Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transportation Study
April 2012
Portland, OR
3
Evaluation Criteria
Pedestrian environment
Minimize crossing delay
Maximize pedestrian accessibility
Transit operations
Maintain transfer
f convenience ((within
h 1 bl
block
k or still
ll at the
h
Square)
Minimize increase in running times/costs
Traffic operations
Do not create problematic intersections
Minimize additional vehicle travel time
Opportunity
pp
y to improve
p
b
bicycle
y facilities
7
Existing Conditions:
Roadway Network
Attractions
Existing Conditions:
Transit Services
10
11
12
Transit Scenario D
13
Bicycles Scenario D
14
Transit operations
8
8,500
500 existing Public Square boardings/alightings moved to adjacent blocks
18 routes with increased travel time
Up to $1.3 million in additional annual operating cost
Traffic
ffi operations
i
9 out of 17 intersections with some additional delay
Maximum additional approach delay of 26 seconds (East Roadway/Superior,
eastbound left turn, PM)
All intersections mitigated
Bicycle infrastructure
Space for east
east-west
west on
on-street
street connection to proposed Neighborhood
Connector
15
Bottom Line
16
Maintains Superior
p
lanes open
p for mixed traffic during
g PM Peak
No change needed to north side of Public Square
No change to transit impacts versus Scenario D
Results in better pedestrian and auto conditions than Scenario D
17
Minneapolis, MN
S ttl WA
Seattle,
18
19
Transit Scenario E
20
Bicycles Scenario E
21
Transit operations
6,300 existing Public Square boardings/alightings moved to adjacent blocks
12 routes with increased travel time
Up to $1.0 million in additional annual operating cost
Traffic operations
10 out of 17 intersections with some additional delay
Maximum additional approach delay of 27 seconds (West Roadway/Superior
& , eastbound thru (buses only) AM, and South Roadway/Ontario,
northbound thru (buses only)
only), AM)
All intersections mitigated
Bicycle infrastructure
Space for east-west on-street connections to proposed Neighborhood
Connector and southern link to Ontario
22
Bottom Line
23
Maintains Superior
p
lanes open
p for mixed traffic during
g PM Peak
No change needed to north side of Public Square
No change to transit impacts
Results in better pedestrian and auto conditions than Scenario E
24
25
Transit Scenario H
26
Bicycles Scenario H
27
Transit operations
17,800 existing Public Square boardings/alightings moved to adjacent blocks
26 routes with increased travel time
Up to $2.8 million in additional annual operating cost
Traffic operations
8 out of 17 intersections with some additional delay
Maximum additional delay of 22 seconds (West 3rd/St. Clair, eastbound left
turn, PM)
All intersections mitigated
Space
S
ffor off-street
ff
bi l facilities
bicycle
f ili i
28
29
Conclusions
Traffic
Scenarios D, E, and H each add a traffic lane to the north side of
Public Square
q
in the PM peak
p
Scenarios D+ and E+ eliminate need to change north side of
Public Square
Off-peak times provides opportunity for Scenario H
Transit
2x and 3x as many riders displaced in Scenario H, than in D or E
Operations 2x and 2.4x more expensive in Scenario H, than in D
and E
Conclusions
Scenario D+ (weekdays) with Scenario H (weekends)
No significant changes to traffic operations
Requires no additional traffic lanes at any time
Maintains pedestrian accessibility and offers bicycle opportunities
Annual additional transit operating cost = up to $1.6 million and
8
8,500
weekday
kd riders
id
moved
d 1 bl
block
k or around
d the
h square
Provides all transportation benefits and land use/urban design
opportunities
Weekdays
Weekends
31