Professional Documents
Culture Documents
qxp:GRAHAM Q7
23/6/08
14:38
Page 133
The slogan another world is possible is regularly seen on anticapitalist protests and the publications of critics of the current system.
For these critics, the ugly face of neo-liberalism massive poverty and
exclusion, exploitation, immiseration, ecological destruction, the perpetuation of a wide range of oppressive and destructive relations, permanent emergency and war is a human construction that can be
reversed or overcome.
As radicals, Laclau and Mouffe would no doubt embrace certain
aspects of this movement. But do they believe in this core proposition?
In certain ways, Laclau and Mouffe do allow for the possibility of
social change through rearticulations and changes in which group is
hegemonic. But in other ways, the core structure of the current system
is put beyond challenge in their approach. There is only one way to
do politics, which is to seek to represent a multitude of floating signifiers under the umbrella of a despotic signifier; ultimately this means
a statist politics, complete with exclusions, violence, alienation and
the rest. This is Laclau and Mouffes major contribution to the strategies of social movements, urging radical activists and single-issue
campaigners to give up on goals of revolution, overthrow and fundamental transformation and instead pursue hegemonic rearticulations
which play by the rules of liberal democracy and recognise their own
particularity and resultant subordination to the states regulatory
function. This would be a dreadful pessimism were it not for the fact
that they also celebrate the possibilities of this radical democratic
practice, constructing a quasi-teleological account of its progress into
an ever-expanding democracy.
Our purpose in this chapter is to stand up for the view that another
world is possible, against what for us appears an almost dystopian
submission to the totalising logic of the dominant system. To seek this
133
23/6/08
14:38
Page 134
23/6/08
14:38
Page 135
23/6/08
14:38
Page 136
23/6/08
14:38
Page 137
23/6/08
14:38
Page 138
23/6/08
14:38
Page 139
23/6/08
14:38
Page 140
23/6/08
14:38
Page 141
23/6/08
14:38
Page 142
23/6/08
14:38
Page 143
23/6/08
14:38
Page 144
23/6/08
14:38
Page 145
23/6/08
14:38
Page 146
23/6/08
14:38
Page 147
23/6/08
14:38
Page 148
23/6/08
14:38
Page 149
23/6/08
14:38
Page 150
23/6/08
14:38
Page 151
23/6/08
14:38
Page 152
23/6/08
14:38
Page 153
23/6/08
14:38
Page 154
23/6/08
14:38
Page 155
23/6/08
14:38
Page 156
Notes
1. Laclau explicitly states that people need an order, and the actual
content of it becomes a secondary situation (1996a: 44). See also Laclau
and Zac (1994) for a particularly systematic statement of Laclaus proorder sentiments.
2. See, for instance, the essays in Howarth et al (2000) applying Laclauian
theory to social movements such as Latin American populism, inter-war
French fascism, Green ideology and Irish Republicanism; Stavrakakis
(2001); Norval (1996).
3. See Kropotkin (2002), Clastres (1989), Sahlins (1972), Lee and DeVore
(1978), Barclay (1982) and Turnbull (1987).
4. The !Kung of the Kalahari Desert, http://www.ucc.uconn.edu/~
epsadm03/kung.html based on Shostak (1981).
5. Robert Redfield, cited at http://anthro.palomar.edu/social/soc_2.htm.
6. anon. (1999), Rumble in the jungle. Fighting for freedom in West
Papua [RJ], Do or Die 8: 231, 230, 232.
7. From OPM/TPN Communiqu 1/12/99, cited http://www.angelfire.
com/zine2/blackstarnorth/tribalwar.html.
8. Hakim Bey, The Temporary Autonomous Zone, at http://www.t0.
or.at/hakimbey/taz/taz3a.htm.
156
23/6/08
14:38
Page 157
157