Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reduced order model for a lithium ion cell with uniform reaction rate
approximation
V. Senthil Kumar*
India Science Lab, General Motors Global R & D, Creator Building, International Technology Park, Whiteeld Road, Bangalore 560066, India
h i g h l i g h t s
< Physics based reduced order model for lithium ion cells.
< Model reduction based on volume averaging and prole based approximations.
< Amenable for battery management system algorithms, detailed parameter estimation etc.
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 16 June 2012
Received in revised form
3 September 2012
Accepted 5 September 2012
Available online 10 September 2012
The detailed isothermal electrochemical model for a lithium ion cell comprises of 10 coupled partial
differential equations (PDEs). It is computationally intensive to use this model for detailed parameter
estimation, battery packs, battery management system algorithms, calendar or cycle life predictions etc.
This work describes a reduced order model framework, which reduces the detailed model PDEs, to
a manageable set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), which can be used for the above applications.
Volume averaging PDEs yield ODEs. Hence volume averaging is the basic method used for model
reduction. The gradient or prole information lost on volume averaging is recovered through prole
based approximations. For the lowest order reduced order model (ROM), a uniform reaction rate,
quadratic electrolyte concentrations and quartic solid phase concentrations are assumed. In this ROM
only 5 linear ODEs are solved, and the rest are nonlinear algebraic evaluations. When compared with the
detailed electrochemical model of a lithium ion cell, this ROM gives negligible error at nominal currents
and a maximum error of about 3% at high currents, for a typical commercial cell.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Lithium ion cell
Reduced order model
Battery management system
Volume averaging
Prole based approximations
electrode particles to form neutral Li species, which then intercalate into lithium metal oxide. The intercalation reactions occurring
during the discharge are reversible and the reverse reactions occur
during charge.
Electrodes contain a solid phase comprising of active materials
(and other additives), and a liquid electrolyte phase. Separator
typically has some solid polymeric membrane and a liquid electrolyte phase. Neglecting the solid additives and inert polymeric
membranes, there are totally ve phases: active materials in the
two electrodes and electrolyte phase in the three regions. For an
isothermal operation of a single cell, drawing the mass and charge
balances for these ve phases, the detailed electrochemical model
comprises of ten coupled partial differential equations (PDEs), Refs.
[1,2]. It is computationally intensive (or often impossible) to use
this detailed electrochemical model for
1. Introduction
0378-7753/$ e see front matter 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.013
427
428
1
ln
Zln
x0
vF
d s1n 1
vx
1
an F
ln
Zln
jn dx 0
x0
1
vF ln
s1n 1
ln
vx x0
an Fhjn i:
(10)
Applying the boundary conditions (2) and (3) as the lower and
upper limits of integration in equation (10) give
I an ln Fhjn i:
(11)
D E
I ap lp F jp :
(12)
D E
an ln hjn it ap lp jp t 0:
v
vx
vF
s1n 1
vx
an Fjn ;
Boundary conditions :
vF
s1n 1
0:
vx xln
(1)
vF1
s1n
I; and
vx x0
(2)
(3)
v
vx
vF
s1p 1
vx
ap Fjp ;
Boundary condition :
vF
I:
s1p 1
vx xL
(4)
vF
s1p 1
0; and
vx xln ls
(5)
(6)
hf in t
1
Aln
Zln
f x; tA dx
x0
hjn it
1
ln
Zln
f x; tdx;
(7)
(13)
It
; and
an Fln
D E
It
jp t
:
ap Flp
(14)
(15)
Equations (14) and (15) relate the volume average reaction rates in
the electrodes to the external current, at any time. These results are
exact, since volume averaging is an exact operation and not an
approximation. Of course, a volume averaged eld equation has lost
information about the prole or gradient of a quantity. The prole
or gradient information will be recovered from the eld equation
by prole approximation, as shown below.
For a constant current discharge, the volume average reaction
rates in the electrodes, equations (14) and (15), are constant. If by
convention, discharge current has a positive sign, then the volume
average reaction rate in the negative electrode is positive, while
that in the positive electrode is negative. These signs are consistent
with the fact that during discharge Li ions are released in the
negative electrode region and consumed in the positive electrode
region.
x0
hf ip t
1
Alp
ZL
f x; tA dx
x ln ls
1
lp
ZL
f x; tdx:
(8)
x ln ls
1
hjn it
ln
Zln
jn x; tdx:
(9)
x0
jn x; tzhjn it
It
; and
an Fln
D E
It
:
jp x; tz jp t
ap Flp
(16)
(17)
429
jn x; t hjn it jdn x; t:
(18)
v
vx
s1n
vF1
vx
It
z an Fhjn it
:
ln
(21)
Eliminating f(t) in equation (20) using equation (21) gives the solid
current in negative electrode, under uniform reaction rate
approximation, as
s1n
vF1
It
ln x:
ln
vx
(22)
Note that equation (22) satises the other boundary condition (2).
Similarly the solid current in the positive electrode, under uniform
reaction approximation is
s1p
vF1
It
x ln ls :
lp
vx
vc2
0;
vx x0
c2 ln ; t c2in ;
(20)
(23)
D2n
vc2
q2in :
vx xln
(25)
(26)
(27)
3 2s
vc2
v
vc
D2s 2 ;
vx
vt
vx
(28)
c2 ln ; t c2in ;
D2s
vc2
q2in ;
vx xln
c2 ln ls ; t c2ip ;
and D2s
vc2
q2ip :
vx xln ls
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
3 2p
vc2
v
vc
D2p 2 ap 1 t jp ;
vx
vt
vx
(33)
c2 ln ls ; t c2ip ;
D2p
(34)
vc2
q2ip ;
vx xln ls
(35)
vc2
0:
vx xL
(36)
and D2p
3.1. Field equations
(24)
(19)
It
0
ln f t:
ln
vc2
v
vc
D2n 2 an 1 t jn ;
vx
vt
vx
D2n
vF
It
s1n 1
x f t;
ln
vx
3 2n
c2 x; 0 c20 :
(37)
430
1
hf is t
Als
lZ
n ls
x ln
1
f x; tA dx
ls
v
vc
1
D2p 2
vx
l
vx
p
p
lZ
n ls
f x; tdx:
(38)
x ln
ZL
xln ls
v
vc
1
vc L
D2p 2 dx
D2p 2
vx
lp
vx
vx xln ls
q2ip
:
lp
(46)
Zln
1
ln
3 2n
x0
vc2
v
vc
D2n 2
vx
vt
vx
an 1 t jn dx:
(39)
In the left hand side of equation (39), the volume average of the
time derivative becomes the time derivative of the volume average
LHS
3 2n
ln
Zln
x0
0
vc2
d B1
dx 3 2n @
dt ln
vt
Zln
1
dhc2 in
C
:
c2 dxA 3 2n
dt
(40)
x0
Zln
v
vc2
1
v
vc
1
vc ln
D2n
D2n 2 dx
D2n 2
vx
ln
vx
ln
vx
vx
vx x0
n
x0
q
2in :
ln
(41)
The volume average of the reaction rate term in the right hand side
of equation (39) is straight forward:
han 1 t jn in
1
ln
an 1 t jn dx an 1 t hjn i:
x0
Putting together the results from equations (40)e(42), and multiplying by the electrode thickness, the volume averaged electrolyte
diffusion equation in the negative electrode region is
dhc2 in
q2in 1 t an ln hjn i:
dt
v
vc
1
D2s 2
vx
ls
vx
s
lZ
n ls
x ln
v
vc
1
vc ln ls
D2s 2 dx
D2s 2
vx
ls
vx
vx xln
q2ip
q
2in
:
ls
ls
(44)
Volume averaging of the accumulation term in equation (28) is as
before. Finally, the volume averaged electrolyte diffusion equation
in the separator region is
ls 3 2s
dhc2 is
q2in q2ip :
dt
dhc2 ip
dt
D E
q2ip 1 t ap lp jp :
(47)
The evolution equations for the average electrolyte concentrations in the three regions, equations (43), (45) and (47), are not
independent of each other. During discharge, in the negative electrode, when an Li ion gets into the electrolyte an electron gets
released into the outer circuit. This electron recombines with some
other Li in the electrolyte within the positive electrode region,
almost instantaneously, neglecting electronic transients. Thus, if
a Li ion is released in the negative electrode region, some other Li
ion gets consumed in the positive electrode region. Hence, an
overall electrolyte balance holds at any time
(48)
dhc2 ip
dhc2 in
dhc2 is
ls 3 2s
lp 3 2p
0:
dt
dt
dt
(49)
Adding up equations (43), (45) and (47), and using the electroneutrality condition (13), it is easily seen that (49) is satised.
In the volume averaged electrolyte diffusion equations (43), (45)
and (47), the interfacial uxes appear explicitly, hence they are
identied as physically relevant internal variables characterizing
the cell behavior. As noted earlier, these volume averaged results
are exact and not approximations, even though they entail loss of
concentration prole or gradient information.
(43)
lp 3 2p
ln 3 2n
Zln
(42)
ln 3 2n
(45)
v
vc
q
D2n 2 z 2in :
vx
vx
ln
(50)
v
vc
q
vc
q
D2n 2
2in 0 D2n 2 2in x f t;
vx
vx
ln
vx
ln
(51)
q
vc
q
@xln : q2in 2in ln f t0f t00D2n 2 2in x:
ln
vx
ln
(52)
vc2
q
q
x2
2in x 0 c2 x; t 2in
f t;
vx
ln D2n
ln D2n 2
(53)
@x ln :
c2in
q2in l2n
f t:
ln D2n 2
(55)
Once the interfacial concentration and ux are known, the electrolyte concentration prole is computed using equation (55). The rest
of the model development focuses on deriving equations for the
interfacial concentration and ux. Applying the volume averaging
denition (7) for the quadratic term appearing in equation (55) gives
Zln
D E
1
1 l3n
l2
x2
n:
x2 dx 0
n
ln
ln 3
3
(56)
q2in 2 2
ln q2in
l c2in
:
2ln D2n 3 n
3D2n
q2in 1 t an ln hjn i:
dt
3D2n dt
(60)
q2ip
v
vc
D2p 2 z
:
vx
vx
lp
(61)
D2p
q2ip
vc2
L x:
vx
lp
(62)
c2 x; t c2ip t
i
q2ip t h 2
lp L x2 :
2lp D2p
(63)
Using the volume average denition (8), the volume average of the
quadratic appearing in the above equation is
D
E
l2p
L x2
:
p
3
hc2 ip c2ip
(57)
lp 3 2p
(58)
(64)
lp q2ip
:
3D2p
(65)
D E
dc2ip l2p 3 2p dq2ip
q2ip 1 t ap lp jp :
dt
3D2p dt
(59)
(66)
For later reference, from equation (63) the electrolyte concentration near the positive collector end is obtained as
c2 x L; t c2ip t
ln 3 2n
q2in tln
:
2D2n
dhc2 in
dc2in
ln dq2in
:
dt
dt
3D2n dt
c2 x 0; t c2in t
x0
hc2 in c2in
(54)
q t 2
ln x 2 :
c2 x; t c2in t 2in
2ln D2n
431
q2ip tlp
:
2D2p
(67)
q2in q2ip
v
vc
D2s 2 z
:
vx
vx
ls
(68)
432
D2s
q2in q2ip
vc2
q2in
x ln :
vx
ls
(69)
c2 x;t c2in t
q2in tq2ip t xln 2
q2in t
:
xln
D2s
2
ls D2s
(70)
c2in c2ip
ls q2in q2ip
2D2s
(71)
ls
3ls
ls
c2in
c2mid hc2 ln ; t
q
q :
2
8D2s 2in 8D2s 2ip
(76)
c2in c2ip
ls q2in q2ip
2D2s
(77)
Substituting this expression for c2in in equation (75) and rearranging gives
(78)
where
This equation can be rearranged as
c2in c2ip
q2in q2ip
;
D2s
ls
2
(72)
hx ln is
1 l2s
ls
;
ls 2
2
x ln 2
E
s
1 l3s
l2
s:
ls 3
3
(73)
hc2 is c2in
ls q2in ls q2ip
:
3D2s
6D2s
(74)
!
l2n 3 2n l2s 3 2s
ln 3 2n ls 3 2s c2in
q lp 3 2p c2ip
3D2n 3D2s 2in
!
l2p 3 2p l2s 3 2s
q ln 3 2n ls 3 2s lp 3 2p c20 :
3D2p 6D2s 2ip
(75)
Now, with four equations for the four unknowns, the formulation is
closed.
For later reference, from equation (70) the electrolyte concentration in the middle of the separator is obtained as
ain
ln ls 3 2n l2s 3 2s l2n 3 2n
2D2s
6D2s 3D2n
;
ln 3 2n ls 3 2s lp 3 2p
(79)
:
ln 3 2n ls 3 2s lp 3 2p
(80)
and
aip
2
ln ls 3 2n l2s 3 2s lp 3 2p
2D2s
3D2s 3D2p
dc2ip
dq2ip
dq
ain 2in aip
:
dt
dt
dt
(81)
dc2in
dt
ain
ls
2D2s
dq2ip
dq2in
ls
aip
:
dt
2D2s
dt
(82)
Equations (81) and (82) express interfacial concentration derivatives in terms of interfacial ux derivatives. Using these equations,
interfacial concentration derivatives are eliminated from equations
(59) and (66) to give
ls ln 3 2n l2n 3 2n
ln 3 2n ain
2D2s
3D2n
dq2in
ln ls 3 2n dq2ip
ln 3 2n aip
dt
2D2s
dt
q2in 1 t an ln hjn i;
and
lp 3 2p ain
(83)
dq2in
dt
lp 3 2p aip
l2p 3 2p
3D2p
D E
q2ip 1 t ap lp jp :
dq2ip
dt
(84)
hand side of the original ODEs (59) and (66) only the interfacial
uxes appear and not the interfacial concentrations. Hence, it was
simpler to eliminate interfacial concentrations using the algebraic
equations (71) and (75), rather than trying to eliminate the interfacial uxes.
4. Total current balance equations
4.1. Field equations
The total current at any point in the cell is the sum of solid current
(Ohmic component in the solid phase), migration current (electrolyte
migration due to electric potential gradient) and diffusion current
(current carried by diffusive ux caused by concentration gradient). In
the separator only migration and diffusion currents exist. The electrolyte potential eld is continuous across the three regions; hence,
like electrolyte concentration eld, electrolyte potential and migration
current continuities apply at the electrodeeseparator interfaces. At the
collector ends, migration currents go to zero and solid currents equal
the external current. At the electrodeeseparator interfaces, solid
currents go to zero, so that the sum of migration and diffusion
currents equals the total current. The interfacial electrolyte potential
and interfacial migration currents are identied as separate
variables, so that is easy to impose them in the individual regions,
and maintain their equality across the interfaces.
l
2
F2 ln s ; t
433
0:
(94)
s1p
vF1
vF
RT
vln c2
k2p 2 2k2p 1 t
I;
F
vx
vx
vx
(95)
F2 ln ls ; t F2ip t;
k2p
(96)
vF2
I2ip t;
vx xln ls
and k2p
(97)
vF2
0:
vx xL
(98)
s1n
vF1
vF
RT
vln c2
k2n 2 2k2n 1 t
I;
F
vx
vx
vx
(85)
For algebraic ease let
vF
k2n 2
0;
vx x0
(86)
F2 ln ; t F2in t;
(87)
vF
and k2n 2
I2in t:
vx xln
(88)
k2s
vF2
RT
vln c2
2k2s 1 t
I;
F
vx
vx
(89)
RT
1 t :
F
(99)
F2 ln ; t F2in t;
(100)
(90)
vF2
I2in t;
vx xln
(91)
F2 ln ls ; t F2ip t;
(92)
k2s
vF
I2ip t:
and k2s 2
vx xln ls
vF2
vln c2
It
2Q
:
k2s t
vx
vx
(101)
(93)
F2 x; t 2Qln c2
It
k2s t
x f t;
(102)
434
0 2Qlnc2mid t
It
ls
l
k2s t n 2
f t;
(103)
F2 x; t 2Qln
c2 x; t
c2mid t
It
ls
x ln
:
k2s t
2
(104)
F2in t F2 ln ; t 2Qln
c2in t
c2mid t
Itls
;
2k2s t
(106)
These interfacial electrolyte potentials will be used while solving
for the electrolyte potential in the electrode regions, to ensure
electrolyte potential continuity.
4.2.2. Negative electrode region
As before the ionic conductivity is assumed to be a function of
the average electrolyte concentration in this region
(108)
"
#
v
It ln x2
vF
vln c2
I:
k2n 2 2k2n Q
vx
ln
2
vx
vx
(109)
"
#
v
It ln x2
k2n F2 2k2n Qln c2 I:
vx
ln
2
c2 x 0;t
Itln
:
c2in t
2k2n
(114)
s1p
(
)
vF1 It
v It xln ls 2
xln ls
:
lp
vx lp
vx
2
(115)
!
c2 x;t
It
xln ls
k2p
c2ip t
It xln ls 2
:
k2p lp
2
(116)
F2 x L; t F2ip t 2Q ln
!
Itlp
c2 x L; t
:
c2ip t
2k2p
(117)
(111)
At x ln :
(110)
It ln x2
k2n F2 2k2n Qln c2 Ix f t;
ln
2
(107)
The solid current term appears in the total current balance for
negative electrode (85). The expression for solid current is taken
from equation (22), rewritten in a once integrated form to facilitate
integration of the total current balance equation,
"
#
vF1
It
v
It ln x2
ln x
:
ln
vx
ln
vx
2
(113)
c2ip t
Itls
and F2ip t F2 ln ls ; t 2Qln
:
2k2s t
c2mid t
s1n
c2 x;t
It
It
l x
ln x2 :
k2n n
c2in t
2k2n ln
(105)
(112)
vc1k
1 v
vc
r 2 D1k 1k ;
2
vt
vr
r vr
k n; p;
(118)
D1k
vc1k
jk ;
vr rrk
(119)
D1k
vc1k
0;
vr r0
(120)
c1k r; 0 c1k0 :
(121)
435
electrode are identical; hence spherical volume average concentration is identical to electrode volume average concentration.
Hence, under this approximation, equations (125) and (127) are
identical.
During discharge, in the negative electrode, when a neutral solid
phase Li is released into the electrolyte as a Li ion and an electron
is released into the outer circuit. This electron recombines with
some other Li in electrolyte within the positive electrode region
(almost instantaneously, neglecting electronic transients), and
forms a solid phase Li. Thus, if a solid phase Li decreases in the
negative electrode, a solid phase Li gets formed at the positive
electrode. Thus, an overall solid phase lithium balance holds at any
time
ln 3 1n hc1n i lp 3 1p c1p ln 3 1n c1n0 lp 3 1p c1p0 Constant:
(128)
Zrk
f
4pr 2 f rdr
r0
4 3
pr
3 k
3
rk3
Zrk
r 2 f rdr:
(122)
r0
Sphere volume averaging the left hand side of equation (118) shows
that volume average of the time derivative is the time derivative of
the volume average
LHS
3
rk3
Zrk
r0
vc1k 2
v 3
r dr
vt r 3
vt
k
Zrk
r 2 c1k dr
r0
dc1k
: (123)
dt
RHS
1 v
vc
r 2 D1k 1k
vr
r 2 vr
3
vc
r 2 D1k 1k
vr
rk3
r k
r0
3
rk3
Zrk
r0
1 v
vc
r 2 D1k 1k r 2 dr
vr
r 2 vr
3j
k:
rk
(125)
From the original initial condition (121), the initial condition for the
above ODE is obtained as
c1k0 c1ko :
(126)
dhc1k i
3hj i
k :
dt
rk
(129)
This equation shows that the rates of change of average solid phase
lithium concentration in the two electrodes are not independent of
each other. For example, if the average solid phase concentration in
the negative electrode is known, that in the positive electrode is
computed from equation (128) as
ln 3
c1p c1p0 1n c1n0 hc1n i:
lp 3 1p
(130)
3 jp
3hjn i
lp 3 1p
0:
rn
rp
(131)
(124)
dc1k
3j
k:
dt
rk
d c1p
dhc1n i
lp 3 1p
0:
ln 3 1n
dt
dt
ln 3 1n
(127)
ak
33 1k
:
rk
(132)
Using these denitions in equation (131) recovers the electroneutrality condition (13) derived in Section 2. Only electrons
move in and out of a sealed lithium cell. Hence, an overall lithium
balance is obviously maintained. Due to electro-neutrality at any
time the total amounts of solid phase Li and electrolyte phase Li
ions are individually constant. Hence, there are separate Li balances
for the solid and electrolyte phases, equations (128) and (48)
respectively. As noted earlier, these volume averaged results are
exact, even though they entail loss of concentration prole or
gradient information.
436
1 v
vc1k
3j
2
r
z k:
D
1k
vr
rk
r 2 vr
(133)
4D1k
2
c
G H:
5
rk 1kr
(142)
1 v
vc1k
r2
2
r
Gt Ht 2 :
D
1k
2
vr
r vr
rk
G
(134)
r2
3
rk3
Zrk
r 2 r 2 dr
r0
3 rk5
3
rk2 :
5
rk3 5
(135)
1 v
vc1k
3
3j
2
r
G H k:
D
1k
5
vr
rk
r 2 vr
(136)
This gives one equation for the two unknowns G and H. Rearranging
equation (134) and integrating once with respect to r gives
6
12D1k
j
c1kr ;
rk k
rk
(137)
c1k
G 2
H
r
r 4 f t;
6D1k
20D1k r 2
r 2 D1k
vc1k
G H 2:
vr
3
5rk
(138)
vc1k
G
H
r
r3 :
3D1k
vr
5D1k r 2
(139)
c1kr h
vc1k
;
vr
(140)
is introduced as a physically relevant variable; an evolution equation for it will be derived by the end of this subsection. For sphere
volume averaging the linear and cubic terms in the right hand side
of (139) the following results are needed:
3
rk3
Zrk
r0
rr 2 dr
3 rk4 3
3
rk ; r 3 3
rk3 4 4
rk
Zrk
r0
r 3 r 2 dr
(144)
@r rk :
csk
G 2
H
r
r 4 f t:
6D1k k 20D1k r 2 k
(145)
c1k csk
r4
3
rk3
G 2
H
r r2
rk4 r 4 :
2
6D1k k
20D1k rk
Zrk
r 4 r 2 dr
r0
(146)
3 rk6 1 3
r :
rk3 6 2 k
3 rk7
3
rk4 :
7
rk3 7
(147)
csk c1k
r5
(143)
r3
15
20D1k
j
c1kr :
rk k
rk
For sphere volume averaging the right hand side, equation (146)
and the following result are needed:
v
vc
r4
vc
r 2 D1k 1k
Gr 2 H 2 0 r 2 D1k 1k
vr
vr
vr
r
r3
r5
G H 2 f t;
3
5r
H
rk2
rk2
G
H:
15D1k
35D1k
(148)
csk c1k
rk
8r
j kc :
35D1k k 35 1kr
(149)
v vc1k
v vc1k
v 1 v
vc1k
2
r
:
D
1k
vr vt
vt vr
vr r 2 vr
vr
(150)
v vc1k
2r
H 2:
vt vr
rk
(151)
(141)
Using equations (140) and (141), sphere volume averaging equation
(139) and simplifying gives
dc1kr
3H
:
2 rk
dt
(152)
dc1kr 30D1k
45
c1kr 2 jk :
dt
rk2
2rk
(153)
These ODEs for the average radial gradient are solved with the
initial conditions
c1kr r; 0 0;
(154)
k n; p;
(155)
where
0:5
jk0 kk cskmax csk 0:5 c0:5
sk c2 ;
2RT
jk
sinh1
:
F
2jk0
(156)
7.2. Electrolyte concentration eld in the electrode and separator
regions
F1 Uk F2
potential eld. In the solid phase, using the reaction rate the solid
phase concentration eld is solved. All the above elds provide
input for the ButlereVolmer kinetics to solve for the solid potential
eld. This computational methodology is used for both the
electrodes. Eventually the cell voltage is computed as the solid
potential difference between the two collector ends.
For the lowest order reduced order model derived here, the
reaction rates in the electrodes are assumed to be the electrode
volume average reaction rates. The salient results of this model are
presented below, in a sequential algorithmic order. This reduced
order model predicts not just the cell voltage, but also the proles
of all the internal variables, subject to the uniform reaction rate and
prole based approximations. The cell voltage and predictions from
the reduced order model are compared with the detailed electrochemical model results in the next section.
7.1. Reaction rates and solid current proles in the electrodes
6. ButlereVolmer kinetics
F
F1 F2 Uk ;
jk 2jk0 sinh
2RT
437
(157)
V F1 x L F1 x 0:
(158)
438
and (95), and two solid phase diffusion equations e equation (118)
applied for negative and positive electrode spheres individually.
The isothermal reduced order model reported herein solves 5 linear
differential equations: two for the interfacial uxes equations (83)
and (84), one for the average concentration in the negative electrode sphere equation (125), and two for the average concentration
gradients in the negative and positive electrode spheres equation
(153). Thus instead of solving 10 coupled PDEs, this ROM solves
only 5 linear ODEs. This complexity reduction was achieved using
uniform reaction rate and prole approximations.
This reduced order model is structured such that nonlinearities
are conned to the nal algebraic evaluations (Computation of
electrolyte potential by analytical integration, e.g. Equation (113)
and inversion of ButlereVolmer kinetics, e.g. Equation (157)) and
the ve ODEs being solved are linear. The ideal model reduction
that can be achieved is abstracted in Fig. 3. A dynamical system of
engineering interest is often described by nonlinear PDEs. Through
suitable approximations one can reduce the dynamical information
into a system of linear ODEs and relegate the nonlinearities to
algebraic expressions, as in this work. The nonlinearity of the
problem, once relegated to algebraic expressions, is not bothersome because linear coupled ODEs can be solved without iteration.
Such a time marching algorithm with minimal computational
complexity is needed for on-board control applications.
7.7. Voltage transients during rest
Uniform reaction rate approximation equates the local reaction
rate everywhere within an electrode to the volume average reaction
rate, and the volume average reaction rate is proportional to the
external current at any time. Hence, if external current is cut off,
under this approximation, reaction rate goes to zero instantaneously.
One of the causes for the voltage transients during rest is the relaxation of concentration gradients within active material spheres. This
phenomenon is captured by the quartic approximation for solid
diffusion presented above. Since the local reaction rate goes to zero
instantaneously under uniform reaction rate approximation, the
average concentration within the active material spheres remains
frozen according to the equation (125). The surface concentration in
an active material sphere given by equation (149), however, can
change as the average radial gradient decreases during rest. Once the
surface concentration feeding into ButlereVolmer kinetics changes,
solid potential changes, leading to voltage transients. The right
hand side of equation (149) shows the two pathways by which
surface concentration relaxes during rest: one by reaction rate and
another by radial concentration gradient. Most of the voltage relaxation during rest is expected to arise from the relaxation of
Nonlinear partial
differential
equations
Approximations
Linear ordinary
differential equations
Nonlinear algebraic
expressions
Fig. 3. Ideal model reduction methodology.
6.5
Error (mV)
439
7.5
8
8.5
9
1000
2000
3000
t (s)
Fig. 5. Absolute error in the cell voltage predicted by the reduced order model at 1C
constant current discharge.
Comsol
ROM
0.2
Error %
3.5
3
0.25
2.5
2
0
1000
2000
3000
t (s)
Fig. 4. Cell voltage predictions from the detailed electrochemical model (Comsol) and
the reduced order model (ROM) at 1C constant current discharge.
1000
2000
t (s)
3000
Fig. 6. Percentage error in the cell voltage predicted by the reduced order model at 1C
constant current discharge.
440
Comsol
ROM
3.5
4.1
Comsol
4.2
ROM
3.9
2.5
3.8
2
0
100
200
t (s)
300
Fig. 7. Cell voltage predictions from the detailed electrochemical model (Comsol) and
the reduced order model (ROM) at 7C constant current discharge.
0.4
60
0.2
100
200
t (s)
300
4000
t (s)
6000
8000
100
1.5
I (A/m )
50
2
2
2.5
0
50
3
3.5
2000
Fig. 12. Percentage error in the cell voltage predicted by the reduced order model for
the low current pulse protocol in Fig. 10.
Error %
8000
0.4
400
Fig. 8. Absolute error in the cell voltage predicted by the reduced order model at 7C
constant current discharge.
100
200
t (s)
300
100
0
400
50
100
t (s)
Fig. 9. Percentage error in the cell voltage predicted by the reduced order model at 7C
constant current discharge.
Fig. 13. A typical high current pulse protocol used to compare the reduced order
model and the detailed electrochemical model.
4.6
20
4.4
10
4.2
I (A/m )
6000
0.2
80
90
4000
Fig. 11. Cell voltage predictions from the detailed electrochemical model (Comsol)
and the reduced order model (ROM) for the low current pulse protocol in Fig. 10.
50
70
2000
t (s)
Error %
Error (mV)
400
10
Comsol
3.8
ROM
20
2000
4000
6000
8000
t (s)
Fig. 10. A low current pulse protocol used to compare the reduced order model and
the detailed electrochemical model.
3.6
0
50
t (s)
100
Fig. 14. Cell voltage predictions from the detailed electrochemical model (Comsol)
and the reduced order model (ROM) for the high current pulse protocol in Fig. 13.
[4] N. Curle, The Laminar Boundary Layer Equations, Oxford University Press,
London, 1962.
[5] E. Glueckauf, Trans. Faraday Soc. 51 (1955) 1540e1551.
[6] C.H. Liaw, J.S.P. Wang, R.A. Greenkorn, K.C. Chao, AIChE J. 25 (1979) 376e381.
[7] D.D. Do, R.G. Rice, AIChE J. 32 (1986) 149e154.
[8] T. Tomida, B.J. McCoy, AIChE J. 33 (1987) 1908e1911.
[9] M. Goto, J.M. Smith, B.J. McCoy, Chem. Eng. Sci. 45 (1990) 443e448.
[10] V.R. Subramanian, V.D. Diwakar, D. Tapriyal, J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 (2005)
A2002eA2008.
Error %
441
Notation
50
t (s)
100
Fig. 15. Percentage error in the cell voltage predicted by the reduced order model for
the high current pulse protocol in Fig. 13.
above elds provide input for the ButlereVolmer kinetics to solve for
the solid potential eld. This computational methodology is used for
both the electrodes. Eventually the cell voltage is computed as the
solid potential difference between the two collector ends.
For the lowest order ROM, a uniform reaction rate, quadratic
electrolyte concentrations and quartic solid phase concentrations
are assumed. In this ROM only 5 linear ODEs are solved, and the rest
are nonlinear algebraic expressions. When compared with the
detailed electrochemical model, this ROM gives a maximum error
of about 0.27% during 1C discharge and about 3.2% during 7C
discharge, for a typical commercial cell.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Mark Verbrugge, Mark Mathias,
Garima Bhatia, Kamakshi Jagannathan, Krishnan Hariharan, Wenbin Gu and Puneet Sinha for their constructive comments/inputs
during the course of model development.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary material associated with this article can be
found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.
2012.09.013.
References
[1] M. Doyle, J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc. 143 (1996) 1890e1903.
[2] V.R. Subramanian, V. Boovaragavan, V.D. Diwakar, Electrochem. Solid-State
Lett. 10 (2007) A255eA260.
[3] M. Guo, G. Sikha, R.E. White, J. Electrochem. Soc. 158 (2011) A122eA132.