Professional Documents
Culture Documents
f o r Coal-Fired U t i l i t y B o i l e r s *
by
R. E.
Thompson, T.
w.
Sonnichsen
KVB, I n c . , T u s t i n , C a l i f o r n i a
92680
and
Dr.
H.
Huang
Argonne N a t i o n a l L a b o r a t o r y , Argonne, I l l i n o i s
60439
INTRODUCTION
NOX is the remaining major or c r i t e r i a p o l l u t a n t t h a t h a s not been e f f e c t i v e l y
reduced to emission l e v e l s approaching 10% or l e s s of t h o s e from a n u n c o n t r o l l e d
s t a t i o n a r y combustion s o u r c e . T h i s i s p a r t i c u l a r l y t r u e a t t h e p r e s e n t i n c o a l - f i r e d
u t i l i t y b o i l e r s because of t h e conversion o f fuel-bound n i t r o g e n i n t h e c o a l t o NO
d u r i n g t h e combustion p r o c e s s .
However, c o a l i s o u r l a r g e s t n a t u r a l f o s s i l f u e l
r e s o u r c e and DOE is r e s p o n s i b l e f o r developing methods o f u t i l i z i n g c o a l i n a n
environmentally a c c e p t a b l e manner.
An i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r i n meeting f u t u r e energy
needs and achieving n a t i o n a l energy independence is our a b i l i t y to expand t h e use of
c o a l i n e l e c t r i c a l power g e n e r a t i o n . C o n s i s t e n t w i t h i t s r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s , EPA h a s
e s t a b l i s h e d r e s e a r c h g o a l s f o r NOx e m i s s i o n s with c o a l of 200 ppm by 1980 and 100 ppm
by 1985. I f it i s e v e n t u a l l y shown t h a t comparable l e v e l s a r e necessary t o maintain
a i r q u a l i t y s t a n d a r d s and c o s t - e f f e c t i v e methods e x i s t , then t h e l i k e l i h o o d o f more
s t r i n g e n t new s o u r c e performance s t a n d a r d s (NSPS) i n t h e mid-1980's e x i s t s f o r coalf i r e d u t i l i t y boilers.
For t h e reasons o u t l i n e d above, a need e x i s t e d t o conduct a comprehensive s t a t e o f - t h e - a r t review o f a l l p o t e n t i a l combustion m o d i f i c a t i o n methods f o r NOx c o n t r o l on
c o a l - f i r e d u n i t s . Combustion m o d i f i c a t i o n h a s i n t h e p a s t been t h e m o s t c o s t - e f f e c t i v e
approach t o l i m i t i n g NOx formation and emissions. With the emergence of s e l e c t i v e
gas-phase NOx decomposition methods, it was d e s i r a b l e to a l s o conduct a review of t h e
m o s t r e c e n t developments i n t h a t f i e l d .
NOX FORMATION
Low excess a i r
Staged combust i o n
Flue g a s r e c i r c u l a t i o n
Corbina t i o n met hods
bituminous/
Coal type
subbituminous
wall f i r e d ,
B o i l e r design
t a n g e n t i a l , cyclone
conventional,
Burner design
low-NOx, advanced concepts
Concerns
C o s t of combustion m o d i f i c a t i o n s
Furnace w a l l c o r r o s i o n
Tube w a l l e r o s i o n
Carbon c a r r y o v e r
Combust ion s t a b i l i t y
Load r e s t r i c t i o n s
Secondary p o l l u t a n t s
Energy p e n a l t i e s
Retrofit applications
Impact on a u x i l i a r y equipment
o p e r a t i o n and maintenance
300-350
300-350
250-300
0.45
0.45
0.45
189
400-500
400-600
250-350
0.6
0.6
0.4
OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
3.
4.
5.
.
.
.
.
.
B.
Operational Factors
Operational Factors
- Flue
Gas R e c i r c u l a t i o n - -
F l u e g a s r e c i r c u l a t i o n w a s found to be a r e l a t i v e l y u n a t t r a c t i v e NOx c o n t r o l
method f o r some of t h e r e a s o n s l i s t e d b e l o w ( 2 ) :
.
.
190
C.
Operational F a c t o r s
.
.
.
.
.
191
1.
Thompson, R. E., Sonnichsen, T. W., Shiomoto, G. H., and Muzio, L. J., "Assessment
of NOx Control Technology f o r Coal-Fired U t i l i t y B o i l e r s , " KVB Report 16400-709,
September 23, 1977.
2.
3.
4.
192
1977.
TABLE 1. COMBUSTION
Basic Wcchanisi
o f COntrOl
Biased F i r i n q
aurncrs a u t
Of scrvice
I ~ C T F ~ S Cf u c l / n i r
r a t i o LO m a p r i t y
>f burncrs
ocrcase f u c l / a i r
a t i o t o active
,umers
'
overfirc A i r
~ n c r e n s ef u e l / a i r
r a t i o to burner9
by d i v c c t i n g conbustion a i r
Flu0 Gas
Pccirculatio"
mduce peak
t1aimc tempera:"re
NOx Reduction
Porcntiol
S i n g l o Pace
Fired
-
Typical
mximvm
0-15%
1%
58
78
30%
35%
158
25%
358
30%
588
30%
301
Horizontally
*sed
Fired
Typical
0-15%
5\
naximur.
15%
88
14\
17%
Tangcntially
Fired
Typical
Haxinm
0-101
10%
4s\
30%
35%
* 0/0.64
-_
0.2/0.75
-_
__
0.2/0.75
Elodiflcatio"
Cost I$/kw)
Ncv/RctrofiC
S i n g l e Face
Fired
-
H O r
Fired
*sed
Z O/O.G4
--
Tangcntiala
Fired
Prirmry
Limitati0"S
Limiting
factor^ I n
Slagginq, smkc,
f l a m instability
carbon c a r r y o v e r
EffecCIVCneSS
Rctrofit
Limitations
Energy
Penaltien
k Y inCeeDLc
slightly
Secondary
POIl"za"t*
operational
and m i n t e n ance Considerations
Impact OD
Auxilialy
Equipmnt
*-sed
Q.2/O.lS
3cgree o f b i a s i n g
*all s l a q g i n g and
:OTrOEion
WgreE of s t a ? i n g ,
! a l l slagginq and
'orrosion
Degrce Of s t a g i n g ,
wall slngging and
.orLon c a r r y o v c r ,
Carbon carryover.
flamc S t a b i l i t y
smke
flame S t a b i l i t y ,
:arbon c a r r y o ~ c r .
.lam stability,
Imke
.make
PulYcrizer and
fan c a p a c l f y ,
f l e x i b i l i t y in
coal f e e d system
'ulVCr1zer
None
No e f f e c t '
Udditionul corntrustion c o n t r o l s .
increased
msintcnanoe
and
an c a p a c i t y ,
. l c x i b i l i t y of
mal feed system
cozrosion
None
No e f f e c t '
'lame
itability
NO
effect'
A d d i t i o n a l cornb u s t i o n COntrOlS,
increased
maintenance
rmace
1.5% due t o
r u x i 1 i a r y fan
Loadings
No e f f e c t +
rube e 1 0 5 i O " .
on l i d i t e d a v a i l a h l o d a t a
193
NO"=
10
effect.
minima1
fan vibration,
increased
~intcnance
tncreased fan
Loading
NO"*
and
indbox configr a t i o n , fan
apacity
NO"=
i d d i t i o n a l conwstion controls,
.nCre&ed
laintenance
m c h 1css Cost
:ffccLivC Lhan
itaging
>*e reported
60
50
40
CQ
t
I
I
0
Crist 6
Edwards 2
Xercer 1
Johnston 2
Widows Creek 5
Shawmee 10
fi
$30
\
a
20
15
10
20
25
30
35
% BOOS
Figure 1.
40
I
0
3o
Gaston 1
ltarlee Branch 3
Four Corners 4
Hatfield 3
dp
on 20
z
0
a
z
% BOOS
Figure 2.
194
50
40
30
Q
.
0
\
20
10
%
Figure 3.
15
BOOS
20
25
30
for Coal-Fired
- - - - - - - -----Units
- - - - - --
'0.5
0.4
Figure 4.
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Annual Production Cost (mills/kWh)
0.5
195