Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HR news reports
&
Business Name
In March 2016, the Supreme Court set aside a number of charges but upheld Quasem Alis
conviction and death penalty in one case of murder. While hearing Quasem Alis appeal,
Chief Justice Surendra Kumar Sinhacriticized the attorney general, prosecutors, and investigators for producing insufficient evidence in the trial court.
On August 24, a group of United Nations experts urged the Bangladeshi government to
annul the death sentence against Quasem Aliand grant him a retrial, noting how the proceedings had reportedly been marred by irregularities. Several prominent international
observers have expressed serious concerns over previous death penalty convictions handed down by the ICT due to concerns over fair trials.
Moulana Delwar
Hossain Sayedee
Quasem Ali was charged with 14 counts of abduction, confinement, and torture, and two
counts of murder allegedly committed by forces under his command, known as the AlBadr, during the war. Quasem Ali was allegedly one of the leaders of Al-Badr, a paramilitary organization that supported the then-West Pakistan army against the East Pakistan
army and was responsible for some of the worst crimes during the independence struggle.
On November 3, 2014, Quasem Ali was found guilty of 10 charges, including two counts of
murder. He was sentenced to death for crimes against humanity on two charges of murder.
Quasem Ali appealed the conviction on November 30, 2014.
On March 8, 2016, the appeals court acquitted Quasem Ali of one count and changed the
penalty in another while upholding eight counts, including a death penalty charge. During
the appeal at the Supreme Court, the chief justice called the prosecution and its investigation agency very incompetent. He accused the prosecution of dealing with gathering evidence in the case against Quasem Ali half-heartedly and with no responsibility. The
chief justice said he was shocked and that the prosecutions case against Quasem Ali
was full of contradictions. He expressed particular concern at the prosecutions failure to
rebut the accuseds alibi defense, which put Quasem Ali in Dhaka on the day of the murder
in Chittagong. Defence could produce a series of documentary evidences in support of
their alibi. But the prosecution and the investigation agency were very incompetent.
Moulana Abdus
Subhan
In March 2016, Quasem Ali filed a petition asking for another review of his case. That petition, his final chance for a rehearing, was denied on August 30.
Trials before the ICT have been replete with violations of the right to a fair trial. Intercepted communications between the prosecution and judges which were leaked to
the Economist revealed prohibited and biased communications that marred several
trials. The ICTs response on several occasions to those who have raised objections
about the trials has been to file contempt charges against them in an apparent attempt to silence criticism rather than to answer substantively or to rectify any errors.
Shaheed Md.
Kamaruzzaman
Shaheed Abdul
Kader Mollah
Shaheed
Mir Quasem Ali