Professional Documents
Culture Documents
90000
100000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
8000
9000
10000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
900
800
2-400E
800
900
1000
400E
2-250E
2-300E
600
700
300E
500
400
300
125E
150E
175E
200E
250E
70 80 90
200
60
100E
50
700
600
500
500
400
400
300
300
200
200
100
90
80
100
90
80
70
70
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
9
8
10
9
8
1
.9
.8
1
.9
.8
.7
.7
.6
.6
.5
.5
.4
.4
.3
.3
.2
.2
.1
.09
.08
.1
.09
.08
.07
.07
.06
.06
.05
.05
.04
.04
.03
.03
.02
.02
70000
60000
80000
90000
100000
CURRENT IN AMPERES
50000
40000
30000
20000
8000
9000
10000
7000
6000
5000
4000
70 80 90
3000
60
2000
50
800
900
1000
40
700
30
600
20
500
8 9 10
400
300
200
.01
5
100
.01
Sometimes a selected ampere rating will fail to meet the coordination requirements in any available speed. In this case the selection of another ampere rating for either the protecting or protected
fuse usually will satisfy all requirements.
Do not assume that other fuses that do not employ S&Cs silver,
helically coiled fusible element construction can better resolve a
coordination impasse than the use of another ampere rating in one
of the S&C speed options. Such other fuses, including time-lag
speeds, super-slow speeds, and high-surge speeds, require the
use of safety-zone or setback allowances and, in addition, they
have larger construction tolerances (plus 20% in current; plus 40%
in terms of time). The application of these two factors will give a time
interval between the adjusted minimum melting curve and the total
clearing curve greater than in the case of S&C speed options.
c1991
TCC NUMBER
119-2
Page 1 of 1
June 17, 1991
TIME IN SECONDS
TIME IN SECONDS
600
40
80E
700
30
65E
20
100
8 9 10
50E
40E
25E
30E
20E
1000
900
800
15E
CURRENT IN AMPERES