Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared By
Ananya Nijhawan
May 14, 2016
Table of Contents
1.0
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................3
1.1 Contact Information and Reporting History.....................................................................3
1.2 Program Summary............................................................................................................3
2.0
PROGRAM IMPACT MONITORING................................................................................3
2.1 Update on Current Community Context...........................................................................3
2.2 Update on Community-Identified Problems to Address...................................................3
2.3 Update on Change Areas...................................................................................................3
2.4 Previously Identified Barriers to Program Success (up to 3)............................................4
2.5 Previously Identified Facilitators of Program Success (up to 3)......................................4
2.6 Potential Barriers to Program Success (up to 3)...............................................................4
2.7 Potential Facilitators of Program Success (up to 3)..........................................................5
2.8 Analysis of Current Results..............................................................................................5
2.9 Learning from Current Results.........................................................................................5
3.0
APPENDIX A PROGRAM LOGICAL FRAMEWORK (Document 905).......................5
Page 2 of 10
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Current
PMEL Lead
Project Lead 1
Project Lead 2
Chapter President
Professional
Mentors
Contact Information
Name
Email
Ananya Nijhawan nijhawaa@mail.uc.edu
Grace Aldredge
ucewb.projects@gmail.com
Colin McConnell
ucewb.projects@gmail.com
Julie Paprocki
zogheise@mail.uc.edu
Mark Miller
mark.miller.cincy@gmail.co
m
Chuck Dragga
dragga@gmail.com
Chapter
Program Title
Community(ies)
Country
Date of 502 Approval
# of months between
this trip and the
previous trip to the site
Date of Baseline Study
Report (901)
Date of This Program
Impact Monitoring
Report (901B)
Phone
513-658-8570
330-322-9083
513-833-5458
216-402-9829
513-706-5072
513-704-0462
University of Cincinnati
Nyambogo Water Supply
Nyambogo
Tanzania
2009
7 months
Page 3 of 10
1.2
Program Summary
2.0
Page 4 of 10
A health organization attempted to build a clinic in the area but did not
have sufficient funds to complete the project. The community has asked
for help from EWB to complete the roof.
2.2
2.3
Page 5 of 10
Change Area
Change in public
health
Change in behavior
The members of the community, especially the women from the subvillages, are willing to provide as much help as required in order to get
easy access to potable water.
This determination is very important as voluntary labor is required from
the community to dig the trenches for the pipes to be laid out.
The success of Phase I of the project in the central Nyambogo area.
Change in access to
services
The center of the community has access to clean drinking water, and
this is in the process of being expanded to three sub-villages.
Only 30% of the community had access to clean drinking water, due to
the distance from the well. 1500 more people (50% total) will have
access to potable water as a result of implementing this project.
Phase II of the project is responsible for this impending change.
Change in technical
knowledge related to
projects
Change in community
organization
Change in community
self-advocacy
Page 6 of 10
Describe changes
Significance of change
Contributions to the change
Explain if no change
2.4
Previously Identified Barriers to Program Success (up to 3)
The cost of pipeline installation is high and the community may not have enough
money to contribute to the installation of the system
A large region of the southern pipeline may have negative pressure and cause an
influx of contaminated groundwater.
2.5
Previously Identified Facilitators of Program Success (up to 3)
The community is very determined to gain access to clean drinking water, and is
therefore willing to provide volunteer labor.
The level of community involvement and interest is very high, which indicates
that a large portion of the population would be willing to use the water system.
The success of Phase I of the project has ensured the confidence of the
community in terms of working with EWB-UC.
2.6
Potential Barriers to Program Success (up to 3)
The community may find it hard to provide compensation for the laborers who are
responsible for digging the trenches. They would like to provide compensation in
the form of food and water for the laborers and their families.
The rainy season lasts until late June, which may delay the digging of trenches,
especially near farmland.
Some of the stakes marking the path of the pipeline may be accidentally
removed by children or animals.
2.7
Potential Facilitators of Program Success (up to 3)
The villagers are well aware of the layout of their land and the location of the
stakes marking the path of the pipeline. This would ensure that they will be able
to dig trenches even if some stakes are accidentally pulled out.
The women are very determined to have the pipeline laid out as soon as
possible, as they have a lot of difficulty walking 3 km every day to obtain water.
Page 7 of 10
The heads of the sub-villages are co-operating and working well with the
Nyambogo Water Committee after requiring some persuasion during the March
2016 trip.
2.8
Analysis Question
To what extent is the program
achieving and influencing the
planned changes or stated
community goals?
Where is the program failing to
influence the planned changes
or stated community goals,
and why?
Are there any negative and or
unexpected changes that have
resulted from the program
implementation? If so, what
are they and why did they
happen?
Considering all parties
involved in the program, how
would you describe your
chapters contribution to the
planned/unexpected changes?
(Very significant, quite
significant, not significant)
2.9
Current Results
The program is well on its way to achieve the goal of providing
clean water to the community. The community has access to
clean, potable drinking water, and 30% of the community is
currently using the well water. This percentage will go up to 50%
of the community, or more, after implementation of Phase II.
The distance of some sub-villages from the center of the
community (where the borehole well is located) deters a large
percentage of the community from using the well water. We are
attempting to improve the situation by building a pipeline that
takes the water to three sub-villages of Nyambogo.
An unexpected change that resulted from program
implementation is government interference. The local district
government is attempting to gain ownership of the water supply
system, as they feel that they have the right to the water and the
money collected from the well users.
Our chapters contribution to the unexpected change does not
seem to be significant at all, as this is a local matter. However,
the community has been pretty firm in its decision to keep
ownership of the water system, and this has significantly helped
reduce government interference and influence.
Analysis Question
What can your team and EWBUSA headquarters learn from
these findings?
Current Results
We learned the importance of ensuring that water is conveniently
accessible. The distance of the sub-villages from the center of
the community played a huge role in determining the number of
people who were able to use the potable water from the well.
This was central to the implementation of Phase II. Also, the
Page 8 of 10
3.0
Program Summary
Overall Goal (higher
purpose)
- Improve personal
health and well-being
of community members
- Create sustainable
source of clean water
Specific Objectives
(outcomes)
- Safe drinking water
- Accessible drinking
water for everyone in
village
Expected Results
(outputs)
- Operational water
collection and
distribution system
- Easy access to water
system via pipe system
Objectively Verifiable
Indicators
- Less time spent
collecting and/or boiling
water before drinking
- Less negative impacts
on health associated with
water
- Quantity of water
available to each
household during dry/wet
seasons
-Level of cleanliness of
water
- Observed evidence of
routine maintenance on
water system done
accurately w/o EWB
Means of Verification
Assumptions
- Water Board
provides employee
to operate/maintain
system
- Measurement of chemicals
and substances in water
- Observation
- Percentage of
households in community
with access to safe water
- Chemical test
- Poll people who purchase
water
- Water flow meter
- Number of people using
water vs total number of
people in community area
- Town cooperates
and collects required
data accurately
- Operators of
system follow
instructions given to
them in a report
- We have or will
have financial
means to implement
such a large system.
- People of village
are able to work
Page 9 of 10
system
Activities (inputs)
- Water collection and
distribution system
specs completed,
contractor selected,
system built, town
trained to use system
- Pipe system specs
completed, contractor
selected, system built,
town trained with how
to maintain system
Resources are:
- Town water Committee
- EWB- GCP
-SHED (Josiah Kawira, et.
Al)
-Village Life Outreach
Program (VLOP) Chris
Lewis
- We have resources
or will have
resources to
complete this project
- Town works
together with us and
allows for our project
to be implemented
as it will work best
Page 10 of 10