You are on page 1of 24

Hypothesis testing of Question

No. 1 & 2
H0: There is no association between Male child preferred over
female child and Parents send only male child for better education.

H1: There is association between Male child preferred over


female child and Parents send only male child for better education.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Quality education * Better School Cross tabulation


Better School
Strongly

Quality education

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

17

14

51

Expected Count

10.7

14.8

9.2

13.3

3.1

51.0

Count

12

31

Expected Count

6.5

9.0

5.6

8.1

1.9

31.0

Count

Expected Count

1.3

1.7

1.1

1.6

.4

6.0

Count

Expected Count

1.5

2.0

1.3

1.8

.4

7.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

1.4

.9

1.3

.3

5.0

Count

21

29

18

26

100

Expected Count

21.0

29.0

18.0

26.0

6.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

33.735a

16

.006

Likelihood Ratio

34.446

16

.005

Linear-by-Linear Association

5.807

.016

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 17 cells (68.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .30.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 4 & 5
H0: There is not any association that male child thought as next
bread winner and female child considered as Socio-Economic
burden.

H1: There is any association that male child thought as next


bread winner and female child considered as Socio-Economic
burden.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Bread Winner * Socio Economic Burden Cross tabulation


Socio Economic Burden
Strongly

Bread Winner

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

11

27

Expected Count

4.0

4.9

8.4

7.0

2.7

27.0

Count

19

32

Expected Count

4.8

5.8

9.9

8.3

3.2

32.0

Count

18

Expected Count

2.7

3.2

5.6

4.7

1.8

18.0

Count

19

Expected Count

2.8

3.4

5.9

4.9

1.9

19.0

Count

Expected Count

.6

.7

1.2

1.0

.4

4.0

Count

15

18

31

26

10

100

Expected Count

15.0

18.0

31.0

26.0

10.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
T54. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

46.863a

16

.000

Likelihood Ratio

46.245

16

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

5.947

.015

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 18 cells (72.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .40.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 6 & 7
H0: There is independency that Liberties enjoyed by the male
and only male child given opportunity to study abroad.

H1: There is dependency that Liberties enjoyed by the male and


only male child given opportunity to study abroad.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Liberties * Abroad study Cross tabulation


Abroad study
Strongly

Liberties

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

20

Expected Count

4.6

5.4

4.2

2.4

3.4

20.0

Count

31

Expected Count

7.1

8.4

6.5

3.7

5.3

31.0

Count

20

Expected Count

4.6

5.4

4.2

2.4

3.4

20.0

Count

21

Expected Count

4.8

5.7

4.4

2.5

3.6

21.0

Count

Expected Count

1.8

2.2

1.7

1.0

1.4

8.0

Count

23

27

21

12

17

100

Expected Count

23.0

27.0

21.0

12.0

17.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

21.010a

16

.178

Likelihood Ratio

25.407

16

.063

Linear-by-Linear Association

4.347

.037

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 18 cells (72.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .96.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 8 & 10
H0: There is no assurance that females only given Peripheral
jobs and feminine gender exempted from harsh remarks at
organization.

H1: There is assurance that females only given Peripheral jobs


and feminine gender exempted from harsh remarks at organization.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

PeriphalJobs * Harsh Remark Cross tabulation


Harsh Remark
Strongly

PeriphalJobs

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

29

Expected Count

5.2

10.4

9.0

2.0

2.3

29.0

Count

11

11

31

Expected Count

5.6

11.2

9.6

2.2

2.5

31.0

Count

12

28

Expected Count

5.0

10.1

8.7

2.0

2.2

28.0

Count

Expected Count

.7

1.4

1.2

.3

.3

4.0

Count

Expected Count

1.4

2.9

2.5

.6

.6

8.0

Count

18

36

31

100

Expected Count

18.0

36.0

31.0

7.0

8.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

21.468a

16

.161

Likelihood Ratio

26.495

16

.047

Linear-by-Linear Association

2.927

.087

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 16 cells (64.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .28.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 11 & 13
H0: There is not stability that Males only subjected to rigorous
and tiring work stress or the males are the work horse of
organization.

H1: There is stability that Males only subjected to rigorous and


tiring work stress or the males are the work horse of organization.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Tiring Work Stress * Workhorse Cross tabulation


Workhorse
Strongly

Tiring Work

Strongly Agree

Stress
Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

20

Expected Count

3.6

8.4

5.0

2.4

.6

20.0

Count

15

31

Expected Count

5.6

13.0

7.8

3.7

.9

31.0

Count

11

29

Expected Count

5.2

12.2

7.2

3.5

.9

29.0

Count

10

Expected Count

1.8

4.2

2.5

1.2

.3

10.0

Count

10

Expected Count

1.8

4.2

2.5

1.2

.3

10.0

Count

18

42

25

12

100

Expected Count

18.0

42.0

25.0

12.0

3.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

23.544a

16

.100

Likelihood Ratio

26.086

16

.053

Linear-by-Linear Association

2.279

.131

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 17 cells (68.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .30.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 11 & 14
H0: There is not stability that Males only subjected to rigorous
and tiring work stress and the males are given field jobs because of
their right.

H1: There is stability that Males only subjected to rigorous and


tiring work stress and the males are given field jobs because of
their right.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Tiring Work Stress * Field Jobs Cross tabulation


Field Jobs
Strongly

Tiring Work

Strongly Agree

Stress
Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

20

Expected Count

4.8

5.6

4.6

4.0

1.0

20.0

Count

10

31

Expected Count

7.4

8.7

7.1

6.2

1.6

31.0

Count

10

11

29

Expected Count

7.0

8.1

6.7

5.8

1.4

29.0

Count

10

Expected Count

2.4

2.8

2.3

2.0

.5

10.0

Count

10

Expected Count

2.4

2.8

2.3

2.0

.5

10.0

Count

24

28

23

20

100

Expected Count

24.0

28.0

23.0

20.0

5.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

23.975a

16

.090

Likelihood Ratio

27.590

16

.035

Linear-by-Linear Association

.318

.573

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 16 cells (64.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .50.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 15 & 17
H0: There is not association that male gender is always preferred
as bread winner and Husband also take part in household activities.

H1: There is association that male gender is always preferred as


bread winner and Husband also take part in household activities.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Pref Bread Winner * Households Cross tabulation


Households
Strongly

Pref Bread

Strongly Agree

Winner
Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

11

10

39

Expected Count

9.4

14.8

8.2

4.3

2.3

39.0

Count

17

37

Expected Count

8.9

14.1

7.8

4.1

2.2

37.0

Count

15

Expected Count

3.6

5.7

3.2

1.6

.9

15.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

1.5

.8

.4

.2

4.0

Count

Expected Count

1.2

1.9

1.0

.6

.3

5.0

Count

24

38

21

11

100

Expected Count

24.0

38.0

21.0

11.0

6.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

24.699a

16

.075

Likelihood Ratio

25.721

16

.058

Linear-by-Linear Association

.901

.343

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 18 cells (72.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .24.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 16 & 18
H0: There is not association that mother considered solely
responsible for childs grooming and Children consider their
mother as their friend.

H1: There is association that mother considered solely


responsible for childs grooming and Children consider their
mother as their friend.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Child Grooming * Friend Consider Cross tabulation


Friend Consider
Strongly

Child Grooming

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

11

24

Expected Count

6.2

7.0

6.5

3.1

1.2

24.0

Count

10

14

13

47

Expected Count

12.2

13.6

12.7

6.1

2.4

47.0

Count

20

Expected Count

5.2

5.8

5.4

2.6

1.0

20.0

Count

Expected Count

1.8

2.0

1.9

.9

.4

7.0

Count

Expected Count

.5

.6

.5

.3

.1

2.0

Count

26

29

27

13

100

Expected Count

26.0

29.0

27.0

13.0

5.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

18.991a

16

.269

Likelihood Ratio

19.326

16

.252

Linear-by-Linear Association

.157

.692

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 15 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .10.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 17 & 19
H0: There is not any association that husband also take part in
household activities and wife is penalized for any mischief of
child.

H1: There is association that husband also take part in household


activities and wife is penalized for any mischief of child.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Households * Mischief of Child Cross tabulation


Mischief of Child
Strongly

Households

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

24

Expected Count

5.8

7.2

6.7

2.9

1.4

24.0

Count

11

11

38

Expected Count

9.1

11.4

10.6

4.6

2.3

38.0

Count

10

21

Expected Count

5.0

6.3

5.9

2.5

1.3

21.0

Count

11

Expected Count

2.6

3.3

3.1

1.3

.7

11.0

Count

Expected Count

1.4

1.8

1.7

.7

.4

6.0

Count

24

30

28

12

100

Expected Count

24.0

30.0

28.0

12.0

6.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

35.496a

16

.003

Likelihood Ratio

39.104

16

.001

Linear-by-Linear Association

4.195

.041

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 16 cells (64.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .36.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 21 & 23
H0: There is independency that female seats are less in national
assembly and female never given presidency because of weak
nerve.

H1: There is dependency that female seats are less in national


assembly and female never given presidency because of weak
nerve.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

NA seats * Presidency Cross tabulation


Presidency
Strongly

NA seats

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

11

34

Expected Count

8.5

8.5

8.5

5.4

3.1

34.0

Count

31

Expected Count

7.8

7.8

7.8

5.0

2.8

31.0

Count

22

Expected Count

5.5

5.5

5.5

3.5

2.0

22.0

Count

Expected Count

2.2

2.2

2.2

1.4

.8

9.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

1.0

1.0

.6

.4

4.0

Count

25

25

25

16

100

Expected Count

25.0

25.0

25.0

16.0

9.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

24.003a

16

.089

Likelihood Ratio

27.039

16

.041

Linear-by-Linear Association

.534

.465

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 15 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .36.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 24 & 25
H0: There is not association that females are not given
opportunities and females doctors waste their studies in house
after marriage.

H1: There is association that females are not given opportunities


and females doctors waste their studies in house after marriage.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Family Burden * After Marriage Cross tabulation


After Marriage
Strongly

Family Burden

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

13

21

Expected Count

4.2

8.4

4.2

2.3

1.9

21.0

Count

27

Expected Count

5.4

10.8

5.4

3.0

2.4

27.0

Count

13

33

Expected Count

6.6

13.2

6.6

3.6

3.0

33.0

Count

14

Expected Count

2.8

5.6

2.8

1.5

1.3

14.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

2.0

1.0

.6

.4

5.0

Count

20

40

20

11

100

Expected Count

20.0

40.0

20.0

11.0

9.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

19.996a

16

.220

Likelihood Ratio

22.339

16

.133

Linear-by-Linear Association

5.083

.024

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 17 cells (68.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .45.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

Hypothesis testing of Question


No. 29 & 30
H0: There is independency that liberalism has reduced the
respect of woman and males are dominant only because of their
superior masculine strength.

H1: There is dependency that liberalism has reduced the respect


of woman and males are dominant only because of their superior
masculine strength.

Level of Significance: = 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:
If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not
reject.

Liberalism * Masculine Strength Cross tabulation


Masculine Strength
Strongly

Liberalism

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

19

Expected Count

7.0

6.1

3.0

2.3

.6

19.0

Count

13

23

Expected Count

8.5

7.4

3.7

2.8

.7

23.0

Count

10

31

Expected Count

11.5

9.9

5.0

3.7

.9

31.0

Count

12

21

Expected Count

7.8

6.7

3.4

2.5

.6

21.0

Count

Expected Count

2.2

1.9

1.0

.7

.2

6.0

Count

37

32

16

12

100

Expected Count

37.0

32.0

16.0

12.0

3.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

28.887a

16

.025

Likelihood Ratio

30.918

16

.014

Linear-by-Linear Association

.002

.961

N of Valid Cases

100

a. 17 cells (68.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .18.

Conclusion:
As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.