1 views

Uploaded by Ammâd Ñãqí

Enjoy it....!

- ITK 226 2 Statistics
- Detection
- 17_HW_Assignment_Biostat.docx
- QNT351 QNT 351.docx
- Deciding on the Number of Classes In
- 2nd semister
- chisquare-Ques
- IN-HOUSE TRAINING AS AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE KNOWLEDGE OF SPECIAL SCHOOL TEACHERS FOR THE DEAF ABOUT AUDIOVISUAL LEARNING MEDIA DEVELOPMENT.
- 3 - Hypothesis Testing
- Usia - fungsi kognitif
- Hypothesis Testing
- sol10
- STATS MC Practice Questions 50 (1)
- Categorical data
- PRINT2
- CIDAM
- Home insurance product evaluation
- MT Chapter 17
- statsfinaldraft 4
- SPSS Getting Started Guide

You are on page 1of 24

No. 1 & 2

H0: There is no association between Male child preferred over

female child and Parents send only male child for better education.

female child and Parents send only male child for better education.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Better School

Strongly

Quality education

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

17

14

51

Expected Count

10.7

14.8

9.2

13.3

3.1

51.0

Count

12

31

Expected Count

6.5

9.0

5.6

8.1

1.9

31.0

Count

Expected Count

1.3

1.7

1.1

1.6

.4

6.0

Count

Expected Count

1.5

2.0

1.3

1.8

.4

7.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

1.4

.9

1.3

.3

5.0

Count

21

29

18

26

100

Expected Count

21.0

29.0

18.0

26.0

6.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

33.735a

16

.006

Likelihood Ratio

34.446

16

.005

Linear-by-Linear Association

5.807

.016

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .30.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 4 & 5

H0: There is not any association that male child thought as next

bread winner and female child considered as Socio-Economic

burden.

bread winner and female child considered as Socio-Economic

burden.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Socio Economic Burden

Strongly

Bread Winner

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

11

27

Expected Count

4.0

4.9

8.4

7.0

2.7

27.0

Count

19

32

Expected Count

4.8

5.8

9.9

8.3

3.2

32.0

Count

18

Expected Count

2.7

3.2

5.6

4.7

1.8

18.0

Count

19

Expected Count

2.8

3.4

5.9

4.9

1.9

19.0

Count

Expected Count

.6

.7

1.2

1.0

.4

4.0

Count

15

18

31

26

10

100

Expected Count

15.0

18.0

31.0

26.0

10.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

T54. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

46.863a

16

.000

Likelihood Ratio

46.245

16

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

5.947

.015

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .40.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.

No. 6 & 7

H0: There is independency that Liberties enjoyed by the male

and only male child given opportunity to study abroad.

only male child given opportunity to study abroad.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Abroad study

Strongly

Liberties

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

20

Expected Count

4.6

5.4

4.2

2.4

3.4

20.0

Count

31

Expected Count

7.1

8.4

6.5

3.7

5.3

31.0

Count

20

Expected Count

4.6

5.4

4.2

2.4

3.4

20.0

Count

21

Expected Count

4.8

5.7

4.4

2.5

3.6

21.0

Count

Expected Count

1.8

2.2

1.7

1.0

1.4

8.0

Count

23

27

21

12

17

100

Expected Count

23.0

27.0

21.0

12.0

17.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

21.010a

16

.178

Likelihood Ratio

25.407

16

.063

Linear-by-Linear Association

4.347

.037

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .96.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 8 & 10

H0: There is no assurance that females only given Peripheral

jobs and feminine gender exempted from harsh remarks at

organization.

and feminine gender exempted from harsh remarks at organization.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Harsh Remark

Strongly

PeriphalJobs

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

29

Expected Count

5.2

10.4

9.0

2.0

2.3

29.0

Count

11

11

31

Expected Count

5.6

11.2

9.6

2.2

2.5

31.0

Count

12

28

Expected Count

5.0

10.1

8.7

2.0

2.2

28.0

Count

Expected Count

.7

1.4

1.2

.3

.3

4.0

Count

Expected Count

1.4

2.9

2.5

.6

.6

8.0

Count

18

36

31

100

Expected Count

18.0

36.0

31.0

7.0

8.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

21.468a

16

.161

Likelihood Ratio

26.495

16

.047

Linear-by-Linear Association

2.927

.087

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .28.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 11 & 13

H0: There is not stability that Males only subjected to rigorous

and tiring work stress or the males are the work horse of

organization.

tiring work stress or the males are the work horse of organization.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Workhorse

Strongly

Tiring Work

Strongly Agree

Stress

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

20

Expected Count

3.6

8.4

5.0

2.4

.6

20.0

Count

15

31

Expected Count

5.6

13.0

7.8

3.7

.9

31.0

Count

11

29

Expected Count

5.2

12.2

7.2

3.5

.9

29.0

Count

10

Expected Count

1.8

4.2

2.5

1.2

.3

10.0

Count

10

Expected Count

1.8

4.2

2.5

1.2

.3

10.0

Count

18

42

25

12

100

Expected Count

18.0

42.0

25.0

12.0

3.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

23.544a

16

.100

Likelihood Ratio

26.086

16

.053

Linear-by-Linear Association

2.279

.131

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .30.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 11 & 14

H0: There is not stability that Males only subjected to rigorous

and tiring work stress and the males are given field jobs because of

their right.

tiring work stress and the males are given field jobs because of

their right.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Field Jobs

Strongly

Tiring Work

Strongly Agree

Stress

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

20

Expected Count

4.8

5.6

4.6

4.0

1.0

20.0

Count

10

31

Expected Count

7.4

8.7

7.1

6.2

1.6

31.0

Count

10

11

29

Expected Count

7.0

8.1

6.7

5.8

1.4

29.0

Count

10

Expected Count

2.4

2.8

2.3

2.0

.5

10.0

Count

10

Expected Count

2.4

2.8

2.3

2.0

.5

10.0

Count

24

28

23

20

100

Expected Count

24.0

28.0

23.0

20.0

5.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

23.975a

16

.090

Likelihood Ratio

27.590

16

.035

Linear-by-Linear Association

.318

.573

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .50.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 15 & 17

H0: There is not association that male gender is always preferred

as bread winner and Husband also take part in household activities.

bread winner and Husband also take part in household activities.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Households

Strongly

Pref Bread

Strongly Agree

Winner

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

11

10

39

Expected Count

9.4

14.8

8.2

4.3

2.3

39.0

Count

17

37

Expected Count

8.9

14.1

7.8

4.1

2.2

37.0

Count

15

Expected Count

3.6

5.7

3.2

1.6

.9

15.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

1.5

.8

.4

.2

4.0

Count

Expected Count

1.2

1.9

1.0

.6

.3

5.0

Count

24

38

21

11

100

Expected Count

24.0

38.0

21.0

11.0

6.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

24.699a

16

.075

Likelihood Ratio

25.721

16

.058

Linear-by-Linear Association

.901

.343

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .24.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 16 & 18

H0: There is not association that mother considered solely

responsible for childs grooming and Children consider their

mother as their friend.

responsible for childs grooming and Children consider their

mother as their friend.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Friend Consider

Strongly

Child Grooming

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

11

24

Expected Count

6.2

7.0

6.5

3.1

1.2

24.0

Count

10

14

13

47

Expected Count

12.2

13.6

12.7

6.1

2.4

47.0

Count

20

Expected Count

5.2

5.8

5.4

2.6

1.0

20.0

Count

Expected Count

1.8

2.0

1.9

.9

.4

7.0

Count

Expected Count

.5

.6

.5

.3

.1

2.0

Count

26

29

27

13

100

Expected Count

26.0

29.0

27.0

13.0

5.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

18.991a

16

.269

Likelihood Ratio

19.326

16

.252

Linear-by-Linear Association

.157

.692

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .10.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 17 & 19

H0: There is not any association that husband also take part in

household activities and wife is penalized for any mischief of

child.

activities and wife is penalized for any mischief of child.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Mischief of Child

Strongly

Households

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

24

Expected Count

5.8

7.2

6.7

2.9

1.4

24.0

Count

11

11

38

Expected Count

9.1

11.4

10.6

4.6

2.3

38.0

Count

10

21

Expected Count

5.0

6.3

5.9

2.5

1.3

21.0

Count

11

Expected Count

2.6

3.3

3.1

1.3

.7

11.0

Count

Expected Count

1.4

1.8

1.7

.7

.4

6.0

Count

24

30

28

12

100

Expected Count

24.0

30.0

28.0

12.0

6.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

35.496a

16

.003

Likelihood Ratio

39.104

16

.001

Linear-by-Linear Association

4.195

.041

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .36.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.

No. 21 & 23

H0: There is independency that female seats are less in national

assembly and female never given presidency because of weak

nerve.

assembly and female never given presidency because of weak

nerve.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Presidency

Strongly

NA seats

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

11

34

Expected Count

8.5

8.5

8.5

5.4

3.1

34.0

Count

31

Expected Count

7.8

7.8

7.8

5.0

2.8

31.0

Count

22

Expected Count

5.5

5.5

5.5

3.5

2.0

22.0

Count

Expected Count

2.2

2.2

2.2

1.4

.8

9.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

1.0

1.0

.6

.4

4.0

Count

25

25

25

16

100

Expected Count

25.0

25.0

25.0

16.0

9.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

24.003a

16

.089

Likelihood Ratio

27.039

16

.041

Linear-by-Linear Association

.534

.465

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .36.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 24 & 25

H0: There is not association that females are not given

opportunities and females doctors waste their studies in house

after marriage.

and females doctors waste their studies in house after marriage.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

After Marriage

Strongly

Family Burden

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

13

21

Expected Count

4.2

8.4

4.2

2.3

1.9

21.0

Count

27

Expected Count

5.4

10.8

5.4

3.0

2.4

27.0

Count

13

33

Expected Count

6.6

13.2

6.6

3.6

3.0

33.0

Count

14

Expected Count

2.8

5.6

2.8

1.5

1.3

14.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

2.0

1.0

.6

.4

5.0

Count

20

40

20

11

100

Expected Count

20.0

40.0

20.0

11.0

9.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

19.996a

16

.220

Likelihood Ratio

22.339

16

.133

Linear-by-Linear Association

5.083

.024

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .45.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 29 & 30

H0: There is independency that liberalism has reduced the

respect of woman and males are dominant only because of their

superior masculine strength.

of woman and males are dominant only because of their superior

masculine strength.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Masculine Strength

Strongly

Liberalism

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

19

Expected Count

7.0

6.1

3.0

2.3

.6

19.0

Count

13

23

Expected Count

8.5

7.4

3.7

2.8

.7

23.0

Count

10

31

Expected Count

11.5

9.9

5.0

3.7

.9

31.0

Count

12

21

Expected Count

7.8

6.7

3.4

2.5

.6

21.0

Count

Expected Count

2.2

1.9

1.0

.7

.2

6.0

Count

37

32

16

12

100

Expected Count

37.0

32.0

16.0

12.0

3.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

28.887a

16

.025

Likelihood Ratio

30.918

16

.014

Linear-by-Linear Association

.002

.961

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .18.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.

- ITK 226 2 StatisticsUploaded bydgooo
- DetectionUploaded byGinny Wilson
- 17_HW_Assignment_Biostat.docxUploaded byjhon
- QNT351 QNT 351.docxUploaded by116117Math
- Deciding on the Number of Classes InUploaded byPayal Anand
- 2nd semisterUploaded bychishtykhalid
- chisquare-QuesUploaded bySuranjit Roy
- IN-HOUSE TRAINING AS AN EFFORT TO IMPROVE KNOWLEDGE OF SPECIAL SCHOOL TEACHERS FOR THE DEAF ABOUT AUDIOVISUAL LEARNING MEDIA DEVELOPMENT.Uploaded byIJAR Journal
- 3 - Hypothesis TestingUploaded byEmRan Leghari
- Usia - fungsi kognitifUploaded byNurfitri Rahmani Awaliyah
- Hypothesis TestingUploaded byKodhans
- sol10Uploaded bycarl domingo
- STATS MC Practice Questions 50 (1)Uploaded bySta Ker
- Categorical dataUploaded byvelkus2013
- PRINT2Uploaded byAnonymous rNmOyeE
- CIDAMUploaded byJay R Mcjunes Valiao
- Home insurance product evaluationUploaded byZvo Unil
- MT Chapter 17Uploaded byWilson Lim
- statsfinaldraft 4Uploaded byapi-318373346
- SPSS Getting Started GuideUploaded bymehrinfatima
- Group 3 Class C - Parking Area of RSUP Dr. SardjitoUploaded byYunitha Ratnadilla
- The Average Output Power of a Wind Turbine in Turbulant WindUploaded byKausihan Selvam
- Final DigUploaded bysuhanareshh
- 16762-19119-1-PBUploaded byJik
- Excercises in Basic Statistics Using R, TEACHERUploaded byUZAMA
- 1Uploaded byZain Nabi
- National Refereed Article by Karl E. Payton and Joyce A. Scott - Title: Communication Apprehension among Homeschooled College Freshman Journal: FOCUS ON COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND SCHOOLSUploaded byAnonymous sewU7e6
- Tabel Hasil SpssUploaded byJason Carter
- 6 Hypothesis TestingUploaded byMuhaini Mmj
- An Investigation into the Effects of Applying Management Information Systems (MIS) on Managers? Decision Making in Universities (Case Study: Universities & Higher Education Institutes in the City of Qom)Uploaded byTI Journals Publishing

- A.N Ron JohnsonUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Road to hellUploaded byvssm123
- An STM Exercise#1Uploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Role ProfileUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Leadership CaseUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Leadership LEC#3(Skills Approach)Uploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- British Council Core Skills Nov 2014Uploaded byImran Hasan
- Final Report on PTCLUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Assignment on elements and process of.docxUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- The Road to Hell is Paved With Good IntentionsUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- QuestionnaireUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Strategic Design LensUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- FInal Report on PTVUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- 3 Design LensUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí

- kenningsUploaded bywolf helser
- structure of matter power pointUploaded byapi-297580036
- UEE_UNIT-4Uploaded byDilip TheLip
- African Language Policies.pdfUploaded byBrad
- An Interview with William Warren Bartley III and Werner ErhardUploaded byTim20C
- Manual D403-N3046.pdfUploaded byBob Wiggins
- Newborn Nursing CareplanUploaded bySamantha Miller
- inclusive education assignment 2Uploaded byapi-435535701
- Module 4.ScilabUploaded byorg25gr
- Avant-Garde and After_Brandon Taylor_1Uploaded byJorge Santana
- 2015.127155.the Saint of SringeriUploaded byrajagopalan19
- 39.pdfUploaded byAnonymous ypKkMdvUv4
- MATHEMATICAL COMBINATORICS (INTERNATIONAL BOOK SERIES), Volume 3 / 2012Uploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- Psycho Pharmacology and Anti Anxiety DrugsUploaded bymanu sethi
- Case Study 86Uploaded byEciOwnsMe
- Open Channel (Rakshith)Uploaded bySudeepSMenasinakai
- Swinburne, Ross, And the Cosmological ArgumentUploaded byMegan Casey
- Key Statistics About Children and Young People HandoutUploaded byValen Cook
- 2011 Report on ProgressUploaded byEnrique Kaufmann
- 510 Final Design ProposalUploaded byjstieda6331
- 10.1.1.87.15Uploaded byKODOM
- Miracles+Of+The+Gods+_+VON+DANIKEN-highlighted+Dr.RK.pdfUploaded byArgelBlas
- GEOMETRIC CALCULATIONS OF THE CHAMFERED TIP AND THE PROTUBERANCE UNDERCUT OF A TOOTH PROFILEUploaded byAbhishek Joshi
- Aquinas Treatise on LawUploaded byEmerson Cajayon Maala
- jpa-27-4-258Uploaded byCatarina C.
- Administrating the TREX Queue ServerUploaded bynishadabd
- Crim ChartsUploaded byjoeg11781
- Online Recruitment System(1)Uploaded byHarichandran Karthikeyan
- Introduction MidhunUploaded byVignesh Vijayan
- Developing a Framework for a Seamless K-12Uploaded byRyan Leocario