Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Document 1235
Filed 09/09/16
Page 1 of 2
KENNETH MEDENBACH,
Defendant(s).
Defendant, Kenneth Medenbach, through hybrid counsel, Matthew Schindler
submits the following proposed instruction supplementing Ninth Circuit Model Jury
Instruction 8.39 (Theft of Government Money or Property) regarding the intent to
deprive the government of the beneficial use of the property required under 18 USC
641.
The intent, which is required to constitute a violation of 641, is
the intent to appropriate the property to a use inconsistent with
the owner's rights and benefits. A temporary interference with
the owners possession of the property is insufficient.
The requested language is supported by Ailsworth v. United States, 448 F.2d
439, 442 (9th Cir. 1971); see United States v. Trinder, 1 F.Supp. 659 (D.C.,
1932)(court acquitted defendants because they took vehicle with intent to return it
Page 1 PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTION ON INTENT REQUIRED FOR A VIOLATION OF 18
USC 641
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR
Document 1235
Filed 09/09/16
Page 2 of 2
which was inconsistent with the common law of theft incorporated into former 18
USC 641), and the comment concerning that case in Morissette v. United States,
342 U.S. 246 (1952), at 266, n. 28, 72 S.Ct. 240, 96 L. Ed. 288.