Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Of
SUDHA
A Project Report
Under the guideline of
Acknowledgement
First I would like to thank the Almighty God with his blessing; I
have completed this report successfully. It was a big challenge
in completing this report as part of MBA program. I would also
like to thank my guardian, without whom this effort would have
been worth nothing. Their love, support and patience have
taught me about sacrifice, discipline and compromise.
I would like to express my gratitude to my respectable
supervisor Mr. Birendra kumar, Asst. General Manager (A/C)
COMPFED, Patna for his continuous support, inspiration and
greatly appreciation to prepare this internship report on
Analyzing Financial Performance of Sudha. Preparing
this report was a valuable experience for me. It acts as a
window to the real life practice.
This report is combined effort of all and without their
participation it would have been so difficult for me to complete
it in short time.
Finally, I would like to thank all others whose strong supports
make me able to complete this report.
Bonafide Certificate
Signature
Signature
Executive Summary
The training at Bihar State Milk Co-operative Federation LTD
(SUDHA) In Patna helped me gain the practical experience and the study
conducted by mecenters around the importance and position of different dairy
industries.
A thriving dairy sector is of vital importance to every person specially farmers.
It provides milk, Ghee, Cheese other products to every person. It provides a
source of income to rural and urban enterprises and productive individuals and
also a way for the farmers to make their living standard high. During my
summer training in COMPFED (SUDHA)
, the basic focus of my training was on financial statement of SUDHA. Under
this project I had to find out the different players carrying on business of liquid
milk in Bihar and also their market share in the same region. After that we had
to make comparative analysis so that we can recommend suggestion to the
SUDHA to increase its share in the market in Bihar. The training was quite a
comprehensive one in itself; it helped us to have the knowledge in the
following
Table of Contents
Chapter
no.
Title
Introduction
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Page
no.
7
8
9
9
9
10
12
14
18
19
20
22
23
24
25
25
3.1
Financial Performance
Analysis
3.2
Balance Sheet
3.3
Income Statement
3.4
Ratio Analysis
3.5
Trend Analysis
Financial Analysis of Sudha
27
4.1
Quantitative Analysis of
Sudha
Major Findings
43
5.1
5.2
5.3
60
61
62
Findings on Sudha
Conclusion 6
Recommendations
27
28
28
41
10
1.6. Methodology
1.6.1 Type of Research
This report is descriptive in type that briefly reveals the
overall financial activities performed by Compfed.
Collection of primary and secondary data has been
required for the analysis. Annual reports of Sudha were
the source of secondary data in this regard. Ratio
analysis and Trend analysis have also been used as
major tools for the financial performance analysis of
Sudha.
1.6.2 Types of Data Used
In order to analyze the financial performance of Sudha
two types of data have been used. These are as
follows: Primary Data-data observed or collected from
firsthand experience.
Secondary Data-published data and the data
collected in the past or by other parties.
11
12
14
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal
Pradesh
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya
Pradesh
Orissa
Co-operative Unions
Andhra Pradesh Dairy
Development Co-operative
Federation Limited (APDDCF)
Bihar State Co-operative Milk
Producers Federation Limited
(COMPFED)
Gujarat Co-operative Milk
Marketing Federation Limited
(GCMMF)
Haryana Dairy Development Cooperative Federation Limited
(HDDCF)
Himachal Pradesh State Cooperative Milk Producer
Federation Limited (HPCMPF)
Karnataka Co-operative Milk
Producer Federation Limited (KMF)
Kerala State Co-operative Milk
Marketing Federation Limited
(KCMMF)
Madhya Pradesh State Cooperative Dairy Federation
Limited (MPCDF)
Orissa State Co-operative Milk
Producer Federation Limited
(OMFED)
16
Brands
Vijiya
Sudha
Amul, Sagar
Vita
Nandini
Milma
Sanchi ,
Shakti, Sneha
OMFED
Uttar
Pradesh
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
West
Bengal
Goa
Jammu
Pondicherry
Sikkim
Tripura
Parag
Verka
Saras
Aavin
Benmilk
Goadairy
Jamfed
Ponlait
Sikkimilk
Gomati
2.
Barouni Begusarai,
Khagaria, Lakhisarai and
part of Patna District.
3.
Barauni Milk
Union,
Barauni (DRMU)
Tirhut Milk Union,
Muzaffarpur
(Timul)
Muzaffarpur Muzaffarpur,
Sitamarhi, Sheohar, E.
Champaran, Siwan,
Gopalganj & West
Champaran districts.
Samastipur, Darbhanga &
Madhubani district.
4.
Mithila Milk
Union,
Samastipur
5.
Shahabad Milk
Union,
Ara
6.
Bhagalpur Milk
Union, Bhagalpur
18
COMFED
Milk Unions
Primary Milk CoSociety
20
MILK:
Sudha
Sudha
Sudha
Sudha
Sudha
Gold
Shakti
Healthy
Smart
Lite
Milk Products:
Ghee
Ice-Cream
Lassi
Misthi Dahi
Peda
Kalakand
2.3. Marketing
In the initial years, the emphasis of Compfed was on
organising DCS and educating farmers. In the initial
years the milk sale moved at snail's speed from 100.55
thousand litres per day in 1987-88 to 106.54 thousand
litres per day (TLPD) in 1992-93. However, strategies
adopted in 1993-94, changed the trend completely.
Year 2003 was declared as "Market Development Year".
The daily average milk marketing has now reached a
21
Milk Marketing
in '000 lts per day
Milk
Union/Unit
198788
199798
200304
200607
201112
2012-13
Patna
31.54
68.84
103.72
124.46
177.36
186.72
Jamshedpur
21.91
53.41
69.44
87.41
121.35
123.06
Ranchi
7.09
30.02
51.51
65.35
90.18
99.85
Bokaro
10.84
26.26
42.13
54.95
59.23
63.36
Muzaffarpur
22.91
27.49
51.87
55.79
88.40
102.51
3.88
6.78
14.19
15.56
32.32
38.64
3.75
6.83
8.48
20.63
23.67
2.47
6.85
41.33
48.55
66.78
81.91
Samastipur
21.55
54.43
56.84
100.22
110.51
Shahabad
0.04
16.02
14.72
34.19
37.36
Kosi
Delhi
25.87
31.46
Gaya
Vikramshila
Barauni
22
20.86
Total
100.55
245.02
451.46
532.11
816.53
919.89
2.4. Plants
Processing Capacities
Name of the
Plant
Capacity(TLPD)
Management
Patna
150.0
VPMU
Barauni
300.0
BMU
Muzaffarpur
150.0
TIMUL
Samastipur
250.0
MMU
Arrah
100.0
SMU
Jamshedpur
100.0
COMFED
Ranchi
100.0
COMFED
Bokaro
100.0
COMFED
Bhagalpur
60.0
VIMUL
Gaya
35.0
COMFED
Purnia
10.0
BMU
Kaimur
10.0
SMU
Gopalganj
10.0
TMU
Darbhanga
20.0
MMU
Biharsharif
400.0
VPMU
Total
1795.0
23
Capacity(TLPD)
Mgmt.
Hajipur
60.0
VPMU
Sitamarhi
20.0
TMU
Khagaria
40.0
BMU
Rosera
20.0
MMU
Kochas
10.0
SMU
Dumraon
10.0
SMU
Motihari
20.0
TMU
Total
180.0
Bulk Coolers
Mgmt.
Nos.
Capacity(TLPD
)
VP Milk Union
34
97.0
DR Milk Union
22
89.0
19
85.0
Vikramshila
Milk Union
17
57.0
26
41.5
18
47.0
32.0
32.0
Magadh
Project
Dairy
24
Total
151
480.5
Other Plants
Plant
Capacity
CFP, Patna
100 MTD
CFP, Ranchi
100 MTD
CFP, Kanti,Muz'pur
60 MTD
Ice-cream plant,Patna
3TLPD
2.5. Procurements
The milk procurement during 1994-95 averaged 114.32
thousand kgs. Per day which jumped more than five
times to around 608.38 TKPD in 2006-07 but the
devastating floods in July-Sept 2007 and also during
second half of 2008 had very severe effect on the
production of milk and its procurement by DCS. In
2008-09, it fell down to 415.36 TKPD but due to
sustained efforts it again picked up the momentum.
The daily average milk procurement during 2011-12
was 1074.92 TKPD.
Unit wise Milk Procurement
25
198
7-88
1997
-98
2003
-04
2006
-07
201011
2011
-12
Barauni
20.5
7
65.93
135.0
0
173.6
9
333.0
8
314.1
2
Muzaffarp
ur
10.7
7
24.43
52.84
87.13
118.1
3
115.1
2
Samastip
ur
7.44
32.00
69.86
129.8
5
248.1
3
250.9
9
Patna
30.1
8
56.18
102.6
6
157.3
3
221.2
3
210.1
5
Shahabad
8.77
29.99
45.41
123.7
5
129.4
4
Vikramshi
la
1.41
2.81
3.27
7.78
35.05
35.73
Gaya
.68
.0.15
3.55
2.42
10.76
7.50
Kosi
6.29
7.13
Ranchi
5.35
6.06
4.78
4.95
4.74
71.0
5
213.1
9
403.0
0
608.3
8
1101.
38
1074
Total
26
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
2011-12
50%
2010-11
40%
2006-07
30%
2003-04
1997-98
20%
1987-88
10%
0%
Cleaning Section
Quality Control Section
2.7. Organisational Structure:COMPFED
COMPFED
Chairman (IAS)
Deputy Manager
Assistant Manager
Technical Officer
&
Milk Procurement Officer
28
Processing
Employees
Marketing
29
30
A. Analyzing Liquidity
Liquidity refers to the ability of a firm to meet its
short-term financial obligations when and as they
come due. It also refers to the solvency of the
firms overall financial position
The main concern of liquidity ratio is to measure
the ability of the firms to meet their short-term
maturing obligations. Failure to do this will result in
the total failure of the business, as it would be
forced into liquidation.
The three basic measures of liquidity are1. Net Working Capital: A measure of liquidity
calculated by subtracting total current assets by
current liabilities. Current assets normally include cash,
marketable securities, accounts receivable and
inventories. Current liabilities consist of accounts
35
37
39
40
45
47
Authorized
Capital
Paid-Up
Capital
48
Reserve &
Surplus
2013
1,50,000,000
1,25911408.40
2012
1,50,000,000
1,18747430.40
2011
2010
2009
1,50,000,000
1,50,000,000
1,50,000,000
112004754.40
106980085.40
106980085.40
12,54,838,018.
52
1089910457.55
926929400.98
800006508.80
168506808.36
Graphical Presentation:
1400000000
1200000000
1000000000
800000000
Authorized Capital
Paid-up Capital
600000000
400000000
200000000
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Interpretation:
The authorized capital is same every year but Paid up
Capital and Reserve & surplus is sufficiently increase
per year that is a positive sign for Sudha. From 2009 to
2013 it increase approximately six times and it can be
increase more by proper increasing paid up capital.
II. Current Ratio:
49
Current Asset
541448278.91
726721698.13
812502793.39
1,139,511,695.82
Current liabilities
574574400.43
627098529.74
859032934.71
9,19,65,3470.97
Current Ratio
0.942
1.159
0.946
1.239
Graphical Presentation:
Current ratio
1.4
1.2
1
Current ratio
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
Interpretation:
The short-term financial solvency of Sudha is better position in last
four years, because the current ratio was in acceptable limit. The
company can increase its current assets and reduce its current
liabilities for more CR.
50
Current Asset
1466989113.92
1718384416.53
2229262056.35
2600424522.82
Current Liability
11014074.70
627098529.74
14867733.43
57942944.83
1500000000
1000000000
500000000
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
Interpretation:
We know that acceptable of net working capital (NWC) is 1:1. The
net working capital of Sudha is extremely satisfactory over all the last
51
Sales
2893786668.89
3375126124.83
4327487151.49
6414476264.40
Graphical Presentation:
2010
2011
2012
2013
Interpretation:
52
Sales
2893786668.89
3375126124.83
4327487151.49
6,414,476,264.40
Total Asset
831737146.44
1037626798.87
1047186766.11
1505017882.37
Graphical Presentation:
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
53
Interpretation:
The acceptable of total asset turnover for large organization is two
times. The total asset turnover ratio of Sudha indicates that total assets
are efficiently used to generate sales throughout the period from 2010
to 2013. This ratio was 3.479 in 2010, 3.253 in 2011which show the
decreasing pattern and 4.134 in 2012. So the ratio showed an
increasing trend. Companys management should be more efficient in
utilizing the companys total assets to generate more sales.
4.1.1.3 Analyzing Debt Ratio:
I. Debt Ratio:
The Debt ratio measures, the proportion of total assets
provides by the firms creditors. This ratio indicates the
amount of other peoples money being used to
generate profits. The higher the ratio, the greater the
firms degree of indebtedness and the more financial
leverage it has.
Debt Ratio=Total liabilities/Total assets
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
Total Liabilities
2374003604.41
2519226377.38
2850187416.92
2899812757.83
Total Asset
831737146.44
1037626798.87
1047186766.11
1505017882.37
Graphical Presentation:
54
Debt Ratio
2.854
2.428
2.722
1.927
Debt Ratio
3
2.5
2
Debt Ratio
1.5
1
0.5
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
Interpretation:
The debt ratio of Sudha indicates greater indebtedness and high
degree of financial leverage, to generate profits during 2010 to 2013.
In 2010 it was 2.854, in 2011- 2.428 and in 2012 -2.722 and decrease
it in 2013. As its financial leverage is high, it holds lower financial
risks. Sudha can achieve optimum capital structure by reducing debt
capital as well as by increasing equity capital to finance its total
assets.
Long-term Debt
135210938.18
112866776.71
235249696.12
169883114.95
Stockholders Equity
906986594.2
9381304155.38
1101785197.95
1380749426.92
Debt-equity ratio
14.91%
1.203%
21.35%
12.30%
Graphical Presentation:
Debt-Equity Ratio
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
Debt-Equity Ratio
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
2010
2011
2012
2013
Interpretation:
The debt-equity ratio of Sudha is pleasing, as its debt is fluctuating
during 2010 to 2013. In 2011 the trend shows the lowest number of
creditor which really indicates a better condition in this regard but in
2012 it increases to 21.35% which is not a good sign.
The gross profit margin measures the percentage of each sales dollar
remaining after the firm has paid for its goods. The higher the gross
profit margin is the better. A high ratio of gross profits to sales is a
sign of good management of cost of goods sold.
Gross Profit= (Sales-COGS); Gross Margin=Gross Profit X
100/Sales
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
Gross Profit
320568794.02
291675092.98
411920293.02
482429628.69
Sales
2893786668.89
3375126124.83
4327487151.49
6414476264.40
Graphical Presentation:
2011
2012
Interpretation:
57
2013
Operating profit
320568794.02
291675092.98
411920293.02
482429628.69
Sales
2893786668.89
3375126124.83
4327487151.49
6414476264.40
Graphical Presentation:
58
2011
2012
2013
Interpretation:
We know that the acceptable of operating profit margin is 20%.The
operating profit margin ratio indicates the cost price effectiveness of
the operation. Here Sudha was in better condition regarding the
operating efficiency in 2010 but it was poor in 2013 as it has
produced the sufficient operating profit margin 11.08% in 2010,
8.64% in 2011, 9.52% in 2012 and 7.52% in 2013. The company
should enhance its sales by managing the operating cost efficiently.
III. Net Profit Margin
The net profit margin measures the percentage of each sales dollar
remaining after all costs and expenses, including interest and taxes
have been deducted. The higher the firms net profit margin, the better.
Net Profit Margin=Net Profit after Tax/Sales X 100
59
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
Sales
2893786668.89
3375126124.83
4327487151.49
6414476264.40
Graphical Presentation:
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
2010
2011
2012
2013
Interpretation:
The return on total assets (ROA) often called the return on investment
(ROI) measures the overall effectiveness of management in
generating profit with its available assets. The higher the firms return
on total assets is better.
Return on Investment=Net Profit after Tax/Total Assets X 100
60
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
Total Asset
831737146.44
1037626798.87
1047186766.11
1505017882.37
Return on Investment
20.53%
12.34%
15.32%
10.74%
Graphical Presentation:
Return on Investment
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
Return on Investment
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
2010
2011
2012
2013
Interpretation:
Sudha has achieved a scanty and highly satisfying return on
investment in 2010 to 2013 which indicates the effective management
in generating profits with its available assets during this period and its
ROI was better in 2010 and increasing sign is positive for Sudha. The
company can increase more its efficiency by utilizing the firms assets
to generate adequate profitability.
61
Return On Asset
16.59%
13.99%
15.95%
144.51%
Graphical Presentation:
Return on Asset
2010
2011
2012
2013
62
Interpretation:
Sudha achieved satisfying return on asset in 2013 which indicates the
effective management in generating profits with its total asset during
2010 to 2013 and its ROA was better and increasing during from
2012to 2013 which expose a positive sign of this company. The
company can increase more its efficiency by utilizing the firms
capital to generate adequate profitability.
VI. Return On Equity:
The Return on common equity (ROE) measures the return earned on
the common stockholders investment in the firm. Generally, the
higher this return, the better off is the owners.
Return on Equity=Net Profit after Tax/stockholder's equity X 100
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
Stockholders Equity
906986594.2
9381304155.38
1101785197.95
1380749426.92
Return on Equity
18.83%
1.365%
14.57%
11.70%
Graphical Presentation:
Return on equity
20.00%
18.00%
16.00%
14.00%
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
Return on equity
2010
2011
2012
63
2013
Interpretation:
The earnings ability of Sudha or the common stockholders was good
condition in 2010 but gradually decrease in 2011.Specially in 20010 it
achieved a moderate level of ROE and sufficient level. The company
should achieve the best use of equity capital to enhance the earning
per share (EPS) and stockholders return.
64
65
66
67
5.3. Recommendations
SUDHA can take the following recommendations for consideration:
SUDHA can increase its current assets more by enhancing the
accounts receivable and can decrease its current liabilities by
reducing its bank overdraft and short term loan.
The company can try to increase its quick assets like-cash,
accounts receivable and marketable securities.
It also can reduce inventory to improve its inventory turnover
ratio.
Companys management should be more efficient in utilizing
the companys capital to generate sales.
SUDHA is supposed to offer attractive credit policy to its
customers by extending credit period from 60 days to 90 days.
The company should try to utilize its fixed assets more
efficiently to accelerate sales.
The companys management should be more efficient in
utilizing the companys total assets to generate sales.
It should aim to achieve optimum capital structure by reducing
debt capital as well as by increasing equity capital to finance its
total assets.
68
69
70
5.4 Bibliography:
Books:
1. Lawrence J. Gitman Principal of Managerial Finance.
Pearson edition
Website:
1. www.sudha.coop
2. www.patnadairy.org
Annual Report:
1. SUDAH, 2010
2. SUDHA, 2012
3. SUDHA, 2013
71