Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270668783
CITATIONS
READS
95
1 author:
lker Yilmaz
Erciyes niversitesi
12 PUBLICATIONS 209 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
433
Abstract: This study presents the relationship between exhaust gas temperature (EGT) and
engine operational parameters at two different power settings, including maximum continuous
and take-off, in the CFM56-7B turbofan engine. The ground measurements of engine operational
parameters including net thrust, fuel ow, low rotational speed, core rotational speed, pressure
ratio, air temperature at engine fan inlet, take-off margin temperature, and thrust-specic fuel
consumption of 51 different CFM56-7B engines are used to nd the relationship mentioned in
the study. This engine type is selected due to its common use by the civil aviation sector. In accordance with the results of multiple linear regression analysis, it was shown that EGT is affected
by the engine operational parameters in different rate. The relationship between EGT and the
operational parameters used in the maximum continuous power setting is slightly stronger than
that of take-off power setting, R 2 = 0.73 and 0.69, respectively. The fuel ow, thrust-specic fuel
consumption, and take-off margin temperature are determined to be the most signicant operational parameters in the correlations used to predict the EGT of 51 CFM56-7B turbofan engines
in maximum continuous and take-off power settings, R 2 = 0.28, 0.23, and 0.35 and R 2 = 0.27,
0.14, and 0.60, respectively. It is found that there are good agreements between the predicted
and measured values of EGT in the study. It can be concluded that the proposed technique is an
effective tool for the EGT estimation of the turbofan engine.
Keywords: turbofan engine, exhaust gas temperature, regression analysis, operational
parameters
INTRODUCTION
Gas turbine engines have been widely used in industrial and aerospace applications such as co-generation powerplants, ships, aircrafts, and helicopters.
Nowadays, the accurate determination of engine
operational parameters, including exhaust gas temperature (EGT), engine shaft speed, engine pressure
ratio, engine vibration, oil pressure, and temperature,
is an important issue for gas turbine engines used in
commercial aviation. Aircraft airlines and manufactures need to determine the performance parameters
of gas turbine engines to ensure ight safety, to reduce
maintenance costs, and increase the aircraft lifetime.
EGT is one of the most important operational parameters in a gas turbine engine, in view of the fact that
excessive turbine temperatures result in decreased life
JAERO474 IMechE 2009
I Ylmaz
434
METHOD
Data analysis
(1)
Evaluation of the relationship between exhaust gas temperature and operational parameters in CFM56-7B engines
Table 1
EGT
FN
WF
N1
N2
PR
TA
TM
TSFC
Take-off
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
36.473
0.674
0.022
4.949
54.447
0.382
5.197
30.723
0.003
1714.932
118.409
6.109
5046.5
14 382.5
27.243
330.097
339.28
0.374
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
30.103
0.78
0.016
6.364
56.568
0.314
5.501
30.723
0.003
1726.527
119.739
6.234
5085.6
14 403
27.57
329.942
339.275
0.377
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
435
The coefcient of determination is that proportion of the total variability in the dependent variable
that is accounted for by the regression equation and
written as
(Y Y )2
R2 =
(Y Y )2
(2)
In MLRA, two different power settings, including maximum continuous and take-off, and 459 ground measurements data for each power setting (totally 918
measurements data) are used. EGT, which is one of
the most considerable performance parameters was
selected as dependent variable, while other characteristic values of the turbofan engines, such as FN,WF, N1,
N2, PR, TA, TM, and TSFC, were taken as independent
variables to determine their effects on EGT. The effect
of the operational parameters of the turbofan engine
on EGT has been analysed. The present study is an useful and valuable source to understand the relationship
1820
1820
1800
1800
1780
EGT [K]
EGT [K]
1780
1760
1740
1760
1740
1720
1720
1700
1700
1680
116
116.5
117
117.5
118
118.5
FN [kN]
119
119.5
120
1680
6.05
6.1
6.25
1820
1800
1800
1780
1780
1760
1760
EGT [K]
EGT [K]
6.2
(a)
1820
1740
1740
1720
1720
1700
1700
1680
116 116.5 117 117.5 118 118.5 119 119.5 120 120.5 121 121.5 122
FN [kN]
1680
6.05
(b)
Fig. 1
6.15
WF [kg/s]
(a)
6.15
6.2
6.25
WF [kg/s]
6.3
6.35
6.4
(b)
6.1
Fig. 2
I Ylmaz
436
CVRMSE =
RMSE
100
Y
(3)
where
RMSE =
MAE(%) =
3
EGTpredicted EGTmeasured
EGTmeasured
100
(5)
1800
1780
EGT [K]
1780
1760
1740
1760
1740
1720
1720
1700
1700
1680
5020
5030
5040
1680
14250
5050
14300
14350
1800
1800
1780
1780
1760
1760
EGT [K]
1820
1740
14500
14450
14500
1740
1720
1720
1700
1700
5080
14450
(a)
(a)
1820
1680
5070
14400
N2 [rpm]
N1 [rpm]
EGT [K]
(4)
1820
1800
Fig. 3
1/2
The variation of the EGT with the operational parameters (FN, WF, N1, N2, PR, TA, TM, and TSFC) of CFM567B turbofan engines is presented and discussed in this
section. The MLRA has been performed with data from
ground measurements of the engines.
Table 1 gives standard deviations and means of operational parameters of the engine that are based on
the ground measurement of 51 CFM56-7B turbofan
engines at two different power settings.
The relationship between EGT and net thrust measured from 51 CFM56-7B turbofan engines is shown
1820
EGT [K]
Y )2
np
n
i=1 (Yi
5090
5100
1680
14250
14300
14350
14400
N1 [rpm]
N2 [rpm]
(b)
(b)
Fig. 4
Evaluation of the relationship between exhaust gas temperature and operational parameters in CFM56-7B engines
1820
1820
1800
1800
1780
1780
1760
1760
EGT [K]
EGT [K]
1740
1740
1720
1720
1700
1700
1680
26
26.5
27
PR [-]
27.5
1680
290
28
300
310
1800
1800
1780
1780
1760
1760
EGT [K]
EGT [K]
1820
1740
1720
1700
1700
27.5
28
1680
290
310
320
330
340
(b)
300
TA [K]
(b)
Fig. 5
340
1740
1720
27
PR [-]
330
(a)
(a)
26.5
320
TA [K]
1820
1680
26
437
Fig. 6
I Ylmaz
438
Table 3
1820
1800
R2
EGT [K]
1780
EGT
1760
1740
1720
0.020 756
0.279
0.002 981
0.017 464
0.027 72
0.037 955
0.604 518
0.143 57
1700
1680
290
300
310
320
330
340
TM [K]
350
360
370
380
350
360
370
380
(a)
1820
1800
EGT [K]
1780
1760
1740
1720
1700
1680
290
300
310
320
330
340
TM [K]
(b)
Fig. 7
Table 2
EGT
0.012 698
0.286 013
0.153 59
0.082 744
0.191 66
0.0215
0.357 19
0.239 738
(7)
1820
1820
1800
1800
1780
1780
EGT [K]
Evaluation of the relationship between exhaust gas temperature and operational parameters in CFM56-7B engines
1760
1740
1720
439
1760
1740
1720
1700
1700
1680
0.368
0.37
0.372
0.38
0.382
1680
1680
0.384
(a)
Fig. 10
1820
1700
1720
1740
1760
Predicted EGT [K]
1780
1800
1820
1800
Table 4
EGT [K]
1780
1760
Power setting
MAE
CVRMSE
1740
Maximum continuous
Take-off
8.107
8.54
0.7646
0.7444
1720
1700
1680
0.368 0.37 0.372 0.374 0.376 0.378 0.38 0.382 0.384 0.386 0.388 0.39
TSFC [kg/h/N]
(b)
Fig. 8
Relationship between EGT and TSFC: (a) maximum continuous; (b) take-off
It is clear from these gures that there are good agreements between predicted and measured values of EGT.
In Figs 9 and 10, it is possible to notice that the values of
calculated EGT are higher than the measured values. In
other words, the regression equations overestimated
the phenomenon.
Table 4 shows the calculated CVRSME and MAE
using equations (3) to (5), respectively, in the investigated power settings. It can be seen from Table 4 that
the MAE and CVRMSE have acceptable values (8.107
per cent and 0.764 per cent for max. continuous and
8.54 per cent and 0.744 per cent for take-off ).
1820
CONCLUSION
1800
1780
1760
1740
1720
1700
1680
1680
Fig. 9
1700
1720
1740
1760
Predicted EGT [K]
1780
1800
1820
I Ylmaz
440
APPENDIX
Notation
REFERENCES
CFM56
1 Doel, D. L. TEMPER a gas-path analysis, tool for commercial jet engines. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 1994, 116,
8289.
2 Lu, P. J., Zhang, M. C., Hsu, T. C., and Zhang, J. An
evaluation of engine faults diagnostics using articial
neural networks. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 2001, 123,
340346.
3 Glen, S. C., Grifn, P. R., and Paolucci, S. Real-time
on-line performance diagnostics of heavy-duty industrial gas turbines. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 2002, 124,
910921.
4 Glen, S. C., Grifn, P. R., and Paolucci, S. Real-time online performance diagnostics of heavy-duty industrial gas
turbines, 2000 (International Gas Turbine & Aeroengine
Congress & Exhibition Munich, Germany).
5 Martin, S.,Wallace, I., and Bates, D. G. Development and
validation of a civil aircraft engine simulation model for
advanced controller design. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,
2008, 130, 115.
6 Sorato, S., Pascovici, D. S., Ogaji, S. O., and Pilidis,
P. Investigating the emissions and performance of
high bypass ratio aero-engines. Proc. IMechE, Part G:
J. Aerospace Engineering, 2008, 222, 463471. DOI:
10.1243/09544100JAERO275.
7 Roth, B. B., Doel, D. L., and Cissell, J. J. Probabilistic
matching of turbofan engine performance models to test
data. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Land
Sea & Air, 69 June 2005, Reno-Tahoe, Nevada, USA.
8 Bouam, A., Aissani, A., and Kadi, R. Gas turbine performances improvement using steam injection in the
combustion chamber under Sahara conditions. Oil Gas
Sci. Technol., 2008, 63, 251261.
0
i
regression constant
regression coefcient
random error term
CVRMSE
EGT
FN
MAE
MLRA
n
N1
N2
p
PR
R2
RMSE
SD
TA
TM
TSFC
WF
X
Y
Y