Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[Research Article]
INSECT FAUNA OF MANGROVES OF NELLORE DISTRICT, SOUTH COASTAL
ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA
Rajasekhar M1, Chakrapani IS2*, Srinivasulu A3 and Nagendra Prasad SV4
1
Information and studies on the mangrove ecosystems of South Costal Andhra Pradesh are scanty, unlike those of North Coastal
Andhra Pradesh. SPSR Nellore district and Prakasam district form the south coast of Andhra Pradesh. Swarnamukhi, Pennar and
Kandaleru and other streams form estuaries in Nellore district, where the size and density of mangroves vary. Mangroves are
surveyed in select locations of Nellore district with reference to the occurrence of true mangroves, mangrove associates and
insect fauna in particular. High abundance of insects in mangroves is a testimony of their importance in mangrove litter
formation and recycling of nutrients in mangrove ecosystem. Insect faunal diversity in relation to mangrove density of Nellore
district is documented. A total of 90 insect species belonging to 46 families are identified. Thermal pollution caused by mini
power plants during the recent years, and port activities at Krishnapatnam are posing a great threat to Nellore mangroves, in
addition to the indiscriminate use of for aquaculture, saltpans and firewood. Insect faunal diversity in relation to the mangroves
is presented in this paper, in the light of new threats from aquaculture and thermal pollution, and port activities.
Keywords: Mangroves; Insects; Estuarine ecosystem; Andhra Pradesh.
INTRODUCTION:
Mangroves exist in tropical and semi-tropical intertidal
regions of the world. They are salt water tolerant ecosystems.
The total area of mangroves in India is estimated at 6740Km2
which contributes 7% of the worlds total [1]. The luxurious
growth of mangroves across the Indian coast is rich in species
diversity. After Sunderbans in West Bengal, Mahanadi
mangroves, coastal Andhra Pradesh offers a very good shelter
for mangroves [2]. North coast of Andhra Pradesh harbours
mangroves to an extent of 265 Km2 which includes the
Coringa Mangroves. South coast of Andhra Pradesh consisting
of SPSR Nellore and Prakasam districts also provides good
shelter for mangroves and associated floral and faunal
diversity to an extent of 168 Km2. In Nellore district, from
north to south, there are Pennar, Kandaleru and Swarnamukhi
estuaries, where mangroves of different size and density
occur. In Prakasam district, Gundlakamma, Musi, Paaleru and
Maaneru rivers bring nutrients for sustenance of mangroves at
coastal regions.
Among animals, insects are the only class so intimately
involved in the complexities of the biological world. They are
highly abundant in mangroves even, which confirms their
importance in litter formation and nutrient recycling in
mangrove ecosystems. Energy flow and turnover rate of
nutrients in mangrove inshore systems is increased by
recurrent attacks by insects[3] which feed on the leaves, buds,
stem, bark and other parts of the flora[4]. Mangrove
ecosystem offers certain difficulties for faunal studies.
Mangrove insects are difficult to sample and are poorly known
taxonomically. A wide range of taxa contribute to mangrove
insects, and often many developmental stages occur in a
sample procured, which are difficult to indentify. Mangrove
312
METHODS:
Field survey was conducted during the period from 2012-2013
to evaluate the floral and insect faunal diversity of mangroves
in Nellore district. The areas were visited occasionally to
determine accessibility and suitability to survey. Five areas
were identified as field stations:
1. Sriharikota
2. Duggarajupatnam
3. Krishnapatnam
4. Iskapalli
5. Utukuru
6. Annagaripalem
Distribution pattern, frequency and abundance of flora and
fauna were invented. The upper reaches were surveyed by foot
on the muddy flats. The lower and middle reaches were
surveyed in a shallow boat through the channels. Transects
were used along the gradients of mudflats, creeks and
channels to assess the plant species. Ground dwelling insect
fauna and insect borers were obtained by hand searching.
Insects too active to capture were estimated by naked eye.
They were identified with the help of Zoology Department,
S.V.University, Tirupati. Other wild life fauna was evidenced
by direct observations and indirectly through their tracks,
faecal droppings, pug marks and hair samples etc. The
evidence of other wildlife fauna was documented with the help
of an Olympus full HD stylus digital camera.
RESULTS & DISCUSSION:
Mangroves play an important role in soil binding, as a source
of nutrient recycling, breeding ground and nursery areas for
many important fin and shell fishes. In our survey, the
following insects were encountered in Nellore mangroves.
In the present study, 90 species of insects (Table-1) were
identified from the field stations in Nellore district mangroves.
All these insets identified in association with the mangroves
belong to 8 orders and 46 families. Out of the total number of
insects identified, 70 were identified up to species level, 20 up
to the genus level. 4 insects were identified to be anisopterids
belonging to odonata, but could not be identified specifically.
Of all the insects identified, those belonging to Coleoptera
are dominant (26%) (Figure 2&3) represented by 23 species.
28% of the families identified belong to coleoptera
.Lepidopterans (21 species belonging to 8 families) and
Hymenopterans (14 species belonging to 9 families) are also
dominant as reported by Santhakumaran [14]. Isoptera is the
least represented with 2 species identified.
313
Order
Coleoptera
1.
Family
Carabidae
2.
Cerambycidae
3.
Chrysomelidae
4.
Coccinellidae
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Curculionidae
Dysticidae
Elateridae
Lampyridae
Mylaridae
Oedemeridae
Scarabeidae
12. Silphidae
13. Tenebrionidae
II
III
Hemiptera
Hymenoptera
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Coriedae
Corixidae
Fulgoridae
Hemicocephalidae
Nepidae
Pentatomidae
20. Reduviidae
21. Tingidae
22. Apidae
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Species
Brachynus americanus
Pherasophus lineforms
Chion cinctus
Saperda calcarata
Chaetocnema confinis
Chaetocnema pulicaria
Coccinella septempunctata
Chilochorus sp.
Trichobaris trionata
Orcyctes rhinoceros
Elaster sp.
Photinus pyralis
Mylabris sp.
Odedemerid sp.
Canthom viridian
Macrodacylus sp.
Onthophagus longicornis
Phllophage crassima
Nicrophorus marginetus
Amarygmus caparium
Calosoma scrutafor
Cicindilla ocodontata
Tenebroides mauritanicus
Leptocoris varisuga
Perillus
Murgantia luptescens
Hemicocephalus basalis
Locotrephes sp.
Brochymena araborea
Chrysocoris stolli
Easarcories ventralis
Triatoma sp.
Lygus sp.
Apis dorsata
Apis florida
Xylocopa sp.
314
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Andrenidae
Chalicidae
Dryinidae
Eumeridae
Formicidae
Megachilidae
sphegidae
30. Vespidae
IV
Diptera
Lepidoptera
31. Ascilidae
32. Culicidae
33.
34.
35.
36.
Muscidae
Tabanidae
Apacidae
Arctiidae
37. Crambidae
38. Danalidae
39. Noctuidae
40. Nymphalidae
41. Papilionidae
42. Pieridae
VI
Odonata
43. Anisopteridae
VII
Orthoptera
44. Mantidae
45. Acrididae
VIII
Isoptera
46. Grillidae
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
Andren wikella
Chalcis crule
Dryinius sp.
Moobia levigate
Irdomyrmex humilis
Megachile latimanus
Ammophila levigate
Stizus primaticus
Componotus sp.
Ocecophylla sp.
Sclenopis sp.
Promachus sp.
Aedes sp.
Anaphelus sp.
Culex sp.
Haematobia irritans
Tabanus striatus
Telchinae violae
Estigmena acrae
Halisodota caryace
Crambus mutabilis
Danais chrysippus
D.eucharis
D.mellisa
D.limance
D.plexippus
Mesensomia croesus
Plathypena scabra
Ergolis aradinae
Prcis lemonias
Polidours aristolochiae
P.hector
P.polyxenes
Papilla polytes
Anteas florilla
Catopsila horella
Heptosia nina
Terlas hacabe
Acisoma panorpoides
Aris vivida
Crocothemis erytbraea
Libellula luctuousa
Rhythenis varigata
Unidentified species- 4
Mantis religiosa
Camnula pellucidae
Exilisconorus
Gryllotalpha headactyla
Melanoplus sp.
Microcentum rhombifolium
Neoconocephalus
Paratettix sp.
Gryllus assimilus
Reticulitermus flavipes
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The authors are highly thankful to the respective authorities
for permitting to carry on with the work. We are indebted to
the local fisher men and the Andhra Pradesh Forest
Department for their constant support during the study period.
315
REFERENCES:
1,2. Rajasekhar P.S, Brahamaji Rao P and Subba Rao
M.V(2002). Biodiversity values and traditional utilization
patterns of Godavari mangroves, Andhra Pradesh.
Proceeding of the National Seminar on Eastern Ghats
conservation. 2-238
3. Agate A.D (1981).
Final report of the Integrated
Multidisciplinary Survey and Research Programme of the
Ranong Mangrove Ecosystem, Thailand.
4. Metcalf C.L and Flint W.P (1979). Destructive and Useful
Insects. Tata McGraw Hill Publishers, Dehradun. Pp.1086
5. Beaver R.A and Browne F.G (1975). The Scolytidae and
Platypodidae (Coleoptera) of Thailand. Oriental Insects
9:283-311
6. Brown F.G (1961). The Biology of Malaysian Scolytidae
and Platypodidae. Malaysian Forest Research 22:1-25
7. Beeson C.F.C (1953). The Ecology and Control of the
forest Insects of India and neighbouring Countries. 2/e.
Forest Research Institute, Dehradun. p.767
8. Murphy D.H and Rua M.T (1990). Ground Mesofauna of
the Khlong Nagan Transects. Mangrove Ecosystems
Occasional paper, 7:9-13
9. Kalshoven L.G.E (1959). Studies on the Biology of
Indonesian Scolytidae-4, Data on the habitats of
Scolytidae -2nd Part. Tijdsch.Ent. 102:135-173
10. Aparna S and Raja Sekhar P.S (2014). Biodiversity and
Sustainable Use Practices of fishermen Community at
316