Here is the feedback:

In oblicon he gave us a contract and asked us to point out provisions which are problematic and basis.
He gave us the Google terms and conditions and asked us to identify everything that would be subject to a provision
we studied in oblicon. Had to state the applicable provision by number and as close to verbatim as we could in every
instance
General rule is he cares very little for jurisprudence and prefers that you cite the law
In fact - for Oblicon, he wants the students to know the code verbatim such that he has a computerized quiz every
meeting (fill in the blanks of provisions) and you have to get at least 95% in all to pass the course.
For Negotiable instruments, he relies sa Campos as his main teaching material.