Punjab State Government Weekly Gazette Dated On 27-11-2015

Regd.
PART No.
I] NW/CH-22
PUNJAB
CHD/0092/2015-2017
GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 Regd.
(AGHNNo.
6, 1937
SAKA)
2923
Complete : Rs. 19.80
Rs. 5.40
Published by Authority
No. 48 ] CHANDIGARH, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGRAHAYANA 6, 1937 SAKA)
CONTENTS
Pages
PART IPunjab Government Notifications and Orders
.. 2923-2964
PART I-ANotifications by Local Government
.. Nil
PART I-BNotifications by Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners
.. Nil
PART IIStatutory Notifications and Republications from Gazette of India/Punjab
.. Nil
PART IIINotification by High Court, Labour Commissioner ; Advertisements ;

Director of Lotteries, Punjab and Notices etc.
.. 357-363
PART III-ANotifications by Universities
.. Nil
PART III-BCourt Notices
.. Nil
PART IVActs and Bills
.. Nil
PART VNotification by Punjab State Legislature
.. Nil
SUPPLEMENT PART IStatistical
.. Nil
SUPPLEMENT PART IIGeneral
.. Nil
LEGISLATIVE SUPPLEMENTContents
.. Nil
Ditto
PART IActs
.. Nil
Ditto
PART IIOrdinances
.. Nil
Ditto
PART IIIDelegated Legislation
.. Nil
Ditto
PART IVCorrection slips, Republications and Replacements
.. Nil
PART I
ib ;gbkJh ns/ ;?BhN/PB ftGkr
nfX;{uBk
fwsh 30 nes{po, 2015
BzLi;;$n1(1)15$28944H^Pqh bkbih okw, T[g wzvb fJzihBhno (e'v BzL 365$744)n$iksh,
g[Zso wfjrk okw, ib ;gbkJh ns/ ;?BhN/PB T[g wzvb, fGZyh (n?N wkB;k) Bz{ 60 ;kb dh T[wo g{oh j'D
( 2923 )
2924
PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)
[PART I
T[gozs fwsh 31H10H2015 (pknd d[gfjo) Bz{ gzikp ;hHn?;HnkoH fibd^1 Gkr^1 d/ fB:w 3H26(T) sfjs
;oekoh ;/tk s'A ;/tk fBftos ehsk iKdk j?.
;[o/P e[wko
uzvhrVQ
tXhe w[Zy ;eZso, gzikp ;oeko,

ib ;gbkJh ns/ ;?BhN/PB ftGkr.
DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNANCE REFORMS
(Governance Reforms-2 Branch)
Order of the Governor of Punjab
Shri Iqbal Singh Sidhu, IAS (Retd), S/o Shri Dalip Singh Sidhu, Commissioner, Right to Service
Commission, Punjab, will be relieved from his duties on 06-11-2015 (AN), on attaining the age of 65 years in
terms of Section 15(1) of the Right to Service Act, 2011.
SARVESH KAUSHAL
Principal Secretary to Government of Punjab
Chandigarh
The 23rd October, 2015
Department of Governance Reforms

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
(HOUSING-II BRANCH)
NOTIFICATION
The 2nd November,2015
No.17/17/2001-5HG2/P.F./619135/1.-Whereas in order to promote industrial development in the State
of Punjab, the Govt., besides extending various other incentives, has already exempted Change of Land Use
(CLU) charges for setting up of industries in the State of Punjab and only nominal External Development
Charges (hereinafter called EDC) and Social Infrastructure Fund (hereinafter called SIF) are being charged.
Whereas to promote Food Processing Projects in the State of Punjab, the Govt. intends to further grant
certain incentives to Mega Food Park Projects in the State. Therefore, the Governor of Punjab is pleased to
exempt EDC for setting up of the following two Mega Food Park Projects in the State and only SIF shall be
chargeable as per policy of the Govt.
1.
Mega Food Park Project, Vill: Laddhowal, Distt. Ludhiana to be set up by Punjab Agro Industries
Corporation Limited.
2.
Mega Food Park Project, Vill: Rihana Jattan, Distt. Hoshiarpur to be set up by Sukhjit Starch
Limited.
With this the Notification No. 17/17/01/5Hg2/327 dated 11.01.2008 shall stand partially amended to the
extent as mentioned above.
fwsh 5 Btzpo, 2015

BzL18$28$15^5wT[2$2342H^gzikp d/ okigkb gq;zBsk^g{ote, gzikp oki nzdo Food Grains
ns/ Agriculture Produce dh ;N'o/I B{z pVktk d/D bJh Silos/ Godowns ;Ekgs eoB tkb/ Individual/
PART I]
2925
Companies B{z T[s;akjs eoB tk;s/ Silos/ Godowns s/ bkr{ External Development Charges (EDC) s'A
S'N fdzd/ j'J/ j/m fby/ nB[;ko gkfb;h dh gqtkBrh fdzd/ jBL^
1H
fJj S'N e/tb T[BQK Silos/ Godowns s/ bkr{ j't/rh fijV/ Food Grains ns/ Agriculture Produce
;N'o eoB tk;s/ tos/ ikDr/.
2H
fJj S'N b?D bJh p/Bsh gZso gzikp ;oeko d/ ;pzXs ndko/ okjhA gqkgs j'Dk ukjhdk j? sK i' fJj
;[fB;aus ehsk ik ;e/ fe fiBQK Silos/ Godowns B{z EDC charges s'A S'N fdZsh ik ojh j? T[; ftZu
tkfenk jh Food Grains/ Agriculture Produce ;N'o ehsk ikt/rk.
3H
fJj S'N Non Agriculture Produce ;N'o eoB tkb/ Godowns B{z T[gbZpX BjhA j't/rh.
4H
EDC dh fJj S'N e'bv ;N'o s/ th bkr{ BjhA j't/rh feT[A i' fJj fJZe tgkfoe Xzdk j? Gkt/A fe e'bv
;N'o ftZu th Agriculture Produce/ Fruits nkfd jh ;N'o ehs/ iKd/ jB.
5H
fJ; ;pzX ftZu gfjbK ikoh ;kohnK B'Nhfce/;aBK dk nfXbzxD (Supersede) j' iKdk j?.
The 17th, November, 2015
No.12/08/12-5HG2/626711/1.-Whereas in order to bring under the umbrella of planning framework

and to provide public safety, security and public conveniences, the Punjab Government had framed a policy
vide Notification No.: 12/8/2012-5HG II/ 5094 dated 16.11.2012 (revised on 07.01.2013) for the regularization
of Marriage Palaces existing on or before 01.01.2012 and for setting up of new Marriage Palaces in the State of
Punjab but still a number of Marriage Palaces have been set up illegally in the State of Punjab after 01.01.2012.
These unauthorized Marriage Palaces have to be dealt strictly so as to discourage such illegal constructions in
future.
Therefore, the Governor of Punjab is pleased to frame a compounding policy for regularization of
Marriage Palaces constructed without taking permission of the Competent Authority after 01.01.2012 as under:
i.
This policy shall be applicable to only those unauthorized Marriage Palaces which have been constructed
after 01.01.2012 and not to the Marriage Palaces covered under regularization policy dated 16.11.2012.
ii.
The building controls and other norms with respect to location, accessibility, plot size, frontage, parking,
setbacks etc. as applicable to new Marriage Palaces under policy dated 16.11.2012 or as amended from
time to time shall be applicable.
iii.
No relaxation in any of the norms of policy dated 16.11.2012 shall be applicable.
iv.
The applicant has to pay CLU, EDC, LF/PF, SIF etc as applicable to new Marriage Palaces as notified
vide Notification dated 06.05.2013 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development or as amended
from time to time.
v.
In addition to the above said charges, the applicant also has to pay the compounding fee on illegally
constructed buildings of the Marriage Palace in accordance with the compounding policy of the respective
Special Development Authority. The compounding fee as applicable to commercial buildings shall be
payable.
vi.
Labour Cess at the rate of 1% of the estimated cost of the building shall be payable under the Building
and Other Construction Workers (regulation of employment and conditions of service) Act, 1996.
2926
[PART I
vii.
The CLU, EDC, LF/ PF, SIF shall be payable in lump sum at the time of approval of CLU and the
compounding fee shall also be paid lump sum at the time of compounding of the building (s). No rebate
shall be payable on lump sum payment.
viii.
Secretary/ Principal Secretary Housing and Urban Development Department will be the Competent
Authority to grant CLU under this policy.
ix.
Director Town and Country Planning will be the Competent Authority to compound the buildings under
this policy.
(CORRIGENDUM)
The 2nd November, 2015
No. 18/24/2015-5Hg2/619111/1.-Whereas the Industrial Policy 2009 provides that the concessions
granted to Super Mega Mixed Use Integrated Industrial Park Projects in the State as per Empowered Committed
meeting held on 28.5.2008 would be exempted from the provisions of Punjab Apartment and Property Regulations
Act, 1995 (Punjab Act No. 14 of 1995).
2.
And, whereas exemption of granted to Super Mega Mixed Use Integrated Industrial Park Project at
Sector-66-A, 82, and 83, S.A.S Nagar of M/s. Janta Land Promoters Limited (Now M/s. Janta Land Promoters
Pvt. Ltd) for an area of 207.86 acres u/s 44(2) of Punjab Apartment & Property Regulations Act, 1995 (Punjab
Act No. 14 of 1995) by the Government of Punjab except Section 5(9), Section 6 to Section 20, Section 32 and
Section 36 to Section 39.
3.
And, whereas the decision to enforce Section 6 to 20, and Section 36 to 39 of Punjab Apartment and
Property Regulation Act, 1995 on Mega Projects was taken by the Cabinet in its meeting held on 17.12.2011.
Further it was clarified by the Empowered Committee in its meeting held on 12.7.2012 that these sections shall
be applicable only on the Mega Projects approved after the date of decision of the Cabinet i.e. 17.12.2011. This
clarification was confirmed by the Cabinet in its meeting held on 20.5.2015.
4.
And, whereas based on the above decision, the section 6 to 20 and 36 to 39 shall not be applicable to
this Super Mega Mixed Use Integrated Industrial Park Project at Sector 66-A, 82 and 83, SAS Nagar of M/s
Janta Land Promoters Pvt. Ltd since this project was approved by the Empowered Committee on 16.3.2011 i.e.
prior to the decision of Cabinet taken on 17.12.2011.
5.
Now, therefore the Governor of Punjab in exercise of the powers vested in him under section 44(2) of
the PAPRA, 1995 (Punjab Act No. 14 of 1995) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, is pleased to
amend the Para-5 of the notification No. CTP(Pb)SMP(M)-23395 dated 23.12.2011 as under:Para-5.) The project of M/s Janta Land Promoters Pvt. Ltd is exempted for an area of 207.86
acres from all the provisions of Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act, 1995 (Punjab Act No.
14 of 1995) except section 5(9) and Section 32 of Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act, 1995
as amended from time to time, subject to the terms and conditions contained in para 5(i) to (viii) of
notification no. CTP(Pb)SMP(M)F2/3395 dated 23.12.2011.
VISWAJEET KHANNA
Principal Secretary to Government of Punjab
Department of Housing & Urban Development
PART I]
2927
DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS

(Tourism Branch)
NOTIFICATION
The 6th November, 2015
No.18/2/1980-5TC/623266/1.-In exercise of powers vested under Article 77 of the Memorandum and
Articles of Association of Punjab Tourism Development Corporation Limited, the Governor of Punjab is pleased
nominate Sh. Harvinder Singh Khalsa S/o Late Sh. Tara Singh R/o of # 3250, Back Side New Bus Stand,
Bathinda Tehsil & District Bathinda as Director of the Board of Directors of the said Punjab Tourism Development
Corporation Limited.
2.
Further in exercise of powers vested under Article 103 of the Memorandum and Articles of Association
of Punjab Tourism Development Corporation Limited, the Governor of Punjab is pleased to create the post of
Vice Chairman by amending the Article 92 of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of Punjab Tourism
Development Corporation Limited and to appoint Sh. Harvinder Singh Khalsa S/o Late Sh. Tara Singh R/o of
# 3250, Back Side New Bus Stand, Bathinda Tehsil & District Bathinda as Vice Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the said Punjab Tourism Development Corporation Limited with immediate effect.
ANJALI BHAWRA
Chandigarh
Principal Secretary to Government of Punjab,
Department of Tourism.
DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
(Education-7 Branch)
NOTIFICATION
No.2/10/2015-2Edu.7/627771/1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 38 of the Right of

Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (Central Act No. 38 of 2009), and all other powers
enabling him in this behalf, the Governor of Punjab is pleased to make the following notification under sub-rule
(6) of Rule 7 of the Punjab Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011:District Admission Monitoring Committee:
(a)
There shall be a District Admission Monitoring Committee (DAMC) in each district and Deputy
Commissioner, shall be the Chairperson of the DAMC, District Education Officers (SE), District
Education Officers (EE), Legal Assistant (RTE) and one Public Representative (Municipal Counselor
in case of City/Town and in case of Village- Sarpanch, etc) as the case may be shall be the member of
DAMC.
(b)
Any parent, aggrieved by the action of the school may file a complaint in writing to the DAMC,
addressed to the concerned Deputy Commissioner,(Chairman).
(c)
The DAMC shall maintain the Register/database of grievances and will take immediate appropriate
action for their redressal. The information shall also be made available on the website of the Directorate
of Education by DAMC.
2928
[PART I
(d)
The DAMC shall prepare cluster/zone-wise vacancy data for free-seats due to the non availability of
seats in schools referred to in sub-clause (I) and (II) of clause (n) of Section-2 or for any other reason
and shall forward the names of children to schools where vacant seats are available, for admission
against free-seats, following sub-rule (4) of Rule-7 of Punjab RTE Rules, 2011 and principle of
neighborhood school.
(e)
The DAMC may call for the details from any school under its jurisdiction for ensuring the compliance
of this order/notification.
(f)
The DAMC shall establish a Help-Desk in the district office to help parents/guardians regarding
admissions to weaker section and disadvantaged group and other procedures, during office hours
manned by two well-conversant officials of the District/Zone. The help desk shall be functional till the
admission process is closed.
Sd/Principal Secretary to Govt. Punjab,
Department of School Education,
Punjab
DIRECTORATE OF RESEARCH AND MEDICAL EDUCATION, PUNJAB
CORRIGENDUM
No.1ME3-Pb-2015/19796.Subject:- Admission to Diploma in Pharmacy-Upvaid (Ayurvedic) Session-2008 and onwards.
*****
In partial modification in Notifications 12/1/2008-3HB-III/1906 dated 31.03.2008 for admissions to

Diploma in Pharmacy-Upvaid (Ayurvedaic) Session, 2008 and onwards issued by Government of Punjab, The
cut of date for admission is hereby extended upto 30th November, 2015 only for the current academic session,
subject to the condition that no further extension will be considered.
HUSSAN LAL, IAS
Secretary, Medical Education & Research
:'iBkpzdh ftGkr
nfX;{uBk
BzLnHnH;H(n^5)^2015$22168H^Pqhwsh ;o'I e[wkoh g[Zsoh Pqh pbd/t ;jkJ/ e'Vk, vokcN;w?B,
noE ns/ nzeVk ;zrmB, gzikp, uzvhrVQ Bz{ 60 ;kb dh tZX toQk T[wo g{oh j' ikD s/ fwsh 31^10^2015
(pLd[L) s'A ;/tk fBftos ehsk iKdk j?.
2H
i/eo T[; fto[ZX e'Jh nB[Pk;Bh ekotkJh$fJBe[nkoh fB:wK nB[;ko eoBh pDdh j'Jh sK fJBQK
j[ewK dk T[BK s/ e'Jh n;o BjhA gt/rk.
i;gkb f;zx,
;eZso :'iBk.
PART I]
2929
T[u/oh f;Zfynk ftGkr

(f;Zfynk^1 Pkyk)
B'Nhfce/;aB
fwsh 18 Btzpo, 2015
BzL5$23$2013^5f;1$626915$1H^gzikp d/ okigkb ih gq;zBsk g{ote fBwB do;kJ/ nfXekohnK
Bz{ 60 ;kb dh T[wo g{oh eoB T[gozs T[BQK d/ BktK d/ ;kjwD/ do;kJhnK fwshnK s'A ;oekoh ;/tk s'A ;/tk
fBftos eoB dh gqtkBrh ikoh eod/ jBL^
bVh BzL
nfXekoh dk BK, nj[dk s/ s?Bksh
foNkfJow?AN dh fwsh
1H
Pqhwsh r[ofwzdo e"o, fgqz;hgb ;oekoh ekbi (bVehnK),
30H9H2015
b[fXnkDk.
2H
Pqh fti? e[wko r'fJb, fgqz;hgb, ;oekoh ekbi, pfmzvk.
30H9H2015
3H
Pqh fti? e[wko Powk, fgqz;hgb, ;oekoh ekbi, BkGk.
31H10H2015
4H
Pqh ;[oihs f;zx, fgqz;hgb, ;oekoh ;kfJz; ns/ y'i ekbi,
31H10H2015
irokT[A.
2H
fJBQK nfXekohnK fto[ZX i/eo e'Jh nB[Pk;Bh ekotkJh$fJBe[nkoh fB:wK nXhB ubdh j't/ iK
e'Jh d/DdkohnK j'D iK fe;/ ndkbs ftu e'Jh e/; fJBQK fto[ZX bzfps j't/ sK fJBQK j[ewK dk T[; s/ e'Jh
n;o BjhA j't/rk.
J/H t/B{ gqPkd,
uzvhrVQ
fwsh 10 Btzpo, 2015
;eZso gzikp ;oeko,

T[u/oh f;Zfynk ftGkr.
T[u/oh f;Zfynk s/ GkPk ftGkr
(f;Zfynk ;?~b)
fwsh 20 Btzpo, 2015
BzL6$46$2015^1f;H;?bH$629004$1H^gzikp d/ okigkb ih gq;zBsk g{ote Pqh u/sB f;zx,

vkfJo?eNo, GkPk ftGkr gzikp gfNnkbk Bz{ fwsh 30H11H2015 Bz{ foNkfJo eoB dh gqtkBrh fdzd/ jB.
2H
T[es dZ;/ nfXekoh fto[ZX i/eo e'Jh nB[Pk;Bh ekotkJh$fJzBe[nkoh fB:wK nXhB ubdh j't/ iK
e'Jh d/DdkohnK j'D iK fe;/ ndkbs ftZu e'Jh e/; fJBQK fto[ZX bzfps j't/ sK fJBQK j[ewK dk T[; s/ e'Jh
n;o BjhA gt/rk.
uzvhrVQ
fwsh 10 Btzpo, 2015
J/ t/Bz{ gqPkd,
;eZso, gzikp ;oeko,
T[u/oh f;Zfynk s/ GkPk ftGkr
s/ GkPktK
2930
[PART I
SECRETARIAT OF THE
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Nirvachan Sadan,
Ashoka Road,
New Delhi 110 001.
Dated: 4th June, 2015
14 Jyaistha, 1937 (SAKA)
NOTIFICATION
No. 82/PB-HP/(05/14)/2015.-In pursuance of Section 106 of the Representation of People Act, 1951,
(43 of 1951) the Election Commission of India hereby publishes judgment/order dated 08.05.2015 of the
Punjab & Haryana High Court, Bench at Chandigarh in Election Petition No. 05 of 2014.
By order,
Sd/(SHANGARA RAM)
SR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx

fuokZpu lnu] v'kksd jksM] ubZ fnYyh&110001
rkjh[k % 4 twu] 2015
14 T;s"B] 1937 'kd
vf/klwpuk
la0 82@iatkc&yks0l0@05@14@2015-&
l0@05@14@2015-&yksd izfrfuf/kRo vf/kfu;e] 1951 dh /kkjk 106 ds
vuqlj.k esa Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx dh fuokZpu vthZ la[;k 05@2014 esa iatkc o gfj;k.kk mPp u;k;ky;]
paMhx<+ csp
a ds rkjh[k 08 ebZ] 2015 ds fu.kZ; dks ,rn~}kjk izdkf'kr djrk gSA
vkns'k ls]
gLrk@&
'kaxkjk jke
ofj"V iz/kku lfpo
PART I]
2931
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Election Petition No. 5 of 2014
Navjot Singh son of Sh. Suba Singh, resident of VPO Dabwali Dhab, Tehsil Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib.
......Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Harsimrat Kaur Badal, Member Parliament from 11-Bathinda (Gen) Parliamentary Constituency, wife of
S. Sukhbir Singh Badal, resident of village Badal, Tehsil Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib.
......Respondent
Election Petition under Section 80 and 81 read with Section 100 of the Representation
of the People Act, 1951 for setting aside the election of the returned candidate i.e.
Smt. Harsimrat Kaur Badal-respondent elected as Member Parliament (Lok Sabha)
from 11-Bathinda (Gen) Parliamentary Constitutency and further to disqualify her
under Section 8A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CM NO. 4-E of 2015
IN
E. P. No. 5 of 2014
Navjot Singh.
......Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Harsimrat Kaur Badal.
......Respondent
Application under Section 151 CPC to place on record the certified copy of the
election petition dated 9.4.2000 bearing E.P. No. 12 of 2000 titled Parkash Singh
Versus Jatinder Singh Kariha filed in the Hon'ble Court.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CM NO. 13-E of 2014
IN
E. P. No. 5 of 2014
Navjot Singh.
......Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Harsimrat Kaur Badal.
......Respondent
Application by the returned candidate, respondent under Section 86(1) of The
Representation of People Act, 1951 to dismiss the election petition.
2932
[PART I
C.M. No. 13-E of 2014 in/and

Election Petition No.5 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M. No. 13-E of 2014 in/and
Election Petition No.5 of 2014 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION : 08-05-2015
Navjot Singh
PETITIONER
VERSUS
Smt. Harsimrat Kaur Badal
RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER

1. Whether reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?
Present:- Shri S.S. Swaich, Advocate for the petitioner/non-applicant.
Shri Ashok Aggarwal, Senior Advocate and Shri M.L. Saggar, Senior Advocate with Shri Sunny
Saggar, Advocate for the respondent/applicant.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
C.M. No.4E of 2015
Allowed as prayed for

C.M. No.13E of 2014
In Election Petition No.5 of 2014 titled Navjot Singh v. Smt. Harsimrat Kaur Baddal, an application
has been moved by the respondent under Section 86(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter
referred to as the Act) with a prayer to dismiss the main election petition.
For the purpose of reference, Section 86(1) of the Act is reproduced here below :"86. Trial of election petitions.-(I) The High Court shall dismiss an election petiton
which does not comply with the provisions of Section 81 or Section 82 or Section
117.
Explanation.- An order of the High Court dismissing an election petition under
this sub-section shall be deemed to be an order made under clause (a) of section
98."
Section 81(1) of the Act provides for the period of limitation within which an election petition can be
preferred. It is extracted here below :81. Presentation of petitons.-(I) An election petition calling in question any election
may be presented by one or more of the grounds specified in sub-section (1) of
section 100 and section 101 to the High Court by any candidate at such election or
any elector within forty-five days from, but not earlier than the date of election of
the returned candidate or if there are more than one returned candidate at the election
and dates of their election are different, the later of those two dates.
PART I]
2933
Explanation.- In this sub-section, "elector" means a person who was entitled

to vote at the election to which the election petition relates, whether he has voted at
such election or not."
Section 82, on the other hand, provides for the necessary parties to the petition which is also extracted
here below :"82. Parties to the petition.-A petitioner shall join as respondents to his petition (a)
where the petitioner, in addition to claiming declaration that the election of all
or any of the returned candidates is void, claims a further declaration that he
himself or any other candidate has been duly elected, all the contesting candidates
other than the petitioner, and where no such further declaration is claimed, all
the returned candidates ; and
(b)
any other candidate against whom allegations of any corrupt practice are made
in the petition."
Non-compliance of the aforesaid provisions of law i.e. Sections 81 and 82 of the Act by the petitioner is
the primary cause of the instant application.
To put it briefly, the respondent to the petition states that the petition ought to be dismissed on the
following grounds :(1)
Being barred by limitation, and
(2)
For want of non-joinder of necessary parties.
The counting of votes of election in question took place on 16.5.2014 and it is agreed that the limitation
of 45 days would expire on 29.6.2014 while the petition was preferred on 30.6.2014.
It is also the common case of the parties that Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 would be
applicable in computing the period of limitation.
Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 is extracted here below :"10. Computation of time.- (1) Where, by any Central Act or Regulation made
after the commencement of this Act, any act or proceeding is directed or allowed to
be done or taken in any Court or office on a certain day or within a prescribed
period, then, if the Court or office is closed on that day or the last day of the
prescribed period, the act or proceeding shall be considered as done or taken in due
time if it is done or taken on the next day afterwards on which the Court or office is
open :
Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to any act or proceeding to
which the Indian Limitation Act, 1877 (15 of 1877), applies.
(2) This section applies also to all Central Acts and Regulations made on or
after the fourteenth day of January, 1887."
It is also conceded that the provisions of the Limitation Act would not apply and thus, the flexibility
provided under the Limitation Act for condonation of delay would be of no consequence in view of the statutory
provisions contained in the Representation of the People Act, 1950.
2934
[PART I
The case of the respondent/applicant is that the petitioner can take the benefit of Section 10 of the
General Clauses Act only if the office was closed and the petitioner was unable to file the petition during
vacation.
The petitioner/non-applicant, on the other hand, contends that there was no notification issued by the
High Court indicating transaction of business during the vacation period and thus, the provisions of Section 10 of
the General Clauses Act would come to the rescue in which eventuality the petition filed on the opening day after
the vacation would be within limitation.
It would be apposite to refer to the relevant law in this regard. In Hukumdev Narain Yadav v. Lalit
Narain Mishra AIR 1974 S.C. 480(1) it was observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as below :"Even if section 4 of the Limitation Act does not apply S. 10 of the General Clauses
Act will certainly apply to election petitions to be filed under Representation of the
People Act if the court is closed on the date when limitation expired. S.10 (1) of the
General Clauses Act enables the filling on the next working day of the Court. However
reading Rs. 6 and 7 of the Election Rules made by the Patna High Court with R.26
of Chapter VII Part II of Patna High Court Rules an election petition can be presented
on the last day of limitation. Even when the Judges are not sitting to receive or
entertain an election petition on that day to the Registrar or his absence to the other
officers specified in R. 26."
...
...
...
...
3. What we have to consider, however, is that whether having regard to the

requirments of Rr.6 and 7 of the Rules for the Disposal of Election Petitions framed
by the Patna High Court, that an election petition should only be filed before a Judge
of the High Court sitting in open Court, and it could not be filed on a Saturday when
the Judges do not sit and hence the filing of that petition on Monday, March 20,
1972, Sunday being a holiday, is in time. Even if it be held that the filing of the
petition was beyond the time prescribed in S.81, it has further to be considered
whether the provisions of S.5 of the Limitation Act 36 of 1963 are applicable to such
petitions and whether the petitioner has shown sufficient cause in the petition which
has now been filed before this Court for not filing the petition in time to enable the
Court to admit it after the prescribed period.
4.
Three questions which require determination are (1)
Is the Court closed on Saturday, when the Judges do not sit for the
purposes either of S. 10 of the General Clauses Act, or S.4 of the Limitation
Act ?
(2)
By virtue of S.29(2) of the Limitation Act, are the provisions of Ss.4 to

24 of the said Act applicable to election petitions?
(3)
If they are, and S.5 of the Limitation Act is applicable, do the facts of the
case warrant condonation of delay ?
5. On the question whether the petitioner could have filed the petition on Saturday
March 18, 1972, what has to be seen is whether the Court can be said to be closed
within the meaning of either S.4 of the Limitation Act, 1963, or S. 10 of the General
PART I]
2935
Clauses Act, 1897, because under both the provisions where the prescribed period
of limitation expires on a day when the Court is closed the petition could be filed on
a day when the Court re-opens. Where, however, the provisions of the Limitation
Act apply, the proviso to S. 10(1) of the General Clauses Act in terms makes that
provision its self inapplicable. Under S.4 of the Limitation Act it is provided that
where the prescribed period for any suit, appeal or application expires on a day
when the Court is closed, the suit, appeal or application may be instituted, preferred
or made on the day when the Court reopens. The Explanation thereof states that a
Court shall be deemed to be closed on any day within the meaning of that section if
during any part of its normal working hours it remains closed on that day. It was
sought to be contended that even if the Limitation Act applies, S.4 would not apply
because an election petition is neither a suit, nor an appeal nor an application,
notwithstanding the definition of "application" contained in S.2(b) of the Limitation
Act as including a petition. It is, in our view, unnecessary to examine the submission
in this context becuase even if S.4 of the Limitation Act does not apply. S.10 of the
General Clauses Act will certainly apply to election petitions to be filed under the Act
as held by this Court in Harinder Singh v. Karnail Singh 1957 SCR 208 (AIR 1957
SC 271). In that case an election petition had to be filed under R.119(a) of the
Election Rules not later than fourteen days from the terminus a quo prescribed
therein, but as the day on which it could be filed was a Sunday he filed it on the next
day. The contention of the Solicitor-General was that S.10 of the General Clauses
Act.
"can apply on its own terms only when the act in question is to be done "within a
prescribed period", that under R.119(a) of the Election rules the petition has to be
filed "not later than" fourteen days, that the two expressions do not mean the same
thing, the words of the Rule being more preemptory, and that accordingly Section 10
of the General Clauses Act cannot be invoked in aid of a petition presented under
R.119, later than fourteen days".
This argument was rejected as being erroneous because, "broadly stated, the object
of the Section is, to enable a person to do what he could have done on a holiday, on
the next working day. Where, therefore, a period is prescribed for the performance
of an act in a Court or office, and that period expires on a holiday, then according to
the section the act should be considered to have been done within that period, if it is
done on the next day on which the Court or office is open. For that section to apply,
therefore, all that is requisite is that there should be a period prescribed, and that
period should expire on a holiday."
Of course Section 10(1) of the General Clauses Act does not speak of a holiday, but
refers to the Court or office being closed on the last day of the prescribed period to
enable a party to do an act or take any proceedings on a certain day or within a
prescribed period, as the next day on which the Court or office is open. If the court
is closed on the day when limitation expired, Section 10(1) of the General Clauses
Act enables the filing on the next working day of the Court. But is the Court closed
2936
[PART I
on a Saturday when the Judges do not sit though the office of the High Court is
open?
6. A long course of decisions have held that a Court is not closed not
withstanding the fact that Judges do not sit on any day if otherwise the Court
is open on that day. Harries, C.J., during the course of the arguments in
Lachmeshwar Prasad Shukul v. Girdhari Lal Chauduri, ILR 19 Pat 123= (AIR
1939 Pat 667 FB), observed that "Satuday" is a Court day although the Judges
are not sitting on that day. The learned Chief Justice and Fazl Ali. J., as he
then was (Agarwala, J., dissenting) went to the extent of holding that even in
the vactions the Court is not closed and money can be deposited. Turner, C.J.,
speaking for himself, Kernan, Kindersley and Muttuswami Ayyar, JJ. (Innes,
J., disenting observed in Nachiyappa Mudali v. Ayyasami Ayyar. (1982) ILR 5
Mad 189 at p.192 (FB).
The judicial sittings of the Court may be adjourned; but the offices of the
Court may still remain open for the presentation of pleadings. The Court may
be open for this purpose although the Judge is not engaged in judicial functions
or is not present in the Court-house or in the place where the Court is held. A
Bench of the Madras High Court in In re. Thakkudubiyyanu Immainyelu,
(1948) I mad LJ 49=(AIR 1948 Mad 521), dealt with a similar practice which is
followed by all High Courts and this Court for the summer vacation when the
Courts close. The notification in respect thereof specify a period between
Monday to Friday both days inclusive as the vacation. The Court reopens on a
Saturday, but judicial work starts only on the following Monday. It was held
that the first day of the Court was a Saturday which was the day for receiving
papers though the Judges actually sat for judicial work on Monday, as such
an application, for which the prescribed period of limitation expired on
Saturday, the 5th when the Court was open and was not filed on that day, but
on Monday, the 7th, was held to be barred.
In Manohar Joshi v. Nitin Bhaurao Patil and another AIR 1996 S.C. 796, it was hled as
below:14. The question now is: Whether the applicability of Section 10 of the General
Clauses Act to the presentation of election petitions under the R.P. Act is excluded?
No doubt the R.P. Act is a self contained Code even for the purpose of limitation
prescribed therein. This, however, does not answer the question. It has to be seen
whether the context excludes the applicability of Section 10 of the General Clauses
Act which is in the part therein relating to the General Rules of Construction of all
Central Acts. The legislative history of prescribing limitation of presentation of election
petitions in accordance with sub-section (1) of Section 81 is also significant for a
proper application of the context. Admittedly, Section 10 of theGeneral Clauses Act
applied when by virtue of the requirement in the then existing sub-section (1) of
Section 81. The period of limitation was prescribed by Rules framed under the R.P.
Act in Rule 119 of the 1951 Rules. This was expressly provided by Rule 2 (6) of the
PART I]
2937
1951 Rules. There is nothing to indicate that providing the period of limitation in subsection (1) of Section 81 itself by subsitutuion of certain words by Act 27 of 1956
instead of prescribing the limitation by Rules, was with a view to exclude the applicability
of the Section 10 of the General Clauses Act. The change appears to have been made
to provide for a fix period in the Act itself instead of leaving that excise to be performed
by the rules making authority. An express provision in Rule 2 (6) of the1951 Rule was
required since the General Clauses Act ipso facto would not apply to Rules framed
under the Central Act, even though it would be the Act itself. The context supports the
applicability of Section 10 of the General Clauses Act instead of indicating its exclusion
for the purpose of computing the limitation prescribed in sub-section (1) of Section 81
for presentation of election petitions.;
15. In view of the basic premise that the election petitioner is entitled to avail the
entire limitation of 45 days for presentation of the election petition as indicated by
Ramlal, (AIR 1962 SC 361) (supra), if the contrary view is taken, it would require
the election petitioner to perform an impossible task in a case like the present, to
present the election petition on the last day of limitation on which date the High
Court as well as its office is closed. It is the under lying principle of the legal maxim
which suggests the informed decision on this point, leading to only conclusion that
Section 10 of the General Clauses Act applies in the computation of the limitation
prescribed by sub-section (1) of Section 81 of the R.P. Act for presentation of an
election petition. So computed, there is no dispute that the election petition presented
in the present case on 16.4.1990 was within limitation and there was no non-compliance
of sub-section (1) of Section 81 of the R.P. Act.
16. We have reached the above conclusion independent of the above decisions of
this Court rendered on petitions presented subsequent to the amendment of subsection (1) of Section 81. It may straightway be said that in all these cases applicability
of Section 10 of the General Clauses Act was either not doubted or was taken for
granted. This is how the position has been understood for all these years and no case
taking the contrary view has been cited at the Bar. This settled position is in conformity
with the view we have taken on this point. There is no basis in law to take a different
view.
In (H.H.Raja) Harinder Singh v. S.Karnail Singh and others 1957 A.I.R. (SC) 271, it was
held as below:4. The first question turns on the interpretation of Section 10 of the General
Clauses Act, which is as follows:Where, by any Central Act or Regulation made after the commencement
of this Act, any act or proceedings is directed or allowed to be done or
taken in any Court or office on a certain day or within a prescribed
period, then, if the Court or office is closed on that day or the last day of
the prescribed period, the act or proceeding shall be considered as done
or taken in due time if it is done or taken on the next day afterwards on
which the Court of office is open.
2938
[PART I
The contention of the Solicitor-General on behalf of the appellant is that this section
can apply on its own terms only when the act in question is to be done within a
prescribed period that under Rule 119 (a) the petition has to be filed not later
than fourteen days, that the two expressions do not mean the same thing, the words
of the Rule being more peremptory, land that accordingly Section 10 of the General
Clauses Act cannnot be invoked in aid of a petition presented Rule 119, later than
fourteen days. In support of this contention, he invites our attention to some of the
Rules in which the expression time within which is used, as for example, Rule
123, and he argues that when a statute uses two different expressions, they must be
construed as used in two different senses. He also points out that whatever the
Legislature intended that if the last date on which an act could be performed fell on
a holiday, it could be validly performed on the next working day, it said so, as in the
proviso to Section 37 of the Act, and that there would be no need for such a
provision, if Section 10 of the General Clauses Act were intended generally to apply.
5. This argument proceeds on an interpretation of Section 10 of the General
Clauses Act which , in our opinion, is erroneous. Broadly stated, the object of the
section is, to enable a person to do what he could have done on a holiday, on the
next working day. Where therefore, a period is prescribed for the performance of an
act in a Court or office, and that period expires on a holiday then according to the
section the act should be considered to have been done within that period, if it is
done on the next day on which the Court or office is open. For that section to apply,
therefore, all that is requisite is that there should be a period prescribed, and that
period should expire on a holiday. Now, it cannot be denied that the period of
fourteen days provided in Rule 119 (a) for presentation of an election petition is a
period prescribed, and that is its true character, whether the words used are within
fourteen days or not later than fourteen days. That the appellant between these
two expressions is without substance will be clear beyond all doubt, when regard is
had to Section 81 of the Act. Section 81 (1) enacts that the election petition may be
presented within such time as may be prescribed, and it is under this Section that
Rule 119 has been framed. It is obvious that the rule-making authority could not
have intended to go further than what the section itself had enacted, and if the
language of the Rule is construed in conjunction with and under the coverage of the
section under which it is framed, the words not later than fourteen days must be
held to mean the same thing as within a period of fourteen days. Reference in this
connection should be made to the heading of Rule 119 which is, Time within which
an election petition shall be presented. We entertain no doubt that the Legislature
has used both the expressions as meaning the same thing, and there are accordingly
no grounds for holding that Section 10 is not applicable to petitions falling within
Rule 119.
It would also be essential to notice that the cause of action to compute the period of limitation of
45 days would commence from the date of the candidate being declared elected. Prior to the amendement of
1956, there was no limitation prescribed and the only requirement under Section 81 was that a petition could be
presented in such form and within such time as may be prescribed. One had to fall back on the rules made
PART I]
2939
under the Act to seek interpretation of the word prescribed'.

However, such an embiguity has been done away with on account of the amendment specifically
providing a period of 45 days from the date of election of the returned candidate.
Section 67-A of the Act clarifies that the date on which the candidate is declared elected by the
Returning Officer, is to be the date of election of that candidate.
On facts, therefore, there would be no ambiguty i.e. if a candidate was declared elected on
16.5.2014, the period of 45 days would end on 29.6.2014 being a period of vacation. The petition was filed on
30.6.2014.
In Lachhman Das Arora v. Geneshi Lal and others AIR 1999 SC 3101, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court observed as below:"The Representation of the People Act, 1951, in so far as it relates to the presentation
and trail of election disputes is a complete Code and a special law. The scheme of
the special law shows that the provisions of Ss. 4 to 24 of the Indian Limitation Act
do not apply. If an election petition is not filed within the prescribed period of forty
five days. S.86 (1) of the Act, which provides that the High Court shall dismiss an
election petition which does not comply with the provisions of S.81 or S. 82 or S.
117, is straightway attracted. Whether S. 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 can
apply in a case where the prescribed period of limitation expires during the vacations
of the High Court would, therefore, depend upon the terms of the Notification
issued by the Punjab and Haryana High Court on 27.11.1995. The notification
unambiguously provides that during the summer vacations i.e. period between June
1 to June 30, 1996 (both days inclusive) while the High Court of Punjab and Haryana
at Chandigarh would remain closed for civil business, it would be open for hearing
of election petitions or any other matter arising out the Representation of the People
Act. Therefore, where the election petition had been filed, on reopening day of the
High Court after summer vacations, but after the expiry of the period of forty-five
days prescribed under S.81 (1) of the Act, which period had expired during the
period of summer vacations the benefit of S. 10 of General Clauses Act was not
available to the election petitioner to save the period of limitation. In view of the
clear language of the notifiction, there was no impendiment in the way of the appellant
to present the election petition during the summer vacations. Further, the argument
of the appellant that in view of the serious charges which had been levelled against
the returned candidate in the election petition, the same ought not to have been
dismissed on the ground of limitation, as the purity of election process is required to
be maintained is not sustainable. There is no quarrel with the proposition that it is
the duty of the Courts of maintain the purity of election process but at the same time
there is no gainsaying that the law of limitation may harshly affect a particular party.
but it has to be applied with all its vigour when the Statute so prescribes. The Courts
cannot extend the period of limitation on equitable grounds more particularly in the
matter of filing of election petitions under the Act.
...
....
...
2940
[PART I
7. On its plain reading, S.81 (1) lays down that an election petition calling in
question any election may be presented on one or more of the grounds specified in
sub-section (1) of S.100 and S.101 of the Act to the High Court by any candidate at
such election or by an elector within forty-five days from, but not earlier than, the
date of election of the returned candidate, or if there are more than one returned
candidate at the election and the dates of their election are different, the later of those
two dates. The Act is a special Code providing a period of limitation for filing of an
election petition. No period for filing of an election petition is prescribed under
the Indian Limitation Act. The Act in so far as it relates to presentation and
trial of election dispute is a complete Code and a special law. The scheme of
the special law shows that the provisions of Ss. 4 to 24 of the Indian Limitation
Act do not apply. If an election petition is not filed within the prescribed
period of forty-five days, S.86(1) of the Act, which provides that the High
Court shall dismiss an election petition which does not comply with the
provisions of S.81 or S.82 or S.117, is straightway attracted.
8. The next question, however, which arises for consideration is whether
S.10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 can apply in a case where the prescribed
period of limitation expires during the vacations of the High Court? Section
10 of the General Clauses Act reads:
Section 10.- Computation of time,(1) Where, by any Central Act or Regulation
made after the commencement of this Act, any act or proceeding is directed or
allowed to be done or taken in any Court or office on a certain day or within a
prescribed period, then, if the Court or office is closed on that day or the last day of
the prescribed period, the act or proceeding shall be considered as done or taken in
due time if it is done or taken on the next day afterwards on which the Court or
office is open:
Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to any act or proceeding to which
the Indian Limitation Act, 1887 (15 of 1887) applies.
9. The proviso to S.10 makes the provisions of S. 10 inapplicable to cases where
the Indian Limitation Act applies and since Indian Limitation Act does not apply to
election petitions filed under the Act, Section 10 of the General Clauses Act in terms
would apply to the filing of election petitions also. According to S.10 (supra) an act
should be considered to have been done within the prescribed period, if it is done on
the next day on which the Court or office is open. The inapplicability of S.10 (supra)
would, however, depend upon the facts of each case and the manner in which the
High Court transacts its business during the period of vacations.
The observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mohd. Ali v. Azad Mohd. 1999(4) R.C.R.
(Civil) 148 where the High Court had issued the following notification during vacations, would be relevant :3. In Lachhman Das Arora v. Ganesh Lal and others 1999(4) RCR (Civil)
138 (SC) : Civil Appeal No. 8343 of 1997, decided on September 1,1999, this Court
has considered the effect of the very same notification dated 27th November, 1995 on
PART I]
2941
the filing of an election petition on the re-opening day of the High Court after
summer vacations, when the prescribed period of limitation expired, during the summer
vacations. After taking note of the provisions of the Representation of the People
Act as well as Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, this Court has come to
the conclusion that the election petition, was barred by time, because of the exception
contained in the Notification itself. The opinion expressed in the said case applies to
this case with full force. We adopt the reasoning given by the Bench in Lachman
Das Arora's case (supra) to this case also.
4. Faced with this situation, Mr. B.S. Malim, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner submitted that another Notification had been issued by the High Court of
Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh on 27th May, 1996 and since the later Notification
did not contain any exception, the benefit of Section 10 of the General Clauses Act,
1897, would be available to an election petitioner for filing the election petition on
the re-opening day of the High Court after summer vacations. The Notification
dated 27th May, 1996 on which reliance is placed reads thus:
No. 207/Genl./XVII.3.- It is notified for general information that the High Court of
Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh shall observe summer vacations from 1st June
to 30th June, 1996 (both days inclusive) and following timings shall be observed
during the period of vacation i.e. 1st June, 1996 to 30th June, 1996.
COURT TIMINGS:
10 a.m. to 4.00 p.m.

with lunch break
from 1.00 p.m. to 1.45 p.m.
OFFICE TIMINGS:
10.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m.

with luch break from
1.30 p.m. to 2.00 p.m.
By order of Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice and Judges
(Sd/-)
Assistant Registrar (General)
for Registrar.
5. In our opinion, reliance on this Notification to save the period of limitation is
misplaced. The Notification 27th May, 1996 (supra) does not in any manner supersede
the Notification issued by the High Court earlier on 27th November, 1995.The
Notification dated 27th May, 1996 has to be read as supplementary to the Notification
dated 27th November, 1995 because in the latter Notification court timings and
office timings during the summer vacations have been prescribed. The effect of the
Notification dated 27th November, 1995 has in no way been whittled down by the
subsequent Notification dated 27th May, 1996 and on the contrary, the subesequent
Notification, by prescribing the court and office timings, has clarified the manner in
which the court business was to be transacted during the summer vacations. Both
the notifications have, therefore, to be read together.
2942
[PART I
6. Mr. Malik then submitted that under Section 23-A of the High Court Judges
(Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 every High Court shall have vacation or vacations
for such period or period as may from time to time be fixed and during the period of
vacations, the Court would not be considered as 'open' for any purpose. There is a
basic fallacy in the argument. These provisiones having nothing to do with the
functioning of the High Courts. The transaction of court business during the vacations
is not controlled by the High Court (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954, but by the
Notification issued by the High Court in that behalf.
The non-applicant i.e. the petitioner on the other hand, would rely on a decision of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Simhadri Satya Narayana Rao v. M.Budda Prasad 1994 (sup 1) SCC 449 wherein it was
held as below:"8. There are no rules or standing orders issued by the Andhra Pradesh HighCourt
providing for a uniform pattern of working during the vacations. It is the notification
notifying the Sankranthi vacation which would indicate the manner and extent of
functioning of the High Court during the vacation. Whether the Registry was open,
if so, to what extent and for what type of work, can only be spelled out from the
contents of the notification. It is, therefore, necessary to examine the scope and
effect of the notification issued by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in this respect.
The said notification is as under:
NOTIFICATION R.O.C No. 5463/89-C3
DATED DECEMBER 29, 1989
Notice is hereby given that the High Court of Andhra Pradesh will remain
closed for Sankranthi vacation, 1990 from Tuesday the 2nd January to Friday
the 12th January 1990 (both days inclusive).
The Hon'ble Shri Justice N.D. Patnaik will be the Vaction Judge from January
2, 1990 to January 6, 1990 and Hon'ble Shri Justice Syed Shah Mihammed
Quadri will be the Vacation Judge from January 7, 1990 to January 12, 1990.
The Vacation Judges will sit in Court at 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday the 3rd
January 1990 and Tuesday the 9th January 1990 during vacation to dispose of
applications of urgent nature unless otherwise notified.
Shri K.V.G. Krishna Murthy and Shri S.Raja Chaudary Assistant Registrars
will be the Vacation Officers during the said vacation.
Notice of any application of an urgent nature shall be given to the Vacation
Officers before 1.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 2nd January and 8th January, 1990.
9. The first para of the notification, which is the operative part, states that the
High Court of Andhra Pradesh will remain closed for Sankranthi vacation, 1990
from Tuesday the 2nd January to Friday the 12th January 1990 (both days inclusive).
The notification nowwhere states that the Registry of the High Court would remain
open. Notice to the effect that the High Court of Andhra Pradesh will remain
closed cannot be understood by layman-litigant to mean that it would still be open
PART I]
2943
for filing purposes. After the operative part which declares the closure of the High
Court for Sankranthi vacation, the subsequent paras specifically indicate the matters
which could be filed during the vacation. It is stated that two Hon'ble Judges would
be the Vacation Judges for the specified period and they would dispose of applications
of urgent nature. The designation of two Assistant Registrars as vacation officers
and the provision of notice of urgent application to the vacation officers a day earlier
of sitting of the vacation Judges, goes to show that the Registry was not functioning
in the ordinay course. A bare reading of the notification leaves no manner of doubt
that the Andhra Pradesh High Court remained closed for all purposes except for
applications of urgent nature for which vacation Judges and vacation officers were
designated. There was no provision for filing of election petitions in the notification
and as such the filing of the election petition by the respondents on reopening day of
the High Court by invoking Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, was justified.
10. In Hari Shanker Tripathi v. Shiv Harsh the notification issued by the
Allahabad High Court stated that May 25 to July 7,1974 would be observed as
closed holiday in the High Court due to summer vacation. The period for filing the
election petition had expired during the summer vacation and the election petition
was filed on the reopening day of the High Court after the summer vacation. This
Court held as under:
For the reasons given above we are satisfied that as the period of limitation
expired during the summer vacation which was a closed holiday by virtue
of the notification issued by the High Court, the Registrar was not
competent to entertain the election petition nor could the appellant have
presented the election petition legally to the Registrar during such period.
We are further satisfied that this is a case in which Section 10 of the
General Clauses Act applies in terms and the appellant was fully justified
in filing the election petition on the reopening day of the High Court,
namely, July 8, 1974.
11. We do not agree with the contention of Mr. Sitaramiah that in the absence of
any bar in the notification the election petitions under the Act can be filed during the
vacations. It is the vacation notification which has to be looked up to find out
whether the Registry is open for presenting the election petitions. The notification in
this case unmistakably stated that the High Court would remain closed during
Sankranthi vacation. No reasonable person would knock the door of the High Court
during that period for filing an election petition.
12. The Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the Sankranthi vacation notification
interpreted the same in the following words:It, therefore, follows that the notification referred to above, dated December
29, 1989 did not permit either of the Hon'ble Judges or the Registry to receive
the election petitions during the Sankranthi vacation. As mentioned already,
the notification says that the High Court of Andhra Pradesh will remain closed
2944
[PART I
for the Sankranthi vacation from January 2, 1990 to January 12, 1990 (both
days inclusive). The nomination does not clarify that the Judges of the High
Court alone would refrain from work between January 2,1990 and January
12, 1990 and that the Registry would function normally during the said period
of vacation. The notification does not even further specify that the vacation
officers are authorized to receive any papers presented to them other than notices
of applications of urgent nature. In the light of the specific wording contained
in that notification, I hold that the High Court of Andhra Pradesh remained
closed for the Sankranthi vacation from January 2,1990 to January 12,1990
which mean that the Registry of the High Court also remained closed during
the said period.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the High Court
Registry was open during the vacation and received as many as 25 election
petitions. It is not necessary in these applications to consider whether the
Registry was competent to receive those 25 election petitions during the vacation.
This is not a relevant consideration for the disposal of these applications. What
all is necessary to consider in these applications is whether in the light of the
wording contained in the notification dated December 29,1989, the High Court
remained closed between January 2, 1990 to January 12, 1990 so as to enable
the election petitioners to invoke Section 10 of the General Clauses Act...
The learned counsel for the petitioners referring to the wording contained in
Section 10 of the General Clauses Act tried to draw a distinction between the
closure of the ' court' and 'office' on the last day of limitation and tried to
submit that what all has been closed is the High Court but not the office. There
is no scope to draw such an inference from the notification. As I have mentioned
already, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, remained closed for the Sankranthi
vacation and the notification does not give room for any distinction being made
between the court and the office which means the Registry of the High Court.
13. We see no infirmity in the reasoning and the conclusions reached by the High
Court. No other point was urged before us. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal with
no order as to costs.
In Satbir v. Smt. Parasanni Devi and others (Civil Appeals No. 3192,3275 & 3523 of 1982
decided on October 5, 1983), while dealing with a notification of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court observed as follows:These election appeals which we propose to dispose of by the common judgment
arise out of an election held in 1982, the result whereof was declared on 21.5.1982.
The period of 45 days available to the appellants for filing Election Petitions in the
High Court expired on 5.7.1982 in the matter giving rise to C.A. No. 3192 of 1982
and on 4.7.1982 in the matters giving rise to C.A. Nos. 3275 & 3533 of 1982.
Admittedly, the petitions were filed on 12th July, 1982 when the High Court opened
after the summer vacation. The only point that has been argued vehemently by Mr.
PART I]
2945
Goyal is that since the High Court was closed for summer vacation he was not
bound under law to file any petition during vacation and could take advantage of the
vacation though the period of 45 days expired during vacation, Mr. Goyal further
argued that even though the petitioner could have filed the petition during vacation if
he so desired, he had nevertheless option to file the petition on the reopening that is
a week after the expiry of 45 days. This argument appears to be based on a notification
made by the Chief Justice regarding the work to be transacted during the summer
vacation which runs thus.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Notification
No. 406 Gen./XVII.3(a)
Dated the 20.11.1981
It is hereby notified for general information that the High Court of Punjab and
Haryana at Chandigarh will be closed for civil business except for hearing Election
Petitions or any other matter arising out of the Representation of the People
Act, 1951, urgent Civil Appeals/Petitions etc. including petitions under Article
226 of the Constitution, on account of long vacation in the year 1982 from 7th
June to 9 July, 1982 (both days inclusive).
During this period, except on Sundays and holidays Appeals/Petitions
etc. will be received at the Court at Chandigarh from such persons as may
choose to present them.
(Emphasis supplied)
BY ORDER OF THE HON'BLE
CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUDGE
REGISTRAR.
From a persual of the afore-extracted provisions of law as also the observations which have
been made in a number of judgements noticed above, it becomes clear that the High Court would have no power
to extend the period of limitation; the provisions of Section10 of the General Clauses Act would apply but its
applicability would largely depend on the facts of the case in particular, the notification issued by the High Court
for the vacation period providing specification of the work permissible during this period.
The court would now like to travel to the notification issued by the High Court of Punjab &
Haryana governing the period of vacation from 2.6.2014 to 28.6.2014 (both days inclusive) as below:HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NOTIFICATION
No. 57 Genl.XVII.3DATED, Chandigarh the 7th May, 2014
It is hereby notified for general information that the High Court of Punjab
and Haryana at Chandigarh will remain closed from 2nd June, 2014 to 28th June,
2014 (both days inclusive) for transacting Civil Business. However, the urgent petitions
under Article 226 of the Constitution and other cases in which Hon'ble the Vacation
Judge(s) is satisfied on account of the urgency, would be taken up during the aforesaid
2946
[PART I
period. The Election Petitions or any other matter arising out of the Representation
of People Act, 1951, shall also be entertained. The regular work of the Court
would commence on Monday the 30th June, 2014.
BY ORDER OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE & JUDGES.
What is of significance is that election petition or any other matter arising out of the Representation
of the People Act, 1951 was permitted to be entertained during this period.
If the notification is specific, then in view of the observation made by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Satbir v. Smt. Parsanni Devi and others' case (supra) and Lachman Das Arora v. Ganeshi Lal and
others' case (supra), there would be no escape from the conclusion that the petitioner could have filed the
Election Petition within the aforesaid period of vacation but he filed it on 30.6.2014 i.e. the opening day when
the period of 45 days expired on 29.6.2014, delaying the petition by one day and with no power with the High
Court to relax the period, the petition would necessarily have to be held to be beyond limitation.
Besides merely because Judges are not holding Court does not imply that the administration of
the courts are at a standstill particularly when act of filing and receiving by the Court is ministerial act, with the
notification specifically enabling entertaining of all or any matters arising out of the Representation of the
Peoples Act.
The judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner/non-applicant in Sukhbeer
Singh v Amarinder Singh 2011(3) R.C.R. (Civil 150 and the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Simhadri Satya Narayana Rao v. M.Budda Prasad 1994 (Sup l) SCC 449 (supra) would be of no
use to the petitioner as the notification issued by the High Court were silent in this regard.
Similarly, in the judgment in Sukbheer Singh v. Amarinder Singh (supra) where there was a
brief recess in April, the notification did not provide specifically that election petitions could be received. For the
purpose of reference, the notification relevant to the case relied upon the said case is extracted here below:350Genl/XCII.3 It is hereby notified for general information that the days
enumerated in the schedule below shall be observed as Holidays by the Punjab and
Haryana High Court at Chandigarh during the Calender year, 2007:Sr.
Description of
Date on
Day of the
No. of
No.
Holidays
which falls
week
Holidays
XXX
XXX
XXX
11
Good Friday
April 06
Friday
12.
Baisakhi/Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar
Jainti
April 14
Saturday
XXX
XXX
XXX
LOCAL HOLIDAYS 2007

XXX
XXX
XXX
5.
April 9
Monday
6.
April 10
Tuesday
7.
April 11
Wednesday
PART I]

8.
April 12
Tursday
April 13
Friday
XXX
XXX
2947
XXX
16. The notification, unambigously provides that 9th to 13th April 2007 are local
holidays, whereas 14.4.2007 is holiday, on account of Baisakhi/B.R. Ambedkar
Jayanti and 15.4.2007 being a Sunday, the High Court would be closed. The High
Court eventually reopened on 16.4.2007 and the election petition was filed on
16.4.2007. The above notification does not make any reference to any arrangement
for work, much less urgent work to be taken up during vacations for obvious reasons.
Work to be taken up during vacations is generally notified, in the cause list proceeding
a spell of vacations. Though, the notification amending the notification of holidays,
was amended, after the declaration of election results, this notification dated 29.3.2007,
published on 4.4.2007, notifying that 21.4.2007 and 28.4.2007 would be Court
working days, does not state that election petitions could be filed during the spell of
vacation i.e. from 9th to 15th April, 2007 and does not disclose the nature of work
to be assigned or entertained during vacations. The daily cause list issued on the eve
of these vacations contains the following note, which reads as follows:During the ensuing holidays commencing from 6.4.2007 to 15.4.2007, the
following officers with their respective staff are put on duty to entertain Habeas
Corpus Petitions from 6.4.2007 to 15.4.2007 and pre-arrest bail matters and
such other urgent matters, if any, received during the aforesaid spell as may be
permitted by His Loardship through Registry from 9.4.2007 to 13.4.2007 will
be taken up by the Hon'ble Judge/s.
Name of Officers:1. Mrs. Tejinder Kaur Bakshi, Assistant Registrar
2. Mr. R.S. Gill, Assistant Registrar (Civil & Judl.)
3. Mr. R.S. Ratol, Deputy Registrar (Protocol)
4. Ms. Nirmal Kant, Deputy Registrar (Accounts)
5. Mrs. Suman chopra, Deputy Registrar (Writ)
6. Mr. A.P. Khurana, Deputy Registar (Groupings)
7. Mr. Ranjit Singh, Deputy Registrar (Establishment)
8. Mr. M.P. Kohli, Assistant Registrar.
9. Mrs. Vijay Bhandair, Assistant Registrar.
For the afore-mentioned reasons, this Court is of the considered view that the Election Petition
was beyond the period of limitation and thus, has to be dismissed on the score. C.M. stands allowed.
Since the election petition is being dismissed on the point of limitation, it may not be necessary
for this Court to go into the issue of proper joinder of parties which is the second objection taken by the
applicant.
The Election Petition stands dismissed.
May 08, 2015
GD
Sd/(MAHESH GROVER)
JUDGE
2948
[PART I

Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110001
Dated: 7th July, 2015
16 Ashadha, 1937 (Saka)
ORDER
No. 76/PB-HP/2015.-Whereas, the Election Commission is satisfied that each of the contesting candidates
specified in column (4) of the Table below at the General Election to the Lok Sabha, 2014 as specified in
Column (2) held from the constitutency specified in column (3) against his/her name, has failed to lodge an
account of election expenses as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and Rules and Order
made there under; as shown in column (5) of the said Table; and
Whereas, the said candidates have not furnished any reason or explanation for the said failure even after
due notice and the Election Commission is thus satisfied that they have no good reason or justification for the
said failure;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of Section 10A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Election
Commission hereby declares the persons specified in column (4) of the table below to be disqualified for being
chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of the Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or
Legislative Council of a State for a period of three years from the date of this order:TABLE
Sr.
No.
Paticulars
of Election
No. and Name

of Constituency
Name and address of contesting

candidate
Reasons for
disqualification
1.
1.
General
Election to
the Lok
Sabha, 2014
4-Jalandhar
Sh. Ajay Kumar Bhagat,

H.No. 1680, Bhargo Nagar,
Near BC-93, Jalandhar
Failure to lodge
account of election
expenses.
2.
-do-
-do-
Sh. Tarsem Peter,

VPO Udhowal Teh. Nakodar,
Distt. Jalandhar
Failure to lodge
account of election
expenses.
3.
-do-
7-Ludhiana
Sh. Akshayabar Nath Mishra,

H.No. 127-C Urban Estate,
Phase-1, Jamalpur, Ludhiana.
Failure to lodge
account of election
expenses.
4.
-do-
do
Sh. Simrejit Singh,

Village & Post Officer Lohara,
Distt. Ludhiana.
Failure to lodge
account of election
expenses.
5.
-do-
12-Sangrur
Sh. Gurdeep Singh,

H.No. B5/103, Ramgarhia
Gurdwara Road, Barnala
Failure to lodge
account of election
expenses.
6.
-do-
-do-
Sh. Gurpreet Singh,

VPO Rooreke Kalan,
Tehsil Tapa, Distt. Barnala,
Punjab
Failure to lodge
account of election
expenses.
PART I]
1.
7.
General
Election to
the Lok
Sabha, 2014
12-Sangrur
Sh. Joti Devaji Ansuia,

H.No. 17-B, Mahesh Nagar,
Dhuri, Distt. Sangrur, Punjab
Failure to lodge
account of election
expenses.
2949
la- 76@iatkc&yks-l-@2015-&
l-@2015-&;r%] Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx dk ;g lek/kku gks x;k gS fd uhps dh
lkkj.kh ds LrEHk (2) esa fofufnZ"V yksd lHkk ds lk/kkj.k fuokZpu] 2014 esa LrEHk (3) esa fofufnZ"V fuokZpu
{ks= ls vkSj LrEHk (4) esa fofufnZ"V fuokZpu yM+us okyk izR;sd vH;FkhZ vius uke ds lkeus] yksd izfrfuf/kRo
vf/kfu;e] 1951] rFkk rn~/khu cuk, x, fu;eksa ,oa vkns'k ds vara xZr ;Fkk visf{kr mDr lkj.kh ds LraHk (5) esa
;Fkk nf'kZr vius fuokZpu O;; dk ys[kk nkf[ky djus esa foQy jgk gSl vkSj
;r:, mDr vH;fFkZ;ksa us] lE;d uksfVl fn, tkus ds ckotqn] mDr foQyrk ds fy, ;k rks dksbZ dkj.k
;k Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k gS] vkSj bl izdkj Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx dk ;g lek/kku gks x;k gS fd mDr foQyrk
ds fy, muds ikl dksbZ mi;qDr ;k U;k;ksfpr dkj.k ugha gS;
vr:, vc yksd izfrfuf/kRo vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 10d ds vuqlj.k es]a Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx ,rn~n~okjk
uhps dh lkj.kh ds LrEHk (4) esa fofufnZ"V O;fDr;ksa dks laln ds fdlh Hkh lnu ;k jkT; dh fo/kku lHkk vFkok
fo?kku ifj"kn ds fy, lnL; pqus tkus ;k gksus ds fy, bl vkns'k dh rkjh[k ls rhu o"kZ dh vof/k ds fy,
fujfgZr ?kksf"kr djrk gS:lkj.kh
e
la-
fuokZpu dk
fooj.k
fuokZpu {ks=
dh la[;k vkSj
uke
fuokZpu yM+us okys vH;FkhZ dk

uke vkSj irk
fujgZrk dk dkj.k
yksd lHkk
lk/kkj.k
fuokZpu] 2014
04&tkya/kj
Jh vt; dqekj Hkxr]

e-u- 1680] Hkkjxks uxj]
fu;j ch-lh- 93] tkya/kj
fuokZpu O;; dk ys[kk

nkf[ky djus esa vlQy
jguk
&ogh&
04&tkya/kj
Jh rjlae ihVj] xkao o

Mkd?kj&m<ksor] rglhy
udjksnk] ftyk& tkya/kj

jguk
&ogh&
07&yqf/k;kuk
Jh v{k;cj ukFk feJk]

e-u-&127c, 'kgjh bLVsV] Qsl&1]
tekyiqj] yqf/k;kuk

jguk
&ogh&
07&yqf/k;kuk
Jh flej thr flag]

xkao o Mkd/kj&yksgkjk]
ftyk&yqf/k;kuk

jguk
2950
1
5
2
yksd lHkk
lk/kkj.k
fuokZpu] 2014
&ogh&
3
12&lax:j
12&lax:j
&ogh&
12&lax:j
4
Jh xqjnhi flag] e-u-&B5/103,
jkexfj;k xq:n~okjk jksM]
cjukyk
Jh xqjfizr flag] xkao o
Mkd?kj&'ksjds dyka] rglhy&rkik]
ftyk&cjukyk] iatkc
Jh tksfr nsokth valqbZ;k]
e-u-&17@3] egs'k uxj] /kqjh]
ftyk&lax:j] iatkc
[PART I
5
jguk
jguk
jguk
vkns'k ls]
gLrk@&
'kaxkjk jke
ofj"B iz/kku lfpo
STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, PUNJAB

NOTIFICATION
The 3rd November, 2015
No.SEC-SA-ET-2015/7981.- In pursuance of the provisions of Section 93 of the Punjab State Election
Commission Act, 1994 (Punjab Act No. 19 of 1994), the Election Commission hereby notifies the order of the
Election Tribunal for general information.
pk^ndkbs Pqh no;adhg f;zx fEzd, nkJhHJ/Hn?;H, gqhIkJhfvzr nca;o, fJb?e;aB fNqfpT{Bb
(fvgNh efw;aBo) ;zro{o.
&&&0&&&
fw;b Bzpo
oi{nk
c?;bk
fgzv
20$fJb?HgNhPB$vhH;h$13
30^07^2013
05^12^2014
r[odk;g[ok
BkIo f;zx g[Zso pjkdo f;zx tk;h fgzv r[odk;g[ok, sfj;hb s/ fIbQk ;zro{o.
HHHHgNhPBo
pBkw
1H
r[odoPB e"o gsBh ;[fozdo f;zx tk;h fgzv r[odk;g[ok jkb tk;h ;zro{o
2H
r[owhs e"o gsBh Bkio f;zx 3H G[fgzdo f;zx g[Zso okw Bzd f;zx
4H
r[ow/b f;zx g[Zso puB f;zx tk;hnkB fgzv r[odk;g[ok, sfj;hb ;zro{o
5H
Pqh uwe"o f;zx foNofBzr nc;o ;pzXs u'D fgzv r[odk;g[ok jkb wkw{ok dh ;zro{o e'ngo/fNt
p?Ae w/B poKu, ;zro{o
6H
gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o u'D ;pzXs fgzv r[odk;g[ok Pqh wB'jo bkb Bkozr, gzikp B?PBb p?Ae w/B poKu,
;zro{o.
HHHHfo;gKv?AN;
PART I]
2951
u'D gNhPB I/o Xkok 74 t 89 nkc dh gzikp oki ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN, 1994
pkps ehJ/ ikB/ oZd u'D fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 ps"o ;ogzu, rokw gzukfJs,r[odk;g[ok.
jkIoL
Pqh nwBdhg f;zx tehb gNhPBo

Pqh ;[ytho f;zx g{DhnK tehb fo;gKv?AN BzL1
j[ewL
fJ; e/; d/ ;zy/g jkbks fJ; gqeko jB fe fJj gNhPB BkIo f;zx gNhPBo B/ fto[ZX r[odoPB
f;zx fo;gKv?AN BzL1 ps"o ;ogzu, rokw gzukfJs r[odk;g[ok, sfj;hb s/ fIbQk ;zro{o ehsh j?. gNhPB
ftZu w'N/ s"o s/ fejk frnk j? fe gzikp ;oeko dhnK jdkfJsK nB[;ko rokw gzukfJs r[odk;g[ok dh u'D
fwsh 3H7H2013 Bz{ j'Jh ;h fi; ftZu gNhPBo ns// fo;gKv?NkB BzL1 sk 4 B/ ;ogzuh bJh BkwIdrh gZso
dkyb ehs/ ;h fi; bJh gNhPBo Bz{ e?wok, fo;gKv?AN BzL1 Bz{ r?; ;N't, fo;gKv?AN BzL2 Bz{ J/no ezvhPBo
fo;gKv?AN BzL3 Bz{ p?Noh ns/ fo;gKv?AN BzL4 Bz{ nbwkoh u'D fBPkB nbkN ehs/ rJ/ ;hl fJj fe fwsh
3H7H2013 Bz{ t'NK ;t/o/ 8 ti/ s'A Pkw 4 ti/ sZe g'b j'JhnK ;h s/ r[odk;g[ok dhnK e[Zb 374 t'NK ftu'A 343
t'NK g'b j'JhnK ;h fiBQK dh Pkw 4 ti/ s'A frDsh P[o{ ehsh rJh s/ nzsek 9 w[skpe 4 t'NK e?A;b j'JhnK,
gNhPBo Bz{ 160, fo;gKv?AN BzL1 Bz{ 171, fo;gKv?AN BzL2 Bz{ 2 t'NK, fo;gKv?AN BzL3 Bz{ 4 t'NK s/ fo;gKv?AN
BzL4 Bz{ 2 t'NK gJhnK s/ gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o B/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 Bz{ 11 t'NK d/ coe Bkb rbs sohe/ Bkb
i/s{ ;ogzu eoko fdZskl fJj fe gNhPBo B/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ BkwIdrh gZsoK ;pzXh fJsokI g/P ehsk ;h
gozs{ foNofBzr nc;o B/ fJ;s/ e'Jh r"o BjhA ehsh s/ rbs s"o s/ T[;dk BkwIdrh gZso wzBi{o ehsk
jkbK fe r[odoPB e"o fgzv r[odk;g[ok dh gZeh t;Bhe BK j? s/ nZi eZb B/V/ xzNk xo ;zro{o fty/ ofjzdh
j? fi; ekoB T[;dk BkwIdrh gZso e?A;b j'DK ukjhdk ;hl fJj fe fo;gKv?AN BzL1 xzNk xo ;zro{o fty/
ngD/ gfotko ;w/s ofjzdh j? s/ T[;d/ gfotko dhnK t'NK tkov BzL6 w[jZbk X{oh r/N piko, e'oN o'v
;zro{o fty/ pDhnK j'JhnK jB fJ; bJh fo;gKv?AN BzL1 ;Ik dh Gkrh j?l fJj fe u'D nwb/ B/ rokw
gzukfJs r[odk;g[ok dh u'D ekBz{Bh sohe/ Bkb BjhA eotkJh BK jh ekBz{B d/ o{bI Bz{ u'D ;w/A s/ frDsh
;w/A tkfunk j?l fJj fe o{b 33 w[skpe gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o Bz{ u'D d/ s[ozs pzd j'D pknd T[whdtkoK s/ T[BQK
d/ J/izNK dh jkioh ftZu ;ko/ p?bN g/goK s/ pef;nK dh gVskb eoBh ukjhdh ;h gozs{ gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o
B/ p?bN pke; gNhPBo s/ T[;d/ J/izN dh jkioh ftZu BjhA y'b/ BK jh T[BQK d/ ;kjwD/ nbZr nbZr eoe/ T[;d/
pzvb pDkJ/ ns/ e'Jh th p?bN g/go s/ bZrk fBPkB T[BQK B[z{ BjhA fdykJhnk s/ nkgD/ nkg jh gqhIkJhfvzr
nc;o p?bN g/go d/ye/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ jZe ftZu oZy/ p?bN g/goK ftZu gk fdzdk ;h idfe ekBz{BD jo
p?bN g/go ;ko/ T[whdtkoK Bz{ fdykT[DK ukjhdk ;hl fJj fe fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ u'DK ;w/A t'NoK Bz{ GowkT[D
bJh rbs t;hfbnK dh tos'A ehsh s/ fgzv ftZu jo fJZe xo ftZu Pokp s/ mzv/ dhnK p'sbK t'NoK Bz{ tzvhnK
s/ fJ;s'A fJbktk eJh t'NoK Bz{ 1000 o[gJ/ s'A b?e/ 1500 o[gJ/ sZe jo t'N d/ fj;kp Bkb g?;/ tzve/ ngD/
jZe ftZu t'N G[rskJh j? i' e[oZgN go?efN; j?l fJj fe fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ u'D nwb/ Bz{ oks ;w/A ngDh e'mh
ftZu J/H;hHtkb/ ewfonK ftZu mfjokfJnk s/ T[BQK d/ ykD ghD dk gqpzX ehsk, fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB wzi{o
eoe/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh u'D ps"o ;ogzu oZd eoe/ gNhPBo Bz{ u[fDnk ;ogzu x'fPs ehsk ikt/.
2H
gNhPB dk B'fN; fo;gKv?ANkB Bz{ fdZsk frnk. fo;gKv?AN BzL 6 B/ ngD/ itkp ftZu gNhPB ftZu bkJ/
d'PK s'A fJBeko ehsk s/ nZr/ fejk fe fgzv r[odk;g[ok dh ;ogzuh dh u'D g{o/ nwB^nwkB Bkb j'Jh ;h
s/ u'D nwb/ B/ fe;/ T[whdtko dh e'Jh wdd BjhA ehsh pbe/ T[BQK ngDh fvT[Nh ekBz{B w[skpe fBGkJh j?.
fo;gKv?AN BzL6 B/ fJj th fejk fe t'NK g?D s'A pkd frDsh T[whdtkoK s/ T[BQK d/ J/izNK dh jkioh ftZu ehsh
rJh ;h s/ u'D nwb/ B/ t'NK jo T[whdtko s/ T[;d/ J/izN Bz{ fdykeo tZyo/^tZyo/ pzvb pDkJ/ ;h. fo;gKv?AN
B/ fJj th fejk fe t'NK dh frDsh ;w/A e'Jh o"bk BjhA fgnk s/ feT[Afe fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ pkeh T[whdtkoK
s'A tZX t'NK jk;b ehshnK ;h, T[;Bz{ ;jh s"o s/ i/s{ eoko fdZsk frnk ;h, fJ; bJh fJj u'D gNhPB oZd
2952
[PART I
ehsh ikt/. fo;gKv?ANkB BzL2 sk 4 B/ ngD/ fbysh itkp ftZu gNhPB ftZu bkJ/ d'PK Bz{ ;jh dZf;nk s/ fejk
fe fJj u'D gNhPB wzBi{o eoe/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh ps"o ;ogzu u'D oZd ehsh ikt/. fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/
ngD/ itkp ftZu gNhPB ftZu bkJ/ ;ko/ d'PK s'A fJBeko ehsk s/ I'o d/e/ fejk fe u'DK dh ;koh ekotkJh
T[whdtkoK s/ T[BQK d/ J/izNK dh jkioh ftZu nwB^nwkB Bkb j'Jh ;h s/ frDsh th T[BQK dh jkioh ftZu jh
ekBz{B nB[;ko ehsh rJh ns/ w"e/ s/ fe;/ B/ th u'DK ;pzXh fJsoki BjhA ehsk BK jh fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ t'NK
jk;b eoB bJh e'Jh e[oZgN go?efN; ehsh j?, fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB oZd ehsh ikt/.
3H
fJ; wojb/ s/ fwsh 19H3H2014 Bz{ r[odoPB e"o fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ fJZe doyk;s i/o Xkok 80
gzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN 1994 g/P eoe/ fJsoki ehsk fe ekBz{BD fJ; u'D gNhPB dh ;[DtkJh fJ;
ndkbs tb'A BjhA ehsh ik ;edh feT[fe fJj y[d gNhPBo tb'A fJ; ndkbs ftZu dkfJo BjhA ehsh rJh.
fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ ngDh w[ZYbh pfj; ftZu fejk fe fJ; e/; ftZu nrbh ekotkJh s'A
gfjbK T[;dh doyk;s dk c?;bk ehsk ikt/. doyk;s dh Beb gNhPBo Bz{ fdZsh rJh, fi;B/ ngD/ fbysh
itkp ftZu fejk fe gNhPBo B/ fJj u'D gNhPB ngD/ tehb Bz{ Bkb b?eo fJ; ndkbs ftZu dkfJo ehsh
;h ns/ j' ;edk j? fe gNhPBo dh jkioh ;fjpB s"o s/ brtkT[Dh ofj rJh j't/ i' fe ikD^p[ZMe/ Bk j?,
fJ; bJh doyk;s fo;gKv?AN BzL1 oZd eoe/ gNhPB s/ nrbh ekotkJh ehsh ikt/.
4H
fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 d/ ftdtkB tehb ;kfjp B/ ngDh pfj; ftZu fejk fe nXhB Xkok 76 gzikp oki
u'D efwPB n?eN,1994 gNhPBo bJh bkIwh j? fe T[j ngDh u'D gNhPB yad
[ ndkbs ftZu jkio j'e/ g/P
eo/, gozs{ fJj gNhPB gNhPBo d/ tehb ;kfjp tb'A g/P ehsh rJh s/ T[; ;w/A gNhPBo T[BQK Bkb BjhA ;h,
fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB oZd ehsh ikt/. fJ; ;pzX ftZu tehb ;kfjp B/ 2010(5) R.C.R.Civil d/ gzBK BzL 474
dk jtkbk fdZsk, fi; ftZu wkD:'r gzikp ns/ jfonkDk jkJhe'oN d/ The Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Kumar
Jain d/ n?cHJ/HUH BzL 1012 nkca 2010 (U n?Av n?w) r[obkb f;zx pBkw gqhIkJhfvzr n|;o fJb?ePB
fNqfpT{Bb pbke bfjok, fIbQk ;zro{o ns/ j'o d/ j[ew fwsh 26$3$2010 i' fBwB nB[;ko tZb fXnkB
fdtkfJnkL
"A.Punjab State Election Commission Act,1994,Sections76(1) and 80(1)-Election to the post
of Sarpanch election petition against the returned candidate election petition not presented by the
candidate himself but presented through advocate-Election petititon dismissed-Held:-Election petition
having been presented by the advocate is in violation of section 76(1) of the Act and the election
petition deserves to be dismissed in view of section 80 of the Act 2009(3)RCR(Civil)937"
fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ ngDh pfj; ikoh oZyd/ j-'J/ nZr/ fejk fe ekBz{BB gNhPB Bkb i'
ekghnK fo;gKv?ANkB Bz{ d/D bJh bkJhnK iKdhnK jB T[BQK d/ jo gzB/ s/ gNhPBo tb'A s;dhe j'Dh ukjhdh
j? gozs{ fJ; e/; ftZu ni/jh fe;/ th gVs s/ gNhPBo tb'A s;dhe BjhA ehsh rJh, fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB
oZd j'Dh ukjhdh j?. fJ; ;pzX ftZu ftdtkB tehb B/ ndkbs dk fXnkB 2013(2) Law Herald (P&H) d/
gzBk BzL 1473 tZb dtkfJnk fi; ftZu wkD:'r gzikp ns/ jfonkDk jkJhe'oN d/ The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice
Daya Chaudhary d/ n?cHJ/HUH BzL 4761 nkca 2009 wBihs e"o pBkw G[fgzdo e"o tr?ok d/ j[ew fwsh
4$2$2013 i' fBwB nB[;ko j?L
"Punjab State Elelction Commission Act,1994, Sec.76 & 80 -Election petition-Neither the
election petition has been signed and attested on all pages nor the copies supplied to the appellant
were signed and attested by the election petitioner-Set aside."
fJ; soQK tehb fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ I'o d/e/ fejk fe feT[Afe gNhPBo B/ fJj gNhPB gzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB
n?eN ns/ gzikp gzukfJsh oki n?eN dh T[bzxDK eoe/ dkfJo ehsh j?, fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh doyk;s nXhB
Xkok 80 wzBi{o eoe/ gNhPB oZd ehsh ikt/.
PART I]
2953
5H
d{i/ gk;/ BkIo f;zx gNhPBo d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ ngDh pfj; ftZu fejk fe n;b ftZu fJj
gNhPB gNhPBo B/ y[d ngD/ tehb Bkb nke/ fJ; ndkbs ftZu g/P ehsh ;h gozs{ rbsh Bkb ndkbs
tb'A f;oc tehb dh jkioh jh doi ehsh rJh s/ gNhPBo dh jkioh doi Bjh ehsh rJh s/ ni/jh wkw{bh
nDrfjbh ekoB gNhPBo dh gNhPB oZd BjhA ehsh ik ;edh. fJ; bJh fo;gKv?AN dk fJsoki oZd ehsk
ikt/ ns/ doyk;s fo;gKv?AN BzL1 oZd eoe/ gNhPB dk c?;bk w?foN d/ nXko s/ ehsk ikt/.
6H
d't/A fXoK d/ ftdtkB tehb ;kfjp Bz{ ;[fDnk frnk s/ fw;b s/ nkJ/ ;p{s dk pra"o w[bkjik ehsk
frnk. fw;b d/ w[bkjik s'A ikjo j? fe fJj gNhPB fwsh 30H7H20213 Bz{ Pqh r[ogqhs f;zx uZmk tehb
gNhPBo tb'A fJ; ndkbs ftZu g/P ehsh rJh ;h. ;pzXs fiwBh j[ew fBwB nB[;ko j?L
30H7H13
jkioL Pqh r[ogqhs f;zx uZmk tehb gNhPBo nZi fJj u'D gNhPB Pqh r[ogqhs f;zx uZmk
tehb tb'A g/P ehsh rJh doi ofi;No j't/.fo;gKv?AN; B{z fwsh 23H8H2013
bJh sbp ehsk ikt/. fwsh 30H7H2013
;' fw;b d/ w[bkjik s'A ikjo j? fe fJj gNhPB g/P eoB ;w/A gNhPBo ndkbs ftZu jkio BjhA ;h s/
gNhPB T[;d/ tehb tb'A jh g/P ehsh rJh ;h. fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB nXhB Xko 76 ;N/N u'D efwPB
n?eN ekpb/ n\oki j?.
Xkok 76(2) gzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN, i' fBwB nB[;ko j?, gNhPB Bkb i' BebK fo;gKv?ANkB Bz{
d/D bJh BZEh ehshnK iKdhnK jB T[j th jo gzB/ s/ gNhPBo tb'A j;skyo eoe/ s;dhe ehshnK bkIwh jBL
"76(2) Every election petition shall be accompanied
by as many as copies thereof as there are
responents mentioned in the petition and every
such copy shall be attested by the petitioner under
his own signatures to be a true copy of the petition"
gozs{ fJ; e/; ftZu gNhPB Bkb i' BebK BZEh ehshnK rJhnK jB T[BQK d/ jo gzB/ s/ gNhPBo tb'A ngD/
j;skyo eoe/ s;dhe BjhA ehsh rJh, fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB nXhB Xkok 76(2) gzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB
n?eN ekpb/ nyaoki j?.
8H
d't/A fXoK d/ ftdtkB tehbK dh w[ZYbh pfj; ;[De/ ns/ fw;b dk pra"o w[bkjik s'A pknd w?A fJ;
Bshi/ s/ g[Zik jK fe fJj gNhPB dkfJo eoB ;w/A gzzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN d/ ;?ePB 76(1) ns/
76(2) dh T[bzxDk ehsh rJh j?. fJBQK jkbks ftZu fJj gNhPB w/BN/B/pb Bk j'D eoe/ ekpb/ nyaoki j?.
fJBQK jkbksK ftZu fJj gNhPB dkfJo eoB ;w/A gzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN ns/ gzikp gzukfJsh oki
n?eN dh gkbDk BjhA ehsh rJh s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 tb'A g/P ehsh rJh doyk;s I/o Xkok 80 wBI{o eoe/
gNhPBo dh u'D gNhPB oZd ehsh iKdh j?.
j[ew ;[DkfJnk frnk. fw;b pknd skwhb tk sewhb j;p ikpsk dkyb foekov o{w j't/. fwsh
5^12^2014
The decision of the Election Tribunal is
being notified subject to any appeal/
Court case, if filed.
Sd/S.S.BRAR
State Election Commissioner,
Punjab
;jh$^
gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o,
fJb?ePB fNqfpT{Bb
(vhH;hH), ;zro{o.
2954
[PART I

pk^ndkbs Pqh no;adhg f;zx fEzd, nkJhHJ/Hn?;H, gqhIkJhfvzr nca;o, fJb?e;aB fNqfpT{Bb
(fvgNh efw;aBo) ;zro{o.
&&&0&&&
fw;b Bzpo
oi{nk
c?;bk
fgzv
38$fJb?HgNhPB$vhH;h$13
14^08^2013
13^11^2014
pkbhnK
joB/e f;zx g[Zso r[ofdnkb f;zx tk;h fgzv pkbhnK, sfj;hb s/ fIbQk ;zro{o
HHHHHgNhPBo
pBkw
1H
oxpho f;zx g[Zso ihs f;zx
2H
r[oizN f;zx g[Zso fsfVnk f;zx
3H
BSZso f;zx g[Zso eosko f;zx, tk;hnkB fgzv pkbhnK,sfj;hb ;zro{o
4H
n?uHn?;Hj;w[Zy, ;?ANob p?Ae nkc fJzvhnk wkb/oe'Nbk (gqhIkJhfvzr ew ;jkfJe foNofBzr nc;o)
pkbhnK, sfj;hb t fIbQk ;zro{o
5H
r[ogqhs f;zx ;kfJz; Nhuo,;oekoh jkJh ;e{b cotkbh (gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o fgzv pkbhnK),
sfj;hb t fIbQk ;zro{o
6H
;[Bhb e[wko ;kj{,gzikp B?PBb p?Ae,;do pIko wkb/oe'Nbk (gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o fgzv pkbhnK),
sfj;hb t fIbQk ;zro{o
HHHHHfo;gKv?AN;
u'D gNhPB I/o Xkok 76 nkc gzikp oki ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN,1994 pkps ehJ/ ikB/
oZd u'D fo;gKv?AN BzL1 ps"o ;ogzu, rokw gzukfJs, pkbhnK.
jkIoL
Pqh r[opuB f;zx ;?Dh tehb gNhPBo

Pqh ;toB f;zx oN'b tehb fo;gKv?AN BzL 1
j[ewL
fJ; e/; d/ ;zy/g jkbks fJ; gqeko jB fe fJj gNhPB joB/e f;zx gNhPBo B/ fto[ZX oxpho f;zx
fo;gKv?AN BzL1 ps"o ;ogzu, rokw gzukfJs pkbhnK, sfj;hb s/ fIbQk ;zro{o ehsh j?. gNhPB ftZu w'N/
s"o s/ fejk frnk j? fe gNhPBo ns/ fo;gKv?ANkB BzL1 s'A 3 B/ rokw gzukfJs pkbhnK dh ;ogzuh dh u'D
bVh ;h fi; bJh gNhPBo Bz{ J/H;hH dk u'D fBPkB, fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 oxpho f;zx BzL 1 B{z p?N, fo;gKv?AN
BzL 2 r[oizN f;zx Bz{ nbwkoh ns/ fo;gKv?AN BzL 3 BSZso f;zx Bz{ foePk dk u'D fBPkB nbkN ehs/ rJ/ ;hl
fJj fe fwsh 3H7H2013 Bz{ t'NK g?D ;w/A fo;gKv?AN BzL 4 s/ 6 fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 dh wdd eod/ t/y/ rJ/ ;h
fi;s/ gNhPBo B/ fJsoki ehsk ;h gozs{ fco th fo;gKv?AN; BzL 4 s/ 6 t'NoK Bz{ fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 d/ jZe
ftZu t'NK gkT[D bJh GowkT[d/ oj/l fJj fe u'D s'A pknd t'NK dh frDsh fgzv pkbhnK d/ ;oekoh jkJh
;e{b d/ tZv/ jkb ftZu fo;gKv?AN BzL 4 s/ T[;d/ ;Nkc tb'A ehsh rJh ;h gozs{ fo;gKv?AN BzL4 s/ 6 B/ frDsh
;w/A ;ko/ T[whdtkoK s/ T[BQK d/ J/izNK Bz{ frDsh w/iK s'A 15^20 c[ZN d{o fpmk fdZskl fJj fe gNhPBo Bz{ gfjbK
jh PZe ;h fe gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o oxpho f;zx fo;gKv?AN dh wdd eoBr/, fi; eoe/ gNhPBo s/ j'o gzuh
d/ T[whtkoK$J/izNK B/ th gqhIkJhfvzr nc;oK Bz{ fejk ;h fe t'NK dh frDsh ;kv/ ;kjwD/ ehsh ikt/ s/ ;kohnK
PART I]
2955
t'NK ;kBz{ ftykJhnK ikD gozs{ frDsh ;Nkc B/ T[BQk dh e'Jh rZb BjhA wzBh s/ fejk fe s[;hA fgAZS/ j'eo p?m
ikU, pj[s dkyb nzdkih eo'r/ sK e/; pDk fdnKr/ fi; eoe/ T[j fgZS/ ub/ rJ/l fJj fe gzuK ;pzXh t'NK
dh frDsh s'A pkd ;ogzuh dhnK t'NK dh frDsh ehsh rJh s/ frDsh s'A pkd gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o B/ gNhPBo
Bz{ 1125 t'NK s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 Bz{ 1082 t'NK gJhnK dZf;nK ;h s/ gNhPBo Bz{ i/s{ eoko fdZsk ;h gozs{
w"e/ s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 tZb'A o"bk gkT[D s/ pknd ftZu fco t'NK obk fwbk bJhnK, s/ fJ; ;w/A gqhIkJhfvzr
nca;o B/ t'NK dh frDsh eod/ ;w/A e'Jh th n;b iK e?A;b t'N fe;/ T[whdtko iK T[BQK d/ J/izN Bz{ Bjh
ftykJh s/ Bshik ckow nB[;ko gNhPBo Bz{ 1092 t'NK s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 Bz{ 1115 t'NK gJhnK fdyk
fdZshnK idfe frDsh w"e/ s/ gNhPBo Bz{ 43 t'NK tZX gJhnK dZf;nK rJhnK ;h s/ fJ; soK t'NK dh frDsh
ftZu Gkoh rVpV ehsh rJh i' ekBz{B dh T[bzxDk j?L fJj fe fo;gKv?ANkB BzL 4 s'A 6 B/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh
fwbh G[rs Bkb t'NK dh frDsh ftZu pj[s Gkoh rVpV ehsh j'Jh j? s/ eogN go?efN; dh tos'A ehsh rJh
j? s/ n;b ftZu gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o d/ gfjbK dZ;D nB[;ko gNhPBo 43 t'NK s'A tZX s/ fiZsk ;h go pknd
ftZu rVpV ehsh rJh j?, fJ; bJh fJ; u'D dh d'pkok frDsh s/ gVskb j'Dh pj[s io{oh j?l fJ; bJh fJj
gNhPB wBi{o eoe/ ;ogzuh dh u'D bJh gJhnK t'NK dh d'pkok frDsh eotk eo gNhPBo Bz{ i/s{ ;ogzu
eoko fdZsk ikt/.
2H
gNhPB dk B'fN; fo;gKv?AN; Bz{ fdZsk frnk. fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 B/ ngD/ itkp ftZu gNhPB ftZu bkJ/
d'PK s'A fJBeko ehsk s/ nZr/ fejk fe fgzv pkbhnK dh ;ogzuh dh u'D bJh t'NK g{o/ nwB^nwkB Bkb
gJhnK ;h s/ u'D nwb/ B/ fe;/ T[whdtko dh e'Jh wdd BjhA ehsh pbe/ T[BQK ngDh fvT{Nh ekBz{B w[skpe
fBGkJh j?. fo;gKv?AN B/ fJj th fejk fe t'NK g?D s'A pkd frDsh T[whdtkoK s/ T[BQK d/ J/izNK dh jkioh ftZu
ehsh rJh ;h s/ u'D nwb/ B/ t'NK jo T[whdtko s/ T[;d/ J/izN Bz{ fdykeo tZyo/^tZyo/ pzvb pDkJ/ ;h.
fo;gKv?AN B/ fJj th fejk fe t'NK dh frDsh ;w/A e'Jh o"bk Bjh fgnk s/ frDsh s'A pkd gkfJnk frnk fe
gNhPBo Bz{ 1092 t'NK gJhnK s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 Bz{ 1115 t'NK gJhnK s/ fJ; soK fo;gKv?AN BzL1 Bz{ ;jh s"o
s/ i/s{ eoko fdZsk frnk ;h s/ t'NK dh d'pkok frDsh eokT[D dk e'Jh m'; ekoB Bjh j?, fJ; bJh fJj
gNhPB oZd ehsh ikt/. fo;gKv?AN BzL2 fsfVnk f;zx B/ fJ; gNhPB ftZu bkJ/ d'PK Bz{ ;jh dZf;nk s/ fejk
fe fJj u'D gNhPB wzBi{o ehsh ikt/. fwsh 18H9H2013 Bz{ fo;gKv?AN BzL3 BSZso f;zx fJ; ndkbs ftZu
jkio nkfJnk gozs{ T[;B/ e'Jh itkp gNhPB dkyb BjhA ehsk pbfe fwsh 21H3H2014 Bz{ r?o jkio j'
frnk, fJ; bJh T[; fto[ZX ekotkJh fJZe sock ehsh rJh. fo;gKv?ANkB BzL4 s'A 6 B/ ngD/^ngD/ itkp
gNhPB ftZu bkJ/ ;ko/ d'PK s'A fJBeko ehsk s/ fejk fe t'NK dh ;koh ekotkJh g{oh nwB nwkB Bkb j'Jh
;h ns/ t'NK dh frDsh T[whtkoK s/ T[BQK d/ J/izNK dh jkioh ftZu ekBz{B nB[;ko ehsh rJh ;h s/ frDsh
;w/A fe;/ th tZb'A e'Jh fJsoki th BjhA ehsk frnk s/ Bk jh frDsh ftZu e'Jh rVpV ehsh rJh s/ ehsh rJh
frDsh w[skpe fo;gKv?AN BzL1 Bz{ ;jh s"o s/ i/s{ eoko fdZsk frnk ;h.
3H
d't/A fXoK d/ ftdtkB tehb ;kfjp dh ;[DtkJh s/ T[BQK d/ ;[MktK w[skpe j/m fbfynK sBehjK pokwd
ehshnK rJhnKL
sBehj BzL1
eh u'D nwbk fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 oxpho f;zx dh u'DK ;w/A wdd eodk fojk ;h?O.P.P.
sBehj BzL2
eh u'D nwb/ B/ t'NK dh frDsh gNhPBo s/ j'o T[whdtkoK Bz{ t'NK, yk; eoe/ e?A;b j'JhnK
t'NK fdyke/ BjhA ehsh? O.P.P.
sBehj BzL3
eh ;pzXs T[whdtkoK dh s;Zbh eokT[D bJh gJhnK t'NK ns/ e?A;b t'NK dh d'pkok frDsh
ehsh ikDh io{oh j?? O.P.P.
sBehj BzL4
eh fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh u'D t'NK dh rbs frDsh j'D ekoB oZd j'Dh :'r j?< O.P.P.
sBehj BzL5
eh w"i{dk u'D gNhPB ekpb/ ocsko Bk j?? O.P.R.
2956
sBehj BzL6
[PART I
obhc
j'o e'Jh sBehj ;[MkJh iK pokwd Bjh ehsh rJh.
4H
gNhPBo B/ ngD/ ;p{s ftZu ngD/ fpnkB s'A fJbktk BSZso f;zx fo;gKv?AN BzL3 dk fpnkB
ebwpzd eotkfJnk. d{i/ gk;/ oxtho f;zx fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 B/ ngD/ fpnkB s'A fJbktk r[oizN f;zx
fo;gKv?AN BzL2 dk fpnkB ebwpzd eotkfJnk. fJ; s'A fJbktk e'Jh d;skt/Ih ;p{s g/P BjhA ehsk frnk.
5H
d't/A fXoK d/ ftdtkB tehb ;kfjp Bz{ ;[fDnk frnk s/ fw;b s/ nkJ/ ;p{s dk pra"o w[bkjik ehsk
frnk. fJ;d/ nXko s/ pokwd ehshnK sBehjK dk fBwB fbys nB[;ko c?;bk ehsk iKdk j?L
sBehj BzL1 eh u'D nwbk fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 oxpho f;zx dh u'DK ;w/A wdd eodk fojk ;h? O.P.P.
6H
fJ; u'D gNhPB ftZu gNhPBo B/ d'P bkfJnk fe t'NK g?D ;w/A fo;gKv?AN BzL4 s'A 6 fo;gKv?AN BzL1
dh wdd eod/ oj/ s/ t'NoK Bz{ T[;d/ jZe ftZu t'NK gkT[D bJh T[e;kT[d/ oj/, gozs{ fJ;Bz{ ;kps eoB bJh
e'Jh ;p{s g/P BjhA ehsk frnk. gNhPBo joB/e f;zx B/ ngD/ fpnkB ftZu fejk fe T[;Bz{ BjhA gsk fe
gNhPB ftZu eh fbfynk j? s/ ni/j/ fpnkB dh o'PBh ftZu gNhPB ftZu bkJ/ fe;/ th d'P Bz{ ;jh BjhA fejk
ik ;edk. fJBQK jkbks ftZu sBehj BzL1 dk c?;bk fto[ZX gNhPBo ehsk iKdk j?.
sBehj BzL2
eh u'D nwb/ B/ t'NK dh frDsh gNhPBo s/ j'o T[whdtkoK Bz{ t'NK, yk; eoe/ e?A;b
j'JhnK t'NK fdyke/ BjhA ehsh? O.P.P.
7H
fJ; sBehj Bz{ ;kps eoB dk i[zwK gNhPBo dk ;h gozs{ T[;B/ ni/jk e'Jh ;p{s g/P Bjh ehsk
fi;s'A ;kps j't/ fe u'D nwb/ B/ t'NK dh frDsh gNhPBo s/ j'o T[whdtkoK Bz{ t'NK yk; s"o s/ oZd j'JhnK
t'NK fdyke/ BjhA ehsh, pbe/ gNhPBo B/ y[d ngD/ fpnkB ftZu fejk fe T[; tb'A frDsh ;w/A okw uzd
frDsh tkb/ ewo/ ftZu jkio ;h s/ frDsh tkb/ fdB frDsh ;pzXh gNhPBo B/ e'Jh fPekfJs BjhA fdZsh
pbe/ d{i/ iK shi/ fdB noih fdZsh ;h. fJ; s'A fJbktk gNhPBo dk J/izN Pqh okw uzd frDsh tkb/ ewo/
ftZu jkIo ;h. gozs{ T[; B/ nkgDk e'Jh fpnkB fJ; ndkbs ftZu doi BjhA eotkfJnk. fJ; s'A fJbktk
gNhPBo d/ rtkj Pqh r[oizN f;zx B/ th nkgD/ fpnkB ghHvpb:{^2$J/ eok; nrikwhB/PB ftZu wzfBnk j?
fe t'NK dh frDsh ;w/A nkw s"o s/ wkj"b mhe fojk j? ns/ fe;/ soQK dh e'Jh rVpV BjhA j'Jh. gNhPBo
B/ fJ; sBehj Bz{ ;kps eoB bJh e'Jh m'; ;p{s g/P BjhA ehsk ns/ fw;b s/ nfijk e'Jh g[ysk ;p{s
g/P BjhA j?, fi; s'A fJj ;kps j' ;e/ fe e?A;b j'JhnK t'NK gNhPBo s/ j'o T[whdtkoK B{z BjhA fdykJhnK
rJhnK. fJ; bJh fJ;dk c?;bk fto[ZX gNhPBo ehsk iKdk j?.
sBehj BzL3 eh ;pzXs T[whdtkoK dh s;Zbh eokT[D bJh gJhnK t'NK ns/ e?A;b t'NK dh d'pkok frDsh
ehsh ikDh Io{oh j?? O.P.P.
8H
fJ; sBehj Bz{ ;kps eoB dk i[zwK gNhPBo dk ;h gozs{ T[;B/ ni/jk e'Jh ;p{s g/P BjhA ehsk
fi;s'A ;kps j't/ fe u'D nwb/ B/ t'NK dh frDsh gNhPBo s/ j'o T[whdtkoK Bz{ t'NK yk; s"o s/ oZd j'JhnK
t'NK fdyke/ BjhA ehsh, pbe/ gNhPBo B/ y[d ngD/ fpnkB ftZu fejk fe T[; tb'A frDsh ;w/A okw uzd
frDsh tkb/ ewo/ ftZu jkio ;h s/ frDsh tkb/ fdB frDsh ;pzXh gNhPBo B/ e'Jh fPekfJs BjhA fdZsh
pbe/ d{i/ iK shi/ fdB noih fdZsh ;h. fJ; s'A fJbktk gNhPBo dk J/izN Pqh okw uzd frDsh tkb/ ewo/
gNhPBo d/ rtkj Pqh r[oizN f;zx B/ th nkgD/ fpnkB ghHvpb:{^2$J/ eok; nrikwhB/PB ftZu wzfBnk j?
fe t'NK dh frDsh ;w/A nkw s"o s/ wkj"b mhe fojk j? ns/ fe;/ soQK dh e'Jh rVpV BjhA j'Jh. gNhPBo
B/ fJ; sBehj Bz{ ;kps eoB bJh e'Jh m'; ;p{s g/P BjhA gNhPBo dk J/izN ;qh okw uzd frDsh tkb/ ewo/
gNhPBo d/ rtkj Pqh r[oizN f;zx B/ th nkgD/ fpnkB ghHvpb:{ ^2$J/ eok; nrikwhB/PB ftZu wzfBnk
PART I]
2957
j? fe t'NK dh frDsh ;w/A nkw s"o s/ wkj"b mhe fojk j? ns/ fe;/ soQK dh e'Jh rVpV BjhA j'Jh. gNhPBo
B/ fJ; sBehj Bz{ ;kps eoB bJh e'Jh m'; ;p{s g/P BjhA ehsk ns/ fw;b s/ nfijk e'Jh g[ysk ;p{s
g/P BjhA j?, fi; s'A fJj ;kps j' ;e/ fe e?A;b j'JhnK t'NK gNhPBo s/ j'o T[whdtkoK B{z BjhA fdykJhnK
rJhnK. fJ; bJh fJ;dk c?;bk fto[ZX gNhPBo ehsk iKdk j?. d{i/ gk;/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ ftdtkB tehb
B/ ngDh pfj; ftZu fejk fe fJ; gNhPB ftZu bkJ/ d'PK d/ nXko s/ t'NK dh d'pkok frDsh Bjh eotkJh
ik ;edh feT[Afe fw;b s/ g/P ehs/ ;p{sK s'A ;kps j? fe t'NK dh frDsh T[whdtkoK s/ T[BQK d/ J/izNK dh
jkioh ftZu nwB^nwkB Bkb ehsh rJh ;h s/ w"e/ s/ fJ; ;pzXh fe;/ B/ e'Jh fJsoki BjhA ehsk. fJ;
;pzX ftZu tehb B/ 2001(2) R.C.R.(Civil) d/ gzBk BzL647 dk jtkbk fdZsk. fi; ftZu wkD:'r ;[gohw e'oN
nkca fJzvhnk d/ The Hon'ble Justice Dr. A.S. Anand CJI, R.C. Lahoti and K.G. Balakrishnan, JJ. d/
f;tb nghb Bzpo 5960 nkca 1999 d/ j[ew fwsh 8$8$2000 i' gqhswfjzdo f;zx pBkw feogkb f;zx ftZu
fdZsk frnk ;h, i' fBwB nB[;ko j?L
"Pb.State Election Commission Act, Sec.66,76,80,81,83 and 87-Punjab Panchayat Election
Rules, 1994,Rule 33-Recount of votes-Election to office if sarpanch-Difference of 27 votes
between elected and defeated candidate-Averments to the effect that Presiding Officer had
illegally rejected 57 votes whereas in fact these were only 37 votes of such nature is vague and
bald allegation-No material facts and particulars furnished-In absence of materIl facts and
particulars which are sine qua non for letting on election petition proceed to trial- Tribunal not
justified in ordering recount of votes."
fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ ngBh pfj; ikoh oZyd/ j'J/ nZr/ fejk fJ; ndkbs tb'A t'NK dh d'pkok
frDsh eokT[D bJh io{oh j? fe gNhPBo tb'A gNhPB ftZu u'D nwb/ tb'A ny"sh s"o s/ ehshnK rbshnK
s/ T{DskJhnK dk g{ok^g{ok t/otk fdZsk ikt/, gozs{ fJ; gNhPB ftZu gNhPBo B/ f;oc fJj jh d'P bkfJnk
j? fe u'D nwb/ B/ u'DK ftZu fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh wdd ehsh s/ fe;/ fe;w dk e'Jh t/otk Bjh fdZsk s/ ni/
jh jkbs ftZu t'NK dh d'pkok frDsh Bjh eotkJh ik ;edh. fJ; ;pzX ftZu tehb B/ 2010(4)
R.C.R.(Civil) d/ gzBk BzL 377 dk jtkbk fdsk fi;d/ g?ok BzL22 dk t/otk fBwB nB[;ko j?L
"In the case of Jitendra Bahadur Singh Vs.Krishna Behari and others, AIR 1970 Supreme
Court 276, it has been held that 'the basic requirement to be satisfied before an election tribunal
to permit the inspection of ballot papers, are (1) that the petition for setting aside the election
must contain an adequate statement of the material facts on which the petitioner relies in
support of his case and (2) the tribunal must be prima facie satisfied that in order to decide the
dispue and to do complete justice between the partie, inspection of the ballot papers is necessary
x x x."
fJ; soQK tehb B/ I'o d/e/ fejk fe feT[Afe ngDh gNhPB ftZu gNhPBo B/ ni/j/ fe;/ d'P dk t/otk BjhA
fdZsk fi; s'A ;kps j't/ fe t'NK dh frDsh d'pkok ehsh ikDh ukjhdh j?. fJ; sBehj dk c?;bk fto[ZX
gNhPBo ehsk iKdk j?.
sBehj BzL4 eh fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh u'D t'NK dh rbs frDsh j'D ekoB oZd j'Dh :'r j?< O.P.P
9H
fJj sBehj ;kps eoB dh i[w/tkoh gNhPBo dh ;h gozs{ gNhPBo B/ ngDh gNhPB ftZu ni/jk
e'Jh d'P BjhA bkfJnk fi; s'A t'NK dh d'pkok frDsh eoBh io{oh j't/. ni/j/ e/;K ftZu t'NK dh d'pkok
frDsh bJh bkIwh j? fe gNhPB ftZu ;ko/ d'PK dk g{ok^g{ok t/otk fdZsk ikt/ ns/ d'PK Bz{ ;kps eoB bJh
;p{s g/P ehsk ikt/, gozs{ fJ; e/; ftZu ni/jk BjhA ehsk frnk. fJ; bJh fJ; sBehj dk c?;bk fto[ZX
gNhPBo ehsk iKdk j?.
2958
[PART I
sBehj BzL5 eh w"i{dk u'D gNhPB ekpb/ ocsko Bk j?? O.P.R.

10H
sBehj BzL 5 Bz{ th ;kps eoB dh i[w/tkoh fo;gKv?ANkB dh ;h fIBK fJ; ;pzXh e'Jh ;p{s g/P Bjh
ehsk. fJj u'D gNhPB fJZe jko/ j'J/ T[wdhtko tb'A dkfJo ehsh rJh j? fi; Bz{ ni/jk eoB dk g{ok g{ok
jZe jk;b j?. sBehj BzL5 dk c?;bk fto[ZX fo;gKv/?ANkB ehsk iKdk j?.
obhcL
tZy^tZy sByhjK d/ ehs/ c?;b/ w[skpe ns/ d't/A fXoK d/ ftdtkB tehbK dh pfj; s/ r"o ehsk frnk
s/ fw;b dk w[bkjik ehsk frnk. Gkt/A nkgDh gNhPB ftZu gNhPBo B/ d'P bkfJnk j? fe u'D nwb/ B/
fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 dh wdd ehsh, gozs{ fJ; d'P Bz{ ;kps eoB bJh e'Jh m'; ;p{s g/P BjhA ehsk pbfe ngD/
fpnkB ftZu fejk fe u'D ;Nkc dh T[; Bkb e'Jh d[PwDh Bjh ;h, g'fbzr ;Nkc B{z T[j y[d ns/ d{ih gkoNh
th ukj^gkDh fgT[Ad/ oj/. gNhPBo B/ ya[d ngD/ fpnkB ftZu fejk fe T[; tb'A frDsh ;w/A okw uzd frDsh
tkb/ ewo/ ftZu jkIo ;h. fJ; s'A fJbktk gNhPBo dk J/izN Pqh okw uzd frDsh tkb/ ewo/ ftZu jkIo ;h.
gozs{ gNhPBo B/ T[; dk e'Jh fpnkB fJ; ndkbs ftZu doi BjhA eotkfJnk. fJ; s'A fJbktk gNhPBo
d/ rtkj Pqh r[oizN f;zx B/ th nkgD/ fpnkB ghHvpb:{^2$J/ eok; nrikwhB/PB ftZu wzfBnk j? fe t'NK
dh frDsh ;w/A nkw s"o s/ wkj"b mhe fojk j? ns/ fe;/ soQK dh e'Jh rVpV BjhA j'Jh. fJ; fNqfpT{Bb ftZu
t'NK dh d[pkok frDsh eoB Bkb t'NK dh r'gfB:sk (Secrecy of votes) Gzr j't/rh. feT[Afe gNhPBo B/
nkgDh gNhPB ftZu nfijk e'Jh m'; ekoB BjhA dZf;nk, fi; s'A ;kps j't/ fe fJ; gNhPB d/ c?;b/ bJh
t'NK dh d[pkok frDsh Io{oh j't/. nfij/ e/;K ftZu t'NK dh d'pkok frDsh bJh bkIwh j? fe gNhPB ftZu
;ko/ d'PK dk g{ok g{ok t/otk fdZsk ikt/ ns/ d'PK Bz{ ;kps eoB bJh ;p{s g/P ehsk ikt/, gozs{ fJ; e/; ftZu
nfijk e'Jh m'; ;p{s g/P BjhA ehsk frnk.
fJ; gNhPB ftZu brkJ/ rJ/ d'P fe;/ soQK th ;kps BjhA jz[d/, fJ; bJh fJj u'D gNhPB Bk^wBI{o
ehsh iKdh j?.
j[ew ;[DkfJnk frnk. fw;b pknd skwhb tk sewhb j;p ikpsk dkyb foekov o{w j't/. fwsh
13^11^2014
;jh$^
gqhikJhfvzr nc;o,
fJb?ePB fNqfpT{Bb
(vhH;hH), ;zro{o.
Sd/S.S.BRAR
Punjab.

pk^ndkbs Pqh noPdhg f;zx fEzd,nkJhHJ/Hn?;H,gqhikJhfvzr n|;o, fJb?ePB fNqfpT{Bb

(fvgNh efwPBo), ;zro{o.
fw;b BzL
oi{nk
c?;bk
fgzv
49$fJb?HgNhPB$vhH;hH$13
30H8H2013
22H12H2014
pkbd ebK
PART I]
r[oizN f;zx wkB g[Zso noiB f;zx tk;h fgzv pkbd ebK, sfj;hb s/ fIbQk ;zro{o.
2959
HHHHHgNhPBo
pBkw
1H
;[wBdhg f;zx g[Zso r[oizN f;zx tk;h fgzv BeN/, sfj;hb ;zro{o
2H
;zs'P nZrotkb, sfj;hbdko, ;zro{o ew foNofBzr n|;o, pbke GtkBhrVQ, fIbQk ;zro{o
3H
r[oBkw f;zx BkfJp sfj;hbdko, GtkBhrVQ, g'fbzr n|;o,pbke GtkBhrVQ, fIbQk ;zro{o.
HHHHHfo;gKv?AN;
u'D gNhPB nXhB gzikp ;N/N fJb?ePB efwPB n/?eN, 1994 pkps oZd ehs/ ikD/ u'D
fo;gKv?AN BzL1 ps"o w?Apo,pbke ;zwsh GtkBhrVQ fIbQk ;zro{o.
jkioL
Pqh fJzdoihs f;zx nPN tehb gNhPBo

Pqh ;[yftzdo f;zx ;Zr{ tehb fo;gKv?AN BzL 1
j[ewL
fJj gNhPB r[oizN f;zx wkB gNhPBo B/ fto[ZX ;[wBdhg f;zx fo;gKv?AN BzL1 ps"o w/?Apo pkbd
ebK pbke BzL5, pbke ;zwsh, GtkBhrVQ fIbQk ;zro{o ehsh j?. gNhPB ftZu w'N/ s"o s/ fejk frnk j? fe
gzikp ;oeko s/ gzikp u'D efwPB dhnK jdkfJsK nB[;ko gNhPBo ns/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ pbke ;zwsh
u'DK (i'B BzL9), pbke ;zwsh GtkBhrVQ ftZu Gkr fbnk ;h fi; bJh gNhPBo Bz{ gszr ns/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1
Bz{ sZeVh u'D fBPkB nbkN ehsk frnk ;hl fJj fe u'D fwsh 19H5H2013 Bz{ j'Jh ;h fi; ftZu e[Zb 2933
t'NK G[rshnK ;h s/ fJ; u'D bJh fo;gKv?AN BzL2 B/ ps"o foNofBzr nc;o s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL3 B/ ps"o g'fbzr
nc;o fvT{Nh fBGkJh ;hl fJj fe t'NK dh frDsh fwsh 21H5H2013 Bz{ ;oekoh jkJh ;e{b GtkBhrVQ fty/
fo;gKv?ANkB BzL2 ns/ 3 dh jkioh ftZu j'Jh ;h s/ p{E BzL55 fgzv pkbd ebK ftu'A gNhPBo B/ 654 t'NK
jk;b ehshnK ;h ns/ frDsh ;Nkc B/ gNhPBo d/ frDsh J/izN ofizdo f;zx g[Zso dbhg f;zx Bz{ fJ; ;pzXh
dZ; fdZsk ;h gozs{ pkd ftZu gNhPBo Bz{ G[rshnK 50 t'NK gNhPBo d/ yks/ ftu'A eZYe/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ yks/
ftZu gk fdZshnK ns/ gNhPBo dhnK t'NK xNke/ 604 eo fdZshnK rJhnK i' fo;gKv?ANkB dh fwbh G[rs dk
Bshik j?l fJj fe T[; s'A pkd id'A fgzv jofdZsg[ok dk p?bN pe;k fbnKdk frnk sK T[; dh ;hb N[ZNh j'Jh
;h fi; s/ gNhPBo ns/ T[;d/ frDsh J/izN B/ fJsoki ehsk ;h gozs{ T[BQK dh e'Jh ;[DtkJh Bjh j'Jh ns/
gNhPBo d/ jZe ftZu G[rshnK e[M t'NK oZd ehshnK rJhnK s/ gNhPBo d/ fJsokiK dk fBgNkok ehs/ pr?o
u'D Bshik x'fPs eo fdsk frnkl fJj fe gNhPBo d/ jZe ftZu G[rshnK 50 t'NK fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ jZe ftZu
frDsh ehshnK rJhnK s/ fJ; soK u'D Bshik rbs s"o s/ n?bkfBnk frnk s/ i/eo nfijk Bk ehsk iKdk
sK gNhPBo jh i/s{ jz[dkl fJj fe fwsh 22H5H2013 Bz{ gNhPBo B/ fJ; ;pzXh ngBh PekfJs T[Zu
nfXekohnK Bz{ G/ih gozs{ e'Jh ekotkJh Bjh ehsh rJhl fJj fe u'DK dh ;koh ekotkJh rbs s/ r?o ekBz{Bh
Yzr Bkb ehsh rJh j? s/ fo;gKv?ANkB BzL 2 s/ 3 B/ rbs s"o s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh Po/ nkw wdd eoe/ T[;Bz{
r?o ekBz{Bh Yzr Bkb i/s{ eoko fdZsk ns/ t'NK dh frDsh th ;jh Yzr Bkb Bjh ehsh rJh fi; eoe/ ;koh
ekotkJh d'pkok j'Dh ukjhdh j? fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB wBI{o eoe/ gNhPBo Bz{ ps"o i/s{ x'fPs ehsk ikt/
s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 ;pzXh n?bkfBnk Bshik oZd ehsk ikt/.
2H gNhPB dk B'fN; fo;gKv?ANkB Bz{ fdZsk frnk. fo;gKv?AN BzL 2 ns/ 3 B/ gNhPB ftZu bkJ/ d'PK s'A
fJBeko ehsk s/ fejk fe u'DK dh ;koh ekotkJh ekBz{B nB[;ko ehsh rJh ;h ns/ w"e/ s/ gNhPBo iK fe;/
j'o B/ fe;/ fe;w dh fPekfJs g/P BjhA ehsh. fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 B/ th ngD/ itkp ftZu gNhPB ftZu bkJ/
d'PK s'A fJBeko ehsk s/ nZr/ fejk fe u'DK dh ;koh ekotkJh ns/ t'NK dh frDsh T[whdtkoK s/ T[BQK d/
2960
[PART I
J/izNK dh jkioh ftZu ;jh Yzr Bkb j'Jh ;h ns/ fe;/ tb'A u'D ;Nkc Bz{ w"e/ s/ e'Jh fPekfJs g/P Bjh ehsh
rJh. fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ fJj th fejk fe fo;gKv?ANkB BzL2 s/ 3 B/ T[; dh fe;/ Yzr Bkb wdd Bjh ehsh
pbe/ ;koh ekotkJh ekBz{B nB[;ko j'Jh ;h, fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB oZd ehsh ikt/. fJ; ;pzXh tehb B/
ndkbs dk fXnkB Xkok 76(2) gzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN tZb dtkfJnk i' fBwB nB[;ko j?L^
"76(2) Every election petition shall be accompanied by as many as copies thereof as
there are responents mentioned in the petition and every such copy shall be attested
by the petitioner under his own signatures to be a true copy of the petition"
fJ; soK fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ fejk fe feT[Afe fJj gNhPB u'D efwPB n?eN dh T[bzxDk
eoe/ dkfJo ehsh rJh j?, fJj oZd ehsh ikt/. d{i/ gk;/ gNhPBo d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ ngBh pfj; ftZu
fejk fe fJj gNhPB ya[d gNhPBo B/ ndkbs ftZu g/P j'e/ dkfJo ehsh ;h, fJ; bJh fe;/ ekBz{B dh
T[bzxDk Bjh ehsh rJh, ;' doyk;s fo;gKv?AN BzL1 oZd ehsh ikt/.
3H d't/A fXoK d/ ftdtkB tehbK dh pfj; s/ r"o ehsk frnk s/ fw;b dk pra"o w[bkjik ehsk frnk. fw;b
dk pra"o w[bkjik s'A pknd w?A fJ; Bshi/ s/ g[Zik jK fe fJj gNhPB dkfJo eoB ;w/A gzzikp ;N/N u'D
efwPB n?eN d/ ;?ePB 76(2) dh T[bzxDK ehsh rJh j? feTA[fe fJj gNhPB Bkb BZEh BebK d/ jo gzB/ s/
gNhPBo tb'A ngB/ j;skyo eoe/ s;dhe BjhA ehsh j'Jh. fJBQK jkbksK ftZu fJj gNhPB w/BN/B/pb Bk
j'D eoe/ ekpb/ nyaoki j?.
T[go'es jkbks ftZu fJj u'D gNhPB Bk^wBI{o ehsh iKdh j?. j[ew ;[DkfJnk frnk. fw;b pknd
skwhb tk sewhb j;p ikpsk dkyb foekov o{w j't/. fwsh 22^12^2014
;jh$^
gqhikJhfvzr nc;o,
fJb?ePB fNqfpT{Bb
(vhH;hH), ;zro{o.
Sd/S.S.BRAR
Punjab

pk^ndkbs Pqh noPdhg f;zx fEzd,nkJhHJ/Hn?;H,gqhikJhfvzr n|;o, fJb?ePB fNqfpT{Bb

(fvgNh efwPBo), ;zro{o.
fw;b BzL
oi{nk
c?;bk
fgzv
42$fJb?HgNhPB$vhH;hH$13
14H8H2013
22H12H2014
d[r
Z K
doPB f;zx g[Zso g{oB f;zx tk;h fgzv d[ZrK, sfj;hb s/ fIbQk ;zro{o.
HHHHgNhPBo
pBkw
1H
jogqhs f;zx g[Zso e"o f;zx 2H pbtho f;zx g[Zso Gkr f;zx tk;hnkB fgzv d[ZrK, sfj;hb ;zro{o
3H
i;gkb f;zx ;eZso wkoehN ew/Nh ;zro{o(foNofBzr nc;o)
4H
skok uzd r'fJb, w?B/io, p?Ae nk| fJzvhnk poKu X{oh, fIbQk ;zro{o (gqhIkJhfvzr n|;o).
HHHHfo;gKv?AN;
PART I]
2961
u'D gNhPB I/o Xkok 76 nkc gzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN,1994 pkps oZd ehJ/
ikB/ oZd u'D o?;gkv?AN BzL 1 ps"o ;ogzu, rokw gzukfJs, d[ZrK.
jkIoL
Pqh UAeko f;zx wkB tehb gNhPBo

Pqh irw/b f;zx ;zX{ tehb tZb'A fo;gKv?AN BzL1
j[ewL
fJ; e/; d/ ;zy/g jkbks fJ; gqeko jB fe fJj gNhPB doPB f;zx gNhPBo B/ fto[ZX jogqhs
f;zx fo;gKv?AN BzL1 ps"o ;ogzu rokw gzukfJs d[ZrK, sfj;hb s/ fibQk ;zro{o ehsh j?. gNhPB ftZu w'N/
s"o s/ fejk frnk j? fe fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ gzukfJs dh iwhB s/ BikfJi epik ehsk j'fJnk j? fi; ;pzXh
rokw gzukfJs d[ZrK B/ gVskb eoe/ fwsh 14H11H2008 Bz{ fJZe wsk gkfJnk ;h fi; w[skpe jogqhs f;zx
dk r?o w[wfeB SZgV rokw gzukfJs d/ oep/ s/ BikfJi epik ehsk j'fJnk j?. fJj fe T[; t/b/ d/ ;ogzu
B/ fJj BikfJi ekpIk Bz{ fJj iwhBK nbkN eokT[D bJh fJBQK dh ;{uh phHvhHghHUH ;zro{o gk; G/ih ;h
fi; B/ ngB/ gZso fwsh 13H5H2011 okjhA fJj ;{uh fIbQk ftek; s/ gzukfJs nc;o, ;zro{o gk; G/i fdZsh
;h s/ T[; ;{uh d/ bVh BzL 50 go jogqhs f;zx g[Zso e"o f;zx dk rokw gzukfJs d/ y;ok BzpokB 250 sk
252 ftu'A 15 fp;t/ s/ BikfJi epik j'Dk doi j?l fJj fe pbpho f;zx fo;gKv?AN BzL2 B/ th gNhPBo ns/
fo;gKv?AN Bkb rokw gzukfJs d[ZrK dh ;ogzuh dh u'D bJh ckow dkyb ehs/ ;h go foNofBzr nc;o B/
gZygks eod/ j'J/ bVh BzL 45 s/ doi pbpho f;zx g[Zso Gkr f;x d/ ekriks fJ; tiQk eoe/ oZd eo fdZs/
fe T[; dk gzukfJs nokIh s/ BikfJi epik j? gozs{ T[;/ ;{uh d/ bVh BzL 50 s/ doi ftnesh ;pzXh ehs/
rJ/ fJsoki Bz{ f;nk;h dpkU j/m nZy'A Ujb/ eo fdZsk s/ d{i/ ftnesh Bz{ xZN t'N fwbD d/ pkti{d th
i/s{ eoko d/ fdZskl fJj fe foNofBzr nc;o Bz{ fJj BikfJi epi/ ;pzXh pDh ;{uh s/ rokw gzukfJs tb'A
gkJ/ ws/ dh ekgh g/P ehsh gozs{ T[; B/ gZygks dk ;jkok b?Ad/ j'J/ f;oc pbtho f;zx d/ g/go oZd ehs/ s/
jogqhs f;zx Bz{ u'D bVB dh r?o ekBz{Bh sohe/ Bkb nkfrnk fdZshl fJj fe fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ u'D ckow
GoB ;w/A fJ; rZb dk fIeo th Bk ehsk j? idfe nfijk ftnesh u'D bVD dk nfXeko jh BjhA j?l fJj
fe gNhPBo B/ ;ogzuh dh u'D ftZu fjZ;k b?D bJh ngB/ BkwIdrh gZso w[ezwb o{g ftZu dkfJo ehs/ ;h
s/ ;oeko tZb'A ikoh ehs/ B'Nhfce/PB w[skpe rokw gzukfJs dh u'D fwsh 3H7H2013 Bz{ j'Jh ;h fi; bJh
u'D ;Nkc fwsh 2H7H2013 dh oks Bz{ jh fgzv g[Zi frnk ;h fiE/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ ;koh oks u'D nwb/ dh
BikfJi s"o s/ ykso dkoh ehsh s/ tofis uhiK dh y[bQe/ tos'A ehsh rJh fi; Bkb u'D ;Nkc B/ u'DK ftZu
fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ jZe ftZu t'NK gkT[D ftZu wdd ehsh i' r?o ekBz{Bh j?l fJj fe gNhPBo B/ fJ; ;pzXh u'D
;Nkc gk; eJh tko fPekfJs ehsh gozs{ T[j fco th t'NoK Bz{ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ jZe ftZu t'NK gkT[D bJh
GowKT[d/ oj/l fJj fe t'NK dh frDsh ;w/A u'D ;Nkc B/ gNhPBo s/ T[;d/ J/izN Bz{ pDdh fBrokBh eoB dh
fJikIs Bk fdZsh Bk jh gNhPBo dhnK t'NK T[; Bz{ fdykJhnk s/ Bk jh frDsh eoB dk w"ek fdZskl fJj fe
t'NK dh frDsh ;w/A gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o s/ T[; dk ;Nkc jkio ;h s/ foNofBzr n|;o jkIo BjhA ;h s/
frDsh s'A pknd gqhIkJhfvzr nc;o B/ e'Jh ckow Bjh Gfonk s/ fJ; soK t'NK dh frDsh ftZu pj[s Gkoh
rVpV ehsh rJh j?, fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB wBI{o eoe/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh ps"o ;ogzu u'D oZd ehsh ikt/
ns/ t'NK dh d'pkok frDsh eotk eo gNhPBo Bz{ i/s{ eoko fdZsk ikt/.
2H gNhPB dk B'fN; fo;gKv?AN; Bz{ fdZsk frnk. fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ ngB/ ngB/ itkp ftZu gNhPB ftZu
bkJ/ d'PK s'A fJBeko ehsk s/ nZr/ fejk fe fgzv d[ZrK dh ;ogzuh dh u'D bJh t'NK g{o/ nwB nwkB Bkb
gJhnK ;h s/ t'NK dh frDsh ;ko/ jkio T[whdtkoK s/ T[BQK d/ J/izNK dh jkioh ftZu ;jh Yzr Bkb ehsh rJh
;h ns/ t'NK g?D ;w/A iK t'NK dh frDsh ;w/A gNhPBo iK fe;/ j'o ftnesh tb'A e'Jh fJsoki Bjh ehsk
frnk. fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ fJj th fejk fe T[;B/ fe;/ gzukfJs dh nokIh s/ BikfJi epik Bjh ehsk j'fJnk
gozs{ gNhPBo B/ fJj d'P rbs s"o s/ gNhPBo dk nXko pDkT[D bJh bkfJnk j? jkbK fe rokw gzukfJs
2962
[PART I
B/ ed/ th T[; s'A fJ; ;pzXh g[ZS gVskb Bjh ehsh Bk jh gzukfJs B/ ny"sh s"o s/ fwsh 14H11H2008 Bz{
BikfJi epi/ ;pzXh e'Jh wsk gkfJnk j? fi; ftZu fo;gKv?AN BzL1 iK T[; d/ gfotko tb'A rokw gzukfJs
d/ oep/ s/ BikfJi epi/ pko/ fieo ehsk j't/. fo;gKv?ANkB BzL3 s/ 4 B/ ngB/ itkp ftZu gNhPB ftZu bkJ/
;ko/ d''PK s'A fJBeko ehsk s/ nZr/ fejk fe T[BQK B/ u'DK ;w/A ngBh fvT{Nh g{oh sBd/jh s/ fJwkBdkoh Bkb
fBGkJh s/ fe;/ dk gZygks Bjh ehsk BK jh o;gkv?AN BzL1 dh fe;/ soK wdd ehsh s/ t'NK dh frDsh d/
nXko s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 Bz{ w"e/ s/ jh i/s{ eoko fdZsk frnk ;h s/ fJ; Bshi/ s'A ;ko/ T[whdtko s/ T[BQK d/
J/izN ;zs[PN ;h fiBQK Bshi/ s/ ngB/ ngB/ d;sys th ehs/ ;h, fbjkik fJj gNhPB oZd ehsh ikt/.
fo;gKv?ANkB B/ nZr/ fejk fe fo;gKv?AN BzL1 tb'A ny"sh s"o s/ rokw gzukfJs dh nokIh s/ BikfJi epik
eoB ;pzXh gNhPBo B/ e'Jh ;p{s g/P Bjh ehsk ;h s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ Bkwidrh gZso ;jh s"o s/ wzBi{o
ehs/ rJ/ ;h s/ u'DK dh ;koh ekotkJh j;p ikpsk nwB nwkB Bkb j'Jh ;h, fJ; bJh fJj u'D gNhPB
oZd ehsh ikt/.
3H d't/A fXoK d/ ftdtkB tehb dh ;[DtkJh s/ T[BQK d/ ;[MktK w[skpe j/m fbfynK sBehjK pokwd ehshnK
rJhnKL
sBehj BzL1
eh fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dh u'D gNhPBo tb'A gNhPB ftZu doi ehs/ ekoBK eoe/ wB;{y eoB
:'r j??O.P.P.
sBehj BzL2
eh fo;gKv?AN BzL1 dk rokw gzukfJs dh iwhB s/ BikfJi epik ehsk j'fJnk j? ?O.P.P.
sBehj BzL3
eh gNhPB dkfJo eoB tes ekBz{B dh gkbDK Bjh ehsh rJh fi; ekoB gNhPB ykoi
eoB :'r j??O.P.R.
sBehj BzL4
eh gNhPBo tb'A gNhPB rbs sZEK d/ nXko s/ dkfJo ehsh rJh j?, n;b sZEK Bz{
S[gkfJnk frnk j?, fi; ekoB T[; Bz{ ;g?Pb joikBK g?Dk ukjhdk j???O.P.R.
sBehj BzL5
eh gNh;B w"i{dk jkbs ftZu uZbD :'r j?, fo;gKv?AN BzL2 Bz{ rbs s"o s/ gkoNh pDkfJnk
frnk j?? ?O.P.R.
sBehj BzL6
eh gNhPB ekB{zBh s"o s/ w/BN/BJ/pb Bk j? feTA[fe gzikp oki u'D efwPB n?eN 1994 dh
76 dh T[bzxDK ehsh rJh j?? O.P.R.
sBehj BzL7
eh gNhPBo dh gNhPB u'D gNhPB dh Xkok 76(2) w[skpe Bk j? ?O.P.R.
sBehj BzL8
eh gNhPBo B/ gNhPB dkfJo eoB ;w/A fJb?ePB fNqfpT{Bb Bz{ ;jh tkfenks Bk dZ;/ jBl
gNhPB M{m/, p/^p[fBnkdh ns/ rbs sZEK d/ nXko s/ dkfJo ehsh rJh j?? O.P.R.
sBehj BzL9
obhc
j'o e'Jh sBehj ;[MkJh iK pokwd Bjh ehsh rJh.

4H gNhPBo B/ ngB/ ;p{s ftZu ngB/ fpnkB s'A fJbktk gq/w f;zx gzukfJs nc;o, pbke ;zro{o
wfBzdogkb e"o eboe dcso phHvhHghHUH ;zro{o d/ fpnkB ebwpzd eotkJ/. d{i/ gk;/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/
ngB/ fpnkB s'A fJbktk r[ouoB e"o gsBh okw f;zx tk;h d[ZrK dk fpnkB ebwpzd eotkfJnk. fo;gKv?AN
BzL2 i;gkb f;zx ;eZso, wkoehN ew/Nh ;zro{o B/ th ngBK fpnkB ebwpzd eotkfJnk. fJ; s'A fJbktk
fXoK B/ e[M d;skt/Ih ;p{s th g/P ehsk.
5H fJ; wojb/ s/ fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ fJsoki ehsk fe nXhB Xkok 76 gzikp oki u'D
efwPB n?eN,1994 gNhPBo bJh bkIwh j? fe T[j ngBh u'D gNhPB yad
[ ndkbs ftZu jkio j'e/ g/P eo/,
gozs{ fJj gNhPB gNhPBo d/ tehb tb'A g/P ehsh rJh s/ T[; ;w/A gNhPBo T[BQK Bkb Bjh ;h, fJ; bJh
sByhj BzL 6 dk c?;bk gfjbK ehsk ikt/ ns/ fJj gNhPB oZd ehsh ikt/. fJ; ;pzX ftZu ftdtkB tehb
B/ 2010(5) R.C.R.Civil d/ gzBK BzL 474 dk jtkbk fdZsk, fi; ftZu wkD:'r gzikp ns/ jfonkDk jkJhe'oN
PART I]
2963
d/ The Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain d/ n?cHJ/HUH BzL 1012 nk| 2010 (UHn?AvHn?w) r[obkb f;zx
pBkw gqhIkJhfvzr nca;o fJb?ePB fNqfpT{Bb pbke bfjok, fIbQk ;zro{o ns/ j'o d/ j[ew fwsh 26$3$2010
i' fBwB nB[;ko j?, tZb fXnkB fdtkfJnk L
"A.Punjab State Election Commission Act,1994,Sections
76(1) and 80(1)-Election to the post of Sarpanch election
petition against the returned candidate election petition not
presented by the candidate himself but presented through
advocate-Election petititon dismissed-Held:-Election petition
having been presented by the advocate is in violation of
section 76(1) of the Act and the election petition deserves
to be dismissed in view of section 80 of the Act 2009(3)RCR
(Civil)937"
fJ; soK fo;gKv?AN BzL1 B/ ngBh pfj; eod/ j'J/ I'o d/ e/ fejk fe feT[Afe fJj gNhPB gNhPBo tb'A ya[d
ndkbs ftZu jkio j'e/ g/P Bjh ehsh rJh. fJj gzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN 1994 dh Xkok 76 dh
T[bzxDK eoe/ dkfJo ehsh rJh j? fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB oZd ehsh ikt/.
gNhPBo d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ nkgDh pfj; ftZu fejk fe i/eo fo;gKv?AN Bz{ u'D gNhPB ;pzXh
ni/jk e'Jh fJsoki ;h sK T[j gfjbK dkfJo eo ;edk ;h gozs{ fo;gKv?AN B/ gNhPB dh ;[DtkJh d"okB bzw/
;w/A sZe gfjbK e'Jh fJsoki Bjh ehsk. ndkbs dh ekotkJh B{z bzwk eoB bJh fJj fJsoki ehsk frnk
j?. fJ; bJh fo;gKv?AN dk fJsoki oZd ehsk ikt/ ns/ feT[Afe fJj gNhPB gNhPBo B/ ya[d ngB/ tehb
Bkb jkio j'e/ fJ; ndkbs ftZu g/P ehsh ;h, doyk;s fo;gKv?AN BzL1 oZd eoe/ gNhPB dk c?;bk w?foN
d/ nXko s/ ehsk ikDk ukjhdk j?. fJ; d/ T[Zso ftZu fo;gKv?AN BzL1 d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ fejk fe ekBz{B ftZu
ni/jk fJsoki dkfJo eoB bJh e'Jh ;wK fB:s Bjh j? s/ fo;gKv?ANkB Bz{ ni/jk fJsoki fe;/ ;w/A th
dkfJo eoB dk nfXeko j?. fJ; ;pzX ftZu ftdtkB tehb B/ 2010(5)Recent Civil Reports d/ gzBK BzL
480 dk jtkbk fdZsk fi; ftZu wkD:'r gzikp s/ jfonkDk jkJh e'oN tb'A ;kc s"o s/ fejk frnk fe
ni/jk fJsoki fe;/ ;w/A th ehsk ik ;edk j? s/ id'A th fJj ndkbs d/ B'fN; ftZu nkt/ iK fbnKdk ikt/
ndkbs bJh gNhPB oZd eoB s'A fJbktk e'Jh ukok Bjh. fJ; soK tehb B/ I'o d/ e/ fejk fe feT[Afe
fJj gNhPB ya[d gNhPBo B/ ndkbs ftZu dkfJo Bjh ehsh ;h. fJ; bJh fJj gNhPB oZd ehsh ikt/.
6H gNhPBo d/ ftdtkB tehb B/ p/Bsh ehsh fe fJj gNhPB gNhPBo B/ ya[d ngB/ tehb Bkb nk e/
fJ; ndkbs ftZu g/P ehsh ;h gozs{ rbsh Bkb ndkbs tb'A f;oc tehb dh jkIoh jh doi ehsh rJh
s/ gNhPBo dh jkIoh doi Bjh ehsh rJh. fJ; bJh fo;gKv?AN dk fJsoki oZd ehsk ikt/ ns/ fJsoki
fo;gKv?AN BzL1 oZd eoe/ gNhPB dk c?;bk w?foN d/ nXko s/ ehsk ikt/.
7H d't/A fXoK d/ ftdtkB tehb Bz{ ;[fDnk frnk s/ fw;b s/ nkJ/ ;p{s dk w[bkjik ehsk frnk. fw;b d/
w[bkjik s'A gkfJnk frnk fe gzBk BzL 1 s/ fJj gNhPB fwsh 24H7H2013 Bz{ Pqh ;zdhg no'Vk tehb gNhPBo
tb'A fJ; ndkbs ftZu g/P ehsh rJh ;h. ;pzXs fiwBh j[ew fBwB nB[;ko j?L
24H7H13
jkioL Pqh ;zdhg no'Vk tehb gNhPBo
fw;b g/P j'Jh. fJj gNhPB ;zdhg no'Vk tehb tZb'A gqkgs j'Jh.
gqXkBrh nc;o ptik ezweko ;oeko pkjo jB. fw;b fwsh 5H8H13 Bz{
gqXkBrh nc;o d/ g/P ehsh ikt/rh. fwsh 24H7H13
;jh$ohvo
2964
[PART I
fw;b d/ w[bkjik s'A ikjo j? fe fJj gNhPB g/P eoB ;w/A gNhPBo ndkbs ftZu jkIo BjhA ;h s/ gNhPB
T[; d/ tehb tZb'A jh g/P ehsh rJh ;h.
8H d't/A fXoK d/ ftdtkB tehbK dh w[ZYbh pfj; ;[De/ T[jBK tZb'A wkD:'r gzikp ns/ jfonkDk jkJhe'oN
d/ g/P ehs/ c?;b/ ns/ fw;b d/ w[bkji/ s'A pknd w?A fJ; Bshi/ s/ g[i
Z k jK fe fJj gNhPB dkfJo eoB
;w/A gzzikp ;N/N u'D efwPB n?eN d/ ;?ePB 76(1) dh T[bzxDK ehsh rJh j? feT[Afe fJj gNhPB ya[d
gNhPBo B/ ndkbs ftZu g/P Bjh ehsh. tehb gNhPBo tZb'A nfijh e'Jh ;kJhN/PB g/P BjhA ehsh fi;
nB[;ko tehb fo;gKv?AN BzL 1 tZb'A ehs/ fJsoki B{z oZd ehsk ik ;edk j't/. fJBQK jkbks ftZu fJj gNhPB
w/BN/B/pb Bk j'D eoe/ ekpb/ nyaoki j? ns/ fJ; dk c?;bk eoB bJh fw;b s/ g/P j'J/ ;p{s dk w[bkjik
iK sBehjK dk c?;bk eoB dh e'Jh b'V BjhA j?.
T[go'es jkbks ftZu fJj u'D gNhPB Bk^wBI{o ehsh iKdh j?. j[ew ;[DkfJnk frnk. fw;b pknd
skwhb tk sewhb j;p ikpsk dkyb foekov o{w j't/. fwsh 22^12^2014
Sd/S.S.BRAR
Punjab
0894/11-2015/Pb. Govt. Press, S.A.S. Nagar
;jh$^
gqhikJhfvzr nc;o,
fJb?ePB fNqfpT{Bb
(vhH;hH), ;zro{o.
PART No.
I] NW/CH-22
PUNJAB
Regd.
GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 Regd.

(AGHNNo.
6, 1937
SAKA)
2965
CHD/0092/2015-2017
Rs. 2.70
Published by Authority
No. 48 ] CHANDIGARH, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGRAHAYANA 6, 1937 SAKA)
PART III/
Notifications by High Court ; Labour Commissioner ; Advertisements ;
Director of Lotteries, Punjab and Notices, etc.
PUNJAB STATE TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED
(Regd. Office: PSEB Head Office, The Mall, Patiala-147001)
Corporate Identity Number: U40109PB2010SGC033814 www.pstcl.org
O/o CE/TS, PSTCL, Patiala Tel. & Fax No. 0175-2207774 E.mail: se-trd@pstcl.org
NOTIFICATION
NO. 28 /TS/ST-6016/Vol.-III.- It is hereby notified that Punjab State Transmission Corporation Ltd.
(PSTCL) proposes to undertake the following schemes/transmission works necessary for the dispersal/distribution
of power for the improvement of the transmission and distribution system of the Punjab State Transmission
Corporation Ltd.
TRANSMISSION WORKS FOR THE YEAR 2015-16
Sr. Name of Work.
No.
1.
Revised route of
i) 220 KV Mukatsar-Sandhwan (Kotkapura)(TL No. 1 to 5A) Single Ckt. Line on Double
Ckt. Towers.
ii) 220 KV Mukatsar- Malout Line (TL No. 1 to 9).
Single Ckt. Line on Double Ckt. Towers
Scope of work,
(Approx. Length
of line in Kms).
Size of ACSR
conductor
(Nominal
Aluminium
Area in mm2)
Approx.
cost (Rs
in Lacs)
39.285
24.441
420
420
2674.13
1663.70
67.397
0.4 Sq. inch

AAAC
5393.11
Deposit works
2.
Re-Conductoring of 220 KV Bhakra-Jmalpur

line (TL-55 to 276) (Double Ckt. Line on Double
Ckt. Towers).
( 357 )
2966
358
3.
PUNJAB
(AGHN 6,6,1937
1937SAKA)
SAKA)
PUNJABGOVT.
GOVT.GAZ.,
GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN
220 KV line from 220 KV Sub-Station Bassi

Pathana to Kotla Sulaman (Single Ckt. Line on
Double Ckt. Towers).
11.052
420
ARTIII
I
[P[P
ART
752.31
It is hereby notified that the PSTCL is undertaking and executing the sanctioned scheme and shall have
the powers for placing of any Wires, Poles, Stays, Apparatus and Appliances for the Transmission and Distribution
of Electricity or for Transmission of telegraphic or telephonic communications necessary for proper coordination
of the works of PSTCL for the areas indicated above for which the Telegraph Authority possess under Part-III
of the Telegraphs Act. 1885 (13 of 1885) in respect of telegraphs established or maintained and the provisions of
section 12 to 16, 18 and 19 of the Indian Electricity Act 1910 shall not apply to the same and therefore no
separate notice of the scheme of PSTCL is required to be given.
This notification has been issued with reference to the relevant clauses of Indian Electricity Act 1910
alongwith latest statutory amendments, modifications, upto date over riding enactments if any and the provisions
made under Section 164 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003 and Govt. of Punjab, Deptt. of Power Endst. No.
11/95/2011-PE 3/2344 dated 28.06.2011 wherein powers of Telegraph Authority under part-III of the Indian
Telegraph Act, 1885 (13 of 1885) have been decided to be conferred and exercised on PSTCL.
Notice is hereby given that any person may raise objections if any/and or make any suggestions against
the above scheme/transmission works within two month of issue of this notification. Thereafter no objections
and or suggestions will be entertained and all schemes/transmission works will be deemed to be sanctioned with
or without modifications as approved by the PSTCL. Necessary plans showing the tentative route of the
Transmission Lines may be seen on any working day in the office of Dy. CE/TLSC Circle, PSTCL, Patiala.
Objections and/or suggestions in respect of the above schemes if any should be sent to the undersigned.
Benefits of the above Scheme:The above works have been planned to augment/add 400KV/220KV/132KV transmission network in
the State of Punjab so as to ensure quality and uninterrupted power supply to all types of existing/prospective
electricity consumers of the State and are urgently required.
Note: There was typing error in the Notification no. 27/TS/ST-6016 Vol-3 dt. 07.09.2015 at Sr.no. 3 regarding
Transmission Lines. After correction, the same has been introduced in this Notification i.e. Notification
No. 28 at Sr. No. 1.
BzL 28$NhHn?;H$n?;HNhH^6016$tkb:{w^3H^ fJj dZf;nk iKdk j? fe gzikp oki NoK;fwPB

ekog'o/PB fbwfNv (ghHn?;HNhH;hHn?b) tb'A fBwBfbys ;ehwK$NoK;fwPB d/ ezw P[o{ eoB dk gq;skt j?,
fijVhnK gzikp oki NoK;fwPB ekog'o/PB fbwfNv d/ ;zukbD ns/ tzv ftZu ;[Xko eoB bJh fpibh dh
fv;go;b$tzv bJh Io{oh jB.
NoK;fwPB toe; cko dh Jhno 2015^2016
bVh ezw dk BK
BzL
fotkfJIv o{N nkc

i) 220 e/HthH w[es;o^;zdtK (e'Neg[ok)
(NhHn?bH BzL 1 N{ 5 J/) f;zrb ;oeN
bkJhB nkB vpb ;oeN Nktoi.
ii)220 e/HthH w[es;o^wb'N bkJhB
;e'g nkc toe,

(nzdkiB b?AE
nkc bkJhB fJB
feb'whNoI)
39H285
24H441
;kJhI nkc
J/H;hHn?;HnkoH
ezzveNo (B'whBb
n?b{whBhnw
fJB n?w n?w2)
nzdkiB
ehws
(bZyK ftZu)
420
420
2674H13
1663H70
J/ohnk
PART III]
I]
PUNJAB
(AGHN 6,
6, 1937
1937 SAKA)
SAKA)
PUNJAB GOVT.
GOVT. GAZ.,
GAZ., NOVEMBER
NOVEMBER 27,
27, 2015
2015 (AGHN
2967
359
(NhHn?bH BzL 1 N{ 9) f;zrb ;oeN

fvg'IN toe;
2
ohêzveNfozr nkc 220 e/HthH GkyVkîwkbg[o

bkJhB (NhHn?b 55 N{ 276) vpb ;oeN
67H397
220 e/HthH bkJhB cokw 220 e/HthH ;p^;N/PB 11H052

pZ;h gmkDk s'A e'Nbk ;[b/wkB f;zrb ;oeN
0H4 ;e/no fJzu

J/HJ/HJ/H;hH
5393H11
420
752H31
fJj dZf;nK iKdk j? fe ghHn?;HNhH;hHn?bH T[es dZ;h wzBi{o ;ehw d/ nXhB b'VhAdh NoK;fwPB
bkJhBK ns/ d{o ;zuko B?Ntoe; d/ ezw bJh io{oh NktoI, g'bI, tkfJoI, ;N/nI (fyZuK) ns/ j'o ;kI
;wkB brkT[Dk ukj[zdk j? i' fe T[es dZ;hnK EktK s/ fpibh dh NoK;fwPB ns/ tzv, N?bhrokfce iK
ghHn?;HNhH;hHn?bH d/ nkg;h skbw/b bJh d{o ;zuko B?Ntoe; bJh io{oh jB.fJ; bJh ghHn?;HNhH;hHn?bH
T[BQK nfXekoK dh tos'A eo/rk i' fe N?bhrokfce nEkoNhI N?bhrokfce n?eN 1885 (13 of 1885) d/
gkoNÎII nXhB N?bhrokcI Bz{ ;Ekfgs iK T[;Bz{ ukb{ oZyD bJh eodhnK jB ns/ fJzvhnB fJb?eNohf;Nh
n?eN^1910 d/ ;?ePB 12 s'A 16, 18 ns/ 19 fJ; ;pzX ftu bkr{ BjhA j'Dr/ ns/ fJ; bJh ghHn?;HNhH;hHn?b
dh ;ehw bJh e'Jh tZyok B'fN; d/D dh b'V BjhA.
fJj B'Nhfce/PB fJzvhnB fJb?eNqhf;Nh n?eN^1910 dh ;pzXs XkoktK nXhB ns/ BthAnK Io{oh
spdhbhnK i' fe j[D sZe bkr{ j'JhnK jB, iK UtoôkJhfvzr fJB?eNw?AN i/ e'Jh j't/ ns/ fpibh n?eN^2003
dh ;?ePB 164 dh Xkok w[skfpe ikoh ehsh iKdh j? ns/ gkto fvgkoNw?AN, gzikp ;oeko d/ fgZm nzeD BzL
11$95$2011^PE 3$2344 fwsh 28H06H2011 nB[;ko fJzvhnB N?bhrokc n?eN^1885 (13 nkc 1885) d/
gkoN 3 nXhB N?bhrokc nEkoNh dhnK gktoI ghHn?;HNhH;hHn?bH Bz{ fdshnk rJhnK jB. fJ; ;pzXh
B'fN; ikoh ehsk iKdk j? fe i/ fe;/ ftnesh B{z T[go'es ;ehw$NoK;fwPB bkJhBK d/ ezwK ;pzXh e'Jh fJsokI
j'D sK T[j nkgDh gqsh t/dBk fJ; B'Nhfce/PB ikoh j'D s'A 2 wjhB/ d/ nzdo^nzdo d/ ;edk j?. fJ; s'A pknd
e'Jh fJsokI iK gqsh t/dBk ;theko BjhA ehsh ikt/rh ns/ ;koh ;ehw$NoK;fwPB bkJhBK d/ ezw, fpBQK e'Jh
;'X ehs/ iK ;'X eoe/ ghHn?;HNhH;hHn?bH dh wzBi{oh w[skfpe bkr{ wzB/ ikDr/. fJ; f;bf;b/ ftZu b'VhAd/
nkoIh gbkB fiBQK ftZu NoK;fwPB bkJhBK d/ o;s/ ftykJ/ rJ/ jB, fe;/ th ezw eko tkb/ fdB T[g w[y
Z
fJzihBhno$NhHn?bHn?;H;hH jbek, ghHn?;HNhH;hHn?bH, gfNnkbk d/ dcso ftu t/y/ ik ;ed/ jB. T[go'es
;ehwK ;pzXh i/ e'Jh fJsokI ns/ gqsh t/dBk j't/ sK fBwB j;skyo B{z G/i/ ikD.
T[go do;kJhnK ;ehwK d/ bkGL^
T[go'es ezw gzikp oki d/ 400 e/HthH$220e/HthH$132e/HthH NoK;fwPB B?Ntoe ftZu tkXk$;woZEk
tXkT[D d/ wzst eoe/ gbkB ehs/ rJ/ jB sK i' oki d/ ;ko/ soQK d/ w"i{dk$;zGkth ygsekoK Bz{ fBoftxB ns/
tXhnk fpibh ;gbkJh fdZsh ik ;e/ ns/ fJj ezw c'oh s"o s/ nfsnzs b'Vhd/A jB.
B'NL
[219-1]
B'Nhfce/PB BzL 27$Nh n?;$n?;HNhH^6016$tkL^3 fwsh 07H09H15 ftZu bVh BzL 3 s/ i' NoK;fwPB
bkJhBK fbfynK rJhnK ;B T[BK ftu NkfJg dh rbsh ekoB e[M ykwhnK ofj rJhnK ;B i' fe
do[;s eoB T[gozs fJ; B'Nhfce/PB BzL28 ftZu ;'X eoB T[gozs bVh BzL1 s/ gk fdZshnK jB ih.
;jh$^
fJziL ni? e[wko eg{o,
w[Zy fJzihBhno$NhHn?;H,
ghHn?;HNhH;hHn?bH, gfNnkbk.
2968
360
PUNJAB WAKF BOARD,

S.C.O. 1062-63, Sector 22-B,
CHANDIGARH
Tehsil/Sub Tehsil
District
Village
Kh. No./
M.C.No.
Area
1.
Graveyard
Nawanshahar
Banga
S.B.S.Nagar
2.
Graveyard
Nawanshahar
Banga
S.B.S.Nagar
3.
Takia
4.
Takia
5.
Dargah
Peer Baba
Shanshah
Value in Rs.
Nature &
Object of Wakf
How the Wakf is

Administered
Paddi
Matwali
H.B.No.39
Kh. No.96 Min

96 Min
66 Min
1K-5M
8K-0M
1K-0M
Mazara
H.B.No.94
1654/1- 246
3K 0M
Sultanpur Lodhi Doda Wazir

Kapurthala
Sultanpur Lodhi
Kapurthala
Masit
Kapurthala
Kapurthala
Dainwind
20,00,000.00
As per collector
rate.
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board,
Chandigarh.
According to the report of Estate Officer,

Punjab Wakf Board, Nawanshahar dated
14.7.2015. Copies of Jamabandi for the
year 2010-2011are enclosed.
3,00,000.00
Approx.
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board
Chandigarh

Nawanshahar dated 28.10.2015. Copy of
Jamabandi for the year 2012-2013
enclosed.
10//25
9//21
15//13
21//13
18
21//14/1
08K -00M 35,00,000.00

08K -00M
08K -00M
05K -00M
05K -00M
05K -08M
39K -08M
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board
Chandigarh

PWB, Kapurthala dated 6.8.2015. Copies
of Jamabandi for the year 1992-93 &
2012-13 are enclosed herewith.
Kh. No.3//10
3//11
3//12
04K -03M 10,00,000.00

08K -00M
02K -07M
14K - 11M
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board
Chandigarh

PWB, Kapurthala dated 6.8.2015. Copies
of Jamabandi for the year 2012-13 is
enclosed herewith.
Under Red
Line
809.6
Sq. yard
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board
Chandigarh

PWB, Kapurthala dated 2.9.2015.
Photocopy of site plan & Affidavits of
Sh.Balwant Singh & Sh.Kulwant Singh r/o
Village Dainwind P.O. Lakhan Kalan, Distt.
2,00,000.00
Remarks
ART
[P[P
ART
IIII
Sr. Name of
No. Wakf
PUNJAB
(AGHN6,6,1937
1937SAKA)
SAKA)
PUNJABGOVT.
GOVT.GAZ.,
No.Wakf-45/Gen./Pub./2011.-In exercise of the power conferred under Section 27 of the Wakf (Amended) Act, 2013, which are accessible by me under the
delegated powers by the Administrator vide order dated 19.12.2014 under Section 40 of the Wakf (Amended) Act, 2013. The following properties are hereby
declared as Sunni Wakf.
Tarn Taran
Tarn Taran
7.
Graveyard
Takia
8.
Takia
Ahmed
Shah Faqir
Wasniya
Deh Haza
Dargah
Baba
Karam Sah
9.
Dargah
Baba
Sanait
Ali Shah
10.
Graveyard
PUNJAB
(AGHN 6,
6, 1937
1937 SAKA)
SAKA)
PUNJAB GOVT.
GOVT. GAZ.,
GAZ., NOVEMBER
NOVEMBER 27,
27, 2015
2015 (AGHN
Graveyard
I]
PART III]
6.
Kapurthala are enclosed herewith.

sides of the property is as under:North 76ft South 90ft
East 90ft West 100 ft
10K - 16M
12,00,000.00
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board,
Chandigarh.

PWB, Amritsar dated 1.9.2015. Copy of
Jamabandi for the year 2010-11 is
enclosed herewith.
Amritsar
Amritsar
Ladhewal
H.B. No.165
211
229
685
803
686
01K - 04M 18,00,000.00

05K - 05M
11K - 04M
02K - 18M
03K - 03M
23K - 14M
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board,
Chandigarh.

PWB, Amritsar dated 1.10.2015. Photocopy
of Jamabandi for the year 1968-69 &
photocopy of the minutes of the Committee
is enclosed herewith.
Tarn Taran
Tarn Taran
Palasour
H.B. No.71
14/2
99/14/1
01K - 07M 1,00,000.00

00K - 07M
01K 14M
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board,
Chandigarh.

PWB, Amritsar dated 2.10.2015.Copy of
enclosed herewith.
Amritsar
Amritsar
Kot Khalsa
Under Red
Line
84 Sq. yards 15,00,000.00
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board,
Chandigarh.

PWB, Amritsar dated 28.10.2015.
Photocopy of undertaking given by the
Sarpanch of Kot Khasla is also enclosed
herewith.
Nabha
Patiala
Nabha
Kh. No.123/2
4K - 08M
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board,
Chandigarh.

PWB, Patiala dated 1.9.2015. Copy of
Jamabandi for the year 1995-96 &
Girdawari for the year 2014-15 is
enclosed herewith.
12,50,000.00
2969
361
Dhotian
Kh. No.188
H.B .No.315
Graveyard Anandpur Sahib

Sahota
Ropar
H.B.No.320
Kh. No.176
4K 4M
15,00,000.00
Religious
Under Direct
Management of the
Punjab Wakf Board,
Chandigarh.

PWB, Ropar dated 30.10.2015. Copy of
enclosed herewith.
No. Wakf-45/Gen./Pub./2011/(Corrigendum).-In exercise of the power conferred under Section 27 of the Wakf (Amended) Act, 2013, which are accessible
by me under the delegated power by the Administrator, vide orders, dated 19.12.2014 under Section 40 of the Wakf Act, 1995. The following Corrigendum in
respect of under mentioned Sunni Wakf property, which are earlier published in Govt. of India Supplementary Gazette Part III Section 4.
Sr. Page No.
No. of Gazette
Sr. No. of
Gazette
Date of
Gazette
Tehsil/Distt.
Village
Nature &
Object of Wakf
1.
198
2262
9.1.1971
Tarn Taran
Amritsar
Dhotian
H.B.
No.315
Religious
Under direct management

of Punjab Wakf Board,
Chandigarh
According to the report of Estate Officer, PWB,

Amritsar dated 29.6.2015 Wakf property known as
Graveyard was published in the Govt. of India
Gazette dated 9.1.1971. In Column No. 5 area
measuring 192K-0M of Kh. No.187, 187/1 was
wrongly published. The correct Khasra & area is Kh.
No.187 (31K-7M) & 187/1(6K-11M) total area
measuring 37K-18M. It may be read as Kh.No.187
(31K-7M) & 187/1(6K-11M) total area measuring
37K-18M as per jamabandi for the year 2010-2011.
2.
1061
1539
19.9.1970
Samrala
Ludhiana
Dhanda
Religious
Under direct management

of Punjab Wakf Board,
Chandigarh
According to the report of Estate Officer, PWB,

Khanna dated 6.8.2015 Wakf property known as
Graveyard was published in the Govt. of India
Gazette dated 19.9.1970. In Column No. 5 area
measuring 2K-13M was wrongly published. The correct
area is 2K-17M. It may be read as Khasra No.44
area measuring 2K-17M as per jamabandi for the year
2012-2013.
Remarks
Sd/Chief Executive Officer

Punjab Wakf Board
Chandigarh
ART
[P[P
ART
IIII
[220-1]
How the Wakf is

Administered
PUNJAB
(AGHN6,6,1937
1937SAKA)
SAKA)
PUNJABGOVT.
GOVT.GAZ.,
Corrigendum
2970
362
11.
I]
PART III]
PUNJAB
(AGHN 6,
6, 1937
1937 SAKA)
SAKA)
PUNJAB GOVT.
GOVT. GAZ.,
GAZ., NOVEMBER
NOVEMBER 27,
27, 2015
2015 (AGHN
2971
363
CHANGE OF NAME
I, Ranjeet Singh S/o Kartar Singh R/o Malwal Road, Ferozepur City have changed my name to Ranjeet
Singh Bhullar.
[221-1]
I, Sukhwinder Singh S/o Kartar Singh R/o Vpo. Sangatpura (Moga) have changed my name to Sukhwinder
Singh Maan.
[222-1]
I, Kalwinder Singh S/o Hakam Singh #B-30, Thermal Colony, Bathinda changed my name Kalwinder
Singh Sran.
[223-1]
I, Rajwant Singh S/o Jamit Singh, R/o H.No. 463, St. No. 4, Ghuman Nagar-B, Sirhind Road, Patiala,
have changed my name to Rajwant Singh Sandhu.
[224-1]
0894/11-2015/Pb. Govt. Press, S.A.S. Nagar

Punjab State Government Weekly Gazette Dated On 27-11-2015

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Punjab State Government Weekly Gazette Dated On 27-11-2015

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Regd.

PART I-ANotifications by Local Government

PART I-BNotifications by Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners

PART IIStatutory Notifications and Republications from Gazette of India/Punjab

PART IIINotification by High Court, Labour Commissioner ; Advertisements ;

PART III-ANotifications by Universities

PART III-BCourt Notices

PART IVActs and Bills

PART VNotification by Punjab State Legislature

SUPPLEMENT PART IStatistical

SUPPLEMENT PART IIGeneral

PART IIIDelegated Legislation

PART IVCorrection slips, Republications and Replacements

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

tXhe w[Zy ;eZso, gzikp ;oeko,

Department of Governance Reforms

fwsh 5 Btzpo, 2015

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

No.12/08/12-5HG2/626711/1.-Whereas in order to bring under the umbrella of planning framework

No relaxation in any of the norms of policy dated 16.11.2012 shall be applicable.

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS

Principal Secretary to Government of Punjab,

The 5th November, 2015

No.2/10/2015-2Edu.7/627771/1.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 38 of the Right of

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

In partial modification in Notifications 12/1/2008-3HB-III/1906 dated 31.03.2008 for admissions to

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

T[u/oh f;Zfynk ftGkr

nfXekoh dk BK, nj[dk s/ s?Bksh

Pqhwsh r[ofwzdo e"o, fgqz;hgb ;oekoh ekbi (bVehnK),

Pqh fti? e[wko r'fJb, fgqz;hgb, ;oekoh ekbi, pfmzvk.

Pqh fti? e[wko Powk, fgqz;hgb, ;oekoh ekbi, BkGk.

Pqh ;[oihs f;zx, fgqz;hgb, ;oekoh ;kfJz; ns/ y'i ekbi,

;eZso gzikp ;oeko,

BzL6$46$2015^1f;H;?bH$629004$1H^gzikp d/ okigkb ih gq;zBsk g{ote Pqh u/sB f;zx,

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

Hkkjr fuokZpu vk;ksx

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

C.M. No. 13-E of 2014 in/and

Smt. Harsimrat Kaur Badal

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER

Allowed as prayed for

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

Explanation.- In this sub-section, "elector" means a person who was entitled

Being barred by limitation, and

For want of non-joinder of necessary parties.

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

3. What we have to consider, however, is that whether having regard to the

Three questions which require determination are (1)

By virtue of S.29(2) of the Limitation Act, are the provisions of Ss.4 to

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

under the Act to seek interpretation of the word prescribed'.

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)

PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ., NOVEMBER 27, 2015 (AGHN 6, 1937 SAKA)