You are on page 1of 4

Insights into Editorial: Indias e-waste problem

insightsonindia.com/2016/09/05/insights-editorial-indias-e-waste-problem/

INSIGHTS

9/6/2016

The Union environment ministry in March 2016 had notified the E-Waste Management Rules 2016 replacing the
2011 version. With this, the Indian government has taken a key step to combat this most lethal form of pollution.
The earlier rules issued five years ago were quite inadequate.

Why worry about e-waste?


Organic and easily recyclable metal, glass and plastic waste need not permanently remain in landfills. But hardto-recover substances from e-waste like mercury make their home in landfills and keep leaching into ground
water.
In recent years, its e-waste has grown faster than earlier anticipated. The Greenpeace study found ewaste growing at 15% annually and projected it to go up to 800,000 tonnes by 2012. But it stood at 1.7
million tonnes in 2014, the fifth highest in the world, according to a UN study.
In India, e waste accounts for 4% of global e-waste and 2.5% of global GDP (2014 figures) so it has a
higher share of e-waste than its share of gross domestic product (GDP). For China, the two ratios are
about the same. The US, on the other hand, accounts for a lower share of global e-waste than its share of
GDP.
According to a 2011 Rajya Sabha secretariat study, e-waste accounts for 70% of Indian landfills. If
penetration of electronics and electrical products in India by 2030 have to grow even to todays average
world capita which leads to e waste of 6 kg per capita, the absolute e waste generation for India will grow
five times the current level to 9 million tonnes in 2030.

About new rules:


The new rules have included things like discarded CFL (compact fluorescent lamp) light bulbs which contain
mercury.
The new rules have brought producers of electronic goods under extended producer responsibility,
making them liable for collection and exchange of e-waste with targets.
Producers obligation to take care of e-waste will go up from 30% in the first year to 70% in the seventh
year.
To make procedures easier to follow, the new rules require players in the e-waste life cycle to register with
just the Central Pollution Control Board and not have to go through individual state pollution control
boards.
A big responsibility also has been placed on the shoulders of state governments. It is their job to
adequately train and protect the health of workers engaged in recycling.

1/4

Why it is difficult to manage e waste in India?


The producers/manufacturers do not have adequate information on their website regarding e waste
management.
Customer care representatives do not have inkling about any take back or recycling programme and even
if they have set up collection centres, they are simply not enough for a geographically vast country like
India.
India being a vast country, setting up collection mechanism is a big challenge. If any of the brands try
individually to reach out to all corners of the country, it will economically not be sustainable or feasible.
Improper enforcement of the existing laws is another hurdle.

Environmental and Health Impact:


Developing countries with rapidly growing economies handle ewaste from developed countries, and from their
own internal consumers. Though Indias ministry of environment and forest has made import of ewaste illegal, a
fair amount of ewaste is still illegally imported into India. Currently, majority of ewaste handled in India is through
informal sector using rudimentary practices.
The informal sectors recycling practices magnify health risks. For example, primary and secondary
exposure to toxic metals, such as lead, results mainly from open-air burning used to retrieve valuable
components such as gold. Combustion from burning e-waste creates fine particulate matter, which is
linked to pulmonary and cardiovascular disease.
Also, these chemicals are not biodegradable. As per a WHO study, children are especially vulnerable to
the health risks that may result from ewaste exposure and, therefore, need specific protection. As they are
still growing, childrens intake of air, water and food in proportion to their weight is significantly increased
compared with adults, and with that, the risk of hazardous chemical absorption.
In India, about 4-5 lakh children in the age group of 10-15 are observed to be engaged in various ewaste
activities, without adequate protection and safeguards in various yards and recycling workshops.

What Should India Do?


On the positive side ewaste contains many valuable materials like rare metals, which are well worth recovering,
provided one uses green technologies. Just as green power entered electricity generation as a business, ewaste
disposal can be a business: this has been demonstrated by companies like Attero. The threat of generating
ewaste should not diminish our national ambitions in digitising the country and e-enabling the citizens.
Along with digitalisation plans, our nation needs a matching ewaste plan to contain the e-mess, an advance type
of planning rather than a post-facto approach. The first big step is to recognise that the ewaste monster is being
created right now.
Besides, manufacturing processes in India have to adopt better technology so as to generate less waste.

Norway model:
India has a lot to learn from Norway in this matter.
Norway has e-waste take back system in place for more than a decade now, whereas, India notified these
rules very recently.

2/4

When the e-waste rules were introduced in Norway, the country faced similar questions. The authorities
were finding it extremely difficult to enforce and follow up so many entities producing and importing
electronics in the country. The deliberations conceptualised the idea of EPR which culminated in e-waste
regulation.
Like the rules in India, management of e-waste in Norway is also a producer responsibility and producers
are defined as Norwegian manufacturers and importers of EEE. The producers/importers of e-waste in
Norway are obliged to be members of a take-back company and have to pay a fee for their membership to
the take-back companies. This is how it provides the funding for collection and treatment of the waste.
The take back companies in Norway need to get an approval from the Norwegian Environment Agency.
The approval process includes a verification of nearly about 50 criterions besides third party having to
certify them. The process includes providing a plan detailing how they will collect e-waste and treat it in an
environmentally sound way.
They also need to ensure that they will collect all e-waste from their market share which is determined by
how much of electronics is put into the market by their members.
The take back companies report back to Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) register,
which is managed by the government, and also finance WEEE register. In contrast, India does not have
any data on the electronics being manufactured and imported in the country. There is no national registry
taking account of the producers operating in the country and the amount of EEE introduced by them in the
market.
Huge amount of recycling and recovery of e-waste in Norway has only been possible due to the presence
of efficient take back system and the collective interest of the producers to comply with the legislations. In
a stark contrast, the formal collection mechanisms in India are able to capture only five per cent of the end
of life EEE and a huge chunk lands in the informal sector putting a question mark on the recycling and
recovery of e-waste.

What should the government do?


In order to tackle the issue of e-waste handling and management in an effective and meaningful manner, the
government may consider the desirability of bringing a separate legislation on e-waste instead of handling it
under the Environment Protection Act.
Such legislation may call for establishing a central authority or a central public sector undertaking having experts
from IT field and other technical domains possessing knowledge of e-waste disposal, management and recycling
techniques and its own e-waste collection centre/ recycling plants with state-of-art technologies, in all major
cities of the country.
The law should make it mandatory that the e-waste generated from various government departments all over the
country as well as by entities and individuals, big or small industrial houses, educational institutions shall be
deposited at the designated collection centres.

Conclusion:
A strong political will is required to come out with strict regulations to manage e waste in India. Increased public
awareness is the need of hour. It is now to be seen how the stakeholders who turned a blind eye to the rules so
far, proceed ahead.

3/4

Copyright (C) INSIGHTS ACTIVE LEARNING

4/4

You might also like