Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract In this work, the second law of thermodynamics is applied to the industrial ladle furnace
(LF) with a capacity of 55-57 tons of melted steel to evaluate the physical exergy during the steel production process. A computer algorithm is developed to carry out the exergy analysis to the LF. The exergy efficiency of the ladle furnace is determined. As a result, loss exergy, exergies going into and out of
the LF during the steel production process are identified and the ways of minimizing these losses in practice are discussed.
Rsum Dans ce travail, la seconde loi de la thermodynamique est applique au four industriel
poche de coule (LF) ayant une capacit de 55-57 tonnes dacier fondu, pour valuer lexergie physiques
lors du procd de production dacier. On dveloppe un algorithme dordinateur pour effectuer lanalyse
dexergie de la LF. Le rendement dexergie du four poche de coule est dtermin. Comme rsultats,
on identifie perte dexergie, exergies entrant la LF et en sortant lors du procd de production dacier
et lon discute des faons de minimiser ces pertes en pratique.
INTRODUCTION
Conventional energy analysis applies the first law of thermodynamics to evaluate energy efficiencies. The first law
embodies the principle of energy conservation. Energy is
neither created nor destroyed in a physical or chemical
process from the first law; energy is changed merely from
one form to another. However, an approach to energy efficiency based on the first and second laws of thermodynamics indicates the extent to which the capacity of an energy
source to perform useful work has been retained.
In this study an exergy analysis is carried out in the ladle
furnace (LF) which is used as a secondary metallurgical
process in steel production. Loss exergy, exergies going into
and out of the LF are identified and exergy efficiency of the
system is determined.
deoxidation,
alloying,
removing of impurities,
homogenizing,
removing of sulfur,
adjusting temperature of casting and
casting.
440
(1)
where
(1b)
[Fe2O3]
[FeO]
CO(g)
[SiO2]
[MnO]
[P2O5]
[Cr2O3]
(CaS) + [O]
(CaO) + CO2(g)
2[Al] + 3[O]
[Ca] + [O]
2[B] + 3[O]
[Al2O3]
(CaO)
[B2O3]
(2)
Mass (kg)
Liquid steel
Ferro manganese
Metallic manganese
Ferro silica
Low carbon ferro chrome
High carbon ferro chrome
Aluminum
Ferro boron
Sulfur
55750
250
50
100
700
100
80
10
10
Carbon
Lime
Fluspat
MgO
Al2O3
Electrode
Argon
Oxygen
Total
CANADIAN METALLURGICAL QUARTERLY
120
250
20
60
100
30
7080
617
65327
Mass (kg)
Liquid steel
Dust
Slag
Stack gases
Argon
56000
25
1874
348
7080
Total
65327
Exergy of Heat
Heat has a lower exergy compared with work since heat
cannot be totally converted into work. Exergy of heat at the
control surface can be defined as.
B = Qcv (1 - T0 T )
Q
(3)
The kinetic and potential energies of a stream of substance are ordered forms of energy. So, these are fully convertible to work. Due to the disordered and entropy dependent nature of the physical and chemical exergies, components can only be determined by considering a composite,
two-part system, the stream under consideration and the
environment [10]. Total specific exergy for the stream flow
can be written as
btot = bphy + bche + bkin + bpot
(4)
(5)
(6)
441
mi 0 = gi 0 + R T0 ln( Pi 0 P0 )
(6a)
mi 00 = gi 0 + R T0 ln( Pi 00 P0 )
(6b)
g i 0 = hi 0 - T0 sio
(6c)
where
E + nin h0o + Dh
in
] = n [h
in
ex
o
0
+ Dh
ex
] + Q
ex
(7)
loss
(8)
MJ
60511
19427
9839
67
22
11
Total
89777 100
Energy or heat
(MJ)
77511
89
1049
86.4
0.1
1.2
195
5836
1089
0.2
6.5
1.2
1248
2
2722
36
1.4
0.0
3
0.0
Total
89777
100
442
electrode
argon
Start
I
Belect+Bche
BLiq-st+S mexbex
liquid steel
control region
argon
S BQloss
Fig. 1. Schematic of the ladle furnace.
Assumptions in Equation 8 are that stack gases are supposed as ideal gases and the effect of pressure on enthalpies
and entropies of solids is neglected.
BQloss = Qloss . (1 - T0 / T)
(9)
b = (h - h0) - T0 (s - s0)
(10)
h - h0 =
dT
(11)
298
T
s - s0 =
S Qloss=Qcond+Qconv+Qrad+Qabs
cp
T dT
(12)
298
BQ=S Qloss.(1-T0/T)
cp = a + bT + cT-2
(13)
BPhy=Sni[Dh -T0.D s ]i
EXERGY EFFICIENCY
Exergy is a measure of how effectively the input is converted into the products. Exergy efficiency is defined as
(14)
End
443
Table III Exergies of liquid steel going into and out of the ladle furnace on a chemical components basis
Exergy of liquid steel going into the LF
(1803 K)
Chemical
components
Exergy
(MJ)
Fe
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Cr
Ni
Mo
Cu
40067
95
67
196
9
34
55
57
13
71
Total
40664
Exergy
(MJ)
Fe
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Cr
Ni
Mo
Cu
B
53293
255
274
402
10
27
398
60
14
75
2803
Total
57611
Chemical
components
Exergy
(MJ)
Chemical
components
Exergy
(MJ)
Fe2O3
CaO
MnO
Al2O3
Cr2O3
ZnO
86
0.004
7
0
5.6
6.6
Total
105
CaO
SiO2
FeO
MnO
Fe2O3
P2O5
Al2O3
Cr2O3
B2O3
0.7
391
2840
436
1787
33
2482
220
12
Total
8202
Exergy
(MJ)
CO
CO2
1429
1135
Total
2564
Endothermic Reactions
Chemical
components
Exergy
(MJ)
CaCO3
CaS
2
103
Total
105
444
2. Since the exergy of liquid steel going out of the LF is significant (57611 MJ, Table VI), the temperature control of liquid
steel is essential.
y = 81 %
CONCLUSIONS
Exergy analysis of a control volume helps to identify the
sources of losses [13]. The results obtained from the LF are presented in the following:
1. Although energy efficiency of LF is 86.4 % (Table II), exergy efficiency of the LF is found as 81 %. This value is higher
3. Working with scrap which is both clean and with its chemical components close to produced steel would reduce the exergy given to the system.
4. By optimizing the working conditions, slug exergy output
can be minimized.
5. The overall exergy loss in the LF is around 13 % (Table VI).
Slag
Exergy
(MJ)
Chemical
components
Exergy
(MJ)
3.5
1.5
0.054
0.2
31
619
0.06
75
6
322
31
19
25
5.5
25
1159
Ar
2654
CaO
SiO2
FeO
MnO
Fe2O3
P2O5
Al2O3
CaS
MgO
Cr2O3
B2O3
CaF2
Total
2654
Total
Total
5
Argon
Chemical
components
Exergy
(MJ)
Dust
Chemical
components
Exergy
(MJ)
Fe2O3
CaO
MnO
Al2O3
Cr2O3
SiO2
ZnO
0.176
0.017
0.013
0.025
0.008
0.017
0.013
Total
0.269
445
Exergy
(MJ)
40664
(57%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10871
(16%)
19429
(27%)
E
EAF
G
g
h
ho0
I
LF
m
Pi0
Pi00
Exergy
(MJ)
Liquid steel
Dust
Slag
Stack gases
Endothermic reactions
Argon
Loss exergy
Total
57611
(81.2%)
0.269
(0.0004%)
1159
(1.63%)
5
(0.01%)
105
(0.15%)
2654
(3.7%)
9430
(13.3%)
70964
(100%)
70964
(100%)
NOMENCLATURE
B
b
Bche
Belect
BLiq-st
Bphy
BQ
BW
cp
Exergy (MJ)
Specific exergy (MJ/kg)
Exergy of chemical reaction (MJ)
Exergy of electric (MJ)
Exergy of liquid steel (MJ)
Physical exergy (MJ)
Exergy of heat (MJ)
Exergy of work (MJ)
Specific heat capacity at constant pressure
(kJ/kg.K)
Electrical energy (MJ)
Electric arc furnace
Gibbs function (kJ)
Specific Gibbs function (kJ/kg)
Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)
Enthalpy of formation (kJ/kg)
Irreversibility (MJ)
Ladle furnace
Mass (kg)
Partial pressure of ith component in a mixture
at the restricted state(N/m2)
Partial pressure of ith component in the
enviroment (N/m2)
Q
R
T
V
W
y
m
Heat (kJ)
Ideal gas constant (kJ/kg K)
Temperature (K)
Volume (m3)
Work (kJ)
Exergy efficiency (%)
Specific chemical exergy potential (kJ/kg)
SUBSCRIPTS
abs
Al
Ar
C
che
cond
conv
cv
Dst
Elctr
ex
Fls
Fr-bor
Fr-man
Fr-sil
Absorption
Aluminum
Argon
Carbon
Chemical
Conduction
Convection
Control volume
Dust
Electrode
Exit
Fluspat
Ferro boron
Ferro manganese
Ferro silica
CANADIAN METALLURGICAL QUARTERLY
446
HCFr-Cr
i
in
kin
LCFr-Cr
Lim
Liq-st
Me-man
Oxy
phy
pot
rad
Sgas
Slg
Sul
tot
u
0
00
6.
7.
8.
9.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.