Argumentative Essay CORRUPTOR SHOULD BE GIVEN

DEATH SENTENCE
Corruptors are the parasite for the development of our country. The benefits are
great for the people of Indonesia when there is not corruption anymore. A
prosperous Indonesia is not a dream. There are so many corruptor cases in Indonesia, thus
corruptors should be given death sentence. There are three argument the corruptor should get
death sentence that are to scare the people to do corruption, to decrease the number of
corruption in Indonesia, and to increase the pride of Indonesia to the worlds perspective.
Death sentence can scare the people to do corruption. The punishment that given to
corruptor is really weak. The legal basis for criminal (civil) corruption is Law No. 31 of 1999
on Combating Corruption, which is then updated with the Act No. 20 of 2001. In the
Act, set how many prison sentences and fines of minimum and maximum for those found
guilty of corruption. The penalties range from 1 year up to a maximum of 20 years in
prison, and rely on the
parties
to
a criminal
act
of
corruption (whether the
person who bribed or bought off). But there is repetition and ambiguity in some chapters.
Giving death sentence can decrease the number of corruption in Indonesia. Because
death sentence is scaring people to do corruption, it can minimize the number of corruption
case in our country. Nur Wahid said, the death penalty is applied in order to create a deterrent
effect for criminals, as well as potential criminals. "It will give confidence to people that in
our state laws can be enforced and there is protection for the people," he said. The
execution, the former PKS president, should be done firmly and quickly. He believes the
application
of the
death
penalty will not leadto international protests. "Malaysia andSingapore can apply, why Indone
sia did
not," he
said. The
nation,
he
said, requires
a
firm choice and the
courage to establish the death penalty for corrupt.
Death sentence can increase prosperity and the pride of Indonesia to the worlds
perspective. If our country is free from corruption, automatically our country will get more
prosperity and we will not feel embarrassed to our corruption rank.
Metrotvnews.com, Padang: Vice Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission
(KPK) M Jasin revealed, according to survey results of Political and Economic Risk
Consultancy (PERC) 2010 Indonesia are the most corrupt country in Asia Pacific.
PERC survey results (9.27) was put Indonesia in the first rank as the most corrupt country of
the 16-nation Asia-Pacific is
the purpose of
investment, M Jasin said in Padang
Thursday (11/8).
In conclusion, our government should firmly apply the death sentence for the corruptor
because there are provident that death sentence can give scary effect to the people who want
to do corruption and can decrease the number of corruption case that can increase prosperity
so we do not feel embarrassed again for our world corruption rank.
http://kumpulantugaskita.blogspot.com/2012/04/argumentative-essay-corruptorshould-be.html

Death Penalty

Death penalty for serious criminals has been discussed by our experts. Those
who agree say that death penalty will scare the criminals off. However, those
who disagree say that it is inhuman, not effective and we cannot correct the
wrong sentence after the criminals die.
In Switzerland, this penalty does not exist. Most people argue that the
possibility of making the wrong decision is always there although it is true that
spending life behind the bars is not easy either. Also, every person should have a
chance for rehabilitation. In this way he or she can start all over again in another
life style.
Those who agree argue that there is no use to feed the terrorists in
prison with their money. When they get out, they will create a lot of trouble by
blackmailing and killing people. So, who says that jails will stop them from being
bad guys?
My own opinion is divided. On the one hand, I want to be humane, and
on the other hand, I wonder if those people are worthy of my feeling.
http://iswati_lovejesus.guru-indonesia.net/artikel_detail-15035.html

Should Corruptor Get More Punishment?

Do you know what the meaning of corruption is? Is corruption good behaviour?
Well, corruption means the abuse of legal power by government official for
immoral private gain. It is well-known done with tendency towards the benefits for
individual or group interest. Corruption is prominently forbidden not only by law
but also religion in Indonesia. That teaches us about bad impact of doing negative
things, like getting heavy punishment in the hereafter.
You know? According to the the countrys main audit agency, in 2007 60 percent
of Indonesian schools has misappropriated state funds devoted to improving and
repairing school facilities. And ICW has accused several government-run schools
in Jakarta of allegedly embezzling as much as $633 million in funds awarded by
the state for operational assistance.
So, corruption causes mass destruction for peoples misery and I think it should be
stopped by give the corruptors punishment. The punishment can be
impoverishment, exilement, and death penalty. There are some reasons why I can
say this. First, for the impoverishment. According to Transparency International
Indonesia Wasekjen, Luky Djani in Sindo Radio discussion at Warung Daun, Jl

Cikini Raya, Central Jakarta, Saturday (3/3), making corruptors poor criminals will
provide a scary role model for those who wish to engage in corruption. [This
strategy of] impoverishing the corruptors can be applied by the law enforcement
agencies. Beside that, from source Kompas.com, Presiden Susilo Bambang
Yudhoyono also supports verdicts that impoverish corruptors. So, it has been
proven that impoverishment suitable for the punishment for corruptors.
Second, I will talk about exilement. If corruptors got exiled, espescially to an
unknown place / area, there, he/she will think about what he/she has done. In that
case, the possibility for them to do the same thing would be very slim, because of
the misery they felt as long as they got exiled. The second advantage is, they would
be far from the community. Which means that they are far from the cycle of
money, and they wont be able to do corruption again, because theyre far from the
thing that they would corrupt. So, thats the second option.
Third, death penalty. Based on constitution 1999 no. 31 article 2 stating that death
penalty can be executed in a certain condition and it is really a must to be done
including fining death penalty upon the corruptor.
If the death penalty really be executed it will give a shock therapy for the corruptor
because all of corruptors will be afraid to do corruption again. Then the candidate
of new corruptor will think twice or maybe 3 times, 4 times, 5 times up to
hundreds time to do corruption because if they will perpetrate corruption they will
get death penalty.
As we know, there are some state that apply this kind of punishment. The example
is China. In China, those wo commit corruption, they got punished by death
penalty. And the result is, the corruptors got reduced in massive number. The death
penalty is the most effective way amongst all. It is, i think, a very suitable
punishment. Why? Because they have killed so many people, aware or not. The
money that supposed to be given by the government for the nations need, lost to
an unknown source.
As the rising generation, we shall avoid corruption character, because it is bad for
yourself and others and I think everyone should be involved in the effort to
eradicate corruption.
http://visualsystem.wordpress.com/2012/10/17/contoh-hortatory-exposition/

Corruptors are people who do corruption. Corruption is taking the right of the other people for
themselves. For the example that the government who takes the countrys money for his self or
for his family. Corruption make the citizens suffer. Corruption kills thousands of people.
Corruption can make a country broken.
Some people think that give the death penalty for Corruptors is the good way for make the other
corrupters wary, so that they wont do corruption again and corruption will stop.
But think, if the corruptors dead what about the money they have taken? Of course their family
still can enjoy this life use the money, right?
I think Death penalty for corruptors is not effective, thats not comparable with what corruptors
have done to the citizens. Think, corruptors kill them, corruptors make citizens in suffer, and
corruptors are traitor. I think the good ways to make corruptors wary are:
1.take all of what they take from citizens
2.ask them for pay for what they have taken from citizens
3.impoverish them
4.give the ax for them
5.put them in jail for a long time
I think those are the effective ways for make the corruptors wary.

Death penalty for Corruptors ?

Corruptors are people who do corruption. Corruption is taking the right of the other people for themselves. For
the example that the government who takes the countrys money for himself or his family. Corruption make the
citizens suffer. Corruption kills thousands of people. Corruption can make a country broken.
Some people think that give the death penalty for Corruptors is the good way for make the other corrupters wary,
so that they wont do corruption again and corruption will stop.
But think, if the corruptor is dead what about the money they have taken? Of course their family still can enjoy life
using this money, right?
I think Death penalty for corruptors is not effective, thats not comparable with what corruptors have done to the
citizens. Think, corruptors kill them, corruptors make citizens suffer, and corruptors are traitor. I think the good
way to make corruptors wary are:
1.take all of what they take from citizens
2.ask them to pay for what they have stolen from citizens
3.impoverish them
4.give the ax for them
5.put them in jail for a long time
I think those are effective ways to make the corruptors wary.

Corruption is hard to fight.

It starts from thhe discount you get from your job to the big money in the government.

When talking about corruption, no countries are exempted, some goes with the 10$ note in the driving licence,
other like USA where the election is so expensive that the big company pay for it, how any president could not
send them back the lift. (french expression).

One way to fight corruption is to fight equally the people who get the money and the one who gives the money
especially at the top where big company corrupt so they get some market and break some rules that cost money.

Only money solutions can solve money matters.

Well you can kill few people too if you want... :))

http://www.italki.com/entry/281038

I personally support death penalty. As a working principle, it follows the logic that people that kill
other people with ease (bombers and drug dealers come to mind), should have no problems about
being killed in their chosen professions. Similarly, we forgive death in war zones, why can't the rule
applies in civil environment?
I know many people who disagreed, most of the people commenting on this article in Global Voice
are opposed to it.
Many of them are opposed to on moral reasons scripture or otherwise. That is not the case as
there is no religion that does not recognize some sort of capital punishment, including Christianity.
Barron Clarke a commenter on the said article quoted the Judaic Christian saying of
an eye for an eye
in its modern interpretation to be understood as setting the limit of maximum execution and that I
concur: capital punishment is the maximum punishment mentioned in the Christian doctrines, it
should be exercised with caution and only as the very last recourse for the most severe of crimes.
Various other parts of the Christian scriptures supported this view while maintaining to recognize
death as a form of legal and legitimate form of punishment at the same time.
While Jesus didn't live long enough to ever fight war or condemned anyone to death, various
different European churches in all the different flavors of Christianity went on in killing in the name
of God and execute condemned heresies for many centuries afterwards. There is no way to argue
that Christian scripture doesn't recognize capital punishment the different churches change their
views of capital punishment all across two millenias of Christian history, from applying it with zeal
(eg. During the Inquisitions) or to not at all (when Christian churches no longer carry the authority
to condemn and execute such punishment under secular governments).

Islam and Jews both recognize capital punishment as legit and legitimate. As a model for the Jew
regime, Israel's view on capital punishment is somewhat, understandably biased due to their very
unique history in the last century and all Islamic government in the world have death penalty laws
on the book.
Interpretations, however, vary from the different Moslem countries: Somali's an anarchy-state and
Saudi Arabia, a Wahabi-ancient kingdom state both maintain very orthodox and ancient
interpretations of scriptures - including public beheadings, gender based capital discrimination and
arbitrary moral sentencing in issuing deadly verdicts. Egypt and Jordan are more moderate include
more consideration as well as more secular - and accountable - arbitration. The courts in these
countries are also generally more accountable and open to outside influences when sentencing a
person to death.
Indonesia a country with large Moslem population and a secular government - is secular in state
sanctioned capital punishments. The religious court does not have the power to condemn anyone
to death and deals only with matrimony and dietary requirements. There is no reason to assume
that the Indonesian court issued death sentences with religious bias (favoring any particular
interpretation of scriptures). Capital punishment is only available on violent crimes or major drugrelated cases and hardly ever issued for political views since Indonesia moved to a more peaceful
democracy in the last decade.
The society is split and continued to grapple between its support and opposition of capital
punishment. In a weird logic, the largest group opposing the execution of these particular three
condemned men, is the single most vocal proponents of death penalty.
The public opinion on death penalties in all these countries are split the way it stirs passionate
debates in the United States to this day. The Supreme Court ruled for each state to rule their own
and some states, like Texas, prosecute death penalty aggressively in accordance to secular law,
available and legitimate, under the protection of the Constitution of the United States.
Somalia and Taliban Afghanistan have no internationally recognized governments and death
sentences are handed in arbitrary-summary condemnation performed by tribal court (often
involving only a sole individual with a chief-like authority and nonnegotiable and opaque morals).
The sentences vary wildly from one court to another within the same national borders. Death
sentences are often times political in these courts (political oppositions face almost certain deaths
under these governments), rather than moral (the world hears very little about it until they start
killing young woman with kids).
Both countries have proven to be the most resilient to American attempt to change their political
views rather than religions.
Germany has museum of state-sanctioned murders, a holocaust that shatters the conscience of
history to this very day. As a state policy, most of the modern western states abolished death
penalties more influenced by the events in WW II rather than pre-war moral consideration.
The court in Nuremberg sentenced Nazi war criminals to death and executed quite a few. Those
who were convicted were charged with state-sanction systematic murders were guilty in gross
abuse of their political and executive powers, rather than their personal beliefs in regards to death
penalty.
Indeed, in a perverse logic, a whole new set of laws were created to accommodate this new class
of heinous crime and the resulting high court was set to deal with only the most extreme of crimes
in the Hague. In a curious observation, it's interesting that Hermann Goering, Saddam Husein,
Milosevic and Pinochet, four of the most famous defendants in crimes against humanity trials of
the last 60 years, all died before the court had the chance to sentence their crimes. Maybe there is
a higher justice in the power of nature.

Post communist Russia make Stalin's gulag archipelago a tourist destination these days. From a
monarchy to a communist state to a now crowdy democracy, the Russians remain a firm believer
in capital punishment.
Singapore government prosecutes death penalty aggressively in drug cases but not on political
dissidents. This is a government with a peculiar obsession in legislative social engineering and it
has very effectively been a successful deterrent creating an almost drug free in Singapore
(neighboring Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand all have thriving underground illicit substance
industries and most probably consume more illegal drugs collectively than any other country on
the planet).
In imperial Japan, one form of honorable traditional conduct an acceptance of failure is to
murder yourself. Hara Kiri is probably the most impressive execution of all death sentences. The
Philippines, a proto-democracy with Catholic and American influences, death penalty had been
repealed and reintroduced and repealed again during the last twenty years. China executes more
people than any other country on the planet and recognizes abortion as a form of population
control.
As a belief held globally, by population headcount, opposition to death penalty almost certainly
forms only a small minority mainly only to include those who represent power rather those with
more acceptable morals. This was true for the ancient Roman empire when murderers of Roman
citizens were swiftly dealt with in the most severe manners, often including burning down entire
villages of the offending groups and remains true on the protection awarded to the conduct of
American soldiers overseas by not having them placed under international laws.
Death penalty is made available in societies and civilizations by necessity and interests rather than
moral, imposed by the more powerful rather than the righteous. It has nothing to do with religion
or morals.
If one were to argue that it is not far, let me say that I don't even believe in absolute, universal
moral codes. While Life is a precious commodity across all civilizations in all of history, Death
fluctuates in value. Stalin famously said that one person's death is a tragedy and one million
deaths are statistics. For the less brute, George Orwell put society in more elegant manners where
all animals are equal, but some more equal than others.
Some are worth more than others and that is a hard thing to deal with. Life is the only thing worth
dying for, is my own, personal morbid fascination with Death. Capital punishment is an interesting
subject and probably deserves a further discussion. For now, in accordance to the prevailing law, I
think all execution should carried out as swiftly as possible. Death and taxes you will always pay
your dues, that's my personal beliefs.
I don't mention their names on principle because I don't want them turning up on Google
searches.
That's my own, personal morbid fascination with Death and I intend to write more on Death as a
subject in the future.

http://www.indonesiamatters.com/2456/pro-death-penalty/

1st speaker

Honorable adjudicators and happy audience.

Happy audience ladies and gentlemen.

Definition:

Team line:

Corruption means the abuse of legal power by

Our time line is the corruptor has human right to live and

government official for immoral private gain. It is well-

government can use jail sentence.

known done with tendency towards the benefits for

individual or group interest. Corruption is prominently
forbidden not only by law but also religion in Indonesia.
That teaches us about bad impact of doing negative
things, like getting heavy punishment in the hereafter.
Team line:

Team split:
The first speaker speak about the human right for the
corruptor to live, the second speaker talk about the chance
for corruptor to back go the right way, and the third
speaker speak about the worst effect caused by death
penalty.

Our time line is corruption causes mass destruction for

peoples misery and it should be stopped by death
penalty to prevent other corruption.
Team split:

Arguments:
I disagree with the motion because there are some reasons
why I disagree about it! It can be regarded from various
kind of field.

The first speaker will deal with corruption regarded from

law, the second speaker speak about afford to prevent
corruption by death penalty, and the third speaker talk
about exclusive law and court for the corruptor.
Arguments:
Ladies and gentlemen.

1. Regarded from human right.

2. Regarded from psychology of corruptor
family.
Ladies and gentlemen.
Here as the first speaker I will speak about human right. I

Here I agree with the motion stating that the corruptors

think we all know what human right is. Human right is

must get death penalty. There are some reasons why I

right that adhere in everyones self since inside of womb

can say this. Those can be looked upon some point of

thats have a supreme and fundamental as the gift of God

views:

for long life and it cant be claimed by whoever and it must

be respected, be kept and must be protected by whoever

1. Regarded from law.

social or state. From the statement above it is really

obvious that everybody, everyone has a human right

Here I would like to give some reasons regarding law

constitution.

especially life right including for the corruptor. Corruptor

is also an ordinary human. Like me, like you, and like us.

Ladies and gentlemen.

Based on constitution 1999 no. 31 article 2 stating that

So, corruptor has human right to life as well, why

corruptor should get a death penalty ladies and gentlemen?

death penalty can be executed in a certain condition and

Based on constitution of 1945 article 28 a about life right.

it is really a must to be done including fining death

It is really obvious that it is contain about human right.

penalty upon the corruptor.

So, relating to this if the death penalty really be done.
If the death penalty really be executed it will give a

Wont it break human right? Where is the real of our

shock therapy for the corruptor because all of corruptors

government to protect the society if the death penalty

will be afraid to do corruption again. Then the candidate

really be done?

of new corruptor will think twice or maybe 3 times, 4

times, 5 times up to hundreds time to do corruption

Ladies and gentlemen.

because if they will perpetrate corruption they will get

death penalty.

We recognize that Indonesia is even the house of

corruptors. Many corruptors in Indonesia started by the

Ladies and gentlemen.

most little levels up to highest levels. But, I think to give

penalty our government must not use a death penalty.

When we are watching television, reading newspaper or

Actually, the corruptors are mostly smart person and have

listen to radio, corruptor is mainly discussed as the

an outstanding education.

hottest issue. This case are found everywhere, either in

countryside or big cities the corruptor can be whoever

But, because of their intelligence is not be balanced by

having a chance to do it.

strong religion lesson. So that, finally they are taken to do

a corruption.

It can occur at all levels of our society, such as from

local and national government. Those are like the leader

And if all of them get a death penalty what will happen to

of village, representative of citizen and up to the highest

our country? Perhaps, citizen or resident in Indonesia is

level.

only a stupid person as the rest?

If the bad condition is not done soon by firm sanction,

If we wait the next generation it is not sure will be better

what will happen with the country in the future ladies

than the corruptor right now.

and gentlemen?
Ladies and gentlemen.
Here the firmest sanction for the corruptor they must get
death penalty. If the corruptor gets only a sentence in

Now, lets see the reality! We all know that manycorruptors

prison, they can still feel the freedom. For example: one

in Indonesia who has known or have not yet. Maybe the

of the corruptor in our country has got a sentence in

corruptor in Indonesia has reached 50% of official in our

prison but he can still go anywhere, even in jail he got

country and all of them get a case of corruption.

luxurious facilities, like air conditioner, LCD player, and

Please you imagine; if all of them get a death penalty. How

even they can go out of the prison.

about their family fate? Perhaps they will be misery or

maybe their family will be poor because they do not have a

Please you imagine what you feel? How about your

spinal column to fulfill their needs. Will it increase the

feeling watching the reality that make us annoyed about

level of poverty in our country? They will cry all night

it? Do you will the people who has made our society

long who will take responsibilities to them? Our

misery, they get penalty that can be called VIP

government? I think it is not possible right?

punishment.
Ladies and gentlemen.
Ladies and gentlemen.
Like what I say in my previous statement that actually the
Relating to this, it is better to give death penalty for the

corruptor mostly a smart people. If death penalty really be

corruptor rather than sentence in jail for some years or

done it will reduce the intelligence our government.

long life.
So, relating to this I think a death penalty is not really
Please well imagine with your logical thought, if the

important. Instead of giving death penalty it is better if our

corruptor get only sentence in jail or maybe long life,

government improve things for development our country.

does it make our country lose, and it does not give

And instead of their behavior maybe, perhaps our

advantage for us and our country?

government can give the corruptors a penalty as heavy as

the lost that is caused of them.

Why I can say that ladies and gentlemen?

For example: if the corruptor is just in jail it of course

And it is not necessary get a death penalty.

our government will give meals for them. They do not

So, here we are as the opposition we disagree with the

give

motion. Thanks

our

government

advantage

but

make

our

government lose.
Ladies and gentlemen.
As we all know that our country and government has
afforded to eliminate corruptor in our country, like
government has formed a board such as Commission of
Corruption Eradication (KPK), even in all constitution
had been contented about banning to perpetrate
corruption. But what had happened in our surroundings?
There are still many corruptors. They did not feel afraid
of it.
If our government just relax and give penalty in jail for

the corruptor how about our country in the future and for
the next generation?
There will be corruptors everywhere, in the villages up
to the big citiesladies and gentlemen.
To avoid the worst thing that will happen, our
government must give a firm penalty that is death
penalty for the corruptor.
So, we stand in this motion that corruptor must get death
penalty.

2nd speaker

Rebuttal:

Rebuttal:

Well, ladies and gentlemen. Here I am as the second

Ladies and gentlemen happy audience.

speaker from government, I would like to rebut some

arguments from the opposition.

Here is my rebuttal. Based on the arguments given by

government, it does not have any correlation between the

Considering the statements from opposition stating that

death sentences with the fear of perpetrating corruption.

corruptor should not get death penalty because of human

Again, we said it does not have any correlation at all. We

right issue. They said that the corruptor has right to life

should focus on the people who accused as the corruptors

without anyone insulting the basic right that they have.

and they get death penalty.That is the point of this debate

Is that true?

actually. It seems the government does not really

understand with the motion.

Those are not the reason on how to make deal with the
corruptor. They totally make a mass destruction in our

Arguments:

life. Poverty that actually can be reduced by funding

from the government but the corruptor steals it. In fact,

I am sure you all know about mafia of law court.Alleged

they smoothly kill people by taking the money and flee

people will look for the way to escape and manipulate the

away towards the reasons going abroad for injure

result of court. We arevery sorry, somehow we do not

treatment. The government then cant arrest them or

intend to put aside the dignity of judiciary but some

even take them into the tribunal of law court.

irresponsible people who abuse their power of legalized

government to do that.This clearly shows that the tribunal

Arguments:

of law court is still likely to be unfair for some cases.

Ladies and gentlemen.

Ladies and gentlemen.

We should understand clearly about the death penalty.

We, therefore, stand against

This means that people will not do corruption over and

government has possibility to fine the corruptor with

over because of afraid of death penalty. This is the

prison sentence. It aims at giving the corruptor the chance

prevention and not the action for only murdering the

to reconstruct their life into the way of goodness. The way

corruptor with beheading sentence. People will not do

that they and their family can live happily without any

that even trying for once if they know that the result of

feeling of being ashamed and blamed by all people in the

robbing money from the country is death. If we do not

country. Thus it is the main purpose of fining the corruptor

give death penalty so they think it does not matter

with the jail sentence and not with the death penalty that

stealing money because they will get fine only for one

criticized

and half year in the prison. After all, they can be free

Commission demanding all nations to not use the death

with much money that they get it beforehand.

sentence.

Another reason on why we should fine the corruptor

Ladies and gentlemen.

and

cursed

by

this motion because

International

Amnesty

with the death penalty. We can imagine that if we are

sick in very bad condition then the doctor will injure us

The next argument that we should pay more is that there

with very intensive treatment. And if somebody badly

are many people blamed because of the others crime. The

injured, so they will get in emergency treatment. It goes

bad people envy with the good people. So, they try to

the same with corruption, if we do not treat as

manipulate some cases for the good that possibly cause

emergency so it can cause deadly effect for those who

them jailed into prison. We should understand that not all

are infected with the virus called corruption.

government officials corrupt the money and put it into their

own pocket. They do good job without any tendency and

So ladies and gentlemen.

honestly manage the financial administration in advance,

but sadly, they are cursedly slandered by their fellow

The last statement is if we really want to make a

perpetrating corruption. That is definitely because the

change and better life in our future. We should do it

reason on how the bad tackling the good and succeed the

particularly starting from managing ourselves into very

goods position.

good maintenance by eradicating corruption. Thus, we

stand firmly in this motion that the corruptor must get

That is why we should convince you all that this motion is

death penalty. Thanks

clearly understood and tackling the problem properly. We

greatly against this motion ladies and gentlemen. Thanks

3rd speaker

Rebuttal:

Rebuttal:

Ok, ladies and gentlemen. Regarding the arguments from

Ladies and gentlemen. The debate is going to the end and

the opposition, we will give the rebuttal for eliminating

we are as the opposition, will give rebuttal for the last

the anxiety of being alleged as corruptor. We believe that

speaker of government. Here we go. Lets think critically

Commission of Corruption Eradication uses the available

with this motion ladies and gentlemen! The case of

and undisputed evidence to prove someone as the alleged

corruption is criminal but it is the same with the others.

corruptor deriving data and trustable witness. Because

You know why? That because corruption is the case of

the fine is death penalty that is considered as the heaviest

morality. If we can lead to morality into the goodness so it

sentence so the commission cannot take the decision

transforms people from the hell to the heaven. And the

recklessly. They must have used the principle of non-

government should give the chance for corruptor to do

error presumption ladies and gentlemen.

that. Death penalty cannot be used to do that but prison

sentence has the possibility to change corruptor realizing

Points of arguments from the first and second

their mistake.

speaker:
Point of arguments from the first and second speaker.
1. Regarding the law constitution, corruption
can

possibly

get

the

death

penalty

because of the mass misery for people.

1. Regarding human right, corruptor should

have chance to change their behavior
become the good people.

2. Regarding

the

corruption,

prevention
death

for

other

penalty

can

2. Regarding

mafia

of

law

court,

alleged

significantly prevent the vast corruption

corruptor has possibility that someone is

officially.

envy with them and manipulates cases for

them.

Since we know that corruption cannot be stopped by

common sentence for criminal only. That should be an

Ladies and gentlemen.

exclusive law for the corruptor because we already have

special court for them.

This motion is clearly understood that we should give

chance for the corruptor to be the good people.

Ladies and gentlemen.

However, if the sentence has been executed and the last
Corruption has similar crime with the bomber. They kill

was found that the alleged corruptor does not perpetrate,

many people consciously and they deserve to get death

how is the responsibility for the corruptor and the family.

penalty. It goes the same with corruptor. They steal the

They lose forever and no one can make them live again

money from country and it causes many people die

ladies and gentlemen.

because of the money that can help them was lose over
the corruptor ladies and gentlemen.

Therefore, that can cause the revenge from the family.

Who knows? They will do crime that is worse than

Corruption is a mass destruction of people and it causes

great misery for the poor killing them smoothly.

corruption ladies and gentlemen.

This case, we totally agree with the motion that the

So, corruption is the matter of morality and we should

corruptor must get death penalty. Thank you ladies and

change it step by step with prison sentence.

gentlemen.
We are as the opposition, firmly disagree with the motion.
Thank you ladies and gentlemen.

http://hukum.kompasiana.com/2012/02/02/the-corruptor-must-get-death-penalty435915.html