Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS PERTAINING TO THE MEAT
INDUSTRY
Human interference with the natural systems has continued for a long time, and it is
posing a risk not only to the earth but to mankind itself. Even though the livestock sector
plays a major role in the environmental degradation, very less research has been done
pertaining to it and as a result it has gained little to no attention. As the existing ways of
intensive industrial-style meat production are highly unsustainable, an increase in the
meat supply could have catastrophic consequences. This report gathers examples from
scientific literature to provide an insight into the detrimental aspect of the livestock
sector. The livestock sector is a major stressor on many ecosystems and on the planet as
whole. In addition, it is responsible for climate change, with almost half of the entire GHG
emissions coming from the livestock sector alone. This devastating figure is a direct
consequence of recklessly cutting rainforests to clear land for grazing animals and
producing food for them. Raising livestock also takes its toll on the water resources. It is a
very water intensive task and accounts for 8 percent of global human water usage. It is
also the largest sectoral source of marine pollution, contributing to eutrophication, ocean
dead zones, degradation of coral reefs and human health problems. Due to ever increasing
demand for fish, marine ecosystems are at very major risk of collapsing, with some
scientists speculating the oceans to be fishless by the end of the century. Growth of animal
agriculture industry has also made its presence felt in the once untouched forests. It turns
out to be the leading cause of deforestation, over-exploitation and extinction of species.
Being a major driver of deforestation, livestock sector is indeed a key player in loss of
Biodiversity as it is responsible for the destruction of habitats, climate change and is a
driver and facilitator of invasion by alien species. Due to these destructive and damaging
consequences, the probability of our widespread annihilation is increasing rapidly and we
are running out of time to stop the most harmful impacts of what we are doing. A Balance
needs to be maintained between the demand for animal food products and a healthy
environment. We have to change the world by making our choices sustainable. We can
start working on these sustainable alternatives as a solution to this problem and the
easiest way to do this is to bring down the demand for animal based products.
Table of Contents
Introduction .... 1
1.0 Meat supply ... 1
1.1 Increasing incomes .. 1
1.2 Increasing popultaion ... 2
2.0 Greenhouse emissions and Air pollution . 2
2.1 Contribution of livestock industry in GHG 2
2.2 Emissions for a meal. 2
3.0 Animal feed and Land use .. 3
4.0 Livestocks role in water depletion and pollution ... 3
4.1 Water use .. 4
4.2 Water pollution 4
5.0 The condition of fisheries .. 4
5.1 Wasted Catch: Unsolved problem in fisheries 5
6.0 Impact on Biodiversity .. 5
7.0 What are the Consequences? .. 6
Conclusions ... 6
References 7
Introduction
Since time immemorial, humans have been rearing animals to meet their needs of meat, milk,
wool and other domestic requirements. Over the years, as the economy grew, small scale
farming was gradually replaced by industrial style agriculture. Increased efficiency of industrial
agriculture led to fall in prices of products of daily use. It helped to easily and reliably provide
food to pe0ople and turned meat- an infrequent meal into a cheap, every-day product.
However, the irony is that our very affordable meat is not so cheap. Today, the livestock sector
emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious
environmental problems (Steinfeld et al. 2006). This includes stresses such as cutting of
rainforests, overuse of freshwater, food consumption by farm animals, respiration and all the
waste that animals produce. Even though a billion people are chronically hungry and go to bed
empty bellied, a large proportion of the food we produce is being fed to farm animals. But,
perhaps, the most apprehensive impact of raising animals for food and what has been the motif
of many scientific publications in the recent years, is climate change. Animal agriculture, alone
is responsible for up to 51% of all greenhouse gas emissions, which is more than the entire
transportation sector. Yet, whenever we think of the causes of climate change, the images
which make appearance into almost everyones mind are large factories with smoke emitting
chimneys, cars and traffic jams. Humans are using earths natural resources in a very
unsustainable fashion: at rates that increasingly exceed their natural ability to renew
themselves, and polluting the air, water and soil at rates surpassing the capacity of
environment to decompose these pollutants.
2.1
2.2
Methane is 25-100 times more destructive than Carbon Dioxide and has
a global warming potential 86 times that of Carbon Dioxide on a twenty
year frame.
Cows produce 150 billion gallons of methane per day.
Livestock is responsible for 65% of all human-related emissions of
nitrous oxide a greenhouse gas with 296 times the global warming
potential of carbon dioxide, and which stays in the atmosphere for 150
years.
Thus, it is more climate efficient to procure protein from plant based diet than
animal based sources and beef is the least efficient way to produce protein. The
consumption of 1 kg of beef is equivalent to automobile use for a distance of 160
km.
5.1
Industrial agriculture related land use destroys the existing habitats of some
species. For example, conversion of forests into pastures for grazing.
Contributes to climate change which in turn has adverse effect on ecosystems.
Aquatic life is affected by dumping of nitrogenous waste in oceans, creating
many ocean dead zones across the world.
Overexploitation, e.g. overgrazing of pastures, overexploitation of fisheries.
Killing of species such as native wolf and coyotes to protect lands designated
for cattle grazing.
Any phenomena affecting one dimension of biodiversity will inescapably impact other
dimensions. For example, hunting of carnivores leads to increase in herbivores
population, posing a threat to vegetation. The following facts apparently show what the
outcomes are.
Up to 137 plant, animal and insect species are lost every day due to
rainforest destruction.
Ten thousand years ago, 99% of the biomass was wildlife. Today, humans
and the livestock we raise for food makes up 98% of the biomass.
Conclusions
As we have seen, livestock sector emerges as one of the biggest forces driving environmental
degradation and resource overuse. Globally, it is one of the largest sources of greenhouse
emissions, climate change and water pollution. In addition, it contributes to the loss of
biodiversity as large areas of rainforests are cleared worldwide and converted into pastures for
grazing and producing feed for the livestock. Overall, it tends to exacerbate the already
impending threats to social and natural systems thus making both the human society and the
natural environment vulnerable to a catastrophic collapse. Moreover, from an economic
perspective, livestock consumes more protein than it produces, making it an inefficient and
expensive way to produce protein. One way to mitigate the harmful impacts of animal
agriculture is to consume the products in a more responsible way thus reducing the demand
for meat. Also, by relying on poultry instead of beef, the carbon and water footprint of livestock
sector can be reduced significantly. In addition, the policy makers should adopt environmentresilient strategies in order to carry out meat production in a sustainable and effective manner.
Even though the livestock sector remains a major threat to the natural systems, it plays a very
crucial role in agriculture economy, food security and human health and nutrition. Hence, its
environmental aspects need to be visualized in the context of many different functions it
performs. In a long run the policies designed should not only focus on the strategies to manage
environment, but should also focus on improving the livelihoods, as well as the social and
economic well-being of those involved in this sector. Thus keeping in mind the vastness and
complexity of the livestock sector, this method of integrated action seems to be one of the only
ways to effectively and efficiently deal with the ongoing problem in a long run.
References
1. Livestocks long shadow, FAO UN (Rome,2006)
2. Growing greenhouse gas emissions due to meat production, UNEP (2012)
3. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle
assessments, article in livestock science (March, 2010)
4. Wasted Catch: Unsolved problem in U.S. fisheries, Oceana (March, 2014)
5. Feeding livestock food residue and the consequences for the environmental impact
of meat, ARTICLE in JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION (August, 2008)
6. World Watch, November/December 2009. Worldwatch Institute, Washington,
DC, USA. Pp. 1019
7. Meat-eaters Guide to Climate Change & Health. Environmental Working Group
8. Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook, USDA
9. http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/News/2006/1000448/index.html
10. www.cowspiracy.com
11. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v515/n7528/full/nature13959.html
12. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-greenhouse-hamburger/
13. http://www.globalagriculture.org/report-topics/meat-and-animal-feed.html
14. http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/1997/08/us-could-feed-800-million-peoplegrain-livestock-eat
15. http://rainforests.mongabay.com/amazon/amazon_destruction.html
16. http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/solutions/stop-deforestation/solutionsfor-deforestation-free-meat.html#.VwLOUaR97IV
17. http://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/facts-on-animal-farming-andthe-environment/