Professional Documents
Culture Documents
School of Criminology
1
Chapter 1
has
been
part
of
our
history.
On
college
itself.
Although
the
majority
of
college
for
drinkers,
but
also
for
those
in
the
immediate
environment.
Heavy drinking has been associated with physical or
sexual
assault,
criminal
violations,
and
unsafe
sexual
alcohol;
yet,
virtually
all
college
students
or
not.
Although
heavy
drinkers
invite
negative
These
secondary
consequences
include
vehicle
important
because
it
examines
the
comparisons
between
students
who
abstain
from
and
research
student
has
academic
highlighted
drinking
drinking
effects
attending
paths
level
a
and
(Wechsler
universities
with
while
in
positive
the
et
college.
relationship
experience
al.
higher
Previous
1995).
between
of
secondary
Also,
students
incidences
of
heavy
their
peers
alcohol
consumption;
instead,
the
and
lower
academic
grades
and
greater
where
the
scholarship
college
quality
is
alcohol
of
life
is
degraded
and
weakened.
The
research
is
programs
and
suggests
that
academic
beneficial
the
to
academe
effects
of
experiencing
study
or
sleep
disruption,
and/or
secondary
multiple
consequences
regression
grades,
overall
anxiety
about
models
of
satisfaction
grades.
of
The
college
three
with
drinking
outcome
life
at
researchers
with
variables:
school,
examine
and
the
background
controls
(e.g.,
age,
gender,
parents
research
students
summarizes
academic
existing
achievement
research
and
regarding
satisfaction
at
a
the
University.
Furthermore, the study provides a concise review of
current material relating to the structure of postsecondary
education
highlighting
the
role
of
alcohol
across
the
Conceptual Framework
The
study
revolved
around
the
concept
of
perceived
This
male
students
practice
drinking
liquor
as
leisure
Input
1. Profile of the
respondents
1.1.
Age
1.2. Gender
1.3. Year Level
1.4. Highest Educational
Attainment of
Parents
1.5. Occupation of
Parents
1.6. Religious
Affiliation
2. Perceived Causes of
drinking alcohol in
terms of:
2.1. Curiosity
2.2. Stress reduction
2.3. Failed Grades
2.4. Peer Factor
2.5. Environment
Conditions
3. Perceived Effects of
drinking liquor as to:
3.1.
Family
3.2.
School
3.3.Friends
Process
1.Assessing the profile
of the respondents
in
terms
of
Age,
Gender, Year Level,
Highest
Educational
Attainment
of
Parents,
Occupation
of
Parents
and
Religious
Affiliation.
2.Assessing
the
perceived causes of
drinking alcohol in
terms of Curiosity,
Stress
reduction,
Failed Grades, Peer
Factor
and
Environment
Conditions.
3.Assessing
the
perceived effects of
drinking liquor as
to
Family,
School
and Friends.
4.Correlating
the
perceived causes of
drinking liquor of
the
respondents
profile variables.
Feedback
Figure 1
Paradigm of the Study
Output
1. Determined the
perceived
causes
of
liquor
exposure among
criminology
students.
2. Proposed
measures
minimize
exposure
students
liquor.
to
the
of
to
answer
the
following
questions:
1 What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:
1
Age
Gender
Year Level
Parents Occupation
Religious Affiliation
Family
School
Friends
of
liquor
exposure
of
the
respondents
and
their
profile variables?
5 What measures can be proposed to minimize the exposure to
liquor of the respondents?
Hypothesis
This study was guided by a lone hypothesis that there
is no significant relationship between the perceived causes
of liquor exposure of the respondents and their profile
variables.
result
of
this
study
would
be
useful
and
of
the
Administration
in
enacting
rules
and
Valley.
The
perceived
causes
were
limited
to
Conditions.
This
study
was
conducted
at
the
the
follows:
following
words
are
operationally
defined
as
Attainment.
The
level
of
the