Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SO ORDERED.
Padilla,
JJ., concur.
Jr.,
[2]
Rollo, p. 22.
[3]
Rollo, p. 42.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[14]
(unpaid debt of
$285,000.00)
$3,000
$9,000
PEREZ, J.:
Before the Court is a petition for review assailing
the 9 May 2008 Decision1 of the Court of Appeals in
CA-G.R .. CV No. 88686, which affirmed in part the
8 December 2006 Decision2 of the Regional Trial
Court (RTC) of Baler, Aurora, Branch 96.
FAIR MARKET
VALUE
P1,693,125.00
P400,000.00
P490,000.00
P175,000.00
P750,000.00
USA
PROPERTY
FAIR MARKET
VALUE
$13,770.00
$8,000
Retirement, pension,
profit-sharing, annuities
$100,000.00
$56,228.00
PRESBITERO J.
VELASCO, JR.**
Associate Justice
ATTESTATION
I attest that the conclusions in the above Decision
had been reached in consultation before the case
was assigned to the writer of the opinion of the
Court's Division.
ANTONIO T. CARPIO
Associate Justice
Second Division Chairperson
CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 13, Article VIII of the
Constitution and the Division Chairperson's
Attestation, I certify that the conclusions in the
above Decision had been reached in consultation
before the case was assigned to the writer of the
opinion of the Court's Division.
MARIA LOURDES P. A. SERENO
Chief Justice
17
NACHUR
Respondents. December
27,
x-------------------------------------------------x
DECISION
REYES, R.T., J.:
For Our review on certiorari is the Decision[1] of the
Court of Appeals (CA) reversing that[2] of the
Regional
Trial
Court
(RTC),
Branch
45,
Anonas, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, in an action for
reconveyance and damages. The CA declared
respondents as rightful owners of one-half of the
subject property and directed petitioners to
execute a registerable document conveying the
same to respondents.
The Facts
Spouses Simeon Doronio and Cornelia Gante,
now both deceased, were the registered owners of
a parcel of land located at Barangay Cabalitaan,
Asingan,
Pangasinan
covered
by
Original
Certificate of Title (OCT) No. 352. [3] The courts
below described it as follows:
Un terreno (Lote 1018), situada en el
municipio de Asingan, Linda por el
NE; con propriedad de Gabriel
Bernardino;
con
el
SE
con
CA Disposition
Fourth A piece of
residential
land
located in the barrio of
Cabalitian but we did
not measure it, the
area is bounded on
the north by Gabriel
Bernardino; on
the
east by Fortunato
Doronio; on the south
by
Geminiano
Mendoza and on the
west by a road to
Villasis. Constructed
on said land is a house
of light materials also
a
part
of
the
dowry. Value 200.00.
[25]
(Emphasis ours)
Taking note that the boundaries of the lot
donated to Marcelino Doronio and Veronica Pico
differ from the boundaries of the land owned by
spouses Simeon Doronio and Cornelia Gante, the
CA concluded that spouses Simeon Doronio and
Cornelia Gante donated only half of the property
covered by OCT No. 352.[26]
Regarding the allegation of petitioners that
OCT No. 352 is inadmissible in evidence, the CA
pointed out that, while the OCT is written in the
Spanish language, this document already forms
part of the records of this case for failure of
appellees to interpose a timely objection when it
was offered as evidence in the proceedings a
quo. It is a well-settled rule that any objection to
the admissibility of such evidence not raised will be
considered waived and said evidence will have to
form part of the records of the case as competent
and admitted evidence.[27]
The CA likewise ruled that the donation of the
entire property in favor of petitioners predecessors
is invalid on the ground that it impairs the legitime
of respondents predecessor, Fortunato Doronio. On
this aspect, the CA reasoned out:
Moreover, We find the donation of
the entire property in favor of
appellees predecessors invalid as it
impairs the legitime of appellants
predecessor. Article 961 of the Civil
Code is explicit. In default of
testamentary heirs, the law vests
the inheritance, x x x, in the
legitimate x x x relatives of the
deceased, x x x. As Spouses Simeon
A civil action
may either be ordinary
or special. Both are
governed by the rules
for
ordinary
civil
actions, subject to
specific
rules
prescribed
for
a
special civil action.
xxxx
c) A special
proceeding
is
a
remedy by which a
party
seeks
to
establish a status, a
right or a particular
fact.
As could be gleaned from the
foregoing, there lies a marked
distinction between an action and a
special proceeding. An action is a
formal demand of ones right in a
court of justice in the manner
prescribed by the court or by the
law. It is the method of applying
legal remedies according to definite
established rules. The term special
proceeding may be defined as an
application
or
proceeding
to
establish the status or right of a
party, or a particular fact. Usually, in
special proceedings, no formal
pleadings are required unless the
statute expressly so provides. In
special proceedings, the remedy is
granted
generally
upon
an
application or motion.
Citing
American
Jurisprudence, a noted authority in
Remedial Law expounds further:
It
may
accordingly be stated
generally that actions
include
those
proceedings which are
instituted
and
prosecuted according
to the ordinary rules
and provisions relating
to actions at law or
suits in equity, and
that
special
proceedings
include
those
proceedings
the
Register
of
Deeds
of
October 3, 2003