Eukaryontenphyla

!!! Please rename .txt in .
html
<html><head><title>Overview of the phyla in the imperium Eucarya</title></head>
<body style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10pt">
Elisa Rost 
Four important classification systems for eukaryote
s are compared. For each phylum, the broadest perception is adopted, as long as
it leaves the taxon monophyletic. Still, some phyla are defined too narrowly. En
tamoebozoa and Pelomyxozoa should in fact be treated as belonging to the same cl
ass (!), and some phyla in kingdom Corticatida might be combined (e.g. Phaeodare
a-Ebriozoa, or Xenophyophora-Granuloreticulosa-Polycystinea-Acantharea-Taxopodid
a). On the other hand, a number of distinct phyla will have to be added, like ma
ny old lineages in kingdom Fungida, Malawimonadozoa in kingdom Excavatida, Picoz
oa in kingdom Corticatida, and isolated groups like Diphyllatia and Breviatozoa.
 
The kingdoms follow Luketa (2012). 
 
<table style="font-size:11pt" width="100%" border="5" bordercolor="#000000" cell
spacing="5" cellpadding="3">
<tr>
<td width="25%">Siewing (1985)
</td>
<td width="25%">Hausmann & Hülsmann (1996)
</td>
<td width="25%">Doweld (2001)
</td>
<td width="25%">Lanfranco (2007)*
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="center">Regnum Amoebozoida
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">incertae sedis
</td>
<td width="25%">Amoebozoa, Arcellozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Amoebozoa pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">not mentioned, although in the scope of the work
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Multiciliozoa
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Protostela
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Myxomycota pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Entamoebozoa
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Caryoblasta
</td>
<td width="25%">Pelomyxozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Pelobionta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Myxogastra
</td>
<td width="25%">Physaromycota
</td>
<td width="25%">Myxomycota pro parte maiore
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Dictyostela
</td>
<td width="25%">Dictyosteliomycota
</td>
<td width="25%">Dictyosteliomycota
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Classis incertae sedis: Acarpomyxea**
</td>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="center">Regnum Apusozoida
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Cercomonadozoa pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Apusozoa
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Euglenozoa pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Spironematellozoa***
</td>
<td width="25%">Discicristata pro parte

</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="center">Regnum Animalioida
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">not in the scope of the work
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Amoebidiozoa****
</td>
<td width="25%">Zygomycota pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Choanoflagellata
</td>
<td width="25%">Codosigozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Choanozoa
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Porifera
</td>
<td width="25%">Metazoa (rank of taxon not specified!) pro parte*****
</td>
<td width="25%">Spongiozoa
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Placozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Metazoa (rank of taxon not specified!) pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Trichoplacozoa
</td>

</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Myxozoa
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Myxidiozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Myxozoa
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Cnidaria
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Hydrozoa
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Ctenophora
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Ctenoplanozoa
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Cladus incertae sedis: Mesozoa
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">[see next cell below]
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Coelomata
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">several phyla, not otherwise specified, which are collec
tively termed Zoobiota
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="center">Regnum Fungida
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Nucleariozoa
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Microspora
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Metchnikovellozoa, Chytridiopsidomycota
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte (refers ONLY to Hyaloraph
idium!) sensu Hansson (1997), as they are part of Ankistrodesmaceae s
ensu Ustinova et al. (2000) and therefore part of Chlorococcales sensu von Denffer et al. (1983)
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Chytridiomycota, Classis incertae sedis: Hyaloraphidiomy
cetes, Monoblepharomycota
</td>
<td width="25%">Chytriomycota
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Blastocladiomycota
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Basidiobolomycota
</td>
<td width="25%">Zygomycota pro parte******
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Mucoromycota
</td>
<td width="25%">Zygomycota pro parte maiore
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Glomomycota
</td>
<td width="25%">Glomeromycota
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">"Ascomycetes/Basidiomycetes" (rank of taxon no
t specified, but the indication of two subordinate classes suggests phylum)*****
</td>
<td width="25%">Tuberomycota, Ustilaginomycota
</td>
<td width="25%">Eumycota
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte? They are brown algae sensu
von Denffer et al. (1983), but not all classes of chromists were listed i
n the classification scheme of Sarcomastigophora
</td>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Nematophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="center">Regnum Corticatida
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte, Labyrinthomorpha
</td>
<td width="25%">Chromista pro parte maiore, Ordo incertae sedis: Actinop
hryida, Ordo incertae sedis: Ciliophryida
</td>
<td width="25%">Pseudodendrozoa, Bicosoecomycota, Labyrinthulomycota, De
velopayellomycota, Saprolegniomycota, Hyphochytriomycota, Opalinomycota, Bacilla
riophyta, Vaucheriophyta, Fucophyta, Eustigmatophyta, Synurophyta, Chrysomonadop
hyta, Raphidomonadophyta, Dictyochophyta, Pedinellophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Chrysophyta, Fucophy[...], Tribophyta, Eustigmatophy[...
], Pseudofungi, Raphidophyta, Labyrinthulomycota, Bicosoecida, Slopalinida
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte, Apicomplexa, Ciliophora pro
parte maiore
</td>
<td width="25%">Alveolata*******
</td>
<td width="25%">Perkinsozoa, Gregarinozoa, Peridiniophyta, Parameciozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Ciliophora, Apicomplexa, Perkinsozoa, Pyrrhophyta, incer
tae sedis: Ellobiopsids
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte sensu Hansson (1997)
</td>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Cercozoa
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Coelodendrozoa pro parte********
</td>
<td width="25%">Radiozoa pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Ebriozoa
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>

</td>
<td width="25%">Vampyrellozoa pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Filosea (the taxon including Euglypha)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Ordo incertae sedis: Desmothoracida
</td>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte sensu Levine et al. (1980
), as they are part of Heterochloridales sensu Awasthi (year??)
</td>
<td width="25%">Chromista pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Chlororachniozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Chlorarachniophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
)
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Vampyrellozoa pro parte
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Plasmodiophorozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Plasmodiophoromycota
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Gromiozoa
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Ascetospora
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Haplosporidiozoa, Paramyxozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Haplospora, Paramyxea
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">incertae sedis*********
</td>
<td width="25%">Psamminozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Xenophyophora
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Rotaliozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Granuloreticulosa
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Classis incertae sedis: Polycystinea
</td>
<td width="25%">Coelodendrozoa pro parte
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Acanthometrozoa**********
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Ordo incertae sedis: Taxopodida
</td>
<td width="25%">Coelodendrozoa pro parte
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Isomita***********
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Acanthocystozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Heliozoa
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Prymnesiophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Haptophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Cryptomonadophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Cryptophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte sensu Hansson (1997),
as they are part of Chlorococcales sensu von Denffer et al. (1983)
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Glaucocystophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Glaucophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Biliphyta (rank of taxon not specified!) pro parte*****

</td>
<td width="25%">Cyanidiophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Cyanidiophy[...]
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Biliphyta (rank of taxon not specified!) pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Rhodymeniophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Rhodophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Chlorophyta pro parte maiore
</td>
<td width="25%">Micrinomonadophyta, Chlorococcophyta, Chlamydomonadophyt
a, Ulvophyta, Oedogoniophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Chlorophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte? They are part of Chlorosarc
inaceae sensu Rogers et al. (1980)************ and therefore part of Ulot
richales sensu von Denffer et al. (1983), but not all orders of chlorophy
tes were listed in the classification scheme of Sarcomastigophora
</td>
<td width="25%">not in the scope of the work*************
</td>
<td width="25%">Chlorokybophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Charophyta pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
)
</td>
<td width="25%">Chlorophyta pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Mesostigmatophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte? They are part of Ulotrichal
es sensu von Denffer et al. (1983), but not all orders of chlorophytes we
re listed in the classification scheme of Sarcomastigophora
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Klebsormidiophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Zygnematophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte? They are part of Chaetophor
ales sensu von Denffer et al. (1983), but not all orders of chlorophytes
were listed in the classification scheme of Sarcomastigophora
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Coleochaetophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Charophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Marchantiophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Marchantiophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Bryophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Bryophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Anthocerotophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Anthocerotophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Langiophytophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Rhyniophyta pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Rhyniophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Rhyniophyta pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Zosterophyllophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Zosterophyllophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Lycopodiophyta, Isoetophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Lycopodiophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Psilophytophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Trimerophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Cladoxylophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Polypodiophyta pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Ophioglossophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Psilotophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Sphenophyllophyta, Equisetophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Equisetophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Marattiophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Pteridophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Botryopteridiophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Noeggerathiophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Aneurophytophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Progymnospermophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>

</td>
<td width="25%">Moresnetiophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Pteridospermophyta pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Lyginopteridophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Peltaspermophyta
</td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Pinophyta pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Cordaitophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Pinophyta pro parte maiore
</td>
<td width="25%">Pinophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Gnetophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Gnetophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Pinophyta pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Ginkgophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Cycadophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Cycadophyta pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Cycadeoideophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Cycadophyta pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Magnoliophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Magnoliophyta
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="center">Regnum Excavatida
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Retortamonada
</td>
<td width="25%">Retortamonadozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Metamonada pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Axostylata pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Trichomonadozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Parabasalia
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
</td>
<td width="25%">Axostylata pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Oxymonadozoa
</td>
<td width="25%">Metamonada pro parte
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte? The genus Jakoba was
not yet established in 1985, but Nicholls (1984) wrote about Histiona
 and questioned its assignment to Chrysophyceae
</td>
</td>
</td>
<td width="25%">Jakoba
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="25%">Sarcomastigophora pro parte, Ciliophora pro parte
</td>
<td width="25%">Euglenozoa pro parte maiore, Heterolobosa
</td>
<td width="25%">Tetramitozoa, Percolozoa, Stephanopogonophyta, Diplosone
matophyta, Bodonophyta, Euglenophyta
</td>
<td width="25%">Discicristata pro parte maiore
</td>
</tr>
</table>
 
Awasthi, D. K. (year??): Cryptogams (Algae,
Bryophyta and Pteridophyta) B. Sc. First year Second Paper. C.C.S. University, M
eerut 
Doweld, Alexander (2001): Prosyllabus Tracheophytorum. GEOS, Moskva 
Hansson, Hans G. (1997): South Scandinavian Marine Protoctista. Tjär
nö Marine Biological Laboratory 
Hausmann, Klaus & Hülsmann, Norbert (1996): Protozoology. Thieme
, Stuttgart, New York 
Lanfranco, Edwin (2007): A phylogenetic classification of organisms other
than animals. University of Malta, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology 
Levine, N. D., Corliss, J. O., Cox, F. E. G., Deroux, G., Grain, J., Honigber
g, B. M., Leedale, G. F., Loeblich III, A. R., Lom, J., Lynn, D., Merinfeld, E.
G., Page, F. C., Poljansky, G., Sprague, V., Vavra, J. & Wallace, F. G. (198
0): A Newly Revised Classification of the Protozoa. The Journal of Protozool
ogy 27 (1): 37-58 
Luketa, Stefan (2012): New views on the megaclassification of life. Proti
stology 7 (4): 218-237 
Nicholls, K. H. (1984): On the Validity of Histiona aroides Pasche
r (Chrysophyceae?). Archiv für Protistenkunde 128 (1-2): 141-146 
Rogers, Catherine E., Mattox, Karl R. & Stewart, Kenneth D. (1980): T
he zoospore of Chlorokybus atmophyticus, a charophyte with sarcinoid grow
th habit. American Journal of Botany 67 (5): 774-783 
Siewing, Rolf (1985): Lehrbuch der Zoologie Band 2. Systematik. Gustav Fi
scher Verlag, Stuttgart, New York 

Ustinova, Iana, Krienitz, Lothar & Huss, Volker A. R. (2000): Hyal
oraphidium curvatum is not a Green Alga, but a Lower Fungus; Amoebidium p
arasiticum is not a Fungus, but a Member of the DRIPs. Protist 151 (3): 253262 
von Denffer, Dietrich, Ziegler, Hubert, Ehrendorfer, Friedrich & Bresinsk
y, Andreas (1983): Lehrbuch der Botanik 32. Auflage. VEB Gustav Fischer Verl
ag, Jena 
 
*an alternative circumscription is given for some phyla. In each case, the view
which is, seemingly according to the author, the more modern one, is adopted her
e 
**in this comparison interpreted as the taxon including Stereomyxa 
***better known as Hemimastigophora 
****better known as Mesomycetozoa 
*****included by a figure, although otherwise not in the scope of the work 
******not mentioned, but obviously included here 
*******the separate mention of the taxon incertae sedis Ellobiopsida may be igno
red, as it is not in the main systematic treatment of the work 
********better known as Phaeodarea 
*********the same work lists two further classes incertae sedis (Athalamea and M
onothalamea, each said to be non-monophyletic) upon which other phyla can be fou
nded, if desirable 
**********better known as Acantharea 
***********in this comparison interpreted as the taxon including Telonema
 
************but the same authors strongly refuted this position in 1980! 
*************the same work states that all green plants belong to the phylum Chl
orophyta. However, no classification scheme is given, and the term Chlorobionta
is used alternatively. So the first statement is ignored here 
 
Please feel free to contact me if you have additional information, if you want t
o ask something or if there are critical corrections to the presented phylogeny.
 
<img src="email.gif" alt="Bild kann leider nicht geladen werden" title="Mailadre
sse" style="float:left"></body></html>

Eukaryontenphyla

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Eukaryontenphyla

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

!!! Please rename .txt in .

<td width="25%">Discicristata pro parte

<td width="25%">not in the scope of the work

<td width="25%">incertae sedis

<td width="25%">Biliphyta (rank of taxon not specified!) pro parte*****

<td width="25%">not in the scope of the work

scher Verlag, Stuttgart, New York<br>

You might also like