Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S, BCKR
$25 until
December 31, 1982
S29.95 thereafter
H OW ARD S. B6CK6R
ART WORLDS
Works of art are produced by cooperation. The
creating artist works with a network of suppliers
of materials, distributors of art works, fellow'
artists, and with critics, theorists, and audiences.
These contributing individuals and organiza
tions together constitute an art world. And the
very existence of this art world gives artists the
opportunity and means to make art. How is this
cooperation possible? In what w'ays do works of
art show the effects of having been made
collectively?
In this most unusual book, noted sociologist
Howard Becker draws examples from music,
drama, dance, literature, film, and the visual arts.
Among his findings is that much work ev en
tually recognized as art has its beginnings apart
from the cooperative nurturing of an art world.
He cites such outsiders as composer Charles
Ives, sculptor Simon Rodia, and quiltmakers as
artists whose work did not receive recognition
until a suitable art world existed to foster them.
Sociologists, critics and analysts of the several
arts, and working artists will find herein a clari
fication of the role of well-know n observations
about the cooperative character of art work. The
analysis clarifies problems in aesthetics and crit
icism and provides a model for the analysis of
other social worlds.
ART W ORLDS
T h is
On
SEAX-ARP-6X6G
SEAX-ARP-6X6G
HOWARD S. 86CKLR
ART WORLDS
UNIVBRSITV OF CRUFORNIR PR6SS
Berkeley Los Rngeles London
Contents
List of Illustrations
Preface
Acknowledgments
1 Art W orlds a n d Collective Activity
vi
ix
xii
1
2 C onventions
40
3 Mobilizing R esources
68
93
131
165
7 E diting
192
226
272
10 C h an g e in Art W orlds
300
11 R e p u ta tio n
351
Bibliography
Index
373
385
Illustrations
12
20
27
31
43
44
49
51
62
65
76
85
136
140
144
147
148
vii I L L U S T R A T I O N S
154
176
196
206
234
245
252
257
261
262
280
282
284
285
294
295
318
323
324
327
334
335
337
338
342
347
Preface
X P R E F AC E
Xi P R E F A C E
Acknowledgments
Xiii A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S
Xi v A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S
2 * ART W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
3 A R T W O R L D S AND C O U . E C T I V E ACTI V IT Y
4 A R T W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T I V E ACTI VI TY
5 A R T W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T I V E AC T I V I T Y
6 A R T W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T I V E ACT I VI T Y
T H E DIVISION OF LABOR
Given th a t all th ese things m u st be d o n e for an art w ork to
o c c u r as it actually does, w h o will do them ? Im agine, as one
e x tre m e case, a situation in w hich one p erso n did everything:
m a d e everything, invented everything, h a d all the ideas,
p e rfo rm e d o r e x ec u ted the work, ex perienced a n d a p p r e
ciated it, all w ith o u t the assistance o r help o f a n y o n e else. We
c a n h ard ly im agine su ch a thing, b e ca u se cill the arts we
know , like all the h u m a n activities we know, involve the
c o o p e ra tio n of others.
If o th e r people do som e of these activities, how do the
p a rtic ip a n ts divide up the jobs? Think of the opposite e x
trem e, a situation in which each activity is d o n e by a se p a ra te
p e rso n , a specialist w h o does n o th in g but th a t one operation,
m u c h like the division of tasks on an industrial assem blyw line.
This too is a n im a g in ary case, though som e a rts a p p ro x im a te
it in practice. The list of credits w hich e n d s the typical H ol
lyw ood fe a tu re film gives explicit recognition to su ch a finely
divided set of activities. The fine divisions are trad itio n al in
the m a k in g of large-budget films, p artly e n fo rce d by union
jurisdictional a rra n g e m e n ts a n d partly by the traditional
re w a rd system of public credit on w hich c a re e rs in the film
in d u stry are b a se d (F aulkner, forthcom ing, discusses the
role of credits in the care ers of H ollyw ood com posers).
T here see m s to be no limit to the fineness of the division of
tasks. C onsider the list o f technical credits for the 1978 film
H urricane (see C hart 1). The film em p lo y ed a d irecto r of
p h o to g ra p h y , but Sven Nykvist did not actually o p e ra te the
c a m e ra ; E d w a rd L a c h m a n did that. L a c h m a n , how ever, did
not do all the jo b s associated w ith o p e ra tin g the c a m e ra ; Dan
M y h ram loaded it and, w hen the focus h a d to be shifted in
the c o u rse of filming a scene, Lars K arlsson pulled'' the
focus. If s o m e th in g w ent w ro n g with a c am e ra , c a m e ra m e
chanic G e rh a rd H entschel fixed it. The w ork of clothing a n d
m a k in g up the actors, p re p a rin g a n d taking care of the script,
p re p a rin g scen ery a n d props, seeing to the co ntinuity of
the dialogue a n d the visual a p p e a ra n c e of the film, even
8 A R T W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T I V E ACTI VI TY
CHART 1
C o n s tru c tio n M a n a g e r
J a n Troell
Dino d e L a u ren tiis
L o ren zo S em p le, Jr.
C harles N o r d h o ff a n d
J a m e s N o r m a n Hall
L o re n z o S em p le, Jr.
S v e n Nykvist, A.S.C.
N ino R o ta
S a m O 'S te e n
D anilo Donati
F r a n k Clark
Jo se L op ez R o d e ro
F re d Viannellis
Ginette A n g o sse L o p e z
G eorge O d d n e r
G iovanni Soldati
G o r a n S e tte rb e r g
Edw ard L achm an
Sergio M artinelli
L ars K arlsso n
S ergio M elaranci
D an M y h r m a n
G e r h a r d H e n ts c h e l
Alfio A m b rog i
Glen R o b in s o n
Aldo Puccini
Joe Day
Jack Sam pson
R a y m o n d R o b in s o n
J o e B e rn a rd i
W a v n e R ose
Aldo Puccini
T ec h n ic a l A ssist a n c e in t h e C o n s t r u c t io n
o f t h e T a n k a n d V illa L a l iq u e
C.G.E.E. A l s t h o m - P a t e e t e
U n d er t h e S uperv isio n of M ichel S trebel
C horeographer
T e c h n ic a l c o n s u lta n t
Art d i r e c to r
I llu s t r a t o r
Coco
Milton F o r m a n
Giorgio Postiglione
M e n to r H u e b n e r
9 ART W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
M a k e -u p artist
A ssistan t m a k e - u p
S c r ip t s u p e rv is o r
H a i r stylist
P ro p s
W ardrobe
S o u n d m ix e r
Boom m en
Key grip
S t u n t c o - o r d in a to r
S tuntm en
Still P h o t o g r a p h e r
S pecial Stills
U nit publicist
D ialogue c o a c h
A ssistant film e d i t o r
P ro d u c tio n A u dito r
A ssistant A u d ito r
C ra n e O p e r a t o r
C a s tin g bv
L o c a l C astin g a n d D ialogue C oach
Vehicles
M a ss im o d e Rossi
A d o n ellad e Rossi
Nikki C lap p
E n n io M arroni
G eo rg e H a m ilto n
F r a n c o Antonelli
L a urie Clarkson
J o h n S te v e n so n
J o h n Pitt
M ario Stella
Miguel P e d re g o sa
P ab lo G arcia
R o m a n A riz n a v a rre ta
F ran k C o n n e r
Alfonso Avincola
T o m G ray
N o r m a n S c h w a r tz
B o b b ie Di
Brian G ibbs
Rex Saluz
D an H oge
M cL ean/E bbins/M ansou
J o h n A larim o
Fiat
10 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
11 A R T W O R L D S
AND C O L L E C T I V E
ACTIVITY
X
T=>
-e
/*>
^2
t
- f t t*
v
13 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L F. C T I V E A C T ! V I T Y
15 A R T W O R L D S
AND C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
16 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
19 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T ! V I T Y
21 A R T VV O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T 1 V I T Y
22 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
23 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
24 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
COOPERATIVE LIN K S
W h a te v e r the artist, defined as the p e rso n w h o p e rfo rm s
th e core activity w ith o u t w h ich the w ork w ould not be art,
25 A R T W O R L 1) S A N D C 0 L L E C T I V E A C T ! V I T Y
26 A R T W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
27 * A R T W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T l V E A C T I V I 1 Y
r-p-o-p-h-e-s-s-a-g-r
w ho
a ) s vv ( e loo ) k
u p n o w g a th
PPEGORHRASS
eringint(oaT hc) :1
eA
!p:
S
a
(r
r lv In G
.g R rE a P sP h O s)
to
29 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E AC T I V I T Y
30 A R T W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
31 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
33 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
34 A R T W O R L D S AND C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
3 5 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T ! V F. A C T I V I T Y
37 A R T W O R L D S A N D CO L L E C I 1 V E A C T I V 1 T Y
39 A R T W O R L D S A N D C O L L E C T I V E A C T I V I T Y
2 Conventions
o f a m e l o d y I h a v e i n m i n d . S o l v e t h i s p r o b l e m : W h a t is t h e
se c o n d note?
__
S o m e people will guess - - - , D above m iddle C, re.
O thers will say it is =^ ~ , E above m iddle C, m i. O thers will
be suspicious, th in k in g I have so m e th in g trickier in m ind,
a n d try C -sharp or, seeing th a t there is n o necessity for my
m elody to m ove up, B below the staff. In fact, o f course, the
p ro b le m is not soluble; you do n o t have e n o u g h in fo rm atio n .
It m ig h t be a n y of those o r a n y o th e r note of the c h ro m a tic
scale.
S u p p o s e I give you a n o th e r clue, the seco n d n o te o f the
m elody. It is the first one guessed, D above m iddle C. W h a t is
the th ird note? M ost people will now, with m u c h m o re a s
su ran c e, guess E, mi. Or su p p o se the second n ote isn't D, its
E. T h en m o st people will know' th a t th e third n ote is G, sol. In
n e ith e r case c a n th e y be 100 p e rc e n t sure, b u t they feel th a t
the probability of being right is certainly m u c h g re a te r th a n
in the first case.
W hy is the original qu estio n so difficult? W hy is it so m u c h
easier to a n s w e r w h en you kn o w tw o notes instead of one?
40
41 C O N V E N T I O N S
42 C O N V E N T I O N S
question, a n d w ould n o t k n o w the a n s w e r if they did, n ever
having le arn e d the co n v en tio n s necessary for the p r o b le m s
solution.
We have a lre a d y seen how conventions provide the basis
on w h ich a rt w orld p a rtic ip a n ts can act to g e th e r efficiently
to p ro d u c e w orks ch ara cte ristic of those w orlds. Different
g ro u p s of p a rtic ip a n ts know different p a rts of th e total body
of conventions u se d by an a rt world, ordinarily w h at they
need to know to facilitate the portion of the collective action
in w hich they take part.
Every a rt w orld uses, to organize s o m e of the c o o p e ra tio n
b etw een so m e of its particip an ts, conventions k n o w n to all o r
alm o st all well-socialized m e m b e r s of the society in w hich it
exists. S o m e tim e s a n art w orld uses m a terials deeply e m
b e d d e d in the cu ltu re quite a p a r t from the history of th a t art
m ed iu m , as w h en classical ballet relies on o u r c o n v e n tio n a l
ized u n d e rs ta n d in g of the roles of m e n a n d w o m e n a n d the
c h a ra c te r of ro m a n tic a tta c h m e n ts b etw een th e m as the
skeleton on w hich to c o n stru c t a series of d a n c e s in w h ich the
m a n s u p p o rts the w o m a n , w oos her, is sp u rn e d , a n d e v e n
tually w ins h e r (see figure 5). The d a n c e s have w h a te v e r
m o d ic u m of plot they c o n tain becau se w e a lrea d y know
alm o st all of the story, having a c q u ire d it m u c h as w e learned
clo-re-mi, a n d need only the b a re st cues to inject the rest of
the d r a m a into the action we see.
S o m e tim e s the a rt w orld relies on co n v en tio n s of th e art
itself, b u t o n es w hich ev ery o n e has e x p erien ced so early a n d
so often th a t they are as m u c h p a rt of the cu ltu re as the sex
roles ballet d e p e n d s on for its sense. Im a g in e th a t you have
b e en w atch in g a fe atu re film for ninety m in u te s a n d you now
see one of the chief c h a ra c te rs slowly walk aw ay from the
c a m e r a while th e c a m e ra sim u ltan eo u sly pulls fa rth e r a n d
fa rth e r back. W h a t is h a p p e n in g ? The film has en d ed , a n d
people in the th e a te r are getting up, throw ing aw ay their
p o p c o rn boxes, a n d p u ttin g on their coats as they p re p a re to
leave. Freeze fra m e s a n d swelling m usic similarly indicate
the e n d in g in a c o n v en tio n al way.
T he c o n v en tio n s of stick-figure draw in g m a k e use o f the
c o m m o n s e n s e know ledge we all have of w h a t co n stitu te the
44 C O N V E N T I O N S
45 C O N V E N T I O N S
46 C O N V E N T I O N S
47 C O N V E N T I O N S
48 C O N V E N T I O N S
49 C O N V E N T I O N S
50 C O N V E N T I O N S
52 C O N V E N T I O N S
53 C O N V E N T I O N S
54 C O N V E N T I O N S
55 C O N V E N T I O N S
56 C O N V E N T I O N S
57 C O N V E N T I O N S
58 C O N V E N T I O N S
59 C O N V E N T I O N S
60 C O N V E N T I O N S
61 C O N V E N T I O N S
fo rm a n c e ( J j j l
) o r with the first n ote of each p air
slightly longer as in jazz ( i* J / JJ' Jjk ). A conventional
language allows these m a tte r s to be discussed a n d settled
expeditiously.
M atters o f in te rp re ta tio n m a tte r s allowing m ore th a n one
m o d e of p e r f o r m a n c e play an even larger role in d r a m a
th a n in m usic, since a typical script specifies m u c h less of
w h a t is to be d o n e th a n does a typical m usical score. In
establishing an in terpretation, a cto rs a n d directors use a
co n v entional language, largely m ethodological, that fu r
nishes the te rm s in w hich such m a tte rs as w h ere actors
s h o u ld m ove, how long they sh o u ld delay before proceeding
w ith the next sp eech o r action, w h ere they sh o u ld look while
o th e rs are sp ea k in g or moving, a n d so on can be discussed
a n d settled (the relevant te rm s are blocking, beats, a n d focus
[Lyon, 1975]).
Art w orlds so m e tim e s splin ter a n d turn into relatively a u
to n o m o u s su b g ro u p s. W hen that h a p p e n s, p a rtic ip a n ts in
each of the splinters know, a n d b ecom e responsible for
knowing, s o m e w h a t different sets o f conventions. People
w h o play w h at has c o m e to be called new m usic" find that
c o m p o s e rs w a n t them to m a k e so u n d s not conventionally
m a d e on th e ir in stru m e n ts. Most players originally learn
th ese from , o r w ork th e m o u t in co n su ltatio n with, the c o m
p o se r o r s o m e o n e with w h o m they have personal contact.
But as p e rfo rm a n c e of the m u sic b e c o m e s m o re w idespread,
players w h o have not h ad personal access to c o m p o se rs
c o n fro n t scores using u n fa m ilia r a n d u n c o n v e n tio n a l n o ta
tion (sec figure 9) to d e n o te effects that w ere know n, though
not usually n o ta te d , o r w ere previously u n u se d . Thus, c la r
inet players m ight find in their p a rt n o te s m a rk e d half-open
a n d half-blacked-in, d e n o tin g q u a r te r tones, (like this: J o r f )
o r m a rk e d with w edges ( ) o r o th e r devices to indicate a
slap -to n g u e effect. They can c reate th o se so u n d s, b u t players
m u st know o r be tau g h t w h a t is w a n te d so that the n o tatio n is
m u tu a lly u n d e rsto o d . T h e n c o m p o se rs can use the n o tatio n
to get the s o u n d they w ant, players can know they are m a k
ing the s o u n d s w an ted , a n d the tw o p arties to the p e rfo r
m a n c e c a n c o o rd in ate their activity. (See Rehfeldt, 1977, a
62 C O N V E N T I O N S
i?JT7Tnn
FORMAT 2
63 C O N V E N T I O N S
because scribes in some areas preferred to write very esotericallv, using difficult signs and swirls, and because in others
they became careless and sloppy. Communication and edu
cation could not spread until this tendency was reversed.. . .
Though the then current cursive scripts increased speed in
writing by the use ot ligatures between letters, they were all
but illegible and gradually in the late eighth century were
replaced by a script known as Carolingian miniscule, charac
terized by small, separate and highly legible letters.. .. Soon
all Western Europe was using the same script, and m anu
scripts became easier to read not only because the new script
was so legible but because spaces and phrases were initiated
by capitals in contrast to the older Roman practice of omitting
spaces and punctuation. (Lerner, 1974, pp. 18284)
W ith o u t th a t sim ple stan d a rd iz atio n , literary a rt w ould be
im possible. We will see later h o w th e s p re a d of su ch s ta n
d a rd iza tio n m a k e s the b o u n d a rie s of an art world.
K now ledge of professional culture, then, defines a g ro u p
of practicin g professionals w h o use certain conventions to go
a b o u t th e ir artistic business. M ost of w h at thev know thev
learn in the c o u rse of th e ir daily practice, and, as a general
rule, n o n e of the a rt w o rld s o th e r p a rtic ip an ts need to knowr
su c h things to play their parts. These u n d e rs ta n d in g s facili
tate getting the w ork done, b u t o n e n e ed not k n o w th e m to
u n d e rs ta n d the works them selves. The g ro u p defined by
know ledge of these w orking co n v en tio n s can re a so n a b ly be
th o u g h t of as th e in n e r circle of the a rt world.
S m aller g ro u p s form within the b ro ad outlines of an art
world. E very art w ork creates a w orld in som e respects
unique, a c o m b in a tio n of vast a m o u n ts o f co n v en tional m a
terials w ith som e th a t are innovative. W ith o u t the first, it b e
co m es unintelligible; w ith o u t th e second, it b e co m es boring
a n d featureless, fading into the b a c k g ro u n d like m usic in
s u p e rm a rk e ts a n d p ic tu re s on m otel walls. The variations
m a y be so sm all that only an aficionado w ould notice
them , o r so obvious no o n e could ignore them . In either
case, given the w w ld they are m a d e in a n d the a u d ie n c e
they a re p re se n te d to, th e re w ill be m o re o r lessbut usually
so m e n e w m aterial to be learned, m aterial specific to the
piece itself.
64 C O N V E N T I O N S
66 C O N V E N T I O N S
67 C O N V F . N T I O N S
3 Mobilizing
I T W A S M o n sieu r Tuttin w h o w as alw ays given Pablo
[Picasso] 5 w o rk to print, since P ablos disregard fo r
co nventional lithographic processes created all kin d s o f
problem s fo r the printers. The difficulty was, M onsieur
Tuttin did not like P a b lo s w ork. In fact, he detested it.
Pablo h a d done a lithograph o f one o f his pigeons in
a highly u n co n ven tio n a l way. The b ackground coat was
in black lithographic ink a n d the pigeon itself h a d been
painted on top o f that in w hite gouache. Since litho
graphic ink has w a x in it, gouache norm ally w o u ld n 7
ta k e very well but in spite o f that fact, Pablo h a d car
ried it o ff brilliantly on the lithographic paper. W hen
M ourlot [proprietor o f the lithographic print shop ] cam e
to the R u e des G rands-A ugustins a n d sa w w hat Pablo
h a d done, he said, H o w do yo u expect us to print that?
It's not possible. H e p o in ted ou t to Pablo that in theory,
w h e n the d ra w in g w as transferred fro m the paper to
the stone, the gouache w o u ld protect the stone a n d the
ink w o u ld run only o nto those parts w here there was
no gouache; but, on the o th er hand, on contact w ith the
liquid ink the gouache itself w o u ld surely dissolve, at
least in part, a n d run.
You give it to M o n sieu r Tuttin; he'll k n o w h o w to
handle it, Pablo told him.
The next tim e w e w ent to M ourlot's shop, M onsieur
Tuttin w as still fu ssin g a b o u t the pigeon. N obody ever
did a thing like that before, " he fum ed. I can 7 w ork
on it. It w ill never co m e out.
I'm sure yo u can handle it, Pablo said. Besides, I
have an idea M adam e Tuttin w o u ld be very happy to
have a p r o o f o f the pigeon. I'll inscribe it to her.
A n y th in g but, M o n sieu r Tuttin replied in disgust.
Besides, w ith that gouache yo u've p u t on, it w ill never
w o r k ."
A ll right, then, Pablo said. I'll take y o u r daughter
ou t to d in n e r so m e evening a n d tell her w hat k in d o f a
printer her fa th er is. " M o n sie u r Tuttin looked startled.
I k n o w , o f course, Pablo w en t on, that a jo b like that
68
69 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
and
L a k h , 1964, p . 86*
70 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
71 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
M ATERIAL R E SO U R C E S
W h e th e r artists need specialized m a terials th a t no one else
has a n y use for, o r w h e th e r they can use s ta n d a r d m a terials
alread y easily available, affects the w o rk they do. W hat m a
terials are available, a n d on w h a t term s, d e p e n d s on the w ay
the society organizes p ro d u c tiv e e c o n o m ic activity. In w h a t
follows, I will talk m ostly a b o u t the m a rk e ts ch aracteristic of
m a n y c o n te m p o r a ry societies.
S o m e m ed ia require goods designed a n d m a n u fa c tu re d
especially for th em : oil p ain ts in sm all tubes, m usical in s tru
m e n ts a n d their accessories, ballet shoes. The m a n u f a c tu r e
of su ch item s is fre q u en tly so technical a specialty that the
artists w h o use th em c a n n o t p ro d u c e the item s them selves
(though som e m a k e it th e ir business to do ju s t th a t a n d such
item s as b a sso o n reeds are typically m a d e by their users).
O th er m e d ia require ra w m a teria ls th a t can be ex tracted
from n a tu re by a n y o n e w h o w a n ts to b o th e r: w ood sculptors
look for felled trees people will let th e m haul away. Still
o th e rs require n o th in g m o re th a n m a terials easily available
to anyone, o rd in a ry stuff ro u tin ely fu rn ish ed for o th e r p u r
poses. So poets use ty p ew riters and p a p e r available for ro u
tine bu sin ess a n d p e rso n a l use, sculptors use w elding e q u ip
m e n t a n d m etal available for ro u tin e m a n u fa c tu rin g p u r
poses, a n d visual artists occasionally take a d v a n ta g e of the
availability of o rd in a ry h o u s e h o ld furnishings a n d foodstuffs
in their work.
W hen artists use m a terials m a n u fa c tu re d for nonartistic
p u rp o s e s a n d widely used by nonartists, they are least c o n
stra in ed by the c o n v en tio n s o f a rt worlds. On the o th e r han d ,
they are stuck with w h a t o th e r people need for o th e r p u r
poses a n d th u s m a k e easily available. B ecause this is usually
the c h e a p e s t w ay to get w o rk m aterials, artists w h o have little
or no m o n e y often use it, for su c h m a terials are everyw here
to beg, borrow , o r steal. W hen the Tactile Art G roup (a s e m
in ar led by Philip B ric k m an a n d m yself at N o rth w e ste rn
w hich u n d e rto o k to invent a new art form ) p r o d u c e d its first
w orks, a lm o st every tactile artist u s e d stuff fo u n d in the
72 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
73 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C F. S
74 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
75 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
76 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
77 M O B I L I Z 1 N G R E S O U R C E S
PERSONNEL
It is unfeeling to sp eak of the people w h o c o o p era te in the
p ro d u c tio n of a rt w orks as p e rs o n n e l or, w o rse yet, s u p
port p e rso n n e l, b u t th a t accu rately reflects their im p o rta n c e
in the c o n v en tio n al a rt w orld view. In th a t view, the p erso n
w h o d o e s the real w o rk , m a k in g the choices that give the
w ork its artistic im p o rta n c e a n d integrity, is the artist, w ho
m ay be a n y of a n u m b e r of people involved in its p ro d u c tio n ;
e v ery o n e else's jo b is to assist the artist. I do not a c c e p t the
view o f the relative im p o rta n c e of the p e rs o n n e l involved
th a t the te rm co n notes, b u t I use it to e m p h a siz e th a t it is the
c o m m o n view in a rt worlds.
It is e v en useful to c a rry the d e h u m a n iz a tio n o f artistic
s u p p o r t p e rso n n e l one step f u rth e r a n d think o f th e m as
resources, a sse m b le d in re so u rc e pools like m aterial re
sources, a n d ask how su ch pools arc a sse m b le d a n d h o w the
people in th e m get c o n n e c te d to p a rtic u la r art p ro je cts in a
s u p p o r t role.
The people w h o m ak e up a pool of potential p e rso n n e l for
art p ro je cts b e lo n g to th a t pool b e c a u se they c a n do som e
specialized task re q u ire d in the m ak in g o f the art w o rk s in
q u e stio n a n d they m a k e th em selves available to do it. The
n u m b e r s a n d kinds of people a n d the conventional te rm s on
w h ich they m a k e th em selv es available differ fro m m e d iu m
to m e d iu m a n d place to place. The B ro a d w a y th e a te r w orld
has available to it p e r h a p s ten tim es as m a n y (or m ore)
p eo p le w ith extensive d ra m a tic training, w h o could p e rfo rm
a d e q u a te ly in a variety of roles a n d vehicles, th a n are a c
tually w o rking as a cto rs at any given time. On th e o th e r han d ,
few people have the o d d c o m b in a tio n of skills called for in
m a k in g theatrical props, a n d even fewer m a k e them selves
available fo r theatrical work. T h ere will usually be an o v e r
su p p ly of people for the roles th o u g h t to c o n tain som e ele
m e n t of the a rtistic in th eater, th a t includes playw rights,
actors, a n d d ire c to rs a n d a s h o rt supply o f people with
technical skills to do s u p p o rt w ork th a t does not s h a re in that
c h arism a . M ore p eo p le w a n t to w rite novels th a n design
th e m for the printer, be great m usical p e rfo rm e rs th a n repair
in stru m e n ts, d ra w on lithographic stones th a n print from
them .
78 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
79 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
80 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
81 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
82 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
83 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
84 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
85 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
86 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
87 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
88 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
89 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
90 M O B I L I Z I N G R E S O U R C E S
91 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
92 M O B I L I Z I N G
RESOURCES
94 D I S T R I B U T I N G ART W O R K S
95 D I S T R 1 B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
96 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
s u p p o rte d by a well-to-do or w orking spouse. S o m e artists
have m a d e or in herited e n o u g h to live on, freeing their tim e
for a rt w ork. S o m e artists sim ply have w h a te v e r jo b s are
available to th e m by virtue of their social position o r o th e r
training. M any poets s u p p o rt their w ork this way: T. S. Eliot
w o rk e d in a b a n k a n d th e n for a publisher, W allace Stevens
w as an executive of an in su ra n ce c o m p an y , a n d William
Carlos W illiams w as a practicing physician. O th er artists
have jo b s w hich are p a rt of the art world, th o u g h n o t as
artists. Painters m a y w ork as fram ers, c o m p o se rs as orchestrators, novelists a n d poets as editors. In a c o m m o n a r
ra n g e m e n t, they teach the a rt they practice, in e lem e n ta ry
a n d se c o n d a ry schools, in professional art schools, a n d as
private teachers.
H o w m u c h tim e do these jo b s leave for serious a rt work?
Artists fre q u e n tly co m p lain th a t th e ir day j o b (the e x p re s
sion is c o m m o n in the p e rfo rm in g arts, w h ere the a rt j o b
usually occurs at night) interferes w ith their w ork. It takes up
so m u c h tim e th a t n o n e is left for art o r it overlaps e n o u g h in
c o n te n t to interfere with creating original a rt w orks. (P h o to g
ra p h e rs w h o do c o m m e rc ia l w o rk so m e tim e s say th a t the
c o m m ercia l a ttitu d e influences their p e rs o n a l w ork, m a k
ing it h a rd for th e m to see a n d p h o to g ra p h in a w ay th a t does
not e m b o d y the restrain ts of the advertising m entality.) Art
ists m a y p re fe r professional w ork as teacher, doctor, or
law yer b e c a u se it lets th e m allocate their ow n time. Alternalively, they m a y p re fe r less prestigious w ork th a t d e m a n d s
less attention, ev en th o u g h it is physically m o re difficult,
tim e-consum ing, a n d tiring.
Artists w h o finance their o w n w o rk c a n be free of the
existing distrib ution system for their m e d iu m : they n e ed not
d istrib u te their w ork a t all, certainly not for m o n e ta ry return.
If they are sufficiently isolated o r alienated from the art
world, they will ex perience this as a liberation r a th e r th a n a
deprivation. If th e y need not p ro d u c e for d istrib u tio n w ithin
the c o n stra in ts of a system , they can ignore its re q u ire m e n ts
a n d m a k e w o rk s as big o r small, sh o rt o r long, c o m p r e h e n
sible o r unintelligible, p e rfo rm a b le o r not as they like, for
those c o n stra in ts typically originate in the rigidity of a dis
97 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O R K S
98 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
99 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
100 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
101 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
102 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O R K S
103 D I S T R I B U T I N G ART W O R K S
104 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O R K S
105 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
106 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART
W O R K S
107 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
108 D I S T R I B U T I N G ART W O R K S
109 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
110 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
ART W O R K S
th e w o rk s o f the gallery's artists; a n d a large gro u p of gallcrygoers, w h o a tte n d openings, c o m e to see shows, and g e n e r
ally diffuse interest in the gallery's artists by talking about
th e m a n d re c o m m e n d in g show s to others. Potential bu y ers
o f the w ork do not sh are an aesth etic a n d body o f conventional know ledge with artists, b o th b e c a u se they co m e fro m
less c u ltu re d classes th a n p a tro n s a n d becau se the cu ltu re of
the a rt w orld has b e c o m e increasingly esoteric a n d p ro fes
sionalized, d e v o ted to the ex ploration o f p ro b le m s grow ing
o u t o f its ow n tra d itio n (see K ubler, 1962).
Dealers typically specialize in a style o r school of art.
"Their" artists have s o m e th in g in c o m m o n , so th a t people
w h o c o m e to th e gallery can expect to see w ork w hich d e
p e n d s m o re o r less on the sam e o r related a s s u m p tio n s a n d
conventions. S tea d y a tte n d a n c e at a gallerys exhibitions
te ac h es you how to a p p re c ia te th a t stylew h a t its possibil
ities are, w h a t experiences you c a n have in viewing it, facts
a b o u t the artists a n d their b a c k g ro u n d , a n d its philosophical
o r aesthetic intentions a n d u n d e rp in n in g s (contained in wall
labels a n d catalogues). G allerygoers w h o identify them selves
as potential p u rc h a s e rs get personalized lessons from the
gallery staff, w h o analyze the w ork of individual artists and
even individual paintings or sculptures, suggest their rela
tionship to o th e r im p o r ta n t o r c u rre n t styles o r schools, a n d
discuss the aesthetics of the work, sim u ltan eo u sly p e rh a p s
discussing w h e re you m ight p u t a p a rtic u la r w o rk in y o u r
h om e, h o w you m ight w a n t to pay for it, a n d how it w ould fit
in w ith o th e r w orks you alread y own.
These lessons in how to a p p re c ia te the w o rk of a gallerys
artists build on a g ro u n d w o rk laid by critics a n d aestheticians. A estheticians (as the next c h a p te r shows) deal with
the basic philosophical positions which justify w o rk of one
o r a n o th e r kind as legitim ate art, suitable for app reciatio n .
Critics o p e ra te at a m o re m u n d a n e level, discussing the
day-to-day affairs of the art world they are p art of, c u rre n t
ev en tsshows, m a jo r acquisitions, a n d c h a n g e s of style
w hich affect re p u ta tio n s a n d the prices o f work, a n d p a r
ticular th eo ries of painting w hich inform so m e picture or
g ro u p of them . W hite a n d W hite (1965) cite a re p resen tativ e
112 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O R K S
113 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O R K S
114 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O R K S
115 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
116 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
117 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O R K S
118 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
o p erate. Even public m u s e u m trustees, in political system s
th a t allow for private a c c u m u la tio n of w ealth a n d property,
usually re p re s e n t the w ealthiest classes, b e ca u se they c a n
assist th e m u s e u m w ith gifts of m o n e y a n d art, a n d usually
do, in re tu rn for positions of control. Vera Zolberg (1974) has
show n, in h e r analysis of the d e v e lo p m e n t of the Chicago Art
Institute, th a t rich p a tro n s originally exerted direct control
over the m u s e u m 's affairs, taking a h a n d in acquisitions,
displays, a n d o th e r artistic m a tte rs. They later p u t control
into the h a n d s of a cad em ically train ed art historians, w ho
h ad b e tte r in fo rm a tio n a b o u t w h a t w as "really valuab le a n d
im p o r ta n t th a n could p art-tim e connoisseurs. Finally, as
m u s e u m s b e c a m e increasingly large a n d com plicated, a n d
as th e notion th a t a d m in istra tio n is a n a rt tra n sfe ra b le from
one situation to a n o th e r gained ground, p a tro n s (and the
C hicago Art In stitu te exemplifies the trend) p u t control into
th e h a n d s of tra in e d a d m in istra to rs, w h o m ay have h a d no
previous ex perience in the arts.
These shifts in the control of m u s e u m s do n o t m e a n th a t
artists have no tro u b le w ith m u se u m s. Like dealers, m u s e u m
directors, a n d the tru ste es th e y w o rk for, have interests
w h ich m a y differ fro m those of the artists; to m a k e m a tte rs
m o re c o m p lica te d , m u s e u m staff m a y act in w h a t they th in k
are th e tr u s te e s interests, even th o u g h the tru ste es m a y have
no su ch interests. Thus, m a n y m u s e u m s sh o w ed obvious
re lu c ta n c e (especially d u rin g the V ietnam W ar a n d related
ev en ts o f the 1960s) to exhibit o penly political c o n te m p o ra ry
art, at a tim e w h e n artists w ere b e co m in g m o re openly polit
ical. In a n e x em p la ry case, on the invitation of a c u ra to r of
the G u g g en h e im M useum , H a n s H aa ck e h a d p re p a re d a
piece w hich tra c e d a n d d isplayed the p a tte rn of o w n ersh ip of
slum p ro p e rtie s on New York's Low er E a st Side. The d ire cto r
of the m u s e u m , insisting th a t the w ork w as "political,
canceled the show ; this led to the firing o f the c u ra to r in
volved, a boycott of the m u s e u m by m a n y c o n te m p o ra ry
artists, a n d (p e rh ap s) to H a a c k e 's la ter piece detailing the
c o rp o ra te c o n n ec tio n s a n d activities of the m u s e u m 's
trustees. (See H a a c k e , 1976, for th e details.) The case w a s an
o d d one, since n o n e of the tru ste es h a d anv interest in slum
119 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O RKS
120 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
121 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
122 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
123 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O R K S
124 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
125 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
126 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
Since no one k n o w s w h a t the m a ss a u d ie n c e will ap p ro v e
a n d su p p o rt, cu ltu re industries e n c o u ra g e everyone a n d a n y
one to pro p o se ideas for th e m to distribute. Most of the cost
o f developing ideas is b o rn e by artists w h o h o p e the in d u stry
will take th e m u p a n d d istrib u te th e m . The in d u stry selects
s o m e of these n u m e ro u s p ro p o sals for use. As H irsch points
out, "cultural organizations ideally m axim ize profits by m o
bilizing p ro m o tio n a l re so u rc e s in s u p p o rt of volum e sales for
a sm all n u m b e r of item s" (H irsch, 1972, pp. 652-53). They
p ro m o te item s by selective advertising a n d o th e r p r o m o
tional devices, a n d note the effect o f these m e a s u re s on sales.
As th a t in fo rm a tio n c o m e s in, they d ro p so m e of the d istrib
u te d item s from the actively p ro m o te d list, effectively
killing their c h a n c e s of success. W here so m a n y item s are
available, those th a t do n o t receive som e special a tte n tio n do
n o t get k n o w n well e n o u g h to reach those w h o m ig h t w an t
them . (Bliven [1973] describes, in the w o rd s of a book sales
m an , how publishing firms continually re a d ju s t their plans
for new books.)
W orks re a c h the public with varying a m o u n ts of p r o m o
tion a n d availability. The system thus p ro v id e s varying
a m o u n ts of m o n e y (in so m e cases, e n o rm o u s am o u n ts), an
o p p o rtu n ity (sm aller o r larger) for display of o n e s work, a n d
a relatively sm all c h a n c e of re ac h in g an a u d ie n c e w hich
sh a re s the taste a n d p erspective w hich p ro d u c e d the work.
B ecause they do not co n n ect with an a u d ie n c e directly, a r t
ists w h o se w o rk is d istrib u ted th ro u g h the cu ltu re industries
co m e to d e p e n d on a n d are responsive to the im m e d ia te
feed b ack a n d ju d g m e n t of their professional p e e r groups, on
the one han d , a n d of the people w ho m a n a g e the distribution
sy stem on the other.
The system affects the a rt w ork th ro u g h the interaction
b etw ee n the m a n a g e rs of the cu ltu re industries a n d the a r t
ists. Take as sim ple a m a tte r as the length of a work. W riters
learn to think a n d plan in the lengths th a t are com m ercially
suitable. Trollope (1947 [1883], p. 198), w riting in the d ay s of
the triple-decker, said, "An a u th o r soon b e co m e s a w a re of
h o w m a n y p ag es he has to fill." S u th e rla n d gives fu rth e r
exam ples. The serialized form in w hich novels a p p e a re d , a n d
127 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
128 D I S T R I B U T I N G
ART W O R K S
129 D I S T R I B U T I N G A H T W O R K S
130 D I S T R I B U T I N G A R T W O R K S
5 A
0 s t h 0 tics, A 0 s t h 0 tic io n s,
o n d Critics
A E S T H E T IC S AS ACTIVITY
A estheticians s tu d y the p rem ises and a rg u m e n ts people
use to justify classifying things a n d activities as " b e a u t i f u l /
"artistic," "art," "not art," "good art," " b a d art," a n d so on.
They c o n s tru c t sy ste m s with w hich to m ak e a n d justify both
the classifications a n d specific in stances of their application.
Critics apply aesth etic sy stem s to specific art w orks a n d a r
rive at ju d g m e n ts of th e ir w o rth a n d explications of w hat
gives th e m that w orth. Those ju d g m e n ts p ro d u c e r e p u ta
tions for w o rk s a n d artists. D istributors a n d au d ien c e
m e m b e r s take re p u ta tio n s into a c c o u n t w h e n they decide
w h a t to s u p p o rt em otionally a n d financially, a n d that affects
the re so u rc e s available to artists to co n tin u e th e ir work.
To talk this way describes aesthetics as an activity ra th e r
th a n a b o d y of doctrine. A estheticians are not the only people
w h o engage in this activity. Most p a rtic ip a n ts in art w orlds
m a k e aesth etic ju d g m e n ts frequently. Aesthetic principles,
a rg u m e n ts, a n d ju d g m e n ts m a k e up an im p o rta n t p art of the
b o d y of c o n v e n tio n s by m e a n s of w hich m e m b e rs of art
w orlds act together. C reating an explicit aesthetic m a y p re
cede, follow, o r be s im u lta n e o u s with developing the tech-
131
132* A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , AND C R I T I C S
133 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
134 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
135 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
reso u rces, b u t p a rtic ip a n ts in art w orlds, especially the p e o
ple w h o control access to d istrib u tio n channels, often feel
th a t w h a t th e y do m u s t be logically defensible. The h e at in
d iscussions of aesth etics usually exists b e c a u se w h a t is being
d ecid ed is not only an a b s tra c t philosophical q u e stio n but
also so m e allocation of valuable resources. W h e th e r jazz is
really m u sic o r p h o to g ra p h y is really art, w h e th e r free-form
jazz is really jazz a n d th e refo re m usic, w h e th e r fashion p h o
to g ra p h s are really p h o to g ra p h y a n d th e refo re art, are dis
cussions, a m o n g o th e r things, a b o u t w h e th e r people w h o
play free-form jazz can p e rfo rm in jazz clubs for the a lrea d y
existing jazz a u d ien c e a n d w h e th e r fashion p h o to g ra p h s can
be exhibited a n d sold in im p o rta n t galleries a n d m u seu m s.
A estheticians, then, provide th a t e lem e n t of the battle for
recognition of p a rtic u la r styles a n d schools w hich consists of
m a k in g the a rg u m e n ts w hich convince o th e r p a rtic ip a n ts in
an a rt w orld th a t th e w ork deserves, logically, to be included
w ithin w h a te v e r categories co n ce rn th a t world. The c o n s e r
vatism of art w orlds, arising o u t of the w ay conventional
p ractices c lu ste r in neatly m e s h e d pack ag es of m u tu a lly a d
ju s te d activities, m aterials, a n d places, m e a n s th a t ch an g e s
will not find a n easy reception. Most ch an g e s p ro p o s e d to art
w orld p a rtic ip a n ts are m inor, leaving u n to u c h e d m ost of the
w ays th ings are done. The w orld of sy m p h o n ic m usic, for
instance, has not c h a n g e d the length o f co n cert p ro g ra m s
very m u c h in recent years, for the very good re a s o n that,
becau se of union ag ree m en ts, it w ould increase th e ir costs to
len gthen the p ro g ra m s and, b e ca u se a u d ie n c e s expect eighty
o r ninety m in u te s of m usic for the price of a ticket, they d are
not s h o rte n th em very m u ch. (T hat w as not alw ays the case.
P robably as a result o f the un io n izatio n of m usicians, a m o n g
o th e r things c o n ce rt p ro g ra m s have s h o rte n e d ap p rec iab ly
since, say, B eethoven's time, as figure 13 show s [Forbes,
1967, p. 255].) The basic in s tru m e n ta tio n of the o rc h e s tra has
not c h a n g e d , n o r have the tonal m aterials used (i.e., the
c o n v en tio n al te m p e re d c h ro m a tic scale) or the places in
w h ich the m u sic is p re se n te d . B ecause of all these c o n s e rv a
tive pressu res, in n o v a to rs m u s t m a k e a stro n g a rg u m e n t in
d e fen se of any substan tially n e w practice.
136 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
P r ic e s o f A d m is s io n A r e a s U s u a l .
T h e B e g i n n i n g Is
at
H alf -P ast 6 O c l o c k .
137 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
size d e s e rv e a n d e a r n becau se aesthetic w riting insists
on a real m o ral difference b etw een a rt and n o n a rt. A estheti
cians d o not sim ply intend to classify things in to useful
categories, as w e m ight classify species of plants, but ra th e r
to s e p a ra te the deserving from the undeserving, a n d to do it
definitively. They do not w a n t to take an inclusive a p p ro a c h
to art, c o u n tin g in everything th a t conceivably m ight h a v e
so m e interest o r value. They look, instead, for a defensible
w ay to leave so m e things out. The logic of the e n te rp ris e the
bestow ing o f honorific titlesre q u ire s th e m to rule som e
things out, for th e re is no special h o n o r in a title every c o n
ceivable o b je c t o r activity is entitled to. The practical c o n s e
q u e n c e s o f their w ork re q u ire the sa m e exclusionary a p
p ro a ch , for distributors, au diences, a n d all the o th e r p a rtic i
p a n ts in an a rt w orld look to aesth etician s for a w ay of
m a k in g h a rd decisions a b o u t re so u rc e s in a c lea rcu t and
defensible, r a th e r th a n fuzzy a n d arguable, way.
A estheticians m ight well a rg u e th a t they do not intend to
m a k e evaluative ju d g m e n ts at all, b u t sim ply to arrive at a
c le a rc u t delineation of the categories of a rt a n d n o n a rt. Since
all the societies in w hich a esth etician s engage in this activity
use art as an honorific term , the very m aking of the d istin c
tion will inevitably assist in the ev alu a tio n of potential c a n
d idates for the s ta tu s of art w ork. A estheticians need not be
cynical p a rtic ip a n ts in art w o rld conspiracies for their work
to have this utility.
T h a t aesth etic positions freq u en tly arise in the c o u rse of
fighting for the a c c e p ta n c e of so m e th in g new d o es not alter
the situation. S u c h positions, too, need to show th a t som e
th ings are not a rt in o rd e r to ju stify the claim th a t so m e th in g
else is. Aesthetics w hich declare th a t everything is a rt do not
satisfy people w h o c reate o r use th e m in the life of an art
world.
A E S T H E T IC S AND ORGANIZATION
The rest o f w h a t aesth etician s a n d critics do is to provide a
ru n n in g revision of the value-creating theory which, in the
fo rm of criticism , c o n tin u o u sly a d a p ts the p rem ises of the
138 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
139 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
FIGURE 14. Poster advertising The Bus Show. The Bus Show,
organized by Bill Arnold in 1975, proposed to exhibit 8,500 contem
porary photographs o f high artistic quality in the advertising spaces
on New York City buses. Arnold gathered material for the show by
advertising to art photographers. (Courtesy Bill Arnold.)
141 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
142 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
is ro o m for (as w h en an a w a rd c o m m itte e decides th a t no
w o rk is w o rth y of a prize this year). Or it can fix the s ta n d a rd
so th a t m a n y m o re w orks are ju d g e d a d e q u a te th a n th e re is
ro o m for. E ith er of the latter tw o situations throw s into
d o u b t the a d e q u a c y of the a rt w orld's institutional a p p a
ratus, the validity of its aesthetic, o r both. There is, thus, so m e
p re ss u re for an aesthetic s ta n d a rd flexible e n o u g h to p r o
d u c e a p p ro x im a te ly the a m o u n t of w ork fo r w hich the o r
ganizations have ro o m and, conversely, for the institutions to
g e n era te th e a m o u n t of exhibition o p p o rtu n ity req u ired by
the w orks the aesthetic certifies as being of the a p p ro p ria te
quality.
The d istrib u tio n system itself requires m a terials to d istrib
ute, g e n era tin g a f u rth e r p re ss u re for ch an g e s in aesthetic
ju d g m e n ts in the form of rediscoveries of w orks a n d artists
h ith e rto not ra te d very highly. M oulin points out th a t Old
M asters a n d o th e r ''c o n se c ra te d " paintings of u n q u e stio n e d
value increasingly m ove into private a n d m u s e u m collec
tions a n d d is a p p e a r from the m a rk e t m a d e bv dealers a n d
galleries. S he q u o te s a French dealer:
It is impossible to make money selling Renoir if you do not
belong to the great dynasty of dealers. Since they can only be
found with difficulty, the paintings still in circulation reach
such prices that it is impossible to build up a stock of them.
Dealers then become the intermediaries between two collec
tors or between a collector and a museum. Rediscoveries are
due to the fact that what has already been discovered can no
longer be found. (Moulin, 1967, p. 435, my translation)
A rediscovery consists of a c a m p a ig n to call to the atten tio n
of poten tial bu y ers artists w h o se w o rk is still relatively avail
able a n d th u s sells a t a re a so n a b le price.
M oulin p o in ts out the role of specialists in aesthetic j u d g
m e n ts in this process:
The revaluation of certain styles and certain genres is not
independent of the efforts of specialists, historians or mu
seum curators.. . . [There is an] involuntary collaboration
between intellectual research and commercial initiatives in
the rediscovery and launching of artistic values of the past.
143 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
144 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
145 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
146 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
148 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
FIGURE 17. Andy Warhol, Brillo. Pop Art works provoked the
criticism that anyone could have done them, that they did not re
quire or embody the special gifts o f the artist. (Photograph courtesy
o f the Castelli Archives.)
A rth u r D anto a n d G eorge Dickie have p re se n te d the m o st
im p o rta n t s ta te m e n ts of the institutional theory. D an to dealt
with the essen ce of art, with w h a t in the relation b etw een
o b ject a n d art w orld m a d e th a t o b ject art. In a fa m o u s
s ta te m e n t o f the p roblem , he said:
To see something as art requires something the eye cannot
descryan atmosphere of artistic theory, a knowledge of the
history of art: an artworld. (Danto, 1964, p. 580)
The th eo ry o u t of w hich the idea of m ak in g the Brillo box
cam e, the relation of th a t idea to o th e r ideas a b o u t w h a t
149 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
150 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
151 A E S T H E T I C S ,
A E S T H E T I C I A N S , AND C R I T I CS
152 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
154 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
155 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
156 A E S T H E T I C S ,
A E S T H E T I C I A N S , AND C R I T I C S
157 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
S everal difficulties arise in creating a new art w orld to
ratify w ork w h ich finds no h o m e in existing art w orlds. R e
sources (especially financial su p p o rt) will alread y have been
allocated to existing artistic activities, so th a t one n eed s to
develop n e w so u rces of su p p o rt, pools of personnel, sources
o f m aterials, a n d o th e r facilities (including space in w hich to
p e rfo rm a n d display works). Since existing aesthetic theories
have not ratified the work, a new aesthetic m u st be devel
oped, a n d new m o d e s of criticism a n d s ta n d a rd s of ju d g
m e n t e n u n c ia te d . To say th a t these things m u s t be done,
how ever, raises an interesting definitional q u e stio n o f the
kind philosophical analysis provokes. H ow m u c h of the a p
p a r a tu s of an o rg anized art w orld m u s t be c re a ted before the
w o rk in q u e stio n will be tre a te d seriously by a larger a u
dience th a n the original gro u p w h o w a n te d to c reate the new
w orld? W h a t it takes to convince people will vary a great
deal. S o m e re q u ire an e la b o ra te ideological explanation.
O th e rsth e a te r m a n ag ers, o p e ra to rs of re co rd in g studios,
a n d p rin te rs only ask th a t their bills be paid.
The q u e stio n of h o w m u c h institutional a p p a r a tu s is re
q u ire d to satisfy the definition need not, indeed sh o u ld not,
be a n s w e re d by setting som e specific criterion o r precise
po in t on a c o n tin u u m . The activities involved can be carried
on by varying n u m b e rs of people, a n d w ith o u t the full-blown
institutional a p p a r a tu s o f su c h w ell-equipped w orlds as s u r
ro u n d c o n te m p o ra ry s c u lp tu re a n d p ain tin g or sy m p h o n ic
m usic a n d g ra n d o pera. W h en w e speak of art w orlds, we
usually have in m in d these w ell-equipped ones, but in fact
paintings, books, m usic, a n d all sorts of o th e r artistic o bjects
a n d p e rfo rm a n c e s can be p ro d u c e d w ithout all the s u p p o rt
p erso n n e l these w orlds d e p e n d on: critics, im presarios, fu r
nishers of m a terials a n d e q u ip m e n t, providers of space, a n d
au diences. At a n extrem e, re m e m b e r, a n y artistic activity can
be d o n e by one person, w h o p e rfo rm s all the n e ce ssary activ
ities; this is n o t c o m m o n a n d n o t a condition m a n v artists
aspire to (though one they so m e tim e s yearn for w h e n they
have tro u b le with their fellow participants). As the n u m b e r
of people involved grows, the activity reach es a point w h ere
so m e stable n u cleu s of people c o o p e ra te s regularly to p r o
158 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
d u c e the sam e sort of w ork; as the n u m b e r grow s larger, it
m a y re a c h a po in t at w hich individual artists can p ro d u c e
w ork for a large a u d ie n c e of people they d o n t kn o w p e r
sonally a n d still have a re a so n a b le expectation of being tak en
seriously. Call the first po in t of organization an esoteric
w orld a n d the latter o n e exoteric. The n a m e s a n d the cutoff
points m a tte r less th a n the recognition th a t they are^ a rb i
trary, the reality being a variety of points th a t v a ry along
several continua.
H o w M anv?
N either Dickie n o r D anto is very clear as to how m a n y art
w orlds there are. Dickie says:
The artworld consists of a bundle of systems: theater,
painting, literature, music, and so on, each of which furnishes
an institutional background for the conferring of status on
objects within its domain. No limit can be placed on the
number of systems that can be brought under the generic
conception of art, and each of the major subsystems contains
further subsystems. These features of the artworld provide
the elasticity whereby creativity of even the most radical sort
can be accommodated. A whole new system comparable to
the theater, for example, could be added in one fell swoop.
What is more likely is that a new subsystem would be added
within a system. For example, junk sculpture added within
sculpture, happenings added within theater. Such additions
might in time develop into full-blown systems. (Dickie, 1975,
p. 33)
Blizek (1974) sees th a t this is an em pirical question, b u t also
sees th a t the definition of art w o rld is so loose th a t it is not
clear w h e th e r there is one a rt w orld, of w hich th ese are
s u b p a rts, o r a n u m b e r of th e m possibly u n re la te d and,
fu rth e rm o re , th a t if there are a n u m b e r of art w orlds they
m ight conflict. Several r e m a r k s a re relev ant here.
Em pirically, th e su b w o rld s of the various a rt m e d ia m ay
be su b d iv id ed into se p a ra te a n d alm ost n o n c o m m u n ic a tin g
segm ents. I have sp o k en of schools a n d styles as th o u g h they
c o m p e te d for the sa m e re w ard s a n d a u d ie n c e s (a n d will
again, in discussing p rocesses of c h an g e in a rt worlds), b u t
159 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
160 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I CS
161 A E S T H E T I C S ,
A E S T H E T IC IA N S ,
AND
CRITICS
162 A E S T H E T I C S ,
AESTHETICIANS,
AND C R I T I C S
163 A E S T H E T I C S , A H S T H E T I C I A N S , A N D C R I T I C S
164 A E S T H E T I C S , A E S T H E T I C I A N S ,
AND C R I T I C S
166 A R T A N D T I I E S T A T E
167 A R T AND T H E S T AT E
169 A R T A N D T II E S T A T E
Even though all states have enacted penal statutes that pro
hibit forgery, such statutes do not deal specifically with the
creation or marketing of false paintings. The California stat
ute is typical: anyone who signs the name of another with
fraudulent intent or attempts to pass as genuine any forged
writings is guilty of forgery. The statute deals primarily with
forgery of writings or instruments such as checks or bank
notes, while forged paintings are not mentioned. Even if the
statute were amended to include paintings, numerous alter
natives for faking paintings are left uncovered. (Bauman,
1972, p . 940)
171 A R T
AND
TH E
STATE
sonal lovaltv
%/
w and the value of ones word, much more than the
legal significance of the agreement, which only perverts the
close ties between people. . . . Their objective is to dissociate
bv all means the relations between artists and dealers from
their economic and legal context. (Moulin, 1967, p. 322-23, my
translation)
Not surprisingly, artists find this w orks to their disad v an tag e:
Artists, for their part, refer to the inequality of power existing
between the contractors. . . . Thev estimate that the stocks
accumulated by the dealer on the one hand and the solidarity
between dealers on the other guarantee the latter against any
eventual recourse by the artist, whatever might be the legal
protections benefiting the authors of objects which are not
simple commercial products, but rather the expression of a
creative personality.... [Quoting a painter:] And then, if you
start a lawsuit, you would be sunk. It would not be easy to find
another dealer to take you on after that. The dealers stick
together on that point. (Moulin, 1967, p. 324, my translation)
As in the case o f fakes, th e law fre q u en tly d o es not specify
rights clearly, a n d legal p ro c ee d in g s are necessary to e s ta b
lish w h o c a n do w h at with the w ork. The practice o f p u b li
cizing p o p u la r re co rd s by having disk jockeys play th e m on
the radio relied on legal in te rp re tatio n :
The practice of broadcasting records was attractive, espe
cially to smaller stations, considering the minimal investment
necessary to fill air time. The opposition of sheet music pub
lishers and a number of performers such as Fred Waring
and Bing Crosby at the outset hampered the broadcasting of
gramophone records, but did not end it. As Judge Learned
Hand was to rule, copyright control ended with the sale of the
record. Radio stations, therefore, could not be restrained
from using records in broadcasts. This interpretation of the
1909 copyright law, coupled with the publishers' realization
that radio could provide a forum for their songs, uplifted the
status of radio as the central avenue for public recognition of
a songwriter's product. (Denisoff, 1975, p. 219)
W h e th e r m a n u f a c tu r e r s could sell m a c h in e ry w ith w h ich
private citizens could record films a n d o th e r television p ro
g ra m s sim ilarly h a d to be settled by the courts.
172 A R T AND T H E S T A T E
173 A R T AND T H E S T A T E
1 74 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
175 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
176 A R T
AND T H E
STATE
17 7 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
178 * A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
179 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
180 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
181 A R T A N D T H E
S T AT E
182 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
184 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
185 A R I A N D T H E S T A T E
186 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
the w ay they deal w ith dissident elem ents, the types ranging
from genocidal societies in w hich the state arbitrarily takes
the lives o f citizens for d ev ian t o r dissident b eh av io r" to
"perm issive societies in w hich n o rm s are q u e stio n e d a n d
c o m m u n ity definitions r a th e r th a n state definition o f w h a t
co n stitu tes n o rm a tiv e b e h av io r e m erg e in the d ecisio n -m ak
ing p ro cess" (Horowitz, 1980, pp. 44-45). The artist, only one
of the poten tial dissidents or d eviants g o v e rn m e n ts tre at in
this ra n g e of ways, is su b je c t in so m e societies to the m o st
e x tre m e sanctions.
In states w hich do not act again st the artist directly, the
m o st c o m p le te form of c en so rsh ip is the total d e stru c tio n of
the w o rk s the g o v e rn m e n t finds offensive. The m o d e rn a r
chetype of su ch action is book burning, even th o u g h th a t
actually destroys, n o t the w ork itself, b u t only som e copies of
it; the w ork will c o n tin u e to exist in a re a s the g o v e rn m e n t has
no jurisdiction over, n o tab ly o th e r countries w ith different
political sy stem s a n d aims. (R ay B r a d b u r y s F ahrenheit 451
considers the m o re e x tre m e case in w hich every physical
copy h a s been d e stro y ed by an im placab le a n d efficient r e
gime; ev en th e re the w ork co n tin u es to exist by being re
co rded in p e o p le s m em ories.)
Visual a rt w o rk s w hich exist in u n iq u e copies c a n be c o m
pletely destro y ed . T h at often occurs as a side effect of su ch
political u p h e a v a ls as foreign c o n q u ests o r civil war. The
d e stru c tio n of so m a n y great w o rk s of religious art in E n g
land a fte r it broke with R o m a n Catholicism exemplifies the
process, as d o es the d e stru ctio n of Aztec a n d In c a art by
S p a n ish c o n q u ero rs. In the first case, the king w a n te d to
d estroy sym bols of religious a u th o rity a n d p o w er to w hich
the c o m m o n people m ig h t co n tin u e to re sp o n d ; in the s e c
ond, the c o n q u e ro rs sim ply w a n te d the precious m e tals the
w orks w ere m a d e o u t of. (C onceptual a rt w orks resem b le
literature in this re sp e c tany p a rtic u la r copy c an be d e
stroyed, b u t the idea exists as long as a n y o n e know s it.)
M ost c e n so rsh ip is n o t so ruthless a n d com plete. It in te r
feres w ith the distribution, r a th e r th a n the creation o r c o n
tin u ed existence, of the works. T he state forbids their sale,
exhibition, o r p e rfo rm a n c e in the places w h ere a n d to the
187 A R T AND T H E S T AT E
188 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
189 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
190 A R T A N D T H E S T A T E
191 A R T
AND T H E S T A T E
it can be released or not. For the kid who comes up now, it's
not like that. That's why so many people compose in English
[instead of Portuguese], because its easier to get through. "The
next lime Im going to get it right, since it seems that I did
something wrong. That can be the thinking of a kid who
starts out and finds himself censored. (Chrysostomo, 1976, p.
4, m v translation)
To su m m ariz e , the state p a rtic ip ate s in the n e tw o rk of
co o p era tio n , the a rt world, w h ich p ro d u c e s the w orks c h a r
acteristic of a p a rtic u la r m e d iu m at a p a rtic u la r time. It
c rea tes th e fra m e w o rk o f p ro p e rty rights w ithin w hich artists
get e c o n o m ic s u p p o r t a n d m a k e re p u ta tio n s. It limits w h a t
artists can d o w h e n it p ro te cts people w h o se rights m ay have
been in frin g ed by artists in ten t on p ro d u c in g their work. It
gives o p e n s u p p o r t to s o m e fo rm s of art, a n d to so m e p ra c
titioners of those form s, w h en they a p p e a r to f u rth e r n a
tional p u rp o ses. It uses state p o w e r to su p p re s s w ork w hich
s e e m s likely to mobilize citizens for d isa p p ro v e d activities
o r p re v e n t th e m fro m being m obilized for a p p ro p ria te
p u rposes.
T h e state th u s acts like o th e r art w orld particip an ts, p r o
viding o p p o rtu n itie s to get art w o rk d o n e by giving su p p o rt
b o th directly a n d indirectly for w h a t it a p p ro v e s of, a n d
actin g as a c o n s tra in t on o th e r activities by p re v e n tin g a c
cess, for w orks d e e m e d u n satisfacto ry , to so m e o f the facil
ities o rdinarily available to all particip an ts. Thus, the state
m ay p re v e n t w o rk s from being d is trib u te d (the m ost usual
form of in tervention) o r from c o n tin u in g to exist, o r m ay
p u n is h those people guilty o f creatin g u n d e sira b le w ork by
d e a th , im p riso n m e n t, o r o th e r kinds o f sanctions. In this
sense, all artists d e p e n d on the state a n d th e ir w ork e m
bodies th a t d e p e n d e n c e .
7* Editing
192
193 EDI TI NG
And he did stay in.
The editorial w ork w en t beyond c u ttin g a n d m in o r a lte ra
tions. P art 2, "A G am e o f C h e s s /' includes a co n v ersatio n
w ith so m e o n e identified as a thirty-one y ear old w o m a n w ho
h a s h a d m o re children than she w a n ts b e c a u se "Albert w on't
leave h e r alone." Eliot originally w rote a line for A lberts
wife's c o n v ersatio n al p a r tn e r w hich explained all the u n
w a n te d children: "You w a n te d to keep him at hom e, I s u p
pose." Vivian Eliot crossed this out a n d su b stitu ted "W hat
you get m a rrie d for if you d o n 't w a n t to have children?" Eliot
deleted "to h a v e / but Mrs. E lio ts line a p p e a re d otherw ise
u n c h a n g e d as line 164 of the p oem , m a rk in g an im p o rta n t
c h a n g e in the tone of the passage (Eliot, 1971, pp. 14-15, 20,
21, a n d 139).
Saxe C om m ins, a longtim e e d ito r for R a n d o m House,
w o rk e d closely with the poet R o binson Jeffers over a period
o f m a n y years, a n d his ch an g e s (m a d e as suggestions ra th e r
th a n changes) affected the tone a n d c o n te n t of m u c h of
Jeffers w ork. Jeffers long poem The D ouble Axe c o n tain e d a
n u m b e r of bitterly anti-Roosevelt a n d a n ti-T ru m an lines
C o m m in s fo u n d offensive a n d th o u g h t o thers w ould find so
offensive as to h u rt the b o o k 's reception. He suggested th a t
Jeffers c h a n g e these vindictive lines. W hen the final version
arrived, he w rote Jeffers unhappily:
I noticed, of course, all the changes you have made and in
almost every instance they are immense improvements. There
are two, however, which give rise to misgivings on my part. I
refer to page 25, where you changed the line
T o feed the v a n ity of a p a ra ly tic a n d m a k e
trick fo rtu n e s
to
To feed th e p o w e r - h u n g c r o f a p a r a ly z e d m a n a n d
m a k e trick fo rtu n e s.
194 E D I T I N G
If you insist, let the verse read "To feed the povver-hunger
of a politician"instead of "paralyzed man." And I hope you
will always protest when Caesar's epilepsy is mentioned. Or
Dostoevskisthough it influenced his genius, just as Roose
velts paralysis influenced, and to some extent excuses, his
character. This is my reason for speaking of it.
( J e f f e r s t o C o m m i n s , 19 F e b r u a r y 1948)
195 EDI TI NG
m inute? Shall I play the next note lo u d e r o r softer? With
w h a t kind of attack? L onger o r s h o rte r th a n the similarly
m a rk e d notes th a t s u rro u n d it? Shall 1 put a spot o f blue here,
o r p e r h a p s green, o r m a y b e no th in g at all? As these choices
are m ad e, from m o m e n t to m o m e n t, they s h a p e the work.
S u p p o se I u n d e rta k e , as a p h o to g ra p h ic project, to investi
gate the life a n d cu ltu re of the Italian c o m m u n ity of San
F ran cisco s N o rth B each district. Following the typical p ra c
tice of c o n te m p o r a ry p h o to g ra p h e rs, w h e th e r they arc in te r
ested in th a t kind of d o c u m e n ta ry p ro je ct o r in the e x
plo ration of s o m e m o re form al a n d a b s tra c t artistic p roblem ,
I will m a k e a very large n u m b e r of p h o to g ra p h s. E a c h e x
p o su re will be a choice from a large n u m b e r o f possibil
ities. I m ig h t decide to c o n c e n tra te on p o rtraits o f older
people, believing th a t close-ups of th e ir faces will c o n tain the
essence of the culture. I might, conversely, decide to p h o to
g ra p h su c h n e ig h b o rh o o d events as the C o lu m b u s Day P a
ra d e o r the blessing o f the local fishing fleet (see Becker, 1974,
a n d figure 20), o r such n e ig h b o rh o o d institutions as taverns,
re sta u ra n ts , grocery stores, a n d churches. In eith er case, I
th e n choose lenses, films, tim es of day, a n d p a rtic u la r people
a n d places. H a v in g d o n e that, I m a k e m a n y e x p o su re s of
e a c h p o rtra it su b jec t a n d even m o re of the people a n d places
I select as c h a ra cte ristic of the area. I vary d istances a n d
angles, a n d shoot essentially the s a m e su b je c t repeatedly,
expecting th a t m o m e n ta r y variations in expressions, m oods,
p o stu res, a n d g ro u p in g s will m a k e im p o rta n t diff eren ces in
the result.
I m ig h t th u s expose as m u c h as ten to tw e n ty rolls of
thirty-six e x p o su re film d u rin g a day of serious work, a n d
m ig h t d ev o te a n y w h e re from o n e to one h u n d re d days (or
m ore) to the project. But I w o u ld not, w hen I p re s e n te d the
results o f m y w o r k in a b o o k o r e x h i b i t o r p h o t o e s s a y , u s e all
th o se im ages. After all, on the above sch ed u le I m ight p ro
d u c e as m a n y as tw enty o r thirty th o u s a n d se p a ra te fra m e s
of film, m o st of w hich w ould be technically usable. But the
average exhibit w o u ld c o n tain thirty o r forty im ages, a n d a
book m ight use as m a n y as o n e h u n d re d . 1 w ould m ak e
c o n ta c t sh eets which sh o w ed every fram e, review them
197 E D I T I N G
198 E D I T I N G
199 E D I T I N G
200 E D I T I N G
201 E D I T I N G
202 E D I T I N G
203 E D I T I N G
204 E D I T I N G
205 E D I T I N G
207 E D I T I N G
208 E D I T I N G
209 E D I T I N G
210 E D I T I N G
ED ITIN G BY O T H E R S
Artists, th e people w h o get the credit o r b la m e for art
w orks, typically m a k e m a n y of the choices w h ich sh a p e a
w o rk s c h a ra c te r. The a rt w orld's o th e r p a rtic ip a n ts affect
the result by e n terin g into the in ternal dialogue w hich p r e
cedes a n d a c c o m p a n ie s th o se choices. But o th e r p a rtic ip a n ts
affect a rt w orks m o re directly as well, m ak in g choices of their
o w n w hich, in d e p e n d e n t of the a rtis ts wish o r intention, also
s h a p e the w ork. S o m e tim e s artists recognize the possibility
a n d think of it as they w ork; o fte n they do n o t know, a n d
p e rh a p s could not know , w h a t o th e rs will do to afreet their
w ork, a n d th u s c a n n o t a c c o m m o d a te to it. These fateful
actions of o th e rs o c c u r d u rin g the w ork's entire life, often
a fte r th e artists th em selves have died; the effects m a y be
te m p o ra ry o r p e rm a n e n t.
M a n u fa c tu re rs a n d d istrib u to rs p e rfo rm an editorial
function by failing to m a k e so m e m a terials a n d e q u ip m e n t
available. They thus effectively p rev en t artists from m ak in g
certain choices o r m a k e th e m prohibitively expensive in tim e
a n d effort for all b u t people d e te rm in e d to have just th a t item
as p a rt of their work. W hen the m a jo r suppliers re d u c e the
variety of p h o to g ra p h ic film a n d p a p e r available, they force
m e to edit o u t of the possible c o rp u s of m y w ork w h a t I m ight
have m a d e w ith the u n a v aila b le m aterials. Artists notice
th e se c o n stra in ts w h e n s o m e favorite m aterial d isa p p e a rs
fro m the m a r k e tw h e n they can no longer, fo r instance, get
Agfa's R e c o rd R ap id p a p er. But artists are alw ays c o n
strain ed by the unavailability o f m aterials, especially those
th a t n e v er w ere m a d e at all, b e c a u se suppliers d id n 't know'
how to m a k e th e m o r h a d re jec te d the possibility as im p r a c
tical o r unprofitable. Conversely, w h e n suppliers m a k e new
m a terials available, they a d d to the possibilities from which
artists can choose. T he Polaroid system of in s ta n t color
p h o to g ra p h y c re a te d n e w artistic possibilities.
M an y a rt w orks exist in th e form of directions to o thers
telling th e m w h a t to do to actualize the w ork on a p a rtic u la r
occasion. T he directions m a y consist of a m usical score, the
script of a play, a m a n u s c rip t to be printed, o r plans for a
211 E D I T I N G
2 1 2
EDITING
2 1 3
EDITING
214 E D I T I N G
215 E D I T I N G
216 E D I T I N G
217 E D I T I N G
218 E D I T I N G
219
E D I T I N G
220 E D I T I N G
221
E D IT I N G
222 E D I T I N G
223 EDI TI NG
history of a field by rediscovering forgotten m a ste rs of
painting, literature, o r m usic. T he p ro cess is especially visible
in fields new ly discovered to have artistic value. Thus, p h o
to g ra p h ic h isto ria n s have been re c o n stitu tin g the history of
the m e d iu m by discovering bodies of w ork, describing them ,
publishing th e ir findings (in the n e w Journal o f the H istory
o f Photography), a n d th u s m oving u n k n o w n survivors to
the k n o w n a n d c a ta lo g u e d cate g o ry of the p h o to g ra p h ic
w orld. In so doing, of course, they follow the d ic tate s of an
aesth etic th a t is being c re a te d collectively as the w ork p r o
ceeds, an aesth etic which c rea tes the m e d iu m 's ancestry.
B ecause a rt w orks can die, so m e artists do w h a t they can to
preserv e their w ork; so m e tim es su b sta n tia l portions of art
w o rld s join in the effort. C onsider the p ro b le m of physical
deterioration. W orks o f visual art, by virtue of the n a tu re of
th e ir m a te ria ls a n d the effects of w ea th e r, te m p e ra tu re , a n d
chem ical pollution, can d e terio rate badly. Paintings crack,
s c u lp tu re s break. P h o to g rap h s, chem ically m ade, suffer
fro m c h em ical deterioration. P h o to g ra p h e rs a n d m u s e u m s
w hich collect p h o to g ra p h s have jointly developed a s ta n d a rd
of archival processing, designed to g u a rd against this h a z a rd
by prescribing p ro c e d u re s for rem o v in g the m o st d a n g e ro u s
c h em ic als from the print. Similarly, m a n y p h o to g ra p h e rs arc
re lu ctan t to m ake, a n d m u s e u m s are re lu c ta n t to collect,
color p h o to g ra p h s , w hich are chem ically less stable a n d are
shorter-lived th a n black-and-w hite. Individual p a in te rs and,
m o re im p o rtan tly , m u s e u m s a n d even su ch cities as Venice
a n d Florence, a tte m p t to do s o m e th in g a b o u t the increasing
d a n g e r to visual a rt w o rk s from industrial a n d a u to m o b ile
pollution, w hich have severely d a m a g e d in a relatively few
years w o rk s th a t h a d lasted for centuries w ith o u t visible
h a rm .
Artists can also take p re c a u tio n s to save their w o rk from
social a n d political execution, hiding d a n g e ro u s m eanings,
avoiding d a n g e ro u s topics. Phillips describes how the m a k
ers o f English to m b s c u lp tu re avoided the d e stru c tio n of
im ages th a t followed the b re ak w ith the R o m a n C hurch:
Religious feelings of the wealthy could no longer be expressed
in the adorning and erecting of churches, nor could even their
224 E D I T I N G
2 2 5 E I) I T I N G
8 Integrated Professionals,
Mavericks, Folk Artists,
and Naive Artists
227
P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
M A V E R I C K S ,
FOLK
ARTIS T S
228 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
M A V E R IC K S ,
FO LK
A R T IS T S
229 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
230 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK ARTISTS
231 P R O F E S S I O N A L S , M A V E R I C K S , F O L K A R T I S T S
232 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
233 P R O F E S S I O N A L S , M A V E R I C K S ,
234 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
235 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK AR T I S T S
236 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
238 P R O F E S S I O N A L S , M A V E R I C K S , F O L K A R T I S T S
239 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
M A V E R IC K S ,
FOLK
A R T IS T S
240 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
241
P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
M A V E R I C K S ,
FOLK
A R T I S T S
242 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
243 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK ARTISTS
244 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK ARTISTS
245 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
246 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK ARTISTS
FOLK ART
W h en we a tte n d s o m e o n e s b irth d a y party, we c u s to m a r
ily sing H a p p y B irth d a y to him. W e do not h ire professional
p e rfo rm e rs for su c h an event. It d o e s n t m a tte r if the singing
is o u t of tu n e o r te m p o , as long as the song gets sung. Any
c o m p e te n t p a rtic ip a n t in the cu ltu re can m a n a g e a n a c c e p
table version, since e v ery o n e k n o w s it a n d the s ta n d a r d of
acceptability is very low.
H a p p y B irth d a y is the kind of thing I m e a n w h e n I speak
of folk art. This m a y be a s o m e w h a t eccentric use of the term
(see Glassie's [1972] discussion), but I do not re fer specially
to w ork d o n e by c o u n try folk o r to rural re m n a n ts of c u sto m s
o n c e w id espread. R ath e r, I w a n t to talk a b o u t w ork d o n e
totally ou tsid e professional a rt worlds, w ork d o n e by o rd i
n a ry p eo p le in the c o u rse o f their o rd in a ry lives, w o rk sel
d o m th o u g h t of by those w h o m a k e o r use it as a rt at all,
even though, as often h a p p e n s , o thers fro m outside the
c o m m u n ity it is p r o d u c e d in find artistic value in it.
247 P R O F E S S I O N A L S , M A V E R I C K S , F O L K A R T I S T S
248 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
249 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK ART I S T S
250 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
251 P R O F E S S I O N A L S , M A V E R I C K S , F O L K A R T I S T S
sh ared . Q uilters a n d their families a d m ire so m e quilts m ore
th a n others. A h u s b a n d told C ooper a n d Buferd:
Im glad Molly got to show you that quilt, but I wont let her
sell it. Thats the finest thing we ever had in this house. That's
the best one she ever done. We had that one on our bed from
the first till I told her to put it away for safekeeping. The gold
triangles were beginning to show a little wear. (P. 20)
And a q u ilter said:
I keep my best quills put up for special occasions, or just to
bring out and look at, put on the bed once in a while. Ill pass
them on to the kids of course. (P. 108)
Quilters a p p a re n tly seld om m a k e explicit the aesthetic
u n d e rly in g these ju d g m e n ts a n d choices; they are, a fter all,
not p ro fessio n al artists or critics. But if we bring the sensi
bility o f s o m e o n e fam iliar with m o d e rn paintings (of the kind
H olstein m e n tio n ed ) to b e a r as we look at pieced quilts, som e
quilts clearly p re se n t d e v e lo p m e n ts that are interestingly
parallel to those of painters. Quilters did d escribe their
w o rking m e th o d s to C ooper a n d B uferd in a way that s u g
gests th a t they develop private se q u e n c e s of p ro b le m s and
solutions (of the kind G eorge K u b le r speaks of) within the
fra m e w o rk of the tra d itio n a l quilt designs.
Quilt designs, while traditional, are by no m e a n s c o n
straining; they allow plenty o f room for variation, choice,
a n d the play of individual skill a n d taste (see figure 24). M any
quilts are m a d e up of a sim ple s q u a re m odule, w hich can be
a s s e m b le d in a seem ingly en dless variety of w ays to m ake
quite different overall p a ttern s. T he D r u n k a r d s P a th , for
instance, c o m b in e s a q u a r te r circle a n d the negative space
th a t s u r r o u n d s it to m a k e such overall p a tte r n s as the
D r u n k a r d s P a t h itself a n d the Millwheel. The Log
C a b in sq u a re , consisting of a n u m b e r of strips b u tted
against o n e a n o th e r a ro u n d a central s q u a re (so a rra n g e d
th a t the s q u a r e is h alf light a n d half dark, divided along the
diagonal), can be a rra n g e d in m a n y w aysto p ro d u c e a p a t
tern of d iagonal light a n d d a rk stripes a cro ss the entire quilt
(called S traight F u r ro w ), a p a tte rn of co n cen tric squares,
252 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
d
FIGURE 24. Quilt designs. These designs are sometimes made
from a simple module, which can he assembled to make a great
variety o f overall patterns, especially when the tonal values and pat
terns of the cloth o f which the module is made are varied. The
Drunkards Path block can be made (a) with a dark quarter circle,
the complementary space in the square being light, or (b) with the
values reversed. Using block (b), you can create (c) the classic
Drunkard's Path overall design. Combining (a) and (b) allows you
to make the more complicated (d) Millwheel. (Drawings by Nan
Becker.)
a ltern a tin g light a n d d a rk (called "B a rn Raising"), o r a
surprisingly large n u m b e r of o th e r variations, s o m e of w hich
h a v e trad itio n al n a m e s a n d o th e rs not. If you a d d to these
possibilities the en dless w ays th a t colors, hues, a n d print
p a tte rn s c a n be built into su ch a rra n g e m e n ts , it is clear th a t
the q u iltm a k e r has a large a rra y of artistic re so u rce s to w o rk
with. A look at the illustrations in the books I h a v e b e en citing
will confirm th a t so m e q u iltm a k e rs use th e m to p ro d u c e
w ork which, as H olstein claims, resem b les th a t of c o n te m
p o ra ry p ain ters; b u t it is a good b et th a t the q u iltm a k e rs
w ould not reg ard th a t p ain tin g as serious art.
253 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK ARTISTS
254 P R O F E S S I O N A L S , M A V E R I C K S , F O L K A R T I S T S
255 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK ARTISTS
256 P R O F E S S I O N A LS,
MAVERICKS, FOLK.ARTISTS
girls, let's go to it." We'd pull up our chairs around the frame
and anyone that dropped in would do the same, even if they
couldnt stitch straight. Course wed take out their stitches
later if they was really bad. But it was for talking and visiting
that we put in quilts in the summer. People would get out after
the chores in the summertime and how the word would fly
that we had the frame up. Had to have a screened porch
cause sometimes youd quilt and visit till midnight by lamp
light with the bugs battin against the screen. (P. 76)
Since ev ery o n e involved know s, w ithin limits, as m u c h
a b o u t w h a t is being d o n e as ev ery o n e else, a n d ev ery o n e can
do w h ic h e v e r of the several activities involved n eed s to be
done, c o o p e ra tio n o c c u rs easily, w ith very little friction o th e r
th a n the o rd in a ry friction of h u m a n intercourse. To take u p a
quite different e x am p le for a m o m e n t, Bruce Ja c k so n (1972)
d escrib es h o w black convicts in Texas priso n s c o o rd in a te
their effort th ro u g h the use of w ork songs, the songs p ro v id
ing the rh y th m by w hich su ch activities as cutting d o w n a
tree c a n be c arried o u t safely (see figure 25). S o m e m en lead
the singing b e tte r th a n others, a n d ev erybody prefers it w hen
they do the leading. N evertheless, even a b a d le ad e r will
serve the p u rp o s e as long as he c a n keep tim e a n d be h e a rd
over the w ork noise. A nyone can lead, b e c a u se everyone
k now s the song already. The le a d e rs m ain function is sim ply
to sing o u t the verses they sh o u ld use in singing the song. The
lead e r takes the verses from a large pool of verses k n o w n to
be p a rts of th a t song; ev ery o n e know s all the parts, a n d they
n e ed not be d o n e in a n y p a rtic u la r order, n o r need a n y p a r
ticu lar n u m b e r o r c o m b in a tio n of th e m be d o n e on any p a r
ticu lar occasion.
B ecause quilts, to re tu rn to th a t exam ple, w ere the p r o d
ucts of a sy stem of fam ilies in a c o m m u n ity , a n d not art
w o rk s p ro d u c e d in a n a rt world, until recently they w ere
preserved, if at all, in th o se families, p a sse d on from p a re n t
to child to g ran dchild, their value lying partly in their b eau ty
b u t m o re in their c o n tin u in g utility as b e d d in g a n d their
value as sen tim e n ta l e m b o d im e n ts of fam ily c o n tin u ity a n d
solidarity. T hey h a d no artistic value, w ere not critically
ju d g e d w orks of a n a m e d artist, w hose re p u ta tio n w ould
257 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK ARTISTS
FIGURE 25. Convicts singing. Folk art occurs as part of the daily
activity o f members o f a community. Texas convicts coordinate po
tentially dangerous activities like chopping down trees by singing
rhythmic songs. (Photograph by Bruce Jackson.)
benefit from the value of the w ork while it a d d e d to it. In fact,
quilts w ere seldom signed a n d could be a ttrib u te d to their
m a k e r only on the basis of m e m o ry a n d family lore. They
w ere used until they w ore out, alth o u g h so m e family
m e m b e r m ig h t find one especially pleasing a n d a tte m p t to
re p a ir a n d preserve it. No organization devoted itself to dis
covering e x e m p la ry w orks, p u rc h a s in g them , a n d preserving
th e m for la ter s tu d y a n d display. Quilts w ere not a rt becau se
no one tre a te d th e m like art. They w ere the physical e m b o d
im ent of families a n d c o m m u n ities, b u t that w as no reason
to preserve th e m ; if they w ere not p re se rv e d they could not
258 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK
ARTISTS
NAIVE ARTISTS
A final kind of artist is alternately called primitive, naive,
o r grass-roots. G r a n d m a M oses is the prototype, alth o u g h she
ev en tu ally w as d iscovered by a n d in c o rp o ra te d into the art
w orld (as so m e tim e s h a p p e n s to such people). These artists
have usually h a d no c o n n e c tio n w ith any art w orld at all.
They do not kn o w the m e m b e r s of the o rd in a ry a rt w orld in
w hich w o rk s like theirs (if su ch exist) are p ro d u c e d . They
have not h a d the training people w h o ordinarily p ro d u c e
such w orks have had, a n d they k n o w very little a b o u t the
260 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK ARTISTS
261 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
FOLK
ARTISTS
FIGURE 26. Simon Rodia, the Watts Towers. Naive artists work
outside the confines o f any art world, accomplishing what they do
without the support o f others. Rodia explained his work to others,
when he bothered to explain it at all, by saying he had done it all by
himself. (Photograph by Seymour Rosen.)
D.C., m a d e a similarly unclassifiable w ork called The Throne
o f the Third H eaven o f the N ational M illenium G eneral A s
sem bly (see figure 27), w hich consisted o f a g arag e filled with
altars, pulpits, shrines, wall tablets, a n d o th e r religious a rti
cles covered with gold a n d tin foil (W alker Art Center, 1974,
c o n ta in s d escrip tio n s a n d illustrations of this a n d several
o th e r w o rk s I will m ention). C larence S chm idt c o n stru c te d a
n u m b e r o f buildings a n d d e c o ra te d the s u rro u n d in g trees
a n d the land they stood on with silver foil, pink plastic baby
262 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
263 P R O F E S S I O N A L S , M A V E R I C K S , F O L K A R T I S T S
264 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
to the same spot and found some even more beautiful stones,
which I enthusiastically began to collect.
I took this coincidence as an omen. Since nature it
self provided sculptures, then I coaid be an architect or
mason! . . .
And so, for the next 25 years, I moved stones. (Cheval, 1968,
p. 9)
H e r m a n R usch, a f a r m e r in C ochrane, W isconsin, began the
Prairie M oon M u seu m a n d G arden, a tw o-acre c o n stru ctio n
of arches, pillars, tow ers, a n d o th e r things m a d e of cem ent,
"to dress the place up" (Hoos, 1974, p. 71). G ra n d m a Prisbrey
began h e r w ork b e ca u se the trailer she lived in w as not big
e n o u g h for h e r family or h e r collection of two th o u s a n d
pencils. W hen the w ork w as conceived a n d execu ted delib
erately, as so m e w ere (e.g., S. P. D in sm o o rs G arden o f
E d en , a half-acre a rc h ite c tu ra l a n d scu lp tu ral politicoreligious c o n stru c tio n in Lucas, K ansas), the reaso n s for
doing it are p e rso n a l a n d not alw ays intelligible, a point I will
re tu rn to.
These works, not belonging to a n y trad itio n of artistically
defined p ro b le m s a n d solutions, seem to spring o u t of n o
w here. No o n e know s how to re sp o n d to them . A udiences
(w h o ev er h a p p e n s to see th em ) do n o t know w h a t to m a k e of
th e m , a n d their m a k e rs c a n n o t take a d v a n ta g e of a n y e s ta b
lished n e tw o rk of c o o p e ra tio n in building them . They w ork
alone. R odia said:
I did it all by myself. I never had a single help. One thing, I
couldn't hire any help, for I no have-a no money. Not a thing.
If I hire a man, he don't know what to do. A million times, I
don't know what to do myself. I would wake up all night,
because this was my own idea. (Trillin, 1965, p. 72)
(There is no technical re aso n for n o t using helpers. Antoni
G audi, the C atalan a rt n o u v e a u architect, m a d e c o n s tru c
tions w hich h a v e m a n y of the sam e featu res of the w ork of
R odia a n d o th e r naive artists. But, being a n established
p ro fessio n al architect, th o u g h m o re th a n a little e c c e n
tric, G audi h a d rich p a tro n s a n d clients a n d could afford
265 P R O F E S S I O N A L S , M A V E R I C K S ,
266 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
M A V E R IC K S ,
FO L K
A R T IS T S
268 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
269 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
MAVERICKS,
270 P R O F E S S I O N A L S ,
271 * P R O F E S S I O N A L S , M A V E R I C K S , F O L K A R T I S T S
d u c e d by people w h o are not in te g ra ted professionals, to
select so m e w o rk s as w o rth o u r a tte n tio n a fte r all, deserving
elevation from m arginal to central status. A n o th e r time,
people fro m so m e o th e r a rt w orld will m a k e still a n o th e r
selection, in so far as the m e c h a n is m s o f p re se rv a tio n keep
w ork intact so th a t it can be selected. (See the discussion in
Moulin, 1978, pp. 244-47.)
275 A R T S
AND C RAF T S
276 A R T S AND C R AF T S
277 A R T S A N I) c R A F T S
the o rg a n iz e d voice of the a rtist-c ra ftsm a n . The influential
m agazine it once published, Craft H orizons, e m p h asized
q u e stio n s o f b e a u ty a n d artistic m erit, in co n tra st with a then
m o re purely craft-oriented m a g a z in e like Ceramics M onthly.
Sim ilar p u rely craft-o rie n ted m a g azin es serve m o st crafts.
Work by artist-craftsm en , w ith som e claim to be conside re d art by/ the c u sto d ia n s of conventional a rtcollectors,
c u ra to rs, a n d gallery o w n e rs finds n e w organizational set
tings, w h ich partially free the a rtist-c ra ftsm a n from the c o n
stra in ts e m b o d ie d in the em p lo y er-em p lo y ee relationship
c h a ra c te ristic o f the p u re c r a f t s m a n s position. U n d e r the
h e a d in g o f m in o r arts," beautiful craft o b je c ts arc displayed
in show s a n d m u s e u m s , win prizes for th e ir b eauty, c o n
trib u te to the re p u ta tio n s of the c ra fts m e n w h o m a k e them ,
b e c o m e the s u b je c t o f books a n d the occasion for d e m o n
stra tio n s of h o w to do it," a n d even furnish the basis on
w hich te ac h in g jo b s are given a n d held. In short, not only do
s o m e people care to m a k e the distinction b e tw e e n beautiful
a n d o rd in a ry craft objects, b u t there are su b sta n tia l re w a rd s
for m ak in g m o re beautiful o b je c ts while a d h e rin g to c ra ft
s ta n d a rd s .
A rtist-craftsm en have h ig h er a m b itio n s th a n o rd in a ry
c raftsm e n . While they m a y s h a re au diences, institutions, a n d
re w a rd s w ith o rd in a ry c ra ftsm e n , they also feel so m e kinship
w ith fine-art institutions. Thev see a co ntinuity b etw een w hat
they do a n d w h a t fine artists do, even th o u g h they recognize
th a t they have chosen to p u rsu e the ideal of b eau ty they
sh are w ith fine artists in a m o re lim ited a re n a . W hat c o n sti
tutes b e a u ty can of c o u rse be the su b jec t of co n sid erab le
controversy, b u t it is the third m a jo r criterion a cc o rd in g to
w h ich people ju d g e w ork a n d to w hich they orient their ow n
activity.
W e m ig h t im agine the differentiation ol c ra ftsm e n a n d
a rtist-c ra ftsm e n as a typical historical seq u en ce. A craft
w orld, w h o se a esth etic e m p h a siz e s utility a n d virtuoso skill
a n d w h o se m e m b e r s p ro d u c e w o rk s acco rd in g to the d ic
tates of clients o r e m p lo y e rs o p e ra tin g in so m e e x trac ra ft
world, develops a new segm ent (B ucher, 1962; B uch er a n d
S trau ss, 1961). The new s e g m e n t's m e m b e rs a d d to the basic
278 A R T S
AND CR A FTS
aesthetic an e m p h a s is on b e a u ty a n d develop so m e a d d i
tional organizations, w hich free th e m of the n e e d to satisfy
em p lo y ers so com pletely. These a rtist-c raftsm e n d ev elo p a
kind of a rt w orld a ro u n d their activities, a m in o r a rt" w orld.
The w orld contains m u c h of the a p p a r a tu s of full-fledged
m a jo r arts: shows, prizes, sales to collectors, teach in g posi
tions, a n d the rest. N ot all c raft w orlds develop su ch an
artistic, beau tv -o rien ted seg m e n t (p lu m b in g has not). But
w h ere an a rt s e g m e n t develops, it usually coexists peacefully
with the m o re purely utilitarian c raft segm ent.
A n o th er s e q u e n c e o c cu rs w h en m e m b e rs of a n established
w orld alread y defined as art, people involved in the typical
activities a n d ideologies of the c o n te m p o ra ry art world, in
vade (and the m ilitary m e ta p h o r is a p p ro p ria te ) an e s ta b
lished c raft w orld, especially its a rt segm ent. The se q u e n c e
begins w h e n so m e fine artists look for new m ed ia in w hich to
explore a c u rre n t expressive p roblem . These artists h a p p e n
on o n e of the crafts a n d see in its m a terials a n d te c h n iq u e s a
poten tial for artistic exploitation. They see a w ay to do s o m e
thing th a t will interest th e art w orld to w hich they are ori
e n te d a n d to w hich they re sp o n d . They have no interest in
the c o n v en tio n al s ta n d a r d of practical utility; their notion of
b e a u ty is likely to be very different fro m a n d m o re a d v a n c e d
th a n th a t of the c raft th e y are invading a n d the kind of skill
a n d control th a t interests th e m quite different from th a t
prized by th e m o re tra d itio n a l practitioner.
The n e w b re ed of artists in the c raft devise new a n d a g
gressively n o n u tilitarian s ta n d a rd s . Only the utilities defined
by the a rt w o rld in w h ic h they p a rtic ip ate in te re st them .
Art utilities typically include usefulness as o b je cts of a e s
thetic c o n te m p la tio n , as o b je c ts o f collection a n d o s te n ta
tious display, a n d as item s o f in v estm en t a n d p e c u n ia ry gain,
b u t not the practical utilities defined by the p u rp o s e s a n d
org an izatio n o f o th e r w orlds. Artists invading a c raft w an t
to m a k e sure th a t the w orks they p ro d u c e c a n n o t be used as
people have b e en a c c u s to m e d to using th e m . R o b ert A rne
son, for exam ple, o n e of the leading spirits in the m o v e m e n t
w h ich claim ed p o tte ry as a fine-art field (Zack, 1970), m a d e
a series of large plates, technically c o m p ete n t, w hose utility
279 A R T S AND C R AF T S
281 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
282 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
i
. *< ,
tSfflE
t
^ y
283 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
p ro b le m s a n d topics defined within, r a th e r th a n outside of,
the c u rre n t a rt world. These p re s u m p tio n s are often violated,
b u t artists o rient them selves to that model.
Fine-art p h o to g ra p h e rs, for exam ple, do a g re a te r variety
of w ork, less c o n s tra in e d by the re q u ire m e n ts of o rg a n iz a
tions in w hich they work, th a n do p h o to g ra p h e rs w h o work
in su c h craft-o rien ted a re a s as advertising, fashion p h o to g
rap h y , o r p h o to jo u rn a lis m (R o sen b lu m , 1978). Similarly,
artists w orking in conventional c raft m edia are relatively
freer th a n a rtist-c raftsm e n w ho w ork in the sam e m edia,
both in the diversity of the o b je cts they m a k e a n d in the
variety a n d w him sicality o f the talk with w hich they explain
their work. The o b jects typically re se m b le c u rre n t w ork in
such c o n te m p o r a ry high-art w orlds as p ain tin g a n d scu lp
ture, a n d the talk b o th calls a tte n tio n to the re se m b la n c e a n d
displays at least superficial indifference to being intelligible
or rational. The latter ch ara cte ristic expresses an indiffer
ence to public a c c e p ta n c e c h a ra cte ristic of m a n y c o n te m p o
ra ry artists.
H e re are so m e exam ples. A rneson has m a d e m a n y pieces
w hich are in fact sculpture: a typew riter, s o m e w h a t sagged
out o f s h a p e a n d rough a r o u n d the edges, w hose keys are
red -p ain ted fingernails (see Zack, 1970, for o th e r exam ples,
a n d see figure 30); a series of self-portraits, sm o k in g a cigar
o r with the skull o p e n e d to reveal various co n ten ts; an
e n o rm o u s table covered with dishes of food, s ta n d in g in
fro n t of a life-sized p o rtrait of the artist in a c h e f s hat, all
glazed a p u re unrelieved w hite. To an o b s e rv e r fam iliar with
the c o n v e n tio n s of c o n te m p o r a ry sc u lp tu re a n d ceram ics,
th ese pieces look not quite like sculpture, but m o re like c e r
am ics. Aggressively not utilitarian pottery, they nevertheless
call a tte n tio n to th em selves as p ottery th ro u g h the rough
m o d e lin g of the clay a n d the g a u d y glazes. S o m e of their
effect lies in the am b ig u ity so created . O th er pieces are utili
tarian in principle but not q u ite in fact. An e x am p le is Arnes o n s te a p o t w hose sp o u t is a realistically m odeled penis; you
can p o u r tea from it, but not for everyone (see figure 31).
To tu rn to the talk that a c c o m p a n ie s su ch work, here is
A rneson explaining himself:
284 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
art w o rk s
in
po r c ela in
, g l a z e d in a l l t h e c o o l
of
celadon
285 A R T S AND C R AF TS
286 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
2 8 7 A R T S AN I) C R A F T S
288 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
289 A R T S A N D C R A I T S
A ca d em ic Art
A cadem icism consists of an increasing c o n c e rn w ith how
things are do n e, with the skill the artist o r p e rfo rm e r exhibits,
as o p p o s e d to w h at is done, the ideas a n d e m o tio n s the w orks
e m b o d y a n d express. Since all arts re q u ire som e s u b
stantial m e a s u re of skill, a c a d e m ic art is clearly an in te rm e
diate a n d a m b ig u o u s case of a te n d en c y th a t e m e rg e s full
blow n in c o m m ercia l art. Most p a rtic ip a n ts in any art w orld
d o n t w o rry a b o u t being expressive or creative; they are
c o n te n t to w o rk w ithin conventionalized form ats. But they,
a n d th o s e w h o s u p p o rt their art w orld as p a tro n s o r c u s
tom ers, generally o rient th em selv es to expressiveness and
creativity as the valuable c o m p o n e n ts of art w orks.
W e can sp e a k o f a c a d e m ic a rt as a rt p ro d u c e d in a w orld in
w h ic h artists a n d o th e rs shift their co n ce rn fro m e x p re s
siveness a n d creativity to virtuosity. T h at co n cern , p a ra l
leling the c raft co n ce rn with skill, is a step aw ay from the
s ta n d a r d s conventionally a c c e p te d as developing out of the
history of a n a r t a n d to w ard the s ta n d a r d s characteristic
of crafts, b u t it is only a step, not the full trip, for the util
ities to w a rd w h ich the w ork is p o in ted are still those o f the
art w o rld ap p rec iatio n , collection, a n d display. Sixteenthcen tu ry engraving exemplifies the d e v e lo p m e n t of such
a c a d em ic ism :
Thus, in engraving there were performers who made great
specialties of the rendering of glass and shiny metal, of silks
and furs, and of foliage and whiskers. It is impossible to think
that even so great an artist as Diirer was not tainted by this
sort of virtuosity. The virtuoso engravers chose the pictures
they were to make or reproduce not for their merit but as
vehicles for the exhibition of their particular skills. The laying
of lines, swelling and diminishing, the creation of webs of
crossed lines, of lozenges with little flicks and dots in their
middles, the making of prints in lines that all ran parallel or
around and aroundone engraver made a great reputation by
the way he rendered the fur of a pussy cat, and another made
a famous head of Christ that contained but one line, which
beginning at the point of the nose, ran around and around
itself until it finally got lost in the outer marginstunts such as
these became for these exhibitionists not a way of saying
something of interest or importance but a method of pos-
290 A R T S AND C R AF T S
291 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
292 A R T S AND C R AF T S
293 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
that *you have to use evervr bit of talent and tricks and whatever learning from past experience has taught you. (Faulkner,
1971, p . 120)
Not only is the m u sic these m en have to play difficult, but
they have to play it u n d e r the m ost trying co n d itio n sw ith
out benefit o f p rio r study, a c c o rd in g to a rigid r h y th m al
ready re co rd e d on a previous so u n d track, a n d with no m ore
th a n two ru n -th ro u g h s before they m a k e the final recording,
all b e ca u se of e c o n o m ic pressu res. The m u sician s w h o play
a n d re c o rd these scores have g re at technical co m p ete n ce .
They kn o w it a n d feel a great pride. F a u lk n e r q u o te s one
e ld e r s ta te s m a n " : "1 believe it is necessary to play c o m
m ercial m usic, no m a tte r how poor, no m a tte r how poorly
w ritten, o r how poorly starv ed a film score is for good ideas,
I feel that for m y o w n private pride of p e rfo rm a n c e , it d e
serves the best I c a n give it. I n ever c o m p ro m is e on t h a t
(F aulkner, 1971, p. 129). A few m u sician s bragged a b o u t their
versatility:
%/
Many reed players dont bend, theyre not flexible. Some dont
even get the right sound in the studio or they refuse to play
different. So [a composer] wants a light, French sound on the
oboe for example, and [another composer] prefers a dark,
flat German sound and you have to bend, to be able to play
them all___
I doubt whether symphony players or other guys really have
all the things down, all the experience that comes with know
ing every style, of having gone through the m ill.. . . I have to
be funny, be a clown, be serious, play jazz, there's all types of
music and all types of challenges. You have to improvise, the
composer will even tell you to do anything you w a n t.. . .
Youre pounding on high notes like we were last week for a
couple of hours and all your blood has gone out of your lips
and then they have you turn right around and play something
soft and delicate, in the upper register, or play a little jazz, or a
bugle call with finesse. Not many can make it come o n . . . .
(Faulkner, 1971, p. 140)
296 A R T S AND C R AF T S
297 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
298 A R T S AND C R AF T S
299 A R T S A N D C R A F T S
lO C h a n g e in Art Worlds
301 C H A N G E I N AH T W O R L D S
302 C H A N G E I N A R T W O R L D S
3 0 3 C H A N G E I N A R T W O R L 1) S
304 C H A N G E I N ART W O R L D S
305 C H A N G E
IN
ART
W O R L D S
306 C H A N G E
IN ART WO R L D S
307 C H A N G E
IN AR T W O R I D S
309 C H A N G E
IN
ART
WO R L D S
B IR TH AND DEATH
F ro m tim e to tim e new a rt w orlds a p p e a r, grow, a n d
pro sp er, eventually achieving sufficient stability th a t they
can go th ro u g h so m e of the se q u e n c e s of internal ch an g e we
have alread y considered. An art w orld is b o rn w h e n it brings
to g e th e r people w h o n ever c o o p e ra te d before to p ro d u c e art
b a se d on a n d using c o n v en tio n s previously u n k n o w n or not
exploited in th a t way. Similarly, a n art w orld dies w h en no
one c o o p e ra te s any longer in its ch ara cte ristic ways to p r o
d u c e art b ased on a n d exploiting its ch aracteristic c o n v e n
tions. We c a n n o t clearly se p a ra te n e w art w orlds fro m those
w hich have c h a n g e d substan tially by virtue of an artistic
revolution, n o r c a n we easily decide w h e n an art w o rld has
died, as o p p o se d to being c h a n g e d or ta k e n over by new
people. We need not m a k e these distinctions definitively,
since o u r interest is in the gro w th a n d d e ca y of fo rm s of
collective action r a th e r th a n in the d e v e lo p m e n t of logical
typologies. W e will look for the m e c h a n is m s w hich help art
w orlds to o p e ra te a n d w hose d is a p p e a ra n c e in terferes with
th a t operation.
W e sh o u ld not co n fu se innovation w ith the d e v elo p m e n t
of a n a rt world. New w orlds develop a ro u n d in n o v a tio n s
technical, co n cep tu al, o r organizational c h a n g e s b u t m o st
in n ovations do not p ro d u c e n e w art w orlds. We have seen
how m avericks can c reate interesting in n o v atio n s w hich b e
co m e d e a d e n d s a n d blind alleys, not becau se the innovation
could not sustain c o n tin u e d e x p erim en ta tio n a n d d e v elo p
m e n t, b u t b e c a u se the in n o v a to r could n o t find sufficient
n u m b e rs of people to join in th a t d ev elopm ent. W hat m ight
have been a n a rt w o rld re m a in s an u n e x p lo red possibility.
M ost su b sta n tia l in n o v atio n s w hich so m e o n e has d e lib er
ately m ad e, h o p in g to p e rsu a d e o thers to join in their exploi
tation, sh are th a t fate. To u n d e rs ta n d the birth o f new a rt
312 C H
AN G E
IN
ART
W O R L D S
e n te d to w a rd c o m p u tin g a n d m a c h in e ry ra th e r th a n m u
sic, they have beg u n to m a k e m usic w ith the m a ch in e s
alone, dispensing with h u m a n players. Not only does th e m u
sic diff er in various w aysusing r a n d o m noise o r m a c h in e
g e n era te d p u re tones as raw m aterial, for in sta n c e b u t the
c o m p o se rs are less p e rfo rm a n c e oriented, m o re in terested in
m ailing ta p e s to each o th e r a n d in having th e m available for
o th e rs to hear. Not h aving been tra in e d to see public p e rfo r
m a n c e as th e p ro p e r w ay to h e a r m usic, an y th in g else being
m erely a reco rd of th a t public event, they tre at ta p e s as an
a u th o r tre a ts books, as o bjects co n tain in g the w ork itself,
any copy being as good as any other, a n d do not re g a rd the
w ork as being im p ro v e d in the slightest by being d o n e in
public, a n y m o re th a n a literary w o rk 's essential m erit lies in
how it s o u n d s w h e n its a u th o r re ad s it aloud. This version of
electronic m usic m a k e s the d e v e lo p m e n t of a new a rt w orld
m o re likely.
S o m e art w orlds begin w ith the d e v e lo p m e n t of a new
concept, a new w ay of thinking a b o u t som ething, w hose
possibilities can be explored a n d exploited ju s t as a technical
d e v e lo p m e n t is. Ian W att describes the d e v e lo p m e n t of the
novel as p a rtly d u e to the new idea of form al realism " as an
a p p ro p ria te m o d e of disco u rse in fiction. S u c h inventors of
th e novel as Defoe, R ich ard so n , a n d Fielding substituted,
for the stylized plots a n d c h a ra c te rs of earlier fiction, a fidelity
to th e details of o rd in a ry ex perience th a t sh o w ed itself in re
alistically com plex, original, a n d not com pletely designed
plots, in th e p articu larity (as o p p o se d to universality) w ith
w hich c h a ra c te rs a n d e n v iro n m e n ts w ere d raw n , a n d in the
plain, e v ery d a y language in w hich the story w as told (W att,
1957, pp. 13-30). A story so told differs in m o re th a n m in o r
details fro m a ro m a n c e w ith a n artificial plot, c h a ra c te rs (like
G a rg a n tu a ) w h o se n a m e s insist th a t they are universal types,
a n d a lan g u ag e n o n e of the c h a ra c te rs could have m a n a g e d
in real lifeit differs in its c o n c e p tio n of w h a t a w o rk of
fiction o u g h t to strive for a n d w h a t it m ig h t accom plish.
A round th a t new c o n c e p tio n a n e w w orld of w riters and
re a d e r s grad u ally arose.
S o m e a rt w orlds begin w ith the d e v elo p m e n t of a new
313
C H A N G E
IN
AR T W ORLDS
314 C H A N G E
IN ART W O R L D S
3 1 5 C II A N G E I N
AR T W OR LDS
317 C H A N G E IN ART W O R L D S
c h a n g e
in
a r t
w o r l d s
MKh
M I AVIH
318*
FIGURE 33. James M. Davis, The Railroad, Tis Like Life. Stereo
graphs emphasized the three-dimensionality o f the image by in
cluding diagonals that ran into deep space. (Courtesy o f the Visual
Studies Workshop.)
ro u n d e d with floral w re a th s th a t stood out in stro n g relief).
T he m a k e rs a n tic ip a te d the c o m p la in ts of c u sto m e rs w h o
h a d p aid for th re e dim ensions, a n d fo u n d th a t they m ig h t as
well have been seeing the im age in two. Thus, the critic
q u o te d earlier sp eak s o f . . . u n su ita b le subjects, o r r a th e r
not selecting suitable ones . . . a n y su b je c t c o m p o s e d of
stra ig h t lines will be nearly as well re n d e re d by a single
view." (L uders, 1892, p. 227).
T h o m a s H en n essey (1973) h a s m a d e a sim ilar analysis of
the successful d e v e lo p m e n t of jazz in the period from 1917
to 1935. H e n o te s th a t w h e re v e r jazz arose, it c o m b in e d
A fro-A m erican a n d E u ro-A m erican elem e n ts in m usic th a t
w as p e rfo rm e d for a n a u d ie n c e r a th e r th a n a c c o m p a n y in g
s o m e o n e 's w ork o r being m a d e within a folk c o m m u n ity .
His analysis show s the co n n ections, in the several cen te rs in
w h ich jazz arose, b e tw e e n the m usical tra d itio n s d ra w n on,
p e rfo rm a n c e situations, p e rfo rm a n c e spaces, a n d the kinds
of m u sic ia n s recruited, a n d d eserves q u o tin g at length:
Jazz did not begin as a single musical tradition in New Orleans
or elsewhere. The reality of early jazz history is the emergence
321 C H A N G E I N A R T W O R I. 1) $
322 C H A N G E I N A R T WO R L D S
323 C H A N G E IN ART W O R L D S
327 C H A N G E
IN ART W O R L D S
wi t h t he
world a n d
1e
n its
history.
H ardw ood
fra m e a n d
fo ld in g h a n
dle. a ll w a l
n u t fin ish .
Helps chil
dren in their
studies and
broade n s
their knowledge of the o u t s i d e
world. Aluminum hood with plush
l>ound edges; good size lenses, se
curely fastened in aluminum frame.
Shipping wt., lbi lbs.
6 9 K 6 8 I O ........................
98c
328 C H A N G E
IN ART W O R L D S
329 C H A N G E IN A R T W O R L D S
330 C H A N G E I N ART W O R L D S
331 C H A N G E
IN
A RT W O R LDS
332 C H A N G E I N A R T W O R L D S
333 C H A N G E IN A R T W ORLDS
c a n n o t be d o n e h ere can be d o n e there. W hen its m e m b e rs
travel they know they will find people w ho know h o w lo do
w h a t n e e d s to be d o n e so th a t the art w orld's work c a n go on.
H e n n e sse y says th a t the n atio n alizatio n of jazz m e a n t that
players fro m a n y of the once s e p a ra te territories n o w could
play in the sam e b a n d with o n e a n o th e r w ith o u t difficulty
(see figures 37 a n d 38). They w ould know several styles,
especially the m o re E u ro p e a n -b a s e d style th a t u se d w ritten
a rr a n g e m e n ts a n d th u s re q u ire d m u sician s w h o could read
m usic. W h en the b a n d s grew in size:
these extra men were more often section players to provide a
setting for the soloist than new solo voices. The main selling
points for these sectionmen were not their improvisational
abilities, but their technical ability and dependability.. . . The
twenties had seen a gradual blending of regional styles as the
media allowed musicians to learn styles across tenitorial lines
so that by the early thirties only the Southwest and to a lesser
extent the Southeast still retained stvles
drastically/ different
*/
from that of the New York-based national bands. Thus, when
the national bands invaded the territories, their style was not
very different from that which most territory bands had been
playing. Moreover, with musicians drawn from all over the
country, national bands could often trot out a local product to
appeal to regional pride wherever they might play. (Hennes
sey, 1973, pp. 486-89)
Ja z z m e n , a n d au diences, h ad co m e to s h a re a body of c o n
ventions a n d p ractice th ro u g h w hich they could c o o p e ra te to
p ro d u c e the jazz w o rld s c h ara cteristic w orks. S h a rin g that
know ledge m a d e possible the s p re a d o f th o se p a tte rn s of
co o p erativ e activity.
A m a jo r c o m p o n e n t o f the co n v entional know ledge w hose
s p r e a d m a k es personnel in te rc h a n g e a b le is the sp re a d of the
basic im a g ery the new form utilizes. Art w o rk s m a n ip u la te
m a te ria ls m o re or less know n to p eo p le w h o ex perience a n d
a p p re c ia te them , as we have seen: so m e of the m aterial a
w ork uses is well kno w n to m ost m e m b e r s of a society; som e
is k n o w n only to those with special training; so m e has to be
learn ed bv/ a lm o st everyone
o th e r th a n the m a k e r in o rd e r to
/
a p p re c ia te the work. W h en an a rt w orld sp re a d s so as to
334 C H A N G E I N ART WO R L D S
FIGURE 37. The Buddy Petit Jazz Band o f New Orleans. Early
jazz groups were locally based, and reflected the character o f the
black population in their locality and the kinds o f occasions for
which they performed. This band might have performed for street
parades, outdoor concerts, and the like. (Photograph courtesy o f the
Institute o f Jazz Studies, Rutgers University.)
achieve national o r in te rn a tio n al coverage, m a n y people
m u s t learn new conventions, learn to organize u n fa m ilia r
sights, so u n d s, a n d ideas into aesthetic experiences. The
ra p id s p re a d of the ste re o g ra p h b o th p ro d u c e d a n d d e
p e n d e d for its success on a w id e sp re a d fam iliarity with a n d
re sp o n siv e n ess to im ag ery w hich h a d h ith e rto b e en of in
terest only to a relative few. M uch of the im agery, as we have
seen, h a d a p u rely local interest.
To p u rs u e th a t exam ple, the sales efforts w hich sp re a d
stereo c a rd s a n d viewers a cro ss the c o u n try m u s t have p r o
d u c e d a n h o m o g e n iza tio n of national taste as w h a t w ere
3 3 5 C H A N G E I N A R T W O R E I) S
h jh b
339 C H A N G E
IN ART W O R L D S
340 C H A N G E IN A R T W O R L D S
341 C H A N G E IN A R T W O R L I) S
344 C H A N G E I N ART W O R L D S
345 C H A N G E
IN A R T W O R L D S
346 C H A N G E I N A R T W O R L D S
347 C H A N G E I N A R T W O R L D S
348 C H A N G E I N A R T W O R L D S
350 C H A N G E I N A R T W O R L D S
11 Reputation
352 R E P U T A T I O N
353 R E P U T A T I O N
354 R E P U T A T I O N
355 R E P U T A T I O N
356 R E P U T A T I O N
357 R E P U T A T I O N
358 R E P U T A T I O N
Levels o f R ep u tation
Artists are not the only ones to have re p u tatio n s. W orks
have re p u ta tio n s, too. T he finest novel of the last ten y e ars,
the g re ate st w ork of S o u th A m erican fiction, one of the
ten g re ate st paintings of the tw entieth c e n tu r y m e m b e rs of
a rt w orlds say su ch things every day. They are not ju d g in g
the people w h o m a d e the works, b u t ra th e r h o w well the
w ork deals w ith the problem s, possibilities, a n d con strain ts
of its genre, o f w h a t George K u b le r (1962) calls a formclass. They c o m p a re the w ork to o th e rs like it, m o re or less
w ith o u t re feren c e to w h o m a d e it. An o th erw ise ungifted
artist, c o n tra ry to the th eo ry of artists' re p u tatio n s, m a y get
h o t a n d m a k e one g re at w ork. The w o rk s re p u ta tio n will
o v e rsh a d o w its m a k e r s. Likewise, a great w o rk c a n be m a d e
b u t know ledge of its m a k e r be lost o r n ever re co rd e d ; K ubler
m e n tio n s this as ch ara cte ristic of m a n y of the great artistic
cultures.
Schools develop rep u tatio n s, m a d e up in p a rt of the r e p u
tatio n s of the individual artists w h o belong to th e m a n d the
w o rk s those m e m b e rs create. M ethod actin g a n d serial
com position, for instance, have re p u ta tio n s n o t necessarily
universally ag reed o n w hich are b a s e d on b u t not the sa m e
as the individual re p u ta tio n s of w orks a n d w orkers. The r e p
u ta tio n of a school d e p e n d s on so m e larger a rt w o rld s
a ss e s s m e n t o f th e possibility of creating im p o rta n t w ork u s
ing the co n v en tio n s ch ara cte ristic of the school. C an you
c o m p o se em otionally m e an in g fu l m usic if you a c c e p t the
c o m p lica te d c o n strain ts of the twelve-tone system ? Can you
c o m p o se m u sic th a t e m b o d ie s y o u r o w n gifts a n d sensibility
by leaving m u c h of w h a t is to be played to c h a n c e o p e ra tio n s
carried on by the p e rfo rm e r on the occasion of e ac h p e rfo r
m a n c e ? Art w orld m e m b e r s w h o a n sw e r n o to these q u e s
tions a u to m atica lly decide the re p u ta tio n s of all the artists
w h o b elong to th o se schools a n d all the w orks b a s e d on those
theories.
G en res develop re p u tatio n s, ju s t as schools do, w hich
reflect the c o n se n su s of th e relevant art w orld a b o u t the
degree to w hich im p o rta n t w orks c a n be d o n e in th e m . W hite
359 R E P U T A T I O N
360 REPUTATI ON
genres fall o u t of favor, a n d artists th o u g h t seco n d -rate rise in
favor as stars fall.
R ep u tation a n d A rt W orld
The th eo ry o f re p u ta tio n says th a t re p u ta tio n s are b ased
on works. But, in fact, the re p u ta tio n s of artists, works, a n d
the rest result from the collective activity o f a rt worlds. If we
review the m a jo r activities of a rt w orlds from this point of
view, we can see h o w they all c o n trib u te to a n d d e p e n d on
the m ak in g of rep u tatio n s.
F or re p u ta tio n s to arise a n d persist, critics a n d a e sth e ti
cians m u st establish theories of a rt a n d criteria by w hich art,
good art, a n d great art can be distinguished a n d identified.
W ith o u t those criteria, no o n e could m a k e the ju d g m e n ts of
works, genres, o r m e d ia on w hich the ju d g m e n ts of artists
d e p e n d . R e m e m b e r D a n to s a p h o rism : To see s o m e th in g as
a rt re q u ire s s o m e th in g the eye c a n n o t d e sc ry a n a t m o
sp h e re of artistic theory, a know ledge of the history o f art: an
a rtw o rld " (Danto, 1964, p. 580). Likewise, h isto ria n s a n d
sch o lars m u s t establish the can o n of a u th e n tic a te d w orks
w h ich c a n be a ttrib u te d to an artist, so th a t th e rest o f us can
b a se o u r ju d g m e n ts on the a p p ro p ria te evidence. T he distri
b u tio n system relies on these scholarly ju d g m e n ts to ratify its
choices of w h a t to d istrib u te (a n d at w h a t price):
The two major facts which introduce, at the level of the supply
[of classical paintings], guarantees of rarity and quality are
the following. Each work put on sale is singular and irreplace
able: it is the unique product of the undivided labor of a
unique creator. The authenticity and the originality, as well as
the quality of works, arc guaranteed by a corps of specialists,
the historians of art. (Moulin, 1978, pp. 242-43, my translation)
P a rtic ip a n ts in the d istrib u tio n system help s h a p e the w ork
by setting the co n ditions d istrib u ta b le w orks m u s t m e e t
s c u lp tu re s th a t are n o t too heavy for m u s e u m floors to bear,
m u sical w orks n o t too long for a u d ie n c e s to sit through.
S o m e go fa rth e r th a n that, tak ing a n active role (as did the
p a tro n s o f Italian R en aissan ce painters) in th e design of the
w ork. The state g u a ra n te e s the right to control pu b licatio n or
d istrib u tio n of wrork, w h ich allows artists to control the c o r
pus of w h a t is c o u n te d as th e ir oeuvre.
361 R E P U T A T I O N
362 R E P U T A T I O N
363 R E P U T A T I O N
364 REPUTATI ON
c ern s language. Music a n d visual art use lan g u ag es th a t can,
in s o m e m ean in g fu l sense, be called international. But liter
a tu re uses o n e of the w o rld s languages, few of w hich are
m u tu a lly intelligible. In practice, only a few In d o -E u ro p e a n
lan g u ag es are k n o w n in e n o u g h co u ntries th a t literature
w ritte n in th e m has a n y c h a n c e of being c o n sid ered in the
global ju d g m e n ts w hich c reate international literary r e p
utations. A novelist w h o writes in F ren ch o r S p a n ish will
b e read m o re widely a n d have a b e tte r c h a n c e for a n in te r
national re p u ta tio n th a n one w h o w rites in Portuguese, let
alone o n e w h o writes in Hindi, Tamil, or Swahili. The latter
lan g u ag es are re a d by millions of people, b u t not by the
people w h o m a k e in te rn a tio n a l literary re p u tatio n s. The N o
bel Prize c o m m itte e in literature periodically a w a rd s the
prize to so m e o n e w h o w rites in a m in o r language a n d w hose
w ork is n o t widely kno w n th ro u g h tran slatio n into one of the
E u r o p e a n languages, b u t th a t seldom ch an g e s the situation
very m u c h . T hey m ay a w a rd the prize to an Icelandic novel
ist, b u t m o st m e m b e r s o f the in te rn a tio n al a u d ie n c e do not
re a d Icelan d ic a n d p ro b a b ly n e v e r will, so th a t th e a w a rd is
a gestu re w ith o u t c o n se q u e n c e in the w orld of literature.
If y o u r linguistic c o m m u n ity is small o r u n im p o rta n t, you
c a n n o t h a v e a m a jo r rep u tatio n .
R ep u ta tio n s, resulting from the cooperative activities of
p a rtic ip a n ts in w orlds o f varying size, th u s d e p e n d on, b u t do
not a u to m atica lly reflect, the qualities of a rt w orks as p e r
ceived a n d ju d g e d by th o se particip an ts. T h at w ould only be
tru e if w e s u p p o se d th a t art w orlds d e te c ted those qualities
infallibly, n e v er m a d e a m istake, a n d n e v er overlooked
w o rth w h ile c o n ten d e rs. The evidence th a t th a t is not true
a b o u n d s ; m u c h of th e discussion in earlier c h a p te rs a d
dresses th a t point. T he sa m e evidence, ju st s u m m a riz e d so
briefly, m a k e s clear th a t crucial c o m p o n e n ts of the th eo ry of
re p u ta tio n are factually incorrect, especially those portions
w hich ascribe the un d iv id ed responsibility a n d the praise or
b la m e for the results to the artist acting alone, ignoring the
c o n trib u tio n s of all the o th e rs I have tak en so m u c h sp ac e to
detail. W e praise Picasso, not M. T uttin w h o p rin te d his im
possible" ideas, a n d Trollope r a th e r th a n the old m a n s e rv a n t
w h o w oke him at 5:30 with h o t coffee. We w ould feel foolish
365 R E P l T A T I O N
366 R E P U T A T I O N
367 R E P U T A T I O N
368 REPUTATI ON
in c o rp o ra te their work, assim ilating th e m a fte r the fact of
w h a t they have d o n e ra th e r th a n d u rin g its m aking. But art
w orlds seldom in c o rp o ra te naive o r folk artists into their
ran k s. W h a t those people do is often too different, b o th in
c o n c e p tio n a n d in form , from the a rt w orld's s ta n d a r d p ra c
tice to be assim ilable. It is stigm atized, as well, as being too
crazy o r eccentric to be taken seriously o r as being too
c o n n e c te d with the everyday life of c o m m o n people to be
tr e a t e d as the special w ork of gifted people called for by the
th e o ry of re p u ta tio n . The w o rk of naive artists m a y exhibit
special gifts, b u t it d o es not ordinarily sp eak to m a n y people,
b eing too private. The w ork of folk artists sp eak s to m any,
b u t is too c o m m o n p la c e to be an y th in g special.
As a result, the p ro cess of selection th ro u g h w hich a rt
w orlds o p e ra te a n d a rt re p u ta tio n s are m a d e leaves o u t m o st
of the w o rk s w hich m ig h t be, u n d e r o th e r p ro c e d u re s of
definition a n d selection, included in the c o rp u s of w h a t is
recognized as art, good or c o m p e te n t art, a n d great art. The
reev a lu atio n s of w ork w hich take place at o th e r tim es o r
th ro u g h the efforts of people from elsew here show th a t the
c o n te n t o f the art" category is in fact contingent, not so
m u c h b e c a u se S h a k e sp e a re 's re p u ta tio n varies, as b e ca u se
m o st of the F e rd in a n d Chevals a n d S im on Rodias, the C on
lon N a n c a rro w s a n d o th e r u n h e a r d co m p o sers, the q uilt
m a k e rs a n d p e a s a n t c a rt d e c o ra to rs are left out; for everyone
w e eventually h e a r of, h u n d r e d s n ever co m e to a n y o n e s
a tte n tio n a n d n e v er get c o u n te d in.
Theories w h ich find evidence of a society's values a n d
c u ltu ra l e m p h a s e s in its art, then, really find th a t evidence in
th e a rt w hich survives a co m p licated a n d historically vari
able process of selection a n d re p u ta tio n m aking. W ould such
theories find the s a m e result if they c o n sid ered all the a rt
m a d e in a society? P erhaps. B ut th a t p roposition n e e d s to be
e x p lo red r a th e r th a n a c c e p te d on faith.
ART AND SOCIETY
T h ere is a n o th e r w ay to th in k a b o u t the relation b e tw ee n
a rt a n d society. W h a t I h a v e said h ere a b o u t a rt w orlds b o th
369 R E P U T A T I O N
370 R E P U T A T I O N
371 REPUTATI ON
c a n s tu d y social o rg an izations of all kinds by looking for the
n e tw o rk s re sp o n sib le for p ro d u c in g specific events, the
o v e rlap s a m o n g su ch co o p erativ e n etw o rk s, the way p a rtic i
p a n ts use c o n v en tio n s to c o o rd in a te their activities, how ex
isting c o n v e n tio n s sim u lta n eo u sly m a k e c o o rd in a te d action
possible a n d limit the fo rm s it can take, a n d how th e d e
v e lo p m e n t of new fo rm s of a c q u irin g re so u rce s m ak es
c h an g e possible. (O ther s ta te m e n ts of this point of view can
be fo u n d in the w ritings of, a m o n g others, Sim m el [1898],
Park [1950, 1952, 1955], B lu m e r [1966], a n d H u g h es [1971],
especially pp. 5-13 a n d 52-64].)
Similarly, the fo u r m o d e s of b eing o rien ted to an art
w o rld as in te g ra te d professional, m averick, folk artist, or
naive artistsuggest a general sch e m e for in te rp re tin g the
w a y p e o p le c a n be o rien ted to any kind of social world,
w h a te v e r its focus o r its c o n v en tio n a l ro u n d of collective
activities. In so fa r as the w orld h a s built up routine a n d
c o n v en tio n al w ays of carry in g on those activities its
m e m b e r s usually e n g ag e in, people can p a rtic ip ate in it as
fully c o m p e te n t m e m b e r s w h o know how to do easily a n d
well w h a te v e r n eed s to be done. M ost of w h a t is d o n e in th a t
w o rld will be d o n e by people like t h a t the generalized a n a
logue of in te g ra te d professionals. If the activity is one th a t
every m e m b e r o f the society, o r every m e m b e r o f so m e large
su b categ o ry , engages in, the folk artist m a y p ro v id e a closer
analogue. S o m e people, know ing w h a t is conventional, will
n e v erth e le ss c h o o se to b e h a v e differently, with p red ictab le
e n su in g difficulties. S o m e few of the in n o v a tio n s su ch people
p ro p o s e m a y be ta k e n up by the larger w orld from which
they h a v e differed, tu rn in g th e m (at least in retrospect) into
h o n o re d in n o v a to rs ra th e r th a n cranks. S o m e will not kn o w
of th e w orld's existence o r care m u c h a b o u t it, a n d will invent
the w hole thing for th e m se lv e sthe generalized version of
the naive artist.
In this way, we m ig h t say (with ra th e r m o re w a r ra n t th a n it
is usually said) th a t the w orld of a rt m irro rs society at large.
Bibliography
374 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
375 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
376 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
377 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
378 B 1B L I O G R A P H Y
Harmetz, Aljean. The Making o f the Wizard o f Oz. New York: Alfred
A. Knopf, 1977.
Harris, Neil. The Artist in American Society: The Formative Years
1790-1869. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1966.
Haskell, Francis. Patrons and Painters: A Study in the Relations
between Italian Art and Society in the Age o f the Baroque. New
York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963.
Hennessey, Thomas. From Jazz to Swing: Black Jazz Musicians
and Their Music, 1917-1935." Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern
University, 1973.
Hibel Museum of Art. Catalogue. Palm Beach, Florida: Hibel Mu
seum of Art, 1977.
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. Carnal Knowledge." New York Review o f Books
26, no. 10 (June 14, 1979): 18-20.
Hirsch, Paul M. Processing Fads and Fashions: An OrganizationSet Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems." American Journal of
Sociology 77 (1972): 639-59.
Hitchcock, H. Wiley, and Perlis, Vivian, editors. An Ives Celebra
tion. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1977.
Hoffman, Theodore. The Bluestocking Theater and the Actor from
Mars." Columbia Forum 11 (Fall 1973): 33-38.
Hoffman, Virginia.When Will Weaving Be an Art Form?" Craft
Horizons 30 (August 1970): 18-23.
Holstein, Jonathan. The Pieced Quilt: An American Design Tradi
tion. Boston: New York Graphic Society, 1973.
Hooper, Finley. Greek Realities: Life and Thought in Ancient
Greece. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1967.
Hoos, Judith. Herman Rusch: Prairie Moon Museum and Gar
den." In Naives and Visionaries: An Exhibition by the Walker Art
Center, pp. 71-75. Minneapolis: E. P. Dutton, 1974.
Horowitz, Irving Louis. Taking Lives: Genocide and State Power.
New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1980.
Hughes, Everett C. Action Catholique and Nationalism: A Mem
orandum on Church and Society in French Canada." Unpub
lished, n.d.
_______The Sociological Eye. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.
Hume, David. Of the Standard of Taste." Philosophical Works,
vol. 5, part 3. Boston: Little Brown, 1854 [1752].
Hurley, F. Jack. Portrait o f a Decade. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State
University Press, 1972.
Ives, Charles E. Memos. Edited by John Kirkpatrick. New York:
W. W. Norton and Co., 1972.
379 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
380 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
381 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
1979.
Newhall, Beaumont. T h e H isto ry o f P h o to g ra p h y. New York: Mu
seum of Modern Art, 1964.
Newman, Charles. The Uses and Abuses of Death: A Little Rum
ble through the Remnants of Literary Culture." TriQuarterly 26
(1973): 3-41.
Newman, K. 0. Two Hundred and Fifty Times 1 Saw a Play, or
Authors, Actors and Audiences. Oxford: Pelagos Press, 1943.
Norman, Charles. The Magic-Maker: E. E. Cummings. New York:
Macmillan, 1958.
Norman, Dorothy. Alfred Stieglitz: An American Seer. New York:
Random House, 1973.
Park, Robert E. Human Communities. New York: Free Press, 1952.
______ Race and Culture. New York: Free Press, 1950.
______ Society. New York: Free Press, 1955.
Partch, Harry. Genesis o f a Music. Madison: University of Wiscon
sin Press, 1949.
Perlis, Vivian. Charles Ives Remembered: An Oral History. New
Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.
Peterson, Richard A. The Unnatural History of Rock Festivals:
An Instance of Media Facilitation." Popular Music and Society
2 (Winter 1973): 98-123.
Pevsner, Nicholas. Academies of Art: Past and Present. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1940.
Phillips, John. The Reformation of Images: Destruction o f Art in
England, 1535-1660. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of
California Press, 1973.
Photographers Formulary: Chemical and Laboratory Resources.
Catalogue 3. Missoula, Mont.: Photographer's Formulary, Inc.,
n.d.
Reese, Gustave. Music in the Renaissance. Revised edition. New
York: W. W. Norton, 1959.
Rehfeldt, Phillip. New Directions for the Clarinet. Berkeley and Los
Angeles: University of California Press, 1977.
Reitlinger, Gerald. The Economics of Taste: The Rise and Fall of
Picture Prices, 1760-1960. London: Barrie and Rockliff, 1961.
Roscoe, Lynda. James Hamptons Throne." In Naives and Vision
aries: An Exhibition Organized by the Walker Art Center,
pp. 13-19. Minneapolis: E. P. Dutton, 1974.
Rosenblum, Barbara. Photographers at Work. New York: Holmes
and Meiers, Publishers, Inc., 1978.
382 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
383 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
384 B I B L I O G R A P H Y
Index
385
386 I N D E X
Art w orld: absence of (co n td.)
decline of, 347-350: defined, x,
34-39: h ierarch y in, 151-153: in
stitutions of, 339-347; lim its to
grow th, 347-349; local, 314-315.
318-320, 321; national and inter
national, 322-347; politics of,
134-135. 286-288; and re p u ta
tion, 360-365: revolution in,
304-308: subw orlds, 63
Ashley, R obert, 10
Atget, Eugene, 212-213
Audience, 4. 31-32.42-52. 55, 107108, 111, 121-122, 125,214-217,
312-313, 317-318, 321,336-339
A uthenticity of art works, 22-24.
114-115. 357
Avedon, R ichard, 213
Bacon, Francis, 22
B akhtin, Mikhail, 47, 52, 367
Ballets Russe, 10
B arberini, Maffeo (Pope U rban
VIII), 101
B aum an, Law rence S., 168-169
B axandall, Michael, 15-16, 46-47,
50, 217, 254, 298
Becker, H ow ard S., 87, 149, 152,
195. 234, 291
B eethoven, Ludwig van, x, 10, 135
B ennett, H. Stith, 11, 17,78, 332
B erenson, B ernard, 15
Berg, Alban, 305
Bergos, Joan, 265
Bernini, Gian Lorenzo, 101
B ernstein, L eonard, 34
Bihalji-M erin, Otto, 259
Blake, W illiam, 11
Blasdell, Gregg N., 267
Bleak House, 127
Bliven, B ruce Jr., 126
Blizek, W illiam, 149, 151, 158
Blum er, H erbert, ix, 200, 371
Bollinger, Dwight L., 45
Borges, Jorge Luis, 22-23
RrmrHieu. Pierre, 214, 348
387 I N D E X
Collins, Wilkie, 24
C om m ins, Dorothy, 194. 203
Com m ins, Saxe, 193-194, 203
Connell, Evan S., Jr., 113
C ontracts, 15-16, 170-171
C onventions, 28-34, 40-67: as con
strain ts, 32-34.233-236.238:
an d cultural segm ents, 46-47;
defined, 55-56; im ply an aes
thetic, 305-306; and lay culture,
40-42; m ake art possible, 28-31,
203-204; and professional cul
ture, 56-59
Cookie, 205
Cooper, G rosvenor, 34
Cooper, Patricia, 249-256
C opland, Aaron, 308
Corn, W anda M., 298
Cowboy Artists of Am erica, 159
Cowell, H enry, 34
Cowell, Sidney, 34
Craft, 83, 273-288
Craft Horizons, 277-287
Craig, Ethelbelle and Clayton B.,
159-160
Crane, H art, 345
Credits, 1=9
Critics, 111-113,341
Crosby, Bing, 171
C ulture industries, 122-129
Cum m ings, E. E., 26
Dance, 42, 49-50. 303, 306
Daniel Deronda, 211
Danto, A rthur C., 13, 23, 32, 148
149. 158, 214, 360
Darbel, Alain, 348
D arrah, William Culp, 316,
323-325,336
Dart, T hurston, 19, 32
Da Vinci, L eonardo, 19
Debussy, Claude, 66
Defoe, Daniel, 312
DeKooning, Willem, 91, 174
DenisofT, R. Serge, 170-171, 179,
188,313
388 I N D E X
Film (co n td.)
88, 89-90. 183, 208-209, 292-296
Folk art, 246-258. 368
Forbes, Elliot, 135
Forster, E.M., 207
Foster, Stephen, 25
Fountain, 153
Francesca, Piero della, 15
Frank, R obert, 50, 64-66,
112-113.298
Free-lance system s, 83-88
Freidson, Eliot, 14, 21
Friedlander, Lee, 50
Fulcher, Jan e, 181-182
Functionalism , 6
C ans, H erbert, 145. 348
G allery-dealer system , 108-119. 142
Gaudi, Antoni, 264-265
Getz, Stan, 214
G hirlandaio, Dom enico, 15
Gilot, Frangoise, 69
Glass, Philip, 10, 50
Glassie, H enry, 246, 302
G oldfarb, Jeffrey C., 184
G oldm ann, Lucien, 365
G om brich, E. H., 30
Gould, Joe, 243
G overnm ent, 104-105, 107. 160-161,
165-191.345-346
G raham , Bill, 120
G reenberg, Clem ent, 173-174
Griff, M ason, 291
Group, The, 88-90
Griswold, W endy, 170, 222
H aacke, H ans, 53, 100, 105-106,
113, 118, 152
H aber, Ira Joel, 117
H alverstadt, Hal, 287
H am ilton, George E., 326, 329
H am pton, Jam es, 260-261, 266, 269
H and, Judge L earned, 171
H ardy, B arbara, 211-212
H arm etz, Aljean, 21
H arris, Neil, 298
389 I N D E X
32L 326-329. 331-333
Jeffers, Robinson, 193-194
Jenkins, Reese V., 73, 321
Johnson, Thom as, 6
Jolas, Betsy, 240
Joyce, Jam es, 243
Julius Caesar, 175
Kael, Pauline, 88-90
K afka, Franz, 212
K aren, R obert, 91, 209, 303
K arlsson, Lars, 7
Kase, Thelm a, 26
Katz, Elihu, 55
Kealey, E dw ard R., 17-18
K eystone View Co., 325
Kienholz, Ed, 263
K ilburn B rothers, 323
Kingsley, R obert, 106
K irkpatrick, John, 34, 237
Kjrirup, Sdren, 132
K ubler, George, 13, 111, 138, 23(1
303, 353, 358, 361-362
K uhn, T hom as, 296, 304, 346
Labeling theory of deviance, 149
L achm an, E dw ard, 7
Lake, Carlton, 69
Lang, Roger, 285-286
Lartigue, Jacques H enri, 213
Last Days o f Pompeii, The, 128
Lazarsfeld, Paul, 55
Lerner, R obert, 62-63
Lesy, M ichael, 222
Let Us N ow Praise Famous Men, 345
Levine, E dw ard M., 93, 307
Levine, M arilyn, 281
Lewis, David K., 55
Lichtenstein, Grace, 159
Lipm an, Jean, 260
L iterature and poetry, 6, 11-14,
2 2-24,45, 47, 123-128. 129. 184,
187, 192-194, 203, 212, 215-217,
243,312-313. 363-364
L ithography, 25-26. 68-69
Lorrain, Claude, 361
390 INDEX
M ozart (cont'd.)
64, 224
M udie, C. E.. 128
M ukerji, C handra, 208-209
M useum of A m erican Folk Art, 221
M useum of M odem Art, 346
M useum s, 23, 26-27, 117-119,
220-221, 224, 286, 306-307
M usic copying, 9,79, 238
M usical com position, 10-11, 17-18,
32-34, 50, 57,61-62, 87-88,
201-202.211.233-246. 290-291
M usical perform ance, 10-11, 30-31,
58, 256-257, 292-296
M yhram , Dan, 7
Naive artists, 22L 258-269, 368
N ancarrow , Conlon, 245-246, 368
N ational E ndow m ent for the
Arts, 132
Newhall, B aum ont, 298, 321, 334,
346
Newhall, Nancy, 213
N ew m an, Charles, 125, 129, 144
N ew m an, K. O., 302
N orm an, Charles, 26
N orm an, D orothy, 341
Nykvist, Sven, 7
OKeeffe, Georgia, 343
O liphant, Mrs., 124
O rph6on, 181-182
Paderew ski, Ignace, 10
Painting and sculpture, 15-16, 23,
3 0 ,4 2 -4 4 ,4 6 -4 7 .93, 97-99.
100-103, 108-119.142-143. 146,
159-160,170-171.172-174. 232.
247-248. 263, 268-269. 361-362
Palais Ideal, 263, 266, 267
Park, R obert E., 371
Parker, Charlie, 64
Parker, H oratio, 233, 240
Partch, H arry, 32-33. 76j 244
Patronage, 99-107; governm ent.
391 I NDEX
R eputation, 23^24, 95, 172-175. 232,
236. 241-242. 251. 267-268.
269. 351-368: levels of.
358-360; produced by art
w orlds, 360-365; theory of,
352-357
R esource pool, 70, 78-81
R ichardson, Sam uel, 312
Riley, Terry, 50
Rite o f Spring, The, 290
Rivera, Diego, 291, 344
R oberts, George, 237
Rockefeller, John D. Ill, 119
Rockefeller, Nelson, 105
Rock m usic, LL 17-18. 78-79. 170.
171. 179. 188, 309, 313-314, 332
R odia, Sim on, 226, 260, 265-266,
268, 368
Roscoe, Lynda, 266
R osenblum , B arbara, 33, 128,
282, 343
R osenblum , Ralph, 90-91. 209, 303
Ross, Lillian, 84-86
Rossiter, Frank R., 233, 235, 236,
240, 24J
Rota, Nino, 9
R oualt, Georges, 173, 198
R ousseau, H enri, 259
Rubin, Cynthia Elyce, 316
R ubinstein, Artur, 231
Rusch, H erm an, 264, 267
Russell, Charles, 159
S a m izh d a t, 184,187
S anders, Clinton, 291
S a n tAnna, Alfonso Ro
m ano de, 189
S auter, Eddie, 214
Schary', Dore, 84-86
Schcnck, Nicholas, 84-86
Schm idt, Clarence, 263
Schoenberg, Arnold, 241, 305
Schonberg, H arold C 79
Schools, 59, 79-80. 296
Schuller, G unther, 238
392 I NDEX
Tactile Art G roup, 71-72, 205, 209
Taft, Robert, 298, 32 L 339, 346
Talbot, George, 222
Taste, 102-103
T axation, 172
Taylor, Paul, 49, 303
Thackeray, William M ake
peace, 127
T heater, 52-53. 61, 75, 7L 90^91,
175. 189-190. 202.219.302
T hom pson, Peter H unt, 75
Throne o f the Third Heaven o f the
National M illenium General A s
sembly, The, 261, 262
Tice, George, 321. 340
Titian, ix, 23, 115. 224
Toulouse-Lautrec, H enri, 207
Tracy, Mr., 267
Travesties, 14, 354
Trillin, Calvin, 226, 260, 264-265, 268
Trollope, A nthony, L 18-19. 23-24.
126, 128, 356, 364
Tugwell, Rex ford, 345
Tulsa, 207
Tuttin, M., 68-69, 364
Twain, M ark, 207
U nderw ood and U nderw ood, 326,
337-339
Useem, Michael, 348
Utility. 273-275. 278-279, 283,
291-296
Vanity Fair, 127
Vclho, G ilberto, 188
Villon, Jacques, 116-117
Virtuosity. 275-277, 279, 289^290,
291-296
D esigner:
C om positor:
W en d v C alm enson
D h a r m a Press
Printer:
T h o m so n -S h o re Inc.
Binder:
T ext:
D isplay:
1 1 /1 3 A s t e r
B a u h a u s L ight
HOWARD 5. BCKR
ART UJORLDS
"Maybe the years I spent playing the piano in taverns in Chicago and
elsewhere led me to believe that the people who did that mundane work
were as important to an understanding of art as the better-known players
who produced the recognized classics of jazz. Growing up in Chicago
where Louis Sullivan's democratic philosophy was embodied in the sky
scrapers of the downtown 1 loved to prowl around and Moholy-Nagy's
Institute of Design gave a Midwestern home to the refugee Bauhaus*
concern for the craft in artmay have led me to think that the craftsmen
who help make art works are as important as the people who conceive
them. My rebellious temperament may be the cause of a congenital
antielitism. learning the Chicago tradition" of sociology from Everett C.
Hughes and Herbert Blumcr surely led to a skepticism about conventional
definitions of the objects of sociological study.
All those things had a part in forming the attitudes of this book.. . . I
have treated art as the work some people do, and have been more concerned
with patterns of cooperation among the people who make the works than
with the works themselves or with those conventionally defined as their
creators
That has inevitably meant treating art as not so very different
from other kinds of work, and treating people defined as artists as not so
very different from other kinds of workers, especially the other workers
who participate in the making of art works.
"The idea of an art world forms the backbone of my analysis. Art world
is commonly used by writers on the arts in a loose and metaphoric way,
mostly to refer to the most fashionable people associated with those
newsworthy objects and events that command astronomical prices. I have
used the term in a more technical way, to denote the network of people
whose cooperative activity, organized via their joint knowledge of conven
tional means of doing things, produces the kind of art work that art world is
noted for.
FROM T H E PREFACE
ISBN 0-520-04386-3