Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Daniela Liran1, Ilana Shoham Vardi2, Ruslan Sergienko2 & Eyal Sheiner3
1Faculty of Health Sciences, The Joyce and Irving Goldman Medical school, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben Gurion
University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel, 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Health Services
Evaluation, Be'er Sheva, Israel, and 3Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben Gurion University
of the Negev, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Be'er Sheva, Israel
Objective: To investigate teenage pregnancy outcomes controlling for lack of prenatal care (LOPC) and ethnicity. Methods:
A retrospective population-based cohort study comparing
singleton deliveries of nulliparous women classified into two
teenage groups: 1517, 1819, and a comparison group of
2024 years was performed. Multiple logistic regressions were
used to control for confounders. Results: The study population
consisted of 31,985 women, 1,482 1517 years old, 5,876 1819
years old and 24,627 2024 years old. A significant linear association was found between maternal age and perinatal mortality,
low birth weight (LBW) and preterm delivery (PTD). Using multivariable logistic regression models, controlling for LOPC and
ethnicity, the association between maternal age and perinatal
mortality was no longer statistically significant, but both LBW
and PTD were significantly associated with young maternal age
(>17 years). Conclusion: Teenage pregnancy is a risk factor for
LBW and PTD especially for parturient younger than 17.
Keywords: Ethnic minority, low birth weight, preterm delivery
Introduction
Teenage pregnancy, defined as a pregnancy which ends before the
mother reaches the age of 20 years old [1], poses a great challenge to health professionals and is recognized as an essential risk
to public health [1,2]. An estimated 16 million girls aged 1519
years give birth every year. This makes up 11% of all births worldwide [3]. Although the use of contraception has been increasing
globally, awareness among teenagers is still low and teenage pregnancy is common [1].
Recent data have shown a decrease in teenage birth over the
last 10 years [4,5].
The role of maternal age and its effect on adverse perinatal
outcomes has been a subject of ongoing controversy [3,4,68].
Several studies concluded that teenage pregnancy is a risk factor
for LBW (< 2500 grams [2,3,5,7,913]), PTD (< 37 weeks gestation [57,916]), eclampsia [7], fetal death [4,7,10], anemia
[4,6,8], congenital deformities, small for gestational age [9] and
chorioamnionitis [8]. In contrast, other studies disputed the
independent effect of maternal age on pregnancy outcomes by
showing that the associations of adverse perinatal outcomes in
teenagers had been confounded mainly by lack of or inadequate
prenatal care and other socio-cultural characteristics often associated with ethnicity [1,1719]. Therefore, it is not clear whether
adverse pregnancy outcomes are related to biological immaturity
or to social factors such as lack of prenatal care, poverty, smoking,
drug use, as well as single parenting [1,17].
The rate of teenage pregnancy in Israel is currently 32/1000.
This rate varies by religion and local culture. It has been shown
that in Israel teenage pregnancies rates in the Muslim population are three times higher than in the Jewish population [20].
The Bedouin population, a Muslim minority in southern Israel,
characterized by high fertility rates encourages marriages and
pregnancies at an early age [21]. On the contrary, in the majority
of the Jewish population pregnancy at an early age is less common
and is often associated with social marginality.
Prenatal care has been shown to be an important factor
affecting outcome of pregnancies [1,17,18]. In Israel prenatal
services are accessible to all residents [22]. During the study a low
payment covering all prenatal services as well as infant care and
immunizations was required.
The objective of the present study was to determine whether
young maternal age was an independent risk factor for adverse
perinatal outcomes in Jews and Bedouins, two distinct populations, while controlling for prenatal care.
Methods
A retrospective population-based cohort study comparing
singleton deliveries of nulliparous women between the years
1988 and 2010 was conducted at Soroka University Medical
Center (SUMC). Women were classified into two teenage groups:
1517, 1819, and a comparison group of 2024 years old,
enabling a comparison between two subgroups in order to assess
a linear association between maternal age and adverse perinatal
outcomes. Data were obtained from the perinatal database, which
consisted of information recorded immediately following delivery
by an obstetrician. SUMC is the only major hospital in the Negev
region, where practically all births in the region take place. Only
nulliparous women between the ages of 15 and 24 were included
in the study in an effort to eliminate any confounding factors
caused by parity.
The following maternal and pregnancy characteristics were
examined: ethnicity, lack of prenatal care, fertility treatment,
recurrent abortions, gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-gestational
Correspondence: Daniela Liran, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Joyce and Irving Goldman Medical School, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben Gurion
University of the Negev, P.O Box 151, Beer-Sheva, Israel. E-mail: danielaliran@walla.co.il
469
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Biblioteka Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego on 11/03/14
For personal use only.
Results
The study population consisted of 31,985 women, of which 4.6%
(n = 1482) were less than 17 years old, 18.4% (n = 5,876) were
1819 years old and 77% (n = 24,627) were 2024 years old
(comparison group). Maternal, pregnancy and delivery characteristics of the three groups are shown in Table I. The two younger
age groups were predominantly comprised of women of Bedouin
1517 (N = 1482)
p Value
LBLa
78.4%
21.6%
0.1%
0.5%
19.7%
0.7%
0%
2.2%
2.3%
0.3%
74.6%
25.4%
0.4%
1%
11.5%
1.1%
0.1%
2.4%
3%
0.5%
47.3%
52.7%
1.4%
1.7%
6.2%
2.4%
0.3%
2.2%
3.5%
0.8%
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
0.001
0.844
0.015
0.02
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
0.733
0.004
0.005
2.8%
6.3%
6.3%
0.4%
1.1%
3%
0.7%
0.1%
5.7%
7.7%
2.1%
4.4%
9.3%
0.3%
1.4%
2.6%
0.5%
0.1%
5.4%
8.4%
1.7%
5%
11.1%
0.5%
2.2%
3.5%
0.6%
0.1%
6%
10.7%
0.003
0.007
<0.000
0.166
<0.000
0.001
0.496
0.715
0.223
<0.000
0.001
0.804
<0.000
0.114
<0.000
0.002
0.534
0.996
0.165
<0.000
aLBL,
linear by linear.
Data are presented as percentages and p value for statistical significance.
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Adverse perinatal outcome in teenage pregnancies: is it all due to lack of prenatal care and ethnicity?471
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Biblioteka Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego on 11/03/14
For personal use only.
1517 (N = 1482)
1819 (N = 5876)
52.1%
47.9%
15.5%
17.7%
2.9%
1.1%
8.6%
3.5%
2.5%
1.1%
0.2%
1.2%
52.5%
47.5%
11.2%
14.3%
2.3%
1.3%
7.6%
2.8%
2.0%
1%
0.2%
0.9%
Maternal age
2024 (N = 24,627)
51.3%
48.7%
9.1%
11.5%
1.7%
2.1%
6.7%
2%
1.5%
0.8%
0.1%
0.6%
p Value
LBLa
0.248
0.150
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
0.001
<0.000
<0.000
0.169
0.768
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
<0.000
0.062
0.481
<0.000
Table III. Multiple logistic regression models of risk factors for adverse perinatal outcomes in the total study population and in two ethnic groups.
Total population
Bedouins
Jews
Adverse perinatal outcomes
OR
95% CI
OR
95% CI
OR
95% CI
Perinatal mortality
Maternal age
1517
1.297
0.9151.837
1.100
0.7381.639
2.302
1.1414.644
1819
1.136
0.9171.408
1.047
0.8231.333
1.440
0.9182.260
2024
REF
REF
REF
Ethnicity (B/J)
1.689
1.3862.057
LOPC
2.048
1.6122.602
1.790
1.3812.326
4.981
2.8528.698
LBW
Maternal age
1517
1.304
1.1311.502
1.202
1.0261.408
1.841
1.3452.520
1819
1.081
0.9921.176
1.062
0.9651.169
1.121
0.9321.348
2024
REF
REF
REF
Ethnicity (B/J)
1.776
1.6501.912
LOPC
1.637
1.4731.820
1.538
1.4161.769
2.238
1.6333.067
PTD
Maternal age
1517
1.587
1.3661.844
1.438
1.2121.706
2.202
1.6192.995
1819
1.142
1.0401.255
1.100
0.9861.226
1.241
1.0301.494
2024
REF
REF
REF
Ethnicity (B/J)
1.355
1.251.466
LOPC
1.464
1.2981.652
1.381
1.2141.571
2.267
1.6443.126
Data are presented as OR and 95%.
B- Bedouin; J- Jewish.
LBW, low birth weight; LOPC, lack of prenatal care; PTD, preterm delivery.
Discussion
The purpose of our study was to determine whether young
maternal age was an independent risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes in populations where the socio cultural context
of teenage pregnancy was different. The main finding of our population-based study was that in both ethnic groups young maternal
age, adjusted for prenatal care, was a significant risk factor for
both PTD and LBW, but not for perinatal mortality. PTD rates
were higher in both teenage groups (1517 and 1819 year olds)
when compared to controls (2024 year olds) and LBW rates were
higher only in the 1517 year old age group. Other studies have
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Biblioteka Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego on 11/03/14
For personal use only.
Acknowledgements
Performed in part of Daniela Liran MD requirements.
Declaration of Interest: The authors report no declarations of
interest.
References
1. Chen XK, Wen SW, Fleming N, Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Walker M.
Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population
based retrospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:368373.
2. Loto OM, Ezechi OC, Kalu BK, Loto A, Ezechi L, Ogunniyi SO. Poor
obstetric performance of teenagers: is it age- or quality of care-related? J
Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24:395398.
3. Sagili H, Pramya N, Prabhu K, Mascarenhas M, Reddi Rani P. Are
teenage pregnancies at high risk? A comparison study in a developing
country. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;285:573577.
4. de Vienne CM, Creveuil C, Dreyfus M. Does young maternal age
increase the risk of adverse obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes: a
cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;147:151156.
5. Gupta N, Kiran U, Bhal K. Teenage pregnancies: obstetric characteristics
and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;137:165171.
6. Keskinoglu P, Bilgic N, Picakciefe M, Giray H, Karakus N, Gunay T.
Perinatal outcomes and risk factors of Turkish adolescent mothers. J
Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2007;20:1924.
7. Kongnyuy EJ, Nana PN, Fomulu N, Wiysonge SC, Kouam L, Doh AS.
Adverse perinatal outcomes of adolescent pregnancies in Cameroon.
Matern Child Health J 2008;12:149154.
8. Raatikainen K, Heiskanen N, Verkasalo PK, Heinonen S. Good outcome
of teenage pregnancies in high-quality maternity care. Eur J Public
Health 2006;16:157161.
9. Gortzak-Uzan L, Hallak M, Press F, Katz M, Shoham-Vardi I. Teenage
pregnancy: risk factors for adverse perinatal outcome. J Matern Fetal
Med 2001;10:393397.
10. Mukhopadhyay P, Chaudhuri RN, Paul B. Hospital-based perinatal
outcomes and complications in teenage pregnancy in India. J Health
Popul Nutr 2010;28:494500.
11. Santos GH, Martins Mda G, Sousa Mda S, Batalha Sde J. [Impact of
maternal age on perinatal outcomes and mode of delivery]. Rev Bras
Ginecol Obstet 2009;31:326334.
12. Chedraui P. Pregnancy among young adolescents: trends, risk factors
and maternal-perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med 2008;36:256259.
13. Yadav S, Choudhary D, Narayan KC, Mandal RK, Sharma A, Chauhan
SS, Agrawal P. Adverse reproductive outcomes associated with teenage
pregnancy. Mcgill J Med 2008;11:141144.
14. Jolly MC, Sebire N, Harris J, Robinson S, Regan L. Obstetric risks
of pregnancy in women less than 18 years old. Obstet Gynecol
2000;96:962966.
15. Usta IM, Zoorob D, Abu-Musa A, Naassan G, Nassar AH. Obstetric
outcome of teenage pregnancies compared with adult pregnancies. Acta
Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:178183.
16. Orvos H, Nyirati I, Hajd J, Pl A, Nyri T, Kovcs L. Is adolescent
pregnancy associated with adverse perinatal outcome? J Perinat Med
1999;27:199203.
17. Ekwo EE, Moawad A. Maternal age and preterm births in a black
population. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000;14:145151.
18. Sukanich AC, Rogers KD, McDonald HM. Physical maturity and
outcome of pregnancy in primiparas younger than 16 years of age.
Pediatrics 1986;78:3136.
19. Trivedi AN. Early teenage obstetrics at Waikato Hospital. J Obstet
Gynaecol 2000;20:368370.
20. Sikron F, Wilf-Miron R, Israeli A. [Adolescent pregnancy in Israel:
a methodology for rate estimation and analysis of characteristics and
trends]. Harefuah 2003;142:131136, 158, 157.
21. Belmaker I, Dukhan L, Elgrici M, Yosef Y, Shahar-Rotberg L. Reduction
of vaccine-preventable communicable diseases in a Bedouin population:
summary of a community-based intervention programme. Lancet
2006;367:987991.
22. Abu-Ghanem S, Sheiner E, Sherf M, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, ShohamVardi I. Lack of prenatal care in a traditional community: trends and
perinatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;285:12371242.
23. Twizer I, Sheiner E, Hallak M, Mazor M, Katz M, Shoham-Vardi I. Lack
of prenatal care in a traditional society is it an obstetric hazard. J Reprod
Med 2001;46:662668.
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine