Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Colonization of Ukrainian part of Lower Danube began in the interval 7.57.0 ka BP, when the regional landscape was mesophilous
meadow steppe. Forest plots with small percentages of deciduous vegetation were present in river valleys, temporary estuaries, and on
ridges. The faunal complex was dominated by aurochs, red deer, and wild boar. High biomass density, combined with the fact that the
region had not been intensively explored previously, allowed relatively stable forms of human adaptation. This is illustrated by the
presence of the base camp Mirnoe, the seasonal settlements Zaliznychne and Vasylivka, which display diverse forms of livelihood
activity, and by the distinctive pattern of site distribution pattern. In this context, the beginning of auroch domestication in this region is
conceptualized not so much as an adaptive response to subsistence source base shortage, but rather as a phenomenon caused, together
with joint exploitation of the same settlement area, by resource spatial distribution.
r 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1. Introduction
Prehistorically, the territory between the Lower Danube
and Lower Dniester formed a bridge between the Balkan
and Northern Pontic regions, two epicenters of intensive
prehistoric population development. In spite of its apparent key role for understanding of human migrations and
interactions, the Stone Age archeology of this region
remained poorly studied for a long time. The rst
Mesolithic site in the small Sarata River valley was
discovered only in 1957. Paleolithic and Neolithic sites
were known only from isolated surface nds, which hardly
could be interpreted (Kremer, 1960; Dvoryaninov, 1976).
The rst large-scale archeological excavations in this region
were conducted on the Belolesie and Mirnoe sites in the
late 1960s and 1970s by Vladimir Stanko. On this basis, the
chronological scheme of the Mesolithic of this region was
elaborated (Stanko, 1991). Due to the eldwork of Sergey
Dvoryaninov, Sergey Kovalenko, Ivan Chernyakov, Mikhail Agbunov, and others, who conducted archeological
Tel.: +38 67 7863247.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
O.V. Smyntyna / Quaternary International 167168 (2007) 114120
115
ARTICLE IN PRESS
116
Table 1
Faunal remains in the Late Mesolithic settlements, Ukrainian part of
Lower Danube (Boreal period, Holocene)
Fig. 2. Results of int primary processing (Zaliznychne assemblage).
Species
Mirnoe
8101/67
Zaliznichne
21/?
2/?
1369/31
112/8
69/6
29/4
61/6
2/?
36/4
4/2
6/3
13/5
286333
13/?
1/1
7/2
1/1
1/1
10/2
2/?
2/1
+
ARTICLE IN PRESS
O.V. Smyntyna / Quaternary International 167168 (2007) 114120
117
Table 2
Results of int primary processing
Mirnoe
Items
Raw material
Nuclei
Flakes
Blades
Nuclei revivals
Debris
Total
a
386
462
7589
9640
b
2516
20593
Mirnoe 2
%
1.9
2.2
36.9
46.8
12.2
100
Items
3
8
44
71
2
11
139
Mirnoe 3
%
2.2
5.8
31.7
51.1
1.4
7.9
100
Items
43
22
290
284
37
134
810
Vasylivka
%
5.3
2.7
35.8
35.1
4.6
16.6
100
Items
1
2
102a
84
7
18
214
Zaliznychne
%
0.5
0.93
47.7
29.3
3.3
8.4
100
Items
59
46
1802
2675
43
3086
0.8
0.6
23.4
34.7
0.6
40
7711
100
ARTICLE IN PRESS
O.V. Smyntyna / Quaternary International 167168 (2007) 114120
118
Table 3
Results of int secondary processing
Mirnoe
Items
Scraper
Burin
Retouched blades
Geometric microliths
Points
Retouched blades
Pieces ecaille
Bits
Combined forms
Varia
1191
263
816
147
78
161
40
40
23
Total
2759
Mirnoe 2
%
43.2
9.5
29.6
5.3
2.8
5.84
1.45
1.45
0.8
100
Items
Mirnoe 3
%
12
1
5
2
1
1
22
54.6
4.6
22.7
9.1
4.6
4.6
100
proportion of geometric (mostly trapeze-like) and nongeometric (retouched blades, piece ecaille, points of
different types) forms of int inserts used in composite
tools (Smyntyna, 2004a).
3. Discussion: cultural responses of Lower Danube Late
Mesolithic populations to local environmental challenges
The available paleogeographic and archeological data
allow modeling of the system of cultural adaptation of Late
Mesolithic populations of the Lower Danube to the
peculiarities of the Boreal paleoenvironment. Several
elements of hunter-gatherers adaptive strategy can be
delineated. The most important among them are occupation system, subsistence strategy, and ethnic attribution.
3.1. Occupation system
The peculiarities of the occupation system formed in the
Lower Danube region during the favorable, humid and
warm climate phase 78 ka BP in great measure were
caused by the curious fact that this region practically was
not exploited earlier. The only previous inhabitants were
representatives of the Bilolissya technocomplex, which
penetrated here from Dobrudja at the very beginning of the
previous cold and arid climate stage.
During the period under study, the population was not
numerous, as the number of sites indicates. Nevertheless, they
tried to use their living space intensively. Their mode of life in
newly exploited territory was characterized by the much
greater stability in comparison with adjacent areas, implying
exploration of a series of small short-term sites around a basic
settlement. The territorial remoteness of the main basic
settlements of the region suggests that their inhabitants did
not contact each other, trying to survive by their own means.
3.2. Subsistence strategy
The food procurement system could be reconstructed on
the basis of faunal and oral remains found at the basic
Items
Vasylivka
%
86
3
21
14
1
11
60.1
2.1
14.7
9.8
0.7
7.7
2.8
2.1
143
100
Items
Zaliznychne
%
12
42.9
7
3
25
10.7
2
1
7.14
3.57
1
2
3.57
7.14
28
100
Items
139
65
96
24
7
7
16
1
38.2
17.9
26.4
6.6
1.9
1.9
4.4
0.3
1.9
364
100
ARTICLE IN PRESS
O.V. Smyntyna / Quaternary International 167168 (2007) 114120
119
ARTICLE IN PRESS
120
Kovalenko, S.I., Tsoy, V.B., 1999. K voprosu o razvitii pozdnemesoliticheskih industriy v Karpato-Dunaiskom regione (To the question of
development of Late Mesolithic industry in Carpathian-Danubian
region). Stratum Plus 1, 257262.
Kremer, A.M., 1960. Materialy razvedok pamyatnikov kamennogo veka
na r. Sarate (Materials of observations of Stone Age sites on the Sarata
river). Zapiski Odesskogo Arheologicheskogo Obschestva 1 (34),
224225.
Pashkevich, G.A., 1982. Paleobotanicheskaya characteristika poseleniya
Mirnoye (Paleobotanic characteristic of Mirnoe settlement). In:
Stanko, V.N. (Ed.), Mirnoe. Problemy Mesolita Stepey Severnogo
Prichernomoriya (Mirnoe: Problems of Mesolithic of North Black Sea
Steppe). Nauka, Kiev, pp. 132138.
Smyntyna, O.V., 1997. O sootnoshenii lokalnoi kulturnoi traditsii i
sposoba kulturno-istoricheskoi adaptatsii v epohu mezolita (On
correlation of local cultural tradition and mode of economic and
cultural adaptation in Mesolithic epoch). Zapiski istorychnogo
facultetu 5, 1017.
Smyntyna, O.V., 2004a. Late Mesolithic of Southern Ukraine: the
settlement of Zaliznychne and new sources for interpretation of the
Kukrek phenomenon. British Archaeological Reports International
Series 1302, 173186.
Smyntyna, O.V., 2004b. Late Mesolithic living spaces in the framework of
the Black and Azov Sea. British Archaeological Reports International
Series vol. 1271 (Paleoecology: General Sessions and Posters. Acts of
the XIVth UISPP Congress, University of Liege, Belgium, 28
September 2001), pp. 2632.
Stanko, V.N., 1982. Mirnoye. Problemy Mesolita Stepey Severnogo
Prichernomoriya (Mirnoe: Problems of Mesolithic of North Black Sea
Steppe). Nauka, Kiev.
Stanko, V.N., 1991. Kulturno-istoricheskiy process v mesolite SeveroZapadnogo Prichernomoriya (Cultural and historical process in
Mesolithic of North-Western Black Sea region). In: Vanchugov, V.
(Ed.), Severo-Zapadnoye Prichernomoriye: kontaktnaya zona drevnikh kultur. Naukova dumka, Kiev, pp. 517.
Stanko, V.N., 2000. Pervye skotovody azovo-prichernomorskih stepey
(First cattle breeders of Azov-Black Sea steppes). In: Smyntyna, O.
(Ed.), Archeologia ta ethnologia Skhidnoyi Evropy: materialy i
doslidzhennya. Astroprint, Odessa, pp. 720.
Stanko, V.N., Dolukhanov, P.M., Seferiades, M., Smyntyna, E.V.,
Pilipenko, G.P., Goloborodova, E., 1999. Mezolit Yuzhnoi Bessarabii
(Mesolithic of Southern Besarabia). Zapiski istorychnogo facultetu 8,
687.
Zaitseva, G.I., Timofeev, V.I., Zagorska, I., Kovalukh, N., 1997.
Raidouglerodnye daty pamyatnikov mezolita Vostochnoi Evropy
(Radiocarbon dates of Mesolithic sites of Eastern Europe). Radiouglerod i khronologiya 2, 117127.