Professional Documents
Culture Documents
References
Aplin L.M, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J., Sheldon BC. 2012. Social networks
predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds. Proc R Soc B. 279:
4199-4205.
Atwell JW, Gardoso GC, Whittaker DJ, Campbell-Nelson S, Robertson KW,
Ketterson ED. 2012. Boldness behavior and stress physiology in a novel urban
environment suggest rapid correlated evolutionary adaptation. Behav Ecol.
23:960-969.
References
Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., & Sanford, R.N. (1950). The
Authoritarian Personality. New York: Norton
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Manitoba: University of
Manitoba Pres.
Avery, P. G. (1988). Political Tolerance among Adolescents. Theory and Research
in Social Education, 16, 183-201.
Benson, P.L., & Vincent, S. (1980). Development and Validation of the Sexist
Attitudes toward Women Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 276-291.
Bienen, L., Alan, N., Denno, D.W., Allison, P.D., & Mills, D.L. (1998). The
Reimposition of Capital Punishment in New Jersey: The Role of Prosecutorial
Discretion. Rutgers Law Review (Fall).
Bobo, L. (1983). Whites Opposition to Busing: Symbolic Racism or Realistic
Group Conflict? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45, 1196-1210.
Brown, D.E. (1991). Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Burt, M.R. (1980). Cultural Myths and Supports for Rape. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
Carmines, E.G., & McIver, J.D. (1981). Analyzing Models with Unobserved
Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures. In G.W. Bohinstedt & E.F. Borgatta
(Eds.), Social Measurements: Current Issues (pp.65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Christopher, W., Arguellas, J.A., Anderson, R.A., Barnes, W.R., Estrada, L.F.,
Kantor, M., Mosk, R.M., Ordin, A.S., Slaughter, J.B., & Traquada, R.E. (1991).
Report of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department.
Suite 1910, 400 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899.
Self-Regulation and Personality 1
Regular exercises in self-regulation can broad improvements in selfregulation, making us flawless to ego depletion. In addition, it shows that ego
depletion lessen the outcome of many traits of its behaviors., particularly in wide
differences in socially disapproved motivations or norms produces higher level
differences in behavior when it is weakens the customary inner restraints
(Baumeister, Gailliot, DeWall, & Oaten, 2006).
Self-Regulation is a very significant process of personality by which
many of us seek to exert self-control over our thoughts, feelings, impulses and
appetite, and task performances. It is more extensive in human rather than
animals. Even if human beings are more capalble for self-regulation, however, if
far less than what many would regard as ideal self-regulation then, failures are
central to the majority of personal and social problems that plague citizens in
modern societies (Baumeister, Gailliot, DeWall, & Oaten, 2006).
How does Self-Regulation operates?
When this limited strength has been extremely used. The person falls
into a state of ego depletion. By which, their efforts are far more than a normal
successful do. They have suggested that self-regulation operates on the basis of an
energy or strength that can become depleted. This strength resources may be
considered an important aspect of personality not least because of its long-term
power to promote positive, desirable outcomes (Baumeister, Gaillot, DeWall, &
Oaten, 2006).
Self-Regulation is a multifaceted process, as indicated by the different
emphasis of various theoretical models (Baumeister et al. 2006). First, SelfRegulation as Strength. They accumulated findings that self-regulation operates
with a limited resource that resembles a form of strength or energy. Second,
Self-Regulation and Personality 3
Validating the Construct of Ego Depletion. It was in the beginning when they had
to contend with alternative explanations or converging evidence just to have a
research about the construct of an ego depletion. Not necessarily the effect of ego
depletion will be the difficult and effortful task that a will perform every now and
then. Another explanation was headed that ego depletion is somewhat part of a
state of General Mental Fatigue. Because according to this study, Fatigue causes a
person to to work less. But this study is no longer exists because of its weak
evidences (Baumeister et al. 2006).
How can we increase Strength via Exercise?
Self-Regulation resembles as a muscle in that it seems to become tired after
exertion, resulting in temporarily diminished power or capacity. By repeating
exercises it will strengthen the self-regulation in the long run. There are many
evidences on how to increase the strength. First, Posture; Affect Regulation and
Dietary Monitoring; Physical Exercise as Self-Regulation Exercise; Money
Management; Study Habits and Exam Stress; Interpreting the findings; and
Switching Hands, Verbal Regulation and Stereotyping. By these studies, it does
appear possible ways to improve self-regulation via regular exercise. In addition,
there is always a room for improvements that fits the strength model in an
important manners: Increasing of Strength can also increase a general core
capacity (Baumeister et al. 2006).
Whats on with the Depletion and Individual Differences?
Enabling the individuals to bring their behaviors into rooms is the major purpose
of self-regulation. Many studies was conducted just to know what is on with the
depletion and individual differences that they needed to find out. Dieters;
Stereotype Suppression; Temptation to Drink; Gender, Socio-sexual Orientation
and Sexual infidelity; Sexual History and Sexual Restraint; Social Anxiety and
Social Interactions; and Attachment Style and Optimal Self-Presentation.
Multiple Studies have found that interactions between ego depletion and
personality traits have a factor to individual differences (Baumeister et al. 2006).
As conclusion, the ideals, moral values, social norms, laws and other standards
are very important key for us to success in our lives and one thing that we must
consider is the distinctively personality traits of human (Baumeister et al. 2006)
References
Allgeier, A.R., & Algeier, E.R. (1995). Sexual Interactions (4th Ed.). Lexington,
MA: D.C. Health.
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of
Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
Amir, O., Dhar, R., Pocheptsova, A., & Baumeister, R.F. (2005). Deciding
without Resources: Psychological Depletion and Choice in Context. Manuscript
submitted for publications.
Baumeister, R.F. (1998). The Self. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey
(Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (4th Ed., pp. 680-740). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Baumeister, R.F. (2005). The Cultural Animal: Human Nature, Meaning, and
Social Life. New York: Oxford University Pres.
Baumeister, R.F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, Intimacy, and Time:
Passionate Love as a Function of Change in Intimacy. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 3, 49-67.
Gailliot, M.T., & Baumeister, R.F. (2005). Self-Regulation and Sexual Restraint.:
Dispositionally and Temporarily Poor Self-Regulatory Abilities Contribute to
Failures at Restraining Sexual Behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Oaten, M., & Cheng, K. (2004a). Longitudinal Gains in Self-Control from
Regular Physical Exercise. Manuscript submitted for publication, Macquarie
University.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review.
Early Experience and Personality 1