(93

100

2003 11
101

101

Trigger Level

12Hz
1Hz

101

87 91

NSC91-2526-Z-008-009 NSC92-2625-Z-008-012

II


1.

.....................................................1
........................................................1

1.2

....................................................1

1.3

....................................................2

1.4

....................................................2

1.5

....................................................3

2.

1.1

...................................4
2.1

........................................................4

2.2

................................................4

2.2.1

........................................4

2.2.2

........................................8

2.2.3

........................................9

2.3
3.

.........................................10

............................................14
3.1

.......................................................14

3.2

.............................................14

3.2.1

...........................................14

3.2.2

.............................................17

3.2.3

.............................................23

3.2.3.1

.........................................23

3.2.3.2

.........................................28

3.2.3.3

PGA ratio .............30

3.3

.................................................34

3.3.1

.............................................34

3.3.2

...............................................35

3.3.3

.........................................35

3.3.4

...............................................39

3.3.5

...................................41
III

3.3.6

.............................55

3.3.6.1

S .................................55

3.3.6.2

...................................55

3.3.7

...............................57

3.3.8

.....................................57

...............................................58

3.5

.......................................................60

4.

3.4

................................................62
4.1

.......................................................62

4.2

...................................................62

4.3

.........................................62

4.4

.................................................63

4.4.1

.........................................63

4.4.2

.......................................66

4.5
5.

.......................................................66

....................................................69
.................................................69

5.2

...................................................70

6.

5.1

................................................72

A- 93 H/V ratio .............................75

B- 95 ...........................................92
C- .................................96
Haskell .................................................96
English Abstract..................................................100

IV


2-1 1999 .......................6
2-2 Wang C. Y.2004 ....................7
2-3 Wang C. Y.2004 ............................7
2-4
1997..........................................................12
2-5 S 1996 .....13
3-1 15 ................................................................16
3-2 1996 7 29 TAP022 ...........................19
3-3 1996 7 29 TAP089 ...........................19
3-4 15 PGA ratio...............................................22
3-5 15 PGV ratio...............................................22
3-6 .................................25
3-7 .................................26
3-8 .................................27
3-9 .....................................................29
3-10 FFT PGA ratio ..................................................32
3-11 PGA ratio......................................33
3-12 1Hz PGA ratio .........33
3-13 ...................................................37
3-14 93 .........................................................38
3-15 ...............................40
3-16 0.1Hz .........................................................................44
3-17 0.2Hz .........................................................................44
3-18 0.3Hz .........................................................................45
3-19 0.4Hz .........................................................................45
3-20 0.5Hz .........................................................................46
3-21 0.6Hz .........................................................................46
3-22 0.7Hz .........................................................................47
V

 3-23 0.8Hz .........................................................................47

3-24 0.9Hz .........................................................................48
3-25 1.0Hz .........................................................................48
3-26 1.2Hz .........................................................................49
3-27 1.4Hz .........................................................................49
3-28 1.6Hz .........................................................................50
3-29 1.8Hz .........................................................................50
3-30 2.0Hz .........................................................................51
3-31 2.5Hz .........................................................................51
3-32 3.0Hz .........................................................................52
3-33 3.5Hz .........................................................................52
3-34 4.0Hz .........................................................................53
3-35 4.5Hz .........................................................................53
3-36 5.0Hz .........................................................................54
3-37 ..................................................................................54
3-38 S Wang C.Y.2004........55
3-39
..............................................................................................................59
3-40 101 1.56Hz..........59
4-1 .....................................................................63
4-2 .....................................................................63
4-3 Haskell ...............................64
4-4 Haskell ...............................65
4-5 .................................................66
4-6 .................................................66

VI


3-1 1995 2001 15 .......16
3-2

15 PGA PGA ratio...........................................20

3-3

15 PGV PGV ratio...........................................21

3-4 .............................................................61
4-1 .............................68

VII

1.
1.1

101
5 101 2003 11
2004

1986 5 11 2002 3 31

1.2

Source Effect
Path Effect
Site Effect

1985 300
Anderson et al.1986

1999

TAP022TAP089
1
PGAPeak Ground Acceleration
3-2Trigger Level

1.3

1997

1.4

TAP022

1995 2001 TAP022 49 TAP089 40

TAP089 PGA PGV

Nakamura1989
Borcherdt1970

1.5

Haskell1953

2.
2.1

2.2

2.2.1

150
1000
1980

 300 200

2-1

3000 400

50006000

Wang2004

2-2 2-3

 2-1 1999

 2-2 Wang2004

2-3 Wang2004
7

2.2.2

1978

1990
6000 4000

1 T1 2200 2000


Ditrupa Sp

2Kcl 900 400

a. Kct

300

b. Kce

2.2.3
1998
1999
2-4

 239
600750 10
170

10,000

2.3

2000 SHAKE

Sa

Site
Period
2000

760

10

1996

TAP022

1996 SH

2-5
S

1996TSMIP

11

12
2-4 1997

12

 2-5 S 1996

13

3.
3.1

3.2

3.2.1

1992
Taiwan Strong Motion Instrumentation
Program TSMIP1993

2002

Terra Tech IDS3602 Teledyne Geotech A900

TAP022 TAP089 1999 Terra
Tech IDS3602 Teledyne Geotech A900
250 200
14

 96dB A900

TAP022
TAP089
1995 2001
15 3-1
760 1 15
1 3-1

921
15 4.96.8 3-1

15

 3-1 1995 2001 15

Event
NO.

1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1996
1998
1999

07 14
08 20
12 01
01 22
03 05
07 29
05 09
09 22

16 52
09 25
03 17
19 22
14 52
20 20
20 53
00 14

121051.06 24019.22
121034.82 24041.54

Km

ML

Km

8.79

5.8

84.1

159.20

56.92

67.9

176.19

169.44

4.9

45.07

5.7

65.4

121 43.42 24 55.70

66.86

5.1

69.7

124.38

122021.69 23055.81

6.4

146.3

146.06

65.68

6.1

119.2

130.63

5.4

93.4

123.16

121 38.56 24 36.36

6.00

15.59

6.8

143.6

201.21

122 20.82 24 29.33

121 54.42 24 49.40
121 02.80 23 49.58

83.61

1999

09 22

00 49

121 01.47 23 45.33

8.95

6.3

151.2

200.94

10

1999

09 23

12 44

121004.89 23054.73

11

1999

09 25

23 52

6.47

5.6

132.8

201.25

9.89

6.8

141.3

203.31

121 00.35 23 51.56

12

1999

09 30

09 49

121 57.24 24 40.74

65.87

5.5

86.1

134.18

13

2001

06 13

13 17

122036.39 24022.87

64.41

6.3

96.6

175.90

17.29

6.3

78.9

150.95

6.7

138.06

14

2001

06 14

02 35

121 55.68 24 25.13

15
2001 12 18 04 03 122 39.12 23 52.02

12.00

170.1

921

3-1 15

16

3.2.2

Trigger Level 15

3-2 3-3 1996 7 29

TAP022 PGA 38.43182.81
141.13 galTAP089 16.5121.74 34.20 gal
EW
NS V PGA 3-2

PGA
PGA
2.45 3.94 4.24 3-2

Source EffectPath Effect

Site Effect
15

PGA ratio
TAP089 PGA
3-4 PGA 3-2 3-4
PGA
PGA ratio
17


PGA ratio
TAP089 PGA
PGV ratio
3-3 3-5
PGA ratio
PGV ratio

2002

PGA
PGA

PGA ratio

Boore and Joyner (1989) 50Km

Ouz zel et al.2002 1999 8 17

Izmit

PGA

18

182.81

140.13
38.43

3-2 1996 7 29 TAP022

21.74

34.2

16.51

3-3 1996 7 29 TAP089

19

 3-2
Event Station

15 PGA PGA ratio

PGA Ratio

PGA(gal)

NO.

Code

TAP022

8.09

22.18

19.42

TAP089

4.20

6.73

6.14

TAP022

20.58

42.10

42.22

TAP089

5.08

6.24

6.32

TAP022

13.35

63.30

46.36

TAP089

5.44

10.14

11.13

TAP022

9.81

31.06

34.24

TAP089

7.26

7.89

9.32

TAP022

10.32

37.61

46.89

TAP089

5.07

10.74

12.04

TAP022

38.43

182.81

141.13

TAP089

16.51

21.74

34.20

TAP022

12.18

24.64

42.21

TAP089

6.23

6.13

7.76

TAP022

16.54

51.80

34.54

TAP089

9.72

16.03

16.02

TAP022

11.52

37.91

24.90

TAP089

5.52

11.79

7.52

TAP022

3.64

10.21

8.61

TAP089

2.19

4.66

3.58

TAP022

12.89

32.20

25.95

TAP089

5.17

10.62

9.98

TAP022

29.98

55.72

49.91

TAP089

6.31

8.50

8.96

TAP022

23.30

49.46

76.44

TAP089

10.65

12.32

21.19

TAP022

42.65

116.68

234.23

TAP089

15.88

39.86

43.52

TAP022

16.85

24.22

26.22

TAP089

5.51

10.84

8.83

10

11

12

13

14

15

EW

NS

EW

NS

1.93

3.30

3.16

4.05

6.75

6.68

2.45

6.24

4.17

1.35

3.94

3.67

2.04

3.50

3.89

2.33

8.41

4.13

1.96

4.02

5.44

1.70

3.23

2.16

2.09

3.22

3.31

1.66

2.19

2.41

2.49

3.03

2.60

4.75

6.56

5.57

2.19

4.01

3.61

2.69

2.93

5.38

3.06

2.23

2.97

2.45

3.94

4.24

0.91

1.86

1.31

Mean

PGA ratio

20

 3-3
Event Station
NO.

Code

TAP022
TAP089
TAP022

10

11

12

13

14

15

15 PGV PGV ratio

PGV Ratio

PGV (gal)
V

EW

NS

EW

NS

0.46

1.44

0.96

1.59

4.24

2.23

0.29

0.34

0.43

0.49

2.01

1.55

3.06

7.18

5.34

TAP089

0.16

0.28

0.29

TAP022

0.72

4.22

4.36

3.27

6.21

8.38

TAP089

0.22

0.68

0.52

TAP022

0.45

1.70

1.35

1.50

2.70

2.41

TAP089

0.30

0.63

0.56

TAP022

2.07

5.23

6.48

1.34

3.29

4.05

TAP089

1.54

1.59

1.60

TAP022

1.64

10.14

8.42

2.34

9.14

5.23

TAP089

0.70

1.11

1.61

TAP022

0.34

0.91

1.35

1.42

2.94

4.09

TAP089

0.24

0.31

0.33

TAP022

1.24

5.24

2.40

1.94

5.19

2.31

TAP089

0.64

1.01

1.04

TAP022

0.93

3.36

2.10

2.66

3.65

2.56

TAP089

0.35

0.92

0.82

TAP022

0.26

0.85

0.66

2.60

2.83

2.28

TAP089

0.10

0.30

0.29

TAP022

1.02

4.41

2.34

1.89

5.07

2.32

TAP089

0.54

0.87

1.01

TAP022

1.18

2.38

1.76

5.62

5.29

4.51

TAP089

0.21

0.45

0.39

TAP022

1.78

2.10

5.33

3.07

2.44

3.86

TAP089

0.58

0.86

1.38

TAP022

3.12

12.48

10.86

2.35

4.99

2.41

TAP089

1.33

2.50

4.51

TAP022

1.30

3.84

2.54

1.07

1.84

2.12

TAP089

1.21

2.09

1.20

2.38

4.47

3.61

1.13

1.99

1.75

Mean

PGV ratio

21

(a)ML

(a) ML

(b)Km

(b) Km

(c)Km

(c) Km

(d)

(d)

(e)TAP089 PGA

(e) TAP089 PGV

3-4 15 PGA ratio

3-5 15 PGV ratio

22

3.2.3

Source
Mechanism Path Effect
MagnitudeEpicentral DistanceFocal
DepthSite Effect

3.2.3.1

1Borcherdt19702Nakamura
1989
Lermo and Chavez-Garcia1993
S
Field and Jacob1993
Lachet and Bard1994 Dravinski et al.1996

PGAPGA ratio PGVPGV ratio

1
2

Reference-site method RSM

Horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio H/V

23

 S Stefano and Sandra2004

P S
S

15 S
3-6
1. S

2. 5%Cosine Taper
3. EWNS V
5 Smooth
4. RMS

5. Nakamura H/V Ratio

15 3-7 3-8
1995 7 14 1.8Hz
0.81.5Hz
1.53Hz

24

 3-6

25

 3-7

26

 3-8
27

3.2.3.2

TAP089
Stefano and Richwalski
2004
S
15 3-9 1Hz

1Hz 1Hz2Hz

28

 3-9
29

3.2.3.3 PGA ratio

Fast Fourier
Transform FFT

0.1

PGA ratio PGA ratio

TAP089

TAP089
FFT

1. FFT 15
PGA ratio
3-10
2. 15

30

 1Hz 1Power
Amp2 PGA ratio
3-11 3-12 1Hz
PGA ratio
FFT PGA ratio
24Hz
PGA ratio FFT

1Hz
PGA ratio
PGA ratio
TAP089
FFT
PGA ratio

0.8Hz1.5Hz
1Hz 0.8Hz1.5Hz

31

aE

bN

cZ
3-10 FFT PGA ratio

FFT PGA ratio FFT

32

 3-11 3-12 1Hz

PGA ratio
PGA ratio

1. PGA ratio

2. 0.8Hz1.5Hz power Amp2

PGA ratio

33

3.3

3.3.1
Microtremor Measurement

S Wave

Horike1985Milana et al.1996 Liu et al.

2000

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

34

3.3.2
Borcherdt1970

Lermo and
Chavez-Garcia1993
H S H B

SE =

HS
HB

3-1

2003 Nakamura1989

SM =

HS
VS

3-2

3.3.3

3-13
2 1.7
93 100200
200
35

400 3-14

SAMTAC-801B Recorder VSE-311C Sensor

1. EWNS V
2. 25Hz50Hz100Hz200Hz400Hz
3. GPS
4. 3.5Inch 1.3Gbyte
GIGAMO
5. 0.07100Hz-3db
6.

18 200

36

 3-13

37

 3-14 93

1. 64
2. 1520255075100125 150

3.
4.
3.3.7

38

3.3.4

Nakamura1989

3-15
1.
2. 20 4096
5%Cosine Taper
3.
4. EWNS V
5 Smooth
5. RMS

6. Nakamura H/V Ratio

7.

2003

Nakamura H/V Ratio

39

93 93
H/V ratio A
3-163-36 93
H/V ratio 3-37

3-15

40

3.3.5

Te
H VS
Te =

4H
1

VS
f

3-3

Te
n

Hi
i =1 VSi

Te = 4

3-4

Hi = i

VS i

= i

3-3
VS = 4 f H

3-5

1. 55
300m/s 3-5
1.36Hz 1.41Hz
2. 7
130m/s 3-5
4.64Hz 3.14Hz

1.
41

2.

3-163-36 3-37

0 60
101

3.3.6.2
0.1Hz1.0Hz 3-163-25

1.0Hz 5.0Hz 3-25

3-36

1.2Hz
1.6Hz

1.0 2.0Hz 3-253-30

42

 1.6 2.0Hz

2.5Hz4.0Hz
3.5Hz
1

10,000

3-263-29 1.2Hz1.8Hz

1.4Hz 1.6Hz

3-37
1.

2.
3.

239

43

44
3-16 0.1Hz

3-17 0.2Hz

0 60
101

44

45
3-18 0.3Hz
3-19 0.4Hz
0 60
101

45

46
3-20 0.5Hz

3-21 0.6Hz

0 60
101

46

47
3-22 0.7Hz
3-23 0.8Hz
0 60
101

47

48
3-24 0.9Hz
3-25 1.0Hz
0 60
101

48

49
3-27 1.4Hz

3-26 1.2Hz

0 60
101

49

50
3-28 1.6Hz
3-29 1.8Hz
0 60
101

50

51
3-31 2.5Hz

3-30 2.0Hz

0 60
101

51

52
3-32 3.0Hz

3-33 3.5Hz

0 60
101

52

53
3-35 4.5Hz
3-34 4.0Hz
0 60
101

53

54
3-37
3-36 5.0Hz
0 60
101

54

3.3.6

3.3.6.1 S
Wang2004 S
3-38
3-37

3-38 S Wang2004

3.3.6.2
101
55


1999
2-4
1
3-163-37
1.
0.1Hz1.0Hz

3545
0.1Hz 1.6Hz

1.0Hz
1.0Hz1.6Hz
2.

0.3Hz1.4Hz 3-18
3-27
3. 0.3Hz0.4Hz 0.6Hz 5060
1.2Hz

1.11.4Hz
4. 1.6Hz

0 60 Mapinfo

56

 2.0Hz
20100
4.0Hz
4.5Hz 4.5Hz
5. 1.62.0Hz

6.

3.3.7
12

3-39

P28
40 PA5
P95

3.3.8

57


0.81.5Hz
1.1Hz1.5Hz
1.53Hz 1.8Hz3.6Hz
3Hz

3.4

2002 3 31 331

101 56 4
331
331 30
PGA 193gal 57gal
PGA ratio 3.39 2002
1.5% 2.03.0
0.30.5Hz 101
1.56Hz 3-40 101

331
2002

58

3-39

3-40 101 1.56Hz

59

3.5

1.

2.

1.11.5Hz

3.

12Hz

4.

1986

5.

1.2Hz1.8Hz

1.4Hz 1.6Hz

6.

3-4

60

 3-4

PGA ratio

PGA 4
PGA 2.5

0.81.5Hz

1.53Hz

0.7Hz 2Hz

1.8Hz 3.0Hz

1Hz

1.1Hz1.5Hz

1.8Hz3.6Hz

1. 0.4 1.4Hz 1. 1.8 3.0Hz

2. 2.
1.121.56Hz

61

1.723.58Hz

4.
4.1

P S
Haskell1953Haskell Method

4.2

4.3

VPVS

1.7g/cm3
Transfer Function
TAP022 15 55 4-1
TAP089 16 7 4-2
TAP022
1.56Hz 10TAP089 5.15Hz
17.5

62

 4-1

4.4

4-2

4.4.1
3.2.3.2
1995 7 14 1.8Hz
0.81.5Hz
1.53Hz
4-34-4
TAP022
TAP089

63

 4-3 Haskell

64

 4-4 Haskell

65

4.4.2
3.3
PA5 1.41HzP3
3.14HzTAP022
1.56Hz 10TAP089
5.15Hz 17.5
4-54-6TAP022
TAP089

4-5

4.5

4-6

3.5

4-1
1.

66

2.

67

 4-1

PGA 4
PGA 2.5

PGA ratio

0.81.5Hz

1.53Hz

0.7Hz 2Hz

1.5Hz 3.0Hz

1Hz

1. 1.8Hz3.6Hz

1. 1.1Hz1.5Hz

3Hz

2. 10

2. 10

1. 0.41.4Hz 1. 1.83.0Hz

2. 2.
1.121.56Hz

1.723.58Hz

1. 1.56Hz

1. 5.15Hz

2. 10

2. 17.5

68

5.
5.1

1. 15 1995 2001

PGA

2.

3. Haskell method

4.
660
PGA

5.

6. 101 200
69

5.2

1.
101

SHAKESchnabel
1972

2.
2 1.7

0.1
1Hz 10
5Hz 2
70

 13Hz
3 10 101
101 0.10.2Hz
101
3 10

14

71

6.
A.

Anderson, J. G., P. Bodin, J. N. Brune, J. Prince, S. K. Singh, R. Quaas,

and M. Oate,1986. Strong ground motion from the Michoacan,
Mexico earthquake, Science 233, 1043-1049.
Boore, D. M., L. Seekins, and W. B. Joyner, 1989. Peak acceleration
from the 17 October 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Seism. Res. Lett.
60,151166.
Borcherdt, R. D.,1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near
San Francisco Bay, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 60, 29-61.
Dravinski, M., G. Ding, and K. L. Wen,1996. Analysis of spectral
ratios for estimating ground motion in deep basins, Bull. Seism. Soc.
Am., 86, 3, 646-654.
Field, E. and K. Jacob,1993. The theoretical response of sedimentary
layers to ambient seismic noise, Geophy. Res. Lett., 20, 2925-2928.
Haskell, N. A.,1953. The disperdion of Surface Waves on Multilayered
Media: Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 43, 17-34.
Horike, M., 1985 . Inversion of phase velocity of long-period
microtremors to the S-wave-velocity structure down to the basement
in urbanized areas: J. Phys. Earth 33, 5996.
Lachet, C. and P. Y. Bard, 1994 . Numerical and Theoretical
Investigations on the Possibilities and Limitations of Nakamuras
Technique, J. Phys. Earth, 42, 377-397.
Lermo, J. and F. J. Chavez-Garcia,1993. Site effect evaluation using
spectral ratio with onlyone station, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83,
1574-1594.
Liu, H.-P., D. M. Boore, W. B. Joyner, D. H. Oppenheimer, R. E.
Warrick, W. Zhang, J. C. Hamilton, and L.T. Brown, 2000 .
72

Comparison of phase velocities from array measurements of

Rayleigh wave associated with microtremor and results from
borehole shear-wave velocity profile, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90,
666678.
Milana G., S. Barba, E. Del Pezzo, and E. Zambonelli, 1996. Site
response from ambient noise measurements: new perspective from an
array study in Central Italy, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 320328.
Nakamura, Y., 1989. A method for dynamic characteristies estimation
of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface, QR of RTRI,
30, no.1, February,25-33.
Ouz zel, Edward C., Mark M., Mustafa E., and Erdal S.,2002. Site
Effects in Avcilar, West of Istanbul, Turkey,from Strong- and
Weak-Motion Data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 499-508.
Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J. and Seed, H. B.,1972. SHAKE A
Computer

Program

for

Earthquake

Response

Analysis

of

Horizontally Layered Sites., Report NO. UGB/EERC 72-12,

University of California, Berkeley.
Stefano P. and Sandra M. R.,2004. The Importance of Converted
Waves in Comparing H/V and RSM Site Response Estimates, Bull.
Seism. Soc. Am., 94, 304-313.
Wang, C.Y.,2004.Subsurface Structures and P- and S- wave Velocities
of the Taipei Basin,Taiwan, Seismic Hazard Assessment in the Taipei
Basin, p3.
B.

1978

304305-380
1980
2002
73

1999

1996

1993

1-10
2002PGA

2003 S

1996

1997

1996

1990
33 1 65-84
2000

2002331

74

 A93 H/V ratio

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

 B95

92

Nakamura H/V ratio

Map

Map

(m)

4096 A

4096 V

8192 A

8192 V

P1

121.56117
121.55963
121.56148
121.56036
121.55893
121.55788
121.55678
121.55523
121.55413
121.56140
121.56021
121.55905
121.55815
121.55645
121.55509
121.55413
121.56166
121.55995
121.55839
121.55770
121.55671
121.55549
121.55420
121.56153
121.56025
121.55863
121.55721
121.55603
121.55446
121.55368
121.56157
121.56020
121.55888
121.55722
121.56161

25.02679
25.02679
25.02802
25.02798
25.02788
25.02797
25.02807
25.02789
25.02804
25.02894
25.02904
25.02926
25.02909
25.02911
25.02899
25.02881
25.03039
25.03037
25.03044
25.03044
25.03027
25.03028
25.03042
25.03173
25.03170
25.03222
25.03204
25.03196
25.03201
25.03265
25.03274
25.03279
25.03281
25.03273
25.03364

2.44

2.59

2.44

2.5

1.8

1.89

1.87

2.03

3.14

3.14

3.14

3.14

1.72

1.7

1.68

1.68

1.8

1.8

1.8

1.8

3.5

3.58

3.5

3.5

20

3.14

3.21

3.18

3.21

11

2.72

2.72

2.5

2.47

10

1.91

1.87

1.89

1.87

3.58

3.41

3.54

3.14

1.98

2.01

1.87

2.01

1.43

1.48

1.41

1.41

1.38

1.38

1.36

1.38

35

1.96

1.85

1.89

1.8

10

2.82

2.72

2.75

2.82

3.18

3.33

3.06

3.06

41

2.95

3.03

2.92

3.03

1.41

1.36

1.48

1.48

1.32

1.32

1.27

1.32

12

1.47

1.41

1.3

1.38

39

1.43

1.5

1.38

1.43

27

1.7

1.56

1.58

1.6

26

1.33

1.27

1.27

1.24

19

3.29

3.21

3.33

3.29

12

2.13

2.35

2.29

2.27

64

1.35

1.08

1.19

1.14

24

1.18

1.07

1.07

1.05

12

1.12

1.27

1.36

1.36

13

1.28

1.12

1.14

1.21

13

1.8

1.47

1.62

1.58

19

2.82

2.82

2.78

2.78

19

1.5

1.47

1.48

1.5

12

1.14

1.17

1.27

1.18

18

1.43

1.41

1.32

1.38

15

2.65

2.65

2.56

2.65

P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P9
P10
P11
P12
P13
P14
P15
P16
P17
P18
P19
P20
P21
P22
P23
P24
P25
P26
P27
P28
P29
P30
P31
P32
P33
P34
P36

93

P37
P38
P39
P40
P41
P42
P43
P44
P45
P46
P47
P48
P49
P50
P51
P52
P53
P55
P56
P57
P58
P59
P60
P61
P62
P63
P64
P65
P66
P67
P68
P69
P70
P71
P72
P73
P74

121.56019
121.55883
121.55701
121.55595
121.55434
121.55315
121.56025
121.55893
121.55726
121.55600
121.55481
121.55301
121.56158
121.56140
121.55917
121.55732
121.55543
121.55267
121.56161
121.56150
121.55941
121.55741
121.55576
121.55445
121.55333
121.56575
121.56190
121.55888
121.55610
121.55326
121.55191
121.55524
121.55737
121.55925
121.56170
121.56353
121.56360

25.03363
25.03367
25.03386
25.03375
25.03380
25.03380
25.03489
25.03484
25.03491
25.03487
25.03490
25.03496
25.03669
25.03606
25.03652
25.03622
25.03640
25.03582
25.03767
25.03827
25.03776
25.03754
25.03782
25.03783
25.03764
25.04213
25.04221
25.04223
25.04229
25.04255
25.03951
25.03938
25.03863
25.03992
25.04128
25.04112
25.04233

19

1.62

1.62

1.74

1.64

19

1.76

1.36

1.66

1.66

13

1.47

1.47

1.38

1.38

10

1.22

1.14

1.28

1.28

19

1.45

1.35

1.35

1.35

10

1.56

1.27

1.62

1.41

1.47

1.41

1.43

1.43

56

1.72

1.76

1.62

1.72

10

1.91

1.66

1.87

1.94

11

1.56

1.32

1.32

1.56

10

1.4

1.17

1.28

1.28

12

1.68

1.56

1.58

1.58

1.68

1.62

1.78

1.78

11

1.43

1.27

1.38

1.36

19

2.03

1.96

2.01

1.98

12

1.6

1.47

1.56

1.64

15

1.87

1.85

1.89

1.85

35

1.9

2.01

1.9

1.91

1.56

1.32

1.43

1.43

13

1.33

1.47

1.52

1.58

25

1.76

1.76

1.7

1.7

18

1.56

1.58

1.66

1.68

19

1.8

1.5

1.5

1.5

25

1.8

1.56

1.6

1.62

10

1.8

1.7

1.74

1.74

38

1.22

1.27

1.27

1.27

1.89

1.8

1.78

1.78

1.43

1.41

1.47

1.48

1.43

1.21

1.38

1.47

22

0.92

0.94

0.95

0.98

1.47

1.5

1.47

1.47

1.74

1.7

1.7

1.7

29

2.1

1.96

2.03

2.01

1.5

1.32

1.33

1.38

1.58

1.5

1.5

1.5

22

1.76

1.7

1.7

1.7

23

1.27

1.36

1.27

1.27

94

P75
P76
P77
P78
P80
P81
P82
P86
P87
P88
P90
P91
P92
P93
P94
P95
P96
PA2
PA3
PA4
PA5

121.56363
121.56571
121.56624
121.56621
121.56362
121.56616
121.56359
121.56283
121.56248
121.56041
121.55220
121.55160
121.55159
121.55105
121.55176
121.55054
121.55722
121.56358
121.56173
121.55921
121.55514

25.03867
25.04026
25.03840
25.03714
25.03651
25.03545
25.03543
25.02752
25.02558
25.02605
25.02598
25.02697
25.03051
25.03363
25.03644
25.03748
25.03115
25.04036
25.04047
25.03115
25.03301

10

1.62

1.41

1.56

1.54

10

1.47

1.38

1.43

1.43

13

1.5

1.17

1.41

1.38

17

1.5

1.56

1.54

1.48

11

1.72

1.66

1.76

1.64

2.06

2.29

2.06

2.06

1.89

2.01

2.06

2.06

11

3.4

3.46

3.5

3.5

21

1.91

1.89

1.94

1.96

17

2.13

2.24

2.19

2.24

3.14

3.25

3.33

3.18

2.47

2.44

2.5

2.41

14

1.98

1.89

1.85

12

1.48

1.47

1.45

1.45

27

1.48

1.5

1.47

1.47

11

1.8

1.94

1.91

19

1.38

1.21

1.21

1.27

34

1.5

1.21

1.41

1.41

11

2.03

2.08

2.13

2.13

15

1.32

1.21

1.22

1.19

11

1.41

1.33

1.28

1.38

95

 C
Haskell

96

(TAP022)

2002 08 07

97

97

(TAP089)

2003 07 10

98

98

Haskell ModelTAP022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

0.65
1
0.85
2.5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
0.0

Vp(m/sec)

Vs(Km/sec)

1480.7
1539.1
1492.5
1369.8
1351.3
1204.8
1298.7
1449.2
1538.4
1587.3
1639.3
1538.4
1785.7
2222.2
2300.0

134.6
139.9
127.7
126.3
169.5
192.3
206.2
238.1
384.6
263.2
335.6
416.7
800.0
628.9
900.0

Haskell ModelTAP089
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

0.45
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.35
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.0

Vp(m/sec)

Vs(Km/sec)

1003.5
1031.8
1024.9
1187.8
1255.5
1234.6
1176.5
1075.3
990
1010.1
1111.1
1282.1
1470.6
1515.2
1369.3
2000.0

111.5
114.64
113.88
131.98
139.47
124.84
135.14
139.08
130.55
118.62
120.77
135.14
155.76
168.92
304.88
892.86

99

English Abstract
Site effect study in the HsinYi area, Taipei City
Chen-Hsiu Wang

HsinYi area is rapidly developing political and economic zone in

these days, the opening of Taipei Financial Center has made this
neighborhood a well-known new spot internationally. But from many
earthquake damage records, this area is much more serious than epicenter
that are far from hundred kilometers as Hualien and Ilan. Scrutiny the two
stations of strong motion network in HsinYiTAP022 and TAP089we
discover that TAP022close Taipei Financial Center receives more
earthquake datas than TAP089, its recording intensity is also more large,
but the trigger level of the two strong motion stations are the same.
We use the common earthquake datas of the two stations and very
intensive microtremor measurement in HsinYi area to investigate and
discuss the site effect of the two stations especially. Then compare our
site effect map with and SunShan thickness and velocity maps for
discussing the ground motion characters of the two sites and their
possible reasons.
We fine that using microtremor measurement can get a well fit in
site effect and SunShan thickness mapsand we make sure that SunShan
thickness controls the site TAP022s low frequency12Hzsite effect,
no matter what the earthquakes energy pass this area, the horizontal
component will enlarge especially about 1Hz.
This research also verifies that using microtremor measurement is a
good geophysical method for estimating the site effect of alluvium. By
the way we can apply those site effect estimation for seismic hazard
analysis.
Key wordsite effectHsinYi areamicrotremor measurement
Taipei Financial Center
100