Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In relation to this, compliance with the tax law typically means: a) true reporting of
the tax base; b) correct computation of the liability; c) timely filing of the return; and d)
timely payments of amounts due. Not complying with the law will lead to penalties
and/or surcharges ordered by the Authority. The people, whether currently a taxpayer or
not, must have the knowledge about taxation and understand the tax regulations.
Without this knowledge, the conflict arises such as not paying the imposed taxes or not
filing the required return on due dates and worst, making it as an excuse to escape from
obligations. This study will assess the Level of Effectiveness and Awareness of
Business Tax Management of stores in the University of the Philippines (UP) Teachers
Village.
Background of the Study
University of the Philippines (UP) Teachers Village, known as Maginhawa, is a
great destination for people who love to eat varieties of foods and drinks. Maginhawa
and few surrounding streets in Quezon City became popular neighborhoods for those
seeking new restaurant experiences. Since they offer a unique, nice presentation, and
remarkable taste of foods, they are well known not only to people residing in the
Quezon City village but also to those who came from different places in Manila. The
prices are quite affordable and worth buying.
Based on 2014 figures provided by the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), there
are 946,988 establishments in the Philippines. Of these, 99.6% (942,925) are micro,
small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and the remaining 0.4% (4,063) are large
enterprises, and the UP Teachers Village is a part of these MSMEs. Being part of
MSMEs and knowing that they are getting a lot of attention from people, the researchers
had the desire to know about the level of awareness and effectiveness of business tax
management in UP Teachers Village.
There are many issues in the Philippines regarding taxes. The Tax Management
Association of the Philippines (TMAP) claims that Filipinos pay the highest tax rates
among countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). On the other
hand, an issue about lowering tax rates was mentioned in the State of the Nation
Address (SONA) 2016. President Rodrigo Duterte confirmed that his administration will
aggressively pursue lower tax rates in his first State of the Nation Address last July 25,
2016, Monday. My administration will pursue tax reforms towards a simpler, more
equitable and more efficient tax system that can foster investment and job creation. We
will lower personal and corporate tax rates," he said during his Address.
In the case of developing countries like the Philippines, taxation is an important
matter to be considered. From the past until now, one of the major problems in the
Philippines is corruption, wherein it reduces the available funds and increase
government losses. The money collected goes to the wrong people with a wrong
purpose. With the knowledge about these issues, it is reasonable to find out the level of
awareness and effectiveness in one of the top food destinations in Manila.
Theoretical Framework
Taxation is a means by which governments finance their expenditure by imposing
charges on citizens and corporate entities. Meaning, it is the source of revenue for the
government to encourage or discourage certain economic decisions. Whereas, the
Bureau of Internal Revenue is the primary revenue-generating (body) in the country,
which needs all the support it can get to inculcate awareness about taxation and its
importance. The people must have a knowledge and understanding of tax regulations,
due to meet tax obligations. Taxpayer awareness has a positive effect on tax
compliance. Becoming aware with the importance of paying taxes, and what benefits it
can bring to the country, the people will better understand the importance of paying
taxes. Under the Proclamation No. 812, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo declared
the month of April 2005 as Tax Awareness Month on the 21 st day of March 2005. This
serves as a step towards promoting, enhancing and stilling nationwide awareness and
appreciation of the importance and value of taxes to the society.
In the Theory of Planned Behaviour by Ajzens (1991), human behaviour is
guided by three kinds of considerations: (1) beliefs about the likely outcomes of the
behaviour and the evaluations of these outcomes (behavioural beliefs), (2) beliefs about
the normative expectations of others and motivation to comply with these expectations
(normative beliefs), and (3) beliefs about the presence of factors that may facilitate or
impede performance of the behaviour and the perceived power of these factors (control
beliefs). In their respective aggregates, behavioural beliefs produce a favorable or
unfavorable attitude toward the behaviour; normative beliefs result in perceived social
pressure or subjective norm; and control beliefs give rise to perceived behavioural
control. The theory states that attitude toward behaviour, subjective norms, and
perceived behavioural control, together shape an individual's behavioural intentions and
behaviours.
It relates to the awareness of the taxpayer. Taxpayers, who are aware of the tax,
will know through the behavioral belief of the favorable benefits of paying taxes, its
importance to help the government finance its costs in providing the public needs. A
person, complying with tax regulations because of social normative pressures or the
normative expectations of others in paying taxes is caused by its normative beliefs. It
encourages every taxpayer to have the confidence and decide to become an obedient
taxpayer which pays their tax obligations, linking to the effectiveness of the tax system.
According to the self-awareness theory by Duval and Silvia (2001), when people
focus attention on the self, they compare the self with standards, try harder to meet
standards, and show stronger emotional responses to meeting or failing to meet a
standard. The tendency to change the self to match a standard depends on other
variables, particularly perceptions of how hard it will be to attain the standard. Duval and
Wicklund proposed that, at a given moment, people can focus attention on the self or on
the external environment. Focusing on the self enables self-evaluation. In the objective
of self-awareness, it means that a person focuses their attention on the self and his
behaviour, which allows him to evaluate what he sees based on the standards and
expectations that he has developed throughout his life.
Tax awareness of a taxpayer refers to the satisfaction and pride for fulfilling tax
obligation when it is due. It also refers that tax is likely to be a duty of every citizen,
therefore paying the tax is a prior expenditure. People are expected to follow the
requirements given by the Tax Code because the public pay taxes for the reason that
this is what our law says. In connection, a business owner views his business separate
from everything else; the owner will evaluate his business based on the standards that
is expected on how a business should work. The taxpayer will become conscious and
aware of the importance of complying with the requirements of the Tax Code.
Conceptual Framework
INPUT
Profile
Age
Sex
Length of Service
Highest Educational
Attainment
Years of Operations
Capitalization
Number of Employees
Use of Computer
Registration
PROCESS
Survey
Questionnaire
Personal Interview
Documentary
Search
Readings
Statistical Analysis
Frequency
and
Percentage
Ranking
Weighted Mean
One Way ANOVA
OUTPUT
Policy Recommendation for:
Improving business tax
compliance by
establishing
transparency to the
public with regards to the
inflows and expenditures
of revenues from the
collection of business
taxes.
Disseminating programs
for taxpayer education
which includes
organizing seminars for
existing and aspiring
entrepreneurs.
Inducing a relatively
large number of
researchers to engage in
extensive researches
and studies regarding
business tax
administration and
compliance.
Improving the
implementation regarding
business tax programs
business tax
Advancing activities
involving tax knowledge
among persona involved
in tax management
Feedback
Figure 1. Conceptual Paradigm
The conceptual framework discussed the flow of the study to be taken. The study
used the systems approach. The system of three (3) frames is composed of input which
went through the process or operation and emerged as the output.
The input contains the leading variables regarding effectiveness and awareness
of business tax management of stores in UP Teachers Village. It includes personal
profile of the respondents. In addition to that are the problems encountered by the
company regarding its tax management and its proposed solutions.
The process consist the methods and procedures to be used to analyze those
variables by using surveys, conducting personal interview, and analyzation of data
obtained from the respondents.
The output contains the perception and conclusion of the researchers regarding
the effectiveness and awareness of business tax management of stores in UP Teachers
Village. It also contains policy recommendations that the researchers suggested for the
improvement of the management with regards to their awareness and effectiveness of
business tax management.
The arrows show the relationship between each during the research. On the
other hand, the feedback loop connects the output to the process involved as well as to
the input. It made the system continuous.
For better understanding and interpretation of this study, the following items are
operationally defined.
Age. It refers to the respondents span of life when the research was conducted.
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). It is the governing body that implements
administrative provisions of National Internal Revenue Code of the Philippines also
known as Tax Code.
Business Taxes. It refers to impositions collected by the National Government
on onerous transfer of property, service, or rights in the regular or ordinary course of
business conducted within the Philippines.
Business Tax Awareness. It refers to the respondents level of knowledge
regarding registration, keeping of accounting record or books, issuance of sales
invoices and official receipts, filing of tax returns, payment of taxes and civil penalties
and surcharges.
Business Tax Effectiveness. It refers to the respondents business application
of business taxes according to their awareness regarding registration, keeping of
accounting record or books, issuance of sales invoices and official receipts filing of tax
returns, payment of taxes and civil penalties and surcharges.
Lead Variables. In this study, these are the measures that will assess the
awareness and effectiveness of the food stores,
Length of Service. It refers to the number of years the employee is employed in
the store or the number of years the owner runs the business.
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter presents the general concepts, principles, theories and conclusions of
related literature and studies formulated by the experts of past generations. This
chapter includes local literature from locally published books and references, and local
studies taken from research works and studies related
synthesis that dealt with theories, principles, concepts, approaches and techniques are
reviewed which contributed a lot towards the enrichment of knowledge, in-depth
understanding and insights of the researchers.
Foreign Literature
In Taiwan, business tax generally applies on the sale of goods and services
within its premises as well as the importation of goods in to the said country. Business
tax is imposed under two systems: Value Added Tax or VAT and Non- VAT (also known
as Gross Business Receipts Tax or GRBT). It is said to be applicable especially on
general industries. Non- VAT is applicable to financial institutions, special vendors on
beverages and food, small scale business enterprises. Business entities that sell goods
or services in Taiwan are required to pay business tax and issue government uniform
invoice to buyers at time of sale, delivery or receipt of payment, unless exempt from
doing so. Business tax is also levied on the consignees or holders of imported goods
and the buyers of services supplied by foreign companies with no fixed place of
business in Taiwan. An enterprise, whether or not it has sales must generally file a bimonthly VAT return with the collection authority by the 15th of each odd month for the
two preceding months. A company that qualifies for zero-rated VAT may apply to file
returns on a monthly basis. (Kuo,2015)
equity of VAT is therefore based on the fact that it is a consumption tax. The regressive
characteristics of VAT have been argued that it is only in a short run period; say a year
that VAT is regressive. However, on life cycle concept VAT burden tends to even out in
the long run. (Oladipupo,2013)
The strategic policy decisions in establishing VAT systems have attracted of tax
scholars such as Obadagbonyi. According to him some of these strategic policy
decisions range from the desirability of VAT adoption or otherwise, the form of VAT
system to adopt, coverage of VAT system, the government department to be
responsible for VAT administration. On the desirability of VAT, two groups exist. There
are those countries, which adopted it on a mandatory platform either because it was a
condition precedent to becoming a member of a regional grouping, like EEC or because
of the linkage with the colonial French master, as Cote dIvoire and Senegal. Then there
are other countries, which were merely persuaded to adopt VAT systems as a means of
enhancing their revenue-base by such international bodies as World Bank, International
Monetary Fund (IMF). Examples of which is Nigeria. VAT system has not in any way
been attractive in some other countries particularly those with strong pure federation. In
these countries, sales tax was doing very well and that each component state is
seriously guarding its revenue-base as well as its relative independence more jealously.
Examples of such countries include United States of America and Canada.
(Oladipupo,2013)
Three methods for calculating VAT have been identified. These are the credit
method (the Japanese model) and the addition and subtraction methods respectively.
The credit method is the most popular even though it does not define value added. The
attractions include easy policing and affordability of good audit trail due to the use of
invoicing.
Local Literature
A business is characterized as trade or commercial activities such as selling
goods or services to customers with a viewpoint of obtaining profit. The basic conditions
for an economic activity to be subject to business tax are (1) related to trade, profession
or business (2) occurred within the Philippines and (3) not exempted by law from
business tax. The regular business activity which are the sales of goods or services are
the basis of charging business tax. Exemptions to this rule of regularity is the sale of
services or goods by a non-resident foreign person. The major business taxes in the
Philippines are value added tax, percentage tax and excise tax.
The value-added tax is a form of consumption tax imposed on each (1) sale,
barter, exchange or lease of goods, properties or services in the course of trade or
business in the Philippines and (2) Importation of goods into the Philippines; whether or
not in the course of trade or business (Valencia & Roxas, 2016). It is an indirect tax
whereas the seller is statutorily liable for payment but may be shifted on to the buyer,
transferee or lessee of goods, properties or services. In the case of importation, the
importer is the one liable for payment of VAT.
There are three classifications of merchants organizations as to VAT liability
namely: (1)Non VAT-registered (2) VAT-registered and (3) VAT registrable. Non VATregistered person refers to a person who is not liable to the VAT and did not register as
such. On the other hand, a VAT-registered person refers to a person who is liable to the
VAT and did register as such. Lastly, a VAT- registrable person refers to a person who is
liable to VAT but did not register as such. Both VAT-registered persons and VAT
registrable persons are subject to the 12% VAT rate. (Litonjua & Litonjua, 2013)
The criteria of knowing when a person/business is subject to VAT are as follows:
(1) transactions are taxable (2) actual/expected yearly gross sales or gross receipts
exceeds P 1,919,500 (3) registered as VAT-registered person or VAT-registrable and (4)
transactions are made in the course of trade or business.
There are two methods in computing VAT namely: Tax Exclusive Basis and Tax
Inclusive Basis. Under the former, the 12% vat rate is applied on the basis of gross
sales/receipts which still excludes the VAT. However, in the tax inclusive basis, the
12/112 VAT factor is applied on the invoice price/receipts which includes the VAT.
In the standpoint of a seller, the tax added to the goods or services sold that is
collectible from the buyer is called Output VAT which is to be treated as current liability
of a VAT-registered seller. A non-VAT seller is not permitted to collect output VAT from
the buyer. While, on the view of the buyer, a tax added on the purchase price of goods
or services payable to the VAT-registered seller is called input VAT which shall be
recorded and treated by the VAT-registered buyer as a current asset. The taxpayerseller that is VAT registered is liable only up to the amount excess of his output VAT
over his input VAT.
Other Percentage Tax (OPT) also called Non-VAT is a business tax imposed
with the varying rates (from 0% to 30%) on business transactions specifically identified
by law (Litonjua & Litonjua, 2013). A Non-VAT business is a business with an annual
gross sales or gross receipts of P1,919,500 and below is subject to 3% OPT.
OPT is imposed on (1) sale of goods or services by non-VAT persons whose
annual total sales or gross receipts do not exceed P1,919,500 (2) gross receipts of a
Non-VAT TV/radio franchise grantees whose annual gross receipts do not exceed
P10,000,000 and (3) specifically mentioned under OPT in accordance with Section 117
to 127 of NIRC which are (1) Domestic Common Carriers and Keepers of Garage (2)
International Common Carriers (3) Franchise Grantees (4) Overseas Communicators
from the Philippines (5) Banks and Non-Bank Financial Intermediaries (6) Other NonBank Financial Intermediaries (7) Life Insurance Companies (8) Agents of Foreign
Insurance Companies (9) Amusement Places (10) Winners in Horse Races, Jai-Alai and
(11) Sellers/Transferors of Shares of Stock.
Excise tax is generally imposed on harmful and non-essential goods
manufactured or produced in the Philippines for domestic sale, consumption or for any
other disposition including imported goods (Valencia & Roxas, 2016). In general, the
excise tax return shall be filed and the corresponding excise tax due shall be paid by the
producer, manufacturer of local goods or by the importer of foreign goods before
removal of the manufactured/produced or imported goods from the place of
production/manufacturing or from the custody of the Bureau of Customs as the case
maybe. (Litonjua & Litonjua, 2016)
The value added tax and other percentage tax are mutually exclusive; which
means that a product or service cannot be subject to both taxes at the same time
whereas the excise tax shall be in addition to the value added tax (in the case of a VAT
registered person) or to the percentage tax (in the case of non-vat registered person)
imposed upon its sales.
In connection with the effectiveness of the collection of business taxes, a Filipino
journalist named Chito Chavez of the Manila Bulletin wrote that the business tax
collection in Quezon City increased during the first 10 months of 2012 by about 12.22%
compared to the same period last year. In 2011, the Bureau of Local Government
Finance of the Department of Finance, has named Quezon City as the best individual
revenue performer among the 17 local government units comprising the NCR. The
registered businesses in Quezon City has increased from 60,154 in 2011 to 67,096 in
2015. (Quezon City Information Technology Development Office 2012)
Foreign Studies
The spread of value-added tax (VAT) in developing countries has been dramatic
over the decade of 1990s. Adopted by more than 130 countries, including many of the
poorest, VAT has been, and remains, the key of tax reform in many developing
countries. While adopting VAT, there are arguments for and against uniform general VAT
system. A uniform and general VAT on all commodities is considered to be efficient and
less distortionary. On the other hand, from the distributional perspective many goods
especially food are exempted from VAT net as low income people spend a high share of
income on food. This paper analyzes income distribution and welfare impact of VAT
reform for Bangladesh with taking the special consideration into local and super market
food sectors.
Being a developing country with low tax-GDP ratio, reforming the existing tax
structure is essential for Bangladesh. The challenge is how to redesign the VAT system
without deteriorating the income distribution. We applied the CGE model by Bohlin
(2010) to analyze effects from VAT reforms where all the simulations were made to keep
the revenue unchanged.
Comparing the equivalent variations we see that a uniform and general VAT on
all the goods and services is welfare improving. However, it is more about an
implementation issue. For a low income country with a large informal sector, VAT
avoidance is existent. For the equity concern food and agricultural commodities are
exempted from VAT in Bangladesh. Moreover, there is a threshold for VAT compliance.
Therefore, VAT broadening by exempting the 17 agriculture and local market food
sector are justified in the presence of an informal economy with tax avoidance. The
imposed VAT rate is much lower than the present official VAT rate. (Jrgen Levin and
Yeasmin Sayeed, 2014)
Value added tax (VAT) is a key part of the fiscal revenue of many countries. Yet
this broad-based tax on consumer spending exempts financial services. This seems
puzzling to many, particularly given the significance of that sector and the size of its
value-added in today's world economy. The fact that the European Commission is
currently reviewing the tax treatment of financial activities in the European Union (EU)
underscores
the
importance
of
addressing
the
issue.
Conventional wisdom holds that taxing financial services under a transactionbased VAT system entails difficulties that render it impossible to tax the services. The
thesis investigates where the difficulties lie. The research is undertaken using
benchmarks, namely the character of European VAT as an indirect tax on consumption
expenditure and the specific features of financial activities, namely that they turn around
money and the functions of money. The various key VAT concepts (e.g., taxable person,
activities, namely that they turn around money and the functions of money.) The various
key VAT concepts (e.g., taxable person, taxable transactions, and taxable amount) are
researched in order to establish whether the inclusion of financial activities in the
European VAT system entail specific difficulties both from a practical, legal point of view
and from a theoretical point of view (in the light of the benchmarks). The thesis contains
an extensive investigation of the law inter alia as regards the scope of the exemption for
financial services and the scope of the European VAT system. It is found that,
particularly with regard to defining the scope of European VAT, what constitutes a
taxable transaction, the taxable amount and calculating a deductible proportion, clear
practical and theoretical difficulties exists.
Finally, the thesis describes and evaluates alternative treatments to an
exemption of financial services such as using both additive and cash-flow methods. The
current review of financial services is also discussed. It is found that no clear best
practice can be established. However, based on both theoretical and practical
considerations, a preferred treatment is presented (Henkow,2007).
Ethical tax awareness of a taxpayer refers to the satisfaction and pride for
fulfilling tax obligation when it is due. It also refers that tax is likely to a duty of every
citizen therefore paying the tax is a prior expenditure.
It is such a good signal for government that potential taxpayers, in average, have
been aware of tax obligation. The government must accordingly take into account to
keep the awareness become compliance in the future when potential taxpayers become
real taxpayers.
Tax knowledge also affects the taxpayers attitude towards the accuracy of the
tax return (Eriksen and Fallan, 1996; Kirchler et. al., 2008)
No study has been done to investigate which parts of tax knowledge have the
greatest effect on attitude toward taxation. Experiments with different types of courses
could provide new understanding. (Eriksen and Fallan, 1996: 399).
The tax administrators should not only focus on their convenience but must also
consider taxpayers convenience particularly in terms of tax regulations, filings,
assessments, payments, administration and costs of administering the tax system
(Sandford, 1993).
Specific tax education programmes for taxpayers have been implemented in
most countries including the US (including via online education22), Canada and the UK.
Tax education can constitute any informal or formal programme organised by the tax
authority or independent agencies by which to facilitate taxpayers in completing tax
returns correctly and also to cultivate awareness of their responsibilities in respect of the
tax system (Eriksen and Fallan, 1996; IRB Annual Report, 2006; McKerchar, 2007).
In addition to tax education, knowledge about tax laws also plays a major role in
determining taxpayers compliance behaviour (Eriksen and Fallan, 1996). Therefore a
step ahead, for example continuous education programmes and effective monitoring
mechanisms must be taken into account by tax authorities to ascertain that taxpayers
43 have a good and reasonable knowledge and understanding of tax matters. However,
the awareness and attitude of the taxpayer himself is more important since the
effectiveness of tax education depends on the readiness, acceptance and honesty of
taxpayers.
The study provides further evidence that tax knowledge is important and
significantly affects tax compliance (in a positive direction) meaning, developing tax
knowledge further would probably help to increase tax compliance. (Palil,2010)
Local Studies
The conclusion the researchers arrived at, is that the industry will gain more if the
corporate tax is reduced followed by the abortion of the documentary stamp tax.
However, the government may not lower the corporate tax because of the VAT tax.
Thus, making the industry earn more withour lowering the corporate income tax.
(Erestain, 2006)
In a study conducted by undergraduate students of Dela Salle University
focusing on the tax system of Philippines vis a vis India, they said that India is a bit
better off than the Philippines because the bracketing they used in terms of income tax
is clearer and more understandable compared to the bracketing system of the income
tax of the Philippines. The Value added tax of India is based on a multi-point destination
system and is imposed on every stage of the production of the good. However, basic
necessities and goods of local importance have been exempted to the VAT and
precious metals such as gold, silver and precious stones have a tax rate of 1%. The tax
collection of India is more efficient since their tax is straightforward and clearer
compared to the Philippines. The tax system of the Philippines, is not so effective, unlike
in the India because there are so many things to pay, the taxpayer will pay a certain
amount and a percentage in excess of the lower amount. (Camarao et al , 2014)
According to a study conducted in Divisoria, where store owners continue to
comply and implement tax provison. The store managements know very well that when
they do not comply with the tax provision, they will receive penalties and worst is that
the BIR will order the closure of their stores. The study recommends, seminars, forums
and symposiums will help increase the awareness of taxpayers about the tax
provisions. (Barberan, 2015).
According to a study conducted in Cainta, Rizal, value-added tax returns are the
most prominent type of tax returns filed by the management people. VAT is basically a
multiple stage tax. According to which, a person has to pay tax at every stage of
production and distribution. Hence, tax would be charged at every step of value
addition. Since, the tax is charged on commodities purchased for consumption, it is
therefore a consumption tax. From a buyers view point, it is a tax charged on purchase
price while from a sellers perspective; it is levied on value addition made to any
product, service or material at a particular stage in the supply chain. The difference
between the two amounts is paid to the government and the remainder is kept by the
producer to makeup for the changes they have incurred in purchasing inputs
(Fernandez et al, 2014).
Chapter 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter discusses the design and procedures undertaken in conducting the
study. It presented the research method used, respondents of the study, population,
sample size, sampling technique, instrument used, data gathering procedures and
statistical treatment of data.
Research methods used
The researchers made use of the descriptive research method which is designed
to obtain information concerning the current status of the phenomena to describe what
is existing with respect to the variables or conditions in the chosen field of study. This
method allows the researchers to interpret the theoretical meaning of the findings and
hypothesis development for further studies.
used
in
this
research,
data
obtained
and
treated
are
data
on
Name of Business
n=
N
2
1+ N e
0.05
1+(47)( 2)
47
n=
n=42
The sample sizes of 42 food stores were the total of subjects who were willing to
participate in the research during the period of data collection.
According to United States Bureau of the Census (1998), a sampling technique is
the name or other identification of the specific process by which the entities of the
sample have been selected. According to Royal Geographical Society (2010), in reality
there is simply not enough; time, energy, money, labor/man power, equipment, access
to suitable sites to measure every single item or site within the parent population or
whole sampling frame. Therefore an appropriate sampling strategy is adopted to obtain
a representative, and statistically valid sample of the whole.
There are many sampling techniques that can be used. There are 3 main types
of sampling techniques, namely: Random, Random, And Systematic and Stratified
sampling technique. The researcher used Random Sampling as the technique to
achieve the required sample size. The researchers chose this technique because it is
the least biased of all sampling techniques, there is no subjectivity - each member of the
total population has an equal chance of being selected.
Description of Respondents
The respondents of the study are 42 management people from selected stores
registered at Barangay UP Village, Quezon City through the coordination of Barangay
Chairman Lolita DL. Singson. There were 19 owners, 12 managers, 6 supervisors and 5
staff that participated in the survey.
Research Instrument
In this study, survey questionnaires are used as the principal instrument in data
gathering. Some of the questions are adopted from other various theses regarding tax
compliance. The contents of the questionnaire are patterned from the questionnaire
developed in a study entitled Measuring the Level of Compliance with Value-Added Tax
Provisions of Selected Stores in Divisoria by Barberan, Hanah Faye P. et al. By all
means, the researchers designed the questionnaires in a proper form to accommodate
sufficient and relevant information required from the respondents.
The questionnaire is composed of 5 parts, namely: profile of the respondents, the
profile of the respondents, the profile of the respondents company, Profile of Business
Tax Practices, level of awareness and level of effectiveness. Likert scale is used to
modify the answers of the respondents considering five (5) options with the
corresponding scale. For level of awareness, the 5 options are (5) Hightly Aware; (4)
Aware; (3) Undecided; (2) Not aware; 1 Strongly not aware. For level of effectiveness,
the 5 options are (5) Hightly Effective; (4) Effective; (3) Undecided; (2) Not effective; (1)
Strongly not effective. Respondents are requested to check the space provided for each
option.
selected statistical tools. The results of the tabulation were used in the data gathering
improved by the research team in order for the researchers to arrive at the interpretation
of the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data
The data gathered in this study pertaining to the employees and owners of the
selected stalls within the vicinity of the Brgy. Teachers Village are grouped, tabled and
carefully organized to be used in the presentation and interpretation of the results.
1. Frequency and Percentage Distribution
The percentage and frequency distributions are used to classify the respondents
according to personal variables such as age, gender, civil status, highest educational
attainment, position in the company and number of years in position; and their
perspective according to business variables such as form of business, years of
existence. The frequency also presented the actual response of the respondents to a
specific question or item in the questionnaire.
On the other hand, the percentage of that item is composed by dividing it with the
sample total number of respondents who participated in the survey. The formula used in
the application of this technique is:
% = (f/n) x 100
Where:
% = percentage
f = frequency
n = number of cases or total sample
2. Weighted Mean
Another Statistical technique used by the researchers is the weighted mean. It is
used to determine the average responses of the different options provided in the various
parts of the survey questionnaire used. The method is used in conjunction with the
Likert Scale. It is solved by the formula
Where:
x= fx/ n
x= weighted mean
fx= the sum of all the products of f and x
f being the frequency of each weight
and x as the weight of each operation
n= total number of respondents
3. Analysis of Variance
A common statistical technique used to test a hypothesis concerning the means of
several independent samples. The one-way ANOVA or one-way F-test is used whether
F=
MS s
MS w
F= F compute
MSs = mean squares of between groups
MSw = mean squares of the within-group
Chapter 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPETATION OF DATA
This chapter shows and discloses the presentation of organized data into logical,
sequential and meaningful categories and classifications to make them amenable to
study and interpretation. The tabulated data were analyzed in order to answer the
specific questions in the statement of the problem. Analytical tables were also presented
according to the sequence of the specific questions.
Frequency
13
20
6
2
1
42
Percentage (%)
30.95
47.62
14.29
4.76
2.38
100.00
This table shows that out of 42 respondents, 20 or 47.62% are from the range 26-30
years old; 13 or 30.95% are from the range of 20-25 years old; 6 or 14.29% are from the
range of 31-35 years old; 2 or 4.76% are from the range of 36-40 years old; 1 or 2.38%
are from the range of 41 years old and above.
Table 3
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the
Respondents in terms of Sex
Sex
Male
Female
Total
Frequency
18
24
42
Percentage (%)
42.86
57.14
100.00
This table shows that out of 42 respondents, 24 or 57.14% are female and
18 or 42.86% are male.
Table 4
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the
Respondents in terms of Position of the Employee
Position of the Employee
Owner
Manager
Supervisor
Staff
Total
Frequency
19
12
6
5
42
Percentage (%)
45.24
28.57
14.29
11.90
100.00
Table 5
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the
Respondents in terms of Length of Service
Length of Service
1-5 years
6-10 years
Total
Frequency
41
1
42
Percentage (%)
97.62
2.38
100.00
This table shows that out of 42 respondents, 41 or 97.62% serve from the
range of 1-5 years and only 1 or 2.38% serve from the range of 6-10 years
Table 6
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents
in terms of their Highest Educational Attainment
Respondents in terms of their
Highest Educational Attainment
High School Undergraduate
Masters Degree
High School Graduate
Vocational
College Undergraduate
College Graduate
Total
Frequency
Percentage (%)
2
1
1
3
3
32
42
4.76
2.38
2.38
7.14
7.14
76.19
100.00
Table 7
Frequency
Percentage (%)
2
1
1
3
3
32
42
4.76
2.38
2.38
7.14
7.14
76.19
100.00
Frequency
24
16
2
42
Percentage (%)
57.14
38.10
4.76
100.00
This table shows that out of 42 respondents, 24 or 57.14% are sole proprietorship; 16 or
38.10% are partnership; 2 or 4.76% are corporation.
Table 9
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the
Respondents in terms of Years of Operation
Years of Operation
5 years and below
6-10 years
Total
Frequency
40
2
42
Percentage (%)
95.24
4.76
100.00
Table 10
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the
Respondents in terms of Capitalization
Capitalization
Loan
Investment from owners
Partly loan and partly
investment from owners
Others
Total
Frequency
2
32
Percentage (%)
4.76
76.19
14.29
2
42
4.76
100.00
Table 11
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the
Respondents in terms of Number of Employees
Number of Employees
5 employees and below
6-10 employees
10 employees and above
Total
Frequency
12
21
9
42
Percentage (%)
28.57
50.00
21.43
100.00
Table 12
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the
Respondents in terms of Taxes Filed and Paid
Taxes Filed and Paid
VAT
Other Percentage Tax
Total
Frequency
39
3
42
Percentage (%)
92.86
7.14
100.00
Table 13
Distribution of the Stores According to Frequency
of Tax Filing and Paying
Frequency of tax filing
and payment
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Total
Frequency
Percentage (%)
30
7
5
42
71.43
16.67
11.90
100.00
The table indicates that among the 42 stores, 30 or 71.43 % are filing and paying
monthly; 7 or 16.67% are filing and paying quarterly; and the 5 stores or 11.90% are
filing and paying annually. This shows that the majority of the stores chose to file and
pay their taxes monthly.
Table 14
Distribution of the Stores According
to Frequency of Tax Review
Frequency of tax review
Monthly
Quarterly
Semiannually
Annually
Total
Frequency
31
6
1
4
42
Percentage (%)
73.81
14.29
2.38
9.52
100.00
The result shows that among the 42 stores, 31 or 73.81% review their taxes
monthly; 6 or 14.29% of them review their taxes quarterly; 1 store or 2.38% review their
taxes semi-annually; and 4 or 9.52% are annually. This indicates that most of the stores
review their taxes monthly.
Table 15
Distribution of the Stores According to Preparing of Financial Statements
Preparing of financial
statement
Owner
Manager
Accountant
External Accountant
Total
Frequency
Percentage (%)
13
3
19
7
42
30.95
7.14
45.24
16.67
100.00
Table 16
Distribution of the Stores According to Tax Filing
Tax Filing
Owner
Manager
Accountant
External Accountant
Total
Frequency
12
3
25
2
42
Percentage (%)
28.57
7.14
59.52
4.76
100.00
The table indicates that in tax filing among the 42 stores, 12 or 28.57% are being
filed by the owner; 3 or 7.14% are being filed by the Manager; 25 or 59.52% are filed by
an Accountant; 2 or 4.76% are filed by an External Accountant. The result shows that
the taxes of the stores are mostly filed by their internal accountant
Table 17
Distribution of the Stores According to Tax Payment
Tax Payment
Owner
Manager
Accountant
External Accountant
Total
Frequency
14
3
23
2
42
Percentage (%)
33.33
7.14
54.76
4.76
100.00
The table shows that in payment of taxes, out of 42 stores, 14 or 33.33% are
paid by the owner; 3 or 7.14% stores are paid by the Manager; 23 or 54.76% are being
paid by an Accountant; 2 or 4.76% are paid by an External Accountant. This indicates
that taxes are being paid mostly by the Internal Accountants.
Table 18
Distribution of the Stores According to Tax Review
Tax Review
Owner
Manager
Accountant
External Accountant
Total
Frequency
14
2
24
2
42
Percentage (%)
33.33
4.76
57.14
4.76
100.00
The table shows that in reviewing their taxes, among the 42 stores, 14 stores or
33.33% are being reviewed by the owner; 2 or 4.76% are reviewed by the Manager; 24
or 57.14% of them are reviewed by their Accountant; 2 or 4.76% are reviewed by the
External Accountant. This shows that the taxes of the stores are mostly reviewed by
their internal accountant.
Table 19
Distribution of the Stores According to Use of Computer
in Preparing Financial Statement
Use of Computer Preparing of Financial
Statement
Yes
No
Total
Frequency
Percentage (%)
32
10
42
76.19
23.81
100.00
The table shows that among the 42 stores, 32 or 76.19% uses computer in
preparing the financial statement; 10 stores or 23.81% do not use computer in financial
statement preparation. This indicates that majority of the stores uses computer in
financial statement preparation.
Table 20
Distribution of the Stores According to Use of Computer in Tax Filing
Use of Computer - Tax
Filing
Yes
No
Total
Frequency
Percentage (%)
36
6
42
85.71
14.29
100.00
The table indicates that out of the 42 stores, 36 stores or 85.71% use computer
in filing their tax; 6 or 14.29% do not use computer in tax filing. The result shows that
most of the stores use computer in filing their taxes.
Table 21
Distribution of the Stores According to Use of Computer in Tax Payment
Use of Computer - Tax
Payment
Yes
No
Total
Frequency
Percentage (%)
32
10
42
76.19
23.81
100.00
The table shows that among the 42 stores, 32 or 76.19% of them uses computer
in paying their tax; 10 stores or 23.81% do not use computer in tax payment. This
indicates the most stores uses computer in paying their taxes.
Table 22
Distribution of the Stores According to Use of Computer in Tax Review
Use of Computer - Tax
Review
Yes
No
Total
Frequency
Percentage (%)
34
8
42
80.95
19.05
100.00
The table shows that among the 42 stores, 34 or 80.95% uses computer in reviewing
their taxes; 8 stores or 19.05% do not use computer during tax review. This indicates
that majority of the stores uses computer during tax review.
3. Level of awareness
3.1. Registration
3.1.
Table 24
Level of Awareness of the Organization's Management People on Business
Tax Management in the Aspects of Keeping the Accounting Records
Verbal
Weighte Interpretati
Issuance of Sales Invoices and Official Receipts
d Mean on
The business must issue duly registered receipt or invoice for
Highly
every sale of goods or service rendered
4.71 Aware
The businesss invoice must always show the quantity,
description of merchandisor nature of service and the name of
Highly
the customer
4.71 Aware
The businesss invoice and official receipt must always
Highly
prepared in duplicate or more.
4.69 Aware
The business Tax Identification Number, name of owner,
business address, contact number and the business name
must always be indicated in any invoices, statements or
Highly
documents filed by the company
4.69 Aware
Highly
Overall Weighted Mean
4.70 Aware
This indicates that the respondents are highly aware at an average of 4.71 that
the must issue duly registered receipt or invoice for every sale of goods or service
rendered. At an average of 4.71, the respondents are highly aware that the
businesss invoice must always show the quantity, description of merchandisor
nature of service and the name of the customer. The table also indicates that an
average of 4.69 the respondents are highly aware that the businesss invoice and
official receipt must always prepared in duplicate or more. The respondents are
highly aware that the business tax Identification Number, name of owner, business
address, contact number and the business name must always be indicated in any
invoices, statements or documents filed by the company at an average of 4.69. The
overall weighted mean of 4.7 indicates that the respondents are highly aware as to
issuance of sales invoices and official receipts.
3.2.
Table 25
Level of Awareness of the Organization's Management People on Business
Tax Management in the Aspects of Issuing Receipts and Sales Invoices
Verbal
Weighte Interpretati
d Mean on
Highly
4.71 Aware
Highly
4.71 Aware
Highly
4.69 Aware
Highly
4.69 Aware
4.70 Highly
Aware
This indicates that the respondents are highly aware at an average of 4.71 that
the must issue duly registered receipt or invoice for every sale of goods or service
rendered. At an average of 4.71, the respondents are highly aware that the
businesss invoice must always show the quantity, description of merchandisor
nature of service and the name of the customer. The table also indicates that an
average of 4.69 the respondents are highly aware that the businesss invoice and
official receipt must always prepared in duplicate or more. The respondents are
highly aware that the business tax Identification Number, name of owner, business
address, contact number and the business name must always be indicated in any
invoices, statements or documents filed by the company at an average of 4.69. The
overall weighted mean of 4.7 indicates that the respondents are highly aware as to
issuance of sales invoices and official receipts.
3.3.
Table 26
Level of Awareness of the Organization's Management People on Business
Tax Management in the Aspects of Filing Tax Return
Weighted
Mean
4.67
4.71
4.71
4.69
4.76
4.71
Verbal
Interpretatio
n
Highly
Aware
Highly
Aware
Highly
Aware
Highly
Aware
Highly
Aware
Highly
Aware
This indicates that the respondents are highly aware at an average of 4.67 that
the business must file all the applicable tax returns. At an average of 4.71, the
respondents are highly aware that the business must observe the implemented due
date of filing by the BIR. The table also indicates that at an average of 4.69, the
respondents are highly aware that the business must observe the proper place of filing
the applicable tax returns. The respondents are highly aware that the business must file
a monthly and quarterly declaration of the tax return at an average of 4.76. An average
of 4.71 of the respondents are highly aware that the returns must be filed with to the
authorized collecting agent. The overall weighted mean of 4.71 indicates that the
respondents are highly aware as to filing of tax returns.
3.4.
Table 27
Level of Awareness of the Organization's Management People on Business
Tax Management in the Aspects of Paying the Tax
Payment of Taxes
The business must always pay its tax liability upon the date
of filing of the tax return
The amount of the tax liability explicitly written in the tax
return must rarely in disagreement with the assessed
amount of the BIR Commissioner
The business as a taxpayer must be keen to changes in BIR
regulations
It must be the companys accountant who calculates and
disseminates tax information regarding the companys tax
liability
The business must pay monthly and quarterly tax return
Overall Weighted Mean
Verbal
Weighte Interpretatio
d Mean
n
Highly
4.71 Aware
Highly
4.76 Aware
Highly
4.71 Aware
Highly
4.64 Aware
Highly
4.69 Aware
Highly
4.70 Aware
This indicates that the respondents are highly aware at an average of 4.71 that the
business must always pay its tax liability upon the date of filing of the tax return. At an
average of 4.76, the respondents are highly aware that the amount of the tax liability
explicitly written in the tax return must rarely in disagreement with the assessed amount
of the BIR Commissioner. The table also indicates that at an average of 4.71, the
respondents are highly aware that the business as a taxpayer must be keen to changes
in BIR regulations. The respondents are highly aware that it must be the companys
accountant who calculates and disseminates tax information regarding the companys
tax liability at an average of 4.64. An average of 4.69 of the respondents are highly
aware that the business must pay monthly and quarterly tax return. The overall
weighted mean of 4.7 indicates that the respondents are highly aware as to payment of
taxes.
3.5.
Table 28
Level of Awareness of the Organization's Management People
on Business Tax Management in the Aspects of Civil Penalties and Surcharges
Verbal
Weighte Interpretatio
Civil Penalties and Surcharges
d Mean n
The business must not neglect the filing of the tax return and
Highly
payment of the tax due to avoid surcharges
4.64 Aware
The business must never been involved in filing a fraudulent
Highly
tax return
4.67 Aware
The business must pay the penalties and surcharges
demanded by the BIR in case of failure to file and pay the
Highly
correct amount of the tax duly
4.64 Aware
Highly
Overall Weighted Mean
4.65 Aware
This indicates that the respondents are highly aware at an average of 4.64 that
the business must not neglect the filing of the tax return and payment of the tax due to
avoid surcharges.
business must never been involved in filing a fraudulent tax return. The table also
indicates that at an average of 4.64, the respondents are highly aware that the business
must pay the penalties and surcharges demanded by the BIR in case of failure to file
and pay the correct amount of the tax duly. The overall weighted mean of 4.65 indicates
that the respondents are highly aware as to civil penalties and surcharges.
4.3.
4.4.
4.5.
Table 33
Level of Effectiveness of the Organization's Management People on Business
Tax Management in the Aspects of Paying Tax
4.6.
Table 34
Level of Effectiveness of the Organization's Management People on Business
Tax Management in the Aspects of Civil Pelanties and Surcharges
5. Significant Differences between the level of Awareness and Respondents Profile
5.1.1. Age
Table 35
Significant Difference between the Level of Awareness and Profiles
When Grouped According to Age
This portrays the significant difference between the awareness and profiles when
grouped according to age. In terms of registration the computed p-test value of .138
higher than the level significance of .05. Thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, as
to keeping of accounting records and books, p-test value of .461 doesnt attain the
required value of significance. Therefore, the hypothesis is accepted. Issuance of sales
invoice and official receipts has the P-test value of .102 and doesnt meet the required
value of significance resulting to an accepted hypothesis. Filing of tax returns has the Ptest value of .391 thus the hypothesis is accepted. Likewise, in terms of payment of
taxes and civil penalties and surcharges have the P-test value of .227 and .086,
respectively. Thus, both variables dont attain the required value of significance and the
hypothesis is accepted.
5.1.2. Sex
Table 36
Significant Difference between the Level of Awareness and Profiles
When Grouped According to Sex
Indicator
Registration
Keeping of
Accounting Record
or Books
Issuance of Sales
Invoices and Official
Receipts
Filing of Tax Returns
Payment of Taxes
Civil Penalties and
Surcharges
Overall
Sex
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Mea
n
4.85
4.72
Fvalue
pvalue
Decision
Remarks
0.631
0.532
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
-0.204
0.839
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.796
0.431
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.264
0.793
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.805
0.425
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.508
0.614
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.527
0.601
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
4.54
4.58
4.81
4.63
4.74
4.68
4.81
4.63
4.72
4.60
4.75
respectively, which is higher than the level of significance thus the hypothesis is
accepted. Overall, there is no significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to their sex and the
decision is to accept the hypothesis.
This shows the significant difference between the level of awareness and profiles
when grouped according to position on the business. In terms of registration, keeping of
accounting records and book, issuance of sales invoices and official receipts, fillng of
tax returns, payment of taxes, and civil penalties and surcharges, the computed P-test
values are 0.000, 0.001, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, and 0.000 respectively which lower than
the level significance of .05 Hence, all variables under perception of the store owner to
its staff on their level of compliance with Business Tax provisions attain the required
value of significance. The hypothesis on all variables is rejected.
3. Indicator
Registration
Keeping of
Accounting Record or
Books
Issuance of Sales
Invoices and Official
Receipts
Filing of Tax Returns
Payment of Taxes
Civil Penalties and
Surcharges
Overall
Length of
Service
1-5 years
6-10 years
1-5 years
Mea
n
4.85
4.72
4.54
6-10 years
4.58
1-5 years
4.81
6-10 years
4.63
1-5 years
6-10 years
1-5 years
6-10 years
1-5 years
6-10 years
1-5 years
6-10 years
4.74
4.68
4.81
4.63
4.72
4.60
4.75
4.64
Fvalue
pvalue
Decision
0.631
0.532
-0.204
0.839
0.796
0.431
0.264
0.793
0.805
0.425
0.508
0.614
0.527
0.601
Remarks
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to their length of
service. In terms of registration the computed p-value is higher than the level
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of accounting
record or books the computed p-value is higher than the level of significance of .05 thus,
the hypothesis is accepted. . Issuance of sales invoices and Official Receipts, Filing of
Tax Returns, Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value of 0.431,
0.793, 0.425, and 0.614 respectively, which is higher than the level of significance thus
the hypothesis is accepted. Overall, there is no significant difference in the respondents
perception of the organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to
length of service and the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
This shows the significant difference between the Level of Awareness and
profiles when grouped according to highest educational attainment. In terms of
registration, the computed F- test of 0.777 does not attain the required value of
significance. Hence, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, as to keeping of accounting
records and books, P-test value is 0.820 and it doesnt attain the required value of
significance. Therefore, the hypothesis is accepted. Furthermore, in terms as to
issuance of sales invoice and official receipts, the P-test value of 0.749 and doesnt
meet the required value of significance resulting to an accepted hypothesis. A filing of
tax returns has the P-test value of 0.027 and meets the required value of significance.
Thus, the hypothesis is rejected. Likewise, in terms of payment of taxes, the P-test
value is 0.494, thus, variable attained the required value of significance and the
hypothesis is rejected. And in terms of civil penalties and surcharges has the P-test
value of 0.424, respectively. Thus, all variable except filing of tax return doesn`t attained
the required value of significance and the hypothesis is accepted.
Payment of
Taxes
Civil
Penalties
and
Surcharges
Overall
Forms of
business
Sole
Proprietorhip
Partnership
Corporation
Sole
Proprietorhip
Partnership
Corporation
Sole
Proprietorhip
Partnership
Corporation
Sole
Proprietorhip
Partnership
Corporation
Sole
Proprietorhip
Partnership
Corporation
Sole
Proprietorhip
Partnership
Corporation
Sole
Proprietorhip
Partnership
Corporation
Mean
Fvalue
pvalue
Decision
Remarks
2.137
0.132
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.413
0.665
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
4.798
0.014
Reject
Ho
Significant
1.800
0.179
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
2.873
0.069
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
2.847
0.070
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
2.078
0.139
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
4.95
4.55
4.50
4.63
4.45
4.75
4.86
4.63
3.38
4.89
4.46
4.50
4.87
4.59
3.70
4.79
4.58
3.50
4.83
4.54
4.05
This shows the significant difference between the Level of Awareness and
profiles when grouped according to form of business. In terms of registration, the
computed F- test of 0.132 does not attain the required value of significance. Hence, the
hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, as to keeping of accounting records and books, Ptest value is 0.665 and it doesnt attain the required value of significance. Therefore, the
hypothesis is accepted. Furthermore, in terms as to issuance of sales invoice and
official receipts, the P-test value of 0.014 and does meet the required value of
significance resulting to rejected hypothesis. A filing of tax returns has the P-test value
of 0.179 and doesnt meet the required value of significance. Thus, the hypothesis is
accepted. Likewise, in terms of payment of taxes, the P-test value is 0.069, thus,
variable doesnt attain the required value of significance and the hypothesis is accepted.
And in terms of civil penalties and surcharges has the P-test value of 0.070,
respectively. Thus, all variable except issuance of sales invoice and official receipts
doesn`t attained the required value of significance and the hypothesis is accepted.
Years of
Operation
5 years
and below
6-10 years
5 years
and below
Mea
n
6-10 years
4.13
5 years
and below
4.71
6-10 years
4.50
5 years
and below
6-10 years
5 years
and below
6-10 years
5 years
and below
6-10 years
5 years
and below
6-10 years
4.79
Fvalue
pvalue
Decision
Remarks
0.889
0.379
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.987
0.330
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.401
0.691
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
2.797
0.008
Reject Ho
Significant
0.991
0.328
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.583
0.563
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
1.199
0.238
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
4.38
4.59
4.78
3.40
4.73
4.20
4.67
4.33
4.71
4.16
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to their years of
operation. In terms of registration the computed 0.379 p-value is higher than the level
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of accounting
record or books the computed 0.330 p-value is higher than the level of significance of .
05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Issuance of sales invoices and Official Receipts,
Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value of 0.691, 0.328, and
0.563, respectively, which is higher than the level of significance thus the hypothesis is
accepted. However, in Filling of Tax Return the computed .008 p value is lower than
the level significance thus the hypothesis is rejected. Overall, there is no significant
difference in the respondents perception of the organizations level of awareness when
they are grouped according to their sex and the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
5.1.8. Capitalization
Table 42
Significant Difference between the Level of Awareness and Profiles
When Grouped According to Capitalization
Number of Employee
Table 43
Significant Difference between the Level of Awareness and Profiles When
Grouped According to Number of Employees
Table 44
Significant Difference between the Level of Awareness and Profiles When
Grouped According to Tax Filed and Paid
Indicator
Registration
Keeping of
Accounting
Record or
Books
Issuance of
Sales Invoices
and Official
Receipts
Filing of Tax
Frequency of
tax filing and
payment
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Monthly
Quarterly
Mea
n
4.73
4.96
4.80
4.53
4.75
Annually
4.55
Monthly
Quarterly
4.64
4.89
Annually
4.80
Monthly
4.68
F-value
pvalue
Decision
0.380
0.687
0.334
0.718
0.381
0.686
0.163
0.850
Remarks
Quarterly
4.86
Annually
4.68
Monthly
4.66
Payment of
Quarterly
4.91
0.329
0.722 Accept Ho Not Significant
Taxes
Annually
4.68
Monthly
4.62
Civil Penalties
and
Quarterly
4.95
0.789
0.462 Accept Ho Not Significant
Surcharges
Annually
4.40
Monthly
4.64
Overall
Quarterly
4.89
0.411
0.666 Accept Ho Not Significant
Annually
4.65
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
Returns
organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to their frequency of
tax filing and payment. In terms of registration the computed 0.687 p-value is higher
than the level significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of
accounting record or books the computed 0.718 p-value is higher than the level of
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Issuance of sales invoices and
Official Receipts, Filing of Tax Returns, Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and
Surcharges got a p-value of 0.686, 0.850, 0.722, and 0.462 respectively, which is higher
than the level of significance thus the hypothesis is accepted. Overall, there is no
significant difference in the respondents perception of the organizations level of
awareness when they are grouped according to their frequency of tax filing and
payment, and the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
5.2.2
Table 45
Significant Difference between the Level of Awareness and Profiles When
Grouped According to Frequency of Tax Filing
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to their preparation
of financial statements. In terms of registration the computed 0.723 p-value is higher
than the level significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of
accounting record or books the computed 0.702 p-value is higher than the level of
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. On the other hand, Issuance of
sales invoices and Official Receipts and Filing of Tax Returns got a p-value of 0.014 and
0.225 respectively, which is lower than the level of significance of .05 thus, the
hypothesis is rejected. Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value
of 0.114 and 0.082 respectively, which is higher than the level of significance thus the
hypothesis is accepted. Overall, there is no significant difference in the respondents
perception of the organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to
their preparation of financial statements, and the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to their frequency of
tax review. In terms of registration the computed 0.875 p-value is higher than the level
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of accounting
record or books the computed 0.704 p-value is higher than the level of significance of .
05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Issuance of sales invoices and Official Receipts,
Filing of Tax Returns, Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value of
0.836, 0.937, 0.876, and 0.566 respectively, which is higher than the level of
Returns, Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value of 0.230,
0.070, 0.225, and 0.136, respectively, which is higher than the level of significance of
0.05 thus the hypothesis is accepted. Overall, there is no significant difference in the
respondents perception of the organizations level of effectiveness when they are
grouped according to their sex and the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
6.1.2. Sex
Table 51
Significant Difference between the Level of Effectiveness and Profiles
When Grouped According to Sex
Indicator
Registration
Keeping of
Accounting Record
or Books
Issuance of Sales
Invoices and Official
Receipts
Filing of Tax Returns
Payment of Taxes
Civil Penalties and
Surcharges
Overall
Sex
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Male
Femal
e
Mea
n
4.93
4.71
Fvalue
pvalue
Decision
Remarks
1.545
0.134
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
2.015
0.052
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.424
0.674
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.841
0.405
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.515
0.609
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.267
0.791
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.940
0.353
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
4.85
4.42
4.78
4.70
4.80
4.60
4.72
4.59
4.72
4.67
4.80
4.61
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of effectiveness when they are grouped according to their sex. In
terms of registration the computed 0.134 p-value is higher than the level significance of .
05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of accounting record or books
the computed 0.052 p-value is higher than the level of significance of .05 thus, the
hypothesis is accepted. . Issuance of sales invoices and Official Receipts, Filing of Tax
Returns, Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value of 0.674,
0.405, 0.609, and 0.791, respectively, which is higher than the level of significance of
0.05 thus the hypothesis is accepted. Overall, there is no significant difference in the
respondents perception of the organizations level of effectiveness when they are
grouped according to their sex and the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
6.1.3. Position in the store
Table 52
Significant Difference between the Level of Effectiveness and Profiles
When Grouped According to Position on the Business
This depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of effectiveness when they are grouped according to their position
on the business. In terms of registration the computed 0.000 p-value is lower than the
level significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is rejected. Moreover, keeping of
accounting record or books the computed 0.000 p-value is lower than the level of
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is also rejected. Issuance of sales invoices and
Official Receipts, Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value of
0.000, 0.000, and 0.00, respectively, which is lesser than the level of significance thus
the hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, overall, there is significant difference in the
respondents perception of the organizations level of effectiveness when they are
grouped according to their position on the business and the decision is to reject the
hypothesis
Surcharges for it has a p-value of 0.525 which is above the level of significance value.
Overall, there is no significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of effectiveness when they are grouped according to their sex and
the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
Years of
Operation
5 years
and below
6-10 years
5 years
and below
Mea
n
6-10 years
4.13
5 years
and below
4.71
6-10 years
4.50
5 years
and below
6-10 years
5 years
and below
6-10 years
5 years
and below
6-10 years
5 years
and below
6-10 years
4.79
Fvalue
pvalue
Decision
Remarks
0.889
0.379
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.987
0.330
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.401
0.691
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
2.797
0.008
Reject Ho
Significant
0.991
0.328
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.583
0.563
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
1.199
0.238
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
4.38
4.59
4.78
3.40
4.73
4.20
4.67
4.33
4.71
4.16
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to their years of
operation. In terms of registration the computed 0.379 p-value is higher than the level
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of accounting
record or books the computed 0.330 p-value is higher than the level of significance of .
05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Issuance of sales invoices and Official Receipts,
Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value of 0.691, 0.328, and
0.563, respectively, which is higher than the level of significance thus the hypothesis is
accepted. However, in Filling of Tax Return the computed .008 p value is lower than
the level significance thus the hypothesis is rejected. Overall, there is no significant
difference in the respondents perception of the organizations level of awareness when
they are grouped according to their sex and the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
6.1.8. Capitalization
Table 57
Significant Difference between the Level of Effectiveness and Profiles
When Grouped According to Capitalization
accepted. Issuance of sales invoice and official receipts has the P-test value of .238 and
doesnt meet the required value of significance resulting to an accepted hypothesis.
Filing of tax returns has the P-test value of .526 thus the hypothesis is accepted.
Likewise, in terms of payment of taxes and civil penalties and surcharges have the Ptest value of .155 and .306, respectively. Thus, both variables dont attain the required
value of significance and the hypothesis is accepted.
6.1.9.
Number of Employee
Table 58
Significant Difference between the Level of Effectiveness and Profiles When
Grouped According to Number of Employees
record or books the computed 0.065p-value is higher than the level of significance of .
05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. . Issuance of sales invoices and Official Receipts,
Filing of Tax Returns, Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value of
0.354, 0.266, 0.320, and 0.130, respectively, which is higher than the level of
significance of 0.05 thus the hypothesis is accepted. Overall, there is no significant
difference in the respondents perception of the organizations level of effectiveness
when they are grouped according to their sex and the decision is to accept the
hypothesis.
6.1.10.
Table 59
Significant Difference between the Level of Effectivess and Profiles When
Grouped According to Tax Filed and Paid
Indicator
Registration
Keeping of
Accounting
Record or
Books
Issuance of
Sales Invoices
and Official
Receipts
Filing of Tax
Returns
Payment of
Taxes
Frequency
of tax filing
and
payment
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Monthly
Quarterly
Mea
n
4.82
4.86
4.65
4.63
4.64
Annually
4.35
Monthly
Quarterly
4.72
4.89
Annually
4.60
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
4.67
4.94
4.40
4.63
4.86
4.44
Fvalue
pvalue
Decision
Remarks
0.247
0.782
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.291
0.749
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.373
0.691
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.748
0.480
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.395
0.676
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
Civil Penalties
and
Surcharges
Overall
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
4.70
4.86
4.40
4.70
4.84
4.47
0.700
0.503
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
0.478
0.623
Accept
Ho
Not
Significant
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of effectiveness when they are grouped according to their frequency
of tax filing and payment. In terms of registration the computed 0.782 p-value is higher
than the level significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of
accounting record or books the computed 0.749 p-value is higher than the level of
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Issuance of sales invoices and
Official Receipts, Filing of Tax Returns, Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and
Surcharges got a p-value of 0.691, 0.480, 0.676, and 0.503 respectively, which is higher
than the level of significance thus the hypothesis is accepted. Overall, there is no
significant difference in the respondents perception of the organizations level of
effectiveness when they are grouped according to their frequency of tax filing and
payment, and the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to their preparation
of financial statements. In terms of registration the computed 0.723 p-value is higher
than the level significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of
accounting record or books the computed 0.702 p-value is higher than the level of
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. On the other hand, Issuance of
sales invoices and Official Receipts and Filing of Tax Returns got a p-value of 0.014 and
0.225 respectively, which is lower than the level of significance of .05 thus, the
hypothesis is rejected. Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and Surcharges got a p-value
of 0.114 and 0.082 respectively, which is higher than the level of significance thus the
hypothesis is accepted. Overall, there is no significant difference in the respondents
perception of the organizations level of awareness when they are grouped according to
their preparation of financial statements, and the decision is to accept the hypothesis.
This table depicts the significant difference in the respondents perception of the
organizations level of effectiveness when they are grouped according to their frequency
of tax review. In terms of registration the computed 0.806 p-value is higher than the
level significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Moreover, keeping of
accounting record or books the computed 0.551 p-value is higher than the level of
significance of .05 thus, the hypothesis is accepted. Issuance of sales invoices and
Official Receipts, Filing of Tax Returns, Payment of Taxes, Civil Penalties and
Surcharges got a p-value of 0.779, 0.563, 0.724, and 0.526 respectively, which is higher
than the level of significance thus the hypothesis is accepted. Overall, there is no
significant difference in the respondents perception of the organizations level of
effectiveness when they are grouped according to their frequency of tax review, and the
decision is to accept the hypothesis.