wzo16 Hindsstan Times e-Paper - HC rejects publishers’ copyright claim over polocopied book sale - 17 Sep 2016- Page #0 SGELEF H( rejects publishers’ copyright claim over = Subata Rey ‘SC EXTENDS ‘SUBRATA PAROLE TILL SEPT 23 EW OE The Supreme Curt nie tended the para of Sarah Strata Ry September 2, arte oi in ay on uitrion seus ars tr psd a. ‘repute cote tt ‘rable hinarange mre to reine ier The Sontoenena the rele ns ‘atanbyabenhhanedby (het Astke Ts Thakvs PTL Gauvery row: Stalin, animochtdotainod ‘NIK DK eters Wt: Tat ninar vere aang velar et on eye stag potest n Sparco hac in Tami taa overhear ‘oath dur t-5andh (ey omers an aes feokedamoed pense PO Youth succumbs tones, talin Kashir unrest at 85 SRINAGAR yout nied) lsh st week sxccumbed Soy, ton the tl to $5 inducing te poeemen, btppaperhindustasimes.comlopaperMiower. aspx photocopied book HY coreepordnt Newbee Me Dott high evurt Asmssea om Pda ss by national publishers Against the sale of phatocop. fod books and pages In Delhi Unnorsts landmark orlet okay to havea wide reaching Impact on copyright laws i Inia. “Justi Ray Sab Bn ‘ao lied a tan on the photo ‘ple ok tomssuingtopies ft eaptes rom textbooks of {he hee interop ss tostudonts in Navember 2012, the cour had banned the leone amestae Photcopy Service Jeeta pat tieDel Shot Homomis sore campus on pion mowed by publishers Including University Press Cambridge University Press fn Taylor & Francs, "the international publish sng plants atl alleged that the Kook was violating thelr ‘pyri and “atthe nstanco ff Beth Unversity” was aus {ng huge financial losses as students stopped buying lr textbooks. Buh Unters suport te photocopiers saving these of repeated cpyrghe os ale ‘THECOURT SAID PHOTOCOPYING ONLY THE RELEVANT PAGES HAVE. RELIEVED THE STUDENTS FROM SPENDING DAYS a es ty tude vas nessa ‘ital need srs notte ‘rota inn igcront Scent sora doo, Ingmostef the books were te expense "The university argued that calling repretuetion ot cops Fighted books for euationl purpose as Inringerent was Brzong” Under the copyright ek 67, dew are execs ‘on "ale use” of Work inelus Ing edteational propose trom fhe purview of inIngemen, ‘tha sid, Tearwuod the photocopy of copyrighted books at the un ‘sly campus were done by Stes for preparation of dit ‘nurse and vas not mest Tot ‘commer expotation, Intellectual property experts halle tho vere, sing he court ha onrety phot the ‘supremacy of sell goed over pirate property ”