You are on page 1of 28

Big Brothers Big Sisters

Managing Employee Performance


Managers Guide

Performance Management Cycle

Conduct
Development
Planning
Organizational
Direction:
Strategy
Operational
Planning
Culture

Set
Departmental
Goals
Description
Set Objectives &
Competencies

Review Job
Description,
Set Objectives
&
Competencies

Recognize &
Reward
Performance
Assess
Organizational
Needs
Development
Planning

Monitor
Performance
Provide Feedback &
Consequences
Coach

Assess &
Review
Performance

Monitor
Performance
Provide
Feedback &
Consequences
Coach
Encourage Progress:
Assess & Review
Performance

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

Performance Communication Principles


If you ask people what they want most from their jobs, more than likely theyll tell you
they want to feel good about themselves and their work and to know their jobs are
important. They want to be involved in their jobs and they want to be treated with
respect.
In every aspect of managing employee performance there are four principles to keep in
mind. In your communications with employees, you should aim to:

Maintain or enhance their self-esteem

Listen and respond with empathy

Ask for their help and encourage involvement

Share your thoughts, feelings and rationale

When these principles are used effectively they communicate that you are committed to
building confidence, instilling trust and providing whatever it takes for people to do their
jobs as competently as possible. Heres how these principles play out in the performance
cycle:

When you are establishing expectations (objectives, performance standards and


competencies):
o Encourage cooperation and commitment to actions
o Establish a climate of openness and trust
o Provide support for achieving objectives and demonstrating competencies
o Emphasize the need for individual contributions in achieving BBBS goals

When you help people perform successfully by providing feedback, coaching


and tracking progress:
o Help people stay on target toward achieving their performance plan
o Ensure continued commitment to objectives and competencies
o Increase involvement and self-management
o Promote continuous development and improvement

When you review performance:


o Promote dialogue and mutual decision making
o Increase involvement as people review their own performance
o Encourage development as people look for ways to improve performance

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

Developing Performance Objectives


What is an Objective?
An objective is a statement of what you aim to achieve the outcomes. The benefit of
setting objectives is so that everyone is in alignment with what needs to get accomplished
so your efforts are expended on what is really important. Furthermore, by clarifying with
your employee upfront what effective performance looks like, there is more of a chance
the two of you will be aligned when their performance is reviewed at the end of the year.

How Many Objectives Should I Have?


Typically, employees should have 3 to 6 major outcomes or objectives they are targeting
to achieve during the year.

What is the Process for Setting Objectives?


After reviewing the agencys goals, the Department Manager sets the departments goals
and then each employee in the department drafts a set of objectives for their job to
discuss with their manager. Then, the employee and manager will determine what their
objectives should be for the year.

Can Objectives Change During the Year?


During the year, you and your employee may determine that some or all of their
objectives should be modified. You may eliminate objectives or add objectives. Also, as
business circumstances change and/or as your employee begins implementing the
objective, they may discover that what constitutes success for that objective changes.
For example, a new opportunity may arise that becomes a greater priority to the agency.
Or, perhaps, it is discovered that the agency isnt ready to implement a particular
project your employee was assigned to work on and the project changes or deadlines
change. Often, as an employee starts working on a project, they make discoveries that
may indicate they need to modify what constitutes success. This is why discussing
objectives with an employee is not a one-time event its a conversation that should
occur throughout the year.

How Do You Write an Effective Objective?


In reviewing an employees draft objectives, ask yourself:

Is it written as an outcome? Does it describe what they are looking to achieve?


Or is it simply a task or job responsibility? For example:

Write grant proposals is a job responsibility or a task. An objective would


be: By December 2009, grants written bring in 30% of the agencys targeted
revenue.

Make match support contacts is a job responsibility or a task. An objective


would be, All matches should be contacted once a month. Or Average

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

match length of matches in caseload should be 12 months for school-based


and 24 months for community based by the end of year.

Does it reflect how success would truly be measured? When you consider your
Departments objectives and our values as an agency, what kinds of criteria would
reflect success for the objective? For example, success might be reflected in
terms of:

Quantity. How many of something the employee does? For example, the
number of partnerships or prospects or the % improvement in retention rate

Impact on Customers. For example, satisfaction scores of Bigs or partners

Decrease in Errors

Increase in Revenue, Decrease Costs, within Budget, Money Saved

Improvement in System or Process Performance. For example, turnaround


time or response time

Description of a job well done. Sometimes it is very difficult to measure the


accomplishment of a goal. In that case, they might be able to describe what
an effective job looks like. This way, you and your employee will be on the
same wavelength.

Is it SMART? Effectively written objectives satisfy 5 criteria whose first letters


spell the acronym SMART.

Specific: Objectives must be clear and unambiguous. They should be written


in terms of major outcomes, clear and concise, able to be clearly observed.

Measurable: Objectives should be quantifiable where possible and should


answer the questions: What is the desired outcome? How will the employee
measure the results? How will the employee demonstrate that they are
complete?

Achievable: Objectives should be realistic and attainable by average


employees. They should neither be out of reach nor below standard. Each
one should be realistic given the available resources, other responsibilities,
etc. and within the employees sphere of influence.

Relevant to the agency vision, mission and strategic business plan. Each
objective should be consistent with the agency vision and business plan and
most should align directly with a stated agency objective or departmental goal.

Time bound: Objectives should include a deadline by which they must be


completed.

How are Objectives Rated?


Mid-year and again at the end of the year, you and your employee will formally talk
about and document the employees progress on achieving their objectives. You will rate
/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

your employee on the accomplishment of each objective at the end of the year as well as
their overall performance. The employee is not asked to do a self-rating, as its usually
the experience that when both employees and managers rate employees, the performance
review discuss focuses on debating ratings versus talking about performance. Nationals
rating categories are:

Does not meet minimum standards

Accelerated progress needed

Solid performance

Pace setting performance

Led to breakthroughs

Your agency will establish your own rating system. The above is just one possibility.

What is the Rating Based On?


How you rate an employee on an objective may depend on a number of factors,
including:

To what degree they accomplished the objective

How difficult the objective was to accomplish

To what degree there were obstacles preventing full accomplishment

To what degree did they wisely use resources when accomplishing the objective

How much supervision they needed in accomplishing the objective

How they went about accomplishing the objective and what impact did this have
on other people and other projects

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

Competencies
Why Are Competencies Important?
Have you ever known someone who gets results, but in the process alienates people and
takes shortcuts that negatively impact other departments? Thats an example of someone
who may achieve their objectives, but doesnt demonstrate effective behavior or
competencies. If you only measure someone on their objectives, they may get their
results, but at the expense of someone else or at the expense of long-term results. The
other reason competencies are important is that, if you demonstrate the competencies
important to your job, you will be more likely to achieve your objectives. When a
manager gives feedback to an employee, he or she gives feedback on the how of
performance on how well they demonstrated a competency or competencies. When a
manager coaches an employee, he or she coaches them on how they can better use their
competencies.

What is a Competency?
There are two parts to a performance. Objectives/deliverables are what you achieve and
competencies are how you achieve your objectives/deliverables.
There are many definitions of the term competency. The simplest way to think about
competencies is that they are categories of skills and behaviors that distinguish superior
performance.
Basically, there are three categories of competencies: job specific, leadership and general:

Job-Specific competencies apply to the skills needed to perform a specific job


well. For example, a grant writer needs the technical or job-specific competencies
to write persuasively to obtain funding. An IT professional needs the technical or
job-specific competencies to troubleshoot software or hardware problems users
have.

Leadership competencies refer to specific organizational skills and behaviors like


managing change, managing people and strategic thinking.

General competencies refer to skills and behaviors such as interpersonal skills,


attention to detail and planning and organizing.

What Does a Competency Look Like?


Each competency is defined by a set of behaviors that specifies what youd see someone
doing that demonstrates high performance on the competency. For example, here is a
competency that a manager might have:

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

Planning & Organizing: Able to help others prioritize their work and
manage their time effectively; hold others accountable for creating
adequately detailed project plans; coach others to follow up and monitor
projects and help them see the benefits of doing so; plan ahead to make sure
critical resources are lined up; set and stick to an agenda in meetings to avoid
wasted time.

How Do You Incorporate Competencies into a Performance


Management System?
Competencies have been defined for VPPs and four other program roles that are used in
selecting high performing employees in those roles. Competencies can also be
incorporated in performance management systems. That is, in addition to being expected
to achieve objectives or goals during the year, employees are also expected to
demonstrate specific behaviors. If your agency decides to hold people accountable for
specific competencies, the first year performance on competencies may not figure in the
overall performance rating. Rather, to start with, they are used for development. This
means that the competency and associated behaviors are listed on the appraisal form,
during the year the employee gets feedback on them and at the end of the year the
manager and employee write a summary of how the employee has performed in those
competencies. There is no rating. For example:
Competency

Self Assessment

Planning and Organizing.


Able to help others prioritize
their work and manage their
time effectively; hold others
accountable for creating
adequately detailed project
plans; coach others to follow up
and monitor projects and help
them see the benefits of doing
so; plan ahead to make sure
critical resources are lined up;
set and stick to an agenda in
meetings to avoid wasted time.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

Manager Assessment
This is a strength of Elmos that
hes not only been able to share
within the team, but within the
agency. He created a project
management template and used
project management software that
has proven successful for other
projects. All of his projects have
been on time, risks and issues
have been identified and managed
proactively. He is also mentoring
someone to take over his role at
managing the ABC project so he
can move on to other challenges.
That person has been stepping up
beautifully in part because of the
project management system and
excellent file keeping that Elmo
has put in place.

Notice in the example that the manager talks about the impact this competency had on
achieving objectives. He basically summarizes the behavioral examples he/she has
collected. During your employees performance review, if they had defined
competencies, youll talk with them about which one or two competencies or skills he or
she will target for improvement and come up with a plan to improve their performance on
them. In the next section, well describe what a development plan might look like and
the different options there are for developing employees.
Once managers are used to providing feedback on behaviors, the agency may decide to
rate employees on their competencies. Typically, competencies are rated on how
frequently they are demonstrated. The agency may decide that a certain % of an
employees overall performance rating depends on how they did on competencies. For
example, perhaps 60-70% of the employees rating depends on what they achieved (their
goals or objectives) and 30-40% of their overall rating depends on performance on
competencies (or how they achieved their objectives).

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

Development Planning
What is an Effective Development Plan?
An effective development plan identifies in a very specific way what behaviors the
employee is targeting to develop and is also very specific about how they will go about
improving them.
Here is what part of a development plan might look like for someone for whom Planning
and Organizing is not a strength. An effective plan is developed collaboratively by an
employee and his/her manager. Ask the employee first for his/her ideas before providing
yours.
This manager needs to learn the skill himself prior to being able to coach his team in this
area.
Competency
Development Area
Planning and
Organizing:
Needs to use to
learn project
management tools
for upcoming
projects

Development Actions
1. Talk with Elmo Butler and
adopt 3 or 4 project
management
tools/techniques for use in
my Accelerating Revenue
project.

Target
Date
End of
2nd Q

Resources Needed
Manager will talk
with Elmo Butler
and his boss about
working with me

2. Observe Elmo Butler run a


project meeting and have
him observe me in
launching team meeting for
Accelerating Revenue
project.
3. Read book, Essentials of
Project Management and
talk with manager and
Elmo about insights.

Notice that the development plan includes learning from experience, not just reading a
book or going to a course. Lessons from experience are often the greatest teachers as
long as the employee has a thinking partner to reflect on the lessons learned. The
following pages have a variety of different options for development. Share these with
your employee to give them some ideas.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

10

Options for Development


There are so many ways to develop someone! There are five categories to develop
someone while they are in their current role. Following are the categories and examples
of developmental assignments under each.
Small Projects and Start-Ups which emphasize persuasion, learning new content quickly,
working under time pressure and dealing with groups of people not worked with before.
Such assignments may or may not emphasize individual leadership, depending on
whether or not the person is in charge. Examples:

Task force on a pressing business problem

Plan an off-site meeting, conference, fundraiser

Handle a negotiation

Present proposal to management

Start up something small

Supervise assigning office space

Make presentations

Write PR releases or communications to media

Serve on new committee

Launch a new program

Assign project with tight deadline

Small Scope Jumps and Fix-Its, which emphasize team-building, individual


responsibility, dealing with the boss, development of subordinates and time pressure. In
these situations, the person should be in charge of people for a short period of time or are
responsible for dealing with a specific crisis or problem (an undoable project, costcutting) where high conflict is likely. Examples:

Manage ad hoc group of inexperienced, less than competent people, former peers

Manage ad hoc group in a rapidly expanding operation

Manage ad hoc group in a static operation

Manage a group of experts in which you dont have as much expertise

Deal with a crisis

Assign a project in which the last person who tried it failed

Supervise cost-cutting

Resolve conflict among warring subordinates

Make peace with an enemy

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

11

Small Strategic Assignments, which emphasize intellectual pressure, influence skills and
a lack of credibility in some area. Having to report on findings and attempting to
influence higher level managers should be a feature of such assignments. Examples:

Summarize new trend/technique; present to others

Write a proposal for a new approach

Write a speech for someone higher in organization

Write up a policy statement

Study funder needs

Postmortem on failed project

Study innovation of another organization or agency

Interview funders, partners or Bigs on their view of specific services

Coursework/Coaching Assignments, which emphasize missing something one needs to


know and intellectual pressure. Examples:

Teach a course or workshop

Teach someone how to do something they are not expert in

Teach someone how to do something they are expert in

Design training course

Do a self-study project

Attend a course

Spend a day with an expert on some job aspect

Study new technical area

Activities Away from Work. Examples:

Become active in a professional organization

Become active in a volunteer organization

Become a Big Brother or Sister

Join a community Board

Act as a consultant on a problem/issue outside job

Coach childrens sport

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

12

Feedback
Why Is Performance Feedback Important?
One of the major reasons for unsatisfactory performance by workers is a lack of feedback
to them about the work they are doing. In fact, it has been estimated that
approximately 50% of the nonperformance problems in organizations occur
because of the lack of feedback. Staff dont know how well or badly they are doing. If
a staff person thinks he or she is doing okay, he/she has no reason to change.

Effective FeedbackTimely, Balanced and Specific


Effective feedback answers the often unspoken question, How am I doing? If
employees know what their competencies and related behaviors are (that is, they have
specific expectations about how they need to behave), they can get feedback from a
number of sources: clients, peers, other managers, donors, partners. However, whether or
not a job has defined competencies, employees need feedback from their managers.
When they perform effectively or need to improve, tell them and provide specific
feedback on what they did well or not so well and why. Your feedback is important. It
helps determine whether people meet objectives and demonstrate competencies. For the
best results, your feedback should be timely, balanced and specific.

Timely. As soon as possible after an incident occurs. The incident is still fresh in
the persons mind, so feedback will be more meaningful.

Balanced. Mix positive and negative comments throughout the discussion


whenever possible. Too much negative feedback might make people defensive
and unwilling to communicate. On the other hand, if you recognize all the good
performance first and save corrective comments for last, people might feel as
though you set them up. After giving corrective feedback, end the discussion
with a plan for improving performance. Work closely with the person on the plan.
The more the individual contributes to it, the more committed he or she will be to
carrying it out.

Specific. A vague commentYou could have done a better job on that call
doesnt identify a specific problem. It doesnt say what was wrong or how to
improve, and its not the type of feedback that will help someone achieve an
objective. Similarly, general praiseGood job on that call!doesnt specify
what the person actually did well and should continue to do.

Specific Feedback through Complete Behavioral ExamplesSTARs


It might seem difficult to provide feedback because it relates to behaviors or skills that
cant always be quantified. As a result, people often base their feedback on opinions or
feelings rather than fact. However, there is a way you can provide objective, reliable and
significant feedback on competencies (whether the competencies have or have not been
spelled out for a job). Use complete behavioral examples, or STARs. A STAR provides a

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

13

complete picture of a persons behavior. It includes details about the Situation or Task,
the Action, and the Result (STAR). Heres a STAR:
I want to give you some feedback about how you handled that situation when the
Big was considering ending the match (Situation). You asked the Big about his
reasons and determined that he thought his Little didnt like him anymore. Then
you shared with him how the Little talked to you about how much his Big has
meant to him and the specific things the Big did that he valued. You also
explained to the Big that its normal for 12 year old boys not to express
appreciation and that the Big shouldnt interpret this as meaning he wasnt having
an impact (Action). As a result, the Big decided to continue the match. This will
really help you achieve your match retention goals for the year (Result).

Sources of STARs
You can collect STARs on performance from:

The employee themselves

Direct observation

Written material

Third-party reports

However, you might not always get complete behavioral examples. But without them,
your feedback could be inaccurate and less meaningful. To collect all the information,
you need to determine which elements of the STAR are missing and ask follow-up
questions to fill in the gaps.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

14

Coaching
The Purpose of Coaching
To coach is to convey a valued person from where he or she is to where he or she wants to be.
In the simplest of terms, masterful coaching involves expanding peoples capacity to take
effective action.
In essence, the purpose of coaching is to help people change. If there is no change, then the
coaching has not had any impact. To facilitate change, you must understand peoples real needs.
Often, however, what the problem the employee says they need help with is rarely the underlying
issue. The employees real needs emerge through a process of co-discovery in which all sources
of information are explored within the context of the employees life and work.
Coaches must be skilled at adapting their methods, techniques and approaches to the needs of the
people they coach. Most coaches consistently fail in the fundamentals of listening, empathizing
and probing (asking questions) even when they think that is what they are doing. Instead, they
revert to advice giving, problem solving and theorizing. This is a human tendency in all kinds of
helping situations, a tendency to want to fix the problem. All of us have grown up with an
implicit model of coaching that is fundamentally flawed. We have learned how to help others
while receiving instruction, advice and guidance from our parents, teachers, religious leaders,
scoutmasters, athletic coaches who, for the most part, take a directing, authoritarian approach.

Coaching Style Preferences


Research tells us that most people who coach prefer to use a directing approach which involves
observing us perform and then telling us what they think, good or bad, about how were doing
and what we could be doing differently. At best, they are experts in their field. They know more
than we do and we benefit when they share their insights. Directing managers may ask insightful
questions and be good listeners, but their fundamental modus operandi is to direct us toward the
path they think we need to take. If they are right, and we submit to their will, then we may
perform better and profit from the experience. This approach to coaching is appropriate when the
manager is more of an expert on the topic, when the situation is hazardous, if there is one way to
do something or if there is little time for coaching. Directing coaching is also the right approach
when employees ask for advice and when it truly is what they want. Most managers prematurely
decide what the employees issues are, direct the conversation according to that assumption and
frequently discover later that they were wrong.
However, most employees want their manager to be a thinking partner (developing). That is,
they want their manager to ask vs. tell. They want their manager to solicit their perceptions and
ideas, ask probing questions, listen and guide them toward their own answers. The best
developing managers have an elegant repertoire of questions and know how to ask the right
questions at the right time to evoke insight. This is the real key to success in this type of
coaching. Questions that merely elicit facts are not particularly insightful. Insightful questions
are those that provoke the employee into questioning why something is the case or what the
implications are of various courses of action or that capture the imagination by getting the
employee to think of possibilities.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

15

What Directing Coaches Do

Are to the point


Are specific and outspoken about what
they want people to do
Give positive feedback
Provide direction
Take an assertive and active role in the
coaching process
Tell experiences based on examples when
coaching

What Developing Coaches Do

Ask for self observation and perspective


before giving feedback and opinions
Ask open ended, insightful questions that
make people think for themselves first
Probe deeper into the individual to better
understand how to help
Minimize lecture
Allow employees to make the final
decision for what they need to do and take
responsibility for their decisions

Dialogue
The work of coaching is done largely through conversation. In fact, over the period of time a
manager works with an employee, there will be many conversations. Together, these
conversations constitute the dialogue between the manager and the employee. Dialogue is a
process of discovery.
One commonly thinks of dialogue as a conversation between two or more people or as the words
spoken by characters in a work of fiction. The term acquired a more specialized meaning in the
1990s when a British physicist and philosopher, David Bohm, found that many of the worlds
problems occurred because people talk at cross-purposes, dont examine their assumptions, are
unaware of how their perceptions influence their thought processes and try to prevail in
conversations by imposing their truth on others.
The most fundamental coaching skills are asking and listening. Being attentive to the employee,
really hearing whats being said and being facile at asking insightful questions take managers a
long way. However, to create a rich and insightful dialogue, managers must also express
empathy, give feedback, reflect on what theyve heard, make generalizations and advise and
confront.
Many managers are not skillful at dialogue, probably because they are talkers and advice givers
by nature. They have a strong need to assert their knowledge or be in control of the situation.
Other managers become so immersed in the conversation that they cant step away from the flow
of the dialogue and think about pacing, disclosure and the give-and-take of information as
employees progress toward insights. Ultimately, this is what dialogue is about, helping
employees gain insights about themselves that they would not have had without the dialogue.
Without these moments of insight, employees are unlikely to change and grow.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

16

A Typical Coaching Scenario


Following is a typical coaching scenario. The manager is well-intended, but, see if you can
determine where he misses the boat before you turn the page.
Jan is the new Director of Program. As shes trying to learn more about how the agency does
match support, shes been listening to how some of the MSS do their match support contacts. She
noticed that one of the newer MSS doesnt ask many questions when she calls the Bigs. She
basically asks how the match is going and then, shortly afterwards, ends the call. Jan also noticed
that the retention rate of Cindys matches is much lower than that of her more experienced
colleagues. Jan opened the coaching session and began the process of discovery that would help
him understand Cindys needs. After the preliminaries in their discussion, Jan asked about her
approach to doing match contacts.
Jan: Cindy, as you know Ive been listening to how the Match Support Specialists on the team
handle their match contacts. I noticed that on the two calls you had just now you spent just a few
minutes with the Bigs. I want to know more about your approach.
Cindy: Jan, I have so many calls I have to do. I cant spend too much time on these calls. I think
my caseload is too high.
Jan: Lets talk about what you are trying to accomplish on these calls. Why do you think they
are important?
Cindy: Well, Im supposed to make sure the match is going well. So, if the Big and Little say the
match is okay, I say, Thats great and thats it.
Jan: I think you need some training in how to ask better questions of the match

Question:
What mistake did Jan make in coaching Cindy? What should she have done differently?
Turn the page for the answer.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

17

The above is a typical coaching scenario. Jan thinks the real problem is Cindy doesnt have the
skills she needs to coach the Bigs. However, she jumped too quickly from preliminary problem
identification to solution. In her desire to be helpful, Jan is like a problem-seeking missile. As
soon as she detects a problem, she hones in on it and tries to solve it. In doing so, she is making a
rookie coachs mistake: treating effects rather than causes. Consider what Jan defined as Cindys
problem; she needs skills in coaching. This may be the case, but more likely this is a consequence
or outcome of some underlying problem; it is not the problem itself. Until she understands the
root causes, she cannot truly be helpful to her.
Now lets take a re-look at this scenario and see what it sounds like when Jan engages in a true
dialogue with Cindy and helps her get to the heart of the issue.
Getting to the Heart of the Issue: Exploring the Problem
Jan: Lets talk about what you are trying to accomplish on these calls. Why do you think they
are important?
Cindy: Well, Im supposed to make sure the match is going well. So, if the Big and Little say the
match is okay, I say, Thats great and thats it.
Jan: Cindy, help me understand something. What happens if you sense the match isnt going
well? Has that ever happened? (Note: You need to know whether this situation or behavior is
unusual and, if so, why. This is called exploring context.)
Cindy: (reflecting) Yes, when a Big tells me they might end a match, I try to find out why and
convince them to hang in there.
Jan: Tell me about a call like that.
Cindy: Yesterday, I got a call from a Big who wanted to end the match. She was really upset
because her Little just sits there and wont say much. I got a little bit more information and then
called the father. The grandmother answered and told me the Littles father was in the hospital
and the Little is really worried that he might die. Thats what happened to her mother. When I
spoke to the child, she said that her Big meant a lot to her. Then I called the Big back and told
her what was going on. We had a great conversation about how the Big just needed to be a little
patient right now and that this is typically what happens . The Big said she didnt have a lot of
experience with quiet children in general, so we talked about how she might She decided not
to end the match.
Jan: Thats really good. Yet, how come you didnt use this approach with the calls I heard.
Cindy: Well, I used to have conversations like this with all my matches, but then I was told by
my old manager that I would need to handle a bigger caseload because were short staffed. So, I
figured I would only spend time with matches that were just about ready to close. I didnt
know what else to do.
Jan: Thats a real dilemma. I can see its upsetting to you. Well, were going to bring in some
Fellows from Xavier School of Social Work to handle some matches. I dont think well need to
add to your caseload.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

18

Cindy: That would be great. I really want to help Bigs and Littles have stronger relationships
and prevent matches from closing prematurely. Thats why I took this job.
The above scenario illustrates the importance of asking good questions to probe beneath the
surface to diagnose whats really going on. In Cindys case, she had skills in coaching and
knew what to do, the problem was she thought shed need to err on the side of quantity at the
expense of quality. Through the coachs skilled questioning and by the coach clarifying
expectations, she was able to resolve her dilemma.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

19

Coaching Format
On the following page is a simple format for coaching someone. In essence, it is a
problem solving model. When you are functioning as a thinking partner with an
employee, you, in general, want to help them solve their own problems. The first two
stages are about identifying the real problem which is usually the bulk of the
conversation. The second two stages are about generating solutions and selecting an
action. It is important in the second stage to try to identify what the facts are because
when people first start talking about an issue or problem they may not be clear or
coherent about whats really going on. They just know their side and their perceptions.
Also, in the first stage, people may share emotions which can cloud the facts.
The bolded question in the third column of the chart below is the basic question you ask,
but weve included a range of other probes you can use to help the employee think things
through.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

20

Stage
Whats up?

Goal
Ask questions to
confirm
understanding

Questions to Ask
What happened?
What seems to be the trouble?
What do you make of_____?
How do you feel about_____?
What concerns you most about______?
What seems to be your main obstacle?
Whats holding you back from_____?

Whats so?

Testing thinking to How did you reach that conclusion?


agree on facts
What do you mean by______?
Tell me more about it?
What else?
What leads you to conclude that?
How would you summarize your efforts so far?
How is it working?

Whats
possible?

Generate
possibilities for
action

What do think you might do?


How do you want _____ to turn out?
What do you want?
How do you suppose you could improve the situation?
What are you thinking of doing about it?
What if it doesnt work out the way you wish?
If you do____, how will it affect______?
What else do you need to consider?
What are some options/alternatives? What are the pros and
cons of that approach?
What do you think of these various alternatives weve been
discussing?

Lets go!

Confirm action plan What have you decided to do?


What do you think you should do next?
Who should you involve? When will you do____?

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

21

Performance Appraisal
Preventing Problems at Review Time

Identify expectations up front (including what constitutes different levels of


performance) and reevaluate regularly; have employee participate in setting
objectives. Objectives should be SMART.

Provide feedback on a regular basis and connect it to the impact on


departmental/agency performance and achievement of mission/vision.

Solicit feedback from others about the employees performance.

Check in with employee periodically about how they are doing and what support they
need. Help them navigate challenges if needed.

Encourage candor especially about bad news.

Confront performance issues early.

Conduct formal interim reviews.

Recognize and reward performance. Use reinforcers and rewards the employee
values.

Keep records of performance examples, feedback, conversations about performance.


Ask the employee to do so as well.

Dont hold individuals accountable for poor systems or processes or circumstances


outside of their influence.

Differentiating Levels of Performance

Extent to which they achieved their objectives/goals

Complexity/visibility of objectives/goals

Amount of supervision required

How they achieved the objective (competencies)

Ability to navigate challenges

Impact on others and/or on the organization

Are they a role model/mentor/teacher in this area for others?

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

22

Ensuring a Successful Appraisal Discussion

There are no surprises; this summarizes discussions held during the cycle. By this
time, people already have tracked their performance, collected data, received
feedback from you and met with you regularly for coaching, reinforcing and periodic
review discussions.

The emphasis is on continuous improvement and development. Performance reviews


often make people uncomfortable and defensive. In this process, the discussion is
positive. The key themes are continuous improvement and development, even if a
person hasnt met their goals.

The success of the discussion depends on the successful implementation of the


performance management cycle. The success of this discussion also depends on the
quality of coaching, reinforcing, feedback and data collecting that has taken place
throughout the cycle.

People must be involved and get an opportunity to provide their input. Performance
review discussions depend heavily on the other persons involvement. The individual
is responsible for compiling performance data, rating performance, planning personal
development and sharing this information with you.

Preparing for the Discussion


When scheduling the meeting, talk to the employee beforehand and:

Review what you will discuss and why.

Discuss what the individual must do to prepare for the discussion.

Explain the length and format of the discussion.

Gather and review pertinent data (feedback, meeting notes, coaching and reinforcing
discussion notes, action plans or reports) that you have collected.

Give the person any performance data youve collected since your last discussion so
the employee can review them. Suggest that the employee give you additional
information about his or her performance for your review.

Use the information youve gathered to complete the appraisal. Record specific data
or examples of feedback that will help the individual understand how you evaluated
performance.

Before you meet with the employee, review your assessment of the employee with
your manager.

Arrange for a private, quiet place, free from interruptions; schedule enough time for
the discussion.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

23

Discussion Format- Option I


Since youve reviewed the employees self-evaluation before writing your evaluation of
the employee, you have a sense of where the two of you may agree and disagree. One
option is to have the employee review your evaluation of their performance during the
meeting and then discuss first where you agree and then were you disagree. Here is a
way of framing the discussion.
Introduction
Thanks, Sally, for coming in. Ive been looking forward to the chance to go over this past
year with you. Id like to go through the process carefully, since this will be one of the
most important things that we do together all year.
Setting the Agenda
Id like to start by having you tell me about the evaluation that you wrote of your own
performance--- what you felt were the most important items and how you came up with
the evaluation that you did. Then Id like to have you read the evaluation I wrote and talk
about the highlights.
I think the most productive way to proceed is for us to cover the areas where we both
agree first, and then move into those areas where we dont see exactly eye to eye. I want
to explain how I went about evaluating your performance the way I did and give you the
chance to ask me any questions you have.
When weve finished evaluating last year, Id like to talk about your development plans
for the upcoming year. I have some ideas on things you might do to increase your skills,
and Im sure that you have some ideas in this area too.
Starting Things Off
Why dont you start by telling me how you feel this past year has gone?
Wrapping Up the Evaluation Discussion
Now that weve reviewed your evaluation, lets summarize the key points weve
discussed. In general, you feel that [general statement of employees reaction to the
appraisal]. Is that an accurate summary?
In reviewing the evaluation, there are two areas in which I think your performance has
been particularly strong: [describe two specific areas of strength that should be continued
and enhanced].

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

24

There is also one area in particular that you need to work on improving. That area is
[describe the single most important development area in the employees performance and
explain why improvement is necessary].
That pretty much sums it up for me, Sally. Are there any other questions I can answer for
you? [Listen and respond appropriately.]
As a final matter, its our policy to ask you to sign the performance evaluation to make
sure that youve had a chance to read and understand it. If youd like to add any
comments, feel free to do so. [Give evaluation to employee to sign.]
Weve already talked about your objectives (and competencies) for next year. I have
every confidence youll be able to achieve them and continue to contribute to the agency.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

25

Discussion Format- Option II


Open
State purpose and importance.
Emphasize that the discussion is a summary of performance based on the information
youve both been collecting throughout the cycle.
Provide the structure.
Say: Well take a look at objectives talk about your performance in each of them. Then
well talk about any actions that need to be taken. (If they have competencies) Then
well look at each competency and talk about your performance in each. Then well talk
about how youve done on your development plan.
Clarify
(Complete the Clarify and Discuss and Agree guidelines for each objective and
competency if the employee has competencies)
Compare actual vs. expected performance.
For each objective and competency discuss how actual performance compares to the level
agreed to.
Review successes/problems.
When the person has met objectives and competencies talk about behaviors that illustrate
what he or she did to be successful. This enhances self-esteem and encourages continued
or improved performance. Acknowledge the achievement when the person discusses
successful performance.
If the person hasnt met objectives or competencies effectively, be sure to keep the
discussion positive to maintain self-esteem. This is a future-oriented discussion; you
want to uncover causes of the problem and discuss what can be done about it. It wont
help to just rehash the details. Listen to the persons rationale and respond with empathy.
For example, You didnt achieve your match retention goal. Since youre new, I can
understand that youre still learning how to help strengthen your matches
State how the persons level of performance impacts departmental or agency goals and
the agencys mission. For example, Your performance has helped us improve our overall
match retention rate. Think about all the childrens lives youve impacted because of your
efforts.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

26

Discuss and Agree


Discuss performance on development plan.
Ask employee to talk about progress. Add your observations.
Develop action plans and follow-up date(s), if needed.
The two of you should agree on action plans to enhance successes or resolve problems.
Discuss what the person should continue doing and what should be done differently.
Seek the employees ideas and build on those ideas as much as possible to enhance
commitment and self-esteem. The action plan might require removing obstacles or
coaching the individual. When you discuss action plans, set follow-up dates to check for
progress.
Close
Summarize discussion.
Ask the employee to summarize or use your notes to recap each action and follow-up
date.
Express confidence.

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

27

Handling Two Difficult Situations


If a person believes his or her rating is too low, but doesnt have data to substantiate
a higher rating:

Explain that you understand the individuals right to question the rating

Ask for data or reasons to warrant a rating change

Refocus the discussion on ways to improve if the person still disagrees after
reviewing the data

If people display negative feelings toward you, the process or being reviewed:

Ask for reasons that explain the resentment, listen intently and empathize with
their feelings

Discuss concerns openly

Seek ideas about addressing the concerns

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_6/330960858.doc

28

You might also like