Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1
e) Personal Law: These are laws as per community/ casts available in a country. It includes
provisions prescribing Hindu law for Hindus and Islamic law for Muslims, for litigation relating
to personal matters. Example: Hindu Law and Muslim Law.
Indian Contract Act 1872 is the main source of law regulating contracts in Indian law.
It determines the circumstances in which promise made by the parties to a contract shall be legally
binding on them. Each contract creates some right and duties upon the contracting parties. Indian
contract deals with the enforcement of these rights and duties upon the parties.
3.2 Meaning and Definition of Contract
The word contract is derived from the Latin Contractum meaning drawing together.
According to Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a Contract is An agreement
enforceable by law". In the other words an agreement which can be enforced in a court of law is
known as contract.
An analysis of these definitions would show that a contract must have the following two elements:
(a) An agreement, and
ShivaniSharma/BBAFT SEM I/IIMR
Page 2
(b) Its enforceability (legal obligation, in case of non-performance legal action can be taken by party
of contract)
In the form of an equation, it can be shown as under:
Contract = Agreement + Enforceability at Law
(a) According to section 2(e) of Indian Contract Act, 1872, an Agreement is "every promise and
every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other." In equation format
an agreement is:
A person makes proposal to another person say X offers to Y to sell his (X) car for Rs. 50000.
The other person to whom the proposal is made accepts it say Y accepts the offer.
With the acceptance of the proposal, promise comes into being, say now the X has promised
to sell his car to Y for Rs. 50000 and Y has promised to pay Rs.50000 for Xs car.
Every promise is forming a consideration (something in return) for each other, say the
consideration which X will receive for his car is Rs. 50000 and the consideration which the
Y will receive for his Rs.50000 is Xs car.
An agreement has come into existence, where X made an offer to Y, Y accepted the offer,
the promises so made by X and Y are forming consideration for each other.
Page 3
ii.
iii.
Lawful consideration
Page 4
i.
iv.
Capacity of parties
v.
Free consent
vi.
Lawful object
vii.
Possibility of Performance
viii.
ix.
Certainty of meaning
x.
Lawful Offer and Acceptance: - In order to create a valid contract there must be an
agreement between two parties, i.e., lawful offer of one party followed by a lawful
acceptance of that offer by another party. There must be a lawful proposal and a lawful
acceptance of that proposal, thus resulting in an agreement. The word lawful before offer
and acceptance signifies that proposal and acceptance must satisfy the requirements of the
law of contract.
There must be two parties to an agreement, i.e. one party making the proposal and the
other party accepting it. Such offer any acceptance must be valid. An offer to be valid must
fulfill certain conditions, such as it must intend to create legal relations, its term, must be
certain and unambiguous, it must be communicated to the person to whom it is made, etc.
An acceptance to be valid must folds certain conditions, such as it must be absolute and
unqualified, it must be made in the prescribed manner, and it must be communicated by an
authorized person before the offer lapses.
Example: A say to B that he will sell his cycle to him for Rs.2000. This is an offer. If B
accepts this offer, there is an acceptance.
ii.
Creating Legal Relations: - There must be an Intention among the parties that the
agreement should be attached by legal consequences and create legal obligations or legal
relationship. If there is no such intention on the part of the parties, there is no contract
between them. Agreements of a social or domestic nature do not contemplate legal
relationship.
Example: A husband agreed to pay 30 to his wife every month while he was abroad. As he
failed to pay the promised amount, his wife sued him for the recovery of the amount. Held:
She could not recover as it was a social agreement and the parties did not intend to create
any legal relations [Balfour v. Balfour (1919)2 K.B.571].
Example: A father promises to pay his son Rs.500 every month as pocket money. Later, he
refuses to pay. The son cannot recover as it is a social agreement and does not create legal
relations.
Example: X is an oil trader and Y offers him to purchase 100 liter of eatable oil on a certain
date and rate. X accepts this offer and received payment for this but refuse to deliver oil to
Y. Now, Y can create a suit on X in case of nonperformance by X.
Page 5
In the other words, if the parties are intending to create a legal completion for contact
performance than only it is a legal or valid contract otherwise not.
iii.
iv.
Page 6
not completed age of 18 at the time of entering into contract are not eligible to enter
into a contract and that contract will be a void (invalid) contact.
Example: X minor borrowed Rs 8,000 from Y and executed mortgage of his property
in favour of the lender. This was not a valid contract because X is not competent to
contract. Therefore, the mortgage was not valid and the money advanced to minor
could not be recovered.
b) Mental incompetence (Unsound mind): according to section 12 a person is said
to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract, if at the time when he
makes it is capable to understand the terms of contact and form a rational judgment
as to its effect upon his interest. Thus, if person is not capable of both, he is said to
have suffered from unsoundness of mind.
Position of a person who is usually of unsound mind and occasionally of
sound mind: A person, who is usually of unsound mind, but occasionally of sound
mind, may make a contract when he is of sound mind.
Position of a person who is usually of sound mind and occasionally of
unsound mind: A person, who is usually of sound mind, but occasionally of
unsound mind, may not make a contract when he is of unsound mind.
In short, if the person is of sound mind at the time of formation or entering into a
contract he/she is capable enough to entre and can create a valid contract otherwise
it a void contact.
ICA, 1872, includes the following persons under the unsoundness of mind:
Lunatic (mentally ill): A person who is mentally deranged (mad, insane) due to
some mental force/tension or other personal experience but who has some lucid
interval (the term that describes a period in a mentally unbalanced person's life
where they act normally) of sound mind. It means that, when after a particular period
of unsoundness of mind person is normal can make a contract when he is of sound
mind and it will consider as a lunatic person under law.
Idiots: A person who is permanently of unsound mind. It means that there are no
mental faculties available to think, learn and understand anything to that person.
According to ICA, 1872, such a person is not at all eligible to enter into a contract
because of permanent incapability. Idiots are the persons who suffer from Unsound
mind from birth itself. Therefore they cannot enter into Contracts throughout their
life. In such a way they suffer from permanent Incapacity.
Page 7
such a person is not at all mentally available to understand terms of contract while
entering into a particular contract. It means that this category persons suffers from
unsoundness of mind temporary after getting recovered from the effect, they can
enter into Contracts.
Examples: A patient, in a lunatic asylum, who is at intervals, of sound mind, may
contract during those intervals.
Example: A sane man, who is delirious from fever or who is so drunk that he cannot
understand the terms of a contract or form a rational judgment as to its effect on his
interest, cannot contract whilst such delirium or drunkenness lasts.
c) Status/ Person Disqualified by Law: Besides minor and person of unsound mind,
there are others who are disqualified from contracting under the provisions of some
other laws, such person have been discussed below:
v.
Foreign Sovereigns and Ambassadors: They can enter into contracts and enforce
those contracts in our courts but they cannot be sued in our courts without the
sanction of the Central Government unless they choose to submit themselves to the
jurisdiction of our courts.
Convict: A convict is one who is found guilty by a court and is undergoing sentence
of imprisonment. During the period of his imprisonment, he is incompetent to
contract and also to sue on contract made before conviction.
Insolvents: When a persons debts exceed his assets, he is adjudged insolvent and
his property stands vested in the Official Receiver or Official Assignee appointed by
the court. Such a person cannot enter into contracts relating to his property.
Free consent: - (sec.14) It is essential to the creation of every contract that there must be
a free and genuine consent of the parties to the agreement.
According to section 23 of ICA, 1872 consent means two or more people are said to be
consent when they are agree upon the same thing in the same sense. Thus consent
involves identity of minds in respect of the subject matter of the contract. When there is no
consent at all, the agreement is void (invalid) and not enforceable at the option of either
party.
Example: X has one Maruti car and one Fiat car. He wants o sell Fait car. Y does not know
that X has two cars. Y offers to buy Xs Maruti car for Rs. 50000. X accepts, the offer thinking
Page 8
it to be an offer for his Fiat car. Here there is a no identity of minds in respect of subject
matter i.e. car.
The consent of the parties is said to be free when they are of the same mind on all the
material terms of the contract. The parties are said to be of the same mind when they agree
about the subject-matter of the contract in the same sense and at the same time.
Free Consent: According to Section 14 of ICA, 1872, Consent is said to be free when it is not
caused by (i) Coercion, (ii) Undue influence, (iii) Fraud, (iv) Misrepresentation, or (v)
Mistake.
In the other words, if consent comes with one of the above mentioned element it will not be
considered as a free consent by contracting party and will be formed a void contract.
Page 9
10
capacity, he just want assent of Y to purchase factory. Y purchased factory. Here the
intention of X was not to deceive Y but to just get him entre into contract.
vi.
Lawful object: - (Sec.23) The object of an agreement must be lawful. The object is
considered lawful unless it is forbidden by law or is fraudulent or involves or implies injury to
the person or property of another or is immoral or is opposed to public policy.
Example: A promise to pay B Rs.5 thousand if B beats C. The agreement is illegal as its
object is unlawful.
vii.
viii.
ix.
Certainty of meaning:- In order to give rise to a valid contract the terms of the agreement
must not be vague or uncertain. If it is vague and it is not possible to ascertain its meaning,
it cannot be enforced. According to Section 29 of the Contract Act, Agreements the meaning
Page 10
11
of which are not certain or capable of being made certain are void. In order to give rise to a
valid contract the terms of the agreement, must not be uncertain. For a valid contract, the
terms and conditions of an agreement must be clear and certain.
Example: A promised to sell 20 books to B. It is not clear which books A has promised to
sell. The agreement is void because the terms are not clear.
Example: A agrees to sell B a hundred tons of oil. It is not clear what is the kind of oil. The
agreement is void because of it uncertainty.
Example: A agreed to purchase a van from B on hire-purchase terms. The price was to be
paid over two years. Held there was no contract as the terms were not certain about rate of
interest and mode of payment.
x.
Agreement not expressly declared void: - (sec.24 to 30) the agreement must not
have been expressly declared to be void, under the Section 24 to 30 of ICA, 1872.
This includes: Agreement in restraint of marriage (to stop someone to get marry),
agreement in restraint of trade (to stop someone to trade with any one), agreement in
restraint of legal proceedings (to stop someone to not take legal action against someone)
and agreement by way of wager (bet or gamble) have been expressly declared void.
In the other words, ICA, 1872, already mentioned some of the agreements which cannot be
enforceable by law, which are void. If an agreement is need to be valid must not include any
feature of these void agreements.
Example: X promised to marry none else except Y and in default pay her Rs 1,00,000. X
married to Z and Y sued X for the recovery of Rs 1,00,000. It was held that Y was not entitled
to recover anything because this agreement was in restraint of marriage and as such void.
Example: A promise to close his business against the promise of B to pay him Rs.2 lac is a
void agreement because it is restraint of trade.
Example: A and B mutually agree that if it rains today A will pay B Rs 100 it does not rain B
will pay A Rs 100 or where C and D enter into agreement that on tossing up a coin, if it falls
head upwards C will pay O and if it falls tail upwards D will pay C Rs 50; there is, a wagering
agreement.
A wager can be described as, follows: The agreement of gaming and wagering is that one
party is to win and the other e upon a future every which at the time C the contract is of an
a in nature - that is to say, if the event turns out one way A will lose; I it turns out the other
way he will win.
Page 11
12
2. On the basis of Formation/ Creation (how a contract came into existence or the way it has
been framed)
a) Express Contract, (by words)
b) Implied Contract, and (without words)
c) Quasi Contract. (by law)
3. On the basis of Performance/ Execution (task allotted between both the parties)
a) Executed Contract,
b) Executory Contract,
c) Partly Executed and Partly Executory Contract,
d) Unilateral Contract, and
e) Bilateral Contract.
1. On the basis of validity
a) Valid Contract: If a contract satisfies all the conditions/essentials prescribed by
section 10 of ICA, 1872, is a valid contract. If one or more these aligned essentials of a
valid contract is missing than the contract will be void, voidable, illegal or
unenforceable.
Example: X offers marry to Y, Y accepts Xs offer. This is a valid contract.
Example: X offers to sale his car to Y, Y accepts his proposal, this is a valid contract.
Page 12
13
b) Void Contract: (void null, empty, not valid, invalid, ineffective or not have value in
the eyes of law) According to section 2 (j) of the ICA, 1872, A contract which ceases
to be enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to be enforceable. Ceases
means finish, discontinue, come to the end, terminate or when in a contract none of
the party of a contract is willing or able to performed assigned tasks.
In the other words, when a contract is valid at the time of formation but which
subsequently became void due to impossibility of performance because of non
existence of subject matter (destroy or damage of subject matter) or illegality (change
of law) of contract performance or any other reason.
It means that void contract is a contract which is valid when parties are entering into
a contract but due to some future events parties are not able to perform contract than
that valid contract will become void.
Example: A offers on December 1, 2016 to sale his house in Rs. 40,00,000 to B on 30
December, 2016. B accepts his offer. This is a valid contract. Suddenly, house of A
destroyed by earthquake on December 15, 2016. In this case contract among both of
them was valid at the time of formation but due to non existence of subject matter
(house) it has became impossible to sale that house or to complete the performance
of contract.
Example: A trader from China X offers Indian Y to purchase toys from him on
November 2016. Y accepts his proposal. This is a valid contract because there is a
peaceful relationship between both countries at the time of contract formation. In the
month of October, China declared war with India and stopped all trade between both
countries. Under this condition a valid contract between X and Y will come to the end
due to change of law and became void contract.
Example: Mr. X agrees to write a book for a publisher. After few days, X dies in an
accident. Here a valid contract becomes void due to the impossibility of performance
of contract.
c) Void Agreement: According to Section 2 (g), an agreement not enforceable by law
is said to be void, such agreements are void from the beginning/ from the time of its
formation (void-ab-initio), which means that they are unenforceable right from they
are made.
In the other words, agreement without legal effects is known as void agreement. For
example an agreement with minor or with unsound mind person is void from the
beginning (void-ab-inito) because minor and unsound mind person are not competent
to enter into a contract as per ICA, 1972. Thus a void agreement never matures into a
contract.
Example: X is a minor borrowed Rs.2, 00, 000 from Y a majors and promised to repay
after 1 month. This is a void agreement as per ICA, 1872.
d) Voidable Contract: According to Section 2 (i) of ICA, 1872, an agreement which is
enforceable by law at the option of one or more of the parties thereto, but not at the
option of others is a voidable contracts. (voidable: capable of being made void,
whose performance can be avoided and which can be legally inactive) In the other
words, a voidable contract is a contract which can be set aside or repudiate (cancel)
or avoided at the opinion of the aggrieved party (contract party who has been unfairly
ShivaniSharma/BBAFT SEM I/IIMR
Page 13
14
treated by other one). Until the contract is set aside or repudiate by aggrieved party,
it remains a valid contract.
In simple words, when one party of contract in the position to avoid performance on
his part then the agreement is treated to be voidable. Such a right may be arising
when one of the party consent has been taken with coercion, undue influence,
misrepresentation, and fraud. It means that the party whose consent was not free at
the time of formation of contract (which is called as aggrieved party) will be able to
cancel the contract and ignore the performance. If the aggrieved party is not willing to
cancel contract, the contract will remained valid in the eye of law. Generally, a
contract formed under mistake will be void.
Example: . B threatens to kill to C if he does not sell his imported scooter to D for Rs.
5000. C agrees. Here the consent of C has been obtained through coercion. Under this
contract if C wants, he can cancel performance of contract i.e., transfer of scooter to
D. it means that, according to C a contract is voidable but D is considering this
contract as valid. This is voidable contract.
e) Illegal Agreement: an illegal agreement is one the object of which is unlawful. Such
an agreement cannot be enforced by law. Thus, illegal agreements are always voidab-initio (void from very beginning). These are also considered as void agreements.
Example: X agrees Y to appoint him in government jog and will charge of Rs. 200000
for the same. This is unlawful consideration between both parties.
f)
Page 14
15
Example: A says to B that he will sell his car to him for Rs. 80,000 and B agrees and
say yes. This is a spoken express proposal.
b) Implied Contract: A contract inferred by the conduct (act) of a person or the
circumstances (situation) of a case is called implied contract. Or, when contract is
being framed otherwise than the use of words (not oral and written) is called as
implied contract.
Example: The Delhi Transport Corporation (D.T.C) runs Omni buses on different
routes to carry passengers at the scheduled fares. This is an implied proposal by
the DTC and accepted by those who travel in DTC.
Example: A stops a taxi by waving his hand and takes his seat. There is an implied
contract that A will pay the prescribed fare.
c) Quasi Contract: Quasi contracts are the contracts which are not created by words
or otherwise (by act or condition), these contract comes into existence by the law.
Under section 68-72, Constructive or Quasi contracts arise out of obligations
enjoyed by one person from the voluntary acts of the other which are intended to
be performed only on the happening of some future uncertain event.
Generally a contract comes into existence as a result of offer made by one party
and its acceptance by the other party, with free will of both the parties. However
under certain conditions even though no will is expressed by both the parties for
creating contractual relations, the law creates and enforces legal rights and
obligations. Such contracts are known as Quasi Contracts. The principle behind
Quasi Contracts is that a person shall not be allowed to enrich himself at the
expense of another.
Court creates quasi contract to avoid the unjust enrichment of a party in a dispute
over payment for goods or services. In some cases a party who has suffered from a
loss in a business relationship may not be able to recover for the loss without
evidence of a contract. To avoid this unjust result, courts create a fictitious
agreement where no legal enforcement exists.
Example: A, a tradesman, leaves goods at Bs house by mistake. B treats the
goods as his own. B is bound to pay A for them.
Example: A and B jointly owe Rs.5,000 to C. A alone pays this amount to C. B not
knowing this again pays Rs.5,000 to C. In this case C is bound to repay Rs.5,000 to
B as this amount is paid to him by mistake.
3. On the basis of Performance/ Execution (task allotted/ performance done
between both the parties)
a) Executed Contract: Where both the parties have performed their obligations, it is an
executed contract.
Example: A contracts to buy a bicycle from B for cash. A pays cash. B delivers the bicycle.
Page 15
16
b) Executory Contract: Where neither party to the contract has performed his share of the
obligation, i.e. both the parties have yet to perform their promises, the contract is executory.
Example: On June 1, A agrees to buy a bicycle from B. The contract is to be performed on June
15.
c) Partly Executed and Partly Executory Contract: it is a contract where one of the parties
to the contract has performed his obligation and the other party has still to perform his
obligation.
Example: X offer to sell his car to Y for Rs.100000 on a credit of one month. Y accepts Xs
offer. X delivered car to Y. Here the contract is executed as to X and executory as to Y.
d) Unilateral Contract: it is a one side contract in which only one party has to perform his
promise or obligation to do.
e) Bilateral Contract: A bilateral contract is one in which both the parties have to perform
their respective promises or obligations to do.
Page 16
17
ii. Rescission - Rescission means cancellation of the contract by any party or all the parties
to a contract.
iii. Alteration - Alteration means a change in the terms of a contract with the mutual
consent. Alteration discharges the original contract and creates a new contract.
iv. Remission - Remission is the acceptance of a lesser sum than what was contracted for or
a lesser fulfillment of the promise made.
v. Waiver - Waiver means intentional relinquishment of a right under the contract.
c) Discharge by Subsequent or Supervening Impossibility or Illegality:
1. Cases where the doctrine of supervening impossibility applies
i. Destruction of subject matter.
ii. Death or personal incapacity of promisor.
iii. Outbreak of war.
iv. Change of law.
v. Non-existence or non-occurrence of a particular state of things (failure of ultimate
purpose).
Page 17
18
Page 18
19
d) Suit for Injunction: means demanding courts stay order Injunction means an order of
the court which prohibits a person to do a particular act. For example -W agreed to sing at
Ls theatre only during the contract period. During the contract period, W made contract
with Z to sing at another theatre and refused to perform the contract with L. It was held that
W could be restrained by injunction from singing for Z.
e) Suit for Quantum Meruit: Quantum - meruit means as much as is earned. In this suit,
claim is made to compensate for the work already done. For example -C an owner of a
magazine engaged P to write a book to be published by installments in his magazine. After a
few installments were published, the publication of the magazine was stopped. It was held
that P could claim payment for the part already published.
Amar sold his business to Bharat but this fact was not known to an old customer Chander.
Chander placed an order for certain goods to Amar by name. Bharat supplied the goods to
Chander. Is there a valid contract?
Ans.............................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
................................................ .
3) Kuber gifted Rs. 50000 to Sundari his neighbours wife by executing a registered gift deed
without any consideration. There is no near relation between Kuber and Sundari. Is this gift
valid?
Ans.............................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
ShivaniSharma/BBAFT SEM I/IIMR
Page 19
20
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
................................................ .
4) A gifted whole of his property to his daughter on the condition that she should pay Rs.200
per month to her uncle (fathers brother). Later she refused to pay her uncle on the ground
that she did not receive any consideration from her uncle. Is she justified?
Ans.............................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
................................................
5) Ramesh a minor, by misrepresenting himself to be of 19 years, obtains a loan of Rs. 10000
from suresh stating that the amount was badly needed by him to complete his education.
Suresh, without making any further enquiry, lent the amount to ramesh. Can suresh recover
the amount from ramesh?
Ans.............................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
................................................
6) A sells, by auction, to B, a horse which A knows to be unsound. A says nothing to B about
the horse's unsoundness. Is it a case of fraud? What kinds of remedies are available for B?
Ans.............................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
................................................
Page 20