Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M. S. Kaiser , A. R. M. Siddique
1
I. INTRODUCTION
Bangladesh is enduring from energy shortage due to
the increasing gap between generation and demand.
Most of the people of Bangladesh live in villages and
more than 70% of them do not have access to grid
electricity [1]. The main source of income of these
villagers is agriculture and farming. The annual income
of them is less than 444 US dollar (1 USD = 78
Bangladesh Taka (BDT)). Due to the high price of diesel,
they cannot use their own diesel generator to use
electricity. Renewable energy (RE) resources like wind,
solar, biomass, hydro-electric and tidal wave etc
become essential to fulfill the energy demand [2]. The
depletion of fossil fuel, fuel price uncertainty, and global
warming concern make the RE popular to all [3] [4] [5].
The solar radiation receives at the gourd surface is
PV
50 rural homes
78kWh/d
Generator
Synergy SLG
Converter
Battery
( )
( )), of solar
( )
(1)
(2)
where, w is the air density, A is the surface area, is
the wind speed, (
) is the performance coefficient
of the turbine, is the tip speed ratio of the rotor blade
tip speed to wind speed, is the blade pitch angle, t
and
are wind turbine and generator efficiency
respectively.
778
( )
(
( )
( ))
(4)
( )
Solar Resources
Daily Radiation (kWh/m^2/day)
( )
(5)
can be written as
( )
( )
( )
,
)
(6)
( )
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
6
4
2
0
Daily radiation
Clearness Index
and
(
(7)
( )is
where,
is the efficiency of the inverter,
the hourly energy consumed by the load (in KWh), and
is the battery discharge efficiency.
F. Mathematical Model of Battery
B. Solar Resource
( )
(8)
C. Load Demand
The electrical loads of the Kutubdia Island are divided
into domestic, agricultural, government and private
office and rural industry. The electrical appliances like
fan and compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) are used for
domestic use. For this analysis we consider that the
each home requires 1.58 KWh/day of energy. Thus 50
rural houses of Lemsikhali village of Kutubdia required
78 KWh of energy per day. Figure 5 shows the monthly
load profile as a function of time for 50 rural homes in
Lemsikhali.
On the other hand, the total capital cost, i.e., Cc, for
the proposed combination of PV-Wind-DEG hybrid
system can be given by
(10)
where,
,
,
,
and
are the cost of
each unit of wind generator or turbine, solar panel,
diesel generator, battery and fixed cost including
cost of converter, inverter and other respectively.
Figure 3. Map of Kutubdia showing wind resource at 50m height
above the ground level.
Wind Resource
7
Wind Speed m/s
can be written as
) ,
(11)
where,
(
) is the capital recovery factor, i is
the interest rate in [%]
is the project lifetime [yr].
6
5
4
3
( )) ,
2
1
0
( )
can be written as
( )
( )
( )
(12)
( ),
( ),
( ),
( ) and
where
( )are the operating cost of PV, wind, DEG,
battery and others respectively. The total annual life
cycle cost of the system, i.e.,
, is composed of
both capital and operating cost
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Agu Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
(13)
(9)
where
, ,
are number of units of wind
generator or turbine, number of solar panel and
number of diesel generator respectively.
(14)
If,
(15)
and
are the power generated by wind, PV
and diesel generator
is the total load
demand. The objective function fo the optimization
problem for the proposed PV-Wind-DEG hybrid
system can be given by
Figure 5. Monthly load profile for a year.
780
(16)
,
(17)
Appliance
Quantity
Power
Use hour/day
CFL
21
Radio/Cassette Player
B/W TV*
60
B. Photovoltaic Module
The unit price of PV panel is considered 60 to 70
BDT/Watt. Life time of the modules is 20 years, the
derating factor is 0.9, ground reflection is 0.15 and
these are tilted at 21 degree with no tracking mode.
12
10
Power (kW)
C. Wind Generator
PV
Wind
Generator
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
D. Diesel Generator
The diesel generator has also been considered in
the system. The lifetime is 10000 hours, minimum
load ratio is 0.3, the unit cost is 30000 BDT/kW, per
liter diesel cost is around 50 BDT and intercept
coefficient is 0.08 L/hr/kW (Shaahid SM and ElAmin, 2010).
781
VII. CONCLUSION
It is clear that human life can be sustained on earth in
the future if we are able to replace conventional energy
sources with an alternative source of energy such as
Solar, Wind, tidal wave etc and hybrid of these options.
Optimal hybrid option analysis is required for designing
solar home system. In this paper, we have proved
optimal hybrid option analysis for Kutubdia based on
energy resources and required load demand. As an
example scenario, we have done the analysis for
Lemsikhali, a village of 50 homes in Kutubdia Island,
required 78kWh of energy per day. Hybrid optimization
model of renewable energy (HOMER) is used to find the
optimal combination of Solar Photovoltaic (PV)-WindDiesel (DEG) hybrid system, and financial feasibility is
analyzed using Renewable Energy Technologies screen
(RETScreen) for the optimal combination of PV-WindDEG hybrid system. From the optimal result, it is found
that 4kW PV, 1kW wind, 24kW DEG, 36 Battery and
24kW converter. It has been found that PV-Wind-DEG,
hybrid system is feasible in Kutubdia. This study shows
that HOMER analysis is required for selecting optimal
system configuration based on the installment cost of
the system and available energy resources. Internal rate
of return and payback period analysis has been done
using RETScreen software. If clean development
mechanisms, carbon tax, and oil price increase are
considered, the unit cost would be reduced
considerable and system will be found to be more
feasible. We would like to developed a mathematical
model that combined both HOMER and RETScreen.
REFERENCES
[1] BPDB, Annual
report
of
bangladesh
power
development
board
(bpdb)
2012,
http://www.bpdb.gov.bd/generation.html, 2012.
[2] M. A. Motin, Md. Forhad Zaman, M.R.I. Sheikh, Energy
Efficient Modeling of Solar Wind Hybrid Power System for
a Tourist Island International Journal Of Advanced
Renewable Energy Research (IJARER), vol-1, issue-1, pp-17, 2012.
782
OPTIMIZED RESULT FOR 50 RURAL HOMES WITH 77.7 KWH/DAY WHEN THE AVERAGE WIND SPEED IS 4.4M/S
TABLE II.
PV
(kW)
4
20
32
32
Wind
(kW)
1
1
1
-
DEG
(kW)
24
25
8
TABLE III.
PV
(kW)
8
36
Wind
(kW)
1
2
1
DEG
(kW)
24
24
-
Batt
36
56
52
64
64
Conv
(kW)
24
24
28
24
24
CC
(BDT/kWh)
7345416
7049484
12365574
13098774
13298142
NPC
(BDT)
9059856
9337380
12556908
13261170
13412802
COE
(BDT/kWh)
27.85
28.70
38.61
40.79
41.26
Ren
Frac
0.85
0.78
1
1
1
Diesel
(L)
2856
3760
6
Gen
(hr)
393
788
5
Batt
Life yr
19.2
20
20
20
20
OPTIMIZED RESULT FOR 50 RURAL HOMES WITH 104 KWH/DAY WHEN THE AVERAGE WIND SPEED IS 4.4M/S
Batt
Conv
(kW)
32
32
32
56
48
64
TABLE IV.
CC
(BDT/kWh)
9805068
9813726
17456400
NPC
(BDT)
12002328
12023232
17675112
COE
(BDT/kWh)
27.53
27.61
40.56
Ren
Frac
0.83
0.88
1
PV
CC
BDT
(106)
1.27
Cac
BDT
/yr(106)
0.111
Cac
BDT
/yr(106)
-
Wind
3.12
0.727
DEG
0.495
0.043
-2628.6
Co
BDT /yr
Cfuel
BDT
/yr
-
Cannual
BDT
/yr(106)
0.113
3900
0.276
1778.4
133458
0.176
1817.4
Batt
1.99
0.174
4243.2
5023.2
0.183
Conv
.463
0.040
1872
0.0423
Total
7.35
0.064
1606.8
14398.8
133458
0.789
783
Diesel
(L)
3716
3789
-
Gen
(hr)
496
512
-
Batt
Life yr
19.2
20
20
ddd
784
All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.