Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2006 9
Journal of Electronics & Information Technology
Vol.28No.9
Sept.2006
MIMO
100876)
100032)
100080)
2 MIMO
(CCDF)MIMO 10%
3
i.i.d. 1
MIMO
MIMO
TN92TN823
1009-5896(2006)09-1636-04
L Ying-hua
Li Yun-zhuang
Du Juan
Abstract
A 2-D shooting-and-bouncing ray-tracing (SBR) method is used to analyze the different antenna array
structures effect on the capacity CCDF of indoor NLOS MIMO channel. The results show in NLOS indoor environments
the less antenna interval is, the less MIMO channel capacities get. The results on 10% outage capacity show that there exist
a fixed relationship that i.i.d Rayleigh channel capacity is larger than the capacity with linear antenna array which is larger
than the capacity with rectangular antenna array or with circular antenna array. When antenna interval is equal to or larger
than 3 , antennas array structures affect the CCDF indistinctively and all the CCDF approach the theoretical i.i.d
Rayleigh capacity, i.e. Telatar capacity. When antenna interval is equal to or less than 1 , the CCDFS of MIMO system
equipped with different antenna array structures changes remarkably. To obtain the MIMO capacity gains in indoor NLOS
environment, antenna interval and antenna structure should be considered jointly when designing the antenna array.
Key words
MIMO
MIMO
Foschini, Telatar[1,2]
MIMO
MIMO
MIMO
MIMO
(BLAST)(STTCSTBC)[3, 4]
[5]MIMO
MIMO
FoschiniTelatarMIMO
MIMO
2004-12-29 2005-06-21
[6,7]
(6027101860331010)
WLAN
MIMO
1637
MIMO
MIMO
MIMO
MIMO
2.1
(GO)
(UTD)
SBR
SBR
SBR
SBR
MIMO[8 11]
SBR 3
[12]
1
360
360
r l 2 l
S 15
r 1 t 3 d 5
a b c
S ar + bt + cd
MIMO
r = Hs + n
(1)
r M 1 s N 1
n M 1
2 , H M N i j
hij N M
Telatar Foschini MIMO
( b / ( s Hz ) )
(2)
(SNR) C eq
MIMO
H(2)MIMO Ceq
[14, 15]
L
gij (t ) = Pk eik (t k )
k =0
(3)
Pk k k k
; L ; (t )
hij = Pk eik e i 2 f0 k
k =0
(4)
(4) H Pk k k
N M hij
1000
18dB
Ceq CCDF
1
A 1000
5.2GHz, = 5.8cm
8
d
r = 5
[13]
r = 1 = 0.00001A / m 2
0.35m 0.15m
2 3 3
2.2 MIMO
0.5 1 3 5
1638
28
[16] 1
MIMO CCDFS
MIMO 10% 2
MIMO
MIMO 10%
(b/(s Hz))
(b/(s Hz))
(b/(s Hz))
Telata
0.5
30.7365
27.4119
26.7619
36.9063
33.8749
28.1711
28.6274
36.9063
35.1160
34.7596
35.0091
36.9063
36.0370
35.9836
35.4553
36.9063
2 8
Fig.2 Antenna array structures
of 8 elements
3 6
CCDF MIMO
(b/(s Hz))
i.i.d. 10%
3 5 CCDF
10%
10%
10%
0.5 1
/ 10%Telata
/ 10%Telata
/ 10%Telata
100(%)
100(%)
100(%)
MIMO CCDF
0.5
83.28
74.27
72.51
MIMO MIMO
91.79
76.33
77.57
95.15
94.18
94.86
97.64
97.50
96.07
% CCDF (100 )%
1
MIMO Telatar
5 3
1 0.5
1 3 5
MIMO 10%
0.5b/(s Hz) Telatar
2b/(s Hz) 1
MIMO 10% 0.5b/(s Hz)
MIMO 10% 56b/(s Hz)
0.5
CCDF
Fig.3 CCDF with antenna
CCDF
10
interval of 0.5
interval of 1
2 1
1
90%
[7]
CCDF
Fig.3 CCDF with antenna
interval of 3
CCDF
Fig.4 CCDF with antenna
interval of 5
80%i.i.d.
3 90%
MIMO
[5]
i.i.d.
1639
MIMO
[7]
[8]
8 MIMO CCDF
MIMO
MIMO
[9]
3 MIMO
90%
[12] , .
i.i.d.
MIMO
[2]
[3]
1985.
[14] Chuah C N, Tse D, Kahn J M, et al.. Capacity scaling in MIMO
[1]
E,
Proakis
J,
Shamai
S.
Fading
channels:
1977 (MIMO)
.
1944
.