Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rey Gamboa
Despite all the grim warnings against raising taxes on tobacco and alcohol products, the
Sin Tax Law since its passage in 2012 has brought substantial and increased revenues to
government coffers, the bulk going to health care and the remaining to tobacco farmers welfare.
True, there may still be some illicit tobacco trade going on, and this subsequently
somehow reduces total tax collections. Fortunately, our government revenue collection agencies
and law enforcers recognize the problem, and are committed to solve this.
Even the warning that high taxes could dampen cigarette and liquor sales significantly,
and thereby negate the expected government collections, has not happened. Demand has
somehow been dampened, but the significant rise in taxes has more than compensated for
dramatically improved collections.
After three years, collections are still rising by double digits. Compared to 2014, revenues
from excise taxes collected on tobacco and alcohol products rose 25 percent to P142 billion in
2015 from P113 billion the previous year.
And surprisingly, the bulk of revenues came from cigarettes, up 32 percent to P100
billion, with fermented liquors contributing14 percent or about P28 billion, distilled spirits and
compounded liquors accounting for P13.5 billion, and wines up P500 million.
SIN TAXES WORK
The World Health Organization (WHO), which has taken a strong interest in introducing
taxation of tobacco and alcohol products in the Philippines as a means towards raising health
revenues since over a decade ago, recently released its own assessment of the Sin Tax Laws
effectiveness.
Within the first year, the WHO said, the government had collected more than P500
million. The amount was divided for health care (85 percent) and displaced tobacco farmers (15
percent), as stipulated in the law.
HEALTH CARE
In 2014, the money was able to provide health care to an additional 14 million families or
roughly 45 million Filipinos, according to the WHO. There was also an 82 percent increase in
enrollment of the population in PhilHealth, which is higher than the 74 percent registered in
2009.
While victims of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as strokes and heart diseases
had been the initial target beneficiaries, the law and its implementing rules and regulations do not
specify this. The PhilHealth route was expected to do the work, especially since one out of four
Filipinos is affected by NCDs.
Somewhere along the line, therein arose problems and issues. While the poor who are
enrolled in PhilHealth now have the opportunity to access medication for NCDs, the option to
avail of treatment is still low, at less than 50 percent of those affected.
Health advocates say the new system still needs time to sink in so that those who
formerly shunned treatment because of fear of the cost would be convinced to enroll in
PhilHealth and go to their health center.
HELP FOR TOBACCO FARMERS
Allocation of the incremental 15 percent of the collected sin tax funds should go to
tobacco farmers that are and will be affected by the law. The number has been estimated at about
54,000 families.
In 2014, the amount that should have been allocated for the tobacco farmers was at P15
billion; disbursement of this money continues to be plagued by ambiguities, although there are
general conditions defined in the law and its IRR.
The money is supposed to fund alternative programs for tobacco farmers and workers,
including a shift to the production of other agricultural products or commercial crops, financial
support for those displaced, infrastructure projects like farm-to-market roads, and agro-industrial
projects that will enable them to be involved in the management and subsequent ownership of
projects like post-harvest and secondary processing facilities.
MISAPPROPRIATIONS
Already, there are charges of misappropriations, especially among stakeholders in the
health sector who feel the absence of clear directions on how the collected revenues should be
used has opened the door for unwarranted purchases that are not related to diseases due to
cigarette smoking or excessive liquor indulgence.
Conclusion:
The author ends the essay by recommending improvements for the Sin Tax Law
to be more efficient. He said that there must be transparency with the allocation of funds
and the government must see to it that the people really benefit from it.
Essay Language: The mode of the essay is quite calm and informative. It doesnt impose
anything to the reader, but it wants to impart awareness among the reader about what is
happening with regards to Sin Tax Law.
Essay Type: This essay is a reflective essay because it provokes the readers into thinking of what
is the right thing to do with Sin Tax Law, and the issues concerning it. The essay provides
information and facts about the topic so that the reader can analyze and judge well.
smoking and drinking, and it actually preserves ones life. Negative in the sense that some of the
politicians has taken advantage of the huge amount of money which was intended for the
peoples use.
To top it all, Sin Tax Law has been beneficial to peoples health and well-being, but then,
there is much more rooms for improvements. This law must cater not just the needs of the
people, but also the transparency in allocating the funds.
Maybe, it is quite fun and challenging to do wrong. But you must accept the reality that
in every wrongdoing, there is a consequence that you must face. There may be people who will
help you get off that way of doing wrong. Smoking and drinking can lead you to death. Sin Tax
Law is just a preventive measure by the government. But the decision is up to you, whether you
stop it, or not. Besides, not drinking and smoking also prevents those filthy hands in commiting a
crime. In such a way, you put a stop to yourself from destroying your body, and you help others
to avoid the temptation of sin. But still, at the end of the day, it is still the people who will
decide, whether they would continue in doing the fun and exciting wrong, or try doing what is
right.