You are on page 1of 15

Side-by-side comparison of ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003 and ANSI/ISEA Z87.

1-2010

Introduction
The ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 standard is developed by the Z87 Committee on Eye and Face Protection, which is an accredited committee
operating under the procedures established by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). As Secretariat of the committee,
ISEA is responsible for the administrative functions of the committee. The committees membership, consisting of a crossrepresentation of various stakeholder interests (producers, users, government agencies, technical and professional organizations,
testing laboratories) serves as the final approval body for the standard. The public is invited to review the standard at the same time
as it is being considered for approval by the Z87 committee.
There are challenges in providing a true side-by-side comparison of the two editions given that the 2010 edition represents a
dramatic change in the way the document is organized. The 2003 version and its predecessors were organized based on protector
type (spectacles, goggle, faceshields and welding helmets). Each protector type had its own chapter in the standard, leading to
significant repetition of content despite the fact that performance tests, optical properties and markings were the same regardless of
the protector type.
During the development of the 2010 edition, the Z87 Committee reorganized the document such that it focuses on demonstrating
protection against a given hazard, placing more emphasis on selecting a protector based on its protective properties and less on its
configuration type. This hazard-based approach mirrors accepted international eye and face protection standards and is seen as
more useful to the employer in choosing the appropriate eyewear for the worker.
As part of this emphasis of selection based on hazards, the 2010 edition includes performance testing and product markings for
workplace hazards including impact, droplet and splash, optical radiation, dust, fine dust and mist. General requirements for all
protector types are applied to assess optical qualities, minimum robustness (drop ball impact), ignition, corrosion resistance, and
minimum coverage. It is noted that there are some performance assessments that are unique (either in test execution or pass-fail
criteria or both) to a specific protector configuration, such as welding devices or prescription safety eyewear. The 2010 standard
defines the number of samples to be tested when assessing the protectors ability to meet applicable performance criteria.
Despite the change in appearance and addition of testing based on hazards, it is believed that the products complying with
ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010 are at least as protective as those meeting the editions cited in OSHA regulations. A comparison of the
product performance aspects is noted below:

Prepared under the direction of the Eye and Face Protection Group of the International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA), secretariat to ANSI/ISEA Z87.1

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 2

General Optical and Physical (for all protector types or individual configurations, as noted)
OPTICAL REQUIREMENTS
Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Optical Quality

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.4.3.1
Section 7.5.3
Section 8.4.1
Section 9.4.1
Section 10.5.1

Section 5.1.1 (criteria)


Section 9.1 (test method)

No change.

Luminous Transmission
(clear lenses)

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.4.3.6
Section 7.5.4
Section 8.4.6
Section 8.5.2
Section 9.4.5
Section 10.4.5
Section 10.5.2
Section 14.12 (test method)
Table 1

Section 5.1.2 (criteria)


Section 9.2 (test method)

No change.

Haze

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.4.3.5
Section 8.4.5
Section 9.4.4
Section 14.11 (test method)

Section 5.1.3 (criteria)


Section 9.3 (test method)

No change.

2003 version included criteria


and method in same section.
2010 version separates them
out for consistency in
standards organization.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 3

Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Refractive Power,
Astigmatism Plano

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.4.3.3
Section 8.4.3
Section 10.4.2
Section 14.10 (test method)

Section 5.1.4 (criteria)


Section 9.4 (test method)
Table 1

No change.

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.4.3.4
Section 8.4.4
Section 9.4.3
Section 10.4.3
Section 14.10 (test method)

Section 5.1.4 (criteria)


Section 9.4 (test method)
Table 1

No change.

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.4.3.2
Section 8.4.2
Section 9.4.2
Section 10.4.1
Section 14.9 (test method)

Section 5.1.4 (criteria)


Section 9.4 (test method)
Table 2

No change.

Section 7.5.3

Section 5.1.5

No change.

Resolving Power Plano

Prism and Prism Imbalance Plano

Refractive Power,
Astigmatism, Prism and Prism
Imbalance, Prescription

All tolerances have been


consolidated into a single
table.

All tolerances have been


consolidated into a single
table.

Reference test method


updated to reflect more
current version.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 4

PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS
Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Minimum Lens Thickness

Criteria for individual


protectors:
Section 7.3.2
Section 7.5.2.2
Section 8.2.2.2
Section 9.2.2.2

Section 5.3, Table 3 (criteria)

No change.

Drop-Ball Impact Resistance

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.3.1
Section 7.4.1
Section 7.5.1
Section 8.2.2.1
Section 9.2.2.1
Section 10.2.2.1

Section 5.2.1 (criteria)


Section 9.6 (test method)

Applies part of the basic


impact lens test from 2003
version to a full assembly as
an indicator of minimum
overall robustness and is
universally applied rather than
being protector dependent.
1 in. ball
2.4 oz.
50 in. drop

Section 14.4 (test method)

Flammability

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.6
Section 8.6
Section 9.6
Section 10.6
Section 14.6 (test method)

Replaced with ignition test.


(see below)

Not representative of realistic


use as it measured resistance
to material igniting from
contact with hot metal rather
than the unlikely event that
the device will be in flames.
Ignition test (as noted below)
replicate more realistic
assessment for protectors.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 5

Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Ignition

None.

Section 5.2.3 (criteria)


Section 9.7 (test)

New.

Corrosion Resistance

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.7
Section 8.7
Section 9.7
Section 10.7
Section 14.7 (test method)

Section 5.2.4 (criteria)


Section 9.8 (test method)

No change.

Cleanability

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.8
Section 8.8
Section 9.8
Section 10.8
Section 14.7 (test method)

Deleted.

Assessment seen as too


subjective to be useful.
Manufacturers instructions
tend to include cleaning
instructions that will not
compromise the device.

Minimum Coverage

None.

Section 5.2.5 (criteria)

Assures that little-to-none of


the soft tissue within the
wearers orbital socket is
exposed to flying particles.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 6

OTHER REQUIREMENTS (configuration specific)


Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Ventilation, goggles

Section 8.9
Section 8.9.1
Section 8.9.2

Section 5.5.1
Section 5.5.1.1
Section 5.5.1.2

Language specifies
orientation of protector
(maximum open position)
when tested to other methods

Screen windows and screen


lenses
Transmittance (non lens
area), welding protectors

Section 9.5

Section 5.5.2

No change.

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 8.10
Section 10.9.1
Section 14.12 (test method)

Section 5.5.3.1 (criteria)


Section 9.2 (test method)

Language clarifies area of


evaluation (that which
exposes itself forward).

Light Tightness, welding


protectors

Section 10.9.2 (criteria)


Section 14.14 (test method)

Section 5.5.3.2 (criteria)


Section 9.9 (test method)

No change.

Section 5.5.4

New. Language reflects


movement toward completedevice testing as required by
the 2010 edition.

Section 5.5.5

No change.

Frames for replaceable or


removable lenses

Respiratory protection,

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 11.2
Section 11.3
Section 11.4
Section 11.5

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 7

Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Replaceable Lenses, goggles


and welding
helmets/handshields

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 8.11
Section 10.10

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 5.6.1
Section 5.6.2

No change.

Section 5.7

New.

Aftermarket Components

Requires that non-original


equipment manufacturers of
devices that are represented
as an accessory to
protectors perform testing to
assure that such accessory
does not compromise the
integrity of the Z87 protector.
Also assures that replacement
lenses, claimed as compatible
with various frames, meet the
standard in all combinations.
These put structure and
requirements on the growing
number of universal
accessory and replacement
parts being offered.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 8

Assessments for Hazard-Based Protectors


IMPACT RATED (referred to as high-impact in 2003 standard)
Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Frames and Shells

Section 7.2

Section 6.1.2

2010 version requires that


plano spectacles are to be
tested as complete devices
and allows prescription
spectacles to be tested with a
representative test lens
Testing extended to frames
and shells encompass testing
of welding helmets.

Lateral (side coverage)

None.

Section 6.1.3 (criteria)


Section 9.10.1 (test method)

2010 standard now requires


lateral coverage for impact
rated protectors. Inclusion is
consistent with other
international product
standards.
Assessment criteria and test
method written to
accommodate spectacles
designed to be tested on the
smaller headform.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 9

Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

High Mass

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.2.1
Section 7.4.2.1.1
Section 8.2.1.1
Section 8.3.1.1
Section 9.2.1.1
Section 9.3.1.1
Section 10.2.1.1
Section 10.3.1.1
Section 14.1 (test method)

Section 6.2.2 (criteria)


Section 9.11 (test method)

No change in pass/fail criteria.

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.2.2
Section 7.4.2.1.2
Section 7.5.2.1
Section 8.2.1.2
Section 8.3.1.2
Section 9.2.1.2
Section 9.3.1.2
Section 10.2.1.2
Section 10.3.1.2
Section 14.2 (test method)

Section 6.2.3 (criteria)


Section 9.12 (test method)
Table 5

High Velocity

Test method language


clarifies designated test height
(50 in.) and changed the
spherical radius of the missile
from 1mm (2003) to
3.175mm (2010) revision to
provide a more blunt impact.
Includes language to
accommodate prescription
lens carriers.
No change in pass/fail criteria.
Velocities have been
consolidated into a single
table.
Assessment criteria and test
method written to
accommodate spectacles
designed to be tested on the
smaller headform.
Testing includes fewer impact
sites, in 30 increments and
defines the area of where the
impact must occur at each
test point.
Includes language to
accommodate prescription
lens carriers.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 10

Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Penetration

Criteria for individual


protectors. See:
Section 7.3.3
Section 7.4.2.1.3
Section 8.2.2.3
Section 8.3.1.3
Section 9.2.2.3
Section 9.3.1.3
Section 10.2.2.2
Section 10.3.1.3
Section 14.2 (test method)

Section 6.2.4 (criteria)


Section 9.13 (test method)

No change in pass/fail criteria.


Assessed only for impactrated protectors.
Test method section has been
updated to specify that new
needle must be used for each
drop and specifies the
diameter from the center of
the eye drop zone.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 11

OPTICAL RADIATION
Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Autodarkening Welding Filter


(ADF) Lenses

Section 10.12,1 and 10.12.2


and 10.12.3 (criteria)
Section 14.12 (test method)
Table 1

Section 7.1.3 (criteria)


Section 9.2 (test method)
Table 6

Requires testing in lightest


and darkest designated
states, not each designated
state.
Table number references are
changed, but spectral
requirements for shades are
unchanged.

Switching Index (ADF)

Section 10.12.4 (criteria)


Section 14.13 (test method)
Table 3

Section 7.1.3.1 (criteria)


Section 9.15 (test method)
Table 11

Occlusion

Section 10.12.5 (criteria)


Section 14.10 (test method)

Section 7.1.3.2 (criteria)


Section 9.15 (test method)

Optical Radiation Filters


---Special Purpose
Lenses/Filters

Specific descriptions:
Section 6.1.1.6
Section 6.1.2.3
Section 6.1.3.2
Section 6.1.4.1
Section 10.11 (marking)
Table 2

Section 3 (definition)
Table 10 (special purpose
lenses transmittance)

Clarifies that switching is


measured from the light to
dark state.
Table number references are
changed, but switching
speeds are unchanged.
No change.

No change. S marking still


applies.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 12

Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Optical Radiation
---Variable Tint Lenses

Section 4 (definition)
Section 6.2.4.5

Section 3 (definition)

No change. V marking still


applies.

Optical Radiation Filters


---Clear and Filter

Criteria for individual


protectors with filter lenses:
Section 7.4.3.6
Section 7.5.4
Section 8.4.6
Section 8.5.2
Section 9.4.5
Section 10.4.5
Section 10.5.2
Section 14.12 (test method)
Table 1

Sections 7.1.1 and 7.1.2


(criteria) except visible light
filters
Section 7.1.4 (criteria for light
filters)

Spectral transmittance
categories/requirements
expanded to allow matching
and selection of filters for
radiation hazards in greater
specificity than previous
edition. Such is noted by the
prefix markings for individual
filters as noted below:

Section 9.2 (test method)


except visible light filters

Table 6 (welding filter


transmittance)

No change to spectral
requirements. Added W
prefix to shade markings to
assist user in identifying
specific filter that might be
appropriate for hazard.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 13

Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Table 7 (ultraviolet filter


transmittance)

Added ultraviolet filtration


Scale numbers 2 through 6
and added U prefix to
indicate scale. This is to
assist user in identifying
specific filter that might be
appropriate for hazard.

Table 8 (infrared filter


transmittance)

Added infrared filtration Scale


numbers 1.3 through 10 and
added R prefix to indicate
scale. This is to assist user in
identifying specific filter that
might be appropriate for
hazard.

Section 7.1.4 (criteria)


Table 9 (visible light filter
transmittance)

Incorporates reference to
ANSI Z80.3-2008 standard to
include requirements for color
recognition that go with these
filters.
Added visible light filtration
Scale numbers 1.3 through 10
and added L prefix to
indicate scale. This is to assist
user in identifying specific
filter that might be appropriate
for hazard.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 14

Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

Transmittance categories for


face shield windows

Section 9.4.5 (criteria)


Section 14.12 (test method)

Variations in Luminous
Transmittance

Note (3) to Table 1

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale
Designation of light, medium
and dark faceshield no longer
called out. The ranges for
these previous designations
are covered, in part, by Table
9 for visible light filters. Such
table was included in concert
with the addition of tables for
UV and IR lenses.

Section 7.1.5 (criteria)

No change.

Transmittance of Housings
Goggles

Section 7.2.1 (criteria)


Section 9.2 (test method)

New. Related to expanded


optical radiation categories.

Transmittance of Housings
Faceshields

Section 7.2.2 (criteria)


Section 9.2 (test method)

New. Related to expanded


optical radiation categories.

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003/2010 Comparison page 15

DROPLET, SPLASH, DUST HAZARDS


Criteria

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2003

ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010

Notes/Rationale

Droplet and Splash

Not included.

Section 8.1 (criteria)


Section 9.16 (test method)

Incorporation of test in
consistent with other accepted
international eye and face
protection standards.

Dust

Fine Dust

Not included.

Not included.

Section 8.1 (criteria)


Section 9.17 (test method)

Section 8.1 (criteria)


Section 9.18 (test method)

Compliant products bear


marking D3 to assist users
in identifying specific
protectors that might be
appropriate for hazard.
Incorporation of test in
consistent with other accepted
international eye and face
protection standards.
Compliant products bear
marking D4 to assist users
in identifying specific
protectors that might be
appropriate for hazard.
Incorporation of test in
consistent with other accepted
international eye and face
protection standards.
Compliant products bear
marking D5 to assist users
in identifying specific
protectors that might be
appropriate for hazard.

You might also like