Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Process Biochemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/procbio
Short communication
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 8 March 2008
Received in revised form 25 October 2008
Accepted 5 November 2008
Keywords:
Nanober mat
Electrospinning
Juice processing
Apple juice
Clarication
Membrane ltration
1. Introduction
Juice and fruit juice products represent a very important
segment of the total processed fruit industry and their consumption signicantly increased during the last years. The major
amount of apple juice is consumed as a brightly clear product
obtained through the clarication of the raw apple juice [1].
Traditionally, apple juice clarication is achieved by addition of
ltering aids, such as gelatin and bentonite, promoting the
adsorption and/or coagulation of a wide range of compounds.
The particles in suspension are then removed by centrifugation or
common ltration, improving juices stability and appearance and
thus increasing the consumers acceptability [2]. However, this
process is not only expensive and laborious but it can also causes
modications on sensory and nutritional properties of the juice
[3,4]. In addition, in recent years there has been an increasing
demand for natural, free-additive products, motivating the juice
processing industry to develop and employ free-additive clarication techniques. Ultraltration is the mostly widespread freeadditive clarication method due to many advantages, including
higher juice yield, cost reduction and high quality products [2,5].
Unfortunately, a disadvantage of this process is the rapid reduction
of permeate ux by fouling of the membrane which declines the
system performance [6].
354
measurement, 25 mL of juice was titrated with 0.25 M NaOH to pH 8.1, and the
suitable volume was converted into malic acid equivalent. The total phenolic
content of samples was determined according to the Folin-Ciocalteau method [15].
Total protein was measured using a commercial protein kit (Micro Lowry,
Petersons ModicationSigma).
Free sugars (glucose, fructose and sucrose) where measured by HPLC using a
Beckman system with RI detector and an YMC-Pack polyamine II S-5um column
(250 mm 4.6 mm). Isocratic elution was carried out at room temperature using
acetonitrile/water (75:25) at 1.5 mL/min as the mobile phase. Organic acids were
quantied by HPLC using a Beckman System Gold, a diode array detector (210 nm)
and a Aminex Ion Exclusion HPX-87H column (300 mm 47.8 mm). Isocratic
elution was carried out at 40 8C using 5 mmol/L sulphuric acid at 0.6 mL/min as the
mobile phase.
2.6. Statistical analysis
A one-way ANOVA was used to test for any signicant difference between
treatments and control on each independent variable under study. A t-Student test
was performed to test for specic statistical signicance among data means.
Fig. 1. Images showing the general aspect of the PET ENM membrane (A) before ltration and (B) after apple juice ltration.
355
Fig. 2. SEM images showing the morphology of the PET electrospun membrane (A) magnication 500; (B) magnication 1500.
was very similar for all treatments and visibly higher than the
control (unclaried juice). The preliminary removal of pectins and
starch, common to all the clarication methods, is the main
responsible for the improved colour and turbidity of the claried
juice samples. However, ENM ltration and ultraltration promoted a signicant decrease in the turbidity of the juice (p < 0.05)
and the best clarication efciency. No signicant effects of the
treatments were found for the total solids content, soluble solids,
pH and acidity (p < 0.05).
Table 3 shows the concentration of total phenolic compounds,
proteins, selected free sugars and organic acids. As expected, the
protein content of the apple juice is very low and relatively high
errors are associated to the results, which should be regarded as
indicative. Nevertheless, in general, a decrease in the protein
concentration was observed after the clarication treatments,
being more evident for the conventional clarication and PET ENM
ltration (p < 0.05). Since the protein content of the juice is very
low, removing this kind of compounds will not reduce the
nutritional value of this product, but can be useful to reduce
turbidity and improve juice stability.
In general, it was observed a more pronounced reduction of free
sugars when the clarication method was performed using the PET
ENM ltration. Under the analytical conditions used, no signicant
Table 1
Operational parameters for conventional clarication, ultraltration and PET ENM ltration, related to the treatment of 150 mL juice volume.
Method
Conventional clarication
Ultraltration
PET ENM ltration
Average processing
time (min)
Required
temperature (8C)
Required
pressure (psi)
Clarication
agents added
Average ux
(mL cm 2 min
160
35
6
50
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
50.8
0.7
N.A.
0.17
3.5
Table 2
Physico-chemical properties (mean standard deviation, n = 3) of apple juice samples obtained from different clarication treatments.
Treatment
Coloura Abs440 nm
Turbiditya% T650 nm
Acidityb (%w/w)c
Unclaried (control)
Conventional clarication
Ultraltration
PET ENM ltration
0.53 0.07
0.41 0.04
0.40 0.03
0.40 0.03
75 4
82 4
87 2
88 1
13.1 0.6
13.2 0.6
13.0 0.2
13.1 0.7
14.5 0.4
14.5 0.5
14.2 0.2
14.4 0.5
0.33 0.03
0.32 0.03
0.35 0.01
0.32 0.02
a
b
b
b
a
b
c
c
Means with different letters within a column indicate signicant differences (p < 0.05).
All scores within each column were not signicantly different to p < 0.05 level.
c
As malic acid equivalent.
b
356
Table 3
Composition in protein, phenolic compounds, sugars and organic acids (mean standard deviation, n = 3) for apple juice samples obtained from different clarication
treatmentsa.
Unclaried (control)
Conventional clarication
Ultraltration
194 16 a
0.15 0.01
83 16 b
0.13 0.01
145 14 c
0.14 0.02
98 3 b
0.15 0.02
Sugars (g/L)
Fructose
Glucose
Sucrose
95.4 0.8 a
37.2 0.3 a
13.6 0.5 a
91.3 0.5 b
35.2 0.5 b
12.3 0.3 b
94.8 0.9 a
33.7 0.8 c
13.1 0.4 a
89.9 0.6 b
33.6 0.4 c
10.9 0.4 c
9.7 0.2
0.14 0.03
n.d.c
n.d.
9.9 0.3
0.10 0.02
n.d.
n.d.
9.8 0.1
0.18 0.05
n.d.
n.d.
9.8 0.2
0.13 0.03
n.d.
n.d.
Means with different letters within a row indicate signicant differences (p < 0.05).
Not signicantly different at p < 0.05 level.
c
n.d.not detected.
b
References
[1] McLellan MR, Padilla-Zakour OI. Juice processing. In: Barrett DM, Somogyi L,
Ramaswamy H, editors. Processing fruits: science and technology. Florida: CRC
Press; 2005.
[2] Gokmen V, Artik N, Acar J, Kahraman N, Poyrazoglu E. Effects of various
clarication treatments on patulin, phenolic compound and organic acid
compositions of apple juice. European Food Research and Technology
2001;213:1949.
[3] Chatterjee S, Chatterjee S, Chatterjee BP, Guha AK. Clarication of fruit juice
with chitosan. Process Biochemistry 2004;39:222932.
[4] Gokmen V, Cetinkaya O. Effect of pretreatment with gelatin and bentonite on
permeate ux and fouling layer resistance during apple juice ultraltration.
Journal of Food Engineering 2007;80:3005.
[5] de Bruijn JPF, Venegas A, Martinez JA, Borquez R. Ultraltration performance of
Carbosep membranes for the clarication of apple juice. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft Und-Technologie-Food Science and Technology 2003;36:397406.
[6] Youn KS, Hong JH, Bae DH, Kim SJ, Kim SD. Effective clarifying process of
reconstituted apple juice using membrane ltration with lter-aid pretreatment. Journal of Membrane Science 2004;228:17986.
[7] Frenot A, Chronakis IS. Polymer nanobers assembled by electrospinning.
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 2003;8:6475.
[8] Tan SH, Inai R, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Systematic parameter study for ultrane ber fabrication via electrospinning process. Polymer 2005;46(16):6128
34.
[9] Gibson P, Schreuder-Gibson H, Rivin D. Transport properties of porous membranes based on electrospun nanobers. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2001;187188:46981.
[10] Gopal R, Kaur S, Ma ZW, Chan C, Ramakrishna S, Matsuura T. Electrospun
nanobrous ltration membrane. Journal of Membrane Science
2006;281:5816.
[11] Yoon K, Kim K, Wang XF, Fang DF, Hsiao BS, Chu B. High ux ultraltration
membranes based on electrospun nanobrous PAN scaffolds and chitosan
coating. Polymer 2006;47:243441.
[12] Barhate RS, Ramarkrishna S. Nanobrous ltering media: ltration problems
and solutions from tiny materials. Journal of Membrane Science 2007;296:18.
[13] Ma Z, Kotaki M, Yong T, He W, Ramakrishna S. Surface engineering of
electrospun polyethylene terephthalate (PET) nanobers towards development of a new material for blood vessel engineering. Biomaterials
2005;26:252736.
[14] Veleirinho B, Rei MF, Silva JAL-DA. Solvent and concentration effects on the
properties of electrospun poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanober mats. Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics 2008;46:46071.
[15] Swain T, Hillis WE. The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica. The
quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. Journal of Science Food Agriculture 1959;10:638.