Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3600
Composite Structures
Mechanics
2015
Introduction 2 h
Materials 8 h
Properties 4 h
Mechanics 12 h
The module is divided into 3 sub
modules:
Processing 6 h
1. Laminate composition (1 h)
2. Micromechanics (1 h)
3. Macromechanics (10 h)
Vf =
Wf r f
W f r f + Wm r m
Wf =
Vf r f
V f r f + Vm r m
; Vm = 1 - V f
; Wm = 1 - W f
Hardener (h)
100
= 0.725
138
Wh = 1 - Wr =
Wr / rr
= 0.679
Wr / rr + Wh / rh
38
= 0.275
138
Vh = 1 - Vr = 0.321
( 0.679
0.321 0.321
=
0.679 0.679
0.472 47.2
=
1
100
Laminate Density
Laminate density can be computed when densities and volume or
weight fractions of the constituents are known
For a fibre/matrix laminate with no voids:
r c =V f r f + Vm r m =
1
W f / r f + Wm / r m
rc =
=
1
W f / r f + Wm / r m + Wb / rb
1
kg / dm3
0.35 0.455 0.195
+
+
2.54
1 .3
0 .6
= 1.23 kg / dm3
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 9
Laminate Thickness
Laminate thickness s can be computed when masses per unit area
(mA) and densities of the constituents (r) are known
For a fibre/matrix laminate:
mAf mAm
s=
+
rf
rm
Thickness is often computed from the mass per unit area, density
and volume fraction (V) of the reinforcement; alternatively, fibre
volume content can be evaluated when laminate thickness is known:
1 mAf
s=
Vf r f
1 mAf
Vf =
s rf
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 10
mAf Wm
0.455
mAm = Wm mAc = Wm
=
mAf =
0.9kg / m2 = 1.17kg / m 2
Wf Wf
0.35
mAb =
Wb
0.195
mAf =
0.9kg / m 2 = 0.5kg / m 2
Wf
0.35
W f Wm
Vv = 1 - r c
+
r f rm
W f Wm Wb
Vv = 1 - r c
+
+
r f r m rb
mAf
Vv = 1 tc
1
Wm
Wb
r +W r +W r
f
m
f
b
f
rc =
mAf
mAc
=
tc
W f tc
Wf =
mAf
m
mAc = Af
mAc
Wf
Vv = 1 -
0 .9 1
0.455
0.195
+
+
= 0.05 = 5%
0.0022 2540 0.35 1300 0.35 600
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 14
Micromechanics Introduction
Micromechanical analysis models predict composite behaviour
starting from the composition of the composite and from the
properties of the constituents
Micromechanical models are typically used
to predict ply properties in their principal
coordinate system
The so-called rules-of-mixtures relations
are the most commonly used models
Due to many simplifications, results provided
by micromechanical models are normally
applicable only for preliminary analyses
n 12 = -
e2
e1
, s1 0
s2 = s3 = s4 = s5 = s6 = 0
Engineering shear strain (g) is used
g
2
Micromechanics Assumptions
Linear elastic behaviour of
material constituents (and the
composite)
Rules-of-Mixtures Relations
Unidirectional Ply Youngs Modulus E1
Assumption:
e f 1 = e m1 = e 1
200
Ff 1 = Af s f 1 = V f A E fL e1
Fm1 = Am s m1 = Vm A Em e1
150
100
50
0
0
20
40
60
V_f
80
100
%
E_1
Modulus:
s 1 Ff 1 + Fm1
E1 = =
= V f E fL + Vm Em
e1
Ae1
f_1 = 100 %
Micromechanical model :
Standard
Fiber : T300;7/1750
Modified : Sun Sep 22 15:40:38 2002
Matrix material : Epoxy;Typical:1250
Modified : Thu Mar 01 16:06:23 2001
Rules-of-Mixtures Relations
Unidirectional Ply Youngs Modulus E2
Assumption:
s f 2 = s m2 = s 2
Elongations of the
constituents:
DL f 2 = L f 2 e f 2 = L V f s 2 E fT
8
6
4
2
0
DLm 2 = Lm 2 e m 2 = L Vm s 2 Em
20
40
60
V_f
80
100
%
E_2
Modulus:
E2 =
s2
s2
1
=
=
e 2 (DL f 2 + DLm 2 ) L V f E fT + Vm Em
f_1 = 100 %
Micromechanical model :
Standard
Fiber : T300;7/1750
Modified : Sun Sep 22 15:40:38 2002
Matrix material : Epoxy;Typical:1250
Modified : Thu Mar 01 16:06:23 2001
Rules-of-Mixtures Relations
e f 1 = e m1 = e 1
0.3
Transverse deformations:
DL f 2 = L f 2 e f 2 = - L2 V f n fLT e 1
DLm 2 = Lm 2 e m 2 = - L2 Vm n m e1
0.2
0.1
0
0
20
40
60
V_f
Poissons ratio:
e2
DL2 L2
n 12 = - = = V f n fLT + Vm n m
e1
e1
80
100
%
nu_12
f_1 = 100 %
Micromechanical model :
Standard
Fiber : T300;7/1750
Modified : Sun Sep 22 15:40:38 2002
Matrix material : Epoxy;Typical:1250
Modified : Thu Mar 01 16:06:23 2001
Rules-of-Mixtures Relations
Unidirectional Ply Shear Modulus G12
Assumption:
t f 12 = t m12 = t 12
30
g f 12 = t f 12 G fLT =t 12 G fLT
g m12 = t m12 Gm =t 12 Gm
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
V_f
80
100
%
G_12
Shear modulus:
G12 =
t 12
t 12
1
=
=
g 12 V f g f 12 + Vm g m12 V f G fLT + Vm Gm
f_1 = 100 %
Micromechanical model :
Standard
Fiber : T300;7/1750
Modified : Sun Sep 22 15:40:38 2002
Matrix material : Epoxy;Typical:1250
Modified : Thu Mar 01 16:06:23 2001
E1 = V f E fL + Vm Em = 80GPa
E2 =
1
= 6GPa
V f E fT + Vm Em
E1 = V f E fL + Vm Em
= 0.5 221GPa + 0.5 4GPa
= 112.5GPa
E2 =
1
V f E fT + Vm Em
1
=
0.5 84GPa + 0.5 / 4GPa
= 7.6GPa
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 22
Rules-of-Mixtures Relations
Unidirectional Ply CTE a1
Assumptions:
e f 1 = e m1 = a1 when T = 1o C
a fL p a1 p a m
(for clarity)
60
40
Ff 1 = Af s f 1r = V f A E fL (a1 - a fL )
Fm1 = Am s m1r = Vm A Em (a m - a1 )
CTE a1:
V f E fL a fL + Vm Em a m
SF = 0 Ff 1 = Fm1 a1 =
V f E fL + Vm Em
20
-20
0
20
40
60
V_f
80
100
%
alpha_1
f_1 = 100 %
Micromechanical model :
Standard
Fiber : T300;7/1750
Modified : Sun Sep 22 17:44:22 2002
Matrix material : Epoxy;Typical:1250
Modified : Sun Sep 22 17:43:58 2002
Rules-of-Mixtures Relations
Unidirectional Ply Strengths
Rules-of-mixtures relations can also be
derived for strengths by assuming that the
ply fails when
Rules-of-Mixtures Relations
Fabric and Mat Plies
To some extent, rules-of-mixtures relations can be applied also for
laminates made of fabric and mat plies
Youngs moduli of fabric and mat plies are often estimated with the
equation:
E1 = a V f E fL + Vm Em
where a is the efficiency factor:
a 1/2 for balanced fabric plies
a 3/8 for mat plies
Macromechanics Introduction
Macromechanical analysis
models predict laminate
behaviour in mechanical and
hygrothermal loading
Ply properties and laminate
structure are the initial data for the
analyses
Commonly used term for the theory
to be presented is the Classical
Lamination Theory (CLT)
Results provided by the models
describe well laminate behaviour
Macromechanics Outline
Assumptions
Notation and conventions
Ply behaviour
Symmetric laminate in mechanical loading
Unsymmetric laminate in mechanical loading
Hygrothermal behaviour
Laminate failure
Applicability of the models
Assumptions
Isotropic and/or orthotropic plies
Linear elastic behaviour of plies
Layers of the laminate are perfectly
bonded to adjacent layers
e
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 28
Assumptions (Continued)
The assumed mechanical behaviour of a symmetric laminate with 4
layers is illustrated below
In-plane loading
Flexural loading
e = z k
z
z
s
z
z
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 29
top
z0 = - h/2
zn = h/2
1
2
z1
zn-1
n-1
n
bottom
zn = h/2
1
2
z1
zn-1
n-1
n
bottom
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 32
top
z0 = - h/2
Examples
zn = h/2
1
2
z1
zn-1
n-1
n
bottom
g /2
e2
n 12 = ; s 1 0 ; s 2 = s 3 = t 23 = t 31 = t 12 = 0
e1
e
n xy = - y ; s x 0 ; s y = s z = t yz = t zx = t xy = 0
ex
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 34
e yf
g xyf
e
kx =
;ky =
; k xy =
h2
h2
h2
f
x
k
k
k =1 R = e z
\e = k z
N x = t s x dz ; M x = t s x zdz
N y = t s y dz ; M y = t s y zdz
N xy = tt xy dz ; M xy = tt xy zdz
Note! Mx / My is the moment that
bends the laminate in the
direction of the x-/y-axis
{s }
xyz
s x
s
y
s z
= ;
t yz
t zx
t xy
{e }
xyz
e x
e
y
e z
=
g yz
g zx
g xy
Note!
e y = a21 N x + a22 N y + a 26 N xy
g xy = a61 N x + a62 N y + a 66 N xy
a11
[a ] = a21
a31
Vector {b}
a12
a22
a32
a13
a23
a33
b1
{b} = b2
b
3
Multiplication:
a11
[a ] = a21
a31
Transpose:
a12
a22
a32
a13
a23
a33
[a]
a11
= a12
a13
Inverse:
a21
a22
a23
a31
a32
a33
Multiplication:
...
... ...
Ply Behaviour
Isotropic Ply Stress-Strain Relations 1/3
Three engineering constants
fully describe linear-elastic
behaviour of an isotropic
material:
Youngs modulus E
Poissons ratio n
shear modulus G
From the three constants,
only two are independent
since it can be shown that:
G=
2
1
s 1 = E e1
n = - e 2 e1
t 12 = G g 12
2
E
2 (1 + n )
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 44
Ply Behaviour
Isotropic Ply Stress-Strain Relations 2/3
Plane stress state:
s 3 = t 23 = t 31 = 0
s2
t 12
1
n
e1 = s 1 - s 2
E
E
n
1
e 2 = - s1 + s 2
E
E
1
g 12 = t 12
G
s1
s1
t 12
s2
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 45
Ply Behaviour
Isotropic Ply Stress-Strain Relations 3/3
Stress-strain relations in matrix form:
{e }
12
e1 1 E - n E 0 s 1 S11
= e 2 = - n E 1 E
0 s 2 = S21
g 0
0
1 G t 12 0
12
S12
S22
0
0 s 1
0 s 2 = [S ] {s }12
S66 t 12
Or:
{s }
12
s 1 b E
= s 2 = b n E
t 0
12
b n E 0 e1
1
b E
0 e 2 = [Q ] {e }12 ; b =
2
1
n
0
G g 12
[S] and [Q] are, respectively, the compliance and stiffness matrices
of the ply
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 46
Ply Behaviour
Orthotropic Ply in Its Principal Coordinate System 1/2
For orthotropic plies (materials), material properties are symmetric with
respect to three mutually orthogonal planes
In plane stress state, stress-strain relations in the principal coordinate
system are then:
s2
1
n 21
e1 = s 1 - s 2
E1
E2
n 12
1
s1 + s 2
E1
E2
1
g 12 =
t 12
G12
e2 = -
s1
t 12
s1
2
1
t 12
s2
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 47
Ply Behaviour
Orthotropic Ply in Its Principal Coordinate System 2/2
In matrix form:
{e }
- n 21 E2
0 s 1
e1 1 E1
= e 2 = - n 12 E1
1 E2
0 s 2 = [S ] {s }12
g 0
t
0
1
G
12 12
12
{s }
s 1 b E1
= s 2 = b n 12 E2
t
0
12
12
12
b n 21 E1 0 e1
1
b E2
0 e 2 = [Q] {e }12 ; b =
1 - n 12n 21
0
G12 g 12
n 21 E1 = n 12 E2
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 48
n 21 =
E2
8
n 12 = 0.3 = 0.06
E1
40
{s }
- 0.06 8 0
1 40
[S ] = - 0.3 40 1/ 8
0 1 / GPa
0
0
1 / 3
40.7 2.44 0
[Q] = [S ]-1 = 2.44 8.15 0 GPa
0
0
3
12
= [Q ]{e }12
40.73 2.44 0
0.2
= 2.44 8.15 0GPa 0 10-2
0
0
0
3
81.5
= 4.9 MPa
0
Ply Behaviour
third equation
When ply stress state is known in one
coordinate system, it can always be
computed in another coordinate system
+q
sy
t xy
t 12 + s 1 tan q =
sin q +
cosq
cosq
cosq
sy
t xy
t 12 tan q + s 2 =
cosq sin q
cosq
cosq
s2
t 12
t xy
+q
s1
sy
1
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 50
Ply Behaviour
Stress Transformations 2/2
The transformation equations become:
{s }
12
2
s 1 cos q
= s 2 = sin 2 q
t - sin q cosq
12
{s }
xy
sin 2 q
cos 2 q
sin q cosq
2 sin q cosq s x
- 2 sin q cosq s y = [T ] {s }xy
cos 2 q - sin 2 q t xy
= [T ] {s }12
-1
Ply Behaviour
2
y
ex
e x
e1 e1
[
]
[
]
e
=
e
=
T
e
=
T
2 2
y
e y
e g / 2
g / 2
e
12 12
xy
xy
+q
x
2
1
e12 =
g 12
2
Ply Behaviour
Strain Transformations 2/2
Use of engineering shear strains results in the following transformation
equations:
2
e1 cos q
{e }12 = e 2 = sin 2 q
g - 2 sin q cosq
12
sin 2 q
cos 2 q
2 sin q cosq
{e }
xy
Note!
[T ]
-T
sin q cosq e x
-T
- sin q cosq e y = [T ] {e }xy
cos 2 q - sin 2 q g xy
= [T ] {e }12
T
[ ]
= [T ]
T -1
Ply Behaviour
Stress and Strain Transformations Summary
cos 2 q
[T ] = sin 2 q
- sin q cosq
{s }
12
= [T ] {s }xy
12 = [T ] {e }xy
{e }
[T ]
-T
-T
sin 2 q
cos 2 q
sin q cosq
2 sin q cosq
- 2 sin q cosq
cos 2 q - sin 2 q
{s }
= [T ] {s }12
{e }
= [T ] {e }12
-1
xy
xy
[ ]
= [T ]
T -1
Ply Behaviour
Orthotropic Ply in the xyz Coordinate System 1/4
When (1) ply behaviour in the principal coordinate system and (2)
stress and strain transformation equations are known, it is easy to
derive constitutive equations that define ply behaviour in the xyz
coordinate system (i.e. in the laminate coordinate system):
{s }
xy
= [T ] {s }12
= [T ] [Q ] {e }12
-1
-1
= [T ] [Q ][T ]
-1
-T
{e }
xy
[Q ] = [T ] [Q][T ]
-1
-T
Q11 Q12
= Q21 Q22
Q16 Q26
Q16
Q26 ;
Q66
S11
[S ] = [Q ]-1 = S21
S16
S12
S22
S26
S16
S 26
S66
Ply Behaviour
Orthotropic Ply in the xyz Coordinate System 2/4
Worth of noting is that the stiffness
and compliance matrices do not
contain null terms
This means that there is a new type
of coupling in ply behaviour :
normal stress results in normal
strains and in shear strain
shear stress results in shear
strain and in normal strains
Ply Behaviour
Orthotropic Ply in the xyz Coordinate System 3/4
Ply engineering constants
can be derived from the
elements of the compliance
matrix:
1
1
1
Ex =
; Ey =
; Gxy =
S11
S22
S66
S12
S12
n xy = - ; n yx = S11
S 22
0.35
120
0.3
100
0.25
80
0.2
60
0.15
40
0.1
20
0.05
0
0
10
E_x
E_y
G_xy
20
30
40
50
theta
60
70
80
90
nu_xy
nu_yx
Ply Behaviour
Orthotropic Ply in the xyz Coordinate System 4/4
Due to the new coupling effect,
the moduli and Poissons ratios
do not fully define ply
behaviour
Additional terms needed to
define ply behaviour are called
the Lekhnitskiis coefficients:
h x , xy
h y , xy
g xy S16
e
S
=
=
; h xy , x = x = 16
e x S11
g xy S66
g xy S 26
e y S26
=
=
; h xy , y =
=
e y S 22
g xy S66
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
-2.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
theta
60
70
80
90
eta_xy,x
eta_xy,y
eta_x,xy
eta_y,xy
40.7 2.44 0
[Q] = 2.44 8.15 0GPa
0
0
3
[Q ] = [T ] [Q][T ]
-1
s x
39.0
s
=
Q
{
e
}
=
20
.
4
y
MPa
xy
t
18.8
xy
[]
T -1
s 1
49.8
s
=
[
T
]
{
s
}
=
9
.
6
2
MPa
xy
t
5 .9
12
Laminate Behaviour
Symmetric Laminate in In-plane Loading 1/4
Constitutive equations can be derived for a symmetric laminate in inplane loading when ply properties and laminate structure are known:
{N }
xy
N x h / 2 s x
s x ,i
n
= N y = s y dz = s y ,i hi
i =1
N - h / 2 t
t
xy
xy
xy ,i
z
= {s }xy ,i hi = [Q ] i {e }xy ,i hi
n
i =1
i =1
= [Q ] i hi {e }xy = [ A] {e }xy
i =1
s
z
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 60
Laminate Behaviour
Symmetric Laminate in In-plane Loading 2/4
On the other hand, laminate strains can be solved when the resultant
in-plane forces (applied loads) are known:
{e }
xy
= [ A] {N }xy = [a ] {N }xy
-1
[A] and [a] are, respectively, the in-plane stiffness and compliance
matrices of the laminate:
[A] = [Q ] h = [T ] [Q] [T ]
n
i =1
[a] = [ A]
i =1
-1
-T
i
hi
[ ]
Note! [T ] = [T ]
-T
T -1
-1
Laminate Behaviour
Symmetric Laminate in In-plane Loading 3/4
Replacing the resultant in-plane
forces with normalized in-plane
stresses yields:
{s }
0
xy
{e }
xy
1
{N }xy = 1 [A] {e }xy = [A* ] {e }xy
h
h
e
z
s
z
s0
Laminate Behaviour
Symmetric Laminate in In-plane Loading 4/4
In-plane engineering constants
can further be derived from the
elements of the normalized
compliance matrix:
1
1
1
;
E
=
;
G
=
y
xy
a*11
a*22
a*66
a*12
a*12
n xy = - * ; n yx = - *
a 11
a 22
a*16
a*16
h x , xy = * ; h xy , x = *
a 11
a 66
a*26
a*26
h y , xy = *
; h xy , y = *
a 22
a 66
Ex =
Carbon/epoxy [+q/-q]SE
Theta-laminate E_x, E_y, G_xy, nu_xy, ...
GPa
160
1.6
140
1.4
120
1.2
100
80
0.8
60
0.6
40
0.4
20
0.2
0
0
10
E_x
E_y
G_xy
20
30
40
50
theta
60
70
80
90
nu_xy
nu_yx
Laminate Behaviour
Carpet Plots
(0/45/90)s - E_x
GPa
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
45 layers
80
100
%
0% 0
20% 0
40% 0
60% 0
80% 0
0% 90
20% 90
40% 90
60% 90
80% 90
E_x
100% 0
125.00
100% 90
8.00
100% 45.00
17.48 GPa
Solution:
1. {N}xy
2. [A]
3. {e}xy
4. {e}12
5. {s}12
5kN
= 62.5kN / m
80mm
N x 62.5
N
=
0
y
kN / m
N 0
xy
Nx =
900
5kN
x
z
Solution:
1. {N}xy
2. [A]
3. {e}xy
4. {e}12
5. {s}12
[]
[]
[A] = hi [Q ]i
26.6 8.4 10.5
i =1
= 8.4
10.3 - 3.6 GPa = 6.8 8.2 0 MN / m
[Q]
30
[Q]
-30
{e }
xy
0 62500
6 .4 - 5 .2
0.3973
= - 5.2 16.4
0 0 10-8 = - 0.3258%
0
0
13.9 0
{e }
= [T T ] {e }xy
{e }
0.2165
= - 0.1450 %
- 0.6262
{e }
0.2165
= - 0.1450 %
0.6262
12
30
12
-30
12
-1
{s }
= [Q ]{e }12
{s }
84.65
30
= [Q ]{e }12 = - 6.52MPa
- 18.8
12
30
12
{s }
-30
12
= [Q ]{e }12
30
84.65
= - 6.52 MPa
18.8
1
1
Ex = * =
Pa = 19.7GPa
-11
a11 5.1 10
1
1
6.4 - 5.2 0
Ey = * =
Pa = 7.6GPa
-11
-8
a22 13.1 10
= 0.8mm - 5.2 16.4 0 10 m / N
0
0 13.9
1
1
Gxy = * =
Pa = 9.0GPa
-11
a66 11.1 10
5.1 - 4.2 0
*
-11
= - 4.2 13.1 0 10-11 m 2 / N
a
4
.
2
10
Laminate Behaviour
Symmetric Laminate in Bending 1/4
As for in-plane loading, constitutive
equations can be derived for a
symmetric laminate in bending by
noting that:
{e }
xy
{M }
= z {k }xy
xy
e
z
M x h / 2 s x
= M y = s y z dz
M -h / 2 t
xy
xy
s
z
Laminate Behaviour
Symmetric Laminate in Bending 2/4
{M }
xy
M x h / 2 s x
h/2
= M y = s y z dz = [Q ] i{e }xy ,i z dz
-h / 2
M -h / 2 t
xy
xy
h/ 2
= [Q ] i z {k }xy z dz = [Q ] i z 2 dz {k }xy
-h / 2
-h / 2
h/ 2
1 n
3
3
= [Q ] i zi - zi -1
3 i =1
) {k } = [D] {k }
xy
xy
{k }
xy
= [ D]-1{M }xy
= [ d ]{M }xy
[D] and [d] are respectively the flexural stiffness and compliance
matrices of the laminate
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 72
Laminate Behaviour
Symmetric Laminate in Bending 3/4
e = z k
{s }
f
xy
6
6
{
}
[D ] {k }xy
M
=
xy
2
2
h
h
12
= 3 [D ] {e f }xy = [D* ] {e f }xy
h
{e } = [D ] {s } = [d ] {s }
* -1
xy
[D*]
xy
xy
[d*]
and
are, respectively, the
normalized flexural stiffness and
compliance matrices of the laminate
sf
Laminate Behaviour
Symmetric Laminate in Bending 4/4
Flexural engineering constants can further be derived from the elements
of the normalized flexural compliance matrix:
f
f
xy
1
1
1
f
f
= * ; E y = * ; G xy = *
d 11
d 22
d 66
d *12
=- *
d 11
h f x , xy =
*
16
d
d *11
; n
f
yx
d *12
=- *
d 22
; h f xy , x =
*
16
d
d *66
1.4
120
1.2
100
80
0.8
60
0.6
40
0.4
20
0.2
h f y , xy =
d 26
d * 22
; h f xy , y =
d 26
d *66
0
0
10
E^f_x
E^f_y
G^f_xy
20
30
40
50
theta
60
70
80
90
nu^f_xy
nu^f_yx
M =Fx
10 N
450
F L 10 N 450mm
Mx =
=
b
80mm
x
z
M x 56.25
Nm
M
=
0
y
M 0 m
xy
1 n
[D ] = [Q ] (zi3 - zi3-1 )
3 i =1
i
[ ] [(-0.0002)
1
{Q
3
30o
- 30o
- 30o
30
- (-0.0004)3 m3
[ ] [0 - (-0.0002) ]m
+ [Q ] [(0.0002) - 0 ]m
+ [Q ] [(0.0004) - (0.0002) ]m }
+Q
[Q ]
30o
{k }
xy
-1
1
= 0.36 0.44 0.11
0
Nm
/
m
=
0
.
05356
mm
Nm
0
- 0.0572
0.34 0.11 0.38
{e }
i
xy
= zi {k }xy
{e }
12
= [T T ] {e }xy
-1
{s }
12
= [Q ]{e }12
i
10 N
450
{e }
xy
0.3973 0.0836
= - 0.3258 + z - 0.053561 / mm
0
- 0.0572
5 kN
x
z
{e }
12
= [T T ] {e }xy
-1
{s }
= [Q ]{e }12
i
12
Laminate Behaviour
Unsymmetric Laminate 1/5
In an unsymmetric laminate, the
neutral plane does not coincide with
the midplane
in-plane forces result in midplane
strains and curvatures
{e }
xy
= {e 0 }xy + z {k }xy
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 79
Laminate Behaviour
Unsymmetric Laminate 2/5
Constitutive equations can be derived when the laminate structure, ply
behaviour and the form of strain distribution are known:
{N }
xy
h/2
{s }
xy dz =
-h / 2
[Q ] {e }
h/ 2
xy dz =
-h / 2
[Q ] [{e }
h/2
xy
+ z {k }xy ]dz =
-h / 2
h/2
0
h/2
-h / 2
{M }
xy
h/ 2
{s }
-h / 2
xy z dz =
[Q ] {e }
h/2
-h / 2
xy z dz =
[Q ] [{e }
h/2
xy
+ z {k }xy ] z dz =
-h / 2
h/ 2
0
h/2
-h / 2
Laminate Behaviour
Unsymmetric Laminate 3/5
To summarize:
{N }
xy
{M }
xy
[A] = [Q ]
h/2
-h / 2
dz = [Q ] i ( zi - zi -1 ) = [Q ] i hi
0
N
A B e
=
k
M
B
D
xy
xy
i =1
i =1
1 n
[B] = [Q ] i z dz = [Q ] i zi 2 - zi-12
2 i =1
-h / 2
h/2
Or:
1 n
[D] = [Q ] i z dz = [Q ] i zi 3 - zi-13
3 i =1
-h / 2
h/2
Laminate Behaviour
Unsymmetric Laminate 4/5
Laminate midplane strains and curvatures can be solved when the
resultant in-plane forces and resultant moments are known:
{e } = [a ]{N } + [b ]{M }
0
xy
{k }
xy
xy
xy
or
e 0
a bN
= T
k xy b d M xy
The matrices [a], [b] and [d] are called, respectively, the in-plane,
coupling and flexural compliance matrices:
[b ] = -[a][B]([D] - [B][a][B])
-1
[d ] = ([D] - [B][a][B])
-1
Laminate Behaviour
Unsymmetric Laminate 5/5
Sometimes its advantageous to perform matrix inversion only partly:
{N }
{M }
xy
xy
{e } = [a]{N } - [a ][B]{k }
0
xy
{M }
xy
xy
xy
The equations provide, for example, the in-plane strains in the wall of
a cylindrical pressure vessel ({k}xy = 0) and the applied moments due
to the curvature restraint of the wall
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 83
{N }
xy
{M }
xy
= [ A]{e
} + [B]{k }
xy
xy
N x A11
N A
y 12
N xy A16
=
M x B11
M y B12
M
xy B16
[A] = h [Q ]
n
i =1
1 n
[B] = [Q ] (zi2 - zi2-1 )
2 i =1
i
1 n
[D ] = [Q ] (zi3 - zi3-1 )
3 i =1
i
1.3o
p
o
k xy = 180 = 0.02271 m
1
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 84
N x A11
0 A
12
0 0
=
0 0
0 0
0 B16
0 B16 e xo
0 B26 e yo
0
0
o
o
0
=
A
e
+
A
e
+ B26 k xy
12 x
22 y
D
= 2 B16 - ( A11 + A12 ) 66 k xy
B16
Laminate Behaviour
Meaning of the Coupling Terms 1/3
Laminate Behaviour
Meaning of the Coupling Terms 2/3
B66 0
Laminate Behaviour
Meaning of the Coupling Terms 3/3
Laminate Behaviour
Classification Symmetric Laminates
Laminate Behaviour
Classification Antisymmetric Laminates
Laminate Behaviour
Classification Unsymmetric Laminates
Laminate Behaviour
Quasi-Isotropic Laminates
So-called quasi-isotropic
laminates are a specific
group of laminates
Laminate E and G
GPa
60
40
20
0
20
40
60
60
[0/90/45/-45]SE; and
[0/60/-60]SE
E
G
40
20
0
20
x-direction -->
40
60
GPa
Carbon/epoxy
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 92
Laminate Behaviour
Load Response
Stiffness and compliance matrices define load response of the
laminate:
laminate strain state can be computed when in-plane forces and
moments applied to laminate are known; or
in-plane forces and moments can be computed for a given state of
deformation
When laminate strain state is known, the strain state of each layer is
also known
Layer stresses can further be computed from layer strains
Laminate Behaviour
Hygrothermal Effects Introduction
Hygrothermal stresses develop in
laminates when layers with different
properties and/or orientations are not
able to expand/compress freely
Assuming linear elastic behaviour,
hygrothermal stresses in a layer can
be computed with the Hookes law
from residual strains of the layer
Hygrothermal strains and stresses
can further be added to the strains
and stresses due to mechanical
loading
Laminate strain
due to DT
1
2
3
4
Free strain of
layer 4 due to
DT
Residual strain
of layer 4 due
to DT
Laminate Behaviour
Hygrothermal Effects Notation and Conventions
e0I
ee
-erI
layer 1
layer 1
layer 2
ee
erI
e NM
eI
stress-free state
layer 2
laminate
Laminate Behaviour
Hygrothermal Effects Ply
Ply behaviour in the principal coordinate system:
e 1 1 E1 - n 21 E2 0 s 1
a1
b1
s + DT a + Dc b
e
=
n
E
1
E
0
2 12 1
2
2
2
2
g 0
t
0
0
0
1
G
12 12
12
or shortly:
{e }
12
E2 ; a 2 ; b 2
1
Note! The unit of b is [1/w%]
E1 ;a1 ; b1
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 96
Laminate Behaviour
Hygrothermal Effects Equivalent Stresses
To model hygrothermal behaviour of a laminate, ply equivalent
stresses are defined
These are the mechanical stresses that result in the same ply
strains as a temperature / moisture content change
In the principal coordinate system:
12
{G } = [Q]{b }
Dm =1
12
12
{G } = [T ] {G }
-1
DT
xy
DT
12
{G } = [T ] {G }
-1
Dm
xy
Dm
12
Laminate Behaviour
Hygrothermal Effects Equivalent Forces and Moments
Equivalent in-plane forces and bending moments of a laminate
due to a temperature change can further be computed:
{N }
DT
xy
{G }
h/2
DT
-h / 2
{M }
DT
xy
DT
{
dz
=
G
}xy,i (zi - zi -1 )
xy ,i
n
i =1
1 n DT
2
2
= {G }xy ,i z dz = {G }xy ,i zi - zi -1
2 i =1
-h / 2
h/2
DT
These are the forces and moments that result in the same
laminate strains as a temperature change
Analogous expressions can be written for equivalent in-plane forces
and bending moments due to a moisture content change
Laminate Behaviour
Hygrothermal Effects Constitutive Equations
Constitutive equations with hygrothermal effects included can further
be written:
0
N DT
N Dc
N
A B e
=
- DT - Dc
M xy B D k xy M xy M xy
or:
N A
N DT
N Dc
N
A B e 0
A = + DT + Dc =
k
M
B
D
M
M
M
xy
xy xy
xy
xy
where:
N and M are the externally applied forces and moments
NA and MA are the apparent forces and moments
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 99
Laminate Behaviour
Hygrothermal Expansion 1/2
The coefficients of hygrothermal expansion can be derived from the
constitutive equations by noting that externally applied forces and
moments are zero in free expansion:
N DT
N Dc
N
A B e 0
0
=
- DT - Dc =
M xy B D k xy M xy M xy 0
Additionally, for a symmetric laminate:
{M } = {M }
DT
Dc
xy
xy
= 0 and [B ] = 0
DT =1
= [ A] {N
Dc =1
-1
{b }
xy
-1
{0} = [A]{e }
0
xy
} = [a] {G } (z
n
xy
DT =1
xy ,i
i =1
} = [a] {G } (z
n
xy
i =1
Dc =1
xy ,i
- {N DT }xy - {N Dc }xy
- zi -1 )
- zi -1 )
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 100
Laminate Behaviour
Hygrothermal Expansion 2/2
Note:
The derived hygrothermal expansion coefficients are also valid for
unsymmetric laminates in zero-curvature state, i.e. when curvature
is suppressed
Hygrothermal expansion and curvature coefficients can be derived
analogously for unsymmetric laminates that are allowed to curve
It is relatively straightforward to extend the theory to cover the
cases where temperature and/or moisture content is not constant
through the thickness of the laminate
{e }
xy
{N } = {G} (z
n
DT
xy
i =1
- zi -1 )
xyi
Q11 Q12 0 a1
(E1a1 + n 21E1a 2 ) D
1.11
{G DT }12 = DT Q12 Q22 0 a 2 = DT (n 12 E2a1 + n 21E2a 2 ) D = -16.8MPa
0
0 0 Q66 0
0
xy
0o
90o
xy
xy
N
m
{N }
xy
{s }
0
xy
= -{N DT }xy
{N }
xy
7175
N
= 7175
0 m
8.97
= 8.97 MPa
0
{e }
xy
= {e }12 = 0
{e } = [S ]{s } + D T {a }
{s } = -D T [Q ]{a }
12
12
12
12
{s }
12
=0
12
= {s }12 = {s }12
0
90
1.11
= 16.8MPa
0
47.7
-1
= [T ] {G}12 = 6.41 MPa
m 35.8
N
N
A B e
+ DT =
k
M
B
D
M
xy
xy
xy
{G}
{N } = [A]{e }
38.2
{N DT }xy = 5.1 kN
0 m
DT
DT
xy
xy
= {G} ( zi - zi -1 )
n
i =1
xyi
8.04 11.92 0
[A] = 11.92 36.08 0 MN
m
0
0 12.01
60o
xy
{e }
xy
0.89
-1
= [ A] {N DT }xy = - 0.28%
0
{e }
I 60
12
{e }
o
I 60
0 12
= [T T ]60 {e }xy
-1
0.013
= 0.597%
-1
a1 - 0.05
= DT a 2 = 1.2 %
0 0
{e }
I 60
r 12
{s }
60o
12
= {e I }12 - {e 0I }12
60
= [Q ]{e
60
o
I 60
r 12
0.06
= - 0.65%
-1
35
= - 35MPa
- 20
Laminate Failure
Analysis Approach 1/4
When only mechanical loads are applied to a laminate, laminate failure
analysis is performed as follows:
1. Laminate strain state due to the applied loads is computed:
e 0
a bN
= T
k xy b d M xy
2. Layer strains at the top (t) and bottom (b) surfaces of the layer are
computed:
{e }
t
xy , k
{e }
b
xy , k
= {e 0 }xy + zk {k }xy
{s }
= [Q ]{e } xy ,k
t
xy , k
{s }
= [Q ]{e } xy ,k
b
xy , k
Laminate Failure
Analysis Approach 2/4
4. Coordinate transformations are made to obtain layer strains and
stresses in their principal coordinate systems
{e }
12 , k
= [T ]
-T
{e }
xy , k
{s }
12 , k
= [T ]{s }xy ,k
Laminate Failure
Analysis Approach 3/4
The techniques applied to compare the layer strain/stress state with
ply failure strains/stresses in principal loading conditions are generally
called failure criteria
Three types of failure criteria are in use:
independent failure criteria: strain/stress components are
compared independently with measured failure strains/stresses
partly interactive criteria: interaction of two strain/stress
components is accounted for
fully interactive criteria: interaction of all three strain/stress
components is accounted for
Laminate Failure
Analysis Approach 4/4
When internal strains/stresses due to
temperature and/or moisture content
changes exist, layer strains/stresses to
be used in failure analyses are:
sum of the stresses due to external
(mechanical) loading and residual
stresses that are computed from
residual strains of layers:
{s }
xy , k
{ }
= [Q ] {e }xy ,k + e r
NM
DT
xy , k
{ } )
+ er
Dm
xy , k
Laminate Failure
Failure Criterion Functions
Failure criteria are expressed in the form of failure criterion functions
The functions are constructed so that their value is
zero (0) with no loads applied
one (1) when the lowest load resulting in failure is applied
Stress-based criteria:
Strain-based criteria:
0 f (s 1 ,s 2 ,t 12 ) < 1 no failure
1 f (s 1 ,s 2 ,t 12 ) failure
0 f (e1 , e 2 , g 12 ) < 1 no failure
1 f (e1 , e 2 , g 12 ) failure
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 110
Laminate Failure
Criticality of a Load
Criticality of a load can be expressed with
{F }
failure
= RF {F }applied
or
MoS = RF - 1 or
Note!
RF > 1 and MoS > 0 indicate that the laminate does not fail
Laminate Failure
Maximum Stress Criterion
Maximum stress criterion is an independent criterion in which each
stress component is compared to the corresponding failure stress and
the highest ratio is selected to describe severity of the loading
Failure criterion function is thus:
s s t
f = max 1 , 2 , 12
S
X Y
where X, Y and S are ply failure stresses in the principal loading
conditions:
s1 0 X = X t ; s1 < 0 X = X c
s 2 0 Y = Yt ; s 2 < 0 Y = Yc
Note! t = tension,
c = compression
Laminate Failure
Example 1 Maximum Stress Criterion
FPF - Layer stresses/strains
Carbon/epoxy [30]
Laminate : Hiili/epoksi [30]
Modified : Sun Oct 13 11:33:38 2002
Lay-up : (+30a) h = 0.2 mm
Ply
a T300;Epoxy;UD-.200/210/60
sig^f_x = 0 MPa
sig^f_y = 0 MPa
tau^f_xy = 0 MPa
=
=
0 MPa
0 MPa
1 30
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
theta
30
t
b
sig_1
MPa
93.75
93.75
sig_2
MPa
31.25
31.25
tau_12
MPa
-54.13
-54.13
eps_1
%
0.0675
0.0675
eps_2
%
0.3681
0.3681
gam_12
%
-1.0825
-1.0825
Laminate Failure
Maximum Strain Criterion
Maximum strain criterion is an independent criterion in which each
strain component is compared to the corresponding failure strain and
the highest ratio is selected to describe severity of the loading
Failure criterion function is thus:
e1 e 2 g 12
f = max
,
,
X e Ye Se
where Xe, Ye and Se are ply failure strains in the principal loading
conditions:
e1 0 X e = X et ; e1 < 0 X e = X ec
e 2 0 Ye = Yet ; e 2 < 0 Ye = Yec
Note! t = tension,
c = compression
Laminate Failure
Example 1 Maximum Strain Criterion
FPF - Layer stresses/strains
Laminate :Carbon/epoxy
Hiili/epoksi [30] [30]
Modified : Sun Oct 13 11:33:38 2002
Lay-up : (+30a) h = 0.2 mm
Ply
a T300;Epoxy;UD-.200/210/60
=
=
sig^f_x = 0 MPa
sig^f_y = 0 MPa
tau^f_xy = 0 MPa
0 MPa
0 MPa
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
theta
30
t
b
sig_1
MPa
93.75
93.75
sig_2
MPa
31.25
31.25
tau_12
MPa
-54.13
-54.13
eps_1
%
0.0675
0.0675
eps_2
%
0.3681
0.3681
gam_12
%
-1.0825
-1.0825
Laminate Failure
Fully Interactive Failure Criteria
In fully interactive failure criteria, the interaction of all stress/strain
components is accounted for
The subset of fully interactive criteria, called the quadratic criteria, are
commonly used for fibre-reinforced plies
In stress space, assuming plane stress state, the failure criteria are
generally of the form:
The coefficients Fii and Fi are determined so that the value of the failure
criterion function is one in the principal loading conditions when failure
load is applied
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 116
Laminate Failure
Tsai-Hill Criterion
In the Tsai-Hill Criterion it is assumed that F1 = F2 = F6 = 0 which results
in the failure criterion function:
s s t s s
f = 1 + 2 + 12 - 1 2 2
X
X Y S
s1 0 X = X t ; s1 < 0
2
s 2 0 Y = Yt
X = Xc
; s 2 < 0 Y = Yc
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 117
Laminate Failure
Example 1 Tsai-Hill Criterion
FPF - Layer stresses/strains
Carbon/epoxy
Laminate : Hiili/epoksi
[30] [30]
Modified : Sun Oct 13 11:33:38 2002
Lay-up : (+30a) h = 0.2 mm
Ply
a T300;Epoxy;UD-.200/210/60
=
=
sig^f_x = 0 MPa
sig^f_y = 0 MPa
tau^f_xy = 0 MPa
0 MPa
0 MPa
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
theta
30
t
b
sig_1
MPa
93.75
93.75
sig_2
MPa
31.25
31.25
tau_12
MPa
-54.13
-54.13
eps_1
%
0.0675
0.0675
eps_2
%
0.3681
0.3681
gam_12
%
-1.0825
-1.0825
Laminate Failure
Tsai-Wu Criterion
In the Tsai-Wu criterion, all components of the general expression are
included
The coefficients Fij and Fi are solved by considering failure in the
principal loading conditions, which yields:
2
2
2
1 1
s1
s2
t 12 1
1
s 1 + - s 2 + 2 F12 s 1 s 2
f =
+
+ 2 + X t X c Yt Yc S
Xt Xc
Yt Yc
Laminate Failure
Example 1 Tsai-Wu Criterion
FPF - Layer stresses/strains
Carbon/epoxy
Laminate : Hiili/epoksi
[30] [30]
Modified : Sun Oct 13 11:33:38 2002
Lay-up : (+30a) h = 0.2 mm
Ply
a T300;Epoxy;UD-.200/210/60
=
=
sig^f_x = 0 MPa
sig^f_y = 0 MPa
tau^f_xy = 0 MPa
0 MPa
0 MPa
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
theta
30
t
b
sig_1
MPa
93.75
93.75
sig_2
MPa
31.25
31.25
tau_12
MPa
-54.13
-54.13
eps_1
%
0.0675
0.0675
eps_2
%
0.3681
0.3681
gam_12
%
-1.0825
-1.0825
Laminate Failure
Hoffman Criterion
The Hoffman criterion is equivalent to the Tsai-Wu criterion, except that
the value of the coefficient F12 is specified to be - F11
This yields:
2
2
2
1 1
s1
s2
t 12 1
1
s1 s 2
s 1 + - s 2 f =
+
+ 2 + X t X c Yt Yc S
Xt Xc
Xt Xc
Yt Yc
Laminate Failure
Example 1 Hoffman Criterion
FPF - Layer stresses/strains
Carbon/epoxy
Laminate : Hiili/epoksi
[30] [30]
Modified : Sun Oct 13 11:33:38 2002
Lay-up : (+30a) h = 0.2 mm
Ply
a T300;Epoxy;UD-.200/210/60
=
=
sig^f_x = 0 MPa
sig^f_y = 0 MPa
tau^f_xy = 0 MPa
0 MPa
0 MPa
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
theta
30
t
b
sig_1
MPa
93.75
93.75
sig_2
MPa
31.25
31.25
tau_12
MPa
-54.13
-54.13
eps_1
%
0.0675
0.0675
eps_2
%
0.3681
0.3681
gam_12
%
-1.0825
-1.0825
Laminate Failure
Puck Criterion
An example of partly interactive failure criteria is the Puck criterion
that is applicable for unidirectional plies
In the criterion, the criticality of the stress state in the fibre direction is
predicted with the maximum stress condition and matrix/interphase
failure is predicted with an interactive criterion:
s
s t
f = max ( f f , f m ) ; f f = 1 ; f m = 2 + 12
X
Y S
s1 0 X = X t ; s1 < 0 X = X c
s 2 0 Y = Yt ; s 2 < 0 Y = Yc
2
Laminate Failure
Example 1 Puck Criterion
FPF - Layer stresses/strains
Carbon/epoxy
Laminate : Hiili/epoksi
[30] [30]
Modified : Sun Oct 13 11:33:38 2002
Lay-up : (+30a) h = 0.2 mm
Ply
a T300;Epoxy;UD-.200/210/60
=
=
sig^f_x = 0 MPa
sig^f_y = 0 MPa
tau^f_xy = 0 MPa
0 MPa
0 MPa
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
theta
30
t
b
sig_1
MPa
93.75
93.75
sig_2
MPa
31.25
31.25
tau_12
MPa
-54.13
-54.13
eps_1
%
0.0675
0.0675
eps_2
%
0.3681
0.3681
gam_12
%
-1.0825
-1.0825
Laminate Failure
Modified Puck Criterion
The modified Puck criterion is identical with the original Puck
criterion, except for the matrix/interphase failure that is predicted with
the expression:
2
2
s2
t 12 1 1
fm =
+ 2 + - s 2
Yt Yc S
Yt Yc
Laminate Failure
Hashin Criterion
Fibre failure and matrix/interphase failure predicted separately also in
the Hashin criterion:
f = max ( f f , f m )
2
s 1 t 12
f f = +
Xt S
2
s t
f m = 2 + 12
Yt S
when s 1 0 ;
s1
ff = Xc
when s 1 < 0
when s 2 0
2
2
2
s2
s
t
Y
2 12
c
f m = + + - 1 when s 2 < 0
2 S S 2S
Yc
Laminate Failure
Example 1 Comparison of Failure Analysis Results
Carbon/epoxy [30]
Laminate Failure
Maximum strain
Maximum stress
Laminate Failure
Reserve Factor vs. Value of Failure Criterion Function
With independent failure criteria, the relation between the value of
reserve factor and failure criterion function is:
RF =
1
f
With quadratic criteria, the RF value must be solved from the second
order equation, e.g. with the Hoffman criterion the RF value is solved
from the equation:
2
2
2
1
1 1
s
s
t
s1 s 2
1
2
1
2
12
s 1 + - s 2 = 1
RF
+
+ 2 + RF Xt Xc
Yt Yc
X t X c Yt Yc S
X t X c
{s }
12
MoS = RF - 1 =
1
- 1 = 1.6%
0.984
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 130
{s }
12
2 s1
2 s2
2 s 12
2 s 1s 2
RF + RF + RF
=1
- RF
2
X
X
Y
S
1
1
2
f RF = 1 RF =
MoS =
- 1 = -0.14 = -14%
f
1.357
2
{s
o
DT =125 60
12
Since applied forces and moments are zero and the solution is linearly
dependent on DT , the stresses per unit temperature change are :
{s }
o
DT =1 60
12
1
=
{s DT =125 }1260 = {280 - 280 - 162}T 103 Pa
o
DT
C
o
1
0
.
28
0
.
28
0
.
16
0
.
28
(
0
.
28
)
2
2
= DT
+
+
2
C
1400
1400 100 40
1
= DT 2 2.4 10-5 2 = 1 , for failure
C
2
1
o
o
DT =
C
=
204
C
-5
2.4 10
T = 204 oC + 25 oC = 229 oC
Laminate Failure
Failure Envelopes
Failure envelopes are commonly
used to display combinations of
loads that result in failure
Envelopes can be created in
stress or strain space
eps_y
%
1
-1
-2
-3
-1
-0.5
0.5
eps_x
gam_xy = 0 %
gam_xy = 0.5 %
gam_xy = 1 %
1.5
%
Carbon/epoxy [0]
Laminate Failure
Comparison of Failure Criteria
Failure envelopes created using
different failure criteria clearly
indicate the nature of different
types of failure criteria:
eps_y
%
1
-1
-4
-2
-3
-1
-0.5
0.5
eps_x
Tsai-Hill
Max stress
Max strain
1.5
%
Carbon/epoxy [0]
Laminate Failure
FPF and DLF Analyses
Laminate failure analyses are commonly performed using different
initial data used for plies:
in the FPF (First Ply Failure) analysis, stresses/strains resulting
in first failure are used for plies FPF analysis gives a prediction
for the load with which laminate degradation initiates
in the DLF (Degraded Laminate Failure) analysis, stresses/
strains resulting in final failure are used for plies DLF analysis
gives a prediction for the load resulting in the final failure of the
laminate
Note! Another common term for the DLF type analysis is the LPF
(Last Ply Failure) analysis
Laminate Failure
Example of FPF and DLF Analysis Results
Carbon/epoxy [0/60/-60]SE-laminate (note different scales)
eps_y
%
1
FPF envelope
eps_y
2
DLF envelope
0.5
-0.5
-1
-1
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0.5
eps_x
1.5
%
-1
-0.5
0.5
1.5
eps_x
Plot x- and y-components not in the same scale.
e
z
u 0
ex =
x
g xy
v 0
; ey =
y
0
v 0 u 0
=
+
x y
2 w0
kx = - 2
x
2 w0
ky = - 2
y
2 w0
k xy = -2
xy
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 140
dw
dx
gxz
Composite structures 2015
Mechanics
Page 141
Summary
Basics of
(1) micromechanics,
(2) the classical lamination theory, and
(3) the commonly used failure criteria of fibre reinforced laminates
were introduced
Analyses of laminate structures are based on these methods