Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tool Steels
Elhachmi Essadiqi
CONTENTS
11.1
11.2
11.1 INTRODUCTION
Tool steels are very special steels used to shape, cut, and form an extremely wide variety of
metals and other materials under demanding conditions. The first known tool made of iron date
back 60 centuries. The heat treatment to harden tool iron, consisting of heating and water
quenching, was known 30 centuries ago. The earliest tool steels were based on plain carbon steel.
In the mid-19th century and early in the 20th century, highly alloyed tool steels were developed
to meet very stringent requirements for specific applications. This evolution was taking place in
parallel with the understanding of the benefit of the alloying elements such as manganese,
tungsten, molybdenum, vanadium, and chromium, and their availability. In parallel to this
evolution, steelmaking evolved toward more controlled conditions to improve the quality and
cleanliness of the tool steels. This advance in technology and knowledge allows designing
specialized tool steels for cold and hot working of metals, molding plastics, as well as for
many other special purposes. This chapter reviews manufacturing and heat treatment of various
types of tool steels to achieve the required properties for specific applications.
TABLE 11.1
Main Groups of Tool Steels and AISI Letter Symbols
Group
Water-hardening tool steels
Shock-resisting tool steels
Oil-hardening cold-working tool steels
Air-hardening, medium-alloy cold-working tool steels
High-carbon, high-chromium cold-working tool steels
Mold steels
Hot-working tool steels, chromium, tungsten, and molybdenum
Tungsten high-speed tool steels
Molybdenum high-speed tool steels
Identifying Symbol
W
S
O
A
D
P
H
T
M
Source: From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International,
Materials Park, OH, 1998, p. 7; Tool steels, Heat Treaters Guide: Practices and Procedures for
Irons and Steels, H. Chandler, Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1995, pp. 517669.
Tool Steels
TABLE 11.2
AISI Classification and Nominal Compositions of Major Tool Steels
Identifying Elements, %
AISI
UNS No.
Mn
Si
Cr
Mo
Co
Ni
0.601.40 (a)
0.601.40 (a)
1.10
0.50
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.55
0.45
0.50
0.80
1.40
1.00
2.00
2.25
1.50
1.50
0.75
2.50
1.75
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.90
0.90
1.45
1.20
1.00
1.60
0.80
1.00
0.50
0.75
0.50
1.75
0.25
2.00
2.00
1.80
1.25
5.00
5.00
1.00
1.00
5.25
5.00
5.00
1.00
4.75
1.00
1.00 (c)
1.25
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.25
1.00
1.25
1.40
1.50
1.50
1.80
12.00
1.00
1.00
653
Continued
654
UNS No.
D3
D4
D5
D7
T30403
T30404
T30405
T30407
Si
Cr
Mo
Co
Ni
2.25
2.25
1.50
2.35
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.501.10 (a)
0.70
1.00
0.75
0.20
0.25 (c)
1.50
Mold steel
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P20
P21
0.07
0.10
0.07
0.10
0.10
0.35
0.20
1.20 (Al)
2.00
0.50
5.00
2.25
1.50
1.70
0.20
0.75
0.40
0.50
1.25
3.50
4.00
0.40
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.40
0.40
3.25
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.25
0.40
0.40
0.40
1.00
2.00
1.50
5.00
4.25
2.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
4.25
0.35
0.35
0.30
0.45
0.25
0.50
3.50
2.00
12.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
1.00
9.00
11.00
12.00
15.00
15.00
18.00
Mn
T51602
T51603
T51604
T51605
T51606
T51620
T51621
0.60
4.00
2.00
6.00
0.75 (a)
0.80
0.75
0.80
0.80
0.75
1.50
4.00
1.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
18.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.50
2.00
5.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
20.00
14.00
12.00
0.80 (a)
0.851.00 (a)
1.05
1.20
1.30
0.80
1.00
0.851.00 (a)
8.00
0.90
0.90
0.80
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
1.00
2.00
2.40
3.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.25
1.15
2.00
2.00
1.50
6.00
6.00
6.00
5.50
4.00
1.75
2.00
1.50
2.00
6.00
1.10
1.10
1.20
1.15
1.25
1.10
4.25
3.75
3.75
4.25
4.00
3.75
2.00
1.15
1.60
2.00
3.20
1.25
6.75
1.50
2.75
5.25
2.00
1.50
5.00
5.00
8.00
12.00
5.00
5.00
8.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.50
5.00
8.75
8.00
8.00
9.50
8.00
5.00
12.00
5.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
3.75
9.50
8.00
6.25
8.25
9.50
5.00
8.00
8.25
12.00
8.25
5.00
655
(a) Available with different carbon contents. (b) Contains graphite. (c) Optional.
Source: From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1998, p. 8; Tool steels, Heat Treaters Guide: Practices and
Procedures for Irons and Steels, H. Chandler, Ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1995, pp. 517669.
Tool Steels
656
TABLE 11.3
Cross-References of AISI Tool Steels Designations to Designations in Other National Systems
United States (AISI)
M3, class 1
M3, class 2
1.3344
M4
4659 BMI
4659 BM2
G4403 SKH52
G4403 SKH53
G4403 SKH54
1.3348
4659 BM4
G4403 SKH55
4659 BM34
4659 BM34
4659 BM34
1.3249
1.3249
1.3249
1.3243
M36
1.3243
M41
1.3245, 1.3246
G4403 SKH55,
G4403 SKH56
G4403 SKH55
M42
1.3247
G4403 SKH59
G4403 SKH58
M10, reg C
M10, high C
M30
M33
M34
M35
M43
Great Britain
(B.S.)c
4659 BM42
France (AFNOR)d
A35-590 4441
Z85DCWV08-04-02-10
A35-590 4301
Z85WDCV06-05-04-10
A35-590 4302
Z90WDCV06-05-04-02
A35-590 4360
Z120WDCV06-05-04-03
A35-590 4361
Z130WDCV06-05-04-04
A35-590 4442
Z100DCWV09-04-02-02
A35-590 4371
Z85WDKCV06-05-05-04-02
A35-590 4372
Z90WDKCV06-05-05-04-02
A35-590 4371
Z85WDKCV06-05-05-04
A35-590 4374
Z110WDKCDV07-05-04-04
A35-590 4475
Z110DKCWV09-08-04-02
A35-590 4475
Sweden (SS14)
2715
2722
(USA M3 class 2)
2782
2723
2736
M7
Japan (JIS)b
1.3207
M46
M47
1.3247
1.3247
Z110DKCWV09-08-04-02-01
A35-590 4376
Z130KWDCV12-07-06-04-03
G4403 SKH57
G4403 SKH2
4659 BT1
T2
T4
1.3255
G4403 SKH3
T5
1.3265
G4403 SKH4B
4659 BT5
T6
T8
T15
1.3257
G4403 SKH10
4659 BT6
G4404
G4404
G4404
G4404
G4404
G4404
4659 BH10
4659 BH11
4659 BH12
4659 BH13, 4659 H13
4659 BH19
G4404 SKD5
A35-590 3543
Z30WCV9
H22
H23
H24
H25
H26
G4404 SKD5
4659 BH26
1.3202
1.2581
1.2625
(USA M50)
(USA T5)
(USA T15)
2242
2730
Continued
657
SKD7
SKD6
SKD62
SKD61
SKD4
SKD8
4659 BT15
A33-590 4201
Z80WCV18-04-01
4203 18-02
A35-590 4271
Z80WKCV18-05-04-01
A35-590 4275
Z80WKCV18-10-04-02
A35-590 4171
Z160WKVC12-05-05-04
Tool Steels
M44
658
Japan (JIS)b
Great Britain
(B.S.)c
France (AFNOR)d
Sweden (SS14)
3548 Z65WDCV6.05
A4
A5
A6
A7
A8
1.2606
A9
A10
G4404 SKD12
G4404 SKD62
4659 BA2
4659 BA6
3432Z38CDWV5
G4404 SKD11
A35-590-2233 Z200C12
4659 BD3
D4
D5
D7
1.2880
1.2378
O2
1.2842
G4404 SKD1,
G4404 SKD2
G4404 SK1,
G4404 SKD2
G4404 SKS21,
G4404 SKS3,
G4404 SKS93,
G4404 SKS94,
G4404 SKS95
4659 BO1
2312
2140
D3
2260
1.2206
1.214, 1.2419, 1.2442,
1.2516, 1.2519
Shock-resisting steels (ASTM A681)
S1
1.2542, 1.2550
S2
1.2103
S5
1.2823
S6
S7
P3
1.5713
P4
1.2341
P5
P6
1.2735, 1.2745
P20
1.2311, 1.2328, 1.2330
P21
G4404 SKS2
A35-5902132 130C3
A35-590 2141 105WC13
4659 BS1
4659 BS2
4659 BS5
G4404 SKT3,
G4410 SKC11
G4404 SKS51,
G4404 SKT4
G4404 SKT3,
G4410 SKC11
G4404 SKS51,
G4404 SKT4
G4410 SKC31
2881 Y10NC6
2882 10NC12
A35-590 2333 35CMD7
G4404 SKS 41
Tool Steels
O6
O7
2710
(USA P4)
(USA P20)
Continued
659
660
W2
4659 BW2
W5
France (AFNOR)d
Sweden (SS14)
British Standard.
(a) Available with different carbon contents. (b) Contains graphite. (c) Optional.
Source: From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1998, pp. 1012; J.G. Gensure and D.L. Potts, International
Metallic Materials Cross-Reference, 3rd ed., Genium Publishing, New York, 1988; C.W. Wegst, J.C. Hamaker, Jr., and A.R. Johnson, Tool Steels, 3rd ed., American Society for
Metals, Materials Park, OH, 1962.
Japan (JIS)b
with the manufacture of the tool die or mold. After the preliminary selection based on the
above two criteria, the final selection will be based on the final cost per unit part produced by
the tool [1].
TO
HEAT-TREATMENT RESPONSE
Service characteristics are related to toughness, resistance to softening, and wear resistance. An
overview and comparison of the most important manufacturing and service characteristics of
tool steels are given in Table 11.4. This qualitative ranking helps assessing various tool steels.
11.3.1 STEELMAKING
Tool steels are processed through an electrical arc furnace (EAF); secondary refining processes have been introduced recently such as argonoxygen decarburization (AOD), vacuum
oxygen decarburization (VOD), and the use of ladle furnaces [7]. The principle benefits
associated with secondary refining are reduced furnace time, increased overall capacity,
improved yield quality, consistency, and reproducibility.
Most tool steels are processed using EAFs. The cleanliness of the liquid steel and the control
of the chemistry are performed in ladle furnace, the AOD process, and vacuum arc degassing
process (VAD) [8,9]. In the latter process, optimum temperatures for vacuum degassing,
refining, as well as final alloy composition and subsequent ingot teeming can be accurately
controlled. In addition, stirring the argon under vacuum provides melt uniformity and maximizes the removal of undesirable gases and nonmetallic inclusions from the steel. Next to
vacuum arc melting, the VAD process improves cleanliness and hence, mechanical properties
in the final product. This process is required when higher levels of polishability and improving
toughness of tool steels are required. If more cleanliness and improved properties are required,
vacuum arc remelting (VAR) is employed. In this process, the molten steel from the VAD is
teemed into a cylindrical ingot. The ingot is then remelted under vacuum into a water-cooled
copper mold. The resultant VAR ingot is forged into intermediate billets or to the final product.
To improve cleanliness by reducing nonmetallic inclusions of the steel and to reduce segregation of other processes such as electroslag remelting, P=M, and spray forming are used.
Electroslag remelting, which is employed in the production of a relatively small percentage
of tool steels, involves passing an electrical current through a consumable electrode of similar
chemistry as that desired in the final ingot, that resistance melts under a protective, refining
slag, and is then solidified into an ingot. The electrode is usually of the similar chemistry as
the final ingot [10]. The cleanliness of ESR-melted product is superior to that of air-melted
EAF product due to the reduction of sulfur and the removal of inclusions by the ESR slag,
which results in better properties such as fatigue resistance, as illustrated in Figure 11.1, and
improved hot workability.
P=M has been used in the past to produce high-alloy tool steels. It is now a major
manufacturing process for various types of tool steels such as cold-work and hot-work tool
steels. The powder process involves melting the steel to the desired chemistry and then
producing the powder by impinging a thin stream of molten steel with jets of water or gas.
The powder is then processed through a series of operations such as drying, screening,
662
TABLE 11.4
Manufacturing and Service Characteristics of Tool Steels
Hardening and Tempering
Hardening
Response
Resistance to
Cracking
Toughness
Resistance
to Softening
Deep
Deep
Deep
A or S, low, O, medium
A or S, low, O, medium
A or S, low, O, medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
6065
6065
6166
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Very high
Very high
Very high
Very high
Very high
Very high
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
6166
6166
6166
6065
6065
6065
6065
6065
6570
6570
6570
6570
6769
6570
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Very high
Highest
Very high
Very high
Highest
Highest
Highest
Highest
Highest
Highest
Highest
Highest
Highest
Highest
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
high
high
high
high
high
high
high
high
high
high
high
high
high
high
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
A
A
A
A
A
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
or S, low,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
High
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
6065
6165
6266
6065
6065
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Very high
Very high
Highest
Highest
Highest
Very
Very
Very
Very
Very
high
high
high
high
high
Deep
Deep
A or S, low, O, medium
A or S, low, O, medium
Medium
Medium
6065
6368
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low to
medium
Medium
Low to
medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Highest
Highest
Very high
Highest
Deep
Very low
Highest
3956
High
High
Medium
H11
Deep
Very low
Highest
3854
Medium
to high
Medium
to high
Very high
High
Medium
Medium
Approximate
Hardness (b), HRC
Resistance
to Wear
Machinability
AISI Designation
Resistance to
Decarburization
Medium
Deep
Very low
Highest
3855
High
Medium
H13
Medium
Deep
Very low
Highest
3853
Very high
High
Medium
H14
Medium
H19
Medium
Tungsten hot-work steels
H21
Medium
H22
Medium
H23
Medium
H24
Medium
H25
Medium
H26
Medium
Molybdenum hot-work steels
H42
Medium
Air-hardening medium-alloy cold-work steels
A2
Medium
A3
Medium
A4
Medium to high
Deep
Deep
Low
A or S, low, O, medium
Highest
High
High
High
High
High
Medium
Medium to high
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
A or
A or
A or
A or
A or
A or
High
High
High
High
High
High
3654
3952
3437
4555
3544
4348
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Medium
Medium
High
Medium
High
High
Very high
Very high
Very high
Very high
Medium to high
Medium to high
Medium to high
High
Medium
High
Deep
A or S, low, O, medium
Medium
5060
Medium
Medium
Very high
High
Deep
Deep
Deep
Lowest
Lowest
Lowest
Highest
Highest
Highest
5762
5765
5462
High
Very high
Medium to high
Deep
Lowest
Highest
5460
Medium
Medium to high
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Deep
Deep
Deep
Deep
Lowest
Lowest
Lowest
Lowest
Highest
Highest
Highest
Highest
5767
5060
3556
5562
Medium
Medium
Low to
medium
Low to
medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
to high
High
High
Medium
Medium to high
Medium
Medium
Low to
medium
Low to
medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
to high
A6
A7
A8
A9
A10
High
High
High
Medium
Highest
Medium to high
Medium to high
High
Lowest
Lowest
Lowest
Lowest
Lowest
Highest
High
Highest
Highest
Highest
5461
5461
5461
5461
5865
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
High
High
High
Very low
Very low
Very low
W, high, O, very low
Very high
Very high
Very high
W, high, O,
very low
5762
5762
5853
5864
High
High
Highest
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
to
to
to
to
high
high
high
high
S, low,
S, low,
S, low,
S, low,
S, low,
S, low,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
O,
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
663
Very high
4047
4057
Medium
to high
Medium
to high
High
High
Tool Steels
H12
Continued
664
Resistance to
Cracking
Shock-resisting steels
S1
Medium
S2
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
High
High
Low
4068
5060
S5
Low
Medium
Medium
High
5060
S6
S7
Low
Medium
Medium
Deep
Medium
A, lowest, O, low
High
A, highest,
O, high
Medium
W, low, O, medium
L6
High
Low-alloy special-purpose steels
P2
High
Medium
Low
W, high,
O, medium
High
Medium
Low
P3
High
Medium
P4
P5
P6
P20
High
High
High
High
P21
High
Water-hardening steels
W1
Highest
W2
Highest
W5
Highest
Approximate
Hardness (b), HRC
Machinability
Toughness
Resistance
to Softening
Resistance
to Wear
Very high
Highest
Very high
Highest
Medium
Low
Highest
Highest
Low
5456
4757
Medium
Medium
to high
Medium
to high
Medium
Medium
Medium
Very high
Very high
High
Low
Low to medium
4563
High
Low
Low to medium
4562
Medium
Very
high (c)
Very high
Low
Medium
High
5864 (c)
High
Low
Medium
Low
High
5864 (c)
High
Low
Medium
High
Medium
Very low
W, high, O, low
A, very low, O, low
Low
High
High
High
High
5864 (c)
5864 (c)
5864 (c)
2837
High
High
High
High
Medium
Low
Low
Low
High
Medium
Medium
Low to medium
Deep
Lowest
High
3040 (d)
Medium
to high
Medium
to low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
to high
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
High
High
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
5064
5064
5064
Highest
Highest
Highest
High (e)
High (e)
High (e)
Low
Low
Low
Low to medium
Low to medium
Low to medium
A, Air cool; B, brine quench; O, oil quench; S, salt bath quench; W, water quench. (b) After tempering in temperature range normally recommended for this steel. (c) Carburized case
hardness. (d) After aging at 510 to 5508C. (e) Toughness decreases with increasing carbon content and depth of hardening.
Source: From A.M. Bayer, T. Vasco, and L.R. Walton, Wrought tool steels, in ASM Handbook, Vol. 1, Properties and Selection: Iron, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys, 10th ed.,
1990, p. 772 Tool Steels, Products Manual, American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, D.C., 1978.
Hardening
Response
AISI Designation
Resistance to
Decarburization
109
750
102
700
650
94
600
87
550
80
Air melted
500
73
450
65
400
58
Indicates runout
350
104
Stress, ksi
Stress, MPa
ESR
105
106
Cycles
107
51
108
FIGURE 11.1 SN curves for tensioncompression fatigue testing of transverse air-melted and ESR A2
specimen. (From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International,
Materials Park, OH, 1998, p. 33; T.V. Philip, Met. Technol., 1975, 554564.)
annealing, sintering, and pressing into billets that are conventionally forged or rolled into
bars. This process is more suitable for the production of more highly alloyed tool steels such
as high-carbon, high-chromium, and high-speed steels. These steels are very difficult to
produce by cast ingot process due to slow cooling rates, resulting in macrosegregation and
the formation of eutectic-carbide structure that are difficult to be broken down during hot
working [12]. Rapid solidification associated with P=M process reduces segregation and
produces uniform and fine microstructure of an atomized powder. High-speed steels produced by P=M have better grindability than the same steel produced by casting due to their
fine and uniformly distributed carbides. Figure 11.2 illustrates the finer and uniformly
distributed carbides and homogeneous microstructure in bars produced by P=M compared
to that in ingot casting [13].
The spray forming process [1] is attracting more attention because of its economy and
capability of producing dense, preformed products of metals of different shapes. This process
consists of gas atomization of molten metal by nitrogen or argon into small droplets. These
droplets are deposited into a rotating collector that can produce products with different
FIGURE 11.2 Microstructure in 100-mm diameter. Bars of high-speed steel M3 produced by (a) P=M
and (b) ingot casting. (From S. Wilmes, H-J. Becker, and R. Krumpholz, Tool Steels, A Handbook for
Materials Research and Engineering, Vol. 2, Applications, ed., Verein Deurscher Eisenhuttenleute, 1993,
p. 327.)
shapes such as billet, hollows, and sheet. Tool steels have been produced in Japan using the
Ospray process since 1986. High-carbon, high-speed steel, and high-chromium cast iron are
the alloy sprayed [8,14]. High-alloy steels made using Ospray have uniform and fine carbides
of a size close to P=M products. A comparison of properties of high-speed steel tools
manufactured by Ospray, powder metallurgy, and ingot metallurgy, is given in Table 11.5.
It shows that the performance of tools produced by the Ospray process is equivalent to that
produced by P=M.
DURING
HEAT TREATMENT
Distortion, which is the sum of all changes in dimension and shape that appear after heat
treatment, is a common concern in tool steel manufacturing. Usually it is difficult and
TABLE 11.5
Comparison of Properties (Relative Values) of High-Speed Tool Steel Made
by Various Processes
Property
Carbide size, mm
Bend strength
Wear resistance
Grindability
Toughness
Ospray Metallurgy
Powder Metallurgy
Ingot Metallurgy
56
90
100
80
90
23
100
90
100
100
1520
60
100
25
60
Source: From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International,
Materials Park, OH, 1998, p. 41.
expensive to machine tool steels in the hardened condition. The final shape of some tool steels
is produced by machining in the soft-annealed condition [13]. To prevent distortion that
cannot be avoided during heat treatment, this process is carried out prior to manufacturing of
tool steel. The factors that affect dimensional accuracy are (1) specific volume differences of
phases existing before and after heat treatment; (2) thermal stresses caused by temperature
differences between the surface and the core of heat-treated tool; and (3) stresses that are
caused by phase transformation.
Segregation affects distortion through its influence on transformation. Segregation can be
reduced by homogenization heat treatment.
11.4.4 MACHINABILITY
Machinability is characterized by all the properties of a material that play a role in shaping
steels by the use of cutting tools. Soft steels such as low-carbon tool steels with high-ferrite
content are difficult to machine due to adhesion between the tool and workpiece. In this case,
tool steel is machined in the normalized condition with a ferritepearlite microstructure, and
not in the soft-annealed condition. Steels with a high-carbon content are machined under
soft-annealing condition with spheroidized carbides [13]. The best machining results are
obtained with a hardness between about 180 and 230 HB.
Machinability is reduced by the presence of hard particles such as alumina and silica and
special carbides, which increase cratering on the cut surface and abrasion on the top surface.
It is well known that sulfur improves machinability through its influence on chip formation.
Sulfur is generally limited to 0.1% to avoid high anisotropy of properties, such as toughness.
11.4.5 GRINDABILITY
Grindability is the ability to remove a large amount of material by grinding in a short period
of time without damaging the tool surface. The grindability index is the volume of metal
removed per volume of wheel wear. Usually, tools, that are heat treated after machining, are
shaped by grinding after heat treatment. Surface damaging can be caused by the accumulation of heat in the surface, which may cause surface tempering or hardening. Stresses
developed during such heating through volumetric changes may create grinding check defects.
Grindability, which can be measured by abrasion, decreases with increasing hardness, carbide
content, hardness of carbides, and carbide size.
11.4.6 POLISHABILITY
Tool steels with polished surfaces are used in stamping, forming, and plastic processing.
Ledeburitic tool steels are more difficult to polish due to the presence of hard carbides.
Microstructure inhomogeneities result in poor response to polishing. Clean steels with fewer
nonmetallic inclusions and reduced segregation have excellent polishability. Hard inclusions
such as alumina or silicates are detrimental to the quality of polished tool steels. Polishability
increases with the hardness, but this is not the only factor to take into account for designing
tool steels with high hardness.
11.5.1 HARDNESS
The hardness of tool steels is related to the material to be processed. It varies between about
200 HV for glass-mold steels at the lower level and 900 HV for forming and machining tools at
the upper level. Obtaining high hardness and microstructures that have high hardness are the
major objectives of final heat treatment applied to tool steels.
Carbon content is the dominant factor controlling the strength of martensite through its
interaction with other structural elements of a martensitic microstructure [1517]. Figure 11.3
illustrates hardness as a function of carbon for various microstructures obtained from the
austenite transformation and heat treatment of carbon steels. Martensite transformation
from austenite is never complete. At the end of the transformation corresponding to the
temperature Mf a certain amount of austenite is untransformed (retained austenite [RA]) [18].
This amount of RA depends on the martensite temperature range MsMf; it increases as the
range narrows, and this range narrows as Ms is lowered.
Hardness is the most important characteristic of a tool steels that indicates their potential
application. The hardness also allows to draw a conclusion on the working stress limit and
1100
1000
65
900
800
700
Martensitic structure (quenched)
600
50
500
400
40
300
Hardness, Rockwell C
Hardness, Vickers
60
30
20
10
200
100
0.40
0.60
0.80
Carbon, %
1.00
1.20
FIGURE 11.3 Hardness of three microstructures as a function of carbon content. The high-carbon
region of the martensitic structure curve is broad due to retained austenite. (From E.C. Bain and H.W.
Paxton, Alloying Elements in Steel, 2nd ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1961, p. 37.)
thus, on the shape stability of a tool. Due to this shape stability, hardness must be sufficiently
high that the yield stress is above the highest load stress on the tool. The relationship between
hardness and flow stress in the case of tool steels is shown in Figure 11.4. However, increasing
the hardness for shape stability could affect other properties such as toughness, which is
usually reduced, and thus, the susceptibility to fracture of the tool steel is increased. Wear
resistance increases with increasing hardness.
N/mm2
3500
Steel:
Hardening temperature:
12208C
12908C
9008C
8708C
S 6-5-2
S 18-0-1
60 WCrV 7
120 W 4
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
Hardness, HRC
FIGURE 11.4 Relationship between hardness and bending yield stress of hardened tool steels. (From
S. Wilmes, H.-J. Becker, and R. Krumpholz, Tool steels,A Handbook for Materials Research and
Engineering, Vol. 2, Applications, ed., Verein Deurscher Eisenhuttenleute, 1993, p. 306; J.C. Hamaker
Jr., V.C. Stang, and G.A. Roberts, Trans. Amer. Soc. Metals, 49, 1957, S. 550=75.)
70
1000
High-speed steel alloyed with cobalt
and vanadium
900
65
60
Hardness, HV
700
Cast
hard alloy
600
55
50
500
Hardness, HRC
High-speed steel
800
45
400
40
30
20
300
Nickel alloy
NiCr 19 NbMo
10
200
100
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Testing temperature, 8C
FIGURE 11.5 Hardness at elevated temperatures of different types of tool steels. (From S. Wilmes,
H-J. Becker, and R. Krumpholz, Tool steels, A Handbook for Materials Research and Engineering,
Vol. 2, Applications, ed., Verein Deurscher Eisenhuttenleute, 1993, p. 307; G.A. Roberts, Trans.
Metallurg. Soc. AIME, 236, 1966, S. 950=63.)
The hardness of tool steels decreases with increasing temperature. Figure 11.5 illustrates
the variation with temperature of hardness of various types of tool steels. Tools that operate
above 2008C must have high hardness as possible at elevated temperatures to ensure the shape
stability and an adequate value of wear resistance of the tool steel at the operating conditions.
At temperatures higher than 6008C the hardness of martensitic tool steels is no longer
sufficient to cope with the stress. Reliable hardness is to be found in some austenitic steel
and in nickel and cobalt alloys that on the other hand are not suitable for tools at low
operating temperatures due to their low hardness. In tool steels, martensite formation is the
most efficient method of improving hardness.
Hardness is usually measured with various loads on the Rockwell C scale (HRC), which
uses a diamond cone indenter, and on the Vickers scale (HV), which uses a diamond pyramid
indenter. The equivalent hardness numbers between HRC and HV are given in Table 11.6.
Soft annealing, which produces ferrite matrix with interstitial carbides, could reduce
hardness. Cr is the element that has less influence on the solid solution strengthening as
illustrated in Figure 11.6.
The most effective way of improving hardness in tool steels is through martensite formation during quenching and precipitation of fine carbides of Mo, Cr, and V.
11.5.2 HARDENABILITY
Hardenability, which is of equal importance as hardness, includes maximum achievable
hardness during quenching, and the depth of hardening obtained by quenching in a specific
Tool Steels
TABLE 11.6
Approximate Conversion of Hardness Values and Tensile Strengths for Steels
Rockwell Hardness C
Scleroscope
Hardness No.
Tensile Strength
(Approx.)a
43
46
50
53
56
21
24
27
393
455
517
20.3
24.0
27.1
58
60
60.6
62.4
63.8
41.7
45.0
47.8
30
31
34
37
40
295
311
328
345
360
29.8
32.2
34.4
36.6
38.8
65.2
66.4
67.6
68.7
69.8
50.2
52.3
54.4
56.4
58.4
42
45
47
50
52
379
397
415
433
452
471
487
507
525
40.8
42.7
44.5
46.1
47.7
49.1
50.5
51.7
53.0
70.8
71.8
72.8
73.6
74.5
75.3
76.1
76.7
77.4
60.2
61.4
63.5
64.9
66.4
67.7
69.0
70.0
71.2
55
57
59
62
64
66
67
69
71
100
120
140
160
180
95
115
135
155
175
200
220
240
260
280
195
215
235
255
275
300
320
340
360
380
400
420
440
460
480
500
520
540
560
A Scale 60 kg Load
Diamond Cone HRA
Superficial 30-N
10 kg Load
Diamond Cone
579
634
696
765
827
889
952
1007
1069
1131
1207
1289
1372
1461
1537
1620
1703
1793
1862
1951
Continued
671
Brinell Hardness
No. 3000 kg Load
10 mm Ball
Vickers Hardness
No. HV
672
A Scale 60 kg Load
Diamond Cone HRA
Superficial 30-N
10 kg Load
Diamond Cone
Scleroscope
Hardness No.
Tensile Strength
(Approx.)a
545
564
582
601
620
638
656
670
684
698
710
722
733
745
54.1
55.2
56.3
57.3
58.3
59.2
60.1
61.0
61.8
62.5
63.3
64.0
64.7
65.3
65.9
66.4
67.0
67.5
68.0
78.0
78.6
79.2
79.8
80.3
80.8
81.3
81.8
82.2
82.6
83.0
83.4
83.8
84.1
84.4
84.7
85.0
85.3
85.6
72.1
73.2
74.2
75.1
75.9
76.8
77.6
78.4
79.1
79.7
80.4
81.1
81.7
82.2
82.7
83.1
83.6
84.0
84.4
72
74
75
77
79
80
81
83
84
86
87
88
90
91
92
93
95
96
97
2020
2089
2186
2262
2358
2448
These values are substracted from Ref. [15] and converted to MPa.
Source: From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1998, p. 83; Smithells Metals Reference Book, 9th ed.,
pp. 21-4, and 21-5.
580
600
620
640
660
680
700
720
740
760
780
800
820
840
860
880
900
920
940
Brinell Hardness
No. 3000 kg Load
10 mm Ball
240
P
Mn
Si
220
200
Hardness, Brinell
Mo
180
Ni
160
W
140
Cr
120
100
80
0
14
10
12
Alloying element, %
16
18
20
22
FIGURE 11.6 Influence of alloying elements on solid solution strengthening of ferrite. (From E.C. Bain
and H.W. Paxton, Alloying Elements in Steel, 2nd ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH,
1961, p. 62.)
manner. With the same hardness, a tempered martensite has better toughness than a bainitic
or pearlitic microstructure.
Steels for forging and pressing dies and for cutting tools need a thin surface zone with very
high surface-hardness but with a soft core. These steels are used in tools subjected to bending
or impact, due to their lack of susceptibility to cracking. Jominy tests for hardenability
assessment used for structural steels are not suitable for tool steels due to their high degree
of hardenability. Depth hardening of the tool steels is assessed using timetemperature
transformation (TTT) curves.
Alloying elements that stabilize austenite increase hardenability. However, with tool steels
the choice of alloying elements depends on many other properties such as carbide formation,
carbide hardness, decarburization tendency, nitridability, and deformability. The following
examples illustrate the effects of some alloying elements: (1) adding Ni gives good hardenability without carbide formation but with lower transformation temperature; (2) Si increases
the tendency of decarburization; and (3) Cr, Mo, W, and V result in carbide formation and
make the steels easy to nitride.
In tool steels, carbide quantities are up to 5 vol.% in hot-work tool steels, up to 20% in highspeed tool steels, and up to 25 vol.% in ledeburitic steel with 12%Cr. With C content above 0.7%,
the result of increasing the hardening temperature produces a more stable austenite, which
results in large quantities of retained austenite, and therefore the hardness is decreased.
11.5.3 TOUGHNESS
AT
OPERATIONAL TEMPERATURE
The toughness of tool steels that are subjected to dynamic stresses is the ability to release stress
peaks by a small local plastic deformation that prevents a crack formation. Toughness is a generic
term for all influences which concern the resistance of a tool to fracture [13]. The toughness of tool
steels that are used with service hardness below about 55 HRC is better assessed by impact energy
on notched and unnotched specimens. In the case of tool steels with hardness in service higher than
55 HRC, static bending tests and the static torsion tests have been shown to be reliable. When
comparing materials having the same hardness, only plastic bending energy or torsional energy
needs to be considered in assessing toughness. Toughness properties are influenced strongly by the
microstructure, and they show improvement with a more homogeneous microstructure. Finer
spheroidized carbides also improve toughness. It is improved by segregation reduction, cleanliness, and reduction of inclusions such as oxides, sulfides, and carbides. To reduce toughness
anisotropy, producing clean steel is not enough; there is a need for additional homogenizing which
reduces the degree of segregation. In the case of alloyed steels, a reduction of segregation can be
achieved by P=M, which also produces very fine carbides. Toughness properties deteriorate with
the presence of an upper bainite microstructure due to carbide precipitation.
Solidification/casting
Forging/rolling
A+C
Temperature
Normalizing
Annealing
A+F+C
Stress relief
Air
cool
F+C
Machining
Ms
Hardening
RT
Time
FIGURE 11.7 Schematic diagram of tool steel processing and heat treatment prior to final hardening
heat treatment. A, austenite; C, carbides; F, ferrite; M, martensite. (From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and
R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1998, p. 67; G. Krauss,
Steels: Heat Treatment and Processing Principles, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990.)
The heat treatment of tool steels is implemented to achieve one of the following targets:
1. To obtain a desired microstructure and properties suitable for machining or cold
deformation
2. To release residual stresses accumulated during previous thermal and mechanical
treatments
3. To homogenize the microstructure with globular carbides by a spheroidization
treatment
4. To dissolve by a normalizing treatment the intergranular carbides that are detrimental
to the mechanical properties of tool steels
A+C
Temperature
Austenitizing
Quenching
A+F+C
Preheat
F+C
Pearlite
H2O
Salt
Tempering
Air
Bainite
Ms
Martensite
RT
Time
FIGURE 11.8 Schematic diagram of tool steel heat treatment steps for final hardening. (From
G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park,
OH, 1998, p. 68.)
11.6.1 NORMALIZING
Normalizing is a heat treatment that is performed in hot forged or hot-rolled tool steels to
produce more uniform, fine-grained microstructures for subsequent annealing and hardening
heat treatments. The normalizing treatment helps to produce a more uniform distribution of
precipitates. In tool steels with more stable carbides such as Cr and W carbides, the precipitates
may be preferentially aligned in the hot-working direction, or present at grain boundaries.
The normalizing process consists of heating the steel to the temperature region indicated in
Figure 11.9 by the crosshatched area, followed by air-cooling. During heating and holding at
the normalizing temperature, the initial ferritecarbide structure that is stable at low temperatures transforms to austenite. The dissolution of carbides during heating depends on the alloy
content of the tool steels. During cooling austenite transforms to ferrite and cementite. In the
case of the low-alloy tool steels, cementite and pearlite will form during air-cooling. The
carbides in this structure will be spheroidized in subsequent annealing treatments. In highalloy tool steels, due to their high hardenability, martensite may form during air-cooling, which
may cause cracking, and thus, a normalizing treatment should be avoided for these tool steel
grades. Table 11.7 lists normalizing and annealing temperatures for different tool steel grades
[5,26]. As previously indicated, high-alloy steels should not be normalized.
1100
Upper temperature limit for forging
E
Acm
1000
1650
Normalizing
A3
800
Oil
quenching
1470
Oil
quenching
Water quenching
A1
700
Annealing
Water quenching
K
1290
Temperature, 8F
Temperature, 8C
G
900
1830
Recrystallization annealing
1110
600
Stress-relief annealing
500
0.5
1.0
930
1.5
Carbon, wt%
FIGURE 11.9 Schematic diagram of heat treatment temperature ranges for carbon and tool steels. (From
G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and P. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH,
1998, p. 68; K.E. Thelning, Stell and its Hert Treatment, 2nd ed., Butterworths, London, 1984.)
TABLE 11.7
Normalizing and Annealing Temperatures of Tool Steels
Annealing
Normalizing
Temperature, 8C
Temperature, 8C
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
815870
870900
870900
815870
870900
22
22
22
22
22
207235
212241
223255
217255
235269
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
870900
870900
870900
870900
22
22
22
22
248269
248293
285311
262285
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
870900
870900
870900
870900
870900
870900
870900
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
830845
830845
22
22
197235
197235
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
845900
870900
870900
22
22
22
192229
207235
207241
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
Do not normalize
870900
870900
870900
22
207235
212255
217241
Do not normalize
815870
845900
22
22
207235
207235
870900
870900
870900
22
22
22
217255
223255
235262
845870
845870
740760
730745
870900
845870
845870
765795
22
22
14
14
14
22
14
8
201229
207229
200241
217248
235262
192223
212248
235269
Type
Hardness, HB
217255
223255
229269
235277
248293
229255
241277
Continued
2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Type
Normalizing
Temperature, 8C
Annealing
Temperature, 8C
Hardness, HB
760790
745775
765790
790815
22
22
11
22
183212
183212
183217
192217
Shock-resisting steels
S1
Do not normalize
S2
Do not normalize
S5
Do not normalize
S7
Do not normalize
790815
760790
775800
815845
22
22
14
14
183229 (c)
192217
192229
187223
Mold steels
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P20
P21
730815
730815
870900
845870
845
760790
Do not anneal
22
22
14
22
8
22
103123
109137
116128
105116
183217
149179
760790
790815
760790
22
22
22
163197
174201
183212
760800
790815
22
22
183207
207235
740790 (e)
760790
22
22
156201
163201
Not required
Not required
Do not normalize
Not required
Not required
900
900
Source: From A.M. Bayer, T. Vasco, and L.R. Walton, Wrought tool steels, in ASM Handbook, Vol. 1, Properties
and Selection: Iron, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys, 10th ed., 1990, p. 769.
11.6.3 ANNEALING
Annealing is a heat treatment process consisting of heating the tool steel above a certain temperature and holding at this temperature for a given length of time. This is followed by cooling at a
predetermined rate, usually in the furnace, to room temperature in order to produce a microstructure that is stable at or below room temperature. The stable structure consists of a mixture of
1600
2912
1500
2732
1400
2552
1300
2372
1200
2192
Hot working
and
homogenizing
1100
2012
1832
1000
Normalizing
Temperature, 8F
Temperature,8C
ferrite and carbides, the distribution of which depends on thermomechanical history of the tool
steels. Tool steels subjected to an annealing treatment are soft and thus, easily machined and heat
treated. If the tool steel is cold or hot rolled, it must be annealed again before subsequent
operations. Annealing is also needed before a hardening operation, particularly in the case of
high-alloy steels, to produce a homogeneous microstructure needed for subsequent heat treatment.
The required annealing conditions depend on tool steel application and its alloy content.
Hypoeutectoid and hypereutectoid steels are annealed to just above the upper critical temperature Ac3, and the lower critical temperature Acm1, respectively. The range of these
temperatures is indicated schematically in Figure 11.10.
There are various types of annealing such as full annealing, isothermal annealing, and
spheroidizing.
Full annealing consists of heating the steel above the transformation temperature Ac3 into
the single-phase austenite for hypoeutectoid steel, and above A1 in the two-phase field of
austenite and carbides, in the case of hypereutectoid steels. If the hypereutectoid steels are
heated above Acm, carbides will form during slow cooling at grain boundaries of austenite and
may cause fracture during forming or in service. The holding time at the reheating temperature is about 1 h per 25-mm thickness to dissolve the carbides present in steel and to form
austenite [28]. The holding step is followed by very slow cooling rate in the furnace. The
cooling rates are lower than 258C=h to allow transformation of austenite to ferrite and the
formation of globular carbides. The annealing temperatures are in the range of 730 to 9008C
depending on the chemical composition of the steel, as indicated in Table 11.8.
Isothermal annealing is another variant of full annealing. The reheating and holding steps are
similar to that of full annealing, followed by cooling the workpiece very rapidly to a temperature
just below the transformation range and holding it at this temperature for 1 h or more, to allow
complete transformation of the austenite to ferritepearlite or pearlitecementite. Air-cooling
follows this holding step. The isothermal process is useful for small parts where the cooling rate
from the homogenization temperature can be achieved.
1652
900
Annealing
800
1472
1292
700
600
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Carbon content, wt%
1112
2.0
FIGURE 11.10 Temperature range of normalizing, annealing, hot working, and homogenizing hypoeutectoid and hypereutectoid steels. (From G. Krauss, Steels: Heat Treatment and Processing Principles,
ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990, p. 108.)
TABLE 11.8
Effect of Alloying Elements in Tool Steels
Ferrite-Stabilizing Elements
Austenite-Stabilizing Elements
Chromium
Molybdenum
Niobium
Silicon
Tantalum
Titanium
Tungsten
Vanadium
Zirconium
Carbon
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
Nickel
Nitrogen
11.6.4 SPHEROIDIZING
2012
1000
1832
Temperature, 8C
1100
1652
900
1472
800
Spheroidizing
1292
700
Process and recrystallization annealing
600
Stress relieving
500
400
0.5
1.0
1112
Temperature, 8F
There are many heat treatment approaches for producing spheroidized microstructures. The
spheroidizing method used for tool steels consists of heating the steel just below Ac1, maintaining it for a period of time, with cyclic heating and cooling above A1 and below Ar1,
followed by slow cooling rates, lower than 1508C=h. The temperature range for spheroidizing
treatment is indicated in Figure 11.11.
The microstructure produced by spheroidization consists of spherical carbides uniformly
distributed in a matrix of ferrite. It is the most stable microstructure and has a good
machinability compared to other microstructures formed in tool steels. Figure 11.12 shows
a spheroidized microstructure of 1.0% carbon steel.
The first step of spheroidization will produce a distribution of very fine-spheroidized
particles from the pearlitic, bainitic, or martensitic start microstructure. In the case of highly
alloyed steel coarser alloy carbide particles are produced.
932
1.5
752
2.0
FIGURE 11.11 Temperature range around A1 used for spheroidization. (From G. Krauss, Steels: Heat
Treatment and Processing Principles, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990 p. 118.)
FIGURE 11.12 Spheroidized microstructure 1.0% C steel, 2000 magnification. (From E.C. Bain and
H.W. Paxton, Alloying Elements in Steel, 2nd ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH,
1961, p. 101.)
In hypoeutectoid steels and cold-working tool steels, the most favorable annealed structure for machining is pearlite with a fine-lamellar structure. In hypereutectoid C steels used
for cold-working tool steel, the favorable structure for machining is globularized cementite.
All alloy steels have a globularized carbide structure in the annealed state. Fine-globular
carbides uniformly distributed have better properties in service. This is obtained by reducing
segregation through appropriate steelmaking practices, large reductions during hot working,
and appropriate cooling conditions after hot-transformation cycles.
During the annealing operations, the formation of proeutectoid carbides at grain boundaries should be avoided. These carbides are not soluble during austenitization [28].
11.6.6 HARDENING
The hardening operation of tool steels consists of three heat treatment steps: austenitization,
quenching to obtain martensite, and finally tempering [8,19,28]. These steps are discussed below.
11.6.6.1
Austenitizing
The austenitizing heat treatment is the most critical step performed on tool steels. The
following precautions have to be observed during austenitizing: to prevent abnormal grain
growth, distortion or loss of ductility, excessive carbide solution that will affect austenite
chemistry and hence hardenability, and decarburization that may modify surface chemistry,
the austenitizing temperature and holding time should be very well controlled. The austenitizing temperature is particularly important for high-alloy steels such as high-speed steels where
the austenitizing temperatures are close to the solidus temperature [19].
Figure 11.13 illustrates the austenite-phase field and the associated critical transformation
temperatures [8,19] including the eutectoid temperature, Ac1, which corresponds to the
transformation during heating of ferrite and carbide to austenite. The effect of alloying
elements on eutectoid temperature and eutectoid composition is given in Figure 11.14a
940
E
1700
G
900
Temperature, 8F
1600
860
820
1500
Ar3
A3
Ac1
1400
Ac3
Accm
780
Arcm
Acm
Ac1
740
A1
A1
1300
Ar1
Ar1
0
Temperature, 8C
Other data
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
700
1.2
Carbon, %
FIGURE 11.13 The transformation temperature on cooling, heating, and equilibrium for FeC alloys as
influenced by heating and cooling at 0.1258C=min. (From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool
Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1998, p. 52; E.C. Bain and H.W. Paxton,
Alloying Elements in Steel, 2nd ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1961, p. 20.)
Ti
1200
Mo
1100
0.80
Si
1000
Cr
900
800
700
600
0
0.60
0.40
Cr
Mo Si
0.20
Ti
Mn
Ni
Mn
Ni
500
(a)
Eutectoid carbon
content, %
Eutectoid temperature, 8C
1300
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Alloying elements, %
(b)
6
8 10 12 14
Alloying elements, %
16
18
FIGURE 11.14 Effect of alloying elements on (a) the eutectoid transformation temperature Ac1 and (b)
the concentration of carbon eutectoid. (From Steel Heat Treatment Handbook, G.E. Totten and M.A.H.
Howes, Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997, pp. 4851.)
and Figure 11.14b, respectively. Alloying elements used in tool steels are categorized either as
ferrite-stabilizing elements that reduce austenite-phase domain, or austenite-stabilizing elements that extend it. They are indicated in Table 11.7 [8]. Figure 11.15 through Figure 11.17
show the effect of Mn, Cr, and Mo on the extend of the phase field of pure austenite at
elevated temperature [18].
During reheating in the austenite region, the ferritic structure with carbides transforms
into austenite with or without carbides, depending on the chemical composition of the tool
steels. In low-alloy steel, a homogeneous austenitic microstructure without carbides may form
during austenitization treatment. In high-alloy tool steel, the resultant microstructure consists
of austenite and carbides that are not dissolved. In ledeburitic steels, not all carbides are
dissolved during reheating, even at the liquidus temperature [28]. It is of interest to note that
in high-speed tool steels made by P=M in which the carbides are finer than that in the same
steels made by conventional methods, carbide dissolution occurs more readily, particularly if
these carbides are of MC type [28].
The microstructure of annealed low-alloy tool steels consists of ferrite and M3C
type carbides, which are easily dissolved in the austenite region. Generally, the quenching
temperature is 508C above Ac3. These temperatures are a good compromise between dissol1500
2600
1400
1300
2200
2.5%
9%
4%
6.5%
2000
1800
1600
0.35% Mn
2.5% Mn
4% Mn
1100
1000
900
800
1400
1200
1200
Temperature, 8C
Temperature, 8F
2400
700
600
FIGURE 11.15 Effect of Mn on the austenite-phase field in FeMnC alloys. (From E.C. Bain
and H.W. Paxton, Alloying Elements in Steel, 2nd ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park,
OH, 1961, p. 104.)
2800
1500
1400
2400
1300
2200
19%
Cr
2000
1200
15%
Cr
1100
12%
Cr
1800
1000
5%
Cr
1600
Temperature, 8C
Temperature, 8F
2600
900
Carbon steel, 0% Cr
800
1400
700
1200
0.2
0.4
0.6
1.4
1.6
1.8
FIGURE 11.16 Effect of Cr on the austenite-phase field in FeCrC alloys. (From E.C. Bain
and H.W. Paxton, Alloying Elements in Steel, 2nd ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park,
OH, 1961, p. 105.)
ution of carbides and minimizing austenite gain growth. The austenitizing treatment, 30 min
per 25-mm thickness of the heat-treated tool in the temperature range of 750 to 9008C, is
sufficient for homogenization.
In highly alloyed steels and ledeburitic steels, the austenitizing temperatures are higher
than the low-alloy steels, due to the difficulty of dissolution of carbides of the type M7C3,
M23C6, M6C, and MC present in the annealed microstructure. The dissolution of these
carbides depends on the annealing temperature, austenitizing temperature, and the holding
time at this temperature.
11.6.6.2
Quenching
During quenching from the austenitizing temperature, austenite may transform to martensite
with some volume fraction of RA. This is possible when the austenite to ferritecarbide
transformation is suppressed by high cooling rates [8] or alloying elements that retard
2800
1500
2600
Temperature, 8F
2400
2200
2000
1800
1600
1300
7%
Mo
1200
1100
4%
Mo
1000
2%
Mo
Temperature, 8C
1400
900
Carbon steel, 0% Mo
1400
800
700
1200
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
600
Carbon, %
FIGURE 11.17 Effect of Mo on the austenite-phase field in FeMoC alloys. (From E.C. Bain and H.W.
Paxton, Alloying Elements in Steel, 2nd ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1961, p. 106.)
this transformation. Quenching media are typically water, brine, oil, salt, inert gas, or air
depending on the composition and the thickness of the tool steel [26].
11.6.6.3
Retained Austenite
After quenching, the microstructure of tool steels consists of martensite and RA. The latter
reduces the hardness of the steel and affects the properties of tools in service. During work
hardening RA transforms to martensite. The quantity of RA that is related to the reduction of
Mf depends on the chemical composition, austenitizing temperature, and cooling rate. RA
increases with increasing austenitizing temperature due to the increase of carbon content and
other alloying elements by the dissolution of carbides present in the annealed structure [28].
All of the alloying elements, except cobalt, lower Ms. Carbon has the most powerful effect
on Ms temperature. The higher the alloy content of austenite, the lower the Ms temperature
and the greater the amount of RA at room temperature [8].
For a given tool steel alloy and austenitizing conditions, the content of RA varies with
cooling rate and is maximum around the critical cooling rate for martensite.
11.6.6.4
Tempering
Tempering, which is the final step of the heat treatment of tool steels, consists of heating the
as-quenched microstructure to temperatures below the transformation temperature Ac1. It is
a very complex phenomenon originating from the as-quenched microstructure of tool steels,
which consists primarily of martensite with RA and carbides. The microstructure and
tempering reactions are reviewed in more detail in Refs. [8,29,34]. During tempering there
are three or five transformation steps that occur depending, on the alloying of tool steels:
1. In the first step between 50 and 2008C, there is precipitation of epsilon carbides, which
delays softening of the as-quenched structure. During this step a volumetric contraction
occurs.
2. The second step is between 200 and 3508C, during which dissolution of epsilon carbide
and precipitation of cementite are occurring along with a reduction in hardness.
3. The temperature range of the third step depends on the chemical composition of the
steel and corresponds to a reduction in the stability of RA. This instability is produced
by carbide precipitation, which reduces the alloy content in solution in the austenite,
the and hence increases Ms. This instability starts at 150 and 4508C, for carbon steels
and high-alloy tool steels, respectively. The transformation of RA to martensite or
bainite during cooling results in a volume increase. This expansion increases with
increasing volume fraction of RA.
4. The fourth stage corresponds to highly alloyed tool steels containing carbide-forming
elements. There is an exchange of carbon between cementite and other carbides; this
phenomenon is associated a large volumetric expansion.
5. The fifth stage, which is also associated with highly alloyed tool steels, starts at 6008C
and continues until Ac1. It corresponds to the coalescence of carbides and results in an
annealed microstructure. This phenomenon is associated with a volumetric contraction.
It is necessary that the person designing the heat treatment be familiar with the nature of the
dilatations that occur during the tempering operations in order to arrive at the proper final
dimensions prior to heat treatment.
The variation of the hardness of tool and die steels with respect to the tempering
temperature could have one of the four principal behaviors given in Figure 11.18. Class 1 is
typical of carbon and low-alloy tool steels in which the hardness is decreasing progressively
Cla
ss
1
Class
Hardness
Class 2
Class 4
Tempering temperature
Tempering parameter, T(c + log t )
FIGURE 11.18 Four major types of hardness versus tempering temperature in tool steels. (From
G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park,
OH, 1998, p. 100.)
with increasing temperature due to the precipitation and coarsening of cementite, or of other
low-alloy carbides. Class 2 is characteristic of medium- to high-alloy cold-working die steels
in which the alloying addition retards carbide precipitation and related softening. Curves
between Class 1 and Class 2 could be obtained for low- to medium-alloy steels. Class 3 is
representative of highly alloyed high-speed steels in which secondary hardening occurs at
high-tempering temperatures. The final hardness of these steels could exceed that in the
untempered condition. Class 4 is representative of the medium- to high-alloy hot-working
tool steels that exhibit a secondary hardening, as is the case with Class 3. In Class 4, the asquenched hardness is lower than that of class 3 due to its lower carbon content.
Secondary hardening is a result of the transformation of RA to martensite on cooling from
the tempering temperature, and of precipitation of an ultrafine dispersion of alloy carbides [30].
Tungsten, vanadium, chromium, and molybdenum that are the strong carbide-forming
elements are most commonly used to achieve secondary hardening. To take advantage of their
precipitation characteristics, they must be dissolved in austenite during the austenitizing
treatment in order to be incorporated into the martensite formed during quenching with
sufficient supersaturation for secondary hardening during tempering. Figure 11.19 through
Figure 11.22 show the effect of strong carbide-forming elements on the secondary hardening of
0.5% C tool steel [8].
The recommended tempering conditions for optimum performance with recommended
austenitizing temperatures of each of the tool steels are given in Table 11.9. The tempering
treatment should be performed as soon as possible after quenching, and heating to tempering
temperatures should be slow to ensure temperature homogenization within the tool steel and
the prevention of cracking. Slow cooling in still air is also recommended to minimize the
development of residual stresses [8].
In carbon and low-alloy steels, tempering increases the toughness of hardened steels from
the low value characteristic of as-quenched martensite. In high-alloy tool steels, tempering
Tempering temperature, F
200
200
600
1000
1400
1800
Vanadium steels
800
700
600
400
Hardness, HV
Hardness, HV
500
300
%C
0.50
0.46
0.43
0.46
0.48
200
130
95
%V
(calc)
0.26
0.53
1.02
2.02
315
540
760
980
Tempering temperature, C
FIGURE 11.19 Secondary hardening caused by alloy carbide precipitation produced by V additions.
(From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials
Park, OH, 1998, p. 104.)
increases the hardness in addition to producing a dispersion of stable alloy carbides resistant
to coarsening during exposure to heating. Such coarsening would lower hardness and limit
tool life during high-speed machining or high-temperature forging.
Tempering temperature, 8F
200
200
600
800
1000
1400
1800
Tungsten steels
700
600
Hardness, HV
500
400
300
%C
0.50
0.47
0.46
0.55
0.55
0.55
200
130
%V
(calc)
1.13
5.42
10.62
15.07
20.19
315
95
540
760
980
Tempering temperature, 8C
FIGURE 11.20 Secondary hardening caused by alloy carbide precipitation produced by tungsten
additions. (From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International,
Materials Park, OH, 1998, p. 104.)
Tempering temperature, 8F
200
200
800
600
1000
1400
1800
Molybdenum steels
700
600
Hardness, HV
500
400
300
%C
0.50
0.46
0.47
0.50
0.48
200
130
95
%V
(calc)
0.51
0.98
1.96
5.07
315
540
760
980
Tempering temperature, 8C
FIGURE 11.21 Secondary hardening caused by alloy carbide precipitation produced by Mo additions.
(From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials
Park, OH, 1998, p. 104.)
2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Tempering temperature, 8F
200
600
200
800
1000
1400
1800
Chromium steels
700
600
Hardness, HV
500
400
300
200
130
%C
0.50
0.35
0.48
0.52
95
%V
(calc)
3.88
7.39
11.73
315
540
760
980
Tempering temperature, 8C
FIGURE 11.22 Secondary hardening caused by alloy carbide precipitation produced by chromium
additions. (From G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International,
Materials Park, OH, 1998, p. 104.)
690
TABLE 11.9
Hardening and Tempering of Tool Steels
Hardening
Type
Rate of Heating
Preheat
Temperature, 8C
Hardening
Temperature, 8C
Holding
Time, min
Quenching
Medium (a)
Tempering
Temperature, 8C
Rapidly
Rapidly
Rapidly
Rapidly
Rapidly
Rapidly
Rapidly
Rapidly
Rapidly
Rapidly
Rapidly
from preheat
from preheat
from preheat
from preheat
from preheat
from preheat
from preheat
from preheat
from preheat
from preheat
from preheat
730845
730845
730845
790
730845
730845
730845
730845
730845
730845
730 845
11751220
11901230
12051230 (b)
11751205 (b)
12201245 (b)
11901215 (b)
11901210 (b)
11901215 (b)
12001225 (b)
11901220 (b)
11801205 (b)
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
O, A, or
O, A, or
O, A, or
O, A, or
O, A, or
O, A, or
O, A, or
O, A, or
O, A, or
O, A, or
O, A, or
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
540595 (c)
540595 (c)
540595 (c)
540595 (c)
540595 (c)
540595 (d)
510595 (d)
510595 (d)
540625 (d)
525565 (d)
525595 (d)
815870
815870
815870
12601300 (b)
12751300 (b)
12051260 (b)
25
25
25
O, A, or S
O, A, or S
O, A, or S
540595 (c)
540595 (c)
540650 (d)
815
815
815
815
815
10101040
9951025
9951040
10101065
10951205
A
A
A
A
A or O
540650
540650
540650
540650
540705
730845
730845
10951190
11201220
25
25
O, A, or S
O, A, or S
565650
565650
815
845
10951205
12051260
25
25
A or O
O
595675
650815
1540 (e)
1540 (e)
1540 (e)
1540 (e)
25
815
815
870
10951230
11501260
11751260
25
25
25
O
A or O
O, A, or S
565650
565675
565675
815
815
815
815
9801025
925980
9701010
10101065
1545
1545
1545
3060
A
O
A
A
205540
205540
205540
150540
790
790
675
650
815
790
790
650
925980
955980
815870
830870
955980
9801010
9801025
790815
2045
2560
2045
2045
3060
2045
2045
3060
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
175540
175540
175425
150525
150540
175595
510620
175425
790815
760800
790815
O: 790830
W: 845885
1030
520
1030
1030
O
O
O
O or W
175260
175260
175315
175290
Slowly
Slowly
Slowly
Slowly
650
650
Shock-resisting steels
S1
S2
S5
S7
Slowly
Slowly
Slowly
Slowly
650 (f)
760
650705
900955
845900
870925
925955
1545
520
520
1545
O
B or W
O
A or O
205650
175425
175425
205620
900925 (g)
900925 (g)
970995 (g)
900925 (g)
900925 (g)
870900 (h)
830845 (h)
800830 (h)
970995 (h)
845870 (h)
790815 (h)
815870
15
15
15
15
15
15
O
O
A
O or W
A or W
O
175260
175260
175480
175260
175230
480595 (i)
Mold steels
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P20
650
Continued
691
Tool Steels
H24
H25
H26
692
Rate of Heating
Preheat
Temperature, 8C
P21(j)
Slowly
Do not preheat
Slowly
L3
Slowly
L6
Slowly
Hardening
Temperature, 8C
Holding
Time, min
Quenching
Medium (a)
Tempering
Temperature, 8C
705730
60180
A or O
510550
W: 790845
O: 845925
W: 775815
O: 815870
790845
1030
O or W
175540
1030
O or W
175315
1030
175540
650
790870
15
W or B
175260
Water-hardening steels
W1, W2, W3
565650 (k)
760815
1030
B or W
175345
Slowly
(a) O, oil quench; A, air cool; S, salt bath quench; W, water quench; B, brine quench. (b) When the high temperature heating is carried out in a salt bath, the range of temperatures
should be about 148C lower than given here. (c) Double tempering recommended for not less than 1 h at temperature each time. (d) Triple tempering recommended for not less
than 1 h at temperature each time. (e) Times apply to open furnace heat treatment. For pack hardening, a common rule is to heat 1.2 min per mm (30 min per in.) of cross section
of the pack. (f) Preferable for large tools to minimize decarburization. (g) Carburizing temperature. (h) After carburizing. (i) carburized per case hardness. (j) P21 is a
precipitation-hardening steel having a thermal treatment that involves solution treating and aging rather than hardening and tempering. (k) Recommended for large tools and
tools with intricate sections.
Source: From A.M. Bayer, T. Vasco, and L.R. Walton, Wrought tool steels, in ASM Handbook, Vol. 1, Properties and Selection: Iron, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys, 10th
ed., 1990, pp. 770771.
Type
for lower compressive stresses such as the ledeburitic chromium steel D2. In the case of
deep drawing dies subject to friction forces, steel D2 is suitable for drawing punches
and drawing rings and steel O2 is used for ejectors and blank holders. Nitriding could
be applied to avoid cold welding.
Stamping tools that are subject to pressure and friction stresses lower than those
encountered in extrusion can be made from O2 for blank holders and S1 for tools to
produce coins. In rolling, suitable tool materials for cold rolls are steels L3, O, A2, D2,
and M4 for thread rolls and multiroll stands.
4. Steels for hot forging
In the case of hammer forging that is characterized by impact loading between the tool
and the forged part, there is no need for a die material with hardness retention. The L6
family of tool steels is a good material for massive dies. Also, high-carbon (1.45%) steel
with 3.3% vanadium due to its wear resistance and its hardness is suitable for dies with
flat cutting. Wear resistance on the surface of these steels can be increased by nitriding
or chromium plating for flat cuts.
The hot-working steels H10, H11, and H13 are suitable for press forging dies that
are heated during forging process due to the longer time contact between forged parts and
die. Martensitic-hardened microstructure is suitable for delaying heat checking in dies
for forging copper alloys. For hot-rolling steels H11, H20, and H21 are suitable.
5. Steel alloys for hot extrusion
Hot extrusion is a hot-forming process used to produce long, straight, semifinished metal
products such as bar, solid, and hollow sections, tubes, wires, and strips. The forming
temperature depends on the alloys to be extruded. Tool steels used in extrusion must have
high-temperature strength due to the high pressing forces involved in this process. Hotworking steels are generally adequate except in the isothermal extrusion of titanium, for
which superalloys are more appropriate [35]. The tool steels H11 and H13 are suitable for
the extrusion of light metals; while in the case of extrusion of heavy metals such as copper
and steels Ni-base super alloy tool steels H26 and T15 are more suitable. For tube
extrusion the mandrel steels H10 and H19 are more appropriate.
6. Steels for machining
In machining operations, tools for turning are made of high-speed steels. Abrasive wear
resistance and hardness at high temperature are the two important properties for
machining tool steels. Cobalt addition in the range of 5 to 12% to the base alloy M2
improves the hardness at higher temperatures. Steel M41 which contains 4.8% Co, is
used for milling cutters and screw taps. The addition of V in the range of 3 to 5%
increases wear resistance. The alloy M3 with 3% V is used for countersinks, broaches,
and threading taps. More information on high-speed steels is to be found in Ref. [8].
M40 type steels are used for machining aerospace materials such as Ti and nickel-base
alloys. Due to its high wear resistance T15 tool steels are used for lathe tools and
machining materials with high-tensile strength.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park,
OH, 1998, pp. 728.
2. Tool steels, Heat Treaters Guide: Practices and Procedures for Irons and Steels, H. Chandler, Ed.,
ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1995, pp. 517669.
3. J.G. Gensure and D.L. Potts, International Metallic Materials Cross-Reference, 3rd ed., Genium
Publishing, New York, 1988.
4. C.W. Wegst, J.C. Hamaker, Jr., and A.R. Johnson, Tool Steels, 3rd ed., American Society for
Metals, Materials Park, OH, 1962.
5. A.M. Bayer, T. Vasco, and L.R. Walton, Wrought tool steels, in ASM Handbook, Vol. 1, Properties
and Selection: Iron, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys, 10th ed., 1990, pp. 757779.
6. Tool Steels, Products Manual, American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, D.C., 1978.
7. K.W. Lange, Thermodynamic and kinetic aspect of secondary steelmaking processes, Int. Mater.
Rev., 3 (2), 1988, 5389.
8. G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park,
OH, 1998, pp. 3043.
9. Atlas Specialty Steels Division, Rio Algom Limited, Edmonton.
10. G. Hoyle, Electroslag Processes, Principles and Practices, Applied Science, Essex, U.K., 1983.
11. T.V. Philip, ESR: a means of improving transverse mechanical properties in tool and die steels, Met.
Technol., 1975, 554564.
12. G.A. Roberts and R. Cary, Tool Steels, 4th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1998.
13. S. Wilmes, H-J. Becker, and R. Krumpholz,Tool steels, A Handbook for Materials Research and
Engineering, Vol. 2, Applications, ed., Verein Deurscher Eisenhuttenleute, 1993, pp. 302373.
11. T. Itami and Y. Kawashima, The Production of Rolling Mill Rolls and High Speed Cutting Tools at
Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Spray Forming: Science, Technology and Application, Metal Powder
Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1992, pp. 7791.
15. G. Roberts, G. Krauss, and R. Kennedy, Tool Steels, 5th ed., ASM International, Materials Park,
OH, 1998, pp. 67107.
16. W.C. Leslie and R.J. Sober, The strength of ferrite and of martensite as functions of composition,
temperature and strain rate, Trans. ASM, 60, 1967, 459484.
17. G. Krauss, Heat treated martensitic steels: microstructural systems for advanced manufacture, Iron
Steel Inst. Jpn., 35 (4), 1995, 349359.
18. Steel Heat Treatment Handbook, G.E. Totten and M.A.H. Howes, Eds., Marcel Dekker, New
York, 1997.
19. E.C. Bain and H.W. Paxton, Alloying Elements in Steel, 2nd ed., American Society for Metals,
Metals Park, OH, 1961.
20. J.C. Hamaker Jr., V.C. Stang, and G.A. Roberts, Trans. Amer. Soc. Metals, 49, 1957, S. 550=75.
21. G.A. Roberts, Trans. Metallurg. Soc. AIME, 236, 1966, S. 950=63.
22. Smithells Metals Reference Book, 8th ed., Elsevier Butterworth, Heinemann, 2004, pp. 21-4
and 21-5.
23. J.R.T. Branco and G. Krauss, Heat treatment and microstructure of tool steels for molds and dies,
in Tool materials for Molds and Dies, G. Krauss and H. Nordberg, Eds., Colorado School of Mines
Press, Golden, CO, 1987, pp. 94117.
24. G. Krauss, Steels: Heat Treatment and Processing Principles, ASM International, Materials Park,
OH, 1990.
25. Abrasives for grinding operations, ASM, Specialty Handbook: Tool Materials, J.R. Davis, Ed.,
ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1995, pp. 101115.
26. B.A. Becherer and T.J. Witheford, Introduction to heat treating of tool steels, Heat Treating, Vol. 4,
ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1991, pp. 711725.
27. K.E. Thelning, Steel and its Heat Treatment, 2nd ed., Butterworths, London, 1984.
` Outils, Technique de lIngenieur, Traite
28. R. Leveque, Traitement Thermiques des Aciers A
Metallurgie, M 1134, 1997.
29. G.R. Speich and W.C. Leslie, Tempering of steel, Metall. Trans., 3, 1972, 10431054.
30. Y. Imai, Phases in quenched and tempered steels, Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met., 16, 1975, 721734.
31. G. Peter, Winchell symposium on the tempering of steel, Metall. Trans. A, 14A, 1983, 9911145.
32. G. Krauss, Tempering and structural change in ferrous martensitic structures, in Phase Transformation in Ferrous Alloys, A.R. Marder and J.J. Goldstein, Eds., TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1984,
pp. 101123.
33. G. Krauss and P.E. Repas, Eds., Fundamentals of Aging and Tempering in Bainitic and Martensitic
Steel Products, Iron and Steel Society, Warrendale, PA, 1992.
34. G.R. Speich and K.A. Taylor, Tempering of ferrous martensites, in Martensite, G.B. Olson and
W.S. Owen, Eds., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1992, pp. 243275.
35. Handbook of Workability and Process Design, G. Dieter, H.A. Kuhn, and S.L. Semiatin, Eds., ASM
International, Materials Park, OH, 2003, pp. 291315.