Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NEW POSSIBILITY,
DESIGN YOUR FUTURE
Seongwan Bae
2013.04.04
MidasIT
Part 1. Definitions
......... 03
......... 08
......... 18
......... 20
Part 5. Conclusions
......... 53
Part 1. Definitions
Soft Ground
http://en.midasuser.com
Part 1. Definitions
Classification of Clay
Classification of Clay
Terzaghi & Peck (1967)
Very Soft
Very Soft
SPT(N)
qc(tf/m2)
Soft
Medium
Stiff
Very Stiff
Hard
Stiff
Very Stiff
Hard
815
1530
30
1530
3060
60
SoftMedium
24
48
515
http://en.midasuser.com
Part 1. Definitions
http://en.midasuser.com
Part 1. Definitions
http://www.penta-ocean.co.jp/english/business/civil/softground.html
8
http://en.midasuser.com
Part 1. Definitions
......... 03
......... 08
......... 18
......... 20
Part 5. Conclusions
......... 53
Overview
[ 1D Consolidation]
[ FEM Consolidation]
10
http://en.midasuser.com
Sand
[ De Beer Method) ]
11
http://en.midasuser.com
http://en.midasuser.com
Type
Volumetric Compression
Index (mv) method
Schematic
Diagram
Settlement
Calculation
Remarks
13
http://en.midasuser.com
Type
Volumetric Compression
Index (mv) method
Schematic
Diagram
Rebound
Calculation
Remarks
14
http://en.midasuser.com
http://en.midasuser.com
[ Degree of Consolidation]
[ Rate of Settlement]
16
http://en.midasuser.com
Type
Skempton
Hansbo
IP = Plastic Index
WL = Liquid Limit
Empirical
Equations
Type
Clay
0.25 ~ 0.30
Silt
0.30 ~ 0.45
silty Clay
0.25 ~ 0.40
Peat
0.35 ~ 0.50
17
http://en.midasuser.com
Analysis
Method
Simplified
Bishop
Simplified
Janbu
Spencer
Morgenstern Price
Sarma
(Vertical)
Vertical F
Equilibrium
Horizontal F
Equilibrium
Moment
Equilibrium
Advantages
Disadvantages
Reduction in computing
time
Appliable for circular and
non-circular failure surface
Inaccurate against
horizontal force
Conservative Results
(F.S.)
18
http://en.midasuser.com
Part 1. Definitions
......... 03
......... 08
......... 18
......... 20
Part 5. Conclusions
......... 53
Site Investigation
Boring Test
Lab Test
-Consolidation Test
-UU,CU Test
Cc , Cv , Ch
E0 , Pc , Kv , Kh
Sa
Stability Analysis
1D Consolidation Analysis
Max.height of embankment
Construction Stage
Check Reinforcement
Compare Reinforcement
SCP / GCP
Conterweight Fill
Check Points
-Material properties
-Stability
-Waterlevel, site condition
-Effect
-Duration
-Economy, Constructability
Compare Drainage
Plastic Board Drain
Pack Drain
Sand Drain
Fiber Drain
Construction,
Monitoring and Control
20
http://en.midasuser.com
Part 1. Definitions
......... 03
......... 08
......... 18
......... 20
Part 5. Conclusions
......... 53
1st Zone
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
32
22
http://en.midasuser.com
Preliminary Analysis
Embankment
Landfill
Landfill Thickness
Soft Ground
N-value
[ Model ]
Waterlevel
[ Input Data ]
Total Settlement
Consolidation Period
Type
Weak Layer
Thickness (m)
10
Embankment
Height (m)
12
15
Number of
Analysis Cases
5 X 5 X 2 = 50 case
Generated Settlement
Landfill Thickness
(m)
Residual Settlement
Softground
Properties
Top
[ Output Data ]
Bottom
23
http://en.midasuser.com
Preliminary Analysis
D 10m
10
10m D 30m
20
30m D
30
24
http://en.midasuser.com
Parametric Analysis
Preloading Heights
Drainage Methods
1st section
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
32
25
http://en.midasuser.com
Parametric Analysis
<Model>
Modeling Process : CAD section import Smart Surface Drag &Drop (Assign Material Properties)
1D Consolidation Analysis
Multi Analysis
Parametric Analysis for Max. Drain Spacing
Parametric Analysis for Min. Preloading Height
Smart Result
26
http://en.midasuser.com
Copy &
Paste
Smart Surface(SS)
27
Set
Waterlevel
Create Analysis
Cases
http://en.midasuser.com
Smart Surface(SS)
28
Set
Waterlevel
Create Analysis
Cases
http://en.midasuser.com
Smart Surface(SS)
29
Set
Waterlevel
Create Analysis
Cases
http://en.midasuser.com
Smart Surface(SS)
Set Calculation
Point
30
Set
Waterlevel
Create Analysis
Cases
http://en.midasuser.com
Smart Surface(SS)
31
Set
Water
level
Create Analysis
Cases
http://en.midasuser.com
Smart Surface(SS)
32
Set Water
level
Create
Analysis
Cases
http://en.midasuser.com
33
http://en.midasuser.com
Preloading Heights
Preloading Heights
34
http://en.midasuser.com
Preloading Heights
Preloading Heights
Height Increase /
Number of Increment
2
Analysis Cases for Each
Increment
35
http://en.midasuser.com
Preloading Heights
Results Analysis
Analysis of Preloading
Analysis Results
36
http://en.midasuser.com
Preloading Heights
Scheduled construction
Degree of
Occurred
Residual
Allowable
Remarks
period(day)
consolidation (%)
settlement (m)
settlement (m)
settlement(m)
730
74.54
0.7974
0.2723
0.1000
NG
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
99
Duration (day)
371
445
530
627
741
882
1063
1318
1755
2769
0.5884
0.6418
0.6953
0.7488
0.8023
0.8558
0.9093
0.9628
1.0162
1.0590
0.4814
0.4279
0.3744
0.3209
0.2674
0.2139
0.1605
0.1070
0.0535
0.0107
37
http://en.midasuser.com
Preloading Heights
P/L height
Section
Duration (day)
Degree of
Occurred
consolidation
90%
settlement (m)
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
1318
1318
1318
1318
1318
1318
1318
1318
1318
1318
0.9721
0.9812
0.9900
0.9987
1.0071
1.0153
1.0233
1.0312
1.0389
1.0464
0.0976
0.0886
0.0797
0.0711
0.0626
0.0544
0.0464
0.0385
0.0309
0.0233
Residual
settlement (m)
[Preloading Height Summary of review results of residual settlement]
0.2
0.1
85%
90%
95%
0
-0.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
P reloading height (m)
2.5
http://en.midasuser.com
Drain Spacing
Drainage Methods,
Reinforcement Methods,
Drain Spacing
Drainage Methods,
Drain Spacing
39
http://en.midasuser.com
Drain Spacing
Construct PBD
Drain Spacing
40
http://en.midasuser.com
Drain Spacing
Results Analysis
41
http://en.midasuser.com
Degree of
Occurred
Residual
Allowable
Remarks
period(day)
consolidation (%)
settlement (m)
settlement (m)
settlement(m)
730
74.54
0.7974
0.2723
0.1000
NG
Degree of
Occurred
Residual
settlement (m)
settlement (m)
residual settlement
(m)
Remarks
consolidation (%)
0.90m x 0.90m
95.69
1.0236
0.0461
0.1000
OK
1.10m x 1.10m
91.63
0.9802
0.0895
0.1000
OK
1.30m x 1.30m
88.05
0.9419
0.1278
0.1000
NG
1.50m x 1.50m
85.24
0.9118
0.1579
0.1000
NG
1.70m x 1.70m
83.10
0.8889
0.1808
0.1000
NG
Spacing
http://en.midasuser.com
Degree of
Occurred
Residual
Allowable
Remarks
period(day)
consolidation (%)
settlement (m)
settlement (m)
settlement(m)
730
74.54
0.6598
0.2253
0.1000
NG
Degree of
Occurred
Residual
settlement (m)
settlement (m)
residual settlement
(m)
Remarks
consolidation (%)
1.60m x 1.60m
94.40
0.7519
0.0446
0.1000
OK
1.80m x 1.80m
91.61
0.7448
0.0682
0.1000
OK
2.00m x 2.00m
89.03
0.7349
0.0906
0.1000
OK
2.20m x 2.20m
86.79
0.7247
0.1103
0.1000
NG
2.40m x 2.40m
84.92
0.7154
0.1271
0.1000
NG
Spacing
http://en.midasuser.com
Strength Increase,
Slope Stability for each construction stage
44
http://en.midasuser.com
45
http://en.midasuser.com
Create Slope
Models
Guide Message
46
http://en.midasuser.com
Increase Parameters
47
http://en.midasuser.com
48
http://en.midasuser.com
Softground
Slope
Softground
Slope
Module
Module
Module
Module
Max.Height of 1st
Max.Height of 2nd
stage
49
stage
http://en.midasuser.com
Softground
Slope
Softground
Slope
Module
Module
Module
Module
Max.Height of 1st
Max.Height of 2nd
stage
50
stage
http://en.midasuser.com
Softground
Slope
Softground
Slope
Module
Module
Module
Module
Max.Height of 1st
Max.Height of 2nd
stage
51
stage
http://en.midasuser.com
Softground
Slope
Softground
Slope
Module
Module
Module
Module
Max.Height of 1st
Max.Height of 2nd
stage
52
stage
http://en.midasuser.com
2
53
http://en.midasuser.com
Part 1. Definitions
......... 03
......... 08
......... 18
......... 20
Part 5. Conclusions
......... 53
Part 5. Conclusions
Conclusions
Design Criteria
In terms of both serviceability and costs
Site Investigation
Geological information and reliable parameters for analysis
Design Process
Ensure both stability of embankment and residual settlements
Monitoring
Performance of embankment during and after construction
55
http://en.midasuser.com
SoilWorks - Vision
SoilWorks
SoilWorks is
Time is
Money
Time
56
http://en.midasuser.com
SoilWorks - Vision
International SoilWorks
57
http://en.midasuser.com
SoilWorks - Vision
International SoilWorks
- 2013
58
http://en.midasuser.com
SoilWorks
59
http://en.midasuser.com