The coherence of the incoherence

Ibrahim Amellal
27 septembre 2016

God doesnt play dice

Albert Einstein
May be three-card monte
Ibrahim Amellal

Abstract

The topic of this article is to show that the law in quantics physics whose
seem us strange arent.

Schrodingers cat

Lets begin by the famous cat of Schrodinger. Is it possible that the cat
is 50 % dead and 50 % alive ? Probably. And it is possible that this cat is
dead or alive mutually ? Probably too ... And How ?
By the concept of relativity of the information. What time is it ? 00 :400
and the date 17 july 2016 at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium but at London its
23 :40 or 11 :40 PM and the date is 16 July 2016. Its correct to say its 00 :40
and that its 23 :40 too. And its impossible that its 00 :40 and 23 :40 in
the same time. But and that the important point ... in the same referential.
For Isaac its 23 :40 but for Georges its 00 :40, one living at London, the
other at Louvain-la-Neuve.
Georges is advance, some kilometers and th day will come but after. In
the Geroges referentiel were the 17 july but for Isaacs referential were only
the 16th.
Lets take 2 boxes (A & B) with one cat enclosed in once. Erwin informs
his friend Werner that one box is empty and other contain the animal. I
inject a nocive gas on the box A.
What can I say about the states of the cat ?
Lets the matrix state of the cat.

Erwin
Werner

Dead
100%
50%

Alive
0%
50%

For Erin whose knows that the cat was in Box A, the cat is surely dead.
2

But for Werner, if he has just his eyes as sensors of informations, its fifty
fifty. Now, Erwin show the boxes and a wave function collapse, a state
matrix colapse.
If Werner had infrared sensors or X-ray, he could know where the cat was.
So what can we conclude, relatively, the representations of the world is
different of a same world. In some cases, this incertitude or rather this
informationless can be modelized by probability whose collapse when the
informations came. This phenomen is very known by the traders and investors whose call them speculation.

The intrude Rafale

So lets continue with an other example.

Belgian police continue to send migrants in the other side of boundaries

c
and saying at french police Rien d clarer
(Nothing special).
French Air force send a beautiful aircraft, the Dassault Rafale, the stateof-the-art recently bought by India to patrol over Belgium and spy the population flux.
The aircraft fly over Courtrai with a pod of reconaissance to collect infos.
Lets assume that a Belgian soldier in the anti-aircraft is on the ground
with his radar, can he knows the position of the french plane exactly ?
By approximation, for our example, c is 300 000 km/s .
The aircraft fly just over our DCA position at the height of 3 km and
the Lieutnant Van der welde see it. But can he claim that the aircraft is 3
km juste above them ?
You see the aircraft but with a latence, the light came with 10 s of latency. Thus the aircraft was there but 10 s ago. And now ?
These aircraft can turn with an angle of 30 and if he doesnt change
his velocity, the espace of probables positions is an arc defined by :
(

r = v.t
= /6

We can generalize for the broke/acceleration and the up/down angle and
well have a 3D space.
But focus on the acceleration., the aircraft if he isnt at the maximum
speed or minimum can acceleterate or broke. We assume that the aircraft
doesnt turn. The aircraft whose size is 15 m could be + 12.5 m or - 12.5 m in
front or behind the arc of circle for example. The referentiel is at the middle
of the aircraft. So the range is [-20m,20m], with a aircraft of 15 meters
and equiprobable repartition, we can obtain a function of his probability.
Outside of the twenty meters, you can fire the missile but the aircraft can
be touched. In the range [-5,5] the probability is 60 % and for values of x,

the probabilities are defined by the line

3
= 75
x

3
75 x

So our DCA sould fire in the range [-5,5] to have the maximum of probabilty 60 % but they must include de latency of the missile. What have we
explain ? Due to latency of the information, we just can evaluate the position of the body with probability and there its with linear function, but the
airplane had sinusoidal shape, by integration, wed find similar distributions
than in quantum physics.
So lets come to the last point.

Bali-balo in the space

Now, lets try to resolve or rather to see a macroscopic case where the
study of a body modifies his state.
The illustration will be one story of the Bali Balo on his bike at 100 above 0
and hit a truck. Unfortunately, he falls 15 meter far and hes died. The driver came the police and the policeman say Dont touch, no modifications
please, we want to collect all infos.
And when, the poloice car come, the body have be moved, the policeman
draw the shape of the carcass.
So reproduce the same kind in the space, the Bali Balo is died and lying
on the ground on a plan asteroid. Unfortunately, were below this asteroid.
The spatial police will investigate and decide to see the body and draw the
shape of his body, in fact, we desire to draw precesily the shape of his carcass. Is it possible ?
Assume that the gravity force of a asteroid is small but the asteroid is a
disqus and thick.
So if we come by the Nord, the body sill be under the gravity of the
asteroid orthogonally at his body but there an other force of graity, those
produced by the spaital police. And the body will swing and each time that
we approach by each angle of the asteroid, the gravity force will impact the
position and well find either the body in line with the head close to us ou
the feet but normally in same axis than our gravity centers.
For a simple law in Newton physics :
(

F (x, y) = m1 a(x, y)
Gm1 m2
F (x, y) =
2
2
x +y

We can wee that the body of Bali Balo m2 has no influence but the body
of the observer m2 will increase linearly the perturbation
of the carcass. And
p
the other variable is the distance, if we choose r = x2 + y 2 , we can draw a
function of perturbation defined by :
a(r, m2 ) =

Gm2
r2

By integration, we can add the factor time at the formula, a short presence will modify lightly.
a(r, m2 , t) =

Gtm2
r2

Its not a conform copy of the Heiseinberg principle but if we will know
more precisely the the body, we will disturb the system.

Conclusion

Like optical illusion some other physics phenomen are so small that they
seem inexistent.
Our brain are tributary of our world, we apprehend the world with a data
fusion of our sense, but the prcision of our view or hearing are limited.