Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[^i^EJl by IAAF
10:1: 51-66, 1995
bv Alessandro Donali
Introduclion
The iraining nielhodoloay and Ihc evalualion syslcm which 1 propose to presenl were
developed in the field and not in a laboratory.
The first simple idea ihai came to my mind,
during the years spent coaching spriniers and
middle dislance runners, was the starling
point for Ihe development of a real methodology.
Everything started in the Autumn of 1981,
The Italian Athlelics Federation put nie in
charge of ihe short middle disiancc events,
which, for many years, had been obtaining
very litlle success. I had just had three year's
experience with the 4()()m National Team. In
1980 the 4x40m relay athletes commitled to
me won the bronze medal in the .MoscowOlympic Games and, in the European Cup of
1981, they finished ahead of the Soviet Union.
Great Brilain. East and West Germany. In
consideraiion of my pasl experience as a middle dislance runner, the Italian managemcni
hoped thai I could supply new and more efficient training syslems for this speciality.
During my first experience wilh them. I
realized thai Italian middle dislance runners
were lacking in speed.
Thc best of them ran the lOOm. during
training, in 11.5-1 l.ftsec. Ihe slowest even in
12.3-12.4sec. It was clear that this serious lack
of speed did nol resull from a lack of stride
length, which was adequate, bui on a poor
rate of striding.
Assuming that excessive endurance training was responsible lor this. I introduced two
e.xercises to increase siride frequency:
a) 40 rapid run back kicks;
bl) 20 rapid high knee pick-ups with the
right leg.
b2) 20 rapid high knee pick ups with ihe lefi
leg.
The first exercise was aimed al the muscles
at lhc hack of lhc thigh and thc pelvis, while
51
Writing my data down and making a graphic representation on the cartesian axis. I realized that the dala ga\e non random results. A
connection betw'een the variation of stride
length and of speed aclually became c\ideni.
The same siraiegy applied to other athletes
gave the same results in terms of graphical
representation {Figure / ) .
Riccardo Materazzi
Tirrenla,
6,11.1981
run
83.5 strides
18 52
II run
72.7 strides
16'32
n i run
68.0 strides
15"30
1314-
i;::
1919go
Figure 1:
as
so
75
70
NumteroltlWMrMM
OS
GO
the lOflm, at maximum speed and, as a second reference point. 1 considered the number
of maximum length, bounding strides ihe athlele needed lo cover the l(X)m,
In fact, since most of the alhleies found it
very difficult to execute the desired movements properly, I had to abandon ihis project
Stefano Mei
Ostia.
6.12.1981
41.8 strides
14 12
II run
43.0 strides
1347
iSL n m
44.5 strides
12'73
nunnlng'.wWilongtrtlMniwnnil itrtdM
Figure 2:
The training <if both sprinters and middledistance runners appears to be most effeclive
when all the following groups of exercises are
practised:
a) running exercises:
b) slrength development exercises;
c) lechnique improvement exercises.
These exercises can be practised in different combinaiions. according to the speciality.
For inslance. slrenglh deveiopmeni and lechnique improvemenl exercises plav a more
important role in sprint training than in middle disiancc training and running exercises
are of less significance.
Every group of exercises consists of a number of categories. For example, running exercises can be divided inlo five main categories,
each concerned wilh the deveiopmeni of:
a 1)speed
a2) speed endurance
a3) lactacid endurance
53
DOWMW
100m
HH
1500m
10.000m
400m
800m
"AIMbmm
endu/aneajl
SoMtt
endurance
T h e i m p o r l a n c e of speed
strengih is greatest in sprinling
and decreases as the running Figure3: Importance of each of the 5 factors in given disdisiances get longer. On the
tances
other hand, streneth endurance
is more imporlani in the longer distances.
sion, for heighl. with double fool lakc-off. for
Both speed slrenglh and endurance strengih speed or for distance. Bounds, as part of the
can be enhanced by means of five groups of preparatory training, play a major role in the
exercises (some exercises for the improve- training of a runner, because their movemenl of lechnique can be included in this ments resemble thai of the running action.
They can be praclised with bells or lighl
group, e.g. the running clastic drills - Fig. 4).
weights (not more than ihe 10% of the body
The firsl group consists of whal may be
weighl).
described as 'preparaiory' exercises, generalThe fourth calegorv includes thc elastic
ly using only the body weight, although belts.
weighted wilh not more than 10% of the runnina drills, high-knee running, both on the
btidy weighl. can also be used. The use of spoi or with a slighl forward movemeni. high
these bells does nol change ihe way the exer- bounding runs and "circular" running.
cises are performed.
The fifth group contains all types of sprintThe second group of exercises are carried ing, with or withoul a weighted belt, on the
out with loads weighing from 50 to 300% of llal or uphill.
the body weight, according to the exercise.
In the development of endurance slrenglh
The third category consists of multi-bounds each of the five grtiups has different characof various tvpes: alternate, in quick succes- terislics: the duration of the exercises and of
^
SPEED
STRENGTH
STRIDE LENGTH
<::zzz::
^
STRIDE FREQUENCY
- STRIDE LENGTH
ENDURANCE
STRENGTH
<:z::zz:
^
Figured:
54
STRIDE FREQUENCV
2)
3i
4}
5>
1)
Circuit Training
2)
3)
*)
5)
Endurance running
'fi
I
l o n g 3110 mgn
II
iQwcniiieipicl
A
I
IOOrr>2tlDOulc>n irSD
Figure 5:
Running speed is the producl of two parameters: stride lenglh and stride frequency.
Two athleles having a different length/frequency ratio may develop the same speed.
For example, alhlete A may run Ihe UH)m
race in 50 sirides (mean stride lenglh 2ni;
mean stride frequency 5 strides per second)
with a time of lO.OOsee; a t h l e l e B inay
achieve the same lime in 45 strides (mean
siride length 2.2m; mean stride frequency 4.5
strides).
This length/frequency ratio is.
therefore, the differentiating faclor belween the two a t h l e l e s .
Apart from technit|ue. this ratio is
essentially dependeni upon the
lenglh. power and elasticity of the
individual athlete's lower limbs.
Consequently, for each alhlete,
the achievemeni of m a x i m u m
speed d e p e n d s on a specific
length/frequency ralio: a different
ralio would p r o d u c e a lower
speed. In the case of maximum
speed performances, this can be
assumed as a biomechanical rule
but il is true only over the short
term, a few hours or a few days,
during which an athlete's physical
condilion. power, elasticity and
technique are comparable.
Over the long period, each one
of these features may be influenced, improved or impaired by
Iraining and this will, therefore,
cause varialions in thc length/frequency ratio.
Il is difficult to give a clear definition of ihe relationship belween
iraining and each one of the two
parameiers of running speed, because the parameters are independent and vet. in some wavs. also
55
FRtJitning
Jf
i :100m
61.5 strides in
13"25
il
100m
55,7 strides in
12"68
11); 100m
51,8 strides in
--,
12"29
41.6 Strides in
V- 100m
VI. 100m
Figure 6:
......^.,>->....^--..,.
13"47
J--.,..;
--.^^
v'^Sv'"
Examples of graduation of the running with shorter (quicker) and longer than normal
strides
Didactic p r o g r e s s i o n of the
running with shorter than normal strides
^
cn tha spot or wiui Kignt forwaro motion,
'ast runnina wittlhlgh knee pldcup
^ i . - - V ~ i
^fri^-^.""^
Speed bounds
iv-v-^
-4
.^b
Figure 7:
MAXIMUM SPEED
6" 30
SHORTER STRIDES
28.5
|
LONGER STRIDES
6"43
30.5
6"41
27.5
6"70
35.2
6"72
25.7
6 "94
38.0
6 "89
24.6
Figures:
Figure 9:
57
5H
max
speed
6" 30"".'-''^.
28,5 strilJes ;
-1%
-2%'
: S = -1.7<!|^
S =- 2 > ^
L=.-6'.'5%;
-3%
: L = + 3.6%-i
:F = - 5 . 1 % :'
-4%
-5%
S = - 6% ^
-6%
.-'
S = - 6.2% t>:
L = + 10.7%\
F = -15.5% ; \
L=.19%-^
F = +.t6% ;
-7%
-8%
-9%
-10%
S = - 10%C?
L = - 33"
:F = + 21%
38
s'=-"8.9%"^
L=t15.9%:
F = -21% :
-|
I
36
34
32
30
number of strides
28
26
24
Figure 11: Performance variations of running speed and stride frequency in relation to stride
length (running distance 60m)
Method
LF
-Al F
Lp/
.^y^
X3
0)
Q.
in
V-
number of strides
Figure 12: Relationship between stride length (strength) and stride frequency (frequency of nervous stimuli) - Each point of the 2 lines corresponds to a specific period of training
59
In the World C h a m p i o n s h i p in R o m e .
Julv-Augusi 1987. Pavoni qualified for the
lOOin final wilh a lime of I0.22sec and for the
2(X)m final with a time of 20.38sec.
Each of these athleles performed, at various times in the course of the year, several
runs with shorl. rapid sirides and several with
longer than normal strides.
The results he had obtained few days before, during a training session, are illustrated
in Figure 14.
SHORTER STRIDES
LONGER STRIDES
46.2
7 "78
23.5
7 "36
43.0
7"44
24,2
7 "01
41.5
7" 30
25.5
6 "73
36.0
6''91
26.0
6"51
00
It is essential that
adequate resl periods are given, since
fatigue would render the dala obtained
useless for comparison;
48
46
44
38
number of strides
Figure 15: Near the point of intersection the 2 lines tend to curve and form a parabola
(Pier F. Pavoni, July-August 1987.100m)
61
62
PERIODS
SPHINTTEST
February '94
July
'94
LONGER STRIDES |
78.2
19"43
45.2
13"60
59.6
14 "96
46.4
12"31
54,7
13"74
47.7
13"02
coMPEnnoN
8 "05
(32.2)
7'97
(31.0)
12"97
(50.3)
12'97
(50.0)
Carla TUZZI
Conclusion
The breakdown of sprint performance into two fundamenlal parameters allows the coach lo accentuate either stride length or stride
frequency, thus making Iraining for
lhc Sprints, hurdles and middle distances more llexible and adjustable
to individual requiremenis.
First of all. this melhod allows
the coach lo construct two distinct
groups of exercises, one aimed al
the development
of speed and
speed endurance and the other at
the development of strength and
Slrenglh endurance. It should be
noled. however, that each group of
exercises forms bolh the training
means and the moniloring system
{Figure 22).
63
400m runner
(47.29 p.b.)
n U N N I N G WITH SHORTER
T H A N NORMAL STRIDES
10-
^o
11 . -
11 . -
u 12
-o 12 +
v
(A
42E 13-f.
o
13
E
14 -
14
15. .
15. .
100
fcr>
400
200
300
dislance
100m
56.0
200m 107.2
300m 161.3
400m 218.0
strides
Strides
Strides
strides
in
in
in
in
10'
23'
37'
53'
98
58
05
61
200
300
distance
100
100m
200m
300m
400m
40,2
80.8
125.8
178.5
hr^
400
Strides in 12" 63
strides in 26" 04
strides in 40" 88
strides in 57" 27
STEFANO MEI
November 1984
SKIP
5.0 "
4.5-
3.5--
3.5-
3.0.
40
3.0A^
4II^->
80 120 160 200 240 280 320
40
movements (number)
40
80
160
320
64
8*72
movements
movements
18''5Q( 9 " 2 5 x 2 )
movements
39"80( 9"95x4)
movements 1 ' 2 3 " 4 0 ( 1 0 " 4 2 x 8 )
-I
14+
80 120 160 200 240 280 320
movements (number)
40
80
160
320
8 "88
movements
1 9 " 7 0 ( 9"85 K 2 )
movements
movements 4 2 " 9 4 ( 1 0 " 7 3 < 4 )
movements 1'30'20 (11 "30 K 8 )
Figure 21: Training samples for the basic exercises of running with a high knee lift and running
with a high back kick
SKipM
CO
LiriLE
z w 1
D
3)
-j
o
>co 1
ism
STBIOg^jl
LJONG I M S T M I C E S
LONG STRIDES ON
SHORT DISTANCES
33
BOUNDING RUNS
m <A
zm
1
CO
HIGH SKIP
("^
3H0RT STniDES i>j
SriOfiT TRIi
SHORT DISTANCE
LONG STRIDES ON
LONG DISTANCES
BOUNDS FOR 100m
te'^EfenbV'Ryfly
ON SHORT
I DISTANCES
ON LONG
DISTANCE
Figure 2 2 : T r a i n i n g s c h e m e m u s c u l a r t r a i n i n g
Main Graphic
Theorical Stridei
28.34
Theorical Time
G.273
Flint Giaphic
Angular Correction
.0626
F i g u r e 23: S p r i n t Test s c r e e n p r i n t of p e r f o r m a n c e e n h a n c e m e n t
GK
65
m/a
100m
150m
24C
nt
days
8 9 ^ 1
12 M K I IT IS _ 21 22 3 24 ai ie 23 ., s')
Reset
m
mofrtti 3
U l jwa
Monthly Graphic
115
16-31
Annual Graphic
Piint Giaphtc
1931
EMI
Figure 24: Sprint Test screen print - sample of monthly distribution of endurance training
b6
Sprint Test is a valid control system for training for speed, speed endurance and lactacid
endurance. In speed iraining it reveals improvements in performance (Figure 23).
In endurance iraining it provides a complete recapitulation (Figure 24).
[?a]