Professional Documents
Culture Documents
x a (t )
dt
(t )e j 2Ft dt
xa (t ) dt
xa ( F ) dF
where
S xx ( F ) X a ( F )
xx
j 2Ft
xx
Rxx ( )
*
a
(t ) xa (t ) dt
j 2 fn
S xx ( f )
rxx ( k )
xx
( k ) e j 2kf
with
( n) x ( n k )
x(n) e j 2fn
Indirect Method: First calculate the ACF and then find the spectrum
by
S ( f ) r (k ) e
xx
xx
j 2kf
xx ( F )
xx
( ) e j 2F d
Pxx ( F )
Rxx ( ) e
j 2F
(t ) x(t )dt
1
d
2T0
N 1
1
N
T0 T
0
T0
Pxx ( f )
T0
x(n) e j 2fn
T0
x(t ) e
j 2Ft
dt
For DT signal,
T0
n0
Nonparametric Methods
Makes no assumption about how data were generated
Bartlett Method: averaging periodograms. Three steps
1. N-point data sequence is subdivided into K non-overlapping
segments with each segment length of M. So, there are K data
segments
xi ( n) x (n iM )
i 0,1, 2, ... K 1
n 0,1, 2, ... M 1
1
M
M 1
x(n) e j 2fn
n 0
i 0,1, ... K 1 3.
find PSD
PxxB ( f )
1
K
K 1
P
i 0
(i )
xx
(f)
modified
periodograms.
Two
n 0,1, 2, ... M 1
i 0,1, 2, ... L 1
1
P (f)
MU
(i )
xx
M 1
x(n) w(n)e
i 0,1, .. L 1 where
j 2fn
n 0
is
the
1
M
M 1
( n)
n0
PxxW ( f )
1 L 1 ( i )
Pxx ( f )
L i 0
M 1
xx
m ( M 1)
( m) w( m)e j 2fm
Parametric Methods
No assumption is required
Extrapolates values of autocorrelation for lags m N (possible if
some a priori information on data generation is available)
Model can be constructed with a number of parameters
estimated from observed data
Eliminates the need of window function
Better resolution due to absence of spectral leakage
ARMA AR and MA
AR model is most widely used due to 2 advantages
1. Suitable for representing spectra with narrow peaks (resonances)
2. Results in very simple equations for AR parameters
AR Parameter Estimation
3
. . . . . .
x (P1)x (P2). x (0) aP x P)(
xx ( m)
1
N
N 1
x ( n) x ( n m)
*
m0
PxxYW ( f )
n 0
2
wp
xx (0) 1 ak ( k )
k 1
2
wp
P
1 a P ( k )e
2
j 2fk
k 1
x (n) a P [i ]x (n i )
i 1
1
N
N 1
x(n)
n 0
a P [1] k1 .
For k = 2, 3, , P
a k [i ] a k 1 [i ] k k a k 1 [ k i ]
and
k
a k [i ] k k
i 1, 2, ...., k 1
for i k
kf kb
2
k
x (n) a k [i ]x (n i )
i 1
x (n k ) a k [i ]x(n k i )
i 1
kb (n)
2
1 N 1 f
ek ( n)
N k nk
N 1
2
1
ekb (n)
N k nk
N 1
1
e f (n) k e b ( n 1) 2 e b (n 1) k e f (n) 2
k 1
k k 1
k 1
k k 1
2( N k ) n k
k k 2 N 1
nk
PxxBU ( f )
e
nk
f
k 1
(n) ekb1 (n 1)
2
2
ekf1 (n) ekb1 (n 1)
ePf ePb
P
1 a P ( k )e j 2fk
k 1
Comparison of methods
Differentiating
Burg AR
Estimator
Characteristics Does not apply
window to data
Minimizes the
forward and
backward
prediction errors
in the least squares
sense, with the AR
coefficients
constrained to
satisfy the L-D
recursion
Advantages
Covariance
Modified
Yule-Walker AR
AR Estimator Covariance
Estimator
AR Estimator
Does not apply Does not apply Applies window to
window to
window to data data
data
Minimizes the
forward
prediction
error in the
least squares
sense
Minimizes the
forward and
backward
prediction
errors in the
least squares
sense
Always produces a
stable model
Minimizes the
forward prediction
error in the least
squares sense (also
called
"autocorrelation
method")
Always produces a
stable model
Disadvantages
May produce
unstable
models
May produce
unstable
models
Performs relatively
poorly for short data
records
Conditions for
Nonsingularity
Order must be
less than or
equal to half
the input frame
size
Order must be
less than or
equal to 2/3 the
input frame size
Because of the
biased estimate, the
autocorrelation
matrix is guaranteed
to positive-definite,
hence nonsingular