B 84567 SB PP0 DRT ST 60 0003 - 2 - AOC - Existing Fuel Gas System Adequacy Check

Design Report/ Study B-84567-SB-PP0-DRT-ST-60-0003–Rev.
2
Existing Fuel Gas System Adequacy Check
ConocoPhillips (Grissik) Ltd. Page 2 of 42
Revision Sheet
ConocoPhillips (Grissik) Ltd.
REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
1A 11 May 2015 First Issuance

Issued for Approval
- Update Executive Summary
- Add Note for figure 3.2
1B 16 June 2015 - Add Note for table 4.3
- Update Methodology with adding 2 (two) operation case
- Update Adequacy Check Calculation Result
- Update Conclusion and Recommendations
Issued for Use
- Update Executive Summary
2 24 July 2015 - Update Fuel Gas Consumption Rate for Existing Facility
- Update Calculation Result
- Update Conclusion and Recommendation
Additional Approvers (If Applicable)
Name Designation Signature Date

Design Report/ Study B-84567-SB-PP0-DRT-ST-60-0003–Rev.2
Executive Summary
This study is performed to check adequacy existing Fuel Gas System #2 which will be used as source of
fuel gas for New GTG Suban Compression Project.
The required fuel gas for new GTG is 2.3 MMscfd. Existing Fuel Gas System #2 capacity is 6.5 MMscfd
(Based on maximum FG Heater flowrate capacity), that supply 7.50 MMscfd fuel gas demand to existing
users. This report shows rating study to existing Fuel Gas System #2 if the 2.3 MMscfd for new GTG will be
added to 7.50 MMscfd compared to existing capability. The capacity for each equipment is shown in table
below:
FG Scrubber
FG Inlet Line Separation MRU Heater Remark
Nozzle
Performance
Existing Fuel Gas

System #2 capacity is
8.88 MMscfd 36.39 MMscfd 4.50 MMscfd 7.5 MMscfd 6.5 MMscfd 4.50 MMscfd limited by
FG Scrubber Inlet
Nozzle
Note : Based on PFD No: ID-N-SB-PP0-PFD-ST-60-0003, the Fuel Gas System #2 can supply 7.5 MMscfd
demand.
Refer to calculation result :

1) The existing HP Fuel Gas Scrubber (250-V-201) dimension still adequate to handle additional gas for
GTG for Suban Compression Project since the gas velocity is below the maximum allowable velocity
but inlet nozzle is not adequate due to actual momentum is higher than nozzle momentum design
criteria.
2) The existing HP Fuel Gas Heater (60-NAP-002) duty capacity is adequate to handle additional GTG
for new Gas Compression Project, while new fuel gas consumption is higher than existing HP Fuel
Gas Heater flowrate capacity stated.
3) The existing line (4”-GF-250-2110-BA1) is not adequate due to actual pressure drop is higher than
design criteria.
The New GTG fuel gas is recommended using fuel gas from Fuel Gas System Suban Compression Project,
however fuel gas from existing Fuel Gas System #2 is provided as back up with normally closed valve as
isolation. The sketch of fuel gas for new GTG is below:
New FG Distribution Suban New Gas Turbine

Compression Project Generator
Back up Supply
FG Distribution
System #2
Figure 1.0 New GTG Fuel Gas Configuration

Contents
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 3
1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 5
1.1 Background..................................................................................................................... 5
1.2 Objective......................................................................................................................... 5
2 GENERAL INFORMATION............................................................................................. 6
2.1 Definition and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 6
3 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 6
3.1 Process Description of Existing Facilities ......................................................................... 6
3.2 Process Description of Existing Fuel Gas System ............................................................ 7
3.3 Process Description of New Facilities .............................................................................. 9
4 CALCULATION BASIS ................................................................................................ 13
4.1 Fuel Gas Composition................................................................................................... 13
4.2 Fuel Gas Properties ...................................................................................................... 13
4.3 New Gas Turbine Generator ......................................................................................... 13
4.4 Fuel Gas Consumption Rate for Existing Facility (Fuel Gas System #2)......................... 14
4.5 Fuel Gas System #2 New Consumption Rate ................................................................ 14
5.1 Fuel Gas System #2 Existing Equipment ....................................................................... 14
5 DESIGN CRITERIA ...................................................................................................... 15
5.1 Separator Gas Sizing Criteria ........................................................................................ 15
5.2 Design Guideline for 2-Phase Separator........................................................................ 15
5.3 Inlet and Outlet Nozzle Criteria ...................................................................................... 16
5.4 Single Phase Vapor Line Criteria................................................................................... 17
5.5 Fuel Gas Temperature Criteria ...................................................................................... 17
5.6 Assumption ................................................................................................................... 17
6 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 17
7 ADEQUACY CHECK RESULTS AND DISCUSION ...................................................... 18
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATION ................................................................... 20
9 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 22
Appendices
Appendix A. HP FUEL GAS SCRUBBER (250-V-201)
Appendix B. HYSYS SIMULATION
Appendix C. LINE SIZING CALCULATION
Appendix D. REFERENCE FOR GTG FUEL GAS CONSUMPTION
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Suban field is a part of the Corridor Block PSC (Production Sharing Contract), located 70 km South-
West of Grissik in South Sumatra. The Suban Field is the largest gas producing field in the Corridor
PSC. Production from the wells is delivered to Suban Gas Plant via a network of approximately 40
km of underground carbon steel flow lines. Currently Suban Gas Plant has 4 gas processing trains
producing 780 MMscfd of sales gas. The gas processing trains consist of several system such as
gathering, separation, sweetening, dehydration, sales gas compression as well as several utilities
system. Sales gas is delivered through a pipeline system to the Grissik Central Gas Plant (CGP) for
custody metering and further delivery to three sales gas pipelines.
Figure 1.1. Corridor Block PSC and the Location Suban Field
Suban Field reservoir pressure decline will result in the need for Suban Compression project to
maintain the production plateau beyond 2018 to meet existing Gas Sales Agreement and support
domestic demand growth. The project scope mainly includes installation of inlet compression, fuel
gas conditioning, additional inlet cooling, and additional power generation within the Suban Gas
Plant boundary and additional utilities systems. The compression facilities will have the capacity to
compress up to 855 MMscfd of raw wet produced gas starting in 2019 with the suction pressure in
the range of 400 until 830 psig and the discharge pressure of 1280 psig. The new facilities will be
located mainly on the CPGL area; however additional land will still need to be acquired as buffer
zone for the gas plant facilities.
1.2 Objective
The objective of this document intended to provide proper adequacy check related existing fuel gas
system for additional new GTG limited to HP Fuel Gas Scrubber (250-V-201) and HP Fuel Gas
Heater (60-NAP-002).
2 GENERAL INFORMATION
2.1 Definition and Abbreviations

The following definition applies to this document:
BDV Blowdown Valve

BOD Basis of Design
CGP Central Gas Plant
CPGL/Company ConocoPhillips (Grissik) Ltd.
COPI ConocoPhillips Indonesia Inc. Ltd.
EDP Emergency De-Pressurized
ESD Emergency Shut Down
FEED Front-End Engineering Design
GTG Gas Turbine Generator
HC Hydrocarbon
HP Horse Power
JT Joule - Thomson
LAHH Level Alarm High-High
LP Low Pressure
MEG Mono Ethylene Glycol
MMscfd Million Standard Cubic Feet per Day of gas
P&ID Piping and Instrumentation Diagram
PFD Process Flow Diagram
PSC Production Sharing Contract
PSI Pound per Square Inch
SDV Shutdown Valve
TPE Tripatra Engineering
UCP Unit Control Panel
3 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
3.1 Process Description of Existing Facilities
The existing Suban Gas Plant consists of four gas processing trains with name plate capacities of 2
x 150 MMscfd sales gas and 2 x 200 MMscfd sales gas. In parallel with the processing trains there
is also a by-pass train (45 MMscfd sales) which includes only dew point control. The plant is
currently producing 780 MMscfd which is above the nameplate capacity of 735 MMscfd.
Production from the Suban wells is balanced between the four gas processing trains and the Suban
by-pass train through pressure control. Each of the four processing trains and the by-pass train has
dedicated inlet cooling and inlet separation systems where the fluid temperature is reduced to
120°F and the bulk of the liquid is removed.
Downstream of the inlet coolers and separation, each of the four gas processing trains have an
amine system for removing CO2 which consists of amine contactors and amine regeneration before
the wet gas is routed to the Hydrocarbon (HC) dew point control and dehydration unit that consists
of JT-valve and glycol injection for hydrate inhibition. Common propane refrigeration compressors
and condensers are installed to share cooled propane to all four train chillers. MEG regeneration
package units inject MEG to the head of Gas-Gas exchanger and Gas Chiller to prevent hydrate
formation and meet water dew-point specification.
The by-pass gas flow goes directly from the inlet cooling and separators to a dew point control
system without passing through an amine system.
Four residue gas compressors are installed tream of the sale gas line which delivers gas to the
Grissik facilities where it is commingled with Grissik sales gas for final sale.
Other major process units at the Suban Gas Plant includes two produced water trains for handling
water streams from the inlet separators as well as two condensate stabilization trains for processing
liquid hydrocarbon streams from the inlet separators and dew point control systems.
3.2 Process Description of Existing Fuel Gas System
Suban gas plant has 2 different pressure of fuel gas which is high pressure fuel gas and low
pressure fuel gas. The main user of each High Pressure fuel gas are listed below :
a. High Pressure Fuel Gas System #1 (240 psig) (Ref. 3)
- Power Generation (247-GTG-101A/B)
- Residue Gas Compressor (247-K-101/201)
- Residue Gas Compressor (247-K-301/401)
b. High Pressure Fuel Gas System #2 (350 psig) (Ref. 4)
- Amine Reboiler Heat Medium Surge Drum (225-V-111)
- Power Generation (247-GTG-201A/B/C)
- Heat Medium Surge Drum (257-V-201)
- Flare Header #2 purge gas
- Make-up for High Pressure Fuel Gas System #1 (240 psig)
The main user of each Low Pressure fuel gas are listed below
a. Low Pressure Fuel Gas System #1 (Ref. 3)
- Flare Ignition Package (248-A-101)
- Heat Medium Heater (257-H-101A/B)
- Heat medium heater (257-H-201A/B)
- Glycol Regeneration Package (229-A-101/201)
- Glycol Regeneration Package (229-A-301/401)
- Flare header #1 & #2
- Produced Water Tank (258-T-101)
- Condensate Storage tank (235-T-101A/B)
b. Low Pressure Fuel Gas System #2 (Ref. 4)
- Flare header purge
- Thermal Oxidizer (225-H-102/202)
- Reboiler Heat Medium Heater (225-H-111/211)
- Amine Regenerator (225-C-102/202)
- Condensate Storage Tank (235-T-201)
- Produced Water Tank (258-T-201)
- Amine Make-up Water Tank (252-T-104)
- Amine Storage Tank (225-T-102/103)
- Lean Amine Surge Drum (225-T-101)
- Incinerator (262-A-101)
Fuel gas pressure requirement for Solar Taurus 70 gas turbine generator is about 310 psig which
taken from Fuel Gas System #2, while Kawasaki gas turbine generator and Solar gas turbine
compressor has lower fuel pressure requirement which is about 220 psig and taken from Fuel Gas
System #1. To ensure the Hg level at grade is meet the threshold limit value (TLV) as government
standard, fuel gas from scrubber is sent to mercury removal unit while to maintain the supply
temperature, high pressure fuel gas improvement project is ongoing by installing fuel gas
conditioning at the upstream of fuel gas scrubber and electric heater with temperature control at
downstream of fuel gas scrubber.
The main source of high pressure fuel gas feeding the scrubber is from the stabilizer feed drum.
Lines from the residue gas compressor suction line or from the sales gas line provide make-up high
pressure fuel gas in the event that the stabilizer feed drum gas flow is inadequate or for start-up. A
line from the high pressure fuel gas scrubber inlet provides make-up gas for the low pressure fuel
gas system and a line from the scrubber outlet Fuel Gas System #2 provides make-up fuel gas for
the Fuel Gas System #1. Excess high pressure fuel gas is sent to flare via the back pressure
control valve. This valve also depressurizes the high pressure fuel gas system during an EDP.
The block diagram of Existing Fuel Gas System is shown in Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1. Block Diagram of Existing Fuel Gas System
The existing power generation system at Suban Gas Plant consist of:
 Three (3) Solar Gas Turbine Generator 9247-G-201A/B/C), 5800 KW, 6600 V, 50 Hz as main
power generator.
 Two (2) Kawasaki Gas Turbine Generator (247-G-101A/B), 950 kW, 400 V, 50 Hz as aditional
power generator power.
 One (1) Emergency Diesel generator (247-DEG-101) of 500 kW, 400 V, 50 Hz as emergency
and black start power source.
Refer to power generation and distribution study (B-84567-SB-EE0-DRT-ST-80-0001), the existing

main power generation sytem is not sufficient to supply whole loads of Suban Gas Plant at worst
case condition. Hence, additional GTG is required to be installed in Suban Compression Project. In
this study, the new GTG for Suban Compression Project is considered using Solar Taurus 70.
3.3 Process Description of New Facilities
Suban Compression facilities is installed in upstream of existing inlet facility Suban Gas Plant. It is
located on the West side of the Suban Gas plant. This is within the COPI boundary area, however
additional 5 hectare land acquisition is required to provide a buffer zone/area.
Well fluid pressure and temperature from Suban flowlines at Suban Inlet Header will be in the range
of 870 – 195 psig and 250 – 280 oF respectively. Subsequently, the well fluids are processed at
inlet facility for cooling and separation of the liquid (condensate and water) from the gas prior to be
sent to Inlet Compressor System.
Four (4) new trains of inlet facility are installed to facilitate the higher actual gas flow and increased
produced water production due to declining reservoir pressure. Four units are selected to align with
existing Suban Gas Plant Configuration to ensure comply with weight and size transportation
limitation
Each inlet facility train consists of Inlet Compressor Inlet Cooler (20HAL-103/203/303/403) and Inlet
Compressor Separator (20MBD-103/203/303/403). The Inlet Compressor Inlet Coolers cool down
0
well fluid to 120 F before being fed to Inlet Compressor Separators.
The Inlet Compressor Separators are installed to remove condensate, produced and condensed
water from gas prior being fed to Inlet Compressor Packages.
Gas Turbine Driven Inlet Compressors, single body back to back compressor design, are required
to increase pressure to designed discharge pressure as required by existing inlet facility Suban Gas
Plant. Each Inlet Compressor train consists of Inlet Compressor Suction Scrubber, 1st Stage Inlet
Compressor, Inlet Compressor Inter Cooler, Inlet Compressor Inter Stage Scrubber, 2nd Stage Inlet
Compressor and Inlet Compressor After Cooler.
The existing Inlet Coolers will be utilized as final cooling before entering the existing Inlet
Separators as discharge scrubber. And then the gas flowing to existing Amine Units, Dew Point
Control Units and Residue Compressors.
Inlet Compressor System shall be designed to have operating capability to cover all compressor
scenarios as shown in Table 3.1
Table 3.1. Compressor Operating Scenarios
Compress Sales Gas

Suction Press. Gas rate Disch. Press. Rate
Period / Duration
(psig) (MMSCFD) (psig) (MMSCFD)
Timeline (Note 1)
Jan 2019 - Jan 2019
Early Life 830 855 1280 800
(1 Month)
Feb 2019 – Jun 2020
Mid Life-1 <830-490 855 1280 800
(17 Months)
Jul 2020 – Oct 2020
Mid Life-2 <490-400 855 1280 800
(4 Months)
Nov 2020 – Jun 2022
<855-600 < 800 - 552
(20 Months)
Late Life <400-280 1250 (min.)
Juli 2022 – Dec 2023
<600-365 < 552
(18 Months)
Beyond Jan 2024 – Dec 2028
<280-150 400-215 1070 (min.) ≤ 358
PSC Life (60 Months)
Note :
1. Compressed gas rate shall be validated during detailed phase based on fuel/seal gas consumption. It is
estimated during Early life and Mid Life – 1, compressed gas rate is 844 MMscfd and 852 MMscfd due to
less fuel/seal gas consumption than Mid Life – 2.
The condensate and produced water from Inlet Compressor Separators are routed to existing
condensate stabilizer system and existing produced water system.
Block Flow Diagram of Suban Compression Facility is shown in Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.2. Block Flow Diagram of Suban Compression
Notes:
1. Grey color shapes are the new equipment.

2. White color shapes are the existing equipment
3. Solid lines are the new pipings.
4. Dash lines are the existing pipings.
st
All new Inlet Compressor Inlet Coolers, Inlet Compressor Separators, Inlet Compressor Suction Scrubbers, 1 Stage Inlet Compressors, Inlet
nd
Compressor Gas Turbine Drivers, Inlet Compressor Inter Coolers, Inlet Compressor Interstage Scrubbers, 2 Stage Inlet Compressors, and Inlet
Compressors After Coolers will be located separately from existing Suban Gas Plant, about 300 m toward West direction.
4 CALCULATION BASIS
The basis and assumptions for the fuel gas system adequacy check are presented in the following
sections.
4.1 Fuel Gas Composition
Fuel gas composition of existing FG System #2 are taken from case-1 HYSYS simulation at sales
gas and gas outlet form Condensate Stabilizer Feed Drum. Fuel gas composition used are
summarized on table below.
Table 4.1. Fuel Gas Composition
Error! Not a valid link.
4.2 Fuel Gas Properties
Fluid properties data are derived from HYSYS simulation based on the operating condition and fluid
composition at section 4.1. Peng-Robinson equation of state is used in the simulation.
Table 4.2. Fluids properties
Parameter Unit Value

Pressure Psig 370
Temperature o
F 95.5
MW - 18.8
Gas Comp factor - 0.937
Gas Viscosity Cp 0.0123
Liquid Density Lb/Ft3 39.49
Liquid Vicosity Cp 0.381
Note: Properties based on fluid composition Case-1
4.3 New Gas Turbine Generator
The new Gas Turbine Generator (GTG) considered for Suban Compression Project is using GTG
Solar Taurus 70. The specification of GTG Taurus 70 is shown in Table 4.3 below.
Table 4.3. Taurus 70 Specification
DESCRIPTION UNIT Value

Output Power KW 5800
FG Consumption Scfm 1600
FG Pressure Psig 310
Note: GTG fuel gas consumption is refer to ref 6, fuel gas demand for existing GTG 247-GTG-
201A/B/C (Taurus 70 Model) is taken as a basis for fuel gas demand for new additional Gas
Turbine Generator. Refer to GTG catalogue,fuel gas consumption for GTG Taurus 70 is 1236 scfm
which is lower than value stated at Ref.6.
Based on fuel gas pressure requirement above, fuel gas for new GTG Taurus 70 will be supplied
from Fuel Gas System #2 which have pressure 350 psig.
GTG Taurus 70 specification shall be verified during detailed phase.

4.4 Fuel Gas Consumption Rate for Existing Facility (Fuel Gas System #2)
Based on description at point 4.3 above, the fuel gas for new GTG will be supplied from Fuel Gas
System #2. The Fuel Gas System #2 consumption rate for each users of existing Suban Gas Plant
is summarized on the following table (Ref. 4).
Table 4.4. Existing HP Fuel Gas System #2 Consumption for Each Users
FG
FG Cons. FG Cons. FG Temp.
Description Tag No. Press.
(SCFM) (MMSCFD) (F)
(Psig)
1600 2.3
Power Generation 247-GTG-201A/B/C 310 145
each each
H/M Surge Drum 257-V-201 881.9 1.27 310 145
Flare #2 Header Purge - 27.8 0.04 310 145
To HP Fuel Gas Header #1 - 1743 2.51 310 145
Note: Data from PFD: ID-N-SB-PP0-PFD-ST-60-0003
Refer to stream number F31 PFD ID-N-SB-PP0-PFD-ST-60-0003, the total fuel gas consumption
rate for Fuel Gas System #2 is 5209 Scfm (7.50 MMscfd). This consumption will be used for basis
fuel gas consumption rate for Fuel Gas System #2 adequacy check.
4.5 Fuel Gas System #2 New Consumption Rate
The Fuel Gas System #2 new consumption rate is based on existing Fuel Gas System #2
consumption with addition consumption for new GTG. The total new fuel gas consumption rate is
shown below:
Table 4.5. HP Fuel Gas System #2 new Consumption
FG
FG Cons. FG Cons.
Description Press.
(SCFM) (MMSCFD)
(Psig)
Existing Fuel Gas System
5209 7.50 310
#2 Consumption
New GTG Taurus 70 1600 2.30 310
Total FG Consumption
6809 9.80
System #2
5.1 Fuel Gas System #2 Existing Equipment
5.1.1 HP Fuel Gas Scrubber (250-V-201)
Design Press. / Temp. : 425 Psig @ 175 °F
Operating Press./Temp. : 370 Psig @ 120 °F
Size : 48” (ID) x 14’-0” (T/T)
Nozzle Inlet : 4”
Inlet Device : No Inlet Device.

Nozzle Gas Outlet : 6”
Liquid Outlet : 2”
5.1.2 HP Fuel Gas Heater (60-NAP-002)
Design Press. / Temp. : 425 Psig @ 200 °F
Gas Rate Capacity : 6.5 MMscfd
Heat Duty Capacity : 104.2 KW
5 DESIGN CRITERIA
5.1 Separator Gas Sizing Criteria
Sizing of vapor/liquid separators will be performed using the following equations:
 l  g
Vc  K .
g
………… (Equation 5.1)
Where:
VC = critical entrainment velocity (ft/s)
K = constant dependent on type of internals in vessel
l = liquid density (lb/ft3)
g = gas density (lb/ft3)
The values of vessel K used for sizing are as follows:
Table 5.1. K Values for Gas Separator Sizing
Vessel Type and Internals K (ft/s)

Vertical Knockout Drum - no internals 0.26
Horizontal Knockout Drum - no internals 0.33
(bulk separation)
Vertical with Mist Mat 0.30
Horizontal with Mist Mat (at HLL) 0.43
Vertical with Vane Pack 0.49
Horizontal with Vane Pack 0.49
Vertical with Cyclone Deck 0.66
K Values should be reduced for increasing pressure. Fig 7-9 in GPSA FPS Version, 12th Edition,
give approximate de-rating factors for pressures above atmospheric. In addition, Inlet Compressor
Suction Scrubbers should have an additional de-rate factor of 0.8.
5.2 Design Guideline for 2-Phase Separator.
Residence time is taken from Doc No. B-84567-SB-PP0-PHY-GN-00-0001 “Process Design

Criteria” [Ref. 2]. is shown on the table below:
Table 5.2. Residence Time Criteria
Reference Level Vertical Vessel/Column
TOV(5) or TTL(6) to HHLL 1.0 X Vessel ID (Min.12”)
HHLL to HLL 1 minute (Min.6”)
HLL to LLL(1) 3 minute + slug allowance (Min.12”)
LLL to LLLL 1 minute (Min.6”)

(3) (2)(4)
LLLL to BOV or BTL 6” (12” for thick walled vessel)
Notes:
1. Normal Liquid Level (NLL) will be determined on a case by case basis but will generally be halfway
between LLL and HLL.
2. LLLL to BOV/BTL shall also consider closure time of liquid outlet SDV and potential for blowby.
3. BOV denotes "Bottom of Vessel".
4. BTL denotes "Bottom Tan Line".
5. TOV denotes "Top of Vessel".
5.3 Inlet and Outlet Nozzle Criteria
Inlet and outlet process nozzles should be sized to meet the following ρ * v 2 limitations refer Doc
No. B-84567-SB-PP0-PHY-GN-00-0001 “Process Design Criteria” [Ref. 2].
Table 5.3. Vessel Inlet and Outlet Nozzle Sizing Criteria
ρ * v2
Nozzle Device
kg/m.s2 lb/ft.s2
No inlet device 1,000(1) 670
Half Open Pipe 1,500(1) 1,000

Inlet (2)
Schoepentoeter or
6,000(1) 4,000
equivalent
Gas Outlet All 3,750 2,500
(4)
Velocity
Nozzle Device
m/s ft/s
(3)
Liquid Outlet All 2 6
Notes:
1. Criteria is based on ρ * v2 when ρ is the fluid density and v is the fluid velocity. The inlet criteria uses a
mixed gas-liquid density and superficial velocity.
2. If no upstream straight length is specified, then an inlet Schoepentoeter or equivalent inlet distributor
shall be used.
3. Minimum nozzle diameter is 2 in.
4. Where the liquid outlet supplies a pump or other device requiring low pressure drop, the velocity criteria
5.4 Single Phase Vapor Line Criteria
Single phase vapor line should be sized to meet the following fluid velocity and pressure drop
limitations refer Doc No. B-84567-SB-PP0-PHY-GN-00-0001 “Process Design Criteria” [Ref. 2].
Table 5.4. Recommended Velocity and Pressure Drop for Single Phase Vapor Lines
(Excluding Vent lines)
Operating Pressure Maximum Velocity Max. Pressure Drop

(psig) (ft/s) (psi / 100ft)
< 15 150 0.15
15 – 100 125 0.40
100 – 500 100 1.0
500 – 1,000 80 1.5
> 1,000 60 2.0
5.5 Fuel Gas Temperature Criteria
The minimum temperature of fuel gas is shall be 50 °F above fuel gas dew point temperature.
5.6 Assumption
 K Value is assumed 0.24 ft/s. K value is determined based on vertical separator with mist
eliminator K Value which described at table 6.1 multiplied by derating factor.
 Liquid rate is assumed 0.1 US gallon/MMscf
 No inlet device installed at inlet nozzle HP Fuel Gas Separator
 Heat transfer is not considered for HYSYS simulation
 Roughness is assumed 0.018 in (pipe corroded).
6 METHODOLOGY
As per objective description, this document limited to conduct adequacy check related to HP Fuel
Gas Scrubber and HP Fuel Gas Heater. Adequacy check of line sizing also provided to consider
whether existing inlet HP Fuel Gas Scrubber adequate to accommodate the maximum rate.
HP Fuel Gas Scrubber adequacy check is calculated with new maximum fuel gas consumption
which described at section 4.5. K-value used is using demister type as per existing HP Fuel Gas
Scrubber internal type and de-rate factor used refer to pressure condition at top inlet nozzle
separators. refer to Fig. 7-13, GPSA Handbook. Several factors should be considered in adequacy
check HP Fuel Gas Scrubber which are total liquid capacity, and nozzle criteria. The liquid capacity
is typically set by determining the volume required to provide adequate residence time the liquid
outlet HP Fuel Gas Scrubber, while nozzle criteria will determine momentum related to nozzle
vibration.
Adequacy Fuel Gas Heater is limited to check Fuel Gas Heater flowrate capacity and Fuel Gas
Heater temperature outlet. Adequacy check Fuel Gas Heater is based on comparison fuel gas
heater capacity with existing fuel gas consumption and additional fuel gas for New GTG. Adequacy
Fuel Gas Heater is based on comparison fuel gas temperature outlet achieved by existing Fuel Gas
Heater with fuel gas temperature criteria (50 °F above fuel gas dew point temperature). Fuel gas
flowrate is based on new fuel gas consumption rate which described at section 4.5 and design duty
of existing Fuel Gas Heater is 104.2 KW.
In order to determine the operating temperature at Condensate Stabilizer Feed Drum, Inlet
Compressor Inlet Cooler, Intercooler and Aftercooler will be simulated in HYSYS with 2 (two)
variation operating case:
1. Case 1
Case 1 is based on maximum air ambient temperature at day condition. The air ambient
temperature is set at 100°F.
2. Case 2
Case 2 is based on minimum air ambient temperature at night condition. The air ambient
temperature is set at 65°F.
Adequacy check HP Fuel Guard Bed (250-S-201) shall be consult with vendor to check efficiency
adsorption of Hg (mercury) and flowrate fuel gas capacity based on fuel gas new consumption rate.
7 ADEQUACY CHECK RESULTS AND DISCUSION

Based on Appendix A,B and C adequacy check calculation are presented on table below:
Table 7.1. Adequacy check HP Fuel Gas Scrubber (250-V-201) Result
Case 1 Case 2
Parameter Unit
(Day) (Night)
Pressure Psig 370 370
o
Temperature F 101.1 93.6
Gas Flowrate MMscfd 9.80 9.80
Liquid Flowrate BPD 0.02 0.02
Actual gas velocity ft/s 0.35 0.34
K Value ft/s 0.24 0.24
Maximum Allowable Velocity ft/s 1.297 1.750
Nozzle Momentum Criteria
Inlet Nozzle lb/ft/s2 670
2
Gas Outlet lb/ft/s 2500
Calculated Momentum
Inlet Nozzle lb/ft/s2 3184 3087
2
Gas Outlet lb/ft/s 618 599
Case 1 Case 2
Parameter Unit
(Day) (Night)
Velocity Criteria
Liquid Outlet ft/s 6
Calculated Velocity
Liquid Outlet ft/s 0.0001 0.0001
Refer to table above, the actual gas velocity is lower than maximum allowable gas velocity. Existing
HP Fuel Gas Scrubber (250-V-201) dimension is still adequate to handle additional fuel gas
consumption rate due to installing new GTG for Suban Compression Project. While the inlet nozzle
momentum is higher than design nozzle momentum criteria.
HP fuel Gas Heater calculation result is shown below:
Table 7.2. Adequacy check HP Fuel Gas Heater (60-NAP-002) Result
Case 1 Case 2
Parameter Unit
(Day) (Night)
o
Existing Fuel Gas Heater Gas Rate MMscfd 6.50 6.50
Capacity
Gas Rate MMscfd 9.80 9.80
Heat Duty KW 104.2 104.2
o
HC Dew Point Outlet Temperature F 70.4 52.3
o
Required Outlet Temperature F 120.4 102.3
o
Calculated Outlet Temperature F 133.0 125.9
Refer to table above, based on the existing HP Fuel Gas Heater (60-NAP-002) Heat duty design is
still adequate to handle additional GTG for new Gas Compression Project due fuel gas outlet
temperature is higher than fuel gas temperature criteria. While based on Existing HP Fuel Gas
Heater flowrate capacity , the fuel gas consumption 9.8 MMscfd is higher than the flowrate capacity
stated at pfd No. ID-N-SB-PP0-PFD-ST-60-0003 which is 6.5 MMscfd, this condition suspected will
increasing HP Fuel Gas Heater pressure drop and fluid velocity. Line sizing calculation result is
shown below:
Table 7.3. Line Sizing (4”-GF-250-2110-BA1) Calculation
Case 1 Case 2
Parameter Unit
(Day) (Night)
o
Velocity Criteria ft/s 100.00
Actual Velocity ft/s 49.65 48.95
Case 1 Case 2
Parameter Unit
(Day) (Night)
Allowable Noise Level dB 85.0
Actual Noise dB 79.2 78.86
Pressure Drop Criteria psi/100ft 1.00
Actual Pressure Drop psi/100ft 1.22 1.18
Refer to table above, the existing line (4”-GF-250-2110-BA1) is not adequate due to actual pressure
drop is higher than design criteria.
For adequacy check existing HP Fuel Guard Bed (250-S-201) cannot be performed, due to need
existing supply data from vendor or data sheet existing HP Fuel Guard Bed 9250-S-201). Refer to
Ref. 4, HP Fuel Guard Bed can handle 7.5 MMscfd fuel gas.
Based on discussion above, the maximum capacity of each equipment at Fuel Gas System #2 is
shown in table below:
Table 7.4. Maximum Equipment Capacity Fuel Gas System #2

HP Fuel Gas Scrubber
HP Fuel HP Fuel
FG Inlet
Separation Guard Gas Remark
Line Nozzle
Performance Bed Heater
8.88 36.39 4.50 7.5 6.5 Existing Fuel Gas

MMscfd MMscfd MMscfd MMscfd MMscfd System #2 capacity is
4.50 MMscfd limited by
FG Scrubber Inlet
Nozzle
Note : Based on PFD No: ID-N-SB-PP0-PFD-ST-60-0003, the Fuel Gas System #2 can supply 7.5
MMscfd demand.
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATION

 The existing HP Fuel Gas Scrubber (250-V-201) dimension still adequate to handle additional
gas for GTG for Suban Compression Project since the gas velocity is below the maximum
allowable velocity.
 Inlet nozzle HP Fuel Gas Scrubber (250-V-201) is not adequate due to actual momentum is
higher than nozzle momentum design criteria.
 Existing HP Fuel Gas Heater (60-NAP-002) duty is still adequate for handle additional fuel gas
flowrate to achieve outlet fuel gas temperature minimum 50 °F above dew point temperature .
While the new fuel gas consumption is higher than existing HP Fuel Gas Heater flowrate
capacity stated, this condition suspected will increasing HP Fuel Gas Heater pressure drop
and fluid velocity.
 The existing line (4”-GF-250-2110-BA1) is not adequate due to actual pressure drop is higher
than design criteria..
 The result is summarized in table 8.1:
Table 8.1. Result Adequacy Check
Case 1 Case 2
Equipment Parameter
(Day) (Night)
 Gas Velocity vs  
Terminal Velocity
X X
HP Fuel Gas Scrubber (250-V-201)  Inlet Nozzle
 
 Outlet nozzle
 
 Liquid Level
HP Fuel Gas Heater (60-NAP-002)  Gas Rate Capacity X X
 Heat Duty Capacity  
Line size (4”-GF-250-2110-BA1)  Velocity  
 Pressure Drop X X
 Noise Level  
Note: X denotes “not meet criteria” and  denotes “meet criteria”.
 The New GTG fuel gas is recommended using fuel gas from Suban Compression Project Fuel
Gas System, However Fuel Gas from existing Fuel Gas System #2 is provided as back up
supply.
 The sketch of fuel gas for new GTG is shown in figure below.
New FG Distribution Suban New Gas Turbine

Compression Project Generator
Back up Supply
FG Distribution
System #2
Figure 8.1. New GTG Fuel Gas Configuration

9 REFERENCES
Reference
Document Number Document Title
Number
Project Design Basis - Suban Compression
1. B-84567-SB-PP0-BOD-GN-00-0001
Project
Process Design Criteria - Suban

2. B-84567-SB-PP0-PHY-GN-00-0001
Compression Project
3 ID-N-SB-PPO-PFD-ST-60-0002 Process Flow Diagram – Fuel Gas System #1
4 ID-N-SB-PPO-PFD-ST-60-0003 Process Flow Diagram – Fuel Gas System #2
Process Flow Diagram – Amine Regeneration

5 ID-N-SB-PPO-PFD-ST-46-0001
System
Process Flow Diagram – Gas Turbine

Generator Package
Process Flow Diagram – Condensate

Stabilization
Process Flow Diagram – Suban Gas Plant

Flare System No. 2
Piping & Instrumentation Diagram – Fuel Gas

9 ID-N-SB-PPO-PID-ST-60-0005
System Train-2
Piping & Instrumentation Diagram – Fuel Gas

10 ID-N-SB-PPO-PID-ST-60-0006
Distribution System
Piping & Instrumentation Diagram – Mercury

11 ID-N-SB-PPO-PID-ST-60-0007 Guard Bed System at HP Fuel Gas Train-2
(250-S-201)
Appendix A – HP Fuel Gas Scrubber (250-V-201)

VERTICAL SEPARATOR FOR TWO PHASE SEPARATOR SIZING
PT. TRIPATRA ENGINEERING
CALCULATION
Project Title : Suban Compression Project Prepared by : KUN/DK

Client : ConocoPhillips (Grissik) Ltd. Checked by : MA
Location : Suban Station Approved by : AA
Tag No. : 250-V-201 Revision No. : 2
Equip. Name : Fuel Gas Scrubber Revision Date : 24/7/2015
Case : RATING CASE 1 (DAY CONDITION) Unit of Measurement : US Customary
INPUT DATA
OPERATING PRESSURE P = 370.0 psig

OPERATING TEMPERATURE T = 101.1 deg.F
GAS
GAS RATE = 9.80 MMscfd
GAS DENSITY ρg = 1.292 lb/ft3
MW GAS = 18.960
GAS COMP. FACTOR z = 0.938
GAS VISCOSITY µg = 0.012 cP
LIQUID
LIQUID RATE = 0.02 bpd Note 1
LIQUID DENSITY ρo = 39.02 lb/ft3
LIQUID VISCOSITY µo = 0.319 cP
WITH MIST ELIMINATOR (YES/NO) = YES
VESSEL TYPE & INTERNAL = VERTICAL WITH MIST MAT
K FACTOR = input K0.24
value ft/s <= K factor multiplied by derating factor
LIQUID RETENTION TIME = - minutes
HEAD TYPE = ELLIPSOIDAL
SEPARATOR CALCULATION
GAS LAW CONSTANT R = 10.7316 ft3.psia/R/lbmole
GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATION g = 32.20 ft/s2
LIQUID DENSITY ρL = 39.020 lb/ft3
LIQUID VISCOSITY µL = 0.319 cP
ACTUAL GAS RATE = 4.389 ft3/s
LIQUID RATE = 0.0000 ft3/s
CHECK MINIMUM GAS AREA AFFECTED BY SUPERFICIAL VELOCITY

C (Re)^2 = N/A
DRAG COEFFICIENT, C = N/A
TERMINAL VELOCITY = 1.297 ft/s
MINIMUM GAS AREA AG,min = 3.384 ft2
MINIMUM DIAMETER DG,min = 24.908 in
SELECTED DIAMETER D = 48 in Ok, selected diameter is higher than /equal to minimum
required diameter
ACTUAL GAS VELOCITY = 0.35 ft/s
CHECK LIQUID LEVEL SETTING
LIQUID LEVEL SETTING UNIT LLLL LLL NLL HLL HHLL
LIQUID LEVEL FROM DATUM in 6 10 18 24 36 Note 2
LIQUID VOLUME ft3 14.7 18.8 27.2 33.5 46.1
RETENTION TIME BETWEEN

min 161147.8 207190.1 299274.6 368337.9 506464.7
LEVEL SETTING
B.O.V - LLLL LLLL - LLL LLL - HLL HLL - HHLL

min 161147.8 46042.2 161147.8 138126.7
LEVEL SETTING
PRACTICAL HEIGHT BETWEEN
in 6.00 4.00 14.00 12.00
LEVEL SETTING
REQUIRED RETENTION TIME min N/R 1 3 1

REQUIRED PRACTICAL HEIGHT
in 12 6 12 6 Note 3
DIFFERENCE
STATUS Not Ok Not Ok Ok Ok
Page 25 of 42
CALCULATION

Case : RATING CASE 1 (DAY CONDITION) Unit of Measurement : US Customary
VESSEL HEIGHT
SELECTED MIN. REQUIRED
FROM THE TOP TANGENT AND MIST ELIMINATOR = 0.50 0.50 ft
MIST ELIMINATOR THICKNESS = 0.33 0.33 ft
BOTTOM MIST ELIMINATOR TO TOP OF INLET NOZZLE = 1.00 1.00 ft
INLET NOZZLE 0.38 - ft
BOTTOM OF INLET NOZZLE TO HHLL = 1.00 1.00 ft
HHLL TO B.O.V = 3.00 - ft
SELECTED VESSEL HEIGHT H = 6.21 ft
SLENDERNESS RATIO L/D = 1.55
NOZZLE CALCULATION
INLET DEVICE = NO INLET DEVICE
LIQUID OUTLET = WITHOUT PUMP
NOZZLE DESCRIPTION UNIT INLET GAS OUTLET LIQUID OUTLET

MOMENTUM CRITERIA, ρv
2
lb/ft/s2 670 2500 N/A
VELOCITY CRITERIA ft/s N/A N/A 6
DENSITY lb/ft3 1.29 1.29 N/A
MAXIMUM VELOCITY ft/s 22.77 43.99 6.00
FLOWRATE ft3/s 4.39 4.39 0.00
MINIMUM REQUIRED AREA ft2 0.19 0.10 0.00
MINIMUM INSIDE DIAMETER in 5.94 4.28 0.01
SELECTED NOMINAL DIAMETER in 4 6 2
PIPING SCHEDULE 40 40 40
INSIDE DIAMETER in 4.03 6.07 2.07
AREA ft2 0.09 0.20 0.02
VELOCITY ft/s 49.64 21.87 0.0001
MOMENTUM CALCULATED, ρv2 lb/ft/s2 3184.07 618.23 N/R
EXCEED
REMARK SIZE OK SIZE OK
CRITERIA
NOTES
1, Liquid rate assumption is 0.1 US Gallon/MMSCF.
2, Liquid level setting is based on existng HP Fuel Gas Scrubber liquid level.
3, Exisitng Liquid level is doesn't meet design criteria of Suban Compression Project. However due to exisitng liquid retention time
higher than design criteria, HP fuel gas scrubber still can be operated. Otherwise level setting can be modified as per design criteria.
Page 26 of 42
CALCULATION

Case : RATING CASE 2 (NIGHT CONDITION) Unit of Measurement : US Customary
INPUT DATA

GAS
MW GAS = 18.650
LIQUID

C (Re)^2 = N/A
required diameter
CHECK LIQUID LEVEL SETTING
LIQUID LEVEL SETTING UNIT LLLL LLL NLL HLL HHLL
LIQUID LEVEL FROM DATUM in 6 10 18 24 36 Note 2
LIQUID VOLUME ft3 14.7 18.8 27.2 33.5 46.1

min 161147.8 207190.1 299274.6 368337.9 506464.7
LEVEL SETTING
B.O.V - LLLL LLLL - LLL LLL - HLL HLL - HHLL

min 161147.8 46042.2 161147.8 138126.7
LEVEL SETTING
PRACTICAL HEIGHT BETWEEN
in 6.00 4.00 14.00 12.00
LEVEL SETTING
REQUIRED RETENTION TIME min N/R 1 3 1

REQUIRED PRACTICAL HEIGHT
in 12 6 12 6 Note 3
DIFFERENCE
STATUS Not Ok Not Ok Ok Ok
Page 27 of 42
CALCULATION

Case : RATING CASE 2 (NIGHT CONDITION) Unit of Measurement : US Customary
VESSEL HEIGHT
SELECTED MIN. REQUIRED
FROM THE TOP TANGENT AND MIST ELIMINATOR = 0.50 0.50 ft
MIST ELIMINATOR THICKNESS = 0.33 0.33 ft
BOTTOM MIST ELIMINATOR TO TOP OF INLET NOZZLE = 1.00 1.00 ft
INLET NOZZLE 0.38 - ft
BOTTOM OF INLET NOZZLE TO HHLL = 1.00 1.00 ft
HHLL TO B.O.V = 3.00 - ft
SELECTED VESSEL HEIGHT H = 6.21 ft
SLENDERNESS RATIO L/D = 1.55
NOZZLE CALCULATION

MOMENTUM CRITERIA, ρv2 lb/ft/s2 670 2500 N/A
FLOWRATE ft3/s 4.33 4.33 0.00
AREA ft2 0.09 0.20 0.02
VELOCITY ft/s 48.94 21.57 0.0001
EXCEED
REMARK SIZE OK SIZE OK
CRITERIA
NOTES
2, Liquid level setting is based on existng HP Fuel Gas Scrubber liquid level.
3, Exisitng Liquid level is doesn't meet design criteria of Suban Compression Project. However due to exisitng liquid retention time
higher than design criteria, HP fuel gas scrubber still can be operated. Otherwise level setting can be modified as per design criteria.
Page 28 of 42
CALCULATION

Case : RATING CASE 1 Unit of Measurement : US Customary
INPUT DATA

GAS
MW GAS = 18.960
LIQUID

C (Re)^2 = N/A
MINIMUM DIAMETER DG,min = 47.998 in 0.002
required diameter
Page 29 of 42
CALCULATION

Case : RATING CASE 1 Unit of Measurement : US Customary
INPUT DATA

GAS
MW GAS = 18.960
LIQUID

C (Re)^2 = N/A
required diameter
NOZZLE CALCULATION

MOMENTUM CRITERIA, ρv
2
lb/ft/s2 670 2500 N/A
FLOWRATE ft3/s 2.01 2.01 0.00
AREA ft2 0.09 0.20 0.02
VELOCITY ft/s 22.77 10.03 0.0000
REMARK SIZE OK SIZE OK SIZE OK
NOTES
Page 30 of 42
Appendix B – HYSYS SIMULATION

CASE 1 (DAY CONDNITION)

CASE 2 (NIGHT CONDITION)

Appendix C – LINE SIZING CALCULATION

PREPARED BY DK/KUN REV
CHECKED BY MA
2
APPROVED BY AA
GAS LINE SIZING
Job No. : 2748

Project : Suban Compression
Doc No. : B-84567-SB-PP0-DRT-ST-60-0003
Revision Date : 24-Jul-15
Line Number : 4"-GF-250-21110-BA1

Routing : Inlet Hp Scrubber 250-V-201
P&ID No. : ID-N-SB-00000-00000-00206
Fluid : Vapor
Case : Rating Case 1
DESIGN CRITERIA
Line sizing criteria General Recommendation
Gravitaty Conversion Factor gc ft.lbm/lbf.s2 32
Specific Heat Ratio k 1.362
Gas Constant R 2 3 1,545.3
(lb/f )ft )/(lb-mole)(R)
Temperature T R 560.770
Sonic Velocity Vc ft/s 1,411.38
Maximum Fluid Velocity Vmax ft/s 100.00
Allowable Pressure Drop ∆P / 100 ft psi/100ft 1.00
Allowable Noise Level at 1 m dB 85
Capacity Design Margin 0%
DESIGN DATA
Pressure P psig 370.00
Temperature T o
F 101.10
Molar Flow Q MMSCFD 9.80
Mass Flow W lb/hr 20,397
Density ρ lb/ft3 1.292
Molecular Weight 18.96
Specific Gravity SG 0.656
Viscosity µ cP 0.012
Compressibility Factor Z 0.938
Pipe Material Carbon Steel (CS) corroded
Pipe Roughness Value ε in 0.0180
CALCULATION
Design Molar Flow MMSCFD 9.80
Minimum Diameter Dmin in 2.84
Option NPS Schedule ID, in

Option 1 4 40 4.026
Option 2 6 40 6.065
Option Velocity, ft/s ∆P, psi/100 ft Noise Level, dB

Option 1 49.65 1.217 79.192
Option 2 21.88 0.157 60.395
SELECTED PIPE SIZE in 6
REFERENCE
1). API RP 14E - "Recommended Practice for Design and Installation of Offshore Production Platform Piping Systems"
2). GPSA Section 17 - Fluid Flow and Piping
3). B-84567-SB-PP0-PHY-GN-00-0001, "Process Design Criteria"
4). B-84567-SB-PP0-CAL-ST-00-0001, "Process Simulation Report"
Page 37 of 42
CHECKED BY MA
2
APPROVED BY AA
GAS LINE SIZING
Job No. : 2748


P&ID No. : ID-N-SB-00000-00000-00206
Fluid : Vapor
DESIGN CRITERIA
DESIGN DATA
Temperature T o
F 93.57
CALCULATION

Option 1 4 40 4.026
Option 2 6 40 6.065

Option 1 48.95 1.180 78.855
Option 2 21.57 0.152 60.039
REFERENCE
Page 38 of 42
CHECKED BY MA
2
APPROVED BY AA
GAS LINE SIZING
Job No. : 2748


P&ID No. : ID-N-SB-00000-00000-00206
Fluid : Vapor
DESIGN CRITERIA
DESIGN DATA
Temperature T o
F 101.10
CALCULATION

Option 1 4 40 4.026
Option 2 6 40 6.065

Option 1 45.01 1.000 77.006
Option 2 19.83 0.129 58.079
REFERENCE
Page 39 of 42
Appendix D – REFERENCE FOR GTG FUEL GAS CONSUMPTION

SUBAN COMPRESSION PROJECT
Attachment for Fuel Gas Adequacy Check
ConocoPhillips (Grissik) Ltd.
GTG Fuel Gas Demand Summary
Value Unit Remark
GTG demand based on vendor info (maximum) 1.78 MMscfd
GTG demand based on vendor info (minimum) 1.67 MMscfd
selected as design
GTG demand based on existing GTG data 2.30 MMscfd flowrate for GTG Fuel
Gas demand
GTG Fuel Gas Demand Based on Vendor Data
at 100oF ambient at 65oF ambient

Units temp temp
Heat Rate btu/kWe-hr 10700 10071
Power kWe 6460 6460
LHV btu/scf 933.1 933.1
Fuel Gas Demand MMscfd 1.78 1.67

B 84567 SB PP0 DRT ST 60 0003 - 2 - AOC - Existing Fuel Gas System Adequacy Check

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

B 84567 SB PP0 DRT ST 60 0003 - 2 - AOC - Existing Fuel Gas System Adequacy Check

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design Report/ Study B-84567-SB-PP0-DRT-ST-60-0003–Rev.

REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE

1A 11 May 2015 First Issuance

Additional Approvers (If Applicable)

Name Designation Signature Date

Existing Fuel Gas

Refer to calculation result :

New FG Distribution Suban New Gas Turbine

Figure 1.0 New GTG Fuel Gas Configuration

2.1 Definition and Abbreviations

BDV Blowdown Valve

CGP Central Gas Plant

CPGL/Company ConocoPhillips (Grissik) Ltd.

COPI ConocoPhillips Indonesia Inc. Ltd.

EDP Emergency De-Pressurized

ESD Emergency Shut Down

FEED Front-End Engineering Design

GTG Gas Turbine Generator

LAHH Level Alarm High-High

MEG Mono Ethylene Glycol

MMscfd Million Standard Cubic Feet per Day of gas

P&ID Piping and Instrumentation Diagram

PFD Process Flow Diagram

PSC Production Sharing Contract

PSI Pound per Square Inch

SDV Shutdown Valve

TPE Tripatra Engineering

UCP Unit Control Panel

3.1 Process Description of Existing Facilities

3.2 Process Description of Existing Fuel Gas System

a. High Pressure Fuel Gas System #1 (240 psig) (Ref. 3)

- Power Generation (247-GTG-101A/B)

- Residue Gas Compressor (247-K-101/201)

- Residue Gas Compressor (247-K-301/401)

b. High Pressure Fuel Gas System #2 (350 psig) (Ref. 4)

- Amine Reboiler Heat Medium Surge Drum (225-V-111)

- Power Generation (247-GTG-201A/B/C)

- Heat Medium Surge Drum (257-V-201)

- Flare Header #2 purge gas

- Make-up for High Pressure Fuel Gas System #1 (240 psig)

a. Low Pressure Fuel Gas System #1 (Ref. 3)

- Flare Ignition Package (248-A-101)

- Heat Medium Heater (257-H-101A/B)

- Heat medium heater (257-H-201A/B)

- Glycol Regeneration Package (229-A-101/201)

- Glycol Regeneration Package (229-A-301/401)

- Flare header #1 & #2

- Produced Water Tank (258-T-101)

- Condensate Storage tank (235-T-101A/B)

b. Low Pressure Fuel Gas System #2 (Ref. 4)

- Flare header purge

- Thermal Oxidizer (225-H-102/202)

- Reboiler Heat Medium Heater (225-H-111/211)

- Amine Regenerator (225-C-102/202)

- Condensate Storage Tank (235-T-201)

- Produced Water Tank (258-T-201)

- Amine Make-up Water Tank (252-T-104)

- Amine Storage Tank (225-T-102/103)

- Lean Amine Surge Drum (225-T-101)

Figure 3.1. Block Diagram of Existing Fuel Gas System

Refer to power generation and distribution study (B-84567-SB-EE0-DRT-ST-80-0001), the existing

3.3 Process Description of New Facilities