Stock Market Levity: What Goes Down Must Come Up?

Sep. 20, 2016 2:40 PM ET

|
About: SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (SPY), DIA, IVV, QQQ, Includes: EWJ, FXI

Gary Gordon
Follow (21,141 followers)
Bonds, dividend investing, ETF investing, long/short equity
Send Message
|
ETF Expert
Summary

Near market tops, bullish investors maintain that what goes down must come back up, implying that one
should ignore price depreciation since assets always recover.

The problem? The belief in stock market levity does not account for the time it may take for one to recover
his/her principal.
Superior Force

One must lose less when gravity becomes the "force majeure" if one intends to benefit from levitating asset
prices.
Isaac Newton is famous for having said, "What goes up must come down." He is equally well remembered
for a falling apple striking his noggin, supposedly inspiring the physicist to develop the theory of gravity.

Near market tops, bullish investors embrace the notion of an opposite force: levity. They maintain that what
goes down must come back up, implying that one should ignore price depreciation since assets always
recover. The problem? The belief in stock market levity does not account for the time it may take for one to
recover his/her principal.
Consider the world's third largest economy. The Nikkei is in the same spot that it sat 30 years earlier. That
is a significant loss of purchasing power on an inflation-adjusted basis. Equally worthy of note, Japanese
equities are still down more than 50% from 1990.

What about the world's second largest economy, China? The emerging market has far more equity growth
to crow about over the last three decades. On the flip side, China's Shanghai Composite is still down more
than 50% after nine years. Worse yet, with debt at 255% of GDP, the Bank for International Settlements
believes there is an enormous risk of a Chinese banking crisis within the next three years.
It follows that Chinese equities are unlikely to levitate back to 2007's flat-line anytime soon. In fact, the
debt-fueled support for China's economy may set the stage for additional losses from current levels.

Ethnocentric American investors often dismiss the world's second and third largest economies. They
typically dismiss European equity woes as well. Indeed, the belief system on levitating U.S. stocks is so
strong many of us fail to grasp that the U.S. Nasdaq Composite has an inflation-adjusted 17-year return of
approximately -30%. (And that's with stock indices - S&P 500, NASDAQ, Dow Industrials - residing near
record peaks.)

Bear in mind, the most reliable measures of stock valuation indicate that U.S. stocks across the board are
considerably overvalued. For instance, the median trailing price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) with reported
earnings and current price is 23. That places the S&P 500 26% above the 50-year fair value level (median
stock average P/E 17).
What about forward earnings? According to Cliff Asness, co-founder of AQR Capital Management, forward
estimates since 1871 place median forward P/Es at 11. Where does that place a stock market with forward
12-month estimates of 16.5? It suggests an equity market that is overvalued by 50%.
Perhaps an earnings-based valuation methodology is not your grande cup of Starbucks coffee. One might
choose to focus on corporate equities as a percentage of GDP. Here, one discovers that U.S. stocks are
currently 35% above an exponential regression line (mean).

Simply stated, stocks may be overvalued by 26-50% on traditional measures. And the percentages? They
are percentages above fair value, not percentages above bargain levels that typically come to fruition
during stock market bears.
Granted, levity is a high-probability force in the investing world. You can choose to hope that you will
recover your principal from the next downturn and eventually prosper. However, the folks at GMO paint a
dismal seven-year picture for holding U.S. stocks.

Might raising some cash be sensible? For adding U.S. stock assets at lower prices?

It is critical to understand that what goes up will come down more critical than keeping the faith that what
goes down must come up. In particular, money cannot truly benefit from compounding without limitations
on the real risk of financial loss. One must lose less when gravity becomes the "force majeure" if one
intends to benefit from levitating asset prices.

Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered
Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold
positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does
not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized
recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate
Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content
is created independently of any advertising relationships.