Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MH ref. 5095507.00
INTRODUCTION
Morrison Hershfield (MH) was retained by the Developer and the Owners (Strata Plan BCS
3723) of Macpherson Walk (Lot 2) to undertake a building envelope warranty review of their
building complex located at 5661, 5663, 5665, 5771, and 5775 Irmin Street, Burnaby, BC. The
review was performed to precede the end of the two year warranty for Lot 2. This letter report
documents the results of our review. The results reported herein are based on information
provided by the resident manager and on site visual review of the complex.
1.1
Scope of Review
Our scope was defined in our proposal of November 9, 2009 and is attached as Appendix A for
reference.
1.2
Limitations
This review is based on a review of available documents and visual inspection of accessible
areas. Our review did not include an exploratory investigation, in terms of removing sections of
cladding, roofing or landscaping for evaluation of the waterproofing systems beneath.
Our deficiency items do not represent a total listing of all locations with deficiencies nor do they
imply all similar locations or items to be deficient. The extent of deficiencies identified in this
report should be confirmed by other parties.
This report documents a list of observed deficiencies relating to the building envelope and
provides recommendations for correction of the deficiencies. The report is not intended to
provide an opinion regarding responsibility of any party in causing or contributing to the
observed condition.
Any comments or conclusions within this report represent our opinion, which is based upon the
documents provided to us, our field review of physical conditions and our past experience.
Morrison Hershfield | 536 Broughton Street Second Floor, Victoria, BC V8W 1C6 Canada | Tel 250 361 1215 Fax 250 361 1235 | morrisonhershfield.com
In issuing this report, MH does not assume any of the duties or liabilities of the designers,
builders or owners of the subject property. Owners, prospective purchasers, tenants or others
who use or rely on the contents of this report do so with the understanding as to the limitations
of the documents reviewed, the general visual inspection undertaken and understand that MH
cannot be held liable for damages which may be suffered with respect to the purchase,
ownership, or use of the subject property.
1.3
Warranty Description
Typically, new construction projects have a variety of different warranty terms. The most
common are the HPO mandated 2 5 10; manufacturers warranties; and depending on the
developer, good will. We comment on these as follows:
2 5 10: HPO mandates that all multi family residential construction is covered by a third party
warranty broken down into three coverages: Materials and Labour Warranty (12, 15 and 24
months); Building Envelope Warranty (5 or 10 years) and Structural Warranty (10 years).
At the 2 year warranty period, the third party warranty provided by Travellers Guarantee of
Canada Ltd. Warranty includes:
a) in the first 24 months,
i)
any defect in materials and labour supplied for the electrical, plumbing, heating,
ventilation and air conditioning delivery and distribution systems,
ii) any defect in materials and labour supplied for the exterior cladding, caulking,
windows and doors that may lead to detachment or material damage to the new
home, and
iii) any Building Code Defect
b) in the first five years, any Building Envelope Defect; and
c) in the first ten years, any Structural Defect.
Manufacturers Warranty:
Material manufacturers typically provide a warranty against
premature failure of their material. These do not typically cover installation defects and should a
material failure be identified, coverage is often limited to supply of new materials only.
Developer/Contractor: Typically the developer/contractor covers the first two years of the
building under the HPO mandated 2 5 10 Warranty. Some developers/contractors may correct
a deficiency beyond their obligated warranty term as a good will gesture, depending on the
nature of the deficiency. This will depend on the developer/contractor and should not be relied
upon.
1.4
Building Description
Macpherson Walk Lot 2 has five buildings: two four storey apartment buildings, located at 5665
and 5775 Irmin Street and three buildings containing two storey townhouses, located at 5661,
5771, and 5773 Irmin Street. The apartments contain 150 units and the townhouses contain 30
units. Both, the apartments and townhouses are clad with a combination of brick veneer, cedar
shingles, and fibre cement panels and shingles, all installed in rainscreen fashion. At the
apartment buildings, each suite at grade has a patio and each suite above grade has a balcony.
Balconies are waterproofed with liquid applied urethane membranes. The glazing systems
consist mainly of windows, sliding doors, patio swing doors and storefront assemblies at the
apartment buildings entrances. The buildings roofing systems consist primarily of sloped roofs
protected with asphalt shingles.
The structure of the complex is wood frame over a single storey below grade concrete parking
garage. The at grade podium over the parking garage is waterproofed with a fully reinforced hot
rubberized asphalt membrane on reinforced concrete.
The following table provides additional background information for the complex:
Building Name and Strata Number:
Building Address:
Bldg 3
Bldg 4
Bldg 8
Bldg 9
Bldg 10
Bldg 11
2 years
Property Manager:
Date of Occupancy:
March 3, 2010
Warranty Company:
Developer:
Architect:
Contractor:
1.5
Documents Reviewed
We were provided with a complete set of architectural drawings and have one binder of the
maintenance and warranty manual for the buildings including:
The binder contains warranties for the following applicable building components:
2.0
Roof
Windows
Storefront assemblies
Siding
Masonry
Balcony waterproofing
Podium waterproofing
INTRODUCTION
Analisa Solamillo performed the site review on Monday January 23, 2012. During our review,
we were provided access to the amenity room and the following 6 units: Bldg 3: 209, 403, and
413, Bldg 4: 204, 305; Bldg 9: townhouse suite 15. We performed our review from these units
and from grade.
2.1
Site Observations
Category I A deficiency exists, in our opinion, where no clear decision can be made as
to whether the problem is a design, construction or maintenance deficiency. Repairs to
correct the deficiency or further investigation, e.g., test openings or material/component
testing, is generally required.
Note that we are not privy to all warranty agreements and hence, some items listed as warranty
items may not be included. The suite numbers listed in the report do not represent a total listing
of all locations with deficiencies nor do they imply all similar locations or items to be deficient.
Sample
Location
Deficiency Parkade
D, M Corrective Action
or I
1.
We recommend
installing a
termination bar or
gumlip metal
flashing at the hot
rubber membrane
termination.
2.
3.
TH01
5661
Irmin
Street
4.
TH14
Exterior
stairs
Parkade
Areas reviewed: A walkthrough of the underground parkade was conducted. The focus of
the review was on the slab on grade, the underside of the suspended slab and the exterior
foundations walls.
Item/
Photo
Sample
Location
Deficiency Parkade
5.
no
photo
Typical
Slab on
Grade
Cracking is common,
particularly in areas without
control joints. Hairline cracks
should be monitored and
large cracks should be routed
and sealed as they appear.
Stall 20 to
25, 147,
and 157
D/M
D/M
6.
D, M Corrective Action
or I
North
parkade
Sample
Location
Deficiency
Interiors
Building 1
Amenity
room and
Guest
suite
Sample
Location
9.
Unit 413
Balcony
10.
Unit 413
Balcony
Deficiency Building 3
Exterior
D, M
or I
Corrective Action
We also recommend
installing self adhesive
membrane and metal
flashing.Alternatively, we
recommend multiple heavy
coats of paint.
11.
a,b
Ground
level
Unit 209
Balcony
12.
Unit 209
Balcony
13.
Unit 209
Balcony
Inconsistent sealant
installations between
cementitious trim.
14.
Unit 209
Interior
Condensation on inside
surface of window glazing.
15.
a,b
Unit 403
Balcony
Item/
Photo
Sample
Location
Deficiency Building 3
Exterior
D, M
or I
Corrective Action
16.
Lobby
17.
Lobby
18.
South
elevation
Sample
Location
Deficiency Building 4
Exterior
D, M Corrective Action
or I
19.
Unit 204
Balcony
20.
Unit 118
Brick
column at
gate
21.
Unit 109
D/I
22.
Unit 118
Townhouse Exterior
Areas reviewed: MH was provided access to townhouse suite 15 at 5771 Irmin Street. From
these, we reviewed walls, patios and checked the operation of the sliding doors and
operable windows. A visual review of the exterior of the building was conducted from grade.
Item/
Photo
Sample
Location
Deficiency Townhouse
Exterior
D, M Corrective Action
or I
23.
a,b
TH27
Tuck tape residue on
5773 Irmin surface of window frame.
Street
24.
TH26
Inconsistent sealant
5773 Irmin installation at wood trim
Street
joints at exterior columns.
TH23
Uneven paint finish on
5773 Irmin outside corner of wall
Street
shingles.
26.
TH21
Cracked mortar joint of
5771 Irmin precast cap at exterior
Street
column.
27.
28.
29.
TH14
10
Roofs
Areas Reviewed: Roofs were reviewed from the accessible balconies and from grade.
Item/
Photo
30.
Sample
Location
Deficiency Roofs
D, M Corrective Action
or I
TH15
Debris on surface of shingled roof M
5771 Irmin adjacent to elbow of rainwater
Street
leader (RWL).
The developer
confirmed
extensions to the
RWL were recently
added. However, the
debris on the
shingles was not yet
removed.
Remove debris and
clean off stains.
31.
East roof
Construction related debris (i.e.
5665 Irmin fasteners) on surface of shingle
Street
roof near roof valley flashing.
Remove
construction related
debris.
11
Summary
MH conducted a visual deficiency review of the building envelope to determine the condition of
the building envelope after two years from its completion. Based on our observations,
documents provided and from the tables above, we have identified items that need to be
addressed under the regular maintenance program or corrected under the warranty, where
applicable, to ensure that the performance of the buildings is in accordance with the design
intent.
In addition to the tables, we make the following comments regarding the building:
We have reviewed the maintenance manual and warranty information provided for
Macpherson Walk Lot 2 and note that there is no updated maintenance schedule. We
recommend that the strata keep track of maintenance activities and of who should be
performing these activities. These records are useful in the evaluation of the warranties
and also provide valuable information at the point the maintenance program will need to
be updated and can be used to plan for renewals.
We trust the above meets the Stratas requirement for warranty review. Please do not hesitate
to contact the undersigned should you have any questions.
Yours truly,
Morrison Hershfield Limited
Analisa Solamillo
Building Envelope Consultant
12
APPENDIX A:
Proposal
13
APPENDIX B:
Photographs
Item 1
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
Item 6
Item 7
Item 8
Item 9
Item 10
Item 11a
Item 11b
Item 12
Item 13
Item 14
Item 15a
Item 15b
Item 16
Item 17
Item 18
Item 19
Item 20
Item 21
Item 22
Item 23a
Item 23b
Item 24
Item 25
Item 26
Item 27
Item 28
Item 29
Item 30
Item 31