Professional Documents
Culture Documents
60616
This simple three-region model for the gas flow through fluidized beds views uniformly sized bubbles, surrounded by clouds and followed by wakes, rising through an emulsion of downward moving solids, Interchange of gas occurs continuously among bubble, cloud-wake, and emulsion regions. This model contains
one parameter, the effective bubble size, and all internal flows and interchanges in the bed are derived
from it. Qualitative and quantitative checks with reported bed behavior are presented.
Bubble Phase
A small, slow bubble rises more slo\vly than the gas percolating
through the emulsion? or
(4)
UAT
Uf
446
I&EC F U N D A M E N T A L S
(5)
> 5
= U,
U,f
f Ubr
= U,
- U,f
+ 0.711
(gdb)liz
(7)
This expression and arguments for its use were first presented
by Sicklin (1962) for gas-liquid systems, and later used by
Davidson and Harrison (1963) for fluidized beds.
Assumption 4. Voidage of Bubbles and Emulsion.
Although experimental evidence (Kunii and Levenspiel, 1968a)
ub + 3 &nf
Fraction
consisting
uo =
Fraction
/--consisting of
1
Average upward
velocity
- 6)urnf
+ 6 ( u b + 3urnf)
(9)
emulsion
phase: I-.s
(1
wne;ion
Now at low gas velocity the bubble fraction is very small; a t
high u, this term dominates the term which follows. Hence
with little error we can write
660
f (1
- 6)ee
= 6
+ (1 -
6)Ee
and measuring 6 and e \vi11 then give ce. Although ee may well
vary with position in the bed, let us assume the emulsion
voidage to be that of the bed a t minimum fluidizing conditions,
or
= e m f . Thus voidages and bed heights are related by
A
20
ub
Umf
10
uo / Urnt
NO. 3
AUGUST 1 9 6 8
447
dp t m m l
Figure 3. Relationship between
volume of wake and volume of
rising bubble
From Rowe and Partidge (1965)
-Bubble
phase
Wake
Emulsion
phase
t t t
"0
Emulsion Phase
# u/ = em f
l&EC FUNDAMENTALS
At
fraction of cross
section where
~
~
~
~
everywhere but
bubble and wake
In symbols this becomes
(1 - 6
- aS)u,
= a8uo
where a is defined as
volume of emulsion transported
upward behind a bubble
E
a =
volume of a bubble
V,
(13)
uo =
void volume
of emulsion ue
(bed volume)
void volume of
bubbles and wakes ub
bed volume
or
u, = (1 -
- ff8)emfu,
+ (6 +
66mf)Ub
(15)
thus
axial and radial dispersion coefficients D, and D, to the movement of gas, and by fitting a variety of two-region models with
and without gas interchange between bubble and emulsion
regions.
The bubbling bed model indicates that the gas in a vigorbubble gas
ously bubbling bed is in three regions-namely,
surrounded by cloud gas, both rising through emulsion gas,
with the characteristics of these three regions given in terms of
u,, unLf,and one bed parameter, the bubble size.
T o be able to use this model for heat transfer, mass transfer,
and reaction operations one more characteristic of bubbling
beds is needed-namely, the interchange rate from region to
region. This is here developed. For beds of small slow bubbles (ub < u,, or u,
2urn,) these bubbles simply supply a
short cut for the faster moving percolating gas. This situation
is easy to treat, but is not of much practical importance. Hence
we develop only the expressions for vigorously bubbling beds
having bubbles with negligible clouds (ub > Emf, or uo > 2urnf).
This is the troublesome situation where gas bypassing is serious,
and it also is the situation of practical importance.
Since there are as many definitions of gas interchange as
there are interpreters of two-region models, let us first clearly
and unambigously define a set of gas interchange measures for
the three-region model. So, recognizing bubble, cloud, and
emulsion regions, consider a single bubble of volume Vb.
Based on unit volume of bubble the interchange coefficient
between bubble and cloud, &c, cloud and emulsion, K,,, and
the over-all coefficient between bubble and emulsion, Kb,, can
be defined as
<<
ub
1
= - [u,
6
(1
- 6 - a6)Umfl
cAc,
Now, when the emulsion solids descend faster than the gas can
percolate through the solids, the direction of gas flow reverses
itself and becomes downward in the emulsion. From Equation 18 this occurs when ue < 0 or when
where cab,
and CAeare the mean concentrations of gaseous
component A in the bubble, in the gas cloud and wake, and in
the emulsion phase, respectively. The relationship between
interchange coefficients is then
1
- N -
Kbe-
Kbe
Kbc
+-Kce1
ub/L f
NO. 3
AUGUST 1 9 6 8
449
kceSbc ( d c / d b )
Vb
or
bubble and cloud. This will involve both bulk flow across the
boundary and mass transfer between gas in the bubble and in
the cloud. So, referring to Figure 5 , we have, for a single
bubble,
- - dNAb
_
(q f
kbcsbc)(CAb
dt
- CAC)
(23)
where q is the volumetric gas flow into and out of a single bubble
(cubic centimeters per second), given by Equation 6, and k b c
is the mass transfer coefficient between bubble and cloud
(centimeters per second).
Assuming a spherical cap bubble with nose angle e = 100'
and the Higbie penetration model with diffusion limited to a
thin layer at the interface, Davidson and Harrison (1963) derived the following expression for the mass transfer coefficient
between bubble and cloud,
Substituting the above expression and Equation 6 into Equation 23 and matching with Equation 21 gives the interchange
coefficient between bubble and cloud as
Discussion
-I
450
l&EC FUNDAMENTALS
ub
(24)
a,
Equations 24 and 28 are the expressions which when combined using Equation 22 give the bubble model predictions of
Kbeand X. As with the previously obtained expressions for the
bubble and emulsion phase properties, we see that these interchange coefficients are completely determined by one bed parameter, the effective bubble diameter.
n=-
,/a)
1.5
.--uo - u m f - (uo - urn/)
ub
umf
(29)
bed, including the flow in each phase and the extent of gas
interchange between phases.
With the basic machinery as developed here we are now in a
position to account for the behavior of the bed when used for gassolid heat transfer and mass transfer or for solid-catalyzed gasphase reactions. This is reported in a follow-up article (Kunii
and Levenspiel, 1968b).
Recent experiments by Kunii et al. (1967) on solids circulation, gas flow, flow reversal in the emulsion, and other characteristics of freely bubbling beds indicate that the type of flow
visualized and assumed for this model is approximated in beds
where the height is no greater than the diameter. In taller
beds more bubbles tend to rise near the bed axis, inducing a
channeling effect. This is not accounted for in the present
model. O n the other hand, this model should be a reasonable
representation of a bed containing adequate internals.
h
0
Nomenclature
At
Cab,
db
[cml
D,,D,
53, De
db
dbad
= 0.4
dP
.i?
L, = 10
100 cm.
e m f E 0.5
umf = 2.1 cm./sec.
uo = 9 N 18 cm./sec.
d b measured at mid height
d,
h
Kb,,
Kce
of bed
Relationship between Effective Bubble Size and Measured Size. Because of the many simplifying assumptions
made throughout this analysis, from the assumption of the
Davidson bubble onward, it would be mere coincidence if the
effective bubble size (calculated from the model) was found
to match the actual measured size. I n any case it is expected
that a simple relationship holds.
A first comparison can be made from the reported data of
Kobayashi et al. (1967), who found both Kbe and db in the same
experiment. Their reported data are shown as the points in
Figure 6, while the predictions of the model, obtained from
Equations 22, 24, and 28, are shown as lines. They also calculated the approximate values of both KO, and db based on the
experimental results reported by Gilliland and Mason (1949,
1952), Overcashier et al. (1959), and Ioffe and Pismen (1960),
which are included in Figure 6. The seemingly perfect agreement is better than can be expected.
Additional checks with other types of measurements such as
axial and radial dispersion of gas, the movement of solids, etc.,
are needed. Such a program is under way and will be reported
on soon.
1
N A
t
Ub, Ubr
Summary
vb
Vu
X
NO. 3
AUGUST 1968
451
ff
= volume
=
=
=
=
=
Ee
Ef
Cnl
Emf
literature Cifed
R A N K E L L
Elutriation in a multisize particle fluidized bed was studied by fluidizing spherical glass beads of size range
less than 595 and greater than 88 microns, in a 3-inch diameter column using air as the fluidizing medium.
The variables studied were particle size distribution and superficial gas velocity. Particle distributions were
made to follow a straight line on log-probability coordinates. The rate of elutriation could be described
( 1 - b)e-k28in which X and X, are the conmathematically by an equation of the form: X / X , =
centrations by weight of particles below a given size in the bed at times 0 and 0, respectively; b is a constant
kz, both constants having dimensions of reciprocal time units. k l increased with
with value 0 5 b 5 1 ; k l
increasing superficial gas velocity and decreased with increasing particle size. The size distribution of the
elutriated particles formed a log-normal distribution in which the geometric mean diameter increases with
elutriation time, while the standard deviation decreases with time.
<
LUTRIATION
452
= Xoe-ka
(1)
Equation 1 was compared to the rate constant for a firstorder chemical reaction. The elutriation rate constant was
found to be almost independent of the composition and composite size of the coarse component, but did increase rapidly