You are on page 1of 1167

Dr.

George Partridge
Energy & Environmental Cabinet
Emails Volume 11

GP1072

Partridge, George (EEC)

'_.om:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Thursday, February 18, 2016 1:15 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
RE: RE: TENORM and Processed TENORM

See comments below in red

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016
To: Anderson, banny J (EEC)

12:15 PM

Cc: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)


RE: TENORM and Processed'TENORM

Subject:
Danny:

Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items]

Violation for disposing of unpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested ma~ifests in a timely manner.


Violation for not reporting the out of state TENO RN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015 and two other additional companies have been identified as well as having waste received
out of state TENORM waste by the landfill facility.

Blue Ridge Landfill [Action Items]

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination anhe site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, .scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
1

GP1073

-_,,
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.

Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. {This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)

Landfills Statewide
____________11 ___1:Dndill:LanJntemalre~iew_~SoJid W_a_steJkan_c___h) _gf the _''Qua rterlyWaste Qua ntityRe ports" fonllllaodfi ll~ln __

Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.

From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of O & G /Fracking Activities.

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TENO RM or processed
TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TENORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operator and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.

Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.

Long-Term Regulatory Goals

Expand our present regulations for Solid Waste to address radioactive constitutes both in terms of waste
received and monitoring requirements.

Develop special waste regulations for traditional TENORM [detectors, specifically designed mono-cells, PPE for
operators, maximum allowable quantities received during ltfe of landfill] (aren't these regulations in place
A
already under 902 KAR 100. If the waste meets the criteria as low level radioactive waste, then licensing of the W
disposal is controlled by CHFS and as such, all the measures you stated in brackets []above fall under their
review/approval. Our current contained LF's shouldn't be accepting this stuff unless in quantities/concentrations
that are exempt from 902 KAR 100, thus, is not a low level radioactive waste.

Required high-level processed radioactive TENO RM waste to be sent to a regulated facility licensed to receive
radioactive waste. (isn't this already a requirement in KY statutes/regs)

I hope you will find this helpful.


Please let me know if there are additional points I need to address for you or how you would like for me to edit or
prepare this materials for you in a format that best serves your need.
Thanks for the opportunity to present this to you and for all you are doing to address the concerns of our Branch
George

GP1074

{ieorge P. Partridjje Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
Y Division of Waste Management
O Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

..
3

GP1075

Partridge, George (EEC)

.rom:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 18, 2016 1:42 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: Vice President of Advanced TENORM Services

Jeri;
I have worked through lunch to help prepare Danny for his 1:30 meeting with Tony Hatton.
Keith and I were going to eat a late lunch now and I will be available when we return.
I am looking forward to us calling our EPA RCRA contact but didn't mention it since you just got back to work and
wanted to wait until you were ready, caught up, or feeling your best.
I will check with you when I return from lunch.
Thank you,
George

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


. e n t : Thursday, February 18, 2016 1:21 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Vice President of Advanced TENORM Services

George,
9Have you called the EPA RCRA contact yet? If not, we can do it this afternoon. Let me know. I'll come to you.
Jeri

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 5:55 PM
To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: FW: Vice President of Advanced TENORM Services

Jeri;
. o k forward to calling EPA next week!
George
1

GP1076

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 5:02 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: Vice President of Advanced TENORM Services

I definitely agree George. I think you hit the nail right on the head when you first mentioned that at our meeting. I
personally believe that is a call for the EEC hazardous waste and the US EPA. I thought your colleague was going to
~--- chec~into that for_ us wjth h~rJ:F'A_C::Q_IJlac::1s_,JQ_h_o_Ric_harg~is_tbg only_perso_n_fil_fPA tl:!atLbave ev~r-JieQ!twith _____________ _
regarding rad and she indicated that John only handles risk analysis for EPA.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:lfsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4:48 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Vice President of Advanced TENORM Services

Curt;
If we can show that an industry that takes the waste produced from the 0 & G industry, etc. and processes it to
produce a product or waste that is substantially different from the source material and is no longer classified as a
"special waste", that would open the door for us to address our concerns from a multitude of regulatory
perspectives.
I am continuing to pursue things from my Section and Division.
Thank again for aii you are doing!

George

GP1077

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 12:11 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Vice President of Advanced TENORM Services

Hello George,

I could not agree more with everything you say about Dr. Ling, Mr. Hoskins and their activities. This most definitely
should not go unpunished. One comment I would make though regarding EEC's authority. My reading of the statute
KRS 224.46-530 would indicate that if we can prove the processed waste being disposed of by ATS generated by
Fairmont Brine and Shalewater Solutions and others no longer meets the EPA definition of "special wastes" but is
rather hazardous wastes after processing, I think EEC has all the authority it needs to pursue actions.

(k) To regulate hazardous waste that is radioactive except to the extent that
such waste is source, special nuclear or by-product material as defined by
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, (68 Stat. 923);

But having said that, I am confident that our cabinet will pursue this matter to the fullest extent of the law.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
75 East Main Street

Ma if stop HSlC-A.
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
aPay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
WBe notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kt!!!~
t'Atl'.lAiloN.HiitttH
From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:20 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Vice President of Advanced TENORM Services

-rt;

GP1078

Dr. Ling has used his reputation and skills to ~upport the activities of Advanced TENO RM Services. It appears that
Cory Hoskins has two businesses incorporated out of his home, BES LLC and Advanced TENORM Services. He appears
to be using Advanced TENO RM Services to attract business from out of state for companies that are searching for an
attractive cost solution to their TE NORM disposal needs. He is using the BES LLC company name and signing off as
the generator of the wastes on the correspondence with the landfills where he ships that waste. That does two
things for him: 1) TENO RM is not mentioned in the correspondence or the name of the company that the landfill or
waste management company sees and 2) being the generator the landfill has the impression that they are receiving
waste that was generated in-state and not regulated, so they feel comfortable accepting it.
~-~-

. l have neve LSee n suchmisrepresentalion.in.theenvirnn ment.alfLeldin_my.c.areechy.Lndiv.idu.als.!hatknow~~~~~,----


regu lations so well (Cory Hoskins) and an individual such as Dr. Ling who is so knowledgeable from a technical
perspective and aware of the regulations at a national level. He would also know the seriousness of disposing of the
waste at a landfill where the workers are not using PPE or are trained on this type of waste.
Dr. Ling also should know the safety precautions one would should take when handling or sampling this type of
waste.
I hope that legal action will be taken against Cory Hoskins and his companies. We not only need to stop him, but also
handle this in a way that lets others know the consequences of ignoring the regulations when knowingly they are
violated. Most of all his actions are jeopardizing the future well-being of those that are exposed to this waste,
particularly from an inhalation pathway.
My understanding from our Division of Waste Management is that we have no regulatory authority for this type of
waste and all enforcement would need to come from your Cabinet. At the same time today I learned we do plan to
take action to let our waste management facilities around the state know about this waste that is being shipped and
disposed of at their facilities.
I want to do all I can to support the work that you and your Section is doing to safely manage and regulate TENORM.
Thanks again for including me in the meeting and for all that Chris has done to help educated us about TENO RM and
radiation safety as well as the site visits he has conducted.

Geroge

(jeorge P. PartridiJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1079

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 8:13 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Maze, Rodney (EEC); Hall, Karen (EEC)
Cc: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Vice President of Advanced TENORM Services

Thanks George for sharing the correspondence with Dr. Ling with us. It will be interesting to hear what Dr. Ling has to
say about the Central Midwest Compact and its ban on the disposal of out-of-compact TENORM wastes in KY. But
now that we know he is directly involved, that will give us someone else to go after should we pursue fines and
penalties. At some point we probably need to get EEC's and CHFS's lawyers involved in this matter for a legal opinion
on our ability to impose fines under the compact. The language in the statute appears pretty tight to me but an
attorney's opinion would be nice to have.
Regards,
Curt

211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky


-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.Irc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.as.px?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defi~edinKRS21.l.~62(8)
shall be t~.e exclllsiye regulatoryresl'ol1sibility .of the states, ~~c;.~pt1falt~~~p~efs,Q)!

-f~ttt!f:'~' ': r;[~tlllilti~it~f~filf~mcky,


211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505

(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or
with any administrative regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or
211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet issued pursuant to KRS
9211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than
ten thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000). Each day of the violation or noncompliance shall constitute a separate
offense.

211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.Irc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring
materials not regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose
radionuclide concentrations have been increased by or as a result of human
practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not includethe 11atural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead re(ers'i9;
rnatefi:Ms'whBse:r'affioabtvif.';is"'techno1cric'aU ,.. erilianced b ''controIJable"raetices
;';'',i:b'~'.~i,:t~~;fi't:l;kliJi.t~~'1t';'~'.f'ii'"i;{t';;,rt':-,~. .'~' - ''' , - .... "'"'' .g ' L,_.,, .. Y _,_ < , .. --. ' ... Y. ", "'" ..... ,... P_.,,.. , ,, ,,
1
' uman.prac
ices,~.
l.0r.
'., :,- --<"y.;:pas
,\;::
:~-fi~.,.L: ,~:;,~ ;;';~ ,._;:,~_,, -;,;:-_,~__:,;:_
,_-,;,,.,,_:. -~
~-''!: , >,----:--,--"V'C~'.'O'.'.'' --..-_ '~-4"',,''":.-c'>'",'!"C''J<T" \C ',"'"'-.'"'T ~-:;-,"""-~ ,-,,"'" ' -.,-~y.-~-.

'"

,' '- '''-~--.

t.-

"~'--

'"'

?. ' ,,_ : ,,,~ . ' , / - ,_,. '""''-, q, .,

-: - . ; '

_!S "- . -,'- _. (>": "'; ~

'-'7<, '.' 'f -

'l

.'--O::';i:h;.;'j'.',,c::;

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
5

GP1080

Kentucky Radiation Health Branch


275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
__ Ile notified JlJ_prQposed_reg_ulatLonchange_5-httos :LLsecur_e.ken:tu_dw~g_mu'_Beg_watchL .
Dispose of ur~anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

____

Vanfl(~'

I~~~~~
f4J\;ltJ1AtfON..1-1Et\.L''H

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 5:52 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Maze, Rodney (EEC); Hall, Karen (EEC)

Cc: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Subject: RE: Vice President of Advanced TENORM Services

Please find correspondence from Dr. Ying that I located and contacted this afternoon by email.

From: Dr. Leong Ying [mailto:leong.ying@klytec.com]

Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 5:29 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Cory Hoskins ; Robert Brenna ; Richard Yuen

Subject: RE: New Comment from KLYSTAR.com

Hi George,
Thank you for connecting with me .... the profile you described do indeed match me perfectly ....
.... I am currently on vacation, back Thursday. Cory Hoskins is KLYTEC business partner on TENORM issues as it relates
to hydraulic fracturing produced wastes, and he or my other KLYTEC colleagues can assist you as needed during my
absence.
Leong

Dr. Leong Ying


KL YTEC - President
leong.ying@klvtec.com
Mobile: 212 203 5842

GP1081

From: george.partridge@ky.gov [mailto:george.partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 1:59 PM
To: klystar@hotmail.com
Subject: New Comment from KLYSTAR.com

Hi Leon,

First

George

name:
Last

Partridge

name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zipcode:
Country:

Tel:

502-564-6716 Ext 4651

Email:

george.oartridge@ky.gov

Are you the Leong Ying that holds a PhD in Nuclear Physics from the University of Liverpool in England and has
had experience working with TENORM or related analytical work. Do you know a Cory Hoskins. If so please
omment:

contact me as soon as possible! Dr. George Partridge, Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection,
Division of Waste Management.

Kind Regards
George Partridge

------.----------------------------.-- - - - - -

No virus found in this message.


Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7357 I Virus Database: 4522/11577 - Release Date: 02/08/16
Powered by NewzPoint 2016 I All rights reserved .

..
7

GP1082

Partridge, George (EEC)

e:rom:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:10 PM
McKeePerez, Nancy
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RCRA question

That's great. We will call at 11:00.


Thanks again.

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:02 PM


To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA question
I'm on a teleconference now and I have a meeting afterward.
Tomorrow I'm completely open until noon. Feel free to call me any time tomorrow morning.

Nancy McKee Perez


Lite Scientist
Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
~source Conservation & Restoration Division
~.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC) [mailto:Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov]

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:59 PM


To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>

.bject: RCRA question

Hi Nancy,
I just tried calling you and got your answering service. Donna Seadler gave me your name. I have a question
about a company that is taking brine from oil and gas processors and precipitating out the solids. I believe oil
and gas processors are exempt from RCRA, but I'm wondering whether the sludges from the other company are
exempt.
When would be a good time to call you tomorrow?
Thanks for your help,
Jeri
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
Fair Oaks Lane
. .nkfort, KY 4060 I
502-564-6716
1

GP1083

Kentucky Radiation Health Branch


275 East Main Street
ilstop HS1C-A
nkfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Unn(U~
~f;.,.f'<ll>i.iil"".."'y
f~f.l!ATlON"'1aP.t.;tH

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:01 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RCRA

These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEP A concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.

The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
d, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
vents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
ZOO Fair Oaks Lane

Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716

GP1084

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:14 PM
Maze, Rodney (EEC)
RE: Big Run

Tracking:

Recipient

Read

Maze, Rodney (EEC)

Read: 2/18/2016 3:15 PM

Sent:

To:

Rodney;
I previously have been the engineer Lindsey assigned to oversee Big Run (John Poore handled all regulatory and
permitting issues, I just was sent out on inspections). In our staff meeting this morning with Lindsey, he shared he has
assigned Mohammad Razavi to be the engineer responsible for Big Run. Earlier this year when he asked what sites we
wanted to be responsible for, I told him the only site I specifically wanted to follow was Big Run and was glad to help out
elsewhere as needed. I am disappointed he had made the change. I mentioned that you and I had been involved
working together on issues at Big Run. Lindsey mentioned he had no objection if I followed up on anything I had started
with you, but to include Mohammad as the contact and person in charge.
I appreciate all we are doing and want to continue to support that work as much as possible.
George

~orgeP.Partrfd8eJ~
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1085

Partridge, George (EEC)

:cation:

RCRA Conference Call


Cont. Rm 202A

Start:
End:
Show Time As:

Fri 2/19/2016 11:00 AM


Fri 2/19/2016 12:00 PM
Tentative

Recurrence:

(none)

Meeting Status:

Not yet responded

Organizer:
Required Attendees:
Resources:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
EEC DEP Conf Rm 202A (Fair Oaks)

-bject:

GP1086

e (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC)
Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:35 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: RCRA question

Subject:

Jeri;
Thank you!
George

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:10 PM


To: McKeePerez, Nancy
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA question
That's great. We will call at 11:00.
Thanks again.

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]

....ant: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:02 PM


~ Higginbotham, Jeri

(EEC)

Subject: RE: RCRA question


I'm on a teleconference now and I have a meeting afterward.
Tomorrow I'm completely open until noon. Feel free to call me any time tomorrow morning.

Nancy McKee Perez


Life Scientist
Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC) [mailto:Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:59 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Subject: RCRA question

Hi Nancy,
tried calling you and got your answering service. Donna Seadler gave me your name. I have a question
~ut a company that is taking brine from oil and gas processors and precipitating out the solids. I believe oil
and gas processors are exempt from RCRA, but I'm wondering whether the sludges from the other company are
exempt.
When would be a good time to call you tomorrow?
~st

GP1087

Thanks for your help,


Jeri
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
ZOO Fair Oaks Lane

Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716

GP1088

Subject:

Partridge, George {EEC)


Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:35 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri {EEC)
RE: RCRA question

Jeri;
Thank you!
George
From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:10 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA question
That's great. We will call at 11:00.
Thanks again.
From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]
nt: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:02 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
bject: RE: RCRA question
I'm on a teleconference now and I have a meeting afterward.
Tomorrow I'm completely open until noon. Feel free to call me any time tomorrow morning.

Nancy McKee Perez


Lite Scientist
Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC) [mailto:Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:59 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Subject: RCRA question

Hi Nancy,
.....41iist tried calling you and got your answering service. Donna Seadler gave me your name. I have a question
~ut a company that is taking brine from oil and gas processors and precipitating out the solids. I believe oil
and gas processors are exempt from RCRA, but I'm wondering whether the sludges from the other company are
exempt.
When would be a good time to call you tomorrow?
1

GP1089

Thanks for your help,


Jeri
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
ZOO Fair Oaks Lane

Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716

GP1090

Partridge, George {EEC)

elm:
Sent:

To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:52 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Letters
TENORM Notice to Solid & Special Facilities 021616.docx

George, Attached is the letter that your attorneys shared with our attorneys which they then shared with my Division
Director, Commissioner and I believe the Cabinet Secretary. It was my understanding that the letter was going to be
mailed on 2/16/16. I personally have no problem with the letter being sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with
the same landfill operators with our own letter giving them more specifics on the Central Midwest Compact KRS's
addressing the prohibition of out-of-region TE NORM disposal. If you all can share your mailing list with us so we can
accomplish that task, it would be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are
now discussing this matter is a good thing. At the end of the day I would like to see the whole case turned over to the
AG's office.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
~ilstop HS1C-A
~nkfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov Id ph/rad ioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

u. ...,..tu~
l'tH.~.....

:u

f'.J\OlAT1a1~.H!!A\t.TH

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:04 AM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: RE: Letters
Curt;
It was confirmed to me this morning no letter has been sent or released. All I saw was draft that was later held by
management for further review.

need for any concerns at this point.

I was just seeking to understand better the correspondence and relationships the two cabinets we are associated with
have as we move forward to address the regulatory issues surrounding TE NORM and waste management at our landfills.
1

GP1091

I will continue to keep you informed as I learn things.


Thank you,
George

<jeorge P. Partrid{Je Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
_____200 Fair Oaks_J,._g_!l~ __2rn:l_Elq_Qr_(~W~L--- __
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1092

. Partridge, George (EEC)

t/!om:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 7:36 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: List of Companies

It was interesting and a change from TENORM.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 3:43 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)

Subject: RE: RE: List of Companies


George;
Have a nice day tomorrow!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 3:25 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

.bject: RE: RE: List of Companies


I m planning on being in the field tomorrow to take advantage of the NOV lull but keep me in the loop.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 3:22 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Thomas, Richard F (EEC)

Cc: dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com; Weems, George (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Subject: RE: List of Companies


Jon and Richard;
I am working to compiled my records from several sources that identify companies potentially involved in shipment of
TENO RM from out of state.
I plan to have that list ready to distribute tomorrow, February 18th unless other work assignments take precedence.
I appreciated the opportunity to meet with everyone this morning.
Thank you,
George

,,,.,.jjjpree P. Partriifee Jr., Pli'D, P.'E., Q'EP


~artment

for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
1

GP1093

(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

...

----------~-~

GP1094

Partridge, George (EEC)


m:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC) .


Friday, February 19, 2016 8:10 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Letter
TENORM Notice to Solid & Special Facilities 021616.docx

Curt;
I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of yesterday, a
letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was passed around and shared with
Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by my supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our Section
employees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.
At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the disposal of
TENORN and processed TENORM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.

~nk

you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.

George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:52 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Letters
George, Attached is the letter that your attorneys shared with our attorneys which they then shared with my Division
Director, Commissioner and I believe the Cabinet Secretary. It was my understanding that the letter was going to be
mailed on 2/16/16. I personally have no problem with the letter being sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with
the same landfill operators with our own letter giving them more specifics ori t.he Central Midwest Compact KRS's
addressing the prohibition of out-of-region TENO RM disposal. If you all can share your mailing list with us so we can
accomplish that task, it would be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are
now discussing this matter is a good thing. At the end of the day I would like to see the whole case turned over to the
AG's office.
Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


. ervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
tucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
1

GP1095

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un!"anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1096

Partridge, George (EEC)

9'Jm:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 8:32 AM
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Letter

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Curt:
Would you be able to meet with me and George later today or early next week? The purpose being to go over the notice
in draft form now as well as see where we can collaborate on this issue of TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.

Regards,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

.,,,,

___ __,_,,_,__ ,,,,_,,,,,.,,..


From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:10 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Letter
,,_,

,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

,,,,

..

~,,_,,,,,~,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

''""""""""""""'"""""""""

"""'"""""""'"""'"""~""""""'"'"'""""

"""""""'"-"""""'"-'"""-"''""""-""

Curt;
I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of yesterday, a
letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was passed around and shared with
Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by my supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our Section
employees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.
At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the disposal of
TENORN and processed TENORM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.

e"'nk

you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.

George
1

GP1097

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:52 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Letters
George, Attached is the letter that your attorneys shared with our attorneys which they then shared with my Division
Director, Commissioner and I believe the Cabinet Secretary. It was my understanding that the letter was going to be
mailed on 2/16/16. I personally have no problem with the letter being sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with
the same landfill operators with our own letter giving them more specifics on the Central Midwest Compact KRS's
addressing the prohibition gf out-~f:-_r:egio!'l_l~l'J_Q~R_IYl~~[spo~~~lf_y_~_l:'_~~n shar~yg~_r: mii_i!ll1_8_!~t with us so we can ~---
accomplish that task, it would be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are
now discussing this matter is a good thing. At the end of the day I would like to see the whole case turned over to the
AG's office.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183.
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1098

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 9:09 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Manifest scans

Did we decide to get them mailed to us or emailed to us? I want to ask Dan Fleshour when we might get them .

GP1099

Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Friday, February 19, 2016 9:11 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
RE: Letter

Hello Danny,
I would be delighted to meet with you and George but could we please do it sometime next week. My Branch Manager
is out of town this week and I know he would like to attend this meeting as would be my Division Director, Ms. Kathy
Fowler. Anytime on Monday, 2/22/16 works for me. I am including Matt and Kathy on this e-mail so they can check their
schedules and get back to us with a day and time that works for them as well. It sounds as though both our legal
departments are also involved in this matter which as I told George, is a good thing in my book. Personally I would love
to see a joint letter go out to all landfill operators from both our agencies that specifically calls out the applicable Central
Midwest Interstate Low-Level Waste Compact KY regulatory statutes and KY administrative regulations. I think this
would leave no doubt in any landfill operator's mind as to what was not acceptable here in KY when it comes to
TENO RM disposal. After talking to the gentleman in charge of Environmental Management at Advanced Disposal this
week, operator of the Blue Ridge Landfill in Irving where this WV Fairmont Brine wastes wound up, there is definitely a
huge knowledge gap on this issue in the landfill community here in KY. Advanced TENO RM Solutions may very well be
just be the tip of the iceberg.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring
radioactive material does not include the natural radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials
whose radioactivity is technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has been separated to various
degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive regulatory responsibility of the
states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in
Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative regulations promulgated
pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and
211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000). Each day of the violation or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Thanks to you and George for all your efforts and we likewise look forward to collaborating with your agency on
TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.

~ Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
1

GP1100

Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.

~~---------n----~~~~~------- --r~tJt::.r10N~M~l.t,tH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:32 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Letter
Curt:
Would you be able to meet with me and George later today or early next week? The purpose being to go over the notice
in draft form now as well as see where we can collaborate on this issue of TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.

Regards,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:10 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Letter
Curt;
I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of yesterday, a
letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was passed around and shared with
Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by my supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our Section
employees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.
At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the disposal of
TENORN and processed TENORM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
2

GP1101

'-

---------------

Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.

fl'.ve copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.
Thank you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:52 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RE: Letters
George, Attached is the letter that ~'Our attorneys shared with our attorneys which they then shared with my Division
Director, Commissioner and I believe the Cabinet Secretary. It was my understanding that the letter was going to be
mailed on 2/16/16. I personally have no problem with the letter being sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with
the same landfill operators with our own letter giving them more specifics on the Central Midwest Compact KRS's
addressing the prohibition of out-of-region TENO RM disposal. If you all can share your mailing list with us so we can
accomplish that task, it would be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are
now discussing this matter is a good thing. At the end of the day I would like to see the whole case turned over to the
AG's office.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
.ervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564.. 1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ijprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ijwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

VoMfU:i!iit~
IW,.~~--....Y
f'Jl.i:'.ilATICJNH~\J.'rH

GP1102

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Friday, February 19, 2016 9:27 AM
McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
FW: Letter

Cc:
Subject:

Thanks Matt. Danny/George, Matt does not get in town until Tuesday. I have meetings on Tuesday from 10-11 and 2-4
but the rest of my day is open for a meeting. Wednesday, 2/24/16 is wide open as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees ori line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified ofproposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/

c.
... -.ftt .

of~

sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

'f1~trr1ti1~~H~r~

From: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 9:16 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: Re: Letter
I will not be back until Tuesday.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) <Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov> wrote:
Hello Danny,
I would be delighted to meet with you and George but could we please do it sometime next week. My
Branch Manager is out of town this week and I know he would like to attend this meeting as would be
my Division Director, Ms. Kathy Fowler. Anytime on Monday, 2/22/16 works for me. I am including Matt
and Kathy on this e-mail so they can check their schedules and get back to us with a day and timethat
works for them as well. It sounds as though both our legal departments are also involved in this matter
which as I told George, is a good thing in my book. Personally I would love to see a joint letter go out to
all landfill operators from both our agencies that specifically calls out the applicable Central Midwest
Interstate Low-Level Waste Compact KY regulatory statutes and KY administrative regulations. I think
this would leave no doubt in any landfill operator's mind as to what was not acceptable here in KY when
it comes to TENORM disposal. After talking to the gentleman in charge of Environmental Management
1

GP1103

at Advanced Disposal this week, operator of the Blue Ridge Landfill in Irving where this WV Fairmont
Brine wastes wound up, there is definitely a huge knowledge gap on this issue in the landfill community
here in KV. Advanced TENO RM Solutions may very well be just be the tip of the iceberg.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=BSOl
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated under the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by or as a result of
human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural radioactivity of rocks or soils,
or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is technologically enhanced by
controllable practices (or by past human practices);

902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has been
separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive regulatory
responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) from
outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in Kentucky, if the imports or
disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.kv.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=BSOS
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet issued
pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten thousand
dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation or
noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Thanks to you and George for all your efforts and we likewise look forward to collaborating with your
agency on TENORM/LLRW disposal in KV.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KV 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:32 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Letter
Curt:

GP1104

Would you be able to meet with me and George later today or early next week? The purpose being to go
over the notice in draft form now as well as see where we can collaborate on this issue of
TENORM/LLRW disposal in KV.

Regards,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:10 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Letter
Cort;

I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of
yesterday, a letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was
passed around and shared with Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a
unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by mY supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our
Section employees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.
At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the
disposal of TE NORN and processed TENO RM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
Following the meeti~g Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.
Thank you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence
with me.
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:52 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: RE: RE: Letters


George, Attached is the letter that your attorneys shared with our attorneys which they then shared
with my Division Director, Commissioner and I believe the Cabinet Secretary. It was my understanding
3

GP1105

that the letter was going to be mailed on 2/16/16. I personally have no problem with the letter being
sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with the same landfill operators with our own letter giving
them more specifics on the Central Midwest Compact KRS's addressing the prohibition of out-of-region
TE NORM disposal. If you all can share your mailing list with us so we can accomplish that task, it would
be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are now discussing
this matter is a good thing. At the end of the day I would like to see the whole case turned over to the
AG' s office.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<imageOOl.jpg>

GP1106

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 10:04 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
FW: Letter

George:
Can you meet around 130 or 2ish today with me and Curt?

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 9:51 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Letter
Danny, If that is the case, I am here all day today and available any time on Monday as well. You and George can come
over any time you like or I could meet with you at your office, whichever you prefer.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
~nkfort, KY 40621
~: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Rt:tA
.

~""'

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 9:42 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Letter
Curt:
I was hoping to keep this initial meeting small. Just me, you and George. After that, we can bring in the higher ups.

I
j

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 9:11 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
~ McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
ject: RE: Letter

Hello Danny,

GP1107

I would be delighted to meet with you and George but could we please do it sometime next week. My Branch Manager
is out of town this week and I know he would like to attend this meeting as would be my Division Director, Ms. Kathy
Fowler. Anytime on Monday, 2/22/16 works for me. I am including Matt and Kathy on this e-mail so they can check theiL_
schedules and get back to us with a day and time that works for them as well. It sounds as though both our legal
-.
departments are also involved in this matter which as I told George, is a good thing in my book. Personally I would love
to see a joint letter go out to all landfill operators from both our agencies that specifically calls out the applicable Central
Midwest Interstate Low-Level Waste Compact KY regulatory statutes and KY administrative regulations. I think this
would leave no doubt in any landfill operator's mind as to what was not acceptable here in KY when it comes to
TENO RM disposal. After talking to the gentleman in charge of Environmental Management at Advanced Disposal this
week, operator of the Blue Ridge Landfill inJDting where t_hisJ[\l'\/_f~lrmont Brln~1Nastes WQ!J_nd up_,__there i~efinit~Jy L ____ _
huge knowledge gap on this issue in the landfill community here in KY. Advanced TENO RM Solutions may very well be
just be the tip of the iceberg.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring
radioactive material does not include the natural radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials
whose radioactivity is technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has been separated to various
degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive regulatory responsibility of the . states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in
Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person wno fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative regulations promulgated
pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and
211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000). Each day of the violation or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Thanks to you and George for all your efforts and we likewise look forward to collaborating with your agency on
TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Z'f1nh1

IV~J~l
2

GP1108

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Att: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:32 AM

8""=

.
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Letter
Curt:
Would you be able to meet with me and George later today or early next week? The purpose being to go over the notice
in draft form now as well as see where we can collaborate on this issue of TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.

Regards,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:10 AM

aA: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


W'f!': Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Letter
Curt;

I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of yesterday, a
letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was passed around and shared with
Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by my supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our Section
employees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.
At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the disposal of
TENORN and processed TENORM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.
Thank you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.

-l

orge

. --------------- ------------------------ _____________ __ _


From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:52 PM
.,

GP1109

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RE: Letters
George, Attached is the letter that your attorneys shared with our attorneys which they then shared with my Division
Director, Commissioner and I believe the Cabinet Secretary. It was my understanding that the letter was going to be
mailed on 2/16/16. I personally have no problem with the letter being sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with
the same landfill operators with our own letter giving them more specifics on the Central Midwest Compact KRS's
addressing the prohibition of out-of-region TENO RM disposal. If you all can share your mailing list with us so we can
accomplish that task, it would be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are

1---- ..

~~~ ~Rf~.~r:!~~is_l!l~!t~r-~_a~~()~ !hiJ1g. j\.!_t~~-~ll_~--~!the da-y_l_~_()~I~ IIke_!()_see t~e "'_'~C>_~_~(l_~~-!~~r:!ed ()\,l~__r_t_o__!~~---

___ _

Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govId ph/rad ioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1110

Partridge, George (EEC)

flm:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 10:47 AM
Dan Fleshour; Partridge, George (EEC)
13 months of manifests (January 2015 through January 2016.

Hi Dan,
When can you get the manifests to us and how are you going to get them to us? Email or paper copy? If email, the total
for attachments per email is 8 meg. If paper, we'd like them to be hand delivered it to make sure they get here and we
would like them by Monday. Thank you, George

GP1111

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 12:16 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Accepted: TENORM/NORM

GP1112
-------

-----

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 12:21 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Letter

To:

Subject:

Danny;
Yes!
Thank you,

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 10:04 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: FW: Letter
George:
Can you meet around 130 or 2ish today with me and Curt?

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

. .nt: .Friday, February 19, 2016 9:51 AM


~: Anderson, Danny

J (EEC)

Subject: RE: Letter


Danny, If that is the case, I am here all day today and available any time on Monday as well. You and George can come
over any time you like or I could meet with you at your office, whichever you prefer.
Curt. Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~anted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Rc!lt!IJ~....

..

ta\t1lA11~H~TB

~----~---~ .....................................

~m: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 9:42 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Letter
1

GP1113

Curt:
I was hoping to keep this initial meeting small. Just me, you and George. After that, we can bring in the

hi~~-~.~-~~~.....

--'-

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 9:11 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)

Subject: RE: Letter


Hello Danny,
I would be delighted to meet with you and George but could we please do it sometime next week. My Branch Manager
is out of town this week and I know he would like to attend this meeting as would be my Division Director, Ms. Kathy
Fowler. Anytime on Monday, 2/22/16 works for me. I am including Matt and Kathy on this e-mail so they can check their
schedules and get back to us with a day and time that works for them as well. It sounds as though both our legal
departments are also involved in this matter which as I told George, is a good thing in my book. Personally I would love
to see a joint letter go out to all landfill operators from both our agencies that specifically calls out the applicable Central
Midwest Interstate Low-Level Waste Compact KY regulatory statutes and KY administrative regulations. I think this
would leave no doubt in any landfill operator's mind as to what was not acceptable here in KY when it comes t.o
TENO RM disposal. After talking to the gentleman in charge of Environmental Management at Advanced Disposal this
week, operator of the Blue Ridge Landfill in Irving where this WV Fairmont Brine wastes wound up, there is definitely a
huge knowledge gap on this issue in the landfill community here in KY. Advanced TE NORM Solutions may very well be
just be the tip of the iceberg.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(8) "Naturally-occurring. radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated u. nder the Atomic Energy Act o .
1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring
radioactive material does not include the natural radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials
whose radioactivity is technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has been separated to various
degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive regulatory responsibility of the
states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in
Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative regulations promulgated
pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and
211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000). Each day of the violation or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Thanks to you and George for all your efforts and we likewise look forward to collaborating with your agency on
TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
2

GP1114

Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

YnuhitJe~
~,Ut!Jr;g
J'iJJ.tilJ.\1'10NGt))iULTH

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:32 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: Letter


Curt:
Would you be able to meet with me and George later today or early next week? The purpose being to go over the notice
in draft form now as well as see where we can collaborate on this issue of TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.

Regards,
Danny Anderson, P.E

id Waste Branch Manager


Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:10 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Subject: RE: Letter


Curt;
I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of yesterday, a
letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was passed a.round and shared with
Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by my supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our Section
!

.91oyees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.


At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the disposal of
TENORN and processed TENORM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
3

GP1115

Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and en~ourage you two to directly correspond.
Thank you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.
George
------ --From~Pendergr-ass,-Eu rt-EGHFS-9PH}--Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:52 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Letters
George, Attached is the letter that your attorneys shared with our attorneys which they then shared with my Division
Director, Commissioner and I believe the Cabinet Secretary. It was my understanding that the letter was going to be
mailed on 2/16/16, I personally have no problem with the letter being sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with
the same landfill operators with our own letter giving them more specifics on the Central Midwest Compact KRS's
addressing the prohibition of out-of-region TENO RM disposal. If you all can share your mailing list with us so we can
accomplish that task, it would be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are
now discussing this matter is a good thing. At the end of the day I would like to see the whole case turned over to the
AG's office.
Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:/Jprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kf!.t

GP1116

Partridge, George {EEC)

elm:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 12:23 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
FW: 13 months of manifests (January 2015 through January 2016.

Jeri;
George Weems is still trying to get them to cooperate.
George P.

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 10:47 AM
To: Dan Fleshour; Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: 13 months of manifests (January 2015 through January 2016.
Hi Dan,
When can you get the manifests to us and how are you going to get them to us? Email or paper copy? If email, the total
for attachments per email is 8 meg. If paper, we'd like them to be hand delivered it to make sure they get here and we
would like them by Monday. Thank you, George

GP1117

Partridge, George {EEC)

elm:

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
'mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov'
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Adv Disposal Profile Sheets & Approval Review Form.pdf; Fairmont Brine plan.pdf;
FairmontBrineRadchem.pdf; Advanced TENORM Services.pdf

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

'mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov'
Delivered: 2/19/2016 1:09 PM

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:

Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they
received from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided
by the landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16,
2015. The Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.

Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine
Processing describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.

Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.

Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.

Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

9'_oree P. Partritfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
1

GP1118

Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

..

GP1119

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 2:01 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RCRA

These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.

From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
centrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
vents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716

GP1120

Subject:

Dan Fleshour <dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com>


Friday, February 19, 2016 3:38 PM
Weems, George (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: 13 months of manifests (January 2015 through January 2016.

We will be hand delivering and will have before the end of the week
George P do you have the list of companies we should look for

Dan Fleshour I East Region Compliance Manager

IM: 513-284-3615 IE: dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com


Connect with us: Advanced Disposal.com Facebook Youtube

From: Weems, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Weems@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 10:47 AM


To: Dan Fleshour; Partridge, George (EEC)

.bject: 13 months of manifests (January 2015 through January 2016.


Hi Dan,
When can you get the manifests to us and how are you going to get them to us? Email or paper copy? If emait the total
for attachments per email is 8 meg. If paper, we'd like them to be hand delivered it to make sure they get here and we
would like them by Monday. Thank you, George

GP1121

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 3:45 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Fwd: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
imageOOl.png

Fyi
Thanks,
Danny
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dan Fleshour <dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 3:41:14 PM EST
To: "Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)" <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting

We are working on pulling all the information together and would like to hand deliver and meet to
discuss the issue further
We plan to have by next Thursday, will everybody be available to meet then
Thanks

Dan Fleshour I East Region Compliance Manager

10 ---------

IM: 513-284-3615 IE: dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com


Connect with us: Advanced Disposal.com Facebook Youtube

GP1122

Partridge, George (EEC)

e!7:'

To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 5:08 PM
Maze, Rodney (EEC)
FW: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
imageOOl.png

Rodney;
Just wanted to share this with you.
George
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 3:45 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Fwd: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
Fyi
Thanks,
Danny
. g i n forwarded message:
From: Dan Fleshour <dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 3:41:14 PM EST
To: "Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)" <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
We are working on pulling all the information together and would like to hand deliver and meet to
discuss the issue further
We plan to have by next Thursday, will everybody be available to meet then
Thanks

Dan Fleshour I East Region Compliance Manager

IM: 513-284-3615 IE: dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com


Connect with us: Advanced Disposal.com Face book Youtube

GP1123

Partridge, George (EEC)

"'m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 5:08 PM
Maze, Rodney (EEC)
FW: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
imageOOl.png

Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Rodney;
Just wanted to share this with you.
George
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Friday, February 19, 2016 3:45 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Fwd: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting

Sent:

Fyi
Thanks,
Danny
. . .gin forwarded message:
From: Dan Fleshour <dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 3:41:14 PM EST
To: "Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)" <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
We are working on pulling all the information together and would like to hand deliver and meet to
discuss the issue further
We plan to have by next Thursday, will everybody be available to meet then
Thanks

Dan Fleshour I East Region Compliance Manager

10-------I M: 513-284-3615

E: dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com
Connect with us: Advanced Disposal.com Face book Youtube
J

GP1124

Partridge, George (EEC)

tlom:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 5:08 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Accepted:

GP1125

Partridge, George (EEC)

'm:

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 6:08 PM
'Dan Fleshour'
RE: 13 months of manifests (January 2015 through January 2016.

Dan;
Please forward your request to my supervisor Lindsey Briggs.
Thank you,
George Partridge

From: Dan Fleshour [mailto:dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com]

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 3:38 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: 13 months of manifests (January 2015 through January 2016.
We will be hand delivering and will have before the end of the week

George P do you have the list of companies we should look for

Dan Fleshour I East Region Compliance Manager

IM: 513-284-3615 I E: dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com


Connect with us: Advanced Disposal.com Facebook Youtube

From: Weems, George (EEC) [mailto:Georqe.Weems@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 10:47 AM
To: Dan Fleshour; Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: 13 months of manifests (January 2015 through January 2016.

Hi Dan,
When can you get the manifests to us and how are you going to get them to us? Email or paper copy? If email, the total
for attachments per email is 8 meg. If paper, we'd like them to be hand delivered it to make sure they get here and we
would like them by Monday. Thank you, George

GP1126

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 6:18 PM
Maze, Rodney (EEC)
RE: Big Run

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Rodney;
Thank you!
George

From: Maze, Rodney (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 5:10 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: Fwd: Big Run


FYI
Rodney Maze

. g i n forwarded message:

From: "Maybriar, Jon (EEC)" <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>


Date: February 19, 2016 at 3:20:42 PM EST
To: "Maze, Rodney (EEC)" <Rodney.Maze@ky.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Big Run

Sent from my iPhone


Begin forwarded message:

From: "Maybriar, Jon (EEC)" <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>


Date: February 19, 2016 at 2:20:16 PM CST
To: "Anderson, Danny J (EEC)" <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Big Run
Danny
This is a very challenging site so please speak with Lindsey to keep George as the lead
for BRL.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

GP1127

From: "Maze, Rodney (EEC)" <Rodney.Maze@ky.gov>


Date: February 18, 2016 at 7:24:09 PM CST
To: "Maybriar, Jon (EEC)" <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Big Run
FYI
Rodney Maze

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Partridge, George (EEC)"


<George.Partridge@ky.gov>
Date: February 18, 2016 at 3:14:12 PM EST
To: "Maze, Rodney (EEC)" <Rodney.Maze@ky.gov>
Subject: RE: Big Run
Rodney;
I previously have been the engineer Lindsey assigned to
oversee Big Run (John Poore handled all regulatory and
permitting issues, I just was sent out on inspections). In
our staff meeting this morning with Lindsey, he shared
he has assigned Mohammad Razavi to be the engineer
responsible for Big Run. Earlier this year when he asked
what sites we wanted to be responsible for, I told him
the. only site I specifically wanted to follow was Big Run
and was glad to help out elsewhere as needed. I am
disappointed he had made the change. I mentioned
that you and I had been involved working together on
issues at Big Run. Lindsey mentioned he had no
objection if I followed up on anything I had started with
you, but to include Mohammad as the contact and
person in charge.

I appreciate all we are doing and want to continue to


support that work as much as possible.
George

(ieorge P. Partrid{Je Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

------------~-------

GP1128

Partridge, George (EEC)

flom:
To:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 19, 2016 6:24 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Subject:

RE: RCRA

Sent:

Jeri:
I am scheduled to attend a meeting all day in Bowling Green on Tuesday. The meeting that was planned for Wednesday
with Curt Pendergrass and his group has been postponed to be rescheduled for a future date.
I am available the other days of the week for a conference call for EPA.
Please reschedule our call with Nancy.
Thank you,
George

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:01 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

"""""1.c: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


~bject: RCRA

These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
,,.i}Ai W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
.
,

~vision of Waste

Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
1

GP1129

-m:

Partridge, George {EEC)

To:

Sent:
Subject:

McKee Perez, Nancy < McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, February 22, 2016 7:22 AM
Read: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Your message
To:
Subject: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:22:21 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 22, 2016 7:22:20 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1130

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


Monday, February 22, 2016 7:30 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

George and Jeri,


I received your email and documents. I'll take a look at them and then we can meet tomorrow (Tuesday) at 11:00, as
discussed.

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
~bject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

ai..

Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.

Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
1

GP1131

We look forward to talking with you again next week.

Thanks again for your assistance!


Sincerely,
George

~---YP.OrfJ2--P~c{gefr~--~~~~-

,__ _ __ __ __ - - ---

Department for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1132

Partridge, George (EEC)


m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 7:41 AM
'McKeePerez, Nancy'
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in Bowling Green on
Tuesday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Public Health, Radiation Materials Section to
discuss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont Brine Processing has been postponed to a
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this week (any day but Tuesday).
Thank you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
George

__ ...... --..... .. .....

... , ...,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,


.
m: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:30 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
,,,.,,.

, ,.,

,,.,,~,,-,,,,,_,~

George and Jeri,


I received your email and documents. I'll take a look at them and then we can meet tomorrow (Tuesday) at 11:00, as
discussed.

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM


To: McKee Perez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
~)eri.Higginbotham@ky.gov

99ject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal


Hello Nancy;
1

GP1133

Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.

Please find attached the following documents:

Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!

Sincerely,
George

<;ieorge P. Partricfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1134

Partridge, George (EEC)

f/Am:

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

McKeePerez, Nancy < McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


Monday, February 22, 2016 7:48 AM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Jeri,
I don't mind moving our meeting to a later date. I'm pretty much booked up until Friday. How about meeting at 10:00 on
Friday?

Nancy McKee Perez


Life Scientist
Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:41 AM
McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
~ Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

A.:

Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in Bowling Green on
Tuesday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Public Health, Radiation Materials Section to
discuss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont Brine Processing has been postponed to a
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this week (any day but Tuesday).
Thank you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
George

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:30 AM
~ Partridge, George (EEC)
~Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
George and Jeri,
1

GP1135

I received your email and documents. I'll take a look at them and then we can meet tomorrow (Tuesday) at 11:00, as
discussed.

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674 .
..
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the ~
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.

91"

Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,

George

{]eor9e P. PartridlJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
2

GP1136

KY Division of Waste Management


200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
- 2 ) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1137
L_ _

-m:

Partrid

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 8:05 AM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
I
FW: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Ditposal

Jeri;
I

I am not available Tuesday of this week.

I
I

Nancy suggested Friday. Would that work for you?


George
{We may also learn more by then.)

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:48 AM


To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Jeri,
. .on't mind moving our meeting to a later date. I'm pretty much booked
Friday?

until Friday. How about meeting at 10:00 on

Nancy McKee Perez


Life Scientist
Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
.
From: Partridge, George {EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:41 AM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in 'Bowling Green on
.....~sday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Publ.ic Health, Radiation l\llaterials Section to
~uss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont rine Processing has been postponed to a
!
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this wejek (any day but Tuesday).
1

GP1138

Thank you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
George
From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]
.sent:-M0r:iday,-F~l:lrnar-y-~2-016-P.JO-AM-----

-------

- -------

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Cc: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
George and Jeri,
I received your email and documents. I'll take a look at them and then we can meet tomorrow (Tuesday) at 11:00, as
discussed.

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov

(404) 562-8674

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;

Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal .
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
2

GP1139

Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
Mairmont Brine Processing .

We look forward to talking with you again next week.


Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

{]eor9e P. Partrid{Je Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1140

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Monday, February 22, 2016 10:30 AM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
RE: RCRA

Thank you Jeri for looking into this issue. Did the EPA have no problems with the radiochemical analysis for Ra-226/228
in the water on top of the FBP sludge using the EPA's method 901.1 water safe drinking water analysis method rather
than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable Ra~226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
method for soil analysis.

EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiocbemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
Aiiti production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
~ument the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).

"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TENORM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENO RM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENORM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
~above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.

GP1141

I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621

______Tel:502-564~37QQ~xt.A183_____________ -----------~-------- ____ -~---- __________________________ -------------------------------------------------~------------Fax: 502-564-1492


E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

/(f/JJ. ~
From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:01 PM

To:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: RCRA

These are my_ notes from o_ ur 11 :00 t-elephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning~
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
...
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TEN ORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection

200 Fair Oaks Lane


Frankfort, KY 4060 I
502-564-6 716
2

GP1142

Partridge, George (EEC)

'm:

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 10:32 AM
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
FW: RCRA

Todd;
As you were talking with me a couple of minutes ago this came in.
Thought you might like to see it!
Thanks for stopping by!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:30 AM
To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
~ank you Je. ri for looking into this issue. Did the .EPA have no problems with the radiochemical analysis for Ra-226/228
~he water on top of the FBP sludge using the EPA's method 901.1 water safe drinking water analysis method rather

than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable Ra-226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
method for soil analysis.

EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
and production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
document the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).

.-

"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."

GP1143

And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and . .
greater for TENO RM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
{http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%2JlRadj_g_active%20Waste%20Compact.pdf-1-Wba_tlwaswantiogJs_riQ_w frnfil1be CMCi::ommissio~oJ~Jf we can -~- _________ _
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENORM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENO RM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
and above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

K'l!J~

f'.A!llATlO'l'JHat\1.TH

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:01 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RCRA

These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicabilify of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
2

GP1144

George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
~m my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in

concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents \Vould be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TEN ORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham. Ph.D.
Division of Waste .Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716

.3

GP1145

Partridge, George (EEC)

"m:
Sent:

To:
Cc:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 10:56 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
RE: RCRA

Curt;
Following the conference call that Jeri and I had with Nancy McKee Perez from U.S. EPA Region 4 this past Friday, I
forwarded her the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste .

Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Nancy is going to look up the records that EPA has on Fairmont Brine Processing since they have a EPA Identification
Number. There should be a Waste Determination for the waste that is generated from the facility. I also want to
c~nfirm that Advanced TENORM Services followed the necessary procedures for acceptance and management of that
wastes from EPA's perspective and what responsibilities lie with the generator (Fairmont Brine Processing). Nancy is
also going to look at the data we have from PACE Analytical so see if any other RCRA regulations apply (designation as
a characteristic waste, etc.)
I anticipate learning more about their waste streams as well as clarifying that the RCRA "O & G" exemption that has
been claimed would not be applicable to processed waste from the O&G industry by a company that serves the
industry.
Thanks for sharing the analytical method for soil analysis and how EPA uses the term "intrinsically derived from
primary filed operations."
Today I am addressing requests from our Field Offices as they draft the NOVs for the two facilities that have received
radioactive wastes from out of state.
We have a follow-up phone call with Nancy this week .

. .nkyou,
George

GP1146

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

..

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:30 AM


To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA

Thank you Jeri for looking into this issue. Did the EPA have no problems with the radiochemical analysis for Ra-226/228
in the water on top of the FBP sludge using the EPA's method 901.1 water safe drinking water analysis method rather
than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable Ra-226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
method for soil analysis.
--------------------------------------~------------~~~-------- ---

EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www .epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
and production "special wastes" being available to take advantage ofthis exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
document the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).

"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materia.
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TE NORM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENO RM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENORM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
and above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
2

GP1147

Partridge, George (EEC)

"m:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 10:58 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie
(EEC)
FW: About the U Landfill

FYI

From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:55 AM


To: Begley, Brian (EEC)
Subject: RE: About the U Landfill
This is a long story. We can talk if you like, and I probably should explain what happened to EPA, because I do not trust
the contractors to tell the truth.
They called and said that they were going to treat the leachate to remove radioactivity after they released a bunch into
the environment. They wanted to send in an application to modify their process, as a modification to the approved
Technical Application.
~old them that because they claim they self-regulate rad (and the courts appear to agree), I would not accept any
.plication that stated that they were asking our approval to treat for rad, or our approval of the process regarding rad.

Further, I told them that I did not want the term "radioactive" or the term "radioactivity" appearing in the application.
Basically, they are treating the leachate for dissolved metals, and then running it through the carbon filters. Any rad that
is removed is gravy as far as I am concerned.

From: Begley, Brian (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:45 AM


To: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: FW: About the U Landfill
Todd,
I have included the e-mail chain for your reference. EPA is requesting that you provide EPA (and my staff could also
benefit) with a short discussion on the Li-landfill and your oversight role (DOE's voluntary actions vs required actions,
etc). One of the topics listed below that would assist EPA in the formulation of their Site Management Plan Comments
are "achieve a better understanding of the rad treatment (if any) and discharge status for the uranium and Tc-99 in the
leachate."

Please let me know if there is a time this week that we can complete this conversation. I can set up a conference line
and we can meet in my office or I can schedule a conference room. Nothing formal expected other than conversation.
Thanks,

.auan 91~, PG

9EE'c KY DWM HWB PGDP Section Supervisor


e-mail: brian.begley@ky.gov
office: {502) 564-6716, ext 4641
1

GP1148

From: Corkran, Julie [mailto:Corkran.Julie@epa.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:12 AM
To: Guffey, Mike (EEC); Begley, Brian (EEC); Brewer, Gaye (EEC); Richards, Jon M.
Subject: RE: About the U Landfill
I would prefer a short discussion with Todd Hendricks some time that is convenient for him. I am trying to load small
pits ofthe_f(jDP ~tteLnJQmY_head~Jo ~st@jish my_b_asajinelJ\/he_11a topi~l_~serits it~~IL___________ ---------------------------~- _____ _

Julie L. Corkran, Ph.D. I Senior Remedial Project Manager


USEPA Region 4 I Atlanta Federal Center 9T25
61 Forsyth Street SW I Atlanta GA 30303-8960
Office: 404.562.8547 I Fax: 404.562.8518 I corkran.julie@epa.gov
From: Guffey, Mike (EEC} [mailto:Mike.Guffey@ky.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:45 AM
To: Corkran, Julie <Corkran.Julie@epa.gov>; Begley, Brian (EEC) <Brian.Begley@ky.gov>; Brewer, Gaye {EEC)
<Gaye.Brewer@ky.gov>; Richards, Jon M.<Richards.Jon@epa.gov>
Subject: RE: About the U landfill

Could request FFA presentation from DOE on the topic. Also, ee can ask our solid waste lead {Todd Hendricks) to lead a
short discussion on U -landfill from his oversight perspective for ext. reg. discussion.

-----.

-------~-----'----- -----------------------'---'----:--'-------------- '-------"------- ------------------- ---------'---~----~----.,. .........


.,

From: Corkran, Julie [mailto:Corkran.Julie@epa.gov]


Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 1:40 PM
To: Begley, Brian (EEC); Guffey, Mike (EEC); Brewer, Gaye (EEC)
Subject: About the U Landfill
Hello to all:

Working on my SMP comments and realized that I did not have a chance to complete a conversation with you to achieve
a better understanding of the rad treatment (if any) and discharge status for the uranium and Tc-99 in the leachate.
So, I am sending this note as a reminder that I would like to learn more about the current status (and t,he future) of the
U landfill.
Thanks,
Julie

Julie L. Corkran, Ph.D. I Senior Remedial Project Manager


USEPA Region 4 I Atlanta Federal Center 9T25
61 Forsyth Street SW I Atlanta GA 30303-8960
Office: 404.562.8547 I Fax: 404.562.8518 I corkran.julie@epa.gov

GP1149

Partridge, George (EEC)

fl!~:
To:

Subject:

Webb, April (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 11:19 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Corey Hoskins

George,
Can you give me some background information so that I can write an information request to Corey about his process?

GP1150

Partridge, George (EEC)

,rom:

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 11:35 AM
Webb, April (EEC)
RE: Corey Hoskins

April;
What is Corey Hoskins requesting? What "process" are you referring to?
Thank you,
George

From: Webb, April (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 11:19 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Corey Hoskins
George,
Can you give me some background information so that I can write an information request to Corey about his process?

GP1151

To:
Cc:
Subject:

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 11:35 AM
McKeePerez, Nancy
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

10:00 Friday is fine.


Thanks,
Jeri

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:48 AM


To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Jeri,
I don't mind moving our meeting to a later date. I'm pretty much booked up until Friday. How about meeting at 10:00 on
Friday?

Nancy McKee Perez


~Scientist
~zardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:41 AM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in Bowling Green on
Tuesday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Public Health, Radiation Materials Section to
discuss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont Brine Processing has been postponed to a
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this week (any day but Tuesday).
- k you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
1

GP1152

---------------

George
From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:30 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

I received your email and documents. I'll take a look at them and then we can meet tomorrow (Tuesday) at 11:00, as
discussed.

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Hello Nancy;

Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies su.Aa.
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
...
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
2

GP1153

Thanks again for your assistance!

tJtcerely,
George

(jeor9e P. PartridiJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1154

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 11:36 AM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Jeri;
Friday is excellent! Glad you are available.
That will give us some time to gather some more information in preparation for the meeting,
Thank you for all you are doing (and your patience with me).
George

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 11:35 AM


To: McKeePerez, Nancy
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
10:00 Friday is fine .

. .~nks,

~n

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:48 AM


To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Jeri,
I don't mind moving our meeting to a later date. I'm pretty much booked up until Friday. How about meeting at 10:00 on
Friday?

Nancy McKee Perez


Life Scientist
Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
. mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
1

..Am: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

~t: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:41 AM

To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


1

GP1155

Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in Bowling Green on
Tuesday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Public Health, Radiation Materials Section to
discuss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont Brine Processing has been postponed to a
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this week (any day but Tuesday).
Thank you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
George

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:30 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
George and Jeri,
I received your email and documents. I'll take a look at them and then we can meet tomorrow (Tuesday) at 11:00, as
discussed.

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKee Perez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
2

GP1156

---------- -----

landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

(jeorge P. Partricfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
Y Division of Waste Management
O Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
rankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1157

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
:ent:
To:

Subject:

Webb, April (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 11:37 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: Corey Hoskins

I believe it is to do with the mining drilling mud and what they do before disposal?
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
April;
What is Corey Hoskins requesting? What "process" are you referring to?
Thank you,
George

From: Webb, April (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 11:19 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Corey Hoskins
George,
Can you give me some background information so that I can write an information request to Corey
about his process?

GP1158

To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 11:42 AM
Webb, April (EEC)
RE: Corey Hoskins

April;
We are addressing both TENORM waste as well as processed TENO RM waste that is being transported fron: out of state
into Kentucky for disposal in our landfills.
Could you please send me the original email request so I can understand better who would be the best person to
respond to his question?
Thank you,
George

From: Webb, April (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 11:37 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: Corey Hoskins
-elieve it is to do with the mining drilling mud and what they do before disposal?
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
April;
What is Corey Hoskins requesting? What "process" are you referring to?
Thank you,
George

From: Webb, April (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 11:19 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Corey Hoskins
George,
Can you give me some background information so that I can write an information request to Corey
about his process?

GP1159

Partridge, George (EEC)

#,om:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Monday, February 22, 2016 12:00 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

RE: RCRA

Thanks George for the summary. Funny thing. The EPA just released the following regarding oil and gas
(http://www.epa.gov/enforcement/national-enforcement-initiative-ensuring-energy-extraction-activities-comply ).
"Nati.anal Enforcement Initiative: Ensuring Energy Extraction Activities Comply with Environmental Laws"~ The EPA's
inspection and enforcement map towards the bottom of the page is a little hard to read but it looks as though EPA is
indeed conducting inspection of well sites in KY. However the EPA's enforcement actions seemed to be geared more
toward violations of the Clean Air Act.
You mentioned two NOVs for accepting out of state TENORM wastes. Do you mind if I ask what is the other landfill
besides Advanced Disposal Solutions in Irving, KY that is going to receive a NOV?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
~nkfort, KY 40621
502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

9111"=

'~

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:56 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
Curt;
Following the conference call that Jeri and I had with Nancy McKee Perez from U.S. EPA Region 4 this past Friday, I
forwarded her the following documents:

- Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
1

GP1160

Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.

Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Nancy is going to look up the records that EPA has on Fairmont Brine Processing since they have a EPA Identification
Number. There should be a Waste Determination for the waste that is generated from the facility. I also want to
confirm that Advanced TENORM Services followed the necessary procedures for acceptance and management of that
wastes from EPA's perspective and what responsibilities lie with the generator (Fairmont Brine Processing). Nancy is
also going to look at the data we have from PACE Analytical so see if any other RCRA regulations apply (designation as
a characteristic waste, etc.)
I anticipate learning more about their waste streams as well as clarifying that the RCRA "O & G" exemption that has
been claimed would not be applicable to processed waste from the O&G industry by a company that serves the
industry.
Thanks for sharing the analytical method for soil analysis and how EPA uses the term "intrinsically derived from
primary filed operations."
Today I am addressing requests from our Field Offices as they draft the NOVs for the two facilities that have received
radioactive wastes from out of state.
We have a follow-up phone call with Nancy this week.
Thank you,

George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:30 AM
To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
Thank you Jeri for looking into this issue. Did the EPA have no problems with the radiochemical analysis for Ra-226/228
in the water on top of the FBP sludge using the EPA's method 901.1 water safe drinking water analysis method rather
than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable Ra-226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
method for soil analysis.

EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www .epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
..
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
2

GP1161

And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
~d production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCR. A subtitle C? Looking at a
~cument the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).

"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas, The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Centra.1 Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TE NORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TENO RM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).

The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the.CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENO RM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENORM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

K~~ffl"'I~ ~~

GP1162

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RCRA
These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning&.
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.

'W

The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
__m__ ~ol_y_e~n,ts_,___ Fainp._Q_nt ~rip.e or_AQ_y~nc~4_'fp_:i\,LQRM~~~fYjf_~-~l!9!!lg_lJ.(:ly~_ ch~!:_/!Cteri_~~c!fu_~_Faste_for proper__ __ m- ---~
disposal.
.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
ZOO Fair Oaks Lane

Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716

GP1163

--------------

Partridge, George (EEC)

,rom:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 12:11 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: RCRA

Curt;
My understanding the following will receive NOVs:

Advanced TENORM Services


Republic's Green Valley Landfill
Advanced Disposal's Blue Ridge Landfill

For Green Valley:


./ Accepting an unpermitted waste (TENORM)
./ Not keeping the required grid map that shows where waste is placed in the disposal cell.
For Blue Ridge:

./ Accepting an unpermitted waste (TENO RM)


./ Not providing the waste manifests in a timely manner as requested.
./ Not documenting the TENO RM related wastes (FBP, etc.) on their Quarterly Waste Received Reports.

For Advanced TENO RM Services, there is a regulation the Division plans to cite that I am not familiar with and has not
been used to my knowledge. It appears to be a very general and broad based in nature since the specifics of the wastes
such as its radioactivity are regulated by your cabinet. I believe discussions are still continuing regarding any action we
can take against ATS. It is easier for us to address the landfill site.
Thanks for the link to information by EPA!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:00 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Subject: RE: RCRA


Thanks George for the summary. Funny thing. The EPA just released the following regarding oil and gas
(http://www.epa.gov/enforcement/national-enforcement-initiative-ensuring-energy-extraction-activities-comply ).
"National Enforcement Initiative: Ensuring Energy Extraction Activities Comply with Environmental Laws". The EPA's
inspection and enforcement map towards the bottom of the page is a little hard to read but it looks as though EPA is
indeed conducting inspection of well sites in KY. However the EPA's enforcement actions seemed to be geared more
.ard violations of the Clean Air Act.

You mentioned two NOVs for accepting out of state TENORM wastes. Do you mind if I ask what is the other landfill
besides Advanced Disposal Solutions in Irving, KV that is going to receive a NOV?
1

GP1164

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
_______[-maJI: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
_____________ _ ______ _
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:56 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA

Curt;
Following the conference call that Jeri and I had with Nancy McKee Perez from U.S. EPA Region 4 this past Friday, I
forwarded her the following documents:

Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Nancy is going to look up the records that EPA has on Fairmont Brine Processing since they have a EPA Identification
Number. There should be a Waste Determination for the waste that is generated from the facility. I also want to
confirm that Advanced TENORM Services followed the necessary procedures for acceptance and management of that
wastes from EPA's perspective and what responsibilities lie with the generator (Fairmont Brine Processing). Nancy is
also going to look at the data we have from PACE Analytical so see if any other RCRA regulations apply (designation as
a characteristic waste, etc.)

GP1165

---

----

------

------------

I anticipate learning more about their waste streams as well as clarifying that the RCRA "O & G" exemption that has
been claimed would not be applicable to processed waste from the O&G industry by a company that serves the
'---ustry.
Thanks for sharing the analytical method for soil analysis and how EPA uses the term "intrinsically derived from
primary filed operations."
Today I am addressing requests from our Field Offices as they draft the NOVs for the two facilities that have received
radioactive wastes from out of state.
We have a follow-up phone call with Nancy this week.
Thank you,
George
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:30 AM


To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
Thank you Jeri for looking into this issue. Did the EPA have no problems with the radiochemical analysis for Ra-226/228
in the water on top of the FBP sludge using the EPA's method 901.1 water safe drinking water analysis method rather
than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable Ra-226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
. t h o d for soil analysis;

EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNum ber=RadiochemicaIMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
and production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
document the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.govI epawaste/ nonhaz/industrial/specia I/oil/ ) .

"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."

~just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate Low-

~el Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what

constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TE NORM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
3

GP1166

The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which

establishes the Compact


(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENORM wastes tci this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TE NORM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
~----and_ahrute_ba.c__kgmund limjt,_ backgIQJJDJJh~nggeJlnecL~?12-C:iLg?tate_\Nid~u __ _____ -------- ___

--~ .- ------

I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
..

~:,,

_.

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:01 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RCRA

These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.

GP1167

From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
__9lvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
rsting required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham. Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort. KY 4060 I
502-564-6716

GP1168

.rtridge, George (EEC)


.rom:
To:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Monday, February 22, 2016 12:17 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject:

RE: RCRA

Sent:

Thanks George.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

'Di*"~
l*(J!<~~

wlJ.\To1tir~.HlVU,.TH

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016

12: 11 PM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: RE: RCRA
Curt;
My understanding the following will receive NOVs:

Advanced TENORM Services


Republic's Green Valley Landfill
Advanced Disposal's Blue Ridge Landfill

For Green Valley:


./ Accepting an unpermitted waste (TENORM)
./ Not keeping the required grid map that shows where waste is placed in the disposal cell.
For Blue Ridge:

A./

Accepting an unpermitted waste (TENORM)


Not providing the waste manifests in a timely manner as requested .
./ Not documenting the TENORM related wastes (FBP, etc.) on their Quarterly Waste Received Reports.

./

GP1169

For Advanced TENO RM Services, there is a regulation the Division plans to cite that I am not familiar with and has not
been used to my knowledge. It appears to be a very general and broad based in nature since the specifics of the wastes
such as its radioactivity are regulated by your cabinet. I believe discussions are still continuing regarding any action we
can take against ATS. It is easier for us to address the landfill site.

A...
W

Thanks for the link to information by EPA!


George
~~----from:-Penderg rass,-eurt-EeH FS--BPH)-

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:00 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
Thanks George for the summary. Funny thing. The EPA just released the following regarding oil and gas
(http://www.epa.gov/enforcement/national-enforcement-initiative-ensuring-energy-extraction-activities-comply ).
"National Enforcement Initiative: Ensuring Energy Extraction Activities Comply with Environmental Laws". The EPA's
inspection and enforcement map towards the bottom of the page is a little hard to read but it looks as though EPA is
indeed conducting inspection of well sites in KY. However the EPA's enforcement actions seemed to be geared more
toward violations of the Clean Air Act.
You mentioned two NOVs for accepting out of state TENO RM wastes. Do you mind if I ask what is the other landfill
besides Advanced Disposal Solutions in Irving, KY that is going to receive a NOV?

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

M'
~~..

.~
.~~~

fV\i!AT10Haart!t';ll'H

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:56 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
Curt;
Following the conference call that Jeri and l had with Nancy McKee Perez from U.S. EPA Region 4 this past Friday, I
forwarded her the following documents:
2

GP1170

Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
-landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.

_9

Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Nancy is going to look up the records that EPA has on Fairmont Brine Processing since they have a EPA Identification
Number. There should bea Waste Determination for the waste that is generated from the facility. I also want to
confirm that Advanced TENORM Services followed the necessary procedures for acceptance and management of that
wastes from.EPA's perspective and what responsibilities lie with the generator (Fairmont Brine Processing). Nancy is
also going to look at the data we have from PACE Analytical so see if any other RCRA regulations apply (designation as
a characteristic waste, etc.)
I anticipate learning more about their waste streams as well as clarifying that the RCRA "O & G" exemption that has
been claimed would not be applicable to processed waste from the O&G industry by a company that serves the
industry.
- n k s for sharing the analytical method for soil analysis and how EPA uses the term "intrinsically derived from
primary filed operations."
.
Today I am addressing requests from our Field Offices as they draft the NOVs for the two facilities that have received
radioactive wastes from out of state.
We have a follow-up phone call with Nancy this week.
Thank you,
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:30 AM

To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)


Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
Thank you Jeri for looking into this issue. Did the EPA have no problems with the radiochemical analysis for Ra-226/228
in the water on top of the FBP sludge using the EPA's method 901.1 water safe drinking water analysis method rather
than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable Ra-226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
9hod for soil analysis.

EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
3

GP1171

Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis


Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids '
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
and production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
document the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
II man ufactu ring process''. (http://www3 .epa .govI epawaste/nonhaz?lndu-strTaTTsPeaalloJUT-----~~---~-- ~- --~---- -

"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TENO RM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regionaf Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20Low
Level%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENO RM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TE NORM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
and above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:S02-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
,~~

GP1172

m: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


t: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:01 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc. Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RCRA

These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy.asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?

W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.

Division of Waste Management


Department for Environmental Protection

ZOO Fair Oaks Lane


Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716

GP1173

-------

---

--- -- - - -

.rtridge, George (EEC)


.rom:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 1:09 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RCRA

Curt,
The only thing I can add to what George said is that I asked Nancy about testing procedures. I am of the impression that
everything that was tested went through TCLP. Pace Analytical lists the sample as a solid. And everything is reported as
micrograms per liter- a liquid medium. All this is acceptable. But Nancy has all the information, so she will make the
final determination. Correct me if I am wrong, but if the only exceedance is radioactive, then it will not be
"characteristically hazardous" under RCRA.
What I think may be the case from EPA's perspective is that the waste was not handled the way it should have been by
Fairmont Brine. It may well end up not meeting the definition of hazardous, but no one did the necessary work to know
that.
We know that laws were broken. But it remains to be seen if the RCRAlaw was broken.
We'll be talking to Nancy again on Friday. We will know more then.
Jeri

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:00 PM
.,jjj: Partridge, George (EEC)
~ Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
Thanks George for the summary. Funny thing. The EPA just released the following regarding oil and gas
(http://www.epa.gov/enforcement/national-enforcement-initiative-ensuring-energy-extraction-activities-comply ).
"National Enforcement Initiative: Ensuring Energy Extraction Activities Comply with Environmental Laws". The EPA's
inspection and enforcement map towards the bottom of the page is a little hard to read but it looks as though EPA is
indeed conducting inspection of well sites in KY. However the EPA's enforcement actions seemed to be geared more
toward violations of the Clean Air Act.
You mentioned two NOVs for accepting out of state TENORM wastes. Do you mind if I ask what is the other landfill
besides Advanced Disposal Solutions in Irving, KY that is going to receive a NOV?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
site: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htrn
~your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
1

GP1174

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:56 AM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
Curt;
Following the conference call that Jeri and I had with Nancy McKee Perez from U.S. EPA Region 4 this past Friday, I
forwarded her the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Nancy is going to look up the records that EPA has on Fairmont Brine Processing since they have a EPA Identification
Number. There should be a Waste Determination for the waste that is generated from the facility. I also want to
confirm that Advanced TEN ORM Services followed the necessary procedures for acceptance and management of that
wastes from EPA's perspective and what responsibilities lie with the generator (Fairmont Brine Processing). Nancy is
also going to look at the data we have from PACE Analytical so see if any other RCRA regulations apply (designation as
a characteristic waste, etc.)
I anticipate learning more about their waste streams as well as clarifying that the RCRA "O & G" exemption that has
been claimed would not be applicable to processed waste from the O&G industry by a company that serves the
industry.
Thanks for sharing the analytical method for soil analysis and how EPA uses the term "intrinsically derived from
primary filed operations."
Today I am addressing requests from our Field Offices as they draft the NOVs for the two facilities that have received
radioactive wastes from out of state.
We have a follow-up phone call with Nancy this week.

..

Thank you,
George

GP1175

- - - - - - - - - - - ---------

----

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:30 AM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA
Thank you Jeri for looking into this issue. Did the EPA have no problems with the radiochemical analysis for Ra-226/228
in the water on top of the FBP sludge using the EPA's method 901.1 water safe drinking water analysis method rather
than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable ~a-226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
method for soil analysis.

EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www .epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
and production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
document the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process"~ (http:Uwww3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).

"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENO RM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TENO RM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills arid those importing this out-of-state TE NORM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENO RM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
and above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
~I let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal

ions of our attorneys on this issue as well.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
3

GP1176

Kentucky Radiation Health Branch


275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
____Banotified_af proposerLregulation_c.hanges_htlJJs:U~s;,ure. kentucky.gov /Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Sent: Friday,- February 19, 2016 2:01 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RCRA

These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEP A concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,.
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort. KY 40601
502-564-6716

GP1177

Cc:

Subject:

Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov
Monday, February 22, 2016 2:12 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC);
Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us; Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us;
Rebecca.Fugitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov
RE: KY Landfill Concern

George,
We appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.
As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas industry waste
substance facility).
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority over the Oil and Gas
Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website.
We met Tim Stapleton from Pressure Tech as well as Cory Hoskins from BES, LLC or BES Technical Solutions, LLC or
Advanced TENORM Services, LLC.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this facility, but the
planning fell through when the site's owner passed away.
~ Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it do. wn last Friday. He's getting questions, but admitted "it's just a
~site" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskins if he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr. Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he backed away
from pursuing it.
Currently, I do not have much on Fairmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's Beth Pratt and
Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
Sincerely,

Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:36 PM
1

GP1178

To: Helmer, Stephen <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>


Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC) <Tony.Hatton@ky.gov>; Maybriar, Jon (EEC) <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>; Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
<Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern

':A...

""W

Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments of TENO RM to our
landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of Cory Hoskins associated with
______ __AIDtanced.IENORM5-e_rvlc.e_sjalsJLassociated .with BES.~LC andJiES Tec_bnicaL~Qlutj()_~_L.LCBlld _his _ac!iyitie~---~---- __ _
surrounding shipments of out of state TENO RM to Kentucky.
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have attached that to
this email message.
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our situation and the
investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TE NORM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory of Advanced
TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's brother. Cory is standing in the
doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive
Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was disposed of at Blue.
Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine Processing .
./ Analytical results from Advanced TENORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who manages Green
Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the TENO RM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TENORM here in Kentucky. We
believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at the Blue Ridge
Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey and sampling protocol in the
future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to the
management of TENO RM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the operators and managers
of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George

(jeorge P. PartridfJe Jr., PliV, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
2

GP1179

From: Stephen. Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh .Ohio.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:07 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
Hi George,
Please send what you can to better understand your concerns.

Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section

614-728-3611

Ohio
Oi~rtm~nt

of Health

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

..
3

GP1180

Information Request for ATS


Conference Room 202C
Start:
End:
Show Time As:

Wed 2/24/2016 1:30 PM


Wed 2/24/2016 4:30 PM
Tentative

Recurrence:

(none)

Meeting Status:

Not yet responded

Organizer:
Required Attendees:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Loyselle, Maridely (EEC)

GP1181

Partridge, George {EEC)

Location:

Information Request for ATS


Conference Room 202C

Start:
End:
Show Time As:

Fri 2/26/2016 8:00 AM


Fri 2/26/2016 10:00 AM
Tentative

Recurrence:

(none)

Meeting Status:

Not yet responded

Organizer:
Required Attendees:
Resources:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Loyselle, Maridely (EEC)
EEC DEP Conf Rm 202C (Fair Oaks)

-bject:

GP1182

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

EEC DEP Conf Rm 202( (Fair Oaks)


Monday, February 22, 2016 3:35 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Accepted: Information Request for ATS

GP1183

Partridge, George (EEC)

Location:

Conference Call - EPA Region 4


Conference Room 202C

Start:
End:
Show Time As:

Fri 2/26/2016 10:00 AM


Fri 2/26/2016 12:00 PM
Tentative

Recurrence:

(none)

Meeting Status:

Not yet responded

Organizer:
Required Attendees:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

-bject:

GP1184

Partridge, George (EEC)


f#.:..bject:
Location:

Information Request for ATS


Conference Room 202C

Start:
End:
Show Time As:

Fri 2/26/2016 1:00 PM


Fri 2/26/2016 4:00 PM
Tentative

Recurrence:

(none)

Meeting Status:

Not yet responded

Organizer:
Required Attendees:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Loyselle, Maridely (EEC)

GP1185

Subject:

EEC DEP Conf Rm 202C (Fair Oaks)


Monday, February 22, 2016 3:41 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Accepted: Information Request for ATS

GP1186

Partridge, George (EEC)

~~:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 4:15 PM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Accepted: Blue Ridge follow-up meeting

GP1187

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 6:00 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Rodney;
Please find below where I first summarize in a brief narrative what I want a contractor conducting a site assessment to
accomplish at Blue Ridge Landfill. The second section below summarized the thoughts I shared with Danny last week
regarding the TENORM/Processed TENORM disposal concerns and the path forward.
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to the determine
the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background radiation sources from an analysis
of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and
leachate. The RSSI will also include a spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and
soil samples to identify the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose
assessment of the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47 shipments of waste
from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure
~ pathways along with exposure pathway modeling with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on
skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide sources.

W9

All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated
during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from desigr,ate work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will be following
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas frorn organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics), ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International
Radiation Protection Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the above describe work.

Quality Assurance Plan

GP1188

i\!~!~i~!t~tfJi~S~iff!::~~1t~l~~~-~~r.~,ft~

HPS - Health Physics Society

,~~~~:x~:~~~tf:~
Waste characterization, remediation, disposal as appropriate

Ph~f'as~e~~mfipti]iriiit!fe~Alis~m~t:rJfi ______

QAPP (ou~iity As~~~~~~; Project-,;l~n) f~~~~J~t------- --------------~~-------------------------~---------

if~~~!ili,i?Alii:~i~it~i~iim~~i~~:~[~~~~rJ}i~~1{@~~~~~~0,~
i~~lud;

MARSSIM - provides technical guidance on conducting radiation surveys and site investigations (Radiological
Survey and Site Investigation Process)

11111ic~~~~1i',~1~[~~~

Equivalent dose to give an approximate measure of the biological effect of radiation

P}1fi~~Y-ix~1~6~]~jJ~_6~t(~~1~{!illB!~:l!f~~ffi/~I~!6!'ng:~wcfi~~e~tiPr1"
MARSAME surveys (equipment)

l~~~{fg~~s~t~1~~i~~~1roin:t~

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community (school)
exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed TENORM
waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the
establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward


Blue Ridge Landfill (NOV Items]

Violation for disposing of unpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested manifests in a timely manner.

Violation for not reporting the out of state TENO RN/Processed TE NORM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015 and two other additional companies have been identified as well as having waste received
out of state TENO RM waste by the landfill facility.
..

Blue Ridge Landfill (Action Items]


2

GP1189

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.

Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.

Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)

9'!.dfills Statewide

Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.

From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G /Fracking Activities.

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TE NORM and processed or concentrated TENO RM.

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TE NORM or processed
TENO RM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operator and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.

Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed .

~geP.Partri<fneJ~
~artment for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
3

GP1190

Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1191

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 6:00 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Rodney;
Please find below where I first summarize in a brief narrative what I want a contractor conducting a site assessment to
accomplish at Blue Ridge Landfill. The second section below summarized the thoughts I shared with Danny last week
regarding the TENORM/Processed TENORM disposal concerns and the path forward.
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to the determine
the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background radiation sources from an analysis
of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and
leachate. The RSSI will also include a spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and
soil samples to identify the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose
assessment of the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47 shipments of waste
from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure
. . . pathway.s a. long with exposure pathway modeling with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on
. . , - skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide sources.
.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated
during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from designate work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will be following
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas from organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics}, ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements}, IRPA (The International
Radiation Protection Association} and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program} for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan} will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the above describe work.

GP1192

~~wtlii!itil\tiiiiiii1~1~4a~1i!~:~~~;=~:~r.~i~ll

'

HPS - Health Physics Society

~I!~~tz~i~rlf~

Waste characterization, remediation, disposal as appropriate

Q~i?~!~~~~~{ffi~li!!~&~~!~[ci:9~!'~~~~XR'n --~------------------------ .----------------~~----~---~--~--- ---- Include a QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) for project

!lii~l6t~!~l~1J:'.i~~~lit~~t~iF~r~11:~~~1~~i~11m~j1~1
MARSSIM - provides technical guidance on conducting radiation surveys and site investigations (Radiological
Survey and Site Investigation Process)

~iitl~"',~::,~m~f~iJ!if!1~1l1~~B

Equivalent dose to give an approximate measure of the biological effect of radiation

~~Ifi~~1'~-~I!"~ij~Ji~~~i~~~~~fif~h!~f2~~~I'1Jt1(1t~tiivgailcf iriie~ti9n_-'
MARSAME surveys (equipment)

~t~~~~t~~ra~I~~Q~5~~~rm~-~i~

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community (school)
exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed TENORM
waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the
establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended by the Radioactive
Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward


Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items)

Violation for disposing of unpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested manifests in a timely manner.

Violation for not reporting the out of state TE NORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015 and two other additional companies have been identified as well as having waste received~
out of state TE NORM waste by the landfill facility.
..

Blue Ridge Landfill (Action Items)


2

GP1193

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Progr:am for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.

Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.

Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)

9'3ndfills Statewide

Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.

From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G /Fracking Activities.

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TENO RM or processed
TENO RM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operator and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.

Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed .

..-orne P. PartridiJe Jr.


~_partment for Environmental Protection

KY Division of Waste Management


200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
3

GP1194

Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

'

GP1195

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 6:30 PM
Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Maze, Rodney (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey {EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC)
RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Delivered: 2/22/2016 6:30 PM

Maze, Rodney (EEC)

Delivered: 2/22/2016 6:30 PM

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Delivered: 2/22/2016 6:30 PM

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Delivered: 2/22/2016 6:30 PM

Melton, Ken (EEC)

Delivered: 2/22/2016 6:30 PM

Rodney and Todd;


In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site survey for the Blue
Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and
requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the
website for NEFAP .

eviewed the web sites for each of the contract. ors, paying particular attention to how they described their services.
ok the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work experience in human health and
ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at
the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included the items that
Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:

NOV Items for Blue Ridge Landfill


Action Items for Blue Ridge Landfill
Statewide Landfill Activities to Address TE NORM on a statewide level.

It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content down to a few
words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience with radionuclides and have
historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career work. There is some over-lap between the respective
areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any other areas you
would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on the path forward
to address TE NO RM/Processed TE NORM disposal concerns facing our state .
..Amks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this area of concern

~red by us all.

GP1196

I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my cell phone and I
will return your call.
Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to the determine
the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background radiation sources from an analysis
of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and
leachate. The RSSI will also include a spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and
soil samples to identify the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose
assessment of the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47 shipments of waste
from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure
pathways along with exposure pathway modeling with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on
skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide sources.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated
during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will follow
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas from organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics), ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International
Radiation Protection Association) and the NEFAP {National Environmental Field Activities Program) for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP {Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items]

Violation for disposing of unpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested manifests in a timely manner.

Violation for not reporting the out of state TENORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015.

Blue Ridge Landfill [Action Items]

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
2

GP1197

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENO RM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section assoeiated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.

Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime ofthe
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.

Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)

Landfills Statewide

Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.

From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G /Fracking Activities.

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TENO RM or processed
TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENORM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operators and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.

Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed .

<george P. Partrirfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
~nkfort, KY 40601
~2) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1198

GP1199

Partridge, George (EEC)

~om:

~:

Sent:
Subject:

Maze, Rodney (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, February 22, 2016 6:45 PM
Read: RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Your message
To: Maze, Rodney (EEC)
Subject: RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 6:30:27 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 22, 2016 6:44:56 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

GP1200

Partridge, George (EEC)

'm:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, February 22, 2016 8:24 PM
Read: RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 6:30:27 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 22, 2016 8:24:01 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

11

GP1201

Partridge, George (EEC)

flam:

Maze, Rodney (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 10:47 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Melton, Ken
. (EEC)

Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Re: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward


im9ge001.gif

Rodney Maze

On Feb 22, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Rodney and Todd;

In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site
survey for the Blue Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive
Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive
Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the website for NEFAP .
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described
the"ir services. I took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work
experience in human health and ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the
activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included
the items that Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:

NOV Items for Blue Ridge Landfill


Action Items for Blue Ridge Landfill
Statewide Landfill Activities to Address TENORM on a statewide level.

It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content
down to a few words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience
with radionudides and have historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career
work. There is_some over-lap between the respective areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any
other areas you would like for me to research or address.

Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on
the path forward to address TENORM/Processed TENORM disposal concerns facing our state.
Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this
area of concern shared by us all.

GP1202

I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my
cell phone and I will return your call.
Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
-

- --

--

"---~--

,__

- --

A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to
the determine the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background
radiation sources from an analysis of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal
cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and leachate. The RSSI will also include a
spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and soil samples to identify
the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose assessment of
the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47
shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from
radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure pathways along with exposure pathway modeling
with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide
sources.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered
negative air containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne
contaminants generated during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from
designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors
will follow appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas
from organizations including, but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics),
ICRP (International Committee on Radiation Protection}, ICRU (International Commission on
Radiation Units and Measurements}, IRPA (The International Radiation Protection
Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for accreditation of
FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the
landfill that is part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge landfill [NOV Items]

Violation for disposing of unpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested manifests in a timely manner.

Violation for not reporting the out of state TENORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly
Waste Received Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between
the dates Of July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015.

Blue Ridge Landfill [Action Items)


2

GP1203

..

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the
cell {providing adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine
Processing from the time period of July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment
to determine the level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and
future worker/community {school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical
constituents present in the processed TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP
certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the establishment and
implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended
by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the
waste was received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since
the exposures they experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for
lung and other cancers in the future years.

Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the
lifetime of the employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site
assessment listed above. Also include all identified receptors including students and employees
at the school adjacent to and across the street from the entrance to the landfill.

Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in
place of the waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the
future use of the site and any potential disturbances to the waste. {This will potentially affect
the exposure plan for the landfill!)

Landfills Statewide

Conduct an internal review {Solid Waste Branch) ofthe "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for
all landfills in Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.

From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out
of state waste from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G
/Fracking Activities.

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that
have potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving
TENO RM or processed TENO RM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in
the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENORM, require a
contractor to conduct a screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe
for operators and no one is exposed to an unacceptable level of radiation.
-

'

Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.

GP1204

(jeorge P. PartrUfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1205

Partridge, George (EEC)

19'om:

Maze, Rodney (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 10:47 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Melton, Ken
(EEC)
Re: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

Rodney Maze

On Feb 22, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Rodney and Todd;
In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site
survey for the Blue Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive
Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive
Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the website for NEFAP.
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described
their services. I took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work
experience in human health and ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the
activities I would like to see the Contractors conduct at the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included
the items that Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:

NOV Items for Blue Ridge Landfill


Action Items for Blue Ridge Landfill
Statewide Landfill Activities to Address TENORM on a statewide level.

It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content
down to a few words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience
with radionuclides and have historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career
work. There is some over-lap between the respective areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any
other areas you would like for me to research or address.

I.-

Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on
the path forward to address TE NORM/Processed TE NORM disposal concerns facing our state.

Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this
area of concern shared by us all.

I
!

1
I

L_____

GP1206

I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my
cell phone and I will return your call.
Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor

site wm

- --A-Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSi) for the-fancffillproperty


be c(inductedto
the determine the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background
radiation sources from an analysis of underlying geology, The RSSI will include the waste disposal
cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and leachate. The RSSI will also include a
spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and soil samples to identify
the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose assessment of
the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47
shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from
radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure pathways along with exposure pathway modeling
with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide
sources.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered
negative.air containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne
contaminants generated during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from
designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors
will follow appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas
from organizations including, but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics),
ICRP {International Committee on Radiation Protection), ICRU {International Commission on
Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International Radiation Protection
Association) and the NEFAP {National Environmental Field Activities Program) for accreditation of
FSMOs {Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP {Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the
landfill that is part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items]

Violation for disposing of unpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested manifests in a timely manner .

Violation for not reporting the out of state TE NORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly
Waste Received Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between
the dates Of July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015.

Blue Ridge Landfill [Action Items]


2

GP1207

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the
cell (providing adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine
Processing from the time period of July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment
to determine the level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and
future worker/community (school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical
constituents present in the processed TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP
certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the establishment and
implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended
by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the
waste was received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since
the exposures they experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for
lung and other cancers in the future years.

Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the
lifetime of the employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site
assessment listed above. Also include all identified receptors including students and employees
at the school adjacent to and across the street from the entrance to the landfill.

Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in
place of the waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the
future use of the site and any f.JOtential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect
the exposure plan for the landfill!)

Landfills Statewide

Conduct an internal review {Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for
all landfills in Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.

From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out
of state waste from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G
/Fracking Activities.

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that
have potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving
TENO RM or processed TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in
the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TENORM/Processed TENO RM, require a
contractor to conduct a screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe
for operators and no one is exposed to an unacceptable level of radiation.

Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.

GP1208

<;iearae P. PartridiJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1209

Partridge, George (EEC)

flam:

Maze, Rodney (EEC)


Monday, February 22, 2016 10:50 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Melton, Ken
(EEC)
Re: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Can we discuss this on Thursday after the Blue Ridge Landfill meeting?
Rodney Maze

On Feb 22, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Rodney and Todd;
In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site
survey for the Blue Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive
Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive
Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the website for NEFAP.
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described
their services. I took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work
experience in human health and ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the
activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included
the items that Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:

NOV Items for Blue Ridge Landfill


Action Items for Blue Ridge landfill
Statewide Landfill Activities to Address TENO RM on a statewide level.

H is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content
down to a few words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience
with radionuclides and have historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career
work. There is some over-lap between the respective areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any
other areas you would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on
the path forward to address TENO RM/Processed TENO RM disposal concerns facing our state.

Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this
area of concern shared by us all.

I,

GP1210

I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my
cell phone and I will return your call.
Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
-~--=.....c_~--------------~--~--

---~-~---~---

- -

- o

---~-~---

~---;.-

--------

------

----

-=-

----

-------~o------

A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to
the determine the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background
radiation sources from an analysis of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal
cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and leachate. The RSSI will also include a
spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and soil samples to identify
the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose assessment of
the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47
shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from
radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure pathways along with exposure pathway modeling
with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide
sources.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered
negative air containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne
contaminants generated during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from
designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors
will follow appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas
from organizations including, but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics),
ICRP (International Committee on Radiation Protection), ICRU (International Commission on
Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International Radiation Protection
Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for accreditation of
FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the
landfill that is part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items]

Violation for disposing ofunpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested manifests in a timely manner .

Violation for not reporting the out of state TE NO RN/Processed TE NORM waste on Quarterly
Waste Received Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between
the.dates Of July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015.

Blue Ridge Landfill [Action Items]


2

GP1211

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the
cell (providing adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine
Processing from the time period of July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment
to determine the level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and
future worker/community (school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical
constituents present in the processed TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP
certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the establishment and
implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended
by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the
waste was received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since
the exposures they experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for
lung and other cancers in the future years.

Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the
lifetime of the employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site
assessment listed above. Also include all identified receptors including students and employees
at the school adjacent to and across the street from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in
place of the waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the
future use of the site and any potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect
the exposure plan forthe landfill!)

Landfills Statewide

Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for
all landfills in Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.

From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out
of state waste from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G
/Fracking Activities.

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that
have potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving
TENORM or processed TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in
the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TENORM/Processed TENORM, require a
contractor to conduct a screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe
for operators and no one is exposed to an unacceptable level of radiation.

Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.

GP1212

(jeorge P. Partricfae Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564;.6716 ext. 4651

GP1213

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Melton, Ken (EEC)


Tuesday, February 23, 2016 6:46 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: This week

George,
I can only tell you how I handled these "special" projects in the past, although none was as horrible or life altering as
this.
My advice to you is to ask Lindsey what he needs from you every Monday so that you can keep a rolling list. Also, make
note when you completed your assignments so that you can use it in your evals.
Then set aside the processed TENORM requests (send an email saying that you have assignments from your supervisor
that you must complete first and that you will get to them as soon as you can or have them contact Lindsey) till you have
finished what Lindsey wants done.
I would request to Lindsey and Danny that this TENO RM be placed on your work plan for this year as it looks like it will
not be handled by anyone else.
I'll be happy to say something to Danny if you would like.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:03 PM

To: Melton, Ken (EEC)


Subject: RE: This week
Hi Ken;
Thanks for being a friend and patient listener today as well as serving as my supervisor for this week.
I appreciate everyone listening patiently to my concerns regarding the disposal situation we are dealing with regarding
radioactive waste in our state.
As people respond I want to be supportive and help out in any way I can without neglecting my responsibilities regarding
our regular permitting and inspection activities.
I am happy to serve and be assigned to wherever I am most needed.
Thanks again for all the support you have expressed and your guidance.
Even though I am off tomorrow, please do not hesitate to call me anytime on my cell phone if a question or need arises .
e a nice day!
George
1

GP1214

From: Melton, Ken (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:49 AM
To: Nielsen, Jamie (EEC); Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC); Partridge, George
(EEC)
Cc: Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC)
Subject: This week
Good morning,
Danny,askedthat I be acting wllife,Gndsey is out this week.
George sent me the list that Lindsey sent out last week of projects to be worked on.
Let me know if you want to send a letter or permit out this week.
Otherwise, I should be here all week so let me know if you need anything or if I can help in anyway.
Thanks,

Ken

GP1215

Partridge, George (EEC)

,,!m:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Tuesday, February 23, 2016 10:43 AM
Partridge, George (EEC); Maze, Rodney (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC)
RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

George,
Thanks.
This is very good and very thorough, in my opinion. It is hard for me to add anything. I may be able to help regarding
geological issues with the site survey, however.
The only thing that I would like to see added would be specifics regarding enhanced groundwater, surface water, and
leachate monitoring for an expanded list of parameters based on the waste analysis. This monitoring could be either
short- or long-term (or both). It may be best to do this when the site survey is complete.
Regarding worker health, safety, and medical monitoring, I think you are completely correct. The only problem is that
we may not have the authority to do that within the context of a solid waste permit. We may need to talk to Daniel
about that.
~haps OSHA or CHFS need to pursue worker safety and health issues, but we need to ask them to figure out who has
~ biggest legal or regulatory stick regarding those matters.

Regards,
Todd

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 6:30 PM
To: Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Maze, Rodney (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC)
Subject: RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward
Rodney and Todd;
In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site survey for the Blue
Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and
requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the
website for NEFAP.

I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described their services.
took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work experience in human health and
ogical risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at

Blue Ridge Landfill.

GP1216

The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included the items that
Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:

NOV Items for Blue Ridge Landfill


Action Items for Blue Ridge Landfill
Statewide Landfill Activities to Address TENO RM on a statewide level.

It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content down to a few
words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience with radionuclides and have
____ his:tQricalh1fQcusedon_chemicaLrnn.tamirij:u1t_s dL.Jringmy car~er wPrk. .. Tb~r.e issQJllE!_Qy~r:la_p l:>etw.e~n.tt:\gr~fill~_c;!iy~ .
areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any other areas you
would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on the path forward
to address TENO RM/Processed TENORM disposal concerns facing our state.
Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this area of concern
shared by us all.

I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my cell phone and I
will return your call.
Thanks again!

George
Cell: 859-221-8843

Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor

A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to the determine
the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background radiation sources from an analysis
of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and
leachate. The RSSI will also include a spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and
soil samples to identify the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose
assessment of the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47 shipments of waste
from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure
pathways along with exposure pathway modeling with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on
skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide sources.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated
during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will follow
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas from organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics), ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
....
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International
..
Radiation Protection Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
2

GP1217

A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the abo~e describe work .

Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward


Blue Ridge landfill [NOV Items]

Violation for disposing of unpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested manifests in a timely manner.

Violation for not reporting the out of state TE NO RN/Processed TENORM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015.

Blue Ridge landfill [Action Items]

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.

Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.

Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)

Landfills Statewide

Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G /Fracking Activities.

GP1218

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TE NORM or processed . .
TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operators and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.

Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.

(jeorge P. Partridge Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

..
4

GP1219

To:

Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. ln'my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
. h o w this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ur~anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1220

To:

Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
~ool and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.

WI!"

Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govI dph/ radioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~anted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

UnafliiJ/S~.
IY;t,'4.-~r..Y
r1At11Ar1m~11iJU.lf.!

GP1221

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:
Cc:

Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:16 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
FW: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

G. Weems:
Do you have any reliable information that this material from Fairmont brine was used as a daily cover material? Or is the
site denying that is was used for that purpose? See below ....

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENO RM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
~getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TE NORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.

9111'

Thanks,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
502-564-1492

ail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http :ljwww.chfs.ky .govId ph/rad ioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
1

GP1222

To:

Subject:

Lindsey & Debbie Briggs <ldbriggs@bellsouth.net>


Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
TENO RM

George,
Any progress at Blue Ridge?
Lindsey

GP1223

Partridge, George (EEC)


. .m:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:07 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

Do not know right now. When we get the manifests we can total it up and according to Dan Fleshour, those won't be
here until Friday (probably) but he'll hand deliver them. George has the figures so far on the Fairmont Brine TENORM
and Green Hunter and knows what he's looking for. Last time I heard of TENO RM was back in the early 90's when they
were trying to scrap "hot" metal. I think George is trying to figure out the Marion County source. Marion County Ohio
is North of Columbus. Blue Ridge disposed 755 tons of "Marion" alternate daily cover (listed under Kentucky counties)
during the third quarter 2015 and Marion County OH has a website devoted to fracking locations in Marion County. I
don't know why Marion county KY would bypass Benson Valley to go to Blue Ridge. Noble Ohio (on the WQR) is a really
large scale fracking area about 30 miles from Pennsylvania and they disposed of 86 tons of "alternate daily cover". It's

.!~~D}E.!!1.~.~gh_;__L~~~-~_u_pJ_~ a~~~-~~~~!!i'!:: . . .~.~-~.~. ~.!~~-~~L th~.. ~.~~~~~i~-~-~-!.~~- ~-~E!~E~.L~.~a,-~I-~?-~.~!i?.~~.:_. --- . ---


From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12: 16 PM
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: FW: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

G. Weems:
you have any reliable information that this material from Fairmont brine was used as a daily cover material? Or is the
site denying that is was used for that purpose? See below ....

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Hello gentlemen,

Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take Jong to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
.endent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
ble to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
1

GP1224

Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621

. CJ~L291:~~64-I[Q_O ~JSL4_i?~
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

V.ou~
IEt.fJ!J_.
..Y
f'.AD1ATiot,~AH~t:n1

GP1225

Partridge, George (EEC)

om:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:42 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Alternate daily cover, Marion

You did notice that 47-16 ton loads could logically explain the 756 tons alternate daily cover for "Marion". They'd have
to use the equivalent to a coal hauling trailer. I can't imagine them hauling a roll off down to the BR Landfill.

GP1226

--~-~

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:45 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday

Is there likely to be anything tomorrow you'll need me for? I'm going to do some Hazardous waste inspections in
between our sessions on the landfill.

GP1227

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:14 AM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: Wednesday

George;
Danny and Ken are having me get caught up on permit reviews that were put on hold while I worked on the TENORM
concerns.
We can take this opportunity to get caught up on our regular work.
Thank you and have a nice day!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:45 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Wednesday
Is there likely to be anything tomorrow you'll need me for? I'm going to do some Hazardous waste inspections in
- w e e n our sessions on the landfill.

GP1228

Partridge, George (EEC)

.Aom:
.-;:nt:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:19 AM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: Alternate daily cover, Marion

George;
Yes I noticed this. But I am pushing the point that Billy keeps denying that can be the waste since he would never use it
as alternate daily cover.
Based on what we observed at the site on our survey measurements and on the soil sample - the contamination is
widespread and on the surface of the landfill.
Either way, the waste was not documented accurately.
I also saw only 1.24 tons of wastes from the Norwich, Ohio area and multiple firms are shipping that waste to Kentucky
for disposal at Blue Ridge. Billy and Dan have been withholding that information which would likely confirm additional
waste was not reported.
I want to see an NOV for not reporting the waste on the Quarterly Waste Received Report form.
I also totaled the cubic yards reported and that would indicate an amount significantly above the 756 tons.
9'orgeP.

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:42 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Alternate daily cover, Marion
You did notice that 47-16 ton loads could logically explain the 756 tons alternate daily cover for "Marion". They'd have
to use the equivalent to a coal hauling trailer. I can't imagine them hauling a roll off down to the BR Landfill.

GP1229

Partridge, George (EEC)

aAom:
To:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:24 AM
'Lindsey & Debbie Briggs'

Subject:

RE: TENORM

..-;:mt:

Lindsey;
Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
Have a nice week!
George
-----Original Message----From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: TENORM

1-orge,

Any progress at Blue Ridge?


Lindsey

GP1230

Partridge, George (EEC)

;~~:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:29 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

Danny;
This radiation levels we measured on the surface of the cell were fairly uniform with two areas slightly
elevated. Surface soil samples taken in the ice and snow that were analyzed on a wet basis showed levels of pCi/g at
6+. On a dry basis the levels would have been much higher.
There is every indication, based on both the Quarterly Quantity Waste Received Reports and what we observed at the
site that there is surface soil contaminated with TENORM.
George

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:16 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: FW: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
aii..weems:
~you have any reliable information that this material from Fairmont brine was used as a daily cover material? Or is the
site denying that is was used for that purpose? See below ....

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TE NORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
Mndent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TE NORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
1

GP1231

on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street

~~il~t?_ll_~~1C-,L\__ __ ___
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky,gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Vn(U~
~t.~.-. .V
P.>\tiJ,l\TlO'N~H~AtlH

GP1232

Partridge, George (EEC)


. .m:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge; George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:41 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Blue Ridge Landfill - Address.docx

Curt;
The waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was received from July into November. Please see an aerial view of the school
across the street. There are athletic facilities. There was potential site contamination from windblown dust. The trucks
enter and leave across the street from the school.
When you see the size of the public facilities across from the landfill, we need to consider the exposure of those that
used the facilities and offices during the entire exposure period.
Company management including the landfill operator have been withholding information from us that they are legally
required to submit and telling our management what was reported on the forms is different than the records that have
been provided to us.
I plan to work with our field office inspectors to develop an on-site exposure scenario.
- a n c e d Disposal who manages Blue Ridge has been obstructing our investigation on what happened.

Thank you,

George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Hello gentlemen,

Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENO RM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS .
given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
iculate
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was

being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
1

GP1233

be able to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the&..
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
....
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
- ~~DJUC~YE~~-@JJQ11li~~lth ~-r<li:ish _
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Va~---~
1w.d!JJ_:!I
f'.ftl.t1t\T!ON&H~Jli1.:n1

GP1234

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:44 AM
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Todd;
Thank you,
George

From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 10:43 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Maze, Rodney (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC)

Subject:

RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

George,
Thanks.
This is very good and very thorough, in my opinion. It is hard for me to add anything. I may be able to help regarding
-logical issues with the site survey, however.
The only thing that I would like to see added would be specifics regarding enhanced groundwater, surface water, and
leachate monitoring for an expanded list of parameters based on the waste analysis. This monitoring could be either
short- or long-term (or both). It may be best to do this when the site survey is complete.
Regarding worker health, safety, and medical monitoring, I think you are completely correct. The only problem is that
we may not have the authority to do that within the context of a solid waste permit. We may need to talk to Daniel
about that.
Perhaps OSHA or CHFS need to pursue worker safety and health issues, but we need to ask them to figure out who has
the biggest legal or regulatory stick regarding those matters.
Regards,
Todd

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 6:30 PM


To: Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Maze, Rodney (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC)

lject:

RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

.Rodney and Todd;

GP1235

In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site survey for the Blue
Ridge landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and
requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the . . .
website for NEFAP.
~
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described their services. I
took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work experience in human health and
ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at
the Blue Ridge landfill.
i
I

--

-.~.-

.. ~----~~~~-

""-=~----~~~--------

-------

----=---- ;---'---'-.--'---~=~-----~--"~.,>.----~'--"~--~--

--------=--~- ----

The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have includecTthe items that-~
Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:

NOV Items for Blue Ridge landfill


Action Items for Blue Ridge landfill
Statewide landfill Activities to Address TENORM on a statewide level.

It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise1 edit, or delete the content down to a few
words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience with radionuclides and have
historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career work. There is some over-lap between the respective
areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any other areas you
would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on the path forward
to address TENORM/Processed TE NORM disposal concerns facing our state.

Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this area of concern
shared by us all.
I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my cell phone and I

will return your call.


Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843

Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor


A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to the determine
the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background radiation sources from an analysis
of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and
leachate. The RSSI will also include a spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and
soil samples to identify the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose
assessment of the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47 shipments of waste
from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal. radiation dosimetry from radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure.
pathways along with exposure pathway modeling with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on
skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide sources.

GP1236

All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated

. . during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will foHow
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas from organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics), ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International
Radiation Protection Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items)

Violation for disposing of unpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested manifests in a timely manner .

Violation for not reporting the out of state TENORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015.

: - e Ridge Landfill [Action Items]

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.

Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.

GP1237

Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!}

Landfills Statewide

Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch} of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.

_ ErQ!Jl_r~yie~of "Q!Jarterly \N_aste quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have receivedout of state waste
from- cou-nti~s-o-~-areast-hatar~~kno"11~-as-regio-ns having-high-le-vels -ofo& G/Fracklng7~ctfvfties:- -~-- --

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016) from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TENO RM or processed
TE NORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016).

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operators and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.

Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.

(ieorge P. PartridtJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1238

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:45 AM
Maze, Rodney (EEC)
RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rodney;
Thursday would be great!
Thank you!
George

From: Maze, Rodney (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:50 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC)
Subject: Re: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward

Can we discuss this on Thursday after the Blue Ridge Landfill meeting?
Rodney Maze

On Feb 22, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Rodney and Todd;
In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site
survey for the Blue Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive
Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive
Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the website for NEFAP.
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described
their services. 1. took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work
experience in hurnan health and ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the
activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included
the items that Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:

NOV Items for Blue Ridge Landfill


Action Items for Blue Ridge Landfill
Statewide Landfill Activities to Address TENO RM on a statewide level.

It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content
down to a few words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience
with radionuclides and have historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career
work. There is some over-lap between the respective areas. I value you input.
1

GP1239

Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any
other areas you would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on
the path forward to address TENO RM/Processed TENO RM disposal concerns facing our state.
Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this
area of concern shared by us all.
-~ -~..-.--------~-~-

-- ----

~-~----~- --~.

--~-"-"--"--"-~~-o ..~~-

---

------ ----"---'--

---

--

1will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call m~e anyffme.on rn~y~

.... ~--~

cell phone and I will return your call.


Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843

Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor


A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to
the determine the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background
radiation sources from an analysis of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal
cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and leachate. The RSSI will also include a
spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and soil samples to identify
the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose assessment of
the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47
shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from
radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure pathways along with exposure pathway modeling
with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide
sources.

All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered
negative air containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne
contaminants generated during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from
designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors
will follow appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas
from organizations including, but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics),
ICRP (International Committee on Radiation Protection), ICRU (International Commission on
Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International Radiation Protection
Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for accreditation of
FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the
landfill that is part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items]
2

GP1240

--------------

-------

Violation for disposing of unpermitted waste in landfill

Violation for refusal to provided requested manifests in a timely manner.

Violation for not reporting the out of state TENO RN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly
Waste Received Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between
the dates Of July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015.

Blue Ridge Landfill [Action Items)

Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the
cell (providing adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine
Processing from the time period of July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.

Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment
to dete.rmine the level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and
future worker/community (school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical
constituents present in the processed TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP
certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the establishment and
implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended
by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.

Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the
waste was received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since
the exposures they experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for
lung and other cancers in the future years.

Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the
lifetime of the employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site
assessment listed above. Also include all identified receptors including students and employees
at the school adjacent to and across the street from the entrance to the landfill.

Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in
place of the waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the
future use of the site and any potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect
the exposure plan for the landfill!)

Landfills Statewide

Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for
all landfills in Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.

From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out
of state waste from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G
/Fracking Activities.

Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that
have potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.

GP1241

If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving
TENO RM or processed TENO RM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in
the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016).

For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENORM, require a
contractor to conduct a screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe
for operators and no one is exposed to an unacceptable level of radiation.

Based on the results above, develop a .plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.

(jear9e P. Partritfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1242

Partridge, George (EEC)

#_om:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:52 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill

Curt;
Should someone like OSHA, etc. look into the protection and well-being of the operators that handled and managed the
TENO RM waste from Ohio and the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing?
The.operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?
Look forward to your guidance and feedback .

ankyou,
George

{ieorge P. PartrUfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1243

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:57 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Garrity, Patrick (EEC)
FW: KY Landfill Concern

Sent:

To:
Cc:
Subject:

For your information.


I was attempting to learn more about the shipments we have been receiving from Ohio since Advanced Disposal has not
provided that information to us.
George

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 2:12 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us;
Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us; Rebecca.Fugitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh .oh io.gov
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern

.e

George,

appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.


As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas industry waste
substance facility).
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority over the Oil and Gas
Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website.
We met Tim Stapleton from Pressure Tech as well as Cory Hoskins from BES, LLC or BES Technical Solutions, LLC or
Advanced TENORM Services, LLC.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this facility, but the
planning fell through when the site's owner passed away.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it down last Friday. He's getting questions, but admitted ;'it'sjust a
website" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskins if he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr. Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he backed away
from pursuing it.
Currently, I do not have much on Fairmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's Beth Pratt and
Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

.,ree,.

-;?lefme,z

Program Administrator

GP1244

Ohio Department of Health


Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611

h.
.
.
0 .._.IG

t>opattment of Haallh

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:36 PM
To: Helmer, Stephen <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC) <Tony.Hatton@ky.gov>; Maybriar, Jon (EEC) <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>; Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

<Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>

Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern


Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments ofTENORM to our
landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of Cory Hoskins associated with
Advanced TENORM Services (also associated with BES, LLC and BES Technical Solutions, LLC) and his activities
surrounding shipments of out of state TENO RM to Kentucky.
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have attached that to
this email message.
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our situation and the
investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:

./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TENORM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory of Advanced
TENO RM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's brother. Cory is standing in the
doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive
Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was disposed of at Blue
Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KV)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine Processing .
./ Analytical results from Advanced TE NORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who manages Green
Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the TENO RM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TENO RM here in Kentucky. We
believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at the Blue Ridge
landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey and sampling protocol in the
future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to the
management of TE NORM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the operators and manage.
of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.

GP1245

------

--------------~

Thank you again,


~incerely,

~eorge
{ieorge P. PartridfJe Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q..'EP
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:07 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
Hi George,
.ease send what you can to better understand your concerns.

Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section

614-728-3611

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

GP1246

Partridge, George (EEC)

-m:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:58 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Thank you George for the status update. I am disappointed and quite frankly surprised to learn that the landfill
operator, Advanced Disposal Solutions, has been reluctant to provide requested information and going so far as to
obstruct your investigation. When we met with Mr. Dan Fleshour, East Region Compliance Manager for ADS at our
office here in Frankfort, he seemed genuinely concerned about the health and welfare of his employees at Blue Ridge
Landfill who may have been exposed both externally and internally from this Fairmont Brine waste. But now that we
know it took from July to November to deplete this FBP wastes as alternate daily cover, we can at least derive a rough
estimate as to the time frame. Knowing the working conditions of the land fill employees (e.g. how did they spread the
cover, did they spend time on the cover after spreading, how many hours a week did they work, etc.) we can at least
begin to build a model for the worst case scenario conditions for their dosimetric evaluation. The experts at REAC/TS will
most definitely be a resource we can lean on. If you and your team are going to be making another site visit to Irving to
talk to ADS employees, please let me know and I will send an inspector along as well to help in the investigation.
Thanks again for all your help.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
tucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502~564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
V.D~

..

'A

l\f:!t..'Y ........ ' .


fclAf:tiA1JON.}JJMt. 'rH
From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:41 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Cc: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure


Curt;

~waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was received from July into November. Please see an aerial view of the school

~ss the street.

There are athletic facilities. There was potential site contamination from windblown dust. The trucks
enter and leave across the street from the school.
1

GP1247

- - -

-----

- -

When you see the size of the public facilities across from the landfill, we need to consider the exposure of those that
used the facilities and offices during the entire exposure period.
Company management including the landfill operator have been withholding information from us that they are legally
required to submit and telling our management what was reported on the forms is different than the records that have
been provided to us.

I plan to work with our field office inspectors to develop an on-site exposure scenario.
---- Advanced Disposal who manages Blue Ridgehasbeen obstructing our investigation on what happened.
Thank you,
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. ~
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations o'f9"
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov

Website: http:f/www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
2

GP1248

Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/


Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/

e o.f. u.n.!'a. nted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

tulJt:~
.
. ~-,..Y
T'J\tll/.\ilt>Fat-t!EJU.:fH

GP1249

To:

Subject:

Lindsey & Debbie Briggs <ldbriggs@bellsouth.net>


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re:TENORM

Has there been an acceptance of authority by someone?


Lindsey

>On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:

>
>Lindsey;

>
>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.

>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.

>
>Have a nice week!

>
.George
> -----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: TENO RM

>
>George,

>
>Any progress at Blue Ridge?

>
>Lindsey

GP1250

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:34 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Hello George,
My go to person in KY OSH is Ms. Kristi Redmond. If there are potential OSHA concerns regarding PPE, Kristi would know.
Kristi Redmon, CIH CSP
Health Standards Specialist
Kentucky Labor Cabinet
1047 US Highway 127 South Ste. 4
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3504
Kristi. Red mon@ky.gov
www.kylabor.gov
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
.ervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx

Vnu

~~t/!J-.w:!l

f'Ji.tlltfflO:f\l/A.MEAt.TH

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:52 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Subject: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill


Curt;
. u l d someone like OSHA, etc. look into the protection and well-being of the operators that handled and managed the
TENORM waste from Ohio and the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing?
1

GP1251

The operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?

Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. PartridfJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1252

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:39 AM
Pendergrass, Curt {CHFS DPH)
RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

Curt;
We should interview the operators at the site.
Also if it was used for alternate daily cover each load was spread and moved serval times over a multiple day period as
additional waste was received at the landfill. That means 47 days accepting the waste with increased number of days of
exposure time.
Mr. Fleshour stated to our management that all Advanced Disposal was told was that the waste was only "soil and
debris."
The waste Profile Sheets that the operator at the landfill gave stated the following:
"Name of Waste 0 & E Exploration and Production Waste Solids and Debris" (Solids, not soil)
"Process of Generating Waste Oil and Gas Production and Exploration Soil and Filter Socks - Exempt"
"Special Handling Instruction or Other Waste Data Waste Exempt per 40 CFR 261.4(b)(S

also in the meeting mentioned requirements that Advanced Disposal has to meet in PA regarding TENORM. Surely
he knows what "Filter Socks" refers to as well as the exemption cited.

I'

Dan also has asked me to provide him a list of the companies we are investigating for his reference, while at the same
time he is withholding the requested manifest for the landfill activities.

The day that Chris and I visited Advanced TENROM Services in West Liberty, Rodney Maze and I paid an unannounced
visit that afternoon to Republic's Green Valley Landfill in the Ashland area. Within three hours after arrival, we left there
with all the copies of the manifests we requested and received full cooperation from Republic.
Advanced Disposal would not show or provide any of the manifests the day Chris, George Weems and I made a site visit
there. We got some manifests for Fairmont Brine since then, but they are withholding information on the other
companies that the operator informed us that were shipping TENO RM waste from Ohio. This is a violation and deserves
an NOV!
When we do get the records I am concerned that they will not be complete and I will never know what was not
submitted since we already know the Quarterly Waste Received Reports did not report the waste disposed of at the
landfill. I will have nothing to check it against.
When we visit landfills unannounced, they are required to produce records as requested for the last three years at our
request for our inspection. The reason for not putting in a request is to prevent them from alternating the records
before they are provided to us to hide a concern from our investigation .
. .anced Disposal is not cooperating with us. If I remember correctly, Dan said their lawyers were contacted the day
we were at the site when they learned the reason for our site visit. Why haven't they addressed the workers? The
morning I visited the site and requested the manifest, Billy told me he put in a call to upper management after we {Chris,
1

GP1253

George, Arline, and I) went out to survey the site. Later in the day Billy the operator refused to give me any
records. Was that a result of the lawyers that were contacted the same day according to Dan? An NOV for not
providing that information is nothing compared to the legal ramifications those records might show and the resulting

liabilities.

We are up against a major waste disposal corporation that is nationwide and have operations in states that regulate
TE NORM. They are not cooperating and we may never know the full story. If it was not for Jason Frame in West Virginia
sharing information about the shipment and Cory Hoskins admitting it to us when we met with him, the records that
Advanced Disposal reported on their required waste reports to our Division would have never indicated what they have
... done.
Thank you again for all you are doing!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:58 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Thank you George for the status update. I am disappointed and quite frankly surprised to learn that the landfill
operator, Advanced Disposal Solutions, has been reluctant to provide requested information and going so far as to
obstruct your investigation. When we met with Mr. Dan Fleshour, East Region Compliance Manager for ADS at our
office here in Frankfort, he seemed genuinely concerned about the health and welfare of his employees at Blue Ridge
Landfill who may have been exposed both externally and internally from this Fairmont Brine waste. But now that we
know it took from July to November to deplete this FBP wastes as alternate daily cover, we can at least derive a rough
estimate as to the time frame. Knowing the working conditions of the land fill employees (e.g. how did they spread the
cover, did they spend time on the cover after spreading, how many hours a week did they work, etc.) we can at least
begin to build a model for the worst case scenario conditions for their dosimetric evaluation. The experts at REAC/TS will
most definitely be a resource we can lean on. If you and your team are going to be making another site visit to Irving to
talk to ADS employees, please let me know and I will send an inspector along as well to help in the investigation.

Thanks again for all your help.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un_!Vanted sources http:/lwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

z..'.

n."tZJ!~'!S,

r41.ti!ATlv~AH~.t1H
2

GP1254

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:41 AM


Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

e!

Curt;
The waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was received from July into November. Please see an aerial view of the school
across the street. There are athletic facilities. There was potential site contamination from windblown dust. The trucks
enter and leave across the street from the school.
When you see the size of the public facilities across from the landfill, we need to consider the exposure of those that
used the facilities and offices during the entire exposure period.
Company management including the landfill operator have been withholding information from us that they are legally
required to submit and telling our management what was reported on the forms is different than the records that have
been provided to us.
I plan to work with our field office inspectors to develop an on-site exposure scenario.
Advanced Disposal who manages Blue Ridge has been obstructing our investigation on what happened.
Thank you,

____

George
..

,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,

_____,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,,, "'''"~-"'~-'"''"'"''''''-

'""'''''"''"''''"''"'''""'

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENO RM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
.......ool and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
~ow this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
3

GP1255

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
. E~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov.
Website: http://.www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

'Yaa*-U~

~~.t.i<~ni,
:r-.AnJt.moN,J.:1~.t.~rn

GP1256

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:40 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill

Hi Curt;
Are you going to follow up with her or do we contact her?
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:34 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill
Hello George,
My go to person in KY OSH is Ms. Kristi Redmond. If there are potential OSHA concerns regarding PPE, Kristi would know .

Kristi Redmon, CIH CSP


Health Standards Specialist
Kentucky Labor Cabinet
1047 US Highway 127 South Ste. 4
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3504
Kristi.Redmon@ky.gov
www.kylabor.gov

Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
otified o.f propo. sed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
ose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
..

Unn..~

~t."lyj_:!J

~Att!J\fi!J:ttHMLTM
1

GP1257

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:52 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill
Curt;
Sh_()~l~soin_eone~ike OSH~, etc. lo()~ i~_t() th~_pr()tection and well-being ofthe_()f>erator~ tha_t handled and mariag~~_!h~
TENORM waste from Ohio and the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing?

The operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?
Look forward to your guidance and feedback.
Thank you,

George

<george P. Partritfge Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1258

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:41 AM
'Lindsey & Debbie Briggs'
RE: TENORM

Lindsey;
Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.
George
-----Original Message----From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM
Has there been an acceptance of authority by someone?
Lindsey

. n Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:

>
>Lindsey;

>
>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.

>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.

>
> Have a nice week!

>
>George

>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: TENORM

>
>George,

>
>Any progress at Blue Ridge?
ndsey

GP1259

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:55 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill

Feel free to give her a call George. I am up to my neck dealing with other fires at the moment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govId ph/radioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~r:.wan~ed sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~P!'JIJ), '
~"'Z~0')'~,H!AL'l'M
From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:40 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill
Hi Curt;
Are you going to follow up with her or do we contact her?
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:34 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill
Hello George,
- g o to person in KY OSH is Ms. Kristi Redmond. If there are potential OSHA concerns regarding PPE, Kristi would know.
Kristi Redmon, CIH CSP
Health Standards Specialist
1

GP1260

Kentucky Labor Cabinet


1047 US Highway 127 South Ste. 4
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3504
Kristi.Redmon@ky.gov
www.kylabor.gov
Regards,
CYrLPend~rgrnss PhD~..

Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section


Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

z.'Aidfl ,;,?;r~

~~j!';;C..~

fW.OJ,tfi"IO'NJ1i!AI.. r.H

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:52 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill
Curt;

Should someone like OSHA, etc. look into the protection and well-being of the operators that handled and managed the
TENORM waste from Ohio and the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing?
The operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?
Look forward to your guidance and feedback.

..

Thank you,
George

<;ieorge P. PartrUfge Jr.


2

GP1261

Department for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
00 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
ankfort, KY 40601
( 02) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1262

Partridge, George (EEC)

'5:.,;,=

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:10 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill

To:

Subject:

Curt;
I will be glad to!
I just want to be sure what we pursue within our Division observes and respected the authority and areas that your
Branch and cabinet address and that specifically whatever I am involved with, that you are informed and in agreement.
It is a pleasure to know and work on this with you. I want all that I do to compliment all that you are doing and that I
move forward appropriately.
Thapks again for everything!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:55 AM

..l/I.= Partridge, George (EEC)


~ Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Subject: RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill


Feel free to give her a call George. I am up to my neck dealing with other fires at the moment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww .chfs.ky .gov Id ph/radioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

m:

e!

~.

Partridge, George (EEC)

t: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:40 AM

To.

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Subject: RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill


1

GP1263

Hi Curt;
Are you going to follow up with her or do we contact her?
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:34 AM


. - To: .ear:tridge,.George {EEC) .
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

_.. ~ ..

Subject: RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill


Hello George,
My go to person in KY OSH is Ms. Kristi Redmond. If there are potential OSHA concerns regarding PPE, Kristi would know.
Kristi Redmon, CIH CSP
Health Standards Specialist
Kentucky Labor Cabinet
1047 US Highway 127 South Ste. 4
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3504
Kristi.Redmon@kv.gov
www.kylabor.gov

Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~~
l(rpJii!!J
P.A~J.l.\noraHif:1LTH

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:52 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Subject: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill


Curt;

GP1264

Should someone like OSHA, etc. look into the protection and well-being of the operators that handled and managed the
TENORM waste from Ohio and the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing?

f l i e operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?
Look forward to your guidance and feedback.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. PartridfJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1265

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:11 AM
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
FW: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill

Todd;
When you are available, let' make a conference call to the individual that Curt has referred us to.
Thank you,
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:55 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill
Feel free to give her a call George. I am up to my neck dealing with other fires at the moment.
~rt Pendergrass PhD
~ervisor, Radioactive Materials Section

Kentucky Radiation Health Branch


275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Ken . ~)
.

. :~"1ii

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:40 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill
lurt;

Are you going to follow up with her or do we contact her?


George
1

GP1266

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:34 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill
Hello George,

Kristi Redmon, CIH CSP


Health Standards Specialist
Kentucky Labor Cabinet
1047 US Highway 127 South Ste. 4
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3504
Kristi.Redmon@ky.gov
www .kylabor.gov
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~"~nted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kt!J!ll~
r~ttlATltiNH~it~rn
From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:52 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Subject: RE: Protecting LF Operators at Blue Ridge Landfill


Curt;
Should someone like OSHA, etc. look into the protection and well-being of the operators that handled and managed the
TENO RM waste from Ohio and the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing?
The operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.

GP1267

-----

----

--

---------

I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.

# o has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?


Who needs to be contacted?
Look forward to your guidance and feedback.
Thank you,
George

~eorgeP.PartridgeJ~
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1268

Partridge, George (EEC)


m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:42 AM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maze, Rodney
(EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
RE: Blue Ridge Follow Up Meeting on Thursday, February 25th

Jon;
Please include Todd Hendricks and Jamie Nielsen in the meeting for this Thursday to follow up with Blue Ridge.
Todd has met with the DPH on this matter with me and is very informed and knowledgeable concerning all that has
taken place. His expertise on NORM/TENO RM and the geology of the site will be extremely important as we move
forward.
Jamie brings a wealth of understanding of the regulatory process and the actions we can take to facilitate getting the
information that has been withheld from us by Advanced Disposal that is hindering the investigation and in the
meantime placing more individuals at risk.
I am feeling overwhelmed by all that has happened and the lives (operators, community, school) that will be potentially
shortened and adversely affected by the exposures resulting from the disposal of an unpermitted radioactive waste in a
~dfill. The latency period between exposure and quantifiable health effects is typically 10-40 years dependent on the
~ of the individual when the exposure first occurred (age affects cell replication rate and impact on DNA damage
leading to increased cases of lung and bone cancers).
It would be very helpful if those I work with and provide guidance and help on a daily basis are included as we move
forward with the project to address Blue Ridge Landfill and Advanced Disposal.
Thank you for considering my request!
George

(jeorge P. PartridiJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1269

rom:
, Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:48 AM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Blue Ridge Follow Up Meeting on Thursday, February 25th

Jon;
Thank you so much!
Hope your day goes well!
George

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:47 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maze, Rodney (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC);
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: Re: Blue Ridge Follow Up Meeting on Thursday, February 25th
George
a9ase invite them and anyone else that needs to be in the meeting
~nt from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@kv.gov> wrote:
Jon;
Please include Todd Hendricks and Jamie Nielsen in the meeting for this Thursday to follow up with Blue
Ridge.
Todd has met with the DPH on this matter with me and is very informed and knowledgeable concerning
all that has taken place. His expertise on NORM/TE NORM and the geology of the site will be extremely
important as we move forward.
Jamie brings a wealth of understanding of the regulatory process and the actions we can take to
facilitate getting the information that has been withheld from us by Advanced Disposal that is hindering
the investigation and in the meantime placing more individuals at risk.
I am feeling overwhelmed by all that has happened and the lives (operators, community, school) that
will be potentially shortened and adversely affected by the exposures resulting from the disposal of an
unpermitted radioactive waste in a landfill. The latency period between exposure and quantifiable
health effects is typically 10 - 40 years dependent on the age of the individual when the exposure first
occurred (age affects cell replication rate and impact on DNA damage leading to increased cases of lung
and bone cancers).
It would be very helpful if those I work with and provide guidance and help on a daily basis are included
as we move forward with the project to address Blue Ridge Landfill and Advanced Disposal.
1

GP1270

Thank you for considering my request!


George

<;jeorge P. Partrirge Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
. Erankf.oit, KYAOfiOJ ~~
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image001.gif>

GP1271

Partridge, George (EEC)

',,om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject:
Attachments:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 10:47 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maze, Rodney
(EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Re: Blue Ridge Follow Up Meeting on Thursday, February 25th
imageOOl.gif

George
Please invite them and anyone else that needs to be in the meeting
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Jon;
Please include Todd Hendricks and Jamie Nielsen in the meeting for this Thursday to follow up with Blue
Ridge.
Todd has met with the DPH on this matter with me and is very informed and knowledgeable concerning
all that has taken place. His expertise on NORM/TE NORM and the geology of the site will be extremely
important as we move forward.
Jamie brings a wealth of understanding of the regulatory process and the actions we can take to
facilitate getting the information that has been withheld from us by Advanced Disposal that is hindering
the investigation and in the meantime placing more individuals at risk.
I am feeling overwhelmed by all that has happened and the lives (operators, community, school) that
will be potentially shortened and adversely affected by the exposures resulting from the disposal of an
unpermitted radioactive waste in a landfill. The latency period between exposure and quantifiable
health effects is typically 10 - 40 years dependent on the age of the individual when the exposure first
occurred (age affects cell replication rate and impact on DNA damage leading to increased cases of lung
and bone cancers).
It would be very helpful if those I work with and provide guidance and help on a daily basis are included
as we move forward with the project to address Blue Ridge Landfill and Advanced Disposal.
Thank you for considering my request!
George

(jeorge P. PartridiJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
1

GP1272

FW: Blue Ridge follow-up meeting


202B
Start:
Show Time As:

Thu 2/25/2016 2:00 PM


Thu 2/25/2016 3:30 PM
Tentative

Recurrence:

(none)

Meeting Status:

Not yet responded

Organizer:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

End:

Jon Maybrair confirmed that we could include in the meeting everyone that needs to be there to discuss Blue Ridge.
I have included the following:

Todd Hendricks and Jeri Higginbotham since they both have assisted with the project and attended the meeting
at the DPH on February 9.
Arline Litchfield since she is the geologist assigned to the site by Lindsey Brigg and assisted with the site
inspection on February 10.

- s needs to be a team effort so everyone's area of expertise is utilized to address all the issues at the site.
I appreciate everyone's participation.
George

-----Original Appointment----From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 4:06 PM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Thomas, Richard F
(EEC); Maze, Rodney (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge follow-up meeting
When: Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
Where: 2028

GP1273

.rtridge, George (EEC)


.From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:04 PM
Melton, Ken (EEC)
RE: Meeting on Blue Ridge on Thursday

Ken;
Jon Maybriar let me know that we could include anyone that needs to be present in the meeting Thursday.
Most of all I want to have geologist represented at the meeting so they will stay informed of how we are preceding with
the site investigation.
The next major step is to assist with the assessment of the extent of the site contamination and develop a remedial
plan.
An understanding of the underlying geology at the site is critical to that study as we assess the potential exposure
pathways along with the background radiation levels from the shale formations at the site.
We will need to distinguish between the NORM at the site and the TE NORM/Processed TE NORM that was contributed
from the waste disposal.
....ws important to me that Todd and/or Arline is available to attend the meeting to address the geology and stay updated
the path forward.

I forwarded meeting invitations to Todd and Arline with the hopes one or both of them will be there.
Since you are acting for Lindsey this week, I am going to let you address who represents us as a geologist at the meeting.
Thanks for your help and support.
George

(jeorge P. Partrit:fne Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1274

Partridge, George (EEC)

.Subject:
Location:

FW: Blue Ridge follow-up meeting


2028

Start:
End:
Show Time As:

Thu 2/25/2016 2:00 PM


Thu 2/25/2016 3:30 PM
Tentative

Recurrence:

(none)

Meeting Status:

Not yet responded

Organizer:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Included Ken Melton since is acting supervisor in Lindsey's absence and is our expert regarding any landfill permit issues.
George
-----Original Appointment----From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 4:06 PM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Thomas, Richard F
(EEC); Maze, Rodney (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)
. .bject: Blue Ridge follow-up meeting
W!'~en: Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
Where: 2028

GP1275

.rtridge, George (EEC)


.rom:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:29 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
FW: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples

FYI

From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 3:06 PM
To: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
All,
Something else we could do is take the gamma specs to the field and excavate (if they are willing) and count in the field
for Pb-214 and Bi-214. If we could excavate in the area where we think the waste is buried until we see a higher dose
rate but not disturb the area right up to the waste, we could potentially not disturb the equilibrium. Just an idea. Let
me know what you all think. I would need a few days to get a plan together if this is what we want to do.
Thanks.
-phanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088

From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:03 PM
To: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Chris,
Thank you for the information!

"'

, was not involved in any of the discussions or the sampling, so I was not aware of where the samples were collected
from. I have been on one landfill sampling excursion, however, where an excavator was used to dig down to the
1

GP1276

approximate area where the waste was buried so that we could sample the waste. I wasn't sure if this was the case
here. That is why I asked the questions that I asked.

Please don't read too much into the 6 pCi/g of Ra-226. The reason that we don't analyze directly for Ra-226 by gamma'
spec is because of the interference with U-235. The peak for both is 186 KeV. The analysis that was done was a rough
estimate beginning with the rough estimate of the 100 gram geometry. It wasn't even a weighed sample because it. was
wet. Please, please understand that all the analysis is a rough estimate. To properly analyze for Ra-226 by gamma spec
would require much more time.
-~~JLynliwouldJiketo_expJor~tbe_po.ssibllitynJcontaminated dai1.cover,J'd be~happv to suppo.rtthatwithanalysisrbut.

let's discuss and come up with a plan before samples are collected.
Are we all in agreement that we are done with analysis on the samples I have in the lab or do you want me to do more?
In my opinion, we really need a plan in place with clear data quality objectives before we collect more samples.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088

From: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth)


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 9:37 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Stephanie,
Just a quick answer to the two questions,
1. It was about 1-3 inches deep, the ground was frozen so digging was too difficult to go deeper than a few
inches
2. It was from the top layer of the landfill area, meaning that it would be the cover material which contains
some waste as well.

Christopher J. Keffer
Radiation Health Specialist Ill
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1 C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4179
Cell: 502 330-7662
FAX: 502-564-1492
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

GP1277

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Ait: Tuesday, February 16~ 2016 8:46 AM

.~:

Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)


Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Partridge, George
(EEC)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Hello Stephanie,
I am going to have to let Chris answer your questions regarding the samples he took at Blue Ridge Landfill.
But thanks for expediting the processing of those samples just the same. I don't believe any of us thought for a moment
that the WV sludge dumped at the Advanced Disposal landfill in June of last year (radiochemical analysis of which I
included in my e-mail) were going to be anywhere near the surface and easily available for sampling 8 months later. One
of the fellows in waste management did a back of the napkin calculation at our recent meeting to discuss this issue and
estimated that literally thousands of tons of waste and debris had been dumped at the site since this TENORM was
disposed of. And since Ra-226/Ra-228 have limited solubility in water and given the high dilution factor in the combined
landfill leachate well from which this water sample was taken, it is not surprising you saw nothing above minimal
detectable activity in the liquid.

Quick question though. You indicated that the wet 100 g sample of cover material you analyzed contained 6 pCi/g Ra226. I am assuming had the sample been dry and allowed to ingrowth for the desired 21 days, the actual activity
concentration of 6 pCi/g would have been much higher. The reason I bring this up is because our friends in EEC division
of solid wastes and hazardous wastes have discovered an uptick in the receipt of waste shipments from OH in the past
~rat this landfill and others here in KY. OH has some of the most restrictive TENORM regs in the US. No OH landfill can
~ept TENORM at greater than 5 pCi/g Ra-226 above natural background. The oil and gas exploration and production
wastes being generated in OH may very well be coming to KY landfills and used as daily landfill cover to overlay wastes
and debris. I know Chris said Blue Ridge landfill and the surrounding areas contained lots of shale high in NORM but I
was just wondering if the slightly elevated Ra-226 you show in your analysis could be due to out-of-state TE NORM being
used as daily cover? Obviously, we would need to actually sample this material being received from OH to see if it
exceeded the acceptable OH landfill dumping TE NORM limit.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~...

"""i'. . . . . . .

f{Aflt1i1ltttl :.H~}Ll:H

GP1278

From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)

..

Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 10:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Curt,
I have a couple of questions:

. ~ 1,_
2.

Wh~t dfil?tb. ~~Hl:lg~gJiQ_girnJ?LeJ;:gJl~ft~<:Jfu:>m?

Was it from the waste or from the fill or from the cap material?

The solid sample was analyzed wet with an approximate 100 gram geometry by gamma spec yesterday. We usually dry,
grind and weigh solid samples before analysis. Also for Ra-226 analysis, we usually seal the container for approximately
21 days to allow for ingrowth. For Ra-226 analysis by gamma spec, we look for the daughters, Pb-214 and B-214,
because the peak for Ra-226 is also the peak for U-235 so there is interference when analyzing directly for Ra-226. The
wet analysis yesterday of the approximate 100 gram geometry when analyzed for Pb-214 and Bi-214 showed around 2-4
pCi/g. Ra-226 was then added to the library then re-analyzed. It showed about 6 pCi/g of Ra-226. If this solid sample
came from the waste, I would expect to have seen results more significant based on the sample results sent in the email
below.
The liquid sample was counted yesterday by gamma spec directly in the sample container it was sent in for two
hours. There was nothing above the minimum detectable activity.
In my opinion, I don't think we should spend any more time or resources on these samples. If we could get some
samples from the waste it may tell us more. We should probably have a plan in place with some data quality objectives
too if this is going to be a long term project.

Just FYI, we only have four gamma specs up .in the lab right now (gamma 4 is out being retrofitted to be mechanically
cooled). Next week we will be moving out the old shields and moving in the new shields. We will be completely down
for a few days. We will then be down to three gamma specs (gamma 2 will not fit in a new shield) while we get the new
equipment up and running.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4:57 PM


To: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
4

GP1279

Thanks Stephanie. Whatever you can do for us would be much appreciated.

et

Pendergrass PhD
.Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govId ph/rad ioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Ket!tl!ilifA

1'.A!:tl.t%1'1QfaH~\lTH
From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4:44 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Thanks for the info Curt. The water sample could be done sometime next week but to analyze the soil sample for Ralet me think about this over the

~' we are looking at a time for ingrowth before gamma analysis can be performed.
~ekend and maybe we can meet sometime on Monday afternoon.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4:36 PM


To: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Will do Kathy.
' . ahanie, these samples were taken by Chris at a landfill where we have very good evidence that out-of-state TENO RM
wastes were disposed of back in June. We believe the wastes were buried on-site and are now covered with several feet
of debris and cover. Chris took the sample where he found the highest dose rate readings on the surface of the landfill
cap in the area where the TENO RM was dumped. Below are the analytical results of the sludge we are talking about. The
5

GP1280

water sample is from the landfill's leachate collection system. We were hoping to have these results sometime next
week so we could decide how best to proceed. If you could get the samples analyzed by the11 that would help
tremendously. As Kathy indicated, Chris found lots of shale deposits scattered about the landfill which gave elevated
dose rate readings so we are not sure how this might impact the natural back ground in the area.
Thanks,
Curt

ANALYTICAL RESULTS RADIOCHEMISTRY

$anipl&:. Fairmont Bnn-su@ Pit

Cl

i41ib 10~ 30150255()1}1

con~cted; OSI06115 ~:25

Reoeiv~: ~1515:45

Mau

Results reported on a "'ar.r.welllht" basis


Para~~rs

Anlfm9ny~12<i

E'PA001.1

Co.bait-SO

EPA~1J

lridiU.m-192

EPA90U

POta~IJm.:.ito

EPA:001.1

Radi~

EPAOOU

Jt.adjurn~m

EPAOOU

&aoo1um-4tr

EPA{i()U

Sltver~uOM

EPA001.1

o.ooo o.a14 (2.oon

f.Cill;J

06/151151.6:51 '.

0~000 :t 0.56~ (1.~3}

pllg

1.51'f 51C:t51 li

O.()OQ C).634 (1 .680)

pCif~

06/1511516:51 1

lJ9Vi;i

OOtl5'1 51 >:-51

1:

pciig

06/1511516:51

1:

3o3.7S0>.774 {7;a17)

.PQit
..~

{1~1515'.!:)1

1.268 :t1;78'J (1,774)

.~ifs

oS115t161s:s1

pCifg

06l1511516;$1 1.

C:NA T;N,A .

c:HA T:l\IA

:c:""T:NA ..

.21t630 t~f9..~6 (17.130)


CfafA t:NA . - . . ....
1<f5a.S00t2Qll;780 (44.630}

.c:HA 'flNA

c:NAT:NA

...

C:tfAT:NA

,J;.3~ :tJ$ (1,$49)


q;f'.M, T:~"

EPA001.1

1&,2~oo*392:l10 (471U)00)

?Gva

D'l'l!)/1 $1"6:51 .,.

EPA9(}1.1

~~336 :fjJ;408 (17.780}

pCifg

OO.t15i1516~51

c:HA. T:~A

. ..

cmAT:NA

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified ()f proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
-,.:.<..,...

/(.t'!.;l
.'..-/:\ -<' -

r~.A.Ul)l>:now

, ,. HMt."r.H

From: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4: 11 PM


6

GP1281

---

---------

---

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: FW: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples

ttorCurt,
Can you all please work with Stephanie and provide whatever information she needs? Also, Matt you may want to
discuss/review the samples. It was my understanding that existing shale on the site may impact the sample results from
the leachate. It would have been nice if you could have found some type of representative water sample to compare
to.
From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 3:56 PM


To: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Green, Joseph T (CHFS Rad Hlth); Keene, Mark (CHS Rad Hlth); Barber, Frank
(CHS Rad Hlth)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Chris/Curt,
In order properly analyze a sample, I need to understand the reason why it was collected. I'll be happy to begin analysis
as soon I understand the reason for the collection of the samples.
Thanks.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
..aitucky Department for Public Health
SowerBlvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088

W'm'o

From: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 3:41 PM


To: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Green, Joseph T (CHFS Rad Hlth); Keene, Mark (CHS Rad Hlth); Barber, Frank (CHS
Rad Hlth)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
REMS,
I have been informed that the processing and analysis of the samples from Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge
Landfill is desired. Please get these samples done as soon as possible. Thank you in advance.

Christopher J. Keffer

,
!

I,

Radiation Health Specialist Ill


Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1 C-A
.kfort, KY 40601
502-564-3700 x4179
Cell: 502 330-7662
FAX: 502-564-1492

I
I

GP1282

Partridge, George (EEC)

rom:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:30 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Accepted: Conference Call - EPA Region 4

GP1283

Partridge, George (EEC)

e!m:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:32 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
FW: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples

FYI

From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:03 PM


To: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Chris,
Thank you for the information!
Curt,

I was not involved in any of the discussions or the sampling, so I was not aware of where the samples were collected
from. I have been on one landfill sampling excursion, however, where an excavator was used to dig down to the
~roximate area where the waste was buried so that we could sample the waste. I wasn't sure if this was the case
, _ . - e . That is why I asked the questions that I asked.
Please don't read too much into the 6 pCi/g of Ra-226. The reason that we don't analyze directly for Ra-226 by gamma
spec is because of the interference with U-235. The peak for both is 186 KeV. The analysis that was done was a rough
estimate beginning with the rough estimate of the 100 gram geometry. It wasn't even a weighed sample because it was
wet. Please, please understand that all the analysis is a rough estimate. To properly analyze for Ra-226 by gamma spec
would require much more time.
If you would like to explore the possibility of contaminated daily cover, I'd be happy to support that with analysis, but
let's discuss and come up with a plan before samples are collected.
Are we all in agreement that we are done with analysis on the samples I have in the lab or do you want me to do more?
In my opinion, we really need a plan in place with clear data quality objectives before we collect more samples.

Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
ae: 502-564-8390

'.
502-382-7003
,
Fax: 502-564-2088

GP1284

From: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth)


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 9:37 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Stephanie,
.. ~.lustai:iui~k_an~~er1oJJ:leJ.\to/_Qgu<~~tlQnsL
.. -~~- ~
1. It was about 1-3 inches deep, the ground was frozen so digging was too difficult to go deeper than a few
inches
2. It was from the top layer of the landfill area, meaning that it would be the cover material which contains
some waste as well.

Christopher J. Keffer
Radiation Health Specialist Ill
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1 C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4179
Cell: 502 330-7662
FAX: 502-564-1492
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
review, use, disclosure, distribution cir copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 8:46 AM
To: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Partridge, George
(EEC)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Hello Stephanie,
I am going to have to let Chris answer your questions regarding the samples he took at Blue Ridge Landfill.
But thanks for expediting the processing of those samples just the same. I don't believe any of us thought for a moment
that the WV sludge dumped at the Advanced Disposal landfill in June of last year (radiochemical analysis of which I
included in my e-mail) were going to be anywhere near the surface and easily available for sampling 8 months later. One
of the fellows in waste management did a back of the napkin calculation at our recent meeting to discuss this issue and
estimated that literally thousands of tons of waste and debris had been dumped at the site since this TE NORM was
disposed of. And since Ra-226/Ra-228 have limited solubility in water and given the high dilution factor in the combined
landfill leachate well from which this water sample was taken, it is not surprising you saw nothing above minimal
detectable activity in the liquid.

~;~tn~if':'';,c~~;:i.,fgJa~~1Bi~~t~:iH:t~i~{H~~~~ilr~~~tf~;~~~~~~::~~~:~,;.,~?.~?':

Jhe reason I bring this up is because our friends in EEC divisio~


of solid wastes and hazardous wastes have discovered an uptick in the receipt of waste shipments from OH in the past.~
year at this landfill and others he.re in KY. OH has some of the most restrictive TENO RM regs in the US. No OH landfill can
accept TE NORM at greater than 5 pCi/g Ra-226 above natural background. The oil and gas exploration and production
2

GP1285

wastes being generated in OH may very well be coming to KY landfills anp used as daily landfill cover to overlay wastes
and debris. I know Chris said Blue Ridge landfill and the surrounding areas contained lots of shale high in NORM but I
A; just wondering if the slightly elevated Ra-226 you show in your analysis could be due to out-of-state TENO RM being
.Ted as daily cover? Obviously, we would need to actually sample this material being received from OH to see if it
exceeded the acceptable OH landfill dumping TE NORM limit.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:l/www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

l(tZf!/!~
1~l/JATION~!-f~;LTH

m:

Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)

t: Monday, February 15, 2016 10:06 AM


Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples


Curt,
I have a couple of questions:
1. What depth was the solid sample collected from?
2. Was it from the waste or from the fill or from the cap material?
The solid sample was analyzed wet with an approximate 100 gram geometry by gamma spec yesterday. We usually dry,
grind and weigh solid samples before analysis. Also for Ra-226 analysis, we usually seal the container for approximately
21 days to allow for ingrowth. For Ra-226 analysis by gamma spec, we look for the daughters, Pb-214 and B-21(
because the peak for Ra-226 is also the peak for U-235 so there is interference when analyzing directly for Ra-226. The
wet analysis yesterday of the approximate 100 gram geometry when analyzed for Pb-214 and Bi-214 showed around 2~4
pCi/g. Ra-226 was then added to the library then re-analyzed. It showed about 6 pCi/g of Ra-226. If this solid sample
came from the waste, I would expect to have seen results more significant based on the sample results sent in the email
below.
The liquid sample was counted yesterday by gamma spec directly in the sample container it was sent in for two
hours. There was nothing above the minimum detectable activity .

-Y

opinion, I don't think we should spend any more time or resources on these samples. If we could get some
samples from the waste it may tell us more. We should probably have a plan in place with some data quality objectives
too if this is going to be a long term project.
3

GP1286

- - - - - -

Just FYI, we only have four gamma specs up in the lab right now (gamma 4 is out being retrofitted to be mechanically
cooled). Next week we will be moving out the old shields and moving in the new shields. We will be completely down
for a few days. We will then be down to three gamma specs (gamma 2 will not fit in a new shield) while we get the ne. .
equipment up and running.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor

Radiation/Imlironmenta LMonitarjngSe_ction.- ._.


Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4:57 PM


To: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples

Thanks Stephanie. Whatever you can do for us would be much appreciated.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@kv.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

.JZ.oo.tu.~

IV-~-'-'"~
ii~tAtidNHEALYH

From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4:44 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Thanks for the info Curt. The water sample could be done sometime next week but to analyze the soil sample for Ra- 226, we are looking at a time for ingrowth before gamma analysis can be performed. Let me think about this over the
weekend and maybe we can meet sometime on Monday afternoon.
4

GP1287

Stephanie C. Brock

~iation Health Supervisor


-~~iation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch

Kentucky Department for Public Health


100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4:36 PM


To: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth)

Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples


Will.do Kathy.
Stephanie, these samples were taken by Chris at a landfill where we have very good evidence that out-of-state TENO RM
wastes were disposed of back in June. We believe the wastes were buried on-site and are now covered with several feet
of debris and cover. Chris took the sample where he found the highest dose. rate readings on the surface of the landfill
cap in the area where the TENO RM was dumped. Below are the analytical results of the sludge we are talking about. The
~er sample is from the landfilf1s leachate collection system. We were hoping to have these results sometime next
~k so we could decide how best to proceed. If you could get the samples analyzed by then that would help
tremendously. As Kathy indicated, Chris found lots of shale deposits scattered about the landfill which gave elevated
dose rate readings so we are not sure how this might impact the natural back ground in the area.
Thanks,
Curt

GP1288

ANALYTICAL RESULTS .. RADIOCHEMISTRY

.~';~!tile-

=rq<#!!9,
si.,dae Pit Cl
'
&tmpl& : FaimtontBrio~-Sludge Pit ~blD: 30150~55001 CoH~d: .06/08115 00:25 R~iv~~ 06/.9W1515:45 Ma~
------------------------------------------------------..,...----..,...-----,---------. Cl .
.
nits.

Anal
. ... y,i.00..

(2.()37)

rJeif!;j

OS,115115fS$1 ~

.0.000 :t Q.565 .(1.~3}

pCilg

/15115~6:~1 11

EPAOOU

o.900 :t: o.634 (1.eao1

.pCil!)

()6115115 :16:51 1

EPA9C>1.1

~~~~:re.oa6

p(:ifg

()tl/1511$16:51 1;

f)Cilg

00/1511.516:51 1:

Antlrni;ny424

EPA001.1

0~000 0.$74
c~NAT:NA

CObalt-$)

EPAf\(11.1

c:NA T.NA .

Jrkliu.n1-192

Pdta$$i1m.:4o

C:tfAT:NA

c11 .130)

. ..

. ..
(+f.&30)

Radlum'"226

EPA901 .1

~'1lm~

EPA901.1

.3o3.7SO :tl.774 (7.811)

p(;ifg

~1.5!1516'.51

Scal:ldlt.im-4tf

EPAOOU

c:HAT:NA
116$ %{784 (1.774}

pCi/g

oi$/15t1516:$1 t:

SilveM10M

EPAOOU

C:NAt:NA
.2.3.81 t 1.$67 (1.549)

pCifp

0$'1511516;51 1.

T~rrt-:232

EPA9()1.1

pJ,';ifg

001151HH6:51
7.
,.,...
:

U~nJum-236

E#A{l(fa.1

1~.50()1:200,780

C:NA.tNA

C;NAt:NA
1~~:392.170 (418Jl00)
c:HAt;NA . . . . .
$4.33'& fi.406 (17 .7$0)

11

'.

pCl!g

C~NAT;NA

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC"A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Ven.tu.. ~.
. ~.-

IV~:~~~!;!#

t~At:JlATIO'Nlt\H~,l.TH

From: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)


Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 4:11 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: FW: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples


Matt or Curt,

A...

Can you all please work with Stephanie and provide whatever information she needs? Also, Matt you may want to
discuss/review the samples. It was my understanding that existing shale on the site may impact the sample results fro~
the leachate. It would have been nice if you could have found some type of representative water sample to compare
to.
6

GP1289

From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)


Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 3:56 PM
: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Green, Joseph T (CHFS Rad Hlth); Keene, Mark (CHS Rad Hlth); Barber, Frank
HS Rad Hlth)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
Chris/Curt,
In order properly analyze a sample, I need to understand the reason why it was collected. I'll be happy to begin analysis
as soon I understand the reason for the collection of the samples.
Thanks.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088

-~:;~~~~~:;~~f:~i~i~~~,(~~:f~~!f~~h)-

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

To: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Green, Joseph T (CHFS Rad Hlth); Keene, Mark (CHS Rad Hlth); Barber, Frank (CHS
Rad Hlth)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples

REMS,
I have been informed that the processing and analysis of the samples from Advanced Disposal- Blue Ridge
Landfill is desired. Please get these samples done as soon as possible. Thank you in advance.

Christopher J. Keffer
Radiation Health Specialist Ill
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1 C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4179
Cell: 502 330-7662
FAX: 502-564-1492
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

GP1290

Partridge, George (EEC)

f/Am:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1;50 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

Curt:
See my responses in red text below to your questions.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure


Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? This is a question for the landfill
personnel....unfortunately. Let's assume for a minute this material was not TENORM. In this case, it should have been
disposed of like other wastes they receive. Within 2 hrs of receipt, spread in loose layers not over 24" deep and then
compacted at the active working face location for that day. Then by the end of the day, should have received a 6 inch
layer of soil cover over the entire working face.

9iiow

you said the material was used as alternate daily cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took
to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks or months? If used as an alternate daily cover, they should
have had it tested to ensure no more than 1 ppm benzene concentration per our regulation and not used it during
precipitation events. Perhaps they had it stockpiled for a period of days, then used it for daily cover. Again, landfill
personnel will have to.answer this question. If the material was used for daily cover, then the solid waste regs allow
daily cover to be exposed for up to 30 days before additional waste placement over the same area or, if no waste
placement within the 30 days, another 6 inches of cover has to be applied for a total depth of at least 12 inches. This
additional 6 inches cannot be an alternate daily cover material though. It must be a non-waste soil. Once waste
placement re-commences in an area with the 6 or 12 inches of cover, the landfill will peel back the soil cover to get
waste on waste. So this cover soil can be disturbed multiple times before being depleted or so intertwined with waste
that itself is now indistinguishable as being a soil or waste.
Hope this helps, but the landfill personnel need to answer these questions.

I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that we getting
to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have
the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And given
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
ter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being
ad is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
1

GP1291

school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
.2z~. ~ii?J_l\1!'1tngree_t

Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http :l/www.chfs.ky.govId ph/rad ioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

i'Je~
P.Ati1;1,no~HEAL~rn

l~~fl'1-,,,'q
Von

GP1292

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:55 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
FW: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

FYI

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:50 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Curt:
See my responses in red text below to your questions.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Hello gentlemen,
. i c k question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TE NORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? This is a question for the landfill
personnel.. .. unfortunately. Let's assume for a minute this material was not TENORM. In this case, it should have been
disposed of like other wastes they receive. Within 2 hrs of receipt, spread in loose layers not over 24" deep and then
compacted at the active working face location for that day. Then by the end of the day, should have received a 6 inch
layer of soil cover over the entire working face.
I know you said the material was used as alternate daily cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took
to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks or months? If used as an alternate daily cover, they should
have had it tested to ensure no more than 1 ppm benzene concentration per our regulation and not used it during
precipitation events. Perhaps they had it stockpiled for a period of days, then used it for daily cover. Again, landfill
personnel will have to answer this question. If the material was used for daily cover, then the solid waste regs allow
daily cover to be exposed for up to 30 days before additional waste placement over the same area or, if no waste
placement within the 30 days, another 6 inches of cover has to be applied for a total depth of at least 12 inches. This
additional 6 inches cannot be an alternate daily cover material though. It must be a non-waste soil. Once waste
placement re-commences in an area with the 6 or 12 inches of cover, the landfill will peel back the soil cover to get
waste on waste. So this cover soil can be disturbed multiple times before being depleted or so intertwined with waste
that itself is now indistinguishable as being a soil or waste.
Hope this helps, but the landfill personnel need to answer these questions.
~uld assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that we getting

~ontact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have

the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
1

GP1293

to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And given
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being
spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.

L
'"W

Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kt:t.ttMe!irl~
f'.fo.tt!AT!oN&_rtEALTH

GP1294

Partridge, George (EEC)

e!~=
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 2:04 PM
'Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov'
RE: KY Landfill Concern

Steve;
From the manifests we have reviewed for our Green Valley Landfill in the Ashland, KY area, it appears that Pressure Tech
has been shipping TENORM wastes from Muskingum County, Ohio managed by BES Technical Solutions, LLC which is the
firm associate with Cory Hoskins.

Shipment of TENORM wastes from Ohio for disposal in Kentucky is prohibited by KRS.
When you met with Pressure Tech and Cory Hoskins, did they indicate they have been shipping waste containing
TENORM to Kentucky?
Thanks for your assistance and sharing what you learned.
George

From: Stephen. Helmer@odh.Ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh .ohio.gov]

nt: Monday, February 22, 2016 2:12 PM


Partridge, George (EEC)
c Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us;
Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us; Rebecca.Fugitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
George,
We appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.
As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas industry waste
substance facility).
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources} has sole and exclusive authority over the Oil and Gas
Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website.
We met Tim Stapleton from Pressure Tech as well as Cory Hoskins from BES, LLC or BES Technical Solutions, LLC or
Advanced TENORM Services, LLC.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this facility, but the
planning fell through when the site's owner passed away.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it down last Friday. He's getting questions, but admitted "it's just a
website" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskins if he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr. Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he backed away

pursuing it .

Currently, I do not have much on Fairmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's Beth Pratt and
Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
1

GP1295

Sincerely,

S~'?I~
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section

..

-- 6lL1.-.:72g:::%11

'h.
O. ,10

Dopartmont of Hoal'th

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:36 PM
To: Helmer, Stephen <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC) <Tony.Hatton@ky.gov>; Maybriar, Jon (EEC) <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>; Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
<Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern

Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments ofTENORM to our
landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of Cory Hoskins associated with
Advanced TENORM Services (also associated with BES, LLC and BES Technical Solutions, LLC) and his activities
surrounding shipments of out of state TENORM to Kentucky.

As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have attached that to
this email message.
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our situation and the
investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TE NORM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory of Advanced
TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's brother. Cory is standing in the
doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive
Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was disposed of at Blue
Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine Processing .
./ Analytical results from Advanced TENORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who manages Green
Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the TENO RM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TE NORM here in Kentucky. We
believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at the Blue Ridge
2

GP1296

Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey and sampling protocol in the
future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.

~ also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to the
management of TENO RM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the operators and managers
of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George

<georee P. Partridge Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q.'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

_,,,,, __,,_,_,,__ ,.,,_,, ____

,,,,,_,,.,~,,-.,,-,,.,,,_.,.,,,,.,w~"'""-"'-''""'""'"-

"'"'"""''""""'

'

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:07 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
Hi George,
Please send what you can to better understand your concerns.

Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611

lOh.io .....

Dtptttmtr;t of Hoa Ith

. .s e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
3

GP1297

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:10 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); McKinley, Matthew
W (CHS-PH)
RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

Subject:

Thank you Danny for taking the time to answer my questions regarding the daily cover. That is exactly the type of
information that we were needing. However it appears that there are questions that can only be answered by Advanced
Disposal Solutions. But now that we know how things are supposed to work, we at least have a much better idea on
what specific questions to ask ADS.
I will plan on seeing you all at 2:00 PM tomorrow at your Fair Oaks office for the meeting with ADS.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
~ail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
~ebsite: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Va~~
l\f&i!l&..

#:!J

flA110t4&\M!$1.t:rn
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:50 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Curt:
See my responses in red text below to your questions.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
- o gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TE NORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? This is a question for the landfill
1

GP1298

personnel.. .. unfortunately. Let's assume for a minute this material was not TE NORM. In this case, it should have been
disposed of like other wastes they receive. Within 2 hrs of receipt, spread in loose layers not over 24" deep and then
compacted at the active working face location for that day. Then by the end of the day, should have received a 6 inch
layer of soil cover over the entire working face.

~
~

I know you said the material was used as alternate daily cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took
to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks or months? If used as an alternate daily cover, they should
have had it tested to ensure no more than 1 ppm benzene concentration per our regulation and not used it during
precipitation events. Perhaps they had it stockpiled for a period of days, then used it for daily cover. Again, landfill
,_J~erSQJJDetwilJ'1civ~tojmfil()!ef Jhi~gt,1e,s!Ion_. If tbelllC'l,!~ri,~1 was use9 ford(:lily cover,t.her:i th~ soli9 \N.a.st~r.:~~.?llow

daily cover to be exposed for up to 30 days before additional waste placement over the same area or, if no waste
placement within the 30 days, another 6 inches of cover has to be applied for a total depth of at least 12 inches. This
additional 6 inches cannot be an alternate daily cover material though. It must be a non-waste soil. Once waste
placement re-commences in an area with the 6 or 12 inches of cover, the landfill will peel back the soil cover to get
waste on waste. So this cover soil can be disturbed multiple times before being depleted or so intertwined with waste
that itself is now indistinguishable as being a soil or waste.
Hope this helps, but the landfill personnel need to answer these questions.
I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that we getting
to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have
the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And given
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being

spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Ken
tu~
-~~'"'~
P~1ATIONJArti,.l\i.Tl'!

GP1299

1-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:20 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

Curt;
Delighted you will be attending the meeting tomorrow!
I have also invited Todd Hendricks to the meeting, but I believe he has a prior commitment and may not be able to
attend.
I also included Arline Litchfield the geologist in our section that has been assigned to the Blue Ridge Landfill.
Also included are Jeri Higginbotham that you met and also Jamie Neilson from our Permitting Section who processes all
the solid waste permits and has extensive knowledge of our regulations.
Also invited is Ken Melton who is the acting supervisor since Lindsey Briggs is on vacation this week.
I hope we will have good attendance at this meeting .

ankyou,
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:10 PM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Thank you Danny for taking the time to answer my questions regarding the daily cover. That is exactly the type of
information that we were needing. However it appears that there are questions that can only be answered by Advanced
Disposal Solutions. But now that we know how things are supposed to work, we at least have a much better idea on
what specific questions to ask ADS.
I will plan on seeing you all at 2:00 PM tomorrow at your Fair Oaks office for the meeting with ADS.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~ 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.govId ph/rad ioactive. htm
1

GP1300

Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/


Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

7/nwwfUtJir~

l~,~~"'~:!I

T'.A~!A1TOt1lMiv,1.rH

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:50 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
~cc: Partrictge,~Geor9e-(EEC);Weerrrs~

George (EEC:); Maybriar, jan

(EEC)

Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure


Curt:
See my responses in red text below to your questions.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? This is a question for the landfill
personnel .... unfortunately. Let's assume for a minute this material was not TENORM. In this case, it should have been
disposed of like other wastes they receive. Within 2 hrs of receipt, spread in loose layers not over 24" deep and then

compacted at the active working face location for that day. Then by the end of the day, should have received a 6 inch
layer of soil cover over the entire working face.
I know you said the material was used as alternate daily cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took
to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks or months? If used as an alternate daily cover, they should
have had it tested to ensure no more than 1 ppm benzene concentration per our regulation and not used it during
precipitation events. Perhaps they had it stockpiled for a period of days, then used it for daily cover. Again, landfill
personnel will have to answer this question. If the material was used for daily cover, then the solid waste regs allow
daily cover to be exposed for up to 30 days before additional waste placement over the same area or,, if no waste
placement within the 30 days, another 6 inches of cover has to be applied for a total depth of at least 12 inches. This
additional 6 inches cannot be an alternate daily cover material though. It must be a non-waste soil. Once waste
placement re-commences in an area with the 6 or 12 inches of cover, the landfill will peel back the soil cover to get
waste on waste. So this cover soil can be disturbed multiple times before being depleted or so intertwined with waste
that itself is now indistinguishable as being a soil or waste.
Hope this helps, but the landfill personnel need to answer these questions.
I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that we getting
to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have
the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And give~
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
,,..,
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being
spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
2

GP1301

dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TE NORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
ool and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radloactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

l.l.onh~~

l~U!!}..,..~;1:
fW.t.tl,11ftitw~ AAHE>\L'rn

GP1302

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:22 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure

looking forward to it George.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@kv.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx

/(~

-1.1.rntHi .
From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:20 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure
Curt;
Delighted you will be attending the meeting tomorrow!
I have also invited Todd Hendricks to the meeting, but I believe he has a prior commitment and may not be able to
attend.
I also included Arline Litchfield the geologist in our section that has been assigned to the Blue Ridge Landfill.
Also included are Jeri Higginbotham that you met and also Jamie Neilson from our Permitting Section who processes all
the solid waste permits and has extensive knowledge of our regulations.
Also invited is Ken Melton who is the acting supervisor since Lindsey Briggs is on vacation this week.
I hope we will have good attendance at this meeting.
efAnkyou,
George
1

GP1303

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:10 PM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure


Thank you Danny for taking the time to answer my questions regarding the daily cover. That is exactly the type of
information that we were needing. However it appears that there are questions that can only be answered by Advanced
Disposal Solutions. But now that we know how things are supposed to work, we at least have a much better idea on
ltVhat spe~!fi~o~IJ'=-Eti~r1? t~oask ADS.
I will plan on seeing you all at 2:00 PM tomorrow at your Fair Oaks office for the meeting with ADS.
-

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ijsecure.kentuckv.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Va.inrh1~
~U~'oGW
T~tllJ.\.TION~H~Jlil..:tH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:50 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure


Curt:
See my responses in red text below to your questions.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:09 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Subject: Blue Ridge Landfill worker exposure


Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENO RM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? This is a question for the landfill
personnel.. .. unfortunately. Let's assume for a minute this material was not TENORM. In this case, it should have been
disposed of like other wastes they receive. Within 2 hrs of receipt, spread in loose layers not over 24" deep and then ~
compacted at the active working face location for that day. Then by the end of the day, should have received a 6 inch . .
layer of soil cover over the entire working face.

GP1304

I know you said the material was used as alternate daily cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took
to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks or months? If used as an alternate daily cover, they should
ve had it tested to ensure no more than 1 ppm benzene concentration per our regulation and not used it during
cipitation events. Perhaps they had it stockpiled for a period of days, then used it for daily cover. Again, landfill
personnel will have to answer this question. If the material was used for daily cover, then the solid waste regs allow
daily cover to be exposed for up to 30 days before additional waste placement over the same area or, if no waste
placement within the 30 days, another 6 inches of cover has to be applied for a total depth of at least 12 inches. This
additional 6 inches cannot be an alternate daily cover material though. It must be a non-waste soil. Once waste
placement re-commences in an area with the 6 or 12 inches of cover, the landfill will peel back the soil cover to get
waste on waste. So this cover soil can be disturbed multiple times before being depleted or so intertwined with waste
that itself is now indistinguishable as being a soil or waste.
Hope this helps, but the landfill personnel need to answer these questions.

I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that we getting
to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have
the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And given
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being
spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

KtztlH~\
rJ\.tHA'rlOr4~~t.1H

GP1305

-m:

Partridge. George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov
Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:32 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: KY Landfill Concern

Pressure Tech indicated they have sent TENO RM waste to Kentucky.


I have an email from ODNR and will forward it to you.
Steve Helmer
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Steve;
From the manifests we have reviewed for our Green Valley Landfill in the Ashland, KY area, it appears
that Pressure Tech has been shipping TENORM wastes from Muskingum County, Ohio managed by BES
Technical Solutions, LLC which is the firm associate with Cory Hoskins.

Shipment of TENO RM wastes from Ohio for disposal in Kentucky is prohibited by KRS .
When you met with Pressure Tech and Cory Hoskins, did they indicate they have been shipping waste
containing TENO RM to Kentucky?
Thanks for your assistance and sharing what you learned.
George

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [ mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh .ohio.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 2:12 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us;
Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us; Rebecca.Fuqitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
George,
We appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.
As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas
industry waste substance facility).
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority
over the Oil and Gas Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website.
We met Tim Stapleton from Pressure Tech as well as Cory Hoskins from BES, LLC or BES Technical
Solutions, LLC or Advanced TENO RM Services, LLC.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this
facility, but the planning fell through when the site's 'owner passed away.
1

GP1306

Mr. Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it down last Friday. He's getting questions, but
admitted "it's just a website" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskins if he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr. Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he
backed away from pursuing it.
Currently, I do not have rnuch on Fairmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's
Beth Pratt and Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
Sincerely,

s~ '71d'1Ue't
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
<image001.jpg>

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:36 PM
To: Helmer, Stephen <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>

Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC) <Tony.Hatton@ky.gov>; Maybriar, Jon (EEC) <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>; Anderson,
Danny J (EEC) <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>

Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern

Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments of
TENORM to our landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of
Cory Hoskins associated with Advanced TENO RM Services (also associated with BES, LLC and BES
Technical Solutions, LLC) and his activities surrounding shipments of out of state TENO RM to Kentucky.
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have
attached that to this email message.
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our
situation and the investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TENORM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory
of Advanced TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's
brother. Cory is standing in the doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity
is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was
disposed of at Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
2

GP1307

v" Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine
Processing.
v" Analytical results from Advanced TENO RM Services that was provided to Republic Services who
manages Green Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the
TENORM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TENORM here in
Kentucky. We believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at
the Blue Ridge Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey
and sampling protocol in the future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to
the management ofTENORM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the
operators and managers of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George

<;1eor9e P. PartrUfee Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q_PP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image002.gif>

From: Stephen. Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh .ohio.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:07 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
Hi George,
Please send what you can to better understand your concerns.

Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section

614-728-3611
<imageOOl.jpg>

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged,
sensitive, or protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that
3

GP1308

Partridge, George (EEC)

if#m

Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov
Wednesday, February 24, '2016 3:34 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Fwd: Pressure Tech trip report
Trip Report 2-17-16 ODH.docx; ATTOOOOl.htm

fyi

Steve Helmer
Sentfrom my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Trivisonno, Ron" <Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us>
Date: February 24, 2016 at 12:44:26 PM EST
To: "Helmer, Stephen" <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: "McCracken, Charles" <Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov>, "Pratt, Beth"
<Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us>, "Worstall, Robert" <robert.worstall@dnr.state.oh.us>
Subject: Pressure Tech trip report

FYI
~is

e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

~tected

GP1309

-----------------

Partridge, George (EEC)


t'-_om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:00 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
FW: Pressure Tech trip report
Trip Report 2-17-16 ODH.docx; ATTOOOOl.htm

Danny & Curt:


Site visit by Ohio to Pressure Tech.
Trip report attached.
George

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh .oh io.gov [mailto: Stephen. Helmer@odh.Ohio.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:34 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Fwd: Pressure Tech trip report
fyi
~veHelmer

~nt from my iPhone


Begin forwarded message:

From: "Trivisonno, Ron" <Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us>


Date: February 24, 2016 at 12:44:26 PM EST
To: "Helmer, Stephen" <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: "McCracken, Charles" <Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov>, "Pratt, Beth"
<Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us>, "Worstall, Robert" <robert.worstall@dnr.state.oh.us>

Subject: Pressure Tech trip report

FYI

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

GP1310

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:11 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
FW: Pressure Tech trip report
Trip Report 2-17-16 ODH.docx; ATTOOOOl.htm

Thanks George. Pretty damning evidence.

Tim described how PT, with the assistance of BES (Cory Hoskins), would sort the boxes of solidified waste
and determine which boxes went to KY or WVa. Because all the waste was expected to exceed Ohio's 5+2
pCi/g Ra, none of the waste was ever disposed of in Ohio.
Did you share this with Jason Frame in WV as well?

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~wanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

v........~~
.. _

l~U~

J!J:l:tililll'fOrj11!~,t.t}t

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24,


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

2016 4:00 PM

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: FW: Pressure Tech trip report


Danny & Curt:
Site visit by Ohio to Pressure Tech.
Trip report attached.

GP1311

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: Fwd: Pressure Tech trip report

fyi

Steve Helmer
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From:~"frfvlsonno, -Ron'' <Ron~irivisonn~o@anr.stal:e.oh.us>

Date: February 24, 2016 at 12:44:26 PM EST


To: "Helmer, Stephen" <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: "McCracken, Charles" <Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov>, "Pratt, Beth"

<Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us>, "Worstall, Robert" <robert.worstall@dnr.state.oh.us>


Subject: Pressure Tech trip report
FYI

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

GP1312

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:22 PM
Frame, Jason R (Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov)
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
FW: Pressure Tech trip report
Trip Report 2-17-16 ODH.docx; ATTOOOOl.htm

Jason;
Please find inserted below my email correspondence with Ohio regarding TENO RM. Please note the attached trip report
from their site visit to Pressure Tech. Pressure Tech has collaborated with Cory Hoskins associated with Advanced
TENO RM Services. It indicates how they are managing TENORM wastes. It appears wastes is being sent to both KY and
WV. Pressure Tech has been shipping TENORM to our Green Valley landfill located in the Ashland, Kentucky area.
I hope you will find this helpful!
Please keep in touch,
Thank you,
George

~orge P.

PartridiJe Jr., Pfi:D, P.'E., Q'EP

~partment for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:34 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Fwd: Pressure Tech trip report
fyi
Steve Helmer

. t f r o m my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

GP1313

-----

From: "Trivisonno, Ron" <Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us>


Date: February 24, 2016 at 12:44:26 PM EST
To: "Helmer, Stephen" <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>

Cc: "McCracken, Charles" <Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov>, "Pratt, Beth"


<Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us>, "Worstall, Robert" <robert.worstall@dnr.state.oh.us>

Subject: Pressure Tech trip report


FYI

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
- proteet~El-health-information.. lf-you-are.not.theintendecl rncipient,be-advised thattheunauthorizeduse,--------~
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

Pressure Tech indicated they have sent TE NORM waste to Kentucky.


I have an email from ODNR and will forward it to you.
Steve Helmer
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Steve;
From the manifests we have reviewed for our Green Valley Landfill in the Ashland, KY area, it appears that Pressure T e e .
has been shipping TENORM wastes from Muskingum County, Ohio managed by BES Technical Solutions, LLC which is the
firm associate with Cory Hoskins.
Shipment of TENORM wastes from Ohio for disposal in Kentucky is prohibited by KRS.
When you met with Pressure Tech and Cory Hoskins, did they indicate they have been shipping waste containing
TENORM to Kentucky?
Thanks for your assistance and sharing what you learned.
George

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 2:12 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us;
Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us; Rebecca.Fugitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
George,
We appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.
As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas industry waste
substance facility).
2

GP1314

In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority over the Oil and Gas
Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website.
~ met Tim Stapleton from Pressure Tech as well as Cory Hoskins from BES, LLC or BES Technical Solutions, LLC or
~anced TENORM Services, LLC.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this facility, but the
planning fell through when the site's owner passed away.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it down last Friday. He's getting questions, but admitted "it's just a
website" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskinsif he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr. Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he backed away
from pursuing it.
Currently, I do not have much on f:airmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's Beth Pratt and
Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
Sincerely,

Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section

.14-728-3611
9-iageOOl.jpg>

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:36 PM
To: Helmer, Stephen <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC) <Tony.Hatton@ky.gov>; Maybriar, Jon (EEC) <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>; Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
<Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments of TENO RM to our
landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of Cory Hoskins associated with
Advanced TENORM Services (also associated with BES, LLC and BES Technical Solutions, LLC) and his activities
surrounding shipments of out of state TENORM to Kentucky.
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have attached that to
this email message.
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our situation and the
investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:

9"

Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859.
v" Copy of the web pages from Advanced TENORM Services and LLC information.
3

GP1315

./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory of Advanced
TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's brother. Cory is standing in the
doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive
~
Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with.
~
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was disposed of at Blue
Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine Processing .
./ Analytical results from Advanced TENORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who manages Green
. V_C3JleyJ,~rii!filL~n<;I~~~ Lr:ic_Ll!c;i~<J. wlth~ th~ mantfe.st tor t~~shJ1:>mgm of th_~JINQ~tvLw~~1~~

We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TENO RM here in Kentucky. We
believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at the Blue Ridge
Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey and sampling protocol in the
future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to the
management of TENO RM waste in .Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the operators and managers
of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George

(jeorge P. PartrUfae Jr., Pli'D, P.'E., Q.'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image002.gif>

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:07 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
Hi George,
Please send what you can to better understand your concerns.

S~'71~

Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section

614-728-3611
4

GP1316

<imageOOl.jpg>
~s e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or

~tected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

I5

GP1317

Partridge, George (EEC)

A.m:
.,.,t:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:44 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Central Midwest Instate Low-Level Radiactive Waste Commission

Danny;
When we are meeting with Curt and if time allows, I would like to have him help us understand better how the Compact
applies the definition of LLRW to a waste analysis for radionuclides and combines them into a value such as 5 piC/g
6
228
which often is reported for a combination of Raii. and Ra by states.
Thank you!
George

Definition of LLRW:
What is LLRW?
Compact defines LLRW as "radioactive waste not classified as (1)
-level radioactive waste, (2) transuranic waste (3) spent nuclear fuel,
(4) by-product material as defined in Section 11 e(2) of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954. This definition shall apply notwithstanding any
declaration by the federal government, a state or any regulatory agency
that any radioactive material is exempt from any regulatory control."
Because it is defined by what it is not, some LLRW can have high
concentrations of radionuclides, irrespective of its name.
Functionally, LLRW is classified into four classes; A, B, C or greater than
class C (GTCC). LLRW is classified based on the concentration of key
short and long half-life radionuclides present in the waste. Class A has
the lowest concentration of these radionuclides. Class B has higher
concentrations of the shorter half-life radionuclides. Class Chas the
highest concentrations of both short and long half-life radionuclides.
GTCC contains short and long half-life radionuclides in concentrations
that exceed the limits established for Class C. The U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (US NRC) has determined that this waste is not
suitable for near surface disposal.
The federal Policy Act makes disposal of class A, B and C wastes a
responsibility of states and compacts and the disposal of GTCC wastes
a federal responsibility. In addition, LLRW that is (1) owned or generated
by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), (2) owned or generated by the
U.S. Navy as a result of decommissioning Navy vessels, (3) resulting
from research, development, testing or production of atomic weapons,
(4) identified by the federal government under its program to
. .ntaminate sites used during the Manhattan Project (the Formerly
Utilized Site Remedial Action Program) are also federal responsibilities.
In 1996 Public Law 104-134 was enacted clarifying that states are not
1

GP1318

responsible for LLRW originating from the operation, decontamination


and decommissioning of uranium enrichment facilities.
A half-life is the time in which half of the atoms of a particular radioactive
substance disintegrate to another nuclear form. Each radionuclide has a
specific half-life. Half-lives measure from millionths of a second to
billions of years. As a general rule, the passage of ten half-lives is
considered sufficient to reduce the radioactivity to a level (0.00097% of
the original amount) no longer considered hazardous.

(jeorge P. Partritfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

,
2

GP1319

Partridge, George (EEC)

.,,,,t:

A..m
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:50 PM
Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
FW: KY Landfill Concern

Daniel
Ohio has been investigating the TENORM shipping activity to Kentucky for me.
Please see correspondence below.
George

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 2:12 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us;
Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us; Rebecca.Fugitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
rorge,
- - - appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.
As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas industry waste
substance facility).
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority over the Oil and Gas
Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website.
We met Tim Stapleton from Pressure Tech as well as Cory Hoskins from BES, LLC or BES Technical Solutions, LLC or
Advanced TENORM Services, LLC.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this facility, but the
planning fell through when the site's owner passed away.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it down last Friday. He's getting questions, but admitted "it's just a
website" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskins if he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr. Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he backed away
from pursuing it.
Currently, I do not have much on Fairmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's Beth Pratt and
Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
Sincerely,

!e

s~~~
1

GP1320

Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:36 PM
To: Helmer, Stephen <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC) <Tony.Hatton@ky.gov>; Maybriar, Jon (EEC) <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>; Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
<Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: RE: KY landfill Concern
Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments of TENO RM to our
landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of Cory Hoskins associated with
Advanced TENO RM Services (also associated with BES, LLC and BES Technical Solutions, LLC) and his activities
surrounding shipments of out of state TENO RM to Kentucky.
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have attached that to
this email message.
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our situation and the
investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TENORM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory of Advanced
TENORM Services {individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's brother. Cory is standing in the
doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive
Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was disposed of at Blue
Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine Processing .
./ Analytical results from Advanced TENO RM Services that was provided to Republic Services who manages Green
Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the TENO RM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TE NORM here in Kentucky. We
believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at the Blue Ridge
landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey and sampling protocol in the
future will confirm ifthat is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to the
,
management of TE NORM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the operators and manage
of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
2

GP1321

Thank you again,


-cerely,
George

<george P. Partridge Jr., Pli'D, P/E., Q_'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:07 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern


~George,

---ase send what you can to better understand your concerns.

S~'ri'~
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section

614-728-3611

... . . , '.10
10

h..... "..
. Dep.1rtm1nt of Ho~ Ith

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

GP1322

Partridge, George (EEC)

m
. .nt:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:53 PM
Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
FW: Pressure Tech trip report
Trip Report 2-17-16 ODH.docx; ATTOOOOl.htm

Daniel:
Trip report attached from Ohio for site visit to Pressure Tech and including in meeting was Cory Hoskins.
Associated email correspondence sent in a separate email message.
George

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:34 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: Fwd: Pressure Tech trip report


fyi

a..
-9nt

veHelmer
from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Trivisonno, Ron" <Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us>


Date: February 24, 2016 at 12:44:26 PM EST
To: "Helmer, Stephen" <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: "McCracken, Charles" <Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov>, "Pratt, Beth"
<Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us>, "Worstall, Robert" <robert.worstall@dnr.state.oh.us>

Subject: Pressure Tech trip report


FYI

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

GP1323

Partridge, George (EEC)

m:
. .t:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:54 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Pressure Tech trip report

To:

Subject:

Curt;
Sent trip report and associated email correspondence to both you and Jason.
Thank you,
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:11 PM

To:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: FW: Pressure Tech trip report
Thanks George. Pretty damning evidence.

..

Tim described how PT, with the assistance of BES (Cory Hoskins), would sort the boxes of solidified waste
and determine which boxes went to KY or WVa. Because all the waste was expected to exceed Ohio's 5+2
pCi/g Ra, none of the waste was ever disposed of in Ohio.

Did you share this with Jason Frame in WV as well?

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

..

vm.~)
l~-m
:g
floAtlJATitiN~H~U.tH

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


nt: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:00 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: FW: Pressure Tech trip report
1

GP1324

Danny & Curt:


Site visit by Ohio to Pressure Tech.
Trip report attached.
George
.from~~tephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.govEmailto~Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.govJ

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:34 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Fwd: Pressure Tech trip report
fyi
Steve Helmer
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:

From: "Trivisonno, Ron" <Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us>


Date: February 24, 2016 at 12:44:26 PM EST
To: "Helmer, Stephen" <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: "McCracken, Charles" <Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov>, "Pratt, Beth"
<Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us>, "Worstall, Robert" <robert.worstall@dnr.state.oh.us>
Subject: Pressure Tech trip report

FYI

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

,
2

GP1325

Partridge, George (EEC)

A.it.om:
--nt:
To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:45 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Meeting Notes for February 19th with Curt Pendergrass
Meeting Between Curt Pendergrass and Danny Anderson - 021916.docx

Danny;
Please find my notes from the meeting that you had with Curt Pendergrass on Friday afternoon, February 19th in
Conference Room 202A.
Thank you for the opportunity to join you and Curt. The meeting was very helpful to my understanding of the
regulations.
George

(jeorge P. Partricfge Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1326

Partridge, George (EEC)

,A..,m:
. . .nt:
To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 7:40 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Alternate daily cover, Marion

With the manifests, we should be able to correlate this to the quarterlies.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:19 AM
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Alternate daily cover, Marion
George;
Yes I noticed this. But I am pushing the point that Billy keeps denying that can be the waste since he would never use it
as alternate daily cover.
Based on what we observed at the site on our survey measurements and on the soil sample - the contamination is
widespread and on the surface of the landfill.
Either way, the waste was not documented accurately.

~lso saw only 1.24 tons of wastes from the Norwich, Ohio area and multiple firms are shipping that waste to Kentucky
, . disposal at Blue Ridge. Billy and Dan have been withholding that information which would likely confirm additional
waste was not reported.
I want to see an NOV for not reporting the waste on the Quarterly Waste Received Report form.
I also totaled the cubic yards reported and that would indicate an amount significantly above the 756 tons.
George P.

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:42 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Alternate daily cover, Marion
You did notice that 47-16 ton loads could logically explain the 756 tons alternate daily cover for "Marion". They'd have
to use the equivalent to a coal hauling trailer. I can't imagine them hauling a roll off down to the BR Landfill.

GP1327

Partridge, George (EEC)


m
. .nt:
To:
Subject:

Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov
Thursday, February 25, 2016 8:47 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: Kentucky Concerns

George,
If you need ODNR records let me know.

Steve Helmer
Sent from my iPhone
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or protected
health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use, disclosure, copying,
distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately delete this e-mail.

..

GP1328

Partridge, George (EEC)

m:
. .t:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 9:46 AM
'Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov'
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
RE: Kentucky Concerns

Steve;
Thank you,
George
-----Original Message----From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 8:47 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: Kentucky Concerns
George,
If you need ODNR records let me know.

ve Helmer
ent from my iPhone
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or protected
health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use, disclosure, copying,
distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately delete this e-mail.

...

GP1329

Partridge, George (EEC)

m:
. .t:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 10:26 AM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: Alternate daily cover, Marion

To:

Subject:

George;
I do not feel the quartiles reported the all the waste received. Even if things were entered in correctly for Marion
County (KV vs WV), then I am surprised we only got 1.24 tons from Muskingum County in Ohio when several companies
were shipping thir waste there.
Time will tell.
Thanks again for all you are doing!
I am glad we finally have the opportunity to work together. I appreciate and have had a wonderful experience working
with those that serve in our field offices.
Looking forward to the meeting this afternoon!
Thanks again,
.eorgeP.

--"--- ---~----~
~"''
(EEC)
..

..

""'"''""'

..............,........................................................................................ ........................................................ ..

From: Weems, George


Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 7:40 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Alternate daily cover, Marion
With the manifests, we should be able to correlate this to the quarterlies.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:19 AM
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Alternate daily cover, Marion
George;
Yes I noticed this. But I am pushing the point that Billy keeps denying that can be the waste since he would never use it
as alternate daily cover.
Based on what we observed at the site on our survey measurements and on the soil sample - the contamination is
widespread and on the surface of the landfill.

; e r way, the waste was not documented accurately.

GP1330

---

----------

I also saw only 1.24 tons of wastes from the Norwich, Ohio area and multiple firms are shipping that waste to Kentucky
for disposal at Blue Ridge. Billy and Dan have been withholding that information which would likely confirm additional
waste was not reported.
I want to see an NOV for not reporting the waste on the Quarterly Waste Received Report form.
I also totaled the cubic yards reported and that would indicate an amount significantly above the 756 tons.
George P.

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:42 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Alternate daily cover, Marion
You did notice that 47-16 ton loads could logically explain the 756 tons alternate daily cover for "Marion". They'd have
to use the equivalent to a coal hauling trailer. I can't imagine them hauling a roll off down to the BR Landfill.

,
2

GP1331

Partridge, George (EEC)

e!;
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:08 AM
Melton, Ken (EEC)
RE: Regulations Pertaining to Radioactive Materials

Ken;
Here are the critical regulations you need to cite highlighted in yellow. I included the other two for your own personal
reference since they are applicable.
Let me know if you need anything else.
George
In State Regulation:

Interstate Commerce:

.~~f~,i~~~'..~~~~~lo~s~~~~~f~}~~~~4~~t!;~t~)6~ctiv.~

. Waste.1n..

KRS 211.869 Penalties


902 KAR 100:012 Fee Schedule

andb.'ut&t.Kerfty,f~Y.z.PfRhl~~ioh~f:~~'5lifiRtJgJt

<george P. Partrid{Je Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1332

Partridge, George (EEC)

'5;;,:

To:
Subject:

Melton, Ken (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:16 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Regulations Pertaining to Radioactive Materials

Thanks George

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:08 AM


To: Melton, Ken (EEC)

Subject: RE: Regulations Pertaining to Radioactive Materials


Ken;
Here are the critical regulations you need to cite highlighted in yellow. I included the other two for your own personal
reference since they are applicable.
Let me know if you need anything else.
George

In State Regulation:

~2 KAR:lOO;OOS General ARplicaBility

........................... ............7........ ........ ..... .... ........... ... . ....


.
....... . .... .... . . ..' .. . ............... .
.. .........

~~~j~~~'(f,t'~r~fJtifi~~~i~[i~~ 0;s"Posi!.bl R~~;o;,tt;v~ ijJOsi~


Interstate Commerce:

~~fff211.869
~f~~,~,~~~~~j~~~~~&~it!~~fit~~ft~i~t~1~ip~~t!~~.W~~!~~1b:ana &~iJc>f~~D:t4PkY~iP(bffj~;H9BfEE~~)tipfi,~d
KRS

Penalties
902 KAR 100:012 Fee Schedule

eorge P. PartridfJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1333

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:28 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
FW: TENORM - Compact Regional Management Plan
Compact Regional Management Plan.pdf

From: Carlton, John (EEC)


Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 1:04 PM

To:

Hatton, Tony (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Aldridge, Louanna (EEC)

Cc: Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)


Subject: TENORM - Compact Regional Management Plan
ALL,
I just found this document which is very enlightening on the position of the Compact Commission regarding TENO RM. In
the Compact Commission's Regional Management Plan, attached, the Commission classifies "NORM, NARM, and
TENORM wastes as [Low-level Radioactive Wastes] and, as such, these wastes are subject to the LLRW policies
enumerated in the Plan." (p. 38)
Regarding imported TENORM, "For the present, the Commission intends to operate on the assumption that citizens are

-.iing to accept responsibility for LLRW generated within their own region, but not for LLRW generated by others ... It is
~Commission's policy to prohibit access to the regional LLRW disposal facility for imported LLRW." (p. 18) Pages 27-31
discuss the policies of NORM, NARM, and TENO RM to a fairly in-depth degree. The Compact also assigns a limit on the
radioactivity of TENO RM allowed for import into the region: "It is the Commission's policy to prohfbit the import of
TENO RM waste with concentrations equal to or greater than 5 pCi/g into the region for disposal." (p. 30)
Regarding disposal of LLRW at non-LLRW regional facilities, "The Commission's policy is to allow the disposal of exempt
quantities of LLRW in disposal facilities other than the regional disposal facility. The disposal of these exempted
quantities shall. be performed as specified in the current radiation control regulations of each of the party states." (p. 37)
Also, "It is the Commission's policy that TENORM waste with concentrations equal to or greater than 2000 pCi/g shall be
disposed at the regional LLRW disposal facility. TENORM waste with concentrations less than 2000 pCi/g shall be
disposed in accordance with the method approved by the appropriate party state regulatory agency."
The document is attached for your reference.
Thanks!

fl*~,~
Internal Policy Analyst II
.......~monwealth of Kentucky
_,-rgy and Environment Cabinet
Department for Environmental Protection
Division of Waste Management
1

GP1334

Program Planning & Administration Branch


Program Development Section
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd floor
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
john.carlton@ky.gov
phone: 502.564.6716 ext. 4023
fax: 502.564.4049

,ert

think before you ink

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

GP1335

Partridge, George (EEC)

-m

Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:55 AM
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
RE: Photos from Site Visit to Advanced TE NORM Services
Advanced TENORM Services - Photos - 020416.pdf

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Hatton, Tony (EEC)

Delivered: 2/25/2016 11:56 AM

Sent:

To:

Tony:
Photos from site visit attached.
Address is:

Advanced TENORM Services


151 University Drive
West Liberty, KY 41472
Location: partitioned office area on upper floor of library building .

organ County Public Library


I have my cell phone with me if a question comes up and I am away from my desk:
Cell Phone: 859-221-8843
Thank you again for all you are doing for this project and our Division!
George

(]eorge P. Partricfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1336

Partridge, George (EEC)

--om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:56 AM
Delivered: RE: Photos from Site Visit to Advanced TENO RM Services

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Hatton. Tony (EEC) (Tony.Hatton@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Photos from Site Visit to Advanced TENORM Services

GP1337

Partridge, George {EEC)

-om:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 1:16 PM
Maze, Rodney (EEC)
FW: Pressure Tech trip report
Trip Report 2-17-16 ODH.docx; ATTOOOOl.htm

Sent:

To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Rodney;
ODH made a site visit to Pressure Tech in Ohio. Please find attached the trip report we received from Steve Helmer.
also had sent it to Curt Pendergrass and his reaction is also included below in the email I received from him.
Please be sure to read this before our meeting today!
Will also send you notes I have from Steve as well.
Look forward to the meeting this afternoon!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:11 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
~ Anderson, Danny J (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
~bject: FW: Pressure Tech trip report
Thanks George. Pretty damning evidence.

Tim described how PT, with the assistance of BES (Cory Hoskins), would sort the boxes of solidified waste
and determine which boxes went to KY or WVa. Because all the waste was expected to exceed Ohio's 5+2
pCi/ g Ra, 'none of the waste was ever disposed of in Ohio.

Did you share this with Jason Frame in WV as well?


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~otified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
o s e of u~anted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Jfr!j

. -~-,.....

f!.J!;;tr~t"!Olll

.~--

li~t.:nt
1

GP1338

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:00 PM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: FW: Pressure Tech trip report
Danny & Curt:
Site visit by Ohio to Pressure Tech.
Trip report attached.
George

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:34 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC}
Subject: Fwd: Pressure Tech trip report

fyi
Steve Helmer
Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:


From: "Trivisonno, Ron" <Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us>
Date: February 24, 2016 at 12:44:26 PM EST
To: "Helmer, Stephen" <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: "McCracken, Charles" <Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov>, "Pratt, Beth"
<Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us>, "Worstall, Robert" <robert.worstall@dnr.state.oh.us>
Subject: Pressure Tech trip report

FYI

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.

GP1339

Partridge, George (EEC)

,,om:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 1:18 PM
Maze, Rodney (EEC)
FW: KY Landfill Concern

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Rodney;
Here is the correspondence I have had with Ohio following a phone I made to ask a question.
Look forward to us continuing to work together on this!
George

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:32 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: Re: KY Landfill Concern


Pressure Tech indicated they have sent TENO RM waste to Kentucky.
I have an email from ODNR and will forward it to you.

~veHelmer
~nt from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Steve;
From the manifests we have reviewed for our Green Valley Landfill in the Ashland, KY area, it appears
that Pressure Tech has been shipping TENORM wastes from Muskingum County, Ohio managed by BES
Technical Solutions, LLC which is the firm associate with Cory Hoskins.
Shipment of TENO RM wastes from Ohio for disposal in Kentucky is prohibited by KRS.
When you met with Pressure Tech and Cory Hoskins, did they indicate they have been shipping waste
containing TENO RM to Kentucky?
Thanks for your assistance and sharing what you learned.
George

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 2:12 PM

To:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us;
Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us; Rebecca.Fugitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
1

GP1340

George,
We appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.
As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas
industry waste substance facility).
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority
over the.Oil and Gas Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website .

. . .W~ln~tiitll ~!fil>J~~tQLLfIQHLPL~.S?.IJr:f!J~~.bj:l~ ~~U.ci.s <;9r:y H()S.~tl}sJr()l!lJtE?,. hL<::.(~rJ!E~J~~b_r:i~!lJ .. .

Solutions, LLC or Advanced TENORM Services, LLC.


Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this
facility, but the planning fell through when the site's owner passed away.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it down last Friday. He's getting questions, but
admitted "it's just a website" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskins if he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr, Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he
backed away from pursuing it.
Currently, I do not have much on Fairmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's
Beth Pratt and Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
Sincerely,

S~'ll~
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
<image001.jpg>
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:36 PM
To: Helmer, Stephen <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC) <Tony.Hatton@ky.gov>; Maybriar, Jon (EEC) <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>; Anderson,
Danny J (EEC) <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern

Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments of
TENO RM to our landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of
Cory Hoskins associated with Advanced TENORM Services (also associated with BES, LLC and BES
Technical Solutions, LLC) and his activities surrounding shipments of out of state TE NORM to Kentucky .
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have
attached that to this email message.
2

GP1341

-------------

-----

--------------

Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our
situation and the investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TENO RM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory
of Advanced TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's
brother. Cory is standing in the doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity
is Chris Keffer with .our DPH - Radioactive Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was
disposed of at Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine
Processing .
./Analytical results from Advanced TENORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who
manages Green Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the
TENORM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TE NORM here in
Kentucky. We believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at
the Blue Ridge Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey
and sampling protocol in the future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to
the management of TENO RM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the
operators and managers of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George

(jeorne P. PartridiJe Jr., Pli'D, P.'E., Q.'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
- Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image002 .gif>

From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]


Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:07 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
-

HiGeorge,
Please send what you can to better understand your concerns.
3

GP1342

---~---

Program Administrator
OhiO Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section

614-728-3611
<image001.jpg>

This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged,
sensitive, or protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that
the unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents
of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately delete this e-mail.

GP1343

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Lindsey & Debbie Briggs <ldbriggs@bellsouth.net>


Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:10 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: TENORM

On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKYT's Facebook page has someone saying the material is
exempt.
Lindsey

>On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:

>
>Lindsey;

>
> Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.
>
>George

>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
o: Partridge, George (EEC)
ubject: Re: TENORM

>
"

>Has there been an acceptance of authority by someone?

>
>Lindsey

>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>
Lindsey;

>>
Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.

>>
At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>>
Have a nice week!

>>
George

>>
-----Original Message----~rom: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
W-ent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: TE NORM
1

GP1344

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:32 PM
'Lindsey & Debbie Briggs'
RE:TENORM

Lindsey;
We knew ahead of time of the news release and are aware of what is taking place.
George
-----Original Message----From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:10 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM
On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKYT's Facebook page has someone saying the material is
exempt.
Lindsey

- n Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:

>
>Lindsey;

>
>Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.

>
>George

>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: Re: TENO RM

>
>Has there been an acceptance of authority by someone?

>
>Lindsey

>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>
. .indsey;
Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.

>>
1

GP1345

At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>>
Have a nice week!
>>
George
>>
-----Original Message---- From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net)

...?~-~gnt.Il,!~~~c!~,.Je ~.ntfil'i-1~.L.~QJ.J:?}~M ..
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: TENORM
>>
>>George,
>>
Any progress at Blue Ridge?
>>
Lindsey

>

GP1346

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 8:24 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
manifests

Let's do those manifests we have; I'll put them in a spreadsheet. Do we have anything new from those we were
emailed?

1.
I

'

GP1347

Subject:

Lindsey & Debbie Briggs <ldbriggs@bellsouth.net>


Friday, February 26, 2016 8:27 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: TENORM

The newspaper article is better than WKYT's press release. Why was McKinley unavailable for comment?
Lindsey

> On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:

>
>Lindsey;

>
>We knew ahead of time of the news release and are aware of what is taking place.
>
>George

>

> -----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]


>Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:10 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
ubject: Re: TENORM

>
>On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKVT's Facebook page has someone saying the material is
exempt.

>
>Lindsey

>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>
Lindsey;

>>
Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.

>>
George
>>
-----Original Message---- From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM

>>
- a s there been an acceptance of authority by someone?
Lindsey

>>
1

GP1348

>>
>On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>>
> Lindsey;
>>>
>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>>>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
---- ?2?~-------~---

- ------------- --- --- ---- -------~

> Have a nice week!


>>>
>George
>>>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
> Subject: TENORM
>>>
>>>George,
>>>
>Any progress at Blue Ridge?
>>>
>Lindsey
>>

>

GP1349

Partridge, George (EEC)

m
nt:

To:

Subject:

Lindsey & Debbie Briggs <ldbriggs@bellsouth.net>


Friday, February 26, 2016 8:27 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: TENORM

The newspaper article is better than WKYT's press release. Why was McKinley unavailable for comment?
Lindsey

>On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:

>
>Lindsey;

>
>We knew ahead of time of the news release and are aware of what is taking place.

>
>George

>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:10 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
.ubject: Re: TENORM
>On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKYT's Facebook page has someone saying the material is
exempt.

>
>Lindsey

>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>
Lindsey;

>>
Not that I am aware of. There are on~going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.

>>
George
>>
-----Original Message---- From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TE NORM

>>
, , a s there been an acceptance of authority by someone?
Lindsey

>>
1

GP1350

----------------

>>
>On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:

I:

Lindsey;

>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>>>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>>>
> Have a nice week!
>>>
>George
>>>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: TENORM
>>>
>>>George,
>>>
>Any progress at Blue Ridge?
>>>
>Lindsey
>>

GP1351

Partridge, George (EEC)

. . . . m

-:;,t:
To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 8:31 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Green Hunter

Here is Green Hunter. http://www.greenhunterresources.com/

Cultivating and Delivering a Diversified Portfolio of OILFIELD FLUID MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS.

GP1352

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 9:40 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Hoskins

Contribution Total : 250.00


HOSKINS. JASON

538 ALEC SPENCER


WEST LIBERTY1 KY, 414720000
Employer : ACERTECH
Occupation : OWNER
Click here to Generate Extract Files

Kentucky Regi
140
Frankfor
Phone: 502_573
Regular Hours of C

To return to the Regist,

Todd Hendricks, P.G.


Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653

GP1353

----------

Partridge, George (EEC)

ti!::
To:
Subject:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 9:40 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Hoskins

Contribution Total: 250.00


HOSKINS, JASON
538 ALEC SPENCER
WEST LIBERTY, KY, 414720000
Employer : ACERTECH
Occupation : OWNER
Click here to Generate Extract Files

Kentucky Regi

140
Frankfor
Phone: 502_573
Regular Hours of C
To return to the Regist1

Todd Hendricks, P.G.


Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653

GP1354

Partridge, George (EEC)

fl'-om:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

McKeePerez, Nancy < McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


Friday, February 26, 2016 9:41 AM
Partridge, George (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Lamberth, Larry; Danois, Hector
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Hi George and Jeri,


In prep for today's meeting, I'd like to share some resources:
https://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/index.htm
And, specifically: https://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/oil-gas.pdf
Take a look at "Scope of the Exemption", "Exempt/Non-exempt", "common misunderstandings". Also take a look at (p.
22) for the definition of "uniquely associated with".
Page 8 provides a "rule of thumb" to determine if the waste would be exempt:
1) Has the waste come from down-hole, i.e., was it brought to the surface during oil and gas E&P operations?
2) Has the waste otherwise been generated by contact with the oil and gas production stream during the
removal of produced water or other contaminants from the product?
In my review, I've taken a look at our guidance documents on E&P Waste, looked up the Fairmont facility in RCRAlnfo
ur national hazardous waste database), looked up the Fairmont facility website, and I also spoke to my R2 contact,
ich is the region that oversees West Virginia.
RAlnfo showed that the facility is the lowest generator of hazardous waste (a conditionally exempt small quantity
generator (CESQG}.
The process provided on their website explains that they pretreat the brine to remove Ba, Sr, TSS, O&G, turbidity and
organics. It doesn't specify how they do this. I'm assuming this where the waste filters are coming from? The treated
brine is then pumped to surface impoundments, where evaporation/crystallization occurs. I'm assuming the waste
sludge is coming from (the bottom of the surface impoundment)?
Also, I took a look at the analytical results. Based on these results, it doesn't appear that the waste would be hazardous,
if the waste was determined to be non-exempt. To gain better insight on the results, I spoke to our EPA lab (located in
Athens, GA}. He said it looked like the type of analysis usually used when waste is sent to a hazardous waste landfill,
which provides info on whether the waste meets Land Disposal Restriction requirements (which is odd, since they're
claiming the 261.4(b}(5} exemption from hazardous waste regulations). Also, in looking through the results, he said that
the material appeared to be fairly wet; it had a high% moisture and it failed the paint filter test.

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
- : Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
1

GP1355

Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Hello Nancy;

Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.

Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such

as Fairmont Brine Processing.

We look forward to talking with you again next week.

Thanks again for your assistance!

Sincerely,
George

(jeorge P. Partrirfee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1356

Partridge, George (EEC)

flam:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Mc Kee Perez, Nancy < McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


Friday, February 26, 2016 9:41 AM
Partridge, George (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Lamberth, Larry; Danois, Hector
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Hi George and Jeri,


In prep for today's meeting, I'd like to share some resources:
https:ljwww3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/index.htm
And, specifically: https://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/oil-gas.pdf
11
Take a look at "Scope of the Exemption 11 , "Exempt/Non-exempt11 , "common misunderstandings Also take a look at (p.
11
22) for the definition of "uniquely associated with
Page 8 provides a "rule of thumb11 to determine if the waste would be exempt:
1) Has the waste come from down-hole, i.e., was it brought to the surface during oil and gas E&P operations?
2) Has the waste otherwise been generated by contact with the oil and gas production stream during the
removal of produced water or other contaminants from the product?
In my review, I've taken a look at our guidance documents on E&P Waste, looked up the Fairmont facility in RCRAlnfo
ur national hazardous waste database), looked up the Fairmont facility website, and I also spoke to my R2 contact,
ich is the region that oversees West Virginia.
CRAlnfo showed that the facility is the lowest generator of hazardous waste (a conditionally exempt small quantity
generator (CESQG).
The process provided on their website explains that they pretreat the brine to remove Ba, Sr, TSS, O&G, turbidity and
organics. It doesn't specify how they do this. I'm assuming this where the waste filters are coming from? The treated
brine is then pumped to surface impoundments, where evaporation/crystallization occurs. I'm assuming the waste
sludge is coming from (the bottom of the surface impoundment)?
Also, I took a look at the analytical results. Based on these results, it doesn't appear that the waste would be hazardous,
if the waste was determined to be non-exempt. To gain better insight on the results, I spoke to our EPA lab (located in
Athens, GA). He said it looked like the type of analysis usually used when waste is sent to a hazardous waste landfill,
which provides info on whether the waste meets Land Disposal Restriction requirements (which is odd, since they're
claiming the 261.4(b)(5) exemption from hazardous waste regulations). Also, in looking through the results, he said that
the material appeared to be fairly wet; it had a high % moisture and it failed the paint filter test.

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
- : Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
,
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
1

GP1357

Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@kv.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Hello Nancy;

Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.

Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.

We look forward to talking with you again next week.


Thanks again for your assistance!

Sincerely,
George

(jeorge P. PartridfJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1358

.;

Partridge, George {EEC)

~~:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


Friday, February 26, 2016 9:41 AM
Partridge, George (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Lamberth, Larry; Danois, Hector
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Hi George and Jeri,


In prep for today's meeting, I'd like to share some resources:
https:/fwww3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/index.htm
And, specifically: https://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/oil-gas.pdf
Take a look at "Scope of the Exemption", "Exempt/Non-exempt", "common misunderstandings". Also take a look at (p.
22) for the definition of "uniquely associated with".
Page 8 provides a "rule of thumb" to determine if the waste would be exempt:
1) Has the waste come from down-hole, i.e., was it brought to the surface during oil and gas E&P operations?
2) Has the waste otherwise been generated by contact with the oil and gas production stream during the
removal of produced water or other contaminants from the product?
In my review, I've taken a look at our guidance documents on E&P Waste, looked up the Fairmont facility in RCRAlnfo
(our national hazardous waste database), looked up the Fairmont facility website, and I also spoke to my R2 contact,
ich is the region that oversees West Virginia.
RAlnfo showed that the facility is the lowest generator of hazardous waste (a conditionally exempt small quantity
generator (CESQG).
The process provided on their website explains that they pretreat the brine to remove Ba, Sr, TSS, O&G, turbidity and
organics. It doesn't specify how they do this. I'm assuming this where the waste filters are coming from? The treated
brine is then pumped to surface impoundments, where evaporation/crystallization occurs. I'm assuming the waste
sludge is coming from (the bottom of the surface impoundment)?
Also, I took a look at the analytical results. Based on these results, it doesn't appear that the waste would be hazardous,
if the waste was determined to be non-exempt. To gain better insight on the results, I spoke to our EPA lab {located in ,
Athens, GA). He said it looked like the type of analysis usually used when waste is sent to a hazardous waste landfill,
which provides info on whether the waste meets Land Disposal Restriction requirements {which is odd, since they're
claiming the 261.4{b)(S) exemption from hazardous waste regulations). Also, in looking through the results, he said that
the material appeared to be fairly wet; it had a high% moisture and it failed the paint filter test.
Nancy McKee Perez
Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov

(404) 562-8674

Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
1

GP1359

Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.

Please find attached the following documents:


--

-----

=---~-

~----

Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documen.ts and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.

We look forward to talking with you again next week.


Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

~eor9eP.PartridfjeJ~
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1360

Partridge, George (EEC)

fl!j.om:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 9:51 AM
'Lindsey & Debbie Briggs'
RE: TENORM

Lindsey;
Please direct all your questions to Tony Hatton and Jon Maybrair. They are the ones corresponding with everyone
considering all that happened.
George
-----Origina I Message----From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 8:27 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM
The newspaper article is better than WKVT's press release. Why was McKinley unavailable for comment?
Lindsey

..
On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>
>Lindsey;

>
>We knew ahead of time of the news release and are aware of what is taking place.

>
>George

>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:10 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: Re: TENO RM

>
>On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKYT's Face book page has someone saying the material is
exempt.

> '
>Lindsey

>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
indsey;
>>
Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.
1

GP1361

>>
George
>>
-----Original Message---- From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM
>>
_ <?_Hc:i_~ thgrgJ.:i~_~ruu1 g<;<;eptan~r:9f !'!_1.1ttiority by sorl'leoneO?
>>
Lindsey
>>
>>
>On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>>
> Lindsey;
>>>
>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>>>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>>>
> Have a nice week!
>>>
>George
>>>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: TENO RM
>>>
>>>George,
>>>
>Any progress at Blue Ridge?
>>>
>Lindsey
>>

>

.....
2

GP1362

- - - - - - -

Partridge, George (EEC)

a.,m
~nt:
To:

Subject:

Young, Anita (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 11:58 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Thinking of you

I know you have had a rough last couple of weeks ....... Just wanted to let you know that I am praying for your health &
wellbeing during these difficult times.
Please take care of yourself and try to eat & get enough rest.
I appreciate your perseverance & determination in trying to resolve the issues that concern us all greatly.
I greatly appreciate all that you are trying to do to protect others and to hold the ones involved accountable.
Take care of yourself
Anita

GP1363

Partridge, George (EEC)

--m
~t:
To:

Cc:

Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Friday, February 26, 2016 12:01 PM
Kalt, Brian
McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC);
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH);
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: Fairmont Brine Processing

Hello Mr. Kalt,


It was a pleasure speaking with you on the phone this morning. Again, I want to thank you and Fairmont Brine
Processing for reaching out to our office and to our colleagues in the Dept. of Environmental Protection as we work to
resolve the issues we are now facing. With this now making front page news in the local papers, the sooner we get a
firm grip on what we are dealing with and the potential impact to public health and safety, the better.
And I especially want to thank you for offering to provide samples of sludge from this same settling tank where the
material we are now dealing with first originated at FBP. The fact that the tank is used in the initial stage of settling and
precipitation of oil and gas flowback and produced fluids, I would imagine the sludge now in your tanks is fairly
representative of what was there last summer when these tanks were cleaned out and the material brought to KY. As
you said, you will understandably need to first discuss this with your attorneys to get their input, but I can assure you
that we will be more than happy to split those samples with FBP so you can have them analyzed by another lab of your
choosing for comparison. The Dept. for Public Health, Radiation Health Branch has its own Environmental Monitoring
AJ.poratory and the samples you provide would have the radiochemical analysis conducted by our laboratory and I am
~ my colleagues in Solid Wastes will wish to conduct their own analysis as well for other non-radioactive constituents.
We will probably reach out to our colleagues in the WV Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and
Indoor Air Division to assist us in our sampling trip to your Fairmont WV facility.
As for your requests for documents provided by Mr. Cory Hoskins of Advanced TENORM Services/BES Technical
Solutions, Waste Management and Pace Analytical, I am going to have to forward that along to my colleagues in Solid
Waste for their input and consideration. As we discussed, the very preliminary radiation survey results by a staff
member from this office showed slightly elevated exposure rate readings in localized areas of the landfill cap but the
region where the landfill in question is located was found to have a high amount of shale which contains elevated levels
of natural uranium and thorium and decay daughters. Obviously, much more thorough and extensive radiation surveys
and sampling will need to be conducted to better characterize and quantify the radiological concerns.
Thank you again for reaching out to our office and we look forward to working with you and FBP to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
-502-564-3700 ext. 4183
502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov

IT:

GP1364

Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.kv.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Ynn(U~

l~!#<li~Mf~w:~f"'J\J)!ATltrf'ij&.HSiH.TH

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 11:14 AM

. ~to: Penoergrass;-curtTCHFs r>PH)


Subject: Fairmont Brine Processing
Mr. Pendergrass

Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today. Per our conversation, if you would, please send the following:

1. Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TENO RM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
2.
3.
4.

Kentucky DEP and or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Services.
Any documentation and or results from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management.
Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
You mentioned that your team did some radiation monitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the results
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send analysis once received.

If anything else is needed on our end, please let me know.

Respcetfully,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1365

Partridge, George (EEC)

--m
~t:

To:
Subject:

Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 1:17 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
$275M SHALE BRINE PLANT SET IN W.VA. - FAIRMONT FIRM LOSES CONTRACT FOR
FACILITY

Perhaps, this was the reason they went with BES Technologies.

$275M SHALE BRINE PLANT SET IN W.VA. - FAIRMONT FIRM LOSES


CONTRACT FOR FACILITY

Page: D-1
The news that Antero Resources will build a massive $275 million wastewater
treatment plant to process shale brine in West Virginia wasn't a surprise for Brian
Kalt, general manager with Fairmont Brine Processing.
The surprise was learning that Antero would be building the plant with Veolia
Water Technologies, a branch of the French technology giant.
The Denver-based oil and gas company announced Wednesday that over the next
two years Veolia will design, build and operate the Sandstrom Wastewater
Treatment facility, a 60,000-barrel-a-day plant that will evaporate and crystalize
produced water - yielding fresh water and salt products to be used by the oil and
,. . industry.

GP1366

Clearing of the site, a patch of land near Route 50 in Doddridge County, has begun,
and Antero has filed two permits with the state, one for construction and another
for air emissions, over the past two months. That's how Mr. Kalt confirmed what
he'd been hearing - that his small company's major break was at risk.

f/j

Fairmont, a sister company of Pittsburgh-based Venture Engineering, has a small


ev~aporationand .crys1allizatton

pJant Jnfairmgnt, W.Va., wh~re~AnteroJ~Jts~- .

anchor client. The facility is a tenth of the size of what Veolia will be building.
Mr. Kalt said his company has spent the past year and $2 million on engineering
work for the large plant, which would have been tailored to Antero's needs but
also would have room for other producers' water.
Fairmont kept Antero apprised of its progress and forwarded all drawings and
descriptions of its treatment process, he said.
"Had we known that this was a possibility, we would not have allowed them so
much access to our patented process despite the non-disclosure agreement and
,
confidentiality agreement set forth in our contract," he said.
Alvyn Schopp, chief administrative officer and Antero's regional vice president of
Appalachia, said the company hasn't broken any confidentiality agreements and
did not share Fairmont's drawings with anyone.
"I'm sure they are disappointed," he said. "Fairmont and Veolia weren't the only
ones we looked at. We believe that we have been very fair with Fairmont, very
upfront with Fairmont."
Antero's contract for the existing Fairmont plant runs through 2016 and, despite a
recent pause, Mr. Schopp said the plan is to continue to send water to Fairmont
through the remainder of its contract.

After 18 months of planning, he said Antero chose the company that would deliver
"the most technologically advanced plant."

fll

"We think this will be closely watched by industry to see how successful this is," he
2

GP1367

said. If proven to be a viable alternative to disposal wells, Mr. Schopp said he


hopes more such plants will be built.

Veolia did not respond to calls for comment.

Antero said Wednesday that Sandstrom would be part of the company's water
division, which was incorporated in November and is being negotiated for sale to
Antero Midstream, a master limited partnership partly owned by Antero.

The oil and gas driller has operations in the Marcellus and Utica shales. Unlike
some operators that focus on exploration and production, and outsource
everything else, Antero is known to prefer to have control over all aspects, said
David Meats, an equity analyst with Morningstar Inc. That way it can tailor
infrastructure to its needs and control costs.
Antero said Wednesday that when the facility is ramped up, it will amount to a
$150,000 savings on each well.

. o u have to get rid of the water somehow. The need for water in tracking is huge.
-,,the other options were lower cost, they'd be doing that," Mr. Meats said.
Mr. Kalt said losing Antero will mean a "significant loss of revenue" for his
company. He said Fairmont will try to cobble together enough other producers to
justify building a large plant anyway.
Memo: Anya Litvak: alitvak@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1455.
Record: 15082018714642
Copyright: Copyright (c) 2015 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

GP1368

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 1:21 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
GreenHunter: Multistate Groups Demand Coast Guard Action to Protect Ohio River

Multistate Groups Demand Coast Guard Action to Protect Ohio River


Targeted News Service (USA) - February 19_, 2015Browse Issues

Section: Public Policy


COLUMBUS, Ohio, Feb. 18 -- The Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition issued the
following news release:
&ilting seriou.s public health and safety concerns, environmental and community
-,,oups opposed to barging of tracking waste sent a letter to the U.S. Coast Guard
requesting that the agency immediately initiate investigative action related to
GreenHunter, LLC to determine the true contents of waste that GreenHunter, LLC
may be transporting by barge on inland waterways, including the Ohio River and
the Mississippi River, both, sources of drinking water for millions of people.
The letter of February 17, addressed to Captain Richard Timme, also requests the
Coast Guard to issue a "cease and desist" order to GreenHunter, LLC to stop
transporting any "oilfield wastes" while the Coast Guard makes its determination
of what exactly is being shipped by the company. Additionally, the groups' letter
requests the Coast Guard to initiate an "enforcement penalty proceeding" if,
indeed, the Coast Guard finds Green Hunter in violation regarding possible
shipments of "shale gas extraction wastewater," or SGEWW.

For the past two years, GreenHunter, LLC ha.s been seeking U.S. Coast Guard
-mission to transport tracking waste on the Ohio River or other inland
waterways.
1

GP1369

The group's letter references a statement by Kirk Trosclair, COO of GreenHunter to


the Wheeling Intelligencer (2/6/15), 11 GreenHunter Water will continue to

transport 'oilfield waste' until such time as the Coast Guard ultimately decides on
the proper definition of 'shale gas extraction waste water' and the rules under
which such waste water can be transported. Once these rules are finalized,
__ GceenHunterwiJLcampJywitb~~these_rulesand_regulati.ons.

11

_______

-~

__________ _

The group reads Trosclair's statement that GreenHunter 'will continue to


transport' to mean that the company is actively shipping drilling wastes now, with
impunity and without legal authority."
Currently, tracking waste has too many legal exemptions, trade secrets, and
euphemisms associated with it making it difficult to ascertain the precise
components of the tracking waste. This in itself makes this situation not your
typical shipment for transport down the Ohio River. Obviously, the Coast Guard
needs to know exactly what substances are being transported on the waterways
so that they can protect the public interest.
~
Dr. Randi Pokladnik says she "is concerned with the ability of local public drinking
water systems to remove the numerous aromatic organic, carcinogenic and
endocrine disrupting chemicals contained in wastes from shale gas extraction."
"Just the thought of toxic and potentially radioactive unconventional gas well
waste being shipped by barge on the Ohio River sickens me" says Robin Blakeman,
organizer with the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition in Huntington, WV. 11 1, and
three generations of my entire immediate family get our tap water from the
Huntington, WV intakes. I am appalled that a company like Green Hunter would
try to subvert the Coast Guard's authority and may already be shipping this
noxious substance by barge, as well as by truck near the river's edge. I hope the
Coast Guard and the US EPA will do everything in their power to fully investigate
Green Hunter's operations and stop them from any activity which endangers our
tap water!"
One only needs to consider the recent events of Charleston and Fayette County,
West Virginia and Toledo, Ohio to grasp the enormity of the consequences of
2

GP1370

fll'

losing - even temporarily - a source of drinking water.


-bruary 18, 2015
United States Coast GuardO
Sector - Ohio Valley
600 Martin Luther King Jr. Place
Louisville, Kentucky 40202
ATIN: Captain Richard Timme
SUBJ: Request for Investigative Action: GreenHunter LLC Dear Captain Timme:
We are a coalition of grassroots and nongovernmental organizations which have
long and actively opposed the allowance of barge shipments of oil and gas drilling
4'1tastes from hydraulic fracturing (tracking) - what the Coast Guard calls "shale gas
extraction wastewater," or SGEWW - on inland waterways.
We filed comments in the Coast Guard rulemaking as directed, via Regulation.gov,
and our members include persons imminently threatened with environmental and
health hazards by the content of "SGEWW" which may leak or be volatilized or
burned if barge shipment is permitted in your district. We are copying US EPA
Region IV in Atlanta which has jurisdiction over the Ohio River. Emergency
remediation and incident command control measures by the USCG and US EPA
would be needed if this SGEWW is allowed to be shipped. No public notice has
been given to first responders along the banks of the river that SGEWW shipments
would be allowed to commence in order for first responders to be given the
requisite training qnd response equipment to deal with the probable
consequences of SGEWW release or ignition.
M s with growing concern that we have witnessed the unfolding controversy in the
-Jlllllll!st three weeks, in which GreenHunter LLC has insisted during investor
presentations that the firm has received Coast Guard permission to ship oil and
3

GP1371

- - - - - - - - -

- .

gas drilling wastes via barge on the Ohio and Mississippi river systems.
GreenHunter, which has been pursuing permission to ship tracking wastes for
more than two years, has departed from its original scheme to add those wastes
to the Coast Guard list of legal cargoes, and now insists that Captain Richard
Timme has authorized "oilfield wastes" to be river-transported under the terms of
Navigation and Inspection Circular 7-87. As you know, Dr. Cynthia Znati of the
... _... USC.G_HQhaspubJidyd.ente.d_thatSGEWW is ~LPJ~cmitted ~arggforQhioRiYer_.
barge shipment, in part, because of the 70,000 comments received that must be
reviewed, some that include evidence of the radioactivity in the sludge
components which pose risks greater than that of classical "oilfield waste."
We're gratified that Dr. Znati's response to our concerns and news media
questions, correctly communicated the meaning of Captain Timme's
correspondence with GreenHunter, and that the agency is still deliberating the
question of whether USCG would permit SGEWW to be shipped.
We were therefore surprised when GreenHunter LLC defied the USCG authority
over SGEWW shipments by publicly stating its intention to ship these mixed
radioactive and toxic chemical sludge wastes.

On February 6, 2015,Kirk Trosclair, COO of GreenHunter, told the Wheeling


Intelligencer that, "GreenHunter Water will continue to transport 'oilfield waste'
until such time as the Coast Guard ultimately decides on the proper definition of
'shale gas extraction waste water' and the rules under which such waste water can
be transported. Once these rules are finalized, GreenHunter will comply with these
rules and regulations."
(http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/624568/RadiationConcerns-Coast-Guard.html).
We read Trosclair's statement that GreenHunter "will continue to transport" to
mean that the company is actively shipping drilling wastes now, with impunity and
without legal authority. Regulation does not turn on semantic differences, but
instead, on physical evidence. In the instance of transporting radioactivity-laced
industrial toxins on public waterways, the lack of evidence of the true nature of
GreenHunter's cargoes is of grave concern. Therefore, we ask that the Coast Guan~
Criminal Investigative Service be asked to examine the contents of the current
4

GP1372

shipments and the dockside tanks owned by Green Hunter. If these contain
SGEWW as we believe they do, we ask the CGCIS to initiate enforcement penalty
.oceeding or criminal information proceeding in consultation with the Office of
the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio.
The Ohio and Mississippi rivers are a source of drinking water for millions of
people. A January 2015 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
study of the tracking waste stream in Pennsylvania showed that inadequate
traceability and public protections are in place to handle the at-times highlyradioactive tracking emissions and wastes. That study, found here, has prompted
reconsideration of Pennsylvania's weak regulations. Among other findings, tracking
waste liquids (SGEWW) contained levels of radioactivity in excess of 26,600 pCi/L.
1 {Copy of pages excerpted from study enclosed). The federal drinking water
standard is 5 pCi/L. Leakage of GreenHunter cargoes into river waters in the
present circumstances, where the company insists it need not test or characterize
its "oilfield wastes" could be catastrophic, and at a minimum, could pose
continuing environmental and health hazards which would stress public water
. . . pp lies and various forms of wildlife.
For these reasons, we urgently request that the Coast Guard act immediately to
initiate a criminal investigation of operations associated with GreenHunter LLC.
Pending discovery of the contents of any barges and storage tanks, including
records of contents of any barge shipments, to issue an immediate cease and
desist order to Green Hunter to halt any shipments of "oilfield wastes" regardless
of the origins claimed by GreenHunter LLC.
Given GreenHunter's impunity in asserting that they will not follow the USCG HQ
Hazardous Materials Branch Directive, an immediate cease and desist order should
accompany the USCG CGCIS to visit to this shipper's site and its barges to take
evidence of the SGEWW movement that would be admissible in the courts.
Please respond immediately respecting the Coast Guard's planned response to
GreenHunter's defiance of the USCG authority over SGEWW in current and past
- g e shipments. Thanking you in advance,
Teresa Mills
5

GP1373

2319 Parkridge Court

Grove City, OH 43123


On behalf of the signatories that are provided on the following page.
cc:
RADM Kevin Cook, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Hale Boggs Federal Building,
500 Poydras Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Office of Investigation, Coast Guard Criminal Investigative Service
245 Murray Dr. - Bldg. 410 Stop 2600, Washington, DC 20528
James Giattina, US EPA Region IV,
61 Forsyth St. Atlanta, GA 30303
Dr. Cynthia Znati
U.S. Department of Transportation
West Building, Ground Floor
1200 New Jersey Ave SE
Washington , DC 20590-0001
Signatories:
6

GP1374

"'on cern ed Citizens Ohio/Sha le rsvi lie


Mary Greer
Shalersville, OH
Fresh Water Accountability Project
Leatra Harper
Grand Rapids, OH 43522
Southeast Ohio Alliance to Save Our Water
Senecaville, OH 43780

.oncerned Citizens of Medina County


Kathie Jones
Medina, OH
CCLT/Uniontown IEL Superfund Site & Stark
County Concerned Citizens, Christine Borello
Plain Township, Ohio
Guernsey County Citizens Support on Drilling Issues
Greg Pace
eeernsey County, OH
Morrow County Power
7

GP1375

Donna Carver
Mt Gilead, OH
Radioactive Waste Alert
Carolyn Harding
Columbus, OH
Defenders of the Earth Outreach Mission
Rev. Monica Beasley-Martin
Youngstown, OH

Southeastern Ohio Fracking Interest Group


Betsy Cook
Lowell, OH Washington County
West Virginia Sierra Club
Jim Sconyers
Co-Chair, Marcellus Campaign
West Virginia
Center for Health, Environment and Justice

Ohio field office


Teresa Mills
8

GP1376

--

--~

----------

,lumbus,OH
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
Robin Blakeman
Huntington, WV
FaCT-OV
Patricia Jacobson
Wheeling, WV
Ohio Alliance for People and Environment

~ Joseph Cronin
Yellow Springs, OH
Buckeye Forest Council
Heather Cantino, board vice chair
Columbus, OH
Concept Zero Student Group
David Nickell
West Kentucky Community College, KY
-thwest Ohio No Frack Forum
Joanne Gerson
9

GP1377

Cincinnati, OH
Athens County Fracking Action Network
Roxanne Groff, steering committee member
Athens, OH
Licking County Concerned Citizens for Public
Health and Environment
Carol Apacki
Licking County, OH

Jefferson County Ohio Citizens for


Environmental Truth
Jonathan Smuck
Steubenville, OH
Cumberland Chapter Sierra Club
Judy Lyons, Chair
Lexington, KY
Frackfree America National Coalition

Diana Ludwig
McDonald, OH
10

GP1378

JICT-

Faith Communities Together

Ron Prasek, Convener


Ohio
Frackfree Mahoning Valley
Susie Beiersdorfer
Youngstown, OH
Guardians of Mill Creek Park
Lynn Anderson

..,ungstown, OH
Clean Water Action Pennsylvania
Steve Hvozdovich
Pittsburgh, PA
We Are Not Expendable
John Williams
Trumbull County, OH
People for Safe Water
rilyn Welker
Springfield, OH
11

GP1379

Network for Oil and Gas Accountability and


Protection Vanessa Pecec
Concord Twp., OH
Coshocton Environmental and Community
Awareness
Nick Teti
Coshocton, OH
Communities United for Responsible Energy

Caitlin Johnson
Youngstown, OH
Concerned Barnesville Area Residents
John Morgan
Belmont County, OH
Appalachian Ohio Sierra Club
Loraine Mccosker
Athens, OH

Northwest Ohio Alliance to Stop Fracking


Leslie Harper
12

GP1380

"'heeling Water Warriors


Robin Mahonen
Wheeling, WV
Friends of Bell Smith Springs
Sam Stearns
Stonefort, IL
Food & Water Watch
Alison Auciello, Ohio organizer

.ncinnati, OH
[Category: Environment]
TNS 24HariCha 150219 30FurigayJane-5034306 30FurigayJane
Memo: Teresa Mills, 614/507-5651, tmills@chej.org
Index terms: Trade Associations; Press Releases
Dateline: COLUMBUS, Ohio
Record: 5034306
Copyright: Copyright (c) 2015 Targeted News Service. All rights reserved.

13

GP1381

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:

Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 1:37 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Young, Anita (EEC)
requested documents

Sent:

To:
Cc:
Subject:

George,
I'll bring you these documents for your files.

$&~~S

II~

:~;

~~f'l:

~It~

J~N~

Department for Environmental Protection


Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Ln, 2"d Floor
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
Phone: (502) 564-6716

GP1382

Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Friday, February 26, 2016 1:55 PM
Frame, Jason R
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Fairmont Brine Processing

Will do Jason and thanks for the offer and for all the help that you have given us. We literally could not have done this
without you. I have a feeling we are going to be spending a lot of time at Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine KY.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:50 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing
Let me know when you would like to go, it's about 1.5 hours from my office in Charleston.

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

GP1383


From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Penderqrass@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 12:01 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC);
Partridge, George (EEC); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
,
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing
Hello Mr. Kalt,
It was a pleasure speaking with you on the phone this morning. Again, I want to thank you and Fairmont Brine
Processing for reaching out to our office and to our colleagues in the Dept. of Environmental Protection as we work to
resolve the issues we are now facing. With this now making front page news in the local papers, the sooner we get a
firm grip on what we are dealing with and the potential impact to public health and safety, the better.
And I especially want to thank you for offering to provide samples of sludge from this same settling tank where the

material we are now dealing with first originated at FBP. The fact that the tank is used in the initial stage of settling and
precipitation of oil and gas flowback and produced fluids, I would imagine the sludge now in your tanks is fairly
representative of what was there last summer when these tanks were cleaned out and the material brought to KY. As
you said, you will understandably need to first discuss this with your attorneys to get their input, but I can assure you
that we will be more than happy to split those samples with FBP so you can have them analyzed by another lab of your
choosing for comparison. The Dept. for Public Health, Radiation Health Branch has its own Environmental Monitoring
Laboratory and the samples you provide would have the radiochemical analysis conducted by our laboratory and I am
sure my colleagues in Solid Wastes will wish to conduct their own analysis as well for other non-radioactive constituents.
We will probably reach out to our colleagues in the WV Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and
Indoor Air Division to assist us in our sampling trip to your Fairmont WV facility.
As for your requests for documents provided by Mr. Cory Hoskins of Advanced TENO RM Services/BES Technical
Solutions, Waste Management and Pace Analytical, I am going to have to forward that along to my colleagues in Solid
Waste for their input and consideration. As we discussed, the very preliminary radiation survey results by a staff
member from this office showed slightly elevated exposure rate readings in localized areas of the landfill cap but the
region where the landfill in question is located was found to have a high amount of shale which contains elevated levels
of natural uranium and thorium and decay daughters. Obviously, much more thorough and extensive radiation surveys
and sampling will need to be conducted to better characterize and quantify the radiological concerns.
Thank you again for reaching out to our office and we look forward to working with you and FBP to resolve this issue.

Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
2

GP1384

---------

Kentucky Radiation Health Branch


275 East Main Street
ailstop HSlC-A
ankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 11:14 AM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: Fairmont Brine Processing
Mr. Pendergrass
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today. Per our conversation, if you would, please send the following:

1. Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TENORM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
Kentucky DEP and or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Services.
2. Any documentation and or results from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management .
3. Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
4. You mentioned that your team did some radiation monitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the results
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send analysis once received.

If anything else is needed on our end, please let me know.

Respcetfully,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1385

Partridge, George (EEC)

fl'om:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Friday, February 26, 2016 1:55 PM
Frame, Jason R
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Fairmont Brine Processing

Will do Jason and thanks for the offer and for all the help that you have given us. We literally could not have done this
without you. I have a feeling we are going to be spending a lot of time at Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine KY.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govI dph/radioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:l/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/

~~~s~ .of..~..n....w. a... ~'~ed. sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~tj!l~
F~tllAritl-NtlaH!U';U~

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:50 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing
Let me know when you would like to go, it's about 1.5 hours from my office in Charleston.

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

GP1386

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26,


To: Kalt, Brian

2016 12:01 PM

Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC);
Partridge, George (EEC); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing
Hello Mr. Kalt,
It was a pleasure speaking with you on the phone this morning. Again, I want to thank you and Fairmont Brine
Processing for reaching out to our office and to our colleagues in the Dept. of Environmental Protection as we work to
resolve the issues we are now facing. With this now making front page news in the local papers, the sooner we get a
firm grip on what we are dealing with and the potential impact to public health and safety, the better.
And I especially want to thank you for offering to provide samples of sludge from this same settling tank where the

material we are now dealing with first originated at FBP. The fact that the tank is used in the initial stage of settling and
precipitation of oil and gas flowback and produced fluids, I would imagine the sludge now in your tanks is fairly
representative of what was there last summer when these tanks were cleaned out and the material brought to KY. As
you said, you will understandably need to first discuss this with your attorneys to get their input, but I can assure you
that we will be more than happy to split those samples with FBP so you can have them analyzed by another lab of your
choosing for comparison. The Dept. for Public Health, Radiation Health Branch has its own Environmental Monitoring
Laboratory and the samples you provide would have the radiochemical analysis conducted by our laboratory and I am
sure my colleagues in Solid Wastes will wish to conduct their own analysis as well for other non-radioactive constituents.
We will probably reach out to our colleagues in the WV Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and
Indoor Air Division to assist us in our sampling trip to your Fairmont WV facility.
As for your requests for documents provided by Mr. Cory Hoskins of Advanced TENORM Services/BES Technical
Solutions, Waste Management and Pace Analytical, I am going to have to forward that along to my colleagues in Solid
Waste for their input and consideration. As we discussed, the very preliminary radiation survey results by a staff
member from this office showed slightly elevated exposure rate readings in localized areas of the landfill cap but the
region where the landfill in question is located was found to have a high amount of shale which contains elevated levels
of natural uranium and thorium and decay daughters. Obviously, much more thorough and extensive radiation surveys
and sampling will need to be conducted to better characterize and quantify the radiological concerns.
Thank you again for reaching out to our office and we look forward to working with you and FBP to resolve this issue.

Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
2

GP1387

Kentucky Radiation Health Branch


275 East Main Street
ailstop HS1C-A
ankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~
. .~
. . -l!!J;:~F!Ty
f-:A!Jl.l!CrtONm:tll~tH

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 11:14 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: Fairmont Brine Processing


Mr. Pendergrass
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today. Per our conversation, if you would, please send the following:
1.

2.
3.
4.

Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TE NORM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
Kentucky DEP and or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Services.
Any documentation and or results from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management.
Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
You mentioned that your team did some radiation monitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the results
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send analysis once received.

If anything else is needed on our end, please let me know.

Respcetfully,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, diss.eminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1388

Cc:
Subject:

Frame, Jason R <Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov>


Friday, February 26, 2016 2:14 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Fairmont Brine Processing

I thought someone on your side said this material sent to multiple landfills.

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:55 PM


To: Franie, Jason R
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing
Will do Jason and thanks for the offer and for all the help that you have given us. We literally could not have done this
without you. I have a feeling we are going to be spending a lot of time at Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine KY.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183

502-564-1492
. .ail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
1

GP1389

Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/


Dispose of un~anted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Jlgp!YJ_~

1'Jl~ttlAT40tlil~J-~~~AL'tH
From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:50 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing
Let me know when you would like to go, it's about 1.5 hours from my office in Charleston.

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, Febr.uary 26, 2016 12:01 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler; Kathy L (CHFS PH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC);
Partridge, George (EEC); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing
Hello Mr. Kalt,
It was a pleasure speaking with you on the phone this morning. Again, I want to thank you and Fairmont Brine
Processing for reaching out to our office and to our colleagues in the Dept. of Environmental Protection as we work to
resolve the issues we are now facing. With this now making front page news in the local papers, the sooner we get a
firm grip on what we are dealing with and the potential impact to public health and safety, the better.
And I especially want to thank you for offering to provide samples of sludge from this same settling tank where the
material we are now dealing with first originated at FBP. The fact that the tank is used in the initial stage of settling and
precipitation of oil and gas flowback and produced fluids, I would imagine the sludge now in your tanks is fairly

representative of what was there last summer when these tanks were cleaned out and the material brought to KY. As
you said, you will understandably need to first discuss this with your attorneys to get their input, but I can assure you
that we will be more than happy to split those samples with FBP so you can have them analyzed by another lab of your
2

GP1390

choosing for comparison. The Dept. for Public Health, Radiation Health Branch has its own Environmental Monitoring
Laboratory and the samples you provide would have the radiochemical analysis conducted by our laboratory and I am
my colleagues in Solid Wastes will wish to conduct the. ir own analysis as well for other non-radioactive constituents.
~_will probably reach out to our colleagues in the WV Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and
Indoor Air Division to assist us in our sampling trip to your Fairmont WV facility.

.,a=

As for your requests for documents provided by Mr. Cory Hoskins of Advanced TENORM Services/BES Technical
Solutions, Waste Management and Pace Analytical, I am going to have to forward that along to my colleagues in Solid
Waste for their input and consideration. As we discussed, the very preliminary radiation survey results by a staff
member from this office showed slightly elevated exposure rate readings in localized areas of the landfill cap but the
region where the landfill in question is located was found to have a high amount of shale which contains elevated levels
of natural uranium and thorium and decay daughters. Obviously, much more thorough and extensive radiation surveys
and sampling will need to be conducted to better characterize and quantify the radiological concerns.
Thank you again for reaching out to our office and we look forward to working with you and FBP to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
. a i l : curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unw~nted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

m..

C..

IV...., ..

...

Z l

">.;::

from: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 11:14 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: Fairmont Brine Processing
Mr. Pendergrass
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today. Per our conversation, if you would, please send the following:
1.

Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TENO RM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
Kentucky DEP and or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Services.
2. Any documentation and or results from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management.
3. Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
4. You mentioned that your team did some radiation monitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the results
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send analysis once received.

If anything else is needed on our end, please let me know.


3

GP1391

Respcetfully,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244 .
~-=---

----- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1392

Partridge, George (EEC)

...A_m
Subject:
Attachments:

Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 2:35 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Template TENORM.docx
Template TENORM.docx

Sensitivity:

Confidential

~t:
To:

This draft letter is for internal use only .

GP1393

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT CABINET

Matthew G. Bevin
Governor

DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION


DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
200 FAIR OAKS LANE, 2ND FLOOR
FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 40601
PHONE(502)564-6716

Charles G. Snavely
Secretary

www.dep.ky.gov

February 26, 2016

{Landfill Name and Address}

RE:

Request for Information to all Contained Landfills in Kentucky

To Whom It May Concern:

The Kentucky Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste Branch hereby
requests information pursuant to 401 KAR 47: 120, Section 1(8). DWM requests waste
manifests, profile sheets, and associated analytical data for any waste accepted by your facility
since January of 2015. This request includes, but is not limited to, documents that relate to
material that meets the following criteria:
1.

Associated with the following companies:


a. Advanced TENORM Services
b. Any company linked with the individual Cory or Jason Hoskins
c. BBU Services of West Virginia
d. BES
e. BES Technical Solutions
f. Buckeye Water Service (BWS)
g. Cambrian Well Services
h. E&R Energy
i.
Fairmont Brine
J. Fairmont Brine Processing
k. Goff-USTS
1. Greenhunter
m. Mountain States Environmental
n. Muskingum Iron & Metal
o. Nuverra Environmental Solutions
p. Pressure Tech
q. Salyer Branch Transport

KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com

An

Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D

GP1394

{Landfill Name, Date, and Al number}

'

2.

Waste with the following or similar descriptions:


a. Filter press solids
b. Drilling mud/sludge
c. Oil and Gas Exploration and/or Production Materials such as soil, debris, dirt, rock,
gravel, mud, solids, or sludge
d. Used filters or cartridges
e. Filter socks
f. Filter sludge
g. Tank bottom sludge
h. Dry cake or mud cake
i. Brine pit waste, including solids or sludge
j. Any waste associated with the oil and gas exemption per 40 CFR 261.4(b)(5)

3.

Any Industrial Waste or Special Waste generated in Ohio or West Virginia

Please include a table of contents and a cover letter signed by a person with signature
authority for the facility. All correspondence should also reference the facility Agency Interest
Identification number. Please submit the information no later than March 18, 2016 to the
address below:

Division of Waste Management


Solid Waste Branch, Second Floor
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
Should you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (502) 5646716, extension 4664 or Jamie Nielsen at extension 4773.

Sincerely,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Manager, Solid Waste Branch
DA/jnn

KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com

An

Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D

GP1395

--

----

------------- ----

Partridge, George (EEC)

e?~
To:

Subject:

jeremy.slucher@ky.gov
Friday, February 26, 2016 2:41 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
DEP- MOTOR POOL/FAIR OAKS - Change Request Completed (Request ID: R025202)

Your change request has been completed by the Motor Pool staff. Please review the information below to ensure that
your request meets your needs.
Your schedule can be viewed on-line at: https://eecppc.agilefleet.com/ MyScheduleBrowse.asp?Requests=Current
If the link above spans more than one line you may need to copy and paste.
Requestor: Partridge, George
Driver: Partridge, George
Request date/time: 02/26/2016 2:26:50 pm
Pick-up: 2/26/2016 3:00:00 PM
Return: 2/27/2016 8:00:00 PM
Duration: 1 day 5 hours
Request ID: R025202
Confirmation#:
Usage Type: Motor Pool
Site: DEP- MOTOR POOL/FAIR OAKS
Location:
Vehicle: Unassigned
Type:
License Number:
Options:
Account: DWM-SWB
Department: DEP
Destination: Site Visit at Irvine, KY t
Object Code: Y
Comments: Thank you! George
PLEASE NOTE: Due to some vehicles returning late to the motor pool, we may have to assign you a different vehicle on
the day of your reservation. You will also be notified prior to your scheduled trip if no vehicles are available so that
alternate transportation can be arranged.
Please pick up the vehicle at the Pick-up date and time indicated above .

GP1396

Partridge, George (EEC)

~~:
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 3:05 PM
Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)
RE: TENORM Doc Draft
Template TENORM - GP.docx

Jamie;
I will send you updates as I add to the draft document. Each will have a GP added to the document name to know it is a
version I am work with.
Thank you,
George

<;eorge P. PartrUf.ae Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

'

GP1397

Partridge, George (EEC)

e!.7:'
To:

Subject:

Cooley, Tony (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 3:38 PM
EEC DEP DWM SWB
DVD burner now available for use

IT assigned an external DVD burner to me on my inventory. Because it is so portable and is on my inventory, I will
routinely keep this in my office rather than leave it with the mirror stereoscope CPU. It is a black 6 x 6 inch plastic
square labeled the name Transcend located under a stack of blank DVD-R's next to my phone.
If you need to burn a DVD, you can borrow it to use on your own CPU's and then return it afterwards. Use the blank
DVD's as needed.

Tony Cooley

P.E., P.G.
Environmental Engineer II
EEC-DEP Division of Waste Management
Solid Wasie Branch, Closure Section
502-564-6716
502-56-1-8158 ext 4654 (direct)

GP1398

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 3:47 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
FBP
FBP.JPG

Todd Hendricks, P.G.


Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653

GP1399

Partridge, George (EEC)


Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 4:09 PM
Thomas, Richard F (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
FW: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27 /16

. .m:
Sent:

To:
Cc:
Subject:

Let's assume this is a go and be onsite in the morning.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:07 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill. County on 2/27/16


As far as I know Jon. I believe everyone but the Secretary has given the green light and from what I hear, her approval is
a given. Are you planning to send anyone?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~I: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
. .x: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kr&JtUJ

'

f'J\tl(AilOl~~H~i:t'rH

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:46 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


Is this final yet

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 12:45 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)

Subject: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


.lloJon,

GP1400

Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and several
members of our Radiation Health Branch staff will be meeting Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire Dept. and other
members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the morning in the parking lot of the Estill
County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt. Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S. Dept. of Energy.
certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of
radiation and contamination surveys both outside and inside of the high school and middle school. If we have the time,
we may also conduct additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have someone available to
.. .

g;iv~ ~s ~~cess to_ th~ ~~hoo~ r>remises.

Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

/(f2lf{!fg~
flA1Tt)NHzALTH

GP1401

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Friday, February 26, 2016 4:13 PM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC)
RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16

Sounds great Jon. Can we all plan on meeting up at some place besides the schools so we arrive on scene as a unit? I was
thinking maybe the McDonalds at exit 90A off 1-75 in Richmond at KY Hwy 25. From there it is pretty much a straight
shot into Irvine on 52. If we can leave there by 8:20 AM we should have plenty of time to make the 30 min. drive to
Irvine and be at the school by 9:00 AM. George and George, what do you think?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.kv.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. ~notified o. f pro.posed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
""'Wspose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Ki?JJ~
r~.A!'J1A110:ta&H~J.TH
From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:08 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
George Weems and Partridge

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:07 PM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
As far as I know Jon. I believe everyone but the Secretary has given the green light and from what I hear, her approval is
a given. Are you planning to send anyone?

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
ntucky Radiation Health Branch
5 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
1

GP1402

Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183


Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

V,mAtufkflA

~t,..,....,..,..rw!'.I.
f;'.t\JJJ)l;'F!oN11V-J.. TH

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:46 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Is this final yet

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 12:45 PM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Hello Jon,
Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and several
'
members of our Radiation Health Branch staff will be meeting Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire Dept. and other
members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the morning in the parking lot of the Estill
County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt. Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S. Dept. of Energy
certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of
radiation and contamination surveys both outside and inside ofthe high school and middle school. If we have the time,
we may also conduct additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have someone available to
give us access to the school premises.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1403

Partridge, George (EEC)

ti!~=
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>


Friday, February 26, 2016 4:18 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
David Patrick
Re: Conversation

George,
I recently noticed news stories about illegal TENORM dumping in Kentucky. Please keep my identity confidential
regarding the reporting of this activity. I would like all correspondence regarding this subject (written or verbal) to
remain confidential due to potential problems it may cause me with my customer base.
Thank you.
Kevin D KOSKO
Sent from .my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very generous with his time and the
information he provided was both very informative and helpful.
Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last summer and earlier this month
since my name had been misspelled in the email address.
He brought me up to date on what has taken place which I appreciated so much.
Thanks again for all the helpful information you shared.
Look forward to keeping in touch as issues surrounding lENORM continue to develop.
Thanks again,
George

From: Kevin Kosko [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:22 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: RE: Conversation
George,
I understand you spoke to Jason Frame; thank you for following up. Jason is a really good guy who
always seems to want to "do the right thing". I think WV was in relatively the same situation about a
year ago as Kentucky is in now. I worked with him and Ken Holiday from WVDEP and as hard as they are
1

GP1404

trying, I think they are finding it tough sledding when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the
state legislature. Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out.

I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TE NORM being disposed of
in Ky.
Best Regards,

Kevin

KErvinKosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:25 PM
To: Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation

Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on TERNORM.
You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised Statues. The KAR (Kentucky Administrative
Regulations) which people follow closely, to my knowledge does not address what is required by KRS.

'

.'

I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive TENO RM and want to investigate
the situation, checking their records on waste received.
To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me with the following questions:
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be contained, shipped or described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me narrow down the files I need to
review to identify waste received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who I need to meet with and where I
need to focus my time on regarding the review of files/manifest for waste being received by the
facility. I will also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know the engineers and
consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as the contractors/consultants.

GP1405

With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to build a case to
expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENO RM waste disposal issue for the Solid
Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste Management in KDEP is doing to address
it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George

<george P. Partrid{Je Jr., Pli'JJ, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image002.gif>

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:03 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick

Subject: RE: Conversation


George,
I am writing to inform you that the amount of high concentration TE NORM waste being imported into
Ky. for disposal is larger than I originally thought. Just today, one of my salesman visited three facilities
in Norwich Ohio that are taking all of their TE NORM waste (that is too highly concentrated to enter or
that has been rejected by Ohio, PA, and/or WV) to Advanced Waste's Green Valley Facility located in
Ashland, Ky. Based on the regulation you sent (KRS 211.863) this is seemingly prohibited. The generators
are being told that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility. Is this correct? Is the Advanced
Waste Landfill facility truly a legal disposal option for highly concentrated TE NORM generated outside of
the region (KY and Illinois)? If so we would like to start sending the mass quantities of waste we have to
that facility instead of the specially constructed radioactive waste landfill where we currently send it.
Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
3

GP1406

<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

From: Partridge, George {EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:55 PM
To: Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation
Kevin;
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to speak to you over the phone
concerning a topic I have been concerned about and involved with for several years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENO RM, the Director of the Division of Waste
Management has requested our Program Planning and Administration Branch to work with me to get
familiar with TENO RM and to look at how we need to respond here in Kentucky. This effort was
initiated as a result of your phone call. I did not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general
terms that if we ignore taking a position on TENORM, we will be witnessing its disposal in landfills
designated for other types of waste.

Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.


I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help establish the need for Kentucky to
develop a regulatory or policy framework while being sensitive to all parties involved, including landfill
management or companies that may not recognize or understand what they are facing as well as those
like yourself that share important information we need to work toward proper management of waste
disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that you did with me.
Please do not hesitate to call or email me anytime.
I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENO RM with other members of our
Division.
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3: 12 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Conversation

George,
4

GP1407

Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today regarding TENO RM disposal regulations in the state
of Ky. You will also probably be getting a call from Leo Guzmondi from Nuverra regarding this issue. It
was ironic as I called him about taking their waste from several brine recycling facilities in Ohio and PA.
He stated that they were planning to take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for
disposal. I told him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was completely unaware of the statute.
The waste from those facilities and others similar (that currently take waste to KY) typically range from
300-600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a significant concentration from a
worker/environmental protection standpoint (Ohio allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow
50 pCi/g) but compliant transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive LSA labeling or
Class 7 Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure how the good people of Kentucky will feel about
seeing placarded loads of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago. The majority of TENO RM waste
rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was going to WV., when the press found out what was happening the
backlash was so severe the governor enacted emergency legislation to place a moratorium on TE NORM
disposal in all state landfills.
Please feel free to contact me if you would like.
Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kesko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: {937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phish/Fraud
5

GP1408

Partridge, George (EEC)

f/&m:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 4:36 PM
'Kevin Koska'
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt
(CHFS DPH)
RE: Conversation

Kevin;
I have been asked who initially let us know. My management knows since all my correspondence is now a record within
the state.
I am not identifying you or your company to anyone who calls.
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:18 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Re: Conversation
.eorge,
I recently noticed news stories about illegal TENO RM dumping in Kentucky. Please keep my identity confidential
regarding the reporting of this activity. I would like all correspondence regarding this subject (written or verbal) to
remain confidential due to potential problems it may cause me with my customer base.
Thank you.
Kevin D KOSKO
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very generous with his time and the
information he provided was both very informative and helpful.
Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last summer and earlier this month
since my name had been misspelled in the email address.

He brought me up to date on what has taken place which I appreciated so much .


Thanks again for all the helpful information you shared.
Look forward to keeping in touch as issues surrounding TENO RM continue to develop.
1

GP1409

Thanks again,

George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:22 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick

Subject: RE: Conversation


George,

I understand you spoke to Jason Frame; thank you for following up. Jason is a really good guy who
always seems to want to "do the right thing". I think WV was in relatively the same situation about a
year ago as Kentucky is in now. I worked with him and Ken Holiday from WVDEP and as hard as they are
trying, I think they are finding it tough sledding when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the
state legislature. Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out.
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TE NORM being disposed of
in Ky.
Best Regards,

Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:25 PM


To: Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation

Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on TERNORM.
You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised Statues. The KAR (Kentucky Administrative
Regulations) which people follow closely, to my knowledge does not address what is required by KRS .
I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive TENO RM and want to investigate
the situation, checking their records on waste received.
2

GP1410

-----------------

---------

To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me with the following questions:
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be contained, shipped or described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me narrow down the files I need to
review to identify waste received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who I need to meet with and where I
need to focus my time on regarding the review of files/manifest for waste being received by the
faeility. I will also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know the engineers and
consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as t~e contractors/consultants.
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to build a case to
expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENORM waste disposal issue for the Solid
Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste Management in KDEP is doing to address
it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George

(jeorge P. PartridfJe Jr., Pli'D, P.P., QPP


Department for Environmental-Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image002.gif>

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:03 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick

Subject: RE: Conversation


George,

I am writing to inform you that the amount of high concentration TE NORM waste being imported into
Ky. for disposal is larger than I originally thought. Just today, one of my salesman visited three facilities
in Norwich Ohio that are taking all of their TE NORM waste (that is too highly concentrated to enter or
that has been rejected by Ohio, PA, and/or WV) to Advanced Waste's Green Valley Facility located in
Ashland, Ky. Based on the regulation you sent (KRS 211.863) this is seemingly prohibited. The generators
are being told that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility. Is this correct? Is the Advanced
Waste Lanpfill facility truly a legal disposal option for highly concehtrated TENORM generated outside of
3

GP1411

the region (KY and Illinois)? If so we would like to start sending the mass quantities of waste we have to
that facility instead of the specially constructed radioactive waste landfill where we currently send it.
Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
. . ...

ViceJ>residenL
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470~2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:55 PM
To: Kevin Kosko <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation

Kevin;
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to speak to you over the phone
concerning a topic I have been concerned about and involved with for several years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TE NORM, the Director of the Division of Waste
Management has requested our Program Planning and Administration Branch to work with me to get
familiar with TENO RM and to look at how we need to respond here in Kentucky. This effort was
initiated as a result of your phone call. I did not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general
terms that if we ignore taking a position on TENORM, we will be witnessing its disposal in landfills
designated for other types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help establish the need for Kentucky to
develop a regulatory or policy framework while being sensitive to all parties involved, including landfill
management or companies that may not recognize or understand what they are facing as well as those
like yourself that share important information we need to work toward proper management of waste
disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that you did with me.

GP1412

Please do not hesitate to call or email me anytime.


I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENO RM with other members of our
Division.
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:12 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Conversation
George,
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today regarding TENO RM disposal regulations in the state
of Ky. You will also probably be getting a call from Leo Guzmondi from Nuverra regarding this issue. It
was ironic as I called him about taking their waste from several brine recycling facilities in Ohio and PA.
He stated that they were planning to take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for
disposal. I told him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was completely unaware of the statute.
The waste from those facilities and others similar (that currently take waste to KY) typically range from
300-600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a significant concentration from a
worker/environmental protection standpoint (Ohio allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow
50 pCi/g) but compliant transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive LSA labeling or
Class 7 Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure how the good people of Kentucky will feel about
seeing placarded loads of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago. The majority of TENO RM waste
rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was going to WV., when the press found out what was happening the
backlash was so severe the governor enacted emergency legislation to place a moratorium on TENO RM
disposal in all state landfills.
Please feel free to contact me if you would like.
Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kesko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: {937)470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

Spam
Phish/Fraud
5

GP1413

Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

GP1414

!-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 4:41 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27 /16

Sent:

To:

Subject

Curt;
Sounds fine with me. I am still waiting to hear from George Weems. l went ahead and got a vehicle for tomorrow so I
could drive myself.
Can we exchange cell phone numbers in case we get delayed or something happens?
George
Cell: 859-221-8843 (personal cell phone number)

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4: 13 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
&_ounds great Jon. Can we all plan on meeting up at som. e place besides the schools so we arrive on scene as a unit? I was
~inking maybe the McDonalds at exit 90A off 1-75 in Richmond at KY Hwy 25. From there it is pretty much a straight
shot into Irvine on 52. If we can leave there by 8:20 AM we should have plenty of time to make the 30 min. drive to
Irvine and be at the school by 9:00 AM. George and George, what do you think?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

J(e11,.
.

.~

-l'llo

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


I

. n t : Friday, February 26, 2016 4:08 PM


: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


1

GP1415

George Weems and Partridge

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:07 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16

As far as I know Jon. I believe everyone but the Secretary has given the green light and from what I hear, her approval is
a given. Are you planning to send anyone?
Curt Pendergrass-PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kentu~
i~tlfZrfu~H~\ttri

-------~---------------oMo--~-----oOOO~~-- """"'''"-'''"""""'""""""""" '"'"'""" Oo ._,.,.,,,,.,,.,,,,, ,,,..,,,.,,.,,,,.,,,,,_

"""'""'' ,,,_,..... ,_,,,,~--""""""-""'-"""'""""""'"""'--'""'""'

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:46 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


Is this final yet

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 12:45 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)

Subject: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


Hello Jon,
Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and several
members of our Radiation Health Branch staff will be meeting Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire Dept. and other
members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the morning in the parking lot of the Estill
County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt. Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S})ept. of Energy
certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of
radiation and contamination surveys both outside and inside of the high school and middle school. If we have the time,
we may also conduct additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have someone available to
give us access to the school premises.

GP1416

Thanks,
urt Pendergrass PhD
pervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kctltu~~
r~ot;;o~i~J..rH

GP1417

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 4:43 PM
'Kevin Kesko'
RE: Conversation

Kevin;
When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENO RM waste that was generated in Ohio was properly disposed
of according to Ohio's standards, what would the charge have been per ton?
All I am asking is a range representative of the companies that are the disposal business charge.
Please respond as soon as you can to my request.
Thank you,
George

From: Kevin Kesko [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Friday, February 26, 2016 4:18 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
.~bject: Re: Conversation

Sent:

George,
I recently noticed news stories about illegal TENORM dumping in Kentucky. Please keep my identity confidential
regarding the reporting of this activity. I would like all correspondence regarding this subject (written or verbal) to
remain confidential due to potential problems it may cause me with my customer base.
Thank you.
Kevin D KOSKO
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very generous with his time and the
information he provided was both very informative and helpful.

Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last summer and earlier this month
since my name had been misspelled in the email address .
He brought me up to date on what has taken place which I appreciated so much.
Thanks again for all the helpful information you shared.
1

GP1418

Look forward to keeping in touch as issues surrounding TE NORM continue to develop.

Thanks again,
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:22 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
-ce:~oavia

Patrie!<

- ------- -

Subject: RE: Conversation


George,
I understand you spoke to Jason Frame; thank you for following up. Jason is a really good guy who
always seems to want to "do the right thing". I think WV was in relatively the same situation about a
year ago as Kentucky is in now. I worked with him and Ken Holiday from WVDEP and as hard as they are
trying, I think they are finding it tough sledding when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the
state legislature. Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out.

I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TENORM being disposed of
in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin

'

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:25 PM
To: Kevin Kosko <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation

Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on TERNORM.
You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised Statues. The KAR (Kentucky Administrative
Regulations) which people follow closely, to my knowledge does not address what is required by KRS.

GP1419

I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive TENORM and want to investigate
the situation, checking their records on waste received.
To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me with the following questions:
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be contained, shipped or described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me narrow down the files I need to
review to identify waste received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who I need to meet with and where I
need to focus my time on regarding the review of files/manifest for waste being received by the
facility. I will also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know the engineers and
consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as the contractors/consultants.
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to build a case to
expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENORM waste disposal issue for the Solid
Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste Management in KOEP is doing to address
it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George

<george P. Partridjje Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image002.gif>

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:03 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: RE: Conversation
George,

I am writing to inform you that the amount of high concentration TENORM waste being imported into
Ky. for disposal is larger than I originally thought. Just today, one of my salesman visited three facilities
in Norwich Ohio that are taking all of their TENO RM waste (that is too highly concentrated to enter or
that has been rejected by Ohio, PA, and/or WV) to Advanced Waste's Green Valley Facility located in
3

GP1420

Ashland, Ky. Based on the regulation you sent (KRS 211.863) this is seemingly prohibited. The generators
are being told that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility. Is this correct? Is the Advanced
Waste Landfill facility truly a legal disposal option for highly concentrated TENORM generated outside of
the region (KY and Illinois)? If so we would like to start sending the mass quantities of waste we have to
that facility instead of the specially constructed radioactive waste landfill where we currently send it.

Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:55 PM
To: Kevin Kosko <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation

Kevin;
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to speak to you over the phone
concerning a topic I have been concerned about and involved with for several years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENO RM, the Director of the Division of Waste
Management has requested our Program Planning and Administration Branch to.work with me to get
familiar with TENO RM and to look at how we need to respond here in Kentucky. This effort was
initiated as a result of your phone call. I did not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general
terms that if we ignore taking a position on TE NORM, we will be witnessing its disposal in landfills
designated for other types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help establish the need for Kentucky to
develop a regulatory or policy framework while being sensitive to all parties involved, including landfill
management or companies that may not recognize or understand what they are facing as well as those
like yourself that share important information we need to work toward proper management of waste
disposal.
4

GP1421

Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that you did with me.
Please do not hesitate to call or email me anytime.
I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENO RM with other members of our
Division.
George

From: Kevin Kosko [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:12 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick

Subject: Conversation
George,

1,

Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today regarding TENO RM disposal regulations in the state
of Ky. You will also probably be getting a call from Leo Guzmondi from Nuverra regarding this issue. It
was ironic as I called him about taking their waste from several brine recycling facilities in Ohio and PA.
He stated that they were planning to take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for
disposal. I told him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was completely unaware of the statute.
The waste from those facilities and others similar (that currently take waste to KY) typically range from
300-600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a significant concentration from a
worker/environmental protection standpoint (Ohio allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow
SO pCi/g) but compliant transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive LSA labeling or
Class 7 Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure how the good people of Kentucky will feel about
seeing placarded loads of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago. The majority of TE NORM waste
rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was going to WV., when the press found out what was happening the
backlash was so severe the governor enacted emergency legislation to place a moratorium on TENORM
disposal in all state landfills.
Please feel free to contact me if you would like.
Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655

<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

GP1422

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
.J?hish/F_raud_ . .
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

'

GP1423

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Friday, February 26, 2016 4:44 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS-1CA
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
Website:http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line athttps:Uapps4.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Curt;
Sounds fine with me. I am still waiting to hear from George Weems. I went ahead and got a vehicle for
tomorrow so I could drive myself.
Can we exchange cell phone numbers in case we get delayed or something happens?
George
Cell: 859-221-8843 (personal cell phone number)

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26,


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

2016 4:13 PM

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Sounds great Jon. Can we all plan on meeting up at some place besides the schools so we arrive on
scene as a unit? I was thinking maybe the McDonalds at exit 90A off 1-75 in Richmond at KY Hwy 25.
From there it is pretty much a straight shot into Irvine on 52. If we can leave there by 8:20 AM we
should have plenty of time to make the 30 min. drive to Irvine and be at the school by 9:00 AM. George
and George, what do you think?

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
1

GP1424

--------

--

- -

Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183


Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<imageOOl.jpg>

_F_!Q!fl;

M~yl:>riar,)011 (EEC)

- senfi -i=riday,-Fe&ruar}f 26~-:foT6-~E68--Ptvf


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
George Weems and Partridge

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:07 PM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
As far as I know Jon. I believe everyone but the Secretary has given the green light and from what I
hear, her approval is a given. Are you planning to send anyone?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<imageOOl.jpg>

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:46 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Is this final yet

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 12:45 PM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)


Subject: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Hello Jon,
2

GP1425

Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and
several members of our Radiation Health Branch staff will be meeting Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire
Dept. and other members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the
morning in the parking lot of the Estill County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt.
Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S. Dept. of Energy certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing
our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of radiation and contamination surveys
both outside and inside of the high school and middle school. If we have the time, we may also conduct
additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have
someone available to give us access to the school premises.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>

GP1426

Partridge, George (EEC)

~~:
To:

Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Friday, February 26, 2016 4:47 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC)
Re: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16

George, My cell phone number is 502-330-8379.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS-lCA
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
Website:http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line athttps:ljapps4.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Curt;
Sounds fine with me. I am still waiting to hear from George Weems. I went ahead and got a vehicle for
tomorrow so I could drive myself.
Can we exchange cell phone numbers in case we get delayed or something happens?
George
Cell: 859-221-8843 (personal cell phone number)

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4: 13 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Sounds great Jon. Can we all plan on meeting up at some place besides the schools so we arrive on
scene as a unit? I was thinking maybe the McDonalds at exit 90A off 1-75 in Richmond at KY Hwy 25.
From there it is pretty much a straight shot into Irvine on 52. If we can leave there by 8:20 AM we
should have plenty of time to make the 30 min. drive to Irvine and be at the school by 9:00 AM. George
and George, what do you think?

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
1

GP1427

Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183


Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

seilI:i=r1aay~i=e-6rliaiY26~-2016 4:os-i:>rvi
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


George Weems and Partridge

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:07 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


As far as I know Jon. I believe everyone but the Secretary has given the green light and from what I
hear, her approval is a given. Are you planning to send anyone?

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:46 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


Is this final yet

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 12:45 PM

To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Hello Jon,
2

GP1428

-~-~----

Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and
several members of our Radiation Health Branch staff will be meeting Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire
Dept. and other members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the
morning in the parking lot of the Estill County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt.
Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S. Dept. of Energy certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing
our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of radiation and contamination surveys
both outside and inside of the high school and middle school. If we have the time, we may also conduct
additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have
someone available to give us access to the school premises.
Thanks,

'

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<imageOOl.jpg>

GP1429

----------------

Partridge, George (EEC)


.rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 4:49 PM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Thomas, Richard F (EEC); Weems, George (EEC)
RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16

I went ahead and got a state vehicle and I am driving myself. I will meet at the location that Curt suggested unless I hear
otherwise.
George P.

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:09 PM
To: Thomas, Richard F (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Subject: FW: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Let's assume this is a go and be onsite in the morning.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:07 PM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16

" ' s far as I know Jon. I believe everyone but the Secretary has given the green light and from what I hear, her approval is
a given. Are you planning to send anyone?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.kv.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epav/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted
sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
-,,,

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:46 PM
o: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
ubject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Is this final yet
1

GP1430

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 12:45 PM

To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)

Subject: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


Hello Jon,
Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and several
-members~ofourRadiation Health-Bram:h staff-will be meeting Lt.- Matt Blose afWinC?hester Fire--Dept.-and other-------- ---members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the morning in the parking lot of the Estill
County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt. Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S. Dept. of Energy
certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of
radiation and contamination surveys both outside and inside of the high school and middle school. If we have the time,
we may also conduct additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have someone available to
give us access to the school premises.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un!"anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

'

N:!JJ!JJ
..
t~!:JJ.l.\T'lOf4~HeAttf\
h<

'

GP1431

.m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 4:50 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27 /16

Curt;
Thank you!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:47 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC)

Subject: Re: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16


George, My cell phone number is 502-330-8379.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailsto HS-lCA
nkfort KY 40621
el: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
Website:http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line athttps://apps4.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Curt;
Sounds fine with me. I am still waiting to hear from George Weems. I went ahead and got a vehicle for
tomorrow so I could drive myself.
Can we exchange cell phone numbers in case we get delayed or something happens?
George
Cell: 859-221-8843 (personal cell phone number)

..

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:13 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC)

Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16

GP1432

Sounds great Jon. Can we all plan on meeting up at some place besides the schools so we arrive on
scene as a unit? I was thinking maybe the McDonalds at exit 90A off 1-75 in Richmond at KY Hwy 25.
From there it is pretty much a straight shot into Irvine on 52. If we can leave there by 8:20 AM we
should have plenty of time to make the 30 min. drive to Irvine and be at the school by 9:00 AM. George
and George, what do you think?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
. - Mallstclp-HSIC=JX-- ..- ... - --- .

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:08 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
George Weems and Partridge

'

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:07 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
As far as I know Jon. I believe everyone but the Secretary has given the green light and from what I
hear, her approval is a given. Are you planning to send anyone?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>

GP1433

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:46 PM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: RE: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Is this final yet

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 12:45 PM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RHB and BERT surveys in Estill County on 2/27/16
Hello Jon,
Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and
several members of our Radiation Health Branch staff will be meeting Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire
Dept. and other members of the Area 13. Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the
morning in the parking lot of the Estill County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt.
Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S. Dept. of Energy certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing
our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of radiation and contamination surveys
both outside and inside of the high school and middle school. If we have the time, we may also conduct
additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have
someone available to give us access to the school premises.

'

Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>

GP1434
-

------

.m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>


Friday, February 26, 2016 5:07 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: Conversation

George,
The Ohio waste acceptance criteria is only 6.99pCi/g for combined Radium-226/228 so that waste could never get into
Ohio.
Pa. disposal may have been an option as they accept up to 120uR/HR and there is a tiered pricing structure that tops out
at about $500/ton. We charge $460/ton to solidify, transport via rail and dispose of this type of waste at US Ecologies in
Grandview, Idaho.
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;

'

When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENO RM waste that was generated in Ohio was
properly disposed of according to Ohio's standards, what would the charge have been per ton?
All I am asking is a range representative of the companies that are the disposal business charge.
Please respond as soon as you can to my request.
Thank you,
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4: 18 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Re: Conversation
George,
I recently noticed news stories about illegal TENORM dumping in Kentucky. Please keep my identity
confidential regarding the reporting of this activity. I would like all correspondence regarding this
subject (written or verbal) to remain confidential due to potential problems it may cause me with my
customer base .

Thank you.

GP1435

Kevin D KOSKO

Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very generous with his time
and the information he provided was both very informative and helpful.
Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last summer and
earlier this month since my name had been misspelled in the email address.
He brought me up to date on what has taken place which I appreciated so much.
Thanks again for all the helpful information you shared.
Look forward to keeping in touch as issues surrounding TENORM continue to develop.
Thanks again,
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:22 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: RE: Conversation

'

George,
I understand you spoke to Jason Frame; thank you for following up. Jason is a really
good guy who always seems to want to "do the right thing". I think WV was in relatively
the same situation about a year ago as Kentucky is in now. I worked with him and Ken
Holiday from WVDEP and as hard as they are trying, I think they are finding it tough
sledding when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the state legislature.
Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out.
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TENORM
being disposed of in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655

GP1436

<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past.. .

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:25 PM
To: Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation
Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on TERNORM.
You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised Statues. The KAR
(Kentucky Administrative Regulations) which people follow closely, to my knowledge
does not address what is required by KRS.
I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive TENORM and want
to investigate the situation, checking their records on waste received.
To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me with the following
questions:

'

Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill
facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be contained, shipped or
described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me narrow down
the files I need to review to identify waste received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who I need to meet
with and where I need to focus my time on regarding the review of files/manifest for
waste being received by the facility. I will also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know
the engineers and consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as
the contractors/consultants.
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to
build a case to expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENORM waste disposal issue
for the Solid Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste
Management in KDEP is doing to address it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
3

GP1437

George

George P. PartrUljje Jr., Pfi'IJ, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image002.gif>

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:03 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: RE: Conversation
George,
I am writing to inform you that the amount of high concentration TENORM waste being
imported into Ky. for disposal is larger than I originally thought. Just today, one of my
salesman visited three facilities in Norwich Ohio that are taking all of their TENO RM
waste (that is too highly concentrated to enter or that has been rejected by Ohio, PA,
and/or WV} to Advanced Waste's Green Valley Facility located in Ashland, Ky. Based on
the regulation you sent (KRS 211.863} this is seemingly prohibited. The generators are
being told that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility. Is this correct? Is the
Advanced Waste Landfill facility truly a legal disposal option for highly concentrated
TENO RM generated outside of the region (KY and Illinois)? If so we would like to start
sending the mass quantities of waste we have to that facility instead of the specially
constructed radioactive waste landfill where we currently send it.

Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

GP1438

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:55 PM
To: Kevin Kosko <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation

Kevin;
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to speak to you over
the phone concerning a topic I have been concerned about and involved with for several
years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENO RM, the Director of the
Division of Waste Management has requested our Program Planning and Administration
Branch to work with me to get familiar with TENORM and to look at how we need to
respond here in Kentucky. This effort was initiated as a result of your phone call. I did
not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general terms that if we ignore taking a
position on TENO RM, we will be witnessing its disposal in landfills designated for other
types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.

I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help establish the need for
Kentucky to develop a regulatory or policy framework while being sensitive to all parties
involved, including landfill management or companies that may not recognize or
understand what they are facing as well as those like yourself that share important
information we need to work toward proper management of waste disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that you did with me.
Please do not hesitate to call or email me anytime.
I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENORM with other
members of our Division.
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:12 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Conversation
George,

Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today regarding TENORM disposal
regulations in the state of Ky. You will also probably be getting a call from Leo Guzmondi
from Nu\lerra regarding this issue. It was ironic as I called him about taking their waste
from several brine recycling facilities in Ohio and PA. He stated that they were planning
to take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for disposal. I told
him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was completely unaware of the statute.
The waste from those facilities and others similar (that currently take waste to KY)
typically range from 300-600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a
5

GP1439

significant concentration from a worker/environmental protection standpoint (Ohio


allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow 50 pCi/g) but compliant
transportation ofthis material also requires DOT Radioactive LSA labeling or Class 7
Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure how the good people of Kentucky will feel
about seeing placarded loads of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago. The majority of
TENORM waste rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was going to WV., when the press
found out what was happening the backlash was so severe the governor enacted
emergency legislation to place a moratorium on TENORM disposal in all state landfills.

Please feel free to contact me if you would like.


Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

'

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phish/Fraud
6

GP1440

Partridge, George (EEC)

.From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
'BKalt@fairmontbrine.com'
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the questions you
asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TE NORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One contact shared
that TE NORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us
about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENDRMJ

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch issues permits
for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and
disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP managed the waste,
and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill since their management has not
made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so we can address
the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key questions I am seeking to
address in my role as a permit engineer ~ith the Solid Waste Branch are as follows:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
1

GP1441

----------------

--

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions without a
written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to briefly address questions you
have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and to address the questions we are receiving

regarding the waste and how it was managed.


I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any questions I have or
information I need will be directed to your attention through formal correspondence/letters from the appropriate
governing entities that we are working with.

Tnan1<v1:m,
George

<;jeorge P. Partrid{Je Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., fl'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

'

GP1442

Partridge, George (EEC)

.From:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
Delivered: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

GP1443

Partridge, George {EEC)


.From:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
Delivered: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Pendergrass. Curt (CHFS DPH) (Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

'

GP1444

Partridge, George (EEC)


.From:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
Delivered: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Maybriar, Jon (EEC) (Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

I'
I

GP1445

Partridge, George (EEC)

.From:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
BKalt@fairmontbrine.com
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
Relayed: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the
destination server:
BKalt@fairmontbrine.com (BKalt@fairmontbrine.com)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

GP1446

Partridge, George (EEC)

.From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Partridge, George (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:37 PM
Read: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your message
To:
Subject: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36:34 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36:32 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

GP1447

Partridge, George (EEC)

From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:43 PM
Read: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your message
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:35:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, February 26, 2016 5:43:29 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1448

Partridge, George (EEC)

.From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 5:50 PM
'Kevin Koska'
RE: Conversation

Kevin;
My understanding is the landfills are charging in the range of$ 23 - $ 26 per ton to dispose of the waste they have
received from out of state.
The numbers will help us understand more what is going on.
Thank you so much for all you are doing to support our concerns. I have shared you name with no one outside of my
work group. I have requested that your name be kept confidential.
Thanks again for all you help!
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:07 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
ubject: Re: Conversation
George,

'

The Ohio waste acceptance criteria is only 6.99pCi/g for combined Radium-226/228 so that waste could never get into
Ohio.
Pa. disposal may have been an option as they accept up to 120uR/HR and there is a tiered pricing structure that tops out
at about $500/ton. We charge $460/ton to solidify, transport via rail and dispose of this type of waste at US Ecologies in
Grandview, Idaho.
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENORM waste that was generated in Ohio was
properly disposed of according to Ohio's standards, what would the charge have been per ton?
All I am asking is a range representative of the companies that are the disposal business charge.

Please respond as soon as you can to my request.


Thank you,
1

GP1449

George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:18 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Re: Conversation
George,
I recently noticed news stories about illegal TE NORM dumping in Kentucky. Please keep my identity
confidential regarding the reporting of this activity. I would like all correspondence regarding this
subject (written or verbal) to remain confidential due to potential problems it may cause me with my
customer base.
Thank you.
Kevin D KOSKO
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very generous with his time
and the information he provided was both very informative and helpful.
Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last summer and
earlier this month since my name had been misspelled in the email address.
He brought me up to date on what has taken place which I appreciated so much.
Thanks again for all the helpful information you shared.
Look forward to keeping in touch as issues surrounding TENORM continue to develop.
Thanks again,
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:22 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: RE: Conversation
George,
I understand you spoke to Jason Frame; thank you for following up. Jason is a really
good guy who always seems to want to "do the right thing". I think WV was in relatively
the same situation about a year ago as Kentucky is in now. I worked with him and Ken
2

GP1450

----------

---

- -

Holiday from WVDEP and as hard as they are trying, I think they are finding it tough
sledding when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the state legislature.
Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out .
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TENORM
being disposed of in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:25 PM
To: Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation
Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on TERNORM.
You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised Statues. The KAR
(Kentucky Administrative Regulations) which people follow closely, to my knowledge
does not address what is required by KRS.
I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive TENORM and want
to investigate the situation, checking their records on waste received.
To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me with the following
questions:
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill
facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be contained, shipped or
described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me narrow down
the files I need to review to identify waste received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who I need to meet
with and where I need to focus my time on regarding the review of files/manifest for
waste being received by the facility. I will also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
3

l__

GP1451

The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know
the engineers and consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as
the contractors/consultants.

With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to
build a case to expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENO RM waste disposal issue
for the Solid Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste
-Managemenf1ri-R0Ii5-1Scfoinit:O-a-adressit.
- -- - - I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George

<jeorge P. PartrUfae Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
{502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

<image002.gif>

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:03 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: RE: Conversation
George,
I am writjng to inform you that the amount of high concentration TENORM waste being
imported into Ky. for disposal is larger than I originally thought. Just today, one of my
salesman vi.sited three facilities in Norwich Ohio that are taking all of their TE NORM
waste (that is too highly concentrated to enter or that has been rejected by Ohio, PA,
and/or WV) to Advanced Waste's Green Valley Facility located in Ashland, Ky. Based on
the regulation you sent (KRS 211.863) this is seemingly prohibited. The generators are
being told that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility. Is this correct? Is the
Advanced Waste Landfill facility truly a legal disposal option for highly concentrated
TENO RM generated outside of the region (KY and Illinois)? If so we would like to start
sending the mass quantities of waste we have to that facility instead of the specially
constructed radioactive waste landfill where we currently send it.
Respectfully,
Kevin
4

GP1452

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [rnailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:55 PM


To: Kevin Kosko <kevink@shalerntr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation

Kevin;

Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to speak to you over
the phone concerning a topic I have been concerned about and involved with for several
years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENORM, the Director of the
Division of Waste Management has requested our Program Planning and Administration
Branch to work with me to get familiar with TE NORM and to look at how we need to
respond here in Kentucky. This effort was initiated as a result of your phone call. I did
not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general terms that if we ignore taking a
position on TENO RM, we will be witnessing its disposal in landfills designated for other
types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help establish the need for
Kentucky to develop a regulatory or policy framework while being sensitive to all parties
involved, including landfill management or companies that may not recognize or
understand what they are facing as well as those like yourself that share important
information we need to work toward proper management of waste disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that you did With me.
Please do not hesitate to calf or email me anytime.
I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENORM with other
members of our Division.

GP1453

George

From: Kevin Koska [rnailto:kevink@shalerntr.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:12 PM

To:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Conversation
George,

~ --Thank-yofffortakingth~time

to-talkwithme todayregardinglENC>RMdisposa1
regulations in the state of Ky. You will also probably be getting a call from Leo Guzmondi
from Nuverra regarding this issue. It was ironic as I called him about taking their waste
from several brine recycling facilities in Ohio and PA. He stated that they were planning
to take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for disposal. I told
him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was completely unaware of the statute.
The waste from those facilities and others similar (that currently take waste to KY)
typically range from 300-600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a
significant concentration from a worker/environmental protection standpoint (Ohio
allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow SO pCi/g) but compliant
transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive LSA labeling or Class 7
Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure how the good, people of Kentucky will feel
about seeing placarded loads of radioactive material going to local landfills.

This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago. The majority of
TENO RM waste rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was going to WV., when the press
found out what was happening the backlash was so severe the govern~r enacted
emergency legislation to place a moratorium on TE NORM disposal in all state landfills.

Please feel free to contact me if you would like.


Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

GP1454

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

GP1455

Partridge, George (EEC)

.From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 5:52 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
FW: Conversation

Information below from contact in Ohio who manages TENORM waste.

George,
The Ohio waste acceptance criteria is only 6.99pCi/g for combined Radium-226/228 so that waste could never get into
Ohio.
Pa. disposal may have been an option as they accept up to 120uR/HR and there is a tiered pricing structure that tops out
at about $500/ton. We charge $460/ton to solidify, transport via rail and dispose of this type of waste at US Ecologies in
Grandview, Idaho.

GP1456

Partridge, George (EEC)


.From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>


Friday, February 26, 2016 5:57 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: Conversation

George,
Please call when you get a minute to discuss.
Thanks,
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
My understanding is the landfills are charging in the range of$ 23 - $ 26 per ton to dispose of the waste
they have received from out of state.
'

The numbers will help us understand more what is going 011.


Thank you so much for all you are doing to support our concerns. I have shared you name with no one
outside of my work group. I have requested that your name be kept confidential.
Thanks again for all you help!
George

From: Kevin Kosko [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:07 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: Re: Conversation


George,
The Ohio waste acceptance criteria is only 6.99pCi/g for combined Radium-226/228 so that waste could
never get into Ohio.
Pa. disposal may have been an option as they accept up to 120uR/HR and there is a tiered pricing
structure that tops out at about $500/ton. We charge $460/ton to solidify, transport via rail and dispose
of this type of waste at US Ecologies in Grandview, Idaho.
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone

GP1457

On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENORM waste that was
generated in Ohio was properly disposed of according to Ohio's standards, what would
the charge have been per ton?

All I am asking is a range representative of the companies that are the disposal business

charge~

--

Please respond as soon as you can to my request.


Thank you,
George

From: Kevin Kosko [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:18 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick

Subject: Re: Conversation


George,
I recently noticed news stories about illegal TENORM dumping in Kentucky. Please keep
my identity confidential regarding the reporting of this activity. I would like all
correspondence regarding this subject (written or verbal) to remain confidential due to
potential problems it may cause me with my customer base.
Thank you.

'

Kevin D KOSKO
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov>
wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very
generous with his time and the information he provided was both very
informative and helpful.
Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last
summer and earlier this month since my name had been misspelled in
the email address.

He brought me up to date on what has taken place which I appreciated


so much.
2

GP1458

Thanks again for all the helpful information you shared.


Look forward to keeping in touch as issues surrounding TENO RM
continue to develop.
Thanks again,
George

From: Kevin Kosko [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:22 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick

Subject: RE: Conversation


George,
I understand you spoke to Jason Frame; thank you for following up.
Jasdh'is a really good guy who always seems to want to "do the right
thing". I think WV was in relatively the same situation about a year ago
as Kentucky is in now. I worked with him and Ken Holiday from WVDEP
and as hard as they are trying, I think they are finding it tough sledding
when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the state legislature.
Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out.
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of
state TENO RM being disposed of in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:25 PM
To: Kevin Kosko <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation

Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on
TERNORM.
3

GP1459

You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised


Statues. The. KAR (Kentucky Administrative Regulations) which people
follow closely, to my knowledge does not address what is required by
KRS.
I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive
TENO RM and want to investigate the situation, checking their records
on waste received.
'

-.-~

----

-~

To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me


with the following questions:
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by
the landfill facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be
contained, shipped or described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me
narrow down the files I need to review to identify waste
received at Green Valley.

.j

My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who
I need to meet with and where I need to focus my time on regarding the
review of files/manifest for waste being received by the facility. I will
also be researching our files here in Frankfort.

The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my


understanding. I know the engineers and consultants that work for that
facility, both with Republic as well as the contractors/consultants.
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me
to continue to build a case to expedite the needed regulatory
framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENO RM
waste disposal issue for the Solid Waste Branch and support the work
that the Division of Waste Management in KOEP is doing to address it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George

<george P. PartrUfge Jr., Pfi'D, P:E., Q.'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
4

GP1460

<image002.gif>

From: Kevin Kosko [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:03 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: RE: Conversation
George,
I am writing to inform you that the amount of high concentration
TENORM waste being imported into Ky. for disposal is larger than I
originally thought. Just today, one of my salesman visited three
facilities in Norwich Ohio that are taking all of their TENO RM waste (that
is too highly concentrated to enter or that has been rejected by Ohio,
PA, and/or WV) to Advanced Waste's Green Valley Facility located in
Ashland, Ky. Based on the regulation you sent (KRS 211.863) this is
seemingly prohibited. The generators are being told that this is a legal
disposal option by the landfill facility. Is this correct? Is the Advanced
Waste Landfill facility truly a legal disposal option for highly
concentrated TENORM generated outside of the region (KY and Illinois)?
If so we would like to start sending the mass quantities of waste we
have to that facility instead of the specially constructed radioactive
waste landfill where we currently send it.

Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:55 PM


To: Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation

Kevin;
5

GP1461

Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to
speak to you over the phone concerning a topic I have been concerned
about and involved with for several years now.

Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENORM, the
Director of the Division of Waste Management has requested our
Program Planning and Administration Branch to work with me to get
familiar with TENORM and to look at how we need to respond here in
l<~rl~!.fC~Y'_ Thi?_ ~ffQrt was iriJtia!e_cla~ <:! r~sult ()f your R_Q()n~ccaH. Ldid_

not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general terms that if we
ignore taking a position on TENORM, we will be witnessing its disposal
in landfills designated for other types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help
establish the need for Kentucky to develop a regulatory or policy
framework while being sensitive to all parties involved, including landfill
management or companies that may not recognize or understand what
they are facing as well as those like yourself that share important
information we need to work toward proper management of waste
disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that
you did with me.

Please do not hesitate to call or email me anytime.


I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENO RM
with other members of our Division.
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:12 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Conversation
George,
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today regarding TENO RM
disposal regulations in the state of Ky. You will also probably be getting
a call from Leo Guzmondi from Nuverra regarding this issue. It was
ironic as I called him about taking their waste from several brine
recycling facilities in Ohio and PA. He stated that they were planning to
take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for
disposal. I told him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was
completely unaware of the statute. The waste from those facilities and
others similar {that currently take waste to KY) typically range from 300600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a significant
concentration from a worker/environmental protection standpoint
6

GP1462

(Ohio allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow SO pCi/g) but
compliant transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive
LSA labeling or Class 7 Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure
how the good people of Kentucky will feel about seeing placarded loads
of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago.
The majority of TENO RM waste rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was
going to WV., when the press found out what was happening the
backlash was so severe the governor enacted emergency legislation to
place a moratorium on TENORM disposal in all state landfills.
Please feel free to contact me if you would like.
Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
7

GP1463
------~----

Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forgerprevfo~U:s~

vote

GP1464

Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>


Friday, February 26, 2016 5:57 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: Conversation

Subject:

George,
Please call when you get a minute to discuss.
Thanks,
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
My understanding is the landfills are charging in the range of$ 23 - $ 26 per ton to dispose of the waste
they have received from out of state.
The numbers will help us understand more what is going on.
Thank you so much for all you are doing to support our concerns. I have shared you name with no one
outside of my work group. I have requested that your name be kept confidential.
Thanks again for all you help!
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:07 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: Conversation
George,
The Ohio waste acceptance criteria is only 6.99pCi/g for combined Radium-226/228 so that waste could
never get into Ohio.
Pa. disposal may have been an option as they accept up to 120uR/HR and there is a tiered pricing
structure that tops out at about $500/ton. We charge $460/ton to solidify, transport via rail and dispose
of this type of waste at US Ecologies in Grandview, Idaho.
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone

GP1465

On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENORM waste that was
generated in Ohio was properly disposed of according to Ohio's standards, what would
the charge have been per ton?
... All LC1rl1_a_~KiDg i~ (l r(lnKe r~preseritC1tiv~ Qf the ~ompaniesJbat are tbe disp()sal l;>lj~i11e?~
charge.
Please respond as soon as you can to my request.
Thank you,
George

From: Kevin Kesko [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 4:18 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Re: Conversation
George,
I recently noticed news stories about illegal TENORM dumping in Kentucky. Please keep
my identity confidential regarding the reporting of this activity. I would like all
correspondence regarding this subject (written or verbal) to remain confidential due to
potential problems it may cause me with my customer base.
Thank you.
Kevin D KOSKO
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov>
wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very
generous with his time and the information he provided was both very
informative and helpful.
Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last
summer and earlier this month since my name had been misspelled in
the email address.

He brought me up to date on what has taken place which I appreciated


so much.
2

GP1466

Thanks again for all the helpful information you shared.


Look forward to keeping in touch as issues surrounding TENO RM
continue to develop.
Thanks again,
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:22 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick

Subject: RE: Conversation


George,
I understand you spoke to Jason Frame; thank you for following up.
Jason is a really good guy who always seems to want to "do the right
thing". I think WV was in relatively the same situation about a year ago
as Kentucky is in now. I worked with him and Ken Holiday from WVDEP
and as hard as they are trying, I think they are finding it tough sledding
when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the state legislature.
Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out.
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of
state TENORM being disposed of in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:25 PM
To: Kevin Kosko <kevink@shafemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation
Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on
TERNORM.
3

GP1467

You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised


Statues. The KAR (Kentucky Administrative Regulations) which people
follow closely, to my knowledge does not address what is required by
KRS.
I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive
TENO RM and want to investigate the situation, checking their records
on waste received.
To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me
with the following questions:
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by
the landfill facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be
contained, shipped or described.
Please provide a time period {days, months, etc.) that will help me
narrow down the files I need to review to identify waste
received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who
I need to meet with and where I need to focus my time on regarding the
review of files/manifest for waste being received by the facility. I will
also be researching our files here in Frankfort.

The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my


understanding. I know the engineers and consultants that work for that
facility, both with Republic as well as the contractors/consultants.
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me
to continue to build a case to expedite the needed regulatory
framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENORM
waste disposal issue for the Solid Waste Branch and support the work
that the Division of Waste Management in KDEP is doing to address it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George

<;jeorge P. Partricf8e Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q.'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
4

GP1468

<image002.gif>

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtr.com]

Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:03 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick

Subject: RE: Conversation


George,
I am writing to inform you that the amount of high concentration
TENO RM waste being imported into Ky. for disposal is larger than I
originally thought. Just today, one of my salesman visited three
facilities in Norwich Ohio that are taking all of their TENO RM waste (that
is too highly concentrated to enter or that has been rejected by Ohio,
PA, and/or WV) to Advanced Waste's Green Valley Facility located in
Ashland, Ky. Based on the regulation you sent (KRS 211.863) this is
seemingly prohibited. The generators are being told that this is a legal
disposal option by the landfill facility. Is this correct? Is the Advanced
Waste Landfill facility truly a legal disposal option for highly
concentrated TE NORM generated outside of the region (KY and Illinois)?
If so we would like to start sending the mass quantities of waste we
have to that facility instead of the specially constructed radioactive
waste landfill where we currently send it.

Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...

From: Partridge, George (EEC} [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 7:55 PM
To: Kevin Koska <kevink@shalemtr.com>
Subject: RE: Conversation
Kevin;
5

GP1469

Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to
speak to you over the phone concerning a topic I have been concerned
about and involved with for several years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENO RM, the
Director of the Division of Waste Management has requested our
Program Planning and Administration Branch to work with me to get
familiar with TENO RM and to look at how we need to respond here in
Ke_ntu_c;ky, l]Jj.?gffQrtwa_sinjtiated;:,1s1:i_ resuJt of yourphQne call Jdid
not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general terms that if we
ignore taking a position on TENORM, we will be witnessing its disposal
in landfills designated for other types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help
establish the need for Kentucky to develop a regulatory or policy
framework while being sensitive to all parties involved, including landfill
management or companies that may not recognize or understand what
they are facing as well as those like yourself that share important
information we need to work toward proper management of waste
disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that
you did with me.

Please do not hesitate to call or email me anytime.


I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENORM
with other members of our Division.
George

From: Kevin Koska [mailto:kevink@shalemtLcom]

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 3:12 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: David Patrick
Subject: Conversation
George,
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today regarding TENORM
disposal regulations in the state of Ky. You will also probably be getting
a call from Leo Guzmondi from Nuverra regarding this issue. It was
ironic as I called him about taking their waste from several brine
recycling facilities in Ohio and PA. He stated that they were planning to
take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for
disposal. I told him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was
completely unaware of the statute. The waste from those facilities and
others similar (that currently take waste to KY) typically range from 300600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a significant
concentration from a worker/environmental protection standpoint
6

GP1470

(Ohio allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow 50 pCi/g) but
compliant transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive
LSA labeling or Class 7 Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure
how the good people of Kentucky will feel about seeing placarded loads
of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago.
The majority of TENO RM waste rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was
going to WV., when the press found out what was happening the
backlash was so severe the governor enacted emergency legislation to
place a moratorium on TENORM disposal in all state landfills.
Please feel free to contact me if you would like.
Respectfully,
Kevin

Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: {937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
7

GP1471

Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote

Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forge1 previous

voten~Crn

GP1472

Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, February 26, 2016 6:52 PM
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC);
Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Melton, Ken (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: Contact on TENORM from Ohio

Hello Everyone;
As I shared with Lindsey Briggs, Danny Anderson, and Tony Hatton - I was contacted by Kevin Koska (contact
information below) and was told that TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. He also shared Jason
Frame's contact information as well and suggested I give him a call. Jason brought to my attention the waste shipments
from Fairmont Brine Processing to a landfill in Irvine, Kentucky. I have shared the specifics with you including dates and
correspondence.
Kevin has requested that we do not release his name to the public. He is a speaker for the TENO RM disposal industry,
his company is in the business for its disposal, and my understanding he is also the president of the "Oil and Gas
Association" (? - Ohio?).
Using Kevin's words "if the industry labels him as a whistle blower", it could be catastrophic to his career in the industry.
He has volunteered to be a speaker and work with us. He want to support efforts to see that all companies follow the
His firm charges around$ 460/ton to dispose of routine TENORM waste from 0 & G/Fracking operations
~ cannot compete with landfills in Kentucky that only charge in the neighborhood of$ 23 - 26/ton to dispose of the
same waste.

~ulations.

Please do not share Kevin's name with anyone outside of state


government or with the press or public. Also please remember
it was Jason Frame from WV that was responsible for us
knowing about Fairmont Brine Processing.
Kevin Kesko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655

Thank you,
-orge
(je<Yrge P. PartrUfae Jr.
Department for Environmental Protection
1

GP1473

KY Division of Waste Management


200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1474

Partridge, George (EEC)

fl'_rom:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 7:14 PM
Read: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your message
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:35:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, February 26, 2016 7:14:11 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1475

Partridge, George (EEC)

~rom:

~~:

Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 8:52 PM
Read: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:35:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, February 26, 2016 8:51 :55 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1476

Cc:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:00 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set as being
acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

Ai;e i;;;~~;-mail is~;;fu~;;:;;~entity to~ ~~ddressed. lt;cont~~~


, . . y attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:Georqe.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the questions you
asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

~ received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One contact shared
~t TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us

about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.


1

GP1477

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch issues permits
for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and
disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

- Wh<!! fe~s9idth_~ 1~11dfilJ ~.h<!rgeforth_e waste dispo~al?


I do not have that information.
I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP managed the waste,
and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill since their management has not
made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so we can address
the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key questions I am seeking to
address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my calf yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions without a
written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to briefly address questions you
have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and to address the questions we are receiving
regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any questions I have or
information I need will be directed to your attention through formal correspondence/letters from the appropriate
governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge 'P. 'PartrU:fae Jr., 'Pfi'D, 'P.'E.! Q.'E'P


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1478

------------

---- --------------------------------

-------- - - - - - -----------

----

-----------------------

GP1479

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
Sent:

To:
Cc:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
-----~-

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
1

GP1480

The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP .

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENO RM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. lhe DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.

Thank you,
George
2

GP1481

George P. PartridiJe Jr., PfiV, P.T., QTP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image001.gif>

GP1482

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:18 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
Under KRS 211.862, 211.863 and 902 KAR 100, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
A.sc1ose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~lete and destroy the message.

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC) [mailto:Danny.Anderson@ky.gov]

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
1

GP1483

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

Jhe-infor:mation contained intbise~maiLisintended only for the individual or. entity to whom it is addr-essed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridqe@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
2

GP1484

We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we' are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jearge P. PartridiJe Jr., PfiV, P.'.E., Q'.EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOi.gif>

GP1485

Partridge, George (EEC)

~:,:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:42 PM
Kalt, Brian
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Mr. Kalt,


We are at Estill County High School today across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill conducting radiological surveys. I will
send you a link to Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Regional Management Plan when I get in the
office on Monday. But to answer your question, the RMP sets a threshold for TENO RM at 5 pCi/g Ra-226/228 with no
allowance for background. However the compact strictly forbids the importation and disposal of out of compact
TENORM regardless. I believe OH sets a limit at 5 pCi/g plus background which OH established at 2 pCi/g Ra-226.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS-lCA
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492

~ebsite:http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
~your fees on line athttps://apps4.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
On Feb 27, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Pendergrass,
Under KRS 211.862, 211.863 and 902 KAR 100, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
has Kentucky set as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC) [mailto:Danny.Anderson@ky.gov]

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


1

GP1486

To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100
should be directed to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations
which is the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,

1:5annYArffferson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
has Kentucky set as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged
information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or
print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly
highlight the questions you asked and what I shared with you.

The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in
blue):

GP1487

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to


Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio
to Kentucky. One contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV
as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste
stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The
Solid Waste Branch issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any
unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and disposal of radioactive
materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding
how FBP managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was
received by Blue Ridge Landfill since their management has not made a complete
disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following
information, so we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division
by the press and public. The key questions I am seeking to address in my role as a
permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were
received by Blue Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact
that will have on management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to
address my questions without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you
contacted me today and we got a chance to briefly address questions you have. We are
both seeking to understand better what has happened and to address the questions we
are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt
Pendergrass. Any questions I have or information I need will be directed to your
attention through formal correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing
entities that we are working with.

GP1488

Thank you,
George

(jeor9e P. Partricfee Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
.. {!59?1-~?4-E3?_1E3 ...~~t~.465J
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1489

Partridge, George (EEC)

~m
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:50 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
According to the Inverse Square Law, I imagine the readings to be at background. You've listed the threshold in pCi/g,
however, because your radiological surveys are being conducted via hand held radiation meters, it would help put the
numbers into perspective if you gave me the threshold in R.

Respectfully,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including

A.&y attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
. .close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:42 PM
To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
We are at Estill County High School today across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill conducting radiological surveys. I will
send you a link to Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Regional Management Plan when I get in the
office on Monday. But to answer your question, the RMP sets a threshold for TENO RM at 5 pCi/g Ra-226/228 with no
allowance for background. However the compact strictly forbids the importation and disposal of out of compact
TENORM regardless. I believe OH sets a limit at 5 pCi/g plus background which OH established at 2 pCi/g Ra-226.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
'lstop HS-1CA
nkfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
1

GP1490

Website:http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line athttps:f/apps4.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
On Feb 27, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Pendergrass,
Under KRS 211.862, 211.863 and 902 KAR 100, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
has Kentucky set as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC) [mailto:Danny.Anderson@ky.gov]


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 20161:14 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100
should be <;iirected to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations
which is the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
has Kentucky set as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
2

GP1491

Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC


412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged
information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or
print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly
highlight the questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in
blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to


Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio
to Kentucky. One contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV
as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste
stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TE NORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The
Solid Waste Branch issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any
unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and disposal of radioactive
materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding
how FBP managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was
received by Blue Ridge Landfill since their management has not made a complete
disclosure of the wastes they have received.
3

GP1492

We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following
information, so we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division
by the press and public. The key questions I am seeking to address in my role as a
permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as follows:
l.
2.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were
_ c~~Jx~_g_l}yfiJ1,t_Ridge J!'l_ncttil! l}gtwgen July ang J\Jo11em1Jer of 2Ql5? _
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact
that will have on management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to
address my questions without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you
contacted me today and we got a chance to briefly address questions you have. We are
both seeking to understand better what has happened and to address the questions we
are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt
Pendergrass. Any questions I have or information I need will be directed to your
attention through formal correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing
entities that we are working with.

Thank you,
George

<jeor9e 'P. 'PartridiJe Jr., 'PfiV, 'P.'E., Q'E'P


Department for _Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1493

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Saturday, February 27, 2016 6:05 PM
'Kalt, Brian'
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr. Kalt;
Thank you for the correspondence. I believe Danny Anderson responded to your question regarding interpretation of
KRS 211.862 and 211.863.
We look to CFHS-DPH with my contact being Dr. Curt Pendergrass.
I will check with Curt this coming week and be sure you questions get address.
Thank you,
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

nt: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:00 PM


: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set as being
acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~ose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
~attachments)

GP1494

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I ~ppre_ci'!!e~)'Ol.I calling today and th~ opeortunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the questions you
asked and what I shared with you.
-The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TE NORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One contact shared
that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us
about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENO RM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch issues permits~
for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and
disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

91"

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP managed the waste,
and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill since their management has not
made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so we can address
the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key questions I am seeking to
address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as follows:

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions without a
written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to briefly address questions you
2

GP1495

have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and to address the questions we are receiving
regarding the waste and how it was managed .
. . .ppreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any questions I have or
..-:formation I need will be directed to your attention through formal correspondence/letters from the appropriate
governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

fjeorge P. Partrid{Je Jr., Pli'D, P.'E., Q.'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1496

Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Mr. Kalt,


As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
. e n separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502

(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal Facility
The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
~Clionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management

aA

GP1497

activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
MailstopHSlC~A

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Zl'en .

.,.,~

l;'ViJfri~

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
2

GP1498

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents {including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridqe@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.

The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?

GP1499

3.
4.
5.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returntng my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
tQ_aciJirns~th!'! q1..1~e~!iQn~wg_9rn reJ:eJviog reg!'lrdiog the Wg~tejwd how it was managed, ...
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. Partritfae Jr., Pfi1J, P.'E., Q_TP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1500

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Young, Anita (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 9:23 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC)
998 Revised WQR 2015

I have entered the revised WQR's that were submitted to us on Feb 25 for Blue Ridge Landfill.
Thanks, Anita

GP1501

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
BKalt@fairmontbrine.com
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Mr. Kalt,


'

As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

' S 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


11
(8) Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
11

11

(10) Region means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
11
(301) Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in

-ntucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505

GP1502

(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order ofthe cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation~
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

A..

Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
Disposal of TENO RM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal Facility
- --- ~-rh-e~-p~b-lic-he-alth an_ci_satetvhazard prese-nied by rE:i\foRrvfwasteTs a functfon -of the.
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~an!ed sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the-related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson

On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:


Dr. Partridge,
2

GP1503

Thank you for putting this all together.


Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


3

GP1504

I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2.
3.
4.
5.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?


What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.

Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. PartridiJe Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., fl'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1505

Partridge, George (EEC)

~om:

W';:;nt:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 10:10 AM
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
RE: FBP

Todd;
Thank you,
George
From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:47 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: FBP

Todd Hendricks, P.G.


Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
~nkfort, KY 40601
~-564-6716 ext. 4653

GP1506

Partridge, George (EEC)

-rom:

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 10:32 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Green, Robin C (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
TENORM fact sheet

George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blueridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, timelines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested from
the Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!

Regards,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664

.x:

502.564.3492

1.ee
1

GP1507

Partridge, George (EEC)

~~:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd
(EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Read

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Delivered: 2/29/2016 10:34 AM

Read: 2/29/2016 10:36 AM

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Delivered: 2/29/2016 10:34 AM

Read: 2/29/2016 10:36 AM

Weems, George (EEC)

Delivered: 2/29/2016 10:34 AM

Read: 2/29/2016 11:09 AM

Hatton, Tony (EEC)

Delivered: 2/29/2016 10:34 AM

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Delivered: 2/29/2016 10:34 AM

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Delivered: 2/29/2016 10:34 AM

To:

Cc:

Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
~as asked to witness and participate in those activities.

, s important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George

<georne P. PartridiJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1508

Partridge, George (EEC)

~m:
Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Weems, George (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Weems, George (EEC) (George.Weems@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

GP1509

, Partridge, George (EEC)

~~m:
Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

GP1510

Partridge, George (EEC)

.Arom:

'9';-o:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Briggs. Lindsey (EEC) (Lindsey.Briggs@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

..

GP1511

Partridge, George (EEC)

.A_om:

97o:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Maybriar, Jon (EEC) (Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

GP1512

Partridge, George {EEC)


..Aom:

s;::

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Hendricks, Todd (EEC) (todd.hendricks@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

GP1513

Partridge, George (EEC)

..Aom:

~:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your m~ssage has been delivered to the following recipients:


Hatton, Tony (EEC) (Tony.Hatton@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

GP1514

Partridge, George (EEC)

~om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:36 AM
Read: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34:26 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 29, 2016 10:35:34 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1515

Partridge, George (EEC)

~m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:

Maybriar, Jon {EEC)


Partridge, George {EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:36 AM
Read: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your message
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - lrvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34:26 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 29, 2016 10:36:19 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

I ..

GP1516

Partridge, George (EEC}

-om:
Sent:

To:
Cc:

Subject:
Attachments:

Green, Robin C (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 10:49 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: TENORM fact sheet
TENORM MATERIALS IN KENTUCKY LANDFILLS TIMEUNE.docx

George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back
to me, that is fine, too.
Thanks,
Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
. 0 2 ) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:32 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Green, Robin C (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: TENORM fact sheet

Sent:

George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blue ridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, timelines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested from
the Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!
Regards,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
nkfort, KY 40601
. .ice: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

GP1517

Partridge, George {EEC)

-om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 11:09 AM
Read: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your message
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - lrvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Sent: Monday, February 29, 201610:34:26 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 29, 2016 11 :08:33 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1518

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 11:24 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Do you have a list of participants?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Jon;

With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
._ase schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. PartridiJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1519

Partridge, George (EEC)

~om:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Monday, February 29, 2016 11:31 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Swipe ssamples

Good morning George: .


My supervisor Curt Pendergrass is requesting any documentation that would accompany the swipe samples we took on
the field in front of the landfill entrance, done at different locations on either side of the entry access road to the facility.
If you recall these are samples F-1 through F-9 taken 12/27/16. I would appreciate it if you can scan and send me the
report which could be a short narrative and would include the readings, GPS locations and a sketch (or map) of the
approximate area at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your consideration.
Best Regards
AJ

AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492

https://prd.chfs.ky.gov /Rad ePay/

~TICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use' of the individual or
~ity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law.

If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

GP1520

Partridge, George (EEC)

t'-om:

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Monday, February 29, 2016 11:34 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
samples

Hello again George: I forgot to mention that the chain of custody of those swipe samples would have started with me.
Thanks
Regards
AJ

AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492
https://prd .chfs.ky .gov/Rad ePavI
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
~ying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

._=

GP1521

Partridge, George (EEC)

..Aom:

~nt:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 1:35 PM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Accepted: Blue Ridge Landfill Overview

GP1522

Partridge, George (EEC)

e!~:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 2:16 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

George;
Meeting scheduled for tomorrow mo ring!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:24 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site,Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Do you have a list of participants?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
. .bject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
'

This is very important!


Thank you,
George

<georee P. Partridfje Jr.

Department for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
~nkfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1523

GP1524

1-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 2:32 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from Saturday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you heard
anything from Curt? Do we know what came out yesterday?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:16 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
George;
Meeting scheduled for tomorrow moring!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:24 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

-bject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Do you have a list of p~rticipants?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.

- " i s very important!


Thank you,

George
1

GP1525

<jeorge P. Partridge Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1526

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 2:43 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

George;

I am interested in learning the results from this weekend as well.


George

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:32 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from Saturday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you heard
anything from Curt? Do we know what came out yesterday?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:16 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
, .bject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling

- Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

George;
Meeting scheduled for tomorrow moring!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:24 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Do you have a list of participants?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM


To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Jon;

- h the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
1

GP1527

It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
--

~-

-.

George

<geor13e P. Partridge Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1528

Partridge, George (EEC)

~~:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 2:54 PM
Green, Robin C (EEC)
RE: TENORM fact sheet

Robin;
Thanks for taking time from your busy day for me to share correspondence with you regarding the event surrounding
the waste received by Blue Ridge Landfill.
George

From: Green, Robin C (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:49 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet

George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
~ou think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back
, . . .me, that is fine, too.
Thanks,
Robin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564~6716 ext 4673
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:32 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Green, Robin C (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Subject: TENORM fact sheet


George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blueridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, timelines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested from
1

-Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!

GP1529

Regards,
Danny Anderson, P.E.
Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

GP1530

Partridge, George (EEC)

m
nt:.

To:
Subject:
Attachments: .

Kalt, Brian <BKaft@fairmontbrine.com>


Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sludge Disposal Plan_Approval Email-7-21-2015.pdf; Sludge_Profile_10583SWV_SWPU
ID_14-10-130_12-2-2014.pdf; Sludge_SOl-00001_9-12-2014.pdf

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

..,

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs .
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Stiff trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

~er Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
-me, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TE NORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.

4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is u.sed by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
fear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
n the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

GP1531

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
watering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
atering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
he dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and

delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
.ject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,

GP1532

As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENO RM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


"Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated

der the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502

(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
9u1ations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order ofthe cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

~Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS

Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
~East Main St.reet
. .stop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183

GP1533

Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Y your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/

Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~t!/ltu~
,,

'Vm.n,.~.

f:'Ji.til.i:YrJtiN.,HE.t'iLTH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:

Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents {including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian

GP1534

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TEN ORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.

GP1535

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal

correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with .
Thank you,
George

{]eorge P. Partridge Jr., Pli:n, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1536

Kalt, Brian
From:

Sent:
To:
Cc:

Subject

Frame, Jason R <Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov>


Tuesday, July 21, 2015 3:02 PM

Kalt, Brian
Turner, Tony; Ivey, Walter M
'RE: FBP - Sludge Removal Plan

Mr. Kalt,

Your disposal plan is approved. You are required to submit manifest and chain of custody information for all loads. Thanks

Jason R. Frame B.S. R.T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301

Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524

Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:55 AM

GP1537

To: Frame, Jason R


Subject: RE: FBP - Sludge Removal Plan

Mr. Frame,
1

Fairmont Brine
Processing
Date:
To:

July 16t11 , 2015


West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services
lndoorAir Division
Attn: Jason R. Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, WV 25301

~Rac.liation,'1"01dcsand

Re:

Sludge Disposal Plan

Dear Mr. Frame,


The purpose of this correspondence is in reference to the West Virginia Office of Environmental Health
Services' {OEHS) request that Fairmont Brine Processing (FBP) submit a plan for the disposal of its
sludge. The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) has received and
processed FBP's Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Form. As a result, FBP was assigned a U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) identification Number {WVR000521948).
FBP will contract the removal of all sludge through Advanced TENORM Services (ATS). Based out of
West Liberty, Kentucky, ATS is comprised of dedicated professionals with top level Ph.D. nuclear
physicists, health physicists, engineers, and geologists who have decades of experience with sludge
management.
On July 2ott', 2015, via DOT compliant trucks, ATS will transport 35 sealed containers from FBP's location
in Fairmont, WV to Ashland, KY. There will be no waste handling, solidification, or tank transfer taking
place in WV. All material will be solidified to pass the paint filter test. Upon completion of solidification
and as a special waste per 40 CFR 261.4(b)(5), the material will be disposed of in a Subtitle O landfill
located in Irvine, Kentucky. In order to track the disposal of each container, a manifest tracking log will
be maintained throughout the duration of the project. Before containers are returned for service, they
will be cleaned and issued a certificate. Any residue generated during the tank cleaning process will be
solidified and disposed of at the same Subtitle O landfill and documented in the manifest tracking log.

If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,

Brian Kalt
GM
Fairmont Brine Processing, LlC
412-680-6244

bkalt@fairmontbrine.com

GP1538

Waste Management
(

Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form


sposal Facility:

Meadowfill LF

enerator's Name:

Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

WMI Waste Code:

Common Name of Waste:

WM SPWASTE PLANT

State Waste Code:

Volume of Waste:

2000

Residual Waste Code:

Frequency:

Year

Technical Representative:

Tons

EC#

WV/16

/12/2/2014/105835

14-10-130

John Wakin

Representative's Signature:

Date:

03-Dec-14

Phone Number:

Renewal Requirements
WCF - BIENNIAL

Conditions of Approval:
MANIFEST EACH WASTE SHIPMENT.
CONDITION #4: THIS WASTE MUST BE AERATED OVER AN
UNUSED LINED PORTION OF THE LANDFILL.

Other Waste Description:


SLUDGE FROM BRINE PROCESSING

Additional Renewal Requirements

Effective Date of Approval:

Tuesday, December 02, 2014

Expiration Date of Approval:

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Disposal Recommendation:

Landfill, Non Hazardous

Notes:

Conditions of Approval:

Page I of I

GP1539

I
west Virginia department of environmental protection
Division of Water and Waste Management
60 I 57t1t Street, SE
Charleston, WV 25304
Telephone: (304) 926-0499
Fax: (304) 926-0456

Earl Ray Tomblin, Governor


Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary
www.dep.wv.gov

Minor Permit Modification for


Disposal of Petroleum-Contaminated Materials
SWPU ID: 14-10-130
Landfill: Meadowfill

Generator: Fairmont Brine Processing

Request Received: October 29, 2014

Request Dated: October 28, 2014

Waste: Sludge From Brine Processing

Generated at: Marion County, WV

Comments and/or Conditions

The following checked (X) comments and/or conditions apply:

1.

~ The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Solid Waste, has

reviewed the information submitted by the Meadowfill Landfill. Based upon this
information, the WVDEP believes that this waste is not hazardous waste under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act. Consequently, a minor permit modification is granted for
the disposal of this waste at the Meadow:fill Landfill.

2.

l8] Quantity Approved: 2,000 Tons per Year

D
3.

l8] This amount may be received before November 25, 2016.

D
4.

This Quantity Approved is an increase of the amount allowed by the Minor Permit
Modification
granted
The above date represents an extension of the time allowed by the Minor Permit
Modification
granted

[gl Approved for disposal:


~ TPH (GRO + DRO + ORO)> 10,000 mg/kg: This waste must be aerated over an

unused lined portion of the landfill until test results are obtained showing that TPH
(GRO + DRO +ORO) is less than 10,000 mg/kg, TOVs are less than 100 ppm, and if
DRO is present at more than 100 mg/kg, until total PAH is less than 100 mg/kg, and
then disposed of within 30 days of obtaining those test results.

D TPH (.....) < 10,000 mg/kg:


a. DRO > 100 mg/kg and/or TOV s > 100 ppm: This waste must be aerated over an
unused lined portion of the landfill until test results are obtained showing that, as
Promoting a healthy environment.

GP1540

ID: 14-10-130

LF: Meadowfill

Generator: Fainnont Brine Processing

Page2

applicable, total PAH is less than 100 mg/kg and TOVs are less than 100 ppm,
and then disposed of within 30 days of obtaining those test results.
b. DRO < 100 mg/kg and TOVs < 100 ppm: This waste must be disposed of within
30 days of receiving the waste or this minor pennit modification, whichever is
later.
5.

D Approved for use as daily cover or disposal:


D TPH (.....) > 5,000 mg/kg: This waste must be aerated over an unused lined portion of
the landfill until test results are obtained showing that TPH (..... )is less than 5,000
mg/kg, TOVs are less than 100 ppm, and if DRO is present at more than 100 mg/kg,
until total PAH is less than 100 mg/kg, and then used as daily cover or disposed of
within 30 days of obtaining those test results.

D TPH (..... ) < 5,000 mg/kg


a. DRO > 100 mg/kg and/or TOV s > 100 ppm: This waste must be aerated over an
unused lined portion of the landfill until test results are obtained showing that, as
applicable, total PAH is less than 100 mg/kg and TOVs are less than 100 ppm,
and then disposed of within 30 days of obtaining those test results.
b. DRO < 100 mg/kg and TOV s < 100 ppm: This waste must be used as daily cover
or disposed of within 30 days of receiving the waste or this minor permit
modification, whichever is later.

6.

D After a minimum of thirty days of aeration, this waste must be tested for

and the

analytical results submitted to this office for review before disposal.

7. [gl Petroleum contaminated materials that are not used as daily cover shall be included in
monthly tonnage calculations.
8.

D Petroleum contaminated materials (PCM) that are used as daily cover may be excluded
from monthly tonnage calculations, provided that all of the following conditions are met:
a. Daily deposition of solid waste is confined to as small an area as practical in
accordance with the Solid Waste Management Rule, 33 C.S.R. 1-4.6.a.l.A.
b. Calculations for the amount to be used as daily cover and exempted from the tonnage
limits shall be based on an eight foot (8') vertical cell height for solid waste disposed
of daily.
c. Under no circumstances, shall the amount of PCM used as daily cover and exempted
from monthly tonnage calculations, exceed the rate of 0.14 tons per one (1) ton of
solid waste.
d. Example: A facility that receives 200 tons per day of solid waste, including PCM that
is suitable for use as daily cover, shall not exceed 28 tons per day for tonnage
exemption.
Required formula for calculation:

0.14 x tons of solid waste per day = tons of cover material permitted per day.
9.

IZl The disposal or use as daily cover of this waste must take place during nonnal working
hours, will not be exempt from assessment fees, and must be included in the monthly
tonnage report.
GP1541

ID: 14-10-130

10.

LF: Meadowfill

Generator: Fairmont Brine Processing

Page 3

~Additional comments and/or conditions: Waste must be solidified prior to disposal.

11. ~ If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Kenneth Holliday at
(304) 926-0499, extension 1615 or Kenneth.C.Holliday@wv.gov.

Director

GP1542


__.(._,,'(/.;..,;t...,0.._~::;,,_;:c:;p'"'"-~-1----- 'TEL.# _ _ _ _ __ FAX# _ _ _ _ __
~,Aflil\l
E-MAIL
400
TEMP.'
'I OF
HN03 H2S04 HCL NaOH BACT NO \l~C'~
'DATE
'TIME g ~
MATRIX
~ 1Ji
W,DW.S,0,M
Yes No CONTAIN.
PRES.

CUSTOMER# _

sAMPLER {S)
LABORATORY#

10:10

SAMPLES DO~O NOT_ _ _MEET USEPA GUIDELINES FOR HOLDING TIMES


REMARKS:
SAMPLES DO~DO NOT_ _ _MEET USEPA GUIDELINES FDR CHEMICAL PRESERVATIVES
SAMPLES DO~DO NOT_ _ _MEET USEPA GUIDELINES FOR SAMPLE CONTAINERS
SAMPLES ARE ARE NOT_ _ _ FOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PURPOSES
OATEfTIME
'RELINQUISHED BY:
'RECEIVED BY:
DATE: "'f{fz..JI~(
wEATHERrrEMPERATURE:
PAI~TIME:
SIG
t=='-=;--;;;;==::-;;;;~--r..:.:;.:;=..o..sw~~=---+=.::::;.;,,+':'!e~r!!2~~,,,_--I D RUSH STATUS11NITIALACCEPTANCE _ __
'RELINQUISHED BY:
ADDITIONAL LABORATORY FEES MAY APPLY'..
PRINT:
PATE:
PRINT:
EXTENT OF LIABILITY
TIME:
SIGN:
SIGN:

PWS#~--~-------

cl..,t, / 7o'

av

t='""'---,,.-.,.----.---t..:.:.:!=---,,~,,..-----+:::='----:-=--...,.-----l SHOULD RELIANCE LABORATORIES, INC. BE AT FAULT ANO ANV DISPUTE ARISE FIEGAROING ANALYTICAL DATA GENERATED
lHE LAaOAAlORY,
DATEfTIME
'RELINQUISHED BY:
'RECEIVED BY:
THE EXTENT OF THE UASIUTV TO RELIANCE WIU. BE A DUPLICATE ANALYSIS OF THAT SAMPLE (PROVIDING
SAMPLE REMAINS) OA
A REFUND OF THE ANAl.VTICAL FEE. IN NO EVENT WILL RSLIANCE LABORATORIES BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES INCWOING BUT NDT LIMITED TO
DATE:
PRINT:
PAINT:
DIRECT, INOl~l;C:T OR CONSECUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING FROM SU'CH OJSPUTE.

ADEQUATE

TIME:

SIGN:
SIGN:
t==---------t-=~--====c=----+:=:;.._-.,,=====----1
~IiL~lf:~~:'JJ::~~~:~~~\~N~gjTIWs~~~:~v,~e~~r:~N:OODf'rigN:~~~ NOT AGUARANTEE THAT SAMPLES WILL BE
'DATEfTIME

'COURIER:

PATE:

'RECEIVED BY:

PRINT:

*TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

TRACKING#:
TIME:
SIGN:
=====------~-""=----------'-"=""----------'
ORIGINALCHAfNOFCUSTCID'f DOOUMENTMUSTBE EXECU'TSDIN INK

WiilTE. LABOAATOR'I

GP1543

\'SUCW- c:uem

Reliance

LABORATORIES

Reliance Laboratories, Inc.

Martinsburg Laboratory

2044 Meadowbrook Road I P.O. Box4657


Bridgeport, WV 26330
Phone: 304.842.5285 I Fax: 304.842.5351

Ridgefield Business Center I 25 Crimson Circle


Martinsburg, WI/ 25403
Phone: 304.596.2084 I Fax: 304.596.2086

Certifications: WV Department of Health#: 00354, 00443

I WV Department of Environmental Protection#: 158, 181

MD Department of Environment#: 336, 337 \ US Environmental Protection Agency#: WV00042, WV00901

LABORATORY REPORT SUMMARY


Client:

C06407

Tuesday, October 14, 2014


Total Number of Pages: 4

FAIRMONT BRINE PROCESSING, LLC

(Not Including C.O.C.)

1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 505


PITTSBURGH

PA

Page 1of4

15233-

Lab ID

Sample ID

Sample 102

Sample Date

218683-2014-SL

501-00001

SLUDGE-BOTIOM OF CONCRETE BASIN

9/12/2014

The enclosed results have been analyzed according to the referenced method and SOP. Any deviations to the method have been noted on the
report. Unless otherwise noted, all results have been verified to meet quality control requirements of the method. This report may not be
reproduced, except in full, without written approval of Reliance Laboratories, Inc.
Digitally signed by Tenley
Miller
ON: en=Tenley Miller,

Report Reviewed By:

o=Rellance Laboratories, Inc.,


ou, email=tmiller@wvdsl.net,
c=US
Date:2014.10.1415:49:40
-04'00'

J--~~~~~~~~~~~Envi ron menta I Analysts and Consultants

Reliancelabs@wvdsl.net I www.Reliancelabs.net

GP1544

),

Reliance

Reliance Laboratories, Inc.

Martinsburg Laboratory

2044 Meadowbrook Road I P.O. Box 4657


Bridgeport, l/W 26330
Phone: 304.842.5285 I Fax: 304.842.5351

Ridgefield Business Center I 25 Crimson Circle


Martinsburg, l/W 25403
Phone: 304.596.2084 I Fax: 304.596.2086

Certifications: WV Department of Health#: 00354, 00443 WV Department of Environmental Protection#: 158, 181
MD Department of Environment#: 336, 337 US Environmental Protection Agency#: WV00042, WV00901

LABORATORIES

FAIRMONT BRINE PROCESSING, LLC

Tuesday, October 14, 2014


Page 2 of 4

1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 505


PITTSBURGH,

Lab Number:

15233-

PA

218683-2014-SI

Sample ID:

501-00001
SLUDGE-BOTTOM OF CONCRETE BASIN

Parameter

Value

Analyte Group:

Units

Method

Date/Time Analyzed

Analyst

MDL

MCL

lnorganics

Percent Solids

SM2540B-97

9/15/2014

10:40 CT

Total Volatile Solids

EPA 160.4

9/15/2014

10:40 CT

SW1010A
9/18/2014
SW9045D
9/18/2014
SM4500CND-99 9/19/2014

14:25 KD
13:50 KV
9:10 KD

250

SW9030B

17:07 MC

500

~~~point

__

> 200

pH
Reactive Cyanide

8.00
<1

Deg F
S.U.
mg/kg

Reactive Sulfide

<1

mg/kg

--~--------------------------------------------------------------

9/26/2014

Remarks:
Date Sample Collected:

9/12/2014

Sample Submitted By:


Date Sample Received:

B.PLEMONS
9/12/2014

10:10
10:50

= Not Detected at the MDL or MRL

Sample temp. upon receipt: 20.6 Deg C

ND

MDL - Minimum Detectable Limit

MRL - Minimum Reporting Limit

MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level, USEPA Regulated

[MCL]

= Maximum Contaminant Level, Non-Regulated

'Method Code: STANDARD METHODS 19TH ED; US EPA METHODS FOR THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTES, Rev. 83; US EPA METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION
METALS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES, May 1994; TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WASTE, SW-846, 3rd ED; USEPA Manual for Certification of Laboratories Analyzing
inking Water, 5th ED, In accordance with EPA Regulations, all reports, Including raw data and quality control data, are maintained by the laboratory for a minimum of 5 years.

DTE: ..mg/kg as received


NOTE: ..mgn in leachate

RLl.001

GP1545

Reliance

Reliance Laboratories, Inc.

Martinsburg Laboratory

2044 Meadowbrook Road I P.O. Box 4657


Bridgeport, I/If\/ 26330
Phone: 304.842.5285 I Fax: 304.842.5351

Ridgefield Business Center I 25 Crimson Circle


Martinsburg, I/If\/ 25403
Phone: 304.596.2084 I Fax: 304.596.2086

Certifications: WV Department of Health#: 00354, 00443 WV Department of Environmental Protection#: 158, 181
MD Department of Environment#: 336, 337 US Environmental Protection Agency#: WV00042, WV00901

LABORATORIES

FAIRMONT BRINE PROCESSING, LLC


1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 505
PITTSBURGH,

Tuesday, October 14, 2014


Page 3 of 4

PA

Lab Number:

15233-

218683-2014-SI

Sample ID:

501-00001

SLUDGE-BOTTOM OF CONCRETE BASIN


Parameter

Analyte Group:

Value

Units

Method

Date/Time Analyzed

Analyst

MDL

MCL

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons


6.69

TPH - ORO ___________1596 ----~g/kg ___S_W801~E:l!.~~~OB 9/25/2014 __ __! 8:24_M_~ _______1_0______ _

o-T~ehenyl (Surrogat~-----~--~----~~015~-~~~2014
TPH - GRO
790
mg/kg
SW8015B/5035 9/24/2014
4-Bromochlorobenzene (Surrogate)
115
%
SW8015B
9/24/2014

-------------~------------

18:24 MC
18:52 MC
18:52 MC

0.5

Remarks:
Date Sample Collected:

9/12/2014

Sample Submitted By:


Date Sample Received:

B.PLEMONS
9/12/2014

10:10
10:50

= Not Detected at the MDL or MRL

Sample temp. upon receipt: 20.6 Deg C

ND

MDL Minimum Detectable Limit

MRL. Minimum Reporting Limit

MCL Maximum Contaminant Level, USEPA Regulated

[MCL]

= Maximum Contaminant Level, Non-Regulated

'Method Code: STANDARD METHODS 19TH ED; US EPA METHODS FOR THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTES, Rev. 83; US EPA METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION
METALS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES, May 1994; TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WASTE, SW-846, 3rd ED; USEPA Manual for Certification of Laboratories Analyzing
nking Water, 5th ED. In accordance with EPA Regulations, alt reports, Including raw data and quality control data, are maintained by the laboratory for a minimum of 5 years.

OTE: "mg/l<g as received


NOTE: "mg/I in leachate

RLl.001

GP1546

Reliance

Reliance Laboratories, Inc.

Martinsburg Laboratory

2044 Meadowbrook Road I P.O. Box4657


Bridgeport, WV 26330
Phone: 304.842.5285 I Fax: 304.842.5351

Ridgefield Business Center I 25 Crimson Circle


Martinsburg, WV 25403
Phone: 304.596.2084 I Fax: 304.596.2086

I WV Department of Environmental Protection#: 158, 181


I US Environmental Protection Agency#: WV00042, WV00901

Certifications: WV Department of Health#: 00354, 00443


MD Department of Environment#: 336, 337

LABORATORIES

FAIRMONT BRINE PROCESSING, LLC

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 505


PITTSBURGH,

Lab Number:

Page4 of4

PA

15233-

218683-2014-SI

Sample ID:

501-00001
SLUDGE-BOTTOM OF CONCRETE BASIN

Parameter

Analyte Group:

Value

Units

Method

Date/Time Analyzed

17:21

--------------------------------

TCLP Hexachlorobutadiene**
------------

MDL

MCL

TCLP

TCLP Arsenic**

-----

Analyst

----

!~~~!~tr~~~1o~~~t~x1~~e
TCLP Trichloroethylene**

MC

--------------- -

ND
ND
ND
ND

0.01

5.0

---------- ----------

10/1/2014

19:24 MC

0.003

10/1/2014

19:24 MC

0.001

0.7

10/1/2014

19:24 MC

0.002

0.5

-19:24
--------- - - 0.2
0. 001
MC

TCLP Vinyl Chloride**


-----1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surrogate)

50.6

10/1/2014

19:24 MC

4-Brom~uorobe_r:izene (Surrogate)

99.6

10/1/2014

19:24 MC

Toluene-dB (Surrogate)

96.6

10/1/2014

19:24 MC

10/1/2014

0.5

Remarks:
Date Sample Collected:

9/12/2014

Sample Submitted By:

B.PLEMONS

Date Sample Received:

9/12/2014

10:10
10:50

Sample temp. upon receipt: 20.6 Deg C

ND = Not Detected at the MDL or MRL

MDL - Minimum Delectable Limit

MRL - Minimum Reporting Limit

MCL- Maximum Contaminant Level, USEPA Regulated

(MCL] =Maximum Contaminant Level, Non-Regulated

'Method Code: STANDARD METHODS 19TH ED; US EPA METHODS FOR THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTES, Rev. 83; US EPA METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION
METALS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES, May 1994; TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WASTE, SW-846, 3rd ED; USEPA Manual for Certification of Laboratories Analyzing
nking Water, 5th ED. In accordance with EPA Regulations, all reports, Including raw data and quality control data, are maintained by the laboratory for a minimum of 5 years.

OTE: "mg/kg as received


NOTE: "mg// in leachate

RLI.001

GP1547

.
M.

.
1

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.

3310 Win St.


ENV'J'RONMElllTAL TECHNOLOGl!:S, INC
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
AntJlytiaaJ l...1.1bcratorfif!5'
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489
Website: http://www.settek.com

October 13, 2014


Tenley Miller
Reliance Laboratories-Bridgeport
Benedum Industrial ParkP.O. Box 4657
Bridgeport, WV 26330
TEL:
FAX:

RE:

218683

Dear Tenley Miller:

Order No.:

14092799

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 9/25/2014 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
There were no problems with the analytical events associated with this report unless noted in the
Case Narrative .

Quality control data is within laboratory defined or method specified acceptance limits except
where noted.

If you have any questions regarding these tests results, please feel free to call the laboratory.

Sincerely,

Dr. Mo Osman
Project Manager
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
A2LA 0724.01, Alabama 41600, Arizona AZ0788, Arkansas 88-0735, California 07256CA, Colorado, Connecticut PH-0105, Delaware, Florida NELAC
E87688, Georgia E87688 aud 943, Idaho OH00923, Illinois 200061 and Reg.5, Indiana C-OH-13, Kansas E-10347, Kentucky (Underground Storage Tank)
3, Kentucky 90146, Louisiana 04061 and LAl2004, Maine 2012015, Maryland 339, Massachusetts M-OPH923, Minnesota 409711, Montana CERT0099,
New Hampshire 2996, New Jersey OH006, New York 11777, North Carolina 39705 and 631, Ohio Drinking Water4170, Ohio VAP CL0052, Oklahoma
9940, Oregon OH200001, Pennsylvania 68-01335, Rhode Island LA0003 l 7, South Carolina 92016001, Tennessee TN04018, Texas Tl 04704466-11-5,
Region 8 8TMS-L, USDA/APHIS P330-ll-00244, Utah OH009232011-l, Vermont VT-87688, Virginia 00440 and 1581, Washington C891, West
Virginia 248 and 9957C and E87688, Wisconsin 399013010

Page 1of4

Page 1 of 7
GP1548

'

..

U.)G!E$, !~lC

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.


3310WinSt.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489
Website: http://www.settek.com

CLIENT:

Reliance Laboratories-Bridgeport

Project:

218683

Lab SampleID Client Sample ID


14092799-001

218386-2014-SL

Tag No

Workorder
Sample Summary
WO#:

14092799
13-0ct-14

Date Collected

Date Received

Matrix

9/12/2014 IO: 10 00 AM

9/25/2014IO:15:00 AM

Sludge

Page 2 of4

Page 2 of 7
GP1549

'

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNO
~...,Jl!fllllll/I Ani11ytit:-BI L<Jbcrat.arfe~

.
IT
$,INC.

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.


3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489
Website: http://www.settek.com

CLIENT:

Reliance Laboratories-Bridgeport

Project:

218683

Case Narrative
VIO#:

14092799

Date:

10/13/2014

This report in its entirety consists of the documents listed below. All documents contain the Summit
Environmental Technologies, Inc. Work Order Number assigned to this report.
Paginated Report including: Cover Letter, Case Narrative, Analytical Results, Applicable Quality
Control Summary Reports and copies of the Chain of Custody Documents supplied with this sample
set.
Concentrations reported with a J flag in the Qual field are values below the Limit of Quantitation
(LOQ) but greater than the established Limit of Detection (LOD). There is greater uncertainty
associated with these results and data should be considered as estimated.
Method numbers, unless specified as SM (Standard Methods) or ASTM, are EPA methods.
Estimated uncertainty values are available upon request.

Original
Page 3 of4

Page 3 of 7
GP1550
-

------

._
11

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.

3310 Win St.


E!'WlflOJIJMENfAL TCl{NOU)Gi!:$, INC
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Anslytiatfl t,.,barataries
TEL: (330) 253-8211 FAX: (330) 253-4489
Website: http://www.settek.com

WO#: 14092799
Date Reported: 10/13/2014

Company: Reliance Laboratories-Bridgeport


Address: Benedum Industrial ParkP.O. Box 4657
Bridgeport WV 26330
Received: 9/25/2014
Project#: 218683

SVOC 8270 TCLP BNA List


Client ID#

Lab ID# Collected Analyte

Rep Lmt Result Units

Matrix

Method DF RegLvl

Run

Analyst
AKE

218386-2014-SL

001

9/12/2014 1,4-Dichlorobenzene

0.10

ND mg/L

Sludge

EPA8270 C

7.5

10/11/2014

218386-2014-SL

001

9/1212014 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol

0.25

ND mg/L

Sludge

EPA8270 C

400

10/11/2014

AKE

218386-2014-SL

001

9/12/2014 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

0.25

ND mg/L

Sludge

EPA 8270 C

2.0

10/11/2014

AKE

218386-2014-SL

001

9/12/2014 2,4-Dinitrotoluene

0.10

ND mg/L

Sludge

EPA8270 C

0.13

10/11/2014

AKE

218386-2014-SL

001

0.10

ND mg/L

Sludge

EPA8270 C

0.50

10/11/2014

AKE
AKE

218386-2014-SL

001

9/12/2014 Hexachloro-1,3butadiene
9/12/2014 Hexachlorobenzene

0.10

ND mg/L

Sludge

EPA 8270 C

0.13

10/11/2014

218386-2014-SL

001

9/12/2014 Hexachloroethane

0.10

ND mg/L

EPA8270C

3.0

10/11/2014

AKE

218386-2014-SL
218386-2014-SL

001
001

9/12/2014 Nitrobenzene
9/12/2014 Pentachlorophenol

0.10
0.25

ND mg/L
ND mg/L

Sludge
Sludge
Sludge

EPA8270 C
EPA8270 C

2.0
100

10/11/2014
10/11/2014

AKE
AKE

218386-2014-SL

001

9/12/2014 Pyridine

0.25

ND mg/L

Sludge

EPA 8270 C

5.0

10/11/2014

AKE

GP1551

'

RELIANCE LABORATORIES,
0

2044MEADOWBROOKROAD
POST OFFICE BOX 4657
BRIDGEPORT, WV 26330
TEL. (304) 842-5285 FAX (304) 842-5351

RIDGEFIELD BUSINESS CENTER


25 CRIMSON CIRCLE
MARTINSBURG, WV 25403
TEL (304) 596-2084 FAX (304) 5962086

I()

(I)

Cl

ca

a..

E~MAIL rellancelabs@wvdsl.net
INTERNET www.RelianceLabs.net

*CLIENT NAME

.I. -CHAIN OFCUSTODVRECORD

.......

R~t'im(p. La;fvrzr~y~::J2 lttC ~

*ADDRESS.~~------------~~~~--~~~--.~~~~~~~~~~~~*TEL.# _ _ _ _ _ __ FAX# _ _ _ _ __
CUSTOMER # --..,....-,..,.....,,...,......------71 hL..
.. ,..
*SAMPLER (S)
LABORATORY#

HN03 IH2S04I HCL

INaOHiBAC.Tlp~i?s.
~

SAMPLES 00....L.._DO NOT_ _ _MEET USEPA GUIDELINES FOR HOLDING TIMES


.!REMARKS:
SAMPLES DO / D O NOT_MEET USEPA GUIDELINES FOR.CHEMICAL PRESERVATIVES
SAMPLES DO .,.,-- DO NOT_MEET USEPA GUIDELINES FOR SAMPLE CONTAINERS
SAMPLES ARE "-~l_N9T_ _ _ FOR REGULATO~ COMPLIANCE PURPOSES
"OATElllME

DATE:

GP1552

SIGN:

Tl~

PRINT:

DATE:

SIGN

TIME:

"RECENED BY:

C/-f7- '-(-/ Y

PAINT~ ;J

I fa 0 <.J

srGN:.l""C'4

"DATI:ITIME

WEATHERfTEMPERATURE:

D RUSH STATUSc1NmALACCEFTANcE

BY:

PAINT;

----

- ADDITIONAL LABORATORY FEES MAY APPLY...

EXTENT OF LIABILITY

SIGN
*DA'WTIME

PWS#~~~~~~~~~.._~

:~=~~c~~AB~~~fe~r!:~w"i1't~e~0o~,~~A~~:i~ ~G;'.: ~~~';'~1:: :~=~~a:i~ =~~

*RECEIVED BY:

. 'REUNQUIStfEDBY:
PRINT:

DATE:

: PAINT:

i ~.:~I~~~: ~~~~;:~Ji.iri: ~~~..~~~~E~=s~':t~~1;?~~ SE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES INCLUOING BUT NOT LIMITED TD

SIGN:

TIME:

' SIGN;

, NarE:

L*COURIER;

JRAt::Kll\IG#:

DATE;
>TIME:

'OA'femME
'

. '

----

1. .

- -

.;..,,..;;t--v T SIGN;
_;,;S; .

i:S"t.:;:' ...

TYPICAL SAMPLE TUAN AROullll FOR .R<lUTINE. SAMPLES IS S TO 10 WORl<lNG DAYS. THIS IN NOT A GUARANreE THilT SAMPLE5 WILL BE
COMPLETED IN THIS TIME FRAME, HOWEVER. NON-llOl111NE SAMPLES MAY REQUllE ADDmONAI. Tll.IE.

jl

~~==

.~-

""""""~

"-------

f ()Iii Ul\11'1 I 11 /I Ill U I I \ 1

;,QRIGJNALCHAJNOFCUSTDDYDOCUl.IENTMUSTBEExECllTEDININK

WHITE LABOMrORY

veu.ow - CLIENT

..

RELIANCE LABORATORIES, INC.


ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS AND CONSULTANTS
BRIDGEPORT, WV
'

'"

MARTINSBURG, WV

www.Reliancelabs.net

Cerlif1eat1ons: WV Department of Health #: 00354, 00433 I WV Department of Environmental Protection #: 1ss, 181
MD Department of Envlr~nment #: ~36,. 33?1 US Environmen~I P(l)teclio'n Agency#: WV00042, WV00901

.
I

Monday, Septemb~rlS, 2014


SfilnmitEnvrronmenial
3310 Win,Street
Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223

Please anal~e the following.samplci(s) for: TCLP Semi-:Volatiles

Please id.enti~ as;


218683-2014-Sl

Sample Ip: 501-00001

9/12/2014 10:10

Sampled by: B.Plemons

PL~ASE SEND RESULT.S & INVOICE TO:


.. RELIANCE LAaORAToRIEs, INC.
ATT'Ni TENLEY.MILLER

. P.O. :aox 4657


BRIDGEPORT, WV 26330
tmiller@wvdsl.net

PLE~S)!ExECUTE THE ENCLOSED C:aAIN OF CUSTODYRECORD AND RETURN WITH

1~stJLts:

'TIW'1K tou.

-r ciP e'JCfta.l-h.if~ pu-br~ o/:i3~P I 'f

2044 MEADOWBROOK ROAD

I P.O. BOX 4657 I BRIDGEPORT, WV 2~330 I VOICE: 304-842-5285 I FAX: 304-842-5351

R1oaeF1ELo eus1NEss cENTER 125 qR1MsoN ciRcLe rMARr1NseuRa, wv 25403 1vo1cE: 304.ses-2084 I-FAX: 304.59e-2oaa

Page 6 of 7

GP1553

' '
Rev. 12

'

Date: 07127/13

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.


Cooler Receipt Form
Initials of person inspecting cooler and samples:

e-...">"'l....l~~
....~-~-c-.---_.- - -

Client...............
,12-
..,.
....
Date Received:

9..,,.35~1'-l

Time Received:

Order Number:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

./oJI"

Number of Coolers/Boxes:

Shipper~

UPS

8 C..

Date cooler(s) opened and samples inspected:

Q.f)tf~lff

N/A
DHL

Airborne

US Postal

Walk-in

Pickup

Foam

Packaging:
Tape on cooler/box:

None

Other:._ _ _ _ _ __

Custody Seals intact

N/A

C-0-Clnp~

NIA

lce_
.. ..,..r_B
Blluuee ice _ _ __
Sample Temperature IR Gun #16020459 CF

Other: _ _ _ _ _ _ __

~absent I melted

.0 ...o

.s__c

c --~-]-

N/A

NIA

Radiological Testing Instrument serial #35127


Y
N
NIA
(see page 2 for scan results)
**Use 1 sheet per sample for Radiological Testing. If sample Is HOT, the Radiological Safety Officer must be notified
Immediately.

C(Q~ fiU~ QL!~ groperly

NIA

Samples in separate bags

NIA

"sample containers Intact"

NfA

*If no, list broken sample{s):._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

~
~

Sample label(s) complete (ID, date, etc.)


label(s) agree with C-0-C
Correct containers used

NIA

NIA

NIA

q=-

N/A

N/A

Sufficient sample received


Bubbles absent from 40 ml vials-

**Samples with bubbles <Smm are acceptable. Indicate bubble size if >6mm. - - - - - - - Was client contacted about samples

Will client send new samples

Client contact: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date/Time:._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~----~~
Logged in by:. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

G:\QC SHARED\Document Control Templates -Tracklng\Cooler receipt fOrm Rev. 12 07-27-13.doc

Page 1 of 2

Page 7 of 7

GP1554

Partridge, George (EEC)

-!.~:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Green, Robin C (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 3:52 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)
RE: TENORM fact sheet
TENORM MATERIALS IN KENTUCKY LANDFILLS TIMEUNE.docx

OK, I have attached my summary to this email. Please make any corrections necessary.,

Robin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste 11anagement
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:54 PM

A.a: Green, Robin C (EEC)

~ject: RE: TENORM fact sheet


Robin;
Thanks for taking time from your busy day for me to share correspondence with you regarding the event surrounding
the waste received by Blue Ridge Landfill.
George
From: Green, Robin C (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:49 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet

George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back
to me, that is fine, too.

eenks,

Robin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
1

GP1555

Solid Waste Branch


Division of Waste I\1anagement
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:32 AM
To: P_artridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Green, Robin C (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: TENORM fact sheet
George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blueridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, time lines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested from
the Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!
Regards,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

GP1556

Subject:
Attachments:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, .Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sludge Disposal Plan_Approval Email-7-21-2015.pdf; Sludge_Profile_105835WV_SWPU
ID_14-10-130_12-2-2014.pdf; Sludge_SOl-00001_9-12-2014.pdf

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

a..er Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
. . . .me, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
~hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
W-lear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
1

GP1557

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding~
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.

5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP} Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including.
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
2

GP1558

As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENO RM.
~ 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.kv.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501

:'Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of comrierce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.govfstatutes/statute.aspx?id=8502

(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices ofthe commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutesfstatute.aspx?id=8505
Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
,ulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

8-i

Central Midwest Interstate low-level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional llRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
East Main Street
. .!stop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
3

GP1559

Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

m. ~.
1.~R

v..en.

IV~"ffl>it~i!/M~rM"?JlJ:JJATJONtbl-ll::AtTH

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jor:i (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian

GP1560

-----

--

--------

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

..

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.

GP1561

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. Partricfee Jr., Pfi1J, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image001.gif>

..
6

GP1562

Partridge, George (EEC)

lorn:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 3:56 PM
Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
RE: Key Email Correspondence from WV
Email Correspondence - DEP-DWM-02_29_16.pdf

Jamie;
Please find attached the scanned email correspondence you reviewed with me.
Please place it in TEMP0360.
Thank you,
George

<george P. PartrUfee Jr.

Department for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
564-6716 ext. 4651

-2)

GP1563

To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
Kalt, Brian, President (BKalt@fairmontbrine.com)
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sludge Disposal Plan_Approval Email_7-21-2015.pdf; Sludge_Profile_l05835WV_SWPU
ID_14-10-130_12-2-2014.pdf; Sludge_SOl-00001_9-12-2014.pdf

Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?

' -

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protedion Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. .otified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1564

Vou/U~
IVif;l.;.-,.,,.
...,
P~l.t\TiONAH~1t.'tH

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) "'."as accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TE NORM Services for
2

GP1565

--------

--

----

dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive

,terials were to be eliminated.


5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and

- e t e and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) (mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Ka It's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
lromised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


3

GP1566

(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is . . .
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

A..

{10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) ''Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material ''TENORl\/I'' rneans N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility ofthe states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day ofthe violatio.
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional llRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm

GP1567

'

-------------

----

Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/


Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/

e o--f--u_ _ 11!'an-~ed sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx


-R

-""'""""'

_,

f'A!:Jl.lrr101-~:&HJZJ!,LTH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents {including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
5

GP1568

I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contacCs.hgrec! that TENQRM ~~s!e \f\l<:JS also l:Jeing shipped froll} WV as well and referr~q us to Jason
Frame. Jason/Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping cohtainers?
3. What was the tot.al quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 20157
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.

GP1569

Thank you,
George

(ieorge P. Partridge Jr., PfiV, P."E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
{502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1570

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 4:30 PM
'Kalt, Brian'
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr. Kalt;
Thank you for responding to my questions and the documents you provided us.
Sincerely,
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,

ase see the responses in green to your questions below.

1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
n determined to be non-hazardous.

GP1571

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.

-.

..

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the sernad half pf W15, Er:JP'.~ sJydge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occ.urrirg rac:Jioa.~!iye m.a!erial
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed,

plea~e

o~.
..

let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
2

GP1572

Curt;
, n k you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
'

KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm


(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Mgmt Plan.pdf)
. .__
,.Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility

a.A, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional

GP1573

----------

_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kfb..t1ii:1ir~
~,,,,.~_:!/

f'...'li~IAT1fil'~~H!V\LTH

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
4

GP1574

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill .

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TE NORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
5

GP1575

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank youagain for returni11g rnY callyesterday even though you were not able to ~ddre~s my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. Partridjje Jr., Pfi:D, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image001.gif>

GP1576

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday,.February 29, 2016 4:32 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Curt;
Thank you for copying me on correspondence.
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
To: Kalt, Brian, President (BKalt@fairmontbrine.com)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
Ai.iuiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
. .iochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


aervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
ucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
1

GP1577

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~..~

'?7it;[!G~~~"i~I .
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with. a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generat.
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.

GP1578

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
....-/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
~clear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test; and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
Aa:sident
,,.rmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

----------

"-------------

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


3

GP1579

To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised; below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http:l/www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(BJ "Nat_ur9l_ly-occurrir~~ ~adioactive material" (NORM) means naturally_occurring rnat~rials not regul~'!t~d
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

...

KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8SOS


(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:ljwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENO RM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
4

GP1580

Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section


Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
East Main Street
ilstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http :Uwww.chfs.ky.govId ph/rad ioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
~

l(rpJM~gR
.,.,it~"."
... ~"If"'''.'~ A.:. .,_,;..,,1 '\l<.u.
f<ilr'l;iHoi"'H ;;.(llh~ni:rt.t.i; n

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
A.inks,
Anderson

~ny

On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:


Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

GP1581

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
0

I appreciated you calllng today ana-the opportunity for us to tall< just wanted to briefly highlight: the

questions you asked and what I shared with you.


The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM7

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2.
3.
4.
5.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?


What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 20157
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

GP1582

I~

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<george P. Partrit:fae Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1583

Partridge, George (EEC)

-rom:
Sent:

To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 4:38 PM
Green, Robin C (EEC)
RE: TENORM fact sheet
TENORM MATERIALS IN KENTUCKY LANDFILLS TIMELINE (2) - GP.docx

Robin;
Attached is your document with a couple of minor additions for your consideration.
Thank you,
George

From: Green, Robin C (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:52 PM
,

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Cc: Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)
Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet

OK, I have attached my summary to this email. Please make any corrections necessary.

~obin

C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:54 PM
To: Green, Robin C (EEC)

Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet


Robin;
Thanks for taking time from your busy day for me to share correspondence with you regarding the event surrounding
the waste received by Blue Ridge Landfill.
George

GP1584

Cc: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet

George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline .back
to me, that is fine, too.

Thanks,
Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:32 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Green, Robin C (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: TENORM fact sheet
George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blueridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, timelines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested from
the Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!
Regards,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

GP1585

Partridge, George (EEC)

f#._om:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 4:44 PM
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
RE: Swipe ssamples

AJ,
It was a pleasure to meet you Saturday and I appreciated so much all that you and Chris did in Irvine, KY to help us
understand the situation better.
Unless something changes unexpectedly regarding my schedule, I plan to work on the documentation for Saturday's site
visit and get that to you tomorrow.
Thanks again for all your help,
George

From: Bhattacharyya, Anjan

Sent:

Monday, February 29, 2016 11:31 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Swipe ssamples
Aw,pod morning George:
~supervisor Curt Pendergrass is requesting any documentation that would accompany the swipe samples we took on
the field in front of the landfill entrance, done at different locations on either side of the entry access road to the facility.
If you recall these are samples F-1 through F-9 taken 12/27/16. I would appreciate it if you can scan and send me the
report which could be a short narrative and would include the readings, GPS locations and a sketch (or map) of the
approximate area at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your consideration.
Best Regards

AJ

AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492

https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

GP1586

Partridge, George (EEC)

: f/lom:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Green, Robin C (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 4:59 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)
FW: TENORM fact sheet
TENORM MATERIALS IN KENTUCKY LANDFILLS TIMELINE.docx

Danny,
I made George's suggested change as well as your and Jamie's changes.

Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste 11anagement
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673

Robin;
Attached is your document with a couple of minor additions for your consideration.
Thank you,
George
From: Green, Robin C (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:52 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Cc: Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)

Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet

OK, I have attached my summary to this email. Please make any corrections necessary.

~inC.Green

~vironmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
1

GP1587

Division of Waste Management


200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:54 PM


To: Green, Robin C (EEC)

Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet


Robin;
Thanks for taking time from your busy day for me to share correspondence with you regarding the event surrounding
the waste received by Blue Ridge Landfill.
George
From: Green, Robin C (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:49 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet

George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or ..A
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back.9"
to me, that is fine, too.
Thanks,
Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:32 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Green, Robin C (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Subject: TENORM fact sheet


George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blueridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, time lines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested f r o .
the Director's office.

GP1588

Thanks for all your efforts George!

"'-egards,
Danny Anderson, P.E.
Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

GP1589

Partridge, George (EEC)

.rom:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 5:16 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sludge Disposal Plan_Approval Email-7-21-2015.pdf; Sludge_Profile_105835WV_SWPU
ID_14-10-130_12-2-2014.pdf; Sludge_SOl-00001_9-12-2014.pdf

Email received from Mr. Kalt.

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
'

2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to.capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan .
. .'s sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no

GP1590

-----

--------------

- - -

levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
--

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there ar:ialytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;

Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.


George Partridge
KDWM
2

GP1591

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
~:Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
~nt:

Hello Mr. Kalt,


As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.. 861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it .
.:...~ 211.863 Control of comm.erce of low-level. radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky

...... rohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502


(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000} nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000}. Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENO RM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
~quire an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
WWivities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.

GP1592

Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
- ___ Fax: 502-564.-:.1492 __
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov Id ph/rad ioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https:l/prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kr!!!~
t'Jl.DlATlOit~~Jl~\lTH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services {CHFS).

.A
9"

Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

--------------------.. - - - - - - - - - - - The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
4

GP1593

------------------------

--------

intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TE NORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are beirig presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5

GP1594

5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
gy~stJQns I h(!v~ or inf()rrnC!tiQD ln~~d_will be directed to your attention tbr9ugh fQfrn?l

correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

{ieorge P. Partridjje Jr Pfi'D, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1595

Partridge, George (EEC)

Aa,m
..,.nt:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 5:17 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sludge Disposal Plan_Approval Email_7-21-2015.pdf; Sludge_Profile_105835WV_SWPU
ID_14-10-130_12-2-2014.pdf; Sludge_SOl -00001_9-12-2014.pdf

Email received from Curt Pendergrass.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
To: Kalt, Brian, President (BKalt@fairmontbrine.com)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up

samples if they are available.


Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
jii East Main Street
Wlstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
1

GP1596

Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From:
[ mailto: BKalf@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material -
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
2

GP1597

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
-rrently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

.412-680-6244

~hi=~~;;;ddressed. cont~ud;;

trmation contained in
Its
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

t: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


3

GP1598

Hello Mr. Kalt,

As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks er soils; or,background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www. Ire. ky.govI statutes/ statute.aspx?id=8505


(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENO RM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TENORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,

..

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
4

GP1599

Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
502-564-1492
~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~!'anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

a.:

Ynnflii:J(/ff.":;,,

IW:,~~-...Y

rw.tJlA'flDl'~&.Htl:JJ.rH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

To:

Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).

Thanks,
Danny Anderson
Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

GP1600

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
I

The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENO RM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
6

GP1601

briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed .

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. PartrUJBe Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image001.gif>

I
I

e
7

GP1602

Partridge, George (EEC)

m
. .nt:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, February 29, 2016 5:47 PM
Green, Robin C (EEC)
RE: TENORM fact sheet

Robin;
Thank you,
George

From: Green, Robin C (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:59 PM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)
Subject: FW: TENORM fact sheet

Danny,
I made George's suggested change as well as your and Jamie's changes .

_..i.obin C. Green
wironmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:38 PM


To: Green, Robin C (EEC)
Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet
Robin;
Attached is your document with a couple of minor additions for your consideration.
Thank you,
George

GP1603

Cc: Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)

Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet

OK, I have attached my summary to this email. Please make any corrections necessary.

Robin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division ofWasteManagement ~
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:54 PM


To: Green, Robin C (EEC)
Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet

Robin;
Thanks for taking time from your busy day for me to share correspondence with you regarding the event surrounding
the waste received by Blue Ridge Landfill.
George
From: Green, Robin C (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:49 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: TENORM fact sheet

George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back
to me, that is fine, too.
Thanks,
Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673

GP1604

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:32 AM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


: Green, Robin C (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
bject: TENORM fact sheet
George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blueridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, timelines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested from
the Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!
Regards,

Danny' Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

GP1605

Partridge, George (EEC)


m
. .nt:
To:

Subject:

Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:48 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Swipe ssamples

Thank you, glad we could be of assistance.


Regards

AJ

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:44 PM


To: Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Subject: RE: Swipe ssamples
AJ;
It was a pleasure to meet you Saturday and I appreciated so much all that you and Chris did in Irvine, KY to help us
understand the situation better.
Unless something changes unexpectedly regarding my schedule, I plan to work on the documentation for Saturday's site
visit and get that to you tomorrow .

hanks again for all your help,


9orge

From: Bhattacharyya, Anjan

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:31 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: Swipe ssamples


Good morning George:
My supervisor Curt Pendergrass is requesting any documentation that would accompany the swipe samples we took on
the field in front of the landfill entrance, done at different locations on either side of the entry access road to the facility.
If you recall these are samples F-1 through F-9 taken 12/27/16. I would appreciate it if you can scan and send me the
report which could be a short narrative and would include the readings, GPS locations and a sketch (or map) of the
approximate area at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your consideration.
Best Regards

AJ

AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.

Radiation Health Specialist II


Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3700 x4171
: 502-564-1492

https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
1

GP1606

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying ofthis communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

GP1607

Partridge, George (EEC)

8aom
~~t:
To:

Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:09 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Blue ridge LF

George:
I thought you might find this interesting. The below graybar in tempo contains documents/application from when the LF
tried to permit the Martha oil waste.
Al998
APE19960003

Regards,
Danny Anderson, P.E.
Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

GP1608

Partridge, George {EEC)

8a,m
~nt:
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Green, Robin C (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:18 AM
Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)
TENORM MATERIALS IN KENTUCKY LANDFILLS TIMELINE 3-1-2016
TENORM MATERIALS IN KENTUCKY LANDFILLS TIMELINE 3-1-2016.docx

All,
George received additional information last night about events of July 21, 2015. He and I have
made some additions to the timeline based on this information. New version is attached.
Thanks,
Robin

I. .
1

GP1609

-----------------

TENORM MATERIALS IN KENTUCKY LANDFILLS - Tl MELINE


1.

July 16, 2015 - Fairmont Brine sent a letter to West Virginia's Office of Environmental Health
(WVOEH) notifying WVOEH of their intent to send their waste stream to Advanced TENORM for
processing and then disposal at a Kentucky landfill.

2.

July 21, 2015 - Staff at WVOEH contact staff of Kentucky's Cabinet for Health and Family
Services (CHFS), Radiation Health Branch (RHB) about the proposed disposal of TENO RM in a
Kentucky class D landfill. At 1:19 pm, staff of RHB emailed WVOEM restating an earlier
conversation that there were currently no regulations in Kentucky regarding TENO RM and that
each landfill may have their own limits for the acceptance of radiation levels.

3.

July 21, 2015 - At 3:02 pm, staff of WVOEM notified Fairmont Brine that their disposal plan was
approved and that Fairmont Brine was required to submit manifest and chain of custody
information for all loads.

4.

July 21, 2015 - At 9:45 pm, a different staff member of RHB contacted WVOEM stating that due
to the Compact between Kentucky and Illinois, radioactive materials from WV could not be
brought to Kentucky for disposal, but also deferred to staff of the Division of Waste
Management, Solid Waste Branch (SWB) regarding disposal of hazardous NORM or TENO RM
materials at Kentucky landfills. In addition to the DWM Hazardous Waste Branch staff who were
notified, a SWB staff member was intended to be copied on the email from RHB, but the staff
member's name was typed incorrectly.

5 . July 24, 2015 through November 16, 2015- Illegal dumping of TE NORM materials in Kentucky
occurred at Blue Ridge Landfill.

6. January 13, 2016 -A consultant contacted a SWB staff member with an allegation of illegal
disposal of TENO RM in Kentucky.

7. January 18, 2016- The consultant notified a SWB staff member that WVOEH staff had been
notified of the allegations as well.

8. January 19, 2016-WVOEH staff emailed RHB staff stating that no response to the July 21, 2015
email had ever been sent by the SWB.

9. January 28, 2016 -SWB staff contacted WVOEH about the consultant's allegation. WVOEH staff
member copied email from July 21, 2015 to SWB staff member. SWB staff member sees email
intended for him, but incorrectly addressed.
10. February 22, 2016- Division of Waste Management (DWM) sent a notice to solid and special
waste facilities owner and operators notifying them of the issue and the applicable statues and
regulations.
11. February 26, 2016 - DWM employees met with representatives of Blue Ridge Landfill to obtain
additional information about waste shipments and disposal procedures.
12. February 27, 2016 - DWM and CHFS employees conducted radiation surveys at nearby school.
13. February 28, 2016- Estill County hires Eco-Tech to perform additional radiation surveys.

GP1610

Partridge, George (EEC)

...,m
~nt:.
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:21 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Blue ridge LF

Danny;
Thank you for sharing this! I look forward to reviewing the documents.
Thanks again for all you are doing regarding the Blue Ridge Landfill and Irvine, KY.
I wish you and the others in our Division the best as you proceed with the meetings today.
I am grateful to you all!
Thanks again,
George

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:09 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Blue ridge LF
9orge:
I thought you might find this interesting. The below graybar in tempo contains documents/application from when the LF
tried to permit the Martha oil waste.
Al998
APE19960003
Regards,

Danny Anderson, P.E.


Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492

GP1611

Partridge, George (EEC)

~m
.,.nt:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:33 AM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Accepted: Blue Ridge Landfill Overview

GP1612

Partridge, George (EEC)

8a,m:
~:

Sent:
Subject:

Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:43 AM
Read: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Your message
To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34:26 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:43:04 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

GP1613

Partridge, George (EEC)

"'-rom:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:43 AM
Read: RE: Photos from Site Visit to Advanced TENORM Services

Your message
To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: Photos from Site Visit to Advanced TENORM Services
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 11 :55:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:43:09 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1614

- - - ------------

Partridge, George (EEC)

tt#,,rom:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:39 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon
(EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC)
Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad
(EEC)
Blue Ridge Surface Water Runoff
Blue Ridge Drainage.JPG; Blue Ridge Drainage 2.JPG

See attached photos from Google Earth. This is runoff from Blue Ridge.
We need to investigate the discolored water. There could be leachate impacts to surface water, and the surface water
could be a pathway for both dissolved and particulate constituents.

Todd Hendricks, P.G.


Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653

GP1615

Partridge, George {EEC)

~rom:

.-;~nt:
To:
Cc:

Subject:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:50 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon
(EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC)
Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad
(EEC)
RE: Blue Ridge Surface Water Runoff

Please note that prior to 6-20-12, the drainage was not red.
Were this naturally-occurring geologically-derived iron, it would probably not have started in 2012.

From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:39 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC)

Cc: Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)

Subject: Blue Ridge Surface Water Runoff


See attached photos from Google Earth. This is runoff from Blue Ridge.

I,,

We need to investigate the discolored water. There could be leachate impacts to surface water, and the surface water
could be a pathway for both dissolved and particulate constituents.

Todd Hendricks, P.G.

Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653

GP1616

- - - - - - -

Subject:

--------

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Ii

D2

I2

D2

'ordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

iu

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:

Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

GP1617

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
2

GP1618

Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
~ormation on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
F-~del, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highes_t reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
A...mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
~bsite: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~~nted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Nz:t
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

trying to track this information down.

GP1619

3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

HW us~s ,sQdh!msuJf9Je, ;;i :mhible c;;ompQynd wh95g predorninci.nt use is .iD thg ma nufci~turn of po1N_der~cl s()aps1 t(J.

capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower~
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
4

GP1620

information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
~bject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
, l l o Mr. Kalt,

As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

{10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
-Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive

GP1621

material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=SSOS
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or non<:Q.~RliCll')Ce shall constitute a separate off~.n~e ..
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183

Fax:502-564~1492

E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.. ;

.~

Keo!l!J

rAtflfo.TlO'f~."""",,,.,,.r.,... n

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
~
Family Services (CHFS).
..
Thanks,
6

GP1622

Danny Anderson

Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:


Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frarne. Jason Frame inforrned us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENO RM?

GP1623

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
. manage_dthe waste, and.that Lam only seeking to understand what wasr.eceived by BJueJUdge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste availab.le to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorne P. Partriaee Jr., Pfi1J, P.T.., Q..T.P


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1624

Partridge, George (EEC)

t/lom:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Hendricks, Todd
(EEC)
RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Hatton, Tony (EEC)

Delivered: 3/1/2016 6:15 PM

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Delivered: 3/1/2016 6:15 PM

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Delivered: 3/1/2016 6:15 PM

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Delivered: 3/1/2016 6:15 PM

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Delivered: 3/1/2016 6:15 PM

Sent:
To:
Cc:

Tony;
Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the Irvine County
High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an internal meeting to discuss my
observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or at least prior to the public meeting this
evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps
~take to protect their safety and well-being until we know more (such as a reconstructive exposure assessment, etc.)
~ich will be weeks to months in the future.
I am going to list my observations a~d recommendations below and also attached a copy of an email message I sent
requesting a meeting.

We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the plans for the site
visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the exposure to the school and surrounding
area would include airborne particulate matter since the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the
school entrance. Both the school and the school grounds, particularly around the entrance and in front of the
school would experience particulate deposition.
When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of the entrance to
the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating "We are not here to look for particulates."
(That was the primary exposure of concern!).
Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattacharya not to take the "back packs" (which were the most
sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH} across the street which resulted in the grounds of the
school where the grass was, not getting surveyed for deposited particulates.
I also mentioned to Matt McKinley that the schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems, remove the existing
filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the filter to check for particulate matter
containing radionuclides. This was not done to my knowledge.

I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:

The maintenance workers at the school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters to the HVAC
systems for the school, which for one school occurs on a monthly basis.
Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the landfill,
previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when the grass on the school
1

GP1625

grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity will expose both the workers, students,
and all individuals that may be present in the vicinity when those activities are conducted.

My message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February 27th stated the
following:

"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school
building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of
landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any
concernsonisksto the public due~to present activities. They should goabouttheirnormalactivmes. TbeJisk
concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and
discuss with you."
In my text messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present activities." I still needed to
discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the school who change the filters potentially being
exposed to particulates containing radionuclides. I am also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass
about the resuspension of previous particulate deposition that occurred and has contaminated the grounds in front of
the school near the entrance.
I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday morning. Danny and I
have talked but it has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he was busy with other matters pertaining
to Blue Ridge. I appreciate all the Danny is doing and realize he has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time he
has been available to spend with me. I also realize Jon is extremely busy as well.

I am also extremely worried that individuals will die a premature death or have serious health problems in the future
from this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure and the increase incidence of cancer
and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending on exposure scenario and age at time of exposure.
I am also concerned about the operators and workers at the landfill and how .close they are working to
previollsly deposited waste. Are they maintaining a buffer distance to minimize exposure? Is the landfill
resuming their normal activities before they assess the extent of contamination? Are they continuing to let
the public drive up to the area of the working face and discharge waste materials they are dropping
off? Has the equipment at the landfill that was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a
precaution?......
I want to conclude with the following comments:
../ I appreciate being an employee in the Division of Waste Management, it represents my life's work
and vocation .
../ I could not ask for a more talented group of coworkers
../ I appreciate the leadership of our Division and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny has devoted to
listening to my concerns and observations.
I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to talk. I feel like I
have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and what I have feared would happen
and has happened in other states has now occurred in Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this
was processed TENORM rather than the TENORM that is produced at the 0 &. G drilling/fracking sites.
I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their emails when
they are away from the office!
Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your work on this
and the Public Meeting tonight.
George
2

GP1626

AA
-W

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM

~: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

W"'c: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George

(ieor9e P. Partridjje Jr.

:. .
Department for Environmental Protection
Division of Waste Management
O Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)

Frankfort, KY 40601
I
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1627

Partridge, George (EEC)

~om:

;JS~nt:
To:

Subject:

Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Automatic reply: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

I will be out of the office March 2-4, 2016. If you need to speak with someone please contact Jon Maybriar or
Tim Hubbard at 502-564-6716 .

GP1628

Partridge, George (EEC)

-9.om:

T~:
Sent:

Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Briggs, Lindsey (EEC) (Lindsey.Briggs@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

GP1629

Partridge, George (EEC)

~.rom:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Maybriar, Jon (EEC) (Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

GP1630

Partridge, George (EEC)

~om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Hendricks, Todd (EEC) (todd.hendricks@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

\
I

..

GP1631

Partridge, George (EEC)

From:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

GP1632

--------

Partridge, George (EEC)

From:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Hatton, Tony (EEC) (Tony.Hatton@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

GP1633

Partridge, George (EEC)

!om:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:16 PM
'Kalt, Brian'
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

ent:

To:

Subject:

Mr. Kalt;
Thank you for copying me on this helpful information that you shared with Dr. Pendergrass.
Sincerely,
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,
ase note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
iographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity

of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2
D2
1

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
!

~ation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2

Examples: (Distance from source)

(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2

GP1634

Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem

If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)

Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)


If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
......
delete and destroy the message.
..

GP1635

om: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

nt: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


'1tl!a,.o: Kalt, Brian

W:'c: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materi.al above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.


Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

/(ftJfiir1!JIA)
.~~:~
.

.!;;~1t,,B;~~~;B~l1@fal,;~~1bri~;;;1- . . . . . . . . . . ..
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
3

GP1636

To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards.CJength 20',Height 6' and Width


2.

a.

Empty WeighUs 9,00Qlbs.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
4

GP1637

,.Te

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Aironmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addres.sed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
~: Kalt, Brian

Wl'bject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Ka It's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
aier the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
W'as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural

radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
5

GP1638

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.kv.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- ProhiiJition~_-- Exernptiol'l. http://www.lrc.kv.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material {NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices ofthe commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars {$10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars {$100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TENO RM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un!"an!ed sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~w~
1,"tZt~v..w
1~D1ATIO!iHlei.\t:rn

GP1639

om: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Wnt:

Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

.;_o: Kalt, Brian

~c: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian

,
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFSDPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;

I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

GP1640

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

- -

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my calf yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. PartridiJe Jr., Pfi1J, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
8

GP1641

,rtridge, George (EEC)

rom:
ent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:19 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016
Meeting Attendance List - DWM - DPH - 030116.pdf

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Delivered: 3/1/2016 7:19 PM

Curt;
Will you please forward the attendance list for today's meeting to those in your Branch that need a copy.
I wished so much you could have attended this meeting. I was hoping to catch you before meeting started so I could
update you on correspondence I received from Mr. Kalt associated with FBP.
Between Mr. Kalt's phone calls and correspondence he shared with me along with Jason Frame from WV, we sought to
reconstruct the sequence of contacts between the DWM, DPH, ATS, and FBS.
It was very important to Kathy and your commissioner that we confirmed the dates that the state was contacted, who
knew how the shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine were being handled and when you and others were
contacted. They were under the impression that the first contact anyone had with the state was January of this year
.lowing the contacts I had with an out of state consultant.
.
They wanted to know the date I was first contacted and when in turn I contacted you. I made a copy of that email
message for them for their records.
Also Jon Maybriar had a stack of paper and indicated it included email messages between you and me from past
correspondence and referenced an email message from February of last year.
Jamie Nielson shared a stack of email correspondence with your management and we went over it.
It is a pleasure to know and interact with you. We have been looking at TENORM for several years now and I want so
much for us to continue to do so in the future with the hopes that all that has happened will lead us to a stronger
regulatory framework for the management of this waste in Kentucky.
Thanks again for all you, Chris, and AJ have done to help and work with us. You are an awesome team!
George

(jeorge P. PartrUfge Jr.

Department for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
3/iJ..O Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
nkfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1642

.!

GP1643

Partridge, George (EEC)

From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:17 PM
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
RE: Blue Ridge Surface Water Runoff

Todd;
Thank you for your observations.
George
From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:50 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC)

Cc: Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)

Subject: RE: Blue Ridge Surface Water Runoff


Please note that prior to 6-20-12, the drainage was not red.
Were this naturally-occurring geologically-derived iron, it would probably not have started in 2012.
From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

nt: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:39 PM

: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC)
Cc: Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Surface Water Runoff
See attached photos from Google Earth. This is runoff from Blue Ridge.
We need to investigate the discolored water. There could be leachate impacts to surface water, and the surface water
could be a pathway for both dissolved and particulate constituents.

Todd Hendricks, P.G.


Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653

GP1644

9artridge, George (EEC)

rom:
ent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:19 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016
Meeting Attendance List - DWM - DPH - 030116.pdf

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Delivered: 3/1/2016 7:19 PM

Curt;
Will you please forward the attendance list for today's meeting to those in your Branch that need a copy.
I wished so much you could have attended this meeting. I was hoping to catch you before meeting started so I could
update you on correspondence I received from Mr. Kalt associated with FBP.
Between Mr. Ka It's phone calls and correspondence he shared with me along with Jason Frame from WV, we sought to
reconstruct the sequence of contacts between the DWM, DPH, ATS, and FBS.
It was very important to Kathy and your commissioner that we confirmed the dates that the state was contacted, who
knew how the shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine were being handled and when you and others were
contacted. They were under the impression that the first contact anyone had with the state was January of this year
.lowing the contacts I had with an out of state consultant.
They wanted to know the date I was first contacted and when in turn I contacted you. I made a copy of that email
message for them for their records.
Also Jon Maybriar had a stack of paper and indicated it included email messages between you and me from past
correspondence and referenced an email message from February of last year.
Jamie Nielson shared a stack of em'ail correspondence with your management and we went over it.
It is a pleasure to know and interact with you. We have been looking at TENORM for several years now and I want so
much for us to continue to do so in the future with the hopes that all that has happened will lead us to a stronger
regulatory framework for the management of this waste in Kentucky.
Thanks again for all you, Chris, and AJ have done to help and work with us. You are an awesome team!
George

{ieorge P. PartrUfae Jr.

Department for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
~o Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
nkfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1645

GP1646

9artridge, George (EEC)


From:

To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:19 PM
Delivered: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) (Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016

GP1647

9artridge, George {EEC)

From:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46 PM
Delivered: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015

GP1648

9artridge, George (EEC)

From:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46 PM
Delivered: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Briggs, Lindsey (EEC) (Lindsey.Briggs@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015

GP1649

Partridge, George (EEC)

~;m:
Sent:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:56 PM
Read: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016

Your message
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:18:39 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:56:10 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

GP1650

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:

To:
Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:19 PM
Read: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Tuesday, March 01 , 2016 6: 14:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:19:20 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1651

..

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:21 PM
Read: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46:22 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:21 :11 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

GP1652

Partridge, George (EEC)

t'-cm:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 8:41 PM
Read: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:14:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 8:41 :18 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
II

GP1653

Subject:
Attachments:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:11 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016
Meeting Attendance List - DWM - DPH - 030116.pdf

Will do George and thanks. Unfortunately, my presence was not requested by my Branch Manager at yesterday's
meeting with EEC or at last night's public meeting in Irvine. Though my Division Director did bring back a stack of copied
e-mails from your meeting, all from me, which makes it appear that I was the one who dropped the ball on the Fairmont
Brine shipments. I am somewhat surprised to see such an approach now that you and others in Solid Wastes have
uncovered the fact that our KY RCRA subtitle D municipal solid waste landfills have been accepting TENO RM
contaminated wastes for years from surrounding states from Pressure Tech, Green Hunter and others, most of which
exceeded limits for legal disposal at municipal landfills in those states where the wastes originated. Obviously, the FBP
wastes is just the tip of the iceberg. I am hoping this does not digress into a finger pointing match between our two
cabinets. I know for a fact that you and I have been trying our best to get a handle on this situation for years and to keep
KY from becoming a dumping ground for out-of-state TENO RM. Hopefully now that this whole issue is out in the open
our two cabinets can put their heads together to develop a complimentary set of TE NORM regs hopefully modeled on
Ohio's regs to prevent this from ever happening again here in KY.
I guess we will just have to wait and see how things turn out. In the meantime, I have been told to copy all of my e-mails
pertaining to this issue going back years for an open records request.

'rt

9..rakecare,
Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

v.a.,_rn -- ). ; ;,

~!..~""'."''"'

f-'.AMATIONMEJ':.t\"rl

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:19 PM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016


I

Will you please forward the attendance list for today's meeting to those in your Branch that need a copy.
1

GP1654

I wished so much you could have attended this meeting. I was hoping to catch you before meeting started so I could
update you on c0rrespondence I received from Mr. Kalt associated with FBP.

...

Between Mr. Kalt's phone calls and correspondence he shared with me along with Jason Frame from WV, we sought to
reconstruct the sequence of contacts between the DWM, DPH, ATS, and FBS.
It was very important to Kathy and your commissioner that we confirmed the dates that the state was contacted, who
knew how the shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine were being handled and when you and others were
contacted; They were under the impression that the first contact anyone had with the state wasJanuary ofthis~year ~
following the contacts I had with an out of state consultant.
They wanted to know the date I was first contacted and when in turn I contacted you. I made a copy of that email
message for them for their records.
Also Jon Maybriar had a stack of paper and indicated it included email messages between you and me from past
correspondence and referenced an email message from February of last year.
Jamie Nielson shared a stack of email correspondence with your management and we went over it.
It is a pleasure to know and interact with you. We have been looking at TENO RM for several years now and I want so
much for us to continue to do so in the future with the hopes that all that has happened will lead us to a stronger
regulatory framework for the management of this waste in Kentucky.
Thanks again for all you, Chris, and AJ have done to help and work with us. You are an awesome team!

George

(jeor9e 'P. 'PartrUfge Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1655

Partridge, George (EEC)

--om:

To:
Sent:
Subject:

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:32 AM
Read: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015

Your message
To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Wednesday- March 2, 2015
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46:22 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:31 :37 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

GP1656

Partridge, George (EEC)

elm:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:38 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015

George,
You can use your accumulated time as you see fit to do; however I suggest using your comp time to reduce your
balance.
Lindsey
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46 PM
To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015
Lindsey;
I do not ever remember feeling so emotionally drained as I am today. I have been intensely pursuing the investigation of
TENO RM since January 13th when I first received news of shipments of TE NORM to Kentucky. Not only the hours I have
in officially at work, I have been reviewing materials at home on weekends and in the evenings seeking to learn as
as I can as a path forward is developed to address what has happened in Irvine, KY.

aut9ch

When I learned of the shipments of wastes from Fairmont Brine Processing, I felt totally overwhelmed knowing from my
years of research work and teaching as a faculty member at Penn State that individuals potentially will have their lives
shortened or adversely affected from the resulting exposures that occurred in Irvine, KY this past year.
I am requesting to take some sick time to allow me to go home and rest as much as I can so I can return to work feeling
more rested than I have been lately.
I also feel I have done all I can to support this investigation. My greatest strength is my technical skills and I am available
as needed as a consultant whenever anyone has a question or requests my participation.
Otherwise, I feel we are at a point that management has some decisions to make, Advanced Disposal has responsibilities
to develop a plan and hire the appropriate consultants, and the community has been informed of what has happened in
their community.
It is time for me to stop my investigation knowing that others in both cabinets has all the information I have and
everyone knows of my concerns as well as what I feel the path forward should be.
You are my supervisor, I work for you and I look forward to returning to work and resuming the everyday activities for
which we are here.
- n d to forward requests to your attention so you can coordinate my activities and work assignments.
Last year was a good year and I enjoyed all the experiences I had from the field work at all the sites I visited.
1

GP1657

I want this to be even a better year and return to what I enjoy doing the most - resource conservation and waste
management.
I appreciate the opportunity to work for you and look forward to focusing again on the work we were doing before all
the events happened in Irvine, Kentucky.
I anticipate coming in later in the day on Wednesday - hopefully feeling better than I do this evening.
Thanks again for everything, and most importantly listening patiently to my concerns and providing helpful feedback and
guidance.
George

(jeorge P. PartridBe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1658

Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


ervisor, Radioactive. M. aterials Section
ntucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

v~..tutlir~
t~!Jrnnra~H~\t.r11

~t,.,~--~:!I

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
-endergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
1

GP1659

of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2

-~--

Di
1

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= {Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: (Distance from source)

Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
2

GP1660

If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes {.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem .
. .ou were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes {0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
{1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem {0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
-----------~---~------------

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message .

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM

Kalt, Brian

~:Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below {make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
{0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr {0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency {EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour {0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana {0.009863 mR per banana).
3

GP1661

Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.


Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
- Frankfort, KY40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~anted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.

GP1662

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by

e"!..y

or CT scan.

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes'. After some dewatering period on~site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
.Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.

If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
----------------------~------------

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


t: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
5

GP1663

Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson,Danny J (EEC~; Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENO RM.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by C:ontrollable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm -
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has W
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:ljwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
--Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
6

GP1664

_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
1

- u i r e an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs:ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

m: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


nt: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

'
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
7

GP1665

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC .
412-680-6244

----------------- ----The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its

..

contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TE NORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
8

GP1666

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2.
3.
4.
5.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?


What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorae P. PartrUige Jr., Pfi:n, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

..
9

GP1667

rtridge, George (EEC)

.From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

-----------------------------------------------

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and m. ay contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
ete and destroy the message.

Ii.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrelil/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still

et,

.etained these samples.

Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
1

GP1668

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website:http://www:chfs:ky.govtdph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

VoHfUeJir~

~~-.Y
r~OlATltH~JAMjzAliH

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
~ubject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity.
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Squ~re Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2

D2
1

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
2

GP1669

.ou were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
. I f you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)

~rce reading:

2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)

If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
ose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
te and destroy the message.

GP1670

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

..

Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/gforRa-226 and Ra~228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.

Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Th<rnks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwa~ted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

KtzJ.t/4~
'PJJ.tlIA'fi\.l'NGAH~l:tH
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
4

GP1671

'tlemen,

Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's {FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan {Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.

~en

soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr {0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.

5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

GP1672

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted o A
the Non-Hazardous Material.
W
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENO RM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

GP1673

A...
-~

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm


(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
-..;: Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
.,..cility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/

: 1.

os.e of un!'.a.n. te.. d sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

. 't!n
.

~~'
.

f';,J\tflJ.\"rJtil~ ' .HiAt.l'H

GP1674

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
.. Family Services(CHFS) ...
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
8

GP1675

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,

George

(jeorge P. PartrUfae Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
9

GP1676

'

rtridge, George {EEC)


1

.From:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Thank you sir.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~From:

Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

~,-;;;;;:;;;;:;; fortt;;;jndivid:;;;i or-;,;;;ty to wh~~con~n7"


any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

~---- --~-

-~

GP1677

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Jhankyoy_l\/lr. Ka_ltJgr the thQJQ.ugb explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us knowthatthe on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Vn"fU~

I~!.,...._

f'Jl~ftlATI-rlN~Hat1LTH

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
ofthe radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
2

GP1678

-------------------------

radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
.ead over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
1

. I n industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2
Di
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: {Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact {assumed 0.25" from source)
~ou were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem

~ou were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
{1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
{10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough .
mples: (Time exposed to source)

Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)

GP1679

If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.

If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards-,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.

Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by th. e Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA)&._
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in th.is matter.


4

GP1680

.ards,
.Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext .. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un!"anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
tl9ase see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge La'ndfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's {FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
nsoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
n determined to be non-hazardous.
..

GP1681

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen
x-ray or CT scan.

ba

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of

radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second halfof20151FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TE NORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
6

GP1682

on.A
9""

Curt;
enk you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question .

George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENO RM.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area ofthe state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
' K A R 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx ?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense .

tral Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


1 Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
7

GP1683

_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.

..

Regards,
~YI1:P~J1_d~rgrn~s _pf1[)

Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section


Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kt!Jt~
r~.t.t!ATlON~H~,1.;rn

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
8

GP1684

.tridge, George (EEC)


.From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,

I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period oftime
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
a...::1ose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
.,...ete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
bsite: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
y your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
1

GP1685

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Dr.Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and

delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contacF those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

GP1686

Curt Pendergrass PhD


ervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
tucky Radiation Health Branch

.275 East Main Street


Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:/lwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

',-,,~
\t~J\!Jl;fflON~H:et\LlH
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
~iographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity

~he radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.

Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
{Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2

.xamples: (Distance from source)


Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
3

GP1687

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.000866 mrem, or0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)

Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)


If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message ..

GP1688

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

..

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio lo Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENO RM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Was~e Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.

I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received .
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
9

GP1689

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 20157
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thankyou again for returningmy call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. PartridiJe Jr., Pn'D, P.'E., Q.'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
{502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

10

GP1690

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


~ent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM

91:>: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date}. If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA},
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance, in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un.wanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
,"""""''

....--

rAti-IA1'iOl~

'

H~.llH

-------..--- .................~-~------"'""''' , .
~m: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
5

GP1691

Gentlemen,

'

Please see the responses in green to your questions below.


1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.

-2.

Who manufacruredtlie shippingtontainers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TE NORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr}. The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA}, both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer}, and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management '
of the landfill?

GP1692

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
~vironmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on

. e Non-Hazardous Material.
. I f anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
-bject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TE NORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
oactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

GP1693

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm '
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8} shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day ofthe violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TENORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Vm.tu~."N.

IV""'"'"-~~

MEriATH'JttMEM.TH

GP1694

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

nt: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

'Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;

I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you .
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
9

GP1695

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

'

.. -- KelittJtky dtfeS~ffOt 'teg(Hate TENORM? Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that ram not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A ~escription of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<jeorge P. PartridiJe Jr., Pli1J, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
10

GP1696

Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM
Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of.the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated .

GP1697

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
2

GP1698

Vanh~

~;~!U,.~rrr!l

ellli'1Ttot~A_H!ZJ.\t:rH
1

'

;;;~;;;;-1<~lt~-5;1;~-[~~ilt~:6K:;itt~i~~~~tbri~;:~~~]

.... .. ... . ....... .

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period oftime
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
Ai!_sclose, disse. minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
,..lete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
bsite: http:ijwww.chfs.ky .govId ph/rad ioactive .htm
your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:l/www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1699

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and

delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

GP1700

Curt Pendergrass PhD


.pervisor, Rad. ioactive Materials Section
ntucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~wanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Rt!lm~
n..'\ts1.tr:n&NJ&J-1~.tnt
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
diographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity

the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2
D2
1

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
.xamples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
5

GP1701

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem

If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)

Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)


If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1702

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

ent: Monday., February 29, 2016 4:29 PM

.Cc:

9: Kalt, Brian

Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra~128
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (o.qoo8652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Kf/JJ!JJ>

r~trJA-rib1'4AJ.ii~.t<rH

.A-------~--~,,-,,,,,...............
~m: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


7

GP1703

Gentlemen,

'

Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who rrrannfacturedtheshipping-tontainers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-~ay or CT scan.

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
(

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

GP1704

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.

le

If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
.bject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


{8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" {NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
emioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices {or by past human practices);

As

GP1705

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm '
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

VeJih~
IV....,J.!!
.
~.A~lATJbraAHlEAt.TH

10

GP1706

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


nt: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

'

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;

I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you .
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
11

GP1707

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

'

Kentucky does not regulateTENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KD.EP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge P. Partridj]e Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
12

GP1708

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Ci.Jrt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM

To:

Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we tan easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not far,niliar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.

GP1709

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htrn
Pay your fees on lirie at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServkes/SCATR.aspx
2

GP1710

Fromi Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
.

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~close, diss.e.minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
. . = t e and destroy the message.

-----------------------~------------

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Thank you sir.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
bsite: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
, _ your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~e notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1711

___
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Wednesday, .March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contehts (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and

delete and destroy the message.


,

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter,

GP1712

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Mervisor, Radioactive Materials. Section
.tucky Radiation Health Branch
. 7 5 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:{/www.chfs.ky;gov/dph/radioactive;htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR'.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM

To: F>endergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 201~
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In

' Afiidiographic i.nspection, the radi.ation spreads out as it travels away.from the source. The. refore, the intensity
"'119the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact th.at the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2

D2
1

Accoraingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate. in feet)A2
.
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
.Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
5

GP1713

- - - - - - -

--

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem

'

If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*{0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)11.2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)11.2
(10 ft away)11.2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)11.2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1714

--~---.------~--------~~------------~----------------

From: Pendergrass, Curt(CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Monday, February 29, 2016 4. :29 PM

Kalt, Brian
c: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

,&.nt:

Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories.and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Somethingthatactually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra~226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
'inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 footfrom the sludge samples before you sentthem to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot trom the sludge boxe.s or 1 foot frorri the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.00022G7mR/hr). The highest reading (1 footfrom the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter,
Regards,
Cu.rt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275
. East Main Street
.
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u.nwan~ed sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

m: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM.
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
7

GP1715

Gentlemen,

'

Please see the responses in green to your questions below.


1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (~BP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium~ a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typic:aldrinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioac:tive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 inR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanc:ecl TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to


of the landfill?

~elp us understand the impact that will have on management '

GP1716

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom..it is addressed. Jts contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, .
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
-bject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sent: Monday,

~~

'

Thank you for responding to Mr. Ka It's question.


George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
~s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
~-ioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is

technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

GP1717

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:l/www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm '
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
.-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:l/www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:l/www.lrc.ky.govI statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(11 Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww'.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TENORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of 1.:1.nwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx

10

GP1718

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


nt: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge[ George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
'

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

..

Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
president
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. I.ts
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its c~ntents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
11

GP1719

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

'

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for IJcensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste.1 and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permitengineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste.similar iri nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
. managementof.the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you wefe not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<jeor9e P. PartridfJe Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q,'EP


Department for Environmelltal Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
12

GP1720

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:11 AM
Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive.htm
~~your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. . . . .notified of proposed regulation changes https:Lfsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
,.
"
.,
.

----------

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt {CHFS DPH)
Cc:: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

Kind Regards,

,.,,an Kalt
~sident

Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC


412-680-6244
1

GP1721

The informati.on contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual o. r entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including\.
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must hot use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

=-~~Et:ct_Dl_U?.e_ndergra__ss,~Curt~C-ctlS~DE.l:IJ [mailto:Curt.E.endergrass@.k.gruL"J-._~~~-~~--~---~- _--~~-~---- ~---~~


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, .2016 9:38 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really dor(t wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge oh-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilied, Based on
FBP' s ~nderst_andi~g of the ~ewatering proc~ss _and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring rad1oact1ve materials were to be ehmmated.
-

GP1722

9"

I
1

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
site: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

.ii:

GP1723

-------------

- -

'

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM

To:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a Client requests a longer petiod of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (inclucfirig
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail and
delete cind destroy the message.
...

..A

From: Pend~rgrass, Curt (Cf-If~, OPH) [mailto:Curt.Pehdergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08. AM

To:

Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge; George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS~PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26't2016
. .
.

Thank you sir.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E..:ma.il: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at httbs://prd:chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1724

,______,,___,,.,...,..,._______

~-----------

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~close, disseminate; copy or print its contents, If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~te and destroy the message.
,

------------ ------------------

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/nr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
~' I would be more .than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
I . . .ned these samples.
I

'

Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

GP1725

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-'564-1492
E..:mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
.---- weosife: ffffPfl7www.cnf5.RV:imVZC1on/f'aai0aeTIW:tmn~ ~~~---~-H - -

'
---~~~~ --~--- ~~~--~--~~~~~-~-

---- ---~~--

Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/

Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentuckv.gov/Regwatch/


unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Dispose of ,;
.
.
.
'

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
TO: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic i.nspection, the.radiation spreads out a.s ittravels awayfrom the source. Th. erefore,the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the_ fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as if spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source,

W"'

In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate readtng at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft}"2
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
6

GP1726

If you were. standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem

flvou were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2 . = 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)

~rce reading:

2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)

If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and

.ee

and destroy the message.

GP1727

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
~-what-we~wefe~feally~i'l0piAg..t0~find.-SomethiRg~t-hat~aGtually;..puta..numberJ:~the,actuaLpCi{~fac.Ra:22..6__arulB_g-228 .
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples ifthey are available.

'

Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you tookthe surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If.you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you tookyour
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radiqactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples {1 foot from the sludge) was only Q,2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (lfoot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr {0.0008G52 mR/hrl As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose.of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assis.ta.nce in this matter,
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay[
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:l/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of l:lnwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org[StateServices/SCATR.aspx

-.......,-,...,.........,.~----,.,......-.~.---

"-------~-

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
8

GP1728

Gentlemen,

# a s e see the responses in green to your questions below.


1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to .25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate; a soluble compound wbose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to fqrm
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
' e n soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In 1:he second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 tnR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the d.ose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physicaUy dewaterthe sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on~site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewaterlng and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
- Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

GP1729

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.

'

If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: P.artridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


..
.
.
..
'

Sent: Monday; February 29,

2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to M.r. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr: Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM} means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural

...

radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is , . _
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

10

GP1730

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
-9>2 KAR 100:010. Defin.itions for 9.02 KAR. Chapter 10.0. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
411J{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -~ Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
{3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
D.ispos.al of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
cility
.
..
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal .in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
se of unwanted sources http:f/www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

11

GP1731

--------.- - - - ---------

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
~-~ramihrS'ervices(eHPS)~--~ . "~ .-~-- --- ~--~-~~-~----~---~--~--~-.~~-~-
1

Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59.PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed, Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5::36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergra!:;s, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on Febrllary 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and. what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue}:

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
12

GP1732

'

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was serit directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.

..

We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need.will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,

George

{]eorne P. Partridfle Jr., Pli'D, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
13

GP1733

200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)


Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

<imageOOl.gif>

14

GP1734

Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Wednesday, March 02, 201610:15 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
Friday will work, but please confirm when you know for sure. The concrete basin is around 20' deep so if you could
bring a "sludge judge" or similar apparatus, we should be able to pull a sufficient volume sample.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
y attachmen ts) are confidential an. d may contain privileged information. If you a.re not an intended reci. pient you must not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
ete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:11 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call .on February 26, 2016
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV fatility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C'-A
~kfort, KY 40621
~02-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
1

GP1735

Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/


Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwaii~ed sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

'

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM
1
-- ..... :ro:,..Pem;le1"g1"assr-curt~~CH~S~DRl::I~. .. .. ... . . . ... . ~-~-.~. ----~~~~-~~~---~---~-~~-------~-""------ .~-.-.~~--~~~~
I
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
1

Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing,LLC
412-680-6244

-----~--------~'

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cd Partr.idge, George (EEC);. McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
SUbject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we caii easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard ~
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
..
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on

GP1736

FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extrernely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.peridergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
3

GP1737

Pay yourfees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/


Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:l/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM
t:(): P~ndergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a clienfrequests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Ki.nd Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fai.rmont Brine Processing, LLC
412~680~6244

The inf()rmation contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or, entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including.,.
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended reC:ipient you must not use, .
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents . If you receive this e-mail. in error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail ar:id
deiete and destroy the message.

'

,'

F~om: Penc:IE;?rgrass, Curt (~HFS PPH) [mailto:CurtPeilderqrass@ky.gov]


Se11t: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:0SAM
Kalt, Brian
Cf::;d>artridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

To:

Thank you sir.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioact.ive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health .Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-'mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/

GP1738

------------------------------

Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/


Dispose of unwan!ed sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

I-

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March_02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge,_ George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
subjed:: RE: Phone CalloflFebruary 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

e information_ contained in this e-mail is intended only forthe individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
y attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
sclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy themessage.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (C:HFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based pn the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contad those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
~ick up the samples. And as long as_ we have your written permission to release these_- samples, assuming _they still
~st, I would be niore than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.

GP1739

Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop-HSlC-A Frankfort, KY40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-:1492
~~~~~~ . ~~~~. .
.E-mail: curt.pendergrass@kv.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources.http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

'

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc:: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,

Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calciilated above backgrouOd. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law .. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to cakulate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading ~t ~ given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you ~~nt to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: (Distance from source)
6

GP1740

Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)

' flvou were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough .

..,mples: (Time exposed to source)


Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs)* (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including

~ttachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1741

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone call on february 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Erwiro11mental .
Technologle.s Laboratorie~ 1 d~n'tsee \;h~re any radiochemical analysis on any of thi; ~aterial was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies an~
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very .low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
publ.ished _by the Nude. ar.Regulatory Comm'.ssio.n (NRC} arid United States Environn'!entProtection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of dnnkmg several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502~564-1492

E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljptd;thfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
8

GP1742

To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


-tlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1. A description of the containers used for.the shipment of the waste.


Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
Still trying to track this information down.
3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
~insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
- - n determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium 1J11ith barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials
above background.
This sludge is. similar
in nature to sludge generated
.
.
.
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
\

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0~0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP' s understanding
he dewatering proces.s and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
eriaJs were to be eliminated.
'

5.

Is there ana!ytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
9

GP1743

--------

--------

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted o.....
the Non-Hazardous Material.

~
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016

Crt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS. 211.862 Definiti.ons for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www~lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result ofhuman practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural

radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
10

GP1744

{10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and th~ Commonwealth of Kentucky;

. .2 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm


{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
".'- Prohibitions".'- Exemption. http:/lwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id::;8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505


(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of.the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)

__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
.cility

_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed. waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/d ph/radioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
I
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwat.ch/
' . .ose of ~nwa.nted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
1.

Ki

~~i\\~Qij

-.nl
11

GP1745

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt,. Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
~"~~- tf)_ th_~ ag~l'l.Yresi;ionsibl~ fQr: the enfQrcern~nt of those stcitutes (lnd r:eEulatiom; whichjs _the Cabinet for He_alth and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
.Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e~mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-ma.il in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
12

GP1746

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. lhe DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I conduded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge LandfiH
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.

We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,

George

(jeor9e P. Partriffee Jr., Pli'D, P.'E., Q,'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
13

GP1747

KY Division of Waste Management


200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

<imageOOl.gif>

14

GP1748

Partridge, George {EEC}

-!:=

To:
Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 201610:17 AM
Thomas, Richard F (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Manifests so far

So far I have loads almost into February, in fact the 2ih of January.

..

GP1749

-m:.

Partridge, Geor:ge (EEC)


Frame, Jason R <Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov>
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sent:

To:
- Cc:
Subject:

Curt,
I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division_
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356~4303
Fax: (304) 55.8".0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pehdergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10: 11 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor; Radioactive Materials Section
tucky Radiation Health Branch
. . East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621

----,

--

~--

GP1750

Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183


Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky'.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
'
,,: .;
.
.
.
..
. ...

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
.

.. .

..

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHSPH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26,.2016


Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
tr~mspired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
min..d. us coming tog.et? I am not familiar wit. h your facility but I really don't ~ish to get in a ~oatto float on your settling.
pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.

GP1751

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced IENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of thedewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated ..

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
1

East Main Street


lstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183

GP1752

Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:/fwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM:
To: Pendergrass, Cl1rt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The informati<;m contained in this e~mail is intended ohly for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (in~ll.lding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must ri~{lJse,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
de,ete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM


h:~~B~n

..

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley; .Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492

GP1753

E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
...Jl.vour fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~otified of proposed regulation changes https:Lfsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

.12-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must riot use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc:: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highestrecorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
~ did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this

_.,ne FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
5

GP1754

exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
~~ _______ JY1~.!l_~~Q-~ HS1~~A________

~~="=-=,-~,--.~-~-7- -~~~----~~------~=-c---"~_____,___-~

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.f)endergrass@ky.gov
Website: httP:llwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at.https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be noti.fied of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
'

-;',

From: Kalt, Brian [maUto:BKalt@fairmogtbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
C~: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,

Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

11
11

D2
D2
. 1

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a _known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate. mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate. in feet)A2
6

GP1755

(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft}"2

#pies: (Distance from source)


Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were. standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr}*(0.0208 ft}"2
(1 ft away}"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= {2 mrem/hr}*(0.0208ft}"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

. o t e , at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
--esitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

--~~~~~--~~~~
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
7

GP1756

disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Penderqrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW:- Phone Call on February 26, 2016

~-~--~----~-~---=-=---~---~~~-_..,,._-,------,--_-~..,,..,,---~~--~"-~--,,."-,..-=r=<r---=~-~.,~------==o~='""~""""~--~-=--.-~------=----=-=--~

-----~------ ___________ ----~~~~-~~-~---~~-

Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra~228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical_ analysis by our Environmental Monitoring laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from t~e sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?

In the _second half of 201-5, FBP's sllJdge h-a_d ex_h_ ibited very, very low levels of natural-ly o-c.curring radioac.tiv_e ___
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2?67 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section_
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1757

From:

Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

. . .t: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


~~Partridge, George

(EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,

'
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. length 20', Height 6' a.nd Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
Still trying to track this information down.
3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

...... _ uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.

-~ture

When soluble barium is converted to .insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP' s sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0~0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are l()Wer
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana) .
.-.ilrrently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
~atering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for

dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test; and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding

GP1758

of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste availab_le to help us understand the impact that will have on management'
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680~6244

The information contained in this e-mail Is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

Froh1: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@fsy.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian

Subject: RE:

Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge,. George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE:

Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Mr. Kalt,


As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


10

GP1759

(8} "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM} means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
~s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
~ioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices};
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:/lwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.-htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3} Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM} as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505


(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
1

issued p.ursu antto KRS 211.8..5.9. or KRS 211.8.63 an d 211.865 sha. II be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
ousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
. .noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Central Midwest Interstate low-level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf}

_._Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional llRW Disposal
Facility
-._The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposalin a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~ 502-'564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
11

GP1760

Pay yourfees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/


Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

T~

Kalt,,_B.r,.,.ia,.,,ob'.._.~~~~~~~~~=~~

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together;
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The inforn;iation contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;
12

GP1761

I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you .

The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, andthat I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us u.nderstand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.

13

GP1762

Thank you,

..

George

(ieorge P. Partridfie Jr., Pfi1J, P.1:., !!.,PP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
~,~______________.(5ll2)~5Jl.4~6Zt6-ext.~465:1~~~~----- ---~---~-~~--~----~~-~-----~--------~~~-~---------

c __ -

-~--~-------~--~-----

<imageOOl.gif>

14

GP1763

9tridge, George (EEC)


.rom:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:33 AM
Frame, Jason R
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Thanks Jason. I would very much appreciate your accompaniment and your assistance on our visit to Fairmont Brine.
Hopefully Friday works well for you. The sooner we get these sludge samples to our lab for radioche.mical analysis, the
better.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. B.e notified of p.roposedregulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
pose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
,-.;

_,..

'

From: Frame, JasonR[mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.go\f]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew w (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Curt,
I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

Jason R. Frame B.S. R.T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: {304)356-4303
Fax: {304) 558-05,24
Email: Jason.R.Fr~me@WV.gov

GP1764

From: Pendergrass, Curt {CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:11 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the slu~ge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-5643700 ext. 418~
Fax: 502~564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/r'adioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd:chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

-~

From: Kalt,Brian[mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.cbm]
Sent: Wednesday, .March 021 2016 10:0.0 AM.
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
'
Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of t h e '
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What .
day would work for you and or your team?

GP1765

Regards,

.rianKalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in tfil~ -e~mail is intendei:fonlyfor'the iffdividUal or ehtity-to whom it is ad<;lresse&lts contents-fincluding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-ma.il and
delete and destroy the message.

----~---~~-----~~-----,,-

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance jusfthe same. Looking back your earlier e~
mails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would

81jnd us. co. m_ .i.ng...to get? I am_ no_ t f.amiliar w_ith. yo.r fad.lity but I really do.n't _w_ ish to get in. a.. boat to float oil you r settl-ing
~nd or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks.like it Would be diffkultto sample.

Currently, FBP does n9t physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering bo)(es. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for d~watering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process; the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to.be eliminated .

GP1766

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail:curt.pendergrass@kv.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov /Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx.
4

GP1767

'

~~~It, B:~:allto:BKalt@fuinnonllirine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only forthe individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, diss.e. minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
ete and destroy the message.
~

From: Pendergrass, Curt (C:HFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge; George(EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive .htm
~your fees on line at https://ptd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. .notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:/fwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1768

~-_______,__--'-----________~----'--~'
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680.:6244

The information contained in this. e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail and

delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt forthe thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading With the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrern/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see-if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more tha.n happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as
long
as we have your
written permission to release these samples, assuming they
still
.
.
.
. .
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still.
retained these samples.

Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance iri this matter,

GP1769

Curt Pendergrass PhD


~pervisor,. Rad.ioactive Materials Section
.tucky Radiation Health Branch
. 7 5 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:t/www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwante.d sources http:ljwww .crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,

Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
diographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second di.stance. Therefore, the equation tak.es on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
.xamples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
7

GP1770

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem

'

If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.

If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)

Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)


lfyou were standing on the source for 5 minutes {;083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.

If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1771

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


nt: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone call on February 26, 2016
'

Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we~were really hoping to-find;Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra;;226 and Ra~228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the secorid half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturallyoccurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

.fa
1

.~n [mailt;,:BKalt@falnnontbrine.rom]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
9

GP1772

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up tci 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight i.s 9,000 lbs.
2.

Wh() mani.JfacturedfheSfiipping containers r-. --

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, AdvancedTENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate; a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x.:ray or CT scan.

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's Sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water trecitment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP' s sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr {0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge} was only 0~8652 R/hr {0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and .United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour {0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana {0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on..:site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring rcidioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management'
of the landfill?

10

GP1773

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.

I:_

If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individ1.1al or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian

.bject: RE:' Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC);.Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
..-...9s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
I

'.

~-ioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is

.technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

11

GP1774

----------

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010: Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:llwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm '
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:llwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502

(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:llwwwJrc~ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low".'Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: htfo:Hwww .chfs.ky;gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATRaspx
"'

-;'1i:

12

GP1775

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


nt: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone call on February 26, 2016

'

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt.
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed, Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 201.6
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13 .

GP1776

------------ ----------------

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

'

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permitsfor contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ri<;lge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address irt my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. l_am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions y()u have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<jeor9e P. Partrirfae Jr., Pfi1J, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management

GP1777

Cc:
Subject:

Frame, Jason R <Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov>


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:36 AM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Friday is fine, but I'm not s9 sure about the sludge being easily accessible.

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, WestVirginia 25301
Office: {304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 55g..:0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:33 AM


To: Frame, Jason R
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Thanks Jason. I would very much appreciate your accompaniment and your assistance on our visit to Fairmont Brine.
Hopefully Friday works well for you. The sooner we get these sludge samples to our lab for radiochemical analysis, the
better.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~I: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
9"ax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
1

GP1778

Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/


Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u.nwallted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

">.:::::

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian
~----ccfPaftriClge;~George

(EEC);-McKifileY,MattfiewW (CHS:;PH);R>wler, Katnyr(CHFS-PHy--- -.. - -- ~----- -- -- -----

-------~------

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Curt,
I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: {304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

------------------------

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10: 11 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to rny counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
2

GP1779

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---

-~

Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
502-564-3700 ext. 4183

.Ja=

~x:502-564-1492

E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 201610:00 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

~ . i n d Regards,
Bri.an Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent,: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case giv~n the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier e~ails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
' 9fnaterial currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
1

GP1780

pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard '
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidificC!tion process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
4

GP1781

Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
r:~: 502-564-1492

E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd'.thfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww .crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

----.- - - - - - - .-.-.-------------

----~~

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
SUbject: RE: Phone can on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

.rianKalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-.mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
~pervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
~entucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
5

GP1782

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

--------

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM


To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge,.George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.

GP1783

You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
~terial to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH .or WV
~.pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist; I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
c_urt Peng~_rgniss Ph[)
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 50.2-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Web~ite: http:L/www.chfs.ky.gov/dphfradioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

-~ul1: Kalt, B~ia~ [mailto:BKalt@fairmontb~


~nt: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiati.on becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity a~ a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

.ccordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:

GP1784

With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: (Distance from source)

'

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ftl"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*{0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
8

GP1785

412-680-6244

e information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

--

---

~-

--

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS


[mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 a.nd Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.

Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
. formation on what type of survey instru.ment you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
odel, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0'.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC} and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of be.er per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than-consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-56473700 ext. 4183

~x:502-564-1492
WE~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov

Website: http://www.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive .htm


Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
9

GP1786

'

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium su,lfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
10

GP1787

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
...8:'atering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled .. Based on FBP's understanding
~~t~e dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management.
of the landfill?

Please s~ethe attache<:I Non-H(3Z<trdous_ W<lst~ Approval Notification Form from the_ West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous
. Material.
.
.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont .Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
8.isclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~elete and destroy the message.

-----,....,........---~----------------

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [rnailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

------------------

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

6lubject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


WHello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
11

GP1788

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http:l/www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501

&.

(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased byW
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm


(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has

been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505


(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492

12

GP1789

E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~~~otified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

_IJt

F_r~m: ~ll~~rs9n1 pcinny J. (EEc:)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, C:urt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,

Thank you for putting this all together.


Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentutky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

----------------------.--.-----From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


13

GP1790

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

'

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and i~ responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not e1ware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.

We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2.
3.
4.
5.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?


What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.

14

GP1791

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
. George

<george P. PartridiJe Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q'EP


. P~g~r_tment tm Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

15

GP1792

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:48 AM
Frame, Jason R; Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

All,
What time works best for everyone this Friday?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
. l e t e and destroy the message.

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE.: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Curt,
I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

.Jason R. Frame B.S. R.T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office ofEnvironmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

GP1793

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10: 11 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W {CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle {"concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

GP1794

Kind Regards,

- a n Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

. TheJnformation contained in thise".".mailisintendedonlyforthe.individual or entity.towhom.itis.addressed.Jtscontents (ioc:luding


any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e..:mail in error, please notify the sender by .reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:3.8 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
.
.Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS~PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount oftime that has
transpired.But thanks for checking on the samples with.Summit and Reliance jusfthe same. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sampleof what you are now processing thatyou would

Tnd us c. qm.ing.to get? I am. n. ot fam


.. ilia. r. with your f.ac.ilit.y but I re.ally do.n't. w. ish to get in.a boatto float on yor set.tl.ing
ond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website fooks like it would be difficultto sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on..:site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard .
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for d~Watering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's. understahding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive matedals were to be eliminated .

GP1795

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: htfo:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
4

GP1796

Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (incluaing
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply .e~mail and
lete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. e notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

.Y

GP1797

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


--~ar:Pendergrass,-

I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

-------------

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM

To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter,

GP1798

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
___ tucky Radiation Health Branch

r.:

East Main Street


Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tet: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR'.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM

To:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone can on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,

Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
diographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the sou.rce. Therefore, the intensity
f the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread oyer a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
lOOOrem.
Radiation dose

=(Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2


(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2

-xamples: (Distance from source)


Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
7

GP1799

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)

Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)


If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1800

------.

--.--------~--

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ey.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratorie.s and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from_a_certlfied referencecffob woulcfbe great to-ha\le, \A/ould you mind reaching ol.ri:-tothese two companies and
inquiring as to whethe.r or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
<

Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below {make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,2267 R/hr
(0~0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr)~ As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings (lre lower than the dos.e of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.


Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Ra<;:liation Health Branc.h
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C~A
Frankfort, KY 4062_1
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: .502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:llwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

.A;::-m: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Ws~';;t: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
9

GP1801

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by .Ja.son
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate; a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemicai precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined. to be. non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
do.ctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach; or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas <:an be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature fo sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all S<Jmples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several. glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-,site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremE!IY low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

10

GP1802

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt ..
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its con.tents (induding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the senderby reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 201610:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
.ubject_: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Ka It's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http:l/www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
.Jajr as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
wradioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

11

GP1803

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR. Chapter 100. http://www.lrc ..state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm

A...

(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has . . .
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
-~-(3)~Naturatiy:occurrlng.racffuact:lvemaTeria1

(f..fo~rf!Vi) as definecfin.KRS :n:i:S62{8) shaTfl)ethe-exclusTve . ~-~~-- --

regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505


(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Central Midwestlnterstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility

_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky;gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u_11.wanted sources http:f/www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

M ..

<':'.':-~:,,.

~'nett

12

GP1804

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Und:er KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged informr;ition. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If ybu receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016.5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian

.
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon {EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call
February 26, 2016

on

Hello Brad;

I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you .
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13

GP1805

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM. waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us t<? Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding wa,s the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the wa_ste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the contain.ers used for the shipment of the waste.


2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar iri nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on'
management of t_he landfiil?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<;ieor9e P. Partridfle Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q,'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
14

GP1806

To:
Cc:
Subject:

Frame, Jason R <Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov>


Wednesday, March 02, 201610:55 AM
Kalt, Brian; Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L {CHFS PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

I will work around whatever time KY chooses.

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) sss..:0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:48 AM


To: Frame, Jason R; Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
All,
What time works best for everyone this Friday?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
a.airmont Brine Processing, LLC
. 12-680-6244

GP1807

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

&,.

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian


-~-~cf Partridge;Georgec'tEEC);

Ma<irirey;rvrattnewW~(t:fl~:pR);-rowter, l@hy-[ lCAFS~PAr~---~.

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Curt,
I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

Jason R. Frame B.S.R.T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radia.tion, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frarne@WV.gov

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:11 AM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


.Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
2

GP1808

Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E:rnail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:flprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~nwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt,
[mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, '201610:00 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr, Pendergrass,

..
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team? .

Cd
.

Regards,

~ianKalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents, Ifyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the. sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM.
To:. Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier e~ails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
~terial currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling

GP1809

--

----

-----------

pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated. ,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street

GP1810

Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
, ~: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E-mail:.curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your.fees on line at https://prd'.chfs.ky.gov/rad epav!
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwan!ed sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From:..Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


.

. ...

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone can on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

-Kind Regards,

.ianKalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e7mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its co.ntents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone can on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
..&upe. rvisor, Radioactive Materials Section
~ntucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
5

GP1811

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel; 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~~nted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

Tt)e information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom. it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you mustnot use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25'' from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.

GP1812

You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
,.aiterial to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
..::pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and .thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
.Curt PencleJgra~~J'b_D
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-5.64-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

om:

Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


nt: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
2

D2
D2
1

-ccordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:

GP1813

With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)l\2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)l\2
Examples: (Distance from source)

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)l\2
(1 ft away)l\2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)l\2
(2 ft away)l\2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.

If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)l\2
(10 ft away)l\2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs)* (0.0208 ft)l\2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
8

GP1814

412-680-6244

information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

,. _. -

----------.___,. ,.

---------~~..,.,,.,..."="""~~~~....,,.,,~--

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Thank you Mr. Kai~ for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately{ looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environm.ental
Technologies Laboratories I don'tsee where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which .is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
~formation on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,

,..odel, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from t.he sludge. ls that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
. published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183

~x:502-564-1492
9"-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govI dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epavL
9

GP1815

Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/


Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
-~ --

- ~"=,~-,,~-~-"7""-=-=~~=* ------- -~~~--~-~~"""""""~~...,...,,.~.....__,,_,____,,-=--- ~----~- --~-- ---~-- _______ . .,_ - - ,_ ~ ----- ~--~~-=-=e=-"="=-=-~---~--;-----.,.~~-=--e!-- - - -- _;:-__ ~...,,.~~~~~

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity ofwaste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate an(:! to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to tre non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used. by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge .has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive .materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC} and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana),

10

GP1816

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxe.s. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
~~atering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
~he dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please~~~ t~~ att<!fl1~<! Nof'}~Hazardo1.1s\Afaste Al:>proval Notification Formftom th~ West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.

If anything else is needed, please .let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
. any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
A.iisclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~elete and destroy the message.
.
.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
1

. e l l o Mr.

Kalt~

As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
11

GP1817

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http:/lwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


11
{8) Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated

under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased b
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices {or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:/lwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
{301) 11 Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material {NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to complywith any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($IOO,OOO). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Bra,nch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492

12

GP1818

E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
~your fees on line at https:l/prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~~otified of proposed regulation changes https:f/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

f_!()l!I: .A11de,rs()n1 Danny J (Ege)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC).
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statut_es and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:

Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412~680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete. and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
13

GP1819

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any Concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.

We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

L
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank vou again for retamlngmy call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.

14

GP1820

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

George P. PartrU:fae Jr., Pli1J, P/.E., {!:EP


. Q~p~q_r_tmentfor Envirnomental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl .gif>

15

GP1821

-m:

Partridge, George {EEC)

Sent:

To:
Cc:

Subject:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11:30 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC)
RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

George,
It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which stated: "Just
Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school building to
main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of landfill. Personally
I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any concerns or .risks to
the public dt1e to present activities. They should go about their normal activities. The risk concern and exposures to
worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss with you/'.
Please work with Danny to schedule a time to meet with me to better understand your
observations and concerns.
Thank you,
Jon

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Tony;
Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the Irvine County
High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an internal meeting to discuss my
observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or at least prior to the public meeting this
evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps
to take to protect their safety and well-being until we know more (such as a reconstructive exposure assessment, etc.)
which will be weeks to months in the future.
I am going to list my observations and recommendations belolN and also attached a copy of an email message I sent
requesting a meeting.

,.,

We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the plans for the site
visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the exposure to the school and surrounding
area would include..airborne particulate matter since the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the
school entrance. Both the school and the school grounds, particularly around the entrance and in front of the
school would experience particulate deposition.

GP1822

When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of the entrance to
the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating "We are not here to lookfor particulates."
(That was the primary exposure of concern!).

Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattacharya not to take the "back packs" (which were the mosL,,.
sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street which resulted in the grounds of the
school where the grass was, not getting surveyed for deposited particulates.
I also mentioned to Matt McKinley that the schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems, remove the existing
filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the filter to check for particulate matter
containing radionuclides. This was not done to my knowledge.

.A..

I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:
: The maintenance workers at the school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters to the HVAC
systems for the school, which for one school e>ccurs on a monthly basis.
! Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the landfill,
previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when the grasson the school
grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity will expose both the workers, stt.1dents,
and all fridividuals that niay be present in the vicinity when those activities are conducted.
My message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February 27th stated the
following:
"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As yo1,1 go from entrance of school
building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of
landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any
concerns or risks to the. public due to present activities They should go abol,lt their normal activities. 'The risk
concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early eveiiiiig and
discuss with you."

In my text messages I used the word ''public'' in my message and with the words "present activiti~s." I still needed to
discuss the safety and well~bein8. of tbe maintenance workers atthe school who change the filters poter1tially being
exposed to particulates containing rcidionuclides. I am.also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass
about the resuspension
of
deposition that. occurred
and has contaminated
the grou. nds in front of
.
.
. previous particulate
. .
.
. .
the school near the entrance.
,

I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday morning. oanny and I
have talked but it: has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he was busy with other matters pertaining
to Blue Ridge. I appred;;ite all the Danny is doing and realize he has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time.he
has been available to.spend With me. I .also rea.lize Jon is extremely busy as well.
I am also extremely worried that individuals will die a premature death or have serious health problems in the future
from this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure and the increase incidence of cancer
and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending on exposure scenario and age at time of exposure.

I am also concerned about the operators and workers at the landfill and how close they are working to
previously deposited waste. Are they mC1intaining a buffer .distance to minimize expbSllre? Is thE! landfill
resuming their norma.I activities before they assess the extent of contamination? Are they colltinuing to let
the public drive I.Ip t() the area of the working face and discharge waste materials they are dropping
off? Has the equipment at the landfill that was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a
precaution?......

I want to conclude with the following comments:


2

GP1823

I appreciate being an employee in the Division of Waste Management, it represents my life's work
and vocation.
v' I could not ask for a more talented group of coworkers.
v' I appreciate the leadership of our Division and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny has devoted to
listening to my concerns and observations.

v'

I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to talk. I feel like I
have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and what I have feared would happen

and has happened in other states has now occurred in Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this
was processed TENORM rather than the TENORM that is produced at the O & G drilling/fracking sites.
J:a-lso felftiliswas tile last chance to get a message to you since management reads-their emailswhe~
they are away from the office!
Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your work on this
and the Public Meeting tonight.
George
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
.urvey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discus~;this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important\
Thank you,
George

P~ Partrirfee Jr.
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4651

{ieorge

GP1824

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
To:

Sent:
Subj~t:

Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11:58 AM
Read: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your mes~ge
To:Hatton,Tony(EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:14:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11 :57:46 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

,,
1

GP1825

Partridge, George (EEC)

..A..m:
.;:;,t:
To:
Subject:

McKee Perez, Nancy < McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:07 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

George,
When you have a chance; give me a call. I spoke to my R2 contact, Carol Amend, and she said that she would coordinate
a meeting between ya;ll and the State of West Virginia. West Virginia may be able to shed some light on the Fairmont
Brine Processing's process. Would this be something you all would be interested in?

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>

: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
bject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thankyou for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Prpfile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report'' provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky

hanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
1

GP1826

We look forward to talking with you again next week.


Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

~~~Ji~Q!"fje . P. '}'a'!1ri:!!jJ{.Jr. ~-~--~~--mDepartment for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

.-" ~~~-~~--.-----~~-- ~-- -~---~------ --~ --~---------

GP1827

Partridge, George (EEC)

#:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:45 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
FW: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Jeri;
Could we make this call together?
I am available anytime.
Thank you,
George

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:07 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
George,
Althen you have a chance, give me a call. I spoke to my R2 contact, Carol Amend, and she said that she would coordinate
~meeting between ya'll and the State of West Virginia. West Virginia may be able to shed some light on the FC1irmont
Brine Processing's process. Would this be something you all would. be interested in?

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB &CPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
Ftom: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
0
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV .

lease find attached the following documents:

GP1828

Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report'' provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
~

A..

Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services'' from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being

~---- .,,~-.-~. C:f>l'l)~e,red to co11~r,actfe>r disP-osal of this was.te~--- ______

. --.- ~ ~~--.-~~-- ------~----~~--~---~----~------~--

Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

{1eor9e P. PartritflJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1829

Partridge, George {EEC)

~ro~
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:20 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: manifests

Ge9rge;
I have been so ov_erwhelmed by emails, phone calls, and all our activities on TENORM. I am just getting caught up on my
backlog of emails.
If I miss anything you have requested or need, I apologize.
Please send me a reminder if there is anything you requested and I have not gotten it to you.
Thank you!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 8:24 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: manifests
. e t ' s do those manifests we have; I'll put them in a spreadsheet. Do we have anything new from those we were
emailed?

I
1

GP1830

flom: . . ..
Piirtridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:23 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
FW: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Jeri;
I am still struggling to understand how a processed or treated waste frorn a primary industry (O&G) is considered
"intrinsically derived" and still meets the exemption. It goes through processing and chemicals are added to precipitate
and separate the contaminants.
Hope we can continue to get some clarification regarding this.
Look forward to our ongoing discussions and dialogue with EPA.
Thank you,
George

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:41 AM
To: Part.rid.ge., George (EEC); Higginb.otham, Jeri (EEC)
: Lamberth, Larry; Danois, Hector

ubject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal


Hi George and Jeri,
In prep for today's meeting; I'd like to share some resources:
https:ljwww3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/index.htm
And, specifically: https:ljwww3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/oil-gas.pdf
Takea look at "Scope of the Exemption", "Exempt/Non-exempt", "common misunderstandings". Also takea look at (p.
22) for the definition of "uniquely associated with".
Page 8 provides a "rule of thumb'' to determine if the Waste would be exernpt:
1) Ha$ the waste come from down-hole, i.e., was it brought to the surface during oil and gas E&P operations?
2) Has the waste otherwise been generated by contact with the oil and gas production stream during the
removal of produced water or other contaminants from the product?
In my review, I've taken a look at our guidance documents on E&P Waste, looked up the Fairmont facility in RCRAlnfo
(our national hazardous waste database), looked up the Fairmont facility website, and I also spoke to my R2 contact,
which is the region that oversees West Virginia.
RCRAlnfo showed that the facility is the lowest generator of hazardous waste (a conditionally exempt small quantity
generator (CESQG) .

he process provi.de. d o.n their website. expla.. ins that they pre. treat the brine to remove Ba, Sr, TSS, O&G, turbidity and
9?rganics. It doesn't specify how they do this. I'm assuming this where the waste filters are coming from? The treated
brine is then pumped to surface impoundments, where evaporation/crystallization occurs. I'm assuming the waste
sludge is coming from (the bottom of the surface impoundment)?
1

GP1831

Also, I took a look at the analytical res.ults. Based on these results, it doesn't appear that the waste would be hazardous,
if the waste was determined to be non~exempt. To gain better insight on the results, I spoke to our EPA lab (located in
Athens, GA). He said it looked like the type of analysis usually used when waste is sent to a hazardous waste landfill,
which provides info on whether the waste meets Land Disposal Restriction requirements (which is odd, since they're
claiming the 261.4(b)(S) exemption from hazardous waste regulations). Also, in looking through the results, he said that
the material appeared to be fairly wet; it had a high% moisture and it failed the paint filter test.

&..

Nancy McKee Perez


Haza~dous ~aste, U~TJ'CB . cSi:. QPAP!C>aralTls --~~---~----~---"~-~~~--~- -~---~~~--~--. --~~~~--~~---~~-~
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
'
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc:Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Hello Nancy;

Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received thiswaste is managed by Advanced Disposal.

Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they plannedto dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TEN ORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.

Thanks again for your assistance!


Sincerely,

GP1832

George

Aorge P. PartridiJe Jr.

~partment for Environmental ProtectionKY Division of Waste Management


200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1833

.rtridge.. George (EEC)


.From:
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:23 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
FW: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Jeri;
I am still struggling to understand how a processed or treated waste from a primary industry (O&G) is considered
"intrinsically derived" and still meets the exemption. It goesthrough processing and chemicals are addedto precipitate
and separate the contaminants.
Hope we can continue to get some clarification regarding this.
Look forward to our ongoing discussions and dialogue with EPA.
Thank you,
George

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:.McKeePerez.N~mcy@epa.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:41 AM

To: Partr.idge., G.eorge (EEC); Higg
.. inb.otham, Jeri (EEC.)
: Lamberth, Larry; Danois, Hector
ubject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hi George and Jeri,
In prep for today's meeting; I'd like to share some resources:
https:lfwww3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/index.htm
And, specifically: https:Uwww3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/oil-gas.pdf
Take a look at "Scope of the Exemption", "Exempt/Non-exempt", "common misunderstandings". Also take
22) for the definition of "uniquely associated with".

alook at (p.

Page 8 provides a "rule of thumb" to determine if the waste would be exempt:


1) Has the waste come from down-hole, i.e., was it brought to the surface during oil and gas E&P operations?
2) Has the waste otherwise been generated by contact with the oil and gas production stream during the
removal of produced water or other contaminants from the product?
In my review, I've taken a look at our guidance documents on E&P Waste, looked up the Fairmont facility in RCRAlnfo
(our national hazardous waste database), looked up the Fairmont facility website, and I also spoke to my R2 contact,
which is the region that oversees West Virginia.
RCRAlnfo showed that the facility is the lowest generator of hazardous waste (a conditionally exempt small quantity
generator (CESQG).
~he process provi.ded on their website explains that they pretreat the brine to remove Ba, Sr, TSS, O&G, turbidity and
90rganics. It doesn't specify how they do this. I'm assuming this where the waste filters are coming from? The treated
brine is then pumped to surface impoundments, where evaporation/crystallization occurs. I'm assuming the waste
sludge is coming from (the bottom of the surface. impoundment)?
1

GP1834

Also, I took a look at the analytical results. Based on these results, it doesn't appear that the waste would be hazardous,
if the waste was determined to be non-exempt. To gain better insight on the results, I spoke to our EPA lab (located in
Athens, GA). He said it looked like the type of analysis usually used when waste is sent to a hazardous waste landfill,
which provides info on whether the waste meets Land Disposal Restriction requirements (which is odd, since they're
claiming the 261.4(b)(S) exemption from hazardous waste regulations). Also, in looking through the results, he said that
the material appeared to be fairly wet; it had a high % moisture and it failed the paint filter test.

-&...

"W

Nancy McKee Perez


.Ha~argous .Waste, l,JST,J?CEL~_QEAProgrB:ms____ _ ----- ______ --~~----- _ ~- --. _ _~. _-~--~- ~---- ~--~~~-----Enforcement & Compliance. Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
{404) 562-8674
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste tha_t was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.

Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.

Thanks again for your assistance!


Sincerely,

GP1835

George

or9e P. Partritfee Jr.


partment for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

I.

GP1836

Partridge, George (EEC)

rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Weqnesday, March 02, 2016 2:27 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
FW: $275M SHALE 13RINE PLANT SET IN W.VA. - FAIRMONT FIRM LOSES CONTRACT

FOR FACILITY

Curt;
A news article that Mohammad Razavi, an engineer in our Section shared with me.
George

--------.---- - - -

---------

-.

From: Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:17 PM
To: Anderson, Danny J.(EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: $275M SHALE BRINE Pl.ANT SET IN W.VA. -: FAIRMONT FIRM LOSES CONTRACT FOR FACILITY

Perhaps, this was the reason they went with BES Technologies.

$275M SHALE BRINE PLANT SET IN W.VA. - FAIRMONT FIRM LOSES


CONTRACT FOR FACILITY

llt,ittsburgh Post-Gazette (PA) - August 20, 20158rowse Issues

Author/Byline: Anya Litvak, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette


Edition: SOONER
Section: BUSINESS
Page: D-1

The news that Antero Resources will build a massive $275 million wastewater
treatment plant to process shale brine in West Virginia wasn't a surprise for Brian
Kalt~ general manager with Fairmont Brine Processing.
The surprise was learning that Antero would be building the plant with Veolia
Water Technologies,. a branch of the French technology giant.
The Denver-based oil and gas company announced Wednesday that over the next
~wo years Veolia will design, build and operate the Sandstrom Wastewater
rreatment facility, a 60,000-.barrel-a-day plant that will evaporate and crystalize
produced water - yielding fresh water and salt products to be used by the oil and
1

GP1837

gas industry.

p~tch

Clearing of the site, a


of land near Route 50 in Doddridge County, has begun'
and Antero has filed two permits with the state, one for construction and another
for air emissions, over the past two months. That's how Mr. Kalt confirmed what
he'd been hearing - that his small company's major break was at risk.
Fairmont, a sister company of Pittsburgh-based Venture Engineering, has a small
evaporation and crystallization plant in Fairmont, W.Va., where Antero is its
anchor client. The facility is a tenth of the size of what Veolia will be building.
Mr. Kalt said his company has spent the past year and $2 million on engineering
work for the large plant, which would have been tailored to Antero's needs but
also would have room for other producers' water.
Fairmont kept Antero apprised of its progress and forwarded all drawings and
descriptions of its treatment process, he said.
"Had we known that this was a possibility, we would not have allowed them so
much access to our patented process despite the non-disclosure agreement and
confidentiality agreement set forth in our contract," he sajd.

Alvyn Schopp, chief administrative officer and Antero's regional vice president of
Appalachia, said the company hasn't broken any confidentiality agreements and
did not share Fairmont's drawings with anyone.
"I'm sure they are disappointed/' he said. "Fairmont and Veolia weren't the only
ones we looked at. We believe that we have been very fair with Fairmont, very
upfront with Fairmont."
Antero's contract for the existing Fairmont plant runs through 2016 and, despite a
recent pause, Mr. Schopp said the plan is to continue to send water to Fairmont
through the remainder of its contract.
After 18 months of planning, he said Antero chose the company that would deliver
"the most technologically advanced plant."
2

GP1838

ll'_e think this will be closely watched by industry to see how successful this is," he
.said. If proven to be a viable alternative to disposal wells, Mr. Schopp said he
hopes more such plants will be built.
Veolia did not respond to calls for comment.
Antero said Wednesday that Sandstrom would be part of the company's water
division, which was incorporated in November and is being negotiated for sale to
Antero Midstream, a master limited partnership partly owned by Antero.

The oil and gas driller has operations in the Marcellus and Utica shales. Unlike
some operators that focus on exploration and production, and outsource
everything else, Antero is known to prefer to have control over all aspects, said
David Meats, an equity analyst with Morningstar Inc. That way it can taitor
infrastructure to its needs and control costs.

Antero said Wednesday that when the facility is ramped up, it will amount to a
.150,000 savings on each well.

"You have to get rid of the water somehow. The need for water in tracking is huge.
If the other options were lower cost, they'd be doing that," Mr. Meats said.
Mr. Kalt said losing Antero will mean a "significant loss of revenue" for his
company. He said Fairmont will try to cobble together enough other producers to
justify building a large plant anyway.
Memo: Anya Litvak: alitvak@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1455.
Record: 15082018714642
Copyright: Copyright (c) 2015 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

,
3

GP1839

Partridge, George (EEC)

'"-=

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:27 PM
Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)
RE: $275M SHALE BRINE PLANT SET IN W.VA. - FAIRMONT FIRM LOSES CONTRACT
FOR FACILITY

Mohammad;
Thanks again for sharing this news article with me.
Have a nice afternoon!
George
-~-------

From: Razavi, Mohamrnad (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 .1:17 PM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subjed:: $275M SHALE BRINE PLANT SET IN W.VA. - FAIRMONT FIRM LOSES CONTRACT FOR FACILITY

Perhaps;this was the reason they went with BES Technologies .

$275M SHALE BRINE PLANT SET IN W.VA. - FAIRMONT FIRM LOSES


CONTRACT FOR FACILITY
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette {PA} - August 20, 2015Browse Issues

Author/Byline: Anya Litvak, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette


Edition: SOONE'R
Section: BUSINESS
Page: D-1

~The news that Antero Resources will build a massive $275 million wastewater
~eatment plant to process shale brine in West Virginia wasn't a surprise for Brian

9'Kalt, general manager with Fairmont Brine Processing.


1

GP1840

The surprise was learning that Antero would be building the plant with Veolia
Water Technologies, a branch of the French technology.giant.
The Denver-based oil and gas company announced Wednesday that over the next
two years Veolia will design, build and operate the Sandstrom Wastewater
Treatment facility, a 60,000-barrel-a-day plant that will evaporate and crystalize
,~-~,. _pr~oduced~wate~L~)tielding Jr:esb~wa1ecand~saJt~.PLO~d_u~cttlD~b~e~yse~d b~,t the. oi I and
gas industry.
Clearing of the site, a patch of land near Route 50 in Doddridge County, has begun,
and Antero has filed two permits with the state, one for construction and another
for air emissions, over the past two months. That's how Mr. Kalt confirmed what
he'd been hearing - that his small company's major break was at risk.
Fairmont, a sister company of Pittsburgh-based Venture Engineering, has a small
evaporation and crystallization plant in Fairmont, W.Va., where Antero is its
anchor client. The facility is a tenth of the size of.what Veolia will be building.
Mr. Kalt said his company has spent the past year and $2 million on engineering
work for the large plant, which would have been tailored to Antero's needs but
also would have room for other producers' water.

Fairmont kept Antero apprised of its progress and forwarded all drawings and
descriptions of its treatment process, he said.
"Had we known that this was a possibility, we would not have allowed them so
much access to our patented process despite the non.,.disclosure agreement and
confidentiality agreement set forth in our contract," he said.
Alvyn Schopp, chief administrative officer and Antero's regional vice president of
Appalachia, said the company hasn't broken any confidentiality agreements and
did not share Fairmont's drawings with anyone.
"I'm sure they are disappointed," he said. "Fairmont and Veolia weren't the only
ones we looked at. We believe that we have been very fair with Fairmont, very
upfront with Fairmont."
2

GP1841

__Mtero's contract for the existing Fairmont plant runs through 2016 and, despite a
pcent pause, Mr. Schopp said the plan is to continue to send water to Fairmont
through the remainder of its contract.
After 18 months of planning, he said Antero chose the company that would deliver
"the rno~ttechnolQgiqdlyadvaoc:ed_ pl~nt II
"We think this will be closely watched by industry to see how successful this is," he
said. If proven to be a viable alternative to disposal wells, Mr. Schopp said he
hopes more such plants will be built.
Veolia did not respond to calls for comment.
Antero said Wednesday th~t Sandstrom would be part of the company's water
division, which was incorporated in November and is being negotiated for sale to
,Antero Midstream, a master limited partnership partly owned by Antero .

he oil and gas driller has operations in the Marcellus and Utica shales. Unlike
some operators thatfocus on exploration and production, and outsource
everything else, Antero is known to prefer to have control over all aspects, said
David Meats, an equity analyst with Morningstar Inc. That way it can tailor
infrastructure to its needs and control costs.
Antero said Wednesday that when the facility is ramped up, it will amount to a
$150,000 savings on each well.
"You have to get rid of the water somehow. The need for water in fracking is huge.
If the other options were tower cost, they'd be doing that," Mr. Meats said.
Mr. Kalt said losing Antero will mean a "significant loss of revenue" for his
company. He said Fairmont will try to cobble together enough other producers to
justify building a large plant anyway.

Memo: Anya Litvak: alitvak@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1455.

GP1842

Partridge, George (EEC)

f#-,

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2.:29 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
FW: GreenHunter: Multistate Groups Demand Coast Guard Action to Protect Ohio River

Sent:

To:

Subject:

C::urt;
Article that Mohammad shared with me that mentions Green Hunter, one of the firms that shipped wasted to Blue
Ridge Landfill.
George

From: Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:21 PM
T(): Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Green Hunter: Multistate. Groups Demand Coast Guard Action to Protect
Ohio River
.

Multistate Groups Demand Coast Guard Action to Protect Ohio River


Targeted News Service {USA) - February 19~ 2015Browse Issues

Section: PublicPolicy
COLUMBUS, Ohio, Feb. 18 -- The Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition issued the
following news release:
Citing serious public health and safety concerns, environmental and community
groups opposed to barging of tracking waste sent a letter to the U.S. Coast Guard
requesting thatth~ agency immediately initiate investigative action related to
GreenHunter, LLC to determine the true contents of waste that GreenHunter, LLC
may be transporting by barge on inland waterways, including the Ohio Riv.er and
the Mississippi Riv~r, both, sources of drinking water for millions of people.

The letter of February 17, addressed to Captain Richard Timme, also requests the
Coast Guard to issue a 11 cease and desist 11 order to Green Hunter, LLC to stop
transporting any 11 oilfield wastes" while the Coast Guard .makes its determination
. o f what exactly is being ship~e~_by the company. Additionally, the gro~p~: !etter
equests the Coast Guard to 1nit1ate an "enforcement penalty proceeding 1f,
I
indeed, the Coast Guard finds GreenHunter in violation regarding possible
<

GP1843

shipments of "shale gas extraction wastewater," or SGEWW.


For the past two years, Green Hunter, LLC has been seeking U.S. Coast Guard
permission to transport fracking waste on the Ohio River or other inland
waterways.
~~---Ibe_gio~up~sJetter__Lefex~nc~.s~a_s_tate~me~otb~\cKirkJLQStla1r, . COQ~oLG_ce,e_nJ:tunte_rto_~~-

the Wheeling Intelligencer (2/6/15), "GreenHunter Water will continue to


transport 'oilfield waste' until such time as the Coast Guard ultimately decides on
the proper definition of 'shale gas extraction waste water' and the rules under
which such waste water can be transported. Once these rules are finalized,
GreenHunter will comply with these rules and regulations."
The group reads Trosclair's statement that GreenHunter 'will continue to
transport' to mean that the company is actively shipping drilling wastes now, with
impunity and without legal authority."
Currently, fracking waste has too many legal exemptions, trade secrets, and
euphemisms associated with it making h difficult to ascertain the precise
components of the fracking waste. This in itself makes this situation not your
typical shipment for transport down the Ohio River. Obviously, the Coast Guard
needs to know exactly what substances are being transported on the waterways
so that they can protect the public interest.
Dr. Randi Pokladnik says she "is concerned with the ability of local public drinking
water systems to remove the numerous aromatic organic, carcinogenic and
endocrine disrupting chemicals contained in wastes from shale gas extraction."
"Just the thought of toxic and potentially radioactive unconventional gas well
waste being shipped by barge on the Ohio River sickens me" says Robin Blakeman,
organizer with the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition in Huntington, WV. 11 1, and
three generations of my entire immediate family get our tap water from the
Huntington, WV intakes. I am appalled that a company like Green Hunter would
try to subvert the Coast Guard's authority and may already be shipping this
noxious substance by barge, as well as by truck near the river's edge. I hope the
Coast Guard and the US EPA will do everything in their power to fully investigate
2

GP1844

Green Hunter's operations and stop them from any activity which endangers our

,water!".
One only needs to consider the recent events of Charleston and Fayette County,
West Virginia and Toledo, Ohio to grasp the enormity of the consequences of
losing - even temporarily - a source of drinking water.
February 18, 2015
United States Coast GuardO
Sector - Ohio Valley

600 Martin Luther King Jr. Place


Louisville, Kentucky 40202

.TTN:

Captain Richard Timme

SUBJ: Request for Investigative Action: GreenHunter LLC Dear Captain Timme:
We are a coalition of grassroots and nongovernmental organizations which have
long and actively opposed the allowance of barge shipments of oil and gas drilling
wastes from hydraulic fracturing (tracking) - what the Coast Guard calls "shale gas
extraction wastewater," or SGEWW - on inland waterways.
We filed comments in the Coast Guard rulemaking as directed, via Regulation.gov,
and our members include persons imminently threatened with environmental and
health hazards by the content of "SGEWW" which may leak or be volatilized or
burned if barge shipment is permitted in your district. We are copying US EPA
Region IV in Atlanta which has jurisdiction over the Ohio River. Emergency
remediation and incident command control measures by the USCG and US EPA
would be needed if this SGEWW is allowed to be shipped. No public notice has
. .een given to first responders along the banks of the river that SGEWW shipments
would be allowed to commence in order for first responders to be given the
requisite training and response equipment to deal with the probable

GP1845

consequences of SGEWW release or ignition.

It is with growing concern that we have witnessed the unfolding controversy in the'
past three weeks, in which GreenHunter LLC has insisted during investor
presentations thatthe.firm has received Coast Guard permission to ship oil and
gas drilling wastes via barge onthe Ohio and Mississippi river systems.
~~~ ~Gr:eenHunte.r:rwhtch.has~he.en.~pursuing_p~e[mis.sloJ1!o~sllip_f ra___t:_kLng .wastesJo r . ~~-~-~~
more than two years, has departed from its original scheme to add those wastes
to the Coast Guard list of legal cargoes, and now insists that Captain Richard
Timme has authorized "oilfield wastes" to be river-transported under the terms of
Navigation and Inspection Circular 7-87. As you know, Dr. Cynthia Znati of the
USCG HQ has publicly denied that SGEWW is a permitted cargo for Ohio River
barge shipment, in part, because of the 70,000 comments received that must be
reviewed, some that include evidence of the radioactivity in the sludge
components which pose risks greater than that of classical "oilfield waste. 11
We're gratified that Dr. Znati's response to our concerns and news media
questions, correctly communicated the meaning of Captain Timme's
correspondence with GreenHunter, and that the agency is still deliberating the
. question ofwhether USCG would permit SGEWW to be shipped.

We weretherefore surprised when GreenHunter LLCdefied the USCG authority


over SGEWW shipments by publicly stating its intention to ship these mixed
radioactive and toxic chemical sludge wastes.
On February 6, 2015,Kirk Trosclair, COO of GreenHunter, told the Wheeling
Intelligencer that, uGreenHunter Water will continue to transport 'oilfield waste'
until such time as the Coast Guard ultimately decides on the proper definition of
'shale gas extraction waste water' and the rules under which such waste water can
be transported. Once these rules are finalized, Green Hunter will comply with these
rules and regulations."
(http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/624568/RadiationConcerns-Coast-Guard.html).
We read Trosclair's statement that GreenHunter "will continue to transport" to
mean that the company is actively shipping drilling wastes now, with impunity and
4

GP1846

---

-------

- - -

without legal authority. Regulation does not turn on semantic differences, but
_.stead, on physical evidence. In the instance of transporting radioactivity-laced
pdustrial toxins on public waterways, the lack of evidence of the true nature of
GreenHunter's cargoes is of grave concern. Therefore, we ask that the Coast Guard
Criminal Investigative Service be asked to examine the contents of the current
shipments and the dockside tanks owned by Green Hunter. If these contain
SGEWW_as we beli~v~ th_~y do, we a_S_k the CGCIS to initiate enforcement penaJty
proceeding or criminal information proceeding in consultation with the Office of
the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio.
The Ohio and M,ississippi rivers are a source of drinking water for millions of
people. A January 2015 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
study of the tracking waste stream in Pennsylvania showed that inadequate
traceability and public protections are in place to handle the at-times highlyradioactive tracking emissions and wastes. That study, found here, has prompted
reconsideration of Pennsylvania's weak regulations. Among other findings, tracking
waste liquids (SGEWW) contained levels of radioactivity in excess of 26,600 pCi/L.
1 (Copy of pages excerpted from study enclosed). The federal drinking water
.tandard is 5 pCi/L. Leakage of GreenHunter cargoes into river waters in the
present circumstances, where the company insists it need not test or characterize
its "oilfield wastes" could be catastrophic, and at a minimum, could pose
continuing environmental and health hazards which would stress public water ,
supplies and various forms of wildlife.
For these reasons, we urgently request that the Coast Guard act immediately to
initiate a criminal investigation of operations associated with GreenHunter LLC.
Pending discovery of the contents of any barges and storage tanks, including
records of contents of any barge shipments, to issue an immediate cease and
desist order to Green Hunter to halt any shipments of "oilfield wastes" regardless
of the origins claimed by Green Hunter LLC.
'
'

Given Green Hunter's impunity in asserting that they will not follow the USCG HQ
Hazardous Materials Branch Directive, an immediate cease and desist order should
~ccompany the USCG CGCIS to visit to this shipper's site and its barges to take
evidence of the SGEWW movement that would be admissible in the courts.
5

GP1847

Please respond immediately respecting the Coast Guard's planned response to


Green Hunter's defiance of the USCG authority over SGEWW in current and past
barge shipments. Thanking you in advance,

A..
'W

Teresa Mills
~-------~~J9 P~Jkri~g~-c~_u_r_L ------~----------- ___________________________________ -~---~--~---~---------~.~~---

Grove City, OH 43123


On behalf of the signatories that are provided on the following page.
cc:
RADM Kevin Cook, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Hale Boggs Federal Building,

500 Poydras Street


New Orleans, LA 70130
Office of Investigation, Coast Guard Criminal Investigative Service
245 Murray Dr. - Bldg. 410 Stop 2600, Washington, DC 20528
James Giattina, US EPA Region IV,
61 Forsyth St. Atlanta, GA 30303
Dr. Cynthia Znati
U.S. Department of Transportation

West Building, Ground Floor


6

GP1848

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

tl'ashington, DC 20590-0001
Signatories:
Concerngd C:iti~ens Ohio/Shalersville
Mary Greer
Shalersville, OH
Freshwater Accountability Project
Leatra Harper
Grand Rapids, OH 43522
.outheast Ohio Alliance to Save Our Water
Senecaville, OH 43780
Concerned Citizens of Medina County
Kathie Jones
Medina, OH
CCLT/Uniontown IEL Superfund Site & Stark
County Concerned Citizens, Christine Borello
Plain Township, Ohio

.Guernsey County Citizens Support on Drilling Issues


7

GP1849

Greg Pace
Guernsey County, OH
Morrow County Power

Mt Gilead, OH
Radioactive Waste Alert
Carolyn Harding
Columbus, OH
Defenders of the Earth Outreach Mission

Rev. Monica Beasley-Martin


Youngstown, OH
Southeastern Ohio Fracking Interest Group
Betsy Cook
Lowell, OH Washington County
West Virginia Sierra Club
Jim Sconyers
Co-Chair, Marcellus Campaign

West Virginia
8

GP1850

Center for Health, Environment and Justice

f#l,io field office


Teresa Mills
Columbus, Qtl
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
Robin Blakeman
. Huntington, WV
FaCT-OV
Patricia Jacobson

.heeling, WV
Ohio Alliance for People and Environment
Dr. Joseph Cronin
Yellow Springs, OH
Buckeye Forest Council
Heather Cantino, board vice chair
Columbus, OH
Concept Zero Student Group

~avid Nickell
9

GP1851

West Kentucky Community College, KY

Southwest Ohio No Frack Forum


Joanne Gerson

Athens County Fracking Action Network


Roxanne Groff, steering committee member
Athens, OH
Licking County Concerned Citizens for Public
Health and Environment

Carol Apacki
Licking County, OH
Jefferson County Ohio Citizens for
Environmental Truth
Jonathan Smuck
Steubenville, OH
Cumberland Chapter Sierra Club
Judy Lyons, Chair
Lexington, KY
10

GP1852

Frackfree America National Coalition

-ana Ludwig .
McDonald, OH
FaCT - Faith Comml1nJties Together
Ron Prasek, Convener
Ohio
Frackfree Mahoning Valley
Susie Beiersdorfer

II

Youngstown, OH

! tlltiardians of Mill Creek Park


Lynn Anderson
Youngstown, OH
Clean Water Action Pennsylvania
Steve Hvozdovich
Pittsburgh, PA
We Are Not Expendable
John Williams

T r um bu 11 County, OH
11

GP1853

People for Safe Water


Marilyn Welker
Springfield, OH

~,~~~ttelW<:>Ik_fQr Oil_anq Gas.P..c.c.oyritctb.ility_g_,ng __~-----------~~~~------------~-~~~-~-~~~~--~-~--~~~~


Protection Vanessa Pecec
Concord Twp.,"OH
Coshocton Environmental and Community
Awareness
Nick Teti

Coshocton, OH
Communities United for Responsible Energy
Caitlin Johnson
Youngstown, OH
Concerned Barnesville Area Residents
John Morgan
Belmont County, OH
Appalachian Ohio Sierra Club

Loraine Mccosker
12

GP1854

Athens, OH

~orthwest Ohio Alliance to Stop Fracking


Leslie Harper
Wheeltng Water Warriors
Robin Mahonen
Wheeling, WV
Friends of Bell Smith Springs
Sam Stearns
Stonefort, IL
- o d & Water Watch
Alison Auciello, Ohio organizer
Cincinnati, OH
[Category: Environment]
TNS 24HariCha 150219 30FurigayJane-5034306 30FurigayJane
Memo: Teresa Mills, 614/507-5651, tmills@chej.org
Index terms: Trade Associations; Press Releases
Dateline: COLUMBUS, Ohio
Record: 5034306
Copyright: Copyright (c) 2015 Targeted News Service. All rights reserved .

13

GP1855

Partridge, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:29 PM
Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)
RE: GreenHunter: Multistate Groups Demand Coast Guard Action to Protect Ohio River

Mohammad;
Thank you,
George

From: Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:21 PM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: GreenHunter: Multistate Groups Demand Coast Guard Action to Protect Ohio River

.ultistate Groups Demand Coast Guard Action to Protect Ohio River


Targeted News Service (USA} - February 19, 2015Browse Issues

Section: Public Policy


COLUMBUS, Ohio, Feb. 18 -- The Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition issued the
following news release:
Citing serious public health and safety concerns, environmental and community
groups opposed to barging offracking waste sent a letter to the U.S. Coast Guard
requesting that the agency immediately initiate investigative action related to
GreenHunter, LLC to determine the true contents of waste that Green Hunter, LLC
may be transporting by barge on inland waterways, including the Ohio River and
the Mississippi River, both, sources of drinking water for millions of people .
~letter

of February 17, addressed to Captain Richard Timme, also requests the


~ast Guard to issue a "cease and desist" order to GreenHunter, LLC to stop
transporting any 11 oilfield wastes" while the Coast Guard makes its determination
1

GP1856

of what exactly is being shipped by the company. Additionally, the groups' letter
requests the Coast Guard to initiate an "enforcement penalty proceeding" if,
indeed, the Coast Guard finds Green Hunter in violation regarding possible
shipments of "shale gas extraction wastewater," or SGEWW.
For the past two years, GreenHunter, LLC has been seeking U.S. Coast Guard
~~-P~ermissio~n~to~tr:ans.p_ortfcatkjngJ,yaste oJ1theJ)hio Riv~r or othe?r inland

'

~-~-~-- ~-~,~,

waterways.
The group's letter references a statement by Kirk Trosclair, COO of GreenHunter to
the Wheeling Intelligencer {2/6/15), "GreenHunter Water will continue to
transport 'oilfield waste' until such time as the Coast Guard ultimately decides on
the proper definition of 'shale gas extraction waste water' and the rules under
which such waste water can be transported. Once these rules are finalized,
GreenHunter will comply with these rules and regulations."
The group reads Trosclair's statement that GreenHunter 'will continue to
transport' to mean that the company is actively shipping drilling wastes now, with
impunity and without legal authority."
.
t
"
i

Currently, tracking waste has too many legal exemptions, trade secrets, and
euphemisms associated with it making it difficult to ascertain the precise
components of the tracking waste. This in itself makes this situation not your
typical shipment fortransport down the Ohio River. Obviously, the Coast Guard
needs to know exactly what substances are being transported on the waterways
so that they can protect the public interest.
Dr. Randi Pokladnil< says she "is concerned with the ability of local public drinking
wate~r systems to remove the numerous aromatic organic, carcinogenic and
endocrine disrupting chemicals contained in wastes from shale gas extraction."
"Just the thought of toxic and potentially radioactive unconventional gas well
waste being shipped by barge on the Ohio River sickens me" says Robin Blakeman,
organizer with the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition in Huntington, WV. "I, anda.
three generations of my entire immediate family get our tap water from the
,..._
Huntington, WV intakes. I am appalled that a company like Green Hunter would
2.

GP1857

try to subvert the Coast Guard's authority and may already be shipping this
~oxious substance by barge, as well as by truck near the river's edge. I hope the
.oast Guard and the us EPA will do everything in their power to fully investigate
Green Hunter's operations and stop them from any activity which endangers our
tap waterl"
One Qnlyneeds to consider the recent events ofCharlestonandayette-County,
West Virginia and Toledo, Ohio to grasp the enormity of the consequences of
losing - even temporarily - a source of drinking water.
February 18, 2015
United States Coast GuardO
Sector - Ohio Valley
600 Martin Luther King Jr. Place
-uisville, Kentucky 40202
ATTN: Captain Richard Timme
SUBJ: Request for lnvestig~tive Action: GreenHunter LLC Dear Captain Timme:
We are a coalition of grassroots and nongovernmental organizations which have
long and actively opposed the allowance of barge shipments of oil and gas drilling
wastes from hydraulic fracturing (tracking) - what the Coast Guard calls "shale gas
extraction wastewater," or SGEWW - on inland waterways.
We filed comments in the Coast Guard rulemaking as directed, via Regulation.gov,
and our members include persons imminently threatened with environmental and
health hazards by the content of "SGEWW" which may leak or be volatilized or
burned if barge shipment is permitted in your district. We are copying US EPA
ion IV in Atlanta which has jurisdiction over the Ohio River. Emergency
remediation and incide,nt command control measures by the USCG and US EPA
would be needed if this SGEWW is allowed to be shipped. No public notice has
3

GP1858

been given to first responders along the banks of the river that SGEWW shipments
,..
would be allowed to commence in order for first responders to be given the
requisite training and response equipment to deal with the probable
consequences of SGEWW release or ignition.
It is with growing concern that we have witnessed the unfolding controversy in the
~~--,pas~Lth(e~e~~e~e_ks,,Jn_whicbGre_enl:Lunt..er L.LC,has insistect dl1J:ing_investor ___
presentations that the firm has received Coast Guard permission to ship oU and
gas drilling wastes via barge on the Ohio and Mississippi river systems.
GreenHunter, which has been pursuing permission to ship tracking wastes for
more than two years, has departed from its original scheme to add those wastes
to the Coast Guard list of legal cargoes, and now insists that Captain Richard
Timme has authorized "oilfield wastes" to be river-transported under the terms of
Navigation and Inspection. Circular 7-87. As you know, Dr. Cynthia Znati of the
USCG HQ has publicly denied that SGEWW is a permitted cargo for Ohio River
barge shipment, in part, because of the 70,000 comments receive~ that must be
reviewed, some that include evidence of the radioactivity in the sludge
components which pose risks greater than that of classical "oilfield waste."
We're gratified that Dr. Znati's response to our concerns and news media
questions, correctly communicated the meaning of Captain Timme's
correspondence with GreenHunter, and that the agency is still deliberating the
question of whether USCG would permit SGEWW to be shipped.

We were therefore surprised when GreenHunter LLC defied the USCG authority
over SGEWW shipments by publicly stating its intention to ship these mixed
radioactive and toxic chemical sludge wastes.
On. February 6, 2015,Kirk Trosclair, COO of GreenHunter, told the Wheeling
Intelligencer that, "GreenHunter Water will continue to transport 'oilfield waste'
until such time as the Coast Guard ultimately decides on the proper definition of
'shale gas extraction waste water' and the rules under which such waste water can
be transported. Once these rules are finalized, GreenHunter will comply with these
rules and regulations."
(http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/624568/Radiation~
Concerns-Coast-Guard~html).
4

GP1859

..

--

--------------

-------

_lje read Trosclair's statement that GreenHunter "will continue to transport" to


P'ean that the company is actively shipping drilling wastes now, with impunity and
without legal authority. Regulation does not turn on semantic differences, but
instead, on physical evidence. In the instance of transporting radioactivity"."laced
industrial toxins on public waterways, the lack of evidence of the true nature of
Gr~~nHunte_r's cargoes isofgrave concern. The[efore, we ask that-the Coast Guard
Criminal Investigative Service be asked to examine the contents of the current
shipments and the dockside tanks owned by Green Hunter. If these contain
SGEWW as we believe they do, we ask the CGCIS to initiate enforcement penalty
proceeding or criminal information proceeding in consultation with the Office of
the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio.
The Ohio and Mississippi rivers are a source of drinking water for millions of
people. A January 2015 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
study of the tracking waste stream in Pennsylvania showed that inadequate
traceability and public protections are in place to handle the at-times highlyradioactive tracking emissions and wastes. That study, found here, has prompted
9iliconsideration of Pennsylvania's weak regulations. Among other findings, tracking
waste liquids (SGEWW) contained levels of radioactivity in excess of 26,600 pCi/L.
1 (Copy of pages excerpted from study enclosed). The federal drinking water
standard is 5 pCi/L. Leakage of Green Hunter cargoes into river waters in the
present circumstances, where the company insists it need not test or characterize
its "oilfield wastes" could be catastrophic, and at a minimum, could pose
continuing environmental and health hazards which would stress public water
supplies and various forms of wildlife.
For these reasons, we urgently request that the Coast Guard act immediately to
initiate a criminal investigation of operations ass.ociated with GreenHunter LLC.
Pending discovery of the contents of any barges and storage tanks, including
records of contents of any barge shipments, to issue an immediate cease and
desist order to Green Hunter to halt any shipments of "oilfield wastes" regardless
of the origins claimed by GreenHunter LLC.

.
. Given GreenHunter's
impunity in asserting that they will not follow the USCG HQ
Hazardous Materials Branch Directive, an immediate cease and desist order should

GP1860

accompany the USCG CGCIS to visit to this shipper's site and its barges to take
evidence of the SGEWW movement that would be admissible in the courts.
Please respond immediately respecting the Coast Guard's planned response to
GreenHunter's defiance of the USCG authority over SGEWW in current and past
barge shipments. Thanking you in advance,
Teresa Mills
2319 Parkridge Court
Grove City, OH 43123
On behalf of the signatories that are provided on the following page.
cc:
RADM Kevin Cook, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Hale Boggs Federal Building,
500 Poydras Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Office of Investigation, Coast Guard Criminal Investigative Service
245 Murray Dr. - Bldg. 410 Stop 2600, Washington, DC 20528
James Giattina, US EPA Region IV,
61 Forsyth St. Atlanta, GA 30303
Dr. Cynthia Znati
U.S. Department of Transportation
6

GP1861

.~-

---------

"'est Building, Ground Floor


1200 New Jersey Ave SE
Washington, DC 20590-0001
Signatories:
Concerned Citizens Ohio/Shalersville
Mary Greer
Shalersville, OH
Freshwater Accountability Project .

:. .atra Harper
Grand Rapids, OH 43522
Southeast Ohio Alliance to Save Our Water
Senecaville, OH 43780
Concerned Citizens of Medina County
I

'

Kathie Jones
Medina, OH
CCLT/Uniontown IEL Superfund Site & Stark
nty Concerned Citizens, Christine Borello
Plain Township, Ohio
7

GP1862

Guernsey County Citizens Support on Drilling Issues


Greg Pace
Guernsey County, OH
Morrow County Power
Donna Carver
Mt Gilead, OH
Radioactive Waste Alert
Carolyn Harding

Columbus, OH
Defenders of the Earth Outreach Mission
Rev. Monica Beasley-Martin
Youngstown, OH
Southeastern Ohio Fracking Interest Group
Betsy Cook
Lowell, OH Washington County
West Virginia Sierra Club

Jim Sconyers
Co-Chair, Marcellus Campaign
8

GP1863

"'est Virginia
Center for Health, Environment and Justice
Ohio field office
Teresa Mills
Columbus, OH
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
Robin Blakeman
Huntington, WV

-CT-OV
Patricia Jacobson
Wheeling, WV
Ohio Alliance for People and Environment
Dr. Joseph Cronin
Yellow Springs, OH
Buckeye Forest Council
Heather Cantino, board vice chair
umbus, OH
Concept Zero Student Group
9

GP1864

David Nickell
West Kentucky Community College, KY
Southwest Ohio No Frack Forum
Joanne Gerson
Cincinnati, OH
Athens County Fracking Action Network
Roxanne Groff, steering committee member
Athens, OH
Licking County Concerned Citizens for Public
Health and Environment
Carol Apacki
Licking County, OH
Jefferson County Ohio Citizens for
Environmental Truth
Jonathan Smuck
Steubenville, OH
Cumberland Chapter Sierra Club
Judy Lyons, Chair
10

GP1865

"'xington, KY
Frackfree America National Coalition
Diana Ludwig
McDonald, OH
FaCT - Faith Communities Together
Ron Prosek, Convener
Ohio
Frackfree Mahoning Valley

sie Beiersdorfer

!. .

Youngstown, OH
Guardians of Mill Creek Park
Lynn Anderson
Youngstown, OH
Clean Water Action Pennsylvania
Steve Hvozdovich
Pittsburgh, PA
- A r e Not Expendable
John Williams
11

GP1866

Trumbull County, OH
People for Safe Water
Marilyn Welker
Springfield, OH
Network for Oil and Gas Accountability and
Protection Vanessa Pecec
Concord Twp., OH
Coshocton Environmental and Community
Awareness
Nick Teti
Coshocton, OH
Communities United for Responsible Energy
Caitlin Johnson
Youngstown, OH
Concerned Barnesville Area Residents
John Morgan

Belmont County, OH
Appalachian Ohio Sierra Club
12

GP1867

,raine Mccosker
Athens, OH
Northwest Ohio Alliance to Stop Fracking
Leslie Harper
Wheeling Water Warriors
Robin Mahonen
Wheeling, WV
Friends of Bell Smith Springs

.;rnstearns
Stonefort, IL
Food & Water Watch
Alison Auciello, Ohio organizer
Cincinnati, OH
[Category: Environment]
TNS 24HariCha 150219 30FurigayJane-5034306 30FurigayJane
Memo: Teresa Mills, 614/507-5651, tmills@chej.org
. . Index terms: Trade Associations; Press Releases
. . . . Dateline: COLUMBUS, Ohio
Record: 5034306
13

GP1868

Partridge, George (EEC}

f/!om
:~;
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:15 PM
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
RE: Swipe ssamples

AJ;
Please send me the analytical results from all the wipe samples that we collected that day and I will incorporate it with
my notes, the coordinates, etc.
I want the results from the school as well. Ideally, I would like to see us merge the our reports and conclusions since
this was a join effort.
Thank you,
George

______

____________ ______
......,,..;

From: Bhattacharyya, Anjan


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:31 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Swipe ssamples

od morning George:
' . . supervisor Curt Pendergrass is requesting any documentation that would accompany the swipe samples we took on
the field in front of the landfill entrance, done at different locations on either side of the entry access road to the facility.
If you recall these are samples F-1 through F-9 taken 12/27/16. I would appreciate it if you can scan and send me the
report which could be a short narrative and would include the readings, GPS locations and a sketch (or map) of the
approximate area at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your consideration.
Best Regards

I
I

AJ

AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492

https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

GP1869

Partridge, George (EEC)

--om:
:nt
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Weems, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:58 PM
Thomas, Richard F (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
manifests
Blue Ridge Landfill.xlsx

Here is the breakdown on the manifests; some material left off; some unreadable.

GP1870

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:04 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: Attendees: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

To:
Subject:

George;

I am still waiting and requesting the results from all the wipe samples that were taken, both for the school as well as the
ones we took surrounding the entrance to the landfill.
I asked Matt at the meeting the names of others there and he could not remember their names. Said it would be in
there reports. Hopefully I will get a copy we can combine with our notes.
The names I have are to the best of my recollection:

(AJ) Anjan Bhattacharya (CFHS)


Curt Pendergr~ss (CHFS)
Kathy L. Fowler (CHFS)
Matthew (Matt) W. McKinley (CHFS)
Christopher J. Keffer (CHFS)
Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire Department

~mbers of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team


Estill County Judge-Executive Wallace Taylor
Jeff Saylor - Estill County School District Superintendent

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016.2:32 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from Saturday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you heard
anything from Curt? Do We know what came out yesterday?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:16 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
George;

.eting scheduled for tomorrow moring!

George

GP1871

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:24 AM

..

To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Do you have a list of participants?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
___ cc-Io:JY1abr:iar,_Jon_(EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
c

__

__

__

Jon;
.

With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KV, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activit.ies conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where. we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.

This is very important!


Thank you,
George

<jeor9e P. Partritfee Jr~


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP1872

Partridge, George (EEC)

~om:
To:
S~!'t:

Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Pendergrass, Curt (CHfS DPH)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:57 PM
Delivered: RE: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016

Your message has been,cielivered to the following recipients:


Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) (Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016

GP1873

Sent:
Subject:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:08 PM
Read: RE: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016

Your messagf3
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
. Subject: RE: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:57:21 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:07:39 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1874

Partridge, George (EEC)

#om:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:09 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Ct1rt;
Thanks you for responding to Mr. Kalt regarding the measurements that were shared regarding the waste. Most of all,
thanks for following up on obtaining samples of the waste that was shipped.
I am happy to join you for any trips or sites visits to assist with all we need to learn about the waste.
Thanks again for all you are doing!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
A"iiank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation .of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
,...contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to Contactthose laboratories Where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Ra.diation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
_..Jll 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~ 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov{ dph/radioactive.htm
1

GP1875

Pay your fees on line at https://prd.cllfs.ky.gov/rad epay/


Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljw\Vw.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM

To:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

~~~--~cc:PartriClge~ GeoFge-(EEC};McRTfiley;-MattneWW"(CRS=PHr~~-~-

-~ ~- ---~------------

' -----~------- -

~--- --~ ~'--

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,

Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2

11
12

D2
l

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 rriR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:

Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:


With. a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:

GP1876

Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

---te, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

(lg ~_away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

'dRegards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412--680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
~rtunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
3

GP1877

inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
ra.diochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a Uttle more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. ls that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
- -- --"'--

-~---

.- __,___

,_.-~~---~--~~-..-~,,.....-

_;-_-___ :

--~~--~-~~-.

~~~

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC} and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky,govI dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees online at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulatfon changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~m.\lanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM

To:

Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?


4

GP1878

Still trying to track this information down .


. . . . 3.
...

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste --similar in nature?


----~

-----

'

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non~hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of.
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 201.5, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
. A..ove. background. The average. reading of all s~mples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267. R/hr (0.000?267
~/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr): As published by the
.Nudear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removecl via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering pedod on-:site, the boxeswere received by Advanced TE NORM Services for
dewateririg and solidification, as appropriate to Pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering pro~ess and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be ellminated.
.

5. Is th~re analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on rpanagement
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non"'.Hatardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysisthat was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know .

. . Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
5

GP1879

Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412.:680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail ls Intended only for the individual or entity to whom It Is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If yqu receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM

To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211:869. http://www.lrc~ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


{8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" {NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity ofrocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically en.hafrced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm


{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.govfstatutes/sfatute.aspx?id=8502
{3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material {NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
6

GP1880

material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

- 5 211.869 Penalties. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes[statute.aspx?ld=SSOS


(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offe_nse.
Central Mid~est Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
-.__The public health and safety hazard presented by TENORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensedTENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed -LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
ntucky Radiation Health Branch
5 East Main Street
Mailstop HSiC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564~1492

E-m.ail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:l/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

ri_

" .

~~~

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
: ...8:he agency res. ponsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
~ily Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
7

GP1881

Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set

-~-~-~~.-- -~~~~J~~~~~-~p~a-~l~} -----~----

----- -- -- - ~------ -- ~--------~-----~- ----~-. ------~~-~-~--~-~-----

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents {including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From:

Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To:

Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred u.s to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

GP1882

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
man(lgec:I the waste, a_ndthat I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my ccill yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

{ieorge P. Partritfae Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q,'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP1883

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:10 PM
'Kalt, Brian'
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr. Kalt;
Thank you,
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To:. Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Penderqrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
---nk you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
.
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
1

GP1884

The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading_ is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this '
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind 'releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter;
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, lfadioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS:LC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR,aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radic,ition becomes
spread over a larger area, The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2

D2
1

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
2

GP1885

Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:


a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
~~ed the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.

,.,6J;lh

Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples:
(Distance fr()rn ~()urce)
---- -

---

---

' -

Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(~ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
41i1t1sitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the det~ctiOn equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: {Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes {.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

-dRegards,

Brian Kalt
3

GP1886

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more

information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of.2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC} and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses ofbeer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov

GP1887

From: Kalt,Brian[mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.coni]
Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM

sent:

- fo:Part:i-1ci9e~Geor9e-(EEc);--Pencier9rass,-curt-(tt=ii=sbPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 4.7 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's(FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics'and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 fons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sod.iurn sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to .
capture barium, a toxic constituent in sdme brines, as barium sulfate and to capt~re radium, as radium sulfate~ to form .
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non:..hazardous.

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.

, ~the second half of 2015., FBP's slud~e had exhibited very, v_ery.low levels of n.atur.ally.occurring ra_dioac.t.i.ve material
ve background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
5

GP1888

than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
'
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.

.. Js there anal~tical data.Pnihe.wa~~~a.vailabLELto-.b.elp.us.w1dersJand~theJmpact,tbatJ11dlLbaY.e~on,maoagemenL ~~~

~~s_

of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non:.Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

~--~~~~~~~~~

The information 1=ontained in this e-rnai.1 is intended only for the individual or entity tp whom it is ciddressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disdose, disseminate; copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e:.mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [rnailto:George.Parttidge@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016

Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
6

GP1889

Hello Mr. Kalt,

,_promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically entfahce-d by controllable practices {or by past human prai::tices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11 TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:l/www.lrc:.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive -material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

tits

211.869 Penalties. http:((www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505

(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a-civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcoinpact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
____Disposal of TENO RM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the R~gional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TENO RM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal iri place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,

Curt Pendergrass PhD


.A>ervisor, Radioactive_ Materials Section
Wlre'ntucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
7

GP1890

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky~gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww .crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Ccill on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson

On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:


Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412~680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

----------------,.--------,----------~------,-----~--

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
8

GP1891

..

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Callon February 26, 2016


Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
--

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understandirig was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure .

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have r_eceived.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
A description of the containers used for the shiprnent of the waste.
Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
.management of the landfill?
1.
2.
3.

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
9

GP1892

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<geor9e P. Partrirfae Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q:EP


- - .. C -

~-~-~~--D-epai:tmentJor:mLir:onmentaLerotection ---~~~~-~-~---~
..~~~~~---~- --

KY Division of Waste Management


200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor {SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

10

GP1893

Partridge, George (EEC) .

tlam:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:23 PM
'Kalt, Brian'
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr. Kalt;
Thank you for your assistance,
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
. o r to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, topy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

t/l,bjed-. RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
1

GP1894

Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section


Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive.htm
~~~- ~ea~yaudees.11nJine~at~https:tpr:d'.chfs.ky_go\lhr:ad~epavl~~-~=

. -~~~--- _
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Hwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

Rtt1Jl4~
r~t>\n.~&M~tl.f
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc:: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc:: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
2

GP1895

The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what.we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.

did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for ~malysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy fo contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pehdergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2

- = -2-

]l

D2
1

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
3

GP1896

Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:


With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law&_
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.

Radiation dose= (Dose Rate. mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2

Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.

If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Example~: (Time exposed to source)

Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)


If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 m,inutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
4

GP1897

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

,2-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysisresults from both Reliance Laboratories ancl the Summit Environmental
Techncilogie~Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Som<i!thing that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra~228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portionfor
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available .

o, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on wbat type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
.model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 footfrom the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.


Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street

~lstop HS1C-A.
- k f o r t , KY 406.21
WTel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
5

GP1898

Website: http://www.chfs.ky,gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentuckv.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted
sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
,.',.,..,,.
.
. .
.
.
.

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


_-_ To: Partridge, George (EEC}; Pendergrass, curt(CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

~~-~-~~--~~-~-----~--~-~-

-----

-------------~-~------~~--~-=-~-~-

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' arid Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still tryingto track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's {FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan {Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program atthe Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services pkked up 86.5.33 tons of material.
-

4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radil!m, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This_ chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
to be non-hazardous.
been determined
.
.
.
-
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfa~e; it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant. In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0~0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr {0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
6

GP1899

than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

~~rrently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVPEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

I l l e informati.on

contain~

in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom It is addressed. Its contents (including

any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Parttidge@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian

Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016


Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


t: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
7

GP1900

Hello ML Kalt,

As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
-~,~ ~ret:hnolo-gita"lly-~n-h-a-nce-d-byctrntrallable practices-( or lly pasrh-urrfaf1p-racfices );"~-~~--~~--~-~~-~~ -3

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside th.e region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsis}ent with polices Qf the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:l/www.lrc.ky.govI statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.8651 or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000} nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000}. Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcotnpact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Pian.pdf)
__Disposal of TENO RM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC~A

GP1901

'

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
ax: 502-564-1492
-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone call on February 26, 2016

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
. n Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank"you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what.levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


9

GP1902

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
""""""''-~.-~-----~-----=-~---,.,,,~~--=~~~~~~,.~-,..-

-----------

-------'C __

-g.-___

-_.:_ __ _:~====-~~-~-~-~--~~----

.-,-----~~-~...,.....--....,,.,,......-=--~--7"------"---=--="----------=---------'="~~~

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licerisure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped .in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.

10

GP1903

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(jeorge 'P. Partricfae Jr., Pfi'D, P.'.E., Q.'.EP


Departmentfor Environmental Protection.
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image001.gif>

11

GP1904

. . . . .

Partridge, George (EEC)

--r~m:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:25 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on F~bruary 26, 2016

Cu_rt; ...
Thank you for keeping me updated and all the helpful information you are receiving.
George
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Cail on February 26, 2016

Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the ~mount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, .you mentioned that the ~IL1dge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do YPl1 have any of thi.s sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
A..Pna or don. scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom ofa deep settling pond.The picture of the pond on your
~ebsite looks like it would be difficult to sample.
.
.
.

Currently, FBP cjoes not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is. removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for de\/1/atering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solic:fification process, the extremely low levels ()f naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.

GP1905

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: turt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www;chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
2

GP1906

I
I

.~.'

TIOft: np.i.1"*

C,

Kalt, Brian [mallto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone.Call.on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
-sclose., disse. minate, copy or print its contents . lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~lete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.~v]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, MatthewW (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26,.2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E~mail: curt.pendergrass@kv.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
your fees cm line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www:crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

.A'

GP1907

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM

To:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e~mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and

delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergtass@ky.gov]


. .
..
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM

To:

Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKi,nley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation ofthe inverse square law. And thank you for letting us kl1ow that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mtern/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assumihgthey still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

GP1908

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Mntucky Radiation Health Branch
East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564.:.3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-:564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
We~~ite: http://www.chfs.ky'.gov/dph/rad ioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~.nwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

.-:.s

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com1

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
a!llliidiograp.hi.c inspe.ction, the.ra.diation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Th.. erefore, the intensity
. .the radiat.ion follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose.Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
- p i e s : (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
5

GP1909

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem

If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)

Source reading:, 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)


If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1910

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM

M_o: Kalt, Brian

. : ; c : Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from certified referenced lab woUJd be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring. Laboratory? We would be more than happy
to come pick
up
..
.
the samples if they are available.

Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you too.k the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The aver:age reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0,0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 niR/hr), As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and .United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assis.tance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioac;tive M.aterials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.
.
.
~

~: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
7

GP1911

Gentlemen,

Please see the responses in green to your questions below.

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Ja:son
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituentin some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
.doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan .

. FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
raclium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 arid early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in na:ture fo sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As. published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose ()f drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on~site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENO RM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management.
of the landfill?

GP1912

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
. e Non-Hazardous Material.

If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian -Kalt President


Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom .it is addressed. Its c;ontents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information: If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian

.bject: RE: Phone can on February 26, 2016


Curt;
Tha_nk you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
oactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
..
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

GP1913

(10) "Region" means the geographical area ofthe state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-o-ccurring ~adioacti\/e-materia-1 (NOR-M) as defined in KRS 21i.862(B)

shalibe the e>Cdus~iv-e~~-~~~~

regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRs 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.govI statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, d~sposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky;gov/d ph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of ..unwanted
sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
. .
:;ti,
-

10

GP1914

--.

---------~-~------~---------

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

o: Kalt, Brian

c: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may h.ave regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Fa_mily Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for .Putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kent1,.1cky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine
412-680-6244

Pro~essing,

LLC

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. I.ts
contents(including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intehded recipient you rnust not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e~mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent:, Friday,
February 26.
2016 5:36 PM
.
. 1

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;

"

I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the.
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
11

GP1915

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming tha.t I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge ~andfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on th~ waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
manageme11t of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division arid Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

(1eor9e P. PartridfJe Jr., PfiV,, P.'E., Q,'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
12

GP1916

Partridge, George (EEC)

._rom:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:27 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

C:t.Jrt;
Thank you for following up on this!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:11 AM
To: Kalt; Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
How about. we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them .. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment .

rt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C~A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502~564-1492
E-mail: curt;pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.c:hfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd'.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified ofproposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~nwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

--....-,--------..,..--~---

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on Februar.y 26, 2016
Pendergrass,

GP1917

The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President

...C..

Fairmont~Brine1>rocessing1ll
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM
To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley; Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February26, 2016
Sorry to hear that Mr. t<alt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same.
back your earlier e- .
mails, you mentioned that the sli.idge was being dewatere.d on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material
currently on site that we can easily. access to take a sample of what you are now processing.
that Y
.. ou would
.
.
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on yQur settling
pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep.settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficultto sample.

~ooking

Currently, FBP does not physically dewatei" the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORIVI
Services for dewatering and solJdific~tion, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then (anc:lfilled, Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.

GP1918

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pehdergrass@ky.gov
.....Asite: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

W'Wv

GP1919

.From:

.Kai~, ~rian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.co_m_]-..,,;,~----_..,....-----~-_._,..,.;..-..---~----~----

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPlO
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call .on February 26, 2016
~~or:Peneletgrass,

I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a tlient requests a longer period oftime
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-6800:6244

The information contained in this e-rnail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its conterlts(induding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply .e-'mail and

delete an<;! destroy the message.

from:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

$~nt: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM

To::Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir:
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-'mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive.htm
Pay yourfees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be. notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1920

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards~

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680..:6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~sdose, disseminate, copy or. print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply .e~mail and
,..lete and destroy the message. .
.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thoro1,.1gh explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 rnrern/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for.radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
- i n e d these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

GP1921

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A.
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov

.. ... , ~Webstte:..httn:Llwww~cbfs.k:t.gmtLdnbLrad.i.oactiY,e.btm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd;chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers .calculated above background. In

radiograp~i.c.inspection1 the radiation spread. s outas it tr~vels away f.rom th. e source. Therefo.re, th: intensity.
of the rad1at1on follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of

radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to cakl11ate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other dist!'mce. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2

Examples: (Distance from source)


Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
6

GP1922

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem

you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1.ft away)A2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2 . = 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem
(2 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
4!11turce reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs)* (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
te and destroy the message.

GP1923

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced labwouid
great to ~have. Would you mind reaching out to these
companies and .
inq1,1iring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.

be

tWO

Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what. did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0;2267 R/hr
(0,0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008GS2 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.


Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
IViailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E..:mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on. line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epav/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM.


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
8

GP1924

Gentlemen,
.lease see the responses in green to your questions below.

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2 ... Whomanufactur:ed the shipping containers? .
Still trying to track this information down.
3.

What. was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TE NORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfatE!; a soluble compound whose predominant use is in.the manufac;ture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous .

. . .hen .soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium,.FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive materi_al
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
. mR/hr). The highest reading (1 fobt from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking sevi;?ral glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After som~ dewatering period on:site, the boxes were received by AdyanC:ed TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filtertest, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of nat~rally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
- 5 . Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

GP1925

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.

If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,
~. ----~Brian~Kalt~--

--

.~. --~-=~.-~~~----

.----=-= ~~--~~- -.

-----------=

.-~---~.~~~~~-

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents, If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:.George.Partridge@ky.gov]

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 io:07 AM

Curt;
Thankyou for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February29,2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); i<alt,Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon_ (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.B~l to 211.869. http:ljwww.lrt.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated_
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionudide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

10

GP1926

11

11

(10) Region means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 .KAR 100:010. De.finitions for 902 KAR Olapter 100. http:ljwwwJrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
11
1) Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11 TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
en separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:ljwwwJrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS.211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, ifthe imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices ofthe commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
.

A
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
~dionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky;gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs'.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~.nwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

11

GP1927

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

To: Kalt, erian


Cc: Partridge; George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
F~bruary 26, 2016

Subject: Re: Phone Call on

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family
Services
(CHFS).
__ ...,._. ____, -. - - -

~-~~-~-'--------

--~--- -=""'-~~~---0~-=----------~~~~-==-.,.-----

-=~--~-~--

----=~~-~~--~-~~-~~-~-,,,~-------~-=~-~"=--"""""",,--~

Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
12

GP1928

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
cont~ct shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified priorto being sent to the landfill.

Our c,mderstanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Kentucky does notregulate TENORM?
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.

We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented .to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<jeor9e P. Partricfee Jr., PfiV, P.'., Q,'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
13

GP1929

Partridge, George (EEC)

a.,m.
..._.-nt:.
To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:27 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Curt;
Thank you for following up on this!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:11 AM

To: Kalt; Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdic~ion
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.

~rt

Pendergrass PhD
Wpervisor, Radioactive .Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~-------

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM

To: Pendergrass; Curt. (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
. _ . Pendergrass,

GP1930

The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
I

President

,__c_. ~--palrmOTITBriffe-ProtKsfnrttC-c_c_ ...~-~-~~---~~-~~~~412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addres.sed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM

Te>:

Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, MatthewW (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has

tra. nspired. But th._anksfo r_ checking on the. sa. m_ pies with Summit. an. d Reliance j.u. st the. sam. e. Looking
.. ba.ck. y.our earlier.e-.
mails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes~ Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would,....
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boatto float on your settling
pond or don scuqa gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture ofthe pond on your .
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled~ Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.

,
2

GP1931

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pehdergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive .htm
.your fees on line at https:f/prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
otified of proposed regulation changes https:f/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
3

GP1932

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM.

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) .


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-:PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

I j{jst spoke with Summit, and they keep sarnples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-rnail is intended only forthe individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
anv attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. 1fyou are not an intended recipient you rmist not use,
disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply
and
..
delete and destroy the message.
.

dis~lose,

e~mail

:9
-

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DpH) [mailto:Curt.Pehdergrass@ky.gov]

S~nt: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM


TQ.:. Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W(CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on Febr\,lary,26, 2016

Thank you sir.


Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Ken.tucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.govId ph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epav{
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentuckv.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljw\11/w.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1933

~m: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

't:

Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

To:

Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or. entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
dis.close, disseminate, cop.y or print its co11tents. lfyou receive this e~mail in error, pleas.e notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016


Thank you Mr, Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrein/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded.Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.

You did not answer my question but would you be willing fo contact those laboratories where you previously sent t.his
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
ease let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

GP1934

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Ra.diation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-'1492
EMmail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dQh/rad_ioactive .~ti:n
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:l!secure;kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
'

~~

..

..

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt {CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiati.on becomes weaker as it spreads out fr()m the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.

In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Not.e: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose. rate, ft)"2

Examples: (Distance from source)


Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
6

GP1935

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
. o u were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away}"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away}"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
.ource reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)

9'ou

were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.

If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and

, ~ete and destroy .the message.

GP1936

---~---

----------From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday,
To: Kglt, Brian

February 29, 2016 4:29 PM

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of thi.s material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
- .. from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reachlng-out~to-these-two companies.and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available ..
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance ar;id Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second. half of2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring rad.ioactive
material above. background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.00086S2 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

Thanks again for your cooperation and assis.tance in.this matter.


Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky RadiC1tion Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u11wanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

__

-----

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

.. --------~-------------

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
8

GP1937

Gentlemen,
. .ase see the responses in green to your questions below.

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Each box can hold up t.o 25 yards. length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2. Who manufactured_the shipping containers? .
Still trying to track this information down.
3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
.been determined to be non-hazardous.

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
9ctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radi.um with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water trecitment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr(0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) Was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and l,lnited States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the d.ose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is rernoved via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated .
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

GP1938

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

-------

-Br:ian~Kalt---~---------~~-----------------

----

--------

---~----~------- ---~--~--~~-~---~~----~--~--~~-----~~

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partr_idge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridqe@ky.gov]


..
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
'.

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

-------------------------------

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,

As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 195~, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive _material does not _include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

10

GP1939

11

11

(10) Region means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. D.efin. itions for 90.2KAR.Chapter100. http:l/www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
1) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11 TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
en separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in:and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
{3) Naturally-,occurring radioactive material {NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material {NORM} from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:L/www .lrc.ky.govI statutes/ statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less th~n ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www'.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
--.Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility

_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the

dionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TEN ORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:/jprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:/jsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:/jwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

11

GP1940

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and

~~l~l!li!Y Seryt~~s (~Hfi}. _..~~~~. ..... ~~~- --~~ _-.~.-. --~-~~~--~.~--.~- . . ---~---~-~~--~-~--~~~~--~~-~~~Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian.<BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680~6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.

The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
12

GP1941

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste wa~ sent directly to the landfill.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.

We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the conta.iners used for the shipment of the waste.


2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total guantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analyticaldata on the waste available to help us understand the im~actthat will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written requestfrom KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be dir~cted to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,

..

George

(jeor9e P. Partritfee Jr., Pfi'lJ, P.'E., e:EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
13

GP1942

200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)


Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

<imageOOl.gif>

I
14

GP1943

Partridge, George (EEC)


om:
. .nt:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:28 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: Manifests so far

George;
Thank you!
George
From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:17 AM


To: Thomas, Richard F (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Manifests so far
So far I have loads almost into February, in fact the 2ih of January.

GP1944

Partridge, George (EEC)

A.om
~t:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:30 PM
'Frame, Jason R'
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Jason;
I appreciate all you are doing to assist our respective Cabinets that Dr. Curt Pendergrass and I serve in.

George Partridge
KDWM

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt,
I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

.ason R. Frame B.S. R.T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


.itfice of Environmenta.I Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
.
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)?56-4303 ,,
Fax: (304) 558-0524
.
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

Wo Capitol Street, .Room 313

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 201610:11 AM
o Kalt, Brian
.
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L {CHFS PH)

. .~ect: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


1

GP1945

How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking With them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
fa.c. ility. You said the s. ludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Sec.tion
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
. -.~.-Z.7.-l)-6ast-Main~trnet-~~--CC....... _~--~~~-- -~-~----C---.--~ . ---~-~-~-.. ~--~~-~---~---~-~--.~~-~~~-~-~.~=~
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes htt~s://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM

To:F>endergrass,.Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew ,W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

M.r. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM


2

GP1946

To: Kalt, Brian

.
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016 .

cc:

w(CHS-PH)

' r r y to hear that Mr. Kai! but I was thinking thatwas probably going to be the case given the amount of.time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site dew;:itering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to floaton your settling
pond or don scuba gear totake sludge sample atthe bottom of a deep settling po11<J~Ih~_p_if1l!I~J>Hh~_PQ!ld~cmyQlJ_(
website lool<ifike-it would be difficult io sample.~ - --~------

in

----c-

..

'

----- ----

..

Currently, FBP cfoes not physically d.ewater the sludge on:-site. The sludge is removed via pum.p into .standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TE NORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatefing process arid solidification process, the extremely low levels ()f naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated .

GP1947

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htrn
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
4

,
GP1948

Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended onfy for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~ close, dis.semi.nate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail and
. . . . .ete and destroy the message.
.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive .htm
your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. .notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd~org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1949

---

- - - - ----

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


~~~r: Pencfergrass,

I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is add_ressed. Its contents (including
any attachments} are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

ra

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9~02 AM

To:

Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading With
the Fairmont Brine
Processing
sludge
did indeed
read 2 mrem/hr.
.
.. .
.
.
..
.
.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see. if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH o~ WV
.to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy t() contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again foryour cooperation and assistance in this matter,

GP1950

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
~tucky Ra.diation Health Branch
~ East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website:. http:f/www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwant~d sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, 6rian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,

Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
~diographic i.nspection, the radiation spread. s out.as it travels awayfro. m the source. T.herefore, the intensity
. .the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiat.ion becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.

In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

11

Di

l2

D1

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose {measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source {at contact, say 0;25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.

Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feetl''2
{Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)/\2
-mples: {Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact {assumed 0.25" from source)
7

GP1951

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note,.at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is 11ot
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)

Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)


If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1952

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
: Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC);. McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of thi.s material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find, Something that actually put a nmbertQJf'le ac.t.!JaJpCj/gforJ~a:226_and_Ba~228 .
from a certifie-ct reterenceci..iat>wo-uld be great to have. would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are availabl.e.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information.onwhat type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, ccilibration date). lfyou took. a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?

'

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (lfoot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr), As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower thanthe dos.e of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assista.nce in this matter,
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD .
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502'."564-1492
Email: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.goV/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees onllne .at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulatic>n changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of.~nwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

,.,.-~-~------~-~-----------------------~..~--------'~-

: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

ent: Monday, Februa~ 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
9

GP1953

- - - - -

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
~- -~ ~~-2 ... Who~manufac;tur:ed~tl:ie-Shipping.cor:itainers1~.~

__ . ~--

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted i;ind approved by Ja.son
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, Cl toxic coristitu~htin some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate; to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has

been determinedto be non-hazardous.


When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan ..

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBPmonitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no.
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water tre(ltment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) Was only 0~8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower.
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana {0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewaterthe sludge on-site. The sludge is rernoved via pump into stamfard
dewatering
period on~site, the boxeswere received by Advanced
TENORM Serviees
for
dewatering boxes. After some
.
.
.
.
..
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radiocictive
materials were to be eliminated.
'

5.

'

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

10

GP1954

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysi.s that was conducted on
~ Non-Hazardous Material.
tr::nything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian:Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian

-bject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
..,...A~s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
~ioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

11

GP1955

(10) "Region" means the geographical area ofthe state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:llwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.Q.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

&..
"W

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id==8502
~~~---~~~~~--~--~----~~

--~~~

(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low".'Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www'.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__-Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agendes will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.

Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
MailStop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Wet?site: htfo://www.chfs.ky.gov/d ph/radioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified C>f proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentuckv.gov/Regwatch/
~ispose of u1;1wanted sources_http://www:crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

12

GP1956

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

..8 Kalt, Brian

~Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone call on February 26, 2016

. .

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should pe directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services {CHF~).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 a~d 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-,.6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the. individual or entity to whom it is addressed. I.ts
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intMded recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If. you receive this. e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail and dele.te and de~troy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared, with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13

GP1957

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding' was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any .unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates th~ management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, aricfthat I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role.as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the cont(liners used for the shipment of the waste.


2. Who manufactured .the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am al.so glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understa-nd better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<geor9e P. Partri<fee Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q.,'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Ma,nagement
14

GP1958

Partridge, George (EEC}

ttlam:

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:31 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Curt; .
Thank you!
George

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:33 AM
To: Frame, Jason R

.
Ct: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thanks Jason . .I would very much appreciate your accompaniment and your assistance on our visit to Fairmont Brine.
Hopefully Friday works well for you. The sooner we get these sludge samples to our lab f9r radiochemical analysis, the
bett,fr.
Curt Pendergrass PhD .:
~erv.is.or, R. adioactive Materials Section
~tucky Radiation Health Branch
275 EastMain Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort,.KY 40621
Tel: 502-564""3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Webs.ite: http:/jwww .chfs.ky.gov(dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:/jprd.chfs.kv.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:/jsecyre.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:/jwww .crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR'.aspx

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt,
. .uld like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


1

GP1959

Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division


350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:11 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


How about we pay you a Visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accom. p.. any us on this.samp.Hng trip to yo.ur Fa.irmont, WV facility. We.never go int.o another agencies jurisdict.ionJl!a
without first checking with them, And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and y o u .
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY40621
Tel: 502-564~3700~;:'.l}83

:.'}

Fax: 502-564-1492 :
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://\N'J.JW.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://ord;chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.
.";:;.
...
.
.
.

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


2

GP1960

Mr.

Pendergrass~

slud~e

th~ mlddl~

-e
does not accumulate Jn either of the Jarge ponds you see in the picture below, butrather in
of the
picture in what loo!<s like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily .. What
day wpuld work for you and or your team?

"''

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The Information cor:itained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addre~sed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an inte.nded retipient yqu'must notuse, '
disdose, disseminate, copy 6r;print its contents. If you receive this e~mail in error, please notify the seride~ byr~ply:e~mail arid
delete and destroythe message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:CurtPendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM .
To: Kalt, Brian
.
.
.

; Pa.rtridge,.Geol'.ge (E~C); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


119'>Ject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016 .

Mr.

Sorry to hear that


Ka it but I was thinking that wa.s probably going to be the case given the an10unfoftime that has
transp)red.J~ut thariks for cheC:klng on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same, tookiog back your earUer emails, you rnE!QtJohed;tii~t the slUdge was being dewatered on site in dew~tering boxes. Do you have any of this'sllJ~ge
material currently on"site that we can ea~ily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that ybu would
mind us corning to get? I am not familiar with your fadlity but I really don't wish to get in a boat to floa~ on ypur settling
pond or dpn'scl.lba;geartotak.e sJllqge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture oft.he ppndpnyoiir ..
website looks like.it~ould be~ifficult1:o sample.

'
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering. boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels 'of naturcilly
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated .

..
3

GP1961

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htrn
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
4

GP1962

--~-'------~-,...~~---------------------~..,..-------~-

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period oftime
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
, ~~ose, disse.minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
. ~te and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016


Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/rad ioactive.htm
your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. .otified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1963

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
I

~~-~~orPenoergras-s7~~------~~-

-_ ------

--~-~-~------~~~-~--~=---~~~-~~~~--~~--~~--~~-- --~~~-----~~--

I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is add_ressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and.
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday,
To: Kalt, Brian

March 02, 2016 9:02 AM

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr, Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
1

You did not answer my question b_ut would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis fo see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
m()terial to our office for.radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.

Please .let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter,

GP1964

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
. . . .ntucky Radiation Health Branch
~.5 East Main Street
.
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-'564..:1492
E~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:/jwww:chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) ,
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone can on February 26, 2016


Dr. Pendergrass,

Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
-iograp. hic inspection, the rad. ia.tion spreads out as it travels away from the s.ource.. Th. erefore, the intensity
. h e radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typieally known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2
D2
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
I

. - p i e s : (Distance from source)


1.

Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
7

GP1965

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
--~~-~---~~- -----=-=-:='~~-.,...,----"=----

>7-"'-""'"'-~c"'-"'""~-~-~-~~-

Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2

--,,,--~~~-~.,.,._~-~-~-~~~~

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*{0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0;166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP1966

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@!(y.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM

: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, ~eorge (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
,

Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both ~eliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hopin~ to find. Somethin:S that actually put a number to tile actual J.>C::i/gfor fta-226 cind Ra,i28
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so; if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are av.ailable.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. tan you give me a .little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using w.hen you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). lfyou took a background with this instrument, what did it read?You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to R~liance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?

In the second half of2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background; The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr)~ As
published by the Nuclear.Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dos.e of drinking several glasses of beer per !lour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation an.d assistance in this m;:itter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materi~ls Section
Kentucky Ra.di.ation Health Brarich
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 4Q621
Tel: 5Q2~564.:.3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: httb:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwante.d sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

..a:-:~K-a-lt-,~B~ria-n-[m-a--i-lto_:_B~Ka-1-t@_t__a-ir_m_o-nt-b-ri-ne-.-co-m~]~~-------

Wlfn't; Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC);

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


9

GP1967

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program atthe Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to.
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic naiure becomes so benign that it is u:;ed by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can
seen by
x-ray or CT scan.

be

4'

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Becau!;e of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 ahd early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typic:al drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0'.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on'-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on..:site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring r(ldioaC:tive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

10

GP1968

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Milterial.

fl/!_

If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-'6244

'

The information contained in this e-mail .is intended. only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [maHto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) .

Cc: Kalt, Brian


. b j e c t : RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;

Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.


George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id:::i8501

'

(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" {NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
~s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
~oactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
'

11

GP1969
------

-----

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

AA

902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:l/www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive.Material "TENORM"means N.0.R.M., which has .._.,
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:l/www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
---~~

.--

~.

-=--

-~~~~~-~-,~~--~=~:.:

.. ----

~~~~~~~.-~~-

.. --

.. - .

~~ -~

.....

-~~~~~~-

(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material {NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission .
.KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:l/www~lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate L.ow-tevel Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www'.cmcompact.org/f)ublications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENO RM Waste
Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licen.sed LLRW disposal facility.

at

Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky;gov/dph/radioactive. htrn
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky;gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwcinted
'.
.. sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.
.
.
.

12

GP1970

-------.-.------.--.--

-~~-----~-----~--.-.

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

nt: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

.
Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson .
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring r~dioactive material has Kentucky sel:
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards;

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (in~luding any attachmen!s) are confidentialand may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its con.tents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


..
.
.
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;

I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13

GP1971

------------------

---

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste s9lidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

'

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is-responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure ofthe wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all t_he waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that Will have on
management of tile landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
!appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<jeor9e P. PartririiJe Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q,'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
14

GP1972

To:

Subject:

Frame, Jason R <Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov>


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:36 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

No problem

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message -------From: "Partridge, George (EEC)" <George.Partridge@ky.gov>


Date:03/02/2016 5:30 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Frame, Jason R'' <lason.R.Frame@wv.gov>
Cc:
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Jason;
I appreciate all. you are doing to a.ssist our respective Cabinets
that Dr. Curt Pendergrass and I serve in.
I

-~ Partridge

---------

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303

Fax: (304) 558-0524


Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

GP1973

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 201610:11 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them .. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can.bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502..:564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Websit.e: http://www.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:/fprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016


Mr. Pendergrass,

tt"A.

The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the .middle of
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

GP1974

Kind Regards,

t!llianKalt.
President
Fairmont Brine
412-680-6244

Processing~

LLC

The information contained in thise~mail is intended only for the individual- or entity to whom it is addressed. ltscontents-(including.
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended retipient you must not uSeJ:
disclose, disseminate,
copy
or print its cc'>'htents;
If you receive this e-mail .in error, please
.
.
.
. notify. the sender
. by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPl-I) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM

To: Kalt, Brian

.
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But.thanks for checking on the samples with Summitand Reliance just the san:ie. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being de_watered on site in dewatering boxes. DO you have any of fbis.slu~ge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are;nciw processingthatyou would

Ali!.nd u__ s c_ om__in_gto get? '_am n_ ou_a__rniliarwith yo-ur fctc_ i-lity but 1r~ally- don'tw-_ish to get1n_a___ boat_ to_ float oil yo_ u_-_-_r__settl_i~g
~d or don scuba gear to take sl11dge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the ponq on your -_

--- website looks like it would be difficult to sample.


.

Curre.ntly, 'F~P d~es hot physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is ~ernd\/ed via pump ,into standard
dewaterif)g boxes. After some dewaterlng period on-site, the _boxes were receiveg.by Advanced TENORM
Services for g~waterfrig and solidification, as appropriate to pass paintfilter test, (Ind then landfilled., Based on
FBP1s unc.iersf~h~ing of th~ dewatering process and solidification process, th extremely low levels pf naturally
occurring radio~ctive materials were to be eliminated.

GP1975

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky;gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
4

GP1976

..... "!fl~

~:

~tff

Kalt, Blian

[mailto:BKall:@fairmontbrine.~]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM

To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~lose, d. isse. minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive thi~ e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~te and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge; George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016


Thank you sir.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, R~dioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Ayour fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Fnotified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww .crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP1977

--------------

-------

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is add_ressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~
delete and destroy the message.
~

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone.Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr, Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Pr'6cessing sludge did indeed read 2 mrern/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded.Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the sarnples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

GP1978

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
~ntucky Radiation Health Branch
~-5 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564.:.3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
W_ebsite:http:l/www.chfs.ky'.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epav/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

from: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: TueSday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM

To:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W {CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 29, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In

~diog.raphic.. inspection, the.rad. iation spreads out as it travels a. wayfrom the source. The
.. refore, the inte. nsity
. .the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact thatthe intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads otfrom the source since the same about of radiati.on becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

D2
2
Di
1

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.

Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2

i . .mples: (Distance from source)


Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
7

GP1979

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)l\2
(1 ft away)l\2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)l\2
(2 ft away}l\2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)l\2
(10 ft away)l\2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs)* (0.0208 ft)l\2
(1 ft away)l\2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The inforrnation contained in this e-rnail is intended only for the individual or entity to whorn it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachrnents) are confidential and rnay contain privileged inforrnation. If you are not an intended recipient you rnust not use,
disclose, disserninate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-rnail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-rnail and
delete and destroy the rnessage.

GP1980

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratorie.s and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laborato.ries I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find.Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g f()r ~<!.-226 and Ra-22~
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you wen~ using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material a.bove. background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0;2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 lilR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dos.e of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Th.an ks again for your cooperation and a~sistance in this matteL
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
'275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564.:.3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Payyour fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation ctianges https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

~, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.co~-]~~------~-~~--------
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016

To:

GP1981

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
I

~--~--~2k W_hOJWRUfa.c_tuLej;IJJle..shiRPlng_containers]

_ _____

~~-~--~~~ ___ - ____ ------~-~--~-- ____ -'-~c.-~ -~~


_

_________

-----~~-~~-~--~-

St.ill trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill''
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This.chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.

FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handtield detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0'.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxeswere received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management.
of the landfill?

10

GP1982

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail.is intended only for the individual or entity to whpm it is addressed. Its con.tents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
dis~lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
:,
.bject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.:ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
~s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural

.-:1oactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

11

GP1983

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:Uwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

A..

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
--~,~~=~,~--~-.~--~--~

~--~~~~~

in

(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORIVlf as definecl KRS 21l.B62(8fshall 6e'H1e exdusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://ww\N.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low".Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials. Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502~564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky;gov/dph/radioactive.htin
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.cbfs.ky:gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
.
' sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.
.
.
.

12

GP1984

_,,

~~

----------------------

-.-.-.-

-------------.

~--------.

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky ~et
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information cqntained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any atta,chments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or printits contents. If you, receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13

GP1985

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us aboutthe waste stream from FBP.
Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for ticensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
I do not have that information.
I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste,andthat I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue. Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containe.rs used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have
on management of the landfill?
#

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and ~e got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are bOth seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing enti.ties that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<;eor9e P. PartridfJe Jr., Pfi'J?, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
14

GP1986

.!

Partridge, George (EEC)

flom:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19 PM
Delivered: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

GP1987

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon {EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19 PM
Delivered: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Maybriar. Jon (EEC) (Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

I,

GP1988

Partridge, George {EEC)

#m:

To:
Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony {EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19 PM
Delivered: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your me$sage has been delivered to the following recipients:


Hatton. Tony (EEC) (Tony.Hatton@ky.gov)

Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

GP1989

Partridge, George (EEC)

"""
.

To:

Sent
Subject:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:20 PM
Read: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19:24 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:20:19 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP1990

Partridge. George (EEC)

-rom:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:34 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Tracking:

R~ipient

Delivery'

Re<1d

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Delivered: 3/2/2016 6:34 PM

Read: 3/3/2016 8:04 AM

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Delivered: 3/2/2016 6:34 PM

Sent:

To:
Cc:

Danny;

I just finished reviewing all my email messages.


Please find below the correspondence between Jason, Curt and I regarding Fairmont Brine and samples.
As you read the chain of emails below Curt Pendergrass is planning a visit to Fairmont Brine to collects samples and
Jason Frame from West Virginia will be accompanying him.

I have told Curt I will be available to join and assist with any sites visits as we investigate thia wa~te received by Blue
Ridge Landfill.
.

' n k you again for all you are doing and for the helpful insights in the regulatory aspects you
me.

~ave beensha,r;i~g

with

Hope your day goes well!


George

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: Phone Call on Febn,iary 26, 2016

No problem

Sent

via lhe Samsung Gaiaxy Note 3. an AT&T 40 LTI'l smartphone.

-------- Original message ------'-From: "Partridge, George (EEC)" <George.Partridge@ky.gov>


.
Date:03/02/2016 5:30PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Frame, Jason R" <Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov>
l e c t : RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Jason;
1

GP1991

----

-~-----

--

I appreciate all you are doing to assist our respective Cabinets that Dr. Curt Pendergrass and I serve in.
George Partridge
KOWM

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian
-~-- .!:i:::J~artrldge,J3ll!>Lge~(EJ;~); McKi11leY1~~9tthew w (Cf-i~-Ptil; f9Wl(:!r, ~thy L {CHFS P!il~~~~-~~ - ..... --- .... --~---~~~
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
curt,
I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division
350 Capitol Street, Room 313
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednes(jay, March 02, 201610:11 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
CC: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); .Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them, _And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with yo a11d your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
2

GP1992

Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
502-564-3700 ext. 4183
. . .ax: 502-:564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:/fprd.thfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:/fsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatcn/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

_.a-1:

~;

From~ K~lt, Brian[mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.cbm]

02, 2o1:6 10:00 AM .


~~~-~~ffi~~
sent: Wednesday, March

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC)i McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE:

Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Mr. Pendergrass,
'!>

~~

The sludg~does not accumulate hi either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, hut rather.in the middle of toe
picture iri what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?

.Cf

Regards,

Bri~.n Kalt

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The i~formati011 contained in this e~mail is intended only for the individual or entity to.whom it is addressed. Its content~ (incl.udtng
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information .. Ifyou aren~t an Intended recipient you rriu;;t not u~~,
disclo~e, .disseminat~, copy print its contents .. lfyou receive this e-m~il in. error, please notify the sender by reply .e-mail and
delete and d~~troy the message.

or

,' ':J

- .'

From: .P~rldergrass! Curt (CHFS D~H) [mailto:Curt.Pehdergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesde1y, March 02, 20~6 Q:~8 AM

To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

SubJect: RE: Phone Call on February 26,'2016

Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired, But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier eAs, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering box.es. Do you have any of this sludge
ii!ferial currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling

GP1993

-----------------

---

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
4

GP1994

Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~I: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
9:'a_x: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd'.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

' a n Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy' or print its contents, If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
rvisor, Radioactive Materials Section
ucky
Radiation Health Branch
..
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
5

GP1995

Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016.

Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privilegedinformation. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

To: Kalt, Bric:m


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM

Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate n:iading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.

GP1996

You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
~aterial to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
~ pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700~ext. 4183
Fax: 502-5.64-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

A.om: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

~t: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phon.e Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,

Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industria.I radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

-rdingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:

GP1997

With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft}"2
I

Examples: (Distance from source)

I
I ~~--~Based~oo~the"highes'lrecorderlSi:mi:c~t~jlrung:~_mr:e~m/fil..@cont_act {ass,tJmed 0.25"_from source}_

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away}"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away}"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.

If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @> contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
8

GP1998

412-680-6244

e information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHi=S DPH) [maiito:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking thrg,ugh the analysis results from both ReUance Laboratories.and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed Which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the.samples if they are avail.able.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. can you give me a little more
information on '#hat type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
del, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
dings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Relie1nce and S.ummit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring .radioa<;tive
ma~erial above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0'.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0,0008652mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protectipn Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 niR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
502-564-1492
- ail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:/jprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/

.1

GP1999

------

----

Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/


Dispose of unwanted sources http:llwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt,Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 81 Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After F.airr~ont B~ine. ~roces sing's. {.FBP) Sludge Disp~s.al Plan (_Please.see at. tached) w~saccep~e~ and ap~roved by Jason ,A
Frame, Chief Rad1olog1cal Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Serv1ces/Rad1atu;m, Toxics and Indoor .,,..
Air Division, Advanced.TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
.

4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps~ to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non..:hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan ..
FBP' s sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had rio
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was orily 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr {0.0008652 mR/hr). As published ,by the
Nuclear Regulatory.co.mrnission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Ag~nty {EPA), both readings.are low~.
than the dose of drmkmg several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one ~
banana {0.009863 mR per banana).
.
.
10

GP2000

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM services for
watering and so. lidificat.ion, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and the.n. landfilled.. Based on. FBP' s understanqing
the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be el.iminated.
5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
'

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form fromthe West Virginia.Departmenfof
Environmental Protection's
Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.

(WVDE'P)

If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) a.re confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you rnust not use,

-..~lose,d is.se.m.. i.nate, copy or p. rintits contents. If you receive this. e-mail in error, please notify the sender by r~ply e-mail a.nd
~ete and destr:oy th~ message:

. ,

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 '10io7AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS OPH)
Cc:. Kalt, Brian

.. Subject: RE: Phone Call on February26, 2016


Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Mr. Kalt,

As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
11

GP2001

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) ".Naturally:..o~curring radioactive. ma.terial" (NORM.) mea. ns ~atu. ra.lly oc.curring. ~aterials not reg~. lated . .
'
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does hot include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologitally enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

(10) "Region" means.the ~e.og~~~hical_a_r~ao_~the state of Illinois andthe Commonwealth of Kentucky;

902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:ljwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of lc;w;.level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

KRS 211.8~~ Penaltie~. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505

(1) Any person ~ho fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.8G3, .or with any administrative
regulations promulgated.pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any orderofthe cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day ofthe violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

.A
W"

Central Midwest interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission RegiOnal IV!ariagement

Plctn, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)


__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regioriai LLRW Disposal
Facility
-.-The public health and safetY hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencieswill
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste mai:iagement
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a.sanitary landfill, disposal in a licerisedTENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health !Jranch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492

..
12

GP2002

E-mail: curt.pendergrass@kv.gov
.
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
. . .y your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~notified of proposed regulation changes https:/fsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
"O:',

From: Andt;!rson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Safoi~ay, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:'
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
UndElr KRS 211.:862.and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
'

'

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are _not an
intended reCipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the. message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky:Qov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

13

GP2003

Hello Brad;

I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the

'

questions you asked and what I shared with you.


The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (rny response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
---

'

-~

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.
Or understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste; The DPH
.regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licens'1re.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
I do not have that information.
I concludeq our conversation by affirming that I arn not aware of any concerns regarding hqw FBI'
managed the waste.1 and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their manage~ent has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received. .
We woilld appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following informatjqn, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
.
Was all the wast~ similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that w.ill have
on management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how .it was managed.

14

GP2004

I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<jeorge P. Partritfee Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q:EP


O~R~Itment

for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image001.gif>

,,

15

GP2005

Partridge, George (EEC)

.-Am
~
Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:34 PM
Delivered: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your messEtge has been (lelivered to the following recipients:


Anderson. Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

GP2006

------

-------

----~

-----------

Partridge, George (EEC)

~m-

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:34 PM
Delivered: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your mes~~ge l'las b~en delivered to the f()llowing recipients:


Briggs, Lindsey (EEC) (Lindsey.Briggs@ky.gov)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

GP2007

Partridge, George (EEC)

flam:
To:

Sent:'
Subject:

Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 7:57 PM
Read: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Yot.Jr message
To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19:24 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 7:57:03 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

1'

GP2008

Partridge, George (EEC)

-m
Sent:
To:

Subject:

Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Thursday, March 03, 2016 7:54 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Swipe ssamples

Will do. I believe they have the analysis done.


Regards

AJ

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:15 PM
To: Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Subject: RE: Swipe ssamples
AJ
I

Please send me the analytical results from all the wipe samples that we collected that day and I will incorporate it with
my notes, the coordinates, etc.
I want the results from the school as well. Ideally, I would like to see us merge the our reports and conclusions since
this was a join effort .

ankyou,
George
------:---------------~------,---------

From: Bhattacharyya, Anjan


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:31 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Swipe ssamples
Good morning George:
My supervisor Curt Pendergrass is requesting any documentation that would accompany the swipe samples we took on
the field in front of the landfill entrance, done at different locations on either side of the entry access road to the facility.
If you recall these are samples F-1 through F-9 taken 12/27/16. I would appreciate it if you can scan and send me the
report which could be a short narrative and would include the readings, GPS locations and a sketch (or map) of the
approximate area at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your consideration.
Best Regards

AJ

AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HSlC~A
~kfort, KY 40601
....,.. 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492

https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
1

GP2009

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader ofthis message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution o r '
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. ff you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

GP2010

Partridge, George (EEC)

"-=
Sent:

To:

Subjed:

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:04 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: manifests

Put everything you have scanned under that link I gave you and I'll see what I haven't got.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

--------------------

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:20 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)

Subject: RE: manifests


George;
I have been so overwhelmed by emails, phone calls, and all our activities on TENORM. I am just getting caught up on my
backlog of emails.
If I miss anything you have requested or need, I apologize.
Please send me a reminder if there is anything you requested and I have not gotten it to you.
Tharik you!

'orge

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 8:24 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: manifests
Let's do those manifests we have; 1;11 put them in a spreadsheet. Do we have anything new from those we were
emailed?

..
1

GP2011

Partridge, George (EEC)

'5::=
To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:04 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: manifests

Put everything you have scanned under that link I gave you and I'll see what I haven't got.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:20 PM

To: Weems, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: manifests
George;
I have been so overwhelmed by emails, phone calls, and all our activities on TENORM. I am just getting caught up on my
backlog of emails.
If I miss anything you have requested or need, I apologize.
Please send me a reminder if there is anything you requested and I have not gotten it to you.
Thank you!
-orge
----------~-----

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 8:24 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: manifests
Let's do those manifests we have; I'll put them in a spreadsheet. Do we have anything new from those we were
. emailed?

GP2012

Partridge, George (EEC)


..Aom:

~:.
Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:05 AM
Read: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:33:37 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time

(~S

& Canada)

was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:03:35 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

..
1

GP2013

--:

Partridge, George (EEC)

To:

Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:06 AM
Read: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19:24 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:05:01 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

..
1

GP2014

,-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 AM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Trackiflg:

Recipient

.Delivery

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Delivered: 3/3/2016 8:11 AM

Hatton, Tony (EEC)

Delivered: 3/3/2016 8:11AM

Read: 3/3/2016 8:12 AM

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Delivered: 3/3/2016 8:11 AM

Read: 3/3/2016 8:14 AM

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Delivered: 3/3/2016 8:11 AM

Read

Jon;
Nothing has changed since my text.

Please read it carefullyl

School building ok (safe for students to go to school)


' . . From entrance to school building to main road entrance
counts go up (indicated particulate deposition on school
grounds in front of school)
I feel we are seeing ~ontamination from trucks and traffic to
and>frorn landfill. (Landfill entrance across frorn
schoot Traffic to and from landfill has potential.I\'
contaminated the area around
the entrance to the landfill
"'
shared by the school.')
I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due to
present activities. (AU t\4atf McKinley focused on was the
school building so families would feel safe for their children
to return to school. I feel school activities are presently
safe).
-

99

GP2015

The risk concern and exposures to worry about occurred this


past year. (The high exposure levels from airborne

particulates from last year posed a risk to not only the


operators at the landfill, but to the people that visited the
landfill to dispose of waste, as well as the people in the
~~~~-~--.Cc. victntty-of~t11l:~ntrance

tCJ tlTe-sch~ool.-

L~- -

Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss


with you. {There were additional details _that needed to be
shared based on our observations.)
Things that needed to be Discussed:
./Deposition profile from front of school building on grounds
leading .t() entrance and continuing across street \JP to gate
of hmdfUL This indicates there was a potential inhalation
hazard. When grass cutting season starts. (not presenfly),
there could be potential resuspension of deposited
particulates.
<I" If airborne particulates were pre~ent last year, t~en there is
the potential that particulate rcidionuclide m~terialsjs .
. present i~_the HVAC ductwork and maintenance individuals
at the school need to take precautions.

I see no cqncerns regarding regularly attendance or activities at


the present moment forthe school. -f
.
The analytical results from soil wipe samples that I took near the
entrance of the school leading up to the gate of the landfill

where deposition of radionuclides were being check has not


2

GP2016

-------~-

been provided to me as of today, March 3rd.

I was told they

. ,ould try to have someone run the samples Sunday ~r have the

results no later than Monday and they would be provided to


us. I have not received them.

If radionuclides show up in the ductwork of the HVAC system


then that confirms that the maintenance workers at the school
are at risk and also that the individuals in the school building
have previously been exposed to airborne particulates.

I did notice the news from the public hearing and I understood it
was stated "There are no immediate health concerns."
I hope the public realizes that the latency period between
lal><posure and health concerns (increased incidence of cancer) is
~ 40 years.

_,,o

This situation is very serious and we need to both calm the


present fears of the community from present exposures which I
support, but we also need to be collecting data that wouJd
assess if the community is going to be experiencing health
concerns 10+ years from now from what took place last
year. We also need to remember that not only Fairmont Brine
waste was disposed of at this landfill, but TENORM waste in
general was received from other companies .
. _J.Mvanted to convey my concerns to you before the public
'~eeting on Tuesday, so that you and the others could place the
present situation in proper perspective.
3

GP2017

----------

Thank you,
George
c

,,,+,,,..;d"ri

.r,

mC.tTl m

rr::!

(YJ:'m

~--~~ 9 etrrt:Je~':r.-:r6l..'rr-'c~Wlfle-;:,'Y-.,~Fvol.7)~.ri-F.ti;)~...,..%~~--~~~-~.. ~~.

Department for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

SE!nt: Wednesday, Marc:h 02, 2016 11:30 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE:. Safety... of Irvine, KY Community
.
.

George,
It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which stated: "Just
Finished. Appears school buil~iQg is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school building to
main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of landfill. Personally
I feel we are seeing tcintamination from trucks and traffic to .and from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to
the public due to present activities They should go about their normal activities. The risk concern and. exposures to
worry about6ccurred this past year. Will call you latE! afternoon or early evening and discuss with you.".
Please work with. Danny to schedule a time to meet with me to better understand your
observations and concerns.
Thank you,
Jon
~.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM


4

GP2018

-----------------------

To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

fll!...ject:

RE: Safety of Irvine, KY c.ommunity

Tony;
Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at. the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the Irvine County
High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an internal meeting to discuss my
observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or at least prior to the public meeting this
evening so t.hat when they meet with county officials Monday and Tuesday, they could make recommendations 011,st~ps
to take to' protect thei,r safety anci well-being until we know more (such as reconstructive exposure assessment, etc.)
which will be weeks to months in the future.

a.

I am going to list my observations and recommendations below and also attached a copy of an email message I sent
requesting a meeting.

We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the plans for the site
visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the exposure to the school and surrounding
area would include airborne particulate matter since the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the
~school entrance. Both the school and the school grounds, particularly around the entrance and front of the.
school would experience particulate deposition.
When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of the entrance to
the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating '~We are not here to look for particulates."
(That was the primary exposure of concern!).
Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattacharya not to take the "back packs" (which were the most
sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street which resulted in the grounds of the
school Where the grass was, not getting surveyed for deposited particulates.
. . I.also rnentiori~,d to Matt McKinley thatthe schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems, remove the"existing
filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstrearn side of ~he filter to chetk for particulate matter
containing radionuclides. This was not done to my knowledge.

in

I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:

! The maintenanceworkers atthe school each time theyworkon, service, or replace the.filters to the HVAC
systems for the school, which for one school occurs on a monthly basis.

! Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the landfill,
previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when the grass on the school
grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity will expose both the workers, students,
and all individuals that may be present in the vicinity when those activities are conducted.
My rnessage by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February 27th stated the
following:

"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school
building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of
landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any
concerns or risks to the public due to present activities They should go about their normal activities. The risk
concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon _or early evening and
- u s s with you."
.
In my text messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present activities." I still needed to
discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the school who change the filters potentially being
exposed to particulates containing radionuclides. I am also concerned in the future when it Is time to cut the grass
5

GP2019

about the resuspension of previous particulate deposition that occurred and has contaminated the grounds in front of
.thE! school near the entrance.

4'

I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday morning. Danny and I
have talked but it has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he was busy with other matters pertaining
to Blue Ridge. I appreciate all the Danny is doing and realize he has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time he
has been available to spend with rne. I also realize Jon is extremely busy as well.

I am also extremely worried that individuals will die a premature death or have serious health problems in the future
~~~~,fr:om~this,waste~disposaLat,.Blue~Ridge~~theJa1ency_p.e.do1l~etween.eJCPQsUre and the. increase .incidence of canc~r
and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending oil exposure scenario and age at time of exposure;
.

-.

I am also concerned about the operators and workers ilt the landfill and how close they are working to
previously deposited waste. Are they maintaining a buffer diStance to minimize exposure? Is the landfill
resuming their normal activities before they assess the extent of contamination? Are they continuing to let
the public drive up to the area of the working face and discharge waste materials they are dropping
off? Has the equipment at th.e landfill that was. used for waste disp~I been decontaminated as a
precaution?......
I want to condude With the following comments:

./ I appreciate being an employee in the Division of Waste Management, it represents my life's work.
and vocation
./ I could not ask for a more talented group of coworkers
./ I appreCiate the leadership of our Division and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny has devoted to
listening to my c9nc:erns and observations.

I,

fee. '. ov.erw.helmed and. t.er.ri. bly worri.e.d about. t.he lives being affect.ed and it. h.e.lps. m.e. to. ta.. lk
...:. -.I 11.e.el . lik..e
have been going at this ctlone as an employee for several years now and what. I have feared would happen
and has happened in other states has now occurred in Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this
was processed. TEN ORM rather than the TEN ORM that is produced at the 0 8t Gdrilling/tracking sites.

I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their emails when
they are away from the office!

"' Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your work on this
and the PulJlic Meeting tonight.
George

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and d.iscuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accur~te representation of the activities conducted and wl)at we can conclude at this point.

GP2020

Partridge, George (EEC)

film:

Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

To:

Sent:
Subject:

Your message has been.delivered to the following recipients:


Maybriar, Jon (EEC) (Jon.Maybria~ky.gov)

Subject:

RE~

Safety of Irvine, KY Community

..

I1

GP2021

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message has been delivered to the following recipient$:


Hatton, Tony (EEC) CTony.Hatton@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

GP2022

-om: . .

Pe1rtridge, George (EEC)

To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 B:il AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your mt:tssage has been delivered to the following recipients:


Briggs, Lindsey (EEC) (Lindsey.Briggs@ky.gov)

Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

..

GP2023

'-m: . .
Partridge, George (EEC)

To:

Sent:
Subject:

Your mess1:1ge hi:!S

b~en

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

del.ivered to the following recipients:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)

Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

..

GP2024

Partridge, George (EEC)

--om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:12 AM
Read: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message
To:Hatton,Tony(EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 :OO AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 :50 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

..

GP2025

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:
Cc:

Subject:
Attachments:

Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:13 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
. Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Re: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
imageOOl.gif

Have we brought these issues up to CHFS?


Sent from my iPad

On Mar 3, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George;Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:

Jon;
Nothing has changed since my text.
carefully!

Please read it

School btJilding ok (safe for students t:o go to


school)
From entrance to school building to main road
entrance counts go up (indicated particulate.
deposition on school grounds in front of school)
I feel we are seeing contamination 'fr'om trucks and
traffic to and from landfill. (Landfill entrance across
from school. Traffic to and from landfill has
potentially contaminated the area around the
entrance to the landfill shared by the school.)
. I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due
to present activities. (All Matt McKinley focused on
was the school building so families would feel safe

GP2026

~~~-~~

for their children to return to school. I feel school


activities are presently safe).
The risk concern and exposures to worry about
occurred this past y,ear. {The high exposure levels
from airborne particulates from last year posed a
rtsk-t<nrot~only-th-e-operators-&H"'1-e-litr1dfill, hut-t-e .

..

the people that visited the landfill to dispose of


waste; as well as the people in the vicinity of the
entrance to the school.
Will call you late afternoon or early evening and
discuss with you. (There were additional details
that needed to be shared based on our
observations.)

Things that needed tQ. be Discussed:


"' Depqsition profile from front of school building on
grounds leadi,ngto entrance and continuingacross
street up: to gate of landfill. This indicates there
was~ potenti~I inhalation hazard. Wh~n grass
c~tting see1son starts (not pres~ntly), there could be
potential res~spension of "'eposited particulates.
"' If airborn~ p~rticulates were present last year, then
there is the potential that particulate radionuclide
materials is present in the HVAC dL1ctwork and
maintenance individuals at the school need to take
precautions.

GP2027

I see no concerns regarding regularly attendance or


activities at the present moment for the school.
The analytical results from soil wipe samples that I took
near the entrance of the school leading up to the gate
of the landfill where deposition of radionuclides were
being check has not been provided to me as of today,
March 3rd. I was told they would try to have someone
run the samples Sunday or have the results no later
than Monday and they would be provided to us. I have
not received them.
If radionuclides show up in the ductwork of the HVAC
system then that confirms that the maintenance
workers at the school are at risk and also that the
individuals in the school building have previously been
exposed to airborne particulates.
I did notice the news from the public hearing and I
understood it was stated "There are no immediate
health concerns."

I hope the public realizes that the latency period


between exposure and health concerns (increased
incidence of cancer) is 10 - 40 years.
This situation is very serious and we need to both calm
the present fears of the community from present
exposures which I support, but we also need to be
3

GP2028

collecting data that would assess if the community is


going to be experiencing health concerns 10+ years
from now from what took place last year. We also need
to remember that not only Fairmont Brine waste was
disposed of at this landfill, but TENORM waste in
=~~-~~generalwas receivectfrom other cornpanie"s~
..,.,..,._~~~~ .

"'~~~--~--

I wanted to convey my concerns to you before the


public meeting on Tuesday, so that you and the others
could place the present situation in proper perspective.
Thank you,
George

'

<george P. PartridfJe Jr., .'J'fi'JJ, P.'E.,. Q.'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11:30 AM

To: Partridge, George (El:C)


_
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC)

Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

George,
4

GP2029

It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which
stated: "Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Wiil get wipe results Monday. As you go
from entrance of school building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you
scan terrail) going up toward gate of landfill. Person~lly I feel we are seeing c<mtamination from
trucks and traffic to ancl .from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due to present
activities TheY should go about their normal agivities. The risk concern and exposures to worry
about osc:urrecl this past year. Will c;:ill you la~e a~ernoon or early evening and discuss with VO!J.".

Ple~se

work with ~[lanny to schedulEj a time to meet with me to better,


understand your ol:>seniations and c1oncerns.

Thank you,
Jon

From: Partridge,. George (EEC)


Sent: Juesday,Mar<:h 01, 201.66:15 PM
To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)
. . .
.
.
.,
Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC);~Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Undsey (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC) .
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine1 KY Community

Tony;
Jon Mayb'riar requested for me to be present at the sarnpling and site survey that was conducte'CJ at the
lrvineCounty High School and Middle School9rti Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an
internal meeting to discuss my observations whh both Danny Anderson and Jon IVlaybriar on Monday Or
at least prior to the public meeting this evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday
and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps to tak~ to protect their safety and well-being
until we know more (such as a recoristructive exposure assessment, etc.) which will be weeks to months
in the future.
I arn going to list my observations an'CJ recommendations below and also attached. a copy.of an ernail
message I sent requesting a meeting.

We met at approximately s:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the
plans for. the site visit and to arrive in Irvine as group. In the meeting I stressed that the .
exposure to the school and surrounding area would include airborne particulate matter since
the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the school entrance. Both the scfiqol and the
school grounds, parti1:;ularly around the1entrance and in front of the school would experience
.
.
.
particulate depositi6Q.
. ;. . . n

W.hen we arrived at the schooi shortly a1fter 9 AM, Matt McKintey gathered the group in front of
the entrance to the schooi builc:ling and ~tarted his instruction to the group by stating "We are
not here to look for particulates." (That was the primary exposure C>f concern!).
Matt McKinley instruded Chris Keffer amd A. J. Bhattacharya not to ta.ke the "ba.ck packs"
(which were the most sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street
which resulted in the grounds of the school where the grass was, not getting surveyed for
deposited particulates.
.
.
I also mentioned to Matt McKinley that the schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems,
remove the existing filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the

GP2030

filter to check for particulate matter containing radionclides. This was not done to my
knowledge.
. I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:

! The maintenance workers at the school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters

to the HVAC systems for the school, which for one school occurs on a monthly basis.
! Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the
landfill, previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when
. ~-- ---~-~the,gca5-S,,.OJl.:tbe,.sm'"oJgro11ncls is cut.]lle cutthigJ?ftl!~_grass andrelat~-~ land~cape_ac~i\li!Y ____ ---~-~~will expose both the workers, students, and all individuals that may be present in the vicinity
when those activities are conducted.
My message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February
27th stated the following:
"Just Finished. Appears school building is Qk. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance
of school building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going
up toward gate of landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and
from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due to present activities They should go
about their normal activities. The risk concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past
year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss with you."
In my text messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present
activities." I still needed to discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the
school wbo change the filters potentially being e)(posed to particule1tes cQntaining radionclides. I am
also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass about the resuspension of previous
particulate deposition that occurred and has contaminated the grounds in front of the school near the
entrance.

I called Danny thatevening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email messag_e on Monday
morning. Danny and I have talked but it has either been walking down th~ hall or in his office when he
was busy with other matters pertaining to Blue Ridge. I appreciate all the Danny is doing and realize he
has been extremely busy. Jam grateful for the time he has been available to spend with me. I also
realize Jon is extremely busy as well.
I am also extremely worried that individuals wm die a premature death or have serious health
problems in the future from this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure
and the increase incidence of cancer and other serious health effects is 1040 years depending on
exposure s~enario and age at time of exposure.

I am also concerned about the operators and worker$ at the landfill and how close they are
working to . previo11sly depq_sited waste. Are they maintaining a buffer.distance to minimize
expos11re? Is the landfill resuming their normal activities before they assess the extent of
contamination? Are they continuing to let the public drive up to the area of the working face
and discharge waste materials they are dropping off? Has the equipment at the landfill that
was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a precaution?
I want to conclude with the following comments:
./ I appreciate bein9 an employee in the Di~ision of Waste Management, it represents
my life's work and vocation
./ I could not
for a more talented group of coworkers.

ask

GP2031

./ I appreciate the leadership of our Division and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny
has devoted to listening to my concerns and observations.
I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to
talk. I feel like I have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and
what I have feared would happen and has happened in other states has now occurred in
Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this was processed TENORM rather than the
TENORM that is produced at the O & G drilling/tracking sites.
I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their
emails when they are away from the office!

Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your
work on this and the Public Meeting tonight.
George
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC);
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the
results of the survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.

'

I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.


It is importa,nt that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be
presented an accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this
point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on
Tuesday.
'
This is very important!
Thank you,
George

GP2032


GP2033

Partridge, George (EEC)

..Am
~
Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:14 AM
Read: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:14:13 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP2034

Partridge, George (EEC)

~-

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:15 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Attendees: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

To:
Subject:

AJ was the one I needed for CHFS. Still need the other two BERT members~ Next time we get together for something
like this we need to just get everyone to sign an attendance list.
From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:04 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Attendees: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
George;
I am still waiting and requesting the results from all the wipe samples that were taken, both for the school as well as the
ones we took surrounding the entrance to the landfill.

I a?ked Matt at the meeting the names of others there and he could not remember their names. Said it would be in
there reports; Hopefully I will get a copy we can combine with our notes.

The names I have are to the best of my recol.lection:


' ) Anjan Bhattacharya (CFHS)
.
Curt. Pendergrass (CHFS)
Kathy L. Fowler (CHFS)
Matthew (Matt) W. McKinley (CHFS)
Christopher J. Keffer (CHFS)

Lt. Matt Blose Qf Winchester Fire Department


Members ofthe Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team
Estill County Judge-Executive Wallace Taylor
Jeff Saylor-- Estill County School District Superintendent

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:32 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from Saturday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you.heard

anything from Curt? Do we know what came out yesterday?


,...._

~rtridge, George(EEC)

___________ ___

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:16 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
1

GP2035

George;
Meeting scheduled for tomorrow moring!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:24 AM
~~-----'TO:-Rai:t.r:idge-,-Geoi:ge-(EEC)~------ -- --~----~~ --- : -----~-~-~-~-~---~--~- ~--~- ----~----~---~-~""~~~--~-~-~- . -C-C~~--~=-~--~--

Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray27th
Do you have a list of participants?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.

Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George

~eor9eP.PartrUfneJ~
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2036

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:32 AM
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Hatton, Tony (EEC)

Delivered: 3/3/2016 8:32 AM

Tony:
Not yet. I wanted to meet first with Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar and let them proceed as appropriate. I know I
have been very passionate and emotional at times as I sought to understand this waste disposal situation at Blue Ridge
Landfill. ltismy desire tq share what I know with my immediate management and let them proceed as they feel
appropriate since they represent us.
.

'

It means so much to me to be part of this Division. It represents my vocation and life's work. I appreciate all that
everyone is doing to investigate this situation. r realize that everyone is extremely busy and doing t.he best they can
under the circumstances. I do not question that everyone wants to do the right thing and has the best interest of the
community at heart.
.

Thank you so much for all you are doing. I hope you are feeling better.

titltu::~~~k you so much for t~,king to from you very busy schedule t~ allow me update ~ou o~ my understanding of the
Thank you for having me as an employee in your Division and the opportunity to serve under you leadership. I truly feel
blessed.
Sincerely,
George
------~---------~---'--~

--------------

From: Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:13 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: Re: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Have we broughtthese issues up to CHFS?


Sent from my iPad

On Mar 3, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Partridge, George (EEC} <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:

Jon;
1

GP2037

Nothing has changed since my text.


carefully!

Please read it

School building ok (safe for students to go to


school)
~--~~.--~~-~--From en1rancetoschool bu11ding-to mainroa?r-~~-~--~--~~----~-

entrance counts go up (indicated particulate


deposition on school grounds in front of school)
I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and
traffic to and from landfill. (Landfill entrance across
from school. Traffic to and from landfill has
potentially contaminated the area around the
entrance to the landfill shared by the school.)
I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due
to present activities, (AH Matt McKinley focused on
was the school building so families would feel safe
for their children to return to school. I feel school
activities are presently safe).
The risk concern and exposures to worry about
occurred this past year. {The high exposure levels
from airborne particulates from last year posed a
risk to not only the operators at the landfill, but to
the people that visited the landfill to dispose of
waste, as well as the people in the vicinity of the
entrance to the school.
Will call you late \afternoQn or early evening and
discuss with YOIJ. (There were additional details
that needed to be shared based on our
observations.)
2

GP2038

..

Things that needed to be Discussed:


./ Deposition profile from front of school building on
grounds leading to entrance and continuing across
street up to gate of landfill. This indicates there
was a potential inhalation hazard. When grass
cutting season starts (not presently), there could be
potential resuspension of deposited particulates .
./ If airborne particulates were present last year, then
there Js the potential that particulate radionuclide
materials is present in the HVAC ductwork and
maintenance individuals at the school need to take
precautions.
I see no concerns regarding regularly attendance or
activities at the present moment for the school.
The'.;analytical results from soil wipe samples that ,I took
near the entrance of the school leading up to the gate
of the landfill where deposition of radionuclides were
being check has not been provided to me as of today, .
March 3rd. I was told they would try to have someone
run the samples Sunday or have the results l'lo later
than Monday and they would be provided to us. I have
not received them.
If radionuclides show up in the ductwork of the HVAC
system then that confirms that the maintenance
3

GP2039

---------------

workers at the school are at risk and also that the


individuals in the school building have previously been
exposed to airborne particulates.

I did notice the news from the public hearing and I


~~------ ~-- -crneletstooC11t-~wasstated--''Therear1rn-o--imm~ed1crt~---~--------~---------------

hea Ith concerns."

I hope the public realizes that the latency period


between exposure and health concerns (increased
incidence of cancer) is 10 - 40 years.
This situation is very serious and we need to both calm
the present fears of the community from present
exposures which I support, but we also need to be
collecting data that would assess if the community is
going to be experiencing health concerns 10+ years
from now from what took place last year. We also need
to remember that not only Fairmont Brine waste was
dispos~d

ofat this landfill, but TENORM waste in

general was received from other companies.

I wanted to convey my concerns to you before the public meeting on Tuesday, so that you and the others
could place the present situation in -proper perspective.
Thank you,

George
4

GP2040

<jeor9e P. Partrlifne Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11:30 AM

._

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine,. KY Community

George,
It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which
.
stated: "Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go
'

'

from entrance of school building to main road entrance cbunts go up. Also numbers higher as you
scan terrain going up toward gate of landfill. Personally I feel we arE! seeing contamination from
trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due to present
aitivities They should go about ttteir normal activities. The risk concern and exposures to worry
about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss with you.".

Please work with.Dannyto schedule a time to meet with me to better


understand your observations and concerns.
Thank you,
Jon

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6: 15 PM

To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Tony;
5

GP2041

Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the
Irvine County High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an
internal meeting to discuss my observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or
at least prior to the public meeting this evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday
and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps to take to protect their safety and well-being
until we know more (such as a reconstructive exposure assessment, etc.) which will be weeks to months
in the future.
I am going to list my observations and recommendations below and also attached a copy of an email
~~~~-~~--me-ssage-l~sent-r:equesting-a-mee-ting.--~.~~~~~.-~----~~--~~.-~~---~~-~-.~~~-~~~.... ~~---~---~

We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the
plans for the site visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the
exposure to the school and surrounding area would include airborne particulate matter since
the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the school entrance. Both the school and the
school grounds, particularly around the entrance and in front of the school would experience
particulate deposition.
When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of
the entrance to the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating "We are
not here to look for particulates." (That was the primary exposure of concern!).
Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattacharya not to take the "back packs"
(which were the most sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street
which .resulted in the grounds of the school where the grass was, not getting surveyed for
deposited particulates.
I also mentioned to Matt McKinley that the schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems,
remove the existing filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the
filter to check for particulate matter containing radionuclides. This was not done tp my
knowledge.

I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:

! The maintenance workers at tl)e school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters
to the HVAC systems forthe school, whic.h for one school occurs <>n a monthly basis.
! Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the
landfill, previously deposited on the school grounds; bec()ming re-suspended this spring when
the grass on the school grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity
will expose both the workers, students, and all individu~ls that may be present in the vicinity
when those activities are conducted.
My message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February
27th stated the following:

"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance
of school building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going
up toward gate of landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and
from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due to present activities . They should go
about their normal activities. The risk concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past
year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss with you."
In my te><t messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present
activities." I still needed to discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the
school who change the filters potentially being exposed to particulates containing radionuclides. I am

---------

GP2042

---

also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass about the resuspension of previous
particulate deposition that oc:curred and has contaminated the grounds in front of the school near the
entrance.
I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday
morning. Danny and I have talked but it has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he
was busy with other matters pertainingto Blue Ridge. I appreciate all the Danny is doing and realize he
has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time he has been available to spend with me. I also
realize Jon is extremely busy as well.
I am also extremely worried that individuals will die a premature death or have serious health
problems in the future from this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure
and the increase incidence of cancer and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending on
exposure scenario and age at time of exposure,

I am also concerned about the operators and workers at the landfill and how close they are
working to previously deposited.waste. Are they maintaining a buffer distance to minimize
exposure? Is the landfill resuming their normal activities before they assess the extent of
contamination? Are they continuing to let the public drive up to th_e area of the worki'1g face
and discharge waste materials they are dropping c;>ff? Has the equipment at the landfiU. that
was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a precaution?......
I want to conclude with the following comments:

./ I appreciate being an employee in the Division of Waste Management, it represents


my life's work and vocation.

./ I could not ask for a more talented group of coworkers


./ I appreciate the leadership of our Division and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny
has devoted to listening to my concerns and observations.

1.

------------~-

..

I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to
talk. I feel like I have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and
what I have feared would happen and has happened in other states has now occurred in
Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this was processed TENORM rather than the
TENORM that_ is produced at the () & G drilling/tracking sites.
I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their
emails when they are away from the office!
Tha.nks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your
work on this and the Public Meeting tonight.
George
FrolTI: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC);
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th

Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the
results of the survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
7

GP2043

I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.


It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be
presented an accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this
point.

Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on
Tuesday.

Thank you,
George

GP2044

Partridge, George (EEC)

,rom:

To:
Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:32 AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Hatton, Tony (EEC) CTony.Hatton@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

GP2045

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:35 AM
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
RE: Swipe ssamples

To:

Subject:

AJ
I

I will get my notes, the GPS coordinates, and all from Saturday as soon as possible.
Thanks again for everything!
Geor~e.

From: Bhattacharyya, Anjan

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 7:54 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Swipe ssamples
Will do. I believe they have the analysis done.
Regards
AJ

1111:
'
m:

: ::.

. .

Partridge, George (EEC)


ent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:15 PM
To: Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Subject: RE: Swipe ssamples

AJ;
Please send me the analytical results from all the wipe samples that we collected that day and I will incorporate it with
my notes, the coordinates, etc.
I want the results from the school as Well. Ideally, I would like to see us merge the our reports and conclusions since
this was a join effort.
Thank you,
George

From: Bhattacharyya, Anjan

Sent: Monday, February 29, 201611:31 AM


To: Partridge, GeQrge (EEC)
Subject: Swipe ssamples

d morning George:
supervisor Curt Pendergrass is requesting any documentation that would accompany the swipe samples we took on
the field in front of the landfill entrance, done at different locations on either side of the entry access road to the facility.
If you recall these are samples F-1 through F-9 taken 12/27/16. I would appreciate it if you can scan and send me the
1

GP2046

report which could be a short narrative and would include the readings, GPS locations and a sketch (or map) of the
approximate area at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your consideration.

:;st

Regards

.'

AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist ll
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HSlC-A

- --- ~~~--~--~-~------~~-~--------~--~ ----~ -- - -~-----~~~~-~~------------ --~~--~ -- --C---~------Ph: 502-564-3700 x4171


FAX: 502-564-1492
https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/

~----;:;rankfort7"~y~40601~

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

GP2047

---~------------

Partridge, George.(EEC)

,rom:

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:39 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Manifests so far

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Regrettably Richard has the inspection checked out so I can't add the other names to the inspection.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:28 PM
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject:.RE: Manifests so far
George;
Thank you!
George

-----------------

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:17 AM
To: Thomas, Richard F (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Manifests so far

far I have loads almost into February, in fact the 2ih of January.

GP2048

Partridge, George (EEC)

~rom:
Sent:

TO:
Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:51 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Attendees: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

I need the coordinates of the sample sites near the landfill. Will you be around for me to copy them?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:04 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Attendees: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
George;

I am still waiting and requesting the results from all the wipe samples that were taken, both for the school as well as the
ones we took surrounding the entrance to the landfill.
I asked Matt at the meeting the names of others there and he could not remember their names. Said it would be in
there reports. Hopefully I will get a copy we can combine with our notes;
The names I have are to the best of my recollection:

. . . .) Anjan Bhattacharya (CFHS)


rt Pendergrass (CHFS)
Kathy L. Fowler (CHFS)
Matthew (Matt) W. McKinley (CHFS)
ChristopherJ. Keffer (CHFS)

. .

Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire Department


Members ofthe Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team
Estill County Judge:"'Executive Wallace Taylor
Jeff Saylor- Estill County School District Superintendent

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:32 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from Saturday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you heard
anything from Curt? Do we know what came out yesterday?

An: Partridge, George (EEC)

t: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:16 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
1

GP2049

George;
Meeting scheduled fortoinorrow moring!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:24 AM
T(): Partridge, George (EEC)
=-~~~~Subject:.RE:JlE:~Site..SurYey~aad~Saropling~IOioe,~Saturday~Eebll.lcay22tb.~~~~.~.--~--

Do you have a list of participants?

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM

To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tues~ay.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George

(jeorlJe P. Partri<fee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2050

..",
,,

:_

Partridge, George (EEC) .

.rom:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 9:07 AM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: Attendees: Site Survey and Sampling - lrvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Google Earth View - 022716.pdf; GPS Coor & Sample Locations - 022716~pdf

George;
Notes from this past Saturday. I plan to type a narrative and attach my photos as well as soon as possible.
Thank you,
George
From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:~1 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Attendees: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
I need the coordinates of the sample sites near the landfill. Will you be around for me to copy them?

From: Partridge, George(EEC)

~nt: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:04 PM


"1111111111111:

Weems, George (EEC)

Subject: RE: Attendees: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
George;
I am still waiting and requesting the results from all the wipe sarnples that were taken, both for the school as well as the
ones we took surrounding the entrance to the landfill.

I asked Matt at the' meeting the names of others there arid he could not remember their names. Said it would be in
there reports. Hopefully I will get a c6py we can combine with our notes.

The names I have are to the best of my recollection:

(AJ) Anjan Bhattacharja (CFHS)


Curt Pendergrass (CHFS)
Kathy L. Fowler (CHFS)
Matthew (Matt)W. IVlcKinley {CHFS)
Christopher J. Keffer (CHFS)
Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire Department
Members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team

e!1

County Judge-Executive Wallace Taylor


. Jeff Saylor - Estill County School District Superintendent

GP2051

--------------

- - - -

--

From: Ween:is, George (EEC)


_ .
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:32 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th

Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from S~turday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you heard
anything from Curt? Do we know what came out yesterday?
~~from:-Partridge1<3eorge~EEe)~-~--~-~-~-~----~-~--~-~~~---~~-----

- -----~----~--~---~~-~~-~~F--~~~--~

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:16 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - 5aturday, Februray 27th
George;
Meeting scheduled for tomorrow mo ring!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:24 AM. .
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY :- Saturday, Februray 27th_
Do you have a list of participants?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___,
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 201610:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the.
survey and sampling events that were conducted_ by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George

{ieor9e P. Partrid{Je Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
2

GP2052

KY Division of Waste Management


200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB}
.ankfort, KY 40601
.o02} 564-6716 ext. 4651

I-

GP2053

Partridge, George (EEC)

1-rom:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 9:24 AM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jeri:
. Correspondence leading up to the planning of a site visit to Fairmont Brine Processing.
Thank you,
George

Fro,n: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016

No problem

......

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

'

-------- Original message -------From: "Partridge, George (EEC)" <George.Partridge@ky.gov>


Date:03/02/2016 5:30 PM(GMT-05:00)
To: "Frame, Jason R" <Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov>
.
.
Cc:
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Jason;
I appreciate all you are doing to assist our respective cabinets that Dr. Curt Pendergrass and I serve in.

George Partridge
KDWM

From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:25 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: PhOne call on February 26, 2016

.t,

I
I

I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks

Jason R. Frame B.S. R. T. (R), Chief Radiological Health Program


l

GP2054

Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor Air Division


350 Capitol Street, Room 313

Charleston, West Virginia 25301


Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Fr'ame@WV.gov

'

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 201610:11 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

How about we pay you a visit on Friday ML Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they

w~sh to a~compan~ us o~ this sampling trip.to your Fairmont, WV facili~y. We _never go i~to anothe_r age~cies jurisdiction~
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you cind your. . .
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with pr~per planning. What would that entail exactly just 'so we
can bring the proper sampling equiprnent.
Curt Pendergrass-PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort,_KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-'564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergr'ass@ky.gov
Website: http://w'Nw.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 10:00 AM

To:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subjec:t: RE: Phone Call on February 46, 2016
2

GP2055

Mr. Pendergrass,

r~e

sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the

picture in what looks like a rectangle f'<oncrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day wo.uld work for you

~nd

or your team?

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended onlyfor the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its' contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not anJntended recipient you must not use,
disdose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this.e-mail in error, please notify these.nder by.reply e-rriail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:38 AM


To: Kalt Brian
:

=.~art~idg.~I Geo,rge (EEC); McKinl,ey, Matthe.w w(CHS-PH)


: . . .bJ~:. ~E: Phone call on February 26, 2016
.

I. .

',~,:.

'', ;!1~(~;

'

Sorry to hear that f\llr. Kalt Qut I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount oftime that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the s~me. looking ba~k your earlier.emails, younientioned thatthe sl~dge was beil1gdewatered on site in dewatering boxes, Do yoUhave any of this sludge
material currentiy on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
rrilnd vs toming to get? I am not familiar with your fa,!'.:illty but I really don't wish to get in a boa.t to float on your settling
p~nd ord6risp'.Jba gearto takeslu~ge sample the b.ottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
w.ebsite looks like it Would be.ffifficult to sample.

at

Currently, FBP does not physically dewaterthe sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standa'rd
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.

GP2056

------

----

-----------------

---

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww .crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
4

GP2057

,/!;,:It,

::ailto:Bf<alt@fairmontbrine.oom]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e7mail and
~te and destroy the message.
,

From:

Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-.564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
~your fees on line at https:/lprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~otified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sou~ces http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

GP2058

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
I

~~--,or.-Penoergras-s,

~~-~=-,

~-~~-~-

..~- ~..-.. --~--,,---~------~-- ........._-----~~

I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this. e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is add.ressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e:..mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

..A
9"'

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]


sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM
To~ Kalt, Brian.

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading With the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from_ source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read trom others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be wilJing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assumjhg they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your l;>ehalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

GP2059

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
~tucky Radiation Health Branch
~ East Main Street
.
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564.:.3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502~564~1492

E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http;//www .chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive .htm
Pay your.fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of .u.nwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday,' March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To= Pendergrass,.C:urt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,

Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
~iogr.ap.h'.1c inspection, the radiation spread. s out.. as it trav.els a\Nayfrom the source. T.herefor~, the inte.nsity
~he radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the ~ourcesince the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.

In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
- p i e s : (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
7

GP2060

~~--

If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2

= 0.000000086 mrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading:. 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-6806244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP2061

From: Pendergrass, Curt(CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, George (EEC);. McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit En:vironmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and ~a-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samP,les if they are available.

Also, thank you forthe information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a .little more
information on what type of survey .instrume11t you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (m~,J~e,
model, calibration d.ate). lfyo4 ~Qok a background.with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your.
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?

'

In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. the average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0;227 R/hr
(O.OQ02267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) IJV!:ISOnly 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 niR/hr), As
published by ttie Nucle~r Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per ti,our (0.07,mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks agair;i for your cooperation and assistance in this matter,
Regards,
Curt PendergrassphD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky. Rat!hation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1~-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183 '
Fax: .502-564-1492,;
Fm ail:. curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
.
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line .at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un_wanted sourceshttp://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx

..-=:
~t;

[m~:BKalt@fairm~ntbrine.com]

Kalt, Brian
Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
9

GP2062

Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hol.d up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.

Still trying to trackthis information down.


3.

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature?

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdere<;l soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as ratliurri sulfate, to form
an Insoluble.sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined. to be. non-hazardous.

When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so

beni~n that it is used by .

doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in :2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector.. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0'.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 tnR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the tlose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana
(0.009863. mR per banana).
.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewaterthe sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on~site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's under,stariding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive

materials were to be eliminated.


5.

Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have 011managemen.
of the landfill?

10

GP2063

Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.

fl!!_

If anything else is needed, please let us kno~.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244 ..

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.. Its contents (including
any attachments) are copfidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM


To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
.

-bject: RE: Phone Call on February26, 2016

~rt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM


To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016


Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
. . i l l s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
~oactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);

11

GP2064

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

A..

902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 10.0. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htin


(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has , .
been separated
various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

to

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.govfstatutes/statute.aspx?id=8502

- H-(3) Natur~iY-o~~~rringcracti'O~aC:iiVe-materiaTfN-ORM) as defi'rled in KRS 211.862(8) shaff be the exclusive


regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://wwwJrc~ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to cornply with any'provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort,
KY: 40621
.: ..
/.'
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext.. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: htlp:/lwww .Chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line athttps://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
sources.http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx
- - '.
.
.'
~.

~~:

12

GP2065

-------.

-~---~-~------..-

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM

.6J= Kalt, Brian

~: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016


Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Und~rKRS

211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?

..

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The inforrnation contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (inch,1ding any attactirnents) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive .this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]

Sent: Friday, February 26, 20i6 5:36 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); A11derson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly hlghlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13

GP2066

We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted wa?te. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
I do not have that information.
I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


Who manufactured the shipping containers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge La.ndfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similarin nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have
on management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

{ieor9e P. Part:rUfee Jr., Pli1J, P.'E., Q,'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
\

14

GP2067

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
Te>:
Cc:
Subject:

McKeePerez, Nancy < McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


Friday, February 26, 2016 9:41 AM
Partridge, George (EEC); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Lamberth, Larry; Danois, Hector
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Hi George and Jeri,


In prep for today's meeting, I'd like to share some resources:
https:Owww3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/index.htm
And, specifically: https://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/oil-,gas.pdf
Take a look at "Scope of the Exemption", "Exempt/Non-exempt", "common misunderstandings". Also take a look at (p.
22) for the definition of "uniquely associated with".

Page 8 provides a "rule of thumb" to determine if the waste would be exempt:


1} Has the waste come from down-hole, i.e., was it brought to the surface during oil and gas E&P operations?
2) Has the waste otherwise been generated by contact with the oil and gas production stream during the
removal of produced water or other contaminants from the product?
In my review, I've taken a look at our guidance documents on E&P Waste, looked up the Fairmont facility in RCRAlnfo

~(ournational. h.azardous was.te database), looked up the. F.airmont facilit.y w.e. b.site, and I a.I.so.. spo.ke to rriy R.2 con.tact,

ich is the region that oversees West Virginia.


Info showed that the facility is the lowest generator of hazardous waste (a conditionally exempt small quantity
generator (CESQG).
The process provided on their website explains that they pretreat the brine to remove Ba, Sr, TSS, O&G, turbidity and
organics. It doesn't specify how they do this. I'm assuming this where the waste filters are coming from? The treated
brine is then pumped to surface impoundments, where evaporation/crystallization occurs. I'm assuming the waste
sludge is coming from (the bottom of the surface impoundment)?

Also, I took a look at the analytical results. Based on these results, it doesn't appear that the waste would be hazardous,
if the waste was determined to be non-exempt. To gain better insight on the results, I spoke to our EPA lab (located in
Athens, GA). He said it looked like the type of analysis usually used when waste is senfto a hazardous waste landfill,
which provides info on whether the waste meets Land Disposal Restriction requirements (which is odd, since they're
claiming the 261.4(b)(S) exemption from hazardous waste regulations). Also, in looking through the results, he said that
the material appeared to be fairly wet; it had a high % moisture and it failed the paint filter test.

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
- : Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov] .
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
1

GP2068

Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
---~-

.,.._~~~~,-~~-~~~~-""~~~-~

Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they l"ecefve~d
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report'' provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24; 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that rec;:eived this waste is managed by Advanc:ed Disposal.
Correspondence to the "WestVir~inia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORIVI related wastes. Also attC'lc::hed are their recor(ls of incorporation as an LLC here in l(entuc:ky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talkingwith you again .next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

(jeor9e P. PartrirfBe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564~6716 ext. 4651

GP2069

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Friday, February 26, 2016 12:01 PM
Kalt, Brian
McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC);
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH);
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: Fairmont Brine Processing

Sent:
To:

Cc:

Subject:

Hello Mr. Kalt,


It was a pleasure speaking with you on the phone this morning. Again, I want to than~ you and {airrr,lont Brirye
Processing for reaching out to our office and to our colleagues in the Dept. of Environmental i>rotectiOn as we work to
resolve the ~ssues we are now. facing. With this now making front page news in the local papers, the sooner we get a
firm grip on what we are dealing with and the potential impact to public health and safety, the better.

<

'.

..

'

.'

And I especially want to thank you for offering tq provide samples of sludge from thi? same settlingtahk wh~re the
material we are now dealing with first originated at FBP. The fact that the tank .is used in the inltial stage of settling and
precipitation Qf oil and gas flowback and produced fluids, I would imagine the sludge now in your tanks is fairly
representative of what was there last summer when these tanks were cleaned out and the material bro1,1ght to KY. As
you said, you will understandably need to first discuss this with your attorneys to get their input, but I call assure you
that we will be more than happy to split those samples with FBP so you can have them analyzed by another lab of your
choosin. g for co..mpar.ison, T.he. Dep.t. for Public He. alth., Ra. diation Health Br.anch has its ow.n Envir.onrnelltal Mon.itorin.g.
oratory and the samples you provide would have the radiochemical analysis conducted by our laboratory and I am
e my colleagues in Solid Wastes will wish to conduct their own analysis as well for other non'."radioactive const.ituents.
We will probably reach out to our colleagues in the WV Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation; Toxics and
Indoor Air Division to assist us in our sampling trip to your Fairmont WV facility.

. . .

As for your requests for documents provided by Mr. Cory Hoskins of Advanced TENORM Services/BES Technical
Solutions, Waste Management and Pace Analytical, I am going to have to forward that along to rny tolleagt:ies in Solid
Waste for their input and consideration. As we discussed, the very preliminary radiation survey results by a staff
member from this office showed slightly elevate.d exposure rate readings in localized areas of the landfill cap but the
region where the landfiUinques.tion is located was found to have a high amount of shale which contains elevated levels
of natural ur.a.nium and thorium and decay daughters. Obviously, much more thorough and extensive radiation surveys
and sa.Tpling will need.to be conducted to better characterize and quantity the radiologic:al conberns.
.
...
Thank you again for reaching out to our office and we look forward to working with you and FBP to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
kfort, KY 40621
. .502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
1

GP2070

Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Di~pose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd~org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]

Sent: FriQfly, Februa!Y 26, 2016 11:14 AM

To: Pendergrass,

curt (CHFS DPH) - - --

-~~~~~~-~~----~-~-~~~~- ~~- ~~--- --~-~~~~----~~~

----- --~-- -

Subject: Fairmont Brine Processing


Mr. Pendergrass
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today. Per our conversation, if you would, please send the following:

1. Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TENORM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
2.
3.
4.

Kentucky DEP ano or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Servkes.
Any documentation and or re_sL1lts from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management.
Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
You mentioned tha_t your team did some radiation mohitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the re~ults
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send anaiysis once received,

If anything else is needed on our end, please let rrie know.

Respcetfully,

Brian Kalt
President
Faii"mont Brine Processing, LLC
412:..680-6244
.

"

'

. .

..

....

The information contained in this e"mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its .contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and rnay contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must 11ot use,

disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail ~hd
delete and destroy the message.

GP2071

f/L, .

Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19 PM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC)
RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Tracking:

RE!cipient

Delivery

Rei!d-

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)

Delivered: 3/2/2016 6:19 PM

Read: 3/2/2016 6:20 PM

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Delivered: 3/2/2016 6:19 PM

Read: 3/3/2016 8:05 AM

Hatton, Tony (EEC)

Delivered: 3/2/2016 6:19 PM

Reiid: 3/2/2016 7:57 PM

Sent:

To:
Cc:

Jon;
I will follow up with Danny as requested. I c::lo not know what could have changed since Saturday since my text message
was sent at the end of our visit at the schools in Irvine, KY. The consultant from what Matt McKinley shared that .
afternoon that was going to be on. site Sunday, was not certified and therefore could notconduct any sampling or
sample analysis. "Pre~ent" means to me t~at the students can go to school and not be concerned this coming week.
Please keep infoind that the text was sent from my cell phone and I wanted to go into more detail in a follow-up phone
call and meeting.
'

tha~

instru~.

the~e

i~.the

AALhat c.oncer.n.s nie is


Matt Mc.Kinley
ted everyone .that th. e. y. we. re.. not
to. look f.or. part.ides. T.hat
~ary exposure scenario we are concerned with. At this pomt we are concerned with the resuspension of deposited
particulate matter that might potentially become a radionuclide inhalation hazard. That was not addressed by IVlatt
McKinley's group Saturday.
To look for an elevated ionizing radiation level off of the ground or the building surfaces above an acceptable level of
exposure would be unexpected, considering the type of exposure scenario we are dealing with.

I feel we have a dusting of particulate deposition on top of existing shale geology which makes the total cps measured
only slightly above or within the background level range for the shale alone. The shale will stay in place, but the
deposited radionuclide waste particulates if inhaled in the compartments of the respiratory system, are in direct contact
with lung tissue/cells and the continued exposure for extended periods of time raises the risk of increased cancer risk
with a latency period of 10 to 40 years.
Depending on the emitter, the internal dosimetry analysis for an individual walking on a shale formation is minimal and
nothing to be concerned about.
I felt the survey Saturday was more for the public and news crew rather than an assessment of the exposure concerns
we have forthe critical receptors.
I felt the present exposure concerns were minimal to the public even without what was done this past weekend .
want to note that I have not received the sample results from Saturday yet that I requested and were supposed to
. .been completed either Sunday or no later than Monday.
.

GP2072

In closing I want you to know that I appreciate what you, Danny, Tony, and everyone is doing to address the situation at
Blue Ridge. I also realize the extreme demands on everyone's time and schedule presently and thatthere is no way to
meet with everyone. I am very passionate about this situation since it reflects and surrounds so much of my teaching ~
and research work at Penn State when I was a faculty member.
~
Please do not take niy emotions and concerns to be questioning what you all are doing. I am happy to be part of this
Division and I appreciate all those l know and work with and know everyone has the best interest of the Irvine
Community at heart;

George
From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
March 02, 2016 11:30 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Sent: Wednesday,

George,
It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which stated: "Just
Finish~d. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school buildiflg to
main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of landfill. Person~lly
I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to

..A

the pu..b.l.ic du. ..e to prese.nt a. ct.il(.ities... They should. go a.. bout th. eir no.rmal activities. The . risk co.ncern and exposures to
worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss With you.".
...

Please work with Danny t<> schedule a time to meet with me to better understand your
observations and concerns.
Thank you,
Jon

From; Partridge, George (EEC)


March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
To:Hatton,Tony(EEC)
Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Sent: T1:1esday,

Tony;
Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the Irvine County
High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an internal meeting to discuss my
observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or at least prior to the public meeting this
evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps
to ta.keto protect. their. safety and we.II-being until we know more (such as a reconstructive exposure assessment, e t c . ) .
which will be weeks to months in the future.

.
,

GP2073

I am going to list my observations and recommendations below and also attached a copy of an email message I sent
requesting a meeting.

We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the plans for the site
visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the exposure to the school and surrounding
area would include airborne particulate matter since the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the
school entrance. Both the school and the school grounds, particularly around the entrance and in front of the
school would experience particulate deposition.
When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of the entrance to
the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating "We are not here to look for.:particulates."
(That was the primary exposure of concern!).
Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattachar)ta not to take the "back packs" (which were the most
sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street which resulted in the grounds of the
school where the grass was, not gettir;ig surveyed for deposited particulates.
.
.
I also me!1tioned to Matt McKinley that th~ schools needed to turn c:>ff the HVAC systems, remove the existing'
filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the filter to check fqr.particulate matter
containing radionuc::lidE!s. This was not done tQ.!llY knowledge.

I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:

! The maintenance workers at the school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters to the H.VAC
systems for the school, which for one school occurs on a monthly basis.

! Deposited particulate matter.from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the landfill,
previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when the grass on the school
grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity will expose both the workers, students,
and all individuals that may be present in the vicinity when those activities are conducted
. . message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February 27th stated the
following:

"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school
building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of
landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any
concerns or risks to the public due to present activities . they should go about their normal activities. The risk
concern and exposures to worry c;tbout occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and
discuss with you."
In my text messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present activities;'' I still neede(:I to
discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the school who change the filters poten,tialiy being
exposed to particulates containing radi.onuclides. I am also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass
about the resuspension of previous particulate deposition that occurred and has contaminated the grounds in front of
the school near the entrance.
I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday morning. Danny and I
have talked but it has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he was busy with other matters pertaining
to Blue Ridge. I appreciate air the Danny is doing and realize he has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time he
has been available to spend with me. I also realize Jon is extremely busy as well.
..-.,iso.extremely worried that individuals will die a prema.ture death or have seri.ous health pro.blem.s in the future
~ this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure and the increase incidence of cancer

and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending on exposure scenario and age at time

of exposure.

GP2074

I am also concerned about the operators and workers at the landfill and how close they are working to
previously deposited waste. Are they maintaining a buffer distance to minimize exposure? Is the landfill
resu. m...ing th. e.ir. normal activities before they ass.ess .the e.xten.t. o.f con
... tamination? A.re t.hey continuing to l e ' the public drive up to the area of the working face and discharge w.aste materials they are dropping
off? Has the equipment at the landfill that was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a
precaution?
I want to conclude with the following comments:
../ I

'1

appr~iate

being an employee in the Division of Waste Management, it represents my life's work


-~-~~,-~~and.Yeo.cation.
......
-_____ -:_ _:
__
../ I could not ask for a more talented group of coworkers
../ I appreciate the leadership of our Division .and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny has devoted to
listening to my concerns and.observations.
-~--e-~

~~-----_-

c-. .::-~~--""to-=--~"'~"""'""-~~=--=---~~

I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to talk. I feel like I
have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and what I have feared would happen
and has happened in other states has now occurred in Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this
was processed TENORM rather than the TENORM that is produced at the O & G drilling/fracking sites.
I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their emails when
they are away from the office!
Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your work on this
and the Public Meeting tonight.
George

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC) .
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening.in Irvine, KY, the public will wantto know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on iuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George

<geor9e P. Partricfae Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
4

GP2075

Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

..

..

GP2076

------

-----

---

Partridge, George (EEC)

f#om:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:07 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Gents,
I've _been trying to get ahold of Cory Hoskins from Advanced TE NORM Services for over a week now, but he seems to
have gone silent. I'm going to send him an email, and I was wondering if there were any questions you wanted me to
include because I'm guessing you have not heard from him either,

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The info_-rmatio-n contained in this e-m_-a-ii is intended o_ nly for__ the individual or e_ntit-y to whom it is a_ ddres_s_e_d-. Its-content_s (in_cl-uding
attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
. .lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:23 PM

To: Kalt, Brian


Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
SUbject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr. Kalt;
Thank you for your assistance,
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:11 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
~artridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

ewect:

Dr. Pendergrass,
1

GP2077

I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
~--~-4~1~~680~62'44=~--~--~-~-~~~----~----- -----~~~-~~~-~~----~---~-~~~-~-~--

The information contained in this e-mail Is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {induding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [hlailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.govl


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:08 AM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Than_k you sir.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
MaHstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-'564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Oprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Osecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~nwanted sources http:Owww.trcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To:. Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr~

Pendergrass,

GP2078

I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.

tl!.nd Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in tnis e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is a.ddressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not us~;.
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error/please notify the sender by reply e~mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendrgrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [lllailfo:Curt.Pendergrass@ky~gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 AM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)

Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
.contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont ~rine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from sour~e)"
The ~ rnrern/hr ~n colita.ct ~OS~ rate reading is what we were led to be.lieve this sludge read from others in W'I/.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you pre~iously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I saip, we would be m9re than happy to rn~~e the drive to OH or W.V
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to; felease these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf ~~d inquire as io whether they still
retained these samples.
,
Please let me know about the samples and .thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.

Curt Pendergrass PhD


Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183

..... ~502-564-1492
~ii: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov

Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky .gov/dph/radioactive.btm


Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.goV/Regwatch/
3

GP2079

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the valUes provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspecticm, the radiation spr~,ads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, th~ intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one dist,ance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:

Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:,
,
With a known dose rate reading at given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0:0208 feet), the fixed law
called, the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000rem.

Radiation dose= {Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2'
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2

= 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem

If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2

= 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem

GP2080

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
-nsitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 rnretn/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2

= 0.000000086 tnrem, or 0.0086 rem

Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2

= 0.0718 rem (0.0000718 mrem)

~dRegards,

, a n Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its conte.ots (ioc;lucjing
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you musfnot use, '
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov]

Sent: .Monday, February 29, 2016 4:29 PM


To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)


Subject~ FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016

Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental

nologies Laboratorie.s i don't see. wh. ere any radiochemica.I a. nalysis on any of this material was performed which is
t we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228

from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not theyretained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
5

GP2081

radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
tbe samples if they are available.

Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you to.ok your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Surrimit or
1 foot from 1:he sludge boxes or 1foot from the sludge pit?
-~~-,~-7~1r:i~tha.second,baliot2015~..EBJ?:s.slu~dge__b~a.i:Lexblruted.vef, v..erJ l2v.1. lev~ls of natl!rajl_~ occurring radic>active

. _ ~ .......
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ((\JRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), an.d
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).

Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.


Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564;..1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://Www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd;chfs.ky.gov/rad epav/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky;gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

-;.',

From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Sllbject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.

Each box can hold up to 25 yards. length 20', Height()' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs..
2.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?

Still trying to track this information down.


6

GP2082

3.
""

What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill.
between July and November of 2015?

After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame; Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation,. Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.

Was all the waste similar in nature? ,

FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation
process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
.
been determined to be non-haza.rdous.
.

When. soJublebarium isJ:onverted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it.is-used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus~ stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
~/hr). The highest reading (1 footfrom the sludge) was only 0.8G52 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr): As published by t~e
. . .clear, Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0'.009863 mR per banana).

Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewateririg period on-site, the boxes were rece_ived by j\dvanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, a~ a,ppropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the de.watering process and solidification pro~ess, the extremely low. levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.

Is th.ere analytical data oh the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?

Please see the attached Non-Haz.ardous Waste.Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material. .
If anything else is needed, please let us know.

Kind Regards,

i. .nKalt
I

President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

GP2083

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

~--~~-

i=romti'aitrli:lge; Geor9eri:i:cf[rnailto:Geor9e.Pa-rtridge@kY.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) .
Cc: Kalt, .Brian
Subject: RE: Phone can on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thankyou for responding to Mr. Kalt's que~tion.
George Partridge
KDWM

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone can on February 26, 2016

Hello Mr. Kalt,


As promised, below the

applicabl~

Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.

KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501


(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not includethe natural
radioactivity C>f rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by cont~ollable practices (or by past human practices);

(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100~ http:ljwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm


(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O;R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.

KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
8

GP2084

- - - - -

material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.

"RS 211.869 Penalties. http:l/www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505


(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails tq comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars {$100,000). Each day ohhe violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.

Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management


Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcornpact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
_Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in .a licensed TENORM
waste site, or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
~ntuc. ky Radia.tion Health Branch
~ East Main Street

Mailstop HSlC~A
'
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.thfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed n:!gi.fl~tion changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM


To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone call on February 26, 2016

Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
*1e agency responsi.ble for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
~~ily Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
9

GP2085

Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set

~-~-- _-~ asb_eirrg Cil:~~J2~-~IE!? --~~ .________ ~---~- -~~ ______ -~~~~~------~~~ -------~--- -~ --------~~------ :_____ -~-~~~--~-~--~---~
Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e_-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George~Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM

To: Kalt, Brian

Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, WH~
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and th_e opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I _shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):

Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?

We received callsfrom Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.

Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.

Ou_r understanding was the


waste was sent directly
to the landfill.
.
.

Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?

10

GP2086

Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unperrnitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.

What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?

I do not have that information.


I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management ha$ not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance bf your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:

1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.


2.
3.
4.
5.

Who manufactured the shipping containers?


What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 201S?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there. analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?

Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. we.are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George

<;ieor9e P. Partri<fee Jr., PfiV, P/E., Q,'.EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<image001.gif>

11

GP2087

Partridge, George (EEC)

--om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 1:42 PM
Read: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community

Your message
To: Maybrier, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 :00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 1:42:18 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

..

..
1

GP2088

Partridge, George (EEC)

#_rom:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:05 PM
Weems; George (EEC)
RE: KAR

George;
Where is it in KAR that requires the manifests to be available or kept on file for three years?
Thanks for your help!
George

(jeorge P. Partrirfae Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2089

-tte

PartridQe, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:15 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: RE: KAR

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Thanks for your help!


George

__________________________________

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:14 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RE: KAR
Let me check the permit.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:05 PM

To: Weems, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: KAR
-orge;
Where is it in KAR that requires the manifests to be available or kept on file for three years?
Thanks for your help!
George

(jeorge P. Partrilf{Je Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

..
1

GP2090

GP2091

.,_,

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:14 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: KAR

Let me check the permit.

---

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:05 PM
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KAR

--------

George;
Where is it in KAR that requires the manifests to be available or kept on file for three years?
Thanks for your help!
George

(ieor9e P. PartrUfae Jr.


Depa~!'"~nt. fo.r En.vironme. ntal .Protection

D1v1s1on of Waste Management


0 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

I
I
.
!
-

GP2092

To:
Subject:

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:23 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Curt and George,


I will be sending the message below by email to Nancy Perez, USEPA. I wanted to get your availability for what I assume
will be a conference call first.
Jeri
Hi Nancy,
We would indeed be interested in a meeting, conference call, or other arrangement between Kentucky and West
Virginia. I know Dr. Curt Pendergrass (Kentucky) has been making arrangements to travel to Fairmont Brine Processing
with Jason Frame (West Virginia), and this may happen as early as tomorrow. I think it would _be a helpful follow up for
all three regulatory entities (KY, WV, and USEPA) to talk among themselves sometime next week or at everyone's
earliest convenience. I am available. at any time next week.
We appreciate your efforts,
Jeri

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:45 PM
- - To: Higginbotham, Jeri.(EEC)

~ject: F\ftj: RCRA Quest\on & Fairmont'Brine Disposal


Jeri;
Could we make this call together?
I am available anytime.
Thank you,
George

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]


Sent_: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:07 PM
To: Partridge,-George (EEC)
Subject:_RE: RCRAQuestion & Fairmont Brine Disposal
George,
When you have a chance, give me a call. I spoke to my R2 contact, Carol Amend; and she said that she would coordinate
a meeting between ya'll and the State of West Virginia. West Virginia may be able to shed some light on the Fairmont
Brine Processing's process. Would this be something you all would be interested in?

~cy McKee Perez

Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs


Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
1

GP2093

------~--

U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia


mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-86.74
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste. shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
"
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from compani~s such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

(jeor9e P. PartrUfge Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Fioor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2094

...

I ..

GP2095

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:36 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
FW: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Subject:

It is a conference call with WV Hazardous Waste folks .. Curt, are you interested? George, should
us?

we ask Maridelyto join

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:23 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Curt and George,
I will be sending the message below by email to Nancy Perez, USE PA. I wanted to get your availability for what I assume
will be a conference call first.
Jeri

Hi Nancy,
We would indeed be interested in a meeting, conference call, or other arrangement between Kentucky and West
Virginia. I know Dr. Curt Pendergrass (Kentucky) has been making arrangements to travel to Fairmont Brine Processing
with Jason Frame '(West Virginia), and this may happen as early astomorrow. I think it would be a helpful follow up for
~three reg.ula.tory entities(KY, W
.. V, and USEPA) totalk .among themselves sometime next week or at everyone's
~liest conve.nience. I am available at any time next week.
.

We appreciate your efforts,


Jeri
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:45 PM
To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: FW: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Jeri;
Could we make this call together?
I am available anytime.
Thank you,
George.
From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:07 PM


~-~artridge, George (EEC)
~ect:

RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

George,
1

GP2096

When you have a chance, give me a call. I spoke to my R2 contact, Carol Amend, and she said that she would coordinate
a meeting between ya'll and the State of West Virginia. West Virginia may be able to shed some light on the Fairmont
Brine Processing's process. Would this be something you all would be interested in?

.
I

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia

8 6~:~cv@epa.Qov

I ~~-~ ~~~r~e~: z
I

-~-~-~- _-~-~---- ___ -~----~-~-~~ ___ ---~~~~~---~- _: ___ ___ -~~-~--- ________ -~-----~~

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shiprnents they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed_ Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that_ confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 2,4, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The . , , .
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposat

6/A

Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

<;eorne P. Partridjje Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
2

GP2097

KY Division of Waste Management


200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
~ankfort, KY 40601
' r02) 564-6716 ext. 4651

..

GP2098

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
Sent:

To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:43 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: KAR
401 KAR 47_190..pdf

401KAR47.190 Section 8(b)


Section 8(c) describes the records to be kept for 3 years.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, l\r'larch 03, 2016 2: 15 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: KAR
Thanks for your help!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:14 PM


To: Partridge, George (El:C)
-bject: RE: RE: KAR
Let me check the permit.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:05 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KAR
George;
Where is it in KAR that requires the manifests to be available or kept on file for three years?
Thanks for your help!
George

<;ieor9e P. Partritfae Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2099

~~------------

---

GP2100

Partridge, George (EEC)

f#om:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:54 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George
(EEC); Nielsen, Jamie {EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Green, Robin
. C (EEC); Green, Lawrie (EEC)
FW: Fracking Waste

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Jim answered in the negative, as I recall.


This is a good article, nevertheless.

From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 20141:35 PM


To: Gallagher, James (EEC)
Subject: FW:
Do you know if any regs

~r~o~the way in your agency re: TENORM a1J<:lfracking wastes?

Radioactive

waste B.ooms With Frackinga$ N~~ .

ule_ s Mull~d _,_. _.


.

.
.

..

......... .

'

By Alex NussbaumA.prJ6,20i4 iO:Ol AM ET

eographer: Matthew Staver/Bloomberg


North Dakota wells may produce 27 tons a day of filter socks alone, Scott Ra dig, director of the North Dakota Health
Department's Division of Waste Management said, citing a private hauler's estimate.
1

GP2101

While most material is handled properly, it's "clearly not enough. There is definitely some illegal dumping going on."
Oilfields are spinning off thousands of tons of low-level radioactive trash as the U.S. drilling boom leads to a surge in
illegal dumping and states debate how much landfills can safely take.

State regulators are caught between environmental and public health groups demanding more regulation and the
industry, which says it's already taking proper precautions. As scientists debate the impact of small amounts of radiation
on cancer risks, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says there's not enough evidence to say what level is safe.
Left to police the waste, state governments are increasing their scrutiny of well operators. Pennsylvania and West
Virginia are revising limits for acceptable radiation levels and strengthening disposal rules. North Dak<:>ta's doing the
same, after finding piles of garbage bags filled with radioactive debris in an abandoned building this year.
"We have many more wells, producing at an accelerating rate, and for each of them there's a higher volume of
waste," said Avner Vengosh, a professor of geochemistry at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, who) studied
the issue. Without proper handling, "we are actually building up a legacy of radioactivity in hundreds of point$;~here
people have had leaks or spills around the country."

Source: North Dakota Dept of Health via Bloomberg


On Feb. 28, North Dakota officials found hundreds of irradiated "filter socks" -- used to strain wastewater from wells -dumped in an abandoned building in Noonan, just south of the Canadian border. The filters registered about 40
micro rems of radiation: about eight times the naturally occurring "background level" in the area, the state said.
The waste is a byproduct of the drilling renaissance that has brought U.S. oil and natural gas production to its highest
levels in three decades -- while also unlocking naturally occurring radium from rock formations far underground.

Lengthening List
It's the latest environmental challenge for an industry that's pushed the U.S closer to energy independence while facin~.
questions about the effects on water supplies and air pollution-- and even a surge in earthquakes.
~

GP2102

"There's all kinds of regulations about how to deal with waste and how to transport waste and we follow them all," said
Andrew Paterson, a vice president at the Marcellus Shale Coalition, a trade group that represents companies active in
~nnsylvania d_rilling including Range Resources (RRC) Corp. and Noble Energy Inc. (NBL) "It's very safe and the levels
we're talking about are really low-level."

rat

Questions to Fort Worth, Texas-based Range, a pioneer of Marcellus drilling, were referred to the Shale Coalition. A call
to Noble, based in Houston, wasn't returned.
Studies have found higher radiation levels at oil wellssince fhe 1970s; said Vengosh. What's new is the volume of
material being produced. '~It's just become much more abundant right now with the .intensity" of drilling, he said.

Radium Contamination
The issue is shale rock, the dense formations found to hold immense reserves ofgas and oil. Shale often contains higher
levels of radium -- a chemical element used in industrial X-ray diagnostics and cancer treatments -- than traditional oil
fields, Vengosh said.
Freeing gas and oil is a water-intensive process called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in which drill bits cut thousands of
feet through shale fields to make way for high-pressure water streams that pulverize the rock. The process displaces
radium-tinged subterranean water that comes up through the wells, where it can taint soil and surface equipment.
Radiation levels can build up in sludges at the bottom of tanks, pipeline scale,and other material that comes in extended
contact with wastewater.
i

Buried Waste
Some states allow the contaminated material to be buried at the drill site. Some is hauled away, with varying
requirements for tracking the waste. Some ends up in roadside ditches, garbage dumpsters or is taken to landfills in
violation of local rules, said Scott Radig, director of the North Dakota Health Department's Division of Waste
-nagement.

,.

In that state's Bakken oilfields, "it's a wink~and-a-nod situation," said Darrell Dorgan, a spokesman for the North Dakota
Energy Industry Waste Coalition, a group lobbying for stricter rules. "There's hundreds of thousands of square miles in
northwestern North Dakota and a lot of it is isolated. Nobody's looking at where all of it is going."
That's one of the problems the state is trying to fix with rules announced last week requiring well operators to install
leak-proof containers for temporary storage onsite and to use licensed waste haulers and landfills. North Dakota, the
biggest oil-producing state after Texas, has commissioned a study of radiation risks that may spur further changes, Radig
said.
In the meantime, North Dakota landfills have installed radiation detectors to try to catch loads exceeding the state's
current limits. Anything higher must be trucked hundreds of miles to dumps in neighboring states that have less
restrictive limits.

Radioactive Socks
On Feb. 28, North Dakota officials found hundreds of radioactive "filter socks" -- used to strain wastewater from wells -dumped in an abandoned building in Noonan, just south of the Canadian border. The filters registered about 40
microrems an hour of radiation, about five times the naturally occurring "background level" in the area, Radig said.
That's below the 1,500 microrems delivered from a typicaldental x~ray. Still, it could be a danger if people got close
enough to inhale or ingest radioactive dust, Radig said. Radiation levels also can increase if material accumulates in the
-onment.

GP2103

"Just mention the word 'radioactive' and it scares a lot of people," Radig said. ''They're angry about what's going on."
His agency has received more than a dozen reports this year of oilfield debris rejected by landfills because of radiation
concerns.
Illegal Dumping
North Dakota wells may produce 27 tons a day of filter socks alone, Radig said, citing a private hauler's estimate. While
most material is handled properly, it's "clearly not enough. There is definitely some illegal dumping going on."

'

The state hired a contractor last week to remove the Noonan filter socks. The operation will cost about $13,000 and use
- --~ . =mon6'yJr:o.m-at:1~ir:idustcy.,.,backedJundio~lean~p,.ahandnneclailaru:tgas~Jls,.aa;Dn:lingJ.Q~i3ltb Cle.Rartment .
statement.
Oil and gas companies have been dealing with radioactive waste for decades, said Kari Cutting, vice president of the
North Dakota Petroleum Council, an industry trade group in Bisrnarck. ''The majority of companies that have been active
in other shale plays know how to deal with it," she said. "We do not condone illegal dumping or improper management
in any form."
Landfill Restrictions
In West Virginia, on the edge of the gas-rich Marcellus formation, lawmakers voted last month to require landfills to
I
install radiation monitors and to build separate, lined cells designed to contain drilling debris. The law, signed by
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin March 31, also expanded the amount of oil and gas waste landfills can accept.
With proper precautions, landfills are the safest place for the debris, said Thomas Aluise, a spokesman for the state
Department of Environmental Protection. "A lot of operators were just burying them onsite, unchecked, all over the
state'\ he said.
While it's unclear ho. w much drilling waste is produced nationally, state totals are rising. West Virginia. landfills accepted .
721,000 tons of drilling debris in 2013, a figure that doesn't include loads rejected because they topped radiation limits.
The per-month tonnage more than tripled from July 2012, when records were first kept, through last December.
In Pennsylvania, epicenter of the Marcellus boom, the oil and gas industry sent 1.3 million tons to landfills last year; That
included 16,000 tons of radioactive material, according to Lisa Kasianowitz, a spokeswoman for that state's Department
of Environmental Protection.
R;:idiation Study
Pennsylvania allows producers to bury some waste onsite in lined pits. It's drafting rules to discourage that as a
permanent option, Kasianowitz said in a telephone interview. Further changes could come after Pennsylvania completes
a studyof radiation risks that's looking at everything from worker safety at the wellhead to allowable levels in landfills.
Results are due later this year, she said.
Texas last revised its rules on radioactive material in 2003 and currently has no plans to change them, said Ramona Nye,
a spokeswoman for the state's Railroad Commission, which oversees drilling. T.he state allow~ the waste to be taken to a
landfill, buried onsite or mixed into the soil near a well as long as it's treated to reduce radiation below setlevels.
The rules are "more than adequate" to handle oil and gas waste safely, Nye said in an e-mail.
To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Nussbaum in New York at anussbauml@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Susan Warren at susanwarren@bloomberg.netTina Davis, Steven Frank

GP2104

._,

Partridge, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 3:00 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: RE: KAR

Sent:
To:

Subject:

George;
Thank you!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:43 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: KAR
401KAR47.190 Section 8(b)

Section 8(c) describes the records to be kept for 3 years.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2: 15 PM
To : Weem. s, G.eorge (EEC)
. . . .1
bject: RE: RE: KAR

AiU.

Thanks for your help!


George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:14 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: KAR
Let me check the permit.

From: Partridge, George (EEC) .


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:05 PM
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KAR
George;
Where is it in KAR that requires the manifests to be available or kept on file for three years?
- k s for your help!
George
1

GP2105

{ieor9e P. Part:ridfJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

'

GP2106

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 3:01 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Maridely is the representative for the HWB on TENORM. Yes, I feel we should extend an invitation to her.
Thank you,
George

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:36 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)


Subject: FW: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
It is a conference call with WV Hazardous Waste folks. Curt, are you interested? George, should we ask Maridely to join
us?

From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:23 PM
.:~ Partridge; George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt .(CHFS DPH)

..,,,,.,,,J>Ject: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Curt and George,


I will be sending the message below by email to Nancy Perez, USEPA. I wanted to get your availability for what I assume
will be a conference call first.
Jeri
Hi Nancy,
We would indeed be interested in a meeting, conference call, or other arrangement between Kentucky and West
Virginia. I know Dr. Curt Pendergrass (Kentucky) has been making arrangements to travel to Fairmont Brine Processing
with Jason Frame (West Virginia), and this may happen as early as tomorrow. I think it would be a helpful follow up for
all three regulatory entities (KV, WV, 'and USEPA) to talk among themselves sometime next week or at everyone's
earliest convenience. I am available at any time next week.
We appreciate your efforts,
Jeri

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:45 PM

To: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Subject: FW: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Jeri;
. - d we make this call together?
I am available anytime.
1

GP2107

Thank you,
George

'

From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]


Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:07 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

When you have a chance, give me a call. I spoke to my R2 contact, Carol Amend, and she said that she would coordinate
a meeting between ya'll and the State of West Virginia. West Virginia may be able to shed some light on the Fairmont
Brine Processing's process. Would this be something you all would be interested in?

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov
(404) 562-8674
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal

Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report'' provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.

Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies suc"1
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
2

GP2108

We look forward to talking with you again next week.

,_an ks again for your assistance!


Sincerely,
George

lgeorge P. Partri<fne Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2109

I
I

~~~=-

-~.~~-~-.~~~-~~~~=--~~----~-~-~--

-------~~~~--~

--- -

-~--~~

-- -

GP2110

Partridfle, George (EEC)

#m:
To:

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 3:01 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject:

RE; RE: KAR

Sent:

George, you're way too appreciative ...

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 3:00 PM

To: Weems, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RE: KAR
George;
Thank you!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:43 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RE: KAR
'

KAR 47.190 Section 8(b)


Section 8(c) describes the records to be kept for 3 years.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:15 PM

To: Weems, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RE: KAR
Thanks for your help!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:14 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: RE: KAR
Let me check the permit.

From:. Partridge, George (EEC)


t: Thursday, March 03, 2016 2:05 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: KAR
George;
1

GP2111

Where is it in KAR that requires the manifests to be available or kept on file for three years?

Thanks for your help!


George

<jeur9e P. Partritfne Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
~-~IQ'~ivisiOtl~of~Waste.,MaoagemeDt--~~~~- ~~ ~~~~-~-~~~---~-~-~~--~---~-~-c~~ ~-~-~-~-

__--=- c____________ ~~-~

200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)


Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2112

Partridge, George (EEC)

#-:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 03, 2016 5:07 PM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Accepted: Blue Ridge Landfill

Jon;
I know so much is going on right now and how extremely busy you are.
Just wanted to say thank you again for all you are doing.
George

GP2113

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 7:25 AM
'Chlebowy, William'
Anderson, DannyJ (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
RE: Radiation Detectors

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Hello Bill;
I look forward to reviewing the material you shared. with us on radiation detectors. I will follow up with you next week.

I would like very much to visit the Sycamore Landfill arfd see the Radcom RCW34 detector.
It is pleasure to know you and the others associated with Republic. I appreciate all that Republic does for the waste
management industry and the services you provide.
'

'

I appreciate all you are doing and how supportive you have been as we seek to better understand the waste
management aspects of TENO RM.
I look forward to us keeping in touch and wil.1 get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.
Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
- e a nice day!
George

{ieorge P. PartridfJe Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q.'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankf()rt, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

From: Chlebowy, William [mailto:WChlebowy@republicservices.com]


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:57 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

.ect:

Radiation Detectors

. H i all:

GP2114

--------------

-~

Republic intends to install more sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentucky landfills that
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attached is
literature and a picture of a Radcomm RCW34 unit installed last year at the Sycamore Landfill in
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.

A..

In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P drilling waste which included
provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installed the Radcomm RCW34 detector at the
Sycamore Landfill, a small (200 ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P waste is riot accepted.
Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly, inform us whether
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34
detector rion-compliant (We do not want to be proactive and install this type of unit then find out it
doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your availability if you would like to schedule a visit to the Sycamore Landfill a.Q.d check
out the Radcomm RCW34 detector. Feel free to contact us with any questions or comments or if you
need additional information.

Thank yori.

William L. (Bill) Chlebowy, P.E.

Environmental Manager
Heartland Area
2157Highway151
Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0 502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www .republicservices.com

t/_'pR.,..,,.,_.C
Ir\\
SERVICES

We'll handle it from here."'

GP2115

'

~j

Partridge, George (EEC)

flam:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 8:14 AM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Accepted: Blue Ridge Landfill

GP2116

Ballard, Alexandra (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 8:14 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
Blue Ridge Landfill

Jon has a Director's meeting this morning and needs to move this meeting back to 11 :00.

Alexandra L Ballard
DIVISION OF WPSTE MANAGEMENT
200 FAIR OAKS LANE, 2ND FLOOR
FRANKFORT, KY 4060 l
502-564-6716, X4629
FAX 502-564-4049
ALEXANDRA.BALLARD@KY .GOV
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whicf) it is addressed
and may contain confidential information that is legally privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message Is
not the intended recipient you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication In error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destrc;>y all copies of the original message.

..

GP2117

Partridge, George {EEC)

'#m:

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 8:57 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
FW: Radiation Detectors

George:
Please review in the context of our solid and special waste regulations. Specifically, the following regulations, but there
may be more I am missing:
1. 401KAR 47:190 Section 8
2. 401 KAR 48:070 Section 9 and 12
3. 401 KAR 48:090 Sections 2, 8, 10, 11

Please let Curt or others in the RHB branch comment on the specifications of the instrument, its adequacy, etc. for
detecting LLRW in shipments.
Basically, a joint response is what I am asking for here George.
Thanks,
Danny

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 7:25 AM.


To: Chlebowy, William .
Cc: And~rson, Danny J (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Radiation Detectors

Hello Bill;

1lool< forward to reviewing the material you shared with us on radiation detectors: I will follow up with yo~ next week.
I would like very much to visit the Sycamore Landfill and see the Radcom RCW34 detector.

It is pleasure to know you and the others associated with Republic. I appreciate all that Republic dOes for the waste
management industry and the services you provide.
I appreciate all you are doing and how supportive you have been as we seek to better understand the waste
management aspects of TENORM .

k forward to us keeping in touch and will get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.
Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
1

GP2118

Have a nice day!


George

<geor9e P. Partritfae Jr., Pfi'IJ, P.~.,


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)

e:EP
-

------~-- . =Eraokfar1,..KY__~Hl6~Q1__" ___ ,~~="--~~-------~---==-----~--~~---~~- -----~-- -~--~-~~~--~------------~~-~~----~~-~--(502)

564~6716

ext. 4651

- - - --

From: Chlebowy, )#Villiam [mailto:WChlebowy@repubUcservices.com]

Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:57 PM To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Radiation Detectors
-

Hi all:
Republic intends to install more sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentucky landfills that
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attached is
literature and a picture of a Radcomm RCW34 unit installed last year at the Sycamore Landfill in
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.
In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P dfilling waste which included
provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installed the Radcomm RCW34 detector at the
Sycamore Landfill, a small (200 ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P waste is not accepted.

Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly, inform us whether
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34
detector non-compliant.(We do not want to be proactive and install this type of unit then find out it
doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your ayailability if you would like to schedule a visit to the Sycamore Landfill and check
out the Radcomm RCW34 detector. Feel free to contact us with any questions or comments or if you
need additional information.
Thank you.

William L. {Bill) Chlebowy, P.E.


2

GP2119

Environmental Manager
Heartland Area

,,.57 Highway 151


Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0 502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www.republicservices.com

.1-~
.~

UB. IC
~V RPi.
SERVICl:S

81/l..
. .
W~'ll

L.

handle it from here."'

GP2120

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 12:50 PM
Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Webb, April (EEC);
Hughes, Larry (EEC); Martin, Jerri (EEC); Jump, John (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Loyselle, Maridely (EEC)
RCRA conference call

All,
George Partridge and I have been communicating with Nancy Perez, USEPA Region 4 RCRA specialist,
concerning whether or not Fairmont Brine Processing is subject to RCRA law. She contacted another USEPA
RCRA specialist in WV's region, Carol Amend, to set up a conference call with WV Hazardous Waste
people. The conference call was going to be scheduled for some time next week. Maridely Loyselle, George
Partridge, and I were going to be on the phone from Kentucky. Others on the call will be WV regulators and
USEPA.
Should we proceed with scheduling this conference call for next week?
Jeri
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
:vision of Waste Management

partment for Environmental Protection

200 Fair Oaks Lane


Frankfort. KY 4060 I
502-564-6716

GP2121

Partridge, George (EEC)

-rom:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 8:57 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
FW: Radiation Detectors

George:
Please review in the context of our solid and special waste regulations. Specifically, the following regulations, but there
may be more I arn missing:

1. 401KAR 47:190 Section 8


2. 401 KAR 48:070 Section 9 and 12
3. 401 KAR48:090 Sections i, 8, 10, 11
Please let Curt or others in the RHB branch comment on the specifications of the instrument, its adequacy, etc. for
detecting LLRW in shipments.
Basically, a joint response is what I am asking for here George.
Thanks,
Danny

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Fri~ay, March 04, 2016 7:25 AM


To: Chleb6wy, William
Cc: AndeirSOn, Danny J (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Radiatlqn Detectors
Hello Bill;
I look forward to reviewing the material you shared with us on radiation detectors.. I will follow up witnvou next week.
I would like very much to visit the Sycamore Landfill and see the Radcom RCW34 detector.
It is pleasure to know you and the others associated with Republic. I appreciate all that ~epublic does for the waste
management industry and theservites you provide.
I appreciate all you are doing and how supportive you have been as we seek to better understand the waste
management aspects ofTENORM .

k forward to us keeping in touch and will get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.

Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
1

GP2122

Ha,ve a nice day!


George

<george P. Partritfee Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
~----~-----i;'.t:al'.lktoli,~l!Y,-~lOBOj~~---~-- ~-~~~~-=----~-~----~~~--"-----~----------~-~~-=--~~~ --~(502) 564~6716 ext. 4651

_ _ -~---~--~~-~----~---~~~~-~-~~~~--~~

From: Chlebowy, William [mailto:WChlebowy@republicservices.com]Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:57 PM

-To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Radiation Detectors

Hi all:
Republic intends to installmore sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentucky landfills t h a t .
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attached is
literature and a picture of a Radcomril RCW34 unit installed last year at the Sycamore Landfill in
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.

In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P drilling waste which included
provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installeq the Radco~ RCW34 detector at the
Sycamore Landfill, a small (200 ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P wast~is not accepted.
Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly,_inform us whether
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34
detector non-compliant. (We do not want to be proactive-and install this type of unit then find out it doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your availability if y~u would like to schedule a visit to the Sycamore LandfiJl and _check
out the Radcomm RCW34 detector. Feel free to contact us with any questions or comments Qr if you
need additional information.
Thank you.

William L. (Bill) Chlebowy, P.E.


2

GP2123

Environmental Manager
Heartland Area

"-157Highway151
Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0 502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www.republicservices.com

JlTJ
1J-.\\ .REPUBLIC
SERVICES

We'll handle it from here."'

GP2124

Cc:
Subject:

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 12:50 PM
Maybriar, Jon(EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Webb, April (EEC);
Hughes, Larry (EEC); Martin, Jerri (EEC); Jump, John (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Loyselle, Maridely (EEC)
RCRA conference call

All,
George Partridge and I have been communicating with Nancy Perez, USEPA Region 4 RCRA specialist,
concerning whether or not Fainnont Brine Processing is subject to RCRA law. She contacted. another US EPA
RCRA specialist in WV's region, Carol Amend, to set up a conference call with WV Hazardous Waste
people. The conference call was going to be scheduled for some time next week. Maridely Loyselle, George
Partridge, and I were going to be on the phone from Kentucky. Others on the call will be WV regulators and
USEPA.
Should we proceed with scheduling this conference call for next week?
Jeri
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.

r ~vision of Waste Management

1
.

partment for Environmental Protection

ZOO Fair Oaks Lane


Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716

GP2125

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 1:48 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
FW: Radiation Detectors

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Danny;

I was corresponding with Bill before the meeting with you and Jon today.
How would you like for me to proceed from here?
George
-~---

...

--

William l. (Bill) Chlt:lbowy, P.E.


Environmental Manager
Heartland Area

2157 Highway 151


Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@repubHcservices.com
0

502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908

w www.repubHcservices.com

8
s.. .
~1
.

P
.
.
.

uic

1111i.
.. . SEllVICES .

We'll handle it from here."'

: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Friday, March 04, 2016 8:52 AM
To: Chlebowy, William
Subject: RE: Radiation Detectors
~nt:

GP2126

Hi Bill;

The week of March 21 is excellent for me.


Please select a time and date and I will be available.
Thank you!

From: Chlebowy, William [mailto:WChlebowy@republicservices.com]


Serit: Friday, March 04, 2016 8:47 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Radiation Detectors

Hi George:

I am out on vacation most of the Mar 14 week. Right now, I am open the entire week of Mar 2 h l will
be out of the office most of the week of Mar 28. Let me know what works best for you.
Thanks.

William L. (Bill) Chlebowy, P.E.


Environmental Manager
Heartland Area

2157 Highway 151


Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0

502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908

w www.republicservices.i::om

. . ....
. .' . . RIJPU8LIC
~

SERVICES

We'll handle it from here~"'

----- ---
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:Georqe.Partridqe@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 7:25 AM

To: Chlebowy, William


Cc: Ander5on, Danny J (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHF$ DPH)
Subject: RE: Radiation Detectors

Hello Bill;

GP2127

I look forward to reviewing the material you shared with us on radiation detectors. I will follow up with you next week.

-would like very much to visit the Sycamore Landfill and see the Radcom RCW34 detector.
It is pleasure to know you and the otl)ers associated with Republic. I appreciate all that Republic does for the waste
management industry and the services you provide.
I appreeiate all you are doing and how supportive you have been as we seek to better understand the waste
management aspects C>fTENORM.
I look forward to us keeping i.n touch and will get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.
Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
Have a nice day!
George

<ge_or9e P. PartridfJe Jr., Pfi'D,

P.~.,

Q'EP

Department f()r Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564'.'6716 ext. 4651

From: Chlebowy, William [mailto:WChleboWy@republicservices.com]


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 20i6 12:57 PM

To: Pendergrass, Cutt (CHFS DPH); Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Radiation Detectors

Hi all:
Republic intends to install more sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentucky landfills that
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attached is
literature and a picture of a Radcomm RCW34 unit installed last year at the Sycamore Landfill in
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.
In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P drilling waste which included
provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installed the Radcomm RCW34 detector at the
. flj_amore Landfill, a SJllll]l (200 ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P waste is not aq;epted.
Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly, inform us whether
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34

GP2128

detector non-compliant. (We do not want to be proactive and install this type of unit then find out it
doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your availability if you would like to schedule a visit to the Sycamore Landfill and check
out the Radcotnm RCW34 detector. Feel free to.contact us with any questions or comments.or if yc)u
need additional information.

Thank you.

William L (Bill) Chlebowy, P.E.


Environmental Manager
Heartland Area
2157 Highway 151
Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0 502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www.republicservices.com

/l,.. . lf&PllB
. LIO
SERVICES

\!5:f.
.

'

We'll handle it from here."'

GP2129

Partridge, George (EEC)

-rom:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 2:17 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Radiation Detectors

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

George:
I'm sorry, but no outof state travel is authorized. As far as visiting Green Valley, that's fine, but please do not offer any
cornrnent as to the effectiveness of the instrument. This couJd b.e construed as a permit review (and Approval) without
an actual application submittal to us. If Green Valley wants to modifY their waste inspection procedures, they are free to
do so as a permit modification submitted to us on the appropriate forrn, with the appropriate supporting ciocumentation
and with the appropriate fee and signatures. We would most likely get CHFS input. during our review as
Well if it involves
..
radiation detection equipment
'
'

See me if you would like to discuss further.


Thanks, George.
Danny

From: Partridge,George (EEC)


Sent: Friday., M.arch 04, 20.16 1:48 PM
: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: FW: Radiation Detectors
Danny;
I was corresponding With Bill before the meeting with you and Jon today.
How would you like for me to proceed from here?
George

From: Chlebowy, William [mailto:WChlebowy@republiC:services.com]

Sent: Friday, March 04~ 2016 1:21 PM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Radiation Detectors

Hi George:
How does Tues, Mar 22 at 1:00 look?

.Aiam L. (Bill) Chlebowy, P.E.

~ironmental Manager
Heartland Area

GP2130

2157Highway151
Fnmkfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0 502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www .republicservices.com

,R..,..

~~c-~wenhandte itfrom here:"

____,~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~-,-~~--~~-:--:-~~~

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 8:52 AM
To: Chlebowy, William
Subject: RE: Radiation Detectors
Hi Bill;
The.week of March 21 is excellent for me.

Please select a time and date and I will be available.


Thank you!
George

From: Chlebowy,William[mailto:WChlebowy@repoblicservices~com]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 8:47 AM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE; Radiation Detectors

Hi George:
I am out oil vacation most of the M'1f 14 week. Right now, I am open the entire week of Mar 21. I will.
you.
'
be out of the office most of the week of Mar 28. Let me kllow what works best

for

Thallks.

William L. (llill) Chlebowy, P.E.


Environmental Manager
Heartland Area

2157 Highway 151


Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
o so2~209-3B16 c 502-403-8908
2

GP2131

w www .republicservices.com

We'l.1 handle it from here.Ti;

Fro.m: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]


Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 7:25 AM
To: Chlebowy, William
Cc:: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Radiation Detectors
H~llo Bill;

I look forward to reviewing the material you shared with us on radiation detectors. I will follow up with you next week.

I would like very much to visit the Sycamore Landfill and see the Radcom RCW34 detector.
It is pleasure to know you and the others associated with Republic. I appreciate all that Republic does for the waste
managerrient industry and the services you provide.
'ppreciate all you are doing and how supportive you have been as we seek to better understand the waste
management aspects of TENORM.
I look forward to us keeping in touch and will get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.
Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
Have a nice day!
George

<geor9e P~ PartrfdBe Jr., Pli1J, P.'E., Q:EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oa,ks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2132

From: Chlebowy, William [mailto:WChlebowy@republicservices.com]


Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:57 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Radiation Detectors

'

Hi all:

Republic intends to install more sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentuclfy lan4fills_~a,t
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attachetlis
I ~----nteramreanaapfcmre-ora~Raucomm ltC'.W37*--um.t instatled"tam year m1lre-Sycanmre-tan-dfitlin= -~--~,.~
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.
In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P drilling waste which included

provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installed the Radcomm RC)V34 detecfor at the
Sycamore Landfill, a small (200ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P waste is not accepted.
Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly, inform us whether.
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34
detector non-compliant. (We do not want to be proactive and install this type of unit then find out it
doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your availability if you would lil\e to schedule a visit to the Sycamore Landfill and check
out the Radcomm RCW34 detector. Feel free to contact us with any questions or comments or if you
need additional information.
Thank you.

William L. (Bill) Chlebowy, P.E.


Environmental Manager
Heartland Area
2157Highway151
Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0 502-209-3816. c 502-403-8908
w www.republicservices.com

R, . .
81. ~ RSP.U.Bl...IC
SEFIVICES

'1J-.v

We'll handle it from here:"

GP2133

To:

Cc:
Subject:
Atta.chments:

McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>


Friday, March 04, 2016 2:18 PM
amend, carol
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Lamberth, Larry
FW: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Adv Disposal Profile Sheets & Approval Review Form.pdf; Fairmont Brine plan.pdf

Carol,
About two weeks ago, KYDEP requested that I offer them a regulatory interpretation (whether it could be a potential
HW) on a waste t.hat was received by a Subtitle D landfill located in Kentucky. The waste originated from the clean out of
an unknown process at a brine processing facility located in Fairmont, West Virginia, called Fairmont Brine
(http:ljfairmontbrine.com). The facility is claiming that the waste is exempt per the O&G exclusion, 40 C.F.R. 261.4(b)(S).
As such, no Waste profile was provided before the waste was disposed in the fandfill. KYDEP and I wanted to find out
.more information about the wast~ generation process before was agree that this waste is indeed exempt.
Fairmont Brine is a brine processing facility that specializes in processing "flowback and produced fluid" (brine) from oil
and gas exploration .. Based on information f.rom their website, they process the brine by filtering the material to remove
organics, TSS, turbidity, Ba, Sr, and O/G. After filtration, the material is allowed evaporation/crystallization, resulting in
salt and water, which they sell or give away. The material the landfill received was generated from the clean out of some
process at the West Virginia facility. KYDEP was provided with the facility's Sludge Disposal Plan from the West Virginia
Office of Environmental Health Services; so. we are assuming it was some sort of sludge that was in need of dewatering.
~ ~ren't sure w~~re the dewat~ring occurred, at t~e facility or at some point ~hile it wa.s in transi: (if it matters) .. The
,...-iltty used a fac1hty called Advanced TENO RM .services to transport the material from Fairmont Brme to the landfill.

'ff

from KVDEP called Fairmont Brine to get inf()rmation on their process and how the material was generated;
however, the facility wouldn't provide them any information. We were wondering if the State of West Virginia has any
knowledge about this facility and/or about the process that would generate this waste.

I've attached a couple of documents that were provided by KVDEP:


1) [)isposal Profile Sheets provided by the landfill located in Kentucky
2) Fairmont Brine's Sludge Disposal Plan
It would be great if we could get everyone on a call to discuss this. My contacts at KVDEP are Jeri Higginbotham and
George Partridge, cc'd~We are available to meet next week, either Tuesday 'afternoon (except from 2:00,... 3:00), March
8, or any time on Thursday (except from 9:30-10:30), March 10 (EST).
Thank you for your help!

Nancy McKee Perez


Hazardous Waste, UST, PCB & OPA Programs
Enforcement & Compliance Branch
Resource Conservation & Restoration Division
U.S. EPA Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia
ee erez.nanc @e a. av

.) 562-8674

GP2134

From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov}


Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:09 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy <McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov>
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@kv.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
~--"~lcmtlfill~;n-~e'ntm:ky'from"Fcirrmont~Brine-Processingi~--~-~----~-- --~--.~..-- -----------~-~- -~---~~-.~~-

Please find attached the following documents:


Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and Nove_mber 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TE!"!ORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of Incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.

Than~s again f~r reviewin~ these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies suchA

as Fairmont Brine Processing.


We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George

()eorne P. Partridf:Je Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2135

'

e (EEC)

To:

Subject:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 3:04 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Webb, April
(EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC); Martin, Jerri (EEC); Jump, John {EEC}; Partridge, George {EEC);
Loyselle, Maridely (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC)
RE: RCRA conference call

Good afternoon,
I wanted to bring everyone up to speed on the RCRA portion of DWMs
investigation into TENORM generated outside of Kentucky and disposed of in
, Kentucky landfills. A request was recently sent to Advance TENORM Services
requiring information. Their responses will be reviewed by the Hazardous Waste
Branch to make a determination whether this material is subject to RCRA
regulation. The Hazardous Waste Branch will review the findings of this
investigation and decide a future course of action. At this time there will be no
need for Kentucky to participate in a call with US EPA or the State of West
Virginia.

c~cerely,

e
From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 12:50 PM
To:.Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Webb, April (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC);
Martin, Jerri (EEC); Jump, John (EEC)

Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Loyselle, Maridely (EEC)


Subject: RCRA conference call

All,
George Partridge and I have been communicating with Nancy Perez, USEPA Region 4 RCRA specialist,
concerning whether or not Fairmont Brine Processing is subject to RCRA law. She contacted another USEPA
RCRA specialist in WV' s region, Carol Amend, to set up a conference call with WV Hazardous Waste
people. The conference call was going to be scheduled for some time next week. Maridely Loyselle, George
Partridge, and I were going to be on the phone from Kentucky. Others on the call will be WV regulators and
USEPA.
Should we proceed with scheduling this conference call for next week?

. ,W. Higgmbolluun, Ph.D.


Division of Waste Management
1

GP2136

Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, March 04, 2016 6:01 PM
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC);
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Irvine KY - 022716.pdf

Tracking:

Recipient

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Delivery

Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Delivered: 3/4/2016 6:03 PM

Weems, George (EEC)

FYI - Requested notes and field measurement taken in Irvine, KY on February 27,2016.

<george P. Partrirlge Jr.

Department for Environmental Protection


Division of Waste Management
0.. Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
nkfort, KY 40601
2) 564-6716 ext. 4651

.,
1

GP2137

Irvine, KY - School Site Visits


High School and Middle School
Saturday, February 27
9;10 AM -1;58 PM.

Sample Number

F-1
F-2
F-3
F-.4

37

83.98611
37.73663; 83.98605
37.73684; 83;98617
37.73676; 83.98641
37,73669; 83.98665
37.73704; 83.98628
37,73770; 83.. 98629
37.73692; 83.98669
37.73679; 83.98706

F~S

<t=-6

Meter CPS

GPS Coorctinates
37~73673;

. F-7
F..:8
F-9

35~36

33-36
48
26
27
25-26
J8
22

Notes:

1. Counts in front ofschool building; 9 - 12 cps (5-8 with same meter used for measurements in
table.)
Counts increased .as one walked across grounds from front of building to hig~way running
parallel to school: 15- 23 cps (Different handheld meter than one used for table.)
3. Counts on grounds adjacent to entrance road leading from highway to front of building: (23-25
cps) (Different handheld meter than one used for table.)
4. Counts from highway to gate at landfill entrance increased: 22, 26 to 27, 37, 36; general trend
was an increase in counts from school to landfill entrance which could potentially be attributed
to particulate deposition on the surface of shale geology.
2.

with handheld
Attachment: Figure,
notes and photograpahs
taken in field at time of measurements
.
...
..
.
instruments.
'

3&-37---------------~-

Not drawn to scale, just for


illustrative purposes!

CPS23:24

CPS trom PartlcUlate Deposfton

CPS from Shale Geolo&v

School Building

Landfill Gate

GP2138

GP2139

I
GP2140

PhotographsfromSiteVisit on February 27'" 2016

GP2141

lfl'

GP2142

GP2143

I. .

GP2144

Partridge, George (EEC}

~m

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your meS$i19e has been delivered to the following recipients:


Briggs, Lindsey (EEC) (Undsey.Briggs@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

GP2145

Partridge, George (EEC)

~m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016 '.

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Maybriar. Jon (EEC) (Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

..
1

GP2146

Partridge, George (EEC)

~m:
To:

Sent:.
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and ObseNations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

..
1

GP2147

Partridge, George (EEC)

fl!am:

To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Weems, George (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Weems,
George
{EEC)
{Georqe.Weems@ky.gov)
.
t
.
..
.
Subject: RE: Notes and

Obs~rvations

Requested for February 27, 2016

..

..
1

GP2148

Partridge, George (EEC)

flam:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Hatton, Tony (EEC) (Tony.Hatton@ky.gov)

Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

GP2149

Partridge, George (EEC)

'--=
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your rne$sage has been delivered to the following recipients:


Bhattacharyya, Anjan (anjan.bhattacharyya@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

GP2150

Partridge, George (EEC)

"--=
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J .(EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:08 PM
Read: RE: Notes and ObseNations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Notes and ObseNations Requested for February 27, 2016
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 6:02:47 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, March 04, 2016 6:07:54 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

..
1

GP2151

Partridge, George (EEC)

e!-=
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 9:27 PM
Read: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your message
(

To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)


Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 6:02:47 PM (UTC-05:00). Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, March 04, 2016 9:26:52 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP2152

To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Saturday, March 05, 2016 1:18 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC)
Fairmont Brine Processing - Manifests_Email 1 of 3
Quote_Sludge Disposal_Advanced TENOPRM Services_7-7-2015.pdf; Manifests_Sludge
Disposal_l of 3.pdf

Dr. Pendergrass,
Attached is the quote from Advanced TENORM Services as well as the first of three attachments, which contain the
manifests and tickets from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Email one of three.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

. . .2-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP2153

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Attachments:.

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Saturday, March OS, 2016 1:19 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Fairmont Brine Processing - Manifests_Email 2 of 3
Manifests_Sludge Disposal_2 of 3.pdf

Dr. Pendergrass,
Email two of three.

Kind Regards,

Brian.Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LL<;
412:-680-6244

The .information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any atta. ch. m.e.nts) are confidential and may contain privileged i.nformation ..If you are .not an. intend..ed rec. ipient you rnust. not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
ete and destroy the message.

From: Kalt, 13rian

Sent: Saturday, March OS, 2016 1:19 PM


To: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov

cc: 'Partridge, George (EEC)'

Subject: Fairmont Brine Processing - Manifests--Email 1 of 3

Dr. Pendergrass,
Attached is the quote from Advanced TENO RM Services as well as .the first of three attachments, which contain the
manifests and tickets from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Email one .of three.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
. . . . .montBrine Processing, LLC
9"2-680-6244

GP2154

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and

L.
~

delete and destroy the message.

GP2155

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>


Saturday, March OS, 2016 1:20 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Fairmont Brine Processing - Manifests_Email 3 of 3
Manifests,..Sludge Disposal_3 of 3.pdf

Dr. Pendergrass,
Email three of three.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President.
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attach. me.nts) are con'fidential an. d m. ay contain pr.ivilege.d information. If you are not an intended recipient yo. u mustn ot use,
close, disseminate; copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
lete and destroy the message.
.

From: Kalt, Brian


Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 1:20 PM

To: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Cc: ;Partridge, George (EEC)'
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing - Manifests_Email 2 of 3
Dr. Pendergrass,
Email two of three.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC

412-680-6244

information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
1

GP2156

From: Kalt, Brian Sent: Saturday, March OS, 2016 1:19 PM


To: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Cc: 'Partridge, George (EEC)'
Subject: Fairmont Brine Processing - Manifests_Email 1 of 3

Dr. Pendergrass,

~ Attac-hecTiSft1eq~~ot;f~~~~~Adva~~ecirENORIVrserviCe~sasweTfa-stilefirst-of1firee ahacchme-ntS,\vhTcficontaTn- tlle---~~


manifests and tickets from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Email one of three.

Kind Regards,

Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412~680-6244

The infqrmation contained in this e~mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
ariy attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its cont~nts. If you receive this _e-mai_I in error, please notify the sende_r by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
...

_.A

GP2157

e (EEC)

To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

George Partridge <gjpartridge@windstream.net>


Sunday, March 06, 2016 12:26 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Partridge, George {EEC); Delong, Deborah (EEC); 'George Partridge'
RE: Article from UT
UT - Quest - Cover Pagejpeg

Hello Curt and Todd;


Please find attached an article from one of my UT publications that I wanted to share with you. Because of the file size, I
will be sending you the pages of the articles separately. This will be my last email to you or anyone related to any of the
issues surrounding the investigation that is taking place regarding shipments of TENO RM into Kentucky and the Blue
Ridge Landfill or any references related to TENORM.
I was called into Jon Maybriar's, our Assistant Director's Office for the DWM on Friday morning, March 4 at 11:00
AM. Jon and Danny Anderson, our Solid Waste Branch Manager were present.
Jon shared that there are meetings taking place with attorneys frorn both the state and companies involved. Also Daniel
Cleveland has instructed him what he could share with me or others.
I have been instructed to stop all the investigative work I am doing which included working with EPA Region's 2 and 4
. who were h. elping u.s understand better the waste from a "brine processing facility" as well as obtaining records (waste
termination on materials generated by that facility, process information, etc.) related to Fairmont Brine
ocessing. Tt)ey were also helping us understand how other states are managing and regulating this type (TENORM) of

waste. Anything regarding EPA that I was involved with will b.e handled by April Webb from this point forward.
From this point on I am not to acknowledge any emails or phone calls I receive from anyone both with our own state
government as well as anyone contacting me from the outside such as EPA andthe state governments of Ohio and West
Virginia.
Jon specifically mentioned you Curt and the DPH. If I receive anything from the DPH I am not to reply or even
acknowledge I received the email message. I am to forward all phone call messages and emails as I received them to
Danny Anderson for him to handle appropriately.
I am one to at least say "thank you" when an email message is sent to me and I instructed to no longer do that.
I am also not going to say anything, mention anything, or acknowledge anything with my co-workers related to what is
going on.
In essence, I have been totally "silenced" on anything related to our landfills, TENORM, the 0 & G industry, or any of the
events leading up to what has occurred here in Kentucky regarding the receipt of out of state wastes that are potentially
radioactive.
When I return to work Monday, I will be going about my routine work in the Solid Waste Branch. I will be acting and
. . .ng about my daily work responsibilities as if I had no knowledge or interests in what has taken place unless I am
~tructed otherwise by Danny. I will not be talking or discussing anything associated with TENORM with anyone
Including those I work with in the Solid Waste Branch.

GP2158

I also feel my time is limited with the Solid Waste Branch and I will be relocated in the future.
I appreciate all that everyone has done, the support and encouragelllen.t I have recei.ved from others, and espeCially for&...
those that listened and took an interest in my concerns regarding the well -being and health of our operators at our
.....
landfills and the surrounding communities they serve.
I wish you all the best,
Sincerely,
George Partridge

GP2159

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

George Partridge <gjpartridge@windstream.net>


Sunday, March 06, 2016 12:30 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Delong, Deborah (EEC); 'George Partridge'
RE: Article from UT
Article - Page 2Jpeg

Page 2 of Article

GP2160

---

---~

------

Partridge, George (EEC)

9t~=
To:

Cc:

Subject:
Attachments:

George Partridge < gjpartridge@windstream.net>


Sunday, March 06, 2016 12:32 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Delong, Deborah (EEC); 'George Partridge'
RE: Article from UT
Article - Page 4jpeg

Page 4 of article

'

GP2161

.m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

George Partridge <gjpartridge@windstream.net>


Sunday, March 06, 2016 12:32 PM
Pendergrass; Curt (CHFS DPH); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Delong, Deborah (EEC); 'George Partridge'
RE: Article from UT
Article - Page 3jpeg

Page 3 of Article

GP2162

Partridge, George (EEC)

tit~=
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

George Partridge <gjpartridge@windstream.net> .


Sunday, March 06, 2016 12:34 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Delong, Deborah (EEC); 'George Partridge'
RE: Article from UT
Article - Page ljpeg

Page 1 of article.

GP2163

'Partridge, George (EEC)

~m:
~nt:

George Partridge <gjpartridge@windstream.net>


Sunday, March 06, 2016 12:41 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Delong, Deborah (EEC)
RE: RE: Article from UT

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Just wanted to be _sure you all received my email message if the article did not go through because of its size and being

an attachment.
Thank you,
George

From: George Partridge [mailto:gjpartridge@windstream.net]


Sen~: Sunday, March 06, 2016 11:57 AM

To: 'Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov' <Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov>; 'todd.hendricks@ky.gov' <todd.hendricks@ky.gov>.


Cc: 'george.partridge@ky.gov' <george.partridge@ky.gov>; 'Deborah.Delong@ky.gov' <Deborah.Delong@ky.gov>;
'George Partridge' <gjpartridge@windstream.net>
Subject: RE: Article from uT
Hello Curt and Todd;
-Please find attach. ed an a.rt
.. icle fr.om o_ne of my UT publications that I wanted to. shar.e w_. ith you. This will be my last
- - a i l to you
anyone related to any of the issues surrounding the investigation that is taking place regarding
shipments of TENO RM into Kentucky and the Blue Ridge Landfill or any references related to TENO RM.

or

I was called into Jon Maybriar's, our Assistant Director's Office for the DWM on Friday morning; March 4 at 11:00
AM. Jon and Danny Anderson, our Solid Waste Branch Manager were present.
Jon shared that there are meetings taking place with attorneys from both the state and companies involved. Also Daniel
Cleveland has instructed him what he could share with me or others.
I have been i_nstructed to stop all the investigative work I am doing which included working with EPA Region's 2 and 4
who were helping us understand better the waste from a "brine processing facility" as well as obtaining records .(waste
determination on materials generated by that facility, process information, etc.) related to Fairmont Brine
Processing. They were also helping us understand how other states are managing arid regulating this type (TENORM) of
waste. Anything regarding EPA that I was involved with will be handled by April Webb from this point forward.
From this point on I am not to acknowledge any emails or phone calls I receive from anyone both with our own state
government as well as anyone contacting me frorn the outside such as EPA and the state governments of Ohio and West
Virginia.
Jon specifically mentioned you Curt and the DPH. If I receive anything from the DPH I am not to reply or even
acknowledge I received the email message. I am to forward all phone call messages and emails as I received them to
. n y Anderson for him to handle appropria~ely.
I am one to at least say "thank you" when an email message is sent to me and I instructed to no longer do that.

GP2164

I am also not going to say anything, mention anything, or acknowledge anything with my co-workers related to what is
going on.
In essence, I have been totally "silenced" on anything related to our landfills, TENO RM, the O & G industry, or any of t h e .
events leading up to what has occurred here in Kentucky regarding the receipt of out of state wastes that are potentially
radioactive.

When I return to work Monday, I will be going about my routine work in the Solid Waste Branch. I will be acting and
going about my daily work responsibilities as if I had no knowledge or interests in what has taken place unless I am
=~-~jostOl_cted~otb~erwls~.byJlanuy_.J~will JJOt.be_Jitlkin.~Qr_dis~ys~LDg auy.!bl'1K~~~QCj[!~d_Y!!i!Jl~!~NORM with an'[one --- ~--~-~~

including those I work with in the Solid Waste Branch.

.- -

..

.~

I also feel my time is limited with the Solid Waste Branch and I will be relocated in the future.
I appreciate all that everyone has done, the support and encouragement I have received from others, and especially for
those that listened and took an interest in my concerns regarding the well -being and health of our operators at our
landfills and the surrounding communities they serve.
I wish you all the best,
Sincerely,
George Partridge

GP2165

~-

Partridge, George (EEC) .

a.m
~nt:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

George Partridge <gjpartridge@windstream.net>


Sunday, March 06, 2016.12:41 PM
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC); Delong, Deborah (EEC)
RE: RE: Article from UT

Just wanted to be sure you all received my email message if the article did not go through because of its size and being
an attachment.
Thank you,
George
From: George Partridge [mailto:gjpartridge@windstream.net]

Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 11:57 AM


To: 'Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov' <Curt.Pendergrass@ky.gov>; 'todd.hendricks@ky.gov' <todd.hendricks@ky.gov>
Cc: 'george.partridge@ky.gov' <george.partridge@ky.gov>; 'Deborah.Delong@ky.gov' <Deborah.Delong@ky.gov>;
'George Partridge' <gjpartridge@windstream.net>
Subject: RE: Article from UT
Hello Curt and Todd;
.lease find attached an article from one of my UT publications that I wanted to share with you. This will be my last
Aail to you or anyone related to any of the issues surrounding the investigation that is taking place regarding
~pments of TENO RM into Kentucky and the Blue Ridge Landfill or any references related to TENO RM.
I was called into Jon Maybriar's, our Assistant Director's Office for the DWM on Friday morning, March 4 at 11:00
AM. Jon and Danny Anderson, our Solid Waste Branch Manager were present.
Jon shared that there are meetings taking place with attorneys from both the state and companies involved. Also Daniel
Cleveland has instructed him what he could share With me or others.
I have been instructed to stop all the investigative work I am doing which included working with EPA Region's 2 and.4
who were helping us understand better the waste from a "brine processing facility" as well as Obtaining records (waste
determination on materials generated by that facility, process information, etc.) related to Fairmont Brine
Processing. They were also helping us understand how other states are managing and regulating this type (TENORM) of
waste. Anything regarding EPA that I was involved with will be handled by April Webb from this point forward.
From this point on I am not to acknowledge any emails or phone calls I receive from anyone both with our own state
government as well as anyone contacting me from the outside such as EPA and the state governments of Ohio and West
Virginia.
Jon specifically mentioned you Curt and the DPH. If I receive anything from the DPH I am not to reply or even
acknowledge I received the email message. I am to forward all phone call messages and emails as I received them to
. n y Anderson for him to handle appropriately.
I am one to at least say "thank you" when an email message is sent to me and I instructed to no longer do that.

GP2166

I am also not going to say anything, mention anything, or acknowledge anything with my co-workers related to what is
going on.
In essence, I have been totally "silenced" on anything related to our landfills, TENORM, the O & G industry, or any of t h .
events leading up to what has occurred here in Kentucky regarding the receipt of out of state wastes that are potentially
radioactive.
When I return to work Monday, I will be going about my routine work in the Solid Waste Branch. I will be acting and
going about my daily work responsibilities as if I had no knowledge or interests in what has taken place unless I am
I

~-~~~. -:~~~~~~~:~~!~:rt:~~::~~~~~~~~h~~~~::~:i!a~~~;~-~~~iscussingAUY1binK~~s9cl~t~ct\f\/.!lt} TEN.() RM with .'1f!YOnf!_-~---~~~-~-.-~


I also feel my time is limited with the Solid Waste Branch and I will be relocated in the future.
I appreciate all that everyone has done, the support and encouragement I have received from others, and especially for
those that listened and took an interest in my conc~rns regarding the well -being and health of our operators at our
landfills and the surrounding communities they serve.
I wish you all the best,
Sincerely,
George Partridge

GP2167

Partridge, George (EEC)

IJtm:
Sent:
Subject:

Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, March 07, 2016 8:17 AM
Read: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your me}~sage
To: Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 6:02:47 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, March 07, 2016 8:17:22 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

19

..
1

GP2168

GP2169

.m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:
To:

Subject

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)


Monday, March 07, 2016 8:26 AM .
Nielsen, Jamie (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Litchfield, Arline
(EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
FW: TENORM disposition

FYI.
Specifically, this is about Blue Ridge and Green Valley, but I suspect there are other sites.

Lindsey Briggs, PE
Environmental Engineer Supervisor
502 5646716

-----Original Message----From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 7:36 AM
To: Briggs, Lindsey {EEC); Young, Anita {EEC); Bickner, Bob (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC); Green, Lawrie
{EEC)
-~bject: FW: TENORM disposition
. e below and make sure staff in your section are aware of this protocol.

Thanks,
Danny

-----Original .Message----From: Scott, R. Bruce (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, March OS, 2016 11:39 AM
To: Horne, John (EEC); Quarles, Jackie (EEC); Cleveland, Daniel (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon {EEC); Anderson,
Danny J (EEC); Keatley, Aaron (EEC); Brannock, Lanny (EEC); Price, Ronald (EEC); Carlson, Brandon (EEC); Cummins, Jeff
(EEC); Alteri, Sean (EEC); Goodmann, Peter (EEC); Gabbard, Tom (EEC); Akers, Paulette (EEC); Taylor, Larry (EEC); Mura,
John A
Subject: TENORM disposition
Reminder:
In light of the ongoing investigation(s) and evaluation of TENORM disposition and landfill related matters, this is a
reminder to DEP staff of both long-standing protocol and procedures regarding our interactions with ongoing
estigations. This will help ensure that all of the appropriate parties within the agency are better informed,

' communication is better coordinated, and decisions appropriately made to best resolve the issues.

GP2170

1. Because this is currently primarily a DWM issue within the Department, any responses, discussion, and inquiries
regarding the specific matters of these investigations and evaluations from parties outside of the department are to be
first coordinated thru both the DWM Director's office and OGC (Daniel Cleveland and Jackie Quarles). This would include
DNR, CHFS, or any of the agencies that we routinely interact with, in addition ~o the public, regulated entities, and local.
officials.
2. Any media inquiries and responses, consistent with prior protocol, are to be coordinated and referred first to Lanny
and John Mura (EEC Communications Director) with notification to the DWM Director's office and OGC (Daniel Cleveland
and Jackie Quarles). John will be lead on determining who and how the agency is to respond.
3. Any inquiries with the Attorney General's office, consistent with long-standing protocol, are to coordinated and
referred first with OGC {Daniel Cleveland and Jackie Quarles) with notification to the DWM Directos's office.
4. Any open records request response regarding these specific issues, consistent with with prior agency protocol, are to
be coordinated with both the DWM Director's office and OGC prior to finalization.
The above procedures will help ensure that the agency appropriately manages and oversees our actions, interactions,
and responses. I greatly appreciate your continued efforts on this important issue as we work collectively to resolve the
issues.
If you have any questions, please let me know at any time.
Thanks,
Bruce
Sent from my iPad

'

GP2171

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

To:

Sent:
Subject:

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, March 07, 2016 8:28 AM
Read: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your message
To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 6:02:47 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, March 07, 2016 8:27:20 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

GP2172

Partridge, George (EEC)

~~:
To:

Subject:

Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Monday, March 07, 2016 8:37 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

Thank you George I will turn these over to Matt.


Regards
AJ

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM


To: Bhattacharyya, Anjan
.
Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: R!=: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
FYI - Requested notes and field measurement taken in Irvine, KY on February 27,2016.

{ieorge P. Partriffee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB}
Frankfort, KY 40601
~2) 564-6716 ext. 4651

..
1

GP2173

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Hatton, Tony (EEC)


Monday, March 07, 201611:47 AM
EEC DEP DWM Dir. Office; EEC DEP DWM SWB; EEC DEP DWM HWB; EEC DEP DWM SFB
Central Office
Cleveland, Daniel (EEC); Quarles, Jackie (EEC)
FW: TENORM disposition

I understand that most of you are not involved in this issue so I apologize upfront for you being included. For those who
are, and may become involved as the issue progresses see below. If you have any questions please let me know.

Anthony R. Hatton, P.G.


Director, Kentucky Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716

'

-----Original Message----From: Scott, R. Bruce (EEC)


Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 11:39 AM
Horne, John (EEC); Quarles, Jackie (EEC); peveland, Daniel (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); A.nderson,
ny J (EEC); Keatley, Aaron (EEC); Brannock, Lanny (EEC); Price, Ronald (EEC); Carlson, Brandon (EEC); Cummins, Jeff
C); Alteri, Sean (EEC); Goodmann, Peter (EEC); Gabbard, Tom (EEC); Akers, Paulette (EEC); Taylor, Larry (EEC); Mura-,John A
Subject: TENORM disposition
Reminder:
In light of the ongoing investigation(s) and evaluation of TENORM disposition and landfill related matters, this is a
reminder to DEP staff of both long-standing protocol and procedures regarding our interactions with ongoing
investigations. This will help ensure that all of the appropriate parties within the agency are better informed,
communication is better coordinated, and decisions appropriately made to best resolve the issues.
1. Because this is currently primarily a DWM issue within the Department, any responses, discussion, and inquiries
regarding the specific matters of these investigations and evaluations from parties outside of the department are to be
first coordinated thru both the DWM Director's office and OGC (Daniel Cleveland and Jackie 0.uarles). This would include
DNR, CHFS, or any of the agencies that we routinely interact with, in addition to the public, regulated entities, and local
officials.
2. Any media inquiries and responses, consistent with prior protocol, are to be coordinated and referred first to Lanny
and John Mura (EEC Communications Director) with notification to the DWM Director's office and OGC (Daniel Cleveland
and Jackie Quarles). John will be lead on determining who and how the agency is to respond.

-Y

~onsistent

inquiries with the Attorney General's office,


with long-standing protocol, are to coordinated and
referred first with OGC (Daniel Cleveland and Jackie Quarles) with notification to the DWM Directos's office.

GP2174

4. Any open records request response regarding these specific issues, consistent with with prior agency protocol, are to
be coordinated with both the DWM Director's office and OGC prior to finalization.
The above procedures will help ensure that the agency appropriately manages and oversees our actions, interactions,
and responses. I greatly appreciate your continued efforts on this important issue as we work collectively to resolve the
issues;
If you have any questions, please let me know at any time.
~~.J:ha r:iksr~- ....~-~~ --.~....~~~...... -" -,.----
Bruce

Sent from my iPad

......,

GP2175

.m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, March 07, 2016 7:43 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
RE: Hydraulic Fracking
Looking for Action - UT - Quest - FW.pdf

Arti~le from UT highlighting the work of Dr. Sherry Cable, Professor of Sociology.

The disposal and management of waste from the "Fracking Industry'' has the potential of being another Love Canal
where the industry was producing waste and disposing of it before an adequate regulatory structure was in place and
the contaminant migration and health effects did not surface for 30 years or so later. Love Canal was a chemical
exposure scenario. TENORM is radionuclides.
The latency period between exposure and the emergence of health effects from radionuclides is 10-40 years.
Radionuclide.shave a low solubility and tend to partition to the solid phase and therefore their Chemical migration in
environmental systems takes years.
I appreciate everyone's patience with me since January. I have just been so worried about the implications of the
disposal of TENORM in Kentucky and want to do all I can to protect the well-being of our communities .

m back devoting my full attention to our submittals in solid waste and my routine job responsibilities .

anks again for all you are doing for our Division and the communities we serve.
George

(ieorge P. PartridiJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

..
1

GP2176

GP2177

et~=
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC}


Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11:32 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Delivered: 3/9/2016 11:32 AM

Danny;
I received a voice mail message at my extension; 4651 while we were in the meeting in Conference Room 2028 between
10 AM - 11:20 AM today.
The message was:

"Dr. Partridge# this is Brian Kalt. I work with Fairmont Brine Processing. If you would please give me a call when you_,
get a chance. My number is 412-680-6244. Thank you;''
George

(ieor9e P. Partritfee Jr., PfiV, P.'E., Q'EP


part.me.nt .f.or Environm. ental Protection
Division of Waste Management
O Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

...
1

GP2178

'

GP2179

Partridge, George (EEC)

~:
Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11:32 AM
Delivered: RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing

GP2180

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11:36 AM
Read: RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11 :32:27 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11 :35:38 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

'

GP2181

Partridge. George (EEC)


-rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11:41 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing

George:
Do notreturn the call. I will forward on per the email notice from Bruce Scott of 3/5/16.
Danny
From: Partridge; George (EEC)
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11:32 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing
Danny;
I received a voice mail message at my extension; 4651 while we were in the meeting in Conference Room 202B between
10 AM -11:20 AM today.

.Dr.

The message was:

Pa.rtridge, this is Brian Kalt . I work With Fairman.t.Brine Processing. If you would please give me a call when you
~t a chance. My number is 412-680-6244. Thank you. 11

George

<;eorge P. Partricfee Jr., Pli'D, P.'E., fl'EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2182

Partridge, George (EEC)

.om:
Sent:

To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Friday, March 11, 2016 8:43 AM
Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC); Green, Lawrie (EEC); Partridge, George
(EEC); Patrick, Kevin {EEC); Shingleton, Allan {EEC)
DNA Damage in Chernobyl Catfish
233-DNA%20damage%20in%20catfish-Sugg%20et%20al-1996.pdf

Interesting reading ...


Todd Hendricks, P.G.
Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653

'

GP2183

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Friday, March 11, 2016 8:58 AM
Read: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016

Your message
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Notes and. Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Sent: Friday,March 04, 2016 6:02:47 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada}
was read on Friday, March 11, 2016 8:57:36 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

'

GP2184

GP2185

Partridge, George (EEC)

.rom:
Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Friday, March 11, 2016 1:14 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey
(EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC); Green, Lawrie (EEC); Nielsen,
Jamie (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC)
Weems, George (EEC); Simpson, Mark (EEC)
Estill County KGS Study
ri18_12.pdf

FYI, a KGS study regarding sulfide mineral damage to the schools across the road from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Although the pyrite is indeed naturally occurring, if the landfill operations expose it, fracture it, or use it for fill and/or
cover, the minerals are exposed to oxygen and water and surface water and groundwater can be affected.
So, landfill operations can still be the source of the problem, even though the sulfides, metals, etc. are naturally
occurring in the shale.
Todd Hendricks, P.G.
Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601

"2-564-6716 e><t. 4653

GP2186

GP2187

Partridge, George (EEC} .

fl'rom:. .

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Friday, March 11, 2016 1:30 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Estill County KGS Study

The part about simply not using the shale as fill is something we need to remember re: the landfill.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 1:22 PM
To: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: Estill County KGS Study
Todd:
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
George

From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 1:14 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J
(EEC); .Gre.en., Robin C (EEC); Green, Lawrie (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC)
c: Weems, George (EEC); Simpson, Mark (EEC)
ubject: Estill County KGS Study

FYI, a KGS study regarding sulfide mineral damage to the schools across the road from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Although the pyrite is indeed naturally occurring, if the landfill operations expose it, fracture it, or use it for fill and/or
cover, the minerals are exposed to oxygen and water and surface water and groundwater can be affected.
So, landfill operations can still be the source of the problem, even though the sulfides, metals, etc. are naturally
occurring in the shale.
Todd Hendricks, P.G.
Geologist
. ISentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653

GP2188

-om:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Friday, March 11, 2016 1:56 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Estill County KGS Study

I hope so, too.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Friday, March Jl, 2016 1:56 PM
T9:.Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Subject: RE: Estill County KGS Study
Todd;
I have seen the impacts of shale at other landfills and the statement is "it's the shale, not leachate" is what I hear. The
runoff is still coming from the landfill because the shale has been disturbed.
I hope we can address this in the future!

ahank~ou!
.._eorge

From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Sent:. Friday, March 11, 2016 1:30 PM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Subject: RE: Estill County KGS Study
The part about simply not using the shale as fill is something we need to remember re: the landfill.

From: Partridge, George (EEC)


Sent: Friday, March 11, 20161:22 PM

To: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Subject: RE: Estill County KGS Study
Todd:
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
George

From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


nt: Friday, March 11, 2016 1:14 PM
:Partridge, George (EEC)i Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J
EC); Green, Robin C {EEC); Green, Lawrie (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC)
Cc: Weems, George (EEC); Simpson, Mark (EEC)
Subject: Estill County KGS Study
1

GP2189

FYI, a KGS study regarding sulfide mineral damage to the schools across the road from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Although the pyrite is indeed naturally occurring, if the landfill operations expose it, fracture it, or use it for fill and/or
cover, the minerals are exposed to ()xygen and water and surface water and groundwater can be affected.

So, landfill operations can still be the source of the problem, even though the sulfides, metals, etc. are naturally
occurring in the shale.

___ ----~i::orldJ:lsr:idrJcks,~~.-G.~=-~~~~=-~,.-~~-~~---------~~ ---~---~~-----~- ,.. ----~--~--~--~~~~--~-~~--~= -~----~~--~- ----~~........~~~


Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653

'

GP2190

Partridge, George (EEC)


.rom:
Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

George Partridge <gjpartridge@windstream.net>


Saturday, March 12, 2016 6:41 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
FW: Poster on Penn State Research Work
Partridge Jr._38-V2.ppt

From: George Partridge [mailto:gjpartridge@windstream.net]


Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 4:17 PM
To: 'todd.hendricks@ky.gov' <todd.hendricks@ky.gov>
Cc: 'danny.anderson@ky.gov' <danny.anderson@ky.gov>; 'Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)' <Lindsey.Briggs@ky.gov>

Subject: RE: Poster on Penn State Research Work


Hi Todd;
I was looking over my research work I did at Penn State and saw a poster I did that highlighted some of the work I was
doing and wanted to share it with you!
Have a nice week!

GP2191

Partridge, George (EEC)

.rom:

Nielsen, Jamie (EEC)


Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:13 AM
Melton, Ken (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
2257 SHF20020006 - DAFCO NORM

Sent:

To:
Subject:

Catem>ry:I..._S_Ub!:riiltals
__
. _.__ _ _ _...._,I

Program: SOiid Waste

Status: 1
......[ALL_._)----~~

.... 1

Cla$8: 1
.......
~_lt._J_.___ _ _ _....._,,

Year:

l._____.I !

J~N~

Department for Environmental Protection


Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Ln, 2"d Floor
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
Phone: (502) 564-6716

GP2192

'

GP2193

.m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Tracking:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Tuesday, March 15, 2016 6:24 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: Reference Materials
211.859 Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact.pdf; Compact
Regional Management Plan.pdf
Recipient

Delivery

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)

Delivered: 3/15/2016 6:24 PM

Jeri;
Let me know if this was what you were looking for. Attached all the info I have including what you already have
obtained.
Website for CMC is: http://www.cmcompact.org/
I am respecting what has been requested of me. I am glad to provide any information on what I have previously done if
that will help others. I am also restricting any literature or document reviews to historical materials that are not related
to the current investigation.

~nks again for stopping by. It is always a pleasure to visit with you and with my teaching interests in the risk

ssment area, it is a pleasure to look at topics with someone with your many years of experience and expertise in
area.
.
Thank you,
George

{ieorge

P~ Partrid{Je Jr.

Department for Environmental Protection


KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane;.2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

..
1

GP2194

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com>
Wednesday, March 16, 2016 1:40 PM
anthony.kryfka@dot.gov
Jason R Frame; Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Partridge, George (EEC); Easter, Matthew
P (KYOAG)
Fairmont Brine Processing

Sent:

To:

Cc:
Subject:

Mr. Kryfka,
Thank you for taking the time to reach out today. Per our conversation, the names Cc'd on this email are those with
which we have been communicating with since everything has transpired.
Gents-- Tony Kryfka is with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and is investigating what has been
transported on West Virginia roads.

If anything else is needed, please let me know.

Kind Regards,

rianKalt

sident
mont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachmt!nts) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.

GP2195

GP2196

Partridge, Georpe (EEC)

ta!~:
To:

Subject:

Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)


Wednesday, March 16, 2016 4:52 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
nutrition

George,
This might be something that could be done through the Extension Office.
http:Uwww.uky.edu/superfund/about/news/superfund-community-action-through-nutrition-scan-program~presented

cooperative-extension

GP2197

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC}

To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:01 PM
Delivered: FW: Fairmont Brine Processing

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: FW: Fairmont Brine Processing

GP2198

i-m:

Partridge, George (EE(:) .

To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:01 PM
Delivered: FW: Fairmont Brine Processing

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: FW: Fairmont Brine Processing

GP2199

GP2200

Partridge, George (EEC)

,eem=

To:
Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:05 PM
Read: FW: Fairmont Brine Processing

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: FW: Fairmont Brine Processing
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:00:43 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:04:31 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

..
1

GP2201

I..,:

Partridge, G~orge (EEC)

Sent:
To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:15 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Meeting in Your Office on Wednesday 23 from 3:00 - 3:30 PM.

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Read

Anderson, Danny J, (EEC)

Delivered: 3/23/2016 8:15 PM

Read: 3/23/2016 8:16 PM

Danny;
You scheduled me to meet with you in your office today, March 23, 2016 and I accepted the meeting invitation in
Outlook that you sent me at 11:22 AM this morning.
In the meeting we discussed the following topic areas:
1. If I had any concerns regarding my work.
2. Why I seem discouraged or worried at times and what you could do to address it.
3. The fact that when Ken included Catherine that I expressed an interest in staying in Frankfort and leaving at my
regularly schedule time rather than attending a preconstruction meetingthat starts in Glasgow at 3 PM CT
which would result in me getting in late.
4. The nee,d for our Section ~ngineers to work overtime (Blo~k-SOs) again this year considering thatl earned 8Block sos in a row last year and started last year out with very little comp time accrued .
. , 5. The concern I expressed to Ken, who is my acting Supervisor that we have continued to hire geologists when
..
there is a need for the engineers to work overtime and the geologists typically work there regularly scheduled
hours.
6. I expressed an interest in a transfer to Tony and copied Lindsey, you, and Gary Logsdon on it.
I want to documentour discussion and also be sure we are clarified on the points we discussed. If you had invited .Ken
to the meeting you woLild have had a different understanding rather than communicating separately with him and then
with me at~ later time. I Wish
parties could .be present and there would not be a breakdown in communication: Ken
is my acting Supervisor and I shared my concerns with him. My understanding is if we have a concern we should take
that first to our supervi.sor and I did that since Ken is my supervisor for this wee.k. By starting off the meeting with the
questioning if you had "a disgruntle employee" put me on the defensive and I did not feel relaxed from that point on in
the meeting.

all

I am confirming and clarifying my position on the above topics and as well as documenting what was discussed.

ltem1:
No, I am very pleased having you as my Branch Manager and am especially delighted the skills you bring regarding
interpretation and the identification of relevant regulations as WE! address su.bmittals .and perrnitting situations. Ken
has been an wonderful friend, mentor, and co-worker and I could not have been more delighted to have the
opportunity to work closely with him when I first started as well as having opportunities for us to still do things
togethe~
,

l.m2:
1

GP2202

I have over 5 years of full time study and research on particulate behavior as a tenured faculty member at Penn
State. The modeling and health effects of airborne environmental contaminants (including radionuclide.s) and their
impact on human health was my area of teaching and expertise at Penn State. I taught Human Health and Ecological
Risk Assessment for the 12.5 years I was at Penn State. With regard to the exposure assessment of the risk

assessment process I have over 20 years of experience. My academic studies and research work both in industry and
academia makes me acutely aware of the health risks of inhaled rad.ionuclides and I am gravely concerned that both
the operators at the landfill and individuals in the community in Irvine, Kentucky will potentially suffer serious health
concerns or shortened lives in the future from the potential exposure of the low-level radioactive waste that was
disposed of at Blue Ridge Landfill. I am still deeply concerned about the potential for re-suspension of deposited
. ~~~~~partiGleseGOnt-aiRing-radionuclides.on.botbJ:ba.gmunds.surrauodiogJ;h.e~~entr.an~_jo the S!;:bools as well as whe.n t,he .
I
school maintenance workers service the HVAC systems. To my knowledge that has not been addressed, but I have
been cut-off from any communication regarding TENORM both within the Division of Waste Management and with
the CHFS-DPH. Not being copied on any emails concerning the assessment of the site contamination or getting the
analytical results from the soil samples I took on the grounds surrounding the entrance to the schools on February 21,
2016 or not being allowed to contact the DPH to request the analytical results only raises my anxiety.
There is n()t anything I expect you to do regarding my concerns since the management of the NOVs and investigation
is being handled by upper levels of management and beyond our Section (enforcement and ()ffice of Gent;!ral
Counsel?). I am just worried and feel helpless.
ltem3:
I told Ken I was glad to be the primary contcict for the CD&D LF in Glasgow, but I would prefer stayi11g iil Frankfort this
Thursday, particularly since Catherine (a lady) would be with us who I haven't met or been introd!Jced to yet. I told.
you and Ken I have been very stressed out over all that has been going on regarding TENORM, particularly since I am
acutely aware of the health effects. My anxiety level is very elevated and when that Happens mycoloii.acts
up. W,hen I get stressed I have the symptoms of IBS. When we travel out in rural 'areas I wor..Y sometimes I will be , .
too far 'away from a bathroom. I feel so close to Ken and he also has his own personal issues regarding his
dig~stive health, I would not be self-conscious or embarrassed if something happened in his presence. Since I was
not feeling well this week, to go out with a lady I have never met I just didn't feel relaxed. That was my only reason I
declined when it was more than Ken going this week. I am also on a medication presently I hoJ>e to stop taking once
this T~NORM situation is behind us. I enjoy working with ladies and it was only a personal reaso11 I was declining. I
also ate way too much BBQ when I was on vacation this past week and weekend and that only up~et tny eolon
more! With that being said I hope I will have opportunities to work with Tabath'a in the future. I value.her
analytical/lab experience as well as her expertise in the geology area; She is a very talented individual and I feel
fortunate to be in the section with her. We also have other very talented men and women-in our Section that I am
learning so much from since my back~round is in the hazardous waste area.

My work is my vocation and pcission. I am here because I enjoy what I do. We all need to work to support our
families but maximizing income is a low priority to me. Doing work that makes a difference in the well-being of
others and provides a service to communities is what brings me pleasure. Titles and income are not my highest
priorities. I have been blessed with both over the years because if we pursue work that brings happiness and
meaning in our lives, we will be more productive employees and often the rewards follows. They have for me in both
industry and academia. Also i am a Conservative Mennonite-Friend by faith traditions and live simply. The is the
window through which I see life. I do not mind working Block..s.os or earning comp time if that add.resses a need in
the branch, but I am not doing it beca'use I want the overtime or money, I just want to do an exceflent job and be of
se. r.vi c:e to our Div.ision. L.insey Briggs has. s.tressed to me o. n.thr.ee occasions this. yea.r I am not to go. over my reguiarly.
schedule work hours in a week. If I do, I have been instructed to take Friday off. I did express my thoughts to both
Lindsey and my acting Supervisor, Ken Melton that I would like to see the work load more evenly distributed among
the employees of our Section ; where we do not have engineers working 8-Block 50s in a row (Ken and I) and other
2

GP2203

employees leaving at their regularly scheduled time. I left academia sol could be home in tbe evenings to ,be with my
wife Jan. She does not work and is home all the time. I want to be ,there to enjoy time with her. She understands,
~d I am glad to contribute the extra effort as needed at times, but neither of us want to see the long hours a regular
~rt ofmy "'fOrk ~chedule as they have been, in the past. I also take resp()f1Sibility for some ofthose long !)ours sjnc:e I
was ,seeking to accommodate the consul,tants and their work weJnspect. I was e.nj0ying meeting many ofthem for
the fir~tti~e la~t year an,d it was a plecisure seeing their work and getting a cha11ce to know them and I sought to
accommod,;:j~e their sche~IJle beyond what we are required to do by regulations.

This item was addressed to a significant extent above. I feel all employees should be asked to put in a similar Jevel of
in ollr Section and -I have- felt that more overtime and effort
is expected of the engineers than our scientists at
effort
.
times, even though their contribution to the work we do is equally important. I wanted to be a PhD Environmental
Chemist but was ,educated as a PhD Chemical-Civil Engineer. I actually .have more chemistry than a chemistry major in
my educational background and have a love and appreciation for the sciences. It has beeri a pleasure taking trips and
being with Tabatha and Todd in our Section. When I was growing up I was into rock collecting and it has been fun to
learn more about the geology of Kentucky!
-

Regarding a transfer or working in another Branch, I.have the following to share. I did riot apply or interview for the
.. position I .have now in the Solid Waste Branch. Ken Melton and Lindsey Briggs knew I enjoyed the waste
management area and was seeking to learn more about solid waste and its management (and that includes both what
our Solid Waste Branch as well as th~ RLA Branch does) and approached Ille about the position that Rich D~wson
vacated. Both the SWB and Ri.A are of special interest to me and .1 have been participating in activities~ workshops,
and site visits for many years which predates both you and qary Logsdon as Branch Managers. You both came from
er jobs toyourpre~entp~sitions a.nd ~hen a challenging opp?rtunity arises I wouldhopethatydlJWC?l..ildbe happy

en a member of your section pursues 1t and that you would wish the best for them.
.~
I look forward to many more years with state government and would like to work ~s long as I am in good heaith and
feel productive. I would be delighted to work one day for the RLA Branch as I continue my career development in the
waste management area. I al.so feel that would be an excellent job for .meto retire from sinC:e the service
opportunities I enjoyed for so many years are in the recycling, resource management, and resqrce conservation
areas ..That way could transition easily from a position with pay to a position where I would .be a volunteer and there
would be plelit.Y of voluntee.r opportunities in the local community. A.s I pointed out, the ema.il that I copied you on
was sent at 11:07 at night. I was not feeling well, Jan was upset with me, and I was worried and depre~sed on the
processed TENORMthat was trucked into Kentucky and wa:s illegally disposed of in a contained landfill. I have a
personal passion regarding protecting employees in the solid waste industry. The industry is bl.lilt on trust, that
others will do the right thing.and not th.row something into a garb~ge can or load a truck with a waste that would
harm an unsuspecting employee receiving it at a transfer station or landfill. I feef that trust was violated last year
here in Kentucky. I also feel that as a state agency we are piaced iri a position of tru.st by the public to ove'rsee the
protection of human health and the. environment, and I want to honor that trust.
We all need new challenges as employees that help us grow and learn as individuals. That is a lifelong process. If and
when I corisic:ler a job change in the future, please to not take it personally. Since maximizing income and titles are of
little interest to me, I am only doing it to experience a new. learning curve and make contributions in another area of
society. I will leave. th.e Solid Waste Branch thankful for tf)e experiences and learning opportunities it provided me
and for the pleasure of working and knowing the co-workers that make up our Branch.
- k you for the opportunity to meet with you.

GP2204

I request that you send me an email acknowledging that you received and read this email message. Please
indicate if there are any concerns or questions that we still need to address.

~dd

that I do not plan to express any more concerns regarding the TENO RM issues facing
.. '
I also want to
Kentucky or approach you C>r anycfoe in the Division of Waste Management with questions regarding th~
site assessment: for contamination or exposure assessments that were requested as part of the NOV for .
.Blue Ridge Landfill. I plan to focus only on my assigned work (by you, Lindsey, or an acting supervisor such
as Ken) and am glad to work where ever I can be of service or needed.
Thank you,

Have a nice day!


Sincer:ely,
Gorge

(jeorne P. PartridjJe Jr., Pfi'D; P.'., Q:EP


Department for Environmental Protection
KY DivisioncofWaste Management
200 Fair Oaks L,ane; 2nq Floor (SWB)
Frankfoi:t, KY 40601
(502) 564..~?H> ~xt)i6s1

GP2205

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Meeting in Your Office on Wednesday 23 from 3:00 - 3:30 PM.

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@k.y.gov)
Subject: RE: Meeting in Your Office on Wednesday 23 from 3:00 - 3:30 PM.

GP2206

--------

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
To:

Sent:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:16 PM
Read: RE: Meeting in Your Office on Wednesday 23 from 3:00 - 3:30 PM.

Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Meeting in Your Office on Wednesday 23 from 3:00 - 3:30 PM.
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:14:49 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, M?lrch 23, 2016 8:15:31 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

GP2207

-m:

Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:40 PM
Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Arnett, John M (EEC); Bickner, Bob
(EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Cooley, Tony (EEC); Crystal, Angie M (EEC); belong,
Deborah (EEC); Green, Lawrie (EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC);
.
Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Nielsen, Jamie (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC);
Razavi, Mohammad (EEC); Rogers, Tim (EEC); Skees, Catherine; Whitney, Frank D (EEC);
Young, Anita (EEC)
.
RE: Comments or Questions Regarding Estill County, TENORM, or a1ue Ridge Landfill

Hello Everyone;
As you all know, I was very involved in investigating the shipments of TENO RM waste when Danny Anderson received
the call notifying us of the illegal shipments and gave me the number of the "whistle blower" to call and follow up on
which I did as of January 13 of this year.
Presently I have been isolated from any correspondence or activity regarding the investigation or all that is taking place
surrounding the site investigation or exposure assessments.
For someone that was a tenured faculty member at Penn State and taught Human Health and Ecological Risk
Assessment along with research on airborne particle behavior in environmental systems, resuspension of deposited
particulates: e~pos~re asse:sments or risk asse.ssment, and modeling of radio~uclide depos~tion i_n the respira~ory
tern - this s1tuat1on has impacted me acutely from both personal and emotional perspectives since I was so intimately
. .olved in this area of research for many years and continued to follow the work in the area during my tenure with the
Hazardous Waste Branch and now the Solid Waste Branch.
i.

I owe you all an apology for how my emotions and concerns took time from the work you needed to do and must have
been very distracting at times. Thank you all for your kindness and patience during a very difficult time for me.
It doesn't take much, just a comment or a short question by a co-worker to get me thinking again about all my years of
research and teaching on health effects of environmental contaminants. When that happens, not only am I burden to
others, but I also am distracted from the work th.at I a.m assigned to do.
These days, I do not know anymore that what is printed in the newspaper or has been entered into TEMPO.
In the best interest of us all, I request that no one mention TENORM to me, ask a question, make a comment. or joke
with me about the situation that Kentucky is facing these days regarding the shipments of out of state radioactive waste
that was shipped illegally into Kentucky this past year.
At the same time I want you all to know that I want to be a supportive coworker and available wherever I can be of help
or service to the mission of this Branch.
Thanks again for your kindness, patience, being a good listener, and your words of support and encouragement during a
very challenging time in my career.
h you all the best and look forward to serving alongside of you in the months/years ahead.
Thanks again,
1

GP2208

George

{1eor9e P~ PartrUfge Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601 .
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2209

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
Sent:

To:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, March 25, 2016 8:11 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Voicemail

Danny;
Voicemail message on my phone from Kevin Kosko.
George

(Jeorne P. PartritflJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2210

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Friday, March 25, 2016 8:17 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Re: Voicemail

George
Please forward to Daniel Cleveland his phone number.
Thanks,
Danny
On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Danny;
Voicemail message on my phone from Kevin Kosko.
George

<geor9e P. Partridj]e Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP2211

GP2212

Partridge, George (EEC)

-om:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, March 25, 2016 8:26 AM
Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
FW: Voicemail

Kevin Kosko
Shale Mountain Resources
937-470-2655

From: Anderson; Danny J (EEC)


Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 8:17 AM

To: Partridge, George (EEC)


Cc: Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Subject: Re: Voicemail
George
Please forward to Daniel Cleveland his phone number.
Thanks,
Danny
. . Mar 25, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@kv.gov> wrote:
Danny;
Voic:email message on my phone from Kevin Kosko.
George

{iecrrge P. Partrit:fee Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP2213

GP2214

Partridge, George (EEC}

-om:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Anderson, Danny J (EEC)


Friday, March 25, 2016 8:34 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: Voicemail

George
Is this an old message from Kevin or a new one left today or yesterday ?
Thanks,
Danny
On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Danny;
Voicemail message on my phone from Kevin Kosko.
George

(jeorge P. Partritfae Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

GP2215

Partridge, George (EEC)

#m:
Sent:

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Friday, March 25, 2016 9:05 AM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
RE: Voicemail

Danny;
New one from yesterday, March 24, 2016.
George

From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)

Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 8:34 AM


To: Partridge, George (EEC)

Subject: Re: Voicemail


George
Is this an old message from Kevin or a new one left today or yesterday ?
Thanks,
Danny

Mar 25, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Danny;
Voicerriail message on my phone from Kevin Kosko.
George

<georne P. Partri<fae Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
<imageOOl.gif>

..
1

GP2216

Partridge, George (EEC)

'm:

Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)


Wednesday, March 30, 2016 3:16 PM
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC)
FW: Interview

Danny,
I need to find a time for the AG investigator to speak with George Partridge per their request. I'm calling George directly
to get some times in place.
Thanks
Daniel Cleveland, Attorney
Energy and Environment Cabinet
Office of General Counsel
2 Hudson Hollow
Frankfort, KY 40601
ph.(502) 564-2356 ext. 640
fx, (502) 564"9212
Daniel.Cleveland@ky.gov

Confidentiality Notice: This communication contains information which is confidential, attorney work product and
,. . . .
overed by t.he. attorney-client privi.lege. It is for the exc.lusive use of the intend. ed recipient(s). Please note that any form. of
,
tribution, copying, forwarding or use of this communication or the information therein is strictly prohibited and may be
lawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender and then de.lete the

communication and destroy any copies.

From: Whaley, Barbara Maines (KYOAG)

Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 1:11 PM


To:. Cleveland, Demiel (EEC)
Cc: Easter, Matthew P (KYOAG)
Subject: Interview
Daniel: We would like to set up a time for Matt to meet with George Partridge on this Fairmont Brine situation. Thanks,
Barbara
Barbara Maines Whaley, J.D., M.Div.
Assistant Attorney General
1024 Capital Center Dr.
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-696-5337
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information that is. legally privileged and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the inte.nd.ed recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify this office by telephone and return this message
e Office of the Attorney General immediately. Thank you.
r Kentucky Rule of Evidence 503, this communication is confidential and not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than those to whom disclosure is
e in furtherance of the rendition of professional legal services to or on behalf of the Office of the Attorney General.
. .

GP2217

lrtridqe, George (EEC)


.From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)


Wednesday, March 30, 2016 3:35 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
FW: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums

------------

_From: Gilbert, George (EEC)


Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 4:06 PM

To: Melton, Ken (EEC); Baker;.Gorley, Virginia (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC);
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC)

Subject: RE: Martha NORM Site ManC!gement Plan & Addendums


CHFS & EEC would jointly regulate radioactive wastes going to solid waste landfills.
SWB looked at this issue when Ashland, Inc. proposed taking NORM at 13 pCi/gm Ra 226 to Estill Coo. Landfill, then
owned by WM!.
We were prepared to let them accept up to 30 pCi/gm and wrap it in a synthetic liner rburrito") plus add the
radioactive indicators from the EPS to GWM.
Esti.11 Co. Fiscal Court threatened to not approve the next HEX, so Blue Ridge dropped it.
- o u r studies, we found that Michigan allows up to SO pCi/gm Ra 226 in their MSW landfills.
We also found that water treatment and WWTP sludge; and coal ash has some Ra 226.

(jeorge :f. (ji(bert, P.'.E.


Environmental Engineer Consultant
Director's Office
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716
D.irect 502-564-8158 ext. 4601
Mobile 502-598.,9860
From: Melton, Ken (EEC)
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:41 AM

To: Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Gilbert, George (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC);
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC)

Subject: RE: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums


.ess l'.11 t~row.my two cents in:I don't rea.lly have a~ issu~ with setti~g alim~t for landfi~ls to tak~ "natur.ally o~curring"
1oact1ve waste. However, I think we have a much bigger issue after 1t gets disposed of m a landfill. On what Lindsey
on, we only have two landfills in the state that have a double liner (Aleris and West KY -Jones) due to either their
specific wastestream or liner orientation. Even these two have/are getting contamination spikes in their groundwater
wells. I wholeheartedly believe in what we try to do as an agency, but it is silly to believe that a landfill liner
"monitoring
'
1

GP2218

is a 100% leak proof. One of SWB's biggest challenges is trying to get a proper groundwater assessment plan and report
from landfills after they are placed in Assessment.

My opinion is that if a landfill facility takes NORM waste then we should consider adding a constituent or two to their '
groundwater monitoring program. Otherwise we aren't placing safeguards for the! citizens or the environment and are
doing t.hem a disservice.

From: Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC)


~- SentiT-uesda~ptember36;52.0t4~8:4!:l"A"M-'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Gilbert, George (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes,
Larry (EEC)
Cc: Melton, Ken (EEC)
Subject: RE: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums
Disposal of radioactive material is regulated by CHFS. They should be contacted..

Virginia Baker Gorley


Manager, Litigation Section 2
Office of General Counsel
Energy and Environment Cabinet
2 Hudson Hollow Road
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-2356, Ext 513
Fax - 502-564-9212

From: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:21 AM


.
To: Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Gilbert, George (EEC); Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC);
Hughes, Larry (EEC)

Cc: Melton, Ken (EEC)


Subject: RE: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums
The practical answer is to construct sites to handle radioactive waste. Typical landfills constructed to minimum
standards are not these sites.

Lindsey Briggs, PE
Environmental Engineer Supervisor

502 564 6716

From: Cecil, Shawn (EEC)

-------------:---------------,.---..,....,.--

Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:12 AM


To. : Bri.ggs, Linds.ey (EEC); Gilbert, George (EEC); Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC)'
Hughes, Larry (EEC)
Cc: Melton, Ken (EEC)
Subje.ct: RE: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums

GP2219

No one really wants stacks at power plants emitting waste ... but if they're provided for in the law, it sort of is what it
is. We all know permits can be interpreted to be just as protective of the rights of the permitted activity as they are of
41tig protective of the environment. The fact is that there has to be an answer for this or we will have wished it went
mto a landfill, just like Martha (even if it's not spent fuel). History says that often when you can't get a permit, waste
will end up spread all over (which is job security for Superfund, but no good for our mission of protecting human health
and the environment).
I think Curt is just looking for a practical answer. Anything we can do to help on that would be welcome. Naturally
Occurring Radioactive Material in a typical landfill at 30-50 pCi/gm is closer to our mission than allowing or passively
encouraging it be placed in a green field where there is no engineering.

From: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 3:02 PM


To: Gilbert, George (EEC); Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC); Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC);
Hughes, Larry (EEC)
Cc: Melton, Ken (EEC)
Subject: RE: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums
I would not want to permit radioactive waste to be placed in any typical landfill.

Lindsey Briggs, PE
Environmental Engineer Supervisor
502 564 6716

.___-----------'-'-

From: Gilbert, George (EEC)


Sel1t: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:51 AM
To: Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC); Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC)
Cc: Melton, Ken (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums
And for frackin,g Norm wastes coming into KY MSW landfills from other states.

(ieorge :f.

(ii{6ert~

'P.T.

Environmental Engineer Consultant


Director's Office
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-,564-6116
Direct 502-564-8158 ext. 4601
Mobile 502-598-9860
From: Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:51 AM


Gilbert, George (EEC); Cecil, Shawn (EEC.); Hubbard, Tim (.EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC)
Melton, Ken (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

~ect: RE: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums


Is this for the Waste Pile?
3

GP2220

---------------------

Virginia Baker Gorley


Manager, Litigation Section 2
Office of General Counsel
Energy and Environment Cabinet

-- ----

~d~Gf-IGW..RG~-~

Frankfort, KV 40601
502-564-2356, Ext 513
Fax- 502-564-9212

From: Gilbert, George (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 20149:44 AM


To: Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC)

Cc: Melton, Ken (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC)

Subject: RE: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums


We may need some legal help on this.
KRS 224.46-530 is a hazardous waste statute and inapplicable to Superfund or solid waste sites.
Therefore, CHFS may co-regulate radioactive sources under their statute, if they wish.
Technically speaking, The SWB did a study in 1997 when Al proposed taking the NORM material to Estill Co, Landfill, theri.A;
owned by Waste Mgt. Inc.
_
. ~
We did an all-states study, and found that states like Ml allo\llfed up toSO pCi/gmof Ra-226 in its MSW landfills.
We were prepared to allow 30 pCi/gm at Estill with additional liners ("burrito"), but Estill withdrew the application in the
face of a threat by Estill Co. Fiscal Court to never approve another expansion.
What do you all think?

(jeorge ]'. (ji{6ert, 'P.'E.


Environmental Engineer Consultant
Director's Office
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716
Direct 502-564-8158 ext: 4601
Mobile 502-598-9860
From: Cecil, Shawn (EEC)

Sent: Tuesday, September23, 2014 9:18 AM


To: Hubbard, Tim (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC); Gilbert, George (EEC)
Subject: FW: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums

GP2221

From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)

~t: .Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:38 AM

~ Partridge, George (EEC)

Cc: Cecil, Shawn (EEC)

Subject: FW: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums


Hello again George,
I was talking w.ith Shawn Cecil yesterday about this NORM topic and he brought up the issue of the NORM
contamination at Ashland's Martha Oil Fields in Johnson and Lawrence Counties and all the time, effort and expense
that was devoted to c_leaning up those sites. As you probably know, all of the Ra-226 waste material that was collected
over the years by the remediation contractor has been piled on the top of a hill in Blaine, KY in an old coal seam high
wall cut over which they placed a rubber barrier. Evidently, EEC has agreed to some sort of site management plan for
this NORM contaminated landfill back in July. No one from our office has been approached about issuing any kind of
radioactive materials license to this facility and if we were, our regulations would probably prohibit us from doing so.
However, based on the attached letter it appears that EEC has reviewed its statutes, regulations and guidance
documents and found this NORM landfill acceptable. !just want to know what those EEC regulations and guidance
documents address and if KRS 224.46-530 (http:Uwww.lrc.ky.gov/Statutes/statute.aspx?id=10449) is part of those
applicable statutes. That being the case; I hope you have something we can share with Republic Services and other
landfill operators that are wanting to accept NORM contaminated drilling and tracking wastes from out of state as well
as all the scrap metal haulers who get stuck with loads of oil and natural gas production piping contaminated with Ra226 containing scale.
Thanks again for the assistance.
A . t Pendergrass PhD
~ervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Hea.lth Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS~lCA
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees o~ line at https://apps4.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/

---~-------

From: Bentley, Nathan (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 9:12 AM
To: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Gresham, Robert D (CHS-PH); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC); Gilbert, George (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC); Lovitt, Ron (EEC)
Subject: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums

Mr. McKinley,
The

Kentuc~y Department for Environmental Protection - Division of Waste Management has


iewed and approved the Site Management Plan and its addendums for the Ashland Oil
tha Oil Field NORM site in Johnson County .. I am attaching a PDF of our approval letter
the managed closure of the site. A physical copy was mailed last week as well.

Thank you.
5

GP2222
---

-------

Partridge, George (EEC)

t/lm:
Sent:

. To:
Subject:

Weems, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 31, 2016 11:29 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
manifests

Are we still out of the loop on the BRLF? Just asking since I heard a box full of manifests were delivered.

GP2223

To:

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Thursday, March 31, 2016 12:21 PM
Weems, George (EEC)
RE: manifests

Not a word; you just shared with me more than I am aware of.

I am delighted we had the chance to work together.


Have a nice afternoon!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


(
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 11:29 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: manifests
Are we still out of the loop on the BRLF? Just asking since I heard a box full of manifests were delivered.

GP2224

Partridge, George (EEC)

it/lm:.
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Weems, George {EEC)


Thursday, March 31, 2016 12:56 PM
Partridge, George {EEC)
RE: manifests

You too. Now, enjoy the lack of Blue Ridge Landfill hassle. Act like it never existed!

From: Partridge, George (EEC)

Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 12:21 PM


To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: manifests
Not a word; you just shared with me more than I am aware of.
I am delighted we had the chance to work together.
Have a nice afternoon!
George

From: Weems, George (EEC)


ent: T.hursd.ay, March 31, 2016 11:29 AM
: Partridge, George (EEC)
bject: manifests

-.i

Are we still out of the loop on the BRLF? Just asking since I heard a box full of manifests were delivered.

GP2225

Subject:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Monday, April 04, 2016 7:48 AM
Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th

Tracking:

Recipient

Delivery

Read

Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)

Delivered: 4/4/2016 7:48 AM

Read: 4/4/2016 8:14 AM

Anderson, Danny J (EE()

Delivered: 4/4/2016 7:48 AM

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Delivered: 4/4/2016 7:48 AM

Read: 4/4/2016 8:19 AM

Daniel;

I am preparing for the meeting next Friday by printing out email messages which will b.e helpful to refer to. I plan to
bring those in a binder as well as my file on TENORM. After the meeting I will be recycling all the documents in the
paper bins since everything is backed up electr~nically.
I work for the Solid Waste Branch and my preference is for Danny Anderson to be present (and Lindsey Briggs too if
Danny desires for him to be present). I have sought to keep them both informed on all the correspondence and
meetings/field trips that took place related to the incidents that are being investigated.
erything I do goes through Danny since he represents our Branch and I feel any meeting that pertains to anything I am
olved with or working on should include him or give him an opportunity to attend if he desires and feels it would be
e pful.
.
.
The Division of Waste Management reflects my life's work/vocation; it means a lot to me to be part of this Division and I
have its best interests at heart.
Thank you,
George

{ieor9e P. Partritfne Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

GP2226

.I

I~

GP2227

Partridge, George {EEC)

Im=
ro:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Monday, April 04, 2016 7:48 AM
Delivered: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Anderson, Danny J (EEC)(Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Interview with. AG for Friday, April 8th

'

GP2228

.. Partrid&e, Georae (EEC)

'm:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Monday, April 04, 2016 7:48 AM
Delivered: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th

Your message has been delivered to the following recipients:


Cleveland, Daniel (EEC) (Daniel.Cleveland@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April

6th

1
I

,
1

GP2229

Partridge, George (EEC)

.om: .... .

";:

Sent:
Subject:

Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Monday, April 04, 2016 7:48 AM
Delivered: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th

Your me$sage has been delivered to the following recipients:


Briggs, Lindsey (EEC) (Lindsey.Briggs@ky.gov)
Subject: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th

'

GP2230

Partridge, George (EEC)

l~m:
o:

Sent:
Subject:

Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
.Monday, April 04, 2016 8:15 AM
Read: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th

Your message
To: Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Subject: RE: Interview wit~ AG for Friday, April 8th
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 7:47:49 AM .(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, April 04, 2016 8:14:21 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

'

GP2231

Partridge, George (EEC)


. .om:

~o:

Sent:
Subject:

Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)


Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, April 04, 2016 8:20 AM
Read: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th

Your message
To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 7:47:49 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, April 04, 2016 8:18:51 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .

GP2232

GP2233

Partridae, Georae (EEC)

A.._m

Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)


Monday, April 04, 2016 10:15 AM
~artridge, George (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
RE: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th

-,mt:

To:
Cc:
Subject:

"

No problem George. I'll advise the AG investigator of your request.

Daniel Cl~veland, Attorney


Energy and Environment Cabinet
Office of General Counsel
2 Hudson Hollow
Frankfort, KY 40601
ph.(502) 564-2356 ext. 640
fx. (502) 564~9212
Daniel.Cleveland@ky.gov

Confidentiality Notice: This communication contains information which is confidential, attorney work product and
covered by the attorney-client privilege. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). Please. note that any form of
distribution, copying, forwarding or use of this communication or the information therein is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you .have received this communication in error please return it to the sender and then delete the
communication and destroy any copies.

From:

Partridge,

(EEC)

~nt: Monda.y, April 04, 2016 7:48 AM

91: Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)

Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)


Subject: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th
Daniel;

I am preparing for the meeting next Friday by printing out email messages which will be helpful to refer to. I plan to
bring those in a binder as well as my file on TENO RM. After the meeting I will be recycling all th.e documents in the
paper bins since everything is backed lip electronically.
I work for the Solid Waste Branch and my preference is for Danny Anderson to be present (and Lindsey Briggs too if
Danny desires for him to be present). I have sought to keep them both informed on all the correspondence and
meetings/field trips that took place related to the incidents that are being investigated.
Everything I do goes through Danny since he represents our Branch and I feel any meeting that pertains to anything I am
involved with or working on should include him or give him an opportunity to attend if he desires and feels it would be
helpful.
The Division of Waste Management reflects my life's work/vocation; it means a lot to me to be part of this Division and I
have its best interests at heart.
~nkyou,

.rge

GP2234

<;ieorge P. Partri.tffJe Jr.


Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651

1~-

I .

.2

GP2235

'

Partridge, George (EEC)

~rom:
~ent:
To:

Subject:

Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Wednesday, April 06, 2016 1:09 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
FW: Where is the outrage over illegal dumping of tracking waste?

http://www.kentucky.com/opinion/op-ed/article70127627.html

GP2236

Partridge, George (EEC)


. . .om:

Partridge, George (EEC)


Wednesday, April 06, 2016 1:16 PM
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
RE: Where is the outrage over illegal dumping of fracking waste?

~ent:

TO:
Subject:

Todd;
Thank you!

_____________ ___
George

"

From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)


Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 1:09 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: FW: Where is the outrage over illegal dumping of fracking waste?

http://www.kentucky.com/opinion/op-ed/article70127627.html

GP2237

----------

Partridge, George {EEC)

~- bject:

~cation:

"

Interview with AG
EEC DEP Conf Rm 202C (Fair Oaks)

Start:
End:
Show Time As:

Fri 4/8/2016 9:30 AM


Fri 4/8/2016 12:00 PM
Tentative

Recurrence:

(none)

Meeting Status:

Accepted

Organizer:
Required Attendees:
Optional Attendees:

Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)


-Partridge, George (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)

Categories:

Green Category

UPDATED TIME - Hon. Barbara Whaley and Matt Easter will be at the office at approximately 10 AM. I've set this for
9:30 so I can try to answer any questions SWB might have ahead of time.

Just putting this in as a tentative meeting holder. I'm still waiting on a response from Matt Easter at the AG's office

GP2238

You might also like