Professional Documents
Culture Documents
George Partridge
Energy & Environmental Cabinet
Emails Volume 11
GP1072
'_.om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
12:15 PM
Subject:
Danny:
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination anhe site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, .scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
1
GP1073
-_,,
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. {This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)
Landfills Statewide
____________11 ___1:Dndill:LanJntemalre~iew_~SoJid W_a_steJkan_c___h) _gf the _''Qua rterlyWaste Qua ntityRe ports" fonllllaodfi ll~ln __
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of O & G /Fracking Activities.
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TENO RM or processed
TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TENORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operator and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.
Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.
Expand our present regulations for Solid Waste to address radioactive constitutes both in terms of waste
received and monitoring requirements.
Develop special waste regulations for traditional TENORM [detectors, specifically designed mono-cells, PPE for
operators, maximum allowable quantities received during ltfe of landfill] (aren't these regulations in place
A
already under 902 KAR 100. If the waste meets the criteria as low level radioactive waste, then licensing of the W
disposal is controlled by CHFS and as such, all the measures you stated in brackets []above fall under their
review/approval. Our current contained LF's shouldn't be accepting this stuff unless in quantities/concentrations
that are exempt from 902 KAR 100, thus, is not a low level radioactive waste.
Required high-level processed radioactive TENO RM waste to be sent to a regulated facility licensed to receive
radioactive waste. (isn't this already a requirement in KY statutes/regs)
GP1074
..
3
GP1075
.rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeri;
I have worked through lunch to help prepare Danny for his 1:30 meeting with Tony Hatton.
Keith and I were going to eat a late lunch now and I will be available when we return.
I am looking forward to us calling our EPA RCRA contact but didn't mention it since you just got back to work and
wanted to wait until you were ready, caught up, or feeling your best.
I will check with you when I return from lunch.
Thank you,
George
George,
9Have you called the EPA RCRA contact yet? If not, we can do it this afternoon. Let me know. I'll come to you.
Jeri
Jeri;
. o k forward to calling EPA next week!
George
1
GP1076
I definitely agree George. I think you hit the nail right on the head when you first mentioned that at our meeting. I
personally believe that is a call for the EEC hazardous waste and the US EPA. I thought your colleague was going to
~--- chec~into that for_ us wjth h~rJ:F'A_C::Q_IJlac::1s_,JQ_h_o_Ric_harg~is_tbg only_perso_n_fil_fPA tl:!atLbave ev~r-JieQ!twith _____________ _
regarding rad and she indicated that John only handles risk analysis for EPA.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:lfsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Curt;
If we can show that an industry that takes the waste produced from the 0 & G industry, etc. and processes it to
produce a product or waste that is substantially different from the source material and is no longer classified as a
"special waste", that would open the door for us to address our concerns from a multitude of regulatory
perspectives.
I am continuing to pursue things from my Section and Division.
Thank again for aii you are doing!
George
GP1077
Hello George,
I could not agree more with everything you say about Dr. Ling, Mr. Hoskins and their activities. This most definitely
should not go unpunished. One comment I would make though regarding EEC's authority. My reading of the statute
KRS 224.46-530 would indicate that if we can prove the processed waste being disposed of by ATS generated by
Fairmont Brine and Shalewater Solutions and others no longer meets the EPA definition of "special wastes" but is
rather hazardous wastes after processing, I think EEC has all the authority it needs to pursue actions.
(k) To regulate hazardous waste that is radioactive except to the extent that
such waste is source, special nuclear or by-product material as defined by
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, (68 Stat. 923);
But having said that, I am confident that our cabinet will pursue this matter to the fullest extent of the law.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
75 East Main Street
Ma if stop HSlC-A.
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
aPay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
WBe notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kt!!!~
t'Atl'.lAiloN.HiitttH
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
-rt;
GP1078
Dr. Ling has used his reputation and skills to ~upport the activities of Advanced TENO RM Services. It appears that
Cory Hoskins has two businesses incorporated out of his home, BES LLC and Advanced TENORM Services. He appears
to be using Advanced TENO RM Services to attract business from out of state for companies that are searching for an
attractive cost solution to their TE NORM disposal needs. He is using the BES LLC company name and signing off as
the generator of the wastes on the correspondence with the landfills where he ships that waste. That does two
things for him: 1) TENO RM is not mentioned in the correspondence or the name of the company that the landfill or
waste management company sees and 2) being the generator the landfill has the impression that they are receiving
waste that was generated in-state and not regulated, so they feel comfortable accepting it.
~-~-
Geroge
GP1079
Thanks George for sharing the correspondence with Dr. Ling with us. It will be interesting to hear what Dr. Ling has to
say about the Central Midwest Compact and its ban on the disposal of out-of-compact TENORM wastes in KY. But
now that we know he is directly involved, that will give us someone else to go after should we pursue fines and
penalties. At some point we probably need to get EEC's and CHFS's lawyers involved in this matter for a legal opinion
on our ability to impose fines under the compact. The language in the statute appears pretty tight to me but an
attorney's opinion would be nice to have.
Regards,
Curt
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or
with any administrative regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or
211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet issued pursuant to KRS
9211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than
ten thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000). Each day of the violation or noncompliance shall constitute a separate
offense.
'"
t.-
"~'--
'"'
-: - . ; '
'l
.'--O::';i:h;.;'j'.',,c::;
GP1080
____
Vanfl(~'
I~~~~~
f4J\;ltJ1AtfON..1-1Et\.L''H
Please find correspondence from Dr. Ying that I located and contacted this afternoon by email.
Hi George,
Thank you for connecting with me .... the profile you described do indeed match me perfectly ....
.... I am currently on vacation, back Thursday. Cory Hoskins is KLYTEC business partner on TENORM issues as it relates
to hydraulic fracturing produced wastes, and he or my other KLYTEC colleagues can assist you as needed during my
absence.
Leong
GP1081
Hi Leon,
First
George
name:
Last
Partridge
name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zipcode:
Country:
Tel:
Email:
george.oartridge@ky.gov
Are you the Leong Ying that holds a PhD in Nuclear Physics from the University of Liverpool in England and has
had experience working with TENORM or related analytical work. Do you know a Cory Hoskins. If so please
omment:
contact me as soon as possible! Dr. George Partridge, Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection,
Division of Waste Management.
Kind Regards
George Partridge
------.----------------------------.-- - - - - -
..
7
GP1082
e:rom:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hi Nancy,
I just tried calling you and got your answering service. Donna Seadler gave me your name. I have a question
about a company that is taking brine from oil and gas processors and precipitating out the solids. I believe oil
and gas processors are exempt from RCRA, but I'm wondering whether the sludges from the other company are
exempt.
When would be a good time to call you tomorrow?
Thanks for your help,
Jeri
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
Fair Oaks Lane
. .nkfort, KY 4060 I
502-564-6716
1
GP1083
Unn(U~
~f;.,.f'<ll>i.iil"".."'y
f~f.l!ATlON"'1aP.t.;tH
Subject: RCRA
These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEP A concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
d, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
vents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
ZOO Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716
GP1084
elm:
Subject:
Tracking:
Recipient
Read
Sent:
To:
Rodney;
I previously have been the engineer Lindsey assigned to oversee Big Run (John Poore handled all regulatory and
permitting issues, I just was sent out on inspections). In our staff meeting this morning with Lindsey, he shared he has
assigned Mohammad Razavi to be the engineer responsible for Big Run. Earlier this year when he asked what sites we
wanted to be responsible for, I told him the only site I specifically wanted to follow was Big Run and was glad to help out
elsewhere as needed. I am disappointed he had made the change. I mentioned that you and I had been involved
working together on issues at Big Run. Lindsey mentioned he had no objection if I followed up on anything I had started
with you, but to include Mohammad as the contact and person in charge.
I appreciate all we are doing and want to continue to support that work as much as possible.
George
~orgeP.Partrfd8eJ~
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
GP1085
:cation:
Start:
End:
Show Time As:
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Organizer:
Required Attendees:
Resources:
-bject:
GP1086
e (EEC)
Partridge, George (EEC)
Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:35 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
RE: RCRA question
Subject:
Jeri;
Thank you!
George
(EEC)
Hi Nancy,
tried calling you and got your answering service. Donna Seadler gave me your name. I have a question
~ut a company that is taking brine from oil and gas processors and precipitating out the solids. I believe oil
and gas processors are exempt from RCRA, but I'm wondering whether the sludges from the other company are
exempt.
When would be a good time to call you tomorrow?
~st
GP1087
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716
GP1088
Subject:
Jeri;
Thank you!
George
From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:10 PM
To: McKeePerez, Nancy
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA question
That's great. We will call at 11:00.
Thanks again.
From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]
nt: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:02 PM
Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
bject: RE: RCRA question
I'm on a teleconference now and I have a meeting afterward.
Tomorrow I'm completely open until noon. Feel free to call me any time tomorrow morning.
Hi Nancy,
.....41iist tried calling you and got your answering service. Donna Seadler gave me your name. I have a question
~ut a company that is taking brine from oil and gas processors and precipitating out the solids. I believe oil
and gas processors are exempt from RCRA, but I'm wondering whether the sludges from the other company are
exempt.
When would be a good time to call you tomorrow?
1
GP1089
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716
GP1090
elm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
George, Attached is the letter that your attorneys shared with our attorneys which they then shared with my Division
Director, Commissioner and I believe the Cabinet Secretary. It was my understanding that the letter was going to be
mailed on 2/16/16. I personally have no problem with the letter being sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with
the same landfill operators with our own letter giving them more specifics on the Central Midwest Compact KRS's
addressing the prohibition of out-of-region TE NORM disposal. If you all can share your mailing list with us so we can
accomplish that task, it would be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are
now discussing this matter is a good thing. At the end of the day I would like to see the whole case turned over to the
AG's office.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
~ilstop HS1C-A
~nkfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov Id ph/rad ioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
u. ...,..tu~
l'tH.~.....
:u
f'.J\OlAT1a1~.H!!A\t.TH
I was just seeking to understand better the correspondence and relationships the two cabinets we are associated with
have as we move forward to address the regulatory issues surrounding TE NORM and waste management at our landfills.
1
GP1091
GP1092
t/!om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Cc: dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com; Weems, George (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
GP1093
...
----------~-~
GP1094
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Curt;
I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of yesterday, a
letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was passed around and shared with
Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by my supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our Section
employees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.
At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the disposal of
TENORN and processed TENORM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.
~nk
you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.
George
GP1095
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un!"anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
GP1096
9'Jm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Curt:
Would you be able to meet with me and George later today or early next week? The purpose being to go over the notice
in draft form now as well as see where we can collaborate on this issue of TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.
Regards,
.,,,,
,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,
..
~,,_,,,,,~,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
''""""""""""""'"""""""""
"""'"""""""'"""'"""~""""""'"'"'""""
"""""""'"-"""""'"-'"""-"''""""-""
Curt;
I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of yesterday, a
letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was passed around and shared with
Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by my supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our Section
employees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.
At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the disposal of
TENORN and processed TENORM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.
e"'nk
you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.
George
1
GP1097
GP1098
#m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Did we decide to get them mailed to us or emailed to us? I want to ask Dan Fleshour when we might get them .
GP1099
Cc:
Subject:
Hello Danny,
I would be delighted to meet with you and George but could we please do it sometime next week. My Branch Manager
is out of town this week and I know he would like to attend this meeting as would be my Division Director, Ms. Kathy
Fowler. Anytime on Monday, 2/22/16 works for me. I am including Matt and Kathy on this e-mail so they can check their
schedules and get back to us with a day and time that works for them as well. It sounds as though both our legal
departments are also involved in this matter which as I told George, is a good thing in my book. Personally I would love
to see a joint letter go out to all landfill operators from both our agencies that specifically calls out the applicable Central
Midwest Interstate Low-Level Waste Compact KY regulatory statutes and KY administrative regulations. I think this
would leave no doubt in any landfill operator's mind as to what was not acceptable here in KY when it comes to
TENO RM disposal. After talking to the gentleman in charge of Environmental Management at Advanced Disposal this
week, operator of the Blue Ridge Landfill in Irving where this WV Fairmont Brine wastes wound up, there is definitely a
huge knowledge gap on this issue in the landfill community here in KY. Advanced TENO RM Solutions may very well be
just be the tip of the iceberg.
Thanks to you and George for all your efforts and we likewise look forward to collaborating with your agency on
TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.
~ Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
1
GP1100
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.
~~---------n----~~~~~------- --r~tJt::.r10N~M~l.t,tH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Regards,
GP1101
'-
---------------
Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
fl'.ve copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.
Thank you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.
George
VoMfU:i!iit~
IW,.~~--....Y
f'Jl.i:'.ilATICJNH~\J.'rH
GP1102
Cc:
Subject:
Thanks Matt. Danny/George, Matt does not get in town until Tuesday. I have meetings on Tuesday from 10-11 and 2-4
but the rest of my day is open for a meeting. Wednesday, 2/24/16 is wide open as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees ori line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified ofproposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
c.
... -.ftt .
of~
sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
'f1~trr1ti1~~H~r~
GP1103
at Advanced Disposal this week, operator of the Blue Ridge Landfill in Irving where this WV Fairmont
Brine wastes wound up, there is definitely a huge knowledge gap on this issue in the landfill community
here in KV. Advanced TENO RM Solutions may very well be just be the tip of the iceberg.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=BSOl
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated under the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by or as a result of
human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural radioactivity of rocks or soils,
or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is technologically enhanced by
controllable practices (or by past human practices);
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has been
separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive regulatory
responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) from
outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in Kentucky, if the imports or
disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.kv.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=BSOS
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet issued
pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten thousand
dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation or
noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Thanks to you and George for all your efforts and we likewise look forward to collaborating with your
agency on TENORM/LLRW disposal in KV.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KV 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>
GP1104
Would you be able to meet with me and George later today or early next week? The purpose being to go
over the notice in draft form now as well as see where we can collaborate on this issue of
TENORM/LLRW disposal in KV.
Regards,
I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of
yesterday, a letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was
passed around and shared with Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a
unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by mY supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our
Section employees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.
At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the
disposal of TE NORN and processed TENO RM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
Following the meeti~g Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.
Thank you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence
with me.
George
GP1105
that the letter was going to be mailed on 2/16/16. I personally have no problem with the letter being
sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with the same landfill operators with our own letter giving
them more specifics on the Central Midwest Compact KRS's addressing the prohibition of out-of-region
TE NORM disposal. If you all can share your mailing list with us so we can accomplish that task, it would
be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are now discussing
this matter is a good thing. At the end of the day I would like to see the whole case turned over to the
AG' s office.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<imageOOl.jpg>
GP1106
elm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
George:
Can you meet around 130 or 2ish today with me and Curt?
Rt:tA
.
~""'
I
j
Hello Danny,
GP1107
I would be delighted to meet with you and George but could we please do it sometime next week. My Branch Manager
is out of town this week and I know he would like to attend this meeting as would be my Division Director, Ms. Kathy
Fowler. Anytime on Monday, 2/22/16 works for me. I am including Matt and Kathy on this e-mail so they can check theiL_
schedules and get back to us with a day and time that works for them as well. It sounds as though both our legal
-.
departments are also involved in this matter which as I told George, is a good thing in my book. Personally I would love
to see a joint letter go out to all landfill operators from both our agencies that specifically calls out the applicable Central
Midwest Interstate Low-Level Waste Compact KY regulatory statutes and KY administrative regulations. I think this
would leave no doubt in any landfill operator's mind as to what was not acceptable here in KY when it comes to
TENO RM disposal. After talking to the gentleman in charge of Environmental Management at Advanced Disposal this
week, operator of the Blue Ridge Landfill inJDting where t_hisJ[\l'\/_f~lrmont Brln~1Nastes WQ!J_nd up_,__there i~efinit~Jy L ____ _
huge knowledge gap on this issue in the landfill community here in KY. Advanced TENO RM Solutions may very well be
just be the tip of the iceberg.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring
radioactive material does not include the natural radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials
whose radioactivity is technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has been separated to various
degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive regulatory responsibility of the . states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in
Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person wno fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative regulations promulgated
pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and
211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000). Each day of the violation or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Thanks to you and George for all your efforts and we likewise look forward to collaborating with your agency on
TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Z'f1nh1
IV~J~l
2
GP1108
8""=
.
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Letter
Curt:
Would you be able to meet with me and George later today or early next week? The purpose being to go over the notice
in draft form now as well as see where we can collaborate on this issue of TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.
Regards,
I was not included in the group of individuals that prepared this letter and from my understanding as of yesterday, a
letter was never sent or shared with your Branch. Last Friday in a meeting a letter was passed around and shared with
Tony, but I was not given a copy. Danny my Branch Manager shared a unsigned draft of the letter with me.
We had a Staff Meeting yesterday led by my supervisor, Lindsey Briggs. Participants included all of our Section
employees along with Danny Anderson, our Branch Manager.
At the close of the meeting I took a few minutes to bring everyone up to date on what I knew about the disposal of
TENORN and processed TENORM (such as Fairmont Brine Processing).
Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and encourage you two to directly correspond.
Thank you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.
-l
orge
GP1109
1---- ..
___ _
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govId ph/rad ioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
GP1110
flm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hi Dan,
When can you get the manifests to us and how are you going to get them to us? Email or paper copy? If email, the total
for attachments per email is 8 meg. If paper, we'd like them to be hand delivered it to make sure they get here and we
would like them by Monday. Thank you, George
GP1111
elm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
GP1112
-------
-----
To:
Subject:
Danny;
Yes!
Thank you,
J (EEC)
Rc!lt!IJ~....
..
ta\t1lA11~H~TB
~----~---~ .....................................
GP1113
Curt:
I was hoping to keep this initial meeting small. Just me, you and George. After that, we can bring in the
hi~~-~.~-~~~.....
--'-
Thanks to you and George for all your efforts and we likewise look forward to collaborating with your agency on
TENORM/LLRW disposal in KY.
GP1114
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
YnuhitJe~
~,Ut!Jr;g
J'iJJ.tilJ.\1'10NGt))iULTH
Regards,
Danny Anderson, P.E
GP1115
Following the meeting Danny Anderson expressed an interest in meeting with your Branch.
I have copied him on this correspondence and en~ourage you two to directly correspond.
Thank you for giving me a copy of the letter for my files and sharing this importance correspondence with me.
George
------ --From~Pendergr-ass,-Eu rt-EGHFS-9PH}--Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:52 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Letters
George, Attached is the letter that your attorneys shared with our attorneys which they then shared with my Division
Director, Commissioner and I believe the Cabinet Secretary. It was my understanding that the letter was going to be
mailed on 2/16/16, I personally have no problem with the letter being sent. I just want us to be able to follow-up with
the same landfill operators with our own letter giving them more specifics on the Central Midwest Compact KRS's
addressing the prohibition of out-of-region TENO RM disposal. If you all can share your mailing list with us so we can
accomplish that task, it would be very much appreciated. I believe the fact that our attorneys and your attorneys are
now discussing this matter is a good thing. At the end of the day I would like to see the whole case turned over to the
AG's office.
Regards,
Kf!.t
GP1116
elm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeri;
George Weems is still trying to get them to cooperate.
George P.
GP1117
elm:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
'mckeeperez.nancy@epa.gov'
Delivered: 2/19/2016 1:09 PM
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they
received from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided
by the landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16,
2015. The Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine
Processing describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George
GP1118
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
..
GP1119
elm:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
centrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
vents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716
GP1120
Subject:
We will be hand delivering and will have before the end of the week
George P do you have the list of companies we should look for
GP1121
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Fyi
Thanks,
Danny
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dan Fleshour <dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 3:41:14 PM EST
To: "Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)" <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
We are working on pulling all the information together and would like to hand deliver and meet to
discuss the issue further
We plan to have by next Thursday, will everybody be available to meet then
Thanks
10 ---------
GP1122
e!7:'
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Rodney;
Just wanted to share this with you.
George
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 3:45 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Fwd: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
Fyi
Thanks,
Danny
. g i n forwarded message:
From: Dan Fleshour <dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 3:41:14 PM EST
To: "Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)" <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
We are working on pulling all the information together and would like to hand deliver and meet to
discuss the issue further
We plan to have by next Thursday, will everybody be available to meet then
Thanks
GP1123
"'m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Rodney;
Just wanted to share this with you.
George
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Friday, February 19, 2016 3:45 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Fwd: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
Sent:
Fyi
Thanks,
Danny
. . .gin forwarded message:
From: Dan Fleshour <dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com>
Date: February 19, 2016 at 3:41:14 PM EST
To: "Anderson, Danny J (EEC) (Danny.Anderson@ky.gov)" <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: Blue Ridge Waste info - meeting
We are working on pulling all the information together and would like to hand deliver and meet to
discuss the issue further
We plan to have by next Thursday, will everybody be available to meet then
Thanks
10-------I M: 513-284-3615
E: dan.fleshour@advanceddisposal.com
Connect with us: Advanced Disposal.com Face book Youtube
J
GP1124
tlom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
GP1125
'm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dan;
Please forward your request to my supervisor Lindsey Briggs.
Thank you,
George Partridge
Hi Dan,
When can you get the manifests to us and how are you going to get them to us? Email or paper copy? If email, the total
for attachments per email is 8 meg. If paper, we'd like them to be hand delivered it to make sure they get here and we
would like them by Monday. Thank you, George
GP1126
elm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rodney;
Thank you!
George
. g i n forwarded message:
GP1127
------------~-------
GP1128
flom:
To:
Subject:
RE: RCRA
Sent:
Jeri:
I am scheduled to attend a meeting all day in Bowling Green on Tuesday. The meeting that was planned for Wednesday
with Curt Pendergrass and his group has been postponed to be rescheduled for a future date.
I am available the other days of the week for a conference call for EPA.
Please reschedule our call with Nancy.
Thank you,
George
These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
,,.i}Ai W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
.
,
~vision of Waste
Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
1
GP1129
-m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To:
Subject: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:22:21 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 22, 2016 7:22:20 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1130
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
ai..
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
1
GP1131
~---YP.OrfJ2--P~c{gefr~--~~~~-
,__ _ __ __ __ - - ---
GP1132
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in Bowling Green on
Tuesday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Public Health, Radiation Materials Section to
discuss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont Brine Processing has been postponed to a
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this week (any day but Tuesday).
Thank you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
George
, ,.,
,,.,,~,,-,,,,,_,~
GP1133
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George
GP1134
f/Am:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jeri,
I don't mind moving our meeting to a later date. I'm pretty much booked up until Friday. How about meeting at 10:00 on
Friday?
A.:
Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in Bowling Green on
Tuesday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Public Health, Radiation Materials Section to
discuss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont Brine Processing has been postponed to a
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this week (any day but Tuesday).
Thank you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
George
GP1135
I received your email and documents. I'll take a look at them and then we can meet tomorrow (Tuesday) at 11:00, as
discussed.
91"
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George
GP1136
GP1137
L_ _
-m:
Partrid
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeri;
I
I
I
Jeri,
. .on't mind moving our meeting to a later date. I'm pretty much booked
Friday?
Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in 'Bowling Green on
.....~sday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Publ.ic Health, Radiation l\llaterials Section to
~uss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont rine Processing has been postponed to a
!
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this wejek (any day but Tuesday).
1
GP1138
Thank you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
George
From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]
.sent:-M0r:iday,-F~l:lrnar-y-~2-016-P.JO-AM-----
-------
- -------
(404) 562-8674
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal .
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
2
GP1139
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
Mairmont Brine Processing .
GP1140
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Thank you Jeri for looking into this issue. Did the EPA have no problems with the radiochemical analysis for Ra-226/228
in the water on top of the FBP sludge using the EPA's method 901.1 water safe drinking water analysis method rather
than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable Ra~226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
method for soil analysis.
EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiocbemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
Aiiti production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
~ument the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).
"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TENORM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENO RM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENORM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
~above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
GP1141
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
/(f/JJ. ~
From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
To:
These are my_ notes from o_ ur 11 :00 t-elephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning~
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
...
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TEN ORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
GP1142
'm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Todd;
As you were talking with me a couple of minutes ago this came in.
Thought you might like to see it!
Thanks for stopping by!
George
than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable Ra-226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
method for soil analysis.
EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
and production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
document the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).
.-
"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
GP1143
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and . .
greater for TENO RM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
{http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%2JlRadj_g_active%20Waste%20Compact.pdf-1-Wba_tlwaswantiogJs_riQ_w frnfil1be CMCi::ommissio~oJ~Jf we can -~- _________ _
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENORM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENO RM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
and above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
K'l!J~
f'.A!llATlO'l'JHat\1.TH
These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicabilify of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
2
GP1144
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
~m my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents \Vould be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TEN ORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham. Ph.D.
Division of Waste .Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716
.3
GP1145
"m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Curt;
Following the conference call that Jeri and I had with Nancy McKee Perez from U.S. EPA Region 4 this past Friday, I
forwarded her the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste .
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Nancy is going to look up the records that EPA has on Fairmont Brine Processing since they have a EPA Identification
Number. There should be a Waste Determination for the waste that is generated from the facility. I also want to
c~nfirm that Advanced TENORM Services followed the necessary procedures for acceptance and management of that
wastes from EPA's perspective and what responsibilities lie with the generator (Fairmont Brine Processing). Nancy is
also going to look at the data we have from PACE Analytical so see if any other RCRA regulations apply (designation as
a characteristic waste, etc.)
I anticipate learning more about their waste streams as well as clarifying that the RCRA "O & G" exemption that has
been claimed would not be applicable to processed waste from the O&G industry by a company that serves the
industry.
Thanks for sharing the analytical method for soil analysis and how EPA uses the term "intrinsically derived from
primary filed operations."
Today I am addressing requests from our Field Offices as they draft the NOVs for the two facilities that have received
radioactive wastes from out of state.
We have a follow-up phone call with Nancy this week .
. .nkyou,
George
GP1146
..
Thank you Jeri for looking into this issue. Did the EPA have no problems with the radiochemical analysis for Ra-226/228
in the water on top of the FBP sludge using the EPA's method 901.1 water safe drinking water analysis method rather
than an approved EPA method for soils that Patrick indicated would have been more appropriate? Using the EPA's
website and conducting a search for acceptable Ra-226 methods in solids, I came up with the following as an acceptable
method for soil analysis.
--------------------------------------~------------~~~-------- ---
EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www .epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
and production "special wastes" being available to take advantage ofthis exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
document the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).
"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materia.
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TE NORM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENO RM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENORM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
and above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
2
GP1147
"m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
FYI
Further, I told them that I did not want the term "radioactive" or the term "radioactivity" appearing in the application.
Basically, they are treating the leachate for dissolved metals, and then running it through the carbon filters. Any rad that
is removed is gravy as far as I am concerned.
Please let me know if there is a time this week that we can complete this conversation. I can set up a conference line
and we can meet in my office or I can schedule a conference room. Nothing formal expected other than conversation.
Thanks,
.auan 91~, PG
GP1148
Could request FFA presentation from DOE on the topic. Also, ee can ask our solid waste lead {Todd Hendricks) to lead a
short discussion on U -landfill from his oversight perspective for ext. reg. discussion.
-----.
Working on my SMP comments and realized that I did not have a chance to complete a conversation with you to achieve
a better understanding of the rad treatment (if any) and discharge status for the uranium and Tc-99 in the leachate.
So, I am sending this note as a reminder that I would like to learn more about the current status (and t,he future) of the
U landfill.
Thanks,
Julie
GP1149
fl!~:
To:
Subject:
George,
Can you give me some background information so that I can write an information request to Corey about his process?
GP1150
,rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
April;
What is Corey Hoskins requesting? What "process" are you referring to?
Thank you,
George
GP1151
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in Bowling Green on
Tuesday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Public Health, Radiation Materials Section to
discuss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont Brine Processing has been postponed to a
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this week (any day but Tuesday).
- k you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
1
GP1152
---------------
George
From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 7:30 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
I received your email and documents. I'll take a look at them and then we can meet tomorrow (Tuesday) at 11:00, as
discussed.
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies su.Aa.
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
...
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
2
GP1153
tJtcerely,
George
GP1154
Jeri;
Friday is excellent! Glad you are available.
That will give us some time to gather some more information in preparation for the meeting,
Thank you for all you are doing (and your patience with me).
George
. .~nks,
~n
GP1155
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Nancy;
When we planned on the conference call on Tuesday, I didn't realize I was scheduled for a meeting in Bowling Green on
Tuesday. Also the meeting we had scheduled with the Department of Public Health, Radiation Materials Section to
discuss the landfill contamination from the waste received from Fairmont Brine Processing has been postponed to a
later to date.
If it is convenient with you and Jeri, could we meet on another day this week (any day but Tuesday).
Thank you for reviewing the documents and helping us to learn how the waste streams from Fairmont Brine are
regulated in relationship to RCRA.
Thanks again for your assistance and guidance,
George
GP1156
---------- -----
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George
GP1157
-om:
:ent:
To:
Subject:
I believe it is to do with the mining drilling mud and what they do before disposal?
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
April;
What is Corey Hoskins requesting? What "process" are you referring to?
Thank you,
George
GP1158
To:
Subject:
April;
We are addressing both TENORM waste as well as processed TENO RM waste that is being transported fron: out of state
into Kentucky for disposal in our landfills.
Could you please send me the original email request so I can understand better who would be the best person to
respond to his question?
Thank you,
George
GP1159
#,om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
RE: RCRA
Thanks George for the summary. Funny thing. The EPA just released the following regarding oil and gas
(http://www.epa.gov/enforcement/national-enforcement-initiative-ensuring-energy-extraction-activities-comply ).
"Nati.anal Enforcement Initiative: Ensuring Energy Extraction Activities Comply with Environmental Laws"~ The EPA's
inspection and enforcement map towards the bottom of the page is a little hard to read but it looks as though EPA is
indeed conducting inspection of well sites in KY. However the EPA's enforcement actions seemed to be geared more
toward violations of the Clean Air Act.
You mentioned two NOVs for accepting out of state TENORM wastes. Do you mind if I ask what is the other landfill
besides Advanced Disposal Solutions in Irving, KY that is going to receive a NOV?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
~nkfort, KY 40621
502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
9111"=
'~
- Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
1
GP1160
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Nancy is going to look up the records that EPA has on Fairmont Brine Processing since they have a EPA Identification
Number. There should be a Waste Determination for the waste that is generated from the facility. I also want to
confirm that Advanced TENORM Services followed the necessary procedures for acceptance and management of that
wastes from EPA's perspective and what responsibilities lie with the generator (Fairmont Brine Processing). Nancy is
also going to look at the data we have from PACE Analytical so see if any other RCRA regulations apply (designation as
a characteristic waste, etc.)
I anticipate learning more about their waste streams as well as clarifying that the RCRA "O & G" exemption that has
been claimed would not be applicable to processed waste from the O&G industry by a company that serves the
industry.
Thanks for sharing the analytical method for soil analysis and how EPA uses the term "intrinsically derived from
primary filed operations."
Today I am addressing requests from our Field Offices as they draft the NOVs for the two facilities that have received
radioactive wastes from out of state.
We have a follow-up phone call with Nancy this week.
Thank you,
George
EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www .epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
..
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
2
GP1161
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
~d production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCR. A subtitle C? Looking at a
~cument the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).
"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas, The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Centra.1 Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TE NORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TENO RM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the.CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENO RM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENORM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
K~~ffl"'I~ ~~
GP1162
Subject: RCRA
These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning&.
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
'W
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
__m__ ~ol_y_e~n,ts_,___ Fainp._Q_nt ~rip.e or_AQ_y~nc~4_'fp_:i\,LQRM~~~fYjf_~-~l!9!!lg_lJ.(:ly~_ ch~!:_/!Cteri_~~c!fu_~_Faste_for proper__ __ m- ---~
disposal.
.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
ZOO Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716
GP1163
--------------
,rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Curt;
My understanding the following will receive NOVs:
For Advanced TENO RM Services, there is a regulation the Division plans to cite that I am not familiar with and has not
been used to my knowledge. It appears to be a very general and broad based in nature since the specifics of the wastes
such as its radioactivity are regulated by your cabinet. I believe discussions are still continuing regarding any action we
can take against ATS. It is easier for us to address the landfill site.
Thanks for the link to information by EPA!
George
You mentioned two NOVs for accepting out of state TENORM wastes. Do you mind if I ask what is the other landfill
besides Advanced Disposal Solutions in Irving, KV that is going to receive a NOV?
1
GP1164
Curt;
Following the conference call that Jeri and I had with Nancy McKee Perez from U.S. EPA Region 4 this past Friday, I
forwarded her the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Nancy is going to look up the records that EPA has on Fairmont Brine Processing since they have a EPA Identification
Number. There should be a Waste Determination for the waste that is generated from the facility. I also want to
confirm that Advanced TENORM Services followed the necessary procedures for acceptance and management of that
wastes from EPA's perspective and what responsibilities lie with the generator (Fairmont Brine Processing). Nancy is
also going to look at the data we have from PACE Analytical so see if any other RCRA regulations apply (designation as
a characteristic waste, etc.)
GP1165
---
----
------
------------
I anticipate learning more about their waste streams as well as clarifying that the RCRA "O & G" exemption that has
been claimed would not be applicable to processed waste from the O&G industry by a company that serves the
'---ustry.
Thanks for sharing the analytical method for soil analysis and how EPA uses the term "intrinsically derived from
primary filed operations."
Today I am addressing requests from our Field Offices as they draft the NOVs for the two facilities that have received
radioactive wastes from out of state.
We have a follow-up phone call with Nancy this week.
Thank you,
George
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNum ber=RadiochemicaIMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
and production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
document the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process". (http://www3.epa.govI epawaste/ nonhaz/industrial/specia I/oil/ ) .
"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
~just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate Low-
~el Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TE NORM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
3
GP1166
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
--~ .- ------
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
..
~:,,
_.
These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
GP1167
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
__9lvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
rsting required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham. Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort. KY 4060 I
502-564-6716
GP1168
Subject:
RE: RCRA
Sent:
Thanks George.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
'Di*"~
l*(J!<~~
wlJ.\To1tir~.HlVU,.TH
12: 11 PM
A./
./
GP1169
For Advanced TENO RM Services, there is a regulation the Division plans to cite that I am not familiar with and has not
been used to my knowledge. It appears to be a very general and broad based in nature since the specifics of the wastes
such as its radioactivity are regulated by your cabinet. I believe discussions are still continuing regarding any action we
can take against ATS. It is easier for us to address the landfill site.
A...
W
M'
~~..
.~
.~~~
fV\i!AT10Haart!t';ll'H
GP1170
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
-landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
_9
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Nancy is going to look up the records that EPA has on Fairmont Brine Processing since they have a EPA Identification
Number. There should bea Waste Determination for the waste that is generated from the facility. I also want to
confirm that Advanced TENORM Services followed the necessary procedures for acceptance and management of that
wastes from.EPA's perspective and what responsibilities lie with the generator (Fairmont Brine Processing). Nancy is
also going to look at the data we have from PACE Analytical so see if any other RCRA regulations apply (designation as
a characteristic waste, etc.)
I anticipate learning more about their waste streams as well as clarifying that the RCRA "O & G" exemption that has
been claimed would not be applicable to processed waste from the O&G industry by a company that serves the
industry.
- n k s for sharing the analytical method for soil analysis and how EPA uses the term "intrinsically derived from
primary filed operations."
.
Today I am addressing requests from our Field Offices as they draft the NOVs for the two facilities that have received
radioactive wastes from out of state.
We have a follow-up phone call with Nancy this week.
Thank you,
George
EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
3
GP1171
"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENORM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TENO RM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regionaf Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20Low
Level%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills and those importing this out-of-state TENO RM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TE NORM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
and above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
I will let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
opinions of our attorneys on this issue as well.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:S02-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
,~~
GP1172
These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEPA concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy.asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
GP1173
-------
---
--- -- - - -
Curt,
The only thing I can add to what George said is that I asked Nancy about testing procedures. I am of the impression that
everything that was tested went through TCLP. Pace Analytical lists the sample as a solid. And everything is reported as
micrograms per liter- a liquid medium. All this is acceptable. But Nancy has all the information, so she will make the
final determination. Correct me if I am wrong, but if the only exceedance is radioactive, then it will not be
"characteristically hazardous" under RCRA.
What I think may be the case from EPA's perspective is that the waste was not handled the way it should have been by
Fairmont Brine. It may well end up not meeting the definition of hazardous, but no one did the necessary work to know
that.
We know that laws were broken. But it remains to be seen if the RCRAlaw was broken.
We'll be talking to Nancy again on Friday. We will know more then.
Jeri
GP1174
..
Thank you,
George
GP1175
- - - - - - - - - - - ---------
----
EPA Method EMSL-19: Determination of Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Water, Soil, Air and Biological
Tissue (https://www .epa.gov/homeland-security-research/radiochemical-methodsummary?methodNumber=RadiochemicalMethod7 )
Analysis Purpose: Confirmatory analysis
Technique: Alpha counting
Method Developed for: Radium-226 and radium-228 in water, soil, air, biological tissues and biological fluids
Method Selected for: SAM lists this method for confirmatory analysis of soil/sediment, surface wipe, and air
filter samples.
And what about the overriding issue of whether or not a company involved in the processing of oil and gas exploration
and production "special wastes" being available to take advantage of this exemption to RCRA subtitle C? Looking at a
document the EPA put together, it appears that once these E&P wastes are processed, they no longer meet the
definition of "intrinsically derived from primary field operations" but rather are wastes generated from a
"manufacturing process"~ (http:Uwww3.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/oil/ ).
"According to the legislative history, the term "other wastes associated" specifically includes waste materials
intrinsically derived from primary field operations associated with the exploration, development, or
production of crude oil and natural gas. The phrase "intrinsically derived from the primary field operations"
is intended to distinguish exploration, development, and production operations from transportation and
manufacturing operations."
And just for everyone's information, after our meeting last week, I reached out to our Central Midwest Interstate LowLevel Waste Compact Commissioners for their opinion on the Regional Management Plan that puts a limit on what
constitutes TENO RM. The CMC Regional Management Plan, adopted May 1999 does establish a baseline of 5 pCi/g and
greater for TENO RM contaminated wastes (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf ).
The KY Regulator Statutes that established the CMC KRS 211.861-869 make mention of the regional management and
KRS 211.859 which establishes the CMC, discusses the Regional Management Plan in Article Vin KRS 211.859 which
establishes the Compact
(http://www.cmcompact.org/statutes/KRS%20211.859%20Central%20Midwest%201nterstate%20LowLevel%20Radioactive%20Waste%20Compact.pdf ). What I was wanting know from the CMC Commission is if we can
hold our KY landfills arid those importing this out-of-state TE NORM wastes to this 5 pCi/g limit? From what I have
gathered, OH, PA and WV have all promulgated TENO RM regulations and used this same 5 pCi/g Ra-226 + Ra-228 as the
limit for disposal of oil and gas E&P "special wastes" in non-hazardous landfills. OH I believe chose to use a 5 pCi/g over
and above background limit, background being defined as 2 pCi/g statewide.
~I let you know what our CMC Commissioners say on the subject. At some point it would be nice to get the legal
GP1176
These are my notes from our 11 :00 telephone conversation with Nancy McKee Perez of the USEP A concerning
the applicability of RCRA to waste generated by Fairmont Brine Processing.
The waste, as it was being transported to Fairmont Brine, was probably exempt. After it was processed, though,
the sludge might be characteristic, possibly for RCRA metals. They are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium,.
lead, mercury, selenium and silver. It is also possible that it could have been characteristic for certain listed
solvents. Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services should have characterized the waste for proper
disposal.
Nancy asked about the water that was generated. From Fairmont Brine's website, it appears it is put to
beneficial reuse, although not necessarily in the oil and gas industry.
George sent Nancy the data we have from Waste Management. We will be talking again Tuesday.
From my perusal of Waste Management's data, it does not appear that any of the RCRA metals are in
concentrations that would make them characteristically toxic. Furthermore, I doubt that any of the listed
solvents would be used in the industry. But did Fairmont Brine or Advanced TENORM Services ever do the
testing required to know that? And how representative is the Waste Management dataset?
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
Division of Waste Management
Department for Environmental Protection
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort. KY 40601
502-564-6716
GP1177
Cc:
Subject:
Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov
Monday, February 22, 2016 2:12 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC);
Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us; Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us;
Rebecca.Fugitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov
RE: KY Landfill Concern
George,
We appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.
As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas industry waste
substance facility).
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority over the Oil and Gas
Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website.
We met Tim Stapleton from Pressure Tech as well as Cory Hoskins from BES, LLC or BES Technical Solutions, LLC or
Advanced TENORM Services, LLC.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this facility, but the
planning fell through when the site's owner passed away.
~ Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it do. wn last Friday. He's getting questions, but admitted "it's just a
~site" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskins if he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr. Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he backed away
from pursuing it.
Currently, I do not have much on Fairmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's Beth Pratt and
Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
GP1178
':A...
""W
Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments of TENO RM to our
landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of Cory Hoskins associated with
______ __AIDtanced.IENORM5-e_rvlc.e_sjalsJLassociated .with BES.~LC andJiES Tec_bnicaL~Qlutj()_~_L.LCBlld _his _ac!iyitie~---~---- __ _
surrounding shipments of out of state TENO RM to Kentucky.
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have attached that to
this email message.
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our situation and the
investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TE NORM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory of Advanced
TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's brother. Cory is standing in the
doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive
Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was disposed of at Blue.
Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine Processing .
./ Analytical results from Advanced TENORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who manages Green
Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the TENO RM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TENORM here in Kentucky. We
believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at the Blue Ridge
Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey and sampling protocol in the
future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to the
management of TENO RM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the operators and managers
of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George
GP1179
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
Ohio
Oi~rtm~nt
of Health
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
..
3
GP1180
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Organizer:
Required Attendees:
GP1181
Location:
Start:
End:
Show Time As:
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Organizer:
Required Attendees:
Resources:
-bject:
GP1182
-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
GP1183
Location:
Start:
End:
Show Time As:
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Organizer:
Required Attendees:
-bject:
GP1184
Start:
End:
Show Time As:
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Organizer:
Required Attendees:
GP1185
Subject:
GP1186
~~:
To:
Subject:
GP1187
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rodney;
Please find below where I first summarize in a brief narrative what I want a contractor conducting a site assessment to
accomplish at Blue Ridge Landfill. The second section below summarized the thoughts I shared with Danny last week
regarding the TENORM/Processed TENORM disposal concerns and the path forward.
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to the determine
the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background radiation sources from an analysis
of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and
leachate. The RSSI will also include a spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and
soil samples to identify the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose
assessment of the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47 shipments of waste
from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure
~ pathways along with exposure pathway modeling with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on
skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide sources.
W9
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated
during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from desigr,ate work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will be following
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas frorn organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics), ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International
Radiation Protection Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the above describe work.
GP1188
i\!~!~i~!t~tfJi~S~iff!::~~1t~l~~~-~~r.~,ft~
,~~~~:x~:~~~tf:~
Waste characterization, remediation, disposal as appropriate
Ph~f'as~e~~mfipti]iriiit!fe~Alis~m~t:rJfi ______
if~~~!ili,i?Alii:~i~it~i~iim~~i~~:~[~~~~rJ}i~~1{@~~~~~~0,~
i~~lud;
MARSSIM - provides technical guidance on conducting radiation surveys and site investigations (Radiological
Survey and Site Investigation Process)
11111ic~~~~1i',~1~[~~~
P}1fi~~Y-ix~1~6~]~jJ~_6~t(~~1~{!illB!~:l!f~~ffi/~I~!6!'ng:~wcfi~~e~tiPr1"
MARSAME surveys (equipment)
l~~~{fg~~s~t~1~~i~~~1roin:t~
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community (school)
exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed TENORM
waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the
establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Violation for not reporting the out of state TENO RN/Processed TE NORM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015 and two other additional companies have been identified as well as having waste received
out of state TENO RM waste by the landfill facility.
..
GP1189
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)
9'!.dfills Statewide
Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G /Fracking Activities.
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TE NORM and processed or concentrated TENO RM.
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TE NORM or processed
TENO RM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operator and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.
Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed .
~geP.Partri<fneJ~
~artment for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
3
GP1190
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
GP1191
Subject:
Rodney;
Please find below where I first summarize in a brief narrative what I want a contractor conducting a site assessment to
accomplish at Blue Ridge Landfill. The second section below summarized the thoughts I shared with Danny last week
regarding the TENORM/Processed TENORM disposal concerns and the path forward.
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to the determine
the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background radiation sources from an analysis
of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and
leachate. The RSSI will also include a spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and
soil samples to identify the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose
assessment of the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47 shipments of waste
from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure
. . . pathway.s a. long with exposure pathway modeling with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on
. . , - skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide sources.
.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated
during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from designate work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will be following
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas from organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics}, ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements}, IRPA (The International
Radiation Protection Association} and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program} for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan} will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the above describe work.
GP1192
~~wtlii!itil\tiiiiiii1~1~4a~1i!~:~~~;=~:~r.~i~ll
'
~I!~~tz~i~rlf~
Q~i?~!~~~~~{ffi~li!!~&~~!~[ci:9~!'~~~~XR'n --~------------------------ .----------------~~----~---~--~--- ---- Include a QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) for project
!lii~l6t~!~l~1J:'.i~~~lit~~t~iF~r~11:~~~1~~i~11m~j1~1
MARSSIM - provides technical guidance on conducting radiation surveys and site investigations (Radiological
Survey and Site Investigation Process)
~iitl~"',~::,~m~f~iJ!if!1~1l1~~B
~~Ifi~~1'~-~I!"~ij~Ji~~~i~~~~~fif~h!~f2~~~I'1Jt1(1t~tiivgailcf iriie~ti9n_-'
MARSAME surveys (equipment)
~t~~~~t~~ra~I~~Q~5~~~rm~-~i~
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community (school)
exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed TENORM
waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the
establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended by the Radioactive
Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Violation for not reporting the out of state TE NORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015 and two other additional companies have been identified as well as having waste received~
out of state TE NORM waste by the landfill facility.
..
GP1193
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Progr:am for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) an/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)
9'3ndfills Statewide
Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G /Fracking Activities.
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TENO RM or processed
TENO RM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operator and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.
Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed .
GP1194
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
'
GP1195
#m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
eviewed the web sites for each of the contract. ors, paying particular attention to how they described their services.
ok the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work experience in human health and
ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at
the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included the items that
Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:
It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content down to a few
words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience with radionuclides and have
historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career work. There is some over-lap between the respective
areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any other areas you
would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on the path forward
to address TE NO RM/Processed TE NORM disposal concerns facing our state .
..Amks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this area of concern
~red by us all.
GP1196
I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my cell phone and I
will return your call.
Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to the determine
the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background radiation sources from an analysis
of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and
leachate. The RSSI will also include a spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and
soil samples to identify the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose
assessment of the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47 shipments of waste
from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure
pathways along with exposure pathway modeling with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on
skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide sources.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated
during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will follow
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas from organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics), ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International
Radiation Protection Association) and the NEFAP {National Environmental Field Activities Program) for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP {Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items]
Violation for not reporting the out of state TENORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015.
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
2
GP1197
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENO RM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section assoeiated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime ofthe
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)
Landfills Statewide
Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G /Fracking Activities.
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TENO RM or processed
TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENORM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operators and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.
Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed .
GP1198
GP1199
~om:
~:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Maze, Rodney (EEC)
Subject: RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 6:30:27 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 22, 2016 6:44:56 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
GP1200
'm:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Norm and Processed TENORM - Path Forward
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 6:30:27 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 22, 2016 8:24:01 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
11
GP1201
flam:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Rodney Maze
On Feb 22, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Rodney and Todd;
In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site
survey for the Blue Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive
Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive
Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the website for NEFAP .
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described
the"ir services. I took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work
experience in human health and ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the
activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included
the items that Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:
It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content
down to a few words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience
with radionudides and have historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career
work. There is_some over-lap between the respective areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any
other areas you would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on
the path forward to address TENORM/Processed TENORM disposal concerns facing our state.
Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this
area of concern shared by us all.
GP1202
I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my
cell phone and I will return your call.
Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
-
- --
--
"---~--
,__
- --
A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to
the determine the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background
radiation sources from an analysis of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal
cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and leachate. The RSSI will also include a
spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and soil samples to identify
the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose assessment of
the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47
shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from
radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure pathways along with exposure pathway modeling
with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide
sources.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered
negative air containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne
contaminants generated during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from
designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors
will follow appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas
from organizations including, but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics),
ICRP (International Committee on Radiation Protection}, ICRU (International Commission on
Radiation Units and Measurements}, IRPA (The International Radiation Protection
Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for accreditation of
FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the
landfill that is part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge landfill [NOV Items]
Violation for not reporting the out of state TENORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly
Waste Received Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between
the dates Of July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015.
GP1203
..
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the
cell {providing adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine
Processing from the time period of July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment
to determine the level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and
future worker/community {school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical
constituents present in the processed TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP
certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the establishment and
implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended
by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the
waste was received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since
the exposures they experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for
lung and other cancers in the future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the
lifetime of the employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site
assessment listed above. Also include all identified receptors including students and employees
at the school adjacent to and across the street from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in
place of the waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the
future use of the site and any potential disturbances to the waste. {This will potentially affect
the exposure plan for the landfill!)
Landfills Statewide
Conduct an internal review {Solid Waste Branch) ofthe "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for
all landfills in Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out
of state waste from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G
/Fracking Activities.
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that
have potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving
TENO RM or processed TENO RM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in
the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENORM, require a
contractor to conduct a screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe
for operators and no one is exposed to an unacceptable level of radiation.
-
'
Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.
GP1204
GP1205
19'om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Rodney Maze
On Feb 22, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Rodney and Todd;
In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site
survey for the Blue Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive
Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive
Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the website for NEFAP.
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described
their services. I took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work
experience in human health and ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the
activities I would like to see the Contractors conduct at the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included
the items that Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:
It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content
down to a few words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience
with radionuclides and have historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career
work. There is some over-lap between the respective areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any
other areas you would like for me to research or address.
I.-
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on
the path forward to address TE NORM/Processed TE NORM disposal concerns facing our state.
Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this
area of concern shared by us all.
I
!
1
I
L_____
GP1206
I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my
cell phone and I will return your call.
Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
site wm
Violation for not reporting the out of state TE NORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly
Waste Received Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between
the dates Of July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015.
GP1207
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the
cell (providing adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine
Processing from the time period of July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment
to determine the level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and
future worker/community (school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical
constituents present in the processed TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP
certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the establishment and
implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended
by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the
waste was received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since
the exposures they experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for
lung and other cancers in the future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the
lifetime of the employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site
assessment listed above. Also include all identified receptors including students and employees
at the school adjacent to and across the street from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in
place of the waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the
future use of the site and any f.JOtential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect
the exposure plan for the landfill!)
Landfills Statewide
Conduct an internal review {Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for
all landfills in Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out
of state waste from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G
/Fracking Activities.
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that
have potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving
TENO RM or processed TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in
the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TENORM/Processed TENO RM, require a
contractor to conduct a screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe
for operators and no one is exposed to an unacceptable level of radiation.
Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.
GP1208
GP1209
flam:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Can we discuss this on Thursday after the Blue Ridge Landfill meeting?
Rodney Maze
On Feb 22, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Rodney and Todd;
In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site
survey for the Blue Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive
Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive
Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the website for NEFAP.
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described
their services. I took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work
experience in human health and ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the
activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included
the items that Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:
H is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content
down to a few words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience
with radionuclides and have historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career
work. There is some over-lap between the respective areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any
other areas you would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on
the path forward to address TENO RM/Processed TENO RM disposal concerns facing our state.
Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this
area of concern shared by us all.
I,
GP1210
I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my
cell phone and I will return your call.
Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843
Statement for Remedial Action by Contractor
-~--=.....c_~--------------~--~--
---~-~---~---
- -
- o
---~-~---
~---;.-
--------
------
----
-=-
----
-------~o------
A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to
the determine the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background
radiation sources from an analysis of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal
cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and leachate. The RSSI will also include a
spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and soil samples to identify
the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose assessment of
the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47
shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from
radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure pathways along with exposure pathway modeling
with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide
sources.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered
negative air containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne
contaminants generated during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from
designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors
will follow appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas
from organizations including, but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics),
ICRP (International Committee on Radiation Protection), ICRU (International Commission on
Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International Radiation Protection
Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for accreditation of
FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the
landfill that is part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items]
Violation for not reporting the out of state TE NO RN/Processed TE NORM waste on Quarterly
Waste Received Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between
the.dates Of July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015.
GP1211
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the
cell (providing adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine
Processing from the time period of July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment
to determine the level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and
future worker/community (school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical
constituents present in the processed TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP
certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the establishment and
implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended
by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the
waste was received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since
the exposures they experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for
lung and other cancers in the future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the
lifetime of the employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site
assessment listed above. Also include all identified receptors including students and employees
at the school adjacent to and across the street from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in
place of the waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the
future use of the site and any potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect
the exposure plan forthe landfill!)
Landfills Statewide
Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for
all landfills in Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out
of state waste from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G
/Fracking Activities.
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that
have potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving
TENORM or processed TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in
the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TENORM/Processed TENORM, require a
contractor to conduct a screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe
for operators and no one is exposed to an unacceptable level of radiation.
Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.
GP1212
GP1213
elm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
George,
I can only tell you how I handled these "special" projects in the past, although none was as horrible or life altering as
this.
My advice to you is to ask Lindsey what he needs from you every Monday so that you can keep a rolling list. Also, make
note when you completed your assignments so that you can use it in your evals.
Then set aside the processed TENORM requests (send an email saying that you have assignments from your supervisor
that you must complete first and that you will get to them as soon as you can or have them contact Lindsey) till you have
finished what Lindsey wants done.
I would request to Lindsey and Danny that this TENO RM be placed on your work plan for this year as it looks like it will
not be handled by anyone else.
I'll be happy to say something to Danny if you would like.
GP1214
Ken
GP1215
,,!m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George,
Thanks.
This is very good and very thorough, in my opinion. It is hard for me to add anything. I may be able to help regarding
geological issues with the site survey, however.
The only thing that I would like to see added would be specifics regarding enhanced groundwater, surface water, and
leachate monitoring for an expanded list of parameters based on the waste analysis. This monitoring could be either
short- or long-term (or both). It may be best to do this when the site survey is complete.
Regarding worker health, safety, and medical monitoring, I think you are completely correct. The only problem is that
we may not have the authority to do that within the context of a solid waste permit. We may need to talk to Daniel
about that.
~haps OSHA or CHFS need to pursue worker safety and health issues, but we need to ask them to figure out who has
~ biggest legal or regulatory stick regarding those matters.
Regards,
Todd
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described their services.
took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work experience in human health and
ogical risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at
GP1216
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included the items that
Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:
It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content down to a few
words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience with radionuclides and have
____ his:tQricalh1fQcusedon_chemicaLrnn.tamirij:u1t_s dL.Jringmy car~er wPrk. .. Tb~r.e issQJllE!_Qy~r:la_p l:>etw.e~n.tt:\gr~fill~_c;!iy~ .
areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any other areas you
would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on the path forward
to address TENO RM/Processed TENORM disposal concerns facing our state.
Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this area of concern
shared by us all.
I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my cell phone and I
will return your call.
Thanks again!
George
Cell: 859-221-8843
A Radiation Survey and Site Investigation (RSSI) for the landfill property site will be conducted to the determine
the level and extent of contamination and include measurement of background radiation sources from an analysis
of underlying geology. The RSSI will include the waste disposal cell, sedimentation pond, stormwater runoff and
leachate. The RSSI will also include a spectroscopy analysis of waste constituents and site background rock and
soil samples to identify the isotopes present. ABHP certified health physicists (CHP) will conduct a dose
assessment of the exposed on-site and off-site receptors based on present operations at the landfill and include
dose reconstruction from previous disposal activities of radioactive waste (including the 47 shipments of waste
from Fairmont Brine Process). Internal radiation dosimetry from radionuclides will be assessed for all exposure
pathways along with exposure pathway modeling with particular attention to inhalation, deposition on
skin/clothing and ingestion of radionuclide sources.
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated
during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will follow
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas from organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics), ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
....
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International
..
Radiation Protection Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
2
GP1217
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the abo~e describe work .
Violation for not reporting the out of state TE NO RN/Processed TENORM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015.
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!)
Landfills Statewide
Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out of state waste
from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G /Fracking Activities.
GP1218
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TE NORM or processed . .
TENORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016].
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operators and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.
Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.
..
4
GP1219
To:
Subject:
Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. ln'my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
. h o w this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ur~anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
GP1220
To:
Subject:
Hello gentlemen,
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
~ool and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
WI!"
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564~3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govI dph/ radioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~anted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
UnafliiJ/S~.
IY;t,'4.-~r..Y
r1At11Ar1m~11iJU.lf.!
GP1221
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
G. Weems:
Do you have any reliable information that this material from Fairmont brine was used as a daily cover material? Or is the
site denying that is was used for that purpose? See below ....
9111'
Thanks,
ail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http :ljwww.chfs.ky .govId ph/rad ioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
1
GP1222
To:
Subject:
George,
Any progress at Blue Ridge?
Lindsey
GP1223
Cc:
Subject:
Do not know right now. When we get the manifests we can total it up and according to Dan Fleshour, those won't be
here until Friday (probably) but he'll hand deliver them. George has the figures so far on the Fairmont Brine TENORM
and Green Hunter and knows what he's looking for. Last time I heard of TENO RM was back in the early 90's when they
were trying to scrap "hot" metal. I think George is trying to figure out the Marion County source. Marion County Ohio
is North of Columbus. Blue Ridge disposed 755 tons of "Marion" alternate daily cover (listed under Kentucky counties)
during the third quarter 2015 and Marion County OH has a website devoted to fracking locations in Marion County. I
don't know why Marion county KY would bypass Benson Valley to go to Blue Ridge. Noble Ohio (on the WQR) is a really
large scale fracking area about 30 miles from Pennsylvania and they disposed of 86 tons of "alternate daily cover". It's
G. Weems:
you have any reliable information that this material from Fairmont brine was used as a daily cover material? Or is the
site denying that is was used for that purpose? See below ....
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENORM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take Jong to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS.
And given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
particulate matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
.endent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
ble to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
1
GP1224
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
. CJ~L291:~~64-I[Q_O ~JSL4_i?~
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
V.ou~
IEt.fJ!J_.
..Y
f'.AD1ATiot,~AH~t:n1
GP1225
om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
You did notice that 47-16 ton loads could logically explain the 756 tons alternate daily cover for "Marion". They'd have
to use the equivalent to a coal hauling trailer. I can't imagine them hauling a roll off down to the BR Landfill.
GP1226
--~-~
-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Is there likely to be anything tomorrow you'll need me for? I'm going to do some Hazardous waste inspections in
between our sessions on the landfill.
GP1227
-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
George;
Danny and Ken are having me get caught up on permit reviews that were put on hold while I worked on the TENORM
concerns.
We can take this opportunity to get caught up on our regular work.
Thank you and have a nice day!
George
GP1228
.Aom:
.-;:nt:
To:
Subject:
George;
Yes I noticed this. But I am pushing the point that Billy keeps denying that can be the waste since he would never use it
as alternate daily cover.
Based on what we observed at the site on our survey measurements and on the soil sample - the contamination is
widespread and on the surface of the landfill.
Either way, the waste was not documented accurately.
I also saw only 1.24 tons of wastes from the Norwich, Ohio area and multiple firms are shipping that waste to Kentucky
for disposal at Blue Ridge. Billy and Dan have been withholding that information which would likely confirm additional
waste was not reported.
I want to see an NOV for not reporting the waste on the Quarterly Waste Received Report form.
I also totaled the cubic yards reported and that would indicate an amount significantly above the 756 tons.
9'orgeP.
GP1229
aAom:
To:
Subject:
RE: TENORM
..-;:mt:
Lindsey;
Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
Have a nice week!
George
-----Original Message----From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: TENORM
1-orge,
GP1230
;~~:
To:
Subject:
Danny;
This radiation levels we measured on the surface of the cell were fairly uniform with two areas slightly
elevated. Surface soil samples taken in the ice and snow that were analyzed on a wet basis showed levels of pCi/g at
6+. On a dry basis the levels would have been much higher.
There is every indication, based on both the Quarterly Quantity Waste Received Reports and what we observed at the
site that there is surface soil contaminated with TENORM.
George
GP1231
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
~~il~t?_ll_~~1C-,L\__ __ ___
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky,gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Vn(U~
~t.~.-. .V
P.>\tiJ,l\TlO'N~H~AtlH
GP1232
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Curt;
The waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was received from July into November. Please see an aerial view of the school
across the street. There are athletic facilities. There was potential site contamination from windblown dust. The trucks
enter and leave across the street from the school.
When you see the size of the public facilities across from the landfill, we need to consider the exposure of those that
used the facilities and offices during the entire exposure period.
Company management including the landfill operator have been withholding information from us that they are legally
required to submit and telling our management what was reported on the forms is different than the records that have
been provided to us.
I plan to work with our field office inspectors to develop an on-site exposure scenario.
- a n c e d Disposal who manages Blue Ridge has been obstructing our investigation on what happened.
Thank you,
George
Quick question. Can you all give me a better idea of how the Fairmont Brine Processing TENO RM contaminated sludge
was handled at Advanced Disposal Solutions Blue Ridge Landfill? I know you said the material was used as alternate daily
cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks
or months? I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that
we getting to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry.
We have the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of
Ra-226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill
workers actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically
we need to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS .
given the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne
iculate
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was
being spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
1
GP1233
be able to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the&..
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
....
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
- ~~DJUC~YE~~-@JJQ11li~~lth ~-r<li:ish _
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Va~---~
1w.d!JJ_:!I
f'.ftl.t1t\T!ON&H~Jli1.:n1
GP1234
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Todd;
Thank you,
George
Subject:
George,
Thanks.
This is very good and very thorough, in my opinion. It is hard for me to add anything. I may be able to help regarding
-logical issues with the site survey, however.
The only thing that I would like to see added would be specifics regarding enhanced groundwater, surface water, and
leachate monitoring for an expanded list of parameters based on the waste analysis. This monitoring could be either
short- or long-term (or both). It may be best to do this when the site survey is complete.
Regarding worker health, safety, and medical monitoring, I think you are completely correct. The only problem is that
we may not have the authority to do that within the context of a solid waste permit. We may need to talk to Daniel
about that.
Perhaps OSHA or CHFS need to pursue worker safety and health issues, but we need to ask them to figure out who has
the biggest legal or regulatory stick regarding those matters.
Regards,
Todd
lject:
GP1235
In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site survey for the Blue
Ridge landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and
requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the . . .
website for NEFAP.
~
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described their services. I
took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work experience in human health and
ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at
the Blue Ridge landfill.
i
I
--
-.~.-
.. ~----~~~~-
""-=~----~~~--------
-------
----=---- ;---'---'-.--'---~=~-----~--"~.,>.----~'--"~--~--
--------=--~- ----
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have includecTthe items that-~
Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:
It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise1 edit, or delete the content down to a few
words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience with radionuclides and have
historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career work. There is some over-lap between the respective
areas. I value you input.
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any other areas you
would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on the path forward
to address TENORM/Processed TE NORM disposal concerns facing our state.
Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this area of concern
shared by us all.
I will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call me anytime on my cell phone and I
GP1236
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered negative air
containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne contaminants generated
. . during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors will foHow
appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas from organizations including,
but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics), ICRP (International Committee on Radiation
Protection), ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International
Radiation Protection Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for
accreditation of FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the landfill that is
part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items)
Violation for not reporting the out of state TENORN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly Waste Received
Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between the dates Of July 24, 2015 and
November 16, 2015.
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the cell (providing
adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine Processing from the time period of
July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment to determine the
level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and future worker/community
(school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical constituents present in the processed
TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP certified contractor (National Environmental Activities
Program for the establishment and implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and
measurement organization) and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor
approved/recommended by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the waste was
received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since the exposures they
experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for lung and other cancers in the
future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the lifetime of the
employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site assessment listed above. Also
include all identified receptors including students and employees at the school adjacent to and across the street
from the entrance to the landfill.
GP1237
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in place of the
waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the future use of the site and any
potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect the exposure plan for the landfill!}
Landfills Statewide
Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch} of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for all landfills in
Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
_ ErQ!Jl_r~yie~of "Q!Jarterly \N_aste quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have receivedout of state waste
from- cou-nti~s-o-~-areast-hatar~~kno"11~-as-regio-ns having-high-le-vels -ofo& G/Fracklng7~ctfvfties:- -~-- --
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016) from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that have
potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving TENO RM or processed
TE NORM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016).
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENO RM, require a contractor to conduct a
screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe for operators and no one is exposed to an
unacceptable level of radiation.
Based on the results above, develop a plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.
GP1238
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rodney;
Thursday would be great!
Thank you!
George
Can we discuss this on Thursday after the Blue Ridge Landfill meeting?
Rodney Maze
On Feb 22, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Rodney and Todd;
In response to the request to describe in the appropriate language what we need in terms of a site
survey for the Blue Ridge Landfill, I first contacted Curt Pendergrass, Supervisor of the Radioactive
Materials Section with the CFHS-DPH and requested his input. He provide me a list of "Radioactive
Waste Brokers & Decontamination Services" along with the website for NEFAP.
I reviewed the web sites for each of the contractors, paying particular attention to how they described
their services. 1. took the language used by the contractors, along with my knowledge from my work
experience in hurnan health and ecological risk assessment, etc. and prepared a narrative of the
activities I would like to see the contractors conduct at the Blue Ridge Landfill.
The narrative I prepared is highlighted in red bold letters below. Below the narrative I have included
the items that Danny Anderson asked me to prepare for him last week:
It is easier for me to give you my detailed thoughts and let you two revise, edit, or delete the content
down to a few words appropriate for a specific document such as an NOV. I have limited experience
with radionuclides and have historically focused on chemical contaminants during my career
work. There is some over-lap between the respective areas. I value you input.
1
GP1239
Please feel to take my thoughts and edit/correct them as you feel appropriate as well as point out any
other areas you would like for me to research or address.
Thank you both for reviewing my thoughts and providing feedback as I seek to provide suggestions on
the path forward to address TENO RM/Processed TENO RM disposal concerns facing our state.
Thanks again for all you are doing and the support and encourage you both have been as I work on this
area of concern shared by us all.
-~ -~..-.--------~-~-
-- ----
~-~----~- --~.
--~-"-"--"--"-~~-o ..~~-
---
------ ----"---'--
---
--
1will be at a workshop all day Tuesday in the Bowling Green area. Feel free to call m~e anyffme.on rn~y~
.... ~--~
All sampling activities including any core sampling will incorporate temporary HEPA filtered
negative air containment enclosures to control and remove fugitive dust, particles, and airborne
contaminants generated during site activities to prevent the spread of contamination from
designated work areas.
All monitoring activities and analyses will be conducted by licensed laboratories. All contractors
will follow appropriate procedures and have recognized certifications in their respective areas
from organizations including, but not limited to the ABHP (American Board of Health Physics),
ICRP (International Committee on Radiation Protection), ICRU (International Commission on
Radiation Units and Measurements), IRPA (The International Radiation Protection
Association) and the NEFAP (National Environmental Field Activities Program) for accreditation of
FSMOs (Field Sampling and Measurement Organization).
A QAPP (Quality Assurance Project Plan) will be submitted that encompasses all site work at the
landfill that is part of the above describe work.
Overall Recommendations for Addressing Violations and the Path Forward
Blue Ridge Landfill [NOV Items]
2
GP1240
--------------
-------
Violation for not reporting the out of state TENO RN/Processed TENO RM waste on Quarterly
Waste Received Reports when 47 shipments alone was received from one company between
the dates Of July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015.
Immediately cease any waste placement or disturbance of temporary cover in the vicinity of the
cell (providing adequate buffer distance) where the waste was placed from Fairmont Brine
Processing from the time period of July 24, 2015 to November 16, 2015.
Require Advanced Disposal to contract with a company to conduct a thorough site assessment
to dete.rmine the level and extent of the contamination at the site and construct/assess past and
future worker/community (school) exposure scenarios evaluating both radioactive and chemical
constituents present in the processed TENORM waste. The contract shall be with a NEFAP
certified contractor (National Environmental Activities Program for the establishment and
implementation of an accreditation program for field sampling and measurement organization)
and/or "Radioactive Waste Broker and Decontamination" contractor approved/recommended
by the Radioactive Materials Section associated with the CFHS-DPH.
Required Advanced Disposal to have all employees that worked on the site during the period the
waste was received, scheduled for medical monitoring to establish a health level baseline since
the exposures they experience from the waste received have placed them at an elevated risk for
lung and other cancers in the future years.
Require Advanced Disposal to provide on-going annual medical monitoring throughout the
lifetime of the employees where exposure has been confirmed based on the required site
assessment listed above. Also include all identified receptors including students and employees
at the school adjacent to and across the street from the entrance to the landfill.
Development of a remedial plan for the waste site, addressing either removal or containment in
place of the waste along with appropriate site monitoring and deed restrictions regulating the
future use of the site and any potential disturbances to the waste. (This will potentially affect
the exposure plan for the landfill!)
Landfills Statewide
Conduct an internal review (Solid Waste Branch) of the "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" for
all landfills in Kentucky for 2015 through first quarter of 2016.
From review of "Quarterly Waste Quantity Reports" identify all landfills that have received out
of state waste from counties or areas that are known as regions having high levels of 0 & G
/Fracking Activities.
Request all manifests [2015-lst Quarter of 2016] from the landfills identified in Item 2 above that
have potentially received TENORM and processed or concentrated TENORM.
GP1241
If additional landfills are identified beyond those we are presently aware of as receiving
TENO RM or processed TENO RM, the next step is to request all the manifest from all landfills in
the state for 2015-lst Quarter of 2016).
For all landfills that been identified as receiving TE NORM/Processed TENORM, require a
contractor to conduct a screening site assessment to confirm that the landfill is presently safe
for operators and no one is exposed to an unacceptable level of radiation.
Based on the results above, develop a .plan similar to Blue Ridge as needed.
GP1242
#_om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Curt;
Should someone like OSHA, etc. look into the protection and well-being of the operators that handled and managed the
TENO RM waste from Ohio and the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing?
The.operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?
Look forward to your guidance and feedback .
ankyou,
George
GP1243
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
.e
George,
Sincerely,
.,ree,.
-;?lefme,z
Program Administrator
GP1244
h.
.
.
0 .._.IG
t>opattment of Haallh
<Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TENORM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory of Advanced
TENO RM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's brother. Cory is standing in the
doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive
Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was disposed of at Blue
Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KV)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine Processing .
./ Analytical results from Advanced TE NORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who manages Green
Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the TENO RM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TENO RM here in Kentucky. We
believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at the Blue Ridge
landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey and sampling protocol in the
future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to the
management of TE NORM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the operators and manage.
of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
GP1245
------
--------------~
~eorge
{ieorge P. PartridfJe Jr., Pfi'D, P.'E., Q..'EP
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
GP1246
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Thank you George for the status update. I am disappointed and quite frankly surprised to learn that the landfill
operator, Advanced Disposal Solutions, has been reluctant to provide requested information and going so far as to
obstruct your investigation. When we met with Mr. Dan Fleshour, East Region Compliance Manager for ADS at our
office here in Frankfort, he seemed genuinely concerned about the health and welfare of his employees at Blue Ridge
Landfill who may have been exposed both externally and internally from this Fairmont Brine waste. But now that we
know it took from July to November to deplete this FBP wastes as alternate daily cover, we can at least derive a rough
estimate as to the time frame. Knowing the working conditions of the land fill employees (e.g. how did they spread the
cover, did they spend time on the cover after spreading, how many hours a week did they work, etc.) we can at least
begin to build a model for the worst case scenario conditions for their dosimetric evaluation. The experts at REAC/TS will
most definitely be a resource we can lean on. If you and your team are going to be making another site visit to Irving to
talk to ADS employees, please let me know and I will send an inspector along as well to help in the investigation.
Thanks again for all your help.
..
'A
~waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was received from July into November. Please see an aerial view of the school
There are athletic facilities. There was potential site contamination from windblown dust. The trucks
enter and leave across the street from the school.
1
GP1247
- - -
-----
- -
When you see the size of the public facilities across from the landfill, we need to consider the exposure of those that
used the facilities and offices during the entire exposure period.
Company management including the landfill operator have been withholding information from us that they are legally
required to submit and telling our management what was reported on the forms is different than the records that have
been provided to us.
I plan to work with our field office inspectors to develop an on-site exposure scenario.
---- Advanced Disposal who manages Blue Ridgehasbeen obstructing our investigation on what happened.
Thank you,
George
Website: http:f/www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
2
GP1248
tulJt:~
.
. ~-,..Y
T'J\tll/.\ilt>Fat-t!EJU.:fH
GP1249
To:
Subject:
>On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>
>Lindsey;
>
>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>
>Have a nice week!
>
.George
> -----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: TENO RM
>
>George,
>
>Any progress at Blue Ridge?
>
>Lindsey
GP1250
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hello George,
My go to person in KY OSH is Ms. Kristi Redmond. If there are potential OSHA concerns regarding PPE, Kristi would know.
Kristi Redmon, CIH CSP
Health Standards Specialist
Kentucky Labor Cabinet
1047 US Highway 127 South Ste. 4
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-3504
Kristi. Red mon@ky.gov
www.kylabor.gov
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
.ervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx
Vnu
~~t/!J-.w:!l
f'Ji.tlltfflO:f\l/A.MEAt.TH
GP1251
The operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?
Thank you,
George
GP1252
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Curt;
We should interview the operators at the site.
Also if it was used for alternate daily cover each load was spread and moved serval times over a multiple day period as
additional waste was received at the landfill. That means 47 days accepting the waste with increased number of days of
exposure time.
Mr. Fleshour stated to our management that all Advanced Disposal was told was that the waste was only "soil and
debris."
The waste Profile Sheets that the operator at the landfill gave stated the following:
"Name of Waste 0 & E Exploration and Production Waste Solids and Debris" (Solids, not soil)
"Process of Generating Waste Oil and Gas Production and Exploration Soil and Filter Socks - Exempt"
"Special Handling Instruction or Other Waste Data Waste Exempt per 40 CFR 261.4(b)(S
also in the meeting mentioned requirements that Advanced Disposal has to meet in PA regarding TENORM. Surely
he knows what "Filter Socks" refers to as well as the exemption cited.
I'
Dan also has asked me to provide him a list of the companies we are investigating for his reference, while at the same
time he is withholding the requested manifest for the landfill activities.
The day that Chris and I visited Advanced TENROM Services in West Liberty, Rodney Maze and I paid an unannounced
visit that afternoon to Republic's Green Valley Landfill in the Ashland area. Within three hours after arrival, we left there
with all the copies of the manifests we requested and received full cooperation from Republic.
Advanced Disposal would not show or provide any of the manifests the day Chris, George Weems and I made a site visit
there. We got some manifests for Fairmont Brine since then, but they are withholding information on the other
companies that the operator informed us that were shipping TENO RM waste from Ohio. This is a violation and deserves
an NOV!
When we do get the records I am concerned that they will not be complete and I will never know what was not
submitted since we already know the Quarterly Waste Received Reports did not report the waste disposed of at the
landfill. I will have nothing to check it against.
When we visit landfills unannounced, they are required to produce records as requested for the last three years at our
request for our inspection. The reason for not putting in a request is to prevent them from alternating the records
before they are provided to us to hide a concern from our investigation .
. .anced Disposal is not cooperating with us. If I remember correctly, Dan said their lawyers were contacted the day
we were at the site when they learned the reason for our site visit. Why haven't they addressed the workers? The
morning I visited the site and requested the manifest, Billy told me he put in a call to upper management after we {Chris,
1
GP1253
George, Arline, and I) went out to survey the site. Later in the day Billy the operator refused to give me any
records. Was that a result of the lawyers that were contacted the same day according to Dan? An NOV for not
providing that information is nothing compared to the legal ramifications those records might show and the resulting
liabilities.
We are up against a major waste disposal corporation that is nationwide and have operations in states that regulate
TE NORM. They are not cooperating and we may never know the full story. If it was not for Jason Frame in West Virginia
sharing information about the shipment and Cory Hoskins admitting it to us when we met with him, the records that
Advanced Disposal reported on their required waste reports to our Division would have never indicated what they have
... done.
Thank you again for all you are doing!
George
z..'.
n."tZJ!~'!S,
r41.ti!ATlv~AH~.t1H
2
GP1254
e!
Curt;
The waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was received from July into November. Please see an aerial view of the school
across the street. There are athletic facilities. There was potential site contamination from windblown dust. The trucks
enter and leave across the street from the school.
When you see the size of the public facilities across from the landfill, we need to consider the exposure of those that
used the facilities and offices during the entire exposure period.
Company management including the landfill operator have been withholding information from us that they are legally
required to submit and telling our management what was reported on the forms is different than the records that have
been provided to us.
I plan to work with our field office inspectors to develop an on-site exposure scenario.
Advanced Disposal who manages Blue Ridge has been obstructing our investigation on what happened.
Thank you,
____
George
..
,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,
_____,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,,, "'''"~-"'~-'"''"'"''''''-
'""'''''"''"''''"''"'''""'
GP1255
'Yaa*-U~
~~.t.i<~ni,
:r-.AnJt.moN,J.:1~.t.~rn
GP1256
Cc:
Subject:
Hi Curt;
Are you going to follow up with her or do we contact her?
George
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
otified o.f propo. sed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
ose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
..
Unn..~
~t."lyj_:!J
~Att!J\fi!J:ttHMLTM
1
GP1257
The operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?
Look forward to your guidance and feedback.
Thank you,
George
GP1258
To:
Subject:
Lindsey;
Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.
George
-----Original Message----From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM
Has there been an acceptance of authority by someone?
Lindsey
. n Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>
>Lindsey;
>
>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>
> Have a nice week!
>
>George
>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: TENORM
>
>George,
>
>Any progress at Blue Ridge?
ndsey
GP1259
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Feel free to give her a call George. I am up to my neck dealing with other fires at the moment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govId ph/radioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~r:.wan~ed sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
~P!'JIJ), '
~"'Z~0')'~,H!AL'l'M
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
GP1260
z.'Aidfl ,;,?;r~
~~j!';;C..~
fW.OJ,tfi"IO'NJ1i!AI.. r.H
Should someone like OSHA, etc. look into the protection and well-being of the operators that handled and managed the
TENORM waste from Ohio and the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing?
The operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?
Look forward to your guidance and feedback.
..
Thank you,
George
GP1261
GP1262
'5:.,;,=
To:
Subject:
Curt;
I will be glad to!
I just want to be sure what we pursue within our Division observes and respected the authority and areas that your
Branch and cabinet address and that specifically whatever I am involved with, that you are informed and in agreement.
It is a pleasure to know and work on this with you. I want all that I do to compliment all that you are doing and that I
move forward appropriately.
Thapks again for everything!
George
m:
e!
~.
To.
GP1263
Hi Curt;
Are you going to follow up with her or do we contact her?
George
_.. ~ ..
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
~~
l(rpJii!!J
P.A~J.l.\noraHif:1LTH
GP1264
Should someone like OSHA, etc. look into the protection and well-being of the operators that handled and managed the
TENORM waste from Ohio and the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing?
f l i e operators were likely not wearing the proper PPE for handling this type of waste.
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
Who has the authority to investigate worker safety at this landfill?
Who needs to be contacted?
Look forward to your guidance and feedback.
Thank you,
George
GP1265
Subject:
Todd;
When you are available, let' make a conference call to the individual that Curt has referred us to.
Thank you,
George
Ken . ~)
.
. :~"1ii
GP1266
Kt!J!ll~
r~ttlATltiNH~it~rn
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
GP1267
-----
----
--
---------
I am also very concerned that this is an active landfill that has been contaminated with an unpermitted waste and
workers are placing and managing waste on a daily basis as we correspond and investigate this situation.
~eorgeP.PartridgeJ~
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
GP1268
Jon;
Please include Todd Hendricks and Jamie Nielsen in the meeting for this Thursday to follow up with Blue Ridge.
Todd has met with the DPH on this matter with me and is very informed and knowledgeable concerning all that has
taken place. His expertise on NORM/TENO RM and the geology of the site will be extremely important as we move
forward.
Jamie brings a wealth of understanding of the regulatory process and the actions we can take to facilitate getting the
information that has been withheld from us by Advanced Disposal that is hindering the investigation and in the
meantime placing more individuals at risk.
I am feeling overwhelmed by all that has happened and the lives (operators, community, school) that will be potentially
shortened and adversely affected by the exposures resulting from the disposal of an unpermitted radioactive waste in a
~dfill. The latency period between exposure and quantifiable health effects is typically 10-40 years dependent on the
~ of the individual when the exposure first occurred (age affects cell replication rate and impact on DNA damage
leading to increased cases of lung and bone cancers).
It would be very helpful if those I work with and provide guidance and help on a daily basis are included as we move
forward with the project to address Blue Ridge Landfill and Advanced Disposal.
Thank you for considering my request!
George
GP1269
rom:
, Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jon;
Thank you so much!
Hope your day goes well!
George
GP1270
GP1271
',,om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
George
Please invite them and anyone else that needs to be in the meeting
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Jon;
Please include Todd Hendricks and Jamie Nielsen in the meeting for this Thursday to follow up with Blue
Ridge.
Todd has met with the DPH on this matter with me and is very informed and knowledgeable concerning
all that has taken place. His expertise on NORM/TE NORM and the geology of the site will be extremely
important as we move forward.
Jamie brings a wealth of understanding of the regulatory process and the actions we can take to
facilitate getting the information that has been withheld from us by Advanced Disposal that is hindering
the investigation and in the meantime placing more individuals at risk.
I am feeling overwhelmed by all that has happened and the lives (operators, community, school) that
will be potentially shortened and adversely affected by the exposures resulting from the disposal of an
unpermitted radioactive waste in a landfill. The latency period between exposure and quantifiable
health effects is typically 10 - 40 years dependent on the age of the individual when the exposure first
occurred (age affects cell replication rate and impact on DNA damage leading to increased cases of lung
and bone cancers).
It would be very helpful if those I work with and provide guidance and help on a daily basis are included
as we move forward with the project to address Blue Ridge Landfill and Advanced Disposal.
Thank you for considering my request!
George
GP1272
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Organizer:
End:
Jon Maybrair confirmed that we could include in the meeting everyone that needs to be there to discuss Blue Ridge.
I have included the following:
Todd Hendricks and Jeri Higginbotham since they both have assisted with the project and attended the meeting
at the DPH on February 9.
Arline Litchfield since she is the geologist assigned to the site by Lindsey Brigg and assisted with the site
inspection on February 10.
- s needs to be a team effort so everyone's area of expertise is utilized to address all the issues at the site.
I appreciate everyone's participation.
George
GP1273
Subject:
Ken;
Jon Maybriar let me know that we could include anyone that needs to be present in the meeting Thursday.
Most of all I want to have geologist represented at the meeting so they will stay informed of how we are preceding with
the site investigation.
The next major step is to assist with the assessment of the extent of the site contamination and develop a remedial
plan.
An understanding of the underlying geology at the site is critical to that study as we assess the potential exposure
pathways along with the background radiation levels from the shale formations at the site.
We will need to distinguish between the NORM at the site and the TE NORM/Processed TE NORM that was contributed
from the waste disposal.
....ws important to me that Todd and/or Arline is available to attend the meeting to address the geology and stay updated
the path forward.
I forwarded meeting invitations to Todd and Arline with the hopes one or both of them will be there.
Since you are acting for Lindsey this week, I am going to let you address who represents us as a geologist at the meeting.
Thanks for your help and support.
George
GP1274
.Subject:
Location:
Start:
End:
Show Time As:
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Organizer:
Included Ken Melton since is acting supervisor in Lindsey's absence and is our expert regarding any landfill permit issues.
George
-----Original Appointment----From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 4:06 PM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Thomas, Richard F
(EEC); Maze, Rodney (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)
. .bject: Blue Ridge follow-up meeting
W!'~en: Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
Where: 2028
GP1275
Subject:
FYI
"'
, was not involved in any of the discussions or the sampling, so I was not aware of where the samples were collected
from. I have been on one landfill sampling excursion, however, where an excavator was used to dig down to the
1
GP1276
approximate area where the waste was buried so that we could sample the waste. I wasn't sure if this was the case
here. That is why I asked the questions that I asked.
Please don't read too much into the 6 pCi/g of Ra-226. The reason that we don't analyze directly for Ra-226 by gamma'
spec is because of the interference with U-235. The peak for both is 186 KeV. The analysis that was done was a rough
estimate beginning with the rough estimate of the 100 gram geometry. It wasn't even a weighed sample because it. was
wet. Please, please understand that all the analysis is a rough estimate. To properly analyze for Ra-226 by gamma spec
would require much more time.
-~~JLynliwouldJiketo_expJor~tbe_po.ssibllitynJcontaminated dai1.cover,J'd be~happv to suppo.rtthatwithanalysisrbut.
let's discuss and come up with a plan before samples are collected.
Are we all in agreement that we are done with analysis on the samples I have in the lab or do you want me to do more?
In my opinion, we really need a plan in place with clear data quality objectives before we collect more samples.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088
Christopher J. Keffer
Radiation Health Specialist Ill
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1 C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4179
Cell: 502 330-7662
FAX: 502-564-1492
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
GP1277
.~:
Quick question though. You indicated that the wet 100 g sample of cover material you analyzed contained 6 pCi/g Ra226. I am assuming had the sample been dry and allowed to ingrowth for the desired 21 days, the actual activity
concentration of 6 pCi/g would have been much higher. The reason I bring this up is because our friends in EEC division
of solid wastes and hazardous wastes have discovered an uptick in the receipt of waste shipments from OH in the past
~rat this landfill and others here in KY. OH has some of the most restrictive TENORM regs in the US. No OH landfill can
~ept TENORM at greater than 5 pCi/g Ra-226 above natural background. The oil and gas exploration and production
wastes being generated in OH may very well be coming to KY landfills and used as daily landfill cover to overlay wastes
and debris. I know Chris said Blue Ridge landfill and the surrounding areas contained lots of shale high in NORM but I
was just wondering if the slightly elevated Ra-226 you show in your analysis could be due to out-of-state TE NORM being
used as daily cover? Obviously, we would need to actually sample this material being received from OH to see if it
exceeded the acceptable OH landfill dumping TE NORM limit.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
~...
"""i'. . . . . . .
f{Aflt1i1ltttl :.H~}Ll:H
GP1278
..
. ~ 1,_
2.
Was it from the waste or from the fill or from the cap material?
The solid sample was analyzed wet with an approximate 100 gram geometry by gamma spec yesterday. We usually dry,
grind and weigh solid samples before analysis. Also for Ra-226 analysis, we usually seal the container for approximately
21 days to allow for ingrowth. For Ra-226 analysis by gamma spec, we look for the daughters, Pb-214 and B-214,
because the peak for Ra-226 is also the peak for U-235 so there is interference when analyzing directly for Ra-226. The
wet analysis yesterday of the approximate 100 gram geometry when analyzed for Pb-214 and Bi-214 showed around 2-4
pCi/g. Ra-226 was then added to the library then re-analyzed. It showed about 6 pCi/g of Ra-226. If this solid sample
came from the waste, I would expect to have seen results more significant based on the sample results sent in the email
below.
The liquid sample was counted yesterday by gamma spec directly in the sample container it was sent in for two
hours. There was nothing above the minimum detectable activity.
In my opinion, I don't think we should spend any more time or resources on these samples. If we could get some
samples from the waste it may tell us more. We should probably have a plan in place with some data quality objectives
too if this is going to be a long term project.
Just FYI, we only have four gamma specs up .in the lab right now (gamma 4 is out being retrofitted to be mechanically
cooled). Next week we will be moving out the old shields and moving in the new shields. We will be completely down
for a few days. We will then be down to three gamma specs (gamma 2 will not fit in a new shield) while we get the new
equipment up and running.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088
GP1279
et
Pendergrass PhD
.Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govId ph/rad ioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Ket!tl!ilifA
1'.A!:tl.t%1'1QfaH~\lTH
From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)
~' we are looking at a time for ingrowth before gamma analysis can be performed.
~ekend and maybe we can meet sometime on Monday afternoon.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502-564-8390
Cell: 502-382-7003
Fax: 502-564-2088
GP1280
water sample is from the landfill's leachate collection system. We were hoping to have these results sometime next
week so we could decide how best to proceed. If you could get the samples analyzed by the11 that would help
tremendously. As Kathy indicated, Chris found lots of shale deposits scattered about the landfill which gave elevated
dose rate readings so we are not sure how this might impact the natural back ground in the area.
Thanks,
Curt
Cl
Reoeiv~: ~1515:45
Mau
Anlfm9ny~12<i
E'PA001.1
Co.bait-SO
EPA~1J
lridiU.m-192
EPA90U
POta~IJm.:.ito
EPA:001.1
Radi~
EPAOOU
Jt.adjurn~m
EPAOOU
&aoo1um-4tr
EPA{i()U
Sltver~uOM
EPA001.1
f.Cill;J
06/151151.6:51 '.
pllg
1.51'f 51C:t51 li
pCif~
06/1511516:51 1
lJ9Vi;i
OOtl5'1 51 >:-51
1:
pciig
06/1511516:51
1:
3o3.7S0>.774 {7;a17)
.PQit
..~
{1~1515'.!:)1
.~ifs
oS115t161s:s1
pCifg
06l1511516;$1 1.
C:NA T;N,A .
c:HA T:l\IA
:c:""T:NA ..
.c:HA 'flNA
c:NAT:NA
...
C:tfAT:NA
EPA001.1
1&,2~oo*392:l10 (471U)00)
?Gva
EPA9(}1.1
pCifg
OO.t15i1516~51
c:HA. T:~A
. ..
cmAT:NA
/(.t'!.;l
.'..-/:\ -<' -
r~.A.Ul)l>:now
, ,. HMt."r.H
GP1281
---
---------
---
ttorCurt,
Can you all please work with Stephanie and provide whatever information she needs? Also, Matt you may want to
discuss/review the samples. It was my understanding that existing shale on the site may impact the sample results from
the leachate. It would have been nice if you could have found some type of representative water sample to compare
to.
From: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH)
W'm'o
Christopher J. Keffer
,
!
I,
I
I
GP1282
rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
GP1283
e!m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
FYI
I was not involved in any of the discussions or the sampling, so I was not aware of where the samples were collected
from. I have been on one landfill sampling excursion, however, where an excavator was used to dig down to the
~roximate area where the waste was buried so that we could sample the waste. I wasn't sure if this was the case
, _ . - e . That is why I asked the questions that I asked.
Please don't read too much into the 6 pCi/g of Ra-226. The reason that we don't analyze directly for Ra-226 by gamma
spec is because of the interference with U-235. The peak for both is 186 KeV. The analysis that was done was a rough
estimate beginning with the rough estimate of the 100 gram geometry. It wasn't even a weighed sample because it was
wet. Please, please understand that all the analysis is a rough estimate. To properly analyze for Ra-226 by gamma spec
would require much more time.
If you would like to explore the possibility of contaminated daily cover, I'd be happy to support that with analysis, but
let's discuss and come up with a plan before samples are collected.
Are we all in agreement that we are done with analysis on the samples I have in the lab or do you want me to do more?
In my opinion, we really need a plan in place with clear data quality objectives before we collect more samples.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
Radiation/Environmental Monitoring Section
Radiation Health Branch
Kentucky Department for Public Health
100 Sower Blvd., Ste. 108
Frankfort, KY 40601
ae: 502-564-8390
'.
502-382-7003
,
Fax: 502-564-2088
GP1284
Christopher J. Keffer
Radiation Health Specialist Ill
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1 C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4179
Cell: 502 330-7662
FAX: 502-564-1492
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
review, use, disclosure, distribution cir copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
~;~tn~if':'';,c~~;:i.,fgJa~~1Bi~~t~:iH:t~i~{H~~~~ilr~~~tf~;~~~~~~::~~~:~,;.,~?.~?':
GP1285
wastes being generated in OH may very well be coming to KY landfills anp used as daily landfill cover to overlay wastes
and debris. I know Chris said Blue Ridge landfill and the surrounding areas contained lots of shale high in NORM but I
A; just wondering if the slightly elevated Ra-226 you show in your analysis could be due to out-of-state TENO RM being
.Ted as daily cover? Obviously, we would need to actually sample this material being received from OH to see if it
exceeded the acceptable OH landfill dumping TE NORM limit.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:l/www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
l(tZf!/!~
1~l/JATION~!-f~;LTH
m:
Cc: Keffer, Christopher (CHFS Rad Hlth); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
-Y
opinion, I don't think we should spend any more time or resources on these samples. If we could get some
samples from the waste it may tell us more. We should probably have a plan in place with some data quality objectives
too if this is going to be a long term project.
3
GP1286
- - - - - -
Just FYI, we only have four gamma specs up in the lab right now (gamma 4 is out being retrofitted to be mechanically
cooled). Next week we will be moving out the old shields and moving in the new shields. We will be completely down
for a few days. We will then be down to three gamma specs (gamma 2 will not fit in a new shield) while we get the ne. .
equipment up and running.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Stephanie C. Brock
Radiation Health Supervisor
.JZ.oo.tu.~
IV-~-'-'"~
ii~tAtidNHEALYH
GP1287
Stephanie C. Brock
GP1288
.~';~!tile-
=rq<#!!9,
si.,dae Pit Cl
'
&tmpl& : FaimtontBrio~-Sludge Pit ~blD: 30150~55001 CoH~d: .06/08115 00:25 R~iv~~ 06/.9W1515:45 Ma~
------------------------------------------------------..,...----..,...-----,---------. Cl .
.
nits.
Anal
. ... y,i.00..
(2.()37)
rJeif!;j
OS,115115fS$1 ~
pCilg
/15115~6:~1 11
EPAOOU
.pCil!)
()6115115 :16:51 1
EPA9C>1.1
~~~~:re.oa6
p(:ifg
()tl/1511$16:51 1;
f)Cilg
00/1511.516:51 1:
Antlrni;ny424
EPA001.1
0~000 0.$74
c~NAT:NA
CObalt-$)
EPAf\(11.1
c:NA T.NA .
Jrkliu.n1-192
Pdta$$i1m.:4o
C:tfAT:NA
c11 .130)
. ..
. ..
(+f.&30)
Radlum'"226
EPA901 .1
~'1lm~
EPA901.1
p(;ifg
~1.5!1516'.51
Scal:ldlt.im-4tf
EPAOOU
c:HAT:NA
116$ %{784 (1.774}
pCi/g
oi$/15t1516:$1 t:
SilveM10M
EPAOOU
C:NAt:NA
.2.3.81 t 1.$67 (1.549)
pCifp
0$'1511516;51 1.
T~rrt-:232
EPA9()1.1
pJ,';ifg
001151HH6:51
7.
,.,...
:
U~nJum-236
E#A{l(fa.1
1~.50()1:200,780
C:NA.tNA
C;NAt:NA
1~~:392.170 (418Jl00)
c:HAt;NA . . . . .
$4.33'& fi.406 (17 .7$0)
11
'.
pCl!g
C~NAT;NA
Ven.tu.. ~.
. ~.-
IV~:~~~!;!#
t~At:JlATIO'Nlt\H~,l.TH
A...
Can you all please work with Stephanie and provide whatever information she needs? Also, Matt you may want to
discuss/review the samples. It was my understanding that existing shale on the site may impact the sample results fro~
the leachate. It would have been nice if you could have found some type of representative water sample to compare
to.
6
GP1289
-~:;~~~~~:;~~f:~i~i~~~,(~~:f~~!f~~h)-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
To: Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Green, Joseph T (CHFS Rad Hlth); Keene, Mark (CHS Rad Hlth); Barber, Frank (CHS
Rad Hlth)
Cc: Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: Advanced Disposal - Blue Ridge Landfill samples
REMS,
I have been informed that the processing and analysis of the samples from Advanced Disposal- Blue Ridge
Landfill is desired. Please get these samples done as soon as possible. Thank you in advance.
Christopher J. Keffer
Radiation Health Specialist Ill
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1 C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4179
Cell: 502 330-7662
FAX: 502-564-1492
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
GP1290
f/Am:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Curt:
See my responses in red text below to your questions.
9iiow
you said the material was used as alternate daily cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took
to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks or months? If used as an alternate daily cover, they should
have had it tested to ensure no more than 1 ppm benzene concentration per our regulation and not used it during
precipitation events. Perhaps they had it stockpiled for a period of days, then used it for daily cover. Again, landfill
personnel will have to.answer this question. If the material was used for daily cover, then the solid waste regs allow
daily cover to be exposed for up to 30 days before additional waste placement over the same area or, if no waste
placement within the 30 days, another 6 inches of cover has to be applied for a total depth of at least 12 inches. This
additional 6 inches cannot be an alternate daily cover material though. It must be a non-waste soil. Once waste
placement re-commences in an area with the 6 or 12 inches of cover, the landfill will peel back the soil cover to get
waste on waste. So this cover soil can be disturbed multiple times before being depleted or so intertwined with waste
that itself is now indistinguishable as being a soil or waste.
Hope this helps, but the landfill personnel need to answer these questions.
I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that we getting
to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have
the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And given
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
ter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being
ad is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
1
GP1291
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
.2z~. ~ii?J_l\1!'1tngree_t
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http :l/www.chfs.ky.govId ph/rad ioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
i'Je~
P.Ati1;1,no~HEAL~rn
l~~fl'1-,,,'q
Von
GP1292
elm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
FYI
~ontact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have
the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
1
GP1293
to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And given
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being
spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
L
'"W
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kt:t.ttMe!irl~
f'.fo.tt!AT!oN&_rtEALTH
GP1294
e!~=
To:
Subject:
Steve;
From the manifests we have reviewed for our Green Valley Landfill in the Ashland, KY area, it appears that Pressure Tech
has been shipping TENORM wastes from Muskingum County, Ohio managed by BES Technical Solutions, LLC which is the
firm associate with Cory Hoskins.
Shipment of TENORM wastes from Ohio for disposal in Kentucky is prohibited by KRS.
When you met with Pressure Tech and Cory Hoskins, did they indicate they have been shipping waste containing
TENORM to Kentucky?
Thanks for your assistance and sharing what you learned.
George
pursuing it .
Currently, I do not have much on Fairmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's Beth Pratt and
Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
1
GP1295
Sincerely,
S~'?I~
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
..
-- 6lL1.-.:72g:::%11
'h.
O. ,10
Dopartmont of Hoal'th
Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments ofTENORM to our
landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of Cory Hoskins associated with
Advanced TENORM Services (also associated with BES, LLC and BES Technical Solutions, LLC) and his activities
surrounding shipments of out of state TENORM to Kentucky.
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have attached that to
this email message.
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our situation and the
investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TE NORM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory of Advanced
TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's brother. Cory is standing in the
doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive
Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was disposed of at Blue
Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine Processing .
./ Analytical results from Advanced TENORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who manages Green
Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the TENO RM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TE NORM here in Kentucky. We
believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at the Blue Ridge
2
GP1296
Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey and sampling protocol in the
future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
~ also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to the
management of TENO RM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the operators and managers
of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George
,,,,,_,,.,~,,-.,,-,,.,,,_.,.,,,,.,w~"'""-"'-''""'""'"-
"'"'"""''""""'
'
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
lOh.io .....
. .s e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
3
GP1297
Subject:
Thank you Danny for taking the time to answer my questions regarding the daily cover. That is exactly the type of
information that we were needing. However it appears that there are questions that can only be answered by Advanced
Disposal Solutions. But now that we know how things are supposed to work, we at least have a much better idea on
what specific questions to ask ADS.
I will plan on seeing you all at 2:00 PM tomorrow at your Fair Oaks office for the meeting with ADS.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
~ail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
~ebsite: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Va~~
l\f&i!l&..
#:!J
flA110t4&\M!$1.t:rn
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
GP1298
personnel.. .. unfortunately. Let's assume for a minute this material was not TE NORM. In this case, it should have been
disposed of like other wastes they receive. Within 2 hrs of receipt, spread in loose layers not over 24" deep and then
compacted at the active working face location for that day. Then by the end of the day, should have received a 6 inch
layer of soil cover over the entire working face.
~
~
I know you said the material was used as alternate daily cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took
to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks or months? If used as an alternate daily cover, they should
have had it tested to ensure no more than 1 ppm benzene concentration per our regulation and not used it during
precipitation events. Perhaps they had it stockpiled for a period of days, then used it for daily cover. Again, landfill
,_J~erSQJJDetwilJ'1civ~tojmfil()!ef Jhi~gt,1e,s!Ion_. If tbelllC'l,!~ri,~1 was use9 ford(:lily cover,t.her:i th~ soli9 \N.a.st~r.:~~.?llow
daily cover to be exposed for up to 30 days before additional waste placement over the same area or, if no waste
placement within the 30 days, another 6 inches of cover has to be applied for a total depth of at least 12 inches. This
additional 6 inches cannot be an alternate daily cover material though. It must be a non-waste soil. Once waste
placement re-commences in an area with the 6 or 12 inches of cover, the landfill will peel back the soil cover to get
waste on waste. So this cover soil can be disturbed multiple times before being depleted or so intertwined with waste
that itself is now indistinguishable as being a soil or waste.
Hope this helps, but the landfill personnel need to answer these questions.
I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that we getting
to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have
the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And given
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being
spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENO RM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
on how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Ken
tu~
-~~'"'~
P~1ATIONJArti,.l\i.Tl'!
GP1299
1-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Curt;
Delighted you will be attending the meeting tomorrow!
I have also invited Todd Hendricks to the meeting, but I believe he has a prior commitment and may not be able to
attend.
I also included Arline Litchfield the geologist in our section that has been assigned to the Blue Ridge Landfill.
Also included are Jeri Higginbotham that you met and also Jamie Neilson from our Permitting Section who processes all
the solid waste permits and has extensive knowledge of our regulations.
Also invited is Ken Melton who is the acting supervisor since Lindsey Briggs is on vacation this week.
I hope we will have good attendance at this meeting .
ankyou,
George
GP1300
7/nwwfUtJir~
l~,~~"'~:!I
T'.A~!A1TOt1lMiv,1.rH
(EEC)
compacted at the active working face location for that day. Then by the end of the day, should have received a 6 inch
layer of soil cover over the entire working face.
I know you said the material was used as alternate daily cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took
to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks or months? If used as an alternate daily cover, they should
have had it tested to ensure no more than 1 ppm benzene concentration per our regulation and not used it during
precipitation events. Perhaps they had it stockpiled for a period of days, then used it for daily cover. Again, landfill
personnel will have to answer this question. If the material was used for daily cover, then the solid waste regs allow
daily cover to be exposed for up to 30 days before additional waste placement over the same area or,, if no waste
placement within the 30 days, another 6 inches of cover has to be applied for a total depth of at least 12 inches. This
additional 6 inches cannot be an alternate daily cover material though. It must be a non-waste soil. Once waste
placement re-commences in an area with the 6 or 12 inches of cover, the landfill will peel back the soil cover to get
waste on waste. So this cover soil can be disturbed multiple times before being depleted or so intertwined with waste
that itself is now indistinguishable as being a soil or waste.
Hope this helps, but the landfill personnel need to answer these questions.
I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that we getting
to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have
the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And give~
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
,,..,
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being
spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
2
GP1301
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TE NORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
ool and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radloactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
l.l.onh~~
l~U!!}..,..~;1:
fW.t.tl,11ftitw~ AAHE>\L'rn
GP1302
/(~
-1.1.rntHi .
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
GP1303
Va.inrh1~
~U~'oGW
T~tllJ.\.TION~H~Jlil..:tH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
GP1304
I know you said the material was used as alternate daily cover but what I need to know is how long do you think it took
to spread all of that material? Are we talking days, weeks or months? If used as an alternate daily cover, they should
ve had it tested to ensure no more than 1 ppm benzene concentration per our regulation and not used it during
cipitation events. Perhaps they had it stockpiled for a period of days, then used it for daily cover. Again, landfill
personnel will have to answer this question. If the material was used for daily cover, then the solid waste regs allow
daily cover to be exposed for up to 30 days before additional waste placement over the same area or, if no waste
placement within the 30 days, another 6 inches of cover has to be applied for a total depth of at least 12 inches. This
additional 6 inches cannot be an alternate daily cover material though. It must be a non-waste soil. Once waste
placement re-commences in an area with the 6 or 12 inches of cover, the landfill will peel back the soil cover to get
waste on waste. So this cover soil can be disturbed multiple times before being depleted or so intertwined with waste
that itself is now indistinguishable as being a soil or waste.
Hope this helps, but the landfill personnel need to answer these questions.
I would assume that it would take long to spread the material but that is just a guess. The reason I ask is that we getting
to contact REAC/TS in Oak Ridge and get the opinions of the world renowned experts on internal dosimetry. We have
the results of the Pace Analytical Labs to share with them (which probably underestimate the concentrations of Ra226/228) but what I don't know is how long did it take to spread this material, how many hours were the landfill workers
actually doing this work, did any landfill workers spend additional time in the vicinity of materials, etc. Basically we need
to develop a worst case time and distance and potential intake model to share with the fine folks at REAC/TS. And given
the fact that it was summer, I would assume the material was fairly dry and that inhalation of airborne particulate
matter by the landfill workers spreading this material or those workers in the vicinity when the material was being
spread is a concern. In my mind we are looking at both the gamma exposure pathway which is time and distance
dependent and the inhalation pathway which may by activity and meteorological condition dependent. We might even
be able to make the argument that the TENORM contaminated material was spread in July and August before the high
school and middle school students started classes in August 2015. But again, the more information you all can give me
how this material was handled and how landfill workers might have been exposed both externally and internally, the
better the information the experts at REAC/TS will be able to give us.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
KtztlH~\
rJ\.tHA'rlOr4~~t.1H
GP1305
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov
Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:32 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: KY Landfill Concern
Shipment of TENO RM wastes from Ohio for disposal in Kentucky is prohibited by KRS .
When you met with Pressure Tech and Cory Hoskins, did they indicate they have been shipping waste
containing TENO RM to Kentucky?
Thanks for your assistance and sharing what you learned.
George
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us;
Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us; Rebecca.Fuqitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
George,
We appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.
As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas
industry waste substance facility).
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority
over the Oil and Gas Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website.
We met Tim Stapleton from Pressure Tech as well as Cory Hoskins from BES, LLC or BES Technical
Solutions, LLC or Advanced TENO RM Services, LLC.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this
facility, but the planning fell through when the site's 'owner passed away.
1
GP1306
Mr. Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it down last Friday. He's getting questions, but
admitted "it's just a website" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskins if he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr. Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he
backed away from pursuing it.
Currently, I do not have rnuch on Fairmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's
Beth Pratt and Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
s~ '71d'1Ue't
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
<image001.jpg>
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC) <Tony.Hatton@ky.gov>; Maybriar, Jon (EEC) <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>; Anderson,
Danny J (EEC) <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments of
TENORM to our landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of
Cory Hoskins associated with Advanced TENO RM Services (also associated with BES, LLC and BES
Technical Solutions, LLC) and his activities surrounding shipments of out of state TENO RM to Kentucky.
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have
attached that to this email message.
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our
situation and the investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TENORM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory
of Advanced TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's
brother. Cory is standing in the doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity
is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was
disposed of at Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
2
GP1307
v" Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine
Processing.
v" Analytical results from Advanced TENO RM Services that was provided to Republic Services who
manages Green Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the
TENORM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TENORM here in
Kentucky. We believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at
the Blue Ridge Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey
and sampling protocol in the future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to
the management ofTENORM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the
operators and managers of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
<imageOOl.jpg>
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged,
sensitive, or protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that
3
GP1308
if#m
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov
Wednesday, February 24, '2016 3:34 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Fwd: Pressure Tech trip report
Trip Report 2-17-16 ODH.docx; ATTOOOOl.htm
fyi
Steve Helmer
Sentfrom my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Trivisonno, Ron" <Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us>
Date: February 24, 2016 at 12:44:26 PM EST
To: "Helmer, Stephen" <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: "McCracken, Charles" <Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov>, "Pratt, Beth"
<Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us>, "Worstall, Robert" <robert.worstall@dnr.state.oh.us>
Subject: Pressure Tech trip report
FYI
~is
e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
~tected
GP1309
-----------------
FYI
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
GP1310
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Tim described how PT, with the assistance of BES (Cory Hoskins), would sort the boxes of solidified waste
and determine which boxes went to KY or WVa. Because all the waste was expected to exceed Ohio's 5+2
pCi/g Ra, none of the waste was ever disposed of in Ohio.
Did you share this with Jason Frame in WV as well?
v........~~
.. _
l~U~
J!J:l:tililll'fOrj11!~,t.t}t
2016 4:00 PM
GP1311
fyi
Steve Helmer
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From:~"frfvlsonno, -Ron'' <Ron~irivisonn~o@anr.stal:e.oh.us>
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
GP1312
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Jason;
Please find inserted below my email correspondence with Ohio regarding TENO RM. Please note the attached trip report
from their site visit to Pressure Tech. Pressure Tech has collaborated with Cory Hoskins associated with Advanced
TENO RM Services. It indicates how they are managing TENORM wastes. It appears wastes is being sent to both KY and
WV. Pressure Tech has been shipping TENORM to our Green Valley landfill located in the Ashland, Kentucky area.
I hope you will find this helpful!
Please keep in touch,
Thank you,
George
~orge P.
. t f r o m my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
GP1313
-----
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
- proteet~El-health-information.. lf-you-are.not.theintendecl rncipient,be-advised thattheunauthorizeduse,--------~
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
GP1314
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority over the Oil and Gas
Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website.
~ met Tim Stapleton from Pressure Tech as well as Cory Hoskins from BES, LLC or BES Technical Solutions, LLC or
~anced TENORM Services, LLC.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he has no laboratory operation in Ohio. He was working to have a lab at this facility, but the
planning fell through when the site's owner passed away.
Mr. Hoskins indicated he had a website, but he took it down last Friday. He's getting questions, but admitted "it's just a
website" and he put a number of things on it that may not reflect what he does.
I asked Mr. Hoskinsif he worked in Kentucky and he indicated that he did.
Our records show Mr. Hoskins tried to obtain an Ohio radioactive materials license in June 2015, but he backed away
from pursuing it.
Currently, I do not have much on f:airmont Brine Processing but I have forwarded your email to ODNR's Beth Pratt and
Ron Trivisonno.
Let me know if you have any follow up questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
.14-728-3611
9-iageOOl.jpg>
9"
Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859.
v" Copy of the web pages from Advanced TENORM Services and LLC information.
3
GP1315
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory of Advanced
TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's brother. Cory is standing in the
doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity is Chris Keffer with our DPH - Radioactive
~
Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with.
~
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was disposed of at Blue
Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine Processing .
./ Analytical results from Advanced TENORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who manages Green
. V_C3JleyJ,~rii!filL~n<;I~~~ Lr:ic_Ll!c;i~<J. wlth~ th~ mantfe.st tor t~~shJ1:>mgm of th_~JINQ~tvLw~~1~~
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TENO RM here in Kentucky. We
believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at the Blue Ridge
Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey and sampling protocol in the
future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to the
management of TENO RM waste in .Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the operators and managers
of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George
S~'71~
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
4
GP1316
<imageOOl.jpg>
~s e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
~tected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
I5
GP1317
A.m:
.,.,t:
To:
Subject:
Danny;
When we are meeting with Curt and if time allows, I would like to have him help us understand better how the Compact
applies the definition of LLRW to a waste analysis for radionuclides and combines them into a value such as 5 piC/g
6
228
which often is reported for a combination of Raii. and Ra by states.
Thank you!
George
Definition of LLRW:
What is LLRW?
Compact defines LLRW as "radioactive waste not classified as (1)
-level radioactive waste, (2) transuranic waste (3) spent nuclear fuel,
(4) by-product material as defined in Section 11 e(2) of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954. This definition shall apply notwithstanding any
declaration by the federal government, a state or any regulatory agency
that any radioactive material is exempt from any regulatory control."
Because it is defined by what it is not, some LLRW can have high
concentrations of radionuclides, irrespective of its name.
Functionally, LLRW is classified into four classes; A, B, C or greater than
class C (GTCC). LLRW is classified based on the concentration of key
short and long half-life radionuclides present in the waste. Class A has
the lowest concentration of these radionuclides. Class B has higher
concentrations of the shorter half-life radionuclides. Class Chas the
highest concentrations of both short and long half-life radionuclides.
GTCC contains short and long half-life radionuclides in concentrations
that exceed the limits established for Class C. The U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (US NRC) has determined that this waste is not
suitable for near surface disposal.
The federal Policy Act makes disposal of class A, B and C wastes a
responsibility of states and compacts and the disposal of GTCC wastes
a federal responsibility. In addition, LLRW that is (1) owned or generated
by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), (2) owned or generated by the
U.S. Navy as a result of decommissioning Navy vessels, (3) resulting
from research, development, testing or production of atomic weapons,
(4) identified by the federal government under its program to
. .ntaminate sites used during the Manhattan Project (the Formerly
Utilized Site Remedial Action Program) are also federal responsibilities.
In 1996 Public Law 104-134 was enacted clarifying that states are not
1
GP1318
,
2
GP1319
.,,,,t:
A..m
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Daniel
Ohio has been investigating the TENORM shipping activity to Kentucky for me.
Please see correspondence below.
George
!e
s~~~
1
GP1320
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
GP1321
S~'ri'~
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
... . . , '.10
10
h..... "..
. Dep.1rtm1nt of Ho~ Ith
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
GP1322
m
. .nt:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Daniel:
Trip report attached from Ohio for site visit to Pressure Tech and including in meeting was Cory Hoskins.
Associated email correspondence sent in a separate email message.
George
a..
-9nt
veHelmer
from my iPhone
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
GP1323
m:
. .t:
To:
Subject:
Curt;
Sent trip report and associated email correspondence to both you and Jason.
Thank you,
George
To:
..
Tim described how PT, with the assistance of BES (Cory Hoskins), would sort the boxes of solidified waste
and determine which boxes went to KY or WVa. Because all the waste was expected to exceed Ohio's 5+2
pCi/g Ra, none of the waste was ever disposed of in Ohio.
..
vm.~)
l~-m
:g
floAtlJATitiN~H~U.tH
GP1324
FYI
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
,
2
GP1325
A.it.om:
--nt:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Danny;
Please find my notes from the meeting that you had with Curt Pendergrass on Friday afternoon, February 19th in
Conference Room 202A.
Thank you for the opportunity to join you and Curt. The meeting was very helpful to my understanding of the
regulations.
George
GP1326
,A..,m:
. . .nt:
To:
Subject:
~lso saw only 1.24 tons of wastes from the Norwich, Ohio area and multiple firms are shipping that waste to Kentucky
, . disposal at Blue Ridge. Billy and Dan have been withholding that information which would likely confirm additional
waste was not reported.
I want to see an NOV for not reporting the waste on the Quarterly Waste Received Report form.
I also totaled the cubic yards reported and that would indicate an amount significantly above the 756 tons.
George P.
GP1327
Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov
Thursday, February 25, 2016 8:47 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Re: Kentucky Concerns
George,
If you need ODNR records let me know.
Steve Helmer
Sent from my iPhone
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or protected
health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use, disclosure, copying,
distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately delete this e-mail.
..
GP1328
m:
. .t:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Steve;
Thank you,
George
-----Original Message----From: Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov [mailto:Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 8:47 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: Kentucky Concerns
George,
If you need ODNR records let me know.
ve Helmer
ent from my iPhone
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or protected
health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use, disclosure, copying,
distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately delete this e-mail.
...
GP1329
m:
. .t:
To:
Subject:
George;
I do not feel the quartiles reported the all the waste received. Even if things were entered in correctly for Marion
County (KV vs WV), then I am surprised we only got 1.24 tons from Muskingum County in Ohio when several companies
were shipping thir waste there.
Time will tell.
Thanks again for all you are doing!
I am glad we finally have the opportunity to work together. I appreciate and have had a wonderful experience working
with those that serve in our field offices.
Looking forward to the meeting this afternoon!
Thanks again,
.eorgeP.
--"--- ---~----~
~"''
(EEC)
..
..
""'"''""'
..............,........................................................................................ ........................................................ ..
GP1330
---
----------
I also saw only 1.24 tons of wastes from the Norwich, Ohio area and multiple firms are shipping that waste to Kentucky
for disposal at Blue Ridge. Billy and Dan have been withholding that information which would likely confirm additional
waste was not reported.
I want to see an NOV for not reporting the waste on the Quarterly Waste Received Report form.
I also totaled the cubic yards reported and that would indicate an amount significantly above the 756 tons.
George P.
,
2
GP1331
e!;
To:
Subject:
Ken;
Here are the critical regulations you need to cite highlighted in yellow. I included the other two for your own personal
reference since they are applicable.
Let me know if you need anything else.
George
In State Regulation:
Interstate Commerce:
.~~f~,i~~~'..~~~~~lo~s~~~~~f~}~~~~4~~t!;~t~)6~ctiv.~
. Waste.1n..
andb.'ut&t.Kerfty,f~Y.z.PfRhl~~ioh~f:~~'5lifiRtJgJt
GP1332
'5;;,:
To:
Subject:
Thanks George
In State Regulation:
~~fff211.869
~f~~,~,~~~~~j~~~~~&~it!~~fit~~ft~i~t~1~ip~~t!~~.W~~!~~1b:ana &~iJc>f~~D:t4PkY~iP(bffj~;H9BfEE~~)tipfi,~d
KRS
Penalties
902 KAR 100:012 Fee Schedule
GP1333
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
To:
-.iing to accept responsibility for LLRW generated within their own region, but not for LLRW generated by others ... It is
~Commission's policy to prohibit access to the regional LLRW disposal facility for imported LLRW." (p. 18) Pages 27-31
discuss the policies of NORM, NARM, and TENO RM to a fairly in-depth degree. The Compact also assigns a limit on the
radioactivity of TENO RM allowed for import into the region: "It is the Commission's policy to prohfbit the import of
TENO RM waste with concentrations equal to or greater than 5 pCi/g into the region for disposal." (p. 30)
Regarding disposal of LLRW at non-LLRW regional facilities, "The Commission's policy is to allow the disposal of exempt
quantities of LLRW in disposal facilities other than the regional disposal facility. The disposal of these exempted
quantities shall. be performed as specified in the current radiation control regulations of each of the party states." (p. 37)
Also, "It is the Commission's policy that TENORM waste with concentrations equal to or greater than 2000 pCi/g shall be
disposed at the regional LLRW disposal facility. TENORM waste with concentrations less than 2000 pCi/g shall be
disposed in accordance with the method approved by the appropriate party state regulatory agency."
The document is attached for your reference.
Thanks!
fl*~,~
Internal Policy Analyst II
.......~monwealth of Kentucky
_,-rgy and Environment Cabinet
Department for Environmental Protection
Division of Waste Management
1
GP1334
,ert
GP1335
-m
Subject:
Attachments:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
Sent:
To:
Tony:
Photos from site visit attached.
Address is:
GP1336
--om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Thursday, February 25, 2016 11:56 AM
Delivered: RE: Photos from Site Visit to Advanced TENO RM Services
GP1337
-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Rodney;
ODH made a site visit to Pressure Tech in Ohio. Please find attached the trip report we received from Steve Helmer.
also had sent it to Curt Pendergrass and his reaction is also included below in the email I received from him.
Please be sure to read this before our meeting today!
Will also send you notes I have from Steve as well.
Look forward to the meeting this afternoon!
George
Tim described how PT, with the assistance of BES (Cory Hoskins), would sort the boxes of solidified waste
and determine which boxes went to KY or WVa. Because all the waste was expected to exceed Ohio's 5+2
pCi/ g Ra, 'none of the waste was ever disposed of in Ohio.
Jfr!j
. -~-,.....
f!.J!;;tr~t"!Olll
.~--
li~t.:nt
1
GP1338
fyi
Steve Helmer
Sent from my iPhone
FYI
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged, sensitive, or
protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that the unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately
delete this e-mail.
GP1339
,,om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rodney;
Here is the correspondence I have had with Ohio following a phone I made to ask a question.
Look forward to us continuing to work together on this!
George
~veHelmer
~nt from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Steve;
From the manifests we have reviewed for our Green Valley Landfill in the Ashland, KY area, it appears
that Pressure Tech has been shipping TENORM wastes from Muskingum County, Ohio managed by BES
Technical Solutions, LLC which is the firm associate with Cory Hoskins.
Shipment of TENO RM wastes from Ohio for disposal in Kentucky is prohibited by KRS.
When you met with Pressure Tech and Cory Hoskins, did they indicate they have been shipping waste
containing TENO RM to Kentucky?
Thanks for your assistance and sharing what you learned.
George
To:
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Beth.Pratt@dnr.state.oh.us;
Ron.Trivisonno@dnr.state.oh.us; Rebecca.Fugitt@odh.ohio.gov; Michael.Snee@odh.ohio.gov;
Chuck.McCracken@odh.ohio.gov
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
1
GP1340
George,
We appreciate hearing any concerns Kentucky may have.
As a follow up to your email, I traveled with ODNR to their permitted facility, Pressure Tech (oil & gas
industry waste substance facility).
In the state of Ohio, ODNR (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) has sole and exclusive authority
over the.Oil and Gas Industry.
This Pressure Tech location uses the same Ohio address listed on Mr. Hoskins website .
S~'ll~
Program Administrator
Ohio Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
<image001.jpg>
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:George.Partridge@ky.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:36 PM
To: Helmer, Stephen <Stephen.Helmer@odh.ohio.gov>
Cc: Hatton, Tony (EEC) <Tony.Hatton@ky.gov>; Maybriar, Jon (EEC) <Jon.Maybriar@ky.gov>; Anderson,
Danny J (EEC) <Danny.Anderson@ky.gov>
Subject: RE: KY Landfill Concern
Steve;
Thank you so much for calling today and allowing us to share our concerns regarding shipments of
TENO RM to our landfills here in Kentucky. We have been particularly concerned about the activities of
Cory Hoskins associated with Advanced TENORM Services (also associated with BES, LLC and BES
Technical Solutions, LLC) and his activities surrounding shipments of out of state TE NORM to Kentucky .
As requested I prepared a summary of how we became aware of the out of state shipments and have
attached that to this email message.
2
GP1341
-------------
-----
--------------
Also additional attachments are included that I hope you will find helpful as you understand our
situation and the investigation we are conducting. The attachments include:
./ Relevant regulations we are focused on: KRS 224.46-530 and especially KRS 211.859 .
./ Copy of the web pages from Advanced TENO RM Services and LLC information .
./ Photographs when we conducted an unannounced inspection visit to the offices and laboratory
of Advanced TENORM Services (individual sitting at table we understand is Cory Hoskin's
brother. Cory is standing in the doorway. The individual by the boxes scanning for radioactivity
is Chris Keffer with .our DPH - Radioactive Materials Section)
./ Information on LLCs organized that Cory Hoskins is associated with .
./ Fairmont Brine Processing Disposal Plan (waste we are particularly concerned about that was
disposed of at Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, KY)
./ Analytical results provide by Waste Management when they were involved with Fairmont Brine
Processing .
./Analytical results from Advanced TENORM Services that was provided to Republic Services who
manages Green Valley Landfill and was included with the manifest for the shipment of the
TENORM wastes.
We appreciate the interest you are taking in our concerns regarding the disposal of TE NORM here in
Kentucky. We believe the waste from Fairmont Brine Processing was used as Alternative Daily Cover at
the Blue Ridge Landfill. Preliminary site surveys indicates this took place but a more detail site survey
and sampling protocol in the future will confirm if that is the case and the extent of the contamination.
We also hope by sharing our experiences in Kentucky that this will provide helpful information related to
the management of TENO RM waste in Ohio and most of all protect the well-being and health of the
operators and managers of landfills that provide an important service to our respective communities.
Thank you again,
Sincerely,
George
HiGeorge,
Please send what you can to better understand your concerns.
3
GP1342
---~---
Program Administrator
OhiO Department of Health
Bureau Environmental Health and Radiation Protection
Radiological Health and Safety Section
614-728-3611
<image001.jpg>
This e-mail is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain privileged,
sensitive, or protected health information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that
the unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents
of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender via telephone or return e-mail and immediately delete this e-mail.
GP1343
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKYT's Facebook page has someone saying the material is
exempt.
Lindsey
>On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>
>Lindsey;
>
> Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.
>
>George
>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
o: Partridge, George (EEC)
ubject: Re: TENORM
>
"
>
>Lindsey
>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>
Lindsey;
>>
Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>>
At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>>
Have a nice week!
>>
George
>>
-----Original Message----~rom: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
W-ent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: TE NORM
1
GP1344
-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lindsey;
We knew ahead of time of the news release and are aware of what is taking place.
George
-----Original Message----From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:10 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM
On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKYT's Facebook page has someone saying the material is
exempt.
Lindsey
- n Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>
>Lindsey;
>
>Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.
>
>George
>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: Re: TENO RM
>
>Has there been an acceptance of authority by someone?
>
>Lindsey
>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>
. .indsey;
Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>>
1
GP1345
At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>>
Have a nice week!
>>
George
>>
-----Original Message---- From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net)
...?~-~gnt.Il,!~~~c!~,.Je ~.ntfil'i-1~.L.~QJ.J:?}~M ..
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: TENORM
>>
>>George,
>>
Any progress at Blue Ridge?
>>
Lindsey
>
GP1346
-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Let's do those manifests we have; I'll put them in a spreadsheet. Do we have anything new from those we were
emailed?
1.
I
'
GP1347
Subject:
The newspaper article is better than WKYT's press release. Why was McKinley unavailable for comment?
Lindsey
> On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>
>Lindsey;
>
>We knew ahead of time of the news release and are aware of what is taking place.
>
>George
>
>
>On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKVT's Facebook page has someone saying the material is
exempt.
>
>Lindsey
>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>
Lindsey;
>>
Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.
>>
George
>>
-----Original Message---- From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM
>>
- a s there been an acceptance of authority by someone?
Lindsey
>>
1
GP1348
>>
>On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>>
> Lindsey;
>>>
>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>>>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
---- ?2?~-------~---
>
GP1349
m
nt:
To:
Subject:
The newspaper article is better than WKYT's press release. Why was McKinley unavailable for comment?
Lindsey
>On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>
>Lindsey;
>
>We knew ahead of time of the news release and are aware of what is taking place.
>
>George
>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:10 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
.ubject: Re: TENORM
>On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKYT's Facebook page has someone saying the material is
exempt.
>
>Lindsey
>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>
Lindsey;
>>
Not that I am aware of. There are on~going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.
>>
George
>>
-----Original Message---- From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TE NORM
>>
, , a s there been an acceptance of authority by someone?
Lindsey
>>
1
GP1350
----------------
>>
>On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
I:
Lindsey;
>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>>>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>>>
> Have a nice week!
>>>
>George
>>>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: TENORM
>>>
>>>George,
>>>
>Any progress at Blue Ridge?
>>>
>Lindsey
>>
GP1351
. . . . m
-:;,t:
To:
Subject:
GP1352
-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kentucky Regi
140
Frankfor
Phone: 502_573
Regular Hours of C
GP1353
----------
ti!::
To:
Subject:
Kentucky Regi
140
Frankfor
Phone: 502_573
Regular Hours of C
To return to the Regist1
GP1354
fl'-om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
GP1355
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
Sincerely,
George
GP1356
flam:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
GP1357
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@kv.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
Sincerely,
George
GP1358
.;
~~:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
(404) 562-8674
GP1359
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
-----
=---~-
~----
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documen.ts and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
~eor9eP.PartridfjeJ~
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
GP1360
fl!j.om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lindsey;
Please direct all your questions to Tony Hatton and Jon Maybrair. They are the ones corresponding with everyone
considering all that happened.
George
-----Origina I Message----From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 8:27 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM
The newspaper article is better than WKVT's press release. Why was McKinley unavailable for comment?
Lindsey
..
On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>
>Lindsey;
>
>We knew ahead of time of the news release and are aware of what is taking place.
>
>George
>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:10 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: Re: TENO RM
>
>On the news, but I think some of the information is wrong. WKYT's Face book page has someone saying the material is
exempt.
> '
>Lindsey
>
>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:40 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
indsey;
>>
Not that I am aware of. There are on-going discussions with upper management and our attorneys.
1
GP1361
>>
George
>>
-----Original Message---- From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Subject: Re: TENORM
>>
_ <?_Hc:i_~ thgrgJ.:i~_~ruu1 g<;<;eptan~r:9f !'!_1.1ttiority by sorl'leoneO?
>>
Lindsey
>>
>>
>On Feb 24, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
>>>
> Lindsey;
>>>
>Tony Hatton, Danny Anderson, Jon Maybrair, and April Webb are following up on this at the moment.
>>>
>At Danny's request I am presently devoting my time this week to Central Kentucky and reviews associated with our
regular permitting activities.
>>>
> Have a nice week!
>>>
>George
>>>
>-----Original Message----> From: Lindsey & Debbie Briggs [mailto:ldbriggs@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:53 PM
>To: Partridge, George (EEC)
>Subject: TENO RM
>>>
>>>George,
>>>
>Any progress at Blue Ridge?
>>>
>Lindsey
>>
>
.....
2
GP1362
- - - - - - -
a.,m
~nt:
To:
Subject:
I know you have had a rough last couple of weeks ....... Just wanted to let you know that I am praying for your health &
wellbeing during these difficult times.
Please take care of yourself and try to eat & get enough rest.
I appreciate your perseverance & determination in trying to resolve the issues that concern us all greatly.
I greatly appreciate all that you are trying to do to protect others and to hold the ones involved accountable.
Take care of yourself
Anita
GP1363
--m
~t:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
IT:
GP1364
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.kv.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Ynn(U~
l~!#<li~Mf~w:~f"'J\J)!ATltrf'ij&.HSiH.TH
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today. Per our conversation, if you would, please send the following:
1. Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TENO RM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
2.
3.
4.
Kentucky DEP and or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Services.
Any documentation and or results from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management.
Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
You mentioned that your team did some radiation monitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the results
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send analysis once received.
Respcetfully,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1365
--m
~t:
To:
Subject:
Perhaps, this was the reason they went with BES Technologies.
Page: D-1
The news that Antero Resources will build a massive $275 million wastewater
treatment plant to process shale brine in West Virginia wasn't a surprise for Brian
Kalt, general manager with Fairmont Brine Processing.
The surprise was learning that Antero would be building the plant with Veolia
Water Technologies, a branch of the French technology giant.
The Denver-based oil and gas company announced Wednesday that over the next
two years Veolia will design, build and operate the Sandstrom Wastewater
Treatment facility, a 60,000-barrel-a-day plant that will evaporate and crystalize
produced water - yielding fresh water and salt products to be used by the oil and
,. . industry.
GP1366
Clearing of the site, a patch of land near Route 50 in Doddridge County, has begun,
and Antero has filed two permits with the state, one for construction and another
for air emissions, over the past two months. That's how Mr. Kalt confirmed what
he'd been hearing - that his small company's major break was at risk.
f/j
anchor client. The facility is a tenth of the size of what Veolia will be building.
Mr. Kalt said his company has spent the past year and $2 million on engineering
work for the large plant, which would have been tailored to Antero's needs but
also would have room for other producers' water.
Fairmont kept Antero apprised of its progress and forwarded all drawings and
descriptions of its treatment process, he said.
"Had we known that this was a possibility, we would not have allowed them so
much access to our patented process despite the non-disclosure agreement and
,
confidentiality agreement set forth in our contract," he said.
Alvyn Schopp, chief administrative officer and Antero's regional vice president of
Appalachia, said the company hasn't broken any confidentiality agreements and
did not share Fairmont's drawings with anyone.
"I'm sure they are disappointed," he said. "Fairmont and Veolia weren't the only
ones we looked at. We believe that we have been very fair with Fairmont, very
upfront with Fairmont."
Antero's contract for the existing Fairmont plant runs through 2016 and, despite a
recent pause, Mr. Schopp said the plan is to continue to send water to Fairmont
through the remainder of its contract.
After 18 months of planning, he said Antero chose the company that would deliver
"the most technologically advanced plant."
fll
"We think this will be closely watched by industry to see how successful this is," he
2
GP1367
Antero said Wednesday that Sandstrom would be part of the company's water
division, which was incorporated in November and is being negotiated for sale to
Antero Midstream, a master limited partnership partly owned by Antero.
The oil and gas driller has operations in the Marcellus and Utica shales. Unlike
some operators that focus on exploration and production, and outsource
everything else, Antero is known to prefer to have control over all aspects, said
David Meats, an equity analyst with Morningstar Inc. That way it can tailor
infrastructure to its needs and control costs.
Antero said Wednesday that when the facility is ramped up, it will amount to a
$150,000 savings on each well.
. o u have to get rid of the water somehow. The need for water in tracking is huge.
-,,the other options were lower cost, they'd be doing that," Mr. Meats said.
Mr. Kalt said losing Antero will mean a "significant loss of revenue" for his
company. He said Fairmont will try to cobble together enough other producers to
justify building a large plant anyway.
Memo: Anya Litvak: alitvak@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1455.
Record: 15082018714642
Copyright: Copyright (c) 2015 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
GP1368
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
For the past two years, GreenHunter, LLC ha.s been seeking U.S. Coast Guard
-mission to transport tracking waste on the Ohio River or other inland
waterways.
1
GP1369
transport 'oilfield waste' until such time as the Coast Guard ultimately decides on
the proper definition of 'shale gas extraction waste water' and the rules under
which such waste water can be transported. Once these rules are finalized,
__ GceenHunterwiJLcampJywitb~~these_rulesand_regulati.ons.
11
_______
-~
__________ _
GP1370
fll'
GP1371
- - - - - - - - -
- .
gas drilling wastes via barge on the Ohio and Mississippi river systems.
GreenHunter, which has been pursuing permission to ship tracking wastes for
more than two years, has departed from its original scheme to add those wastes
to the Coast Guard list of legal cargoes, and now insists that Captain Richard
Timme has authorized "oilfield wastes" to be river-transported under the terms of
Navigation and Inspection Circular 7-87. As you know, Dr. Cynthia Znati of the
... _... USC.G_HQhaspubJidyd.ente.d_thatSGEWW is ~LPJ~cmitted ~arggforQhioRiYer_.
barge shipment, in part, because of the 70,000 comments received that must be
reviewed, some that include evidence of the radioactivity in the sludge
components which pose risks greater than that of classical "oilfield waste."
We're gratified that Dr. Znati's response to our concerns and news media
questions, correctly communicated the meaning of Captain Timme's
correspondence with GreenHunter, and that the agency is still deliberating the
question of whether USCG would permit SGEWW to be shipped.
We were therefore surprised when GreenHunter LLC defied the USCG authority
over SGEWW shipments by publicly stating its intention to ship these mixed
radioactive and toxic chemical sludge wastes.
GP1372
shipments and the dockside tanks owned by Green Hunter. If these contain
SGEWW as we believe they do, we ask the CGCIS to initiate enforcement penalty
.oceeding or criminal information proceeding in consultation with the Office of
the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio.
The Ohio and Mississippi rivers are a source of drinking water for millions of
people. A January 2015 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
study of the tracking waste stream in Pennsylvania showed that inadequate
traceability and public protections are in place to handle the at-times highlyradioactive tracking emissions and wastes. That study, found here, has prompted
reconsideration of Pennsylvania's weak regulations. Among other findings, tracking
waste liquids (SGEWW) contained levels of radioactivity in excess of 26,600 pCi/L.
1 {Copy of pages excerpted from study enclosed). The federal drinking water
standard is 5 pCi/L. Leakage of GreenHunter cargoes into river waters in the
present circumstances, where the company insists it need not test or characterize
its "oilfield wastes" could be catastrophic, and at a minimum, could pose
continuing environmental and health hazards which would stress public water
. . . pp lies and various forms of wildlife.
For these reasons, we urgently request that the Coast Guard act immediately to
initiate a criminal investigation of operations associated with GreenHunter LLC.
Pending discovery of the contents of any barges and storage tanks, including
records of contents of any barge shipments, to issue an immediate cease and
desist order to Green Hunter to halt any shipments of "oilfield wastes" regardless
of the origins claimed by GreenHunter LLC.
Given GreenHunter's impunity in asserting that they will not follow the USCG HQ
Hazardous Materials Branch Directive, an immediate cease and desist order should
accompany the USCG CGCIS to visit to this shipper's site and its barges to take
evidence of the SGEWW movement that would be admissible in the courts.
Please respond immediately respecting the Coast Guard's planned response to
GreenHunter's defiance of the USCG authority over SGEWW in current and past
- g e shipments. Thanking you in advance,
Teresa Mills
5
GP1373
GP1374
GP1375
Donna Carver
Mt Gilead, OH
Radioactive Waste Alert
Carolyn Harding
Columbus, OH
Defenders of the Earth Outreach Mission
Rev. Monica Beasley-Martin
Youngstown, OH
GP1376
--
--~
----------
,lumbus,OH
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
Robin Blakeman
Huntington, WV
FaCT-OV
Patricia Jacobson
Wheeling, WV
Ohio Alliance for People and Environment
~ Joseph Cronin
Yellow Springs, OH
Buckeye Forest Council
Heather Cantino, board vice chair
Columbus, OH
Concept Zero Student Group
David Nickell
West Kentucky Community College, KY
-thwest Ohio No Frack Forum
Joanne Gerson
9
GP1377
Cincinnati, OH
Athens County Fracking Action Network
Roxanne Groff, steering committee member
Athens, OH
Licking County Concerned Citizens for Public
Health and Environment
Carol Apacki
Licking County, OH
Diana Ludwig
McDonald, OH
10
GP1378
JICT-
..,ungstown, OH
Clean Water Action Pennsylvania
Steve Hvozdovich
Pittsburgh, PA
We Are Not Expendable
John Williams
Trumbull County, OH
People for Safe Water
rilyn Welker
Springfield, OH
11
GP1379
Caitlin Johnson
Youngstown, OH
Concerned Barnesville Area Residents
John Morgan
Belmont County, OH
Appalachian Ohio Sierra Club
Loraine Mccosker
Athens, OH
GP1380
.ncinnati, OH
[Category: Environment]
TNS 24HariCha 150219 30FurigayJane-5034306 30FurigayJane
Memo: Teresa Mills, 614/507-5651, tmills@chej.org
Index terms: Trade Associations; Press Releases
Dateline: COLUMBUS, Ohio
Record: 5034306
Copyright: Copyright (c) 2015 Targeted News Service. All rights reserved.
13
GP1381
-om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George,
I'll bring you these documents for your files.
$&~~S
II~
:~;
~~f'l:
~It~
J~N~
GP1382
Cc:
Subject:
Will do Jason and thanks for the offer and for all the help that you have given us. We literally could not have done this
without you. I have a feeling we are going to be spending a lot of time at Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine KY.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
GP1383
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) [mailto:Curt.Penderqrass@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 12:01 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC);
Partridge, George (EEC); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
,
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing
Hello Mr. Kalt,
It was a pleasure speaking with you on the phone this morning. Again, I want to thank you and Fairmont Brine
Processing for reaching out to our office and to our colleagues in the Dept. of Environmental Protection as we work to
resolve the issues we are now facing. With this now making front page news in the local papers, the sooner we get a
firm grip on what we are dealing with and the potential impact to public health and safety, the better.
And I especially want to thank you for offering to provide samples of sludge from this same settling tank where the
material we are now dealing with first originated at FBP. The fact that the tank is used in the initial stage of settling and
precipitation of oil and gas flowback and produced fluids, I would imagine the sludge now in your tanks is fairly
representative of what was there last summer when these tanks were cleaned out and the material brought to KY. As
you said, you will understandably need to first discuss this with your attorneys to get their input, but I can assure you
that we will be more than happy to split those samples with FBP so you can have them analyzed by another lab of your
choosing for comparison. The Dept. for Public Health, Radiation Health Branch has its own Environmental Monitoring
Laboratory and the samples you provide would have the radiochemical analysis conducted by our laboratory and I am
sure my colleagues in Solid Wastes will wish to conduct their own analysis as well for other non-radioactive constituents.
We will probably reach out to our colleagues in the WV Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and
Indoor Air Division to assist us in our sampling trip to your Fairmont WV facility.
As for your requests for documents provided by Mr. Cory Hoskins of Advanced TENO RM Services/BES Technical
Solutions, Waste Management and Pace Analytical, I am going to have to forward that along to my colleagues in Solid
Waste for their input and consideration. As we discussed, the very preliminary radiation survey results by a staff
member from this office showed slightly elevated exposure rate readings in localized areas of the landfill cap but the
region where the landfill in question is located was found to have a high amount of shale which contains elevated levels
of natural uranium and thorium and decay daughters. Obviously, much more thorough and extensive radiation surveys
and sampling will need to be conducted to better characterize and quantify the radiological concerns.
Thank you again for reaching out to our office and we look forward to working with you and FBP to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
2
GP1384
---------
1. Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TENORM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
Kentucky DEP and or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Services.
2. Any documentation and or results from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management .
3. Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
4. You mentioned that your team did some radiation monitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the results
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send analysis once received.
Respcetfully,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1385
fl'om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Will do Jason and thanks for the offer and for all the help that you have given us. We literally could not have done this
without you. I have a feeling we are going to be spending a lot of time at Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine KY.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govI dph/radioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:l/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
~tj!l~
F~tllAritl-NtlaH!U';U~
GP1386
2016 12:01 PM
Cc: McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC);
Partridge, George (EEC); Brock, Stephanie C (CHS-PH); Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing
Hello Mr. Kalt,
It was a pleasure speaking with you on the phone this morning. Again, I want to thank you and Fairmont Brine
Processing for reaching out to our office and to our colleagues in the Dept. of Environmental Protection as we work to
resolve the issues we are now facing. With this now making front page news in the local papers, the sooner we get a
firm grip on what we are dealing with and the potential impact to public health and safety, the better.
And I especially want to thank you for offering to provide samples of sludge from this same settling tank where the
material we are now dealing with first originated at FBP. The fact that the tank is used in the initial stage of settling and
precipitation of oil and gas flowback and produced fluids, I would imagine the sludge now in your tanks is fairly
representative of what was there last summer when these tanks were cleaned out and the material brought to KY. As
you said, you will understandably need to first discuss this with your attorneys to get their input, but I can assure you
that we will be more than happy to split those samples with FBP so you can have them analyzed by another lab of your
choosing for comparison. The Dept. for Public Health, Radiation Health Branch has its own Environmental Monitoring
Laboratory and the samples you provide would have the radiochemical analysis conducted by our laboratory and I am
sure my colleagues in Solid Wastes will wish to conduct their own analysis as well for other non-radioactive constituents.
We will probably reach out to our colleagues in the WV Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and
Indoor Air Division to assist us in our sampling trip to your Fairmont WV facility.
As for your requests for documents provided by Mr. Cory Hoskins of Advanced TENORM Services/BES Technical
Solutions, Waste Management and Pace Analytical, I am going to have to forward that along to my colleagues in Solid
Waste for their input and consideration. As we discussed, the very preliminary radiation survey results by a staff
member from this office showed slightly elevated exposure rate readings in localized areas of the landfill cap but the
region where the landfill in question is located was found to have a high amount of shale which contains elevated levels
of natural uranium and thorium and decay daughters. Obviously, much more thorough and extensive radiation surveys
and sampling will need to be conducted to better characterize and quantify the radiological concerns.
Thank you again for reaching out to our office and we look forward to working with you and FBP to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
2
GP1387
~
. .~
. . -l!!J;:~F!Ty
f-:A!Jl.l!CrtONm:tll~tH
2.
3.
4.
Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TE NORM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
Kentucky DEP and or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Services.
Any documentation and or results from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management.
Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
You mentioned that your team did some radiation monitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the results
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send analysis once received.
Respcetfully,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, diss.eminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1388
Cc:
Subject:
I thought someone on your side said this material sent to multiple landfills.
502-564-1492
. .ail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
1
GP1389
Jlgp!YJ_~
1'Jl~ttlAT40tlil~J-~~~AL'tH
From: Frame, Jason R [mailto:Jason.R.Frame@wv.gov]
representative of what was there last summer when these tanks were cleaned out and the material brought to KY. As
you said, you will understandably need to first discuss this with your attorneys to get their input, but I can assure you
that we will be more than happy to split those samples with FBP so you can have them analyzed by another lab of your
2
GP1390
choosing for comparison. The Dept. for Public Health, Radiation Health Branch has its own Environmental Monitoring
Laboratory and the samples you provide would have the radiochemical analysis conducted by our laboratory and I am
my colleagues in Solid Wastes will wish to conduct the. ir own analysis as well for other non-radioactive constituents.
~_will probably reach out to our colleagues in the WV Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and
Indoor Air Division to assist us in our sampling trip to your Fairmont WV facility.
.,a=
As for your requests for documents provided by Mr. Cory Hoskins of Advanced TENORM Services/BES Technical
Solutions, Waste Management and Pace Analytical, I am going to have to forward that along to my colleagues in Solid
Waste for their input and consideration. As we discussed, the very preliminary radiation survey results by a staff
member from this office showed slightly elevated exposure rate readings in localized areas of the landfill cap but the
region where the landfill in question is located was found to have a high amount of shale which contains elevated levels
of natural uranium and thorium and decay daughters. Obviously, much more thorough and extensive radiation surveys
and sampling will need to be conducted to better characterize and quantify the radiological concerns.
Thank you again for reaching out to our office and we look forward to working with you and FBP to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
. a i l : curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unw~nted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
m..
C..
IV...., ..
...
Z l
">.;::
Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TENO RM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
Kentucky DEP and or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Services.
2. Any documentation and or results from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management.
3. Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
4. You mentioned that your team did some radiation monitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the results
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send analysis once received.
GP1391
Respcetfully,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244 .
~-=---
----- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1392
...A_m
Subject:
Attachments:
Sensitivity:
Confidential
~t:
To:
GP1393
Matthew G. Bevin
Governor
Charles G. Snavely
Secretary
www.dep.ky.gov
RE:
The Kentucky Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste Branch hereby
requests information pursuant to 401 KAR 47: 120, Section 1(8). DWM requests waste
manifests, profile sheets, and associated analytical data for any waste accepted by your facility
since January of 2015. This request includes, but is not limited to, documents that relate to
material that meets the following criteria:
1.
KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com
An
GP1394
'
2.
3.
Please include a table of contents and a cover letter signed by a person with signature
authority for the facility. All correspondence should also reference the facility Agency Interest
Identification number. Please submit the information no later than March 18, 2016 to the
address below:
Sincerely,
KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com
An
GP1395
--
----
------------- ----
e?~
To:
Subject:
jeremy.slucher@ky.gov
Friday, February 26, 2016 2:41 PM
Partridge, George (EEC)
DEP- MOTOR POOL/FAIR OAKS - Change Request Completed (Request ID: R025202)
Your change request has been completed by the Motor Pool staff. Please review the information below to ensure that
your request meets your needs.
Your schedule can be viewed on-line at: https://eecppc.agilefleet.com/ MyScheduleBrowse.asp?Requests=Current
If the link above spans more than one line you may need to copy and paste.
Requestor: Partridge, George
Driver: Partridge, George
Request date/time: 02/26/2016 2:26:50 pm
Pick-up: 2/26/2016 3:00:00 PM
Return: 2/27/2016 8:00:00 PM
Duration: 1 day 5 hours
Request ID: R025202
Confirmation#:
Usage Type: Motor Pool
Site: DEP- MOTOR POOL/FAIR OAKS
Location:
Vehicle: Unassigned
Type:
License Number:
Options:
Account: DWM-SWB
Department: DEP
Destination: Site Visit at Irvine, KY t
Object Code: Y
Comments: Thank you! George
PLEASE NOTE: Due to some vehicles returning late to the motor pool, we may have to assign you a different vehicle on
the day of your reservation. You will also be notified prior to your scheduled trip if no vehicles are available so that
alternate transportation can be arranged.
Please pick up the vehicle at the Pick-up date and time indicated above .
GP1396
~~:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Jamie;
I will send you updates as I add to the draft document. Each will have a GP added to the document name to know it is a
version I am work with.
Thank you,
George
'
GP1397
e!.7:'
To:
Subject:
IT assigned an external DVD burner to me on my inventory. Because it is so portable and is on my inventory, I will
routinely keep this in my office rather than leave it with the mirror stereoscope CPU. It is a black 6 x 6 inch plastic
square labeled the name Transcend located under a stack of blank DVD-R's next to my phone.
If you need to burn a DVD, you can borrow it to use on your own CPU's and then return it afterwards. Use the blank
DVD's as needed.
Tony Cooley
P.E., P.G.
Environmental Engineer II
EEC-DEP Division of Waste Management
Solid Wasie Branch, Closure Section
502-564-6716
502-56-1-8158 ext 4654 (direct)
GP1398
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
GP1399
. .m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kr&JtUJ
'
f'J\tl(AilOl~~H~i:t'rH
GP1400
Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and several
members of our Radiation Health Branch staff will be meeting Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire Dept. and other
members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the morning in the parking lot of the Estill
County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt. Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S. Dept. of Energy.
certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of
radiation and contamination surveys both outside and inside of the high school and middle school. If we have the time,
we may also conduct additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have someone available to
.. .
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
/(f2lf{!fg~
flA1Tt)NHzALTH
GP1401
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Sounds great Jon. Can we all plan on meeting up at some place besides the schools so we arrive on scene as a unit? I was
thinking maybe the McDonalds at exit 90A off 1-75 in Richmond at KY Hwy 25. From there it is pretty much a straight
shot into Irvine on 52. If we can leave there by 8:20 AM we should have plenty of time to make the 30 min. drive to
Irvine and be at the school by 9:00 AM. George and George, what do you think?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.kv.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. ~notified o. f pro.posed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
""'Wspose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Ki?JJ~
r~.A!'J1A110:ta&H~J.TH
From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
GP1402
V,mAtufkflA
~t,..,....,..,..rw!'.I.
f;'.t\JJJ)l;'F!oN11V-J.. TH
GP1403
ti!~=
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George,
I recently noticed news stories about illegal TENORM dumping in Kentucky. Please keep my identity confidential
regarding the reporting of this activity. I would like all correspondence regarding this subject (written or verbal) to
remain confidential due to potential problems it may cause me with my customer base.
Thank you.
Kevin D KOSKO
Sent from .my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very generous with his time and the
information he provided was both very informative and helpful.
Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last summer and earlier this month
since my name had been misspelled in the email address.
He brought me up to date on what has taken place which I appreciated so much.
Thanks again for all the helpful information you shared.
Look forward to keeping in touch as issues surrounding lENORM continue to develop.
Thanks again,
George
GP1404
trying, I think they are finding it tough sledding when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the
state legislature. Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out.
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TE NORM being disposed of
in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin
KErvinKosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on TERNORM.
You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised Statues. The KAR (Kentucky Administrative
Regulations) which people follow closely, to my knowledge does not address what is required by KRS.
'
.'
I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive TENO RM and want to investigate
the situation, checking their records on waste received.
To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me with the following questions:
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be contained, shipped or described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me narrow down the files I need to
review to identify waste received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who I need to meet with and where I
need to focus my time on regarding the review of files/manifest for waste being received by the
facility. I will also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know the engineers and
consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as the contractors/consultants.
GP1405
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to build a case to
expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENO RM waste disposal issue for the Solid
Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste Management in KDEP is doing to address
it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
3
GP1406
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
George,
4
GP1407
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today regarding TENO RM disposal regulations in the state
of Ky. You will also probably be getting a call from Leo Guzmondi from Nuverra regarding this issue. It
was ironic as I called him about taking their waste from several brine recycling facilities in Ohio and PA.
He stated that they were planning to take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for
disposal. I told him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was completely unaware of the statute.
The waste from those facilities and others similar (that currently take waste to KY) typically range from
300-600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a significant concentration from a
worker/environmental protection standpoint (Ohio allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow
50 pCi/g) but compliant transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive LSA labeling or
Class 7 Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure how the good people of Kentucky will feel about
seeing placarded loads of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago. The majority of TENO RM waste
rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was going to WV., when the press found out what was happening the
backlash was so severe the governor enacted emergency legislation to place a moratorium on TE NORM
disposal in all state landfills.
Please feel free to contact me if you would like.
Respectfully,
Kevin
Kevin Kesko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: {937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phish/Fraud
5
GP1408
f/&m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kevin;
I have been asked who initially let us know. My management knows since all my correspondence is now a record within
the state.
I am not identifying you or your company to anyone who calls.
George
GP1409
Thanks again,
George
I understand you spoke to Jason Frame; thank you for following up. Jason is a really good guy who
always seems to want to "do the right thing". I think WV was in relatively the same situation about a
year ago as Kentucky is in now. I worked with him and Ken Holiday from WVDEP and as hard as they are
trying, I think they are finding it tough sledding when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the
state legislature. Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out.
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TE NORM being disposed of
in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...
Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on TERNORM.
You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised Statues. The KAR (Kentucky Administrative
Regulations) which people follow closely, to my knowledge does not address what is required by KRS .
I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive TENO RM and want to investigate
the situation, checking their records on waste received.
2
GP1410
-----------------
---------
To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me with the following questions:
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be contained, shipped or described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me narrow down the files I need to
review to identify waste received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who I need to meet with and where I
need to focus my time on regarding the review of files/manifest for waste being received by the
faeility. I will also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know the engineers and
consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as t~e contractors/consultants.
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to build a case to
expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENORM waste disposal issue for the Solid
Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste Management in KDEP is doing to address
it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George
I am writing to inform you that the amount of high concentration TE NORM waste being imported into
Ky. for disposal is larger than I originally thought. Just today, one of my salesman visited three facilities
in Norwich Ohio that are taking all of their TE NORM waste (that is too highly concentrated to enter or
that has been rejected by Ohio, PA, and/or WV) to Advanced Waste's Green Valley Facility located in
Ashland, Ky. Based on the regulation you sent (KRS 211.863) this is seemingly prohibited. The generators
are being told that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility. Is this correct? Is the Advanced
Waste Lanpfill facility truly a legal disposal option for highly concehtrated TENORM generated outside of
3
GP1411
the region (KY and Illinois)? If so we would like to start sending the mass quantities of waste we have to
that facility instead of the specially constructed radioactive waste landfill where we currently send it.
Respectfully,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
. . ...
ViceJ>residenL
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470~2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Kevin;
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to speak to you over the phone
concerning a topic I have been concerned about and involved with for several years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TE NORM, the Director of the Division of Waste
Management has requested our Program Planning and Administration Branch to work with me to get
familiar with TENO RM and to look at how we need to respond here in Kentucky. This effort was
initiated as a result of your phone call. I did not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general
terms that if we ignore taking a position on TENORM, we will be witnessing its disposal in landfills
designated for other types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help establish the need for Kentucky to
develop a regulatory or policy framework while being sensitive to all parties involved, including landfill
management or companies that may not recognize or understand what they are facing as well as those
like yourself that share important information we need to work toward proper management of waste
disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that you did with me.
GP1412
Kevin Kesko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: {937)470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Spam
Phish/Fraud
5
GP1413
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
GP1414
!-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject
Curt;
Sounds fine with me. I am still waiting to hear from George Weems. l went ahead and got a vehicle for tomorrow so I
could drive myself.
Can we exchange cell phone numbers in case we get delayed or something happens?
George
Cell: 859-221-8843 (personal cell phone number)
J(e11,.
.
.~
-l'llo
GP1415
As far as I know Jon. I believe everyone but the Secretary has given the green light and from what I hear, her approval is
a given. Are you planning to send anyone?
Curt Pendergrass-PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kentu~
i~tlfZrfu~H~\ttri
GP1416
Thanks,
urt Pendergrass PhD
pervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kctltu~~
r~ot;;o~i~J..rH
GP1417
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kevin;
When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENO RM waste that was generated in Ohio was properly disposed
of according to Ohio's standards, what would the charge have been per ton?
All I am asking is a range representative of the companies that are the disposal business charge.
Please respond as soon as you can to my request.
Thank you,
George
Sent:
George,
I recently noticed news stories about illegal TENORM dumping in Kentucky. Please keep my identity confidential
regarding the reporting of this activity. I would like all correspondence regarding this subject (written or verbal) to
remain confidential due to potential problems it may cause me with my customer base.
Thank you.
Kevin D KOSKO
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very generous with his time and the
information he provided was both very informative and helpful.
Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last summer and earlier this month
since my name had been misspelled in the email address .
He brought me up to date on what has taken place which I appreciated so much.
Thanks again for all the helpful information you shared.
1
GP1418
Thanks again,
George
Patrie!<
- ------- -
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TENORM being disposed of
in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin
'
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on TERNORM.
You are correct on KRS 211.863. KRS is the Kentucky Revised Statues. The KAR (Kentucky Administrative
Regulations) which people follow closely, to my knowledge does not address what is required by KRS.
GP1419
I have been concerned that Green Valley may be targeted to receive TENORM and want to investigate
the situation, checking their records on waste received.
To help me focus on where I need to be investigating, please help me with the following questions:
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be contained, shipped or described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me narrow down the files I need to
review to identify waste received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who I need to meet with and where I
need to focus my time on regarding the review of files/manifest for waste being received by the
facility. I will also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know the engineers and
consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as the contractors/consultants.
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to build a case to
expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENORM waste disposal issue for the Solid
Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste Management in KOEP is doing to address
it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George
I am writing to inform you that the amount of high concentration TENORM waste being imported into
Ky. for disposal is larger than I originally thought. Just today, one of my salesman visited three facilities
in Norwich Ohio that are taking all of their TENO RM waste (that is too highly concentrated to enter or
that has been rejected by Ohio, PA, and/or WV) to Advanced Waste's Green Valley Facility located in
3
GP1420
Ashland, Ky. Based on the regulation you sent (KRS 211.863) this is seemingly prohibited. The generators
are being told that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill facility. Is this correct? Is the Advanced
Waste Landfill facility truly a legal disposal option for highly concentrated TENORM generated outside of
the region (KY and Illinois)? If so we would like to start sending the mass quantities of waste we have to
that facility instead of the specially constructed radioactive waste landfill where we currently send it.
Respectfully,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...
Kevin;
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to speak to you over the phone
concerning a topic I have been concerned about and involved with for several years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENO RM, the Director of the Division of Waste
Management has requested our Program Planning and Administration Branch to.work with me to get
familiar with TENO RM and to look at how we need to respond here in Kentucky. This effort was
initiated as a result of your phone call. I did not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general
terms that if we ignore taking a position on TE NORM, we will be witnessing its disposal in landfills
designated for other types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help establish the need for Kentucky to
develop a regulatory or policy framework while being sensitive to all parties involved, including landfill
management or companies that may not recognize or understand what they are facing as well as those
like yourself that share important information we need to work toward proper management of waste
disposal.
4
GP1421
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that you did with me.
Please do not hesitate to call or email me anytime.
I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENO RM with other members of our
Division.
George
Subject: Conversation
George,
1,
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today regarding TENO RM disposal regulations in the state
of Ky. You will also probably be getting a call from Leo Guzmondi from Nuverra regarding this issue. It
was ironic as I called him about taking their waste from several brine recycling facilities in Ohio and PA.
He stated that they were planning to take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for
disposal. I told him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was completely unaware of the statute.
The waste from those facilities and others similar (that currently take waste to KY) typically range from
300-600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a significant concentration from a
worker/environmental protection standpoint (Ohio allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow
SO pCi/g) but compliant transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive LSA labeling or
Class 7 Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure how the good people of Kentucky will feel about
seeing placarded loads of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago. The majority of TE NORM waste
rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was going to WV., when the press found out what was happening the
backlash was so severe the governor enacted emergency legislation to place a moratorium on TENORM
disposal in all state landfills.
Please feel free to contact me if you would like.
Respectfully,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
GP1422
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
.J?hish/F_raud_ . .
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
'
GP1423
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
2016 4:13 PM
GP1424
--------
--
- -
_F_!Q!fl;
M~yl:>riar,)011 (EEC)
GP1425
Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and
several members of our Radiation Health Branch staff will be meeting Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire
Dept. and other members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the
morning in the parking lot of the Estill County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt.
Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S. Dept. of Energy certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing
our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of radiation and contamination surveys
both outside and inside of the high school and middle school. If we have the time, we may also conduct
additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have
someone available to give us access to the school premises.
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>
GP1426
~~:
To:
Subject:
GP1427
seilI:i=r1aay~i=e-6rliaiY26~-2016 4:os-i:>rvi
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
GP1428
-~-~----
Just to let you know, myself, my Branch Manager Matt McKinley, our Division Director Kathy Fowler and
several members of our Radiation Health Branch staff will be meeting Lt. Matt Blose of Winchester Fire
Dept. and other members of the Area 13 Bluegrass Emergency Response Team at 9:00 AM in the
morning in the parking lot of the Estill County High School across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill. Lt.
Blose and his BERT colleagues are U.S. Dept. of Energy certified Radiation Specialist. We will be bringing
our radiation detection instrumentation and plan on taking lots of radiation and contamination surveys
both outside and inside of the high school and middle school. If we have the time, we may also conduct
additional surveys of the landfill as well.
If you would please, contact those in charge in Estill County and see if they can arrange to have
someone available to give us access to the school premises.
Thanks,
'
GP1429
----------------
I went ahead and got a state vehicle and I am driving myself. I will meet at the location that Curt suggested unless I hear
otherwise.
George P.
" ' s far as I know Jon. I believe everyone but the Secretary has given the green light and from what I hear, her approval is
a given. Are you planning to send anyone?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.kv.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epav/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted
sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
-,,,
GP1430
'
N:!JJ!JJ
..
t~!:JJ.l.\T'lOf4~HeAttf\
h<
'
GP1431
.m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Curt;
Thank you!
George
..
GP1432
Sounds great Jon. Can we all plan on meeting up at some place besides the schools so we arrive on
scene as a unit? I was thinking maybe the McDonalds at exit 90A off 1-75 in Richmond at KY Hwy 25.
From there it is pretty much a straight shot into Irvine on 52. If we can leave there by 8:20 AM we
should have plenty of time to make the 30 min. drive to Irvine and be at the school by 9:00 AM. George
and George, what do you think?
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
. - Mallstclp-HSIC=JX-- ..- ... - --- .
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>
'
GP1433
'
Thanks,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
<image001.jpg>
GP1434
-
------
.m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
George,
The Ohio waste acceptance criteria is only 6.99pCi/g for combined Radium-226/228 so that waste could never get into
Ohio.
Pa. disposal may have been an option as they accept up to 120uR/HR and there is a tiered pricing structure that tops out
at about $500/ton. We charge $460/ton to solidify, transport via rail and dispose of this type of waste at US Ecologies in
Grandview, Idaho.
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
'
When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENO RM waste that was generated in Ohio was
properly disposed of according to Ohio's standards, what would the charge have been per ton?
All I am asking is a range representative of the companies that are the disposal business charge.
Please respond as soon as you can to my request.
Thank you,
George
Thank you.
GP1435
Kevin D KOSKO
'
George,
I understand you spoke to Jason Frame; thank you for following up. Jason is a really
good guy who always seems to want to "do the right thing". I think WV was in relatively
the same situation about a year ago as Kentucky is in now. I worked with him and Ken
Holiday from WVDEP and as hard as they are trying, I think they are finding it tough
sledding when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the state legislature.
Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out.
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TENORM
being disposed of in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
GP1436
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past.. .
'
Who is telling the generators that this is a legal disposal option by the landfill
facility?
Please provide any descriptions on how the waste would be contained, shipped or
described.
Please provide a time period (days, months, etc.) that will help me narrow down
the files I need to review to identify waste received at Green Valley.
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who I need to meet
with and where I need to focus my time on regarding the review of files/manifest for
waste being received by the facility. I will also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know
the engineers and consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as
the contractors/consultants.
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to
build a case to expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENORM waste disposal issue
for the Solid Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste
Management in KDEP is doing to address it.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
3
GP1437
George
Respectfully,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
GP1438
Kevin;
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to speak to you over
the phone concerning a topic I have been concerned about and involved with for several
years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENO RM, the Director of the
Division of Waste Management has requested our Program Planning and Administration
Branch to work with me to get familiar with TENORM and to look at how we need to
respond here in Kentucky. This effort was initiated as a result of your phone call. I did
not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general terms that if we ignore taking a
position on TENO RM, we will be witnessing its disposal in landfills designated for other
types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help establish the need for
Kentucky to develop a regulatory or policy framework while being sensitive to all parties
involved, including landfill management or companies that may not recognize or
understand what they are facing as well as those like yourself that share important
information we need to work toward proper management of waste disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that you did with me.
Please do not hesitate to call or email me anytime.
I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENORM with other
members of our Division.
George
Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today regarding TENORM disposal
regulations in the state of Ky. You will also probably be getting a call from Leo Guzmondi
from Nu\lerra regarding this issue. It was ironic as I called him about taking their waste
from several brine recycling facilities in Ohio and PA. He stated that they were planning
to take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for disposal. I told
him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was completely unaware of the statute.
The waste from those facilities and others similar (that currently take waste to KY)
typically range from 300-600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a
5
GP1439
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
'
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phish/Fraud
6
GP1440
.From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the questions you
asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TE NORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One contact shared
that TE NORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us
about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch issues permits
for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and
disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
GP1441
----------------
--
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions without a
written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to briefly address questions you
have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and to address the questions we are receiving
Tnan1<v1:m,
George
'
GP1442
.From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
Delivered: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
GP1443
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
Delivered: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
'
GP1444
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
Delivered: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
I'
I
GP1445
.From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
BKalt@fairmontbrine.com
Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36 PM
Relayed: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the
destination server:
BKalt@fairmontbrine.com (BKalt@fairmontbrine.com)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
GP1446
.From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To:
Subject: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36:34 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, February 26, 2016 5:36:32 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
GP1447
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:35:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, February 26, 2016 5:43:29 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1448
.From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kevin;
My understanding is the landfills are charging in the range of$ 23 - $ 26 per ton to dispose of the waste they have
received from out of state.
The numbers will help us understand more what is going on.
Thank you so much for all you are doing to support our concerns. I have shared you name with no one outside of my
work group. I have requested that your name be kept confidential.
Thanks again for all you help!
George
'
The Ohio waste acceptance criteria is only 6.99pCi/g for combined Radium-226/228 so that waste could never get into
Ohio.
Pa. disposal may have been an option as they accept up to 120uR/HR and there is a tiered pricing structure that tops out
at about $500/ton. We charge $460/ton to solidify, transport via rail and dispose of this type of waste at US Ecologies in
Grandview, Idaho.
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENORM waste that was generated in Ohio was
properly disposed of according to Ohio's standards, what would the charge have been per ton?
All I am asking is a range representative of the companies that are the disposal business charge.
GP1449
George
GP1450
----------
---
- -
Holiday from WVDEP and as hard as they are trying, I think they are finding it tough
sledding when it comes to getting new rulemaking through the state legislature.
Hopefully, Jason's experiences with this issue might help you folks out .
I will continue to keep my eyes open for other instances where out of state TENORM
being disposed of in Ky.
Best Regards,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...
l__
GP1451
The Green Valley Facility owned by Republic Services from my understanding. I know
the engineers and consultants that work for that facility, both with Republic as well as
the contractors/consultants.
With your help I will be able to document a situation which will help me to continue to
build a case to expedite the needed regulatory framework for Kentucky.
For this year I have been officially assigned to work on the TENO RM waste disposal issue
for the Solid Waste Branch and support the work that the Division of Waste
-Managemenf1ri-R0Ii5-1Scfoinit:O-a-adressit.
- -- - - I look forward to hearing from you!
Thanks again for all you are doing,
Sincerely,
George
<image002.gif>
GP1452
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Kevin;
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to speak to you over
the phone concerning a topic I have been concerned about and involved with for several
years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENORM, the Director of the
Division of Waste Management has requested our Program Planning and Administration
Branch to work with me to get familiar with TE NORM and to look at how we need to
respond here in Kentucky. This effort was initiated as a result of your phone call. I did
not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general terms that if we ignore taking a
position on TENO RM, we will be witnessing its disposal in landfills designated for other
types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help establish the need for
Kentucky to develop a regulatory or policy framework while being sensitive to all parties
involved, including landfill management or companies that may not recognize or
understand what they are facing as well as those like yourself that share important
information we need to work toward proper management of waste disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that you did With me.
Please do not hesitate to calf or email me anytime.
I look forward to this coming week to continuing my work on TENORM with other
members of our Division.
GP1453
George
To:
~ --Thank-yofffortakingth~time
to-talkwithme todayregardinglENC>RMdisposa1
regulations in the state of Ky. You will also probably be getting a call from Leo Guzmondi
from Nuverra regarding this issue. It was ironic as I called him about taking their waste
from several brine recycling facilities in Ohio and PA. He stated that they were planning
to take the 8-10 boxes (15 tons/box) that they produce daily to KY for disposal. I told
him of our discussion and KRS 211.863 and he was completely unaware of the statute.
The waste from those facilities and others similar (that currently take waste to KY)
typically range from 300-600 pCi/g for Radium-226 and Radium-228. This is not only a
significant concentration from a worker/environmental protection standpoint (Ohio
allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow SO pCi/g) but compliant
transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive LSA labeling or Class 7
Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure how the good, people of Kentucky will feel
about seeing placarded loads of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago. The majority of
TENO RM waste rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was going to WV., when the press
found out what was happening the backlash was so severe the govern~r enacted
emergency legislation to place a moratorium on TE NORM disposal in all state landfills.
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
GP1454
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
GP1455
.From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George,
The Ohio waste acceptance criteria is only 6.99pCi/g for combined Radium-226/228 so that waste could never get into
Ohio.
Pa. disposal may have been an option as they accept up to 120uR/HR and there is a tiered pricing structure that tops out
at about $500/ton. We charge $460/ton to solidify, transport via rail and dispose of this type of waste at US Ecologies in
Grandview, Idaho.
GP1456
Subject:
George,
Please call when you get a minute to discuss.
Thanks,
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
My understanding is the landfills are charging in the range of$ 23 - $ 26 per ton to dispose of the waste
they have received from out of state.
'
GP1457
On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENORM waste that was
generated in Ohio was properly disposed of according to Ohio's standards, what would
the charge have been per ton?
All I am asking is a range representative of the companies that are the disposal business
charge~
--
'
Kevin D KOSKO
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov>
wrote:
Kevin;
Delighted I could speak with Jason from WV today. He was very
generous with his time and the information he provided was both very
informative and helpful.
Also we realized I had not received the correspondence that he sent last
summer and earlier this month since my name had been misspelled in
the email address.
GP1458
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Kevin,
Thank you so much for continuing to keep in touch with me on
TERNORM.
3
GP1459
-.-~
----
-~
.j
My plans are to make an unannounced site visit once I know better who
I need to meet with and where I need to focus my time on regarding the
review of files/manifest for waste being received by the facility. I will
also be researching our files here in Frankfort.
GP1460
<image002.gif>
Respectfully,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...
Kevin;
5
GP1461
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to
speak to you over the phone concerning a topic I have been concerned
about and involved with for several years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENORM, the
Director of the Division of Waste Management has requested our
Program Planning and Administration Branch to work with me to get
familiar with TENORM and to look at how we need to respond here in
l<~rl~!.fC~Y'_ Thi?_ ~ffQrt was iriJtia!e_cla~ <:! r~sult ()f your R_Q()n~ccaH. Ldid_
not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general terms that if we
ignore taking a position on TENORM, we will be witnessing its disposal
in landfills designated for other types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help
establish the need for Kentucky to develop a regulatory or policy
framework while being sensitive to all parties involved, including landfill
management or companies that may not recognize or understand what
they are facing as well as those like yourself that share important
information we need to work toward proper management of waste
disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that
you did with me.
GP1462
(Ohio allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow SO pCi/g) but
compliant transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive
LSA labeling or Class 7 Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure
how the good people of Kentucky will feel about seeing placarded loads
of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago.
The majority of TENO RM waste rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was
going to WV., when the press found out what was happening the
backlash was so severe the governor enacted emergency legislation to
place a moratorium on TENORM disposal in all state landfills.
Please feel free to contact me if you would like.
Respectfully,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<imageOOl.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
7
GP1463
------~----
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phi sh/Fraud
Not spam
Forgerprevfo~U:s~
vote
GP1464
Subject:
George,
Please call when you get a minute to discuss.
Thanks,
Kevin
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
My understanding is the landfills are charging in the range of$ 23 - $ 26 per ton to dispose of the waste
they have received from out of state.
The numbers will help us understand more what is going on.
Thank you so much for all you are doing to support our concerns. I have shared you name with no one
outside of my work group. I have requested that your name be kept confidential.
Thanks again for all you help!
George
GP1465
On Feb 26, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Kevin;
When you get this, for our internal information, if the TENORM waste that was
generated in Ohio was properly disposed of according to Ohio's standards, what would
the charge have been per ton?
... All LC1rl1_a_~KiDg i~ (l r(lnKe r~preseritC1tiv~ Qf the ~ompaniesJbat are tbe disp()sal l;>lj~i11e?~
charge.
Please respond as soon as you can to my request.
Thank you,
George
GP1466
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
GP1467
GP1468
<image002.gif>
Respectfully,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: (937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past...
GP1469
Thank you for contacting our Solid Waste Branch. It was a pleasure to
speak to you over the phone concerning a topic I have been concerned
about and involved with for several years now.
Since we received two phone calls this week regarding TENO RM, the
Director of the Division of Waste Management has requested our
Program Planning and Administration Branch to work with me to get
familiar with TENO RM and to look at how we need to respond here in
Ke_ntu_c;ky, l]Jj.?gffQrtwa_sinjtiated;:,1s1:i_ resuJt of yourphQne call Jdid
not share names, specifics, but only indicated in general terms that if we
ignore taking a position on TENORM, we will be witnessing its disposal
in landfills designated for other types of waste.
Please continue to stay in touch as you learn more.
I want an opportunity to identify a situation and use that to help
establish the need for Kentucky to develop a regulatory or policy
framework while being sensitive to all parties involved, including landfill
management or companies that may not recognize or understand what
they are facing as well as those like yourself that share important
information we need to work toward proper management of waste
disposal.
Thanks again for being so generous with you time and sharing all that
you did with me.
GP1470
(Ohio allows 6.99 pCi/g, North Dakota and Michigan allow 50 pCi/g) but
compliant transportation of this material also requires DOT Radioactive
LSA labeling or Class 7 Radioactive Material placarding. I am not sure
how the good people of Kentucky will feel about seeing placarded loads
of radioactive material going to local landfills.
This seems to be a similar situation that WV. was in about a year ago.
The majority of TENO RM waste rejected at PA and Ohio landfills was
going to WV., when the press found out what was happening the
backlash was so severe the governor enacted emergency legislation to
place a moratorium on TENORM disposal in all state landfills.
Please feel free to contact me if you would like.
Respectfully,
Kevin
Kevin Kosko
Vice President
Compliance/Regulatory Affairs
Shale Mountain Resources
Phone: {937) 470-2655
<image001.jpg>
Protect the future, recycle the past ...
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
7
GP1471
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forget previous vote
Spam
Phish/Fraud
Not spam
Forge1 previous
voten~Crn
GP1472
Cc:
Subject:
Hello Everyone;
As I shared with Lindsey Briggs, Danny Anderson, and Tony Hatton - I was contacted by Kevin Koska (contact
information below) and was told that TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. He also shared Jason
Frame's contact information as well and suggested I give him a call. Jason brought to my attention the waste shipments
from Fairmont Brine Processing to a landfill in Irvine, Kentucky. I have shared the specifics with you including dates and
correspondence.
Kevin has requested that we do not release his name to the public. He is a speaker for the TENO RM disposal industry,
his company is in the business for its disposal, and my understanding he is also the president of the "Oil and Gas
Association" (? - Ohio?).
Using Kevin's words "if the industry labels him as a whistle blower", it could be catastrophic to his career in the industry.
He has volunteered to be a speaker and work with us. He want to support efforts to see that all companies follow the
His firm charges around$ 460/ton to dispose of routine TENORM waste from 0 & G/Fracking operations
~ cannot compete with landfills in Kentucky that only charge in the neighborhood of$ 23 - 26/ton to dispose of the
same waste.
~ulations.
Thank you,
-orge
(je<Yrge P. PartrUfae Jr.
Department for Environmental Protection
1
GP1473
GP1474
fl'_rom:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:35:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, February 26, 2016 7:14:11 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1475
~rom:
~~:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 5:35:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, February 26, 2016 8:51 :55 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1476
Cc:
Subject:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set as being
acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
~ received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One contact shared
~t TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us
GP1477
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch issues permits
for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and
disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
Thank you again for returning my calf yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions without a
written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to briefly address questions you
have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and to address the questions we are receiving
regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any questions I have or
information I need will be directed to your attention through formal correspondence/letters from the appropriate
governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1478
------------
---- --------------------------------
-------- - - - - - -----------
----
-----------------------
GP1479
-om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
-----~-
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
GP1480
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP .
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. lhe DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you,
George
2
GP1481
GP1482
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dr. Pendergrass,
Under KRS 211.862, 211.863 and 902 KAR 100, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
A.sc1ose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~lete and destroy the message.
GP1483
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
Jhe-infor:mation contained intbise~maiLisintended only for the individual or. entity to whom it is addr-essed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1484
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we' are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1485
~:,:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
~ebsite:http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
~your fees on line athttps://apps4.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
On Feb 27, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Pendergrass,
Under KRS 211.862, 211.863 and 902 KAR 100, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
has Kentucky set as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
GP1486
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
1:5annYArffferson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
has Kentucky set as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged
information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or
print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in
blue):
GP1487
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio
to Kentucky. One contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV
as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste
stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The
Solid Waste Branch issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any
unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and disposal of radioactive
materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt
Pendergrass. Any questions I have or information I need will be directed to your
attention through formal correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing
entities that we are working with.
GP1488
Thank you,
George
GP1489
~m
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dr. Pendergrass,
According to the Inverse Square Law, I imagine the readings to be at background. You've listed the threshold in pCi/g,
however, because your radiological surveys are being conducted via hand held radiation meters, it would help put the
numbers into perspective if you gave me the threshold in R.
Respectfully,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
A.&y attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
. .close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
We are at Estill County High School today across the street from Blue Ridge Landfill conducting radiological surveys. I will
send you a link to Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Regional Management Plan when I get in the
office on Monday. But to answer your question, the RMP sets a threshold for TENO RM at 5 pCi/g Ra-226/228 with no
allowance for background. However the compact strictly forbids the importation and disposal of out of compact
TENORM regardless. I believe OH sets a limit at 5 pCi/g plus background which OH established at 2 pCi/g Ra-226.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
'lstop HS-1CA
nkfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
1
GP1490
Website:http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line athttps:f/apps4.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
On Feb 27, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Pendergrass,
Under KRS 211.862, 211.863 and 902 KAR 100, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
has Kentucky set as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
2
GP1491
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged
information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or
print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio
to Kentucky. One contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV
as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste
stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The
Solid Waste Branch issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any
unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and disposal of radioactive
materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1492
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following
information, so we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division
by the press and public. The key questions I am seeking to address in my role as a
permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as follows:
l.
2.
Thank you,
George
GP1493
#m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr. Kalt;
Thank you for the correspondence. I believe Danny Anderson responded to your question regarding interpretation of
KRS 211.862 and 211.863.
We look to CFHS-DPH with my contact being Dr. Curt Pendergrass.
I will check with Curt this coming week and be sure you questions get address.
Thank you,
George Partridge
KDWM
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~ose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
~attachments)
GP1494
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TE NORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One contact shared
that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason Frame. Jason Frame informed us
about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch issues permits~
for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH regulates the management and
disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
91"
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions without a
written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to briefly address questions you
2
GP1495
have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and to address the questions we are receiving
regarding the waste and how it was managed .
. . .ppreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any questions I have or
..-:formation I need will be directed to your attention through formal correspondence/letters from the appropriate
governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1496
Cc:
Subject:
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal Facility
The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
~Clionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
aA
GP1497
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
MailstopHSlC~A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Zl'en .
.,.,~
l;'ViJfri~
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
2
GP1498
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents {including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1499
3.
4.
5.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
Was all the waste similar in nature?
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returntng my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
tQ_aciJirns~th!'! q1..1~e~!iQn~wg_9rn reJ:eJviog reg!'lrdiog the Wg~tejwd how it was managed, ...
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1500
-om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
I have entered the revised WQR's that were submitted to us on Feb 25 for Blue Ridge Landfill.
Thanks, Anita
GP1501
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
11
(10) Region means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
11
(301) Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
-ntucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
GP1502
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order ofthe cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation~
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
A..
GP1503
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1504
I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1505
~om:
W';:;nt:
To:
Subject:
Todd;
Thank you,
George
From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
GP1506
-rom:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blueridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, timelines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested from
the Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!
Regards,
.x:
502.564.3492
1.ee
1
GP1507
~~:
Subject:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
Read
To:
Cc:
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
~as asked to witness and participate in those activities.
, s important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George
GP1508
~m:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Weems, George (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
GP1509
~~m:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
GP1510
.Arom:
'9';-o:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
..
GP1511
.A_om:
97o:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
GP1512
s;::
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
GP1513
..Aom:
~:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
Delivered: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
GP1514
~om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34:26 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 29, 2016 10:35:34 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1515
~m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - lrvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34:26 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 29, 2016 10:36:19 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
I ..
GP1516
-om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back
to me, that is fine, too.
Thanks,
Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
. 0 2 ) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Monday, February 29, 2016 10:32 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Green, Robin C (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: TENORM fact sheet
Sent:
George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blue ridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, timelines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested from
the Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!
Regards,
GP1517
-om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - lrvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Sent: Monday, February 29, 201610:34:26 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, February 29, 2016 11 :08:33 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1518
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
._ase schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George
GP1519
~om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Monday, February 29, 2016 11:31 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
Swipe ssamples
AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492
~TICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use' of the individual or
~ity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
GP1520
t'-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Monday, February 29, 2016 11:34 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
samples
Hello again George: I forgot to mention that the chain of custody of those swipe samples would have started with me.
Thanks
Regards
AJ
AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492
https://prd .chfs.ky .gov/Rad ePavI
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
~ying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
._=
GP1521
..Aom:
~nt:
To:
Subject:
GP1522
e!~:
To:
Subject:
George;
Meeting scheduled for tomorrow mo ring!
George
GP1523
GP1524
1-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from Saturday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you heard
anything from Curt? Do we know what came out yesterday?
-bject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Do you have a list of p~rticipants?
George
1
GP1525
GP1526
#m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
George;
George;
Meeting scheduled for tomorrow moring!
George
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Jon;
- h the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
1
GP1527
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
--
~-
-.
George
GP1528
~~:
To:
Subject:
Robin;
Thanks for taking time from your busy day for me to share correspondence with you regarding the event surrounding
the waste received by Blue Ridge Landfill.
George
George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
~ou think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back
, . . .me, that is fine, too.
Thanks,
Robin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564~6716 ext 4673
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
-Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!
GP1529
Regards,
Danny Anderson, P.E.
Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492
GP1530
m
nt:.
To:
Subject:
Attachments: .
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.
..,
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs .
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
~er Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
-me, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TE NORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is u.sed by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
fear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
n the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
GP1531
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
watering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
atering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
he dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
GP1532
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENO RM.
der the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
9u1ations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order ofthe cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
GP1533
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Y your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
~t!/ltu~
,,
'Vm.n,.~.
f:'Ji.til.i:YrJtiN.,HE.t'iLTH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:14 PM
To: Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents {including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
GP1534
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TEN ORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
GP1535
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with .
Thank you,
George
GP1536
Kalt, Brian
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject
Kalt, Brian
Turner, Tony; Ivey, Walter M
'RE: FBP - Sludge Removal Plan
Mr. Kalt,
Your disposal plan is approved. You are required to submit manifest and chain of custody information for all loads. Thanks
Office: (304)356-4303
Fax: (304) 558-0524
Email: Jason.R.Frame@WV.gov
GP1537
Mr. Frame,
1
Fairmont Brine
Processing
Date:
To:
~Rac.liation,'1"01dcsand
Re:
If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Brian Kalt
GM
Fairmont Brine Processing, LlC
412-680-6244
bkalt@fairmontbrine.com
GP1538
Waste Management
(
Meadowfill LF
enerator's Name:
WM SPWASTE PLANT
Volume of Waste:
2000
Frequency:
Year
Technical Representative:
Tons
EC#
WV/16
/12/2/2014/105835
14-10-130
John Wakin
Representative's Signature:
Date:
03-Dec-14
Phone Number:
Renewal Requirements
WCF - BIENNIAL
Conditions of Approval:
MANIFEST EACH WASTE SHIPMENT.
CONDITION #4: THIS WASTE MUST BE AERATED OVER AN
UNUSED LINED PORTION OF THE LANDFILL.
Disposal Recommendation:
Notes:
Conditions of Approval:
Page I of I
GP1539
I
west Virginia department of environmental protection
Division of Water and Waste Management
60 I 57t1t Street, SE
Charleston, WV 25304
Telephone: (304) 926-0499
Fax: (304) 926-0456
1.
~ The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Solid Waste, has
reviewed the information submitted by the Meadowfill Landfill. Based upon this
information, the WVDEP believes that this waste is not hazardous waste under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act. Consequently, a minor permit modification is granted for
the disposal of this waste at the Meadow:fill Landfill.
2.
D
3.
D
4.
This Quantity Approved is an increase of the amount allowed by the Minor Permit
Modification
granted
The above date represents an extension of the time allowed by the Minor Permit
Modification
granted
unused lined portion of the landfill until test results are obtained showing that TPH
(GRO + DRO +ORO) is less than 10,000 mg/kg, TOVs are less than 100 ppm, and if
DRO is present at more than 100 mg/kg, until total PAH is less than 100 mg/kg, and
then disposed of within 30 days of obtaining those test results.
GP1540
ID: 14-10-130
LF: Meadowfill
Page2
applicable, total PAH is less than 100 mg/kg and TOVs are less than 100 ppm,
and then disposed of within 30 days of obtaining those test results.
b. DRO < 100 mg/kg and TOVs < 100 ppm: This waste must be disposed of within
30 days of receiving the waste or this minor pennit modification, whichever is
later.
5.
6.
D After a minimum of thirty days of aeration, this waste must be tested for
and the
7. [gl Petroleum contaminated materials that are not used as daily cover shall be included in
monthly tonnage calculations.
8.
D Petroleum contaminated materials (PCM) that are used as daily cover may be excluded
from monthly tonnage calculations, provided that all of the following conditions are met:
a. Daily deposition of solid waste is confined to as small an area as practical in
accordance with the Solid Waste Management Rule, 33 C.S.R. 1-4.6.a.l.A.
b. Calculations for the amount to be used as daily cover and exempted from the tonnage
limits shall be based on an eight foot (8') vertical cell height for solid waste disposed
of daily.
c. Under no circumstances, shall the amount of PCM used as daily cover and exempted
from monthly tonnage calculations, exceed the rate of 0.14 tons per one (1) ton of
solid waste.
d. Example: A facility that receives 200 tons per day of solid waste, including PCM that
is suitable for use as daily cover, shall not exceed 28 tons per day for tonnage
exemption.
Required formula for calculation:
0.14 x tons of solid waste per day = tons of cover material permitted per day.
9.
IZl The disposal or use as daily cover of this waste must take place during nonnal working
hours, will not be exempt from assessment fees, and must be included in the monthly
tonnage report.
GP1541
ID: 14-10-130
10.
LF: Meadowfill
Page 3
11. ~ If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Kenneth Holliday at
(304) 926-0499, extension 1615 or Kenneth.C.Holliday@wv.gov.
Director
GP1542
__.(._,,'(/.;..,;t...,0.._~::;,,_;:c:;p'"'"-~-1----- 'TEL.# _ _ _ _ __ FAX# _ _ _ _ __
~,Aflil\l
E-MAIL
400
TEMP.'
'I OF
HN03 H2S04 HCL NaOH BACT NO \l~C'~
'DATE
'TIME g ~
MATRIX
~ 1Ji
W,DW.S,0,M
Yes No CONTAIN.
PRES.
CUSTOMER# _
sAMPLER {S)
LABORATORY#
10:10
PWS#~--~-------
cl..,t, / 7o'
av
t='""'---,,.-.,.----.---t..:.:.:!=---,,~,,..-----+:::='----:-=--...,.-----l SHOULD RELIANCE LABORATORIES, INC. BE AT FAULT ANO ANV DISPUTE ARISE FIEGAROING ANALYTICAL DATA GENERATED
lHE LAaOAAlORY,
DATEfTIME
'RELINQUISHED BY:
'RECEIVED BY:
THE EXTENT OF THE UASIUTV TO RELIANCE WIU. BE A DUPLICATE ANALYSIS OF THAT SAMPLE (PROVIDING
SAMPLE REMAINS) OA
A REFUND OF THE ANAl.VTICAL FEE. IN NO EVENT WILL RSLIANCE LABORATORIES BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES INCWOING BUT NDT LIMITED TO
DATE:
PRINT:
PAINT:
DIRECT, INOl~l;C:T OR CONSECUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING FROM SU'CH OJSPUTE.
ADEQUATE
TIME:
SIGN:
SIGN:
t==---------t-=~--====c=----+:=:;.._-.,,=====----1
~IiL~lf:~~:'JJ::~~~:~~~\~N~gjTIWs~~~:~v,~e~~r:~N:OODf'rigN:~~~ NOT AGUARANTEE THAT SAMPLES WILL BE
'DATEfTIME
'COURIER:
PATE:
'RECEIVED BY:
PRINT:
TRACKING#:
TIME:
SIGN:
=====------~-""=----------'-"=""----------'
ORIGINALCHAfNOFCUSTCID'f DOOUMENTMUSTBE EXECU'TSDIN INK
WiilTE. LABOAATOR'I
GP1543
\'SUCW- c:uem
Reliance
LABORATORIES
Martinsburg Laboratory
C06407
PA
Page 1of4
15233-
Lab ID
Sample ID
Sample 102
Sample Date
218683-2014-SL
501-00001
9/12/2014
The enclosed results have been analyzed according to the referenced method and SOP. Any deviations to the method have been noted on the
report. Unless otherwise noted, all results have been verified to meet quality control requirements of the method. This report may not be
reproduced, except in full, without written approval of Reliance Laboratories, Inc.
Digitally signed by Tenley
Miller
ON: en=Tenley Miller,
Reliancelabs@wvdsl.net I www.Reliancelabs.net
GP1544
),
Reliance
Martinsburg Laboratory
Certifications: WV Department of Health#: 00354, 00443 WV Department of Environmental Protection#: 158, 181
MD Department of Environment#: 336, 337 US Environmental Protection Agency#: WV00042, WV00901
LABORATORIES
Lab Number:
15233-
PA
218683-2014-SI
Sample ID:
501-00001
SLUDGE-BOTTOM OF CONCRETE BASIN
Parameter
Value
Analyte Group:
Units
Method
Date/Time Analyzed
Analyst
MDL
MCL
lnorganics
Percent Solids
SM2540B-97
9/15/2014
10:40 CT
EPA 160.4
9/15/2014
10:40 CT
SW1010A
9/18/2014
SW9045D
9/18/2014
SM4500CND-99 9/19/2014
14:25 KD
13:50 KV
9:10 KD
250
SW9030B
17:07 MC
500
~~~point
__
> 200
pH
Reactive Cyanide
8.00
<1
Deg F
S.U.
mg/kg
Reactive Sulfide
<1
mg/kg
--~--------------------------------------------------------------
9/26/2014
Remarks:
Date Sample Collected:
9/12/2014
B.PLEMONS
9/12/2014
10:10
10:50
ND
[MCL]
'Method Code: STANDARD METHODS 19TH ED; US EPA METHODS FOR THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTES, Rev. 83; US EPA METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION
METALS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES, May 1994; TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WASTE, SW-846, 3rd ED; USEPA Manual for Certification of Laboratories Analyzing
inking Water, 5th ED, In accordance with EPA Regulations, all reports, Including raw data and quality control data, are maintained by the laboratory for a minimum of 5 years.
RLl.001
GP1545
Reliance
Martinsburg Laboratory
Certifications: WV Department of Health#: 00354, 00443 WV Department of Environmental Protection#: 158, 181
MD Department of Environment#: 336, 337 US Environmental Protection Agency#: WV00042, WV00901
LABORATORIES
PA
Lab Number:
15233-
218683-2014-SI
Sample ID:
501-00001
Analyte Group:
Value
Units
Method
Date/Time Analyzed
Analyst
MDL
MCL
o-T~ehenyl (Surrogat~-----~--~----~~015~-~~~2014
TPH - GRO
790
mg/kg
SW8015B/5035 9/24/2014
4-Bromochlorobenzene (Surrogate)
115
%
SW8015B
9/24/2014
-------------~------------
18:24 MC
18:52 MC
18:52 MC
0.5
Remarks:
Date Sample Collected:
9/12/2014
B.PLEMONS
9/12/2014
10:10
10:50
ND
[MCL]
'Method Code: STANDARD METHODS 19TH ED; US EPA METHODS FOR THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTES, Rev. 83; US EPA METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION
METALS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES, May 1994; TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WASTE, SW-846, 3rd ED; USEPA Manual for Certification of Laboratories Analyzing
nking Water, 5th ED. In accordance with EPA Regulations, alt reports, Including raw data and quality control data, are maintained by the laboratory for a minimum of 5 years.
RLl.001
GP1546
Reliance
Martinsburg Laboratory
LABORATORIES
Lab Number:
Page4 of4
PA
15233-
218683-2014-SI
Sample ID:
501-00001
SLUDGE-BOTTOM OF CONCRETE BASIN
Parameter
Analyte Group:
Value
Units
Method
Date/Time Analyzed
17:21
--------------------------------
TCLP Hexachlorobutadiene**
------------
MDL
MCL
TCLP
TCLP Arsenic**
-----
Analyst
----
!~~~!~tr~~~1o~~~t~x1~~e
TCLP Trichloroethylene**
MC
--------------- -
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01
5.0
---------- ----------
10/1/2014
19:24 MC
0.003
10/1/2014
19:24 MC
0.001
0.7
10/1/2014
19:24 MC
0.002
0.5
-19:24
--------- - - 0.2
0. 001
MC
50.6
10/1/2014
19:24 MC
4-Brom~uorobe_r:izene (Surrogate)
99.6
10/1/2014
19:24 MC
Toluene-dB (Surrogate)
96.6
10/1/2014
19:24 MC
10/1/2014
0.5
Remarks:
Date Sample Collected:
9/12/2014
B.PLEMONS
9/12/2014
10:10
10:50
'Method Code: STANDARD METHODS 19TH ED; US EPA METHODS FOR THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTES, Rev. 83; US EPA METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION
METALS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES, May 1994; TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING SOLID WASTE, SW-846, 3rd ED; USEPA Manual for Certification of Laboratories Analyzing
nking Water, 5th ED. In accordance with EPA Regulations, all reports, Including raw data and quality control data, are maintained by the laboratory for a minimum of 5 years.
RLI.001
GP1547
.
M.
.
1
RE:
218683
Order No.:
14092799
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 9/25/2014 for the analyses
presented in the following report.
There were no problems with the analytical events associated with this report unless noted in the
Case Narrative .
Quality control data is within laboratory defined or method specified acceptance limits except
where noted.
If you have any questions regarding these tests results, please feel free to call the laboratory.
Sincerely,
Dr. Mo Osman
Project Manager
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
A2LA 0724.01, Alabama 41600, Arizona AZ0788, Arkansas 88-0735, California 07256CA, Colorado, Connecticut PH-0105, Delaware, Florida NELAC
E87688, Georgia E87688 aud 943, Idaho OH00923, Illinois 200061 and Reg.5, Indiana C-OH-13, Kansas E-10347, Kentucky (Underground Storage Tank)
3, Kentucky 90146, Louisiana 04061 and LAl2004, Maine 2012015, Maryland 339, Massachusetts M-OPH923, Minnesota 409711, Montana CERT0099,
New Hampshire 2996, New Jersey OH006, New York 11777, North Carolina 39705 and 631, Ohio Drinking Water4170, Ohio VAP CL0052, Oklahoma
9940, Oregon OH200001, Pennsylvania 68-01335, Rhode Island LA0003 l 7, South Carolina 92016001, Tennessee TN04018, Texas Tl 04704466-11-5,
Region 8 8TMS-L, USDA/APHIS P330-ll-00244, Utah OH009232011-l, Vermont VT-87688, Virginia 00440 and 1581, Washington C891, West
Virginia 248 and 9957C and E87688, Wisconsin 399013010
Page 1of4
Page 1 of 7
GP1548
'
..
U.)G!E$, !~lC
CLIENT:
Reliance Laboratories-Bridgeport
Project:
218683
218386-2014-SL
Tag No
Workorder
Sample Summary
WO#:
14092799
13-0ct-14
Date Collected
Date Received
Matrix
9/12/2014 IO: 10 00 AM
9/25/2014IO:15:00 AM
Sludge
Page 2 of4
Page 2 of 7
GP1549
'
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNO
~...,Jl!fllllll/I Ani11ytit:-BI L<Jbcrat.arfe~
.
IT
$,INC.
CLIENT:
Reliance Laboratories-Bridgeport
Project:
218683
Case Narrative
VIO#:
14092799
Date:
10/13/2014
This report in its entirety consists of the documents listed below. All documents contain the Summit
Environmental Technologies, Inc. Work Order Number assigned to this report.
Paginated Report including: Cover Letter, Case Narrative, Analytical Results, Applicable Quality
Control Summary Reports and copies of the Chain of Custody Documents supplied with this sample
set.
Concentrations reported with a J flag in the Qual field are values below the Limit of Quantitation
(LOQ) but greater than the established Limit of Detection (LOD). There is greater uncertainty
associated with these results and data should be considered as estimated.
Method numbers, unless specified as SM (Standard Methods) or ASTM, are EPA methods.
Estimated uncertainty values are available upon request.
Original
Page 3 of4
Page 3 of 7
GP1550
-
------
._
11
WO#: 14092799
Date Reported: 10/13/2014
Matrix
Method DF RegLvl
Run
Analyst
AKE
218386-2014-SL
001
9/12/2014 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.10
ND mg/L
Sludge
EPA8270 C
7.5
10/11/2014
218386-2014-SL
001
9/1212014 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.25
ND mg/L
Sludge
EPA8270 C
400
10/11/2014
AKE
218386-2014-SL
001
9/12/2014 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.25
ND mg/L
Sludge
EPA 8270 C
2.0
10/11/2014
AKE
218386-2014-SL
001
9/12/2014 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.10
ND mg/L
Sludge
EPA8270 C
0.13
10/11/2014
AKE
218386-2014-SL
001
0.10
ND mg/L
Sludge
EPA8270 C
0.50
10/11/2014
AKE
AKE
218386-2014-SL
001
9/12/2014 Hexachloro-1,3butadiene
9/12/2014 Hexachlorobenzene
0.10
ND mg/L
Sludge
EPA 8270 C
0.13
10/11/2014
218386-2014-SL
001
9/12/2014 Hexachloroethane
0.10
ND mg/L
EPA8270C
3.0
10/11/2014
AKE
218386-2014-SL
218386-2014-SL
001
001
9/12/2014 Nitrobenzene
9/12/2014 Pentachlorophenol
0.10
0.25
ND mg/L
ND mg/L
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
EPA8270 C
EPA8270 C
2.0
100
10/11/2014
10/11/2014
AKE
AKE
218386-2014-SL
001
9/12/2014 Pyridine
0.25
ND mg/L
Sludge
EPA 8270 C
5.0
10/11/2014
AKE
GP1551
'
RELIANCE LABORATORIES,
0
2044MEADOWBROOKROAD
POST OFFICE BOX 4657
BRIDGEPORT, WV 26330
TEL. (304) 842-5285 FAX (304) 842-5351
I()
(I)
Cl
ca
a..
E~MAIL rellancelabs@wvdsl.net
INTERNET www.RelianceLabs.net
*CLIENT NAME
.......
*ADDRESS.~~------------~~~~--~~~--.~~~~~~~~~~~~*TEL.# _ _ _ _ _ __ FAX# _ _ _ _ __
CUSTOMER # --..,....-,..,.....,,...,......------71 hL..
.. ,..
*SAMPLER (S)
LABORATORY#
INaOHiBAC.Tlp~i?s.
~
DATE:
GP1552
SIGN:
Tl~
PRINT:
DATE:
SIGN
TIME:
"RECENED BY:
C/-f7- '-(-/ Y
PAINT~ ;J
I fa 0 <.J
srGN:.l""C'4
"DATI:ITIME
WEATHERfTEMPERATURE:
D RUSH STATUSc1NmALACCEFTANcE
BY:
PAINT;
----
EXTENT OF LIABILITY
SIGN
*DA'WTIME
PWS#~~~~~~~~~.._~
*RECEIVED BY:
. 'REUNQUIStfEDBY:
PRINT:
DATE:
: PAINT:
i ~.:~I~~~: ~~~~;:~Ji.iri: ~~~..~~~~E~=s~':t~~1;?~~ SE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES INCLUOING BUT NOT LIMITED TD
SIGN:
TIME:
' SIGN;
, NarE:
L*COURIER;
JRAt::Kll\IG#:
DATE;
>TIME:
'OA'femME
'
. '
----
1. .
- -
.;..,,..;;t--v T SIGN;
_;,;S; .
i:S"t.:;:' ...
TYPICAL SAMPLE TUAN AROullll FOR .R<lUTINE. SAMPLES IS S TO 10 WORl<lNG DAYS. THIS IN NOT A GUARANreE THilT SAMPLE5 WILL BE
COMPLETED IN THIS TIME FRAME, HOWEVER. NON-llOl111NE SAMPLES MAY REQUllE ADDmONAI. Tll.IE.
jl
~~==
.~-
""""""~
"-------
;,QRIGJNALCHAJNOFCUSTDDYDOCUl.IENTMUSTBEExECllTEDININK
WHITE LABOMrORY
veu.ow - CLIENT
..
'"
MARTINSBURG, WV
www.Reliancelabs.net
Cerlif1eat1ons: WV Department of Health #: 00354, 00433 I WV Department of Environmental Protection #: 1ss, 181
MD Department of Envlr~nment #: ~36,. 33?1 US Environmen~I P(l)teclio'n Agency#: WV00042, WV00901
.
I
9/12/2014 10:10
1~stJLts:
'TIW'1K tou.
R1oaeF1ELo eus1NEss cENTER 125 qR1MsoN ciRcLe rMARr1NseuRa, wv 25403 1vo1cE: 304.ses-2084 I-FAX: 304.59e-2oaa
Page 6 of 7
GP1553
' '
Rev. 12
'
Date: 07127/13
e-...">"'l....l~~
....~-~-c-.---_.- - -
Client...............
,12-
..,.
....
Date Received:
9..,,.35~1'-l
Time Received:
Order Number:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
./oJI"
Number of Coolers/Boxes:
Shipper~
UPS
8 C..
Q.f)tf~lff
N/A
DHL
Airborne
US Postal
Walk-in
Pickup
Foam
Packaging:
Tape on cooler/box:
None
Other:._ _ _ _ _ __
N/A
C-0-Clnp~
NIA
lce_
.. ..,..r_B
Blluuee ice _ _ __
Sample Temperature IR Gun #16020459 CF
Other: _ _ _ _ _ _ __
~absent I melted
.0 ...o
.s__c
c --~-]-
N/A
NIA
NIA
NIA
NfA
~
~
NIA
NIA
NIA
q=-
N/A
N/A
**Samples with bubbles <Smm are acceptable. Indicate bubble size if >6mm. - - - - - - - Was client contacted about samples
Client contact: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Date/Time:._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~----~~
Logged in by:. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Page 1 of 2
Page 7 of 7
GP1554
-!.~:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
OK, I have attached my summary to this email. Please make any corrections necessary.,
Robin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste 11anagement
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back
to me, that is fine, too.
eenks,
Robin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
1
GP1555
GP1556
Subject:
Attachments:
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
a..er Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
. . . .me, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
~hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
W-lear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
1
GP1557
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding~
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP} Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including.
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1558
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENO RM.
~ 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.kv.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
:'Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of comrierce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.govfstatutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices ofthe commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutesfstatute.aspx?id=8505
Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
,ulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
8-i
GP1559
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
m. ~.
1.~R
v..en.
IV~"ffl>it~i!/M~rM"?JlJ:JJATJONtbl-ll::AtTH
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jor:i (EEC)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
GP1560
-----
--
--------
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
..
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
GP1561
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
..
6
GP1562
lorn:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Jamie;
Please find attached the scanned email correspondence you reviewed with me.
Please place it in TEMP0360.
Thank you,
George
-2)
GP1563
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
' -
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protedion Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
GP1564
Vou/U~
IVif;l.;.-,.,,.
...,
P~l.t\TiONAH~1t.'tH
1.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) "'."as accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TE NORM Services for
2
GP1565
--------
--
----
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
GP1566
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is . . .
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
A..
{10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) ''Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material ''TENORl\/I'' rneans N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility ofthe states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day ofthe violatio.
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional llRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
GP1567
'
-------------
----
-""'""""'
_,
f'A!:Jl.lrr101-~:&HJZJ!,LTH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents {including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
GP1568
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contacCs.hgrec! that TENQRM ~~s!e \f\l<:JS also l:Jeing shipped froll} WV as well and referr~q us to Jason
Frame. Jason/Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
GP1569
Thank you,
George
GP1570
elm:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr. Kalt;
Thank you for responding to my questions and the documents you provided us.
Sincerely,
George Partridge
KDWM
1.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
n determined to be non-hazardous.
GP1571
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
-.
..
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the sernad half pf W15, Er:JP'.~ sJydge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occ.urrirg rac:Jioa.~!iye m.a!erial
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed,
plea~e
o~.
..
let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1572
Curt;
, n k you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
GP1573
----------
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kfb..t1ii:1ir~
~,,,,.~_:!/
f'...'li~IAT1fil'~~H!V\LTH
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
4
GP1574
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1575
GP1576
elm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Curt;
Thank you for copying me on correspondence.
George
GP1577
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
~..~
'?7it;[!G~~~"i~I .
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with. a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generat.
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
GP1578
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
....-/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
~clear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test; and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
Aa:sident
,,.rmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
----------
"-------------
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1579
...
GP1580
l(rpJM~gR
.,.,it~"."
... ~"If"'''.'~ A.:. .,_,;..,,1 '\l<.u.
f<ilr'l;iHoi"'H ;;.(llh~ni:rt.t.i; n
~ny
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
GP1581
I appreciated you calllng today ana-the opportunity for us to tall< just wanted to briefly highlight: the
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1582
I~
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1583
-rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Robin;
Attached is your document with a couple of minor additions for your consideration.
Thank you,
George
OK, I have attached my summary to this email. Please make any corrections necessary.
~obin
C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
GP1584
George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline .back
to me, that is fine, too.
Thanks,
Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:32 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Green, Robin C (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: TENORM fact sheet
George:
Robin is putting together a fact sheet for what has transpired at blueridge LF and Green Valley. Facts, timelines, data,
CHFS involvement, etc. Please be available today at her request to assist her on this effort. This has been requested from
the Director's office.
Thanks for all your efforts George!
Regards,
GP1585
f#._om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
AJ,
It was a pleasure to meet you Saturday and I appreciated so much all that you and Chris did in Irvine, KY to help us
understand the situation better.
Unless something changes unexpectedly regarding my schedule, I plan to work on the documentation for Saturday's site
visit and get that to you tomorrow.
Thanks again for all your help,
George
Sent:
AJ
AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492
https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
GP1586
: f/lom:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Danny,
I made George's suggested change as well as your and Jamie's changes.
Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste 11anagement
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
Robin;
Attached is your document with a couple of minor additions for your consideration.
Thank you,
George
From: Green, Robin C (EEC)
OK, I have attached my summary to this email. Please make any corrections necessary.
~inC.Green
~vironmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
1
GP1587
George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or ..A
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back.9"
to me, that is fine, too.
Thanks,
Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
GP1588
"'-egards,
Danny Anderson, P.E.
Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492
GP1589
.rom:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
'
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to.capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan .
. .'s sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
GP1590
-----
--------------
- - -
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
--
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there ar:ialytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1591
GP1592
Regards,
Kr!!!~
t'Jl.DlATlOit~~Jl~\lTH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
.A
9"
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
--------------------.. - - - - - - - - - - - The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
4
GP1593
------------------------
--------
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TE NORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1594
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
gy~stJQns I h(!v~ or inf()rrnC!tiQD ln~~d_will be directed to your attention tbr9ugh fQfrn?l
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1595
Aa,m
..,.nt:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
GP1596
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un~anted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
From:
[ mailto: BKalf@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material -
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
2
GP1597
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
-rrently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
.412-680-6244
~hi=~~;;;ddressed. cont~ud;;
trmation contained in
Its
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1598
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
..
GP1599
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
502-564-1492
~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~!'anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
a.:
Ynnflii:J(/ff.":;,,
IW:,~~-...Y
rw.tJlA'flDl'~&.Htl:JJ.rH
From: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
To:
Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
GP1600
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1601
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed .
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
I
I
e
7
GP1602
m
. .nt:
To:
Subject:
Robin;
Thank you,
George
Danny,
I made George's suggested change as well as your and Jamie's changes .
_..i.obin C. Green
wironmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
GP1603
OK, I have attached my summary to this email. Please make any corrections necessary.
Robin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division ofWasteManagement ~
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Robin;
Thanks for taking time from your busy day for me to share correspondence with you regarding the event surrounding
the waste received by Blue Ridge Landfill.
George
From: Green, Robin C (EEC)
George,
Here is what I have put together as a start. I'd be happy to sit with you and compile more items, or
if you think it would be better for you to review your information and email a revised timeline back
to me, that is fine, too.
Thanks,
Ro bin C. Green
Environmental Scientist
Solid Waste Branch
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, Ky 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4673
GP1604
GP1605
Subject:
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:48 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Swipe ssamples
AJ
AJ
AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
1
GP1606
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying ofthis communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
GP1607
8aom
~~t:
To:
Subject:
George:
I thought you might find this interesting. The below graybar in tempo contains documents/application from when the LF
tried to permit the Martha oil waste.
Al998
APE19960003
Regards,
Danny Anderson, P.E.
Solid Waste Branch Manager
Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2nd Floor
Frankfort, KY 40601
Office: 502.564.6716 ext. 4664
Fax: 502.564.3492
GP1608
8a,m
~nt:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
All,
George received additional information last night about events of July 21, 2015. He and I have
made some additions to the timeline based on this information. New version is attached.
Thanks,
Robin
I. .
1
GP1609
-----------------
July 16, 2015 - Fairmont Brine sent a letter to West Virginia's Office of Environmental Health
(WVOEH) notifying WVOEH of their intent to send their waste stream to Advanced TENORM for
processing and then disposal at a Kentucky landfill.
2.
July 21, 2015 - Staff at WVOEH contact staff of Kentucky's Cabinet for Health and Family
Services (CHFS), Radiation Health Branch (RHB) about the proposed disposal of TENO RM in a
Kentucky class D landfill. At 1:19 pm, staff of RHB emailed WVOEM restating an earlier
conversation that there were currently no regulations in Kentucky regarding TENO RM and that
each landfill may have their own limits for the acceptance of radiation levels.
3.
July 21, 2015 - At 3:02 pm, staff of WVOEM notified Fairmont Brine that their disposal plan was
approved and that Fairmont Brine was required to submit manifest and chain of custody
information for all loads.
4.
July 21, 2015 - At 9:45 pm, a different staff member of RHB contacted WVOEM stating that due
to the Compact between Kentucky and Illinois, radioactive materials from WV could not be
brought to Kentucky for disposal, but also deferred to staff of the Division of Waste
Management, Solid Waste Branch (SWB) regarding disposal of hazardous NORM or TENO RM
materials at Kentucky landfills. In addition to the DWM Hazardous Waste Branch staff who were
notified, a SWB staff member was intended to be copied on the email from RHB, but the staff
member's name was typed incorrectly.
5 . July 24, 2015 through November 16, 2015- Illegal dumping of TE NORM materials in Kentucky
occurred at Blue Ridge Landfill.
6. January 13, 2016 -A consultant contacted a SWB staff member with an allegation of illegal
disposal of TENO RM in Kentucky.
7. January 18, 2016- The consultant notified a SWB staff member that WVOEH staff had been
notified of the allegations as well.
8. January 19, 2016-WVOEH staff emailed RHB staff stating that no response to the July 21, 2015
email had ever been sent by the SWB.
9. January 28, 2016 -SWB staff contacted WVOEH about the consultant's allegation. WVOEH staff
member copied email from July 21, 2015 to SWB staff member. SWB staff member sees email
intended for him, but incorrectly addressed.
10. February 22, 2016- Division of Waste Management (DWM) sent a notice to solid and special
waste facilities owner and operators notifying them of the issue and the applicable statues and
regulations.
11. February 26, 2016 - DWM employees met with representatives of Blue Ridge Landfill to obtain
additional information about waste shipments and disposal procedures.
12. February 27, 2016 - DWM and CHFS employees conducted radiation surveys at nearby school.
13. February 28, 2016- Estill County hires Eco-Tech to perform additional radiation surveys.
GP1610
...,m
~nt:.
To:
Subject:
Danny;
Thank you for sharing this! I look forward to reviewing the documents.
Thanks again for all you are doing regarding the Blue Ridge Landfill and Irvine, KY.
I wish you and the others in our Division the best as you proceed with the meetings today.
I am grateful to you all!
Thanks again,
George
GP1611
~m
.,.nt:
To:
Subject:
GP1612
8a,m:
~:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34:26 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:43:04 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
GP1613
"'-rom:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: Photos from Site Visit to Advanced TENORM Services
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 11 :55:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:43:09 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1614
- - - ------------
tt#,,rom:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
See attached photos from Google Earth. This is runoff from Blue Ridge.
We need to investigate the discolored water. There could be leachate impacts to surface water, and the surface water
could be a pathway for both dissolved and particulate constituents.
GP1615
~rom:
.-;~nt:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Please note that prior to 6-20-12, the drainage was not red.
Were this naturally-occurring geologically-derived iron, it would probably not have started in 2012.
Cc: Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)
I,,
We need to investigate the discolored water. There could be leachate impacts to surface water, and the surface water
could be a pathway for both dissolved and particulate constituents.
Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653
GP1616
- - - - - - -
Subject:
--------
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
Ii
D2
I2
D2
'ordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
iu
were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
GP1617
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1618
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
~ormation on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
F-~del, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highes_t reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Nz:t
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
GP1619
3.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
HW us~s ,sQdh!msuJf9Je, ;;i :mhible c;;ompQynd wh95g predorninci.nt use is .iD thg ma nufci~turn of po1N_der~cl s()aps1 t(J.
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower~
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
4
GP1620
information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
{10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
-Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
GP1621
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=SSOS
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or non<:Q.~RliCll')Ce shall constitute a separate off~.n~e ..
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564~1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:Usecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.. ;
.~
Keo!l!J
rAtflfo.TlO'f~."""",,,.,,.r.,... n
GP1622
Danny Anderson
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frarne. Jason Frame inforrned us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
GP1623
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1624
t/lom:
Subject:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Tony;
Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the Irvine County
High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an internal meeting to discuss my
observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or at least prior to the public meeting this
evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps
~take to protect their safety and well-being until we know more (such as a reconstructive exposure assessment, etc.)
~ich will be weeks to months in the future.
I am going to list my observations a~d recommendations below and also attached a copy of an email message I sent
requesting a meeting.
We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the plans for the site
visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the exposure to the school and surrounding
area would include airborne particulate matter since the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the
school entrance. Both the school and the school grounds, particularly around the entrance and in front of the
school would experience particulate deposition.
When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of the entrance to
the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating "We are not here to look for particulates."
(That was the primary exposure of concern!).
Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattacharya not to take the "back packs" (which were the most
sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH} across the street which resulted in the grounds of the
school where the grass was, not getting surveyed for deposited particulates.
I also mentioned to Matt McKinley that the schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems, remove the existing
filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the filter to check for particulate matter
containing radionuclides. This was not done to my knowledge.
I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:
The maintenance workers at the school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters to the HVAC
systems for the school, which for one school occurs on a monthly basis.
Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the landfill,
previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when the grass on the school
1
GP1625
grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity will expose both the workers, students,
and all individuals that may be present in the vicinity when those activities are conducted.
My message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February 27th stated the
following:
"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school
building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of
landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any
concernsonisksto the public due~to present activities. They should goabouttheirnormalactivmes. TbeJisk
concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and
discuss with you."
In my text messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present activities." I still needed to
discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the school who change the filters potentially being
exposed to particulates containing radionuclides. I am also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass
about the resuspension of previous particulate deposition that occurred and has contaminated the grounds in front of
the school near the entrance.
I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday morning. Danny and I
have talked but it has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he was busy with other matters pertaining
to Blue Ridge. I appreciate all the Danny is doing and realize he has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time he
has been available to spend with me. I also realize Jon is extremely busy as well.
I am also extremely worried that individuals will die a premature death or have serious health problems in the future
from this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure and the increase incidence of cancer
and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending on exposure scenario and age at time of exposure.
I am also concerned about the operators and workers at the landfill and how .close they are working to
previollsly deposited waste. Are they maintaining a buffer distance to minimize exposure? Is the landfill
resuming their normal activities before they assess the extent of contamination? Are they continuing to let
the public drive up to the area of the working face and discharge waste materials they are dropping
off? Has the equipment at the landfill that was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a
precaution?......
I want to conclude with the following comments:
../ I appreciate being an employee in the Division of Waste Management, it represents my life's work
and vocation .
../ I could not ask for a more talented group of coworkers
../ I appreciate the leadership of our Division and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny has devoted to
listening to my concerns and observations.
I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to talk. I feel like I
have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and what I have feared would happen
and has happened in other states has now occurred in Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this
was processed TENORM rather than the TENORM that is produced at the 0 &. G drilling/fracking sites.
I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their emails when
they are away from the office!
Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your work on this
and the Public Meeting tonight.
George
2
GP1626
AA
-W
W"'c: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George
:. .
Department for Environmental Protection
Division of Waste Management
O Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
I
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
GP1627
~om:
;JS~nt:
To:
Subject:
I will be out of the office March 2-4, 2016. If you need to speak with someone please contact Jon Maybriar or
Tim Hubbard at 502-564-6716 .
GP1628
-9.om:
T~:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
GP1629
~.rom:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
GP1630
~om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
\
I
..
GP1631
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
GP1632
--------
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
GP1633
!om:
ent:
To:
Subject:
Mr. Kalt;
Thank you for copying me on this helpful information that you shared with Dr. Pendergrass.
Sincerely,
George Partridge
KDWM
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
D2
2
D2
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
!
~ation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
GP1634
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
......
delete and destroy the message.
..
GP1635
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materi.al above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
/(ftJfiir1!JIA)
.~~:~
.
.!;;~1t,,B;~~~;B~l1@fal,;~~1bri~;;;1- . . . . . . . . . . ..
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
3
GP1636
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.
a.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
4
GP1637
,.Te
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Aironmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addres.sed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
5
GP1638
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.kv.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- ProhiiJition~_-- Exernptiol'l. http://www.lrc.kv.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material {NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices ofthe commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars {$10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars {$100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TENO RM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un!"an!ed sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
~w~
1,"tZt~v..w
1~D1ATIO!iHlei.\t:rn
GP1639
Wnt:
~c: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
,
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFSDPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
GP1640
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- -
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1641
rom:
ent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
Curt;
Will you please forward the attendance list for today's meeting to those in your Branch that need a copy.
I wished so much you could have attended this meeting. I was hoping to catch you before meeting started so I could
update you on correspondence I received from Mr. Kalt associated with FBP.
Between Mr. Kalt's phone calls and correspondence he shared with me along with Jason Frame from WV, we sought to
reconstruct the sequence of contacts between the DWM, DPH, ATS, and FBS.
It was very important to Kathy and your commissioner that we confirmed the dates that the state was contacted, who
knew how the shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine were being handled and when you and others were
contacted. They were under the impression that the first contact anyone had with the state was January of this year
.lowing the contacts I had with an out of state consultant.
.
They wanted to know the date I was first contacted and when in turn I contacted you. I made a copy of that email
message for them for their records.
Also Jon Maybriar had a stack of paper and indicated it included email messages between you and me from past
correspondence and referenced an email message from February of last year.
Jamie Nielson shared a stack of email correspondence with your management and we went over it.
It is a pleasure to know and interact with you. We have been looking at TENORM for several years now and I want so
much for us to continue to do so in the future with the hopes that all that has happened will lead us to a stronger
regulatory framework for the management of this waste in Kentucky.
Thanks again for all you, Chris, and AJ have done to help and work with us. You are an awesome team!
George
GP1642
.!
GP1643
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Todd;
Thank you for your observations.
George
From: Hendricks, Todd (EEC)
Cc: Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)
: Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Green, Robin C (EEC)
Cc: Litchfield, Arline (EEC); Aldridge, Tabitha (EEC); Melton, Ken (EEC); Razavi, Mohammad (EEC)
Subject: Blue Ridge Surface Water Runoff
See attached photos from Google Earth. This is runoff from Blue Ridge.
We need to investigate the discolored water. There could be leachate impacts to surface water, and the surface water
could be a pathway for both dissolved and particulate constituents.
GP1644
rom:
ent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
Curt;
Will you please forward the attendance list for today's meeting to those in your Branch that need a copy.
I wished so much you could have attended this meeting. I was hoping to catch you before meeting started so I could
update you on correspondence I received from Mr. Kalt associated with FBP.
Between Mr. Ka It's phone calls and correspondence he shared with me along with Jason Frame from WV, we sought to
reconstruct the sequence of contacts between the DWM, DPH, ATS, and FBS.
It was very important to Kathy and your commissioner that we confirmed the dates that the state was contacted, who
knew how the shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine were being handled and when you and others were
contacted. They were under the impression that the first contact anyone had with the state was January of this year
.lowing the contacts I had with an out of state consultant.
They wanted to know the date I was first contacted and when in turn I contacted you. I made a copy of that email
message for them for their records.
Also Jon Maybriar had a stack of paper and indicated it included email messages between you and me from past
correspondence and referenced an email message from February of last year.
Jamie Nielson shared a stack of em'ail correspondence with your management and we went over it.
It is a pleasure to know and interact with you. We have been looking at TENORM for several years now and I want so
much for us to continue to do so in the future with the hopes that all that has happened will lead us to a stronger
regulatory framework for the management of this waste in Kentucky.
Thanks again for all you, Chris, and AJ have done to help and work with us. You are an awesome team!
George
GP1645
GP1646
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:19 PM
Delivered: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016
GP1647
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46 PM
Delivered: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015
GP1648
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46 PM
Delivered: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015
GP1649
~;m:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:18:39 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:56:10 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
GP1650
-om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Tuesday, March 01 , 2016 6: 14:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:19:20 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1651
..
-om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46:22 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 9:21 :11 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
GP1652
t'-cm:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:14:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Tuesday, March 01, 2016 8:41 :18 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
II
GP1653
Subject:
Attachments:
Will do George and thanks. Unfortunately, my presence was not requested by my Branch Manager at yesterday's
meeting with EEC or at last night's public meeting in Irvine. Though my Division Director did bring back a stack of copied
e-mails from your meeting, all from me, which makes it appear that I was the one who dropped the ball on the Fairmont
Brine shipments. I am somewhat surprised to see such an approach now that you and others in Solid Wastes have
uncovered the fact that our KY RCRA subtitle D municipal solid waste landfills have been accepting TENO RM
contaminated wastes for years from surrounding states from Pressure Tech, Green Hunter and others, most of which
exceeded limits for legal disposal at municipal landfills in those states where the wastes originated. Obviously, the FBP
wastes is just the tip of the iceberg. I am hoping this does not digress into a finger pointing match between our two
cabinets. I know for a fact that you and I have been trying our best to get a handle on this situation for years and to keep
KY from becoming a dumping ground for out-of-state TENO RM. Hopefully now that this whole issue is out in the open
our two cabinets can put their heads together to develop a complimentary set of TE NORM regs hopefully modeled on
Ohio's regs to prevent this from ever happening again here in KY.
I guess we will just have to wait and see how things turn out. In the meantime, I have been told to copy all of my e-mails
pertaining to this issue going back years for an open records request.
'rt
9..rakecare,
Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
v.a.,_rn -- ). ; ;,
~!..~""'."''"'
f-'.AMATIONMEJ':.t\"rl
Will you please forward the attendance list for today's meeting to those in your Branch that need a copy.
1
GP1654
I wished so much you could have attended this meeting. I was hoping to catch you before meeting started so I could
update you on c0rrespondence I received from Mr. Kalt associated with FBP.
...
Between Mr. Kalt's phone calls and correspondence he shared with me along with Jason Frame from WV, we sought to
reconstruct the sequence of contacts between the DWM, DPH, ATS, and FBS.
It was very important to Kathy and your commissioner that we confirmed the dates that the state was contacted, who
knew how the shipments of waste from Fairmont Brine were being handled and when you and others were
contacted; They were under the impression that the first contact anyone had with the state wasJanuary ofthis~year ~
following the contacts I had with an out of state consultant.
They wanted to know the date I was first contacted and when in turn I contacted you. I made a copy of that email
message for them for their records.
Also Jon Maybriar had a stack of paper and indicated it included email messages between you and me from past
correspondence and referenced an email message from February of last year.
Jamie Nielson shared a stack of email correspondence with your management and we went over it.
It is a pleasure to know and interact with you. We have been looking at TENO RM for several years now and I want so
much for us to continue to do so in the future with the hopes that all that has happened will lead us to a stronger
regulatory framework for the management of this waste in Kentucky.
Thanks again for all you, Chris, and AJ have done to help and work with us. You are an awesome team!
George
GP1655
--om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Wednesday- March 2, 2015
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46:22 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:31 :37 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
GP1656
elm:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
George,
You can use your accumulated time as you see fit to do; however I suggest using your comp time to reduce your
balance.
Lindsey
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 7:46 PM
To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Wednesday - March 2, 2015
Lindsey;
I do not ever remember feeling so emotionally drained as I am today. I have been intensely pursuing the investigation of
TENO RM since January 13th when I first received news of shipments of TE NORM to Kentucky. Not only the hours I have
in officially at work, I have been reviewing materials at home on weekends and in the evenings seeking to learn as
as I can as a path forward is developed to address what has happened in Irvine, KY.
aut9ch
When I learned of the shipments of wastes from Fairmont Brine Processing, I felt totally overwhelmed knowing from my
years of research work and teaching as a faculty member at Penn State that individuals potentially will have their lives
shortened or adversely affected from the resulting exposures that occurred in Irvine, KY this past year.
I am requesting to take some sick time to allow me to go home and rest as much as I can so I can return to work feeling
more rested than I have been lately.
I also feel I have done all I can to support this investigation. My greatest strength is my technical skills and I am available
as needed as a consultant whenever anyone has a question or requests my participation.
Otherwise, I feel we are at a point that management has some decisions to make, Advanced Disposal has responsibilities
to develop a plan and hire the appropriate consultants, and the community has been informed of what has happened in
their community.
It is time for me to stop my investigation knowing that others in both cabinets has all the information I have and
everyone knows of my concerns as well as what I feel the path forward should be.
You are my supervisor, I work for you and I look forward to returning to work and resuming the everyday activities for
which we are here.
- n d to forward requests to your attention so you can coordinate my activities and work assignments.
Last year was a good year and I enjoyed all the experiences I had from the field work at all the sites I visited.
1
GP1657
I want this to be even a better year and return to what I enjoy doing the most - resource conservation and waste
management.
I appreciate the opportunity to work for you and look forward to focusing again on the work we were doing before all
the events happened in Irvine, Kentucky.
I anticipate coming in later in the day on Wednesday - hopefully feeling better than I do this evening.
Thanks again for everything, and most importantly listening patiently to my concerns and providing helpful feedback and
guidance.
George
GP1658
Cc:
Subject:
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
v~..tutlir~
t~!Jrnnra~H~\t.r11
~t,.,~--~:!I
GP1659
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
D2
2
-~--
Di
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= {Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
2
GP1660
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes {.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem .
. .ou were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes {0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
{1 ft away)A2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
-----------~---~------------
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message .
Kalt, Brian
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
{0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr {0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency {EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour {0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana {0.009863 mR per banana).
3
GP1661
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
GP1662
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
e"!..y
or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes'. After some dewatering period on~site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
.Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
----------------------~------------
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1663
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:53 AM
To: Anderson,Danny J (EEC~; Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Mr. Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENO RM.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861to211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by C:ontrollable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm -
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has W
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:ljwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
--Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
6
GP1664
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
1
- u i r e an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs:ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
'
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
7
GP1665
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC .
412-680-6244
----------------- ----The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
..
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1666
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
..
9
GP1667
.From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
-----------------------------------------------
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and m. ay contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
ete and destroy the message.
Ii.
et,
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
1
GP1668
VoHfUeJir~
~~-.Y
r~OlATltH~JAMjzAliH
D2
2
D2
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
2
GP1669
.ou were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
. I f you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
~rce reading:
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
ose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
te and destroy the message.
GP1670
..
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/gforRa-226 and Ra~228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Th<rnks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwa~ted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
KtzJ.t/4~
'PJJ.tlIA'fi\.l'NGAH~l:tH
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
4
GP1671
'tlemen,
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's {FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan {Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
~en
soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr {0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
GP1672
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted o A
the Non-Hazardous Material.
W
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1673
A...
-~
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
: 1.
. 't!n
.
~~'
.
GP1674
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
.. Family Services(CHFS) ...
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
8
GP1675
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1676
'
.From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
~From:
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
~---- --~-
-~
GP1677
Jhankyoy_l\/lr. Ka_ltJgr the thQJQ.ugb explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us knowthatthe on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Vn"fU~
I~!.,...._
f'Jl~ftlATI-rlN~Hat1LTH
GP1678
-------------------------
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
.ead over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
1
. I n industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
D2
2
Di
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: {Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact {assumed 0.25" from source)
~ou were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
~ou were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
{1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
{10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough .
mples: (Time exposed to source)
GP1679
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
Kind Regards-,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by th. e Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA)&._
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
GP1680
.ards,
.Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext .. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un!"anted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge La'ndfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's {FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
nsoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
n determined to be non-hazardous.
..
GP1681
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen
x-ray or CT scan.
ba
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second halfof20151FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TE NORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1682
on.A
9""
Curt;
enk you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question .
George Partridge
KDWM
GP1683
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
..
Regards,
~YI1:P~J1_d~rgrn~s _pf1[)
Kt!Jt~
r~.t.t!ATlON~H~,1.;rn
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
8
GP1684
Cc:
Subject:
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period oftime
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
a...::1ose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
.,...ete and destroy the message.
GP1685
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
GP1686
',-,,~
\t~J\!Jl;fflON~H:et\LlH
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
~iographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
~he radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
{Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
GP1687
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message ..
GP1688
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
..
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM waste was being shipped from Ohio lo Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Was~e Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received .
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
9
GP1689
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thankyou again for returningmy call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
10
GP1690
....--
rAti-IA1'iOl~
'
H~.llH
-------..--- .................~-~------"'""''' , .
~m: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
GP1691
Gentlemen,
'
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
-2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TE NORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr}. The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA}, both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer}, and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management '
of the landfill?
GP1692
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
~vironmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
. e Non-Hazardous Material.
. I f anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1693
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm '
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8} shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day ofthe violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TENORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Vm.tu~."N.
IV""'"'"-~~
MEriATH'JttMEM.TH
GP1694
'Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you .
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
9
GP1695
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
'
.. -- KelittJtky dtfeS~ffOt 'teg(Hate TENORM? Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1696
Cc:
Subject:
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of.the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated .
GP1697
GP1698
Vanh~
~;~!U,.~rrr!l
ellli'1Ttot~A_H!ZJ.\t:rH
1
'
;;;~;;;;-1<~lt~-5;1;~-[~~ilt~:6K:;itt~i~~~~tbri~;:~~~]
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
Ai!_sclose, disse. minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
,..lete and destroy the message.
GP1699
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
GP1700
Rt!lm~
n..'\ts1.tr:n&NJ&J-1~.tnt
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:01 PM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
diographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
D2
2
D2
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
.xamples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
5
GP1701
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1702
.Cc:
9: Kalt, Brian
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra~128
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (o.qoo8652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kf/JJ!JJ>
r~trJA-rib1'4AJ.ii~.t<rH
.A-------~--~,,-,,,,,...............
~m: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
GP1703
Gentlemen,
'
1.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
Who rrrannfacturedtheshipping-tontainers?
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-~ay or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
(
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
GP1704
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
le
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
As
GP1705
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm '
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
VeJih~
IV....,J.!!
.
~.A~lATJbraAHlEAt.TH
10
GP1706
'
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you .
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
11
GP1707
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
'
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KD.EP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1708
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
To:
Kalt, Brian
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.
GP1709
GP1710
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
.
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~close, diss.e.minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
. . = t e and destroy the message.
-----------------------~------------
GP1711
___
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Wednesday, .March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contehts (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
GP1712
' Afiidiographic i.nspection, the radi.ation spreads out as it travels away.from the source. The. refore, the intensity
"'119the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact th.at the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
D2
2
D2
1
Accoraingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate. in feet)A2
.
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
.Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
5
GP1713
- - - - - - -
--
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
'
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*{0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)11.2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)11.2
(10 ft away)11.2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)11.2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1714
--~---.------~--------~~------------~----------------
Kalt, Brian
c: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
,&.nt:
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories.and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Somethingthatactually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra~226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
'inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 footfrom the sludge samples before you sentthem to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot trom the sludge boxe.s or 1 foot frorri the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.00022G7mR/hr). The highest reading (1 footfrom the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter,
Regards,
Cu.rt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275
. East Main Street
.
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u.nwan~ed sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
GP1715
Gentlemen,
'
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (~BP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium~ a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typic:aldrinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioac:tive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 inR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanc:ecl TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
GP1716
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom..it is addressed. Jts contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, .
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Sent: Monday,
~~
'
GP1717
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:l/www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm '
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
.-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:l/www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:l/www.lrc.ky.govI statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(11 Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww'.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TENORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of 1.:1.nwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx
10
GP1718
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
..
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
president
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. I.ts
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its c~ntents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
11
GP1719
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
'
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for IJcensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you wefe not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1720
To:
Cc:
Subject:
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive.htm
~~your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
. . . . .notified of proposed regulation changes https:Lfsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
,.
"
.,
.
----------
Kind Regards,
,.,,an Kalt
~sident
GP1721
The informati.on contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual o. r entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including\.
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must hot use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1722
9"
I
1
.ii:
GP1723
-------------
- -
'
To:
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (inclucfirig
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail and
delete cind destroy the message.
...
..A
To:
Kalt, Brian
Cc: Partridge; George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS~PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26't2016
. .
.
GP1724
,______,,___,,.,...,..,._______
~-----------
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~close, disseminate; copy or print its contents, If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~te and destroy the message.
,
------------ ------------------
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/nr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
~' I would be more .than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
I . . .ned these samples.
I
'
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
GP1725
'
---~~~~ --~--- ~~~--~--~~~~~-~-
---- ---~~--
W"'
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate readtng at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft}"2
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
6
GP1726
If you were. standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
flvou were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2 . = 0.000866 mrem, or 0.866 rem
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
~rce reading:
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
.ee
GP1727
'
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you tookthe surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If.you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you tookyour
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radiqactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples {1 foot from the sludge) was only Q,2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (lfoot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr {0.0008G52 mR/hrl As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose.of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assis.ta.nce in this matter,
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay[
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:l/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of l:lnwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org[StateServices/SCATR.aspx
-.......,-,...,.........,.~----,.,......-.~.---
"-------~-
GP1728
Gentlemen,
Each box can hold up to .25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate; a soluble compound wbose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to fqrm
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
' e n soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In 1:he second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 tnR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the d.ose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physicaUy dewaterthe sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on~site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewaterlng and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
- Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
GP1729
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
'
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Kalt, Brian
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thank you for responding to M.r. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
...
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is , . _
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
10
GP1730
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
-9>2 KAR 100:010. Defin.itions for 9.02 KAR. Chapter 10.0. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
411J{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -~ Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
{3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
D.ispos.al of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
cility
.
..
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal .in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
se of unwanted sources http:f/www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
11
GP1731
--------.- - - - ---------
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59.PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed, Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
12
GP1732
'
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was serit directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
..
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need.will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1733
<imageOOl.gif>
14
GP1734
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dr. Pendergrass,
Friday will work, but please confirm when you know for sure. The concrete basin is around 20' deep so if you could
bring a "sludge judge" or similar apparatus, we should be able to pull a sufficient volume sample.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
y attachmen ts) are confidential an. d may contain privileged information. If you a.re not an intended reci. pient you must not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
ete and destroy the message.
GP1735
'
Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing,LLC
412-680-6244
-----~--------~'
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1736
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extrernely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.
GP1737
Ki.nd Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fai.rmont Brine Processing, LLC
412~680~6244
The inf()rmation contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or, entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including.,.
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended reC:ipient you must not use, .
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents . If you receive this e-mail. in error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail ar:id
deiete and destroy the message.
'
,'
To:
GP1738
------------------------------
I-
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
e information_ contained in this e-mail is intended only forthe individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
y attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
sclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy themessage.
GP1739
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop-HSlC-A Frankfort, KY40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-:1492
~~~~~~ . ~~~~. .
.E-mail: curt.pendergrass@kv.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources.http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
'
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calciilated above backgrouOd. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law .. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to cakulate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading ~t ~ given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you ~~nt to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: (Distance from source)
6
GP1740
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
' flvou were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough .
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
~ttachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1741
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljptd;thfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
GP1742
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
~insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
- - n determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium 1J11ith barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials
above background.
This sludge is. similar
in nature to sludge generated
.
.
.
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
\
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0~0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP' s understanding
he dewatering proces.s and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
eriaJs were to be eliminated.
'
5.
Is there ana!ytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
9
GP1743
--------
--------
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted o.....
the Non-Hazardous Material.
~
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Crt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
10
GP1744
{10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and th~ Commonwealth of Kentucky;
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
".'- Prohibitions".'- Exemption. http:/lwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id::;8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
.cility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed. waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/d ph/radioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
I
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwat.ch/
' . .ose of ~nwa.nted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
1.
Ki
~~i\\~Qij
-.nl
11
GP1745
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
~"~~- tf)_ th_~ ag~l'l.Yresi;ionsibl~ fQr: the enfQrcern~nt of those stcitutes (lnd r:eEulatiom; whichjs _the Cabinet for He_alth and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
.Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e~mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-ma.il in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
12
GP1746
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. lhe DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
3. What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue
Ridge Landfill between July and November of 2015?
4. Was all the waste similar in nature?
5. Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on
management of the landfill?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1747
<imageOOl.gif>
14
GP1748
-!:=
To:
Subject:
So far I have loads almost into February, in fact the 2ih of January.
..
GP1749
-m:.
Sent:
To:
- Cc:
Subject:
Curt,
I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks
----,
--
~--
GP1750
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
.
.. .
..
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1751
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced IENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of thedewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated ..
GP1752
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:/fwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The informati<;m contained in this e~mail is intended ohly for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (in~ll.lding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must ri~{lJse,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
de,ete and destroy the message.
..
GP1753
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
...Jl.vour fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~otified of proposed regulation changes https:Lfsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
.12-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must riot use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
_.,ne FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
5
GP1754
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
~~="=-=,-~,--.~-~-7- -~~~----~~------~=-c---"~_____,___-~
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.f)endergrass@ky.gov
Website: httP:llwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at.https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be noti.fied of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
'
-;',
Dr. Pendergrass,
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
11
11
D2
D2
. 1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a _known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate. mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate. in feet)A2
6
GP1755
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= {2 mrem/hr}*(0.0208ft}"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
. o t e , at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
--esitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
--~~~~~--~~~~
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
7
GP1756
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
From:
~-~--~----~-~---=-=---~---~~~-_..,,._-,------,--_-~..,,..,,---~~--~"-~--,,."-,..-=r=<r---=~-~.,~------==o~='""~""""~--~-=--.-~------=----=-=--~
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra~228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical_ analysis by our Environmental Monitoring laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from t~e sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the _second half of 201-5, FBP's sllJdge h-a_d ex_h_ ibited very, very low levels of natural-ly o-c.curring radioac.tiv_e ___
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2?67 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section_
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
GP1757
From:
'
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. length 20', Height 6' a.nd Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2. Who manufactured the shipping containers?
Still trying to track this information down.
3.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
...... _ uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
-~ture
When soluble barium is converted to .insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP' s sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0~0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are l()Wer
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana) .
.-.ilrrently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
~atering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test; and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
GP1758
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste availab_le to help us understand the impact that will have on management'
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680~6244
The information contained in this e-mail Is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Subject: RE:
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
Subject: RE:
GP1759
(8} "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM} means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
~s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
~ioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices};
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:/lwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.-htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3} Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM} as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
issued p.ursu antto KRS 211.8..5.9. or KRS 211.8.63 an d 211.865 sha. II be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
ousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
. .noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
_._Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional llRW Disposal
Facility
-._The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposalin a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~ 502-'564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
11
GP1760
T~
Kalt,,_B.r,.,.ia,.,,ob'.._.~~~~~~~~~=~~
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together;
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The inforn;iation contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Hello Brad;
12
GP1761
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you .
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
13
GP1762
Thank you,
..
George
c __ -
-~--~-------~--~-----
<imageOOl.gif>
14
GP1763
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Thanks Jason. I would very much appreciate your accompaniment and your assistance on our visit to Fairmont Brine.
Hopefully Friday works well for you. The sooner we get these sludge samples to our lab for radioche.mical analysis, the
better.
_,..
'
GP1764
-~
From: Kalt,Brian[mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.cbm]
Sent: Wednesday, .March 021 2016 10:0.0 AM.
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
'
Mr. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of t h e '
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What .
day would work for you and or your team?
GP1765
Regards,
.rianKalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in tfil~ -e~mail is intendei:fonlyfor'the iffdividUal or ehtity-to whom it is ad<;lresse<s contents-fincluding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-ma.il and
delete and destroy the message.
----~---~~-----~~-----,,-
81jnd us. co. m_ .i.ng...to get? I am_ no_ t f.amiliar w_ith. yo.r fad.lity but I really do.n't _w_ ish to get in. a.. boat to float oil you r settl-ing
~nd or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks.like it Would be diffkultto sample.
Currently, FBP does n9t physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering bo)(es. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for d~watering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process; the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to.be eliminated .
GP1766
GP1767
'
~~~It, B:~:allto:BKalt@fuinnonllirine.com]
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only forthe individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, diss.e. minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
ete and destroy the message.
~
GP1768
~-_______,__--'-----________~----'--~'
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680.:6244
The information contained in this. e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail and
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance iri this matter,
GP1769
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
diographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second di.stance. Therefore, the equation tak.es on the form of:
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
.xamples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
7
GP1770
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
'
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1771
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we~were really hoping to-find;Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra;;226 and Ra~228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the secorid half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturallyoccurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.fa
1
.~n [mailt;,:BKalt@falnnontbrine.rom]
GP1772
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up tci 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight i.s 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, AdvancedTENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate; a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x.:ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's Sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water trecitment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP' s sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr {0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge} was only 0~8652 R/hr {0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and .United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour {0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana {0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on..:site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring rcidioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management'
of the landfill?
10
GP1773
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
I:_
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individ1.1al or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
'.
~-ioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
11
GP1774
----------
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010: Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:llwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm '
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:llwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:llwwwJrc~ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low".'Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: htfo:Hwww .chfs.ky;gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATRaspx
"'
-;'1i:
12
GP1775
'
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt.
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed, Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13 .
GP1776
------------ ----------------
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
'
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permitsfor contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1777
Cc:
Subject:
Friday is fine, but I'm not s9 sure about the sludge being easily accessible.
Thanks Jason. I would very much appreciate your accompaniment and your assistance on our visit to Fairmont Brine.
Hopefully Friday works well for you. The sooner we get these sludge samples to our lab for radiochemical analysis, the
better.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~I: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
9"ax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
1
GP1778
">.:::::
-------~------
------------------------
GP1779
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---
-~
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
502-564-3700 ext. 4183
.Ja=
~x:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
~ . i n d Regards,
Bri.an Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1780
pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard '
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidificC!tion process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.
GP1781
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
r:~: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd'.thfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww .crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
----.- - - - - - - .-.-.-------------
----~~
Kind Regards,
.rianKalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-.mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1782
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
--------
GP1783
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
~terial to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH .or WV
~.pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist; I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
c_urt Peng~_rgniss Ph[)
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 50.2-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Web~ite: http:L/www.chfs.ky.gov/dphfradioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.ccordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
GP1784
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples: (Distance from source)
'
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ftl"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*{0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
8
GP1785
412-680-6244
e information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
--
---
~-
--
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
. formation on what type of survey instru.ment you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
odel, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0'.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC} and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of be.er per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than-consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-56473700 ext. 4183
~x:502-564-1492
WE~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
GP1786
'
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium su,lfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
10
GP1787
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
...8:'atering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled .. Based on FBP's understanding
~~t~e dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management.
of the landfill?
Please s~ethe attache<:I Non-H(3Z<trdous_ W<lst~ Approval Notification Form from the_ West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous
. Material.
.
.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont .Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
8.isclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~elete and destroy the message.
-----,....,........---~----------------
------------------
GP1788
&.
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased byW
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
12
GP1789
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~~~otified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
_IJt
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
GP1790
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
'
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and i~ responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
14
GP1791
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
. George
15
GP1792
To:
Cc:
Subject:
All,
What time works best for everyone this Friday?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
. l e t e and destroy the message.
Curt,
I would like to accompany you on this visit. Thanks
GP1793
GP1794
Kind Regards,
- a n Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
GP1795
GP1796
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (incluaing
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply .e~mail and
lete and destroy the message.
.Y
GP1797
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
-------------
GP1798
r.:
To:
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
diographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the sou.rce. Therefore, the intensity
f the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread oyer a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
lOOOrem.
Radiation dose
GP1799
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1800
------.
--.--------~--
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below {make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,2267 R/hr
(0~0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr)~ As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings (lre lower than the dos.e of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
GP1801
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by .Ja.son
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate; a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemicai precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined. to be. non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
do.ctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach; or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas <:an be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature fo sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all S<Jmples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several. glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-,site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremE!IY low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
10
GP1802
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt ..
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its con.tents (induding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the senderby reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
11
GP1803
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
A...
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has . . .
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
-~-(3)~Naturatiy:occurrlng.racffuact:lvemaTeria1
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky;gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u_11.wanted sources http:f/www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
M ..
<':'.':-~:,,.
~'nett
12
GP1804
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged informr;ition. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If ybu receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
.
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon {EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call
February 26, 2016
on
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you .
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13
GP1805
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENO RM. waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us t<? Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding wa,s the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the wa_ste disposal?
GP1806
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
a.airmont Brine Processing, LLC
. 12-680-6244
GP1807
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
&,.
GP1808
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E:rnail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:flprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~nwanted sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
From: Kalt,
[mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, '201610:00 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr, Pendergrass,
..
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team? .
Cd
.
Regards,
~ianKalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents, Ifyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the. sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier e~ails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
~terial currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
GP1809
--
----
-----------
pond or don scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated. ,
GP1810
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
, ~: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~: 502-564-1492
E-mail:.curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your.fees on line at https://prd'.chfs.ky.gov/rad epav!
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwan!ed sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
. ...
-Kind Regards,
.ianKalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e7mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its co.ntents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1811
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel; 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of u~~nted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
Tt)e information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom. it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you mustnot use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1812
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
,.aiterial to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
..::pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and .thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
.Curt PencleJgra~~J'b_D
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-5.64-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
om:
D2
D2
1
-ccordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
GP1813
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)l\2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)l\2
Examples: (Distance from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)l\2
(1 ft away)l\2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)l\2
(2 ft away)l\2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)l\2
(10 ft away)l\2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs)* (0.0208 ft)l\2
(1 ft away)A2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
8
GP1814
412-680-6244
information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
,. _. -
----------.___,. ,.
---------~~..,.,,.,..."="""~~~~....,,.,,~--
Thank you Mr. Kai~ for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately{ looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environm.ental
Technologies Laboratories I don'tsee where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which .is
what we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
~formation on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
,..odel, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from t.he sludge. ls that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
. published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
~x:502-564-1492
9"-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky .govI dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epavL
9
GP1815
- ~"=,~-,,~-~-"7""-=-=~~=* ------- -~~~--~-~~"""""""~~...,...,,.~.....__,,_,____,,-=--- ~----~- --~-- ---~-- _______ . .,_ - - ,_ ~ ----- ~--~~-=-=e=-"="=-=-~---~--;-----.,.~~-=--e!-- - - -- _;:-__ ~...,,.~~~~~
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity ofwaste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate an(:! to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to tre non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used. by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge .has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive .materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC} and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana),
10
GP1816
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxe.s. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
~~atering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
~he dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please~~~ t~~ att<!fl1~<! Nof'}~Hazardo1.1s\Afaste Al:>proval Notification Formftom th~ West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
. any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
A.iisclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~elete and destroy the message.
.
.
. e l l o Mr.
Kalt~
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
11
GP1817
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased b
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices {or by past human practices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:/lwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
{301) 11 Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material {NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to complywith any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($IOO,OOO). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Bra,nch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
12
GP1818
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
~your fees on line at https:l/prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~~otified of proposed regulation changes https:f/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412~680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete. and destroy the message.
GP1819
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
L
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thank vou again for retamlngmy call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
14
GP1820
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
15
GP1821
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George,
It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which stated: "Just
Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school building to
main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of landfill. Personally
I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any concerns or .risks to
the public dt1e to present activities. They should go about their normal activities. The risk concern and exposures to
worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss with you/'.
Please work with Danny to schedule a time to meet with me to better understand your
observations and concerns.
Thank you,
Jon
Tony;
Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the Irvine County
High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an internal meeting to discuss my
observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or at least prior to the public meeting this
evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps
to take to protect their safety and well-being until we know more (such as a reconstructive exposure assessment, etc.)
which will be weeks to months in the future.
I am going to list my observations and recommendations belolN and also attached a copy of an email message I sent
requesting a meeting.
,.,
We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the plans for the site
visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the exposure to the school and surrounding
area would include..airborne particulate matter since the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the
school entrance. Both the school and the school grounds, particularly around the entrance and in front of the
school would experience particulate deposition.
GP1822
When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of the entrance to
the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating "We are not here to lookfor particulates."
(That was the primary exposure of concern!).
Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattacharya not to take the "back packs" (which were the mosL,,.
sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street which resulted in the grounds of the
school where the grass was, not getting surveyed for deposited particulates.
I also mentioned to Matt McKinley that the schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems, remove the existing
filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the filter to check for particulate matter
containing radionuclides. This was not done to my knowledge.
.A..
I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:
: The maintenance workers at the school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters to the HVAC
systems for the school, which for one school e>ccurs on a monthly basis.
! Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the landfill,
previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when the grasson the school
grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity will expose both the workers, stt.1dents,
and all fridividuals that niay be present in the vicinity when those activities are conducted.
My message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February 27th stated the
following:
"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As yo1,1 go from entrance of school
building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of
landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any
concerns or risks to the. public due to present activities They should go abol,lt their normal activities. 'The risk
concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early eveiiiiig and
discuss with you."
In my text messages I used the word ''public'' in my message and with the words "present activiti~s." I still needed to
discuss the safety and well~bein8. of tbe maintenance workers atthe school who change the filters poter1tially being
exposed to particulates containing rcidionuclides. I am.also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass
about the resuspension
of
deposition that. occurred
and has contaminated
the grou. nds in front of
.
.
. previous particulate
. .
.
. .
the school near the entrance.
,
I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday morning. oanny and I
have talked but it: has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he was busy with other matters pertaining
to Blue Ridge. I appred;;ite all the Danny is doing and realize he has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time.he
has been available to.spend With me. I .also rea.lize Jon is extremely busy as well.
I am also extremely worried that individuals will die a premature death or have serious health problems in the future
from this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure and the increase incidence of cancer
and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending on exposure scenario and age at time of exposure.
I am also concerned about the operators and workers at the landfill and how close they are working to
previously deposited waste. Are they mC1intaining a buffer .distance to minimize expbSllre? Is thE! landfill
resuming their norma.I activities before they assess the extent of contamination? Are they colltinuing to let
the public drive I.Ip t() the area of the working face and discharge waste materials they are dropping
off? Has the equipment at the landfill that was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a
precaution?......
GP1823
I appreciate being an employee in the Division of Waste Management, it represents my life's work
and vocation.
v' I could not ask for a more talented group of coworkers.
v' I appreciate the leadership of our Division and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny has devoted to
listening to my concerns and observations.
v'
I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to talk. I feel like I
have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and what I have feared would happen
and has happened in other states has now occurred in Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this
was processed TENORM rather than the TENORM that is produced at the O & G drilling/fracking sites.
J:a-lso felftiliswas tile last chance to get a message to you since management reads-their emailswhe~
they are away from the office!
Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your work on this
and the Public Meeting tonight.
George
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
.urvey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discus~;this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important\
Thank you,
George
P~ Partrirfee Jr.
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext 4651
{ieorge
GP1824
#m:
To:
Sent:
Subj~t:
Your mes~ge
To:Hatton,Tony(EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 6:14:41 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11 :57:46 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
,,
1
GP1825
..A..m:
.;:;,t:
To:
Subject:
George,
When you have a chance; give me a call. I spoke to my R2 contact, Carol Amend, and she said that she would coordinate
a meeting between ya;ll and the State of West Virginia. West Virginia may be able to shed some light on the Fairmont
Brine Processing's process. Would this be something you all would be interested in?
: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
bject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thankyou for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Prpfile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report'' provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky
hanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
1
GP1826
GP1827
#:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeri;
Could we make this call together?
I am available anytime.
Thank you,
George
GP1828
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report'' provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
~
A..
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services'' from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George
GP1829
~ro~
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ge9rge;
I have been so ov_erwhelmed by emails, phone calls, and all our activities on TENORM. I am just getting caught up on my
backlog of emails.
If I miss anything you have requested or need, I apologize.
Please send me a reminder if there is anything you requested and I have not gotten it to you.
Thank you!
George
I
1
GP1830
flom: . . ..
Piirtridge, George (EEC)
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeri;
I am still struggling to understand how a processed or treated waste frorn a primary industry (O&G) is considered
"intrinsically derived" and still meets the exemption. It goes through processing and chemicals are added to precipitate
and separate the contaminants.
Hope we can continue to get some clarification regarding this.
Look forward to our ongoing discussions and dialogue with EPA.
Thank you,
George
he process provi.de. d o.n their website. expla.. ins that they pre. treat the brine to remove Ba, Sr, TSS, O&G, turbidity and
9?rganics. It doesn't specify how they do this. I'm assuming this where the waste filters are coming from? The treated
brine is then pumped to surface impoundments, where evaporation/crystallization occurs. I'm assuming the waste
sludge is coming from (the bottom of the surface impoundment)?
1
GP1831
Also, I took a look at the analytical res.ults. Based on these results, it doesn't appear that the waste would be hazardous,
if the waste was determined to be non~exempt. To gain better insight on the results, I spoke to our EPA lab (located in
Athens, GA). He said it looked like the type of analysis usually used when waste is sent to a hazardous waste landfill,
which provides info on whether the waste meets Land Disposal Restriction requirements (which is odd, since they're
claiming the 261.4(b)(S) exemption from hazardous waste regulations). Also, in looking through the results, he said that
the material appeared to be fairly wet; it had a high% moisture and it failed the paint filter test.
&..
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report" provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received thiswaste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they plannedto dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TEN ORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
GP1832
George
GP1833
Subject:
Jeri;
I am still struggling to understand how a processed or treated waste from a primary industry (O&G) is considered
"intrinsically derived" and still meets the exemption. It goesthrough processing and chemicals are addedto precipitate
and separate the contaminants.
Hope we can continue to get some clarification regarding this.
Look forward to our ongoing discussions and dialogue with EPA.
Thank you,
George
alook at (p.
GP1834
Also, I took a look at the analytical results. Based on these results, it doesn't appear that the waste would be hazardous,
if the waste was determined to be non-exempt. To gain better insight on the results, I spoke to our EPA lab (located in
Athens, GA). He said it looked like the type of analysis usually used when waste is sent to a hazardous waste landfill,
which provides info on whether the waste meets Land Disposal Restriction requirements (which is odd, since they're
claiming the 261.4(b)(S) exemption from hazardous waste regulations). Also, in looking through the results, he said that
the material appeared to be fairly wet; it had a high % moisture and it failed the paint filter test.
-&...
"W
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
GP1835
George
I.
GP1836
rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
FOR FACILITY
Curt;
A news article that Mohammad Razavi, an engineer in our Section shared with me.
George
--------.---- - - -
---------
-.
Perhaps, this was the reason they went with BES Technologies.
The news that Antero Resources will build a massive $275 million wastewater
treatment plant to process shale brine in West Virginia wasn't a surprise for Brian
Kalt~ general manager with Fairmont Brine Processing.
The surprise was learning that Antero would be building the plant with Veolia
Water Technologies,. a branch of the French technology giant.
The Denver-based oil and gas company announced Wednesday that over the next
~wo years Veolia will design, build and operate the Sandstrom Wastewater
rreatment facility, a 60,000-.barrel-a-day plant that will evaporate and crystalize
produced water - yielding fresh water and salt products to be used by the oil and
1
GP1837
gas industry.
p~tch
Alvyn Schopp, chief administrative officer and Antero's regional vice president of
Appalachia, said the company hasn't broken any confidentiality agreements and
did not share Fairmont's drawings with anyone.
"I'm sure they are disappointed/' he said. "Fairmont and Veolia weren't the only
ones we looked at. We believe that we have been very fair with Fairmont, very
upfront with Fairmont."
Antero's contract for the existing Fairmont plant runs through 2016 and, despite a
recent pause, Mr. Schopp said the plan is to continue to send water to Fairmont
through the remainder of its contract.
After 18 months of planning, he said Antero chose the company that would deliver
"the most technologically advanced plant."
2
GP1838
ll'_e think this will be closely watched by industry to see how successful this is," he
.said. If proven to be a viable alternative to disposal wells, Mr. Schopp said he
hopes more such plants will be built.
Veolia did not respond to calls for comment.
Antero said Wednesday that Sandstrom would be part of the company's water
division, which was incorporated in November and is being negotiated for sale to
Antero Midstream, a master limited partnership partly owned by Antero.
The oil and gas driller has operations in the Marcellus and Utica shales. Unlike
some operators that focus on exploration and production, and outsource
everything else, Antero is known to prefer to have control over all aspects, said
David Meats, an equity analyst with Morningstar Inc. That way it can taitor
infrastructure to its needs and control costs.
Antero said Wednesday that when the facility is ramped up, it will amount to a
.150,000 savings on each well.
"You have to get rid of the water somehow. The need for water in tracking is huge.
If the other options were lower cost, they'd be doing that," Mr. Meats said.
Mr. Kalt said losing Antero will mean a "significant loss of revenue" for his
company. He said Fairmont will try to cobble together enough other producers to
justify building a large plant anyway.
Memo: Anya Litvak: alitvak@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1455.
Record: 15082018714642
Copyright: Copyright (c) 2015 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
,
3
GP1839
'"-=
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mohammad;
Thanks again for sharing this news article with me.
Have a nice afternoon!
George
-~-------
~The news that Antero Resources will build a massive $275 million wastewater
~eatment plant to process shale brine in West Virginia wasn't a surprise for Brian
GP1840
The surprise was learning that Antero would be building the plant with Veolia
Water Technologies, a branch of the French technology.giant.
The Denver-based oil and gas company announced Wednesday that over the next
two years Veolia will design, build and operate the Sandstrom Wastewater
Treatment facility, a 60,000-barrel-a-day plant that will evaporate and crystalize
,~-~,. _pr~oduced~wate~L~)tielding Jr:esb~wa1ecand~saJt~.PLO~d_u~cttlD~b~e~yse~d b~,t the. oi I and
gas industry.
Clearing of the site, a patch of land near Route 50 in Doddridge County, has begun,
and Antero has filed two permits with the state, one for construction and another
for air emissions, over the past two months. That's how Mr. Kalt confirmed what
he'd been hearing - that his small company's major break was at risk.
Fairmont, a sister company of Pittsburgh-based Venture Engineering, has a small
evaporation and crystallization plant in Fairmont, W.Va., where Antero is its
anchor client. The facility is a tenth of the size of.what Veolia will be building.
Mr. Kalt said his company has spent the past year and $2 million on engineering
work for the large plant, which would have been tailored to Antero's needs but
also would have room for other producers' water.
Fairmont kept Antero apprised of its progress and forwarded all drawings and
descriptions of its treatment process, he said.
"Had we known that this was a possibility, we would not have allowed them so
much access to our patented process despite the non.,.disclosure agreement and
confidentiality agreement set forth in our contract," he said.
Alvyn Schopp, chief administrative officer and Antero's regional vice president of
Appalachia, said the company hasn't broken any confidentiality agreements and
did not share Fairmont's drawings with anyone.
"I'm sure they are disappointed," he said. "Fairmont and Veolia weren't the only
ones we looked at. We believe that we have been very fair with Fairmont, very
upfront with Fairmont."
2
GP1841
__Mtero's contract for the existing Fairmont plant runs through 2016 and, despite a
pcent pause, Mr. Schopp said the plan is to continue to send water to Fairmont
through the remainder of its contract.
After 18 months of planning, he said Antero chose the company that would deliver
"the rno~ttechnolQgiqdlyadvaoc:ed_ pl~nt II
"We think this will be closely watched by industry to see how successful this is," he
said. If proven to be a viable alternative to disposal wells, Mr. Schopp said he
hopes more such plants will be built.
Veolia did not respond to calls for comment.
Antero said Wednesday th~t Sandstrom would be part of the company's water
division, which was incorporated in November and is being negotiated for sale to
,Antero Midstream, a master limited partnership partly owned by Antero .
he oil and gas driller has operations in the Marcellus and Utica shales. Unlike
some operators thatfocus on exploration and production, and outsource
everything else, Antero is known to prefer to have control over all aspects, said
David Meats, an equity analyst with Morningstar Inc. That way it can tailor
infrastructure to its needs and control costs.
Antero said Wednesday that when the facility is ramped up, it will amount to a
$150,000 savings on each well.
"You have to get rid of the water somehow. The need for water in fracking is huge.
If the other options were tower cost, they'd be doing that," Mr. Meats said.
Mr. Kalt said losing Antero will mean a "significant loss of revenue" for his
company. He said Fairmont will try to cobble together enough other producers to
justify building a large plant anyway.
GP1842
f#-,
Sent:
To:
Subject:
C::urt;
Article that Mohammad shared with me that mentions Green Hunter, one of the firms that shipped wasted to Blue
Ridge Landfill.
George
Section: PublicPolicy
COLUMBUS, Ohio, Feb. 18 -- The Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition issued the
following news release:
Citing serious public health and safety concerns, environmental and community
groups opposed to barging of tracking waste sent a letter to the U.S. Coast Guard
requesting thatth~ agency immediately initiate investigative action related to
GreenHunter, LLC to determine the true contents of waste that GreenHunter, LLC
may be transporting by barge on inland waterways, including the Ohio Riv.er and
the Mississippi Riv~r, both, sources of drinking water for millions of people.
The letter of February 17, addressed to Captain Richard Timme, also requests the
Coast Guard to issue a 11 cease and desist 11 order to Green Hunter, LLC to stop
transporting any 11 oilfield wastes" while the Coast Guard .makes its determination
. o f what exactly is being ship~e~_by the company. Additionally, the gro~p~: !etter
equests the Coast Guard to 1nit1ate an "enforcement penalty proceeding 1f,
I
indeed, the Coast Guard finds GreenHunter in violation regarding possible
<
GP1843
GP1844
Green Hunter's operations and stop them from any activity which endangers our
,water!".
One only needs to consider the recent events of Charleston and Fayette County,
West Virginia and Toledo, Ohio to grasp the enormity of the consequences of
losing - even temporarily - a source of drinking water.
February 18, 2015
United States Coast GuardO
Sector - Ohio Valley
.TTN:
SUBJ: Request for Investigative Action: GreenHunter LLC Dear Captain Timme:
We are a coalition of grassroots and nongovernmental organizations which have
long and actively opposed the allowance of barge shipments of oil and gas drilling
wastes from hydraulic fracturing (tracking) - what the Coast Guard calls "shale gas
extraction wastewater," or SGEWW - on inland waterways.
We filed comments in the Coast Guard rulemaking as directed, via Regulation.gov,
and our members include persons imminently threatened with environmental and
health hazards by the content of "SGEWW" which may leak or be volatilized or
burned if barge shipment is permitted in your district. We are copying US EPA
Region IV in Atlanta which has jurisdiction over the Ohio River. Emergency
remediation and incident command control measures by the USCG and US EPA
would be needed if this SGEWW is allowed to be shipped. No public notice has
. .een given to first responders along the banks of the river that SGEWW shipments
would be allowed to commence in order for first responders to be given the
requisite training and response equipment to deal with the probable
GP1845
It is with growing concern that we have witnessed the unfolding controversy in the'
past three weeks, in which GreenHunter LLC has insisted during investor
presentations thatthe.firm has received Coast Guard permission to ship oil and
gas drilling wastes via barge onthe Ohio and Mississippi river systems.
~~~ ~Gr:eenHunte.r:rwhtch.has~he.en.~pursuing_p~e[mis.sloJ1!o~sllip_f ra___t:_kLng .wastesJo r . ~~-~-~~
more than two years, has departed from its original scheme to add those wastes
to the Coast Guard list of legal cargoes, and now insists that Captain Richard
Timme has authorized "oilfield wastes" to be river-transported under the terms of
Navigation and Inspection Circular 7-87. As you know, Dr. Cynthia Znati of the
USCG HQ has publicly denied that SGEWW is a permitted cargo for Ohio River
barge shipment, in part, because of the 70,000 comments received that must be
reviewed, some that include evidence of the radioactivity in the sludge
components which pose risks greater than that of classical "oilfield waste. 11
We're gratified that Dr. Znati's response to our concerns and news media
questions, correctly communicated the meaning of Captain Timme's
correspondence with GreenHunter, and that the agency is still deliberating the
. question ofwhether USCG would permit SGEWW to be shipped.
GP1846
---
-------
- - -
without legal authority. Regulation does not turn on semantic differences, but
_.stead, on physical evidence. In the instance of transporting radioactivity-laced
pdustrial toxins on public waterways, the lack of evidence of the true nature of
GreenHunter's cargoes is of grave concern. Therefore, we ask that the Coast Guard
Criminal Investigative Service be asked to examine the contents of the current
shipments and the dockside tanks owned by Green Hunter. If these contain
SGEWW_as we beli~v~ th_~y do, we a_S_k the CGCIS to initiate enforcement penaJty
proceeding or criminal information proceeding in consultation with the Office of
the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio.
The Ohio and M,ississippi rivers are a source of drinking water for millions of
people. A January 2015 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
study of the tracking waste stream in Pennsylvania showed that inadequate
traceability and public protections are in place to handle the at-times highlyradioactive tracking emissions and wastes. That study, found here, has prompted
reconsideration of Pennsylvania's weak regulations. Among other findings, tracking
waste liquids (SGEWW) contained levels of radioactivity in excess of 26,600 pCi/L.
1 (Copy of pages excerpted from study enclosed). The federal drinking water
.tandard is 5 pCi/L. Leakage of GreenHunter cargoes into river waters in the
present circumstances, where the company insists it need not test or characterize
its "oilfield wastes" could be catastrophic, and at a minimum, could pose
continuing environmental and health hazards which would stress public water ,
supplies and various forms of wildlife.
For these reasons, we urgently request that the Coast Guard act immediately to
initiate a criminal investigation of operations associated with GreenHunter LLC.
Pending discovery of the contents of any barges and storage tanks, including
records of contents of any barge shipments, to issue an immediate cease and
desist order to Green Hunter to halt any shipments of "oilfield wastes" regardless
of the origins claimed by Green Hunter LLC.
'
'
Given Green Hunter's impunity in asserting that they will not follow the USCG HQ
Hazardous Materials Branch Directive, an immediate cease and desist order should
~ccompany the USCG CGCIS to visit to this shipper's site and its barges to take
evidence of the SGEWW movement that would be admissible in the courts.
5
GP1847
A..
'W
Teresa Mills
~-------~~J9 P~Jkri~g~-c~_u_r_L ------~----------- ___________________________________ -~---~--~---~---------~.~~---
GP1848
tl'ashington, DC 20590-0001
Signatories:
Concerngd C:iti~ens Ohio/Shalersville
Mary Greer
Shalersville, OH
Freshwater Accountability Project
Leatra Harper
Grand Rapids, OH 43522
.outheast Ohio Alliance to Save Our Water
Senecaville, OH 43780
Concerned Citizens of Medina County
Kathie Jones
Medina, OH
CCLT/Uniontown IEL Superfund Site & Stark
County Concerned Citizens, Christine Borello
Plain Township, Ohio
GP1849
Greg Pace
Guernsey County, OH
Morrow County Power
Mt Gilead, OH
Radioactive Waste Alert
Carolyn Harding
Columbus, OH
Defenders of the Earth Outreach Mission
West Virginia
8
GP1850
.heeling, WV
Ohio Alliance for People and Environment
Dr. Joseph Cronin
Yellow Springs, OH
Buckeye Forest Council
Heather Cantino, board vice chair
Columbus, OH
Concept Zero Student Group
~avid Nickell
9
GP1851
Carol Apacki
Licking County, OH
Jefferson County Ohio Citizens for
Environmental Truth
Jonathan Smuck
Steubenville, OH
Cumberland Chapter Sierra Club
Judy Lyons, Chair
Lexington, KY
10
GP1852
-ana Ludwig .
McDonald, OH
FaCT - Faith Comml1nJties Together
Ron Prasek, Convener
Ohio
Frackfree Mahoning Valley
Susie Beiersdorfer
II
Youngstown, OH
T r um bu 11 County, OH
11
GP1853
Coshocton, OH
Communities United for Responsible Energy
Caitlin Johnson
Youngstown, OH
Concerned Barnesville Area Residents
John Morgan
Belmont County, OH
Appalachian Ohio Sierra Club
Loraine Mccosker
12
GP1854
Athens, OH
13
GP1855
Mohammad;
Thank you,
George
GP1856
of what exactly is being shipped by the company. Additionally, the groups' letter
requests the Coast Guard to initiate an "enforcement penalty proceeding" if,
indeed, the Coast Guard finds Green Hunter in violation regarding possible
shipments of "shale gas extraction wastewater," or SGEWW.
For the past two years, GreenHunter, LLC has been seeking U.S. Coast Guard
~~-P~ermissio~n~to~tr:ans.p_ortfcatkjngJ,yaste oJ1theJ)hio Riv~r or othe?r inland
'
~-~-~-- ~-~,~,
waterways.
The group's letter references a statement by Kirk Trosclair, COO of GreenHunter to
the Wheeling Intelligencer {2/6/15), "GreenHunter Water will continue to
transport 'oilfield waste' until such time as the Coast Guard ultimately decides on
the proper definition of 'shale gas extraction waste water' and the rules under
which such waste water can be transported. Once these rules are finalized,
GreenHunter will comply with these rules and regulations."
The group reads Trosclair's statement that GreenHunter 'will continue to
transport' to mean that the company is actively shipping drilling wastes now, with
impunity and without legal authority."
.
t
"
i
Currently, tracking waste has too many legal exemptions, trade secrets, and
euphemisms associated with it making it difficult to ascertain the precise
components of the tracking waste. This in itself makes this situation not your
typical shipment fortransport down the Ohio River. Obviously, the Coast Guard
needs to know exactly what substances are being transported on the waterways
so that they can protect the public interest.
Dr. Randi Pokladnil< says she "is concerned with the ability of local public drinking
wate~r systems to remove the numerous aromatic organic, carcinogenic and
endocrine disrupting chemicals contained in wastes from shale gas extraction."
"Just the thought of toxic and potentially radioactive unconventional gas well
waste being shipped by barge on the Ohio River sickens me" says Robin Blakeman,
organizer with the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition in Huntington, WV. "I, anda.
three generations of my entire immediate family get our tap water from the
,..._
Huntington, WV intakes. I am appalled that a company like Green Hunter would
2.
GP1857
try to subvert the Coast Guard's authority and may already be shipping this
~oxious substance by barge, as well as by truck near the river's edge. I hope the
.oast Guard and the us EPA will do everything in their power to fully investigate
Green Hunter's operations and stop them from any activity which endangers our
tap waterl"
One Qnlyneeds to consider the recent events ofCharlestonandayette-County,
West Virginia and Toledo, Ohio to grasp the enormity of the consequences of
losing - even temporarily - a source of drinking water.
February 18, 2015
United States Coast GuardO
Sector - Ohio Valley
600 Martin Luther King Jr. Place
-uisville, Kentucky 40202
ATTN: Captain Richard Timme
SUBJ: Request for lnvestig~tive Action: GreenHunter LLC Dear Captain Timme:
We are a coalition of grassroots and nongovernmental organizations which have
long and actively opposed the allowance of barge shipments of oil and gas drilling
wastes from hydraulic fracturing (tracking) - what the Coast Guard calls "shale gas
extraction wastewater," or SGEWW - on inland waterways.
We filed comments in the Coast Guard rulemaking as directed, via Regulation.gov,
and our members include persons imminently threatened with environmental and
health hazards by the content of "SGEWW" which may leak or be volatilized or
burned if barge shipment is permitted in your district. We are copying US EPA
ion IV in Atlanta which has jurisdiction over the Ohio River. Emergency
remediation and incide,nt command control measures by the USCG and US EPA
would be needed if this SGEWW is allowed to be shipped. No public notice has
3
GP1858
been given to first responders along the banks of the river that SGEWW shipments
,..
would be allowed to commence in order for first responders to be given the
requisite training and response equipment to deal with the probable
consequences of SGEWW release or ignition.
It is with growing concern that we have witnessed the unfolding controversy in the
~~--,pas~Lth(e~e~~e~e_ks,,Jn_whicbGre_enl:Lunt..er L.LC,has insistect dl1J:ing_investor ___
presentations that the firm has received Coast Guard permission to ship oU and
gas drilling wastes via barge on the Ohio and Mississippi river systems.
GreenHunter, which has been pursuing permission to ship tracking wastes for
more than two years, has departed from its original scheme to add those wastes
to the Coast Guard list of legal cargoes, and now insists that Captain Richard
Timme has authorized "oilfield wastes" to be river-transported under the terms of
Navigation and Inspection. Circular 7-87. As you know, Dr. Cynthia Znati of the
USCG HQ has publicly denied that SGEWW is a permitted cargo for Ohio River
barge shipment, in part, because of the 70,000 comments receive~ that must be
reviewed, some that include evidence of the radioactivity in the sludge
components which pose risks greater than that of classical "oilfield waste."
We're gratified that Dr. Znati's response to our concerns and news media
questions, correctly communicated the meaning of Captain Timme's
correspondence with GreenHunter, and that the agency is still deliberating the
question of whether USCG would permit SGEWW to be shipped.
We were therefore surprised when GreenHunter LLC defied the USCG authority
over SGEWW shipments by publicly stating its intention to ship these mixed
radioactive and toxic chemical sludge wastes.
On. February 6, 2015,Kirk Trosclair, COO of GreenHunter, told the Wheeling
Intelligencer that, "GreenHunter Water will continue to transport 'oilfield waste'
until such time as the Coast Guard ultimately decides on the proper definition of
'shale gas extraction waste water' and the rules under which such waste water can
be transported. Once these rules are finalized, GreenHunter will comply with these
rules and regulations."
(http://www.theintelligencer.net/page/content.detail/id/624568/Radiation~
Concerns-Coast-Guard~html).
4
GP1859
..
--
--------------
-------
.
. Given GreenHunter's
impunity in asserting that they will not follow the USCG HQ
Hazardous Materials Branch Directive, an immediate cease and desist order should
GP1860
accompany the USCG CGCIS to visit to this shipper's site and its barges to take
evidence of the SGEWW movement that would be admissible in the courts.
Please respond immediately respecting the Coast Guard's planned response to
GreenHunter's defiance of the USCG authority over SGEWW in current and past
barge shipments. Thanking you in advance,
Teresa Mills
2319 Parkridge Court
Grove City, OH 43123
On behalf of the signatories that are provided on the following page.
cc:
RADM Kevin Cook, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Hale Boggs Federal Building,
500 Poydras Street
New Orleans, LA 70130
Office of Investigation, Coast Guard Criminal Investigative Service
245 Murray Dr. - Bldg. 410 Stop 2600, Washington, DC 20528
James Giattina, US EPA Region IV,
61 Forsyth St. Atlanta, GA 30303
Dr. Cynthia Znati
U.S. Department of Transportation
6
GP1861
.~-
---------
:. .atra Harper
Grand Rapids, OH 43522
Southeast Ohio Alliance to Save Our Water
Senecaville, OH 43780
Concerned Citizens of Medina County
I
'
Kathie Jones
Medina, OH
CCLT/Uniontown IEL Superfund Site & Stark
nty Concerned Citizens, Christine Borello
Plain Township, Ohio
7
GP1862
Columbus, OH
Defenders of the Earth Outreach Mission
Rev. Monica Beasley-Martin
Youngstown, OH
Southeastern Ohio Fracking Interest Group
Betsy Cook
Lowell, OH Washington County
West Virginia Sierra Club
Jim Sconyers
Co-Chair, Marcellus Campaign
8
GP1863
"'est Virginia
Center for Health, Environment and Justice
Ohio field office
Teresa Mills
Columbus, OH
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
Robin Blakeman
Huntington, WV
-CT-OV
Patricia Jacobson
Wheeling, WV
Ohio Alliance for People and Environment
Dr. Joseph Cronin
Yellow Springs, OH
Buckeye Forest Council
Heather Cantino, board vice chair
umbus, OH
Concept Zero Student Group
9
GP1864
David Nickell
West Kentucky Community College, KY
Southwest Ohio No Frack Forum
Joanne Gerson
Cincinnati, OH
Athens County Fracking Action Network
Roxanne Groff, steering committee member
Athens, OH
Licking County Concerned Citizens for Public
Health and Environment
Carol Apacki
Licking County, OH
Jefferson County Ohio Citizens for
Environmental Truth
Jonathan Smuck
Steubenville, OH
Cumberland Chapter Sierra Club
Judy Lyons, Chair
10
GP1865
"'xington, KY
Frackfree America National Coalition
Diana Ludwig
McDonald, OH
FaCT - Faith Communities Together
Ron Prosek, Convener
Ohio
Frackfree Mahoning Valley
sie Beiersdorfer
!. .
Youngstown, OH
Guardians of Mill Creek Park
Lynn Anderson
Youngstown, OH
Clean Water Action Pennsylvania
Steve Hvozdovich
Pittsburgh, PA
- A r e Not Expendable
John Williams
11
GP1866
Trumbull County, OH
People for Safe Water
Marilyn Welker
Springfield, OH
Network for Oil and Gas Accountability and
Protection Vanessa Pecec
Concord Twp., OH
Coshocton Environmental and Community
Awareness
Nick Teti
Coshocton, OH
Communities United for Responsible Energy
Caitlin Johnson
Youngstown, OH
Concerned Barnesville Area Residents
John Morgan
Belmont County, OH
Appalachian Ohio Sierra Club
12
GP1867
,raine Mccosker
Athens, OH
Northwest Ohio Alliance to Stop Fracking
Leslie Harper
Wheeling Water Warriors
Robin Mahonen
Wheeling, WV
Friends of Bell Smith Springs
.;rnstearns
Stonefort, IL
Food & Water Watch
Alison Auciello, Ohio organizer
Cincinnati, OH
[Category: Environment]
TNS 24HariCha 150219 30FurigayJane-5034306 30FurigayJane
Memo: Teresa Mills, 614/507-5651, tmills@chej.org
. . Index terms: Trade Associations; Press Releases
. . . . Dateline: COLUMBUS, Ohio
Record: 5034306
13
GP1868
f/!om
:~;
To:
Subject:
AJ;
Please send me the analytical results from all the wipe samples that we collected that day and I will incorporate it with
my notes, the coordinates, etc.
I want the results from the school as well. Ideally, I would like to see us merge the our reports and conclusions since
this was a join effort.
Thank you,
George
______
____________ ______
......,,..;
od morning George:
' . . supervisor Curt Pendergrass is requesting any documentation that would accompany the swipe samples we took on
the field in front of the landfill entrance, done at different locations on either side of the entry access road to the facility.
If you recall these are samples F-1 through F-9 taken 12/27/16. I would appreciate it if you can scan and send me the
report which could be a short narrative and would include the readings, GPS locations and a sketch (or map) of the
approximate area at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your consideration.
Best Regards
I
I
AJ
AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40601
Ph: 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492
https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
GP1869
--om:
:nt
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Here is the breakdown on the manifests; some material left off; some unreadable.
GP1870
To:
Subject:
George;
I am still waiting and requesting the results from all the wipe samples that were taken, both for the school as well as the
ones we took surrounding the entrance to the landfill.
I asked Matt at the meeting the names of others there and he could not remember their names. Said it would be in
there reports. Hopefully I will get a copy we can combine with our notes.
The names I have are to the best of my recollection:
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from Saturday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you heard
anything from Curt? Do We know what came out yesterday?
George
GP1871
..
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Do you have a list of participants?
__
__
__
Jon;
.
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KV, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activit.ies conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where. we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
GP1872
~om:
To:
S~!'t:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Pendergrass, Curt (CHfS DPH)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:57 PM
Delivered: RE: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016
GP1873
Sent:
Subject:
Your messagf3
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
. Subject: RE: RE: Meeting Attendance List of March 1, 2016
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:57:21 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:07:39 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1874
#om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ct1rt;
Thanks you for responding to Mr. Kalt regarding the measurements that were shared regarding the waste. Most of all,
thanks for following up on obtaining samples of the waste that was shipped.
I am happy to join you for any trips or sites visits to assist with all we need to learn about the waste.
Thanks again for all you are doing!
George
GP1875
~
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
To:
~~~--~cc:PartriClge~ GeoFge-(EEC};McRTfiley;-MattneWW"(CRS=PHr~~-~-
-~ ~- ---~------------
' -----~------- -
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
D2
2
11
12
D2
l
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 rriR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
GP1876
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2
---te, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(lg ~_away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
'dRegards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412--680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1877
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
ra.diochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a Uttle more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. ls that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
- -- --"'--
-~---
.- __,___
,_.-~~---~--~~-..-~,,.....-
_;-_-___ :
--~~--~-~~-.
~~~
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC} and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky,govI dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees online at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulatfon changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~m.\lanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
To:
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
GP1878
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
-----
'
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non~hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of.
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 201.5, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
. A..ove. background. The average. reading of all s~mples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267. R/hr (0.000?267
~/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr): As published by the
.Nudear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removecl via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering pedod on-:site, the boxeswere received by Advanced TE NORM Services for
dewateririg and solidification, as appropriate to Pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering pro~ess and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be ellminated.
.
5. Is th~re analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on rpanagement
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non"'.Hatardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysisthat was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know .
. . Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
5
GP1879
412.:680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail ls Intended only for the individual or entity to whom It Is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If yqu receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.govfstatutes/sfatute.aspx?id=8502
{3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material {NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
6
GP1880
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
E-m.ail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:l/secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
ri_
" .
~~~
GP1881
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents {including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
From:
To:
Kalt, Brian
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred u.s to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
GP1882
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my ccill yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1883
To:
Subject:
Mr. Kalt;
Thank you,
George Partridge
KDWM
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1884
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading_ is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this '
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind 'releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter;
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, lfadioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS:LC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR,aspx
D2
2
D2
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
2
GP1885
,.,6J;lh
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Examples:
(Distance fr()rn ~()urce)
---- -
---
---
' -
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(~ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
41i1t1sitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the det~ctiOn equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: {Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes {.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
-dRegards,
Brian Kalt
3
GP1886
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of.2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC} and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses ofbeer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
GP1887
From: Kalt,Brian[mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.coni]
Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
sent:
- fo:Part:i-1ci9e~Geor9e-(EEc);--Pencier9rass,-curt-(tt=ii=sbPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 4.7 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's(FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics'and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 fons of material.
4.
FBP uses sod.iurn sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to .
capture barium, a toxic constituent in sdme brines, as barium sulfate and to capt~re radium, as radium sulfate~ to form .
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non:..hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
, ~the second half of 2015., FBP's slud~e had exhibited very, v_ery.low levels of n.atur.ally.occurring ra_dioac.t.i.ve material
ve background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
5
GP1888
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
'
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
~~s_
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non:.Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
~--~~~~~~~~~
The information 1=ontained in this e-rnai.1 is intended only for the individual or entity tp whom it is ciddressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disdose, disseminate; copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e:.mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
GP1889
,_promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
KRS 211.862 Definitions for KRS 211.861 to 211.869. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8501
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" (NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
or as a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
radioactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically entfahce-d by controllable practices {or by past human prai::tices);
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11 TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:l/www.lrc:.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive -material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
tits
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a-civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcoinpact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
____Disposal of TENO RM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the R~gional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TENO RM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal iri place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
GP1890
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky~gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Uwww .crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412~680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
----------------,.--------,----------~------,-----~--
GP1891
..
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understandirig was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure .
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
9
GP1892
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
~-~-~~--D-epai:tmentJor:mLir:onmentaLerotection ---~~~~-~-~---~
..~~~~~---~- --
10
GP1893
tlam:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr. Kalt;
Thank you for your assistance,
George Partridge
KDWM
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, topy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1894
. -~~~--- _
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:Hwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Rtt1Jl4~
r~t>\n.~&M~tl.f
From: Kalt, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Cc:: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1895
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what.we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for ~malysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy fo contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
D2
- = -2-
]l
D2
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
3
GP1896
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate. mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Example~: (Time exposed to source)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
4
GP1897
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
,2-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
o, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on wbat type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
.model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 footfrom the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
~lstop HS1C-A.
- k f o r t , KY 406.21
WTel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
5
GP1898
Website: http://www.chfs.ky,gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentuckv.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted
sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
,.',.,..,,.
.
. .
.
.
.
~~-~-~~--~~-~-----~--~-~-
-----
-------------~-~------~~--~-=-~-~-
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' arid Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's {FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan {Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program atthe Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services pkked up 86.5.33 tons of material.
-
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radil!m, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This_ chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
to be non-hazardous.
been determined
.
.
.
-
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfa~e; it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant. In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0~0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading {1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr {0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
6
GP1899
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
~~rrently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVPEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
I l l e informati.on
contain~
in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom It is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1900
Hello ML Kalt,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside th.e region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsis}ent with polices Qf the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:l/www.lrc.ky.govI statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.8651 or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000} nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000}. Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
GP1901
'
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
ax: 502-564-1492
-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
. n Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank"you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what.levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
GP1902
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
""""""''-~.-~-----~-----=-~---,.,,,~~--=~~~~~~,.~-,..-
-----------
-------'C __
-g.-___
-_.:_ __ _:~====-~~-~-~-~--~~----
.-,-----~~-~...,.....--....,,.,,......-=--~--7"------"---=--="----------=---------'="~~~
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licerisure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
10
GP1903
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
11
GP1904
. . . . .
--r~m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Cu_rt; ...
Thank you for keeping me updated and all the helpful information you are receiving.
George
From: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the ~mount of time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, .you mentioned that the ~IL1dge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes. Do YPl1 have any of thi.s sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
A..Pna or don. scuba gear to take sludge sample at the bottom ofa deep settling pond.The picture of the pond on your
~ebsite looks like it would be difficult to sample.
.
.
.
Currently, FBP cjoes not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is. removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for de\/1/atering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solic:fification process, the extremely low levels ()f naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.
GP1905
GP1906
I
I
.~.'
TIOft: np.i.1"*
C,
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
-sclose., disse. minate, copy or print its contents . lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~lete and destroy the message.
.A'
GP1907
To:
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e~mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
To:
Kalt, Brian
GP1908
.-:.s
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose.Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
- p i e s : (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
5
GP1909
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1910
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you too.k the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The aver:age reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0,0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 niR/hr), As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and .United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assis.tance in this matter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioac;tive M.aterials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.
.
.
~
GP1911
Gentlemen,
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Ja:son
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituentin some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
.doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan .
. FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
raclium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 arid early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in na:ture fo sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As. published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose ()f drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on~site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENO RM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management.
of the landfill?
GP1912
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
. e Non-Hazardous Material.
Kind Regards,
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom .it is addressed. Its c;ontents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information: If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1913
(10) "Region" means the geographical area ofthe state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902KAR100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-o-ccurring ~adioacti\/e-materia-1 (NOR-M) as defined in KRS 21i.862(B)
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRs 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.govI statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, d~sposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky;gov/d ph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of ..unwanted
sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
. .
:;ti,
-
10
GP1914
--.
---------~-~------~---------
o: Kalt, Brian
c: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may h.ave regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Fa_mily Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for .Putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kent1,.1cky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine
412-680-6244
Pro~essing,
LLC
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. I.ts
contents(including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intehded recipient you rnust not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e~mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Hello Brad;
"
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the.
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
11
GP1915
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1916
._rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
C:t.Jrt;
Thank you for following up on this!
George
rt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C~A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502~564-1492
E-mail: curt;pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.c:hfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd'.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified ofproposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~nwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
--....-,--------..,..--~---
GP1917
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
...C..
Fairmont~Brine1>rocessing1ll
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
~ooking
Currently, FBP does not physically dewatei" the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORIVI
Services for dewatering and solJdific~tion, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then (anc:lfilled, Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.
GP1918
W'Wv
GP1919
.From:
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a tlient requests a longer period oftime
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-6800:6244
The information contained in this e-rnail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its conterlts(induding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply .e-'mail and
from:
To::Kalt, Brian
GP1920
Kind Regards~
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680..:6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~sdose, disseminate, copy or. print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply .e~mail and
,..lete and destroy the message. .
.
GP1921
.. ... , ~Webstte:..httn:Llwww~cbfs.k:t.gmtLdnbLrad.i.oactiY,e.btm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd;chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
radiograp~i.c.inspection1 the radiation spread. s outas it tr~vels away f.rom th. e source. Therefo.re, th: intensity.
of the rad1at1on follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to cakl11ate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other dist!'mce. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
GP1922
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1.ft away)A2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2 . = 0.0002163 mrem, or 0.2163 rem
(2 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
4!11turce reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs)* (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
te and destroy the message.
GP1923
be
tWO
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what. did it read? You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0;2267 R/hr
(0,0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008GS2 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
GP1924
Gentlemen,
.lease see the responses in green to your questions below.
What. was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TE NORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfatE!; a soluble compound whose predominant use is in.the manufac;ture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous .
. . .hen .soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium,.FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive materi_al
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
. mR/hr). The highest reading (1 fobt from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking sevi;?ral glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After som~ dewatering period on:site, the boxes were received by AdyanC:ed TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filtertest, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of nat~rally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
- 5 . Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
GP1925
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
Kind Regards,
~. ----~Brian~Kalt~--
--
.~. --~-=~.-~~~----
.----=-= ~~--~~- -.
-----------=
.-~---~.~~~~~-
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents, If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Curt;
Thankyou for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
10
GP1926
11
11
(10) Region means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 .KAR 100:010. De.finitions for 902 KAR Olapter 100. http:ljwwwJrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
11
1) Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11 TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
en separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:ljwwwJrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS.211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, ifthe imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices ofthe commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http:Uwww.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TE NORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
.
A
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
~dionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky;gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs'.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of ~.nwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
11
GP1927
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family
Services
(CHFS).
__ ...,._. ____, -. - - -
~-~~-~-'--------
--~--- -=""'-~~~---0~-=----------~~~~-==-.,.-----
-=~--~-~--
----=~~-~~--~-~~-~~-~-,,,~-------~-=~-~"=--"""""",,--~
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
12
GP1928
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
cont~ct shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our c,mderstanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Kentucky does notregulate TENORM?
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented .to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1929
a.,m.
..._.-nt:.
To:
Subject:
Curt;
Thank you for following up on this!
George
~rt
Pendergrass PhD
Wpervisor, Radioactive .Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
~-------
GP1930
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
I
President
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addres.sed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Te>:
Kalt, Brian
tra. nspired. But th._anksfo r_ checking on the. sa. m_ pies with Summit. an. d Reliance j.u. st the. sam. e. Looking
.. ba.ck. y.our earlier.e-.
mails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering boxes~ Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would,....
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boatto float on your settling
pond or don scuqa gear to take sludge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture ofthe pond on your .
website looks like it would be difficult to sample.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled~ Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.
,
2
GP1931
GP1932
I j{jst spoke with Summit, and they keep sarnples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-rnail is intended only forthe individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
anv attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. 1fyou are not an intended recipient you rmist not use,
disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply
and
..
delete and destroy the message.
.
dis~lose,
e~mail
:9
-
GP1933
't:
To:
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or. entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
dis.close, disseminate, cop.y or print its co11tents. lfyou receive this e~mail in error, pleas.e notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing fo contact those laboratories where you previously sent t.his
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
ease let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
GP1934
~~
..
..
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Not.e: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose. rate, ft)"2
GP1935
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
. o u were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away}"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away}"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
.ource reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
9'ou
were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
GP1936
---~---
Sent: Monday,
To: Kglt, Brian
__
-----
.. --------~-------------
GP1937
Gentlemen,
. .ase see the responses in green to your questions below.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
.been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
9ctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radi.um with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water trecitment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr(0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) Was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and l,lnited States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the d.ose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is rernoved via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated .
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
GP1938
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
-------
-Br:ian~Kalt---~---------~~-----------------
----
--------
---~----~------- ---~--~--~~-~---~~----~--~--~~-----~~
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Curt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
-------------------------------
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
10
GP1939
11
11
(10) Region means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. D.efin. itions for 90.2KAR.Chapter100. http:l/www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
1) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material 11 TENORM 11 means N.O.R.M., which has
en separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in:and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
{3) Naturally-,occurring radioactive material {NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material {NORM} from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:L/www .lrc.ky.govI statutes/ statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less th~n ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www'.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
--.Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
dionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TEN ORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax:502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:/jprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:/jsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:/jwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
11
GP1940
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
~~l~l!li!Y Seryt~~s (~Hfi}. _..~~~~. ..... ~~~- --~~ _-.~.-. --~-~~~--~.~--.~- . . ---~---~-~~--~-~--~~~~--~~-~~~Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian.<BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680~6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
12
GP1941
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste wa~ sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
..
George
GP1942
<imageOOl.gif>
I
14
GP1943
George;
Thank you!
George
From: Weems, George (EEC)
GP1944
A.om
~t:
To:
Subject:
Jason;
I appreciate all you are doing to assist our respective Cabinets that Dr. Curt Pendergrass and I serve in.
George Partridge
KDWM
GP1945
How about we pay you a visit on Friday Mr. Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
wish to accompany us on this sampling trip to your Fairmont, WV facility. We never go into another agencies jurisdiction
without first checking With them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you and your
fa.c. ility. You said the s. ludge would be easily accessible with proper planning. What would that entail exactly just so we
can bring the proper sampling equipment.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Sec.tion
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
. -.~.-Z.7.-l)-6ast-Main~trnet-~~--CC....... _~--~~~-- -~-~----C---.--~ . ---~-~-~-.. ~--~~-~---~---~-~--.~~-~~~-~-~.~=~
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive .htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes htt~s://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
M.r. Pendergrass,
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1946
.
Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016 .
cc:
w(CHS-PH)
' r r y to hear that Mr. Kai! but I was thinking thatwas probably going to be the case given the amount of.time that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site dew;:itering boxes. Do you have any of this sludge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to floaton your settling
pond or don scuba gear totake sludge sample atthe bottom of a deep settling po11<J~Ih~_p_if1l!I~J>Hh~_PQ!ld~cmyQlJ_(
website lool<ifike-it would be difficult io sample.~ - --~------
in
----c-
..
'
----- ----
..
Currently, FBP cfoes not physically d.ewater the sludge on:-site. The sludge is removed via pum.p into .standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TE NORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatefing process arid solidification process, the extremely low levels ()f naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated .
GP1947
,
GP1948
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended onfy for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~ close, dis.semi.nate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail and
. . . . .ete and destroy the message.
.
GP1949
---
- - - - ----
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is add_ressed. Its contents (including
any attachments} are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
ra
To:
Kalt, Brian
GP1950
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
~diographic i.nspection, the radiation spread. s out.as it travels awayfro. m the source. T.herefore, the intensity
. .the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiat.ion becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
11
Di
l2
D1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose {measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source {at contact, say 0;25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feetl''2
{Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)/\2
-mples: {Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact {assumed 0.25" from source)
7
GP1951
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2
Note,.at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is 11ot
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1952
'
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (lfoot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr), As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower thanthe dos.e of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation and assista.nce in this matter,
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD .
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502'."564-1492
Email: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.goV/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees onllne .at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulatic>n changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of.~nwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
,.,.-~-~------~-~-----------------------~..~--------'~-
GP1953
- - - - -
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1. A description of the containers used for the shipment of the waste.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
~- -~ ~~-2 ... Who~manufac;tur:ed~tl:ie-Shipping.cor:itainers1~.~
__ . ~--
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted i;ind approved by Ja.son
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENO RM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, Cl toxic coristitu~htin some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate; to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBPmonitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no.
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water tre(ltment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) Was only 0~8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower.
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana {0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewaterthe sludge on-site. The sludge is rernoved via pump into stamfard
dewatering
period on~site, the boxeswere received by Advanced
TENORM Serviees
for
dewatering boxes. After some
.
.
.
.
..
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radiocictive
materials were to be eliminated.
'
5.
'
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
10
GP1954
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysi.s that was conducted on
~ Non-Hazardous Material.
tr::nything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian:Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
11
GP1955
(10) "Region" means the geographical area ofthe state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:llwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
(301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.Q.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
&..
"W
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id==8502
~~~---~~~~~--~--~----~~
--~~~
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low".'Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www'.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__-Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agendes will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
MailStop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Wet?site: htfo://www.chfs.ky.gov/d ph/radioactive. htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified C>f proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentuckv.gov/Regwatch/
~ispose of u1;1wanted sources_http://www:crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
12
GP1956
~Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
. .
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should pe directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services {CHF~).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 a~d 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-,.6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the. individual or entity to whom it is addressed. I.ts
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intMded recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If. you receive this. e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e~mail and dele.te and de~troy the message.
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared, with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13
GP1957
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding' was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any .unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates th~ management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1958
ttlam:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Curt; .
Thank you!
George
.
Ct: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH); Fowler, Kathy L (CHFS PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Thanks Jason . .I would very much appreciate your accompaniment and your assistance on our visit to Fairmont Brine.
Hopefully Friday works well for you. The sooner we get these sludge samples to our lab f9r radiochemical analysis, the
bett,fr.
Curt Pendergrass PhD .:
~erv.is.or, R. adioactive Materials Section
~tucky Radiation Health Branch
275 EastMain Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort,.KY 40621
Tel: 502-564""3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E~mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Webs.ite: http:/jwww .chfs.ky.gov(dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:/jprd.chfs.kv.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:/jsecyre.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:/jwww .crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR'.aspx
GP1959
:.'}
Fax: 502-564-1492 :
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://\N'J.JW.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://ord;chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.
.";:;.
...
.
.
.
GP1960
Mr.
Pendergrass~
slud~e
th~ mlddl~
-e
does not accumulate Jn either of the Jarge ponds you see in the picture below, butrather in
of the
picture in what loo!<s like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily .. What
day wpuld work for you and or your team?
"''
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The Information cor:itained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addre~sed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an inte.nded retipient yqu'must notuse, '
disdose, disseminate, copy 6r;print its contents. If you receive this e~mail in error, please notify the seride~ byr~ply:e~mail arid
delete and destroythe message.
Mr.
'
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering. boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels 'of naturcilly
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated .
..
3
GP1961
GP1962
--~-'------~-,...~~---------------------~..,..-------~-
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period oftime
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
, ~~ose, disse.minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
. ~te and destroy the message.
GP1963
~~-~~orPenoergras-s7~~------~~-
-_ ------
--~-~-~------~~~-~--~=---~~~-~~~~--~~--~~--~~-- --~~~-----~~--
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is add_ressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and.
delete and destroy the message.
Sent: Wednesday,
To: Kalt, Brian
You did not answer my question b_ut would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis fo see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
m()terial to our office for.radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please .let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter,
GP1964
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
-iograp. hic inspection, the rad. ia.tion spreads out as it travels away from the s.ource.. Th. erefore, the intensity
. h e radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typieally known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
D2
2
D2
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
I
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
7
GP1965
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
--~~-~---~~- -----=-=-:='~~-.,...,----"=----
>7-"'-""'"'-~c"'-"'""~-~-~-~~-
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2
--,,,--~~~-~.,.,._~-~-~-~~~~
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*{0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0;166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1966
: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, ~eorge (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
,
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both ~eliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
Technologies Laboratories I don't see where any radiochemical analysis on any of this material was performed which is
what we were really hopin~ to find. Somethin:S that actually put a number to tile actual J.>C::i/gfor fta-226 cind Ra,i28
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not they retained the samples from last fall and if so; if our office could acquire a portion for
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
the samples if they are av.ailable.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. tan you give me a .little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using w.hen you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). lfyou took a background with this instrument, what did it read?You indicated you took your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to R~liance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
In the second half of2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background; The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0,2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr)~ As
published by the Nuclear.Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dos.e of drinking several glasses of beer per !lour (0.07 mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks again for your cooperation an.d assistance in this m;:itter.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materi~ls Section
Kentucky Ra.di.ation Health Brarich
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 4Q621
Tel: 5Q2~564.:.3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: httb:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwante.d sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
..a:-:~K-a-lt-,~B~ria-n-[m-a--i-lto_:_B~Ka-1-t@_t__a-ir_m_o-nt-b-ri-ne-.-co-m~]~~-------
GP1967
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program atthe Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to.
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic naiure becomes so benign that it is u:;ed by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can
seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
be
4'
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Becau!;e of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 ahd early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typic:al drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0'.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on'-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on..:site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring r(ldioaC:tive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
10
GP1968
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Milterial.
fl/!_
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-'6244
'
The information contained in this e-mail .is intended. only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
'
(8) "Naturally-occurring radioactive material" {NORM) means naturally occurring materials not regulated
under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whose radionuclide concentrations have been increased by
~s a result of human practices. Naturally occurring radioactive material does not include the natural
~oactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
'
11
GP1969
------
-----
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
AA
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:l/www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive.Material "TENORM"means N.0.R.M., which has .._.,
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:l/www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
---~~
.--
~.
-=--
-~~~~~-~-,~~--~=~:.:
.. ----
~~~~~~~.-~~-
.. --
.. - .
~~ -~
.....
-~~~~~~-
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material {NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission .
.KRS 211.869 Penalties. http:l/www~lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate L.ow-tevel Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www'.cmcompact.org/f)ublications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENO RM Waste
Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TE NORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licen.sed LLRW disposal facility.
at
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky;gov/dph/radioactive. htrn
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky;gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwcinted
'.
.. sources http:Uwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.
.
.
.
12
GP1970
-------.-.------.--.--
-~~-----~-----~--.-.
.
Kalt, Brian
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: Re: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
to the agency responsible for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
Family Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
Danny Anderson .
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring r~dioactive material has Kentucky sel:
as being acceptable?
Kind Regards;
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (in~luding any attachmen!s) are confidentialand may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its con.tents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13
GP1971
------------------
---
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
'
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is-responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
GP1972
To:
Subject:
No problem
-~ Partridge
---------
GP1973
tt"A.
The sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the .middle of
picture in what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?
GP1974
Kind Regards,
t!llianKalt.
President
Fairmont Brine
412-680-6244
Processing~
LLC
The information contained in thise~mail is intended only for the individual- or entity to whom it is addressed. ltscontents-(including.
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended retipient you must not uSeJ:
disclose, disseminate,
copy
or print its cc'>'htents;
If you receive this e-mail .in error, please
.
.
.
. notify. the sender
. by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
.
Cc: Partridge, George (EEC); McKinley, Matthew W (CHS-PH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired. But.thanks for checking on the samples with Summitand Reliance just the san:ie. Looking back your earlier emails, you mentioned that the sludge was being de_watered on site in dewatering boxes. DO you have any of fbis.slu~ge
material currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are;nciw processingthatyou would
Ali!.nd u__ s c_ om__in_gto get? '_am n_ ou_a__rniliarwith yo-ur fctc_ i-lity but 1r~ally- don'tw-_ish to get1n_a___ boat_ to_ float oil yo_ u_-_-_r__settl_i~g
~d or don scuba gear to take sl11dge sample at the bottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the ponq on your -_
Curre.ntly, 'F~P d~es hot physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is ~ernd\/ed via pump ,into standard
dewaterif)g boxes. After some dewaterlng period on-site, the _boxes were receiveg.by Advanced TENORM
Services for g~waterfrig and solidification, as appropriate to pass paintfilter test, (Ind then landfilled., Based on
FBP1s unc.iersf~h~ing of th~ dewatering process and solidification process, th extremely low levels pf naturally
occurring radio~ctive materials were to be eliminated.
GP1975
GP1976
..... "!fl~
~:
~tff
Kalt, Blian
[mailto:BKall:@fairmontbrine.~]
Dr. Pendergrass,
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~lose, d. isse. minate, copy or print its contents. If you receive thi~ e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~te and destroy the message.
GP1977
--------------
-------
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is add_ressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
~
delete and destroy the message.
~
GP1978
To:
~diog.raphic.. inspection, the.rad. iation spreads out as it travels a. wayfrom the source. The
.. refore, the inte. nsity
. .the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact thatthe intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads otfrom the source since the same about of radiati.on becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
D2
2
Di
1
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)A2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)A2
GP1979
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)l\2
(1 ft away)l\2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)l\2
(2 ft away}l\2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)l\2
(10 ft away)l\2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs)* (0.0208 ft)l\2
(1 ft away)l\2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The inforrnation contained in this e-rnail is intended only for the individual or entity to whorn it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachrnents) are confidential and rnay contain privileged inforrnation. If you are not an intended recipient you rnust not use,
disclose, disserninate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-rnail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-rnail and
delete and destroy the rnessage.
GP1980
~, Brian [mailto:BKalt@fairmontbrine.co~-]~~------~-~~--------
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone call on February 26, 2016
To:
GP1981
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
I
~--~--~2k W_hOJWRUfa.c_tuLej;IJJle..shiRPlng_containers]
_ _____
_________
-----~~-~~-~--~-
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill''
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This.chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handtield detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0'.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxeswere received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management.
of the landfill?
10
GP1982
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail.is intended only for the individual or entity to whpm it is addressed. Its con.tents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
dis~lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
.-:1oactivity of rocks or soils, or background radiation, but instead refers to materials whose radioactivity is
technologically enhanced by controllable practices (or by past human practices);
11
GP1983
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:Uwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.O.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
A..
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
--~,~~=~,~--~-.~--~--~
~--~~~~~
in
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORIVlf as definecl KRS 21l.B62(8fshall 6e'H1e exdusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
KRS 211.869 Penalties. http://ww\N.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8505
(1) Any person who fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.863, or with any administrative
regulations promulgated pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any order of the cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day of the violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
Central Midwest Interstate Low".Level Radioactive Waste Commission Regional Management
Plan, Adopted May 1999 (http://www.cmcompact.org/publications/Regional Mgmt Plan.pdf)
__Disposal of TENORM Waste at Facilities in the Region other than the Regional LLRW Disposal
Facility
_The public health and safety hazard presented by TEN ORM waste is a function of the
radionuclides, concentrations and waste form. At a concentration of 5 pCi/g, regulatory agencies will
require an analysis of the public health and safety concerns for any proposed waste management
activities whether it be disposal in place, disposal in a sanitary landfill, disposal in a licensed TENORM
waste site or disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials. Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502~564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky;gov/dph/radioactive.htin
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.cbfs.ky:gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
.
' sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
.
.
.
.
12
GP1984
_,,
~~
----------------------
-.-.-.-
-------------.
~--------.
: Kalt, Brian
: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information cqntained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any atta,chments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or printits contents. If you, receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
GP1985
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us aboutthe waste stream from FBP.
Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for ticensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
I do not have that information.
I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste,andthat I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue. Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KDEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and ~e got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are bOth seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing enti.ties that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
GP1986
.!
flom:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19 PM
Delivered: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
GP1987
#m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon {EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19 PM
Delivered: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
I,
GP1988
#m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony {EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19 PM
Delivered: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
GP1989
"""
.
To:
Sent
Subject:
Your message
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19:24 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:20:19 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP1990
-rom:
Subject:
Tracking:
R~ipient
Delivery'
Re<1d
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Danny;
I have told Curt I will be available to join and assist with any sites visits as we investigate thia wa~te received by Blue
Ridge Landfill.
.
' n k you again for all you are doing and for the helpful insights in the regulatory aspects you
me.
~ave beensha,r;i~g
with
No problem
Sent
GP1991
----
-~-----
--
I appreciate all you are doing to assist our respective Cabinets that Dr. Curt Pendergrass and I serve in.
George Partridge
KOWM
GP1992
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
502-564-3700 ext. 4183
. . .ax: 502-:564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:/fprd.thfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:/fsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatcn/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
_.a-1:
~;
Subject: RE:
Mr. Pendergrass,
'!>
~~
The sludg~does not accumulate hi either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, hut rather.in the middle of toe
picture iri what looks like a rectangle ("concrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day would work for you and or your team?
.Cf
Regards,
Bri~.n Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The i~formati011 contained in this e~mail is intended only for the individual or entity to.whom it is addressed. Its content~ (incl.udtng
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information .. Ifyou aren~t an Intended recipient you rriu;;t not u~~,
disclo~e, .disseminat~, copy print its contents .. lfyou receive this e-m~il in. error, please notify the sender by reply .e-mail and
delete and d~~troy the message.
or
,' ':J
- .'
Sorry to hear that Mr. Kalt but I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount of time that has
transpired, But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the same. Looking back your earlier eAs, you mentioned that the sludge was being dewatered on site in dewatering box.es. Do you have any of this sludge
ii!ferial currently on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
mind us coming to get? I am not familiar with your facility but I really don't wish to get in a boat to float on your settling
GP1993
-----------------
---
GP1994
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
~I: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
9:'a_x: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:Uwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd'.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Kind Regards,
' a n Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy' or print its contents, If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP1995
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Dr. Pendergrass,
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privilegedinformation. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
on-contact dose rate n:iading with the Fairmont Brine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)"
The 2 mrem/hr on contact dose rate reading is what we were led to believe this sludge read from others in WV.
GP1996
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you previously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
~aterial to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I said, we would be more than happy to make the drive to OH or WV
~ pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to release these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf and inquire as to whether they still
retained these samples.
Please let me know about the samples and thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700~ext. 4183
Fax: 502-5.64-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
radiographic inspection, the radiation spreads out as it travels away from the source. Therefore, the intensity
of the radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the source since the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industria.I radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
-rdingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
GP1997
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft}"2
I
I
I ~~--~Based~oo~the"highes'lrecorderlSi:mi:c~t~jlrung:~_mr:e~m/fil..@cont_act {ass,tJmed 0.25"_from source}_
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away}"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away}"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(10 ft away)"2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @> contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
8
GP1998
412-680-6244
e information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
.1
GP1999
------
----
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 81 Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
2.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After F.airr~ont B~ine. ~roces sing's. {.FBP) Sludge Disp~s.al Plan (_Please.see at. tached) w~saccep~e~ and ap~roved by Jason ,A
Frame, Chief Rad1olog1cal Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Serv1ces/Rad1atu;m, Toxics and Indoor .,,..
Air Division, Advanced.TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps~ to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined to be non..:hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it is used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan ..
FBP' s sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had rio
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was orily 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr {0.0008652 mR/hr). As published ,by the
Nuclear Regulatory.co.mrnission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Ag~nty {EPA), both readings.are low~.
than the dose of drmkmg several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one ~
banana {0.009863 mR per banana).
.
.
10
GP2000
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM services for
watering and so. lidificat.ion, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and the.n. landfilled.. Based on. FBP' s understanqing
the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be el.iminated.
5.
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
'
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form fromthe West Virginia.Departmenfof
Environmental Protection's
Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material.
(WVDE'P)
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) a.re confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you rnust not use,
-..~lose,d is.se.m.. i.nate, copy or p. rintits contents. If you receive this. e-mail in error, please notify the sender by r~ply e-mail a.nd
~ete and destr:oy th~ message:
. ,
As promised, below the applicable Kentucky Regulatory Statutes dealing with TENORM.
11
GP2001
902 KAR 100:010. Definitions for 902 KAR Chapter 100. http:ljwww.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/010.htm
{301) "Technically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material "TENORM" means N.0.R.M., which has
been separated to various degrees from the original ore or other material, refining or implementing it.
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of lc;w;.level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
(1) Any person ~ho fails to comply with any provision of KRS 211.859 or 211.8G3, .or with any administrative
regulations promulgated.pursuant to KRS 211.859 or 211.865, or fails to comply with any orderofthe cabinet
issued pursuant to KRS 211.859 or KRS 211.863 and 211.865 shall be assessed a civil penalty not less than ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) nor more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Each day ofthe violation
or noncompliance shall constitute a separate offense.
.A
W"
..
12
GP2002
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@kv.gov
.
Website: http:ljwww.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
. . .y your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
~notified of proposed regulation changes https:/fsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http:ljwww.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
"O:',
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
'
'
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are _not an
intended reCipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the. message.
13
GP2003
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
'
'
-~
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.
Or understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Kentucky does not regulate TENORM?
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted waste; The DPH
.regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licens'1re.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
I do not have that information.
I concludeq our conversation by affirming that I arn not aware of any concerns regarding hqw FBI'
managed the waste.1 and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their manage~ent has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received. .
We woilld appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following informatjqn, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how .it was managed.
14
GP2004
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
,,
15
GP2005
.-Am
~
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:34 PM
Delivered: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
GP2006
------
-------
----~
-----------
~m-
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:34 PM
Delivered: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
GP2007
flam:
To:
Sent:'
Subject:
Yot.Jr message
To: Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19:24 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 02, 2016 7:57:03 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
1'
GP2008
-m
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Thursday, March 03, 2016 7:54 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: Swipe ssamples
AJ
Please send me the analytical results from all the wipe samples that we collected that day and I will incorporate it with
my notes, the coordinates, etc.
I want the results from the school as well. Ideally, I would like to see us merge the our reports and conclusions since
this was a join effort .
ankyou,
George
------:---------------~------,---------
AJ
AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist II
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HSlC~A
~kfort, KY 40601
....,.. 502-564-3700 x4171
FAX: 502-564-1492
https:Uprd.chfs.ky.gov/Rad ePay/
1
GP2009
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader ofthis message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution o r '
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. ff you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
GP2010
"-=
Sent:
To:
Subjed:
Put everything you have scanned under that link I gave you and I'll see what I haven't got.
--------------------
'orge
..
1
GP2011
'5::=
To:
Subject:
Put everything you have scanned under that link I gave you and I'll see what I haven't got.
GP2012
~:.
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: FW: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:33:37 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time
(~S
& Canada)
was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:03:35 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
..
1
GP2013
--:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:19:24 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:05:01 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
..
1
GP2014
,-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Trackiflg:
Recipient
.Delivery
Read
Jon;
Nothing has changed since my text.
99
GP2015
tCJ tlTe-sch~ool.-
L~- -
GP2016
-------~-
. ,ould try to have someone run the samples Sunday ~r have the
I did notice the news from the public hearing and I understood it
was stated "There are no immediate health concerns."
I hope the public realizes that the latency period between
lal><posure and health concerns (increased incidence of cancer) is
~ 40 years.
_,,o
GP2017
----------
Thank you,
George
c
,,,+,,,..;d"ri
.r,
mC.tTl m
rr::!
(YJ:'m
George,
It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which stated: "Just
Finished. Appears school buil~iQg is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school building to
main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of landfill. Personally
I feel we are seeing tcintamination from trucks and traffic to .and from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to
the public due to present activities They should go about their normal activities. The risk concern and. exposures to
worry about6ccurred this past year. Will call you latE! afternoon or early evening and discuss with you.".
Please work with. Danny to schedule a time to meet with me to better understand your
observations and concerns.
Thank you,
Jon
~.
GP2018
-----------------------
fll!...ject:
Tony;
Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at. the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the Irvine County
High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an internal meeting to discuss my
observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or at least prior to the public meeting this
evening so t.hat when they meet with county officials Monday and Tuesday, they could make recommendations 011,st~ps
to take to' protect thei,r safety anci well-being until we know more (such as reconstructive exposure assessment, etc.)
which will be weeks to months in the future.
a.
I am going to list my observations and recommendations below and also attached a copy of an email message I sent
requesting a meeting.
We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the plans for the site
visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the exposure to the school and surrounding
area would include airborne particulate matter since the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the
~school entrance. Both the school and the school grounds, particularly around the entrance and front of the.
school would experience particulate deposition.
When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of the entrance to
the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating '~We are not here to look for particulates."
(That was the primary exposure of concern!).
Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattacharya not to take the "back packs" (which were the most
sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street which resulted in the grounds of the
school Where the grass was, not getting surveyed for deposited particulates.
. . I.also rnentiori~,d to Matt McKinley thatthe schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems, remove the"existing
filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstrearn side of ~he filter to chetk for particulate matter
containing radionuclides. This was not done to my knowledge.
in
I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:
! The maintenanceworkers atthe school each time theyworkon, service, or replace the.filters to the HVAC
systems for the school, which for one school occurs on a monthly basis.
! Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the landfill,
previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when the grass on the school
grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity will expose both the workers, students,
and all individuals that may be present in the vicinity when those activities are conducted.
My rnessage by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February 27th stated the
following:
"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school
building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of
landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any
concerns or risks to the public due to present activities They should go about their normal activities. The risk
concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon _or early evening and
- u s s with you."
.
In my text messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present activities." I still needed to
discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the school who change the filters potentially being
exposed to particulates containing radionuclides. I am also concerned in the future when it Is time to cut the grass
5
GP2019
about the resuspension of previous particulate deposition that occurred and has contaminated the grounds in front of
.thE! school near the entrance.
4'
I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday morning. Danny and I
have talked but it has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he was busy with other matters pertaining
to Blue Ridge. I appreciate all the Danny is doing and realize he has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time he
has been available to spend with rne. I also realize Jon is extremely busy as well.
I am also extremely worried that individuals will die a premature death or have serious health problems in the future
~~~~,fr:om~this,waste~disposaLat,.Blue~Ridge~~theJa1ency_p.e.do1l~etween.eJCPQsUre and the. increase .incidence of canc~r
and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending oil exposure scenario and age at time of exposure;
.
-.
I am also concerned about the operators and workers ilt the landfill and how close they are working to
previously deposited waste. Are they maintaining a buffer diStance to minimize exposure? Is the landfill
resuming their normal activities before they assess the extent of contamination? Are they continuing to let
the public drive up to the area of the working face and discharge waste materials they are dropping
off? Has the equipment at th.e landfill that was. used for waste disp~I been decontaminated as a
precaution?......
I want to condude With the following comments:
./ I appreciate being an employee in the Division of Waste Management, it represents my life's work.
and vocation
./ I could not ask for a more talented group of coworkers
./ I appreCiate the leadership of our Division and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny has devoted to
listening to my c9nc:erns and observations.
I,
fee. '. ov.erw.helmed and. t.er.ri. bly worri.e.d about. t.he lives being affect.ed and it. h.e.lps. m.e. to. ta.. lk
...:. -.I 11.e.el . lik..e
have been going at this ctlone as an employee for several years now and what. I have feared would happen
and has happened in other states has now occurred in Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this
was processed. TEN ORM rather than the TEN ORM that is produced at the 0 8t Gdrilling/tracking sites.
I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their emails when
they are away from the office!
"' Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your work on this
and the PulJlic Meeting tonight.
George
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the
survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and d.iscuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accur~te representation of the activities conducted and wl)at we can conclude at this point.
GP2020
film:
Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Subject:
RE~
..
I1
GP2021
-om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
GP2022
-om: . .
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 B:il AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
..
GP2023
'-m: . .
Partridge, George (EEC)
To:
Sent:
Subject:
b~en
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
..
GP2024
--om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To:Hatton,Tony(EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 :OO AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 :50 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
..
GP2025
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Jon;
Nothing has changed since my text.
carefully!
Please read it
GP2026
~~~-~~
..
GP2027
GP2028
"'~~~--~--
'
George,
4
GP2029
It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which
stated: "Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Wiil get wipe results Monday. As you go
from entrance of school building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you
scan terrail) going up toward gate of landfill. Person~lly I feel we are seeing c<mtamination from
trucks and traffic to ancl .from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due to present
activities TheY should go about their normal agivities. The risk concern and exposures to worry
about osc:urrecl this past year. Will c;:ill you la~e a~ernoon or early evening and discuss with VO!J.".
Ple~se
Thank you,
Jon
Tony;
Jon Mayb'riar requested for me to be present at the sarnpling and site survey that was conducte'CJ at the
lrvineCounty High School and Middle School9rti Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an
internal meeting to discuss my observations whh both Danny Anderson and Jon IVlaybriar on Monday Or
at least prior to the public meeting this evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday
and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps to tak~ to protect their safety and well-being
until we know more (such as a recoristructive exposure assessment, etc.) which will be weeks to months
in the future.
I arn going to list my observations an'CJ recommendations below and also attached. a copy.of an ernail
message I sent requesting a meeting.
We met at approximately s:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the
plans for. the site visit and to arrive in Irvine as group. In the meeting I stressed that the .
exposure to the school and surrounding area would include airborne particulate matter since
the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the school entrance. Both the scfiqol and the
school grounds, parti1:;ularly around the1entrance and in front of the school would experience
.
.
.
particulate depositi6Q.
. ;. . . n
W.hen we arrived at the schooi shortly a1fter 9 AM, Matt McKintey gathered the group in front of
the entrance to the schooi builc:ling and ~tarted his instruction to the group by stating "We are
not here to look for particulates." (That was the primary exposure C>f concern!).
Matt McKinley instruded Chris Keffer amd A. J. Bhattacharya not to ta.ke the "ba.ck packs"
(which were the most sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street
which resulted in the grounds of the school where the grass was, not getting surveyed for
deposited particulates.
.
.
I also mentioned to Matt McKinley that the schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems,
remove the existing filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the
GP2030
filter to check for particulate matter containing radionclides. This was not done to my
knowledge.
. I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:
! The maintenance workers at the school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters
to the HVAC systems for the school, which for one school occurs on a monthly basis.
! Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the
landfill, previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when
. ~-- ---~-~the,gca5-S,,.OJl.:tbe,.sm'"oJgro11ncls is cut.]lle cutthigJ?ftl!~_grass andrelat~-~ land~cape_ac~i\li!Y ____ ---~-~~will expose both the workers, students, and all individuals that may be present in the vicinity
when those activities are conducted.
My message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February
27th stated the following:
"Just Finished. Appears school building is Qk. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance
of school building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going
up toward gate of landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and
from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due to present activities They should go
about their normal activities. The risk concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past
year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss with you."
In my text messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present
activities." I still needed to discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the
school wbo change the filters potentially being e)(posed to particule1tes cQntaining radionclides. I am
also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass about the resuspension of previous
particulate deposition that occurred and has contaminated the grounds in front of the school near the
entrance.
I called Danny thatevening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email messag_e on Monday
morning. Danny and I have talked but it has either been walking down th~ hall or in his office when he
was busy with other matters pertaining to Blue Ridge. I appreciate all the Danny is doing and realize he
has been extremely busy. Jam grateful for the time he has been available to spend with me. I also
realize Jon is extremely busy as well.
I am also extremely worried that individuals wm die a premature death or have serious health
problems in the future from this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure
and the increase incidence of cancer and other serious health effects is 1040 years depending on
exposure s~enario and age at time of exposure.
I am also concerned about the operators and worker$ at the landfill and how close they are
working to . previo11sly depq_sited waste. Are they maintaining a buffer.distance to minimize
expos11re? Is the landfill resuming their normal activities before they assess the extent of
contamination? Are they continuing to let the public drive up to the area of the working face
and discharge waste materials they are dropping off? Has the equipment at the landfill that
was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a precaution?
I want to conclude with the following comments:
./ I appreciate bein9 an employee in the Di~ision of Waste Management, it represents
my life's work and vocation
./ I could not
for a more talented group of coworkers.
ask
GP2031
./ I appreciate the leadership of our Division and the time that Tony, Jon, and Danny
has devoted to listening to my concerns and observations.
I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to
talk. I feel like I have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and
what I have feared would happen and has happened in other states has now occurred in
Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this was processed TENORM rather than the
TENORM that is produced at the O & G drilling/tracking sites.
I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their
emails when they are away from the office!
Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your
work on this and the Public Meeting tonight.
George
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC);
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the
results of the survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
'
GP2032
GP2033
..Am
~
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:14:13 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP2034
~-
To:
Subject:
AJ was the one I needed for CHFS. Still need the other two BERT members~ Next time we get together for something
like this we need to just get everyone to sign an attendance list.
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
I a?ked Matt at the meeting the names of others there and he could not remember their names. Said it would be in
there reports; Hopefully I will get a copy we can combine with our notes.
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from Saturday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you.heard
~rtridge, George(EEC)
___________ ___
GP2035
George;
Meeting scheduled for tomorrow moring!
George
Subject: RE: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray27th
Do you have a list of participants?
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George
~eor9eP.PartrUfneJ~
Department for Environmental Protection
KY Division of Waste Management
200 Fair Oaks Lane; 2nd Floor (SWB)
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
GP2036
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
Tony:
Not yet. I wanted to meet first with Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar and let them proceed as appropriate. I know I
have been very passionate and emotional at times as I sought to understand this waste disposal situation at Blue Ridge
Landfill. ltismy desire tq share what I know with my immediate management and let them proceed as they feel
appropriate since they represent us.
.
'
It means so much to me to be part of this Division. It represents my vocation and life's work. I appreciate all that
everyone is doing to investigate this situation. r realize that everyone is extremely busy and doing t.he best they can
under the circumstances. I do not question that everyone wants to do the right thing and has the best interest of the
community at heart.
.
Thank you so much for all you are doing. I hope you are feeling better.
titltu::~~~k you so much for t~,king to from you very busy schedule t~ allow me update ~ou o~ my understanding of the
Thank you for having me as an employee in your Division and the opportunity to serve under you leadership. I truly feel
blessed.
Sincerely,
George
------~---------~---'--~
--------------
Jon;
1
GP2037
Please read it
GP2038
..
GP2039
---------------
I wanted to convey my concerns to you before the public meeting on Tuesday, so that you and the others
could place the present situation in -proper perspective.
Thank you,
George
4
GP2040
._
George,
It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which
.
stated: "Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go
'
'
from entrance of school building to main road entrance cbunts go up. Also numbers higher as you
scan terrain going up toward gate of landfill. Personally I feel we arE! seeing contamination from
trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due to present
aitivities They should go about ttteir normal activities. The risk concern and exposures to worry
about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss with you.".
GP2041
Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the
Irvine County High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an
internal meeting to discuss my observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or
at least prior to the public meeting this evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday
and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps to take to protect their safety and well-being
until we know more (such as a reconstructive exposure assessment, etc.) which will be weeks to months
in the future.
I am going to list my observations and recommendations below and also attached a copy of an email
~~~~-~~--me-ssage-l~sent-r:equesting-a-mee-ting.--~.~~~~~.-~----~~--~~.-~~---~~-~-.~~~-~~~.... ~~---~---~
We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the
plans for the site visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the
exposure to the school and surrounding area would include airborne particulate matter since
the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the school entrance. Both the school and the
school grounds, particularly around the entrance and in front of the school would experience
particulate deposition.
When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of
the entrance to the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating "We are
not here to look for particulates." (That was the primary exposure of concern!).
Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattacharya not to take the "back packs"
(which were the most sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street
which .resulted in the grounds of the school where the grass was, not getting surveyed for
deposited particulates.
I also mentioned to Matt McKinley that the schools needed to turn off the HVAC systems,
remove the existing filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the
filter to check for particulate matter containing radionuclides. This was not done tp my
knowledge.
I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:
! The maintenance workers at tl)e school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters
to the HVAC systems forthe school, whic.h for one school occurs <>n a monthly basis.
! Deposited particulate matter from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the
landfill, previously deposited on the school grounds; bec()ming re-suspended this spring when
the grass on the school grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity
will expose both the workers, students, and all individu~ls that may be present in the vicinity
when those activities are conducted.
My message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February
27th stated the following:
"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance
of school building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going
up toward gate of landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and
from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to the public due to present activities . They should go
about their normal activities. The risk concern and exposures to worry about occurred this past
year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss with you."
In my te><t messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present
activities." I still needed to discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the
school who change the filters potentially being exposed to particulates containing radionuclides. I am
---------
GP2042
---
also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass about the resuspension of previous
particulate deposition that oc:curred and has contaminated the grounds in front of the school near the
entrance.
I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday
morning. Danny and I have talked but it has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he
was busy with other matters pertainingto Blue Ridge. I appreciate all the Danny is doing and realize he
has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time he has been available to spend with me. I also
realize Jon is extremely busy as well.
I am also extremely worried that individuals will die a premature death or have serious health
problems in the future from this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure
and the increase incidence of cancer and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending on
exposure scenario and age at time of exposure,
I am also concerned about the operators and workers at the landfill and how close they are
working to previously deposited.waste. Are they maintaining a buffer distance to minimize
exposure? Is the landfill resuming their normal activities before they assess the extent of
contamination? Are they continuing to let the public drive up to th_e area of the worki'1g face
and discharge waste materials they are dropping c;>ff? Has the equipment at the landfiU. that
was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a precaution?......
I want to conclude with the following comments:
1.
------------~-
..
I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to
talk. I feel like I have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and
what I have feared would happen and has happened in other states has now occurred in
Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this was processed TENORM rather than the
TENORM that_ is produced at the () & G drilling/tracking sites.
I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their
emails when they are away from the office!
Tha.nks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your
work on this and the Public Meeting tonight.
George
FrolTI: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC);
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine, KY - Saturday, February 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the
results of the survey and sampling events that were conducted by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
7
GP2043
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on
Tuesday.
Thank you,
George
GP2044
,rom:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:32 AM
Delivered: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
GP2045
To:
Subject:
AJ
I
I will get my notes, the GPS coordinates, and all from Saturday as soon as possible.
Thanks again for everything!
Geor~e.
1111:
'
m:
: ::.
. .
AJ;
Please send me the analytical results from all the wipe samples that we collected that day and I will incorporate it with
my notes, the coordinates, etc.
I want the results from the school as Well. Ideally, I would like to see us merge the our reports and conclusions since
this was a join effort.
Thank you,
George
d morning George:
supervisor Curt Pendergrass is requesting any documentation that would accompany the swipe samples we took on
the field in front of the landfill entrance, done at different locations on either side of the entry access road to the facility.
If you recall these are samples F-1 through F-9 taken 12/27/16. I would appreciate it if you can scan and send me the
1
GP2046
report which could be a short narrative and would include the readings, GPS locations and a sketch (or map) of the
approximate area at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your consideration.
:;st
Regards
.'
AJ Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiation Health Specialist ll
Radioactive Materials Section
275 East Main Street, HSlC-A
~----;:;rankfort7"~y~40601~
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
GP2047
---~------------
Partridge, George.(EEC)
,rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Regrettably Richard has the inspection checked out so I can't add the other names to the inspection.
-----------------
far I have loads almost into February, in fact the 2ih of January.
GP2048
~rom:
Sent:
TO:
Subject:
I need the coordinates of the sample sites near the landfill. Will you be around for me to copy them?
I am still waiting and requesting the results from all the wipe samples that were taken, both for the school as well as the
ones we took surrounding the entrance to the landfill.
I asked Matt at the meeting the names of others there and he could not remember their names. Said it would be in
there reports. Hopefully I will get a copy we can combine with our notes;
The names I have are to the best of my recollection:
. .
GP2049
George;
Meeting scheduled fortoinorrow moring!
George
GP2050
..",
,,
:_
.rom:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
George;
Notes from this past Saturday. I plan to type a narrative and attach my photos as well as soon as possible.
Thank you,
George
From: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Attendees: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
George;
I am still waiting and requesting the results from all the wipe sarnples that were taken, both for the school as well as the
ones we took surrounding the entrance to the landfill.
I asked Matt at the' meeting the names of others there arid he could not remember their names. Said it would be in
there reports. Hopefully I will get a c6py we can combine with our notes.
e!1
GP2051
--------------
- - - -
--
Got it. Make a copy of the participant list from S~turday for me to put in TEMPO, S'il vous plait! Have you heard
anything from Curt? Do we know what came out yesterday?
~~from:-Partridge1<3eorge~EEe)~-~--~-~-~-~----~-~--~-~~~---~~-----
- -----~----~--~---~~-~~-~~F--~~~--~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~___,
From: Partridge, George (EEC)
Sent: Monday, February 29, 201610:34 AM
To: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Weems, George (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hendricks, Todd (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Site Survey and Sampling - Irvine,KY - Saturday, Februray 27th
Jon;
With the public meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening in Irvine, KY, the public will want to know the results of the.
survey and sampling events that were conducted_ by the CFHS-DPH in Irvine, Kentucky.
I was asked to witness and participate in those activities.
It is important that we review and discuss those activities prior to the meeting so the public will be presented an
accurate representation of the activities conducted and what we can conclude at this point.
Please schedule a meeting where we can all meet and discuss this prior to the public meeting on Tuesday.
This is very important!
Thank you,
George
GP2052
I-
GP2053
1-rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeri:
. Correspondence leading up to the planning of a site visit to Fairmont Brine Processing.
Thank you,
George
No problem
......
'
George Partridge
KDWM
.t,
I
I
GP2054
'
How about we pay you a visit on Friday ML Kalt? I would need to reach out to my counterparts in WV just to see if they
w~sh to a~compan~ us o~ this sampling trip.to your Fairmont, WV facili~y. We _never go i~to anothe_r age~cies jurisdiction~
without first checking with them. And I believe Mr. Jason Frame has quite a bit of experience working with you cind your. . .
facility. You said the sludge would be easily accessible with pr~per planning. What would that entail exactly just 'so we
can bring the proper sampling equiprnent.
Curt Pendergrass-PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1C-A
Frankfort,_KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-'564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergr'ass@ky.gov
Website: http://w'Nw.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
To:
GP2055
Mr. Pendergrass,
r~e
sludge does not accumulate in either of the large ponds you see in the picture below, but rather in the middle of the
picture in what looks like a rectangle f'<oncrete basin"). With proper planning, we can access the sludge easily. What
day wo.uld work for you
~nd
or your team?
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended onlyfor the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its' contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not anJntended recipient you must not use,
disdose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this.e-mail in error, please notify these.nder by.reply e-rriail and
delete and destroy the message.
I. .
',~,:.
'', ;!1~(~;
'
Sorry to hear that f\llr. Kalt Qut I was thinking that was probably going to be the case given the amount oftime that has
transpired. But thanks for checking on the samples with Summit and Reliance just the s~me. looking ba~k your earlier.emails, younientioned thatthe sl~dge was beil1gdewatered on site in dewatering boxes, Do yoUhave any of this sludge
material currentiy on site that we can easily access to take a sample of what you are now processing that you would
rrilnd vs toming to get? I am not familiar with your fa,!'.:illty but I really don't wish to get in a boa.t to float on your settling
p~nd ord6risp'.Jba gearto takeslu~ge sample the b.ottom of a deep settling pond. The picture of the pond on your
w.ebsite looks like it Would be.ffifficult to sample.
at
Currently, FBP does not physically dewaterthe sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standa'rd
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on-site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM
Services for dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on
FBP's understanding of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally
occurring radioactive materials were to be eliminated.
GP2056
------
----
-----------------
---
GP2057
,/!;,:It,
::ailto:Bf<alt@fairmontbrine.oom]
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
~close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e7mail and
~te and destroy the message.
,
From:
GP2058
~~--,or.-Penoergras-s,
~~-~=-,
~-~~-~-
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this. e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is add.ressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e:..mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
..A
9"'
GP2059
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http;//www .chfs.ky.govI dph/radioactive .htm
Pay your.fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of .u.nwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Please note, for clarity, the values provided previously were numbers calculated above background. In
~iogr.ap.h'.1c inspection, the radiation spread. s out.. as it trav.els a\Nayfrom the source. T.herefor~, the inte.nsity
~he radiation follows Newton's Inverse Square Law. This law accounts for the fact that the intensity of
radiation becomes weaker as it spreads out from the ~ourcesince the same about of radiation becomes
spread over a larger area. The intensity is inversely proportional to the distance from the source.
In industrial radiography, the intensity at one distance is typically known and it is necessary to calculate the
intensity at a second distance. Therefore, the equation takes on the form of:
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:
With a known dose rate reading at a given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0.0208 feet), the fixed law
called the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000 rem.
Radiation dose= (Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2
- p i e s : (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
7
GP2060
~~--
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)A2
(2 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading:. 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-6806244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP2061
Also, thank you forthe information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a .little more
information on what type of survey .instrume11t you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (m~,J~e,
model, calibration d.ate). lfyo4 ~Qok a background.with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you took your.
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Summit or
1 foot from the sludge boxes or 1 foot from the sludge pit?
'
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
material above background. the average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0;227 R/hr
(O.OQ02267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) IJV!:ISOnly 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 niR/hr), As
published by ttie Nucle~r Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per ti,our (0.07,mR per beer), and
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
Thanks agair;i for your cooperation and assistance in this matter,
Regards,
Curt PendergrassphD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky. Rat!hation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HS1~-A
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183 '
Fax: .502-564-1492,;
Fm ail:. curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
.
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line .at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of un_wanted sourceshttp://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx
..-=:
~t;
[m~:BKalt@fairm~ntbrine.com]
Kalt, Brian
Monday, February 29, 2016 3:33 PM
To: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, 2016
9
GP2062
Gentlemen,
Please see the responses in green to your questions below.
1.
Each box can hol.d up to 25 yards. Length 20', Height 6' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs.
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame, Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation, Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdere<;l soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as ratliurri sulfate, to form
an Insoluble.sludge. This chemical precipitation process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
been determined. to be. non-hazardous.
When soluble barium is converted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus, stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in :2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector.. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0'.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 tnR/hr). As published by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission {NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the tlose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana
(0.009863. mR per banana).
.
Currently, FBP does not physically dewaterthe sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewatering period on~site, the boxes were received by Advanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, as appropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's under,stariding
of the dewatering process and solidification process, the extremely low levels of naturally occurring radioactive
Is there analytical data on the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have 011managemen.
of the landfill?
10
GP2063
Please see the attached Non-Hazardous Waste Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
Non-Hazardous Material.
fl!!_
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244 ..
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.. Its contents (including
any attachments) are copfidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error; please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
.
~rt;
Thank you for responding to Mr. Kalt's question.
George Partridge
KDWM
11
GP2064
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
A..
to
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http:ljwww.lrc.ky.govfstatutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
Frankfort,
KY: 40621
.: ..
/.'
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext.. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: htlp:/lwww .Chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line athttps://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose
of unwanted
sources.http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR;aspx
- - '.
.
.'
~.
~~:
12
GP2065
-------.
-~---~-~------..-
~: Partridge, George (EEC); Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
as being acceptable?
..
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The inforrnation contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (inch,1ding any attactirnents) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive .this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and the opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly hlghlight the
questions you asked and what I shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
13
GP2066
We received calls from Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENORM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
Was the waste solidified prior to being sent to the landfill.
Our understanding was the waste was sent directly to the landfill.
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unpermitted wa?te. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
I do not have that information.
I concluded our conversation by affirming that I am not aware of any concerns regarding how FBP
managed the waste, and that I am only seeking to understand what was received by Blue Ridge Landfill
since their management has not made a complete disclosure of the wastes they have received.
We would appreciate the assistance of your company in helping us obtain the following information, so
we can address the questions that are being presented to our Division by the press and public. The key
questions I am seeking to address in my role as a permit engineer with the Solid Waste Branch are as
follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. We are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
14
GP2067
-m:
Sent:
Te>:
Cc:
Subject:
~(ournational. h.azardous was.te database), looked up the. F.airmont facilit.y w.e. b.site, and I a.I.so.. spo.ke to rriy R.2 con.tact,
Also, I took a look at the analytical results. Based on these results, it doesn't appear that the waste would be hazardous,
if the waste was determined to be non-exempt. To gain better insight on the results, I spoke to our EPA lab (located in
Athens, GA). He said it looked like the type of analysis usually used when waste is senfto a hazardous waste landfill,
which provides info on whether the waste meets Land Disposal Restriction requirements (which is odd, since they're
claiming the 261.4(b)(S) exemption from hazardous waste regulations). Also, in looking through the results, he said that
the material appeared to be fairly wet; it had a high % moisture and it failed the paint filter test.
GP2068
Cc: Jeri.Higginbotham@ky.gov
Subject: RE: RCRA Question & Fairmont Brine Disposal
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
---~-
.,.._~~~~,-~~-~~~~-""~~~-~
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they l"ecefve~d
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report'' provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24; 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that rec;:eived this waste is managed by Advanc:ed Disposal.
Correspondence to the "WestVir~inia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORIVI related wastes. Also attC'lc::hed are their recor(ls of incorporation as an LLC here in l(entuc:ky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talkingwith you again .next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George
GP2069
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
<
'.
..
'
.'
And I especially want to thank you for offering tq provide samples of sludge from thi? same settlingtahk wh~re the
material we are now dealing with first originated at FBP. The fact that the tank .is used in the inltial stage of settling and
precipitation Qf oil and gas flowback and produced fluids, I would imagine the sludge now in your tanks is fairly
representative of what was there last summer when these tanks were cleaned out and the material bro1,1ght to KY. As
you said, you will understandably need to first discuss this with your attorneys to get their input, but I call assure you
that we will be more than happy to split those samples with FBP so you can have them analyzed by another lab of your
choosin. g for co..mpar.ison, T.he. Dep.t. for Public He. alth., Ra. diation Health Br.anch has its ow.n Envir.onrnelltal Mon.itorin.g.
oratory and the samples you provide would have the radiochemical analysis conducted by our laboratory and I am
e my colleagues in Solid Wastes will wish to conduct their own analysis as well for other non'."radioactive const.ituents.
We will probably reach out to our colleagues in the WV Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation; Toxics and
Indoor Air Division to assist us in our sampling trip to your Fairmont WV facility.
. . .
As for your requests for documents provided by Mr. Cory Hoskins of Advanced TENORM Services/BES Technical
Solutions, Waste Management and Pace Analytical, I am going to have to forward that along to rny tolleagt:ies in Solid
Waste for their input and consideration. As we discussed, the very preliminary radiation survey results by a staff
member from this office showed slightly elevate.d exposure rate readings in localized areas of the landfill cap but the
region where the landfiUinques.tion is located was found to have a high amount of shale which contains elevated levels
of natural ur.a.nium and thorium and decay daughters. Obviously, much more thorough and extensive radiation surveys
and sa.Tpling will need.to be conducted to better characterize and quantity the radiologic:al conberns.
.
...
Thank you again for reaching out to our office and we look forward to working with you and FBP to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Curt Pendergrass PhD
Supervisor, Radioactive Materials Section
Kentucky Radiation Health Branch
275 East Main Street
Mailstop HSlC-A
kfort, KY 40621
. .502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
1
GP2070
Website: http://www.chfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https://prd.chfs.ky.gov/rad epay/
Be notified of proposed regulation changes https://secure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Di~pose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd~org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
To: Pendergrass,
----- --~-- -
1. Any documentation that Cory Hoskins and or Advanced TENORM Services presented to Blue Ridge Landfill, the
2.
3.
4.
Kentucky DEP ano or The Kentucky Department for Public Health, Cabinet for Health and Family Servkes.
Any documentation and or re_sL1lts from Pace Analytical and or Waste Management.
Any links that can shed light as to whether or not the waste was exempt and or non-exempt.
You mentioned tha_t your team did some radiation mohitoring at the Blue Ridge Landfill, and the re~ults
indicated 20 rem. Additionally, your team took a sample at the source of the reading. If you would, please
send anaiysis once received,
Respcetfully,
Brian Kalt
President
Faii"mont Brine Processing, LLC
412:..680-6244
.
"
'
. .
..
....
The information contained in this e"mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its .contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and rnay contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must 11ot use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail ~hd
delete and destroy the message.
GP2071
f/L, .
Subject:
Tracking:
RE!cipient
Delivery
Rei!d-
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Jon;
I will follow up with Danny as requested. I c::lo not know what could have changed since Saturday since my text message
was sent at the end of our visit at the schools in Irvine, KY. The consultant from what Matt McKinley shared that .
afternoon that was going to be on. site Sunday, was not certified and therefore could notconduct any sampling or
sample analysis. "Pre~ent" means to me t~at the students can go to school and not be concerned this coming week.
Please keep infoind that the text was sent from my cell phone and I wanted to go into more detail in a follow-up phone
call and meeting.
'
tha~
instru~.
the~e
i~.the
I feel we have a dusting of particulate deposition on top of existing shale geology which makes the total cps measured
only slightly above or within the background level range for the shale alone. The shale will stay in place, but the
deposited radionuclide waste particulates if inhaled in the compartments of the respiratory system, are in direct contact
with lung tissue/cells and the continued exposure for extended periods of time raises the risk of increased cancer risk
with a latency period of 10 to 40 years.
Depending on the emitter, the internal dosimetry analysis for an individual walking on a shale formation is minimal and
nothing to be concerned about.
I felt the survey Saturday was more for the public and news crew rather than an assessment of the exposure concerns
we have forthe critical receptors.
I felt the present exposure concerns were minimal to the public even without what was done this past weekend .
want to note that I have not received the sample results from Saturday yet that I requested and were supposed to
. .been completed either Sunday or no later than Monday.
.
GP2072
In closing I want you to know that I appreciate what you, Danny, Tony, and everyone is doing to address the situation at
Blue Ridge. I also realize the extreme demands on everyone's time and schedule presently and thatthere is no way to
meet with everyone. I am very passionate about this situation since it reflects and surrounds so much of my teaching ~
and research work at Penn State when I was a faculty member.
~
Please do not take niy emotions and concerns to be questioning what you all are doing. I am happy to be part of this
Division and I appreciate all those l know and work with and know everyone has the best interest of the Irvine
Community at heart;
George
From: Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
March 02, 2016 11:30 AM
To: Partridge, George (EEC)
Cc: Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Subject: RE: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Wednesday,
George,
It appears that something has changed since your text on Saturday which stated: "Just
Finish~d. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school buildiflg to
main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of landfill. Person~lly
I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any concerns or risks to
..A
the pu..b.l.ic du. ..e to prese.nt a. ct.il(.ities... They should. go a.. bout th. eir no.rmal activities. The . risk co.ncern and exposures to
worry about occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and discuss With you.".
...
Please work with Danny t<> schedule a time to meet with me to better understand your
observations and concerns.
Thank you,
Jon
Sent: T1:1esday,
Tony;
Jon Maybriar requested for me to be present at the sampling and site survey that was conducted at the Irvine County
High School and Middle School on Saturday, February 27, 2016. I was hoping to have an internal meeting to discuss my
observations with both Danny Anderson and Jon Maybriar on Monday or at least prior to the public meeting this
evening so that when they meet with county officials Monday and Tuesday, they could make recommendations on steps
to ta.keto protect. their. safety and we.II-being until we know more (such as a reconstructive exposure assessment, e t c . ) .
which will be weeks to months in the future.
.
,
GP2073
I am going to list my observations and recommendations below and also attached a copy of an email message I sent
requesting a meeting.
We met at approximately 8:20 AM at the McDonalds off of Exit 90 in Richmond to discuss the plans for the site
visit and to arrive in Irvine as a group. In the meeting I stressed that the exposure to the school and surrounding
area would include airborne particulate matter since the entrance to the landfill is directly across from the
school entrance. Both the school and the school grounds, particularly around the entrance and in front of the
school would experience particulate deposition.
When we arrived at the school shortly after 9 AM, Matt McKinley gathered the group in front of the entrance to
the school building and started his instruction to the group by stating "We are not here to look for.:particulates."
(That was the primary exposure of concern!).
Matt McKinley instructed Chris Keffer and A. J. Bhattachar)ta not to take the "back packs" (which were the most
sensitive detection equipment that was brought by DPH) across the street which resulted in the grounds of the
school where the grass was, not gettir;ig surveyed for deposited particulates.
.
.
I also me!1tioned to Matt McKinley that th~ schools needed to turn c:>ff the HVAC systems, remove the existing'
filters and take wipe samples in the ductwork on the upstream side of the filter to check fqr.particulate matter
containing radionuc::lidE!s. This was not done tQ.!llY knowledge.
I feel the following risk scenarios are still present to the school and community:
! The maintenance workers at the school each time they work on, service, or replace the filters to the H.VAC
systems for the school, which for one school occurs on a monthly basis.
! Deposited particulate matter.from the landfill and vehicular traffic coming and going from the landfill,
previously deposited on the school grounds; becoming re-suspended this spring when the grass on the school
grounds is cut. The cutting of the grass and related landscape activity will expose both the workers, students,
and all individuals that may be present in the vicinity when those activities are conducted
. . message by text on the phone to Danny Anderson, sent to him at 1:58 PM on Saturday, February 27th stated the
following:
"Just Finished. Appears school building is ok. Will get wipe results Monday. As you go from entrance of school
building to main road entrance counts go up. Also numbers higher as you scan terrain going up toward gate of
landfill. Personally I feel we are seeing contamination from trucks and traffic to and from landfill. I do not see any
concerns or risks to the public due to present activities . they should go about their normal activities. The risk
concern and exposures to worry c;tbout occurred this past year. Will call you late afternoon or early evening and
discuss with you."
In my text messages I used the word "public" in my message and with the words "present activities;'' I still neede(:I to
discuss the safety and well-being of the maintenance workers at the school who change the filters poten,tialiy being
exposed to particulates containing radi.onuclides. I am also concerned in the future when it is time to cut the grass
about the resuspension of previous particulate deposition that occurred and has contaminated the grounds in front of
the school near the entrance.
I called Danny that evening. I did not receive a return call. I sent an email message on Monday morning. Danny and I
have talked but it has either been walking down the hall or in his office when he was busy with other matters pertaining
to Blue Ridge. I appreciate air the Danny is doing and realize he has been extremely busy. I am grateful for the time he
has been available to spend with me. I also realize Jon is extremely busy as well.
..-.,iso.extremely worried that individuals will die a prema.ture death or have seri.ous health pro.blem.s in the future
~ this waste disposal at Blue Ridge. The latency period between exposure and the increase incidence of cancer
and other serious health effects is 10-40 years depending on exposure scenario and age at time
of exposure.
GP2074
I am also concerned about the operators and workers at the landfill and how close they are working to
previously deposited waste. Are they maintaining a buffer distance to minimize exposure? Is the landfill
resu. m...ing th. e.ir. normal activities before they ass.ess .the e.xten.t. o.f con
... tamination? A.re t.hey continuing to l e ' the public drive up to the area of the working face and discharge w.aste materials they are dropping
off? Has the equipment at the landfill that was used for waste disposal been decontaminated as a
precaution?
I want to conclude with the following comments:
../ I
'1
appr~iate
~~-----_-
c-. .::-~~--""to-=--~"'~"""'""-~~=--=---~~
I feel overwhelmed and terribly worried about the lives being affected and it helps me to talk. I feel like I
have been going at this alone as an employee for several years now and what I have feared would happen
and has happened in other states has now occurred in Kentucky and to a more severe degree since this
was processed TENORM rather than the TENORM that is produced at the O & G drilling/fracking sites.
I also felt this was the last chance to get a message to you since management reads their emails when
they are away from the office!
Thanks again to everyone in the DWM for all you are doing. I wish you all the best as your work on this
and the Public Meeting tonight.
George
GP2075
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-6716 ext. 4651
..
..
GP2076
------
-----
---
f#om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Gents,
I've _been trying to get ahold of Cory Hoskins from Advanced TE NORM Services for over a week now, but he seems to
have gone silent. I'm going to send him an email, and I was wondering if there were any questions you wanted me to
include because I'm guessing you have not heard from him either,
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The info_-rmatio-n contained in this e-m_-a-ii is intended o_ nly for__ the individual or e_ntit-y to whom it is a_ ddres_s_e_d-. Its-content_s (in_cl-uding
attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
. .lose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
ewect:
Dr. Pendergrass,
1
GP2077
I just spoke with Summit, and they keep samples on file for sixty days unless a client requests a longer period of time
prior to analysis.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
~--~-4~1~~680~62'44=~--~--~-~-~~~----~----- -----~~~-~~~-~~----~---~-~~~-~-~--
The information contained in this e-mail Is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {induding
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Pendergrass,
GP2078
I heard back from Reliance this morning, and they only keep samples for a couple of months before they dispose of
them. I will try and get an answer from Summit today and get back with you.
tl!.nd Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in tnis e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is a.ddressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not us~;.
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error/please notify the sender by reply e~mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Thank you Mr. Kalt for the thorough explanation of the inverse square law. And thank you for letting us know that the
.contact dose rate reading with the Fairmont ~rine Processing sludge did indeed read 2 mrem/hr.
"Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr@ contact (assumed 0.25" from sour~e)"
The ~ rnrern/hr ~n colita.ct ~OS~ rate reading is what we were led to be.lieve this sludge read from others in W'I/.
You did not answer my question but would you be willing to contact those laboratories where you pre~iously sent this
same FBP sludge for analysis to see if they retained a sample of that material and if so, would they mind releasing that
material to our office for radiochemical analysis? As I saip, we would be m9re than happy to rn~~e the drive to OH or W.V
to pick up the samples. And as long as we have your written permission to; felease these samples, assuming they still
exist, I would be more than happy to contact Reliance or Summit on your behalf ~~d inquire as io whether they still
retained these samples.
,
Please let me know about the samples and .thank you once again for your cooperation and assistance in this matter.
..... ~502-564-1492
~ii: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
GP2079
Accordingly, we calculated our maximum dose (measured at 2 mR/hr at sludge contact) as follows:
Radiation Dose Rate and Dose Examples:,
,
With a known dose rate reading at given distance from the source (at contact, say 0.25", or 0:0208 feet), the fixed law
called, the Newtown Inverse Square Law is applied to determine the dose rate at any other distance. Note: 1 mrem =
1000rem.
Radiation dose= {Dose Rate, mrem/hr)*(Distance of the known dose rate, in feet)"2
(Distance where you want to calculate the dose rate, ft)"2'
Examples: (Distance from source)
Based on the highest recorded Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the sludge for one hour, the dose would be 2mrem
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208 ft)"2
(1 ft away)"2
If you were standing 2 ft from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.0208ft)"2
(2 ft away)"2
GP2080
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
-nsitive enough.
If you were standing 10 ft away from the source for one hour, the dose would be:
Dose= (2 rnretn/hr)*(0.0208 ft)A2
(10 ft away)A2
Note, at this distance, the reading would not be measured above background, as the detection equipment is not
sensitive enough.
Examples: (Time exposed to source)
Source reading: 2 mrem/hr @ contact (assumed 0.25" from source)
If you were standing on the source for 5 minutes (.083 hours), the dose would be 0.166 mrem.
If you were standing 1 ft from the source for 5 minutes (0.083 hrs), the dose would be:
Dose= (2 mrem/hr)*(0.083 hrs) * (0.0208 ft)A2
(1 ft away)A2
~dRegards,
, a n Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its conte.ots (ioc;lucjing
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you musfnot use, '
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. lfyou receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
Thank you Mr. Kalt for sending along the attached documentation and especially the results of the sludge analysis.
Unfortunately, looking through the analysis results from both Reliance Laboratories and the Summit Environmental
nologies Laboratorie.s i don't see. wh. ere any radiochemica.I a. nalysis on any of this material was performed which is
t we were really hoping to find. Something that actually put a number to the actual pCi/g for Ra-226 and Ra-228
from a certified referenced lab would be great to have. Would you mind reaching out to these two companies and
inquiring as to whether or not theyretained the samples from last fall and if so, if our office could acquire a portion for
5
GP2081
radiochemical analysis by our Environmental Monitoring Laboratory? We would be more than happy to come pick up
tbe samples if they are available.
Also, thank you for the information on the radiological surveys of this sludge material. Can you give me a little more
information on what type of survey instrument you were using when you took the surveys referenced below (make,
model, calibration date). If you took a background with this instrument, what did it read? You indicated you to.ok your
readings 1 foot from the sludge. Is that 1 foot from the sludge samples before you sent them to Reliance and Surrimit or
1 foot from 1:he sludge boxes or 1foot from the sludge pit?
-~~-,~-7~1r:i~tha.second,baliot2015~..EBJ?:s.slu~dge__b~a.i:Lexblruted.vef, v..erJ l2v.1. lev~ls of natl!rajl_~ occurring radic>active
. _ ~ .......
material above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr
(0.0002267 mR/hr). The highest reading (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.8652 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr). As
published by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ((\JRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA),
both readings are lower than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), an.d
slightly lower than consuming one banana (0.009863 mR per banana).
-;.',
Each box can hold up to 25 yards. length 20', Height()' and Width 8'. Empty Weight is 9,000 lbs..
2.
GP2082
3.
""
What was the total quantity of waste shipped in the 47 shipments that were received by Blue Ridge Landfill.
between July and November of 2015?
After Fairmont Brine Processing's (FBP) Sludge Disposal Plan (Please see attached) was accepted and approved by Jason
Frame; Chief Radiological Health Program at the Office of Environmental Health Services/Radiation,. Toxics and Indoor
Air Division, Advanced TENORM Services picked up 865.33 tons of material.
4.
FBP uses sodium sulfate, a soluble compound whose predominant use is in the manufacture of powdered soaps, to
capture barium, a toxic constituent in some brines, as barium sulfate and to capture radium, as radium sulfate, to form
an insoluble sludge. This chemical precipitation
process also removes sand and some hydrocarbons. This sludge has
.
been determined to be non-haza.rdous.
.
When. soJublebarium isJ:onverted to insoluble barium sulfate, it's toxic nature becomes so benign that it.is-used by
doctors as a contrast media to coat esophagus~ stomach, or intestine so that diseased or damaged areas can be seen by
x-ray or CT scan.
FBP's sludge has been fairly consistent since operations began in 2013. Because of the possible co-precipitation of
radium with barium, FBP monitors the sludge with a handheld detector. In 2014 and early 2015, FBP's sludge had no
levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials above background. This sludge is similar in nature to sludge generated
at a typical drinking water treatment plant.
In the second half of 2015, FBP's sludge had exhibited very, very low levels of naturally occurring radioactive material
above background. The average reading of all samples (1 foot from the sludge) was only 0.2267 R/hr (0.0002267
~/hr). The highest reading (1 footfrom the sludge) was only 0.8G52 R/hr (0.0008652 mR/hr): As published by t~e
. . .clear, Regulatory Commission (NRC) and United States Environment Protection Agency (EPA), both readings are lower
than the dose of drinking several glasses of beer per hour (0.07 mR per beer), and slightly lower than consuming one
banana (0'.009863 mR per banana).
Currently, FBP does not physically dewater the sludge on-site. The sludge is removed via pump into standard
dewatering boxes. After some dewateririg period on-site, the boxes were rece_ived by j\dvanced TENORM Services for
dewatering and solidification, a~ a,ppropriate to pass paint filter test, and then landfilled. Based on FBP's understanding
of the de.watering process and solidification pro~ess, the extremely low. levels of naturally occurring radioactive
materials were to be eliminated.
5.
Is th.ere analytical data oh the waste available to help us understand the impact that will have on management
of the landfill?
Please see the attached Non-Haz.ardous Waste.Approval Notification Form from the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection's (WVDEP) Director, Scott Mandirola. Please see the attached analysis that was conducted on
the Non-Hazardous Material. .
If anything else is needed, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
i. .nKalt
I
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
GP2083
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
~--~~-
i=romti'aitrli:lge; Geor9eri:i:cf[rnailto:Geor9e.Pa-rtridge@kY.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:07 AM
To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH) .
Cc: Kalt, .Brian
Subject: RE: Phone can on February 26, 2016
Curt;
Thankyou for responding to Mr. Kalt's que~tion.
George Partridge
KDWM
applicabl~
(10) "Region" means the geographical area of the state of Illinois and the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
KRS 211.863 Control of commerce of low-level radioactive waste in and out of Kentucky
-- Prohibitions -- Exemption. http://www.lrc.ky.gov/statutes/statute.aspx?id=8502
(3) Naturally-occurring radioactive material (NORM) as defined in KRS 211.862(8) shall be the exclusive
regulatory responsibility of the states, except that no person shall import naturally occurring radioactive
8
GP2084
- - - - -
material (NORM) from outside the region for disposal in Kentucky, or dispose of such imported material in
Kentucky, if the imports or disposal are inconsistent with polices of the commission.
Mailstop HSlC~A
'
Frankfort, KY 40621
Tel: 502-564-3700 ext. 4183
Fax: 502-564-1492
E-mail: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Website: http:ljwww.thfs.ky.gov/dph/radioactive.htm
Pay your fees on line at https:ljprd.chfs.ky.gov/rad. epay/
Be notified of proposed n:!gi.fl~tion changes https:ljsecure.kentucky.gov/Regwatch/
Dispose of unwanted sources http://www.crcpd.org/StateServices/SCATR.aspx
Mr Kalt:
Any questions you may have regarding KRS 211 and the related radiology regulations of 902 KAR 100 should be directed
*1e agency responsi.ble for the enforcement of those statutes and regulations which is the Cabinet for Health and
~~ily Services (CHFS).
Thanks,
9
GP2085
Danny Anderson
On Feb 27, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Kalt, Brian <BKalt@fairmontbrine.com> wrote:
Dr. Partridge,
Thank you for putting this all together.
Under KRS 211.862 and 211.863, what levels of naturally occurring radioactive material has Kentucky set
~-~-- _-~ asb_eirrg Cil:~~J2~-~IE!? --~~ .________ ~---~- -~~ ______ -~~~~~------~~~ -------~--- -~ --------~~------ :_____ -~-~~~--~-~--~---~
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e_-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its
contents (including any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an
intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message.
Cc: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Phone Call on February 26, WH~
Hello Brad;
I appreciated you calling today and th_e opportunity for us to talk. Just wanted to briefly highlight the
questions you asked and what I _shared with you.
The questions you asked addressed the following items or issues (my response is in blue):
Who notified us regarding the shipments from Fairmont Brine Processing to Kentucky?
We received callsfrom Ohio that shared TENORM waste was being shipped from Ohio to Kentucky. One
contact shared that TENO RM waste was also being shipped from WV as well and referred us to Jason
Frame. Jason Frame informed us about the waste stream from FBP.
10
GP2086
Yes, it is regulated by the CHFS-DPH and is noted in KRS 211.862 & KRS 211.863. The Solid Waste Branch
issues permits for contained landfills and they are not to accept any unperrnitted waste. The DPH
regulates the management and disposal of radioactive materials and is responsible for licensure.
What fees did the landfill charge for the waste disposal?
Thank you again for returning my call yesterday even though you were not able to address my questions
without a written request from KOEP. I am also glad you contacted me today and we got a chance to
briefly address questions you have. we.are both seeking to understand better what has happened and
to address the questions we are receiving regarding the waste and how it was managed.
I appreciate very much that you are in contact with our Division and Dr. Curt Pendergrass. Any
questions I have or information I need will be directed to your attention through formal
correspondence/letters from the appropriate governing entities that we are working with.
Thank you,
George
11
GP2087
--om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Maybrier, Jon (EEC)
Subject: RE: Safety of Irvine, KY Community
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:11 :00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Thursday, March 03, 2016 1:42:18 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
..
..
1
GP2088
#_rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
George;
Where is it in KAR that requires the manifests to be available or kept on file for three years?
Thanks for your help!
George
GP2089
-tte
Sent:
To:
Subject:
__________________________________
..
1
GP2090
GP2091
.,_,
Sent:
To:
Subject:
---
--------
George;
Where is it in KAR that requires the manifests to be available or kept on file for three years?
Thanks for your help!
George
I
I
.
!
-
GP2092
To:
Subject:
GP2093
------~--
GP2094
...
I ..
GP2095
Subject:
It is a conference call with WV Hazardous Waste folks .. Curt, are you interested? George, should
us?
Hi Nancy,
We would indeed be interested in a meeting, conference call, or other arrangement between Kentucky and West
Virginia. I know Dr. Curt Pendergrass (Kentucky) has been making arrangements to travel to Fairmont Brine Processing
with Jason Frame '(West Virginia), and this may happen as early astomorrow. I think it would be a helpful follow up for
~three reg.ula.tory entities(KY, W
.. V, and USEPA) totalk .among themselves sometime next week or at everyone's
~liest conve.nience. I am available at any time next week.
.
Jeri;
Could we make this call together?
I am available anytime.
Thank you,
George.
From: McKeePerez, Nancy [mailto:McKeePerez.Nancy@epa.gov]
George,
1
GP2096
When you have a chance, give me a call. I spoke to my R2 contact, Carol Amend, and she said that she would coordinate
a meeting between ya'll and the State of West Virginia. West Virginia may be able to shed some light on the Fairmont
Brine Processing's process. Would this be something you all would be interested in?
.
I
8 6~:~cv@epa.Qov
I ~~-~ ~~~r~e~: z
I
-~-~-~- _-~-~---- ___ -~----~-~-~~ ___ ---~~~~~---~- _: ___ ___ -~~-~--- ________ -~-----~~
6/A
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies such
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
We look forward to talking with you again next week.
Thanks again for your assistance!
Sincerely,
George
GP2097
..
GP2098
#m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
GP2099
~~------------
---
GP2100
f#om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Radioactive
.
.
..
......... .
'
GP2101
While most material is handled properly, it's "clearly not enough. There is definitely some illegal dumping going on."
Oilfields are spinning off thousands of tons of low-level radioactive trash as the U.S. drilling boom leads to a surge in
illegal dumping and states debate how much landfills can safely take.
State regulators are caught between environmental and public health groups demanding more regulation and the
industry, which says it's already taking proper precautions. As scientists debate the impact of small amounts of radiation
on cancer risks, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says there's not enough evidence to say what level is safe.
Left to police the waste, state governments are increasing their scrutiny of well operators. Pennsylvania and West
Virginia are revising limits for acceptable radiation levels and strengthening disposal rules. North Dak<:>ta's doing the
same, after finding piles of garbage bags filled with radioactive debris in an abandoned building this year.
"We have many more wells, producing at an accelerating rate, and for each of them there's a higher volume of
waste," said Avner Vengosh, a professor of geochemistry at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, who) studied
the issue. Without proper handling, "we are actually building up a legacy of radioactivity in hundreds of point$;~here
people have had leaks or spills around the country."
Lengthening List
It's the latest environmental challenge for an industry that's pushed the U.S closer to energy independence while facin~.
questions about the effects on water supplies and air pollution-- and even a surge in earthquakes.
~
GP2102
"There's all kinds of regulations about how to deal with waste and how to transport waste and we follow them all," said
Andrew Paterson, a vice president at the Marcellus Shale Coalition, a trade group that represents companies active in
~nnsylvania d_rilling including Range Resources (RRC) Corp. and Noble Energy Inc. (NBL) "It's very safe and the levels
we're talking about are really low-level."
rat
Questions to Fort Worth, Texas-based Range, a pioneer of Marcellus drilling, were referred to the Shale Coalition. A call
to Noble, based in Houston, wasn't returned.
Studies have found higher radiation levels at oil wellssince fhe 1970s; said Vengosh. What's new is the volume of
material being produced. '~It's just become much more abundant right now with the .intensity" of drilling, he said.
Radium Contamination
The issue is shale rock, the dense formations found to hold immense reserves ofgas and oil. Shale often contains higher
levels of radium -- a chemical element used in industrial X-ray diagnostics and cancer treatments -- than traditional oil
fields, Vengosh said.
Freeing gas and oil is a water-intensive process called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in which drill bits cut thousands of
feet through shale fields to make way for high-pressure water streams that pulverize the rock. The process displaces
radium-tinged subterranean water that comes up through the wells, where it can taint soil and surface equipment.
Radiation levels can build up in sludges at the bottom of tanks, pipeline scale,and other material that comes in extended
contact with wastewater.
i
Buried Waste
Some states allow the contaminated material to be buried at the drill site. Some is hauled away, with varying
requirements for tracking the waste. Some ends up in roadside ditches, garbage dumpsters or is taken to landfills in
violation of local rules, said Scott Radig, director of the North Dakota Health Department's Division of Waste
-nagement.
,.
In that state's Bakken oilfields, "it's a wink~and-a-nod situation," said Darrell Dorgan, a spokesman for the North Dakota
Energy Industry Waste Coalition, a group lobbying for stricter rules. "There's hundreds of thousands of square miles in
northwestern North Dakota and a lot of it is isolated. Nobody's looking at where all of it is going."
That's one of the problems the state is trying to fix with rules announced last week requiring well operators to install
leak-proof containers for temporary storage onsite and to use licensed waste haulers and landfills. North Dakota, the
biggest oil-producing state after Texas, has commissioned a study of radiation risks that may spur further changes, Radig
said.
In the meantime, North Dakota landfills have installed radiation detectors to try to catch loads exceeding the state's
current limits. Anything higher must be trucked hundreds of miles to dumps in neighboring states that have less
restrictive limits.
Radioactive Socks
On Feb. 28, North Dakota officials found hundreds of radioactive "filter socks" -- used to strain wastewater from wells -dumped in an abandoned building in Noonan, just south of the Canadian border. The filters registered about 40
microrems an hour of radiation, about five times the naturally occurring "background level" in the area, Radig said.
That's below the 1,500 microrems delivered from a typicaldental x~ray. Still, it could be a danger if people got close
enough to inhale or ingest radioactive dust, Radig said. Radiation levels also can increase if material accumulates in the
-onment.
GP2103
"Just mention the word 'radioactive' and it scares a lot of people," Radig said. ''They're angry about what's going on."
His agency has received more than a dozen reports this year of oilfield debris rejected by landfills because of radiation
concerns.
Illegal Dumping
North Dakota wells may produce 27 tons a day of filter socks alone, Radig said, citing a private hauler's estimate. While
most material is handled properly, it's "clearly not enough. There is definitely some illegal dumping going on."
'
The state hired a contractor last week to remove the Noonan filter socks. The operation will cost about $13,000 and use
- --~ . =mon6'yJr:o.m-at:1~ir:idustcy.,.,backedJundio~lean~p,.ahandnneclailaru:tgas~Jls,.aa;Dn:lingJ.Q~i3ltb Cle.Rartment .
statement.
Oil and gas companies have been dealing with radioactive waste for decades, said Kari Cutting, vice president of the
North Dakota Petroleum Council, an industry trade group in Bisrnarck. ''The majority of companies that have been active
in other shale plays know how to deal with it," she said. "We do not condone illegal dumping or improper management
in any form."
Landfill Restrictions
In West Virginia, on the edge of the gas-rich Marcellus formation, lawmakers voted last month to require landfills to
I
install radiation monitors and to build separate, lined cells designed to contain drilling debris. The law, signed by
Governor Earl Ray Tomblin March 31, also expanded the amount of oil and gas waste landfills can accept.
With proper precautions, landfills are the safest place for the debris, said Thomas Aluise, a spokesman for the state
Department of Environmental Protection. "A lot of operators were just burying them onsite, unchecked, all over the
state'\ he said.
While it's unclear ho. w much drilling waste is produced nationally, state totals are rising. West Virginia. landfills accepted .
721,000 tons of drilling debris in 2013, a figure that doesn't include loads rejected because they topped radiation limits.
The per-month tonnage more than tripled from July 2012, when records were first kept, through last December.
In Pennsylvania, epicenter of the Marcellus boom, the oil and gas industry sent 1.3 million tons to landfills last year; That
included 16,000 tons of radioactive material, according to Lisa Kasianowitz, a spokeswoman for that state's Department
of Environmental Protection.
R;:idiation Study
Pennsylvania allows producers to bury some waste onsite in lined pits. It's drafting rules to discourage that as a
permanent option, Kasianowitz said in a telephone interview. Further changes could come after Pennsylvania completes
a studyof radiation risks that's looking at everything from worker safety at the wellhead to allowable levels in landfills.
Results are due later this year, she said.
Texas last revised its rules on radioactive material in 2003 and currently has no plans to change them, said Ramona Nye,
a spokeswoman for the state's Railroad Commission, which oversees drilling. T.he state allow~ the waste to be taken to a
landfill, buried onsite or mixed into the soil near a well as long as it's treated to reduce radiation below setlevels.
The rules are "more than adequate" to handle oil and gas waste safely, Nye said in an e-mail.
To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Nussbaum in New York at anussbauml@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Susan Warren at susanwarren@bloomberg.netTina Davis, Steven Frank
GP2104
._,
Sent:
To:
Subject:
George;
Thank you!
George
AiU.
GP2105
'
GP2106
#m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Maridely is the representative for the HWB on TENORM. Yes, I feel we should extend an invitation to her.
Thank you,
George
GP2107
Thank you,
George
'
When you have a chance, give me a call. I spoke to my R2 contact, Carol Amend, and she said that she would coordinate
a meeting between ya'll and the State of West Virginia. West Virginia may be able to shed some light on the Fairmont
Brine Processing's process. Would this be something you all would be interested in?
Hello Nancy;
Thank you for taking with us regarding the RCRA regulations and how they may apply to a waste that was received by a
landfill in Kentucky from Fairmont Brine Processing in WV.
Please find attached the following documents:
Waste Profile Sheet and Approval Review Form from Advanced Disposal for the waste shipments they received
from Fairmont Brine Processing. Also attached is the "Detailed Customer Activity Report'' provided by the
landfill manager that confirms receipt of 47 shipments between July 24, 2015 and November 16, 2015. The
Blue Ridge Landfill in Irvine, Kentucky that received this waste is managed by Advanced Disposal.
Correspondence to the "West Virginia Office of Environmental Health Services" from Fairmont Brine Processing
describing how they planned to dispose of the waste.
Analytical results obtained by Pace Analytical on behalf of Waste Management who was initially being
considered to contract for disposal of this waste.
Web Site pages for Advanced TENORM Services advertising their capabilities/expertise in the management of
TENORM related wastes. Also attached are their records of incorporation as an LLC here in Kentucky.
Thanks again for reviewing these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies suc"1
as Fairmont Brine Processing.
2
GP2108
GP2109
I
I
~~~=-
-~.~~-~-.~~~-~~~~=--~~----~-~-~--
-------~~~~--~
--- -
-~--~~
-- -
GP2110
#m:
To:
Subject:
Sent:
GP2111
Where is it in KAR that requires the manifests to be available or kept on file for three years?
GP2112
#-:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jon;
I know so much is going on right now and how extremely busy you are.
Just wanted to say thank you again for all you are doing.
George
GP2113
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hello Bill;
I look forward to reviewing the material you shared. with us on radiation detectors. I will follow up with you next week.
I would like very much to visit the Sycamore Landfill arfd see the Radcom RCW34 detector.
It is pleasure to know you and the others associated with Republic. I appreciate all that Republic does for the waste
management industry and the services you provide.
'
'
I appreciate all you are doing and how supportive you have been as we seek to better understand the waste
management aspects of TENO RM.
I look forward to us keeping in touch and wil.1 get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.
Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
- e a nice day!
George
.ect:
Radiation Detectors
. H i all:
GP2114
--------------
-~
Republic intends to install more sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentucky landfills that
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attached is
literature and a picture of a Radcomm RCW34 unit installed last year at the Sycamore Landfill in
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.
A..
In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P drilling waste which included
provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installed the Radcomm RCW34 detector at the
Sycamore Landfill, a small (200 ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P waste is riot accepted.
Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly, inform us whether
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34
detector rion-compliant (We do not want to be proactive and install this type of unit then find out it
doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your availability if you would like to schedule a visit to the Sycamore Landfill a.Q.d check
out the Radcomm RCW34 detector. Feel free to contact us with any questions or comments or if you
need additional information.
Thank yori.
Environmental Manager
Heartland Area
2157Highway151
Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0 502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www .republicservices.com
t/_'pR.,..,,.,_.C
Ir\\
SERVICES
GP2115
'
~j
flam:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
GP2116
Jon has a Director's meeting this morning and needs to move this meeting back to 11 :00.
Alexandra L Ballard
DIVISION OF WPSTE MANAGEMENT
200 FAIR OAKS LANE, 2ND FLOOR
FRANKFORT, KY 4060 l
502-564-6716, X4629
FAX 502-564-4049
ALEXANDRA.BALLARD@KY .GOV
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whicf) it is addressed
and may contain confidential information that is legally privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message Is
not the intended recipient you are notified that any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication In error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destrc;>y all copies of the original message.
..
GP2117
'#m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George:
Please review in the context of our solid and special waste regulations. Specifically, the following regulations, but there
may be more I am missing:
1. 401KAR 47:190 Section 8
2. 401 KAR 48:070 Section 9 and 12
3. 401 KAR 48:090 Sections 2, 8, 10, 11
Please let Curt or others in the RHB branch comment on the specifications of the instrument, its adequacy, etc. for
detecting LLRW in shipments.
Basically, a joint response is what I am asking for here George.
Thanks,
Danny
Hello Bill;
1lool< forward to reviewing the material you shared with us on radiation detectors: I will follow up with yo~ next week.
I would like very much to visit the Sycamore Landfill and see the Radcom RCW34 detector.
It is pleasure to know you and the others associated with Republic. I appreciate all that Republic dOes for the waste
management industry and the services you provide.
I appreciate all you are doing and how supportive you have been as we seek to better understand the waste
management aspects of TENORM .
k forward to us keeping in touch and will get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.
Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
1
GP2118
e:EP
-
564~6716
ext. 4651
- - - --
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:57 PM To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Radiation Detectors
-
Hi all:
Republic intends to install more sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentucky landfills that
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attached is
literature and a picture of a Radcomm RCW34 unit installed last year at the Sycamore Landfill in
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.
In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P dfilling waste which included
provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installed the Radcomm RCW34 detector at the
Sycamore Landfill, a small (200 ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P waste is not accepted.
Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly, inform us whether
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34
detector non-compliant.(We do not want to be proactive and install this type of unit then find out it
doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your ayailability if you would like to schedule a visit to the Sycamore Landfill and check
out the Radcomm RCW34 detector. Feel free to contact us with any questions or comments or if you
need additional information.
Thank you.
GP2119
Environmental Manager
Heartland Area
.1-~
.~
UB. IC
~V RPi.
SERVICl:S
81/l..
. .
W~'ll
L.
GP2120
To:
Cc:
Subject:
All,
George Partridge and I have been communicating with Nancy Perez, USEPA Region 4 RCRA specialist,
concerning whether or not Fairmont Brine Processing is subject to RCRA law. She contacted another USEPA
RCRA specialist in WV's region, Carol Amend, to set up a conference call with WV Hazardous Waste
people. The conference call was going to be scheduled for some time next week. Maridely Loyselle, George
Partridge, and I were going to be on the phone from Kentucky. Others on the call will be WV regulators and
USEPA.
Should we proceed with scheduling this conference call for next week?
Jeri
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
:vision of Waste Management
GP2121
-rom:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George:
Please review in the context of our solid and special waste regulations. Specifically, the following regulations, but there
may be more I arn missing:
k forward to us keeping in touch and will get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.
Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
1
GP2122
_ _ -~---~--~~-~----~---~~~~-~-~~~~--~~
-To: Pendergrass, Curt (CHFS DPH); Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Radiation Detectors
Hi all:
Republic intends to installmore sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentucky landfills t h a t .
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attached is
literature and a picture of a Radcomril RCW34 unit installed last year at the Sycamore Landfill in
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.
In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P drilling waste which included
provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installeq the Radco~ RCW34 detector at the
Sycamore Landfill, a small (200 ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P wast~is not accepted.
Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly,_inform us whether
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34
detector non-compliant. (We do not want to be proactive-and install this type of unit then find out it doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your availability if y~u would like to schedule a visit to the Sycamore LandfiJl and _check
out the Radcomm RCW34 detector. Feel free to contact us with any questions or comments Qr if you
need additional information.
Thank you.
GP2123
Environmental Manager
Heartland Area
"-157Highway151
Frankfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0 502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www.republicservices.com
JlTJ
1J-.\\ .REPUBLIC
SERVICES
GP2124
Cc:
Subject:
All,
George Partridge and I have been communicating with Nancy Perez, USEPA Region 4 RCRA specialist,
concerning whether or not Fainnont Brine Processing is subject to RCRA law. She contacted. another US EPA
RCRA specialist in WV's region, Carol Amend, to set up a conference call with WV Hazardous Waste
people. The conference call was going to be scheduled for some time next week. Maridely Loyselle, George
Partridge, and I were going to be on the phone from Kentucky. Others on the call will be WV regulators and
USEPA.
Should we proceed with scheduling this conference call for next week?
Jeri
Jeri W. Higginbotham, Ph.D.
1
.
GP2125
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Danny;
I was corresponding with Bill before the meeting with you and Jon today.
How would you like for me to proceed from here?
George
-~---
...
--
502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www.repubHcservices.com
8
s.. .
~1
.
P
.
.
.
uic
1111i.
.. . SEllVICES .
GP2126
Hi Bill;
Hi George:
I am out on vacation most of the Mar 14 week. Right now, I am open the entire week of Mar 2 h l will
be out of the office most of the week of Mar 28. Let me know what works best for you.
Thanks.
502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www.republicservices.i::om
. . ....
. .' . . RIJPU8LIC
~
SERVICES
----- ---
From: Partridge, George (EEC) [mailto:Georqe.Partridqe@ky.gov]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 7:25 AM
Hello Bill;
GP2127
I look forward to reviewing the material you shared with us on radiation detectors. I will follow up with you next week.
-would like very much to visit the Sycamore Landfill and see the Radcom RCW34 detector.
It is pleasure to know you and the otl)ers associated with Republic. I appreciate all that Republic does for the waste
management industry and the services you provide.
I appreeiate all you are doing and how supportive you have been as we seek to better understand the waste
management aspects C>fTENORM.
I look forward to us keeping i.n touch and will get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.
Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
Have a nice day!
George
P.~.,
Q'EP
To: Pendergrass, Cutt (CHFS DPH); Partridge, George (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: Radiation Detectors
Hi all:
Republic intends to install more sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentucky landfills that
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attached is
literature and a picture of a Radcomm RCW34 unit installed last year at the Sycamore Landfill in
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.
In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P drilling waste which included
provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installed the Radcomm RCW34 detector at the
. flj_amore Landfill, a SJllll]l (200 ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P waste is not aq;epted.
Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly, inform us whether
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34
GP2128
detector non-compliant. (We do not want to be proactive and install this type of unit then find out it
doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your availability if you would like to schedule a visit to the Sycamore Landfill and check
out the Radcotnm RCW34 detector. Feel free to.contact us with any questions or comments.or if yc)u
need additional information.
Thank you.
/l,.. . lf&PllB
. LIO
SERVICES
\!5:f.
.
'
GP2129
-rom:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George:
I'm sorry, but no outof state travel is authorized. As far as visiting Green Valley, that's fine, but please do not offer any
cornrnent as to the effectiveness of the instrument. This couJd b.e construed as a permit review (and Approval) without
an actual application submittal to us. If Green Valley wants to modifY their waste inspection procedures, they are free to
do so as a permit modification submitted to us on the appropriate forrn, with the appropriate supporting ciocumentation
and with the appropriate fee and signatures. We would most likely get CHFS input. during our review as
Well if it involves
..
radiation detection equipment
'
'
Hi George:
How does Tues, Mar 22 at 1:00 look?
~ironmental Manager
Heartland Area
GP2130
2157Highway151
Fnmkfort, KY 40601
e WChlebowy@republicservices.com
0 502-209-3816 c 502-403-8908
w www .republicservices.com
,R..,..
____,~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~-,-~~--~~-:--:-~~~
From: Chlebowy,William[mailto:WChlebowy@repoblicservices~com]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 8:47 AM
Hi George:
I am out oil vacation most of the M'1f 14 week. Right now, I am open the entire week of Mar 21. I will.
you.
'
be out of the office most of the week of Mar 28. Let me kllow what works best
for
Thallks.
GP2131
w www .republicservices.com
I look forward to reviewing the material you shared with us on radiation detectors. I will follow up with you next week.
I would like very much to visit the Sycamore Landfill and see the Radcom RCW34 detector.
It is pleasure to know you and the others associated with Republic. I appreciate all that Republic does for the waste
managerrient industry and the services you provide.
'ppreciate all you are doing and how supportive you have been as we seek to better understand the waste
management aspects of TENORM.
I look forward to us keeping in touch and will get back with you next week regarding radiation detectors.
Thanks again for all you are doing to support this important work!
Have a nice day!
George
GP2132
'
Hi all:
Republic intends to install more sophisticated radiation detection systems at its Kentuclfy lan4fills_~a,t
are better suited to detect NORM and TENORM than the systems currently in place. Attachetlis
I ~----nteramreanaapfcmre-ora~Raucomm ltC'.W37*--um.t instatled"tam year m1lre-Sycanmre-tan-dfitlin= -~--~,.~
Hurricane, WV that we are considering to install at our Kentucky landfills.
In 2014, West Virginia enacted regulations to control disposal of E&P drilling waste which included
provisions for radiation detection. As a result, Republic installed the Radcomm RC)V34 detecfor at the
Sycamore Landfill, a small (200ton per day) facility that only takes MSW; E&P waste is not accepted.
Before proceeding, can you provide comments on this unit and, more importantly, inform us whether.
or not any pending legislation to address NORM and TENORM would render the Radcomm RCW34
detector non-compliant. (We do not want to be proactive and install this type of unit then find out it
doesn't meet the regulations.)
Let us know your availability if you would lil\e to schedule a visit to the Sycamore Landfill and check
out the Radcomm RCW34 detector. Feel free to contact us with any questions or comments or if you
need additional information.
Thank you.
R, . .
81. ~ RSP.U.Bl...IC
SEFIVICES
'1J-.v
GP2133
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Atta.chments:
Carol,
About two weeks ago, KYDEP requested that I offer them a regulatory interpretation (whether it could be a potential
HW) on a waste t.hat was received by a Subtitle D landfill located in Kentucky. The waste originated from the clean out of
an unknown process at a brine processing facility located in Fairmont, West Virginia, called Fairmont Brine
(http:ljfairmontbrine.com). The facility is claiming that the waste is exempt per the O&G exclusion, 40 C.F.R. 261.4(b)(S).
As such, no Waste profile was provided before the waste was disposed in the fandfill. KYDEP and I wanted to find out
.more information about the wast~ generation process before was agree that this waste is indeed exempt.
Fairmont Brine is a brine processing facility that specializes in processing "flowback and produced fluid" (brine) from oil
and gas exploration .. Based on information f.rom their website, they process the brine by filtering the material to remove
organics, TSS, turbidity, Ba, Sr, and O/G. After filtration, the material is allowed evaporation/crystallization, resulting in
salt and water, which they sell or give away. The material the landfill received was generated from the clean out of some
process at the West Virginia facility. KYDEP was provided with the facility's Sludge Disposal Plan from the West Virginia
Office of Environmental Health Services; so. we are assuming it was some sort of sludge that was in need of dewatering.
~ ~ren't sure w~~re the dewat~ring occurred, at t~e facility or at some point ~hile it wa.s in transi: (if it matters) .. The
,...-iltty used a fac1hty called Advanced TENO RM .services to transport the material from Fairmont Brme to the landfill.
'ff
from KVDEP called Fairmont Brine to get inf()rmation on their process and how the material was generated;
however, the facility wouldn't provide them any information. We were wondering if the State of West Virginia has any
knowledge about this facility and/or about the process that would generate this waste.
.) 562-8674
GP2134
Than~s again f~r reviewin~ these documents and helping us understand how EPA regulates wastes from companies suchA
GP2135
'
e (EEC)
To:
Subject:
Good afternoon,
I wanted to bring everyone up to speed on the RCRA portion of DWMs
investigation into TENORM generated outside of Kentucky and disposed of in
, Kentucky landfills. A request was recently sent to Advance TENORM Services
requiring information. Their responses will be reviewed by the Hazardous Waste
Branch to make a determination whether this material is subject to RCRA
regulation. The Hazardous Waste Branch will review the findings of this
investigation and decide a future course of action. At this time there will be no
need for Kentucky to participate in a call with US EPA or the State of West
Virginia.
c~cerely,
e
From: Higginbotham, Jeri (EEC)
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 12:50 PM
To:.Maybriar, Jon (EEC); Anderson, Danny J (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Webb, April (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC);
Martin, Jerri (EEC); Jump, John (EEC)
All,
George Partridge and I have been communicating with Nancy Perez, USEPA Region 4 RCRA specialist,
concerning whether or not Fairmont Brine Processing is subject to RCRA law. She contacted another USEPA
RCRA specialist in WV' s region, Carol Amend, to set up a conference call with WV Hazardous Waste
people. The conference call was going to be scheduled for some time next week. Maridely Loyselle, George
Partridge, and I were going to be on the phone from Kentucky. Others on the call will be WV regulators and
USEPA.
Should we proceed with scheduling this conference call for next week?
GP2136
Attachments:
Tracking:
Recipient
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Delivery
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
FYI - Requested notes and field measurement taken in Irvine, KY on February 27,2016.
.,
1
GP2137
Sample Number
F-1
F-2
F-3
F-.4
37
83.98611
37.73663; 83.98605
37.73684; 83;98617
37.73676; 83.98641
37,73669; 83.98665
37.73704; 83.98628
37,73770; 83.. 98629
37.73692; 83.98669
37.73679; 83.98706
F~S
<t=-6
Meter CPS
GPS Coorctinates
37~73673;
. F-7
F..:8
F-9
35~36
33-36
48
26
27
25-26
J8
22
Notes:
1. Counts in front ofschool building; 9 - 12 cps (5-8 with same meter used for measurements in
table.)
Counts increased .as one walked across grounds from front of building to hig~way running
parallel to school: 15- 23 cps (Different handheld meter than one used for table.)
3. Counts on grounds adjacent to entrance road leading from highway to front of building: (23-25
cps) (Different handheld meter than one used for table.)
4. Counts from highway to gate at landfill entrance increased: 22, 26 to 27, 37, 36; general trend
was an increase in counts from school to landfill entrance which could potentially be attributed
to particulate deposition on the surface of shale geology.
2.
with handheld
Attachment: Figure,
notes and photograpahs
taken in field at time of measurements
.
...
..
.
instruments.
'
3&-37---------------~-
CPS23:24
School Building
Landfill Gate
GP2138
GP2139
I
GP2140
GP2141
lfl'
GP2142
GP2143
I. .
GP2144
~m
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
GP2145
~m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Maybriar, Jon (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016 '.
..
1
GP2146
~m:
To:
Sent:.
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and ObseNations Requested for February 27, 2016
..
1
GP2147
fl!am:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Weems, George (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Obs~rvations
..
..
1
GP2148
flam:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Hatton, Tony (EEC)
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
GP2149
'--=
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Friday, March 04, 2016 6:03 PM
Delivered: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
GP2150
"--=
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Notes and ObseNations Requested for February 27, 2016
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 6:02:47 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Friday, March 04, 2016 6:07:54 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
..
1
GP2151
e!-=
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
(
GP2152
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dr. Pendergrass,
Attached is the quote from Advanced TENORM Services as well as the first of three attachments, which contain the
manifests and tickets from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Email one of three.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
. . .2-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP2153
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:.
Dr. Pendergrass,
Email two of three.
Kind Regards,
Brian.Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LL<;
412:-680-6244
The .information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any atta. ch. m.e.nts) are confidential and may contain privileged i.nformation ..If you are .not an. intend..ed rec. ipient you rnust. not use,
close, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
ete and destroy the message.
Dr. Pendergrass,
Attached is the quote from Advanced TENO RM Services as well as .the first of three attachments, which contain the
manifests and tickets from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Email one .of three.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
. . . . .montBrine Processing, LLC
9"2-680-6244
GP2154
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents {including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
L.
~
GP2155
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Dr. Pendergrass,
Email three of three.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President.
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attach. me.nts) are con'fidential an. d m. ay contain pr.ivilege.d information. If you are not an intended recipient yo. u mustn ot use,
close, disseminate; copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
lete and destroy the message.
.
To: curt.pendergrass@ky.gov
Cc: ;Partridge, George (EEC)'
Subject: RE: Fairmont Brine Processing - Manifests_Email 2 of 3
Dr. Pendergrass,
Email two of three.
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
1
GP2156
Dr. Pendergrass,
Kind Regards,
Brian Kalt
President
Fairmont Brine Processing, LLC
412~680-6244
The infqrmation contained in this e~mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
ariy attachments) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its cont~nts. If you receive this _e-mai_I in error, please notify the sende_r by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
...
_.A
GP2157
e (EEC)
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
waste. Anything regarding EPA that I was involved with will b.e handled by April Webb from this point forward.
From this point on I am not to acknowledge any emails or phone calls I receive from anyone both with our own state
government as well as anyone contacting me from the outside such as EPA andthe state governments of Ohio and West
Virginia.
Jon specifically mentioned you Curt and the DPH. If I receive anything from the DPH I am not to reply or even
acknowledge I received the email message. I am to forward all phone call messages and emails as I received them to
Danny Anderson for him to handle appropriately.
I am one to at least say "thank you" when an email message is sent to me and I instructed to no longer do that.
I am also not going to say anything, mention anything, or acknowledge anything with my co-workers related to what is
going on.
In essence, I have been totally "silenced" on anything related to our landfills, TENORM, the 0 & G industry, or any of the
events leading up to what has occurred here in Kentucky regarding the receipt of out of state wastes that are potentially
radioactive.
When I return to work Monday, I will be going about my routine work in the Solid Waste Branch. I will be acting and
. . .ng about my daily work responsibilities as if I had no knowledge or interests in what has taken place unless I am
~tructed otherwise by Danny. I will not be talking or discussing anything associated with TENORM with anyone
Including those I work with in the Solid Waste Branch.
GP2158
I also feel my time is limited with the Solid Waste Branch and I will be relocated in the future.
I appreciate all that everyone has done, the support and encouragelllen.t I have recei.ved from others, and espeCially for&...
those that listened and took an interest in my concerns regarding the well -being and health of our operators at our
.....
landfills and the surrounding communities they serve.
I wish you all the best,
Sincerely,
George Partridge
GP2159
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Page 2 of Article
GP2160
---
---~
------
9t~=
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Page 4 of article
'
GP2161
.m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Page 3 of Article
GP2162
tit~=
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Page 1 of article.
GP2163
~m:
~nt:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Just wanted to be _sure you all received my email message if the article did not go through because of its size and being
an attachment.
Thank you,
George
or
I was called into Jon Maybriar's, our Assistant Director's Office for the DWM on Friday morning; March 4 at 11:00
AM. Jon and Danny Anderson, our Solid Waste Branch Manager were present.
Jon shared that there are meetings taking place with attorneys from both the state and companies involved. Also Daniel
Cleveland has instructed him what he could share with me or others.
I have been i_nstructed to stop all the investigative work I am doing which included working with EPA Region's 2 and 4
who were helping us understand better the waste from a "brine processing facility" as well as obtaining records .(waste
determination on materials generated by that facility, process information, etc.) related to Fairmont Brine
Processing. They were also helping us understand how other states are managing arid regulating this type (TENORM) of
waste. Anything regarding EPA that I was involved with will be handled by April Webb from this point forward.
From this point on I am not to acknowledge any emails or phone calls I receive from anyone both with our own state
government as well as anyone contacting me frorn the outside such as EPA and the state governments of Ohio and West
Virginia.
Jon specifically mentioned you Curt and the DPH. If I receive anything from the DPH I am not to reply or even
acknowledge I received the email message. I am to forward all phone call messages and emails as I received them to
. n y Anderson for him to handle appropria~ely.
I am one to at least say "thank you" when an email message is sent to me and I instructed to no longer do that.
GP2164
I am also not going to say anything, mention anything, or acknowledge anything with my co-workers related to what is
going on.
In essence, I have been totally "silenced" on anything related to our landfills, TENO RM, the O & G industry, or any of t h e .
events leading up to what has occurred here in Kentucky regarding the receipt of out of state wastes that are potentially
radioactive.
When I return to work Monday, I will be going about my routine work in the Solid Waste Branch. I will be acting and
going about my daily work responsibilities as if I had no knowledge or interests in what has taken place unless I am
=~-~jostOl_cted~otb~erwls~.byJlanuy_.J~will JJOt.be_Jitlkin.~Qr_dis~ys~LDg auy.!bl'1K~~~QCj[!~d_Y!!i!Jl~!~NORM with an'[one --- ~--~-~~
.- -
..
.~
I also feel my time is limited with the Solid Waste Branch and I will be relocated in the future.
I appreciate all that everyone has done, the support and encouragement I have received from others, and especially for
those that listened and took an interest in my concerns regarding the well -being and health of our operators at our
landfills and the surrounding communities they serve.
I wish you all the best,
Sincerely,
George Partridge
GP2165
~-
a.m
~nt:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Just wanted to be sure you all received my email message if the article did not go through because of its size and being
an attachment.
Thank you,
George
From: George Partridge [mailto:gjpartridge@windstream.net]
GP2166
I am also not going to say anything, mention anything, or acknowledge anything with my co-workers related to what is
going on.
In essence, I have been totally "silenced" on anything related to our landfills, TENORM, the O & G industry, or any of t h .
events leading up to what has occurred here in Kentucky regarding the receipt of out of state wastes that are potentially
radioactive.
When I return to work Monday, I will be going about my routine work in the Solid Waste Branch. I will be acting and
going about my daily work responsibilities as if I had no knowledge or interests in what has taken place unless I am
I
GP2167
IJtm:
Sent:
Subject:
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Partridge, George (EEC)
Monday, March 07, 2016 8:17 AM
Read: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Your me}~sage
To: Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 6:02:47 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, March 07, 2016 8:17:22 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
19
..
1
GP2168
GP2169
.m:
Sent:
To:
Subject
FYI.
Specifically, this is about Blue Ridge and Green Valley, but I suspect there are other sites.
Lindsey Briggs, PE
Environmental Engineer Supervisor
502 5646716
Thanks,
Danny
' communication is better coordinated, and decisions appropriately made to best resolve the issues.
GP2170
1. Because this is currently primarily a DWM issue within the Department, any responses, discussion, and inquiries
regarding the specific matters of these investigations and evaluations from parties outside of the department are to be
first coordinated thru both the DWM Director's office and OGC (Daniel Cleveland and Jackie Quarles). This would include
DNR, CHFS, or any of the agencies that we routinely interact with, in addition ~o the public, regulated entities, and local.
officials.
2. Any media inquiries and responses, consistent with prior protocol, are to be coordinated and referred first to Lanny
and John Mura (EEC Communications Director) with notification to the DWM Director's office and OGC (Daniel Cleveland
and Jackie Quarles). John will be lead on determining who and how the agency is to respond.
3. Any inquiries with the Attorney General's office, consistent with long-standing protocol, are to coordinated and
referred first with OGC {Daniel Cleveland and Jackie Quarles) with notification to the DWM Directos's office.
4. Any open records request response regarding these specific issues, consistent with with prior agency protocol, are to
be coordinated with both the DWM Director's office and OGC prior to finalization.
The above procedures will help ensure that the agency appropriately manages and oversees our actions, interactions,
and responses. I greatly appreciate your continued efforts on this important issue as we work collectively to resolve the
issues.
If you have any questions, please let me know at any time.
Thanks,
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
'
GP2171
-m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 6:02:47 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, March 07, 2016 8:27:20 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
GP2172
~~:
To:
Subject:
Bhattacharyya, Anjan
Monday, March 07, 2016 8:37 AM
Partridge, George (EEC)
RE: RE: Notes and Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
..
1
GP2173
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
I understand that most of you are not involved in this issue so I apologize upfront for you being included. For those who
are, and may become involved as the issue progresses see below. If you have any questions please let me know.
'
-Y
~onsistent
GP2174
4. Any open records request response regarding these specific issues, consistent with with prior agency protocol, are to
be coordinated with both the DWM Director's office and OGC prior to finalization.
The above procedures will help ensure that the agency appropriately manages and oversees our actions, interactions,
and responses. I greatly appreciate your continued efforts on this important issue as we work collectively to resolve the
issues;
If you have any questions, please let me know at any time.
~~.J:ha r:iksr~- ....~-~~ --.~....~~~...... -" -,.----
Bruce
......,
GP2175
.m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Arti~le from UT highlighting the work of Dr. Sherry Cable, Professor of Sociology.
The disposal and management of waste from the "Fracking Industry'' has the potential of being another Love Canal
where the industry was producing waste and disposing of it before an adequate regulatory structure was in place and
the contaminant migration and health effects did not surface for 30 years or so later. Love Canal was a chemical
exposure scenario. TENORM is radionuclides.
The latency period between exposure and the emergence of health effects from radionuclides is 10-40 years.
Radionuclide.shave a low solubility and tend to partition to the solid phase and therefore their Chemical migration in
environmental systems takes years.
I appreciate everyone's patience with me since January. I have just been so worried about the implications of the
disposal of TENORM in Kentucky and want to do all I can to protect the well-being of our communities .
m back devoting my full attention to our submittals in solid waste and my routine job responsibilities .
anks again for all you are doing for our Division and the communities we serve.
George
..
1
GP2176
GP2177
et~=
To:
Subject:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
Danny;
I received a voice mail message at my extension; 4651 while we were in the meeting in Conference Room 2028 between
10 AM - 11:20 AM today.
The message was:
"Dr. Partridge# this is Brian Kalt. I work with Fairmont Brine Processing. If you would please give me a call when you_,
get a chance. My number is 412-680-6244. Thank you;''
George
...
1
GP2178
'
GP2179
~:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11:32 AM
Delivered: RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing
GP2180
-om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11 :32:27 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11 :35:38 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
'
GP2181
George:
Do notreturn the call. I will forward on per the email notice from Bruce Scott of 3/5/16.
Danny
From: Partridge; George (EEC)
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 11:32 AM
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Voice Mail Message from Fairmont Brine Processing
Danny;
I received a voice mail message at my extension; 4651 while we were in the meeting in Conference Room 202B between
10 AM -11:20 AM today.
.Dr.
Pa.rtridge, this is Brian Kalt . I work With Fairman.t.Brine Processing. If you would please give me a call when you
~t a chance. My number is 412-680-6244. Thank you. 11
George
GP2182
.om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
'
GP2183
-om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Weems, George (EEC)
Subject: RE: Notes and. Observations Requested for February 27, 2016
Sent: Friday,March 04, 2016 6:02:47 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada}
was read on Friday, March 11, 2016 8:57:36 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
'
GP2184
GP2185
.rom:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
FYI, a KGS study regarding sulfide mineral damage to the schools across the road from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Although the pyrite is indeed naturally occurring, if the landfill operations expose it, fracture it, or use it for fill and/or
cover, the minerals are exposed to oxygen and water and surface water and groundwater can be affected.
So, landfill operations can still be the source of the problem, even though the sulfides, metals, etc. are naturally
occurring in the shale.
Todd Hendricks, P.G.
Geologist
Kentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
GP2186
GP2187
fl'rom:. .
Sent:
To:
Subject:
The part about simply not using the shale as fill is something we need to remember re: the landfill.
FYI, a KGS study regarding sulfide mineral damage to the schools across the road from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Although the pyrite is indeed naturally occurring, if the landfill operations expose it, fracture it, or use it for fill and/or
cover, the minerals are exposed to oxygen and water and surface water and groundwater can be affected.
So, landfill operations can still be the source of the problem, even though the sulfides, metals, etc. are naturally
occurring in the shale.
Todd Hendricks, P.G.
Geologist
. ISentucky Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Branch
200 Fair Oaks Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
502-564-6716 ext. 4653
GP2188
-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
ahank~ou!
.._eorge
GP2189
FYI, a KGS study regarding sulfide mineral damage to the schools across the road from Blue Ridge Landfill.
Although the pyrite is indeed naturally occurring, if the landfill operations expose it, fracture it, or use it for fill and/or
cover, the minerals are exposed to ()xygen and water and surface water and groundwater can be affected.
So, landfill operations can still be the source of the problem, even though the sulfides, metals, etc. are naturally
occurring in the shale.
'
GP2190
Subject:
Attachments:
GP2191
.rom:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Catem>ry:I..._S_Ub!:riiltals
__
. _.__ _ _ _...._,I
Status: 1
......[ALL_._)----~~
.... 1
Cla$8: 1
.......
~_lt._J_.___ _ _ _....._,,
Year:
l._____.I !
J~N~
GP2192
'
GP2193
.m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Tracking:
Delivery
Jeri;
Let me know if this was what you were looking for. Attached all the info I have including what you already have
obtained.
Website for CMC is: http://www.cmcompact.org/
I am respecting what has been requested of me. I am glad to provide any information on what I have previously done if
that will help others. I am also restricting any literature or document reviews to historical materials that are not related
to the current investigation.
~nks again for stopping by. It is always a pleasure to visit with you and with my teaching interests in the risk
ssment area, it is a pleasure to look at topics with someone with your many years of experience and expertise in
area.
.
Thank you,
George
{ieorge
P~ Partrid{Je Jr.
..
1
GP2194
-m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mr. Kryfka,
Thank you for taking the time to reach out today. Per our conversation, the names Cc'd on this email are those with
which we have been communicating with since everything has transpired.
Gents-- Tony Kryfka is with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and is investigating what has been
transported on West Virginia roads.
Kind Regards,
rianKalt
sident
mont Brine Processing, LLC
412-680-6244
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including
any attachmt!nts) are confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use,
disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and
delete and destroy the message.
GP2195
GP2196
ta!~:
To:
Subject:
George,
This might be something that could be done through the Extension Office.
http:Uwww.uky.edu/superfund/about/news/superfund-community-action-through-nutrition-scan-program~presented
cooperative-extension
GP2197
-m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:01 PM
Delivered: FW: Fairmont Brine Processing
GP2198
i-m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:01 PM
Delivered: FW: Fairmont Brine Processing
GP2199
GP2200
,eem=
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: FW: Fairmont Brine Processing
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:00:43 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:04:31 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
..
1
GP2201
I..,:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
Read
Danny;
You scheduled me to meet with you in your office today, March 23, 2016 and I accepted the meeting invitation in
Outlook that you sent me at 11:22 AM this morning.
In the meeting we discussed the following topic areas:
1. If I had any concerns regarding my work.
2. Why I seem discouraged or worried at times and what you could do to address it.
3. The fact that when Ken included Catherine that I expressed an interest in staying in Frankfort and leaving at my
regularly schedule time rather than attending a preconstruction meetingthat starts in Glasgow at 3 PM CT
which would result in me getting in late.
4. The nee,d for our Section ~ngineers to work overtime (Blo~k-SOs) again this year considering thatl earned 8Block sos in a row last year and started last year out with very little comp time accrued .
. , 5. The concern I expressed to Ken, who is my acting Supervisor that we have continued to hire geologists when
..
there is a need for the engineers to work overtime and the geologists typically work there regularly scheduled
hours.
6. I expressed an interest in a transfer to Tony and copied Lindsey, you, and Gary Logsdon on it.
I want to documentour discussion and also be sure we are clarified on the points we discussed. If you had invited .Ken
to the meeting you woLild have had a different understanding rather than communicating separately with him and then
with me at~ later time. I Wish
parties could .be present and there would not be a breakdown in communication: Ken
is my acting Supervisor and I shared my concerns with him. My understanding is if we have a concern we should take
that first to our supervi.sor and I did that since Ken is my supervisor for this wee.k. By starting off the meeting with the
questioning if you had "a disgruntle employee" put me on the defensive and I did not feel relaxed from that point on in
the meeting.
all
I am confirming and clarifying my position on the above topics and as well as documenting what was discussed.
ltem1:
No, I am very pleased having you as my Branch Manager and am especially delighted the skills you bring regarding
interpretation and the identification of relevant regulations as WE! address su.bmittals .and perrnitting situations. Ken
has been an wonderful friend, mentor, and co-worker and I could not have been more delighted to have the
opportunity to work closely with him when I first started as well as having opportunities for us to still do things
togethe~
,
l.m2:
1
GP2202
I have over 5 years of full time study and research on particulate behavior as a tenured faculty member at Penn
State. The modeling and health effects of airborne environmental contaminants (including radionuclide.s) and their
impact on human health was my area of teaching and expertise at Penn State. I taught Human Health and Ecological
Risk Assessment for the 12.5 years I was at Penn State. With regard to the exposure assessment of the risk
assessment process I have over 20 years of experience. My academic studies and research work both in industry and
academia makes me acutely aware of the health risks of inhaled rad.ionuclides and I am gravely concerned that both
the operators at the landfill and individuals in the community in Irvine, Kentucky will potentially suffer serious health
concerns or shortened lives in the future from the potential exposure of the low-level radioactive waste that was
disposed of at Blue Ridge Landfill. I am still deeply concerned about the potential for re-suspension of deposited
. ~~~~~partiGleseGOnt-aiRing-radionuclides.on.botbJ:ba.gmunds.surrauodiogJ;h.e~~entr.an~_jo the S!;:bools as well as whe.n t,he .
I
school maintenance workers service the HVAC systems. To my knowledge that has not been addressed, but I have
been cut-off from any communication regarding TENORM both within the Division of Waste Management and with
the CHFS-DPH. Not being copied on any emails concerning the assessment of the site contamination or getting the
analytical results from the soil samples I took on the grounds surrounding the entrance to the schools on February 21,
2016 or not being allowed to contact the DPH to request the analytical results only raises my anxiety.
There is n()t anything I expect you to do regarding my concerns since the management of the NOVs and investigation
is being handled by upper levels of management and beyond our Section (enforcement and ()ffice of Gent;!ral
Counsel?). I am just worried and feel helpless.
ltem3:
I told Ken I was glad to be the primary contcict for the CD&D LF in Glasgow, but I would prefer stayi11g iil Frankfort this
Thursday, particularly since Catherine (a lady) would be with us who I haven't met or been introd!Jced to yet. I told.
you and Ken I have been very stressed out over all that has been going on regarding TENORM, particularly since I am
acutely aware of the health effects. My anxiety level is very elevated and when that Happens mycoloii.acts
up. W,hen I get stressed I have the symptoms of IBS. When we travel out in rural 'areas I wor..Y sometimes I will be , .
too far 'away from a bathroom. I feel so close to Ken and he also has his own personal issues regarding his
dig~stive health, I would not be self-conscious or embarrassed if something happened in his presence. Since I was
not feeling well this week, to go out with a lady I have never met I just didn't feel relaxed. That was my only reason I
declined when it was more than Ken going this week. I am also on a medication presently I hoJ>e to stop taking once
this T~NORM situation is behind us. I enjoy working with ladies and it was only a personal reaso11 I was declining. I
also ate way too much BBQ when I was on vacation this past week and weekend and that only up~et tny eolon
more! With that being said I hope I will have opportunities to work with Tabath'a in the future. I value.her
analytical/lab experience as well as her expertise in the geology area; She is a very talented individual and I feel
fortunate to be in the section with her. We also have other very talented men and women-in our Section that I am
learning so much from since my back~round is in the hazardous waste area.
My work is my vocation and pcission. I am here because I enjoy what I do. We all need to work to support our
families but maximizing income is a low priority to me. Doing work that makes a difference in the well-being of
others and provides a service to communities is what brings me pleasure. Titles and income are not my highest
priorities. I have been blessed with both over the years because if we pursue work that brings happiness and
meaning in our lives, we will be more productive employees and often the rewards follows. They have for me in both
industry and academia. Also i am a Conservative Mennonite-Friend by faith traditions and live simply. The is the
window through which I see life. I do not mind working Block..s.os or earning comp time if that add.resses a need in
the branch, but I am not doing it beca'use I want the overtime or money, I just want to do an exceflent job and be of
se. r.vi c:e to our Div.ision. L.insey Briggs has. s.tressed to me o. n.thr.ee occasions this. yea.r I am not to go. over my reguiarly.
schedule work hours in a week. If I do, I have been instructed to take Friday off. I did express my thoughts to both
Lindsey and my acting Supervisor, Ken Melton that I would like to see the work load more evenly distributed among
the employees of our Section ; where we do not have engineers working 8-Block 50s in a row (Ken and I) and other
2
GP2203
employees leaving at their regularly scheduled time. I left academia sol could be home in tbe evenings to ,be with my
wife Jan. She does not work and is home all the time. I want to be ,there to enjoy time with her. She understands,
~d I am glad to contribute the extra effort as needed at times, but neither of us want to see the long hours a regular
~rt ofmy "'fOrk ~chedule as they have been, in the past. I also take resp()f1Sibility for some ofthose long !)ours sjnc:e I
was ,seeking to accommodate the consul,tants and their work weJnspect. I was e.nj0ying meeting many ofthem for
the fir~tti~e la~t year an,d it was a plecisure seeing their work and getting a cha11ce to know them and I sought to
accommod,;:j~e their sche~IJle beyond what we are required to do by regulations.
This item was addressed to a significant extent above. I feel all employees should be asked to put in a similar Jevel of
in ollr Section and -I have- felt that more overtime and effort
is expected of the engineers than our scientists at
effort
.
times, even though their contribution to the work we do is equally important. I wanted to be a PhD Environmental
Chemist but was ,educated as a PhD Chemical-Civil Engineer. I actually .have more chemistry than a chemistry major in
my educational background and have a love and appreciation for the sciences. It has beeri a pleasure taking trips and
being with Tabatha and Todd in our Section. When I was growing up I was into rock collecting and it has been fun to
learn more about the geology of Kentucky!
-
Regarding a transfer or working in another Branch, I.have the following to share. I did riot apply or interview for the
.. position I .have now in the Solid Waste Branch. Ken Melton and Lindsey Briggs knew I enjoyed the waste
management area and was seeking to learn more about solid waste and its management (and that includes both what
our Solid Waste Branch as well as th~ RLA Branch does) and approached Ille about the position that Rich D~wson
vacated. Both the SWB and Ri.A are of special interest to me and .1 have been participating in activities~ workshops,
and site visits for many years which predates both you and qary Logsdon as Branch Managers. You both came from
er jobs toyourpre~entp~sitions a.nd ~hen a challenging opp?rtunity arises I wouldhopethatydlJWC?l..ildbe happy
en a member of your section pursues 1t and that you would wish the best for them.
.~
I look forward to many more years with state government and would like to work ~s long as I am in good heaith and
feel productive. I would be delighted to work one day for the RLA Branch as I continue my career development in the
waste management area. I al.so feel that would be an excellent job for .meto retire from sinC:e the service
opportunities I enjoyed for so many years are in the recycling, resource management, and resqrce conservation
areas ..That way could transition easily from a position with pay to a position where I would .be a volunteer and there
would be plelit.Y of voluntee.r opportunities in the local community. A.s I pointed out, the ema.il that I copied you on
was sent at 11:07 at night. I was not feeling well, Jan was upset with me, and I was worried and depre~sed on the
processed TENORMthat was trucked into Kentucky and wa:s illegally disposed of in a contained landfill. I have a
personal passion regarding protecting employees in the solid waste industry. The industry is bl.lilt on trust, that
others will do the right thing.and not th.row something into a garb~ge can or load a truck with a waste that would
harm an unsuspecting employee receiving it at a transfer station or landfill. I feef that trust was violated last year
here in Kentucky. I also feel that as a state agency we are piaced iri a position of tru.st by the public to ove'rsee the
protection of human health and the. environment, and I want to honor that trust.
We all need new challenges as employees that help us grow and learn as individuals. That is a lifelong process. If and
when I corisic:ler a job change in the future, please to not take it personally. Since maximizing income and titles are of
little interest to me, I am only doing it to experience a new. learning curve and make contributions in another area of
society. I will leave. th.e Solid Waste Branch thankful for tf)e experiences and learning opportunities it provided me
and for the pleasure of working and knowing the co-workers that make up our Branch.
- k you for the opportunity to meet with you.
GP2204
I request that you send me an email acknowledging that you received and read this email message. Please
indicate if there are any concerns or questions that we still need to address.
~dd
that I do not plan to express any more concerns regarding the TENO RM issues facing
.. '
I also want to
Kentucky or approach you C>r anycfoe in the Division of Waste Management with questions regarding th~
site assessment: for contamination or exposure assessments that were requested as part of the NOV for .
.Blue Ridge Landfill. I plan to focus only on my assigned work (by you, Lindsey, or an acting supervisor such
as Ken) and am glad to work where ever I can be of service or needed.
Thank you,
GP2205
#m:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:15 PM
Delivered: RE: Meeting in Your Office on Wednesday 23 from 3:00 - 3:30 PM.
GP2206
--------
-om:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Subject: RE: Meeting in Your Office on Wednesday 23 from 3:00 - 3:30 PM.
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 8:14:49 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Wednesday, M?lrch 23, 2016 8:15:31 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
GP2207
-m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hello Everyone;
As you all know, I was very involved in investigating the shipments of TENO RM waste when Danny Anderson received
the call notifying us of the illegal shipments and gave me the number of the "whistle blower" to call and follow up on
which I did as of January 13 of this year.
Presently I have been isolated from any correspondence or activity regarding the investigation or all that is taking place
surrounding the site investigation or exposure assessments.
For someone that was a tenured faculty member at Penn State and taught Human Health and Ecological Risk
Assessment along with research on airborne particle behavior in environmental systems, resuspension of deposited
particulates: e~pos~re asse:sments or risk asse.ssment, and modeling of radio~uclide depos~tion i_n the respira~ory
tern - this s1tuat1on has impacted me acutely from both personal and emotional perspectives since I was so intimately
. .olved in this area of research for many years and continued to follow the work in the area during my tenure with the
Hazardous Waste Branch and now the Solid Waste Branch.
i.
I owe you all an apology for how my emotions and concerns took time from the work you needed to do and must have
been very distracting at times. Thank you all for your kindness and patience during a very difficult time for me.
It doesn't take much, just a comment or a short question by a co-worker to get me thinking again about all my years of
research and teaching on health effects of environmental contaminants. When that happens, not only am I burden to
others, but I also am distracted from the work th.at I a.m assigned to do.
These days, I do not know anymore that what is printed in the newspaper or has been entered into TEMPO.
In the best interest of us all, I request that no one mention TENORM to me, ask a question, make a comment. or joke
with me about the situation that Kentucky is facing these days regarding the shipments of out of state radioactive waste
that was shipped illegally into Kentucky this past year.
At the same time I want you all to know that I want to be a supportive coworker and available wherever I can be of help
or service to the mission of this Branch.
Thanks again for your kindness, patience, being a good listener, and your words of support and encouragement during a
very challenging time in my career.
h you all the best and look forward to serving alongside of you in the months/years ahead.
Thanks again,
1
GP2208
George
GP2209
#m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Danny;
Voicemail message on my phone from Kevin Kosko.
George
GP2210
#m:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George
Please forward to Daniel Cleveland his phone number.
Thanks,
Danny
On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Danny;
Voicemail message on my phone from Kevin Kosko.
George
GP2211
GP2212
-om:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kevin Kosko
Shale Mountain Resources
937-470-2655
GP2213
GP2214
-om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
George
Is this an old message from Kevin or a new one left today or yesterday ?
Thanks,
Danny
On Mar 25, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Danny;
Voicemail message on my phone from Kevin Kosko.
George
GP2215
#m:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Danny;
New one from yesterday, March 24, 2016.
George
Mar 25, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Partridge, George (EEC) <George.Partridge@ky.gov> wrote:
Danny;
Voicerriail message on my phone from Kevin Kosko.
George
..
1
GP2216
'm:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Danny,
I need to find a time for the AG investigator to speak with George Partridge per their request. I'm calling George directly
to get some times in place.
Thanks
Daniel Cleveland, Attorney
Energy and Environment Cabinet
Office of General Counsel
2 Hudson Hollow
Frankfort, KY 40601
ph.(502) 564-2356 ext. 640
fx, (502) 564"9212
Daniel.Cleveland@ky.gov
Confidentiality Notice: This communication contains information which is confidential, attorney work product and
,. . . .
overed by t.he. attorney-client privi.lege. It is for the exc.lusive use of the intend. ed recipient(s). Please note that any form. of
,
tribution, copying, forwarding or use of this communication or the information therein is strictly prohibited and may be
lawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender and then de.lete the
GP2217
------------
To: Melton, Ken (EEC); Baker;.Gorley, Virginia (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC);
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC)
To: Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Gilbert, George (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC);
Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes, Larry (EEC)
GP2218
is a 100% leak proof. One of SWB's biggest challenges is trying to get a proper groundwater assessment plan and report
from landfills after they are placed in Assessment.
My opinion is that if a landfill facility takes NORM waste then we should consider adding a constituent or two to their '
groundwater monitoring program. Otherwise we aren't placing safeguards for the! citizens or the environment and are
doing t.hem a disservice.
To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Cecil, Shawn (EEC); Gilbert, George (EEC); Hubbard, Tim (EEC); Hatton, Tony (EEC); Hughes,
Larry (EEC)
Cc: Melton, Ken (EEC)
Subject: RE: Martha NORM Site Management Plan & Addendums
Disposal of radioactive material is regulated by CHFS. They should be contacted..
Lindsey Briggs, PE
Environmental Engineer Supervisor
-------------:---------------,.---..,....,.--
GP2219
No one really wants stacks at power plants emitting waste ... but if they're provided for in the law, it sort of is what it
is. We all know permits can be interpreted to be just as protective of the rights of the permitted activity as they are of
41tig protective of the environment. The fact is that there has to be an answer for this or we will have wished it went
mto a landfill, just like Martha (even if it's not spent fuel). History says that often when you can't get a permit, waste
will end up spread all over (which is job security for Superfund, but no good for our mission of protecting human health
and the environment).
I think Curt is just looking for a practical answer. Anything we can do to help on that would be welcome. Naturally
Occurring Radioactive Material in a typical landfill at 30-50 pCi/gm is closer to our mission than allowing or passively
encouraging it be placed in a green field where there is no engineering.
Lindsey Briggs, PE
Environmental Engineer Supervisor
502 564 6716
.___-----------'-'-
(ieorge :f.
(ii{6ert~
'P.T.
GP2220
---------------------
-- ----
~d~Gf-IGW..RG~-~
Frankfort, KV 40601
502-564-2356, Ext 513
Fax- 502-564-9212
Cc: Melton, Ken (EEC); Briggs, Lindsey (EEC); Baker-Gorley, Virginia (EEC)
GP2221
---~-------
Mr. McKinley,
The
Thank you.
5
GP2222
---
-------
t/lm:
Sent:
. To:
Subject:
Are we still out of the loop on the BRLF? Just asking since I heard a box full of manifests were delivered.
GP2223
To:
Subject:
Not a word; you just shared with me more than I am aware of.
GP2224
it/lm:.
Sent:
To:
Subject:
You too. Now, enjoy the lack of Blue Ridge Landfill hassle. Act like it never existed!
-.i
Are we still out of the loop on the BRLF? Just asking since I heard a box full of manifests were delivered.
GP2225
Subject:
Tracking:
Recipient
Delivery
Read
Daniel;
I am preparing for the meeting next Friday by printing out email messages which will b.e helpful to refer to. I plan to
bring those in a binder as well as my file on TENORM. After the meeting I will be recycling all the documents in the
paper bins since everything is backed up electr~nically.
I work for the Solid Waste Branch and my preference is for Danny Anderson to be present (and Lindsey Briggs too if
Danny desires for him to be present). I have sought to keep them both informed on all the correspondence and
meetings/field trips that took place related to the incidents that are being investigated.
erything I do goes through Danny since he represents our Branch and I feel any meeting that pertains to anything I am
olved with or working on should include him or give him an opportunity to attend if he desires and feels it would be
e pful.
.
.
The Division of Waste Management reflects my life's work/vocation; it means a lot to me to be part of this Division and I
have its best interests at heart.
Thank you,
George
GP2226
.I
I~
GP2227
Im=
ro:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Anderson, Danny J (EEC)
Monday, April 04, 2016 7:48 AM
Delivered: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th
'
GP2228
'm:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Monday, April 04, 2016 7:48 AM
Delivered: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th
6th
1
I
,
1
GP2229
.om: .... .
";:
Sent:
Subject:
Microsoft Outlook
Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Monday, April 04, 2016 7:48 AM
Delivered: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th
'
GP2230
l~m:
o:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Cleveland, Daniel (EEC)
Subject: RE: Interview wit~ AG for Friday, April 8th
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 7:47:49 AM .(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, April 04, 2016 8:14:21 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
'
GP2231
~o:
Sent:
Subject:
Your message
To: Briggs, Lindsey (EEC)
Subject: RE: Interview with AG for Friday, April 8th
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 7:47:49 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
was read on Monday, April 04, 2016 8:18:51 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) .
GP2232
GP2233
A.._m
-,mt:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
"
Confidentiality Notice: This communication contains information which is confidential, attorney work product and
covered by the attorney-client privilege. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). Please. note that any form of
distribution, copying, forwarding or use of this communication or the information therein is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you .have received this communication in error please return it to the sender and then delete the
communication and destroy any copies.
From:
Partridge,
(EEC)
I am preparing for the meeting next Friday by printing out email messages which will be helpful to refer to. I plan to
bring those in a binder as well as my file on TENO RM. After the meeting I will be recycling all th.e documents in the
paper bins since everything is backed lip electronically.
I work for the Solid Waste Branch and my preference is for Danny Anderson to be present (and Lindsey Briggs too if
Danny desires for him to be present). I have sought to keep them both informed on all the correspondence and
meetings/field trips that took place related to the incidents that are being investigated.
Everything I do goes through Danny since he represents our Branch and I feel any meeting that pertains to anything I am
involved with or working on should include him or give him an opportunity to attend if he desires and feels it would be
helpful.
The Division of Waste Management reflects my life's work/vocation; it means a lot to me to be part of this Division and I
have its best interests at heart.
~nkyou,
.rge
GP2234
1~-
I .
.2
GP2235
'
~rom:
~ent:
To:
Subject:
http://www.kentucky.com/opinion/op-ed/article70127627.html
GP2236
~ent:
TO:
Subject:
Todd;
Thank you!
_____________ ___
George
"
http://www.kentucky.com/opinion/op-ed/article70127627.html
GP2237
----------
~- bject:
~cation:
"
Interview with AG
EEC DEP Conf Rm 202C (Fair Oaks)
Start:
End:
Show Time As:
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Accepted
Organizer:
Required Attendees:
Optional Attendees:
Categories:
Green Category
UPDATED TIME - Hon. Barbara Whaley and Matt Easter will be at the office at approximately 10 AM. I've set this for
9:30 so I can try to answer any questions SWB might have ahead of time.
Just putting this in as a tentative meeting holder. I'm still waiting on a response from Matt Easter at the AG's office
GP2238