Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
conducted many studies on the selectivity characteristics of various types of fishing gear (e.g. Rollefsen,
1953; Hamley, 1975, and references cited therein;
Jensen, 1986, 1990; Millar, 1995). Such studies tend to
be highly technical and concerned with precision in
modelling gear selectivity.
Some archaeologists have used generalized and
greatly simplified models of gear selectivity to test
hypotheses regarding archaeological fish assemblages,
including whether an assemblage is cultural or natural
in origin, and what types of fishing gear may have
been used in harvesting the fish (e.g. Balme, 1983;
Noe-Nygaard, 1983; Wing & Scudder, 1983; Butler,
1996). The basic assumption underlying the use of size
distribution or gear selectivity models is that many
types of fishing gear do not result in the capture of a
random or representative sample of the available fish
at a given fishing location, but rather are selective for
particular types and size ranges of fish, and that this
selectivity is reflected in the population structure of an
archaeological assemblage of fish remains.
For example, gill nets are more selective with respect
to size than most other methods of fishing. Gill nets are
staked out vertically in the water, and catch fish by
entangling them by the gills when they try to swim
through the mesh. Fish that are sufficiently smaller
than the gauge of the mesh can swim through the net
without being caught, and those whose girth is sufficiently larger than the mesh can back away unharmed.
Thus a gill net with a relatively uniform gauge mesh
will capture fish in a fairly limited size range. A
generalized, hypothetical gill net selectivity curve
n many archaeological contexts, it is not uncommon for fish remains to be present, often in very
large quantities, but for no direct evidence of
fishing technology to be observed. In addition, many
fish bones in archaeological assemblages exhibit no
signs of cultural modification, such as burning or cut
marks. Thus, interpretation of fish remains is often
dependent upon such assemblage characteristics as
species composition, skeletal part representation and
the size range of the fish represented.
This paper focuses on the use of gear selectivity or
size distribution models to test hypotheses regarding
(1) whether an assemblage was accumulated by cultural or natural means, and (2) what type of fishing
gear may have been employed in harvesting the fish,
assuming the assemblage is a cultural one. I examine
the assumptions underlying the use of such models,
and point out a number of pitfalls to be avoided,
using an archaeological assemblage of tui chubs (Gila
bicolor) from the Harney Basin in the northwestern
Great Basin of North America as an example.
974
R. L. Greenspan
Frequency
Baited hook
Fish size
Figure 1. Generalized gear selectivity curves for a gill net, hook and
line, and a seine net, compared to a hypothetical total population of
fish.
(Figure 1) is unimodal and roughly normal in distribution (Hamley, 1975: 1946). The particular size range
included under the curve depends upon the mesh size
of the net. Baited hooks may also have unimodal
selectivity curves (Figure 1), although they are less
strongly selective than gill nets, and thus typically have
a broader curve (Kenchington, 1993; Millar, 1995).
Unlike gill nets, the selectivity of bag-type nets such
as seine and dip nets is primarily a function of small
fish escaping through the mesh. Among the fish encountering the net, those small enough to escape
through the mesh are not caught, while larger fish
are caught. Thus a hypothetical selectivity curve for
seine nets shows a sharp cut-off on the left side of the
curve (Figure 1), while the remainder of the curve
should follow the size frequency distribution of the fish
encountering the net.
These hypothetical curves are also affected by aspects of fish ecology and behaviour. Fish encountering
the net may not be a cross-section of the total population of the lake, stream, or other fish habitat. For
example, the size distribution of fish encountering a
beach seine or a dip net operated from shore or in
shallow water might be very different from that of fish
encountering a seine or dip net operated in deeper
water from a boat. Net avoidance or escape on the part
of the fish are also relevant considerations. In addition,
it is important to take into account the fact that some
fish may have different seasonal distributions that
could affect gear selectivity models. In the case of
lacustrine tui chubs, adult fish tend to move offshore
into deeper water in the wintertime, and to move
inshore in the spring, while young fish remain in the
shallows most of the time. Thus in the summer months,
particularly during spawning activity, there may be
very dense aggregations of adult tui chubs in shallow,
nearshore water (e.g. Snyder, 1917), while during the
winter months, the adults are far more dispersed, and
many of them are not in nearshore waters at all
(Kimsey, 1954: 399; Vigg, 1980: 53). Such changes in
distribution need to be taken into account in predicting
The application of gear selectivity models to archaeological assemblages typically involves comparing the
size distribution of an assemblage not only to various
selectivity curves, but also to curves that represent
the hypothetical total population or a catastrophic
mortality profile. This is particularly important in
lacustrine settings, where natural mass mortality may
result in accumulations of fish carcasses along shorelines. Comparison of the population structure of the
archaeological assemblage with that expected for a
natural fish kill can aid in distinguishing between
natural and cultural accumulations of fish remains in
lakeside archaeological sites.
An example is a study by Noe-Nygaard (1983), in
which she analysed an assemblage of pike remains
from a Mesolithic lakeside site in Denmark. She compared the population structure of the archaeological
assemblage to specimens from an ecologically similar
modern lake that was poisoned with rotenone. The size
structure of the two assemblages differed markedly,
which contributed to Noe-Nygaards conclusion that
the archaeological assemblage exhibited signs of having been deliberately and selectively fished by humans.
A number of archaeologists and vertebrate palaeontologists have used similar models, typically age profiles derived from theoretical population dynamics, in
interpreting mammalian fossil assemblages. A catastrophic age profile, also known as a living structure
age profile, shows the structure or age distribution of a
living population. An attritional age profile, or true
mortality profile (Klein, 1982a: 58) shows the age
distribution of individuals that die each year of noncatastrophic, or attritional causes, such as accidents,
disease, predation, or old age (Figure 2(c)). Archaeologists have used such models of population structure
to help distinguish between cultural and non-cultural
accumulations of bones, or to determine the circumstances under which carcasses were obtained, such as
whether animals were scavenged or deliberately hunted
(e.g. Klein, 1982a, b; Stiner, 1990, 1995; Savelle &
McCartney, 1991).
Studies that have used theoretical catastrophic mortality models in interpreting fish remains include one
by Balme (1983) and one by Butler (1996). Balme
compared the reconstructed size range of golden perch
from sites along the Lower Darling River in Western
New Wales to selectivity curves for gill nets and traps,
and to a total population curve. Butler compared
the size distribution of an archaeological assemblage
of tui chubs from Stillwater Marsh, Nevada, to a
theoretical catastrophic mortality profile.
The catastrophic morality profiles used by both
Balme and Butler (Figure 2(a), (b)) are diagonal in
% Fish
Hypothetical total
population
Trap
Gill net
Fish length
Frequency
(b)
Fish length
Number of individuals
(c)
Increasing age
Increasing age
Figure 2. (a) Generalized selectivity curves for a drum net trap and a
gill net, compared to a hypothetical total population curve (redrawn
after Balme, 1983: 29). (b) Theoretical catastrophic mortality profile
used in Butlers study (redrawn after Butler, 1996: 704). (c) Theoretical catastrophic and attritional age profiles for mammalian population not characterized by multiple births (redrawn after Klein,
1982a: 152).
shape and imply a constant rate of mortality throughout life; neither Balme nor Butler provided any justification of why such a profile should be appropriate for
modelling fish population structure. Balme does not
discuss the theoretical derivation of her hypothetical
total population curve at all (Balme, 1983). Butler
(1996: 702703) cites other archaeological and palaeontological studies that have made use of theoretical
models of population structure in explaining the
derivation of the model she uses.
One of the studies Butler cites (Stiner, 1991) shows a
catastrophic mortality profile similar to Butlers (1996:
704) with a diagonal, or half-pyramid shape, implying
a constant rate of mortality. In fact, such a form
probably never occurs in natural vertebrae populations (MacArthur & Connell, 1966; 124). Both Butler
(1996) and Stiner (1990, 1991) acknowledge that the
975
976
R. L. Greenspan
60
Age
10+
4
3
2
1
0
Frequency
45
30
15
100
200
Length (mm)
300
400
60
(a)
Frequency
45
30
15
0
100
200
Length (mm)
300
400
60
(b)
Frequency
45
30
15
0
0
10
15
20
Age class
25
30
35
point that fish size and age profiles may have very
different shapes and should not be substituted for one
another.
As with any taxon that exhibits a very high rate of
juvenile mortality, the age or size structure of a fish
population will vary depending upon what time of year
the census is taken. A population census taken shortly
after the fry hatch will show a much higher percentage
of the young of the year, or the 0 age class, than will a
census taken 6 months later. In addition, the likelihood
977
Basalt Uplands
126
5m
Gr
ea
1260
m
HA
RN
se
wo
od
Basalt Uplands
Fl
at
Mud
Lake
NE
U
D
Harney Lake
35HA718
Study Area
s
nd
a
pl
at
OREGON
ry
Fl
a
nt
e
as
od
im
re
G 1
265 m
ou
f
Tu
e
ac
d
Se
2 km
Figure 5. Map showing the location of Harney Dune and the Harney Dune site on the northeast shore of Harney Lake; inset shows the location
of the study area in southeastern Oregon (after Greenspan & Raymond, 1996).
978
R. L. Greenspan
Figure 6. Notched stone net weights from the Harney Dune site.
Figure 7. Feature 106 at the Harney Dune site consists of clustered net weights and is interpreted to be a location where a net was discarded
and eventually disintegrated, leaving only the stone weights.
979
Figure 9. Feature 68, shown here after one-quarter of the pit was
excavated.
980
R. L. Greenspan
(a)
(b)
Figure 10. Tui chub basioccipital (a) and hyomandibular (b), with
measuring points indicated.
Table 1. Output from regression of logN bone length and logN fish
length (TL)
Regression formula
R squared
Standard error of y estimate
Exponent of standard error
of y estimate
Hyomandibular
Basioccipital
1047 (x)+3140
0985
0045
1113 (x)+3911
0964
0069
111
117
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
SD
68
89
66
86
93
17
130
161
240
228
321
342
184
227
277
207
240
267
981
22
18
Frequency
N = 86
(a)
13
2
9
1
4
0
0
120
140
160
180
Total length (mm)
200
220
1
30
2
Frequency
25
20
3
100
N = 93
15
150
200
250
200
300
400
300
350
3
(b)
10
2
5
0
120
1
160
200
240
280
Total length (mm)
320
360
0
5
1
Frequency
4
2
N = 17
3
3
100
1
2
(c)
0
220
240
260
320
280
300
Total length (mm)
340
360
1
2
200
250
Length
982
R. L. Greenspan
Discussion
The hypothesis that deliberate and size-selective fishing
for tui chubs occurred at the Harney Dune site is
supported by the present study. The fish recovered
from the Harney Dune site are relatively large for tui
chubs. The reconstructed total lengths range from 130
Frequency
30
Feature 68
Feature 89
20
Feature 66
10
0
120
160
200
240
280
Total length (mm)
320
360
Figure 13. Comparison of size frequencies of tui chubs from all three
features.
983
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service. I thank A. W. Raymond for inviting
me to participate in the Harney Dune site project, and
for his input and support during every phase of the
research. This paper has benefitted from discussions
with K. A. Cruz-Uribe, D. Markle, A. Munhall
and G. R. Smith. Assistance with various aspects of
this project was provided by P. J. Bartlein, L. Davis,
J. Ricks, W. L. Minckley, D. W. Steinman and
Heritage Research Associates, Inc. L. Davis generously
allowed me to include his unpublished data on Eagle
Lake tui chubs. Figures 8 and 10 were drafted by
K. McCornack. K. A. Cruz-Uribe helped prepare
Figures 1, 2, 5 and 13. The photographs for Figures 6,
7 and 9 were provided by A. W. Raymond. Drafts of
984
R. L. Greenspan
References
Balme, J. (1983). Prehistoric fishing in the lower Darling, Western
New South Wales. In (C. Grigson & J. Clutton-Brock, Eds) Animals and Archaeology. 2. Shell Middens, Fishes and Birds. Oxford:
British Archaeological Reports International Series 183, 1932.
Butler, V. L. (1996). Tui chub taphonomy and the importance of
marsh resources in the western Great Basin of North America.
American Antiquity 61, 699717.
Caughley, G. (1966). Mortality patterns in mammals. Ecology 47,
906918.
Craig, G. Y. & Oertel, G. (1966a). Deterministic models of living and
fossil populations of animals. Quarterly Journal of the Geological
Society of London 122, 315355.
Craig, G. Y. & Oertel, G. (1966b). Models of living and fossil populations of animals generated by a computer. Nature 210, 438439.
Davis, L. (1986). Some notes on the age, growth, and reproduction
of tui chubs (Gila bicolor) from Eagle Lake, California. Unpublished manuscript in possession of the author, Department of
Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Deevey, E. S. (1947). Life tables for natural populations of animals.
The Quarterly Review of Biology 22, 283314.
Dugas, D. P. (1992). Site description of Trench A at Harney Lake
Dune. In (C. Raven & R. G. Elston, Eds) Land and Life at
Malheur Lake: Preliminary Geomorphological and Archaeological
Investigations. Cultural Resource Series 8, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Region 1, Portland, OR, pp. 4148.
Fowler, C. S. (1989). Willard Z. Parks ethnographic notes on
the Northern Paiute of western Nevada, 19331944, Volume 1.
University of Utah Anthropology Papers 114.
Fowler, C. S. (1992). In the Shadow of Fox Peak: An ethnography of
the Cattail-Eater Northern Paiute people of Stillwater Marsh.
Cultural Resource Series 5, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Region 1, Portland, OR.
Greenspan, R. L. (1993). Preliminary Analysis of Fish Remains from
the Harney Dune site. Report submitted to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Portland, OR.
Greenspan, R. L. & Raymond, A. W. (1996). Tui Chub Fishing at
Harney Lake, Oregon. Poster presented at the 25th Great Basin
Anthropological Conference, Kings Beach, CA, October 1996.
Hamley, J. M. (1975). Review of gillnet selectivity. Journal of the
Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32, 19431959.
Jenkins, D. L. (1994). Archaeological investigations at three wetlands sites in the Silver Lake Area of the Fort Rock Basin. In
(C. M. Aikens & D. L. Jenkins, Eds) Archaeological researches in
the Northern Great Basin: Fort Rock archaeology since Cressman.
University of Oregon Anthropological Papers 50, 213258.
Jensen, J. W. (1986). Gillnet selectivity and the efficiency of alternative combinations of mesh sizes for some freshwater fish. Journal
of Fish Biology 28, 637646.
Jensen, J. W. (1990). Comparing fish catches taken with gill nets of
different combinations of mesh sizes. Journal of Fish Biology 37,
99104.
Kenchington, T. J. (1993). Estimation of the functional form of
selectivity by baited hooks: a graphical approach. Canadian
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50, 772780.
Kimsey, J. B. (1954). The life history of the tui chub, Siphateles
bicolor (Girard), from Eagle Lake, California. California Fish and
Game 40, 395410.
Klein, R. G. (1982a). Patterns of ungulate mortality and ungulate
mortality profiles from Langebaanweg (early Pliocene) and
Elandsfontein (Middle Pleistocene). South-western Cape Province,
South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 90, 4994.
Klein, R. G. (1982b). Age (mortality) profiles as a means of
distinguishing hunted species from scavenged ones in Stone Age
archaeological sites. Paleobiology 8, 151158.
Klein, R. G. (1995). Review of Honor Among Thieves: a Zooarchaeological Study of Neandertal Ecology (M. C. Stiner). Science 267,
18431844.
Lagler, K. F. (1978). Capture, sampling and examination of fishes. In
(T. Bagenal, Ed.) Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in
Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No. 3. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific
Publications, pp. 747.
Lindstrom, S. (1996). Great Basin fisherfolk: optimal diet breadth
modeling of the Truckee River aboriginal subsistence fishery. In
(M. Plew, Ed.) Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherer Fishing Strategies.
Boise, Idaho: Boise State University Press, pp. 114179.
Logan, D. & Markle, D. F. (1993). Literature review of fishes and
fisheries of Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. In (S. G. Campbell,
Ed.) Environmental Research in the Klamath Basin, Oregon: 1992
Annual Report. Publication R-93-16, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,
Applied Sciences Branch, Research and Laboratory Services
Division, Denver, 223249.
MacArthur, R. H. & Connell, J. H. (1966). The Biology of Populations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Millar, R. B. (1995). The functional form of hook and gillnet
selection curves cannot be determined from comparative catch
data alone. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52,
883891.
Moyle, P. B. (1976). Inland Fisheries of California. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
Noe-Nygaard, N. (1983). The importance of aquatic resources to
Mesolithic man at inland sites in Denmark. In (C. Grigson & J.
Clutton-Brock, Eds) Animals and Archaeology. 2. Shell Middens,
Fishes and Birds. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series 183, 125142.
Raymond, A. W. (1994). The Surface Archaeology of Harney Dune
(35HA718), Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon. Cultural
Resource Series 9, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1,
Portland, OR.
Raymond, A. W. & Sobel, E. (1990). The use of tui chubs as food by
Indians of the western Great Basin. Journal of California and Great
Basin Anthropology 12, 218.
Rollefsen, G. (1953). The selectivity of different fishing gear used in
Lofoten. Journal du Conseil. Conseil Permanent International Pour
Lexploration de la Mer XIX, 190194.
Savelle, J. & McCartney A. P. (1991). Thule eskimo subsistence and
bowhead whale procurement. In (M. C. Stiner, Ed.) Human
Predators and Prey Mortality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press,
pp. 201216.
Sheldon, R. W. (1965). Fossil communities with multi-modal sizefrequency distributions. Nature 206, 13361338.
Smith, G. R. (1985). Paleontology of Hidden Cave: fish. In
(D. H. Thomas, Ed.) The Archaeology of Hidden Cave, Nevada.
New York: Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of
Natural History 61(1); 171178.
Snyder, J. O. (1917). The fishes of the Lahontan system of
Nevada and northeastern California. Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of
Fisheries 35, 3186.
Stiner, M. C. (1990). The use of mortality patterns in archaeological
studies of hominid predatory adaptations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9, 305351.
Stiner, M. C. (1991). The faunal remains from Grotta Guattari: a
taphonomic perspective. Current Anthropology 32, 103117.
Stiner, M. C. (1995). Honor among thieves: a zooarchaeological study
of Neandertal ecology. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Tuohy, D. R. (1990). Pyramid Lake Fishing: the archaeological
record. In (J. C. Janetski & D. B. Madsen, Eds) Wetland Adaptations in the Great Basin. Provo, Utah: Museum of Peoples and
Cultures Occasional Papers No. 1, pp. 121158.
Vigg, S. (1980). Seasonal benthic distribution of adult fish in
Pyramid Lake, Nevada. California Fish and Game 66, 4958.
Wing, E. S. & Scudder, S. J. (1983). Animal exploitation by
prehistoric people living on a tropical marine edge. In (C. Grigson
& J. Clutton-Brock, Eds) Animals and Archaeology. 2. Shell
Middens, Fishes and Birds. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports
International Series 183, 197210.