Professional Documents
Culture Documents
369
Scientific paper
Abstract
Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) has been applied for the quantitative evaluation of Cl ingress into concrete. In
order to obtain quantitative data on Cl concentration, the measurement conditions were discussed statistically in detail and
sample measurement conditions were introduced. The absolute concentrations of Cl obtained through EPMA were found
to be equivalent with wet analysis and the effect of matrix differences to be negligible. By using the difference in chemical
composition between cement paste and aggregate measured by EPMA with a spatial resolution of 100 m, it was possible
to discriminate the paste part in concrete. Since Cl penetrates into concrete through the paste part, the Cl concentration
profile obtained by EPMA is useful for the estimation of the apparent Cl diffusion coefficient, Da. The quantified value of
Cl concentrations obtained with EPMA were confirmed through comparison with traditional slicing and grinding methods.
Based on the measurement results, the Da value was calculated for various concrete mixtures and the results were found to
be equivalent with those yielded by conventional methods.
1. Introduction
Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) is an analysis
method that allows the quantification of elemental concentrations with high spatial resolution and sensitivity on
a solid surface as well as the measurement of the area
distribution of elements. An apparatus with 4 or 5 spectrometers of the wavelength disperse type (WDS) is
typically used these days for the simultaneous analysis of
several elements. The element distribution measurement
results are displayed as colored map images using a color
scale, giving users an excellent visual grasp of element
distribution.
EPMA was developed mainly for the fields of metallurgy and petrography. The first application of color
mapping in the field of concrete technology was a study
by Kobayashi et al. (1988-1, 1988-2) displaying the
movement and accumulation of sodium and chloride ions
by carbonation at the carbonation front. From this first
application of color mapping, EPMA has been used effectively for various purposes related in particular to the
durability of concrete such as the distribution of chloride
and sulfur (Kawahigashi et al. 1992), chemical corrosion
by sulfate (Sasaki et al.1994), leaching of calcium (Saito
et al.1996), and chloride penetration through cracks (Win
et al.2004). Recently, to allow the precise estimation of
material transport, complex advanced models considering the material transport of various elements have been
1
370
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
thereby reducing apparent diffusion coefficient estimation errors. EPMA measurement of chloride concentration profiles is anticipated to present two problems. One
is that the matrix effect on quantification is complex.
Concrete being a porous material having various mixture
proportions and different degrees of hydration, accurately quantified values are considered difficult to obtain.
The other problem is uneven chloride concentration
profiles having a spatial resolution of less than 1 mm
owing to the arbitrary mixture of paste and aggregate.
Moreover, the various measurement parameters may
affect the measurement results.
Based on the above, to establish a measurement
method of element concentration profiles with high spatial resolution, chlorine, Cl, were chosen as the investigation focus of this study because Cl ingress is one of the
most important factors affecting the durability of concrete. The effectiveness of this method on concrete
technology has been reported in a study on round robin
testing carried out by a working group discussing the
JSCE standard (Mori et al.2005). EPMA is used to
evaluate total Cl content, which is composed of Cl ions in
pore solution, chemically bound Cl in AFm phases such
as Friedels salt, and physically bound Cl in C-S-H. Only
Cl ions in pore solution are expected to ingress into
concrete. However, an apparent Cl diffusion coefficient,
Da, which is a coefficient describing the apparent diffusion" of total Cl, is used to evaluate Cl ingress in many
cases and Cl profiles obtained by EPMA are useful to
estimate Da. This paper mainly deals with the basic factors affecting the quantification results in greater detail
based on previous studies (Yamada et al. 2004, Mori et al.
2004).
371
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
concrete immersed in a chloride solution. The measurement results by EPMA were compared with conventional methods and the repeatability and accuracy of the
EPMA method were examined. From the measured Cl
concentration profile, apparent diffusion coefficients
were estimated and compared with those obtained by
conventional methods.
3. Experiments
3.1 Materials and mixture proportion
Table 3 outlines the materials used in this study. The Cl
concentration was adjusted by adding NaCl to the mixing
water. The mixture proportions and general properties of
concrete are shown in Table 4. For the examination of
repeatability, concrete of 50N was used. Concrete slump
was not controlled strictly but no material segregation
Investigated items
Quantitativity of Cl in paste, accuracy, detection limit, effects of
types of cement
Pores in hardened body
Factors
Cl concentration (C%)
Types of cement
Table 2 Examples of chemical compositions of cement paste and aggregate (mass%, JSCE 2005).
Cement
Paste *1
ISO
sand
Sandstone
CaO
46.4
0.20
5.50
SiO2
15.1
98.4
78.33
SO3
1.44
0.07
Al2O3
3.72
0.4
4.77
Fe2O3
2.12
0.40
1.07
*1) Measured by XRF for paste having W/C = 0.50.
Hard
sandstone
5.65
65.05
(S)0.05
13.89
0.74
Siliceous
rock
98.87
0.41
0.08
Limestone
53.44
1.97
0.78
0.50
Dolostone
33.10
1.30
0.45
Andesite
5.80
59.59
17.31
3.33
Basalt
8.95
49.06
15.70
5.38
Table 3 Materials.
Cement
Mineral
admixture
Fine agg.
Coarse
agg.
Chemical
admixture
Water
Properties
Normal Portland cement (JIS R 5210, d = 3.16 g/cm3)
Blast furnace slag (JIS A 6206, d = 2.85 g/cm3, Blaine = 4000 cm2/g)
Fly ash (Type II by JIS A 6201d = 2.06 g/cm3)
ISO sand (d = 2.64 g/cm3SiO2 = 98.4 mass%)
Land sand (d = 2.60 g/cm3, absorption = 1.44 %)
Crushed hard sandstone (Gmax = 20 mm, d = 2.65 g/cm3, absorption = 0.99 %)
Crushed limestone (Gmax = 20 mm, d = 2.70 g/cm3, absorption = 0.74 %)
AE water reducer (Type I by JSI A 6204, Lignin sulfonate type)
High range AE water reducer (Type I by JSI A 6204, Polycarboxylate type)
AE agent (Arkylallylsulfonate type)
Distilled water
City water
Symbols
N
B
FA
S1
S2
G1
G2
AE1
SP
AE2
W1
W2
Series
1, 2, 3
1,3
1,3
2
3
3 (30N, 40N, 50N)
3 (40FB, 40BB)
3(40N, 50N, 40FB, 40BB)
3(30N)
3
12
3
372
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
W/B
(%)
s/a
(%)
30N
30.0
46.0
40N
40.0
46.0
50N
50.0
46.0
40BB
40.0
46.0
40FB
40.0
46.0
*1) Cured at 20C in water for 8 days.
Fresh properties
W (W2)
C (N)
FA
S2
160
160
160
160
160
533
400
320
240
320
0
0
0
0
80
0
0
0
160
0
749
799
830
793
783
G1
(G2)
889
949
985
(967)
(955)
SL. (cm)
Air (%)
24.0
7.0
9.0
10.0
8.0
3.5
3.9
3.7
4.3
4.5
Compressive
strength
(N/mm2)*1
90.5
57.0
46.6
50.0
47.2
373
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
N P N B3
(1)
V = NP + NB
(2)
3.0
Paste
W/B = 40%
2.0
1.0
N
BB
FB
0.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
Cl concentration (mass%)
Cl concentration (mass%)
1.5
EPMA
Potentiometric titration
1.0
0.5
Paste
Cl Conc.: C1.0%
0.0
20
30
40
W/C (%)
50
60
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
V = 2N B
(3)
= xt
V
n
(4)
= t (n 1, 0.03)
V
n
1.5
EPMA
Potentiometric titration
1.0
0.5
0.0
0
60
Paste
W/B = 40%
40
20
N: y = 67.86 x + 5.22
BB: y = 63.63 x + 5.57
FB: y = 66.20 x + 5.84
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
(5)
N P N Bt (n 1, 0.03)
Cl concentration (mass%)
374
V
n
4.0
3.0
2.0
(6)
1.0
Paste N
N P -N B
0.0
10
100
1000
n (Number of pixels)
10000
375
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
200
Coefficient of variation (%)
Paste N
W/C = 40%
0.3
0.2
0.1
Paste N
W/C = 40%
150
100
50
0
0.0
0.0
25
20
15
10
Paste N
W/C = 40%
5
0
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Cl concentration (mass%)
0.5
1.0
1.5
Cl concentration (mass%)
0.4
0.03
n = 750
n = 1500
0.02
0.01
Paste N
W/C = 40%
0.00
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Cl concentration (mass%)
Fig. 10 Cl concentration and absolute error.
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
1.2
100 m
1.0
50 m
0.8
10 m
0.6
25 m
5 m
0.4
0.2
Cl, 15kV, 0.510-8A
1 m
0.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
Cl concentration (mass%)
376
377
Paste (S/C = 0)
Sand
Void
Cl concentration (mass%)
CaOconcentration
concentration (mass%)
CaO
(mass%)
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
1.0
Beam diameter
= 1 pixel
0.9
0.8
0.7
Beam diameter
= Half pixel
0.6
0.5
0
50
100
150
Pixel size (m)
200
1.00
Paste part
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.0
1.0
2.0
S/C
3.0
4.0
Cl concentration (mass%)
50
Beam diameter
= 1 pixel
40
30
20
Beam diameter
= Half pixel
10
0
0
50
100
150
Pixel size (m)
200
Absolute error
of Cl concentration (mass%)
0.05
Beam diameter
= 1 pixel
0.04
0.03
Beam diameter
0.02
0.01
n = 1500
0.00
0
50
100
150
Pixel size (m)
200
378
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
50N-1
Concrete
22.8%
11.1%
Paste part
14.0%
12.5%
0.5
50N Concrete
EPMA-50N-1
EPMA-50N-2
EPMA-50N-3
Slice-50N-1
Slice-50N-2
Slice-50N-3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance from surface (mm)
(a) Concrete
Cl concentration (mass%)
Cl concentration (mass%)
1.4
1.2
50NPaste
1.0
0.8
EPMA-50N-1
EPMA-50N-2
EPMA-50N-3
Slice-50N-1
Slice-50N-2
Slice-50N-3
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance from surface (mm)
(b) Paste
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
30N
40N
(a) 40N
(b) 30N
40BB
40FB
(d) 40FB
(c) 40BB
0.5
Concrete
0.4
0.3
EPMA-50N (Ave.)
EPMA-40N
EPMA-30N
Slice-50N (Ave.)
Slice-40N
Grinding-30N
0.2
0.1
Cl concentration (mass%)
Cl concentration (mass%)
0.0
0
1.4
Paste
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
5
10 15 20 25 30
Distance from surface (mm)
5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance from surface (mm)
Concrete
0.6
0.4
EPMA-40N
EPMA-40BB
EPMA-40FB
Slice-40N
Grinding-40BB
Grinding-40FB
0.2
0.0
0
5
10 15 20 25 30
Distance from surface (mm)
Cl concentration (mass%)
Cl concentration (mass%)
0.8
EPMA-50N (Ave.)
EPMA-40N
EPMA-30N
Slice-50N (Ave.)
Slice-40N
Grinding-30N
1.6
Paste
1.2
0.8
EPMA-40N
EPMA-40BB
EPMA-40FB
Slice-40N
Grinding-40BB
Grinding-40FB
0.4
0.0
0
5
10 15 20 25 30
Distance from surface (mm)
379
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
20
Concrete (40N)
15
10
y = 65.48 x + 4.78
5
C 0 = 5.10
0
0.00
200
Coefficient of variation (%)
150
100
50
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Cl concentration (mass%)
380
0.03
0.02
Paste
W/C = 40%
n = 750 pixels
0.01
Concrete (40N)
n = observed value
0.00
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Cl concentration (mass%)
(c) Absolute error of Cl concentration
381
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
12
Slice-Concrete
Slice-Paste
EPMA-Concrete
EPMA-Paste
-12
Da (10 m /s)
10
8
6
4
2
0
50N-1
50N-2
50N-3
50N (Avg.)
40N
30N
40BB
40FB
6
4
2
40N
Cl concentration (kg/m )
Grinding-concrete-measurement
Grinding-concrete-estimate
Grinding-paste-measurement
Grinding-paste-estimate
EPMA-concrete-measurement
EPMA-concrete-estimate
EPMA-paste-mesurement
EPMA-paste-estimate
14
Cl concentration (kg/m )
Slice-concrete-measurement
Slice-concrete-estimate
Slice-paste-measurement
Slice-paste-estimate
EPMA-concrete-masurement
EPMA-concrete-estimate
EPMA-paste-mesurement
EPMA-paste-estimate
10
12
10
8
6
4
2
30N
0
0
10
20
30
40
10
20
30
40
5. Conclusions
The measurement of Cl concentration profiles by EPMA
was studied and the following conclusions were ob-
tained.
(1) Because Cl penetrates into concrete through the
paste part, the quantitativity of the EPMA method
for Cl concentration using paste samples was confirmed. The average values of all pixels obtained by
area analysis of EPMA gave equivalent values by
wet analysis. The effect of matrix differences in the
cement paste was limited and the effect of the type
of cement, W/C, and curing period was almost
negligible.
(2) Based on the statistical discussions of a detection
limit and quantification errors for Cl concentrations,
the use of approximately 1000 pixels is recommended for averaging. When more than 750 pixels
were used, it was possible to reduce the quantification relative error to less than several %.
(3) Regarding damage by electron beam irradiation,
when the probe diameter is 1 to 25 m, special at-
382
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Ms. Haruka Takahashi of
Taiheiyo Cement Corp. and Dr. Kazuo Yamamoto of
Taiheiyo Consultant Co. Ltd for their significant contributions to the conduct of experiments and data processing for EPMA. Dr. Hideyuki Takahashi of JEOL is
also gratefully acknowledged for his valuable comments
on this study.
References
ASTM (2004). Standard test method for determining
the apparent chloride diffusion coefficient of
cementitious mixtures by bulk diffusion. ASTM C
1556-04.
Awaya, R. (1991). Analog and digital. Gakkai
Syuppan Center, 32 and 52-53 (in Japanese).
Bentz, D. P. and Garboczi, E. J. (2001). Multiscale
D. Mori, K. Yamada, Y. Hosokawa and M. Yamamoto / Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 4, No. 3, 369-383, 2006
383