Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chloe Pickering
and dont choose how to behave therefore why should they be punished
for their behaviour. However, in a court of law offenders are held morally
accountable for their actions apart from in extreme cases for example
insanity.
A strength of free will is that it is said to have face validity meaning that it
makes sense on the outset. Every day we make choices for example what
to wear or have for breakfast this gives the impression that we are
exercising free will. However neurological studies have found evidence
against free will. Studies conducted by Benjamin Libet (1985) and Chun
Siong soon (2008) have found that the activity related to whether to press
a button with the left or right hand occurs in the brain up to ten seconds
before participants report being consciously aware of making such a
decision. This suggests that even the most basic experiences of free will
are determined by the brain before we become aware of them.
Many psychologists today adopt the interactionist perspective because it
has elements of both free will and determinism. Therefore, it may offer the
best comprise in the free will vs determinism debate and the most
complete explanation of human behaviour. For example, the social
learning theory tends to adopt an interactionist or soft deterministic view.
Bandura argues that environmental factors are the key to learning
behaviour, which is the determinism part but that we are free to choose
and make decisions about what and who to attend to and when to perform
certain behaviour, which is the free will part.