Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KEN M. WILKINSON,
FELLOW FRAUDSTER
2
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 28 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 46 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 47 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 48 of 60
CORRUPT OFFICIAL KEN M. WILKINSON’S ANSWERS UNDER OATH
“24. Are there any easements in the public in the Cayo Costa Subdivision?
ANSWER: There are NO EASEMENTS on the Property Appraiser’s maps,
nor does he have records indicating easements.”
2. Here, Defendant crooked Appraiser Wilkinson stated under oath that there were
NO PUBLIC EASEMENTS in the admittedly private undedicated Cayo Costa
Subdivision as legally described and platted in 1912, Lee County PB 3, PG 25.
See also www.LeeClerk.org.
3. Here in the conceded absence of any public easements in the admittedly private
undedicated Cayo Costa Subdivision, PB 3, PG 25 (1912), any “Lee County
ownership” and/or “title” were absolutely impossible. Here, Wilkinson’s own
ANSWERS UNDER OATH proved his forged and criminal “claims” of
“frivolity” and fake “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”.
CRIME SCENE:
PROPERTY APPRAISER’S OFFICE
LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
CONSPIRING TO DEFRAUD:
CASE OF FORGED “PARCEL”
“12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”
3
Judge Charlene E. Honeywell
FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE
U.S. PUNISHMENT & ‘SANCTIONS’
BRIBERY
1. Defendant corrupt U.S. Judges Sheri Polster Chappell and John Edwin Steele accepted
Defendants’ bribes, and in exchange, criminally concealed, and conspired to conceal, Defendant
2. On pages 17-19 of their Complaint, Doc. # 1, the Plaintiffs had presented their claims for relief
against Defendant crooked Kenneth M. Wilkinson, ¶¶ 65-70, and Defendant crooked Attorney
Jack N. Peterson, ¶¶ 71-74, and the uncontroverted and patently clear proof thereof. Here with
wanton disregard for, e.g., Plaintiffs’ Constitutional rights under the 1st, 14th, 4th, 5th, and 7th
U.S. Constitutional Amendments, said Defendants sought to deliberately deprive the Plaintiffs
3. Here, e.g., … Defendant corrupt Lee County Property Appraiser Kenneth M. Wilkinson
fraudulently concealed the prima facie nullity and illegality of said forged land “parcels” and
forged “claim” “O.R. 569/875”, which Wilkinson knew were null and void and never legally
4. Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, in his private individual and official capacity as crooked Lee
County Property Appraiser, stated in his fraudulent “motion to dismiss”, Doc. # 17, 06/04/2010,
p. 1 of 3:
“Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and (c), moves the
Court to dismiss this “cause”, such as it is, and as grounds states:
1. Plaintiff Busse has already been labeled as “vexatious.”(See Order, dkt. no. 126,
Prescott/Busse v. Alejo, et. al. (2:09-CV-791-FtM-36-SPC) (J. Honeywell). (See also
Order, dismissing the case with prejudice) dkt no. 17, Prescott/Busse v. Tjoflat, Case No.
2:09-CV-341-UASPC, J. Lazzara: “in light of the prior vexatious litigation tactics …”
6. Here, Defendant(s)’ facially irrational and unsupported “labeling” and unintelligent name
calling as “vexatious” were not, and under said Rules could not have possibly been, “grounds”
to “dismiss”. Here, Defendants had bribed Federal Judges to criminally conceal Defendant
Governments’ corruption and the facial criminality and nullity of Governmental scam “O.R.
569/875”. Here, the record patently clearly evidenced Governmental corruption, bribery,
trickery, and deception (vexation). No intelligent argument and/or “claim” for any “land” “title”
in the name of “Lee County, Florida” were ever presented or could have possibly been made
2
7. Here, said Defendant Wilkinson perpetrated fraud on the Court, extended, and conspired to
extend Governmental corruption and said prima facie crime scheme “O.R. 569/875” on the
record. See, e.g., www.LeeClerk.org; website of the Lee County Clerk of Courts; and
3
FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE
SECRETS OF U.S. JUDICIAL TERROR
SECRET 3: Any faith in U.S. justice is your foe. There is NONE, so deal with it!
SECRET 4: Facts, law, reason, logic CANNOT possibly stop the judicial case fixing machine.
SECRET 5: Lawyers play along to get along – Don’t waste your money & time!
SECRET 6: The Mafia is cute compared to the U.S. judicial gang. They even wear colors.
SECRET 7: Expect terror & threats as if you were in Nazi Germany. Watch for the smell of gas!
SECRET 8: Trained for terror, only the most corrupt judges succeed on America’s benches.
SECRET 9: NOTHING favorable will ever happen in your case – Face reality & STOP being a fool!
SECRET 10: By agreement, pro se Plaintiffs will NEVER win any important or critical case.
SECRET 11: America is NOT what you have been brain washed to believe: Spell CORRUPTION!
SECRET 12: Do NOT appear in court or party with the Mafia. Plain and short, it could be unhealthy.
SECRET 13: Property, life, and freedom mean LESS in America than in China. Go travel and see!
SECRET 14: Before you disappear, leave lots of information. Someone might read it. Good luck!
20
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 17 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 18 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 19 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 3 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 4 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 5 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 6 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 7 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 8 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 9 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 10 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 11 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 12 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 13 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 14 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 15 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 16 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 17 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 18 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 19 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 20 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 21 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 22 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 23 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 24 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 25 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 26 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 27 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 29 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 30 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 31 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 32 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 33 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 34 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 35 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 36 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 37 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 38 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 39 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 40 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 41 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 42 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 43 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 44 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 45 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 49 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 50 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 51 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 52 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 53 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 54 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 55 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 56 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 57 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 58 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 59 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 60 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 17 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 3
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
__________________________________/
MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and (c), moves the
1. Plaintiff Busse has already been labeled as “vexatious.”(See Order, dkt. no. 126,
Prescott/Busse v. Alejo, et. al. (2:09-CV-791-FtM-36-SPC) (J. Honeywell). (See also Order,
dismissing the case with prejudice) dkt no. 17, Prescott/Busse v. Tjoflat, Case No. 2:09-CV-341-UA-
SPC, J. Lazzara: “in light of the prior vexatious litigation tactics employed by Plaintiff” @ fn.2).
plaintiff Busse felt compelled to file this latest case, the gravamen of which is the same as the others,
all of which were dismissed. The U.S. Attorney’s Motion to Dismiss (dkt. no. 149, @ p.3) in the
above referenced case (2:09-CV-791) outlines Busse’s litigation history in this Court.
2. The baseless, frivolous and vexatious filing by Busse continues unabated despite
imposition of sanctions. Each new case requires the defendants to expend time and money to
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 17 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 3
3. Busse’s abuse is not just limited to his nuisance “notices” and “motions” filed ad
nauseum with the Court. Busse feels compelled to project his nonsense throughout the
profanity, offensive images and pornographic double entendre in the crudest form clearly designed
to besmirch the names, reputations and personal images of those persons named as defendants.
4. This latest “complaint” is not so much a claim for relief as it is a free-flowing, stream-
(para. 3) and the “scam” being perpetrated on Cayo Costa Island relating to the plaintiffs’ 50' x 130'
lot there. This “complaint” is again, as Judge Lazzara stated: “a multi-page, multi-paragraph
WHEREFORE, Defendant Wilkinson, moves the Court to dismiss this case with prejudice,
award to the defendant costs to prepare this response; and, direct the Clerk to accept no further
filings from these plaintiffs on any terms the Court believes may stem this course of continued abuse.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 5, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk
of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to the
following: Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Lee County Property Appraiser, Government Complex, 2480
Thompson Street, Fort Myers, FL 33901; Jennifer Franklin Prescott, pro se, P.O. Box 845, Palm
2
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 17 Filed 06/04/10 Page 3 of 3
Beach, FL 33480 and Dr. Jorg Busse, pro se, P.O. Box 11124, Naples, FL 34101-11124.
3
FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE
U.S. PUNISHMENT & ‘SANCTIONS’
7. Again, the Plaintiffs move for equal court access in this electronic Court. For the criminal
purpose of extending and concealing Governmental fraud and extortion scheme O.R. 569/875”,
this Court has obstructed the pro se Plaintiffs’ electronic Court access. Here, electronic court
access is the only practical court access from remote parts of the world where mail is
unavailable.
8. In Doc. # 338, p. 12, Civil Rights Case # 2:07-cv-228-FtM-JES-SPC, Defendant crooked Judge
John Edwin Steele expressly verbalized his obstruction of justice and prejudice:
“The copy of the Resolution attached to the Third Amended Complaint establishes
that it was signed, executed, and duly recorded in the public records, and plaintiff
will not be allowed to assert otherwise.”
3
Charlene Edwards Honeywell
FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE
SECRETS OF U.S. JUDICIAL TERROR
SECRET 3: Any faith in U.S. justice is your foe. There is NONE, so deal with it!
SECRET 4: Facts, law, reason, logic CANNOT possibly stop the judicial case fixing machine.
SECRET 5: Lawyers play along to get along – Don’t waste your money & time!
SECRET 6: The Mafia is cute compared to the U.S. judicial gang. They even wear colors.
SECRET 7: Expect terror & threats as if you were in Nazi Germany. Watch for the smell of gas!
SECRET 8: Trained for terror, only the most corrupt judges succeed on America’s benches.
SECRET 9: NOTHING favorable will ever happen in your case – Face reality & STOP being a fool!
SECRET 10: By agreement, pro se Plaintiffs will NEVER win any important or critical case.
SECRET 11: America is NOT what you have been brain washed to believe: Spell CORRUPTION!
SECRET 12: Do NOT appear in court or party with the Mafia. Plain and short, it could be unhealthy.
SECRET 13: Property, life, and freedom mean LESS in America than in China. Go travel and see!
SECRET 14: Before you disappear, leave lots of information. Someone might read it. Good luck!
14
CERTIFIED DELIVERY
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
EMERGENCY MOTION
_______________________________________________________________________/
1. Pursuant to the multiple Affidavits before this Court, the Judicial Officers in this Court
However here, no eminent domain court proceedings ever occurred. No just compensation was
ever paid to the pro se Plaintiffs, and no title ever transferred. Here, Lee County, Florida, never
BRIBERY
2. Here, Defendant crooked Judges John Edwin Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell accepted
Defendants’ bribes for the criminal purpose of defrauding and deliberately depriving the
Plaintiffs of their equity. Here, said corrupt Judges and Judicial Officers violated their oath of
office.
CERTIFIED DELIVERY
17
CERTIFIED DELIVERY
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL FRAUD PUBLISHED AT:
http://www.scribd.com/judicial%20fraud
19
CERTIFIED DELIVERY
COVER UP OF GOVERNMENT SCAM “O.R. 569/875”
20