You are on page 1of 97

BERNIE MADOFF, FELON

KEN M. WILKINSON,
FELLOW FRAUDSTER

2
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 28 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 46 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 47 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 48 of 60
CORRUPT OFFICIAL KEN M. WILKINSON’S ANSWERS UNDER OATH

1. In his “ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF


INTERROGATORIES”, Civil Rights Case 2:07-cv-00228-FtM-JES-SPC
[bribed Judges John Edwin Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell], Defendant crooked
Official KENNETH M. WILKINSON answered and conceded under oath:

“24. Are there any easements in the public in the Cayo Costa Subdivision?
ANSWER: There are NO EASEMENTS on the Property Appraiser’s maps,
nor does he have records indicating easements.”

2. Here, Defendant crooked Appraiser Wilkinson stated under oath that there were
NO PUBLIC EASEMENTS in the admittedly private undedicated Cayo Costa
Subdivision as legally described and platted in 1912, Lee County PB 3, PG 25.
See also www.LeeClerk.org.

PATENTLY CLEAR CORRUPTION ON THE RECORD

3. Here in the conceded absence of any public easements in the admittedly private
undedicated Cayo Costa Subdivision, PB 3, PG 25 (1912), any “Lee County
ownership” and/or “title” were absolutely impossible. Here, Wilkinson’s own
ANSWERS UNDER OATH proved his forged and criminal “claims” of
“frivolity” and fake “land parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”.

TRICKSTER & FRAUDSTER WILKINSON ON “VEXATION”

4. Defendant crooked Appraiser Wilkinson continues to believe that corruption and


judicial bribery will get him off the hook and keep him out of prison. Fellow
fraudster Bernie Madoff comes to mind … Here Defendant Fraudster Wilkinson’s
fraudulent pretenses of purportedly “vexatious litigation” sound like Bernie
Madoff “claiming” to be a victim…

THE JURY SHALL DECIDE!


FELLOW FRAUDSTERS
AT WORK

CRIME SCENE:
PROPERTY APPRAISER’S OFFICE
LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

CONSPIRING TO DEFRAUD:
CASE OF FORGED “PARCEL”
“12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”
3
Judge Charlene E. Honeywell
FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE
U.S. PUNISHMENT & ‘SANCTIONS’

U.S. COVER-UP OF SCAM O.R. 569/875:

U.S. JUDICIAL CASE FIXING:


DEPRIVE – DEFRAUD – DENY
DISALLOW – DISMISS

U.S. JUDICIAL FRIVOLITY SCAM


DEFENDANT KENNETH M. WILKINSON’S FRAUD & FAILURE TO DEFEND

BRIBERY

1. Defendant corrupt U.S. Judges Sheri Polster Chappell and John Edwin Steele accepted

Defendants’ bribes, and in exchange, criminally concealed, and conspired to conceal, Defendant

Governments’ corruption, criminal concealment, and crimes on the record.

PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS FOR RELIEF, DOC. # 1, PP. 17-19

2. On pages 17-19 of their Complaint, Doc. # 1, the Plaintiffs had presented their claims for relief

against Defendant crooked Kenneth M. Wilkinson, ¶¶ 65-70, and Defendant crooked Attorney

Jack N. Peterson, ¶¶ 71-74, and the uncontroverted and patently clear proof thereof. Here with

wanton disregard for, e.g., Plaintiffs’ Constitutional rights under the 1st, 14th, 4th, 5th, and 7th

U.S. Constitutional Amendments, said Defendants sought to deliberately deprive the Plaintiffs

of their uncontroverted entitlement to redress Governmental corruption, fraud, fraud on the

Court, and other grievances on the record.

3. Here, e.g., … Defendant corrupt Lee County Property Appraiser Kenneth M. Wilkinson

fraudulently concealed the prima facie nullity and illegality of said forged land “parcels” and

forged “claim” “O.R. 569/875”, which Wilkinson knew were null and void and never legally

existed … See EXHIBITS.

DEF. WILKINSON’S PRIMA FACIE FAILURE TO PLEAD ANY GROUNDS TO DISMISS

4. Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, in his private individual and official capacity as crooked Lee

County Property Appraiser, stated in his fraudulent “motion to dismiss”, Doc. # 17, 06/04/2010,

p. 1 of 3:

“Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and (c), moves the
Court to dismiss this “cause”, such as it is, and as grounds states:
1. Plaintiff Busse has already been labeled as “vexatious.”(See Order, dkt. no. 126,
Prescott/Busse v. Alejo, et. al. (2:09-CV-791-FtM-36-SPC) (J. Honeywell). (See also
Order, dismissing the case with prejudice) dkt no. 17, Prescott/Busse v. Tjoflat, Case No.
2:09-CV-341-UASPC, J. Lazzara: “in light of the prior vexatious litigation tactics …”

DEFENDANT WILKINSON’S PRIMA FACIE FAILURE TO “PRESENT DEFENSE”


5. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and (c) state, http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule12.htm:

“(b) How to Present Defenses.


Every defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading if
one is required. But a party may assert the following defenses by motion:
(1) lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;
(2) lack of personal jurisdiction;
(3) improper venue;
(4) insufficient process;
(5) insufficient service of process;
(6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and
(7) failure to join a party under Rule 19.
A motion asserting any of these defenses must be made before pleading if a responsive pleading
is allowed. If a pleading sets out a claim for relief that does not require a responsive pleading, an
opposing party may assert at trial any defense to that claim. No defense or objection is waived
by joining it with one or more other defenses or objections in a responsive pleading or in a
motion.
(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.
After the pleadings are closed — but early enough not to delay trial — a party may move for
judgment on the pleadings.”

“LABELING”, NAME CALLING, AND DENIGRATION WERE NOT ANY GROUNDS

6. Here, Defendant(s)’ facially irrational and unsupported “labeling” and unintelligent name

calling as “vexatious” were not, and under said Rules could not have possibly been, “grounds”

to “dismiss”. Here, Defendants had bribed Federal Judges to criminally conceal Defendant

Governments’ corruption and the facial criminality and nullity of Governmental scam “O.R.

569/875”. Here, the record patently clearly evidenced Governmental corruption, bribery,

trickery, and deception (vexation). No intelligent argument and/or “claim” for any “land” “title”

in the name of “Lee County, Florida” were ever presented or could have possibly been made

under any law.

2
7. Here, said Defendant Wilkinson perpetrated fraud on the Court, extended, and conspired to

extend Governmental corruption and said prima facie crime scheme “O.R. 569/875” on the

record. See, e.g., www.LeeClerk.org; website of the Lee County Clerk of Courts; and

www.LeePA.org; website of the crooked Lee County Property Appraiser…

3
FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE
SECRETS OF U.S. JUDICIAL TERROR

SECRET 1: Judicial bribery & corruption are customary and TYPICAL.

SECRET 2: U.S. democracy is DEAD. Don’t be a naïve sheep!

SECRET 3: Any faith in U.S. justice is your foe. There is NONE, so deal with it!

SECRET 4: Facts, law, reason, logic CANNOT possibly stop the judicial case fixing machine.

SECRET 5: Lawyers play along to get along – Don’t waste your money & time!

SECRET 6: The Mafia is cute compared to the U.S. judicial gang. They even wear colors.

SECRET 7: Expect terror & threats as if you were in Nazi Germany. Watch for the smell of gas!

SECRET 8: Trained for terror, only the most corrupt judges succeed on America’s benches.

SECRET 9: NOTHING favorable will ever happen in your case – Face reality & STOP being a fool!

SECRET 10: By agreement, pro se Plaintiffs will NEVER win any important or critical case.

SECRET 11: America is NOT what you have been brain washed to believe: Spell CORRUPTION!

SECRET 12: Do NOT appear in court or party with the Mafia. Plain and short, it could be unhealthy.

SECRET 13: Property, life, and freedom mean LESS in America than in China. Go travel and see!

SECRET 14: Before you disappear, leave lots of information. Someone might read it. Good luck!

God bless America, Anarchy, BP, Corruption, and


Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell.
Charlene Edwards Honeywell
CERTIFIED DELIVERY
COVER UP OF GOVERNMENT SCAM “O.R. 569/875”

20
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 17 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 18 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 19 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 3 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 4 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 5 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 6 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 7 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 8 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 9 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 10 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 11 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 12 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 13 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 14 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 15 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 16 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 17 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 18 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 19 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 20 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 21 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 22 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 23 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 24 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 25 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 26 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 27 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 29 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 30 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 31 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 32 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 33 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 34 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 35 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 36 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 37 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 38 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 39 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 40 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 41 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 42 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 43 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 44 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 45 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 49 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 50 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 51 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 52 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 53 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 54 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 55 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 56 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 57 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 58 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 59 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-JES-SPC Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 60 of 60
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 17 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN


PRESCOTT,

Plaintiffs,

vs. Case No. 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-29 SPC

JOHN EDWIN STEELE, et. al.,

Defendants.
__________________________________/

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and (c), moves the

Court to dismiss this “cause”, such as it is, and as grounds states:

1. Plaintiff Busse has already been labeled as “vexatious.”(See Order, dkt. no. 126,

Prescott/Busse v. Alejo, et. al. (2:09-CV-791-FtM-36-SPC) (J. Honeywell). (See also Order,

dismissing the case with prejudice) dkt no. 17, Prescott/Busse v. Tjoflat, Case No. 2:09-CV-341-UA-

SPC, J. Lazzara: “in light of the prior vexatious litigation tactics employed by Plaintiff” @ fn.2).

Motions to dismiss are currently pending in Case Number 2:09-CV-791-FtM-SPC. Nonetheless,

plaintiff Busse felt compelled to file this latest case, the gravamen of which is the same as the others,

all of which were dismissed. The U.S. Attorney’s Motion to Dismiss (dkt. no. 149, @ p.3) in the

above referenced case (2:09-CV-791) outlines Busse’s litigation history in this Court.

2. The baseless, frivolous and vexatious filing by Busse continues unabated despite

imposition of sanctions. Each new case requires the defendants to expend time and money to
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 17 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 3

respond. Each new case wastes this Court’s limited assets.

3. Busse’s abuse is not just limited to his nuisance “notices” and “motions” filed ad

nauseum with the Court. Busse feels compelled to project his nonsense throughout the

“blogosphere” such as “YouTube,” “Twitter” and “Scribd,” (see e. g.: http://www.youtube-

judicialfruad); http://twitter.com/JUDICIALFRAUD; http://www.scribd.com/doc/30827432Wanted-

For-Corruption-Judge-John-E-The-Butcher-Steele.) The entries are frequently absurd, laced with

profanity, offensive images and pornographic double entendre in the crudest form clearly designed

to besmirch the names, reputations and personal images of those persons named as defendants.

4. This latest “complaint” is not so much a claim for relief as it is a free-flowing, stream-

of-consciousness tirade against the ever-expanding “governmental conspiracy to punish Plaintiffs.”

(para. 3) and the “scam” being perpetrated on Cayo Costa Island relating to the plaintiffs’ 50' x 130'

lot there. This “complaint” is again, as Judge Lazzara stated: “a multi-page, multi-paragraph

rambling, disjointed, and incomprehensible rant.” Prescott/Busse, Case No. 2:09-CV-602-UA-MAP,

dkt. no. 148.

WHEREFORE, Defendant Wilkinson, moves the Court to dismiss this case with prejudice,

award to the defendant costs to prepare this response; and, direct the Clerk to accept no further

filings from these plaintiffs on any terms the Court believes may stem this course of continued abuse.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 5, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to the

following: Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Lee County Property Appraiser, Government Complex, 2480

Thompson Street, Fort Myers, FL 33901; Jennifer Franklin Prescott, pro se, P.O. Box 845, Palm

2
Case 2:10-cv-00089-CEH-TGW Document 17 Filed 06/04/10 Page 3 of 3

Beach, FL 33480 and Dr. Jorg Busse, pro se, P.O. Box 11124, Naples, FL 34101-11124.

By: /s/ Jack N. Peterson


Jack N. Peterson
Assistant County Attorney
Florida Bar No. 0832774
DAVID M. OWEN
LEE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
2115 Second Street
Post Office Box 398
Fort Myers, Florida 33902-3098
Telephone No. (239) 533-2236
Facsimile Phone No. (239) 485-2118
PETERSJN@leegov.com

3
FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE
U.S. PUNISHMENT & ‘SANCTIONS’

U.S. COVER-UP OF SCAM O.R. 569/875:

U.S. JUDICIAL CASE FIXING:


DEPRIVE – DEFRAUD – DENY
DISALLOW – DISMISS

U.S. JUDICIAL FRIVOLITY SCAM


CERTIFIED DELIVERY

EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EQUAL COURT ACCESS

7. Again, the Plaintiffs move for equal court access in this electronic Court. For the criminal

purpose of extending and concealing Governmental fraud and extortion scheme O.R. 569/875”,

this Court has obstructed the pro se Plaintiffs’ electronic Court access. Here, electronic court

access is the only practical court access from remote parts of the world where mail is

unavailable.

JUDICIAL CRIMES & OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

8. In Doc. # 338, p. 12, Civil Rights Case # 2:07-cv-228-FtM-JES-SPC, Defendant crooked Judge

John Edwin Steele expressly verbalized his obstruction of justice and prejudice:

“The copy of the Resolution attached to the Third Amended Complaint establishes
that it was signed, executed, and duly recorded in the public records, and plaintiff
will not be allowed to assert otherwise.”

3
Charlene Edwards Honeywell
FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE
SECRETS OF U.S. JUDICIAL TERROR

SECRET 1: Judicial bribery & corruption are customary and TYPICAL.

SECRET 2: U.S. democracy is DEAD. Don’t be a naïve sheep!

SECRET 3: Any faith in U.S. justice is your foe. There is NONE, so deal with it!

SECRET 4: Facts, law, reason, logic CANNOT possibly stop the judicial case fixing machine.

SECRET 5: Lawyers play along to get along – Don’t waste your money & time!

SECRET 6: The Mafia is cute compared to the U.S. judicial gang. They even wear colors.

SECRET 7: Expect terror & threats as if you were in Nazi Germany. Watch for the smell of gas!

SECRET 8: Trained for terror, only the most corrupt judges succeed on America’s benches.

SECRET 9: NOTHING favorable will ever happen in your case – Face reality & STOP being a fool!

SECRET 10: By agreement, pro se Plaintiffs will NEVER win any important or critical case.

SECRET 11: America is NOT what you have been brain washed to believe: Spell CORRUPTION!

SECRET 12: Do NOT appear in court or party with the Mafia. Plain and short, it could be unhealthy.

SECRET 13: Property, life, and freedom mean LESS in America than in China. Go travel and see!

SECRET 14: Before you disappear, leave lots of information. Someone might read it. Good luck!

God bless America, Anarchy, BP, Corruption, and


Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell.
CERTIFIED DELIVERY

14
CERTIFIED DELIVERY

15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT,


Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-JES-SPC

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;


KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;
RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;
RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUE
ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.; JOHNSON
ENGINEERING, INC.,
Defendants.

EMERGENCY MOTION
_______________________________________________________________________/

EMERGENCY MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO SHOW GOOD CAUSE

AFFIDAVITS & ABSENCE OF ANY CONDEMNATION ON THE RECORD

1. Pursuant to the multiple Affidavits before this Court, the Judicial Officers in this Court

fraudulently alleged “eminent domain” by virtue of Government scam “O.R. 569/875”.

However here, no eminent domain court proceedings ever occurred. No just compensation was

ever paid to the pro se Plaintiffs, and no title ever transferred. Here, Lee County, Florida, never

took any title by virtue of prima facie scam “O.R. 569/875”.

BRIBERY

2. Here, Defendant crooked Judges John Edwin Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell accepted

Defendants’ bribes for the criminal purpose of defrauding and deliberately depriving the

Plaintiffs of their equity. Here, said corrupt Judges and Judicial Officers violated their oath of

office.
CERTIFIED DELIVERY

17
CERTIFIED DELIVERY
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL FRAUD PUBLISHED AT:

http://www.scribd.com/judicial%20fraud

More than 90,000 Readers of

U.S. Governmental Crime Scheme “O.R. 569/875”

19
CERTIFIED DELIVERY
COVER UP OF GOVERNMENT SCAM “O.R. 569/875”

20

You might also like